June 23, 2025 • 14 mins
In this discussion on Byte-sized L&D, Donna and Yakov explore the nuances of micromanagement and its impact on leadership. They argue that while micromanagement is often seen negatively, it can be a critical tool when used strategically. Effective leaders balance hands-on involvement with delegation, using micromanagement to model excellence and address specific challenges. Leaders should assess whether their involvement is empowering or stifling, and adapt their approach based on team needs, promoting trust and growth. The conversation emphasizes the importance of intentional leadership choices, focusing on when and how to micromanage effectively.
#leadership, #micromanagement, #teammanagement, #delegation, #trustbuilding, #growthmindset, #intentionalleadership
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
(00:00):
Welcome to Bite-Sized L&D, your quick, no-nonsense update on the latest in workplace learning.
(00:10):
Today, we're diving deep into the often misunderstood world of micromanagement, exploring how it
can be a strategic tool for setting standards and boosting team performance.
Alright, let's get straight into it.
Alright everybody, welcome to another deep dive on Bite-Sized L&D.
(00:30):
I'm Donna, and as always, I'm here with my co-host, Jakov Lasker.
Today, we're tackling one of those management topics that makes everyone squirm a little bit.
Micromanagement?
But before you roll your eyes and think, oh great, another lecture about how micromanaging is terrible, hold up.
We've got some pretty interesting perspectives to share.
(00:51):
Exactly, Donna.
And here's the thing that caught my attention.
What if all that advice we've been hearing about don't micromanage has actually swung the pendulum too far in the opposite direction?
What if we've created a generation of managers who are so terrified of being called micromanagers that they're actually under-managing?
(01:12):
Ooh, that's a spicy take right off the bat.
Lay it on me.
What does under-managing actually look like?
Picture this.
You're a brand new manager.
You've read all the management books, and they all say the same thing.
Hands off, delegate.
Don't breathe down your reports next.
So when someone on your team hits a roadblock, you're paralyzed.
(01:34):
You want to help, but you're terrified that jumping in will make you look like a control freak.
Oh man, I've seen this.
The manager who's so worried about being hands off that their team member is literally drowning,
and they're just standing there going, but I don't want to micromanage.
Right.
And it's not just new managers either.
Think about those senior executives who've gotten so comfortable at the 30,000 foot view
(01:58):
that they never actually look at what's happening on the ground.
One tech leader put it perfectly.
As you get too far out of the details, you just become a bureaucrat.
That's brutal, but probably accurate.
So what's the solution here?
Are we saying micromanagement is actually good?
Well, this is where it gets nuanced.
(02:18):
The key insight is that micromanagement isn't inherently evil.
It's a tool.
And like any tool, it can be used well or poorly.
The question isn't whether to micromanage.
It's when and how to do it effectively.
OK, so when is micromanagement actually the right move?
Give me some concrete examples.
(02:39):
One of the most powerful uses is what we might call standard setting.
Instead of hovering over someone who can't do their job,
you dive into the details to model the level of quality and thinking you expect.
Think about a CEO who writes a blog post themselves,
not because they don't trust their marketing team,
(02:59):
but to demonstrate the caliber of work they want to see.
That makes sense.
It's less about I don't trust you and more about let me show you what excellence looks like.
Exactly.
And here's another smart application.
Using your attention as a signal.
When a CEO gets personally involved in a specific area,
(03:20):
it sends a message to the entire organization about priorities.
People follow executive attention like a magnet.
So it's almost like strategic signaling through involvement.
But how do you know when to dive deep versus when to stay at a higher level?
This is where some really smart frameworks come in.
One approach is to watch for data anomalies.
When the numbers on your dashboard don't match what you're hearing anecdotally,
(03:44):
that's your cue to put on your detective hat and go see for yourself.
Give me an example of what that detective work looks like.
Picture this scenario.
Your sales numbers look good on paper,
but you keep hearing complaints about deal quality.
So instead of just trusting the dashboard,
you start listening to actual sales call recordings.
(04:04):
Maybe you discover that when customers bring up a specific objection,
your reps aren't redirecting them to your product's key strength
that would solve their problem.
And then you can trace that back.
If one rep doesn't know how to handle that objection,
probably others don't either,
which means there's a training gap,
which means maybe your product marketing isn't clear enough about your value proposition.
(04:27):
Bingo!
You've just turned one sales call observation
into a hypothesis about your entire go-to-market strategy.
That's the power of going deep when the data tells you something's off.
I love that detective mindset.
But let's talk about the system's side of things.
How do you maintain quality standards without becoming a bottleneck?
