Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Also on the issue of cashlest bail, Sir, this is
a DC specific executive order in addition to the measures
that we're taking that are quite similar to what we're
doing around the country. In DC, in particular, the objective
is holding as many criminal defendants in federal custody and
subjecting them to federal charges as possible. That means that
they'll be held pre trial in federal jail as opposed
(00:23):
to just being cut back out on the streets due
to a cashlest bail policy.
Speaker 2 (00:26):
Okay, and we have the room. And by the way,
the prison they have in DC is horrible. It's horrible.
People were subjected to live in that dog trap for
so long, so unfairly.
Speaker 3 (00:47):
I have stories you'll be hearing about them. That prison
is horrible.
Speaker 4 (00:52):
I like, my favorite still is the guy that is
telling Potus all the stuff that he's signing and everything
that's on is like, sir, you know, this is a
delicious bowl of a cream of wheat. It is a
type of breakfast porridge mix and it's used they use
wheat middlings.
Speaker 5 (01:13):
Sir.
Speaker 4 (01:13):
It's very similar to grits. With people in the southern
part of the United States and joy and Uh, you know,
that's what That's what you're looking at today, sir, That's
that's what you're looking at today. I love that because
he's he's so informative and just so nice about it.
That guy, he's like the official announcer of all the things.
Welcome to the program. It's Monday. Happy Monday to you.
(01:37):
A few things that you need to be aware of,
and we're gonna get you set up for the week,
and we're starting out with a couple of things.
Speaker 5 (01:45):
Potus is.
Speaker 4 (01:46):
You know, he's meeting with South Korea leadership. He's also
taking action as it pertains to some of the tariffs,
et cetera. We're gonna get into some cultural issues as
well and run all that down for you. So Happy Monday.
I hope everyone had a nice weekend. Yeah, everybody had
a good weekend.
Speaker 5 (02:05):
Good sure. Yeah.
Speaker 4 (02:06):
And then if John Bolton didn't, if you get the newsletter,
Lorraine has had that all written up for you, for
those of you that are subscribers. And I'm pulling this
up on my Giant you'd think I four and a
half foot gaming screen right in front of me, and I'm.
Speaker 5 (02:21):
Like, where's this there?
Speaker 4 (02:23):
Yeah, it's only the best middlings, sir. Only the middlings
are middlings, even know, Yeah, I don't know anyway, all right,
So the UH Cashless Bail Executive Order that's in Washington
and nationwide, and then the Department of Defense is going
to be creating a National Guard unit. They're going to
be looking at a public disorder. He was also talking
(02:45):
about expanding it to Chicago, because Chicago is so Chicago's dangerous.
Speaker 5 (02:52):
And I loved Chicago growing up.
Speaker 4 (02:54):
I visited there frequently when I was in college.
Speaker 5 (02:57):
Loved Chicago, loved it, but got a little different.
Speaker 4 (03:02):
The crime started getting out of control, you know, when
you would I mean we used to be able to
go up there with different college groups and when when
I was a student and you could just like run
around the city and have fun and go eat late
and do all that, and it was safe and you know,
for the most part, relatively safe.
Speaker 5 (03:17):
Not like that anymore, not even remotely like that.
Speaker 4 (03:21):
So extending that to Chicago, and of course, you know JB. Pritzker,
I think he would love to have that. That's the
thing I was thinking about. I don't know necessarily if
I want potus to extend it, but to expand it
to Chicago because Kane doesn't that elevate JB. Pritzker and
his desperate desire to be seen as this leader within
(03:46):
the Democrat Party. They can't do it unless they have
a boogeyman, right.
Speaker 6 (03:50):
I see what you're saying there, But sometimes you gotta
do what you gotta do in spite of what the
other people.
Speaker 5 (03:54):
He's gonna stunt on that so hard, you know he is.
Speaker 6 (03:56):
He will. He has to. What else does he have.
He doesn't have a record to run on, so he's
got to do something.
Speaker 4 (04:01):
He's going to be like, oh, look look at President
Trump coming in here with the police, and then he's
seen he's gonna in the meantime, he I mean, forget
about his entire uh, the way that he's run his state.
But like when we were talking about the jerrymandering, et cetera,
I just didn't know. I'm very cautious about elevating some
of these fools, and I feel like going into midterms
(04:23):
and then you got to look all the way down
the road to twenty twenty eight, I just don't want
to set anybody up because you already have your hands
full kind of with Gavin Newsom.
Speaker 6 (04:28):
Is it elevating them though, or is it shining a
light on the horrible management that they've been able to
do over the past.
Speaker 4 (04:34):
I agree with you, Look, I agree with you. However,
I also think that in a way it does elevate
him to this national status where it looks like it's
it'll pritzkerwell, and Democrats will make it to where it
looks it's like Pritzker v. Trump, Like how Newsome is
(04:57):
desperate to make it media v. Trump.
Speaker 6 (04:59):
Yeah, the media will definitely help Pritzker with that.
Speaker 4 (05:01):
But I will say one of our the saving one
of the bits of saving grace is that I don't
really think that the left is as enamored of JB.
Speaker 5 (05:10):
Pritzker as JB. Pritzker is enamored of JB. Pritzker. So
there may be something to that.
Speaker 4 (05:18):
But as I was saying, going back to the whole
John Bolton thing, uh, Lorraine is a great piece up
over at Substack. Apparently they were looking at looking for
classified documents in the former national security advisor's house.
Speaker 5 (05:29):
They raided his home. Who is it?
Speaker 4 (05:31):
Is it? Kelly and Conway's husband who was standing outside,
He was a meme holding his phone George what's his name, George? Oh,
just George Coma uh uh he h. I just don't
pay attention to him. Does any wine like on CNN
or MSNBC or something.
Speaker 6 (05:47):
Yes, and online a lot.
Speaker 4 (05:48):
Yeah, I don't really pay attention to it anyway, So
the UH raided his house and they're trying to say
that well by day, I mean, the media is trying
to argue that it's his memoir that kicked off this
investigation into how he handled things as National security advisor.
(06:13):
This is five years after they began looking at these
possible disclosures of classificed information. Bolton had a memoir on
twenty twenty. He was the third National Security Advisor for POTUS.
The book is the room where it happened, and there's
a lot of questions as to some of the stuff
that's in it. Bolton said that he had permission, including
(06:35):
I guess they have to get for certain things permission
from the National Archives that deal with classification of elements,
and they have to get permission from National Archives. Sidepart,
those National Archave people seem like very territorial with their things.
But anyway, Bolton said that Night gave him the approval
to publish at the verbal review. But now apparently in
(06:55):
twenty twenty in June, the dj was seeking an emergency
court order to block it. York Post had a big
deep dive on it. But long story short, the administration
is saying that he broke a non disclosure agreement and
they filed a civil suit against him. This was there's
all kinds of this book that this was under the
Biden administration. They were saying that one of the suits
(07:19):
came out. Simon and Schuster said that the Trump administration
claimed that he broke the non disclosure. The civil suit
was even fired before then filed before then. Simon and Schuster,
they were saying that this is just specifically politically motivated,
is it? Though?
Speaker 5 (07:37):
I don't know.
Speaker 4 (07:38):
I mean, there is a reason the investigation into Bolton
was shut down like in twenty twenty one, and this
was after Biden took office, and some people were saying
that it was for political reasons. And so this piece
and Lorraine is a deep dive on it over again, Substack,
(08:00):
chapter and verse. He said he had no idea that
was happening. Van said that it was not you know,
he wasn't targeted for political reasons. And he said, we
would just be throwing out prosecutions, you know, if we
were going to do that like the Biden administration did.
I don't know if Bolton helped himself because there he
was already fighting to get this book released and get
(08:21):
certain elements declassified before it came out. So you would
think that that's going to be a sign that there's
going to be a push on it. There was a
great thread over by Data Republican that got into his
associations with USAID and many other things, and he made
himself a lot of enemies when he was in the administration.
(08:43):
He made a lot of enemies and that doesn't ever
serve anyone. But he was in a lot of ngo
I mean, he gets money from think tanks and NGOs
and that's how he makes his bank. That's who a
lot of people who are in these administrations when they're finished,
you know, when they leave, they go and they end
up making a lot of money with the these NGOs,
et cetera. So he he had said that, you know,
(09:05):
he'd been at USAID for a long time. He was
involved in running a lot of the policy there. So
I don't know the Trump administration says that they didn't know.
I think that there's I mean, the fact that this
began and it predates even this administration, that there was
that much of a push and shove over what he
could put in the book and when it was coming out,
(09:25):
et cetera, et cetera, and there was even questions as
to whether or not he even got proper clearance from
the National Archives. I mean that kind of indicates that
there's probably something that, you know, he put a foot
wrong and now he's in trouble for it because the
Archives folks, they could, they seem to be pretty territorial.
I mean they went after Pence too, they went after Biden.
I mean they're like equal opportunity, you know, territorial people.
Speaker 5 (09:49):
So we're going to come back to this. We'll have
more on it coming up.
Speaker 4 (09:52):
In the meantime, Democrats are hoping that if they can
revise their language, you'll forget how badly they suck. This
is an actual new thing. Third way they This came
from Politico and the piece on this is that Democrats
are hoping, per New York Post, that they can just
(10:12):
change their language and that's going to help them not
sound like the woke hall monitors like the woke enforcers.
So it's a think tank, a center left thing tank.
They released a list of forty five words and phrases
that they're demanding democrats removed from their vocabulary so they
(10:34):
do not sound like quote unquote enforcers of wokeness. The
group is called Third Way and it's the Blue Blacklist.
Speaker 5 (10:44):
That's what it is.
Speaker 4 (10:45):
And Politico asks, can democrats talk their way out of
the wilderness? That's the million dollar question. I don't think so,
but we'll see. They said that they include They have
several categories that they classify their words in, including bear
with me, therapy speak, organizer jargon, and explaining a way crime.
(11:10):
It's a memo they release that they want They said
they want to help democrats communicate in authentic ways, so
things like that they want struck from the list that
they say that fall into the therapy speak bucket is
the words privilege, othering, triggering, safe space, body shaming. The
(11:31):
memo notes that the language conveys the sentiment I'm more
empathetic than you and you are callous to hurting other
people's feelings, which they say is very antagonistic. They also
want to get rid of chest feeding, patriarchy, pregnant people,
birthing person because they don't want to quote confuser shame
people who could otherwise be allies. So it's not as
(11:54):
though their motivation comes from any correct way at all.
It's that they they think that that somehow is going
to alienate potential allies. We don't like it because it's
stupid and it's illiberal, and it's anti science, and it's
just flatter thing, that's what it is. That's why they
(12:15):
also say that terms like justice involved and involuntary confinement.
Speaker 5 (12:20):
This is where they do get stupid.
Speaker 4 (12:22):
Makes it seem as though they say, you can't say
justice involved because the criminal can't be seen as the victim.
And I can't believe they actually said you can't make
the victim look like an afterthought. Oh my gosh, Like
that's literally all of restorative justice.
Speaker 5 (12:35):
By the way.
Speaker 4 (12:36):
So you can change the language, but when you are
still pushing these sorts of policies that are really going
to help anything, is this is wild.
Speaker 5 (12:44):
We have a lot more on this coming.
Speaker 4 (12:46):
Up as well as some of the latest with the
EU protests are exploding mass protests in and around Europe
because now they are seeing the bill of their open
borders come due, and it's we've got this for you.
We also have the petition on behalf of that illegal
alien trucker. People are signing it because they want they
(13:08):
want the judge to be lenient with this guy waiting
to hear about this.
Speaker 5 (13:11):
We've got a lot of stuff for you as we
move our partners that.
Speaker 4 (13:13):
Help bring you the program to the folks over at Webroot.
The Internet can be. It's both the wild West and
also a very dangerous place. And with avan of social media,
I think it's never been easier to trick people into
giving you their private information to exploit any gaps that
(13:34):
you may have in your security. And this is why
I think it's important to have protection like web Route.
If you're looking for reliable digital protection, something that's not
going to slow you down, nothing clunky that's going to
just drag all your operating system or your apps or
everything else down, you need to look at web Route.
They have powerful, affordable options for everybody, and it's real
(13:55):
time protection against i mean name it, fishing, ransomware, malware, everything,
built in firewall, network monitoring. They have a web threat
shield that blocks malicious websites.
