Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
(00:19):
for tuning the future marketing Let's get it started.
Hey there.
.999Welcome to the FutureCraft marketing podcast, where we're exploring how AI is changing all things from brand to demand.
.999I'm Ken Roden, one of your guides on this exciting new journey.
8
00:00:40,909.999 --> 00:00:47,229.999
And I'm Erin Mills, your other co host, and together we're here to unpack the future of AI and marketing.
9
00:00:47,479.999 --> 00:00:55,419.999
We'll share some insights, test the latest technology, interview industry pioneers, and talk to folks doing really cool things.
10
00:00:55,719.999 --> 00:01:02,559.998
So Ken, what really cool thing have you done in generative ai? Okay, Erin, I made the leap.
11
00:01:02,559.998 --> 00:01:05,399.999
I tried to do an image creation using AI.
12
00:01:05,899.999 --> 00:01:08,666.999
It was I know So here's the deal.
13
00:01:08,746.999 --> 00:01:10,456.999
This could be user error at this point.
14
00:01:10,956.999 --> 00:01:14,406.999
Try to use all of the learnings that we've picked up so far this season.
15
00:01:14,406.999 --> 00:01:21,956.998
Good prompts, clear, of insight, not being generic in what I put in the prompt, the images were horrible.
16
00:01:22,366.998 --> 00:01:23,466.998
Like it was bad.
17
00:01:23,866.998 --> 00:01:30,846.998
What was that artist? Lisa Frank, who did the notebooks? It was like her, but oh, Lisa Frank.
18
00:01:31,6.998 --> 00:01:31,606.998
Lisa Frank.
19
00:01:31,611.998 --> 00:01:33,196.998
Fans are gonna come for you now.
20
00:01:33,364.998 --> 00:01:33,564.998
cool.
21
00:01:33,564.998 --> 00:01:33,904.998
I'm okay.
22
00:01:33,904.998 --> 00:01:36,544.998
Listen, just so we're clear, everyone, I'm a big Lisa Frank fan.
23
00:01:36,804.998 --> 00:01:40,964.997
I'm just saying it was like her stuff, but like on like acid or something.
24
00:01:40,984.998 --> 00:01:41,274.997
I don't know.
25
00:01:41,284.998 --> 00:01:42,764.998
I just, I wasn't a fan of it.
26
00:01:43,504.998 --> 00:01:46,114.9985
My intent is to use it for, work purposes.
27
00:01:46,114.9985 --> 00:01:49,994.999
I'm a marketer and the imagery wasn't really what I was looking for.
28
00:01:49,994.999 --> 00:01:53,744.999
I was trying to get images of people at work doing work things.
29
00:01:54,54.999 --> 00:02:07,154.998
And it was giving me pandas doing work, and unicorns doing work, and then when I tried to be like, No, actually, I'm looking for humans doing work, it got closer, but honestly, it's just, it's not good enough right now.
30
00:02:07,384.999 --> 00:02:21,474.998
I think if you're looking for illustrations, I think if you're doing a presentation, to be a little cheeky, sure, why not? The Image generator I use is not something I'd recommend, but hey, listen, I tried something, right? And so it didn't really work out for me.
31
00:02:22,96.998 --> 00:02:22,576.9975
fair enough.
32
00:02:22,576.9975 --> 00:02:24,586.998
There's a lot of work that needs to be done.
33
00:02:24,646.998 --> 00:02:35,496.997
I will say one really fun thing that we do with our family thread is when it's a birthday, we put the person, and all of their attributes things that people are interested in or known for.
34
00:02:35,496.997 --> 00:02:45,686.997
For me it would be French bulldogs and sailing and give that to the prompt to create an image and create a really fun birthday image that we can share on the family thread.
35
00:02:45,716.998 --> 00:02:50,776.997
So totally see how that doesn't necessarily work and apply for work, but it is fun Okay.
36
00:02:50,916.997 --> 00:02:51,786.997
That sounds great.
37
00:02:51,786.997 --> 00:02:56,336.997
And if you could incorporate Lisa Frank into that, I think it would just be like the best image ever.
38
00:02:56,556.997 --> 00:03:03,256.997
Okay, what you? What are you doing with AI right now? Okay.
39
00:03:03,758.997 --> 00:03:18,598.997
so you can't tell today, but I did do my color analysis and for folks that might remember during COVID, there was this big surge online on TikTok and Instagram about getting your colors done.
40
00:03:18,628.996 --> 00:03:29,828.997
So what colors look good on you? What colors look bad on you? There are a bunch of professionals that do it and you can actually go in and they'll put different colors over you to see what's the best fit for you.
41
00:03:29,858.997 --> 00:03:41,178.997
And one of the things I did was took a selfie, uploaded it and did the color analysis, Were you pleased with the color analysis? Are they colors you would wear? Is it, does it work? Yeah, I think it works.