One fascinating approach comes from companies that are obsessive about brand consistency.
(04:52):
They create what they call red pen holders,
designated people whose job is to review anything going out to more than 100 users.
But here's the key.
These reviewers aren't questioning strategy.
They're putting on the hat of a confused user and asking,
does this make sense to someone seeing it for the first time?
(05:14):
So you're institutionalizing that outside perspective
instead of relying on one person to catch everything.
Right. And they pair that with stage checkpoints.
Instead of waiting until something is 99% done to review it,
they do a quick strategy alignment check at 20% completion,
then a more detailed execution review at 80%.
(05:37):
That way you can still course correct without starting from scratch.
That's smart.
You're building in those quality gates early enough that they're helpful
rather than just frustrating.
Now, what about when you're dealing with a team that's already performing well?
Do you still need to stay in the details?
This is where the concept of porpoising comes in,
like the marine mammals that can swim at different depths.
(06:01):
The best managers know what's happening with everything at a surface level,
but they choose specific initiatives to dive deep on,
usually tied to their most important metrics.
So you're not trying to be deep on everything,
you're being strategic about where you spend your detailed attention.
Exactly. And sometimes external events force that choice.
(06:21):
If there's an existential threat or a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity,
that's when leaders need to dive immediately into the weeds
and work side by side with their teams.
Makes sense. But let's flip this around.
What about when you need to zoom out and empower your team?
How do you avoid the unproductive kind of micromanagement?
Here's a powerful reframe.
(06:43):
Treat micromanagement as a symptom, not a personality flaw.
If you find yourself getting into the weeds with someone,
ask yourself why.
Usually, it's because trust has broken down somewhere.
Oh, that's interesting.
So instead of just telling yourself, stop micromanaging,
you're diagnosing what caused the trust issue in the first place.
(07:05):
Right. One leader puts it perfectly in their team user guide.
I am hands-on until I trust you.
Once I trust you, I'm hands-off.
And if they find themselves creeping back into micromanagement mode,
they treat it as an early warning signal that trust is eroding
and they need to address it directly.
(07:25):
That takes a lot of self-awareness, though.
How do you catch yourself before you've already damaged the relationship?
Regular feedback systems are crucial here.
Instead of waiting for problems to build up,
create lightweight, frequent check-ins.
Some teams do monthly feedback sessions using simple frameworks
like Start, Stop, Continue.
(07:46):
The key is making it routine so it doesn't feel like a big, scary performance review.
And presumably, if you're giving feedback regularly,
you're less likely to need to jump in and course-correct at the last minute.
Exactly. But here's another clever approach.
Instead of using your own time to coach someone who's struggling,
empower their peers to do it.
(08:08):
Set up office hours with senior team members
where people can get feedback on their work.
It builds the overall capability of your team
while taking some of that coaching burden off your shoulders.
I like that because it's also building those peer relationships
that make the whole team stronger.
But what if someone just wants to be told what to do?
(08:29):
I feel like some people actually prefer more direction.
That's a great point, and there's an interesting perspective on this.
Instead of giving people a to-do list,
some leaders prefer to give them what they call a box filled with interesting ideas.
You're providing context and possibilities,
but letting people figure out their own approach.
(08:50):
So it's more like, here's the soup, season it however you want.
Rather than follow this exact recipe.
Perfect analogy.
And even when people ask to just be told what to do,
they usually end up applying their own approach anyway.
So you might as well give them the thinking framework up front.
Now, there's one area where it seems like staying hands-on is always important,
(09:12):
and that's your actual product.
Talk to me about that.
This is fascinating.
There are CEOs of billion-dollar companies
who still personally run payroll or approve every expense over $5.
Not because they love accounting,
but because they're building payroll software,
and they never want to stop being their own customer.
(09:32):
So they're micromanaging the product experience,
but on behalf of their users, not just to be controlling.
Exactly.
And there's real wisdom there.
The moment you stop using your own product,
you outsource the work of understanding what customers actually need.
One leader put it bluntly,
if you stop being the most critical user of your product,
(09:55):
you are toast.
That makes me think about how easy it is to lose touch with the customer experience as you scale.
You get layers of people between you and the actual product.
Which brings us to a crucial hiring insight.
Some companies have stopped hiring pure managers altogether.
Instead, they only hire managers who can still do the work of the people they manage.
(10:17):
If you manage engineers, you need to be able to write excellent code.
If you manage marketers, you need to be an exceptional marketer yourself.
So you're hiring button-clickers,
rather than people who just find other people to click buttons for them.
That's the idea.
Because when things go wrong, and they will,
you want managers who can jump in and help solve the problem,
(10:39):
not just managers who can point fingers or add more process.