Speaker 5 (14:04):
It's compatible with everything.
Speaker 4 (14:06):
Password manager included, system optimizer that removes the clutter, and
you can get up to a million dollars in theft
related expense reimbursement for identity protection. Their coverage can include
children's students, seniors, dependents. Think of your parents out there.
You know people are going after the seniors. Advanced dark
web monitoring, credit and financial monitoring with alerts, identity, health
(14:27):
status updates.
Speaker 5 (14:28):
And so much more.
Speaker 4 (14:29):
VPNs everything, real time antivirus, you name it, they have it.
And you can get fifty percent off of webroots Total
Protection or webroot Essentials by going to webroot dot com
slash data. Now it's only available at that url. Webroot
dot com slash Data for fifty percent off of webroots
Total Protection. Live a better digital life with webroot.
Speaker 6 (14:50):
And now all of the news you would probably miss.
It's time for Data's Quick five.
Speaker 4 (14:55):
I'm not gonna lie. I read this story and I
thought free pet a massive bear.
Speaker 5 (15:01):
Of course I would.
Speaker 4 (15:02):
I'd get molded a A massive bear raided an ice
cream parlor in Lake Tahoe and went wild for one
flavor in particular. It is a giant bear, and it
was like behind the counter helping itself, like a person
with this one, I'm getting to hand. He got in
and he stared at the camera. He really liked the strawberry,
(15:24):
so the strawberry one was his favorite, and he tried
the other ones, but he like, I pretty much ate
the whole tub of strawberry. And then he left half
eaten tubs, overturned paw prints all over the place, and
they had to replace all of their stock. So they
said the shop said that they didn't think he washed
his claws beforehand.
Speaker 5 (15:46):
But I love it.
Speaker 4 (15:46):
How there's one photo of this bear and he's just
lit by the street sign on the outside, and he's
behind the counter watch showing it to you right now,
and it said do not touch. There's a sign on
the left if you're watching the simulcast, you're watching a
stew radio. On the left there's a little sign handwritten
and says do not touch. And then you got the
bear behind the counter like a person, can I help you?
Speaker 5 (16:07):
Yeah, taking orders?
Speaker 4 (16:08):
Bear here to help. So I saw that, I thought
that's actually adorable. I wouldn't go in there and be like,
you're not supposed to be here. But I'm just saying
this is sad. America's last surviving World War Two ACE.
A Navy fighter pilot, Donald McPherson has passed away.
Speaker 5 (16:22):
One hundred and three years old.
Speaker 4 (16:24):
He earned the Congressional Gold Medal and three Distinguished Flying
Crosses age one hundred and three in Nebraska. He was
a pilot of an F six F Hellcat and he
was on the USS X Essex in the Pacific. He
shot down five Japanese planes and that is the minimum
number required to be considered an ACE. And he was
the last surviving ACE pilot from the war, the last
(16:48):
surviving one, and he got that Congressional Gold medal. And
that's if you've made a significant impact on US history
and culture in the three Distinguished Flying Crosses, well, then'e
good and faithful servant. That's awesome and just all so
just kind of stark when you realize how quickly all
these dudes are, all these dudes are leaving, it's you know,
it's this kind of kind of sad and passing away. Also,
(17:09):
let's see here, pull this back up. We have ooh,
we got I'm going to save this. This is an
ice agent that was assaulted in San Francisco, a mob
went wild and a riot ensued. We're going to talk
about that coming up, as well as that truck driver
stick with us bernagun Is. It's a great option to
diversify your weapons array, and it's great I think for
(17:29):
college kids that are going to be living on their
own and also they want to be able to protect themselves,
but they can't, you know, for whatever, they can't on
a gun because it's you know, you.
Speaker 5 (17:38):
Get federal law.
Speaker 4 (17:39):
But also for people who you know, are over the
age of twenty one who maybe because of local munions,
of private property restrictions, whatever, they are disarmed and that
that makes it kind of dangerous when you consider the
crime rate as of late. This is where Berna comes in.
It's a great way to diversify your weapons array. You
have different calibers. You carry blades, bernegun shoots, chemical irritant
(17:59):
piles that can deter threats from up to fifty feet away.
And when you look at regular stunt guns, you only
have one or two shots with those with BURNA with
the CL particularly which is their pistol, that's their smallest version.
The CL stands for Compact launcher that has fifteen round
shot capacity per cartridge, so you're not losing any of
the deterrent power. You're not losing anything. The SD is
(18:20):
their most popular model. The CL, which is newer, is
the smaller version of that. These are legal in all
fifty states. There's no permit required, there's no background check,
there's no waiting period, there's no fee other than the
price of it, which is super affordable and can be
sent right to your door, so it's accessible for everybody.
Speaker 5 (18:37):
Check it out.
Speaker 4 (18:37):
It's the cl stance for compact launcher at burna dot
com slash danta. That's b y r na dot com
slash Danta Burner Ready when you.
Speaker 7 (18:45):
Are makes some common sense of the crazy headlines. With
a data show podcast, you're on the go guide for
getting up to speed on today's most important stories. Subscribe
on YouTube, Apple or your favorite podcast platform.
Speaker 4 (19:00):
I mean, this is just so weak, dude. You can't
even level up for nothing. So this is man, Danny.
What was this that the men's I was looking for?
What the name of this event is some kind of
(19:21):
I don't know, men's health thing. And he shows up
and he's trying to do a bench press. I can't
tell what the hell the spotter's doing. There's like barely
any weight on this thing, and the spotter is basically
doing it for him. He's not letting it go. Man,
Danny could not do it without that guy doing it
for him. That is one of the most embarrassing things
(19:44):
I've ever seen. And I made this mention. I told
Kane this, and I'm sorry, but I've got it. You guys,
one of the reasons that you sit next to me
and we talk every day is because I say the
things you think. I don't know how this guy's wife
looks at him after that and wants to sleep with him.
Speaker 5 (19:58):
I'm sorry. That's so.
Speaker 4 (20:00):
That was natural birth control that I just watched. That's
that is so sad. That's I mean, I can lift that,
That's I can do that. That's that's oh man, you
should not struggle as a man that much with basically
it's just the bar at that point, I I and
I get it that it was just this impromptu thing, right,
(20:22):
I get it, But the spotter, like, what is the
spot of trying to add more weight onto it?
Speaker 5 (20:29):
Now, just let me entertain this for a moment.
Speaker 4 (20:32):
Is the spotter to this man, Donnie stunt trying to
add like push down on him almost who's spots like that?
Speaker 6 (20:41):
Well, I guess he's used to spotting heavier weight, because
that's what you would do for somebody struggling with heavier weight.
You want to make sure you've got one hand underneath,
one hand.
Speaker 5 (20:49):
Over You Never maybe it's because it's there's hard.
Speaker 6 (20:52):
I some people that dead lift that way as well.
Speaker 4 (20:55):
I have never seen anything like that with just that
kind of weight.
Speaker 5 (21:01):
Uh, what are those on there?
Speaker 4 (21:03):
Those aren't even twenty five's probably what is that on there?
Speaker 6 (21:06):
If that? I think those are maybe twenties.
Speaker 4 (21:10):
Yeah, that's like those are the middle the middle those
are oh my gosh, I mean, at least help him
out and put like the oh what is the one
that everyone always says that they do know the type
of weightlifting where they cross vegieva jeez, So maybe it
could help him out and put those weird little CrossFit
rubber weights on that are like five pounds but they're
(21:32):
huge looking and they made they could have helped him
out and done that at least so that way he
looked real.
Speaker 5 (21:36):
I would have done that if I was this guy,
you know, I.
Speaker 4 (21:38):
Would have just kept the you know, kept the Victorian
freak show going and just put some fake ones on.
That is just it's so embarrassing. And I'm not the
only one who saw that. Obviously, every all of his
all of his competitors seized on it. Man, it was
Brooklyn Men's Days, what it was. That's what I was
looking for, because at first I was like, why is
he doing this in the middle of the street. Did
(21:58):
he just like walk over and oh you're lifting, let
me lift? No, it was Brooklyn Men's Day, and I
get the sense that he was not expecting to do this.
He completed two assisted reps. Men, he completed two assisted reps.
I can hear the ribbing all the guys in the
(22:19):
audience are giving him right now. From here, I feel it.
I'm like, oh my gosh, two two assisted reps. No
reps man. Scrawny is what Eric Adams called him. He
goes a lifetime of hard work versus a silver spoon.
Eric Adams went out there, and I mean just saying, right,
(22:43):
I can't believe I'm in a position of talking positively
about Eric Adams.
Speaker 5 (22:46):
This is why I hate the Left. Look what they've
done to us.
Speaker 4 (22:49):
Look at what they've done Look what you did to
my boy, Look what you did to us? And even
Cuomo got out there. So now they're all out there
lifting Man Danny. That was I know, I don't know.
You don't go to a Men's Day event and celebrate masculinity.
Speaker 5 (23:06):
Like a Okay, you know what they did.
Speaker 6 (23:10):
They saw the HEG SETH and RFKJ and your video
and then they're like, you.
Speaker 5 (23:13):
Know, why would you try to do We have got
to appeal to me.
Speaker 4 (23:16):
Oh my gosh, why dude, you need to go on steroids?
Stat like, why would you try to even do that?
Speaker 5 (23:22):
Oh my god, I believe that this.
Speaker 6 (23:24):
Was an actual strategy. I'm not kidding.
Speaker 5 (23:26):
Oh my god. Shares are in the corner.
Speaker 4 (23:28):
I I just got to tell you. I'm I feel
like I'm not speaking for all ladies, but I feel
that I can speak for enough of us sisters, right,
enough of us, especially as conservative ladies.
Speaker 5 (23:41):
Uh yes, strength absolutely matters.
Speaker 4 (23:43):
I'm not into the I'm not into the Beatos shaped people,
you know what I mean, or the Man Danny shaped
kind of people.
Speaker 5 (23:53):
I want to feel like.
Speaker 4 (23:55):
If our car was going off a cliff, that my
husband could hold onto a tree and then literally hold
onto the car with one other hand and then shoot
another hand out of his neck and grab me and save.
I mean, I want to feel like that. I want
to not be able to get my hands around your arms.
That's what I want to do, And I don't care
(24:15):
how you achieve it. I don't not my husband does
not take stories or anything. I don't care how it's achieved.
I'm not throwing no shade on it if you do.
I'm just saying I don't want to be able to
put my hands around my husband's waist or his arms
or his legs.
Speaker 5 (24:31):
I don't want to do that. And I'm not saying
I want you to.
Speaker 4 (24:33):
Be, you know, morbidly obese and seven thousand pounds, but
I don't. I don't want to feel like we could
wear the same shirt, right. I don't want to be
the same size as you. I just I'm the woman.
You know, it's me, So I don't know that is
a big deal. And I'm very old school about this stuff.
(24:56):
And I just feel like this dude is too fem man.
He's way too he's a lady dude. He's I watched
this and I'm like, that man's poor wife. Can he
and I have something so inappropriate to say.
Speaker 6 (25:08):
Go ahead, I'm just gonna say, I know why you
call him, Ma'm donny. No, ma'am, it's man, donny.
Speaker 4 (25:15):
You know what I wanted to say is can he
even lift? I just I'm asking for a friend inquiring minds.
I mean, I don't want to be able to lift
the same as my husband, right. I want to just
(25:38):
collapse of exhaustion just looking at the weight that my
man does in the gym, you know what I mean.
I'm very old school about this stuff, so I don't know.
I and when we're when we're at the gym, my
husband will spot me. I'm not even going to pretend
that I can spot him. But and he's just like
with a finger like girder. And here I'm like, and
(26:00):
I'm pretty feeling pretty bad ass for a lady. I'm
doing a lot, you know. And I'm just saying, so
I looked at this and it hurt me. It hurt
my soul, it hurt my heart, And I'm like, mm,
man like, how would like how does his lady even
get romantical with that?
Speaker 8 (26:19):
Law?
Speaker 4 (26:20):
Does that mean I can't get away from this subject?
This is what is wrong with the left. You know
why their birth rates are falling because look at their
damn men.
Speaker 5 (26:29):
Look at them men. Do you think the men could
storm beaches? Now? Do you think the men could fight
off like a horde of invaders? Now?