42
00:03:41,878.997 --> 00:03:58,563.998
I guess you'll have to see next episode when I incorporate it into my outfit, but I think what's interesting is it does give you a family of colors to work with and a few things that I may not have considered, but do look good in and some things that I should definitely avoid and are sitting in my closet now.
43
00:03:58,803.998 --> 00:04:01,253.998
So spring cleaning coming soon.
44
00:04:01,496.998 --> 00:04:01,796.998
Yeah.
45
00:04:01,946.998 --> 00:04:09,886.998
You think about this, right? I think that with marketers having something like color analysis, if you're in e commerce, Yes.
46
00:04:10,161.998 --> 00:04:17,861.998
Maybe this is a tool if you're sell clothing, like this is an interesting way to get people to engage with your brand a little bit differently than maybe they have in the past.
47
00:04:18,121.998 --> 00:04:25,691.9985
I've heard about these mirrors at some stores that will take a picture of you in like in the mirror and then dress you in something.
48
00:04:25,861.9975 --> 00:04:29,41.9975
And so you can see what you look like with the clothing on without actually having to try it on.
49
00:04:29,301.9975 --> 00:04:32,871.9975
I wonder if we're just headed to a future where they're like, actually these colors look great on you.
50
00:04:33,81.9975 --> 00:04:34,491.9975
Do you know what? It's like the movie clueless.
51
00:04:35,463.9985 --> 00:04:36,403.9985
That's what I was going to say.
52
00:04:36,403.9985 --> 00:04:40,703.9995
I was just going to reference that it is we're coming into the Cher era.
53
00:04:41,141.9995 --> 00:04:45,281.9995
the opposite of clueless Ken, who do we have on the show today? I'm really excited.
54
00:04:45,684.9995 --> 00:04:46,704.9995
Yeah, I am too.
55
00:04:46,784.9995 --> 00:04:56,374.9995
Today we've got Andy Crestodina and he is the co founder and CMO of Orbit Media, and he leads a 50 person digital marketing agency actually in Chicago.
56
00:04:56,644.9995 --> 00:05:06,144.9995
But he's got 24 years of experience and is known out there for being an expert at SEO content, all aspects of marketing.
57
00:05:06,314.9995 --> 00:05:10,584.9995
He's actually the author of a book called content chemistry, the illustrated handbook.
58
00:05:10,834.9995 --> 00:05:25,831.9985
For content marketing, and so he's going to talk to us about things from SEO to content marketing to how the quality of generative AI might be good enough or bad enough for content, or is it just making the internet a horrible place? Yeah.
59
00:05:25,831.9995 --> 00:05:26,931.9985
I'm really looking forward to it.
60
00:05:26,931.9995 --> 00:05:32,951.9995
I really enjoy his newsletter and I think that he provides some practical tips, which is, what we're all about.
61
00:05:33,21.9995 --> 00:05:34,661.9995
so we'll be right back with that interview.
62
00:05:34,661.9995 --> 00:05:35,431.9995
And we're back.
63
00:05:35,761.9995 --> 00:05:36,861.9995
Today we're joined by Andy.
64
00:05:36,861.9995 --> 00:05:39,811.9995
Andy, why don't you tell us about yourself? Thanks for having me.
65
00:05:39,861.9995 --> 00:05:41,91.9995
I'm in Chicago here.
66
00:05:41,91.9995 --> 00:05:43,711.9995
I'm the co founder of a digital agency called Orbit Media.
67
00:05:43,961.9995 --> 00:05:45,561.9995
Orbit's a web design and development company.
68
00:05:45,561.9995 --> 00:05:46,911.9985
We also do website optimization.
69
00:05:47,481.9985 --> 00:05:48,971.9985
This is year like 24.
70
00:05:49,41.9995 --> 00:06:02,306.9995
So I've been in it a long time and hopefully have useful perspectives on topics like, SEO and AI and conversion optimization and content strategy and influencer marketing and email and social and blogging and such.
71
00:06:02,326.9995 --> 00:06:03,156.9995
All the things.
72
00:06:03,376.9995 --> 00:06:04,96.9995
All the things.
73
00:06:04,256.9985 --> 00:06:04,466.9985
Nope.
74
00:06:04,476.9975 --> 00:06:06,306.9975
Glad to be here and looking forward to the conversation.
75
00:06:06,806.9975 --> 00:06:07,136.9975
Awesome.
76
00:06:07,186.9975 --> 00:06:08,76.9985
We're happy to have you.
77
00:06:08,116.9985 --> 00:06:09,536.997
And let's just dive right in.
78
00:06:09,556.997 --> 00:06:23,576.998
So we've all been experiencing a ton of change with AI and, from your perspective, what's been happening in the world of AI related to search and SEO? It is a huge disruption and it's it's just getting started.
79
00:06:24,226.998 --> 00:06:28,656.998
So we have not yet seen how Google is integrating AI into their search results.
