Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Good morning, and we have a story about White House
stenographers first time this whole cycle. The White House stenographers
come with the House. They are not political. Some of
them have been there since Trump and will be there
after Biden, and they are now as mad as you
will ever hear a stenographer on the record that White
House officials working for President Biden tried to change the
(00:22):
meaning of their transcript. So it sounded like the president
on that zoom with Voto Latino was just criticizing a
comedian instead of.
Speaker 2 (00:30):
All Trump supporters.
Speaker 1 (00:31):
So now we've got a supervisor from the stenographer's office
who was saying our stenography office transcript released to our distro,
which includes the national So what.
Speaker 3 (00:42):
Does a mad stenographer look like? Because I mean, if
you hear you know, you hear the word stenographer, it
almost sounds like a dinosaur. I'm just like wondering what
a mad stenographer looks like? What is that like? I mean,
what is and how? I mean there's like the most
innocuous people in the world to make angry. But that's
(01:05):
where where now, where we're making stenographers mad, that's where
at that level of this election, and that has to
do if you remember just to recap the remarks that
Biden gave literally what Kamala Harris is on stage, it's
I can't get over that, the remarks that Biden gave
when Harris was on stage at her rally and he
(01:27):
went off and had said that it was Trump supporters
that were garbage, and they were trying to rewrite it.
And as we've talked about ad nauseum on the show,
it didn't It didn't make sense. It didn't make sense
because it I mean, you're you're talking about one reporter
and or one supporter, and it was like a possessive
(01:50):
and I don't I didn't quite understand that. We talked
about that, and and it just didn't make any sense.
And because you know why it didn't make any sense,
because he was talking about all supporters and so the
White House and a really rare thing, they edited the transcript.
They edited the transcript to make it seem like, oh no, no,
(02:10):
everything that we were saying, this is what he said
the whole time. And they when they edited the transcript.
This is why the stenographers are mad, because everybody knows
it's the White House stenographers that did it. And you know,
these people take their jobs very seriously because they're recording
history and you are. I mean what they did, in
effect is they well, not in effect, I mean really
(02:32):
what they did is they completely compromised the integrity of
those stenographers by claiming that oh no, it's yeah, it's
uh weich is that this is really what he said.
He didn't really say the other stuff. And that's that's
really bad and it and it and it completely uh
(02:55):
compromised their entire all of their integrity. And that's why
they're so up because they've had these jobs. Some of
them have been there longer than Trump. Honestly, I think
there was one that had been there since like the
w Era, I believe. So they take their job seriously
and they've been through a lot of presidents, and so
(03:16):
it completely compromises their integrity by doing this, and that's
why they released I'd never seen White House stenographers have
release this statement before, have you, Kane? I don't think
I have either. So, dang, welcome to the program. That's
how we're starting Friday. Let me, Does it get any
(03:38):
better for Biden Harris? I don't think so. Welcome to
the program. It's at the top of this first hour.
It's Friday, and we've got a lot of stuff to
get We're going to touch on a lot of things
to get ready for next week the election, and let
me tell you, I'm going to walk you through everything
as we get closer and closer, and the one place
(03:58):
where you can get non like, non hysterical coverage where
I'm not going to go with anything unvetted and I'm
not going to sit here and blow smoke up your
backside like some of the influenza influencers out there who
have to quietly revise what they say because they're chasing clicks.
One of the reasons that we've been around as long
as we have been is because we don't do that.
(04:19):
We're consistent and our audience can trust that, and there's
no reason to change that now. So again, welcome Dana
Lash here with you. You can listen obviously across the country,
and you can check out Channel three forty seven as
well direct TV. We're getting some stuff planned so that
every aspect is covered and whether you are maybe you're
at a friend's house and you're watching election night coverage
(04:40):
or you're at home, we're going to have a way
for you to be able to get results completely unspun
results and know what's what as it happens. So that's
one of the things that we're in the planning stages
of doing. So this is how we're starting everything. Today.
The stenog are upset, but you know what, it serves
(05:02):
the Biden administration, right, it's insane that it that this
even had to happen. It's crazy that they even had
to you know, I mean like, it's crazy that they
even had to release this statement. I literally have never
seen ever like that, Like I said, them do this
and so this, uh, the White House stenographers and this
(05:24):
was one of the top things that we had today.
The White House stenographers. They have this this and the
jobs numbers. So they said it was a breach of protocol,
a major breach of protocol. Uh, and that this is
something that we it's never been never been done before.
They were very mad. It was a very terse statement.
(05:44):
So this is the top one of the top stories.
Here's the other top story here the jobs that were created. Guys,
do you know that they were saying that they were
expecting one hundred and twelve thousand, and do you know
how much there were created? Twelve thousand? Can correct me?
(06:07):
If I'm wrong on this, they're going to revise that down, right,
So it's not even really twelve. It's going to be
a lot less than that. Right.
Speaker 2 (06:14):
Historically, that's all we've seen is the numbers revised downward. Wow,
because we all know how it works that the lie
gets traveled around the world a couple times before the
truth actually puts to choose on and everyone thinks that
the original lie number is where we are economically, and
we are not.
Speaker 3 (06:33):
So check this out. Only twelve thousand now again that's
going to be revised down. Only twelve thousand created number one,
the number of private sector jobs down by over twenty
seven thousand manufacturing. And by the way, and this, if
you would have not this would have been I think
(06:54):
a lot lower. Had you not seen in goos like
healthcare NGOs, like the non government officials, like these third
parties that technically they're kind of governmental, they get government
money and they kind of operate similarly to that of government,
that it would have been worse. But apparently manufacturing because
(07:15):
they they count these NGOs in, that was down forty
six thousand. Now they had revised August down by over
eighty thousand and September was revised down by thirty one.
The labor force shrank by two hundred and twenty thousand.
(07:39):
This is a disaster. This close to the election. I mean,
it's a disaster anyway, but this close to the election.
How do you can't fake this with people? This is
really wild. And the rev I mean the revision's good. Heavens,
(08:07):
we're going to be at a negative with the revisions in,
we're going to be at a negative. So again, manufacturing
took a hit, and it would have been even lower.
And that's the one thing that I want to make
sure that you understand. It would have been lower, and
it wasn't because there's any kind of silver lining there there.
I mean, I'm trying not to be like totally a bummer,
(08:27):
but it's not because there's any big silver lining there.
It's because it's the NGOs and government expansion. That's really
what it was. It was government and third party NGOs.
That's the only reason. And even then they had a loss,
that's the only reason it was. It was down and
then it was only forty six thousand, So that's you
got to keep that in mind as well. This is
(08:48):
so bad, It's really bad. And we've only added this many.
It's I mean, this being so close. Like I said
to the election, these numbers, there's no way you can
dance these numbers up, address these numbers up. There's no
way you can dance around it. It's bad. So the
(09:09):
unemployment has held pretty steady at over four percent now,
and all of this is coming from the Bureau of
Labor Statistics, and it was these are the lowest, well,
it's about the lowest edition, the lowest, Yeah, the lowest
editions in four years, five years since Trump left office.
(09:29):
It's the lowest since Trump left office. Uh, total non
farm payroll was unchanged and the unemployment rate unchanged. So
and again it all the healthcare and government. And again
that healthcare sector in goos I want to make I
just I'm going to say that every single time because
and the reason why is I already see a lot
(09:49):
of people on the left, a lot a lot of
Harris surrogates. They're trying to spend that and say, oh, look,
well it was a healthcare this is a this is
really good, this is a really good signal. It's not.
It really isn't. H And so that's the that's this
is the reality of the situation. It's bad so and
it's not. It doesn't have to do with Boeing, and
it doesn't have to do with the meaning the strikes
on the ports either. That was another thing that the
(10:11):
Biden Hears administration. They're trying to blame it on the
strikes and there, and it didn't really even take a
hit from Boeing, by the way, or the port that
and even if even if you even if the strike
never happened, you would still have a fraction of the
jobs required to maintain that same level in the United States,
(10:34):
you still it would still be so below it it's
only a fraction of what it would require to maintain
it's still the lowest number in four years. So that
people can do the math, they can see what that
it's just dumb. And by the way, when you go back,
like I said, in September and in August, and you
look at the previous revisions there there was a six
(10:57):
figure revision in each of those. For August it was
revised down, like I said, by eighty one thousand, from
one hundred and fifty nine thousand to plus seventy eight.
And the change in September was revised down from thirty one.
That was from plus two hundred and fifty four thousand
to two hundred and twenty three So it was August
in September was one hundred and twelve thousand lower than
(11:20):
it was previously reported. The civilian labor force dropped by
over two hundred and twenty thousand. Again, all of this
is coming from government, any gain government, and then the
NGOs with healthcare, that's crazy. And when they try to
(11:41):
compare it, and I think Kin brings up a good
point and slack when you if you try to compare
this with Trump his administration, that's you didn't you didn't
have There was a pandemic and people were being forced
to stay home. So I mean that was, you know,
kind of one of the reasons why there's such a
(12:03):
disparit comparison there. That's wild. So how does this affect
Harris on Bidenomics? She noticed she hasn't talked about bidomics anymore.
She hadn't talked about it at all. That's why they've
shifted so hard to identity politics, because how do you
touch on any of this? You can't. That's the problem.
(12:24):
You can't talk about any of this. I mean, there's
more to it than this. We're also going to get
into some of the voting and the electoral stuff because
in addition to as we talked to Daniel Horowitz, the stagflation,
now we're looking at voter integrity and we're going to
be looking And then Harris released a sit down. It's
(12:47):
an ad that they released in Pennsylvania. This is apparently
their last ad buy and she did this ad with
the Governor of Pennsylvania, Josh Shapiro. Right, they're sitting down
together and Waltz isn't even in the picture. He was
just erased. This is pretty wild. We got this and
a whole bunch of stuff to dive into as we
get you set up for this Friday, as we move
(13:11):
our partners over at tax Network USA. They want to
help you with the Government Theft Agency because the Government
Theft Agency needs to send more money to Ukraine and
they can't do that unless you give them more of
your income that you earned that they had nothing to
do with. This is where tax Network USA comes in. Look,
they share your views, right, but they also want to
make sure that you're not that the IRS can't come
at you. They got eighty eight thousand new Agents Now
(13:32):
and Tax Network USA. They've gone toe to toe with
the IRS and they've won. They've helped taxpayers save over
a billion dollars in tax dot They filed over ten
thousand tax returns. They specialize in helping people just like you.
Doesn't matter if it's personal or business, if you owe
ten thousand or ten million, regardless, they got the tools
and experience to handle anything. And if you're able to
pay on a fixed income, doesn't matter. They provide tailored
(13:53):
solutions to help you resolve your tax burdens effectively. So
don't wait. Visit ta in USA dot com, slash chain
or call one eight hundred nine five eight one thousand
get a free consultation. Their experts are going to walk
you through just a few simple questions to see how
much you can save. But act now, because the IRS
only gets more aggressive with time. That's t NUSA dot com,
slash Dana one eight hundred and ninety five eight one
(14:14):
thousand and.
Speaker 2 (14:16):
Now all of the news you would probably miss. It's
time for Dana's quick five.
Speaker 3 (14:21):
See you guys. Remember TGI Fridays, right They were made
famous in Office Space the movie because well, they were
lampooned because their people were flair right, they were the
buttons on the uniforms and all of that. Well, apparently
they are nearing bankruptcy filing. They've been dealing with slowing
sales and a deal to purchase the company fell through
earlier this year, so they may be on the way.