Speaker 4 (26:38):
Hell, they're tucking and calling themselves ladies. No, that's why
the birth rates are falling, because the men are ugly,
they're weak, and they're thin, thin alarms, the little noodle arms.
Speaker 5 (26:47):
And then the women are bigger than the men.
Speaker 4 (26:49):
Sab it, good night. I don't care who gets offended
over that. It needs to be said. You know, we
need to go back to that good heavens. So as
you can imagine, now Cuomo's getting in on it. I
don't help bust a blood vessel in his face. Let's
not do that. I is that gonna play though with
(27:09):
New York voters. I mean, that kind of stuff absolutely
plays with me. But I'm not a New York voter.
I'm not, you know, one of those. I think at
this point, if you're still living in New York, you're
you know, and and it's and you have a choice
of leaving.
Speaker 5 (27:25):
I don't know. It just feels like I don't Maybe
it doesn't matter to them doesn't.
Speaker 3 (27:29):
Matter to them.
Speaker 6 (27:30):
I honestly, I think it was focus grouped, and I'm
I couldn't be, you know, overjoyed more about the whole idea,
just laughing about this whole thing. They literally had a
meeting and decided to do this. You know that they did.
Do you think that was just like some avant garde
thing that happened while he was getting a bag or something.
Speaker 5 (27:48):
No, he wasn't out, No, no, no, no, they planned this.
Speaker 6 (27:51):
They actually this was a strategy of theirs.
Speaker 3 (27:55):
Amazing.
Speaker 4 (27:56):
I don't and I swear I'm going to move off
of this. But I also don't know any man that
would allow another man unless he's lifting an ungodly amount
of weight and going for like a pr I do
not know anybody that would allow that kind of spotting, And.
Speaker 5 (28:09):
Like, do broke it? Off of it?
Speaker 4 (28:10):
I got this just like, actually spot me, don't like
help me. You know, I don't know any man that
would subject themselves to that publicly even and man Donnie
was like, oh, you could tell the dudes never lift
you look at his wrists, look at the way he
was lifting Win. You know that's right.
Speaker 6 (28:28):
My comforter is heavy one.
Speaker 5 (28:30):
It's like I could.
Speaker 4 (28:30):
Toss him up into the sky, like what is he doing?
One could spin him on his finger.
Speaker 5 (28:37):
This is crazy.
Speaker 4 (28:38):
I don't know, but that's the stuff that they're guys.
We're gonna have to We're gonna have to we're Oh, gosh,
help us all. I just realized this. We're embarking on
a new type of Democrat electioneering where they're going to
pretend to be tough. God help us all to be
(29:00):
subjected to this. This is why this keeps happening. They're like, look,
we're talking tough, and then you got Newsom out there
almost stuttering when he drops an F bomb because he's
so unsure of himself.
Speaker 5 (29:10):
I don't know. This word's too explosive to come out
of my mouth.
Speaker 4 (29:13):
I don't know, and I can't deal. And now they're
going to try to outlift each other. Haven't help us all,
I can't.
Speaker 5 (29:21):
That's what we have. That's what we're going to be
subjected to. I don't know.
Speaker 4 (29:24):
We're gonna have to talk about this flag burning thing.
How y'all feeling about this? The flag burning mandate Potus
has combating flag desecration.
Speaker 5 (29:37):
This is an EO that he has.
Speaker 4 (29:39):
It's the prosecution of burning of the American flag, and
he's saying that it's basically what they're arguing is that
burning the flag is tantamount to fighting words and fighting words.
As you know, there's protected forms of speech and unprotected
forms of speech, meaning forms of speech that are absolutely
(30:00):
protected against litigation so that no one can drag it
through core, the government can't come after you, et cetera.
Speaker 5 (30:05):
But there's there.
Speaker 4 (30:06):
You have things like libel and slander and defamation and
then the fighting words. And what they're arguing is that
burning the flag is tantamount to fighting words because it
by itself is incitement. And I am very very sketchy
on this. I don't like flag burning, but I'm also
very very nervous about setting standards on expression or speech,
(30:33):
simply because I have lived thrown out two Democrat administrations
where they've tried to come at us for it. Under
Obama Biden during the Tea Party days, they literally tried
to stop us from creating And I don't mean just
like generally. I mean groups that I was helping stop
a number of us from being able to get our
(30:53):
tax exempt status and be able to organize and raise
money in a manner keeping with the aren't live though.
I think the law is ridiculous and an abridgment of
speech by itself. Thanks McCain, fine gold. But that's one
way that they try to stop us because they didn't
like what we were saying. They didn't like our descent,
they didn't like our disagreement. Remember, they were going after
our associated press, they were going after a number of individuals,
(31:16):
and then under the Biden administration, simply from sharing things
like the Laptop story, things of that nature that was
considered to be Russian disinformation, thus the threat to national security.
So the government was able to use these tech agencies
get involved and literally silence people. So I get very
very nervous about this type of stuff. For that reason.
(31:40):
I don't like flag burners. I've crashed protests where I've
seen people burn flags. I've had leftist crash rallies that
I've attended or helped organize, and they tried to burn
flags as a way to incite, and I just didn't
incite anyone. They just kind of got made fun of.
But I get very nervous about this. Not this isn't
(32:01):
so much about specifically the flag. It's about how this
is going to be used as sort of a Pandora's
box to justify other means, Like if you can classify
this as fighting words, what else are you going to
be able to classify as fighting words? And I don't
think that you need much of an explanation if you've
seen the previous administration's efforts to this extent, I don't
(32:24):
think you're going to need much of an You'll be
given much of an explanation on it.
Speaker 5 (32:29):
So we're going to come back to this.
Speaker 4 (32:30):
I'm curious as to what people think about it, because
I get I'm this is this is a Pandora's box.
Our partners that help make it possible Relief Factor. Relief
Factor is a veteran owned company and they decided they
wanted to help people manage their aches and pains naturally
with a daily drug free supplement and so it targets
(32:53):
inflammation and it supports joint health with a combination of
powerful ingredients like turmeric, omega three fatty assis, res veratral,
and more, one hundred percent drug free develop to support
your body's natural healing process. My husband's a fan. He
has old sports injuries that he always deals with. So
many of you listeners out there have told me about
(33:14):
you taking Relief Factor and.
Speaker 5 (33:16):
You've noticed a difference.
Speaker 4 (33:17):
And if you're dealing with this stuff, you know you
got aches and you don't have to go and take
prescription medication for it. You're not alone and dealing with
it either. This is where Relief Factor comes in and
they make it easy to try as well. You don't
have to stay stuck living with pain. Try Relief Factors
three week quick Start, it's just nineteen ninety five. That's
less than a dollar a day. You're also supporting a
veteran own company and you can see the difference with
(33:39):
using their product for yourself. Relief Factor dot com one
eight hundred for Relief. That's one eight hundred and number
four relief.
Speaker 7 (33:46):
Get the load down on the latest news with the
side of laughs whenever you want. Subscribe to the Data
Show podcast on YouTube, Apple or wherever you get your podcast.
Speaker 6 (33:57):
Like SAMs through the hour Glass Are the days of
the United States.
Speaker 9 (34:03):
I took my grandson to see what was the movie
with a Buzz?
Speaker 3 (34:09):
Like?
Speaker 5 (34:10):
Not that one, but the New Buzz the Late year.
Speaker 9 (34:14):
I think Cheeky Palmers in that movie, she plays like
the daughter so we're watching it, and the lady, which
is Kiky's mama, they move on into the space years.
They moved down the line. They're like, then she had
a baby? What a woman or my grandson?
Speaker 8 (34:33):
In the middle of the movie, like Papa.
Speaker 9 (34:35):
Sloop, How she have a baby with a woman? She
and a woman?
Speaker 8 (34:38):
Oh, I didn't come in for this show. I just
came to watching still movie. Hey man, watch the movie.
Uh uh they just said she and she had a baby.
They both women. How does she have a baby?
Speaker 5 (34:53):
Movie over it?
Speaker 8 (34:56):
So it's like this, fuck me, I'm scared to go
to the movies. Then, like y'all throwing me in the
middle of I don't have an answer, fool.
Speaker 4 (35:02):
You know, he's not wrong. I think it's hysterical. And
he's getting all kinds of hate for this too. Why
are they flaming him so hard for I mean, it's
not to it's true. I mean there's different ways to
to to.
Speaker 5 (35:18):
Showcase things like that in film.
Speaker 4 (35:20):
But apparently what that film did is they just basically
insinuated that it is the same as just me and
a woman coupling and you know, having a baby.
Speaker 5 (35:29):
Uh, and that's true. You want to go to a.
Speaker 4 (35:30):
Movie, especially if the kids movie, and you don't want
to have to sit here and answer questions about this stuff.
You want to you want to escape. This is why
isn't a Disney movie. It's Disney, so damn garbage. They
opened up a Pirates of the Caribbean bar somewhere.
Speaker 5 (35:42):
I saw this.
Speaker 4 (35:43):
I was almost gonna include it in my headlines, but
I'm like, they don't deserve it. You can open up,
however many Pirates bars. You went to your trash, You're
still trash. You're trash. It's just nonsense. Nobody wants to
have to answer those kind of questions. It's something that
if people want to bring that up with their kids
themselves on their own timelines, that's their right to do it.
But incorporating things like this in a kid's movies, where
(36:08):
it's something that is way above their level of understanding,
and there's a lot of nuance and a lot.
Speaker 5 (36:20):
Of us it's not for kids.
Speaker 4 (36:22):
It's not for kids, and it's not wrong to say
that there are certain things that are just way age inappropriate,
and that's one of them. We got a lot more
on the way, including why is the I don't think
the left has any reason to be upset over the
Trump flag order when they were trying to charge people
for leaving tire tracks on Pride Flag crosswalks. We're going
(36:44):
to talk about all of this stuff coming up stick
with a second hour on the way. Our partners that
help make it possible Relief Factor. Relief Factor is a
veteran owned company and they decided they wanted to help
people manage their aches and pains naturally with a daily
drug free supplement and so it targets inflammation and it
supports joint health with a combination of powerful ingredients like turmeric,
(37:07):
omega three fatty acids, res viatral, and more. One hundred
percent drug free, developed to support your body's natural healing process.
My husband's a fan. He has old sports injuries that
he always deals with. So many of you listeners out
there have told me about you taking relief Factor and.
Speaker 5 (37:25):
You've noticed a difference.
Speaker 4 (37:26):
And if you're dealing with this stuff, you know you've
got aches and you don't have to go and take
prescription medication for it, and you're not alone and dealing
with it either. This is where relief Factor comes in
and they make it easy to try as well. You
don't have to stay stuck living with pain. Try Relief
Factors three week quick start, it's just nineteen ninety five.
That's less than a dollar a day. You're also supporting
a veteran own company and you can see the difference
(37:47):
with using their product for yourself. Relief Factor dot Com
one eight hundred for relief. That's one eight hundred and
number four relief.
Speaker 10 (37:55):
A great And so you know, look, we're going to
remain firm, will take legal lab but the people of
this city are accustomed to rising up against tyranny, and
if that's necessary, I believe that the people of Chicago
will stand firm alongside of me as I work every
single day to protect the people of this city.
Speaker 4 (38:15):
So just to understand what the mayor of Chicago is saying,
is that people will rise up because it's tyranny to
make sure that criminals don't run the streets and that
lawlessness and disorder aren't paramount. If you try to minimize crime,
that's tyranny. That's that's literally what the Chicago mayor just said,
(38:37):
Brandon Johnson, that it's tyranny to you know.
Speaker 5 (38:44):
Get criminals off the streets. Kane, it's tyranny.
Speaker 6 (38:47):
I think they call that tyranny.
Speaker 4 (38:49):
Well, Kobe, yeah, tyranny, Yeah, Kobe, that's Brendon Johnson. Welcome
back to the program. Top of the second hour, Dane
Lashatya the chats at Rumble. You can watch us do
radio Channel three forty seven Direct TV, and we're also
over at X and Facebook too. Anyway, that's not what
tyranny is allowing criminals to run the streets. That's actually
(39:11):
what tyranny is. Tyranny is allowing criminals to run the streets.
Tyranny is not having proper response or representation for your constituents,
for your taxpayers. So now Democrats are like, yes, we
love crime.
Speaker 5 (39:27):
What else?