80
00:06:29,46.998 --> 00:06:33,786.997
If you haven't heard the term SGE, the search generative experience, you're gonna hear that a lot.
81
00:06:34,266.998 --> 00:06:36,366.9985
It just as a user, your experience will change.
82
00:06:36,416.9975 --> 00:06:42,276.9985
You're going to start seeing kind of a summary, like a massive, think of it as like a massive featured snippet at the top of search results.
83
00:06:42,851.9985 --> 00:06:48,31.9985
You're looking for something that's got some organic listings, but then it's going to summarize those up high.
84
00:06:48,621.9985 --> 00:06:58,481.9975
And then even bigger than that, the change will partly be just, are people going to keep using search? I predict that a lot of people are going to start using AI apps to get quick answers.
85
00:06:58,891.9985 --> 00:07:11,421.9985
So there's going to be a big impact on the so called like information intent queries, and that a lot of that traffic and demand for browsers will decline as people learn just how useful AI is.
86
00:07:11,421.9985 --> 00:07:12,481.9985
Answering simple questions.
87
00:07:12,951.9985 --> 00:07:20,851.9985
At the same time, lots of stuff won't be as disrupted because people still want to go to websites to get, information about a possible solution or product or service.
88
00:07:20,901.9985 --> 00:07:23,731.9975
The most valuable traffic will be much less impact than I predict.
89
00:07:24,381.9985 --> 00:07:40,721.9985
It's interesting this weekend, I probably used perplexity AI to answer 10 questions I had, where in the past I would have gone to Google and I reminded me of something you said on a recent webinar that Gartner predicts a 25 percent drop in Google search in the future.
90
00:07:40,951.9975 --> 00:08:01,991.9985
What does that mean for marketers who are focused on SEO? So if my prediction is, comes true in that most of that decline in use of search which was what they're saying, a 25 percent drop in global search value means one in four things that we used Google for before browser plus Google plus websites.
91
00:08:02,416.9985 --> 00:08:09,626.9985
How did it goes away as people just ask AI to not retrieve an answer, but to generate the answer at every day, that's a great example.
92
00:08:09,626.9985 --> 00:08:14,746.9975
Ken, you're one of millions of people who are all gradually realizing that AI is just great, simple answers.
93
00:08:15,256.9975 --> 00:08:17,176.9975
And so some user behavioral shift.
94
00:08:17,736.9965 --> 00:08:22,416.9975
So what that means is it changes literally will change the value of websites.
95
00:08:22,446.9975 --> 00:08:24,856.9975
It'll change the strategy for content programs.
96
00:08:25,286.9975 --> 00:08:41,396.997
It will change how ads work and I, if you want to look back at an example of how this happened before, think about the revenue from news media, which, newspapers had revenue that peaked like in the nineties or something and then declined that was also information intent.
97
00:08:41,796.997 --> 00:08:52,776.997
So the fact, the ability of marketers and big tech and brands to monetize the information intent of a human in the world will probably decline.
98
00:08:53,276.997 --> 00:09:05,36.997
And lots of things that we just look for every day will just be considered basic human knowledge and you'll be able to get to it without an ad or a browser or getting retargeted or a pop up window or allowing cookies or accepting notifications.
99
00:09:05,36.997 --> 00:09:06,116.997
It's very noisy right now.
100
00:09:06,116.997 --> 00:09:07,256.997
The internet's pretty bad today.
101
00:09:07,256.997 --> 00:09:07,876.996
Let's be honest.
102
00:09:07,886.997 --> 00:09:09,866.996
The mobile experience is not good.
103
00:09:10,366.996 --> 00:09:11,556.996
Yeah, I agree with you.
104
00:09:11,556.996 --> 00:09:15,446.996
The experience is really tough and I think, we are up for change.
105
00:09:15,446.996 --> 00:09:16,6.996
It's time.
106
00:09:16,6.996 --> 00:09:19,346.997
That's something that gets better for us as the end user.
107
00:09:19,606.996 --> 00:09:38,151.9965
As this shift does happen, AI becomes more of a go to, how do you see that shifting buyers habits or how do you see that so far shift buying habits? Buyers, I think are going to be less impacted because let's say I'm looking for a piece of software or a service provider, or my wife today is talking to plumbers.
108
00:09:38,651.9965 --> 00:09:52,81.9965
AI is never going to be that great at serving up the latest reviews or the detailed information or the pros and cons or what this company really does or how close are they? when combined with search in like the SGE Google thing.
109
00:09:52,581.9965 --> 00:10:06,576.8965
There'll be utility there for all of us but people who are considering options, especially for those high consideration decisions, commercial intent sort of queries, you want to know what that company stands for, what do they believe, you're still going to want.
110
00:10:07,16.9965 --> 00:10:13,66.9965
So really what a marketer should be looking at now is does that key phrase have visit website intent? You probably never heard that term.