(14:44):
I legit have not eaten at a TGI Friday's Kine
since oh my gosh, it's been fifteen years, maybe eighteen,
maybe twenty. The last the only one I know, was
in South County, the TGF Fridays there and the Rhine Theater.
Remember that, it's legit the only one I know that exists.
So that's kind of crazy. Let's see, people will feel
(15:04):
sorry for robots that make pitiful noises or researcher fines. Okay,
this is not entirely Look, all I know is that
one of the saddest little stories I ever read was
about that Mars rover that was like walking around and
like taking pictures, and it would seeing happy Birthday to itself,
and the last thing before its battery ran out, it
was bleeding out a little happy Birthday song to itself.
(15:27):
It was, legit one of the saddest stories I've ever read.
I didn't say that my eyes got misty or anything,
but it was sad. So they said that participants. They
did the survey on people, and it said participants would
rather do a boring task than they hurt a robot
that makes sad sounds. So if a robot makes sad sounds,
according to this researcher, people feel really bad about it.
(15:48):
And they said they're hesitant to mistreat them if they
think that they can feel pain or they make little sad,
pathetic noises. They have no problem shaking a silent robot,
they said, but as soon as the robot made a
pitiful sound, they wanted to do something boring and not
even bother with that at all. So they can pantomime
human emotions to manipulate them. So that's gonna happen our
(16:09):
Worldbot overlords are gonna have like giant qpies and they're
gonna make little sad noises. That's what's gonna happen while
they're killing you. That's what's gonna happen. They're gonna totally
play on your emotions people. You know what, I don't
think that works with people. That if people do that.
We got a whole bunch of stuff coming up, including
some polling and suing state stuff. Stay with us. Black
Rifle Coffee has the absolute best beans, the best roast,
(16:30):
the best flavor profiles that are that's out there, and
it's so good and it's so affordable. You're getting really good,
the world's best coffee, and you're also you're getting it
at an affordable price because they understand that this is
a veteran owned, veteran founded, veteran run and active duty.
They get some active duty there too, company and every
everything that they do is a tribute to those who
(16:52):
fought for our nation. Now right now, at Black Riflecoffee
dot com, they have their Freedom Roast, which is smooth,
full flavor. You can save twenty percent of the Freedom
Roast roast with Coddana only at Black Rifle Coffee, and
when you subscribe to the Coffee Club, you get free
shipping and automated orders. You pick the roast you want
or roast how often you want it, and it ships
(17:12):
free shipping right to your doorsteps. You are always enjoying
the convenience of having your favorite coffee on hand without
having to do a last minute run to the store
to get coffee that morning, and again they're dedicated to
their mission of supporting veteran and first responder causes. This
is premium coffee hole being k cup ready to drink,
and you can also get apparel, kettles, grinders, mugs and more.
So get your freedom on with the Freedom Roast from
(17:33):
Black Rifle Coffee dot Com and enjoy other topshelf roast
as well, like the Just Black, the Silence or Smooth,
whatever you decide, You're gonna get twenty percent off using
code Dana only at Black Riflecoffee dot Com.
Speaker 4 (17:44):
The Danas Show podcast You're fast, funny and informative news
companion for those always on the move. Subscribe on YouTube,
Apple or wherever you get your podcasts.
Speaker 3 (17:55):
Welcome back to the program, Dana. Last year with you
at the bottom of this hour, I got a few things.
I'm pulling these up now because I've got just some
of the some of the swing state info to look at,
because some of the final polls, again you're looking at
an edge to Trump, but some of the swing states,
though it's so close, it is so close. And one
(18:18):
of the interesting things is that women not by a lot,
but by enough to change potentially the outcome of an election.
Women are showing up more than men. So in all
of these swing states so far, men are behind women
when it comes to early voting. Now, there could be
(18:40):
a number of things that create that, but however, it
is very interesting. I don't think that Democrats trash talking
voters is necessarily gonna know.
Speaker 5 (18:56):
But.
Speaker 3 (18:58):
There are a number of number of things I think
that go into this. But they've women have always like
historically broke for the left, which is kind of sad,
but you know the truth of it. But some of this,
looking at the top, there's some of the toss up states,
there there was a there's some states that are leaning
down that are being well not by everyone universally, that's
(19:19):
why I haven't really gone out with it, but they're
being reclassified as potentially being toss ups. So so far,
the national average literally has them tied the RCP forty
eight point four to forty eight point one, definitely within
the margin of error, putting Trump up by point three.
Now in the Senate, in the House, this is also
incredibly important battle for the Senate. The Republicans, as everything
(19:40):
lays now, are projected to take the Senate and they
may keep the House. It's super close, only a point
nine lead nationally in the House. Compiling all of this together,
very very very cl I am very worried about the House.
(20:02):
The Senate less so. But we're looking at you know,
maybe rejected to take the Senate, maintaining the House, and
the presidential race super close. I don't want people to
think that. That's another reason I want to caution everybody
about believing these polls, because again, and I'll say it
(20:23):
and I'll say it until election's over, Republicans have a habit.
And this is proven by a hard data, hard numbers
from different secretary of State's offices from around the country.
You can literally look at the moment and kind of see,
and this is one of the things I noted back
in twenty sixteen as well. You can kind of see
(20:45):
when the messaging comes out that Republicans are doing well, Look,
we're ahead, we're doing good. You can you know, take
you can exile, you can take a breath, and then
you can see the moment where it's like, oh, we're
the kind of early voting drops off, and then some
of these other areas that people thought because of the
polling was so strong that you were going to get
a greater turnout in these areas Republican dominated. Typically, Uh,
(21:07):
you projected a greater turn off than what you ended
up getting an election day or what you ended up
getting total. Throughout the election, Republicans are like, oh, you
got it, We'll stay home. Don't do that. You need
to you need to view it like I mean you.
You need to view this as maybe your vote's the
literal one that will decide everything, and get out and vote.
There's there should be no excuse. We already we already
(21:28):
went out and voted. You voted too, Kane, didn't you?
Did you wear the trash bag or no? No, I
can remember what you said.
Speaker 2 (21:35):
I thought about it because moving into a new place,
so one of the last things you have or the
trash bags right before you, you know, head to the
other place. So I was thinking about it, but I
ultimately did not.
Speaker 3 (21:45):
My I had a thought about this because I actually
had a friend that asked me, today's the last day
of early voting in Texas, and I had a friend
that actually asked me if I were a trash bag
to vote, is that going to be considered electioneering? Because
you know, you can't where like you can't wear your
mega hat. You can't. And it's not just that you
can't wear any pro Biden stuff either. You couldn't wear
a hat that had a Biden slogan on it.
Speaker 2 (22:06):
Mecca is just make America great against not saying anybody's name.
Speaker 3 (22:11):
I can't wear gun stuff. And I've been there when
i've and I've seen someone who was told to cover
up they had a pro.
Speaker 2 (22:18):
To a thing like just a picture of a gun
on a hat.
Speaker 3 (22:21):
No, it was like it. I think it was like, uh,
I think it actually said make two a great again.
But I think that said vote something on it.
Speaker 2 (22:29):
So a garbage bag doesn't have any work.
Speaker 3 (22:32):
I mean, I don't think it would. But it actually
is interesting though, consider because it's I mean, think about it.
You show U from a garbage bag? Is that considered?
And I told my friend, I said no, but just
like be ready to have a shirt on underneath just
in case, because don't do anything that's good. Don't give
anybody any They live in a really strong Republican area,
So I certainly doubt there would be And do you
(22:53):
think that people would know immediately because honestly, some of
the day's fat some of today's fashion legit looks like garbage.
So I'm just saying, just saying, so the looking at
some of this Minnesota and New Hampshire. New Hampshire was
the one yesterday that OURCP labeled as maybe becoming a
(23:14):
toss up. Minnesota and New Hampshire are toss ups. I
just want to point out the incredible coincidence of this,
because Minnesota is what Tim Walls estate. New Hampshire is
what Joe Biden state. Are you literally telling me that
Democrats can't carry the state of the vice president and
the current president, because OMG, for real, I'm going to
(23:36):
be watching those two states just for the Choden Freuda
of it. I'm trying not to like get over my skis,
but I do think it would be hysterical to have
that talking point and just beat them over the head
with it for the next four years. I'm very I
look at petty stuff like that. How funny would that be?
So not funny if we lose. So I'm just saying,
(23:57):
can we talk about this thing where Liz Cheney's trying
to herself a victim. So he came out and he
said something about Liz Cheney the way she votes, and
she's like war ink, which she is. And he had
(24:17):
said that, well, I mean, well, we'll go play as remark.
I think we have a remark that we can play.
And I don't need to tell you what he said.
You can listen to what he said. This was him
last night at his event. He's been everywhere, and we
know what state he's in. So this is what audio
something like eighteen listen.
Speaker 5 (24:34):
But his daughter is a very dumb individual, very dumb.
She's a radical warhawk. Let's put her with a rifle,
standing there with nine barrel shooting at her. Okay, let's
see how she feels about it. You know when the
guns are trained on her face. You know there are
warhawks when they're sitting in Washington in a nice building saying, oh, gee,
(24:56):
will let's send let's send ten thousand hopes right into
the mouth of the enemy.
Speaker 3 (25:03):
So everyone is acting like it was a threat against
Liz Cheney, which is one of the most victims seeking
things I've ever I can't stand it when women do this,
when women are like, oh, he didn't say, actually something
about me. But I have no other way to refute it.
So I'm just going to say it's a threat. So
he was talking about her vote and she is, I mean,
(25:23):
she's very interventionist. That was considered one of the tenants
of the compassionate conservatism, which is a phrase I have
a huge thing I've been working on for quite some
time about those. Compassionate conservatism is a phrase that describes
Bush light or Republican light. Right. It's like a w
(25:44):
Bush thing. And this is also where I will say
some of the newer Republicans are very bushy because they
want government intervention, and they want child tax credits, and
they want welfare and all this stuff like paying people
to have kids. It's literally called welfare. And they try
to model some of what they want after Victor Orbon
and Hungary. That's like a literally like that's welfare. It's
(26:06):
a lot of George W. Bush compassionate conservatism. This is
the only thing where they do differ from that big
government republicanism on is interventionism. And that's what he's talking
about here. He's saying that if it were up to her,
we would be involved in all these conflicts. And quite frankly,
if you've ever listened to her speak about certain things,
(26:27):
he's not incorrect. I mean, maybe people don't like the
way that he said it. Honestly, I got to tell you,
I really don't think that anybody else has any place
to criticize the rhetoric he uses, after everybody has spent
all these people have spent eight years calling him a
Nazi and calling him a fascist and a bigot and
a sexist and a racist, and leading to to assassination attempts,
(26:50):
and then even joking about the assassination attempts and saying
that the people didn't try hard enough. I mean, these
were actual Democrats that were saying this. So I really
don't think that these people have any place to I
says rhetoric, particularly when he whether they like it or not,
was careful actually in what he said. You just heard
what he said. This is the very fine people on
both sides. They're trying to do this again. They're trying
(27:13):
to redo it. And I particularly do not want to
hear any bitching about nuance or rhetoric from people who
have literally spent the past forty eight hours trying to
argue with all of us about apostrophes. They're saying that
there was an unspoken apostrophe that we're too stupid to
(27:34):
hear but that he but but can't believe what you
believe us on what wasn't said, but also believe us
on what was said like that he didn't say that here.