Speaker 4 (39:28):
I mean, all of the things that they're embracing just
because it's not Trump they have it's just whatever the
opposite of Trump. That's that's their platform. That's a really
bad reactionary position to have anything opposite of Trump. That's
what it's what we're doing. We're just gonna be opposite
to him. He wants to cure diseases. We love diseases.
How dare you?
Speaker 3 (39:49):
Cancer has a right to live?
Speaker 5 (39:51):
Right?
Speaker 4 (39:51):
Well, I mean it's ultimately like what they're arguing, this
is just it's astinine. There's genuine things to object to
him doing. But then this is stupid though, because he's
not wrong on the crime and the lawlessness and disorder.
He's not wrong about any of that. For instance, we've
been talking about this flag burning thing. I don't agree
with it. I think that the government has absolutely no
(40:13):
business regulating speech. I don't care how vile someone thinks
flag burning is, which it is. You not liking speech
is not a reason to use the government to limit it.
So that's, you know, we got to think of this
stuff as well. This order that Potus has put out
where they want to prosecute people who burn the American
(40:36):
flag and they want to reclassify it as being an
action that is tantamount to fighting words. So they're trying
to argue that it is unprotected speech because it's fighting words.
And for you to understand that, if you're just tuning
in and we talked a little bit about this last hour,
you have different forms of speech that are protected in
speech that isn't protected. What that means is that you're
(40:56):
protected from litigation, you're protected from the government persecuting you
or prosecuting you. So libel, slander, defamation and then fighting words.
Fighting words is an interesting thing because it's specifically about
incitement and incitement that is immediately trying to get a
(41:22):
retaliatory response.
Speaker 5 (41:25):
And if you hear Wick, Wick is trying.
Speaker 4 (41:27):
To interject in here, he broke through his gait. He
desperately wants to be a studio pub I see you.
We're talking about libel and defamation. These are issues you
do not know about because you're a dog. He's confused,
he's looking at me. So this uh, idea of this
(41:51):
can being something, that's this being fighting words.
Speaker 5 (41:54):
I just don't think that's true. I don't think that's accurate.
Speaker 4 (41:56):
I don't think that's I don't think that that's uh.
I worry about reclassifying that. So, yeah, I worry about
him reclassifying that this is audio sound. Well, no, that's
that's Chicago. I don't want to play that four four
So no, that's not what we're that's not no, that's
(42:18):
not it. That's crime coverage. That's not the flag though.
Speaker 5 (42:23):
No.
Speaker 4 (42:23):
So this idea that you're going to reclassify this as
being an unprotected form of speech, again, I don't care
how viol it is. That's not the litmus as to
whether or not it should be protected or not. Here's
one thing I sure as hell, no, I don't want
to hear from the left on this at all.
Speaker 5 (42:40):
I don't.
Speaker 4 (42:40):
I don't want to hear from the left on this
at all, because, if you remember, we have had to
pull this up. We have had these issues where people
have been charged for driving over Pride flags. Right, so
they've been there's one instance where you've had two kids.
Speaker 5 (43:05):
Do you remember this.
Speaker 4 (43:05):
I think it was in like Florida where there were
kids that had like their little bikes and they were
driving across these crosswalks that had been painted like Pride
flags and oh my gosh, they left tire marks, and
so they were talking about charging these kids. There was
a guy, this was in We pulled this up because
I had this story. I think this was like Delray Beach. No, well,
(43:27):
here's one team. This is the team facing felony charges
for leaving tire marks on Alphabet Pride intersection. I mean,
they painted the Pride flag on the street and people
drive over.
Speaker 5 (43:41):
Came where to cars go? Okay, yeah, that's where they go.
Speaker 4 (43:45):
They go on the street, and when you drive over
the street sometimes you leave tire marks, especially if it's
like a newly painted thing, which that was they were
going to go after. Delray Beach was going to go
after this nineteen year old because they said that he
left tire marks on an intersection and thus that's considered
vandalizing it. So the Left has nothing to say about this.
(44:09):
They have tried to go after people who have burned
alphabet flags and all this other stuff for I don't
know how long. The BLM stuff. They went after people
who drove over like BLM things, whether it was like
in New York or in Florida or California or wherever.
So the Left has no nothing to stand on with this.
(44:31):
I just think that this is a slippery slope, right,
And Lorraine brings up a very good point for the
people who are talking about the flag. I mean, I
think there needs to be consistency. You're not supposed to
wear it as a shirt, you're not supposed to write
on it, you're not supposed to have I mean, and
we see that a lot, like you're not even no,
you're not supposed to have an American flag button up. No,
(44:51):
that's like a repurposing of it. That's actually against flag
code US flag Code. But we've also had these cases.
Two in nineteen ninety, as she notes, Texas v.
Speaker 5 (45:03):
Johnson. Now this was actually it's nineteen eighty nine Texas v.
Speaker 4 (45:07):
Johnson, where the court has never held that desecration that
is in any way done, that it amounts to incitement
or fighting words. In fact what they said, and this
was the case. There are a couple of cases Texas v.
Johnson eighty nine, United States v. Eikman in nineteen ninety
(45:30):
both ruled that desecrating the American flag as a form
of political protest is a form of symbolic speech protected
by the First Amendment. The court a firm that while
society may find flag burning offensive, the government cannot suppress
this form of expression simply because of its controversial nature.
Speaker 5 (45:45):
And I think that that's true.
Speaker 4 (45:46):
This edict is not going to stand because it's going
to get overturned in court and we're going to have
to spend.
Speaker 5 (45:50):
Tax dollars to litigate it. And that's what aggravates me.
Speaker 4 (45:53):
Sorry, but we don't have that kind of I mean,
we're all taxed to death, and are we're broke. We
don't have the the time and the bandwidth to sit
here and start trying to defend against litigation that should
never even be happening, because this is I don't see
why this.
Speaker 5 (46:10):
Now.
Speaker 4 (46:11):
There are other things that I like that he's done,
but I don't like this. I don't like this also
because of everything that we all just went through the
past eight years with different government agencies trying to silence
people and trying to argue that you asking questions about
ivermectin online is tantamount to misinformation and that enough of
this misinformation is going to be a threat to American
(46:32):
health and that constitutes a national security threat. So that's
why we the government are going to press upon these
these social media companies to shut people down that do this.
We are all still living, many of us, with the
consequences of those actions from the previous administration.
Speaker 5 (46:49):
You know, we went through the whole we had.
Speaker 4 (46:52):
I mean, I lost my damn social media accounts because
I simply asked about the laptop story. I didn't even
tweek the New York Post laptop story. I wrote about
it on my newsletter and then I tweeted it out.
But because it was about the laptop story, I ended
up losing for several days my social media accounts. They
(47:12):
I put a strike against me over at YouTube. I
was briefly suspended on Instagram, I was briefly suspended on
x I got locked out in Facebook, YouTube they I
mean it was nuts all because we were asking questions
about a very legitimate thing. So I am absolutely completely
one thousand percent against the administration doing this, And again
(47:34):
that is completely separate from how vile you think flag
burning is. Nobody likes flag burning. I think it's I
don't know why people do it. I mean, it's the
greatest nation in the land, even with all of our problems.
Still it's heads and shoulders above everybody else. And that's
just the truth of it. You don't even have to
classify yourself as a nationalist to observe this accurately. But
(47:55):
my point is is that the flag burning is vile,
but that's not That is not justification to set an
earth shattering precedent that will affect so many aspects of
American culture, law, etc.
Speaker 5 (48:11):
Policy.
Speaker 4 (48:12):
Because it's built on a dislike of something. Someone's dislike
of it is not enough of a legitimate reason to
use the government to control it. And this is where
I get very very nervous with this stuff. There is
no reason.
Speaker 5 (48:30):
I don't know.
Speaker 6 (48:31):
I have something to add to it too, because the
way they described it today was like, well, if there's
an incitement or some underlying crime, we can go after
them and not run a file of the First Amendment.
And it's like, well, if that's the case, then we
should be able to prosecute based on those other crimes.
Why are we doing this with the flag burning? If
there's property damage, you go after him for that. If
(48:52):
you're not supposed to be burning in a public place,
no matter what it is, whether it sticks or a flag,
there's an avenue there. Why do we have to do
this and label it as an EO and a flag
burning thing?
Speaker 5 (49:02):
And the other thing too is.
Speaker 4 (49:06):
If this is going to be constituted as incitement, then
what happens if someone's wearing a flag?
Speaker 11 (49:15):
No?
Speaker 4 (49:15):
What if you just have like a flag jacket on
a lot of people consider that to be very disrespectful.
I mean, I've seen people get mad because someone had
an American flag beach towel and they laid on it.
Speaker 5 (49:26):
This is like a several years ago. It was like
on Instagram.
Speaker 4 (49:30):
And people get very upset. So is that going to all, oh,
that's incitement. Then how are we defining incitement? This is
the problem that I have with us. It opens up
so many other doors, and you're setting up a dangerous,
dangerous precedent because if you can, if you can define
what incitement is just simply based on dislike of it.
Speaker 11 (49:52):
Uh.
Speaker 4 (49:54):
I mean, I hope that you are prepared to weather
the storm if we lose in twenty eight the hammer
that will come down on conservatives if you allow the
left that, how the hell do you think that that's
going to turn out if they ever get back in power.
These people are not thinking things through. This is what
I'm saying. You know, going back to my original point,
(50:15):
you know, getting upset over Trump for crime fighting crime.
I mean, that's dumb. There's things I don't agree with
that that require legitimate dissent because this is this is
an action of big government. And this is one of
two moves that this administration has made in the past
week that I don't agree with. They've done a lot
that I agree with, but I also am not going
(50:36):
to be held hostage and saying that, well, you have
to agree with every single thing the administration does or
you're you're not a Patriot.
Speaker 5 (50:44):
Well, that's un American. That's some redcoat garbage.
Speaker 4 (50:47):
So that's reject that stuff because we're going to talk
about the government taking ownership, taking a stake in Intel.
I got problems with that too. What in the hell's happening?
This is where nationalism isn't bad, but there's too much
of anything can be dangerous and we're going to talk
about this here coming up as we move. Our partners
(51:08):
that help bring you the program, Keltech the PR fifty seven.
It is a rotary barrel pistol chambered in five seven,
forty percent lighter than the competition if you're looking for
something for concealed carry. And they way that they accomplish
this two ways. The innovative rotary barrel that makes it light,
but also a unique toploading design that replaces the traditional
magazine with a stripper clip where a slimmer carry profile
(51:31):
and a twenty plus one capacity. It's a super fast
and easy field strip. It's also really affordable. MSRP is
only three ninety nine, so it's can be an everyday carry.
Because it's smaller, you're not losing any any stopping power
and made in America. Keltech made in America based in Florida.
(51:52):
You can find out more about the pr fifty seven
chambered in five to seven at keltech weapons dot com.
That's k E L t e C Weapons dot com.
Tell them Dana, send you.
Speaker 6 (52:03):
And now all of the news you would probably miss.
It's time for Dana's quick five.
Speaker 4 (52:09):
Home purchases are getting canceled at a record rate, reports
The Hill. More than fifteen percent of home purchases fell
through last month. In total, fifty eight thousand US home
purchase agreements were canceled. Cancelations are most common in Texas
and Florida. Home sales, they said, are falling through the
highest rate in years. You got record prices, elevated mortgage rates,
(52:30):
economic uncertainty, A lot of people are walking away, and
so that's really destabilizing this whole market.
Speaker 5 (52:37):
Well, this protest as a.
Speaker 4 (52:41):
Newborn has been removed from its mother in Greenland. I
don't know if it's a boy or girl from the
baby's mother in Greenland because they were saying that she
underwent Danish authorities. She underwent a parenting competence test and apparently,
I guess didn't pass it. That's kind of terrifying the
local municipality took her baby into foster care. The mother,
(53:05):
who's eighteen, says she's only seen her daughter once. They
said that even though there's a new law that bans
the controversial, controversial psychometric assessment on people with Greenlandic backgrounds,
this woman who was born to Greenlandic parents, et cetera,
she uh gave birth our daughter in Copenhagen, and they
(53:25):
apparently they sent all a lots clear.
Speaker 5 (53:28):
What this is crazy.