111
00:10:13,66.9965 --> 00:10:14,246.9965
No one ever uses that term.
112
00:10:14,446.9965 --> 00:10:16,546.9965
It's not a thing, but it should be a thing.
113
00:10:17,36.9965 --> 00:10:24,666.995
Does that key phrase have, don't target, be cautious targeting key phrases if you don't believe that key phrase really has visit website intent.
114
00:10:24,676.996 --> 00:10:29,206.996
So it's either a commercial intent phrase or the person's looking for a super long kind of detailed answer.
115
00:10:30,106.996 --> 00:10:36,596.996
Do you think you'll ever see though a buyer say, Hey, I'm looking for this type of solution.
116
00:10:36,786.996 --> 00:10:39,516.996
I know of two vendors, give me a pros cons of them.
117
00:10:40,16.996 --> 00:10:40,366.996
Yup.
118
00:10:40,606.997 --> 00:10:42,906.997
I think it's AI is very good at that in some ways.
119
00:10:42,956.997 --> 00:10:44,816.996
If you give it two things, it will compare them.
120
00:10:45,396.997 --> 00:10:46,916.997
It's going to get much better at that.
121
00:10:47,496.996 --> 00:10:49,506.997
AI just consumed the internet.
122
00:10:49,536.997 --> 00:10:52,976.997
It ingested the web, like whatever the common crawl, like 85 percent of the web.
123
00:10:53,366.997 --> 00:10:56,566.997
So I joke sometimes that AI might as well stand for average information.
124
00:10:57,391.997 --> 00:11:04,81.997
It's giving you the average of what it found, so it's going to look at what it found about Vendor A, Vendor B, and summarize a little comparison thing for you.
125
00:11:04,671.996 --> 00:11:09,241.995
You're not going to get the video of the founder talking about their values.
126
00:11:09,401.995 --> 00:11:14,361.995
You're not going to get reviews, the latest reviews of people, who are, have strong opinions about this.
127
00:11:14,362.095 --> 00:11:19,32.095
You're not going to get the detailed case study that might be especially relevant to your use case.
128
00:11:19,532.095 --> 00:11:24,292.095
I think that there are AI is great and we're excited about it and I'm excited about it.
129
00:11:24,292.095 --> 00:11:39,642.096
And it's ridiculously useful, but it has limits and, for lots of things, for, visual things or, super detailed things or personal points of view, very current newsy what happened yesterday, it's not good for those things.
130
00:11:40,122.096 --> 00:11:40,872.096
And we'll all learn that.
131
00:11:40,872.096 --> 00:11:41,822.096
And we'll, at our.
132
00:11:42,227.096 --> 00:11:46,937.096
Behavior as users of the internet will divide and we'll use AI apps over here and then search over there.
133
00:11:47,437.096 --> 00:11:52,847.096
It's interesting talking about the evolution and the 85 percent ingestion now.
134
00:11:53,77.096 --> 00:11:59,447.096
in your digital marketing tips newsletter, which everyone should subscribe if you aren't, it's such an invaluable tool.
135
00:11:59,517.097 --> 00:12:18,217.097
You talked about the seven ways to use ChatGPT for higher ranking, and that was eight months ago that post in particular, what's different today and what do you think are some tips that still hold true? One thing I don't really do with that is like just flood the internet with tons of, automatically generated, low quality content.
136
00:12:18,217.097 --> 00:12:19,7.097
I don't recommend that.
137
00:12:19,7.097 --> 00:12:20,287.097
I don't think it's helpful for the internet.
138
00:12:20,337.097 --> 00:12:22,537.097
I don't think it's good for your visitor or for your brand.
139
00:12:23,37.097 --> 00:12:29,267.098
What really helps a brand is when a human in the world sees a thing that is so useful that they remember it for months later.
140
00:12:29,837.098 --> 00:12:31,827.098
Thank you, Erin, for thinking of that post.
141
00:12:32,327.098 --> 00:12:33,707.098
That's what you're supposed to be doing here.
142
00:12:33,947.098 --> 00:12:46,337.098
That's what the content strategist's job is to make something that doesn't just rank or even rank and get traffic, but when the right person sees it, they think of it, and they remember it over a long period of time.
143
00:12:46,837.098 --> 00:12:50,657.099
So your job is to make something that is disarmingly surprisingly helpful.
144
00:12:51,207.099 --> 00:12:57,697.098
How do you make something memorable? The things that I put in that, it's like, How to have AI suggest title tags that would have higher click through rates.
145
00:12:58,27.098 --> 00:12:59,277.098
Definitely, we should all do that.
146
00:12:59,787.098 --> 00:13:04,767.098
How to have AI recommend copy edits that would include keyphrases for which the page ranks but aren't on the page.
147
00:13:04,997.098 --> 00:13:05,637.098
Yeah, of course.
148
00:13:05,757.098 --> 00:13:06,877.098
Let's definitely do that.
