Taylor Lorenz’s Shocking Joy and Davy Crockett’s Spending Lesson

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:01):
Thus at President Trump is committed, we're going to deputize
every US citizen in this country to help us find
three hundred and forty thousand missing children, because we need
the public self on this. Every mom and dad knows
what it's like. They have a gut feeling they see
something out there in public that there's something right with
that child. So we're going to deputize every one of
them to help us find these children.

Speaker 2 (00:21):
I like that. I mean, he says that that there
are three hundred and forty thousand kids missing. That's Tom
Homan Incoming Borders are welcome back to the program. Dana
Lash with you, and you can find this channel through
forty seven direct TV as well the chats at Rumble
if you're not listening coast to coast. The deputizing of
a mirror, I'm good with that. You know again, I

(00:43):
mentioned this yesterday. Just get out the GOB network, man,
the good old Boy network. All Tom Homan needs to
do is put that search light in the sky with
the silhouette of a mullet and the GOB network. They're
going to find these kids. So that's how it works, man.
Put it into practice. I mean, we got a doge

(01:05):
for crying out loud. We need a goob network. That's
how that needs to happen. You could just empower average
everyday citizens to go and do what they need to
do in order to not only find these kids, but
maybe get rid of the drone issue. I don't know,
like all kinds of stuff, and so in I mean,
that's the numbers keep going up. It's several hundred thousand,

(01:28):
that's how much we know. It's several hundred thousand kids missing.
And I just for the Democrats were so concerned about
kids at one point. Remember, so let's go back to
when it was Obama Biden, and they were allowing every
everybody and their brother to come to come through the border.
They were allowing everybody to come in, right, And so

(01:51):
at some point it ended up that they were unable
to confirm whether or not some of them miners traveling
with some of these adults, whether or not they were
actually like with the adults, whether or not they were
actually part of it, this family group. And so they
separated them and they held them for X amount of

(02:13):
hours while they determined that the child that a group
of adults was bringing with them across the border to
take advantage of the Floris Amendment, which was fast tracking
them because they had youth. Then they had determined whether
or not that they were legitimately like a family and
not you know, some rando who was trafficking a kid
across the border, and nobody on the left said anything

(02:36):
about that. So Trump comes in and is dealing with
the border and kept that practice in place until they
could get rid of the Floras Amendment that Obama had
put in. And then Democrats are like, oh my gosh,
the kids at the border, they're putting them in cages.
And then they went at Trump for a policy that
Barack Obama literally created and had to create because he

(02:56):
had opened the border that it was difficult for them
to deal with the deluge that was coming in. So
now we have three hundred and forty thousand some odd
missing kids, actual kids brought over by coyotes or adults
or who knows. And all those people that were real
upset about the kids in cages, they don't care about

(03:18):
them kids no more. Do you see aoc down at
the border crying over anybody? Do you see her at
the detention center when people are bringing kids across the border.
Do you see her at any one of the places
in the interior of the United States of America to
where these apparently the paperwork says, these kids are apparently
being shipped to. You don't see her there pretending to cry,

(03:38):
bending over with her hand pressed up to her face
because she is in such great extreme distress emotionally. They
don't care about these kids. They don't give a rats
answer about these kids. You don't hear anybody in the
left talking about the missing kids. They don't care. Although
they pretended to care so much about the kids in
cages from Obama and then Trump into that by the way,
they pretended to care so much about that, But all

(04:00):
they don't care about these these miss what missing kids?
These missing kids?

Speaker 3 (04:03):
What?

Speaker 2 (04:05):
Now? Don't you find that incredibly ironic and also hypocritical?
And it also betrays their stated purpose of complaining because
it's not about the kids at all. They don't care
if it's there, if it's there a men, how much
you want to bet that they try to pin this
on Trump too after he takes office in January? What
about these missing kids? Trump? You're gonna hear it. I

(04:26):
guarantee you, mark my word, You're gonna hear it. They're
gonna do it like they did it by blaming him
with the kids in cages. They're gonna do the same thing.
By the way, you wouldn't have kids in cages if
you just didn't allow every Tom, Dick and Harry to
come in and oh, you got a kid, you get
to get you get to go up to the front
of the line. It's it's this is not like bringing
a can of food to your kids assembly, right, Oh,

(04:47):
if you bring a kid to the border, you'll get
fast track. They treated it like that, though, did they not.
They absolutely treated it like that. Just just unbelievable. But
it betrays their stated purpose. They don't care about it,
any of those. Have you guys heard a trans blind? No,
it is not a type of window blind. No, it's

(05:09):
a new alphabet flag. Trans blind is a transabled identity
where someone desires to physically lose sight from an eye
or from both eyes, or to a physical non blind
individual who internally feels I identifies as blind without necessarily
necessarily desiring to because oh my gosh, why I would

(05:35):
say it's reality blind? Why do people why did they
make a flag for people who can't see it?

Speaker 4 (05:44):
Doesn't make sense, doesn't.

Speaker 2 (05:46):
I mean, that's just that's the first obvious question. If
it's supposed to be trans blind, you're appropriating blindness. Why
would you make a flag that they can't see, like
y'all didn't even try to put brail up in this.
What in the world that doesn't make any sense, does it?
There was this story that I found someone had shared.

(06:08):
It's from a few years ago, speaking of transblind. This
woman identified as trans blind. And back then, and this
was in twenty fifteen, they called it body integrity identity disorder.
Now it's just transblind what other people would call crazy.
All right, you can put all these words and affix

(06:29):
it to it, b as crazy, all right. Thirty year
old woman in North Carolina. This is back in twenty fifteen.
She had wanted to be blind since she was a
little girl, so she poured drain cleaner in her eyes,
didn't get medical attention, and lost her vision. She is
now almost completely blind, and she says that this is

(06:51):
the way I was supposed to be born. And they
write in the piece, and it's Women's Health mag that
has the story. They write in the piece that she
because she wanted to be blind, and she says, it's
where I was supposed to be. They go, it's insane.
And she suffers from a condition called body integrity identity disorder,

(07:13):
and it makes people that they're supposed to be disabled,
like people who want to be paraplegic. That's a thing.
That's a real thing. And so it's trans something. So
this is trans blind. I think they call it transabled
or something or trans I don't know what they call it.
It's an actual thing. I went down the rabbit hole.

(07:35):
It's wild. So what I mean? I have no words, Kane,
I don't have many more than that. I don't have
any I don't even I can't even believe just I mean,
all they got to do. You don't have to pour
draink clean in your eyes. Can't you just close your eyes?

(07:57):
You tell me.

Speaker 4 (07:59):
They sell those pirates patches too. They see pirate patches
you can get not only for Halloween, but you can
buy them at the medical store too. Yeah, get those
eye patches.

Speaker 2 (08:08):
Get you an eye patch. It's super simple.

Speaker 4 (08:10):
And then if you ever feel like later you want
to reverse this trans blind desire, you just take the
patch off and then you're good.

Speaker 2 (08:17):
Why doesn't anyone of our cant as. You know, go,
I'm a trains billionaire, right, I identify as a billionaire.
Give me my money. You're hurting my mental health by
not giving me a billion dollars.

Speaker 4 (08:29):
Where's my FAA authorized takeoff on my private plane?

Speaker 2 (08:32):
Where's my G six? Come on? Where? I mean? You
see what I'm saying? Like they I just give me
the money or it's hurting my mental health. Why can't
I say that and make that happen? Why can't any
of you identifies it. I'm a trains billionaire. I'm saying
that now, that's official. I'm identifying as a billionaire. I

(08:53):
need my money to affirm my wealth.

Speaker 4 (08:57):
I just think you're dreaming small. I'm a trans trillionaire
and you you know, whatever you're doing, it's fine, that's
what you want to do.

Speaker 2 (09:05):
But wait, does that mean that that's a bigger identity
box than mine?

Speaker 4 (09:09):
Yeah?

Speaker 2 (09:09):
Well what's after trillionaire? Quad? Okay? Can I be that?

Speaker 4 (09:14):
You can be that if you want to. I mean,
you're only doing it because I'm a transfer.

Speaker 2 (09:18):
No, I really feel that way. I really identify like that.

Speaker 4 (09:20):
I feel like you're doing it just because I became
a trans trillionaire.

Speaker 2 (09:23):
Yeah, you just can't become it. You got to feel it.

Speaker 4 (09:25):
I feel it.

Speaker 2 (09:26):
I feel like you're appropriating.

Speaker 4 (09:27):
I feel like I'm becoming it, but I.

Speaker 2 (09:28):
Feel like you're appropriating.

Speaker 4 (09:30):
Though not sure that's how it's going down.

Speaker 2 (09:33):
I love when people say that too, when they're like,
I feel like that's just them trying to be They're
trying to soften the blow of bitchery. That's what well.
I really feel like, No, just say it. Just say it.
You don't feel like that. Obviously that's redundant because you're
saying an opinion. So you feel that way, you moron,
stop saying it. I don't really feel like shut up,

(09:56):
trans blind. Just close your eyes, put a headband on,
get one of them headbands on Amazon. Pull it over
your face. You know, it would probably be an improvement
for some of them. Just pull it over your face.
You know. There's this crazy invention that they made. I
don't know when they made it came, but it's really amazing,

(10:18):
real modern, right. I guess they don't have them where
these people come from. But it's like a pillow shaped
like sunglasses, and it has a strap on it and
you can put it on your head. Over your eyes. Yeah,
some people use it when they sleep, you know, to

(10:38):
get the I take it on red eyes. It's an
amazing invention. These people shouldn't meet it pretty no, No,
these people don't know it exists. I mean, they're willing
to pour bleach in their damn eyes for crying out loud.
They don't know it exists. Clearly. How many flags are there?
Hang on, Oh, I'm afraid to look at that.

Speaker 4 (11:00):
Just the genders is unlimited. It's flags are unlimited too, right.

Speaker 2 (11:06):
Oh, well, there's just pride flags also, that's like a
whole thing. There's like seventy two gender flags.

Speaker 4 (11:12):
Oh.

Speaker 2 (11:14):
And I know that the Department of Defense had put
out something a little bit ago where they had what
were they talking about. They were mentioned some kind of
like it was like some kind of woke flag that
they had and they put it out and I'm like,
why is the DD doing this? Like you want to
know why you have problems with recruitment and all this

(11:37):
other stuff. And they had they put out something for
what was like a transflag whatever day, I don't even know.
I don't even know, but they said that there's what
I don't know what a DEMI flux is or a
gender puck. But these are things seventy two flags. There's

(11:57):
seventy two flags. Seventy they said that are have any
two different genders?

Speaker 4 (12:01):
That's seventy more.