So she apparently responded with this news I was reading
this newsweek piece. She apparently had responded to this, and
she was asked, and of course, you know, it's kind
(27:57):
of more I hate by the way, I am so
aggravated it. I'm trying to get this peace up. What
was her remark, because they had it here and now
everything froze. She responded to him, and of course it's
we pulled this up. I apologize, but I'm about to
shoot my computer. And it's true. I'm so done with
this stupid thing. She was saying that she was responding
to it and saying that it was basically more of
(28:18):
the same from Trump, etc. Et cetera. I'll pull it
up at some point unless we I don't think there's
audio of it. She didn't say it with audio. So
the it is they're trying to make something up out
of nothing, essentially, is what it is. They're trying to
make something out of nothing, and it really is nothing.
(28:39):
He didn't say this This was not anything said. She goes.
This is how dictators destroy free nations, was her response.
They threaten those who speak against them with death. That's
not what he did. That's not what he did. She said.
We cannot entrust our country and our freedom to a petty,
vindictive croll and stableman who went to be a tyrant.
(29:03):
You know, I can only speak from personal experience on things,
and I know other people have gone through you know,
other kinds of especially if you're in the media. Other
conservatives have gone through things. But I remember being called
a domestic terrorist by a sitting member of Congress, a Democrat.
They said those words, Dana lash is a domestic terrorist
because of my support for the Second Amendment. And this
(29:24):
wasn't long after Parkland, when I already had people who
were trying to break into my house to kill me.
And then you have a sitting elected official who says
something like this. Liz Channing never spoke out against that.
A lot of these very critical Republicans were very silent,
and it wasn't just me when they would bring up
(29:45):
and then they would universally smear all gun owners as
potential terrorists or potential problems or potential, you know, domestic agitators.
They were trying to They were really careful with their phrasing.
After that, I noticed a lot of these very critical
Republicans never spoke up for those people, never spoke I
(30:06):
never heard her say anything. I was kind of left
to be out there on my own, and a lot
of you were also. She never spoke up with that,
and that was like an actual there's no mincing of
those words, there's no explanation that is needed. But with this,
she's really quick to speak up and mischaracterize it as
(30:29):
a threat. Being criticized is not an attack upon you.
Being criticized for your interventionist policies and saying how would
you like it is not a threat. It is a criticism.
To characterize it as a threat betrays your stated strength
(30:52):
of an empowered woman. And this idea that oh, he's
petty and he's threatening people who speak again him with death,
that's actually not what he did, and it diminishes the
real threats from very real tyrants who do exist in
this world, like the ones that they just seemingly can't
find any strength to speak out against when it does happen. Then,
(31:14):
with the example that I just gave you personally, so
I just the problem is that what he said was accurate,
and it's stung, and she has no way to counter
it except to try to invert it and make herself
the victim. It's a rhetorical trick that's a beginner one.
(31:36):
You can easily see through it, and it's incredibly lame.
And I just expected, I guess a little better of
someone who's been in politics that long, whose family has
been in politics that long, and who has the last
name that she has. I just either refute it properly
or just be silent, because this does you no favors.
(31:58):
If your approach to everyday aches and pains is to
mask them, you know, feel better for a few hours,
or only have the pain return and then repeat the
cycle all over again, it's time to try Relief Factor.
And the good news is that Relief Factor makes that easy.
Their three week quick start is just nineteen ninety five,
less than a dollar a day. Instead of masking pain,
relief Factor helps eliminate it. It's a unique formula of
(32:19):
ingredients that helps support your body's response to inflammation, and
Relief Factor was developed by doctors. It's one hundred percent
drug free and for so many people, the results are
game changing, even life changing. Chris, my husband, rais about
relief Factor. So whether you're a cyclist, a hiker, you know,
an athlete from your college days or high school, and
maybe you're just active now, relief Factor supports inflammation, reduction
(32:41):
and joint health. Try it today. Visit relief factor dot
com or called one eight hundred four relief. That's one
eight hundred the number four relief. See in how just
a few weeks or even days, relief Factor can reduce
your pain and then you feel better, and then life
is just better. So don't mask pain, fight it naturally
with relief Factor.
Speaker 4 (32:59):
Get to lie down on the latest news with the
side of laughs whenever you want. Subscribe to the Dana
Show podcast on YouTube, Apple or wherever you get your podcast.
Speaker 2 (33:10):
Like SAMs through.
Speaker 3 (33:11):
The hour Glass.
Speaker 2 (33:12):
So are the days of the United States?
Speaker 5 (33:17):
Hi?
Speaker 3 (33:18):
You guys, Hi Avengers? Why on the call? Oh? Well,
I think you mean assembling.
Speaker 2 (33:27):
Oh that's pretty good.
Speaker 3 (33:28):
No, that was funny, Starlette.
Speaker 6 (33:29):
It is our pleasure to come together and to get
the vote out this election.
Speaker 2 (33:34):
Yeah, help we feel service. How've always start with what
our voting plans are going to be who we're going
to bring to the polls with us, that sort of thing.
Speaker 3 (33:41):
Just I think Kamala Harris needs a catch free Oh yes,
definitely a catch freeze.
Speaker 2 (33:47):
How about this. I'm just off the top of my head.
Speaker 3 (33:50):
I can do this all day. Shut up.
Speaker 2 (33:53):
I hate it? Okay, I mean it's original, bunch.
Speaker 7 (33:56):
What about something punchier like, oh boom, you're looking for
this man too?
Speaker 2 (34:00):
Everybody loved it?
Speaker 3 (34:01):
Okay again, I think we're just trying to get out
the folk.
Speaker 2 (34:05):
That's better. Okay.
Speaker 3 (34:06):
How about I'm down with democracy.
Speaker 2 (34:08):
It's just clean and simple. Okay, I like that.
Speaker 3 (34:10):
It's hard to argue with that.
Speaker 2 (34:12):
Kamala Harris.
Speaker 3 (34:13):
Down with democracy?
Speaker 1 (34:14):
Oh yeah, I'm Kamala Harris, and I say down with democracy.
Speaker 8 (34:19):
I don't know if that sounds the way we want
it to sound, though.
Speaker 3 (34:22):
I think we just need Can we get some production now?
Speaker 2 (34:25):
My nice.
Speaker 3 (34:28):
Oh yeah, oh yeah, that's right. Down with democracy?
Speaker 4 (34:31):
Down with democracy?
Speaker 9 (34:32):
Is that what we mean?
Speaker 2 (34:33):
Now? Get together, we're gonna tear down democracy.
Speaker 3 (34:37):
This is so perfect. Actually, I know they meant for
this to be funny, but this literally is exactly That
was a major backfire I think for them. Oh my gosh, seriously,
down with democracy, like tear it down. They didn't, that
was the full ad. They didn't alter that. Oh my gosh,
(34:57):
I know what they were trying to do, but they
missed a step.
Speaker 1 (35:02):
Right.
Speaker 3 (35:03):
That was so bad. Yeah, I'm okay with them doing that. Yeah,
down with democracy, down with it, down with the Republic.
I mean that's you know, really, that was honest. Stick
with us. Second hour on the way our partners, the
folks over at Ready Wise, they're always ready even if
you're not. That's what I like about Ready wis, Like
Ready Wis is just waiting there, waiting up in your pantry,
waiting up in your cabinets, you know, just waiting to
(35:24):
get going, and if you need it, it's ready because
it has a twenty five year shelf life. Think about
like the weather, I think about some of this other
stuff that's been happening on lately. Yeah, you always want
to make sure that you are prepared to feed yourself
in your family because in times of crisis, you never
want to have to worry about where your meals are
coming from. So two things for you. They have the
twenty percent off when you use data twenty at checkout.
(35:46):
Then they also have the seventy two hour food kept
Buy one, get one, so it's one hundred dollars in value,
but you're getting it for fifty dollars and then includes
two boxes. They have twelve pouches of premium survival food.
You have the drinks, the breakfast everything. You're getting everything
you need for your daily needs, your calories, all your
colork in, take your protein, your carbs. It's like twenty
(36:06):
percent of your daily carbs as well. So not only
is it going to power you to get through whatever
you need to get through, but you get comfort in
a crisis and beyond. And it's a smart choice because
this is all made, all sourced in the US, packed
in the US. You know the chain of command for
your US food, and you're supporting US agriculture and jobs.
Twenty five year shelf like life. As I said, visit
readywis dot com use promo cod data twenty at checkout
(36:26):
twenty percent off your entire purchase. That's going to gets
you ready wys dot com promo code data twenty for
twenty percent off.
Speaker 2 (36:33):
Day one. What's your first executive action?
Speaker 9 (36:35):
Well, my first priority, which will be probably the package
of bills, is about bringing down the cost of living.
So it's about housing, it's about childcare, it's about what
we need.
Speaker 3 (36:44):
To do to deal with grocery prices.
Speaker 9 (36:46):
So it's not one that it's a package that is
with one singular purpose bringing down the cost of life.
Speaker 2 (36:52):
We have to go.
Speaker 3 (36:54):
How is she going to? First off, she's there now,
so what's stopping her? I mean, it's not even day
one if she were to win, it's not even day one.
She's already there. So yeah, why hasn't she started? Now?
(37:14):
Welcome back to the program. Acquiring minds. Want to know
Dana lash with you top of this second hour, and
I yeah, why hasn't she begun it? Now? I'm really
curious about that because she's there, Kine in the white
How she's the vice president? She could do some things.
(37:42):
Is she withholding this magic policy solution and holding it
over a voter's heads? Because that's pretty lame. It's like,
I have the cure to all diseases here, can't wait
to use it after you vote for me? You know
what I mean? It's like, you're pretty lame. I have
(38:02):
no idea, I have no other way to interpret that.
But she's there now. Second Secondly, How are you gonna
bring about the cost of living when everything that you
want to do and by you I mean Biden, but
you've appropriated it is designed to literally increase the cost
(38:23):
of living. So that also doesn't make any sense to me.
All of these individuals talk like they've never had to
take a kneecon class, they've never had any real world experience.
They just looks like toddlers. They just say whatever, I
want to grow up and be a rainbow, Okay, I
want to grow up and everybody's gonna be happy and
(38:45):
have free money and live in mansions. That's gonna yay,
and everyone's gonna have ponies. That's what she's doing. She's
that it's Toddler twenty twenty four. That's exactly what it is. Apparently,
So Caam, what were you telling me on break? Did
she tell them our Cuban to shut up?
Speaker 2 (39:02):
I saw that there was a breaking report. Now there
was no link in a story tied to it, but
that apparently Kamala Harris campaign told Mark Cuban to stop
speaking on behalf of the Kamala Harris campaign.
Speaker 3 (39:14):
Oh, you know, because Mark Cuban was saying that there's
no strong women around Trump and that women are stupid
if they support him. Harris Faulkner asked him, audious, I'm
at eleven. She took a shift to him, listen to this. Look.
Speaker 2 (39:28):
I don't know where Mark Cuban is today, but as
a woman, I have questions.
Speaker 10 (39:33):
I want to know, are you big enough?
Speaker 3 (39:35):
Are you man enough to apologize on responsibility for witches? Well?