Speaker 4 (53:33):
They said that they started testing her before the announcement
that the ban was coming in and then when they
completed the test the law was in force. But because
I guess they started it before the law that banned
those psych psychometric tests went into effect, I guess it's
considered like allowable. This is insane. Again, big government, Big government, guys,
(53:55):
this is what you get with it. This uh year
old sprinter is said to have the muscle cells of
someone who is in their twenties. That's crazy. She's lives
in a Padua, Italy, so like Capadua's you know, it's
like north of Venice in northern Italy.
Speaker 5 (54:15):
Five foot one a lade sprint ninety two years old.
Speaker 4 (54:17):
They said that she literally like her her muscle cells
look like they're muscle cells of somebody that are in
their twenties. They're studying her. She's like this champion sprinter.
She's been a champion sprinter her whole life. That's crazy.
We have more in store.
Speaker 5 (54:32):
Stick with us.
Speaker 4 (54:33):
Are you tired of doctors telling you no, can't get
affordable off patent medications. You're not alone. All Family Pharmacy
connects you with licensed to US doctors who approved prescriptions online, fast, legally,
and without insurance gatekeeping. Get hard to access medications like
Ivermectin starting at just two dollars per capsule now up
(54:53):
to twenty five percent off, plus Mebendozol hydroxychloroquin antibiotics in
ag D plus the anti aging injectable. Taking the country
by storm. Order online in minutes and have it shipped
straight to your door. Take back your health at Allfamilypharmacy
dot Com slash Daana use code data ten. That's All
(55:14):
Familypharmacy dot Com slash Data Code Data ten.
Speaker 7 (55:19):
Keep your finger on the pulse with a Dana Show podcast,
delivering timely news with insightful analysis whenever you want, straight
to you on YouTube, Apple, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Speaker 12 (55:32):
Hello, my friends, I have to come clean. I have
something to hide. Many things is back because we're doing
a scavenger hunt. No, no, no, actually, we are doing a
scavenger hunt across New York City tomorrow, Sunday, August twenty fourth,
starting at two pm. Here's how it will work. You'll
solve a series of clues, all related to a very
particular theme in New York City history, each of which
(55:53):
will take you the next location, all accessible by public fans.
When you arrive at the location, look for a campaign volunteer.
You will mark off your card and give you a
clue to the next location. At the first stop, you'll
get this card. At the final stop, you'll find a
special surprise, not a lot of cash, so make sure
you go all the way to the ends, but don't
take too long. You need to get to the final
location between five thirty and seven pm. Stay tuned for
the first clue in a video tomorrow morning. Figure out
(56:15):
the location and meet us there at two pm on
Sunday to get your card and struck the hunt. I'll
see you tomorrow with the first clue.
Speaker 4 (56:20):
That sounds horrible. It's a scavenger hunt by the way.
That's what they're going to be doing if he's That's
what people are gonna have to do for food. If
he ends up becoming mayor of New York, they're gonna
have to scavenge. He's just getting everybody to start practicing. Now,
it's just you.
Speaker 5 (56:37):
Yeah, yeah, yeah, you're just gonna it's gonna start practicing now.
Speaker 4 (56:39):
Welcome back to the program. Dana lash with you? Oh, man,
I can't. I'm I'm really amazed at what works.
Speaker 5 (56:52):
I guess with.
Speaker 4 (56:55):
Well, he's in the lead, I know. I mean, he's
actually in the lead in New York. I don't know either. Man,
I'm right there with you. I'm I'm just a shock.
But that's doing a scavenger hunt. That's yeah, that's that's
That's pretty much what they're gonna have to do if
(57:17):
he ends up becoming mayor. It's all gonna be just
one giant scavenger hunt for day to day essentials. Just saying,
I have a number of things we've not gotten into yet,
and I don't know why, like we didn't get the
half of this up. Let me be a little bit up,
can I I want to talk about the I gotta
talk about this Airs Rock thing. Did you see the story?
(57:43):
So visitors in Australia they're banned from taking photos at
that rock.
Speaker 5 (57:49):
Uh the it's what movie was that worth?
Speaker 4 (57:54):
They're like, oh, the ding guy White Mall Baby like
auld Cry in the Dark or something like that. It
was like this movie from the eighties and some lady
was accused of killing her baby and she didn't. I
don't know as long stories that Dingo actually apparently dragged
the baby away. So anyway, the big famous you know,
Airs Rock, the rock down in Australia, it's this it's
(58:17):
considered and I've seen stories about this, and I'm trying
to pull up one of my older stories on this.
The it's the Uluru Rock, the Illuru Rock out there.
You guys know that it's like that big iconic giant
rock that's out in the desert in Australia. Right, So
they're trying to say now that visitors are banned from
(58:38):
taking photos or video of the Alluru Rock. Yeah, it
was known as Ayers Rock. They call it Uluru Rock
or I only have ever really known it as Ayrs Rock.
Speaker 5 (58:49):
They said that, well, it's you.
Speaker 4 (58:51):
Can't take photos or videos of it because it's culturally
sensitive unless you pay. See, the cultural sensitivity is erased.
Speaker 5 (58:58):
With cash.
Speaker 4 (59:00):
You can wipe literally if you go I don't know
if you knew this. You know a lot of these
old remedies are lost in the modern world. But if
you go to the Ayers Rock or Uluru Rock, you
can wash away the cultural sensitivity with money. You get
a lot of cash, preferably a couple of hundreds in
(59:21):
a fitty. Yeah, and you make a matt with it,
and you just wipe away the cultural sensitivity.
Speaker 5 (59:31):
Did you know that? So they said that it's.
Speaker 4 (59:35):
They and a bunch of travel vloggers and you just
regular people who are not insufferable.
Speaker 5 (59:41):
Travel vloggers have.
Speaker 4 (59:42):
Said they were blindsided because this one couple uploaded a
video that they took of the rock to their YouTube
account and they got this lengthy email outlining twenty possible
offenses linked to their YouTube upload and also their Instagram posts.
You have to apply for a per two hundred and
fifty dollars if you're going to film anything, even on
(01:00:03):
your phone, twenty dollars if you're gonna just like take photos,
two hundred and fifty if you're going to do videos,
How do they know what you're doing also, by the way,
and then you have to buy your park pass. It's
thirty eight dollars per adult. And then if you're going
to take any photos, you have to pay for that too.
And then after they got this couple, they got the
(01:00:25):
permit all this stuff, and then months later they told
them that all your content breaches the rules and that
these are culturally sensitive sites and that they describe culturally
important information and they should only be viewed in their
original location and by specific people.
Speaker 5 (01:00:45):
This is so stupid.
Speaker 4 (01:00:47):
It's culture stopped being culturally sensitive the moment they started
asking for cash. If you have to get a permit
to respect their cultural sensitivity, it's not culturally sensitive. You're
just a scammer. They're just scamming you to go see
this rock that God put there out in the nature,
like you. This is the dumbest stuff. I'm so tired
(01:01:08):
of this stupid woke stuff. I'm so tired of it.
It's so good culturally sensitive, my ass, you ask for cash.
It stopped being culturally sensitive then. And if anybody would
have sent me a letter about that rock, I literally
would take a picture of my fingers xerox it and
in every single way they could electronically or otherwise receive correspondence,
they would get a copy of my middle finger. Like,
(01:01:33):
you can't even climb the rock. They find you thousands
of dollars if you climb it, because apparently I don't know.
They're like, it's sensitive. I'm sensitive too. I'm also a
culturally sensitive site.
Speaker 5 (01:01:47):
So I want to.
Speaker 4 (01:01:48):
Look at what I want to look at and take
pictures of what I want to take pictures of. And
if you violate that, you are disrespecting my cultural sensitivity.
You know that that's the rock, Like you can't stop
people from seeing it. Yeah, if you're gonna gaze at this,
it's gonna cost you. Look away unless you're gonna pay.
Speaker 5 (01:02:09):
Look away.
Speaker 4 (01:02:09):
It's culturally sensitive unless you got money. I mean, that's
that's what it's like. Oh do you it's culturally sensitive?
You hold up cold hard cash.
Speaker 5 (01:02:18):
Oh we'll wait a minute then. Yeah.
Speaker 4 (01:02:22):
They said that also there, all of these these travelers
are saying that they don't even really have signs. They
don't have any signs that say that you can't take
a photo of this. I just but they're making them
delete all their content. And they said that, you know,
unless you do all that, you can't really take a
photo of it. This makes me never want to go there,
(01:02:44):
if I'm being honest, which I've always wanted to go there.
It looks beautiful, but I don't want to have to
put up with a bunch of people preening and pretending
that there are God's gift to whatever.
Speaker 5 (01:02:53):
I mean, just stop, We're all equal.
Speaker 4 (01:02:56):
It's a rock that's in the middle of the desert,
and everyone can talk about culture sensitivity. No one's hurting
your feelings by taking a photo of it. No one's
hurting I mean to an extent. I get the climbing thing.
I guess you know, I'm fine whatever, But to go
after people for taking video of it on their phone
(01:03:16):
and then demanding that it's super sensitive unless you got two.
Speaker 5 (01:03:20):
Hundred and fifty dollars.
Speaker 4 (01:03:22):
You got two hundred and fifty dollars, then it's not
so sensitive anymore.
Speaker 5 (01:03:26):
Come on, that's what this says. That's what they're doing.
That's exactly what this says.
Speaker 4 (01:03:31):
What would you do, Kane if they were like sur I,
might you go to buy two and a fifty dollars
to gotta take a video of this a rock?
Speaker 3 (01:03:38):
Oh?
Speaker 6 (01:03:39):
You got six dollars here. Sorry, Yeah, that that is
the weirdest thing because I think they have the framework
to set it up where legally they can go after
you for that. That's insane, makes no sense.
Speaker 4 (01:03:52):
They they said that they had to delete all of
these posts because they were going to get fines under
the Environmental environment Protection of Biodiversity. I guess that's an
Australian law. This makes me not want to visit there ever.
I gotta be honest with you, gotta be honest. So
she said that we picked up it. We had a
branch at one point we were swating flies and we
were told we couldn't have that. And then some areas
(01:04:16):
are photography zones, but you have to include the wide landscape.
And they go through each of your videos and they'll
tell you what to take out. Who gets paid to
do this? Who gets paid to do this? I'm telling
you what man alive MM just saying, So is it.
Speaker 6 (01:04:36):
Just the two hundred and fifty Is it that a
fine or is that the.
Speaker 5 (01:04:40):
So that's the permit?
Speaker 6 (01:04:41):
Oh my goodness.
Speaker 4 (01:04:42):
So if you're going to take video, it's two hundred
and fifty dollars. If you're just going to take a photo.
It's twenty dollars.
Speaker 6 (01:04:49):
But how do you know what if I'm just going
to take one hundred thousands?
Speaker 5 (01:04:52):
What if you're like, oh, whoops, accidentally took a video?
Speaker 4 (01:04:56):
You know, just what happens if it's that ain't happening.
I mean, come and catch me, you know it's not
what are you going to come to America? Make me
delete my inent grampalls. I'll just keep putting no, I'll
keep putting it up. This is so dumb. This makes
people turn into brats.
Speaker 3 (01:05:14):
Now.
Speaker 4 (01:05:14):
I get the climbing. Do you understand the climbing part
of the rock, like you're not supposed to climb on it? Sure,
I guess. I don't know what happens is it awakens
some I don't know what now.
Speaker 6 (01:05:22):
That my tinfoil hat comes out when they say stuff
like that.
Speaker 4 (01:05:26):
It's a very pretty area. But they're they're acting like
they're too precious. I hate that. I don't like when
anybody asks too precious. You know, the only things that
can be too precious are precious moments. I'm joking, but
I don't know. This is just how that that just
seems like that's a scam. This is a scam. It's
(01:05:48):
a scam. Oh well, you know, it's two hundred and fifty.
And I just can't believe that they go and they
monitor people's like social media activity, the idea that some
areas are sacred depending on how much you pay, like
it's sacred, but then you can you know, you can
pay and it's less sacred for you. No, no, no,
(01:06:09):
it's not as sacred for her. She paid two hundred
and fifty dollars to take that video with her smartphone?
Speaker 5 (01:06:15):
Did you okay? Sacred for you? Not sacred for her?
That's how is that?
Speaker 4 (01:06:20):
Like not a modern day indulgence. It's crazy, this is
so this is such a joke. This is such a joke,
absolutely joke.