Speaker 2 (12:03):
I don't even think that the people who say that
they're one of these genders know with how these flags are.

Speaker 4 (12:08):
No, but there's not one person that could identify all
of them and recognize them on site. Like there's so many.

Speaker 2 (12:17):
I mean, I what is the point of it? And
then everybody wants government they want government preference. Oh, there's
mirror gender. Do you hear about this?

Speaker 3 (12:28):
What?

Speaker 2 (12:29):
So this sounds like a really bad superpower to have.
You're changing your gender type based on the people that
are surrounding you. It's like mystery men and completely lame
powers that don't serve anybody, Like the guy who can
be uh invisible, but only when no one's looking.

Speaker 4 (12:45):
It's like a gender chameleon.

Speaker 2 (12:47):
Yeah, you can change your gender type based on the
people around you.

Speaker 4 (12:52):
So if I'm next to a woman, I can identify
as a woman.

Speaker 2 (12:55):
Yeah.

Speaker 4 (12:56):
Then if I'm next to a guy, then I can
then identify as a guy.

Speaker 2 (12:59):
Yeah. I don't know about the magic that makes you
more for franken beans or not or have it? De morph?
Is that a word? Because it can be? I mean, hell,
if they can create a flag, I can make up words.
Why not everyone's Lewis Carroll today. I don't understand some
of this stuff. Some of it I don't know. It's

(13:20):
this is so what's going to happen in like the
future when you know people look back, Like when we
look back on people in the in the dark ages,
what are they going to think when they look back
on us? These people couldn't even figure out their genders.
Look out their flags, got all their flags, like everybody
has to have a flag. You could not tell me
all the people who advocate this, they could not tell

(13:40):
me what all these flags stand for? Seventy two different ones.
This is dumb.

Speaker 4 (13:46):
And now all of the news you would probably miss.
It's time for Dana's Quick five.

Speaker 2 (13:52):
So, as I said earlier, Zuckerberg gave it a million
dollars to Trump's inaugural fund. And so now have Sergey
Brinn and who else did the AI CEO. They've all
all that's like three million dollars that they've been able
to bag for the inaugural fund. So super interesting. Ontario
is threatened to cut off US energy exports if Trump

(14:13):
makes good on his tariff plan. This coming in from MSN,
The air most populous province has no plans to allow.
They don't. They're obviously opposing the tariffs that he's promoting
on Canadian goods if they don't help get the illegal
immigration stuff under wraps. The Ontario Premier doug Ford said

(14:36):
his province was putting together a list of retaliatory measures
and will go so far as to cut off energy
exports if the TOTUS elect slapped Canadian products or the
twenty five percent tax as promised. You know, one of
the things in the tariff discussion that everyone misses is
why is every other country allowed to issue tariffs on
our stuff but we're not. And then they accused us

(14:56):
of not having to free market if we put the
same amount restrictions or tariffs on products that they do.
That doesn't make any sense to me. I don't understand
why that's allowed to like flourish as a narrative. People, Oh,
this is wild. A power outage stranded New York City
subway riders during a storm. They'd go out and relieve
themselves between the train cars. That's so gross. I mean

(15:20):
told you it smelled like pea and eggs down there.
The replic of the famous Christmas story leg lamp was
stolen from a Walmart store. Well, how much is it?
I'm curious. It's fragilele but it was made of well
his was made of glass, but the ones you get
are plastic. But they said that the window of a
plumbing store they had their leg lamp up and it

(15:43):
was stolen, and they said, it's like the fourth of
July and to glorious if you want to return it
to them. Why do you think Democrats lost?

Speaker 5 (15:52):
And what do you think needs to happen by the
midterms and the next presidential election and in order to
find your footing again.

Speaker 6 (16:00):
Well, Kristin no disrespect to you, I think you do
great work. But the reality is that those that tune
in too are traditional news sources. They absolutely went for us,
and we know that the standards that you have to
live by as an actual genalist are completely different from
other platforms, and so we know that we were winning

(16:20):
for those that were tuning into the traditional news sources.
But when it came down to people getting their news
from places that really aren't even news sources. They were
going for Donald Trump by nineteen points, and that is
exactly why we lost. The reality is that we're going
to have to play in spaces that we've never had
to play and make sure that we're communicating in all ways. Unfortunately,
we can't just rely on the mainstream media to get

(16:42):
our message across.

Speaker 2 (16:44):
Well, I think she's a little late to the game,
because win of Democrats ever really totally relied on mainstream
media to get their message across. I mean, who do
you think controls Hollywood? Who controls Hollywood? Who controls academia?
This idea that it's just the media that is responsible
for them so that people are getting there they can't
rely on the mainstream media. That's the stupidest thing I've

(17:04):
ever heard of. She's an example of a person who
just thinks that politics began the day that she was
made self aware, which is probably a couple of years ago.
Let's be real, right, it's one of the dumbest things ever.
That's really stupid. Analysis that like ignores everything that media, all,
everything that the left has been involved in, right, So
it ignores the entire system and bureaucracy of academia. It

(17:30):
ignores the music industry, Kane, It ignores Hollywood arts and entertainment,
film art, all of it fashion. So this idea that well,
you know, we loss because we got to play in
space that we never had a play in before. What
are you talking about? You mean you actually have to
go and talk to the people. Notice that wasn't one

(17:50):
of the things on our lips. You got to go
and talk to the people. That's just stupid. She is
not the brightest bulb in their box. She really isn't
listening to this. And I thought, my gosh, they're going
to keep losing because they have no idea why, they
have no idea why they lost. That's just And she
says that, I guess what, you know these places that

(18:14):
they're not even news sources and and they're not even
new sources. What defines the new source? If you get
news from something, is that a source from which you
got your news? Who defines new source? Because I know
Democrats have been wanting to define have been wanting to

(18:36):
define new sources as goodness, that which validates their narrative.
They've been wanting to do that for a long time.
So is that really this is it's just wanting to
control media. It's wanting to control where the information comes from.
That's all it is. It's wanting to control how people

(18:58):
share information, what they share, how often they share it,
et cetera. I just thought that was a really dumb SoundBite,
wasn't She didn't We just have a SoundBite from her
the other day where she was going off on the
Daniel Penny stuff. Yeah, that's right, okay, Yeah, not the
brightest bulb on the Christmas tree. That one definitely not

(19:21):
now going on from that as it pertains to media,
et cetera. I wanted to touch on this because we
missed it yesterday. Caitlin Clark audio sound bite twenty two.
She's doubled down. So Caitlyn Clark came out and said
that she felt like it was white privilege that she

(19:42):
ended up. She was saying that she somehow was the
beneficiary of white privilege, and she doubled down on it
in this SoundBite. Listen, I think we have it, Okay.

Speaker 7 (19:57):
I always have had really good perspective on everything that's
kind of happened in my life, whether that's been good,
whether that's been bad. And then obviously coming to the WNBA.
Like I've said, I feel like I've earned every single
thing that's happened to me over the course of my career.
But also I grew up a fan of this league
from a very young age, Like my favorite player was
Maya More, Like I know what this league was about,
and like I said, like it's only been around twenty

(20:18):
five plus years, so I know there's been so many
amazing black women that have been in this league. And
continuing to uplift them, I think is very important and
that's something I'm very aware of. And like I said,
like I try to just be real and authentic and
you know, share my truth. And I think that's very
easy for me. Like I'm very comfortable in my own skin,
and that's kind of been how it is my entire life.

Speaker 2 (20:40):
Yes, So, she says that she's admits feeling privilege as
a white person and says that the WNBA was built
on black players. No, it wasn't. The WNBA was the
welfare recipient of the NBA. Nobody gave her about women's basketball.

(21:01):
Women don't even give a rats ass about women's basketball.
The WNBA was subsidized by the NBA. It is the
welfare recipient of the NBA. NBA players and NBA viewers
and NBA game attendees built the WNBA. Let's not pretend
like these women who are in the WNBA built it.

(21:23):
They can barely keep what was given to them. And
then when they get someone who gets the eyeballs, they
trash her and drag her down because they are a
bunch of jealous bitches. That's the reality of it. And
then they want to play victimhood and act as though
everything's a racial hustle when it's not. She is one.
What is her privilege exactly? And I know a lot

(21:45):
of people are slamming her, and I just think that
she is navigating something that no one has ever had
to go through before. And that's part of what my point.
How in the hell does she have white privilege when
she is like one of us, she's a minority player
in the WNBA. How in the hell does she have
white privilege? They have been racist bitches to her since

(22:06):
she got there. They have targeted her, they have smeared her,
they have acted like she has is less than and
to her credit, she's ignored it up until now. I
mean she's ignored it up until you know this point.
So I don't know how she's considered privileged. She works

(22:29):
hard and she has talent, but how is that a privilege?
She works hard with her talent. I mean, this is
it's goofy. She she gets Athlete of the Year and
then she has to apologize. I feel as though she's
she's because she had said she said quote, I want

(22:50):
to say that I've earned every single thing, but as
a white person, there is a privilege. I disagree with us.
And she says, she said, to a lot of those
players in the league that have been really good and
black players, this league has kind of been built on them.
Blah blah, blah blah. Again, someone who is one of
she's a minority player in the WNBA on her team,
and she has to admit to some kind of privilege.

(23:13):
They can't just credit her talent. Like Time Magazine, they
said Clark is cognizant of the racial underpinnings of her stardom.
She says, I want to say the quote that I
gave you, but the fact that she says that, oh yes,
the racial underpinnings Time Magazine and writing about her, the
racial underpinnings of her stardom the racial underpinnings of the WNBA.

(23:37):
Nobody watches it. She's I don't know, she just is
like a beaten dog. But at the same time, she's
never had to navigate nobody's ever had to navigate anything
like this in the WNBA or in anything like this
a female. Nobody's this is kind of new, it's very new.

(24:01):
But she's allowing herself to be bullied at this point.
And there are players of a different race that did
not generate the eyeballs that she generated. They did not
generate the interest for the league that she generated, and
they feel like they and they're trying to other her.
They're trying to say that the only reason that she's
talented is because of some sort of privilege. Being white

(24:24):
doesn't make her play better. Practicing hard and working hard does.
And she has a natural born talent that is entirely
unrelated to her skin color. She just happens to be
a white girl. But no one can credit her talent
because no one wants to admit that she just might
be a better player than Angel Rees, or she just

(24:45):
might be a better player than some of the other
women on the teams in WNBA. They can't say that,
so they have to discredit her talent by saying, oh, well,
white privilege. The hell does white privilege have to do
with being naturally talented at basketball? I suck at basketball.
Love basketball, love watching it, love watching it, and I

(25:06):
always wanted to play it. But I'm not very good? Kane?
Where's my white privilege? I was told that I would
have privilege. Look as badly as I wanted to be
on my school's basketball team, and I never made it.
I was varsity everything I did, but basketball. For some reason,

(25:27):
I have no idea. Why doesn't make sense? I did
eighteen years of classical ballet and then I was varsity
everything I did from freshman on basketball, could not do it.
No idea. Why where's my white privilege? For that right
I wanted it? Isn't that how it works? If you're
white and you want it, don't you automatically get it? Kane?
How does the white privilege work? Isn't that how it works?
You're only you're you're white? Agast fifty So I don't know.