149
00:13:07,317.098 --> 00:13:12,527.098
Now, how to get AI to recommend internal links, from the pages that have good authority to the pages that almost rank high.
150
00:13:12,917.097 --> 00:13:15,187.098
Yeah, I think everyone should do that.
151
00:13:15,227.098 --> 00:13:15,907.098
Do that today.
152
00:13:16,437.098 --> 00:13:30,787.098
But what what I think, I love your question, I don't mean to dodge it, but I think that there's like an evergreen thing here, like an important message, which is that you have experiences and a personal point of view that can connect with the reader on a level that AI can't touch.
153
00:13:31,517.098 --> 00:13:32,787.0985
I just saw a presentation by J.
154
00:13:32,807.0985 --> 00:13:32,817.0985
I.
155
00:13:32,817.0995 --> 00:13:33,237.0985
Kunzo.
156
00:13:33,237.0985 --> 00:13:40,267.0985
He says, humans and AIs both have LLMs, but AI has a large language model and you have little life moments.
157
00:13:40,797.0985 --> 00:13:44,837.0985
He makes this gorgeous argument for, just being more human and more personal.
158
00:13:45,337.0985 --> 00:13:55,137.0985
What we should do is, yes, target keyphrases, yes, improve click through rates, yes, rank higher, yes, do better internal linking, yes, include keywords and semantic SEO and all the things.
159
00:13:55,137.0985 --> 00:13:57,497.0985
I'm an SEO from years ago.
160
00:13:57,997.0985 --> 00:14:08,37.0995
What really has to also happen, that's insufficient, because what also has to happen is the person who lands and reads these words feels a connection and remembers you made an impact.
161
00:14:08,77.0995 --> 00:14:22,497.099
Like, how did this thing help someone? In their day, did it connect with them? Did they relate to it? Was there a connection and on the emotional level? So that's what SEO suck at to be blunt about it and need to fix come on, people, we can do better.
162
00:14:22,497.099 --> 00:14:24,747.0985
Let's make something that's that comes from the heart.
163
00:14:25,127.0975 --> 00:14:26,627.0975
I think SEOs need that message.
164
00:14:27,367.0985 --> 00:14:35,987.0985
I remember reading a recent study from Forrester that actually mentioned that right now we're in this era of AI, but in 10 years, buyers might actually.
165
00:14:36,277.0985 --> 00:14:40,977.0985
Have a bias against AI generated content because there just might be an influx of it.
166
00:14:41,137.0985 --> 00:14:43,747.0985
So we're constantly going to be having to watch this.
167
00:14:43,947.0985 --> 00:14:48,927.0985
I think marketing should try to stay as human as possible because that's how people connect to brands.
168
00:14:49,167.0975 --> 00:15:01,987.0975
But speaking about a little bit more about AI and SEO, how do you see AI shaping tactics like on page optimization and link building, particularly for B2B? Let's do on page optimization first.
169
00:15:01,987.0975 --> 00:15:02,17.0975
Okay.
170
00:15:02,42.0975 --> 00:15:13,392.0975
I think that probably when you combine the tools in the ways that, where people like me are doing them step by step, probably there will be a button that you press that says optimize, and it'll just optimize the post for search.
171
00:15:14,162.0965 --> 00:15:29,272.0975
I hate to say that but I could imagine exactly how I would build that if I were at a SEO software company, you'd basically analyze the performance of that by checking all of its current rankings, validating that as a greater potential to rank through by confirming its.
172
00:15:29,737.0975 --> 00:15:31,897.0975
Authority and the keywords difficulty.
173
00:15:32,557.0975 --> 00:15:45,361.9985
And then if there is a possible upside to recommend edits to the page that would go into the subtopics and answer related questions and, use all the semantically related phrases, okay, that actually can be done by, through a, through a.
174
00:15:46,122.0985 --> 00:15:51,402.0985
It's better when done by a human because you can make something that is in fact memorable and personal and connects.
175
00:15:51,682.0985 --> 00:15:56,272.0985
But is, will there be a button that says optimize? Will it be a WordPress plugin? Probably yes.
176
00:15:56,922.0985 --> 00:16:02,402.0985
What is that? What does that do for rankings and for content? I agree, Ted.
177
00:16:02,412.0985 --> 00:16:09,12.199
It's not really that likely to it'll be easy to compete against that content because it tastes like butter.
178
00:16:09,692.199 --> 00:16:10,362.199
It's boring.
179
00:16:10,842.199 --> 00:16:11,832.199
It doesn't have.
180
00:16:12,117.199 --> 00:16:12,927.199
A point of view.
181
00:16:13,487.199 --> 00:16:22,547.199
If you want to compete with AI, all you have to do is have a strong opinion, collaborate with friends or record yourself, right? Because AI has no opinions.
182
00:16:22,597.199 --> 00:16:24,567.2
It has no friends and it has no face.