This is all really reshaping how I think about the micromanagement spectrum.
It sounds like the real skill is knowing when to zoom in and when to zoom out,
rather than just defaulting to one mode.
Right.
And recognizing that both modes serve important purposes.
The hands-on approach helps you maintain quality standards,
(11:03):
understand your customers, and model excellence.
The hands-off approach gives your team autonomy,
builds their capabilities, and frees you up to work on bigger picture challenges.
So maybe the question isn't, am I micromanaging too much?
But rather, am I micromanaging the right things for the right reasons?
That's a much better question.
(11:24):
Are you diving deep because you don't trust your team?
Or because you're gathering context to make better decisions?
Are you staying hands-off because you're empowering growth,
or because you're avoiding the hard work of actually understanding what's happening?
And probably the answer changes depending on the situation,
the person, and the stakes involved.
(11:46):
Absolutely.
A new hire might need more hands-on guidance than a seasoned team member.
A critical product launch might warrant more executive involvement
than routine maintenance work.
The key is being intentional about those choices.
This gives me a lot to think about for my own management style.
Before we wrap up, what would you say is the biggest mindset shift people need to make here?
(12:09):
I think it's moving away from seeing micromanagement as a binary, good or bad thing,
and instead viewing it as a tool in your leadership toolkit.
The question isn't whether to use it, but how to use it skillfully and sparingly.
And recognizing that sometimes the most empowering thing you can do for your team
is to show them what excellence looks like, even if that means getting into the weeds for a while.
(12:33):
Exactly.
True empowerment isn't just giving people freedom.
It's giving them the context, standards, and support they need to succeed with that freedom.
Well, this has been eye-opening.
I think a lot of managers are going to relate to this tension between wanting to help
and being afraid to step on toes.
Hopefully this gives them some frameworks for thinking about when and how to get more involved.
(12:56):
And remember, if you're a leader listening to this,
the goal isn't to become a better micromanager.
It's to become more thoughtful about when your detailed involvement adds value versus when it gets in the way.
Perfect.
So maybe take a look at your own management approach this week and ask yourself,
where could you benefit from diving deeper, and where might you be holding your team back by staying too involved?
(13:22):
Thanks for tuning in to Bite-sized L&D.
Until next time, keep learning.
See you next time, everyone.
And that wraps up today's podcast, where we delved into how micromanagement when used wisely can
actually enhance team standards, priorities, and trust.
(13:44):
Don't forget to like, subscribe, and share this episode with your friends and colleagues,
so they can also stay updated on the latest news and gain powerful insights.
Stay tuned for more updates.
Welcome to Bite-Sized L&D, your quick, no-nonsense update on the latest in workplace learning.
(00:10):
Today, we're diving deep into the often misunderstood world of micromanagement, exploring how it
can be a strategic tool for setting standards and boosting team performance.
Alright, let's get straight into it.
Alright everybody, welcome to another deep dive on Bite-Sized L&D.
(00:30):
I'm Donna, and as always, I'm here with my co-host, Jakov Lasker.
Today, we're tackling one of those management topics that makes everyone squirm a little bit.
Micromanagement?
But before you roll your eyes and think, oh great, another lecture about how micromanaging is terrible, hold up.
We've got some pretty interesting perspectives to share.
(00:51):
Exactly, Donna.
And here's the thing that caught my attention.
What if all that advice we've been hearing about don't micromanage has actually swung the pendulum too far in the opposite direction?
What if we've created a generation of managers who are so terrified of being called micromanagers that they're actually under-managing?
(01:12):
Ooh, that's a spicy take right off the bat.
Lay it on me.
What does under-managing actually look like?
Picture this.
You're a brand new manager.
You've read all the management books, and they all say the same thing.
Hands off, delegate.
Don't breathe down your reports next.
So when someone on your team hits a roadblock, you're paralyzed.
(01:34):
You want to help, but you're terrified that jumping in will make you look like a control freak.
Oh man, I've seen this.
The manager who's so worried about being hands off that their team member is literally drowning,
and they're just standing there going, but I don't want to micromanage.
Right.
And it's not just new managers either.
Think about those senior executives who've gotten so comfortable at the 30,000 foot view
(01:58):
that they never actually look at what's happening on the ground.
One tech leader put it perfectly.
As you get too far out of the details, you just become a bureaucrat.
That's brutal, but probably accurate.
So what's the solution here?
Are we saying micromanagement is actually good?
Well, this is where it gets nuanced.
(02:18):
The key insight is that micromanagement isn't inherently evil.
It's a tool.