Speaker 4 (25:51):
Yeah, I get a fifty card.

Speaker 2 (25:53):
Yeah, the other fifty percent of you? What privileges have
you gotten?

Speaker 4 (25:59):
Gosh, I don't know.

Speaker 2 (26:02):
You haven't gotten any privileges, not that I know of.
But wait a minute, I'm told that if you're white,
you get all these special things.

Speaker 4 (26:09):
Yeah, I don't. They only see the non white half
of me, apparently.

Speaker 2 (26:14):
Does it? Did you you played football? Right?

Speaker 4 (26:17):
Yeah?

Speaker 2 (26:17):
Were you a better football player because you were white?
Half white?

Speaker 4 (26:21):
Uh? No, I don't.

Speaker 2 (26:24):
It didn't give you any kind of like special superpower. No,
I mean I always thought that you played worse. I
remember the Woody Harrelson movie white Man Cam Jomp. That
was huge when I was a kid, and I remember
looking at that title thinking, I wonder if they can't
ye Hollywood just saying it's true. Do you feel bad
for her, Caylen Clark?

Speaker 4 (26:48):
Do I feel bad for what she's had to go
through and all of that?

Speaker 2 (26:51):
You feel like she's like been browbeating None of those.

Speaker 4 (26:53):
I think so. I think so. She just she literally
just wants to play basketball. She just wants to get
along with everybody. She just wants to have fun, and
everyone else is thrusting her in these directions and making
her do these things. It just doesn't seem just like
anybody who doesn't do anything that comes naturally to them,

(27:13):
It doesn't look right, and it doesn't feel right.

Speaker 2 (27:16):
Loreene says that she feels like she's saying this to
make the other girls on the team feel better, probably.

Speaker 4 (27:20):
Because she wants to get along with them.

Speaker 2 (27:22):
She wants how lame are the chicks in this league? Well,
if you have to have this woman like lie prostrate
in front of the media to make you feel better,
I'm gonna say something mean should I say? I've already
said it once? But these women are they.

Speaker 4 (27:41):
Are I read lips. I didn't know it's a lip
reader to just know?

Speaker 2 (27:45):
Is that white privilege? You would have been able to
hear the voice in your head had even full I'm
just saying that's how it works, right.

Speaker 3 (27:54):
I.

Speaker 2 (27:56):
Loreene says that she's always looked up her teammates, always
been very humble. She's always like she's tried to ignore this,
but that's sort of notice and this is how it is.
And it doesn't matter if it's Kaitlin Clark or whoever.
This is why I'm like, never been in need of
the rage mob because they don't care. She's never gonna
be forgiven. She is their original sin of being born white.

(28:20):
I mean, that's how all of her critics and all
these people around WNBA are acting like, maybe if you
bitches could play basketball a little bit better, then maybe
she wouldn't be getting all the attention. Maybe if you
all were half as talented as she was, then maybe, oh,
I don't know, maybe you would get more advertising dollars,
maybe you would get more sponsorships yourself. Instead of hating
on her, all you women need to be thanking her

(28:41):
for keeping eyes on the WNBA, which has been nothing
more than a glorified welfare recipient of the NBA. And
you all know it's true, bitches, you know it's true.
I'm so tired of this stuff. There are a bunch
of bullies, grown middle aged women being bullies, women who
are in their thirties being bullies. At some point, you

(29:04):
need to grow up, you do. Dana's people are gonna
be like Dana yours. I don't like your language. I
am not Dora the Explorer. Okay, you're not sitting in church,
and this ain't PBS. I do feel bad for her
because she's never had to navigate this, and I think
that people who are trying to jump all over her

(29:25):
need to slow their role a little bit. I mean,
I think the people who need most of the ire
are the coaches and the league and her teammates. Those
are the people that you need to be sharp with
because I think she's just trying to navigate and deal
with it, and she didn't come out and I think she,
I mean, she seemed very hesitant when she was saying
the stuff that she said. But if she thinks though

(29:49):
that this kind of thing is gonna make it to
where they accept her and they celebrate her and they
stop giving her grief, no, in fact, it's gonna double
because if they see a bleed, then they're gonna come
for more. That's how it works.

Speaker 4 (30:04):
Like sands through the au Glans, so are the days
of the United States.

Speaker 8 (30:10):
So I hope that you all feel that sense of
you know, peace and light and that just for a
moment when you leave here today, that you feel, I
don't know, a little a sense of joy because I think.

Speaker 9 (30:24):
We all need like this, you know, we all need
to feel joy now during this time of the season,
during just during this time. So anyway, okay, now I'll start.

Speaker 2 (30:38):
You're all reading into that. So they were saying, oh,
you sound like Halla, and she's like, you all are
reading into it. She sounded exasperated. There. I was on
with Jessie Waters this week earlier this week and he
asked me. It was kind of an aside, but he
had brought up how Joe isn't like really looking at

(30:59):
Kamala when they go and they do these events, like
he's not looking at her and they're not they don't
have any kind of interaction anything like that. And he
had said, how did he ask me something to the
effect of, well, is it overblown because you know Joe
is old? And I said, well, no, because look at Jill.

(31:20):
So their dynamic is especially right now. And it used
to not always be like this when they were first
married and even during I mean ten years ago, he
was really aggressive in Jackwagon and now she's the aggressive
one because he's you know, declining, and so she sets
the tone. So you can watch them their dynamic is

(31:42):
she sets the tone. And if you want to know
where they stand on someone, watch how she acts. She's
the wife, and if the wife doesn't like someone, if
they don't like anybody, you're gonna know, You're gonna know,
and she makes it known. How many different videos have
there been, I've seen at least five two of them
were at the same event, but where she Kamala Harris

(32:05):
was like looking at her and smiling, and Jill Biden
Jaws does not even acknowledge her. After he's out of office.
After Trump is in office, I think you're gonna hear
about some stuff, and I think it's gonna get real, Petty,
I really do stick with us. We have a whole
other hour on the way next do you pay.

Speaker 5 (32:24):
I'm gonna phrase it slightly differently, and you guys can
tell me if I'm completely wrong in saying it this way.
You know, later in the night we're also going to
talk about Penny and the verdict. There there you also
have a victim who somebody determined did not deserve to
continue living. No, no, no, yeah, tell me, tell me,
tell me which vigilante action is?

Speaker 2 (32:46):
Okay, what do you mean vigilante action? So someone's not
allowed to defend themselves. So, no, it was Jordan Neely
who decided that Daniel Penny and everyone else on that
set in the subway at the time, that they could
not just exist peacefully. He was in their faces, threatening them.
Why do these people assist in the violence of these

(33:07):
these absolute thugs? So I don't know who this broad
is on CNN, and I don't care to learn her
name because her opinions are so stupid. She's not going
to last long in this industry, so it doesn't matter
that we know her name or even note the spelling
of it. She's just another stupid opinion that is, you know,
platformed by CNN. That being said, the idea that that

(33:31):
something was done to him, as opposed to he was
doing things to other people that they did not deserve,
that made them feel unsafe and was frankly dangerous, and
so they were defended. Why why do people admit that?
I find that disgusting. You're a racist if you're omitting that.
When I when I hear people talk about this story,

(33:51):
the first thing I do is when I hear that,
they completely omit Jordan Neely's criminal actions, his violent record,
the fact that he was you know, threatening to kill
people including mothers and children on the subway platform. I
can't take those people seriously anymore. There's not a conversation
worth happening. Those people think that women can get raped

(34:13):
and get assaulted, and their children can get attempt you know,
kidnapped and everything else, and that none of those people
can do anything to stop it, because if they do,
they're infringing on the right of the criminal to take
advantage of them. That's what this is, I guess. You know,
some of these progressives think that if depending on what
your skin color is, you have a right to hurt

(34:33):
other people. That's the God's honest truth of it. That's fact.
They honestly believe this. They think that they are that
they in order to settle the score, some people got
to be hurt, so they believe. I'd say, you know,
prove me wrong, but you'd waste your time because there's
there's no I'm right, it's the truth of it. I

(34:54):
just I just can't believe that. You know, oh he
we had another he wasn't a victim. He was victimizing
other people, but he wasn't a victim. That's like blaming
you know, all your skirt's too short or something like that.
It's just just asinine. The hell is wrong with these people?
What the hell is wrong with some of these people
on the left. Seriously, I don't want to ever hear

(35:14):
those people complain if they are put in a position
where they have to defend themselves because they're trying to
criminalize defense and say that if depending on the person's ethnicity,
you can't defend yourself, because that's racist. Now, defending yourself
from attack is racist. If you're a woman trying to
shield your baby in a stroller from a guy screaming

(35:35):
that he's going to kill you, it's racist. If you
defend yourself or someone else defends you, why don't you
try that with your family? I dare say none of
these people who take that position would like it if
they found themselves a victim of Jordan Eely. And apparently
there were a lot of them, forty two arrests in
eight years. He battered old people, He broke bones and

(35:58):
faces of elderly people. He tried to kill a woman
by shoving her on the subway tracks. He'd tried to
kidnap a seven year old. Oh, these were arrests. Absolutely,
there's a record for him. His family was nowhere to
be found until they smelled money. It's just some of
the just a horrible, horrible take from these people. And

(36:22):
then you have we were talking about we played this
last hour audio some bite seven. But Taylor Lorenz when
she was Taylor Lorenz's, isn't she She's like some fifty
year old who pretended that she was thirty, So it
seemed less ridiculous if she wrote about Taylor Swift and

(36:43):
she's she got fired from vox or something like that.
No one can. I don't know what her appeal is
other than she's a good avatar for the stupidity on
the left, and it makes for you know, content that
you can work around. But there were enough people on
the left that said that they enjoyed, or that they celebrated,

(37:08):
or that they felt joy over watching the CEO be
gunned down in the middle of the street. Listen to this,
I'll do somebody seven.

Speaker 10 (37:19):
I think that's why I felt, along with so many
other Americans joy Unfortunately, you know, because seriously, I mean.

Speaker 4 (37:29):
Execution.