Speaker 5 (01:06:28):
I don't know.
Speaker 4 (01:06:29):
To me, it's all still it's still airs rock. I
know that's a whole other argument. I don't know. I
I don't know. I just I think this whole thing
is ridiculous. So just you know, if you're ever going
to go traveling. Some of the other things we have
on deck, We've got Africa wants to redraw the world
map and it's mad because it says its continent size
(01:06:50):
is misrepresented.
Speaker 5 (01:06:54):
Yeah, very upset. We're going to discuss this. They're a
very obs that.
Speaker 4 (01:07:00):
They're saying that it needs to be true scale and
they want it redrawn because the other map was ignorant.
Its ignorant. Hang on, I got a couple of minutes.
Let me share the it's the African Union. They've backed
a campaign to and the use of governments and international
organizations of the Mercader map. That's the one that you
(01:07:23):
see the globes and the maps everywhere, and they're like, no,
it's underplays the size and importance of Africa, and it
disproportionately accentuates the scale of America and Europe to make
them look larger than they are. It was created by
Flemish cartographer, a Flemish cartographer for navigation all the way
(01:07:45):
back in the fifteen sixties. So Greenland looks like it's
the same size as Africa, when really Africa's larger. So
I guess that changes all the problems that they have
in South Africa, right. I guess that goes back and
stops like different nations from selling their rival nations into slavery.
(01:08:06):
I guess it ends all that, huh, just stops all
of it.
Speaker 6 (01:08:09):
I ignore all that stuff I just think that the
maps they use for navigation aren't those maps he's talking about.
Speaker 4 (01:08:15):
You know, that's funny that you would say that. I
also think that probably some of these maps that were
first made in fifteen sixty nine probably not used today in.
Speaker 5 (01:08:26):
Our modern era.
Speaker 4 (01:08:28):
And I'm pretty sure that no one's like, Wow, we
don't have a great opinion of Africa because of the
Mercader app or the map, the Mercader map or we
does it matter?
Speaker 5 (01:08:44):
Does it matter?
Speaker 4 (01:08:46):
I mean I think most people really. I mean, it's
an old timey map. It was an old I mean,
still pretty great for the times, you know, fifteen sixties, okay, but.
Speaker 6 (01:08:56):
My kids drawing of my neighborhood got me lost.
Speaker 5 (01:08:59):
You know what, can you believe this?
Speaker 4 (01:09:02):
I mean, I was using this map from fifteen sixty
nine to navigate and I just couldn't find it. This
cannot be Greenland because Greenland is on here on my
fifteen sixty nine map.
Speaker 5 (01:09:14):
It's similarly sized to Africa. Who nobody is doing this?
Speaker 4 (01:09:20):
Also, we have satellite images. I think that's probably what
people go after. I I just thought that maybe they
had other issues that they were dealing with, But apparently
maps it is.
Speaker 5 (01:09:31):
It feels though, feel it would feel that way, But
that's probably also because the map.
Speaker 4 (01:09:42):
I mean you you might think it, but I don't know.
I mean that's who hears this stuff? Like who's who
do you go tell on about this? Like I don't
like the map where the map people. I'm gonna go
tell the map person. I want the map person to know.
Who do you go and tell on? Who do you
(01:10:04):
snitch to over this?
Speaker 5 (01:10:06):
Right? Is there like some.
Speaker 4 (01:10:10):
I mean, is there like a ministry of maps for
the whole world? And there's just like it's like the
High Table in john Wick and there's just like these
people with questionably Scandinavian accents that are you know, determined
even keeps you s mapping place. Yeah, I don't know.
I'm very curious, Like where do you go to handle
this problem? Is there an hr?
Speaker 5 (01:10:30):
I don't know.
Speaker 4 (01:10:31):
We have more on the way. We got Florida Man
coming up as we move. Our partners that help bring
you the program, it's Patriot Mobiles. So if you're going
to tell someone that they're wrong on the Internet, tell
them that they're wrong with Patriot Mobile. Because nothing packs
a punch like using a Christian Conservative cell phone service
to just put somebody in their place, just saying you
(01:10:51):
can actually switch today and you don't sacrifice your quality
or service. If you want to pay less money than
what you're paying right now, then you need to make
the switch. If you like to have your money work
for you as opposed to funding all of the things
that you vote against at the ballot bucks, then you
need to make the switch. Patriot Mobile not only provides
great customer service with their one hundred percent US based team,
(01:11:15):
an amazing coverage because they're offered on all of the
three major carriers, but you're also backing the things that
you believe in, like they're right now supporting certain things
in the legislative process as it pertains to Texas, the
bill that's backing the legislation protecting women and girls in
bathrooms and locker rooms and things of that nature. I mean,
they're right there helping to make sure that this is
(01:11:39):
getting passed. So when you switch, it's not just about
better coverage, it's about supporting causes that are incredibly important
to you and your family, and every dollar that you
spend is helping fund the defense of this as well.
You can visit Patriotmobile dot com slash data or call
nine seventy two Patriot and you'll go to free month
of service using promo code data. Make the switch today
(01:11:59):
and defend free with every callin text. That's Patriotmobile dot
com slash Dana nine seven to two Patriot promo code Dana.
Speaker 6 (01:12:09):
It's his life mission to make bad decisions. It's time
for Florida.
Speaker 5 (01:12:16):
Man, all right, So first off it decides to open here.
Let me get this. We've got.
Speaker 4 (01:12:27):
FULLLORDA man accused of boarding a school bus and threatening
a driver. You can't be doing that. You're not a student.
You don't need to be getting on the bus. You're
not going one going to school. Well that's apparently this
Florida man didn't get that, and either did ABC twelve
News in Florida, whose website is so heinous and they
have it loaded up with so many cut rate you
(01:12:48):
know ads that you can't even read their stupid, ridiculous story.
Speaker 5 (01:12:53):
A spring hilt Man, Florida man.
Speaker 4 (01:12:55):
He apparently boarded a school bus forty five year old
Alvincore in Hernando County while it was picking up kids. Now,
I got to tell you my first thought was that
is this a dad? Who's like getting on the bus
and apparently he has a child who rides the bus.
But he got on the bus. It was going to
the elementary school. The bus driver demanded that he get
(01:13:18):
off the bus, please leave, don't get on the bus.
He wouldn't do it. He used profane language, according to
the deputies. Then he said he was going to go
back and get his gun.
Speaker 5 (01:13:26):
I don't know.
Speaker 4 (01:13:27):
Yeah, you can't be doing that. They still don't know
why he boarded it. Like, all I know is that
he's being held on five thousand dollars bond. He was arrested,
so I have no idea why he boarded it. I
don't know, but you can't be doing that kind of stuff.
Tomorrow I'll tell you why you don't drive your lawnmower
on the road while you're drunk. A lesson from Florida. Man,
stick with us. Third hour next.
Speaker 13 (01:13:49):
He is absolutely going to be deported in this country.
He's not going to walk the streets in the station
so he can enjoy the little time he has with
his family. And for the person who says we're not
going to separate family with and we can go.
Speaker 5 (01:14:00):
With they go with him.
Speaker 4 (01:14:02):
He said, Tom Holman was like, well, if they don't
want to be separated as family's family can go with him.
Speaker 5 (01:14:06):
I think that's a that's a pretty good deal. Kane. Yeah,
that's a good deal. Yeah he should take that deal.
Speaker 4 (01:14:12):
Sounds like we're almost talking from the scene from a
Glorious Bastard's at the very end when Brad Pitt it's
talking to Hans.
Speaker 5 (01:14:19):
I take that deal, all right.
Speaker 4 (01:14:20):
So welcome back to the program. Top of this third hour,
Dana Lash with you. You can find us doing radio all
across the nation. You can also watch us do the
radio show Channel three forty seven Direct TV. The chats
at Rumble all kinds of good stuff. So that kill
Marl Borrego Garcia. He's getting gosh, when does this guy
(01:14:43):
go away?
Speaker 5 (01:14:44):
Tired of this guy?
Speaker 4 (01:14:46):
Just deport but the left is trying to prevent it
for some reason, the same left that is also petitioning
I'm shocked by this on behalf of this illegal immigrant
trucker that kill three people in Florida.
Speaker 5 (01:15:01):
Did you guys hear about this? This is insane. This
story is just crazy.
Speaker 4 (01:15:05):
So the guy who was driving that he somehow got
a CDL not in the country legally and.
Speaker 5 (01:15:20):
Is like is arrested.
Speaker 4 (01:15:22):
But he was using this official use only median on
Florida's turnpike. He blocked every oncoming lane zero warning, killed
three people as a result. This hardened or seeing he
was here illegally. He somehow got a CDL and from
two states, two states that are also sanctuary city states.
It should be noted, and three million people have signed
(01:15:44):
a petition to support him.
Speaker 5 (01:15:46):
Watch this video. He can't. He doesn't even know enough.
Speaker 4 (01:15:48):
He doesn't even know what his charges are because he
doesn't speak English, but yet he had a CDL.
Speaker 5 (01:15:52):
Watch this. This is wild. Wants pullinted up right now.
This is him being a ring.
Speaker 12 (01:15:58):
They weren't certain record.
Speaker 14 (01:16:01):
He's got to have a translated.
Speaker 3 (01:16:16):
My name is Harjender Singh. Thank you, sir.
Speaker 6 (01:16:20):
You have been arrested on two separate warrants.
Speaker 4 (01:16:23):
Sir uh, he doesn't even understand the charges against him.
Speaker 12 (01:16:34):
The first arrest warrant is for three counts of the
agulent homicide.
Speaker 5 (01:16:39):
It has to all be translated.
Speaker 4 (01:16:47):
He's here illegally, illegally, got a c d L, illegally
given a cd L. He has to have everything translated.
How did he pass a test? To drive a semi
when existing law states you have to know enough English
to be able to talk to talk to people and
(01:17:09):
read road signs. This is three people are dead because
of this guy, because he was here illegally and he
didn't follow the law. He killed three people. I think
all of the companies that employed him are culpable. I
think the states that all the people who push this
open whatever borders everything, giving everybody driver's licenses, all these
(01:17:31):
people are culpable. They have the blood of these people
all on their hands, advocating, advocating for this type of stuff.
He failed his English Language proficiency assessment. He only understood
two of the questions he was asked over twelve questions.
He only understood two of them. He only accurately identified
one highway traffic sign out of a series that they
(01:17:53):
showed him. And yet in California he got a cdo.
Lorraine goes, Oh, he didn't pass. Somebody bribe he was.
Somebody was bribed. Somebody was bribed. There's no way now
who's than who I It is not a tragic accident.
(01:18:14):
People are like, well, you know he didn't that wasn't
his end goal was to kill people. Well, then you
should have followed the law, because not following the law
has a consequence, and sometimes the consequences are pretty horrible,
and this is a pretty horrible consequence. He's lived here
for seven years and he had no he has no
Holy crap, I've you know, I've only been to Italy,
(01:18:34):
you know, a couple of times, and I know more
Italian than this guy knows English. Oh my gosh, this
is crazy, uh I the rules have to apply to him.
You can't say that he is exempt from following the
rules because he is an illegal immigrant. He victimized everyone
(01:19:01):
else because he refused to follow the law. And his
supporters and his backers somehow think that you are exempt.
If you are not here legally, you are exempt from
following the law. It was recklessness and it killed people.
(01:19:22):
And what's crazier, I mean is if you can get crazier.
They have over two million, seven hundred thousand signatures that
are demanding that he be treated with leniency. Anything about
that came over two million, almost three million who.
Speaker 6 (01:19:46):
Signed Where they come from? People from Florida.
Speaker 5 (01:19:49):
It couldn't have been people from Florida. I mean, he
didn't even know.
Speaker 4 (01:19:55):
I used to the video he didn't even understand the
charges that were being brought against him.
Speaker 6 (01:19:58):
And when he watched it actually happen or that family
went right into the truck, he it was like nothing
to him. He had no, no reaction.
Speaker 5 (01:20:07):
It was so weird, like dead, so weird. I don't know.
Speaker 4 (01:20:13):
He's been like for seven years, he's been working for
different companies. I guess with his CDL. I'm just shocked
over this. But the people who signed it, they want
him being treated with leniency. What if their families had
been killed by someone who came here legally violated the
law and then was still violating law.