You know, I mean a lot of people have asked that,
so it's you know, no, he's not going to because
he doesn't think he's done anything wrong. But if the
Harris campaign asked him to stop speak, it hurt. Definitely hurt.
That's the whole point. That's what this campaign is doing.
(39:56):
And I have a piece that's that I'm working on
about this. It was gonna come out with the last
night that it'll be out later today. It's a piece
that I'm working on about this, which gets into they
got mad at my friend Jesse Waters because Jesse Waters
was joking about how his wife better or not vote
for Harris. That would be a betrayal. Jesse has a persona.
He's got a rat pack persona. That's the persona that
he has on Fox. He plays his role. You know
(40:18):
how like with WWE, you got some dudes that are
the baddies that go out there. Jesse has this persona.
I've known Jesse for years and he is He's a
super nice dude. He's joking and people are like, Nope,
the left is situational. He doesn't want to have humor.
Like they'll hold up a severed trump head. Who's that
female carrot Top? Maybe it's carrot Top, trans carrot Top.
(40:39):
Who's the trans carrot Top lady? And she held up
the severed head. I know her name, but I'm pretending
not to. Yeah. They were like, no, it's a joke.
You guys are so sensitive. Oh my gosh, it's just
a joke. Why are you guys so ignorant? If not,
you're so not funny. But then you he makes a
joke about this and everyone's like, all the maga men
(40:59):
are going crazy. And then they use his joke and
he was just being facetious. They use that as a
way to castigate all the dudes and say, oh my gosh,
the ma There was the headline that was literally the
headlines numerous ones that were trending Maga men are freaking out. Well,
I don't know, anyone who slaps their wife or slaps
(41:22):
their girlfriend in the line at a valet except for Democrats.
So this doesn't track. Sorry, this doesn't really track for me.
And it also presupposes the worst about the women that
you're trying to get to vote for you. Isn't that
just like the left? Well, the reason women any women,
If there's a woman that's not voting for me, it's
because she's a beaten dog. Is why she's an unempowered, sad,
(41:46):
pathetic beaten dog. That's exactly what she is. And ladies,
you know, if you're beaten dogs out there, you don't
have to tell your husbands that you voted for We
played that ad yesterday. They because they can't reconcile themselves
to the truth that these chicks don't want her. There
are some chicks out there like me that just don't
(42:07):
want her. I don't think she's accomplished. I think she's
a social climber, a ladder climber. Everything that she has
ever gotten, she's been appointed to. She's not legit entered
a field outright. Everything from the beginning of her career
to where she is now. She was appointed there. She
didn't earn it outright. She doesn't come off as strong,
(42:29):
she doesn't come off as being confident, and she sounds kooky.
She takes and makes the worst decisions because she's a
horrific strategist. Case in point, this ad that she did.
I want her to play this. So this is audio
sound by twenty seven. This is her final ad that
(42:51):
is airing in Pennsylvania, and she did it with the
Pennsylvania governor and the guy who was shortlisted to be
her VP pick Josh Shapiro. Now I had. My theory
is that there are two reasons why they didn't pick
Josh Shapiro over Tim Walls. They didn't pick Shapiro because
a He's Jewish and they don't want to get into
an issue with Israel and Hamas and dear Bornistan. And
(43:15):
then the second thing is that he makes her look
like a m up it. Watch this and tell me
that you disagree. This is audio somebody twenty seven election.
Speaker 2 (43:24):
It's bigger than us. It's about the future. Do you
want more chaos or like me, are you ready for
some common sense? That's why I'm with Kamala. I've known
her for two decades.
Speaker 3 (43:34):
She's practical and she gets a.
Speaker 6 (43:36):
Sty done as I will try a new way forward
and find solutions to create jobs and bring down costs.
I will fight for you and your family every day.
Speaker 3 (43:48):
Pennsylvania, Let's not go back. This is one of the
dumbest moves I've ever seen. I'm glad they made it. Like,
don't get me wrong, but it's one of the dumbest
moves I've ever seen our Democrats do they picked the fud,
the goofy goober that's out of Minnesota, and they didn't
pick Josh Shapiro because look how much he had much
(44:10):
more energy in charisma than she did. Didn't he? I
mean you got that immediately in that ad and that
adds thirty seconds. Well, where was Tim Walls? Isn't it
weird that he went there? Do you think it was weird?
Do you think that they were trying to suggest to
Pennsylvania voters that, oh, no, here's my guy. I mean,
it's weird that Wolf's wasn't in it. Right, everybody knew
(44:32):
that Shapiro. Everybody thought actually he was going to be
the VP. There were tons of Democrats insiders that thought
it was a done deal. Where was Walls at? That's
kind of weird. But do you see now why she
can't have anybody that makes her look better. It enhances
her inepticy, her incompetence. So to have a goofy, goober
(44:55):
like Walls on the ticket, actually they they think that
it makes her look better. What she could have done
is she could have had Shapiro on the ticket with her,
and then she could have defaulted to a more east
woody and strong, silent type and played a role right
and had him go out there, and then she could
come out with some very you know, with some stage
(45:17):
craft to look really well put together and really strong
and really prepared. And she could have limited that and
sent Shapiro out there to do a lot of the
retail stuff if they were smart. But they're not, because
they're horrible strategists. They have no idea how to do
any of those. But it looked weird that they were
sitting there together and she just like kicked Walltz to
the side. I thought that was fascinating. I mean, they're
(45:40):
just not even trying to hide it anymore. They just
erased him entirely. But they're sitting there, They're just sitting there,
and they were, you know, they were talking and that's
just fascinating. So I don't know. I just they really
(46:01):
need they really need Pennsylvanian. That was the other dune thing.
He's Pennsylvanian. They need Pennsylvania. They have to have Pennsylvania.
They really messed up. I think if honestly, if she
ends up losing, that's going to be a huge part
of it. It really will be a huge part of it.
Women are dominating in a lot of these early swing states.
One of the things that we told you, and we
(46:22):
got the new job numbers in we talked about that
last hour. They're all election shenanigans have already started. Lorraine
has a great piece up at Substack right now that
gets into the ballot box bombs and the court cases
and the fraudulent donations and all the fake you know,
registrations and all of that. The ballot box bombs specifically,
they were designed to burn the ballots and not explode
the boxes. And then they found a note in one
(46:45):
of the boxes saying that the boxes are going to
continue to burn until Gaza was freed at bombed again
just out despite so, they think it's a white dude
between ages thirty and forty years old, short hair or
ball thinned, medium built then face in a background in
metal working and welding. I guess because you have to
put it back together. I don't understand why. Okay, so
(47:09):
the I'm sure that they're gonna find those real quick.
That's interesting though, because it could hurt Democrats and Republicans
at the same time, right, because they're the Goazen people.
The people who are pro Hamas are very upset at
Democrats because Democrats are too terrified to publicly state that
they are as hardcore pro Hamas as they say privately
they are. So it's a little a little interesting. But
(47:31):
it was in Vancouver, Washington, Portland, Oregon. So yeah, these
are leftists that are doing this completely but they're anti
Israel protesters. And they said all drop boxes will burn
free Gatha, Well, maybe you should have a drop box
for your stupid ballots. How dumb is that? Right again,
getting into the hole, like I'm just gonna put my
vote in this easy to mess with dropbox here, don't
(47:56):
but we're gonna do the honor. I mean, can you imagine.
I was looking at some of the pictures. It's this
official ballot drop box just on a street corner on completely.
There's like a little camera in the corner, but they're
still looking for the guy. So how much does that
camera's helped? You know? There you go just wild. Then
they had some so this is what was going on
(48:17):
in Bucks County where they had this fight over the
ballots and all of that in Bucks County. And then
you had the RNC, which they sued and they rightfully
are they they were got reversed by the court. And
then they because you had people in Bucks County that
were in line and they were being incorrectly told to
go home, and the RNC interviewed and the RNC was
(48:38):
right to have interveene, and I'm glad that they did.
And you had these paid canvassers. York County was looking
into an abundance of these like paid canvassors and people spreading,
you know, all this telling trying to manipulate people standing
in line, which to me, that's electioneering. That should be
a felony offense for these people. And then you had
(49:02):
the Virginia case too, where they were trying to clean
up their voter roles and they ended up winning on that.
So there's been some there's some shenanigans happening. That's why
turnout past is so critical, because not only do you
have to get over the margin of error, you got
to get over the margin of theft. But is the
theft limited to just election day and the election period.
(49:24):
One of the things we're going to be talking about
on this program coming up is this major problem And
I've brought this up before, this huge problem with the census,
and I retweeted my friend Daniel Horowitz. He and I
actually we were at an event recently together and we
were talking about this in person, and you kind of
have to wonder. You were not saying that this is
(49:47):
going to happen, But what if the census errors or
jerrymanderin and all of this, What if that's the that's
the fix. What if I'm just saying, like, for instance,
Texas should have a couple more seats, Florida should have one.
He knowed, Minnesota and Rhode Island each retained a seat
that they should have lost, and Colorado got an extra
seat that they should not have gotten. So what if
(50:12):
that's the fix? And it's been years in the making,
No one's talking about that, but we will. We got
a lot to hit. I always carry I'm never going
to tell somebody to not carry. I always I have
no problem using lethal force and protection of myself or
somebody else. There are instances where you're barred from carrying,
and I've given you These aren't like anecdotal you know things.
(50:34):
These are I have friends who live in DC, New York.
And my friend who lives in DC, she's a female,
she lives and works in DC, has to per her job,
and she even though she's got one of the very
difficult to get license to carry in DC, she can't
carry everywhere. And you know, sometimes she's leaving at work
at eleven o'clock at night, and she doesn't want to
be a statistic. So she went out and got the
(50:54):
Berna SD, which is their most their best selling model,
the most popular one that they have, and the burn
A gun, and it deters and stops threats from like
what fifty feet away because it shoots these chemical irritant projectiles.
And when you compare it to like a stunt gun,
you got what maybe one or two shots with a
stun gun. You got five rounds with the Burna SD.
(51:16):
So it shoots these chemical irritant projectiles that can disable
these threats and you have an additional option for self defense.
Now at the website. They have different models, they have
different projectiles, accessories, and you can get ten percent off
when you go through burna dot Com slash Data and
they don't care about gun for you zone signs the
burn a sun You can get it shipped right to
(51:36):
your door. There's no waiting period, there's no background check.
Is legal in all fifty states, and this is great
for when your options are limited and not by your choice.
Burna dot com slash data for ten percent off. That's
b y r Ina dot com slash dantap for ten
percent off.
Speaker 2 (51:50):
And now all of the news you would probably miss,
it's time for Data's quick five.
Speaker 3 (51:56):
So Liberty University is being sued by a former IT
staffer because he's a dude who's pretending to be a woman.
It's Liberty University, it's a Christian university. It's a private business.
They can do what they want and no amount of
harassment by lawfair is going to make them do otherwise.