Speaker 10 (37:30):
Maybe not joy, but certainly not no certainly not empathy,
because again.

Speaker 4 (37:36):
How can this make you joyful? This guy's a husband,
a father's down in the middle of Manhattan. Why did
that make you joy?

Speaker 10 (37:45):
Americans that be murdered, So are tens So are the
tens of thousands of Americans, innocent Americans who died because
greedy health insurance executives like this one push policies of denying.

Speaker 2 (37:58):
She's like somebody who read one missive one essay about
health insurance in college, and now she thinks she's an expert.
What is she even talking about? So because she doesn't
like the way health insurance works. And by the way,
health insurance is that way, because you stupid morons, the
Taylortle runs is of the world. Make it that way.
We could have it be portable, We could have it

(38:20):
to where you could make insurance companies compete, and you
could purchase across state lines, et cetera, et cetera, carry
it with you wherever. But you know who fought against that.
Democrats did. Democrats fought against it. They were the ones
who barred that. That was Republicans that were trying to
make that happen. Before Obamacare was passed, they had like

(38:43):
thirteen other proposals. For all the people who get out
there and say Republicans had no proposals to Obamacare, those
people who say that aren't educated enough to be included
in this big kid conversation. The people who say that
didn't pay attention enough to their own government, and so
they need to stay out of this conversation and let
people who do know what happened actually continue on the

(39:05):
merits of fact, because there were thirteen alternatives to Obamacare,
and every single one of them were shot down by
Democrats who controlled everything, and numerous proposals included the portability,
you know, keeping it untethered from your work. It's asinin
that your job provides you with it has to provide
you with your health insurance. It's the dumbest thing I've
ever heard of. You should be able to get it

(39:27):
for yourself. It should be affordable, and you should be
able to use it like you do car insurance or something.
One of the other reason is people use insurance wrong.
That drives up the cost too. The dumb tailor Lorensas
of the world fifty years old, and you act like
a fifteen year old bimbo. I don't get it, Like
what the hell's wrong with you? Like arrested development that one. Oh,

(39:49):
I don't feel bad. Make sure you quote me accurately
media matters, and then please make note that I don't
have enough middle fingers to give you salutes. The George
Soros lotion boys. Anyway, it's true. Let's be real. This
joy that you feel you created the situation. He's just
running one of the companies and you created the regulations

(40:13):
in which he has to operate. You created the framework
he has to operate in that framework. Why are they mad.
They're mad because of what they created. They're mad because
they don't like the conditions of insurance. They're mad because
they made it a healthscape just so dumb and Obamacare's trash.

(40:40):
It absolutely is trash. But that's what you know. And
the other difference he came noted this. To even compare
the healthcare CEO to Jordan Eely is one of the
dumbest things I've ever seen. The CEO had no idea
what was happening. He was walking in the different direction
and this cowardly trust fund socialists came up behind him

(41:02):
and shot him. Jordan Neely was threatening to murder people
in their faces after he's already tried to murder people.
So this is just not even so, this is so goofy,
But they feel joy. They feel joy. I bet she

(41:25):
would have felt joy. I bet if they watched if
there had been footage of Jordan Neely threatening to kill
people and getting in the faces of these of these women,
scaring the babies that were on the subway train, on
the subway car. I bet that the Taylor Lorenzs of
the world would have felt joy at that too. Wouldn't
they have because they're psychos? Would they have felt joy

(41:45):
watching a mother try to shield her child as Jordan
Neely was screaming about how he was going to kill
them all? Does that get them off? Makes me wonder?
These people are that messed up? How messed up are
you that you that you actually have that enthusiasm over
that kind of stuff? These people have a screw loose.
And I'm not talking about the Jordan Neelies. I'm talking

(42:06):
about like the CNN lady and this bra that we
just played on Piers Morgan's whatever. What the hell is
the matter with you? You soul is Cretans. You all
need Jesus in a Bible for Christmas. That's what you
all need. Good night. It's just there's not It's just aggravate.
It actually makes me enraged. It makes me enraged. Meanwhile,

(42:31):
Daniel Penny and his lawyers were interviewed by The New
York Post audio some by five. They were celebrating his
not guilty verdict, And you know what, it was weird
because I was watching all the video footage of this
where they were. I guess they stop at a bar
and had a celebratory pint. And he still is very
and I'm gonna use the word correctly, gen z demure,
And he's just very polite and he doesn't really talk

(42:53):
a lot, and he says hi, and then he walks
away and his lawyer talks for you know, and most
of the stuff that I've seen, watch this. This is
audio some by five.

Speaker 3 (43:00):
How are you failing?

Speaker 4 (43:01):
Yeah, he's failing good. He's failing good. He's sting good.
What's up? Cot together? How's it going?

Speaker 9 (43:10):
Haws?

Speaker 4 (43:10):
It feel feels great. He's finally got the justice he deserved.
Did you think it was going to happen?

Speaker 2 (43:17):
Sorry, good for him.

Speaker 4 (43:20):
No, we think that.

Speaker 2 (43:23):
Any of this. He seems like a very reluctant hero too.
And you know, you had those BLM people who were
screaming about him, uh not being safe in the city.
You know. One of the things that people don't don't
remember is that when you the jury was made up
of predominantly women, and it was black and white, and

(43:52):
every single one of the jurors voted to acquit him.
So all the people who weren't there in that courtroom
and the people who weren't there around for me this
entire time. Maybe they should, you know, shut up about that,
because these people were, they saw everything, and good for him.
He just kind of I don't think that you're going
to see him. I know he's talking to Jennie Piro,

(44:13):
but I don't think you're going to like see or
hear him. I don't think he's going to pop up
like on the lecture circuit or anything like that. He
seems like a very reluctant kind of hero, doesn't he
and not at all how the left needs him to
be in order to make their narratives work. Shame on them.

Speaker 4 (44:32):
And now all of the news you would probably miss
it's time for Dana's Quick five.

Speaker 2 (44:38):
So The Guardian, which is a left leaning pos over
in Britain, says that the college enrollment rate is falling
at a concerning or. The college enrollment levels dropping at
a concerning rate. Fewer eighteen year olds are enrolling, especially
at for your schools, but the number of applications continues
to grow. I think there needs to be a working

(45:00):
of the college system entirely. I think it's absolutely stupid.
It's a racket. I think that they try to charge
you thousands of dollars to take stupid, idiotic humanities classes
that do nothing to enrich one's mind, further one's education,
or have anything to do with their major at all whatsoever.
And I think that if any college receives any kind
of federal money and they require these students to take

(45:22):
these stupid courses as part of their what their degree coursework,
they should be penalized personally. I mean, honestly, it's really
as stupid. The way we run higher education is one
of the dumbest aspects of this country. It really is.
And thanks Left, thanks for doing that, Thanks for consolidating
all of the tuition and the loans and driving up
costs for everybody. Tokyo adopts a four day work week

(45:44):
because they're desperate that women have more kids. They do
have a huge issue over there as it relates to
their well, they're population size. Their population growth has been
super slow. They said, They're fertility rate plummeted to a

(46:05):
record low of one point two in twenty twenty three,
super low fertility rates. So they're implementing a four day
work week for their employees beginning next year, offering them
three day weekends and family friendly options, and they said
that they have to do it to support families. Also,
you know, it's a cultural thing and an economic thing.

(46:29):
If you could have more families live comfortably on one income,
you would probably see more. If you had lower taxation
and less government spending, you would probably see more able
to make that choice. And I think that not just
here in the United States, but I think that that
goes for any any country, any anybody, because it's this
is something that's affecting everybody around the world. Who here

(46:52):
they go here they're set up the narrative telegraph, another
left linking pos in Britain. America's economy risks massive trunk slump.
They're setting Trump up to I told you this is
going to happen. We Bill told you, Cana and I
told you. We talked about this. Kane. What for weeks
they're going to do this? They said, here's the first sentence.
Donald Trump risks tipping the US into recession if he

(47:14):
follows through the promises made on the campaign trail. So Republicans,
here's why DOGE is going to have and we'll talk
more about this. Here's why DOGE is going to have
its work cut out for them. If even if they
were to suggest all of these cuts to Congress, Congress
still has to vote to implement them. That's number one.
Number two, you see these headlines, that's just the start
of it. If you have Republicans actually commit to austerity

(47:39):
and reduce government spending and lower taxes, they are going
to hammer the GOP with headlines like these. Absolutely, they're
going to hammer them with these headlines because and look
what happened in Greece when they just try to implement austerity.
People were riding in the streets. So just saying that's
something to think about this And some study says regularly

(48:02):
posting on social media may worse and mental health and adults. Oh,
I completely agree that. I completely agree with that. In fact,
there's most adults I think on social media not ask
to everybody else. I think that they live up to
this headline. Hype stick with us, Welcome back to the program.
Dana Lash year with you at the bottom of the
second hour. And of course you can watch US coast

(48:23):
to coast. You can listen terrestrially. You can check US
out channel through forty seven Direct TV, also on x Rumble,
where the chat happens YouTube. Uh so we're everywhere. We're
all over the place, every state. So one of the
things we were talking about was this first hour, No
first segment of this hour, right yeah. Earlier was this

(48:44):
time magazine cover of a Potus elect and how it
seemed to be to me this reluctant sort of acceptance
of the inevitable that because it was an oddly somewhat
respectable cover that they gave to a Republican And I'm thinking, oh,
my gosh, don't get excited, though everybody wants to, don't

(49:05):
get excited about that, because it's the trash media. I mean,
there are a bunch of jackwagons. It's the trash media.
And I was thinking about this in context stuff right media,
left media, how we got to this point. And I
read this really good piece the other day from a
friend of mine, Mark Judge. We're going to have a
one in a minute, but it's called the Coming Conservative
Media Collapse, and I thought, ooh, that's a very intentionally

(49:27):
provocative title. Let's dive into this. And he's right. He
gets into the conservative media structure, which definitely now has
a formula, and how they've got to find something else
kin to focus on. They need to get back to
art and culture and all of these other issues because
people are tired of politics. I mean even all of

(49:50):
you out there in radio land. One of the things
that we know when we go and survey all of
our hundreds of affiliates across the country, people get tired
of it. They get tired of politics. So you got
to shift. But that is not what That's not the
incentive on which conservative media is built on, not right now,
not anymore. So what are we going to do? My
friend Mark Judge joins me, and he is an author

(50:10):
and also became infamous, famous or infamous during the Brett
Kavanaugh confirmation here and I almost said trial because it
was like a trial where they were trying to assassinate
him in the court of public opinion, and they dragged
all of Brett Kavanall's friends in it. Every friend that
the man ever had, they dragged through the mud, including

(50:31):
Mark Judge, who joins me now on Skype. Mark, it's
so good to be with you. There's a couple of
things that I want to talk with you about, but
starting with this, you are I think spot on with
your observance of the new conservative media structure. And I
would even go so far as to say there's even
less investigative work because we're so used to playing defensively

(50:54):
that I think we forgot how to do almost anything else.
I kind of wanted to get your thoughts on this.