Speaker 5 (01:20:32):
I don't know.
Speaker 4 (01:20:33):
I don't trust any licenses. If I was, you know,
here in Texas, I would or Florida. I wouldn't trust
any other license from California or Washington or any of
these states where they just give people driver's licenses. I
think that they should enforce a new standard that they
have to pass that state's driver's license in order to
(01:20:53):
be able to drive a truck in that state. I mean,
trucker's jobs are hard enough without this all on top
of it. And what gets me is, and I know
so many truckers that are out there you know, these
people they go through all of this stuff, all of
the you know, they I don't want to say classes,
but the stuff to be familiarized with the regulations of
(01:21:14):
driving a big rig on the road, and you know,
they go through all of this extra jump through all
these extra hoops and they have to you know, they
I can't even imagine the frustration.
Speaker 5 (01:21:27):
Because this is I mean, this guy, this killed people.
Speaker 4 (01:21:33):
And they do what they do, and they see what
California and Washington, how just easily they are able to
throw these commercial driver's licenses out to people who don't
even understand the road signs.
Speaker 5 (01:21:46):
I'm just shocked over this. It's just sickens me.
Speaker 6 (01:21:48):
My biggest problem with it was that even if you're
not a truck driver, which I'm not, you know, you
don't make a move like that in any vehicle on
the road on the highway the way he did to
try to make a U turn from the middle lane
to the other lanes that had a clock all of
the other Yeah, it makes no sense.
Speaker 4 (01:22:07):
And it's just unbelievable. I feel so bad for the
family that are having to deal with this. Uh, it's
the United States can't do what Europe has done. I
don't know if you've seen some of these stories, listen
to those. There's mass protests now. A seventeen year old
girl was stabbed to death while calling the cops to
report being followed home on her bike.
Speaker 5 (01:22:28):
She was in Holland.
Speaker 4 (01:22:30):
Cops arrested this They called them asylum seekers. He killed
her and stabbed her. He stabbed her to death, killing her,
but he had also raped a woman days earlier. Twenty
two year old male arrested four days ago for a
rape in Amsterdam assaulted a third woman five days earlier
(01:22:51):
and he uh, I mean, I just they found her body,
just like just left her body in the said. They've
been protesting in Rotterdam, They've been protesting in Amsterdam, They've
been protesting in different parts of Europe. It is I mean,
it's sickening. And of course you know it's the girls
that are targeted, young women. It's girls that are that
(01:23:12):
are being targeted here and protests have exploded. Me pulled
this one up. This is in Britain, outside of these
hotels where they're bringing in these people who are in
the country illegally, Birmingham, London, they've had protesters draped in
Saint George's Cross gather outside of these different locations because
(01:23:35):
they've been they're protesting what they've been doing.
Speaker 5 (01:23:39):
They've been having flag wars in the UK.
Speaker 4 (01:23:43):
So we had like what is this like a few
a few weeks ago where we had this video of
a girl who dressed up as the Union Jack and
she went to school and they she was dressed up
as like Ginger Spice and she got in trouble. She
was told to take this off. You know, it's the flag.
Whatever they can. People can showcase Gossen flags, but they
(01:24:07):
can't showcase their own British flags. There have been protests
over this. They've been protest over the intake of quote
unquote asylum seekers. I mean this is getting this is
Europe is really getting tense because of this. They arrested
(01:24:27):
people in Bristol, Liverpool and Horley, arrested people in Birmingham,
they arrested people in London and they said enough is enough,
protect our women and girls. And people are saying, oh, well,
this is an anti migrant movement, which is such a lie.
If they've seen the increase in crime, rape, violent crime,
if they've seen what people are having to endure and
(01:24:50):
what women are having to go through. I don't think
that they would say that, or maybe they just see it.
They just don't care. This is colonization. A lot about colonization,
but no one wants to talk about the colonization and
reverse what's happening in Britain's colonization, what's happening in parts
of Holland, in Scandinavia's colonization, what's been happening what they've
(01:25:15):
been trying to do in Italy's colonization, France colonization. Waves
of people coming over illegally and then demanding not assimilation,
but demanding equalization of their religious jurisprudence, things like sharia law,
(01:25:35):
demanding separate, entirely separate systems of quote unquote justice. It is,
It's enough. It's colonization, and people are pushing back against it.
Notice how people always talk about colonization, if you're talking about, oh,
the Pilgrims or the British or whatever, but no one
wants to talk about colonization coming from countries in North Africa,
(01:25:58):
or colonization coming from you all like Pakistan. I mean,
look at Rotheram for crying out loud for twenty years
you had games of the same. They all came from
the same area, and they were targeting and trading and
exploiting and trafficking young women and girls. But you can't
talk about it because they have everyone so terrified.
Speaker 5 (01:26:21):
That's why authorities there were so quiet for so long.
Speaker 4 (01:26:24):
They have people so terrified to speak because they will
They will accuse them of a moral failing to secure
their silence. They'll accuse them of being bigots or racist
if they dare speak up about it. And people are
more terrified of that than they are. Women being violently,
brutally raped and murdered.
Speaker 5 (01:26:44):
That's what it is. Just unbelievable.
Speaker 6 (01:26:47):
And now all of the news you would probably miss
it's time for Dana's Quick five.
Speaker 5 (01:26:53):
Stop this right now.
Speaker 4 (01:26:55):
Stop the pumpkin spice they're bringing they call the PSLs.
Speaker 5 (01:27:00):
I had a girlfriend who was like, oh, yeah, I
can't wait for passel and I'm like, what is that.
I'm thinking it was like a workout or something.
Speaker 4 (01:27:07):
Yeah, No, it's pumpkin spice latte. It comes back today
And Okay, explain this to me.
Speaker 5 (01:27:14):
They have a.
Speaker 4 (01:27:15):
Pecan oat milk cortado. I just want black coffee. I
want an espresso or a black coffee. Maybe I'll get
an Americano. I don't need any of this other stuff.
I don't need any of this stuff. This is crazy punk.
You know what, pumpkin spice latte. I don't like them.
Speaker 5 (01:27:30):
They taste like turkey water. It's weird.
Speaker 4 (01:27:33):
I don't get it. It is ninety it's in the nineties.
People are still at the beach.
Speaker 5 (01:27:39):
Stop it.
Speaker 4 (01:27:40):
It's gross. It's like a chemical pumpkin. It's stop it.
It's ninety degrees out.
Speaker 5 (01:27:47):
Don't want I don't.
Speaker 4 (01:27:48):
I don't want any of my girlfriends being like, oh
my gosh, are you getting out your pumpkin candles?
Speaker 5 (01:27:53):
No, no, I'm not. It's hot. I'm not doing any
of that.
Speaker 4 (01:27:59):
Also, as k notes, there's only one way that you
get this nickname. This is a I swear to you,
this is a real article. I don't send me hate.
The headline is a man dubbed but Sniffer was arrested
again in Burbank.
Speaker 6 (01:28:17):
Really rushed through that.
Speaker 3 (01:28:18):
What is this guy's nickname?
Speaker 6 (01:28:22):
I feel like you USh right?
Speaker 4 (01:28:23):
A man dubbed but Sniffer is arrested again in Burbank again,
but this thirty eight year old was recognized by store employees.
I don't even know how someone does this, but that's
his nickname and that's what he does. He follows women
inside stores and he does that and it's weird for himself. Yeah,
he did it at the nord Storm rack a Walgreens
(01:28:46):
and they see him on the surveillance system. He's a
registered sex offender on parole and apparently he's got these
offenses going back some years. Glendale, Burbank, all this stuff.
Speaker 5 (01:28:55):
He's got a.
Speaker 4 (01:28:59):
See I'm telling you a uh okay, I know I'm
going on this MRC event. It's a boat with MRC.
Just saying this headline doesn't help. A captain was arrested
on a suspicion of operating a container ship drunk coast Guard.
He got in trouble. It was the MSc Jubilee. We
have up next, Steven Yates.
Speaker 7 (01:29:17):
Stick with us the Danish Show podcast. You're fast, funny
and informative news companion for those always on the move.
Subscribe on YouTube, Apple or wherever you get your podcasts.
Speaker 4 (01:29:30):
I'm really sad right now because we're playing the Beatles
Happy Birthday song and I just realized that when we
have a guest, they can't hear it, and I'm not
about to sing it for you because I will not
subject you to such cruelty.
Speaker 5 (01:29:44):
However, it is a birthday. It's a birthday.
Speaker 4 (01:29:48):
Somebody has a birthday today, very special birthday there.
Speaker 5 (01:29:51):
Would you believe they're old.
Speaker 4 (01:29:52):
Enough to actually have a beer now, mister Steven Yates.
Everyone knows Steven Yates correct. He is the senior Search
Fellow at the Heritage Foundation, and he is now twenty
one years old, and we are celebrating you today, my friend.
I hope you have a happy, wonderful birthday, and you're
so generous with your time. Look he's here on his
(01:30:13):
birthday for crying out loud. So happy birthday to you,
Steven Yates. We hope you have a wonderful, wonderful day.
I wish you could have heard our song for you,
but we're glad that you're here with us. So happy
twenty first birthday.
Speaker 3 (01:30:25):
Thank you.
Speaker 11 (01:30:26):
I'm happy to be as I said, termed twenty nine
for the twenty ninth time today.
Speaker 5 (01:30:30):
That works. That works. Yeah, it's ky notes, it's your birthday,
but we get the gifts us all right, Well, I
appreciate you.
Speaker 4 (01:30:39):
So happy birthday to you, okay, we have this this
do we play this audio?
Speaker 5 (01:30:45):
I think we did. We just came out with beatles, Okay.
Speaker 4 (01:30:47):
So I want to set this up for you because
I wanted to kind of get your reaction to this.
So this is Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and there's
been a lot of discussion about how to handle some
of these criminal entities at the boarder and he's talking
about in this flashback audio SoundBite which apparently it looks
like we're going to act on this. He's talking about
(01:31:07):
why the US is preparing to act as it relates
to Venezuela.
Speaker 15 (01:31:11):
Let's listen Explored, because in Venezuela you have the Russian presence,
you have a very strong Iranian presence. The Iranians and
Factor Exploring are in Factor beginning to build drone factories
for the manufacture of Iranian drones in our own hemisphere.
Not to mention the long practice of the Venezuelan regime
of providing real but illegitimate passports to operators for Hesbela
(01:31:34):
in our own hemisphere.
Speaker 4 (01:31:36):
That is a lot of stuff to pack into that country,
a lot. And I mean to say nothing of China's presence.
Russia you know, Iran, all of these entities looking to
get this hole, which they have been for a long time.
And I think you and I have even talked about
it at some point throughout the years. Talk to me
a little bit about what this means in terms of
I feel like we're resetting a little bit our focus,
(01:31:58):
our foreign policy focus, and for far too long, maybe
since the eighties, we haven't really looked down to Central
and South America, particularly Venezuela.
Speaker 5 (01:32:06):
What are your thoughts on this.
Speaker 11 (01:32:09):
Well, there's a few things going on at the same
time that resonate deeply with me. One is I remember
in Trump one point zero, this is an area where
John Bolton really got out of a head of the
president and was kind of advocating a regime change kind
of policy there.
Speaker 3 (01:32:27):
And I don't doubt for.
Speaker 11 (01:32:28):
A minute that the world would be a better place
with a change of regime in Venezuela. But now I
think what the Trump administration's strategy is. They've they've declared
the cartels to be terrorist organizations. They're dead set about
addressing the immigration problem, but also the flow of deadly
(01:32:49):
goods into our country. People can easily forget that Venezuela
to many parts of the United States is a shorter
trip than from that part of the United States to
say Alaska, and so it's not really that far away
for them to be able to touch us from there.
And since nine to eleven we have looked with great
(01:33:09):
unease about the flow of terrorist organizations, Iran sponsored organizations
and of course the Russians and the proliferation risk.
Speaker 3 (01:33:18):
Going through Venezuela.
Speaker 11 (01:33:19):
So that has been an area of concern, but we've
never had an administration with a serious strategy for what
to do with about it. And I think Secretary of
Rubio is giving us an opening salvo on what some
of this will be.
Speaker 3 (01:33:34):
But also not for nothing.