So this dude who wants to be a chick is
(52:16):
mad because he got fired by the Evangelical Christian school,
a private business and they I mean obviously, I would
imagine that when you agree to work there, you know,
usually you send contracts and things like that. They have
an expectation of behavior and you know, you know, things
like that. And so the dude who's named eleanor Zinsky,
(52:38):
he's working with the ACLU, and he's seeing that it's
discriminatory of him, of them to fire him. And he
was only there. He applied for the IT job and
then four months after started transitioning, and he apparently he
did notify them of it, and then requested that the
school like depart from a doctrine and admission. That's what
(53:01):
Liberty said, which I agree with. And so now they're like, oh,
he's you know, they fired, They fired the dude. And
now the dude's like, oh, it's discriminated. They can do
what they want. It's a private business. You cannot force
people to associate against their will if we have freedom
of association. And sorry, but you knew this going into it.
I think he purposefully did this. Really did a car
(53:23):
crashed into Billy Corgan's tea store, Madam Zuzu's. This was
in Chicago. His son and his wife were in or
his son and his mother in law were in there
at the time that had happened. I write about this
over the weekend. It happened at like twelve pm and
it was in Highland Park, Illinois, and a car legit
crashed right in there. His son was okay. I think
his mother in law had some injuries. And they showed
(53:46):
the vehicle half inside and half outside of the store,
and they said they're still investigating it, but they drove
around the curb and right up into the store. So thankfully,
his son was not injured, was out of the way, thankfully.
Good heavens. We have more are on the way, including interesting.
This is interesting. Some Democrats are starting to disassociate from
Harris and try to play up some Trump connections. Not
(54:08):
kidding you, stay with us, Hi.
Speaker 8 (54:12):
I'm Lillian, an English major at Hillsdale College. Here's Hillsdale
President doctor Leary Arne with a Constitution minute.
Speaker 7 (54:20):
America's founders believed in a separation of church and state,
in that the country was not to have an official
religion or an official sect, but that did not mean
that government was to be hostile to religion or even
indifferent to religion, as many today argue. In fact, America's
founding document, The Declaraes of Independence, includes both a reference
to God as the author of the laws of nature
(54:42):
and a confident assertion that human beings are endowed by
their creator with certain inalienable rights. Far from being hostile
or indifferent to religion, America's founders understood the theology of
the Declaration to be an essential part of the education
of citizens.
Speaker 8 (54:58):
To learn more and get a free at Constitution, visit
constitutionminute dot com.
Speaker 3 (55:03):
This Constitution Minute was furnished by Hillsdale College.
Speaker 4 (55:08):
Keep your Finger on the Pulse with a Dana Show
podcast delivering timely news with insightful analysis whenever you want,
straight to you on YouTube, Apple or wherever you get
your podcasts.
Speaker 3 (55:20):
I was reading this story and welcome back to the program,
Dana Lash with you. We have the chat at Rumble
three forty seven direct TV for listening. Trust really also
everywhere around the country. I was reading the story about
this dude who survived for ten days lost in the
California Mountains, and I really don't think that he got lost.
Not all who wander are loss. Some just want to
get the hell away from you people. You know, if
(55:41):
I wanted to add, not you people the drive bys.
If I wanted to add all the Tolkiens quote from
Lord of the Rings, the uh uh what is it?
The uh riddle of Strider? The it makes me. I
was like, is there really did it? Maybe he was
just like, I'm done and then just walk into the woods.
We're almost there. Collective as a nation, I think we're
(56:01):
right there. We're really close. So we've been talking about
some of the election shenanigans. I wanted to share this
story with you too. This is very interesting. So Bob Casey,
who's a Democrat and he's in Pennsylvania. You have Shapiro,
Josh Shapiro, who did this final ad and we play
(56:22):
that for you with Kamala Harris. But the headline here
from the Wall Street Journal, Bob Casey plays the Trump card.
The Democrat from Pennsylvania finds himself in the fight of
his political life. And they said that because he's going
up against Dave McCormick. So you know McCormick, obviously working
(56:47):
with Trump, is a Republican, so you know there's some crossover.
But Casey, Bob Casey is also trying to jump on
the coattails for Trump, even and as Kamala Harris is
doing these ads with Josh Shapiro in Pennsylvania. I think
this is incredibly telling that they're doing this, because this
(57:09):
is not the only Democrat that is doing this. This
is what I tell you when I say you can't
just look at these national polls, okay, and some of
the state poles, I think don't tell the true story.
Stuff like this tells you the true story. So he's
Bob Casey is a Democrat running for Senate, and he
thinks that distancing himself from Kamala Harris and trying to
(57:34):
cozy up to Trump is the way that he's going
to stay alive. They're trying to do the Joe Mansion thing.
Joe Manchin had to do that though, because he's West Virginia,
he had to do it. So you have four Democrat
senators in four different states that have been actually citing
Trump and their ads and trying to get close to them.
(57:59):
That includes Amy Baldwin in Wisconsin, Alyssa Slotkin in Michigan. Ah, wait, Dana,
do you mean those those states where Democrats are having
some trouble, these blue wall battlegrounds. Say? Why yes, Dana,
that's exactly what I'm saying. I find that fascinating. So
(58:21):
he's definitely he's trying to definitely trying to make this
move and kind of get close to Trump like this.
That's and a lot of down ballot democrats in these
tight races are doing the same thing. This is similar
to what happened with Barack Obama in twenty twelve when
(58:42):
Barack Obama was running for or when Barack Obama. This
is midterm election under Barack Obama. Oh no, this is
the general election Barack Obama. Uh, midterm election is when
it started. So like in twenty ten, that's when I mean,
that's when they had the great lacking and that was
part of the Tea Party. The Tea Party made that happen.
(59:03):
The Tea Party took back the House and during that time.
But in twenty twelve, there were people and these were
actual stories, and it was funny because leftist entities like
Daily Coasts and all that were trying to hammer these
democrats from disassociating themselves with Obama. It's not that they
went and they were trying to get like Romney or
(59:24):
McCain or anything like that. They they just didn't want
to do any events with Barack Obama. Claire McCaskill was
one of them because he was a drag on down
ballot races. He did not have coattails his entirety of
his two terms. He did not have any kind of
pool until after he left the White House. And even
then it's arguable and how much pool he had. Bill
(59:44):
Clinton had like double his pooll. So I'm looking at
that effect. She's so toxic that these down ballot democrats
and these very tight races don't want anything to do
with her. So you have Casey. Casey's been there for
three terms. He's an incumbent, so he runs an ad.
He tries to say, yes, I agree with Trump on this,
(01:00:06):
and you know, on some of these policies that are
maybe a little bit more practical in common sense. But
then literally he will echo what the party bosses say
and say that he's a threat to democracy. It's like
he has different ads running on the airwaves right now
that say completely contradictory things. And again he's not the
only one doing this. Now, if Harris takes Pennsylvania, this
(01:00:31):
is the race to watch. You need to watch Bob
Casey's race in Pennsylvania. Actually, let's pull it up right now,
you really need to watch his race because he has
the he is the one that has the momentum. He's
on the ballot, not Shapiro. Shapiro can help, but Casey
is the one that has the momentum on the ballot,
not the top of the ticket. And if she can
(01:00:53):
hold it in Pennsylvania, it will be because he did,
because he did well and he performed as a spected
Let's look at Pennsylvania right now. We're gonna look at
the Senate, looking at the Senate in Pennsylvania, and I mean,
because they're close. This is super fascinating to me that
(01:01:17):
they're I mean, it is something else. Casey is only
up by it's within the margin of error. He's only
up barely. He's not even up by two and a
half right now in Pennsylvania. It's not even two and
a half. He has led the entire time, but not
by a lot, and he's never led beyond the margin
of error. There's only there are only two poles. And
(01:01:40):
I think that the sample size for both of them
was relatively small because the UMass Lowell poll that was
done in early early mid October that was only eight
hundred likely voters and in looking at and that had
Casey yep six. And then the other was a CBS
News poll, and again that only had two hundred and
(01:02:03):
seventy three likely voters. Margin of ERA was three point six,
so that would take his plus six down quite significantly.
And the other one, that UMass poll, the margin of
RA was even higher, that was three point seven, and
so I mean they that's it. He's Casey's only ahead.
The last Rasmussen poll that was taken October twenty fifth
(01:02:24):
to October twenty eight has them tied. The USA today
Suffolk had him plus three, so the RCP average is
two point four. It's really tight there. So if she
ends up taking that state, if she does well, it
will be because of Casey. And McCormick has rightfully been
(01:02:49):
saying Casey's flip flopping as much as Harris is. You know,
Casey's you know, he's he's in which he is. I mean,
he literally has two different contradictors as running right now
in Pennsylvania. And it's funny because Casey at the time
back in six he was running against Rick Santorum, and
(01:03:12):
Casey blasted Santorum because he said, you voted with w
Bush ninety eight percent at the time. But guess how
much now he's voted with Biden. He's mccasey is literally
the exact same. He's voted with Biden ninety eight percent
at the time. That's something McCormick has pointed out. So
I just find it hysterical that Casey thinks the right
(01:03:35):
response is to hug Donald Trump with this. And again
he's not the only one. So these are the races
that you need to watch that are going to give
you a better idea, I think, as to the health
of the top of the ticket in these battleground states.
So you got to look not only at Pennsylvania, you
(01:03:55):
gotta look at Michigan and Wisconsin, because you know, like,
let's look at Wisconsin. I mean, it's Harris is only
up RCP average point three right now. It's tough. It
is tough right now, only up point three, very very
very close. And in terms of the Senate with Baldwin
(01:04:20):
versus Hoved, Baldwin is only up by one point in
the RCP average and she has not led the whole time.
They've kind of gone back and forth, both within the
margin of error, but they've gone back and forth, and
these are the top battlegrounds for the Senate. Arizona, Michigan, Montana, Nevada, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Maryland, Wisconsin.
(01:04:41):
These are one of the things I'm going to do
over the weekend is I'm going to put together an
electoral map because I have a couple of different ways
that I think this can go, and I'll publish that.
I'll put that up on a separate piece. It'll come
out Monday. I'm always curious to see how correct I was.
I was pretty spot on, by the way in twenty twenty.
Just got to say, but these are I mean West,
(01:05:03):
I mean these are this is wild. But they all
think that Biden's doing a horrific job. They all think
the direction of the country is bad. So the toss
up those are the toss up states. Those are the
states where it's really really close, where it's really close,
and Maryland in New Mexico, Lean's DEM, Lean's GP, Florida,
Montana and Nebraska, and you got Scott in Florida. I'm
(01:05:26):
not worried about the likely DEM states New Jersey, Virginia,
and Missouri because Josh Holly's been doing incredibly well By
the way, speaking of Josh Holly audio some by one,
he had a debate with Lucas Kuntes and I just
witnessed a murder when I saw this video. Listen to this.
It's a little bit of courage to share a stage
with Lucas Koontz after he shot a reporter last week.
Speaker 2 (01:05:47):
I guess he wants to go out with a bang now.
Speaker 3 (01:05:50):
As to gosh, And then not only did he stick
him with a shive rhetorically, then he twisted it because
he just buried him with policy and Koots stood there
on the stage looking completely dumbfounded. I mean, and it
was because the whole audience was that that was a murder.
(01:06:14):
That's what a murder looks like. That was the wild
he's Holly is. He's beating the pants off of coons.
He's beating him to death rhetorically, politically, polling wise. So
I'm not even concerned about that race at all, whatsoever.
Holly's gonna cruise, He'll get reelected. It's not even an issue.
But I do think it's funny because he provided a
great opportunity for us to illustrate how idiotic the anti gun,
(01:06:34):
gun controlled Democrats are. Because they are. I mean, it's
just you know, crazy. And by the way, apparently they
didn't even like call the police or do any kind
of emergency or anything like that. After like more stuff
keeps coming out about that whole failed campaign staging op.