183
00:16:24,667.2 --> 00:16:27,627.2
It's very easy to differentiate your content from AI.
184
00:16:28,247.2 --> 00:16:32,427.2
It will, it's like when fiber came out, like there's a flood of low quality content.
185
00:16:33,22.2 --> 00:16:36,342.2
It was just good for all of us who actually work hard on their content.
186
00:16:36,842.2 --> 00:16:38,522.2
Link building? I have no idea.
187
00:16:38,552.2 --> 00:16:40,342.2
I hate to think of what these people do at scale.
188
00:16:40,342.2 --> 00:16:41,182.2
It's a nightmare.
189
00:16:41,242.199 --> 00:16:43,712.2
The automated outreach? Please.
190
00:16:43,942.2 --> 00:16:50,402.199
Who is ever out there doing that? Can you just pause for a minute? I could, I should share screenshots of my inbox.
191
00:16:50,402.2 --> 00:16:54,512.2
It's just flooded! Who does this work for? It's just gross.
192
00:16:54,572.2 --> 00:16:59,100.684
In my LinkedIn, it's ruining my Please stop DMing me and sending me cold emails.
193
00:16:59,100.684 --> 00:17:00,612.2
Please stop DMing me and sending me cold emails.
194
00:17:00,912.2 --> 00:17:05,922.2
I've got a pro tip for anyone who cares about their brand, never send a cold email.
195
00:17:06,322.2 --> 00:17:11,462.2
Why would you do that? You can just start a conversation somewhere else and then follow up with an email.
196
00:17:11,962.2 --> 00:17:12,672.199
Don't recommend.
197
00:17:13,302.2 --> 00:17:15,952.201
I think link building is gross in its current form.
198
00:17:16,252.201 --> 00:17:25,372.1985
And collaborative content attracts links organically by sharing value with influencers and subject matter experts is a fantastic way to do marketing.
199
00:17:25,372.1985 --> 00:17:29,272.1985
I would never write an article about a contributor quote, but I have never sent a cold email.
200
00:17:29,772.1985 --> 00:17:30,922.1985
Death of the cold email.
201
00:17:30,932.1985 --> 00:17:32,122.1985
I would love that.
202
00:17:32,122.1985 --> 00:17:35,162.1985
I think we all appreciate that in our inboxes.
203
00:17:35,662.1985 --> 00:17:41,882.1985
Switching gears a little bit, Google Analytics 4 brings a change for marketers and requires more technical skills.
204
00:17:42,282.1985 --> 00:17:53,292.1985
How are you using AI to pull deeper insights in your analytics data? If you see a useful report in analytics, you can click the export button and then download that as a CSV.
205
00:17:54,52.1985 --> 00:17:55,872.1985
And then upload that to AI.
206
00:17:56,92.1985 --> 00:17:58,52.1985
You should probably clean it up a little bit first.
207
00:17:58,202.1985 --> 00:18:01,492.1985
Everything you export from GA4 has nine rows at the top you should delete.
208
00:18:01,992.1985 --> 00:18:04,212.1995
Upload that to AI and just start talking to it about the data.
209
00:18:04,712.1995 --> 00:18:09,572.1995
So let's say I make a report that has all of my landing pages in the first column.
210
00:18:09,672.1985 --> 00:18:13,512.1985
And then I click the blue plus to add another column for session source medium.
211
00:18:14,12.1985 --> 00:18:23,392.1985
And then as long as all the metrics are there, users, sessions, engagement rate, average engagement time key conversion rate, you can put bounce rate on there, whatever metrics you like.
212
00:18:23,772.1985 --> 00:18:36,252.1975
If you upload that to AI and just say, which content has gets traction in social? Which track, which content gets traction in search? It's actually best if you make that first column of your page titles because it can infer topics.
213
00:18:36,762.1975 --> 00:18:39,532.1985
Then you can start to ask AI all about, it's a research assistant.
214
00:18:39,692.1985 --> 00:18:56,462.299
So hey, what have I never written, but should write? what are the articles that have the highest engagement rates have in common? which of my articles should have higher performance in search but don't based on this dataset? Like it'll tell you, and some of it's wrong or not useful, if so what? It's not an expensive exercise.
215
00:18:56,812.299 --> 00:19:01,162.299
You do need ChatGPT which costs 20 bucks, but I've had cocktails that cost 20 bucks.
216
00:19:01,202.299 --> 00:19:04,827.199
Why are we trying to save 20 dollars on a this super powerful technology? ChatGPT.
217
00:19:05,327.199 --> 00:19:06,377.199
Hey, I'm with you.
218
00:19:06,467.199 --> 00:19:12,747.199
I think the other thing that's interesting is just getting insights that we haven't had readily available to us historically.
219
00:19:13,167.199 --> 00:19:29,787.1995
I'd love to get your perspective on, you talked about what would resonate on social but what's a tip that you can give marketers listening to the podcast that maybe had been unavailable before or hard to access and now much easier with Chat GPT or any other tool AI tool they're using? Yeah.