And like any tool, it can be used well or poorly.
The question isn't whether to micromanage.
It's when and how to do it effectively.
OK, so when is micromanagement actually the right move?
Give me some concrete examples.
(02:39):
One of the most powerful uses is what we might call standard setting.
Instead of hovering over someone who can't do their job,
you dive into the details to model the level of quality and thinking you expect.
Think about a CEO who writes a blog post themselves,
not because they don't trust their marketing team,
(02:59):
but to demonstrate the caliber of work they want to see.
That makes sense.
It's less about I don't trust you and more about let me show you what excellence looks like.
Exactly.
And here's another smart application.
Using your attention as a signal.
When a CEO gets personally involved in a specific area,
(03:20):
it sends a message to the entire organization about priorities.
People follow executive attention like a magnet.
So it's almost like strategic signaling through involvement.
But how do you know when to dive deep versus when to stay at a higher level?
This is where some really smart frameworks come in.
One approach is to watch for data anomalies.
When the numbers on your dashboard don't match what you're hearing anecdotally,
(03:44):
that's your cue to put on your detective hat and go see for yourself.
Give me an example of what that detective work looks like.
Picture this scenario.
Your sales numbers look good on paper,
but you keep hearing complaints about deal quality.
So instead of just trusting the dashboard,
you start listening to actual sales call recordings.
(04:04):
Maybe you discover that when customers bring up a specific objection,
your reps aren't redirecting them to your product's key strength
that would solve their problem.
And then you can trace that back.
If one rep doesn't know how to handle that objection,
probably others don't either,
which means there's a training gap,
which means maybe your product marketing isn't clear enough about your value proposition.
(04:27):
Bingo!
You've just turned one sales call observation
into a hypothesis about your entire go-to-market strategy.
That's the power of going deep when the data tells you something's off.
I love that detective mindset.
But let's talk about the system's side of things.
How do you maintain quality standards without becoming a bottleneck?
One fascinating approach comes from companies that are obsessive about brand consistency.
(04:52):
They create what they call red pen holders,
designated people whose job is to review anything going out to more than 100 users.
But here's the key.
These reviewers aren't questioning strategy.
They're putting on the hat of a confused user and asking,
does this make sense to someone seeing it for the first time?
(05:14):
So you're institutionalizing that outside perspective
instead of relying on one person to catch everything.
Right. And they pair that with stage checkpoints.
Instead of waiting until something is 99% done to review it,
they do a quick strategy alignment check at 20% completion,
then a more detailed execution review at 80%.
(05:37):
That way you can still course correct without starting from scratch.
That's smart.
You're building in those quality gates early enough that they're helpful
rather than just frustrating.
Now, what about when you're dealing with a team that's already performing well?
Do you still need to stay in the details?
This is where the concept of porpoising comes in,
like the marine mammals that can swim at different depths.
(06:01):
The best managers know what's happening with everything at a surface level,
but they choose specific initiatives to dive deep on,
usually tied to their most important metrics.
So you're not trying to be deep on everything,
you're being strategic about where you spend your detailed attention.
Exactly. And sometimes external events force that choice.
(06:21):
If there's an existential threat or a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity,
that's when leaders need to dive immediately into the weeds
and work side by side with their teams.
Makes sense. But let's flip this around.
What about when you need to zoom out and empower your team?
How do you avoid the unproductive kind of micromanagement?
Here's a powerful reframe.
(06:43):
Treat micromanagement as a symptom, not a personality flaw.
If you find yourself getting into the weeds with someone,
ask yourself why.
Usually, it's because trust has broken down somewhere.
Oh, that's interesting.
So instead of just telling yourself, stop micromanaging,
you're diagnosing what caused the trust issue in the first place.
(07:05):
Right. One leader puts it perfectly in their team user guide.
I am hands-on until I trust you.
Once I trust you, I'm hands-off.
And if they find themselves creeping back into micromanagement mode,
they treat it as an early warning signal that trust is eroding
and they need to address it directly.
(07:25):
That takes a lot of self-awareness, though.
How do you catch yourself before you've already damaged the relationship?
Regular feedback systems are crucial here.
Instead of waiting for problems to build up,
create lightweight, frequent check-ins.
Some teams do monthly feedback sessions using simple frameworks
like Start, Stop, Continue.
(07:46):
The key is making it routine so it doesn't feel like a big, scary performance review.
And presumably, if you're giving feedback regularly,
you're less likely to need to jump in and course-correct at the last minute.
Exactly. But here's another clever approach.
Instead of using your own time to coach someone who's struggling,
empower their peers to do it.