Speaker 3 (50:59):
Yeah. Absolutely, And if you remember when we were younger,
in like the nineteen eighties Stana, there was a whole
infrastructure in a community that used to support and bolster
and hold up up and coming artists in bands, in
the fine arts and movies, you know, Martin Scorsese. There
were little rock clubs like the nine thirty club in
DC where I lived, where you go to see bands

(51:20):
like Ram who are up and coming. And the point
is there were there was support for these artists and
even though they were on a smaller scale back then.
And I don't think conservatism has made similar investments. And
post election, we find ourselves with people sick of politics
and saying, hey, I think I'm going to go see
a movie. Who are the cool new bands? Now? I

(51:41):
think I'll go to a jazz club. And that ecosystem
is still largely controlled by the left. And I can
give specific examples of projects that if funded for a
small amount would really get a lot of bang, but
we just haven't worked that muscle. And I should add
you know, I'm not really blaming too much because conservatives

(52:04):
were defending against communism and socialism and wokeness, so that
was a full time job. But we really need to
start putting our money in culture more because I think,
as Andrew breitbartner, that has a much longer term effect.

Speaker 2 (52:18):
Oh, I completely agree. And that's one of the things
that the right has always been kind of bad at.
They do tons of white papers and think tanks and
all this other stuff. Nobody cares about that. Nobody cares
about those things anymore. It shifts. I wanted to share
this graph that this paragraph that you wrote in your
piece that's of a Chronicles magazine. You wrote, yet, what
to Do when the Dog Catches the Car, because you're
talking about all of the conservative outlets that have covered

(52:40):
all of this stuff, and this was good effort and
it was for a good mission you write, Yet, what
to Do when the Dog Catches the Car. The second
era of Trump has ushered in New Times, as actress
and fellow gen x are Justine Bateman has noted, it's
like a fog has lifted artists feel a sense of
freedom that's escaped them for years. You noted a few
years ago the music critic for Washington Post, Chris Richards,
announced that White and Not cover songs by a black artist.

(53:01):
That sentiment now seems preposterous. Is like some of the rebels.
Spirit of the eighties is back. Something I think Bateman
was sensing too. People are turning away from the screaming
matches and back to culture. Even someone as conservative and
interested in politics as I am can't watch any more
shouting pundits on TV. It's over. So what's next?

Speaker 3 (53:24):
Well, I'll give you a very specific example. After the
Kavanaugh nightmare, I wrote a book called The Devil's Triangle.
You graciously gave me a blurb. I was radioactive at
that time, and you said you'd give me a blurb.
So I appreciate you so much for that. And as
egocentric as it might sound, let me just quickly say,
this is a tremendous book about this nightmare.

Speaker 5 (53:46):
I live.

Speaker 2 (53:47):
Great book.

Speaker 3 (53:47):
And yeah, and after and right after all this happened,
I got contacted by a Hollywood actor, a well known
actor I will not say his name, and he said, well,
how many authors have there been to turn this into
a film, and I said none, and he literally went
and he said, you know here, we have a psychological thriller.
This is not a black and white conservative come to

(54:08):
Jesus' story. It's a story about a flawed protagonist who
comes up against the American stose and there is evil.
And he said, this is all the President's meant are
the parallax view with a little Caddyshack thrown in. And
he said, had you lied about your friend and thrown
him under the bus, there wouldn't be one movie made
about you, there'd be three. And so for the past

(54:29):
six months we've produced a treatment. We have a treatment
of a film based on this book. And again I
don't mean to sound like it's about me, because it's not.
It's about the other people involved. And we have people
in Hollywood reading this thing saying, Okay, the election's over.
This could be a great film, not a satirical film,
not a very broad Christian film, although I'm a Christian
a love those kind of films. This could be a

(54:52):
taxi driver or you know, a film like that. And
the actor said to me, ten million dollars two nights
on Netflix. He's been in movies with Johnny Deppies knows
what he's talking about. So I'm we're sitting here thinking, Okay,
the election's over. This treatment is floating around Hollywood. The
budget is loose change for Netflix, and it's a great story.

(55:14):
Why won't someone make this movie? And I think I'm
one of many, many people with similar stories.

Speaker 2 (55:20):
Do you think it's because Hollywood is terrified? They don't know.
I think maybe for two reasons. They're worried about the
backlash from the far left that's sort of their base.
But also they are so unfamiliar with not just so
much conservatism, but that individualist like ethos, that they don't
even know how to approach the material.

Speaker 3 (55:41):
They don't and I'll quickly tell you they're terrified of
the material because since my book came out, I've written
several articles about this in chronicles and the Washington Examiner
and elsewhere. Dana Marty Baron, former editor of the Washington Post,
wrote a memoir talking about me. NPR interviewed Christine Blosiford
on air and reviewed her book. And I'm on social

(56:02):
media calling these cowards out and saying, why won't you
give me equal time. What. You're a journalist who edited
the Washington Post for twenty years. You talk about me
in your book. I point to the mistakes you made,
and you're too much of a coward to respond to me.
So my point being is that if they're afraid, then
Hollywood's really going to be afraid because they don't want

(56:23):
to open this thing and say, oh, Christy Bozi Ford,
these other people were extorting Mark Judge using honey traps
and witness tampering, and he reveals all this in his book,
The Devil's Triangle. There ain't no way we can make
a movie about that. There's no way. And even if
I said, you know, be sympathetic to people, I don't
want to villainize anybody other than the politicians and the media.

(56:44):
The kids I went to school with in the eighties,
I don't want them to evenize. But they are too
chicken s to face me on social media much less
than Hollywood. They're cowards. That's what it is.

Speaker 2 (56:56):
Yeah, I completely we're talking with our friend Mark Judge,
author of Devil's Triangle, and also he was dragged through
the mud and unwillingly made infamous during the Kavanaugh confirmation
hearings you in this piece, and I'm gonna switch to
the HEGs stuff here in a moment, but I think
you just really hit the nail on the head in
a very classy way because you say that conservatives are

(57:17):
still badly outgunned by the left. We I get this sense.
And I was talking with a friend of mine who
is like an associate editor at one of these conservative websites,
and they were saying, Oh, no, we're conservatives are really
doing well, you know with X now elon musket X,
and you know, we're really balancing it all out. And
I'm like, in what way? Like maybe in the news,
but where in the culture are you balancing it out?

(57:38):
And you touch on that you said that the donor
class never had any desire to put resources to work
so we could compete in that manner, and that you
said that you know, it's not just you know, being
snarky Twitter gorillas and all of this stuff and focusing
on stuff that Alec Baldwin says, but to penetrate the
entertainment industry with deeper and more in depth coverage and
to create our own stuff. Is there anyone out there

(58:00):
beside yourself that you think is really that needs, you know, attention,
ory that you could point to and say like this,
or like this or like this.

Speaker 3 (58:08):
I feel like one hundred percent. A friend of mine
named Paul Rowland. He is a writer for a conservative website.
This is a perfect example. He made a movie called Exemple.
It's a black and white film about a priest who
breaks bad. It's like breaking bad with a priest. And
I'm Catholic. It's an awesome movie. I came across this
thing last year. It's a great movie, Dana. The budget

(58:28):
was ten thousand dollars.

Speaker 2 (58:32):
For ten thousand dollars, that's crazy.

Speaker 3 (58:34):
It's called example. You can watch it for free. And
this is a perfect example. And I contacted this guy
and I said, why are and he writes for conservative website.
He's Catholic. I said, why are conservatives propping you up
and throwing money at you?

Speaker 2 (58:46):
Dude?

Speaker 3 (58:47):
You wrote, produce, directed, and acted in this great movie.
And he said, Mark, I'm getting nothing. So I wrote
about him. I interviewed him several times. I reviewed his movie,
and my review was out there on social media and everything.
And to this day he and I talk and I
don't want to put words in his mouth, but I
keep saying, why aren't people throwing money at you?

Speaker 2 (59:07):
Dude?

Speaker 3 (59:07):
You made this you know it costs ten thousand dollars
in His rating is a one hundred percent of rotten.
To manage whist. Guy's a lifted, young conservative leaning filmmaker
made this great film about a priest, a morality and
Solzenatsen and all this cool stuff, and he can't get arrested.
So go to exampleoman and look him up. I don't
have any stake in his movie, but he is the

(59:29):
example I use.

Speaker 2 (59:30):
You also have a piece talking with our friend Mark
Judge over at Splice today, Pete Hegseth will be confirmed.
This is a really great piece and you get into
what changed what you think changed Joni Ernst's mind because
she I do disagree with some of the narrative out
there that she was leading this campaign against him, but
she definitely was not on board. She was very hesitant

(59:54):
I think, even to kind of like delve into it publicly.
Tell me about this because you have a theory.

Speaker 3 (01:00:00):
Experience, just a haunch. I'm a good journalist, so I
don't want to speculate too much. But Jonior's changed on
a dime she abruptly began to support Pete Hegseth, and
long story short, I think Pete Hegseth, like myself during Kavanaugh,
was getting extorted, and he might have been getting honey trapped,
and it might have been getting threatened. And I think
Joni Ernst found that out. I think she had a

(01:00:20):
meeting with him and the FBI because our situations are
very similar. It's like I had people accusing me of
drugging girls and gang rape, and I was getting served
for crimes and states I've never been in. It was
an absolute nightmare. And as I revealed the Devil's Triangle,
the whole thing was an extortionate plot. Now, Hegseeth's alleged
incident happened in twenty seventeen, which is right around the

(01:00:43):
Kavanaugh thing. And my speculation is a survivor of sexual abuse,
like Joni Ernst, who's a tough, independent, strong woman, doesn't
change on a dime because Trump threatened her. She's far
too strong for that. That's like telling you what to do, Dan,
It just it does not work. And so I'm thinking, well,
what if she had a private meeting with Hegseth. Hegseth,

(01:01:03):
who is saying, I look forward to the FBI investigation.
I'm looking forward to that. What if she found out
that he was being extorted? That would explain quite a lot, right,
because a sexual assault survivor doesn't just go, oh, they're
calling me names. I'm going to support him now, bs.
I'm convinced she heard something. I'm convinced somebody said to her, Hey, look,
this was a scam. Twenty seventeen, Mark Judge was getting

(01:01:26):
honey trapped and getting extortion of calls. Is it possible
they were doing it to him? Also? Yes, I think
it is.