It was horrible. Now looking at so we're looking at Wisconsin,
I want to look at Michigan real quick, because that's
(01:06:55):
where looking at the that's where you get to Slocken
versus Rogers, and Slockin's leading by three point five alyssa.
Slockin may turn it out again. It all comes down
to how much of a drag will Harris Walls be
on these tickets, on these down ballot races. How much
(01:07:18):
of a drag are they going to be? And yes,
that is absolutely it has absolutely happened before. Imber. I
tell you I've been there, I've seen it. I have
looked at raw data numerous election because it's been my
job in doing some of this election analysis, whether it's
not just for my program, but if I'm doing it
for Fox and when I was a token conservative at CNN,
(01:07:39):
and you can look and you can immediately it's like
looking at the matrix. You can immediately spot the trends.
When you get all this hard data and I'm looking
at it and you can see where a lot of
these close races previously Obama would just tank them, just
tank them. That's she lacking that they took one of
the one midterm where they lost majority in the House.
Oh my god. It's like the people that he campaigned
(01:08:01):
with lost harder. So they had like this unspoken rule
after that where then you didn't really do a lot
of campaign or Barack Obama after that because everybody was like, oh, yeah,
he's kind of a drag. Harris is the same way.
That's why you don't see her. You're doing a lot
of these events, like when Trump gets out there, they'll
bring up either the candidates or the incumbent that's running.
(01:08:22):
They bring them up on stage. Harris isn't doing that.
Have you seen her do it? Who was it Whitmer?
But Whitmer's not running? Is it? Has she done an
event with slockin? No, that's a battleground state. Don't you
think that that would be think of it if it
was helpful. Don't you think Harris and Waltz would be
doing an event with Slocking Don't you think they would
be doing an event with Bob Casey and Pennsylvania. Don't
think Casey would have been up on stage. Don't you
(01:08:44):
think that they would have been in Wisconsin or Michigan.
They would have been with UH and with Baldwin and Wisconsin,
don't you think so? Because she's a drag our partners
that he'll bring you free radio celtech the P fifteen.
If you don't have the P fifteen, you need to
get it because this is like one of it literally
is the lightest Thinness double stack nine millimeter on the market.
This is ideal for concealed carry, especially for you ladies.
(01:09:07):
I'm not excluding you guys because you guys may want
something light and thin as well to carry, but for
ladies it's a lot harder for us to conceal. And
so knowing that you have the stopping power from nine millimeters,
but that it's sleek, it's compact, that you have that
extra ability for ultraconcealability is amazing. And I have both
the metal and the polymer version, but it is the
(01:09:28):
lightest and thinist comes to two magazines, so you have
a standard fifteen round with minimal pinky extension, and then
you have the standard twelve round that's flush fit and
double also double stack mag that's for ultraconcealability treatment, fiber
optic front sightfully adjustable fiber optic two dot rear as
striker fire. I mean, this is a great trigger. It's
from the inventors of the microcompact pistol category Innovation Performance Keltech.
(01:09:50):
Learn more about the kel Tech P fifteen at keltech
weapons dot com. That's k e Ltec Weapons dot Com.
Tell them Dana sent you.
Speaker 2 (01:09:58):
It's his laugh miss to make bad decisions. It's time
for Florida.
Speaker 5 (01:10:06):
Man.
Speaker 3 (01:10:07):
I just feel like if I got bit by a
shark one time at a certain beach, I wouldn't go
back to that beach, you know what I mean, Like
I would maybe I'd probably find somewhere if I went back,
and I'd probably find somewhere different. Well, that's not what
happened with Joe Fryer. So this dude apparently he got
bitten twice by sharks on at the exact same beach
like eleven years apart. He's a competitive surfer and he
(01:10:29):
got bitten again and he had to go. I mean,
look like it's pretty bad. He was okay, I mean
he was up and he was like, you know, talking everybody,
but he got bitten again and the same time, like
the same it's this Florida. It's an NBC reporter, Joe Fryer.
This dude got I mean eleven eleven years apart, bitten
twice in the exact same beach. This was Treasure Coast
(01:10:52):
News and a yes, I know, shark by chances are
very low. But the guy's name is Cole Toshman. And
he when it bit him the second time, he was
using uh he's punching the shark's head and he had
it was it mangled his hand, so he got twelve
stitches in a cast and he had to like get
a tourniquet and all of that stuff. But I'm just thinking, like,
(01:11:13):
you know, maybe I wouldn't like surfing looks really fun,
But at the same time, I think that's the what
if you're on the surfboard there's a big giant shark
and you just see it in the wave and I ool,
my gosh, right, I would surf all the way to
shore and up a mountain. That's what would happen. Just
saying this just makes this that kind of stuff makes
me nervous. I don't know. Uh, we had the spit
(01:11:35):
mask guy yesterday. This I think we had. Oh no,
this is another guy with a machete. Is this a
new machete? One? Here we go. Eighteen year old Cale
Caleb Williams was arrested. Why are they saying allegedly brandishing
a machete because they have a photo of him literally
(01:11:55):
brandishing the machete. He was brandishing him shuddy at an
elderly woman during an altercation at an early voting site
in Uptune Beach. He raised it over his head. He
got into an altercation with the two women, one of
who was who was seventy one years old, and he
was taken into custody improper exhibition of a dangerous weapon,
so brandishing, basically aggravated assault on a person age sixty
(01:12:18):
five years or older. He was with a group of six.
They were there to I don't know what site he
was for, but apparently they were protesting and he was
smiling and holding them a shuddy aloft in the parking lot.
You gotta be careful around polling sites because they will
get you. At a polling site like peep, they are
literally people who just watch what everybody does, and they
watch where the boundaries are. We have our third hour
(01:12:40):
on the way, and we've got the latest with now
the Liz Cheney victim. We've got a whole bunch of stuff,
the transcript, gait ballat Harvesting the Census, and more. Stick
with us, Welcome back to the program, your lovable curmudgeon
with you at the top of this third hour, Dane Lash.
You can find a at substack as well, chapter and verse.
(01:13:02):
A lot of good stuff that happens over there, and
you can also find us Rumble, where the discussion happens. YouTube, Facebook,
all that good stuff, Channel three forty seven Direct TV.
The podcast Absurd Truth, which has some of the different
moments from the show all in one. One of the
things that I don't think anyone's talking about. The only
other person I've seen talking about this is actually Daniel Horowitz,
(01:13:26):
and I think Ron DeSantis mentioned it briefly once, but
I haven't. But no one's really actually hitting it, particularly
Republicans or the RNC, which to me, they really need to.
And here's why. What if let's just say, because you know,
we got the election Tuesday. Now, let me speculate for
a moment. There's been a lot of discussion about voter integrity,
(01:13:48):
and I get it. I mean, I've seen I saw
a video. I tweeted about it. Actually when was I
think this is yesterday? Was this yesterday where Georgia said
it was a video of like one of their people
and one of their election officials, and Georgia was saying, well,
you know, we may not be able to have the
results by election. It may take a couple of days,
that is what they said. And my point is I
(01:14:10):
had said that that's absolutely ridiculous for that to take
that long. That's ridiculous. There's zero excuse because if you
want to essage voter suspicion of compromised election integrity, then
you've got to get accounted by the end of election nite.
That's just asinine to think that, you know that there's
no reason for it. There's no reason. So you have
(01:14:32):
people who justifiably have issues already and are suspicious and
are concerned about voter integrity. And I get this, and
a lot of people are curious about are watching the
machines and making sure ballots are counted. But and again
I'm speculating, but you need to ask these questions because
(01:14:53):
there's a lot of concern about this census. What if
the there was the fix in, but it was years
in the making and not just election night. What if
election night was the final ps de resistance, what the
piece of lot resistance. What if it was just the
(01:15:15):
last piece of the puzzle. You could have Trump that
could lose due to an unnoticed form of shenanigans. And
like I said, Diana horriz is the only other person
he was on. We ran out a time because there's
so much to get into, but he's going to come
(01:15:36):
back on and we're going to talk about this next week.
What if Republicans saw that there was fraud happening but
they didn't address it or weren't able to address it
or whatever immediately. And one of the things that we've
seen this this election, and I was actually looking at
some of this is that blue wall. So you keep
(01:15:58):
hearing these phrases like the blue wall and this belt,
like Kamala Harris was she was trying for some of
the sun Belt states. They think that they're going to
hold the blue Wall. Democrats wanted to try for the
sun Belt when it was Biden other that they got
Harris her chances are slimmer, and you keep paring about
blue wall, et ceterat ca Democrats have always the crux
of Democrats victory has always been that blue wall. And yes,
California is great, but it's always been Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin. Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin,
(01:16:22):
and I think only one time since Ducaucus have they
ever had it pierced. Right now, migration trends, demographic shifts
have really done a lot to beef up Republican positions
in the Sun Belt states. It's Arizona, Nevada, Georgia, you
got North Carolina. And if Democrats keep the blue wall,
(01:16:47):
say that Trump ends up with two hundred and sixty
eight electoral votes, that's like almost almost a win. Two
seventies is what is needed, an actual possibility. But what
if the states that Trump would win could actually have
(01:17:08):
more electoral votes without having to base any kind of
strategy on piercing or piercing the blue wall or winning
a rest belt state. And that's the issue. That's one
of the issues that Horowitz got into because when you
use this, when you look at the census report and
determine apportionment based on population, he noted in April of
(01:17:28):
twenty twenty, Texas got two congressional seats, Colorado, Florida, Montana,
North Carolina, Oregon gained one. I mean that that's the
estimation is for April first, twenty twenty. The shift benefited Republicans,
But what he's arguing is that it didn't actually capture
the massive migration from blue to red states. And this
(01:17:50):
is never more before, never so harder felt than in
the Sun Belt. He noted that this is this bombshell
report from the Census, and the RNC should have looked
at this. They admitted the Census Bureau admitted that they
overcounted in eight states and that they undercounted in six
(01:18:11):
states by an unbelievable margin. Five of the six undercounted
states were red, and six of the eight undercounted states
that heed were blue. And you had the largest errors
affecting red states on both sides. Say listed the air states.
Undercounted states were Arkansas undercounted by over five percent, Florida
(01:18:36):
by almost four percent, Illinois, may by one percent, Mississippi
by over four percent, Tennessee almost five percent, Texas almost
two percent. Those were undercounted states. Over counted states Delaware
by almost six percent, Hawaii by almost seven percent, Massachusetts
by over two percent, Minnesota by almost four percent, New
(01:18:57):
York by almost three and a half percent, Ohio by
a one and a half percent, Ruled Island by over
five percent, in Utah by almost by two and a
half over two and a half percent. So the errors
that they had in this bombshell census report singularly affected
(01:19:17):
red states by an egregious margin and favored blue states
by an egregious margin. Hans von Spokowski from the Heritage
Foundation had written about this and said that due to
these errors, Florida did not receive two additional congressional seats,
Texas lost out on a congressional seat, Minnesota and Rhode
(01:19:42):
Island each retained a seat they should have lost. Colorado
completely got a brand new seat that it didn't deserve.