220
00:19:29,867.1995 --> 00:19:36,707.1995
One thing I've been doing that I'm recommending, and if you see me at a conference, you might hear me say this AI is fantastic for gap analysis.
221
00:19:36,857.1995 --> 00:19:38,987.1985
You can give it a thing and say what's missing from this thing.
222
00:19:39,597.1985 --> 00:19:40,247.1985
Could be an article.
223
00:19:40,247.1995 --> 00:19:42,327.1995
It could be a webpage, could be your marketing strategy.
224
00:19:42,327.1995 --> 00:19:44,217.1985
It could be your ideal client profiles.
225
00:19:44,787.1995 --> 00:19:48,807.1995
And an expert can look at a thing and also tell you what's missing, but it's more, but it's difficult.
226
00:19:49,307.1995 --> 00:19:55,827.1995
It's Which of my audiences information needs are unmet with the copywriting on my homepage.
227
00:19:56,467.1995 --> 00:19:56,877.1995
Okay.
228
00:19:56,927.1995 --> 00:20:02,177.1985
A hardcore conversion strategist can look closely at that page and tell you, but you need lots of experience.
229
00:20:02,187.1995 --> 00:20:06,707.2015
Just a normal marketer like me, can look at a page now, can use AI to find gaps.
230
00:20:06,707.2015 --> 00:20:09,307.2015
But here's one ChatGPT, that is like an AI only method.
231
00:20:09,917.2015 --> 00:20:16,637.2015
If you give it your industry and say, what are the most important topics in this industry? that are not covered by the big blogs.
232
00:20:17,297.2015 --> 00:20:18,127.2015
It will tell you.
233
00:20:19,117.2015 --> 00:20:25,477.2015
One of the most thought provoking, counter narrative opinions that are least likely to be discussed by thought leaders in my industry.
234
00:20:25,757.2015 --> 00:20:26,447.2015
It'll tell you.
235
00:20:27,107.2015 --> 00:20:31,977.2015
It's not possible for a human to read every article in a vertical and then tell you what's missing.
236
00:20:32,577.2005 --> 00:20:36,457.2005
That's that's an AI only strategy It's, catnip for social media.
237
00:20:36,457.2005 --> 00:20:39,127.2005
You're going to get lots of ideas that you could write about or not.
238
00:20:39,177.2005 --> 00:20:39,727.2005
It's up to you.
239
00:20:39,727.2005 --> 00:20:41,177.2005
You pick the ones that you find interesting.
240
00:20:41,177.2005 --> 00:20:42,647.1995
It'll tell you something that you find boring.
241
00:20:42,647.1995 --> 00:20:44,117.1995
That's an important point about AI, by the way.
242
00:20:44,437.1995 --> 00:20:50,447.1995
Don't judge it based on, spent 45 seconds writing a prompt and getting a response and you didn't like it.
243
00:20:51,67.1985 --> 00:20:56,277.1995
Yeah, you weren't really trying too hard yet, were you? Don't dismiss it based on one or two responses.
244
00:20:56,657.1995 --> 00:21:01,312.1995
If 80 percent of what it gives you is garbage, so what? The 20 percent might be gold.
245
00:21:01,972.1995 --> 00:21:02,572.1995
That's fine.
246
00:21:02,592.1995 --> 00:21:03,782.1995
That's a great ROI.
247
00:21:04,422.1995 --> 00:21:11,742.1985
So anyway, that, but AI powered gap analysis especially if you give it the persona first or upload your ICPs first, it's extremely useful.
248
00:21:12,612.1985 --> 00:21:14,82.1985
I'm totally going to use that tip.
249
00:21:14,292.1995 --> 00:21:15,2.1995
I love that one.
250
00:21:15,682.1995 --> 00:21:15,952.199
Yeah.
251
00:21:15,952.199 --> 00:21:21,552.1985
That's just got a light bulb above my head right now here, because I'm totally going to try that as well.
252
00:21:21,822.1985 --> 00:21:23,722.1985
Working with many clients and.
253
00:21:24,257.1985 --> 00:21:28,267.1985
Try to understand how they're using AI and doing your own work.
254
00:21:28,477.1985 --> 00:21:43,987.1985
Is there a tool or prompt you found, like you just think like all marketers should be, trying right now? Yeah, it's in this one, I also teach a lot I have there's something that all of my most successful adventures in AI have in common, which is they begin with the persona.
255
00:21:44,677.1985 --> 00:21:49,317.1985
I have nicely defined kind of battle tested personas that I can upload and I can upload my own data.
256
00:21:49,327.1985 --> 00:21:50,677.1985
So I'm not concerned about uploading data to AI.