Speaker 2 (01:01:32):
I think I think he will ultimately depending on what
this process goes through, because there's been so much palace intrigue.
I think most of these individuals are going to be
confirmed in the Senate. We got to have you back
to talk more about it. We're running out of time
right now, but our friend Mark Judge, and you can
follow him on exit Mark G. Judge as well. Get
his book Devil's Triangle and you can go and read
his pieces as well. It's all linked up on Uh well,

(01:01:54):
we'll have that linked as well. Marcus. So good to
see you. We got to have you back again.

Speaker 3 (01:01:58):
Yeah, Danny. It gave me the blur of when I
was radioactive. Man, I love you. I will never forget.

Speaker 2 (01:02:02):
That, you know what. I think the country owes you
a lot of gratitude because you held strong and showed
what it was like to be resolute in the fire.
So you you really gave a good example to a
lot of people for them to follow. So I appreciate it.

Speaker 3 (01:02:15):
Sing your American Stasi and they can get bent for
all I care.

Speaker 2 (01:02:18):
Gosh, it's the most gen x thing so far that's
been said today. Kyle, love you, Merry Christmas to my friend,
thank you good Thanks Dana.

Speaker 4 (01:02:27):
It's his lafe mission to make bad decisions. It's time
for Florida man.

Speaker 2 (01:02:37):
So. A Florida man is threatened to light a homeowner's
car on fire with a Molotov cocktail, said police and
Kate Coral. A man was arrested over the weekend. Police
said that he pulled out again with the swords. He
pulled out a sword. Okay, stop, stop, stop, full stop?
Is that a thing in Florida? Every month? I have
two to three stories. They're brand new, different from each other.

(01:03:00):
There are different parts of Florida where someone has a
sword or a machete. Floridians, what is up? Do you
all just like have swords? Is that a thing? What
in the world? So this guy had a sword in
a Molotov cocktail and he wanted to make a point
during an argument with the Cape Coral resident. Cape Coral
police said that they got reports of a disturbance at
the victim's home. They met with the homeowner, thirty six

(01:03:22):
year old man. He shot up in a driveway holding
a glass bottle with a cloth wrapped around the top.
He threatened to throw it, which he claimed was a
Molotov cocktail, at one of the vehicles in the driveway
and lighted on fire. He also had a sword and
he used the sword to tap on the wind shild
of a vehicle during the exchange. It was all captured
on video by ringed orbo the camera and the police

(01:03:43):
located the guy. They asked him. He said, no, I
just I went to go ask about the disrespect to
a family member, and then he was arrested taking the
Lee County jail, charged with violating the law that they
have about manufacturing fire bombs. Okay, there you go. But
the sword though, was it actually a Molotov cocktail. They
never really said, they never really confirmed that it was.

(01:04:03):
But you know, let's see this this Florida man. Yeah,
let's go ahead and do this. So apparently, I don't
think this guy was supposed to be gator hunting, and
he was. And it was a company that showed that

(01:04:27):
this guy and his friends they went down to hunt
some gators. But the guy's wife apparently did not know.
And there's videos, but you can't there's a lot of
coussin in them. But the guy apparently was his wife
didn't know that. They were all having a little boy's
trip and they were all drinking and hunting gaiters, and
then a gator bit his hand. So he's probably gonna

(01:04:48):
have to come up with a story as to how
to tell his wife. It was done by Salty Adventures
and this Isaiah Trillo and his friends they were hunting
gators and then he got his hand bit, and apparently
he told his wife he was He was worried more
about his wife finding out, and he had said in
the video, don't wake Katie up. Whatever you guys do.

(01:05:10):
He didn't bite that hard like trying to hide it
because he didn't want his wife to know. He was
out breaking and gator hunting. Why she probably would want
to play with his third hour next, I don't know.
I was thinking about, first off, welcome, then the last
year you're retired goth curmudgeon. Good to be with you.
We're at the top of our third hour. We got
we have border Thanos Tom Holman coming up at the

(01:05:32):
bottom of the hour. I was thinking for the people
who are super big mad over all the picks, I
wanted you to ask yourself, but have they stole women's
luggage have they stolen a lady's suitcase yet? Just saying,

(01:05:53):
I mean, or can we can we just look for
I know that they're like and look, I understand the
objections to RFK juniors at HHS and others, But who's
that deputy HHS dude? Yeah, there's like a Steven Tie.
There's like an Aerosmith song about him, you know the one.

(01:06:16):
I mean just compare yes, man looks like a man.

Speaker 4 (01:06:22):
Lady that stretched.

Speaker 2 (01:06:23):
Too kind of you know? But did they steal lady's luggage? Though?
That's the question, like that what's his name? Sam sam Brinton,
Sam Brenton, Brenton, that's right, Uh, the guy who legit
stole women's luggage everywhere up multiple times. And one of
them was a black fashion designer from South Africa and

(01:06:46):
he stole her stuff and was wearing it all over.
I mean it was like very colorful, unique, one of
the kind pieces and he was wearing it all over.
He was in charge of like what like nuclear stuf
off nuclear waste. How did he even get First off,
I just don't understand how you could be that damn

(01:07:07):
crazy and then also find time to study nuclear waste,
because it seems like being that crazy is a full
time job. Right, Oh, you're gonna wear PVC head to
toe and go to fetish knights, but ye get up
at six in them all and go and do your
nuclear waste job. Seems a little odd you're gonna steal
ladies' luggage all over. By the way, another thing, you

(01:07:31):
really have to be demented to do that. To steal
someone's luggage at an airport, think of all the people
that are there. You don't know if the person who
is waiting for their luggage is they're watching you take
their suitcase or not, Because then it what if you're caught,
that's that you're gonna get in trouble immediately. Oh my gosh.
And if you're with the government and you have like
a clearance, a security clearance, you're gonna get even moretual.

(01:07:54):
Just think about all of the the mental gym as
he had to go through in order to be like,
I don't GAF and do it anyway. Right, that's just
a whole other level. It is Friday, that's right. I mean,
does your hjhs do they look like? Is it a

(01:08:17):
dude that looks like a lady? Does your waste nuclear
waste head steal lady's luggage?

Speaker 3 (01:08:25):
I don't know.

Speaker 2 (01:08:25):
I'm just wondering. I got questions we'd like to have
him answered, right, I feel like that's the litmus, right there?
Have you ever oh man put me in charge? Oh
my gosh, this is I would only run for elected
office just to be able to sit in on a
confirmation here and control people with questions one time, and
then I would resent my seat because then I don't

(01:08:47):
want to do any of the other work. I don't care.
I don't want to cooperate with these people. I hate
everybody there. But just when was the last time you
stole women's luggage? Oh? Never?

Speaker 6 (01:08:58):
Right?

Speaker 2 (01:08:58):
When's the last time you dressed up entirely head to
toe in PVC or's a furry and had puppy piles.
Wink wink. When did that happen? You know what I mean?
Caine is dying right now, but you know it's true.

Speaker 4 (01:09:10):
It reminds me of the White House Easter at.

Speaker 2 (01:09:12):
The White House, that's right? Is that not like an
OnlyFans thing. I'm surprised no one's done it, fatly surprised
they probably did. Oh my gosh. One of the other
things that is the cutting of all of the government
excess as well, and they're saying that it's crazy, that
it's not something that is realistic. I wanted to share

(01:09:35):
with you this. I'm gonna do it real quick and
I'll make sure I link it in your prep on Monday.
But I retweeted it and it's an older bit of goody.
I remember reading about this in college and Rain Paul
reminded me of the story about Davy Crockett, the original
you know, hardcore badass, right, and he was sharing this
story about government appropriation and it's this this it was.

(01:09:57):
It was published in eighteen sixty seven and Hard magazine,
and it was in the House, and it was a
day where they were taking up they were talking about appropriations,
and everyone was suggesting they need to appropriate money for
the benefit of this widow of a very distinguished naval officer.
And people were getting up and they were making these beautiful,
superfluous speeches, and they were very moving, and then they

(01:10:22):
were about to put it to question. The House speaker
was and then Davy Crockett stood up and he was
saying that as much respect as he had for the
deceased he was asking, and as much sympathy for the
sufferings of the living he had, said, that we must
not permit our respect for the dead, or our sympathy
for a part of the living, to lead us in

(01:10:44):
to an act of injustice to balance the living. He
said that Congress had no right to appropriate that money
is charity, and he noted that the deceased lived a
very long life after the close of war. In fact,
the deceased was in elected office till the day of
his death. Noted, and I was not aware that the
government was in any way in debt to him. And

(01:11:04):
he said, because it's not a debt. Charity is not
a debt. And he says, we do not have the
authority to appropriate this public money as debt and give
it as such. And he said, I'm the poorest man
on this floor. I cannot vote for this bill. And
he goes, well, I'll give one week's pay to the
object if every member of Congress will do the same,

(01:11:25):
and it will amount to more than the bill asks for.
And they took a seat. Nobody replied. Nobody stood up
and offered their own money also, And the bill did
not pass unanimously as it was expected to do. Instead,
it just spit it out on the floor and that

(01:11:46):
was it. And he was asked why he did that,
because originally people thought, well, that's rather cold of you,
Davy Crockett. But he said, no, no, no, He said,
several years ago, I was standing on the steps of
the Capitol. He said, there were other members of Congress there,
and there was a fire over in Georgetown. It was
a very large fire, and we went over to help

(01:12:06):
many people. Mini houses burned and there were families that
were made homeless. And he said, bill was introduced appropriate
and this was a lot of money for that time,
twenty thousand dollars for the relief. He said, we set
all business aside and we rushed it through. And he said,
the next summer, when I was thinking about the election,
I was going to go and scout around some of
the people of my district. And he said, you know,

(01:12:26):
I want to go and talk to some of the voters.
And he said, and I found there was a farmer
that he found plow in a field, and he came
up to him and started talking to him, and the
farmer basically told him to go pound sand. He was
not interested in voting for Davy Crockett because he said
Davy Crockett was stupid and didn't understand the constitution, as
shocked Davy Crockett. Davy Crockett got an earful from this

(01:12:47):
farmer who was like, I do not have time for you, sir.
He said, you're an anteconstitutionalist. And Davy Crockett was like,
what what do you mean and he said, I have
voted against and he was given the list of things.
Then the farmer goes, you remember the fire from Georgetown
when you rushed to appropriate twenty thousand dollars to spend

(01:13:09):
and he said that government is not charity, it's not
yours to give. He said people could have donated. A
lot of your fellow representatives could have written checks and
they would not have had to live one day out
of the luxury to which they have grown accustomed. But
they didn't do it. He said. Everyone in the Senate

(01:13:31):
could have done it, and they didn't do it. You
sought to do it with the people's money instead, and
call it charity, the farmer told him. He said, it's them,
not the amount, Colonel I complain of. It's the principal
and the government ought to have in the treasury no
more than enough for its legitimate purposes. And he goes,

(01:13:55):
this is he goes, the power of collecting and disbursing
money at pleasure is the most dangerous power that can
be entrusted to man, particularly under our system of collecting
revenue by tariff, because it reaches every man in the country,
no matter how poor he may be. And he said,

(01:14:16):
whether it was twenty thousand or two hundred thousand, it's
not yours to give. And he humbled Davy Crockett that day.
He humbled him, and he said, so, see, colonel, you
violated the Constitution. He said, because once you begin to

(01:14:38):
stretch your power beyond the limits of the Constitution, and
there is no limit, there is no security for the people.
He goes, I don't doubt that you try to act honestly,
but that doesn't make what you did better. And so
now you see, that's why I cannot vote for you.
And Davy Crockett was almost speechless, and he was very

(01:14:59):
humble and very honest and transparent in his response, and
he said, I stand corrected. You are right, He said,
I thought I had the sense to understand the Constitution,
and it is clear by what you just told me.