Now you're looking in a crystal ball and trying to
speculate to figure out how much this affects the congressional
district boundaries and the control of Congress. But when you
(01:20:02):
look at the electoral college, it does what if the
race is distorted because of that. There hasn't been a
single hearing held on this Trump hasn't even focused on
this really himself. He's talked to I think he's maybe
mentioned the census a couple of times. He hasn't even
focused on this. But if I mean they had, there
(01:20:29):
was a note that in the previous census there was
an over account of only thirty six thousand people nationwide.
That's a negligible point zero one percent, and it didn't
affect reapportionment. Now the error is way much more egregious,
and it's very much more favorable to Democrats. They Republicans
(01:20:50):
could have taken the two years before this election to
challenge it, and they didn't. They didn't hold any hearings,
they didn't try to correct it. They didn't introduce legislation.
And I have to say I understand that the Trump
camp was litigating certain things. This was the big thing
they needed to litigate, because if there is something that's
(01:21:16):
off I suspect that it will be through this. Now.
They could have Republicans could have introduced legislation, they didn't.
They could have held hearings, they didn't. They could have
had a legal battle. Horoz not. It's that the Supreme
Court ruled in Utah v. Evans that the census clause
(01:21:38):
doesn't forbid using statistical methods to enhance accuracy behind a
beyond a direct count. And then, of course the population
of illegal aliens California, there are some estimates, and don't
pull this up, there are some estimates that California has
additional seats. Politico has a story on this how non
(01:22:01):
citizens decreased Republican chances of winning the White House next year.
This is published in October third of twenty fifteen, and
they noted that that's not the this isn't the only
issue that California, they believe might have an extra five
seats in the House simply due to the population of
illegal immigrants alone. Now, I will say Trump did try
(01:22:24):
to exclude from the census people who were here illegally,
but he was blocked in the courts and everyone was
basically kind of shrugged their shoulders. I guess there's no
legal way to fight on this. So there you go.
(01:22:48):
This is a real problem. And I mean, even back
in this October twenty fifteen piece, and this is an
October of twenty fifteen, this is before he's big win
again to Clinton says the math gives strongly democratic states
an unfair edge in the electoral college, the math that
(01:23:09):
the left uses and that the census has been using,
and the way that they're trying to rig this. The
states with the largest populations of illegal immigrants and other
non citizens gained extra seats in the House at the
expensive states with fewer such quote whole number of persons.
And yet you've barely heard anything about the census fight.
(01:23:33):
The last thing was the fight to prevent illegal individuals,
but it had nothing to do with the apportionment and
the irregular math used to make the determinations of allocating seats,
et cetera. That's the problem, and it's a big issue.
(01:23:56):
I mean, you would have to reallocate some of the seats.
States that have more citizens are losing out against states
that have fewer actual citizens and or have more illegal
aliens present than the states that are losing out. That's insane.
(01:24:18):
So I am not sure how this is will I mean,
it remains to see how this is, how this comes
to pass. I mean, this is you know, it's it's
very troubling, but this is the reality of the situation,
(01:24:39):
and the Republican Party does not have a strategy, to
say nothing of a long term strategy. They do not
have a strategy to deal with US. I don't know
what they're going to do. And as King noted, stay
on defense is a huge issue for the Republican Party.
(01:24:59):
So this is important enough to spend an entire segment
on because I still don't know what. It's a lot
harder to change this after the fact, is it not?
After the election. It's a lot tougher to say, well,
the census. Now you have flawed electoral count because of
the census. That's a lot harder to make that argument
after the fact, isn't it. Why didn't they do anything
(01:25:20):
two years before? So, like I said, if watch those
electoral counts, that'll be a very clear sign on this.
Speaker 2 (01:25:37):
And now all of the news you would probably miss.
It's time for Dana's Quick five.
Speaker 3 (01:25:43):
This is wild. So this guy, this Italian dad, Luciano Diadamo,
did not he woke up from a car crash. He
was in a coma since twenty nineteen, and he was
in a hit and run and he woke up from
it again in Acoma since twenty nineteen. He thought the
year was nineteen eighty and that he was twenty three
years old. He did not know that his parents, his
(01:26:05):
mom had passed. He did not know any of this stuff.
He legit. He was shocked when an older woman came
in and addressed him and the guy sixty eight, now
he was like speechless. He could not believe that was
his wife. And he did not understand how he had
a thirty year old son. And he said, I thought
I was crazy. He's like this is and then he
(01:26:25):
was shocked when he saw his reflection and did not
even know that he was a twenty three year old man.
Can you imagine that's crazy? This apparently, so you can.
We were talking about political clothing at the polls election
workers at Hamilton Township was this in Jersey. They said
(01:26:48):
you can't wear political clothing. And so this woman voted
on her bra. She had to take off her hat
and shirt and then she voted in her bra. And
then yeah, we kind of have to know that though,
like anything that's like a slogan or anything like that,
and that's both sides. That's not just against Republicans, it's
against democrats too. It's to create it's to protect photo
integrity and prevent intimidation, etc. So there you go. Let's
(01:27:11):
see this Halloween costume. It's a child's mind bending Halloween
costume that looked even adults baffled. They were shocked over this,
and they said it was a schoolboy. It was a
Halloween costume trick, so impressive. It's a photo that's circulated
on social media. I wish they would just tell you
instead of making you scroll down past. They're stupid advertising.
(01:27:32):
So it was just him standing next to so it
was him holding his waist and legs.
Speaker 2 (01:27:38):
Yeah, it looks really weird.
Speaker 3 (01:27:41):
I don't know how he did it. People were like,
how did you do that? It looks so great.
Speaker 2 (01:27:45):
You have to be squatting or something.
Speaker 3 (01:27:46):
But he only won third prize. Someone was like, maybe
it looks like it was obviously adult made, but was it.
I mean the other costume sucked. One of them I
think was supposed to be Wins Adams. It's easy enough.
I'm just saying, and it just, you know, I just
feel like that kid was robbed. I gotta say, because
you know that their parents help them. That little girl
(01:28:07):
go buy her Wednesday dress and she didn't. A New
York woman was charged with pepper sprain a Muslim uber
driver as he prayed Jennifer Gilbo was charged with second
degree and third degree assault as a hate crime. He
was praying on July thirty first at a red light
and she sprayed him. She pled not guilty, Good Heavens.
(01:28:29):
Stick with us. We're finishing this third hour.
Speaker 4 (01:28:33):
On the go and need a quick news fix with
a fun twist. Follow Dana's Absurd Truth podcast for bite size,
in formative episodes perfect for your busy schedule on Apple
or wherever you get your podcast.
Speaker 3 (01:28:45):
Welcome back to the program. Bottom of this third hour,
Dana Lash here with you. We're just days away from
the election, days away, and we've been getting into a lot.
I still want to, you know, encourage you to not
take a lot of the voting stuff. A lot of
or a lot of the polling about voting is gospel
(01:29:08):
truth for real, Please do not, because so much of
it is just up for interpretation. I mean, they're just
trying to do the best that they people are trying
to do the best they can, and others are just well,
it's a it's a an industry, and do on the
house to put it. It's just it's an industry looking
(01:29:30):
at a couple of things, including this USA Suffolk poll.
I don't know. I mean so much of it up
a point here, up a point there, I don't know.
I just some of it. Just they looked at three
hundred likely voters. This is meaningless to me. Three hundred
likely voters. This is stupid. Why are we doing this?
(01:29:51):
This is just people trying to put their finger on
the scale and tip it for narrative purpose. That's all.
This is three hundred likely voters. They've already been voting.
Are they registered? Clearly not. They would have said it.
Not all of them are registered, or they would have
said it. So you don't even know if these people voted.
They're trying to say it's tied at forty nine to
(01:30:11):
forty nine. I just these I just toss into the trash.
They're not even worth it. And yet I'm reading, I'm
looking at a whole article that's like deep diving into this,
and what does this tell us. I'm gonna tell you
what it tells you. Nothing. Three hundred likely voters, that's it.
(01:30:33):
And women are over sampled. Do you think that they're
trying to go for a narrative here. I just see
this stuff and I just toss it. It's trash. That's
why we gotta be careful with us. I mean, it's
I don't know. It's like I said, people are gonna
look and see what thick tea leaves. They're gonna just
(01:30:54):
read whatever they want to read out of this. I had.
There's one pulling entity at les Intel. They weren't too
bad back during twenty twenty. In fact, I think that
they were considered the most accurate polster of twenty twenty.
But they were saying that the way that they were
looking at it is that Trump was plus five in Arizona,
(01:31:18):
and that it's a lot tighter in Michigan and Pennsylvania,
where he's basically that where he's plus one. I think
they I don't think you can argue with that small
of the lead that he's leading and these in these
in those states where he might be only plus one,
especially when you have margin of ras at three five
and three seven. I mean that's kind of significant. So
(01:31:40):
I don't know that they basically, I think the most
accurate reading is that the states that Trump really needs
to win is where he's the tightest. I think it's
probably the most accurate to look at. I will say
that his momentum has been consistent, whether it's a five
point thirty eight aggregate or an rc P aggregate, or
(01:32:01):
if it's measured by you know, cook, or if it's
measured by uh, you know, like Quinnipiac, which tends to
lean left. I mean, it's that's been pretty consistent. But
I have everybody sitting here telling me, well, what do
you think is gonna happen? What do you think is
going to happen? I don't know. I mean the Blue
Wall states, that's a problem for Trump if he cannot
(01:32:23):
close those out. I was looking at remember what I
was just telling you about the census stuff, and how like,
what if Trump gets to two sixty eight because of
some of these states with the census. A friend of
mine did their own electoral map and he had guess
what he had Republicans at Kane sixty eight. Interesting, so interesting.
(01:32:49):
So this he's got he's got to close out. He's
got to get one of them. Wisconsin, Michigan, Minnesota's is
a toss up, which is crazy to me. Pennsylvania is
going to be tough, but it could be a two
seventy to two sixty eight type of thing. I will
say again I said this yesterday. You would rather be
(01:33:10):
Trump in this situation than Harris right now. That is
for certain. That is for certain. She's only plus five
aggregatedt RCP for Michigan and plus point two aggregate for Wisconsin.
I mean, it's tough. Kank goes the Amish, You're going
to give Trump the advantage, and but they've been voting
(01:33:32):
large in Pennsylvania. Can I tell you, did I talk
about this the Pennsylvania thing? How when I went out there? Okay,
so I went out there for a two AA event. Right,
we have affiliates on Pennsylvania and you go through Amish country.
And I do not say this with any disrespect at all.
In fact, I say it with cap will attest to this.
I say this with sheer, awe and admiration. I've never
(01:33:55):
seen gothar people in my life. I felt like I
had driven into a Tim Burton movie. We were driving
through this beautiful hilly countryside and I saw a woman
in a black dress with a bonded on in a field. Dude,
she had a scythe I was like my little goth
(01:34:16):
heart saying, like, that's the coolest thing I've ever seen
in my life. And it was like these very like
American Gothic clapward houses and the Almosh rut there doing
their chores, and their carriages were black, and their horses
were black and they had black I was like, this
is the Gothis thing I've ever seen. It's like little
goth on the prairie. It's amazing. And they had syths
(01:34:38):
in this these because they use the old timey stuff.
It was like and I wanted so badly to take photos,
but isn't that I think that's like disrespectful it I
don't know, Like I didn't want to be like leaning
out of the car window because I was telling the
drivers slot out because they pick you out the afield
to pick you up and they take out this event.