Speaker 11 (01:33:36):
We should remember that trendy Aragua comes from Venezuela, and
that is not just an imaginary organization. There may be
people in Aurora, Colorado that wanted to pretend like it
wasn't in America affecting Americans, but those with a sense
of reality, no, And so the idea that you could
(01:33:56):
have drugs, drones, terrorists and the ability to deliver them
in the United States by way of Venezuela is not
conjecture or somebody's kind of play thesis. That's reality now,
and I think it's worthy of the ministration to do
something about it.
Speaker 5 (01:34:11):
You and you mentioned too.
Speaker 4 (01:34:12):
And when I heard Rubio on that sound bite when
he mentioned creating, I guess like a drone factor. I
just keep thinking of drone warfare and the future of conflict.
That's a terrifying thing. And the presence of it so
close to the United States. I mean, it's not very
Just get it up through you know, Central America, and
(01:34:33):
then it's right there at our southern border.
Speaker 3 (01:34:36):
Yeah.
Speaker 11 (01:34:36):
Well, I've kind of made a hobby of giving terrifying
messages to your audience.
Speaker 3 (01:34:40):
Over the years, but there are you know, I wish I.
Speaker 11 (01:34:44):
Could be the purveyor of happiness in sunshine, especially on
my birthday.
Speaker 5 (01:34:48):
I know.
Speaker 11 (01:34:49):
But the confluence of modern drone technology with aerosolized deadly
chemicals is something that I think is more dangerous in
twenty twenty five than what we faced in the post
nine to eleven environment twenty four years ago. And so
I think it's very urgent that we get after the
(01:35:10):
supply chains, that we push these things off at greater
distance to the extent we can. And I think it's very,
very important that the United States Navy and other responsible
allies are the masters of the high seas in the
Caribbean and the Gulf, and so I think this is
just a very very high priority that we have wanted
to pretend like we weren't at risk of.
Speaker 3 (01:35:32):
For too long.
Speaker 5 (01:35:33):
Yeah, very much.
Speaker 4 (01:35:34):
So we're talking with our friends Steve and Yates at
Yates comes on X. This is interesting. I'm looking at
the India China. I saw this. This is something you
had actually retweeted, and you and I talked a little
bit before in terms of India and China. It seems
China very much wanted India to affirm that one China,
(01:35:54):
you know, Taiwan is China, China is Taiwan. Their belief
and apparently new is they're not doing that. What does
that mean for their because that's a that's a big
sticking point for them, and there I was a little
worried that their relationship was starting to get a little
cozier for you know, my taste and obviously yours and
everyone else's what that's Is that significant or is that
(01:36:16):
just kind of more of the same. Is that really
change anything with those two?
Speaker 3 (01:36:21):
Yeah?
Speaker 11 (01:36:21):
I think it's significant, and it doesn't change that much
in the following sense that India has been a part
of the non aligned movement for a long time.
Speaker 3 (01:36:30):
They kind of go their own way.
Speaker 11 (01:36:32):
Sometimes that is very pro Us, sometimes that's very pro Russian.
Speaker 3 (01:36:36):
Mody was giving.
Speaker 11 (01:36:37):
Sort of butterfly kisses by way of social media to
or is the good friend Vladimir Putin. And they will
sometimes play nice with China, but every once in a
while they don't mind reminding China, hey, we're a billion
people too, and I bet if there's a legit count,
we have more than you. And oh, by the way,
our military has fought real wars and yours hasn't. And
(01:36:58):
so every once in a while the Indian can be
counted on to just give the old in living color
line home.
Speaker 3 (01:37:04):
They don't play that.
Speaker 11 (01:37:05):
And so when the Chinese try to say we're going
to put words in your mouth and Taiwan's are part
of China, India didn't say we're going to recognize Taiwan
as an independent country, and they didn't say they're going
to intervene. They just said, no, we're not playing with
you on that, And frankly, I thank them for that.
That's better than what US policy has been from my point.
Speaker 4 (01:37:25):
Of view, Yeah, I definitely, I definitely agree with that.
Talking with our friend Steven Yates, Mody was visiting Japan
and China. Actually he's going to be very busy for
the next couple of weeks. What are they looking to establish?
I wish because I know we have our tariff situation
with India and I wish that we didn't because I
really feel that that could be leveraged to our best
(01:37:47):
interest against any geopolitical foes in the Pacific. Where does
that stand and what is he hoping to accomplish with
this trip?
Speaker 11 (01:37:56):
Well, Mody pushes economic development over most other issue using
these kinds of trips. And Japan and India have had
a long standing, pretty good relationship going back to the
Koizumi administration when Shinzo Abe was in the was the
deputy Chief Cabinet Secretary and would then be a real
strong voice leading Japan toward really strong engagement with India
(01:38:19):
and the arc of peace and freedom that he advocated
that became the Indo Pacific Region.
Speaker 3 (01:38:25):
So this has been.
Speaker 11 (01:38:26):
A long term trend on balancing with Japan and the
friendly relations the China engagement India is doing kind of
what a lot of the rest of the world does.
They don't really want to pick a fight, but they
don't mince words about the fact that it's been Chinese
forces that have killed Indians in recent years in not
huge numbers, but on their border skirmishes, and so they
(01:38:48):
engage in order to try to shape and dissuade, but
then also to seek more normalized opportunity. But India has
also been pretty shrewd about taking some manufacturing opportunities from China.
iPhones have moved largely out of China into India to
be where the dominant manufacturing supply is coming from, and
India is going to grow in that regard too. So
(01:39:09):
I think that's more of what Modi's doing, just proving
that he's his own leader of a country that is
not aligned. But I think overall has more overlapping interests
with ours, just not on the Russia stuff right now.
Speaker 4 (01:39:23):
Yeah, and that's going to be my last question for you,
because I know you were busy, you were traveling, then
you were ill and where you got under the weather.
We're glad that you're that you're recovered for your birthday.
Speaker 3 (01:39:31):
Today, but I'm ah.
Speaker 4 (01:39:34):
Yeah, I just I wanted to get your quick thoughts
on how you thought that the meeting with European leaders
and Trump's meeting with Russia. When I felt that it
was in terms of optics that it was it was
positive for us, and I felt that it was positive
in terms of how Trump was perceived on the world
stage dealing with all of these other world leaders. But
what happens next is that still going to be a
(01:39:55):
gain for the United States. Do you think that it
moved the needle on anything.
Speaker 11 (01:40:01):
I do think it moved the needle, and I do
think it was very very important to happen.
Speaker 3 (01:40:06):
But here's my take.
Speaker 11 (01:40:09):
I don't have high confidence that Vladimir Putin wants peace,
and I don't really care what his opinion is, and
the President, I think, has gotten a pretty clear taste
that Putin, like other leaders, can say whatever they want
to say, but you ultimately have to change actions. That's
changing behavior, and that usually has to be compelled, not induced,
(01:40:31):
when you're dealing with an adversary or competitor. I hope
he's learning these lessons with Russia and understands that China
will be no different in this regard. But for now,
I think that the President, though, to his credit, has
put us, Europe and Ukraine itself in a better position
if this has to be a long term grind, which
(01:40:52):
I think is at least a fifty to fifty chance
going forward, he has the President, in his unique way,
has lit a fire under the backside of Europeans to
sort of grow up and take care of their neighbors.
He has reinvigorated America so that we have less in
dependencies that could be affected by a protracted conflict. He's
(01:41:13):
made it so that the Europeans are going to pay
for the material, Americans aren't going to give it away.
All of these things put us in a better position
if this is just going to be a slow grind,
and if we have those options to wait it out.
In a perverse way, it actually increases the chance that he.
Speaker 3 (01:41:29):
Can negotiate a settlement.
Speaker 11 (01:41:30):
So I think the President, whether it's been by designer intent,
it's four degree chess.
Speaker 3 (01:41:35):
I've told said many times, I'm not smart enough to
do chess in one degree much, you know, idea two degrees.
Speaker 11 (01:41:43):
But I think the President has put everyone in a
better position.
Speaker 3 (01:41:48):
It's just peace could still be elusive.
Speaker 11 (01:41:50):
Even after all that hard work has been done, and
I think the right moves have been taken.
Speaker 5 (01:41:54):
There go Steven Yates, the birthday boy today. Happy twenty
ninth to you, my friend.
Speaker 4 (01:41:59):
I hope you're wonderful day, and thank you for giving
us some of your time so we at least get
to wish you a very happy birthday and we appreciate you.
Speaker 3 (01:42:05):
Thank you, thank you so much.
Speaker 5 (01:42:07):
Of course, less goodnes see you.
Speaker 7 (01:42:09):
Not able to catch all three hours of the Dana Show,
subscribe to the full podcast and get news and laughs
delivered in short, easy to digest episodes ideal for your
busy lifestyle on YouTube, Apple or wherever you get your podcast.
Speaker 5 (01:42:24):
So two things.
Speaker 4 (01:42:26):
First, Rolling Stone is acting like Jack White is super
tough because he's standing up to Trump Rolling Stone, which is,
does anybody look at Rolling Stone for anything anymore?
Speaker 5 (01:42:36):
No? I don't think anybody does.
Speaker 4 (01:42:38):
Yeh on Winner is a loser, says So Jack White
is standing it up to Trump and his punches are landing.
How pathetic are you that you have to sit here
and fluff yourself with such stupid affirmations number one and
number two? Well, can I just add an adendum onto that?
Jack White is also an example of how when anyone
(01:42:59):
gets older, if they dye their hair dark, you need
to not be so high contrast with your hair color
because it accentuates all the errors on your face.
Speaker 5 (01:43:07):
So that's number. That's the little addendum. That's why you're here.
Speaker 11 (01:43:10):
Uh.
Speaker 4 (01:43:11):
The second thing is that in this Vegas Larry cracker
Barrel says we could have done a better job. Hindsight
debt hindsight though. Yeah, So they came out with a
statement saying, in the last few days, if you've shown
us anything, it's how deeply Pep people care about cracker Barrel.
(01:43:34):
We're so grateful for your heartfelt voices. You've also shown
us that we could have done a better job sharing
who we are and who will always be. And then
there's like a million paragraphs about stuff I don't care about.
And then they're like, oh yeah, uncle Herschel's breakfast, and
they're like they're if you're not going to change your heinous,
(01:43:55):
millennial gray brain rot decor, then I don't care. No
one wants to go feel like they're sitting in someone's
pantry from twenty fifteen. Okay, nobody wants that. Nobody wants
And I got hate mail because they said millennial gray.
So I'm saying it a lot right now, millennial gray,
because it's a real thing. Yeah, it's like it's we're
(01:44:17):
gonna get We're gonna get down Wayne Scouting, and we're
gonna paint it, you know, poop gray.
Speaker 12 (01:44:21):
Yay.
Speaker 5 (01:44:22):
So trying to neutral law. I hate this.
Speaker 4 (01:44:26):
So anyway, blah blah blah, come and experience the country
hospitality and remember and that's it, you know.
Speaker 5 (01:44:33):
That was they took the dude like they're as you can.
Speaker 4 (01:44:39):
Realize, they actually took the dude, that old dude, that
was the old cracker in his barrel. That was a
real person. It was yeah, like how Intemima was a
real lady. Yeah, as Steve said, yeah, they saw their
stock tank. We gotta get going though, because I just
realized I'm taking up all your time to today and stupidity.
Speaker 6 (01:44:56):
Well it's easy because it's Mayor Brandon Johnson of Chicago.
One cut eleven. This is how the mayor thinks everyone's
gonna feel about getting law and order back in Chicago.
Speaker 10 (01:45:07):
Go ahead, the firm will take legal action. But the
people in this city are accustomed to rising up against tyranny,
and if that's necessary, I believe that the people of
Chicago will stand firm alongside of me as I work
on every single day.
Speaker 6 (01:45:22):
Chicago's mayor doesn't know what tyranny is. And number two,
the people are not going to act that way. We
actually already are seeing a public outcry of Trump in Chicago.
They want their safety.
Speaker 4 (01:45:34):
Yeah, they do want their safety. They're tired of it.
Can you imagine that going down? I mean you got
to you know, maybe Juicy Simolier wouldn't have been attacked
by those two dudes in the street and getting a
scene which in the middle of a blizzard at two
in the morning, just saying, folks, I'll be back with
you tomorrow.
Speaker 5 (01:45:48):
Have a great night.