Speaker 6 (01:15:13):
I do not.

Speaker 2 (01:15:15):
You never hear a lawmaker say that, do you. You
never hear a lawmaker say I was wrong and you
corrected me. They always because now there is no admittance
of error, because it is taken as a weakness instead
of as a sign of strength to be able to
recognize and build off of a mistake. And he says,
he apologized to him, and he said, what you have

(01:15:37):
said here at your plow has got more hard sounds
sinse in it than all of the fine speeches I
have ever heard. And he said, if I had ever
taken the view of it that you have, I would
have put my head into the fire before I would
have given that vote, and he promised him, and he said,
I ask for your forgiveness, and if you will forgive

(01:15:58):
me a vote for me again, if I ever vote
for an unconstitutional law, I wish that I may be shot,
is what he said. He ended up being friends with
that farmer, and the farmer did support him and ended
up did getting influenced for him. And Davy Crockett was
true to his word and was consistent. But it's not
easy to be a Davy Crockett. Everyone thinks it's mister

(01:16:20):
Smith going to Washington, and it's not. It is not
easy to be like Davy Crockett. It is not easy
to be consistent. It is not easy to have principle.
Because you are rewarded for your flexibility in DC. You
are awarded for your move to do something temporary with

(01:16:40):
immediate gain, immediate satisfaction. We are inventing a system where
we reward the short term only to punish ourselves more
harshly than we ever could have imagined in the long term.
And that has to change. And I hope that it

(01:17:02):
can change by cutting some of this government spending. But
I am so used to being lied to and passed
over and abused by my government that I don't think
that any jury would convict me of an offense of
not trusting them or you for that matter. So we'll see.

(01:17:26):
I hope that they can cut it. I hope, because
nothing will ever happen until we cut government spending. The
refineries that we need to produce more gas, we're not
going to have it better oil. We're not going to
have crude, have more crude, have more natural gas. We're
not going to have it the drilling to become once
again net exporters of energy, we have to reduce spending

(01:17:49):
in order to facilitate some of the things like this.
And I agree the treasury should not have any more
money than it absolutely needs for its legitimate purposes. That
gets to my point I always talk about Article one,
Section eight of the Constitution. If we actually did keep
it that way, we would be running a budget surplus.
You wouldn't have the need for income tax, you wouldn't
have the need for all of this extra spending. You

(01:18:10):
would have the need for any of this. There have
been countless analyzes done by many an economic expert on
this issue, and they all agree if, if, if we
had the courage to do it if we had the
discipline to withstand the austerity that comes with it.

Speaker 6 (01:18:31):
Do we?

Speaker 2 (01:18:33):
Because this is more than just a test of a
new Congress. It's more than just a test of a
new Senate. It's more than just a test of a
new cabinet. It is a test of the American electorate.
It's not just these lawmakers that are being tested right now,
it's you two, all of us. How will we do?

(01:18:54):
We have more to come.

Speaker 4 (01:18:56):
And now all of the news you would probably miss.
It's time for Dana's Quick five.

Speaker 2 (01:19:01):
This is a crazy story. So in Britain, their air
traffic employees did a work from home day and it
exacerbated a nightmare of delays for seven hundred thousand travelers. Yes,
they were stranded. This was over a holiday weekend. The
studies coming out now over last year holiday weekend. Last year,

(01:19:23):
they were wondering, why did we have all these technical
glitches that stopped planes from taking off in landing and
it took hours to fix because engineers were working from
home that day, no joke. They literally had to take
some of them an hour and a half to get
all the way from their houses to the airport and
then take about three to four hours to fix the problem.

(01:19:45):
And it I mean almost a million passengers were affected.
That is crazy. Crazy. Credit card debt hits a record
one point seventeen trillion, according to the New York Fed
New Research. Woopy Goldberg claims a bakery refused to serve
her because of her left wing view use. But as
it turns out, she's smearing them. They said their boiler
broke down, they had massive problems in their kitchen. They

(01:20:07):
did not not make her cupcakes because of who she is.
It's one hundred and forty five year old bakery. For
crying out loud, this is ridiculous, and fears for alien
safety the government's fire and high pulse microwave weapons at UFOs. Now, wait,
there are things to fire up. Welcome back to the program.
Dana Lash with you at the bottom of this third hour,
And of course you can listen coast to coast and

(01:20:27):
you can watch the stream at channel thirty forty seven
Direct TV. We're also on x the chats at Rumble
So and of course don't forget YouTube and Facebook. One
of the things that we I think this was yesterday,
the day before yesterday, we were talking about when the
story hit was Israel closing its embassy in Ireland and
the kind of the shock that was from that, and

(01:20:49):
we kind of dove into some of the history there
between you know, Ireland and Israel and World War Two
and some of this other stuff. And I've noticed an
increase in question from people who don't seem to understand
the mission or purpose of what the United States's alliance

(01:21:09):
with Israel serves and how important it is to have
an ally, you know, in the Middle East, and it
just is kind of it's wild to me that that
would even be questioned, but it is, which I think
it's important that this book came out actually just this week.
It's called The Battle for the Jewish State, How Israel
and America Can Win, and it's authored by Victoria Coats,

(01:21:31):
who also previously was the former deputy National Security advisor
to poet to Select. Victoria Coats's vice president of Catherine
and Shelby Callum Davis Institute for National Security and Foreign
Policy at Heritage and she joins US now via sky. Victoria,
congrats on the book. It was out, came out just
this week, a couple of days ago. This is something
I mean, I don't know I'm trying not to be naive,

(01:21:53):
But am I wrong in noticing like an increase in questioning.
I guess as more people become politically aware or active
and people are trying to they're asking questions that I
thought I had obvious answers. You know, the United States
is partnership with Israel. There are only ally in this
part of the world. Any importance of that relationship, which
is what your book examining it through October seventh, really

(01:22:15):
gets to.

Speaker 11 (01:22:17):
Well, Dan agreed to be with you, and I think,
you know, the reason I wrote The Battle for the
Jewish State is precisely that I think a lot of
Americans do wonder, you know, what is the nature of
the US Israel alliance. And I hate to date myself
this way, but when I was born, the alliance was
twenty years old.

Speaker 12 (01:22:32):
It's now seventy six years old.

Speaker 11 (01:22:34):
So that is a historical arc that takes a sort
of scrappy startup.

Speaker 12 (01:22:38):
Country to being one of the world's great powers.

Speaker 11 (01:22:41):
They're in the top twenty US News and World Report
list of most powerful countries, and so, you know, I
think that does require a re examination. I've heard all
those questions that you've heard, and there are strong answers
to them. And that's what you find in the Battle
for the Jewish State is the history of the alliance,
Why the alliance matters? What the heck happened after October seventh?

(01:23:03):
How did we find ourselves in this war too?

Speaker 12 (01:23:06):
And you know why? It is war on both Israel
and the United States.

Speaker 2 (01:23:10):
I think that's a great way to put it. We're
talking with the Victoria's Victoria Coats on skype via Skype,
and you mentioned October seventh, in which there were American
hostages taken, which we don't really hear about a lot
at all really from this administration. And in fact, I
dare say that it like slipped down the issue of
priorities for not just politicians, but maybe even the attention

(01:23:33):
span of voters as we went into the election season.
I mean, you have terrorists that are holding hostage Americans still,
that's incredibly important. I mean, and especially from the same
administration that flubbed Afghanistan messed up, you know, they withdraw
in Afghanistan. There do we even have did this administration
even have a response to that? I Mean, I'm just

(01:23:55):
shocked that we still have American hostages.

Speaker 12 (01:23:57):
Now it is shocking and it's disgraceful.

Speaker 11 (01:24:00):
And President Biden really stopped talking about them after Christmas
of twenty twenty three, when there were some deals to
get some hostages out. Those were good photo ops for him,
so he talked about them then, but then he stopped
because they became an inconvenient truth for them for the
administration trying to elevate the Palestinians, trying to rehabilitate Hamas,

(01:24:20):
trying to pressure Israel into a negotiated ceasefire with terrorists.
But not only do we still have American hostages, four
of whom we pray as still alive, but we lost
more Americans on October seventh data than in any terrorist attack,
the second most deadly terrorist attack after nine to eleven.

(01:24:41):
And so it's a really dire situation for the United States.
And furthermore, what we've seen since then are not pro
Israel demonstrations on our political in our city streets or
our academic campuses. We've seen pro Hamas demonstrations. So this
is here at home.

Speaker 2 (01:25:00):
You also touch on how this is not just some
simple regional squabble that you can send some diplomats to
and they can have a piece nego negotiation. It's not
going to get solved that way because it is you know,
it's like a holy war plus a cultural battle, you know,
plus a military battle, and after you know, a sod
left serious that regimes collapsing in Syria. Iran was really hit,

(01:25:24):
really hit hard, and that really highlighted that Shia Sunni
fight in this part of the world, and how you
have like one faction that hates Israel really wants to
establish itself as the powerhouse, and then you have these
other factions who don't hate Israel, they're willing to work
with them. We got the Abraham Accords. That really kind
of is like the power struggle, and Israel's sort of

(01:25:45):
in the way of this like Russian, Iranian, Chinese dominance
in the area. Is that like just like too myopic
of a view of this, because it seems like it
all kind of boils down to that, at least partially.