(08:08):
Set up office hours with senior team members
where people can get feedback on their work.
It builds the overall capability of your team
while taking some of that coaching burden off your shoulders.
I like that because it's also building those peer relationships
that make the whole team stronger.
But what if someone just wants to be told what to do?
(08:29):
I feel like some people actually prefer more direction.
That's a great point, and there's an interesting perspective on this.
Instead of giving people a to-do list,
some leaders prefer to give them what they call a box filled with interesting ideas.
You're providing context and possibilities,
but letting people figure out their own approach.
(08:50):
So it's more like, here's the soup, season it however you want.
Rather than follow this exact recipe.
Perfect analogy.
And even when people ask to just be told what to do,
they usually end up applying their own approach anyway.
So you might as well give them the thinking framework up front.
Now, there's one area where it seems like staying hands-on is always important,
(09:12):
and that's your actual product.
Talk to me about that.
This is fascinating.
There are CEOs of billion-dollar companies
who still personally run payroll or approve every expense over $5.
Not because they love accounting,
but because they're building payroll software,
and they never want to stop being their own customer.
(09:32):
So they're micromanaging the product experience,
but on behalf of their users, not just to be controlling.
Exactly.
And there's real wisdom there.
The moment you stop using your own product,
you outsource the work of understanding what customers actually need.
One leader put it bluntly,
if you stop being the most critical user of your product,
(09:55):
you are toast.
That makes me think about how easy it is to lose touch with the customer experience as you scale.
You get layers of people between you and the actual product.
Which brings us to a crucial hiring insight.
Some companies have stopped hiring pure managers altogether.
Instead, they only hire managers who can still do the work of the people they manage.
(10:17):
If you manage engineers, you need to be able to write excellent code.
If you manage marketers, you need to be an exceptional marketer yourself.
So you're hiring button-clickers,
rather than people who just find other people to click buttons for them.
That's the idea.
Because when things go wrong, and they will,
you want managers who can jump in and help solve the problem,
(10:39):
not just managers who can point fingers or add more process.
This is all really reshaping how I think about the micromanagement spectrum.
It sounds like the real skill is knowing when to zoom in and when to zoom out,
rather than just defaulting to one mode.
Right.
And recognizing that both modes serve important purposes.
The hands-on approach helps you maintain quality standards,
(11:03):
understand your customers, and model excellence.
The hands-off approach gives your team autonomy,
builds their capabilities, and frees you up to work on bigger picture challenges.
So maybe the question isn't, am I micromanaging too much?
But rather, am I micromanaging the right things for the right reasons?
That's a much better question.
(11:24):
Are you diving deep because you don't trust your team?
Or because you're gathering context to make better decisions?
Are you staying hands-off because you're empowering growth,
or because you're avoiding the hard work of actually understanding what's happening?
And probably the answer changes depending on the situation,
the person, and the stakes involved.
(11:46):
Absolutely.
A new hire might need more hands-on guidance than a seasoned team member.
A critical product launch might warrant more executive involvement
than routine maintenance work.
The key is being intentional about those choices.
This gives me a lot to think about for my own management style.
Before we wrap up, what would you say is the biggest mindset shift people need to make here?
(12:09):
I think it's moving away from seeing micromanagement as a binary, good or bad thing,
and instead viewing it as a tool in your leadership toolkit.
The question isn't whether to use it, but how to use it skillfully and sparingly.
And recognizing that sometimes the most empowering thing you can do for your team
is to show them what excellence looks like, even if that means getting into the weeds for a while.
(12:33):
Exactly.
True empowerment isn't just giving people freedom.
It's giving them the context, standards, and support they need to succeed with that freedom.
Well, this has been eye-opening.
I think a lot of managers are going to relate to this tension between wanting to help
and being afraid to step on toes.
Hopefully this gives them some frameworks for thinking about when and how to get more involved.
(12:56):
And remember, if you're a leader listening to this,
the goal isn't to become a better micromanager.
It's to become more thoughtful about when your detailed involvement adds value versus when it gets in the way.
Perfect.
So maybe take a look at your own management approach this week and ask yourself,
where could you benefit from diving deeper, and where might you be holding your team back by staying too involved?
(13:22):
Thanks for tuning in to Bite-sized L&D.
Until next time, keep learning.
See you next time, everyone.
And that wraps up today's podcast, where we delved into how micromanagement when used wisely can
actually enhance team standards, priorities, and trust.
(13:44):
Don't forget to like, subscribe, and share this episode with your friends and colleagues,
so they can also stay updated on the latest news and gain powerful insights.
Stay tuned for more updates.
Popular Podcasts
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.