I was like, I didn't want to be like, you know, stop,
I want to take a picture because it's that kind
of disrespectful.
Speaker 2 (01:34:57):
I've been jealous of the Almosh for a long time.
I'd love to be that off dude.
Speaker 3 (01:35:01):
The goth Is stuff I've ever seen in my life.
Like nobody, all these other people are just posers. It
made me feel like a poser, like, wow, this is
just they are so tough and so goth anyway. But
Kean's like, the Amists are gonna come with their syths.
They're gonna come out I mean a for real sight,
not like a like an actual use in the field.
Speaker 2 (01:35:20):
Polls with their sights. Don't say stuff like that.
Speaker 3 (01:35:22):
No, they shouldn't do that. But I'm just like, it's
it's cool. It was so cool it is. I mean,
I was in AWE was like, this is the coolest
thing I've ever seen in my life. It was really
it was beautiful anyway, But you think that they're going
to bring it in perfect.
Speaker 2 (01:35:35):
So I think I've seen a lot of videos where
they're like, we're talking six figures of Amish voting, where.
Speaker 3 (01:35:41):
Before you are there's six figures Amish.
Speaker 2 (01:35:43):
Yeah, there's like thirty thousand that were voting, like in.
Speaker 3 (01:35:46):
The last election, thirty thousand, six figures.
Speaker 2 (01:35:48):
No, no, no, I know this is the last election.
I'm talking about this election. They've already apparently their numbers
are closer to three hundred thousand.
Speaker 3 (01:35:57):
I wonder, well they're apparently they're only ninety two thousand
Amish of all ages in Pennsylvania. So I don't know
if it's gonna get into six figures.
Speaker 2 (01:36:04):
I don't know.
Speaker 3 (01:36:05):
That's not what i'se that's uh.
Speaker 2 (01:36:07):
That's maybe the post I saw was a collective because.
Speaker 3 (01:36:10):
Not all of the politifacts says that one hundred and
eighty thousand New Amish voters is false because there's not that.
There's not one hundred and eighty thousand of them there apparently.
Speaker 2 (01:36:18):
Yeah, in Pennsylvania, but collectively.
Speaker 3 (01:36:20):
Yeah, no, collectively it's different. But they were saying in Pennsylvania.
Speaker 2 (01:36:23):
Yeah, there's a lot of Democrat states, and like you said,
like you know, Pennsylvania is a very important state that
there are a large Amish population there. If you get
those who haven't been previously engaged in voting, you know,
that's going to be a good thing for the campaign.
Speaker 3 (01:36:39):
So I'm telling you this is uh, it's gonna be
very interesting with all of this. I'm just you know,
we'll see. But got to get to that magic number
two seventy. You have to get to two seventy. It's
going to get crazier as we get closer because early voting,
like I said, early voting in is in Texas today
and I think they've been making I just think it's
(01:37:03):
wild that the last big headline from Biden Harris the
week before election. Is the job numbers just horrific? Twelve thousand?
Everyone's like, wait a minute. Everyone woke up this morning.
Maybe I need glasses? Does this say twelve thousand? Because
I thought for sure it was gonna be one hundred
and twenty two thousand. Yeah, we're missing something here, what
(01:37:24):
or one hundred and twenty fifth something like twelve And
that'll be revised down completely. So we'll see about all
of that. But I don't know. I really don't think
that or like hitting out at the women is helping
it all for sure, not at all. I don't think so.
I wanted to get a couple of these. I was
(01:37:48):
gonna play twenty six, but I think I'd rather jump
off my roof than play it. Yeah, I don't think so.
I don't think I'm gonna play that one. I will say,
let's get into this is audio, which wonder oh audio
sound bite nine. They were mad about the garbage. This
(01:38:11):
was last night. They This is how they opened their
evening news. Listen to this.
Speaker 10 (01:38:14):
Vice President Kamala Harris rallied in North Carolina and Pennsylvania
today and is in Wisconsin tonight. Former President Donald Trump
was in North Carolina earlier and tonight is also in Wisconsin.
He landed in Green Bay just a short time ago,
and then pulled this campaign stunt speaking to reporters from
a garbage truck, proof that he and his supporters are
(01:38:35):
giving no grace to a gaff by President Biden where
he and his explanation inadvertently called Trump supporters garbage inadvertently.
Speaker 3 (01:38:43):
Gosh, could you bend over more for this administration? That's
Nora O'Donnell. No grace for you mean, no grace for
the people who been calling, who called us Nazis and garbage.
Are you kidding me? It's a stunt. Clearly no grace
(01:39:04):
that inadvertently. No, he literally said it. It wasn't inadvertently
he said it. Stop trying to put a band aid
on this gaping wound. Quit.
Speaker 2 (01:39:14):
It's worse. They try to spin it. They're acting like
somehow it was Biden that's the victim because he was
given no grace. This is unbelievable.
Speaker 3 (01:39:23):
I I don't know, I can't I don't know.
Speaker 6 (01:39:28):
Oh.
Speaker 3 (01:39:28):
By the way, in case you forgot where Tim Walls
was here, he is audio sound bite five. The guy
who can't load a shotgun listen to this.
Speaker 4 (01:39:35):
That's what their plan is.
Speaker 3 (01:39:36):
He also is talking about putting a national sales tax
on everything things to buy every clothes, food, toys.
Speaker 4 (01:39:42):
Would ever you buy four thousand dollars a year, then
it adds to your family.
Speaker 2 (01:39:46):
Now, look, this dude's nearly eighty years old.
Speaker 4 (01:39:50):
He damn near killed himself getting into a garbage try.
Speaker 3 (01:39:55):
He damer kills herself trying to load a shotgun while
bragging about how much you use that same shotgun to
go shoot with, and then you were like fun foot
foot come on now, CCP, come on, just oh man,
I can't, I can't. This is just gonna get crazier,
gonna get crazier and crazier. That's all I gotta say.
Speaker 4 (01:40:17):
On the go and need a quick news fix with
a fun twist, follow Dana's Absurd Truth podcast for bite
size and formative episodes perfect for your busy schedule on
Apple or wherever you get your podcast.
Speaker 3 (01:40:30):
Caine said he's going to start going by mister garbage
at monsieur garbage.
Speaker 2 (01:40:35):
That's it, garbage. It must be pronounced a.
Speaker 3 (01:40:38):
Garbage with Monsieur garbage. Just madamn garbage. That just just
we already voted sadly. So you can't show up in
your garbage bag and do that, monsieur garbage. Yes, can
I have my h ballot please? Here's my idea. They'll
(01:40:58):
look at you like your nuts.
Speaker 2 (01:40:59):
That's the same be with the last name garbage.
Speaker 3 (01:41:04):
Trash people, trash trash people. I love it. I mean,
it's just the I mean, the dumbest gaff to ever make.
And then they're still they're still Chevron's moving their HQ
from California to Texas after one hundred and forty five years.
Oh look at that, Chevron moving to Okay, your employees
(01:41:24):
cannot vote lefty, so let's like make that just to see.
I would be like, no, I'd be at the border.
Oh you're coming here with your Democrat. Get out, you don't.
You don't get to come here, Go learn to code.
You can't come here. Stay out. No, it's I don't
want that. I don't want the I don't want to
Texas to turn into the needles and feces. I saw
(01:41:46):
a joke. I think it was a babylon be that
made it. They said that parents in San Francisco were shocked.
They were shocked to find a piece of Canadian in
their child's Halloween bag of needles. Just can believe it?
Just insane. I don't know, man, I don't know. I
saw this piece from Politico. Can Stacy Abrams still deliver Georgia?
(01:42:10):
She couldn't even deliver the gubernatorial race for herself twice?
Why does anybody think that she can deliver the state
for Kamala Harris once? I mean that's oh wait, she
is the president of Earth though, or the Earth's governor,
Stacy Harris? I forgot that are Stacy Abrams? That's right.
(01:42:31):
She is the president of Earth or the governor of Earth.
That's right. She's the governor of the United States. She
won that race. Every time she lost, it was stolen
from her. I tell you what. There was another joke too,
It said which campaign after Tuesdays? It's a race to
see which campaign gets to claim voter fraud. That is
(01:42:52):
kind of funny, though, But let's see the winners of
that have been the left, Like since w I will
never forget the hanging chad and how long it took
to make that determination and all the lawsuits that happened,
et cetera, et cetera. Oh my gosh. But they've been
doing it, and then they've been doing it since twenty sixteen,
just saying since twenty sixteen, and then of course right
(01:43:13):
before we go into elections, we've had really one of
the worst job reports that we've had ever. Ever, how
many how much of that twelve thousand jobs that they
said that we was supposed to be one hundred and
twelve thousand? How much of that do you think is
going to be revised away into the ether? Kine?
Speaker 2 (01:43:30):
Probably all of them.
Speaker 3 (01:43:33):
Yes, we lost actually eleven y per killion jobs. It's
more than a deca million. We just started making up
quantities because we just couldn't quantify that.
Speaker 2 (01:43:41):
There's no shutdown, there's no pandemic, So these losses are
really unprecedented.
Speaker 3 (01:43:47):
Yeah, well there's a in the lockdown of inflation, that's
for sure. But yeah, that's that's gonna be. That's the
final art. This job's report is her final argument. That's
the final argument. You can't lie about these numbers. Oh,
but they're trying to. Oh, it's good jobs report, it's good.
Just slow. What you you thought you were gonna have
(01:44:10):
one hundred and twelve thousand, and that was still slow.
That was even by your own estimations of slow twelve
thousand is just like nonexistent and like we said, when
that's revised down to nothingness even more so, I don't know.
I'm telling you what I think. You know what I'm
gonna do. I think I'm just gonna put my Christmas
stuff up this weekend ahead of the election. I think
(01:44:30):
so yeah, Wow, I think I'm just gonna put my
because it's gonna be nuts and I want after election,
I'm just gonna look at my Christmas tree. I think
I'm gonna do it. Yeah, if you give me any
any heat over and I'm just gonna be like I
guess I love Jesus more. It's okay, it's all right.
Speaker 2 (01:44:44):
Did you get your giant twenty foot Nativity scene or no?
Speaker 3 (01:44:47):
No, I want a giant inflatable Nativity scene. Don't tell
me about how I say Nativity. It's just not gonna change. Stop.
Just like milk is milk and pillows pillow, just don't.
I want a giant juice, big giant one bigger than
my front door. I want you to have to literally
look around the baby Jesus to get to my front door.
It's what I want. I'll find one. It'll happen. Today's stupidity,
(01:45:08):
Kane sarm.
Speaker 2 (01:45:09):
It is our vice president, Kamala Harris. Let's hear what
she has to say here. Sure, play this.
Speaker 3 (01:45:15):
And understand the difference here, all right, I understand the
difference here and say it again.
Speaker 2 (01:45:24):
Moving forward.
Speaker 3 (01:45:25):
Understand the difference. What I don't mean, like literally.
Speaker 9 (01:45:28):
You're looking at is a difference in this election.
Speaker 3 (01:45:32):
Let's move forward and see where we are.
Speaker 2 (01:45:35):
So she said move forward and this okay, but I'm
just here. I'm not sure.
Speaker 3 (01:45:41):
I don't even know. That's that's that does it? Guys?
For this week? Election next week, God bless back with
you then