Speaker 11 (01:25:57):
Well, I don't think that's too myopic, and I think
it's really important point. I was actually in Israel and
then in Bahrain and Abraham Accurtz country as the fall
of Syria was happening week before last, and it was
really interesting because the golf countries. They only wanted to
talk to the Israelis and find out what was going
on and how to keep a lid on this situation,
because those Sunni golf monarchies are deeply concerned about the

(01:26:21):
radical Islamists who are part of the now governing body
of Syria. So yes, we're all delighted asad to spending
Christmas in Moscow. Hope it's nice and cold for him,
and very cognizant of the many atrocities he committed against
the Syrian people. But that doesn't make the Turkish backed
HTS folks angels. And so you have quite the alphabet

(01:26:43):
soup of former Isis and al Qaida alums in there.
And the interesting thing is as Israel claimed a little
bit of territory in the goal On Heights adjacent to
the space they already have, you had all sorts of
people accusing them of being imperialist, that they were somehow
trying to conquer the levant. Well, news flash, nobody wants Syria.
I mean, Syria doesn't want to be Syria. And so

(01:27:05):
you know the notion that Israel wants to take that
territory over given just you know, the the intractable problems
that country faces is ridiculous on the face of it.
And I think the cooperation between the Gulf and Israel
is only strengthening even after a year of war.

Speaker 12 (01:27:21):
And that's a great and good thing.

Speaker 2 (01:27:23):
Yeah, very good thing. Indeed, we're talking with Victoria Coats
her new book, The Battle for the Jewish State, how
Israel and America can win. I don't know if any
other country that's worked as hard as Israel has at
trying to maintain peace and be peaceful and only responding
when it is incredibly important to do so in defense
of national security or you know, of life, of Israeli life.

(01:27:44):
But yet that's not how that's not how it's processed,
that's not how it's laundered in the media. They're always
painted as the aggressor, and even the words from our
own government, you know, have kind of, you know, hinted that, oh, well,
they're aggressive here, we need to stop the bombing of
Gaza for instance, when you know, really they've only ever
responded once they've been sheld, then they respond to protect themselves.

(01:28:05):
Is that ever going to change? I mean, when does
that stop? When does reality set in?

Speaker 11 (01:28:10):
Well, I'm hopeful that it is, and the clarity the
President Trump brings to this issue is being welcomed by
every reasonable person in the region. And you know, going
back to the hostages for a minute, I also was
in Israel when his truth social post came out about
the hostages. This is something Joe Biden could have done
fifteen months ago. He could have said, let them out
now or there's going to be hell to pay, and

(01:28:32):
he didn't for fifteen months. President Trump is saying that
there's movement now from Hamas. Concessions are being made to Israel,
not the other way around. So we could see them
out now during the season of Hanukah Christmas next week.

Speaker 12 (01:28:44):
That would be a great and good thing.

Speaker 11 (01:28:46):
But that would happen only because President Trump had the
clarity that he did. So I'm hopeful that as you know,
we get closer to the inauguration and beyond, you know,
that he makes good on what he's been saying that
he wants this word to end, but he once to
end in an an Israeli victory, and we're not going
to have another cease fire. We're not going to let
Hamas regroup and rearm and attack again. We're going to

(01:29:09):
end this vicious cycle of violence that's been going on
for really fifty years, and the greatest victims are the
Palestinian people.

Speaker 2 (01:29:15):
And you mentioned too, you know, just the way that
the you know, the current administration has responded to October seventh.
I can't imagine if Israel had listened to the Biden administration,
it had not hit back at Husbl as hard as
they did and sent them reeling, and I think really
kind of started this you know, domino effect that led
to you know what we see with you know, Assad
now in Moscow. If they if they had not have

(01:29:38):
hit back as hard, if they had not pushed back
against Husble. I mean, where would we be if they
had listened to the Biden administration not done anything.

Speaker 11 (01:29:44):
We'd be back where we were in two thousand and
nine when Condi Rice, I mean a Republican Secretary of
State back they are abstained from a United Nations Security
Council resolution condemning Israel for violence, and Gaza would be
back where we were after the twenty fourteen Gaza War,
when John Carey withheld arms from Israel until they stopped
fighting Hamas. After the twenty twenty one Gaza War. You

(01:30:07):
see where I'm going here. I mean, this is history
repeating itself. And if you know, after October seventh, I
think Israel said, we cannot afford to have this kind
of a risk on our border anymore. We have to
take decisive action. And no thanks to the Biden Harris administration.
You know, they've been slogging through the trenches now for
fifteen months doing the Lord's work, and I think what

(01:30:29):
they've achieved against Hamas and importantly, as you noted, has
Belah in the North is going to be in the
long term a huge good thing for the region and beyond.
But as I said, sadly, no thanks to the United
States in this case.

Speaker 2 (01:30:43):
Victoria put it in terms that people can, you know,
really understand when they look at our ally Israel. What
happens with a compromised Israel. What happens if Israel were
to weaken and we don't have that strong ally in
that part of the world. Because obviously there's there's going
to be a blowback to the US if that were
to ever happen. What does that look like?

Speaker 11 (01:31:04):
Yeah, it really would be a kind of a deadly
weakness for US the Middle East. You can try to
pivot away from it, but it won't pivot away from you.
And the fact of the matter is it is that
crossroads between East and West. A lot of the world's
shipping goes through that region, and a lot of the
world's energy reserves are in that region. And so especially

(01:31:24):
as we take on our new stands as an energy
superpower and grow into that strategically, you know, we want
to have influence in that region where there are other
significant reserves. Without Israel, we really don't have that point
of power projection and the collaboration between our countries on intelligence,
on the development of weapons systems, notably missile defense. This

(01:31:48):
is critical to the security of the American people.

Speaker 12 (01:31:50):
But then I just.

Speaker 11 (01:31:51):
Say, you know, you would have trouble using your iPhone
eating a cherry tomato, all sorts of things that they've
achieved in the medical field. Without Israel. I mean it
is beyond security. They are the startup nation. They are
in an enormous tech hub and have become prosperous well
beyond their size, and I think that is a great
ally for the United States.

Speaker 2 (01:32:13):
Definitely, this is a mustery book. I think that provides
a lot of context that's normally missing from this conversation
nationally and internationally. The book is the Battle for the
Jewish State, How Israel and America can win. Victoria Coates
would love to have you back. Victoria, thank you so
much for what you do. Appreciate your time. Thank you.

Speaker 12 (01:32:31):
Merry Christmas to you here.

Speaker 2 (01:32:32):
Thanks, thank you. I want to know why Trump and
Chip Roy are fighting now, or actually I just want
to know why Trump is fighting chip Roy. He is
blasting him on truth social for some reason. I have
no idea why he had said that. He tweeted out

(01:32:54):
quote Chip Roy is just another ambitious guy with no talent.
By the way, how's Bob Good doing? I had I
hope some talented challengers are getting ready in the great
state of Texas to go after chip in the primary.
He won't have a chance. Okay, first off, why in
the hell is Trump speaking more harshly of Chip Roy
than he ever has of Mike Johnson. Chip Roy is
a conservative stalwart who has delivered on Trump's agenda more

(01:33:16):
than Mike Johnson could ever hope to go and look
at the voting record. I'm not even playing go look
at it. Bob Good was a conservative stalwart. People have
to be strategic. Is it about uplifting your ego or
is it about securing the country for voters. I didn't
vote for this. I didn't vote for people to sit
here and you know have giant ego circle jerks. I

(01:33:39):
did not do that. It's not what I voted for.
I did not vote for petty and fighting when we
could be going after the left. I didn't vote for that.
Nor did you. I mean, my gosh, people, I don't
know if you realize, but this administration's got its work
cut out for him, and everybody's all pitching together to
make sure that it gets done. But you're not going

(01:34:00):
to secure anything when you go after your most conservative fighters.
I don't care if they kiss your ass or not.
Do they vote for your agenda? He does, Chip Roy does.
He has backed that agenda to the hilt. He's not
an ass kisser. I'm not either, but we back the
agenda that gets it done for voters. And that's what

(01:34:22):
it's about. That's all it's ever been about. Why in
the world is he doing this? Why?

Speaker 12 (01:34:31):
And No?

Speaker 2 (01:34:31):
Chip Roy is super popular in Texas. He's not going
to go anywhere. Bob Good is a conservative stalwart. We
had a hardcore conservative who got replaced by a moderate.
We lost a hardcore conservative who stood shoulder to shoulder
with you on everything from lower taxes to gun rights
to everything, and he got replaced by moderate because people

(01:34:52):
decided that they got mad at Bob Good because Bob Good.
I don't care who you supported in the primary. If
you're still litigating the primary, you are a walking min
abortion and you are everything that is wrong with this country.
And I hope you have a crap Christmas, and I
hope it's mean as I sound, because I'm tired of
this stuff. I'm tired of it. Get over. Some of
these people need to get over their fetish over the primary.

(01:35:12):
It's weird. If you're still litigating the primary, you're anti American.
If you're still litigating the primary, you're a communist si op.
We all want lower taxes, we're want to get rid
of this DEI stuff. We don't want World War three,
And by god, you're not going to get it done
by having these petty ego fights. It's not going to happen.
We voted for Good Trump, I didn't vote for petty infighting.

(01:35:36):
Stop it. Most the time of the year, Caine, go ahead, oh,
I just hurt my should.

Speaker 4 (01:35:41):
All right, well, you know you always accuse me of
having a tinfoil hat, only because I have ten of them.
But listen to the chicks on the view here, Oh
my god, wand play this Who.

Speaker 2 (01:35:52):
Is in charge?

Speaker 12 (01:35:54):
Because I've been saying it for a while.

Speaker 2 (01:35:56):
I've been saying that I think I must believe he
is president. I do.

Speaker 12 (01:36:04):
I called I called him vice president. I called him
president because I don't know what JD is doing.

Speaker 4 (01:36:10):
Well, the gist of it is, they think that Elon
Is and JD are plotting to get rid of Trump.

Speaker 2 (01:36:15):
Okay, see there's where the narrative starts. Good lord, I
told you that narrative is happening, right, They're going to
try to divide and conquer. I told you that. And
you know what, going after our own conservative stalwarts isn't
helping either, Folks. That does it for us? Today? Find
us a sub stack. I'll be back finding Mikero be
tomorrow to finished out the week.

All Episodes

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

Stuff You Should Know

New Heights with Jason & Travis Kelce

Dateline NBC

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}Taylor Lorenz’s Shocking Joy and Davy Crockett’s Spending Lesson

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

.css-r6mb8g{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:1;overflow:hidden;}Stuff You Should Know

New Heights with Jason & Travis Kelce

Dateline NBC

All Episodes

Taylor Lorenz’s Shocking Joy and Davy Crockett’s Spending Lesson

Stuff You Should Know