257
00:21:51,327.1985 --> 00:22:09,597.1965
If you don't have that, there's a persona prompt that I use that is, that does a lot of that job where you just fill in the blanks and sounds like this, build me a persona of a job title with roles and responsibilities in industry or company size or geography.
258
00:22:10,97.1965 --> 00:22:16,17.1975
This person's looking for help with challenge or task, and they're considering product or service.
259
00:22:16,947.1975 --> 00:22:20,357.1975
So that it immediately is going to make a persona and it's going to be named Alex.
260
00:22:20,477.1975 --> 00:22:21,457.1975
It's almost always named Alex.
261
00:22:22,132.1975 --> 00:22:25,2.1975
And the fourth thing, the next part of the prompt is has four things.
262
00:22:25,12.1975 --> 00:22:35,562.1965
It says, list their hopes and dreams, list their fears and concerns, list their emotional triggers, and their decision criteria for selecting a company in my industry it'll be partly wrong.
263
00:22:35,582.1975 --> 00:22:36,432.1975
You have to fix it.
264
00:22:36,442.1975 --> 00:22:37,452.1965
Tell it what it missed.
265
00:22:37,452.1965 --> 00:22:38,662.1975
It never trust AI.
266
00:22:38,812.1975 --> 00:22:41,342.1975
I also joke, AI might as well stand for assume incorrect.
267
00:22:41,422.1975 --> 00:22:42,132.1975
Of course it's wrong.
268
00:22:42,242.1975 --> 00:22:42,952.1975
It doesn't know you.
269
00:22:42,972.1975 --> 00:22:43,902.1975
It just read the internet.
270
00:22:43,902.1975 --> 00:22:46,142.1965
It's averaging, so fix it, whatever it gives you.
271
00:22:46,882.1975 --> 00:22:47,712.1975
But then.
272
00:22:48,432.1975 --> 00:22:50,952.1975
You're ready now that it's trained on your audience.
273
00:22:51,462.1975 --> 00:22:57,72.1975
You're really ready to use AI finally, right? Everything you do without this step is very unlikely to be targeted.
274
00:22:57,312.1975 --> 00:22:59,772.1975
Everything you do after this step is very likely to be targeted.
275
00:23:00,552.1975 --> 00:23:01,352.1975
So then talk to it.
276
00:23:01,472.1975 --> 00:23:10,992.1975
It's what's missing from this page? What would help you do your job? What claims do people make in our industry that are least likely to be supported by evidence? I'll go do a research piece.
277
00:23:11,492.1975 --> 00:23:19,822.1975
What do you, what what topics provoke strong emotion and are triggering? We'd start a conversation now, you know what to do on social media.
278
00:23:20,142.1975 --> 00:23:23,102.1975
This is like just everything that you do after that is.
279
00:23:23,672.1975 --> 00:23:25,722.1975
10X more relevant.
280
00:23:25,722.1975 --> 00:23:32,712.1975
It would be surprising, it'd be bad if AI was somehow, an expert on all of us without us telling it who we're talking to.
281
00:23:32,712.1975 --> 00:23:33,342.1975
That would be weird.
282
00:23:33,992.1975 --> 00:23:37,582.1975
You've discussed using AI to create synthetic audience personas.
283
00:23:38,92.1975 --> 00:23:56,172.1985
Can you talk a little bit about that approach? Does it help, with the content creation process or personalization or the relevance and the content you guys are thinking about creating? Yeah, that, that's really the point is if you don't have, if you don't create, it's a fancy way and the word synthetic pops up a lot on AI.
284
00:23:56,612.1985 --> 00:23:57,912.1985
It's a fancy way to say the same thing.
285
00:23:57,912.1985 --> 00:23:59,52.1985
It's train it on your persona.
286
00:23:59,722.1985 --> 00:24:15,662.201
If you get a good persona that AI made for you and you like it, and you feel like you're getting more accurate responses from it, one trick is to then just like copy and paste it into a PDF and share it with your team or upload it to like a shared prompt library, which we should all have so that other people can collaborate with you.
287
00:24:16,162.201 --> 00:24:17,872.202
Look, I'm doing marketing with mine.
288
00:24:17,872.202 --> 00:24:19,402.202
I describe ways to do marketing with it.
289
00:24:19,752.202 --> 00:24:22,352.202
What about the sales team? ChatGPT, maybe you have experience with this.
290
00:24:23,12.202 --> 00:24:24,702.202
Creating a An artificial member of your audience.
291
00:24:24,702.202 --> 00:24:50,477.202
And then how do you use that for sales? I think there's a use case to especially onboard new sales folks or BDRs, have them interact with it And if you're thinking, yeah, you don't want the cold emails for certain, but if you do get somebody and you're trying to craft an email or you're get them on the phone, I think as a new person, especially newer to an industry, how would this person react if I said this? I don't know.
292
00:24:50,977.202 --> 00:24:53,957.1015
Yeah, it's know what I want to do when I don't have the raw material for it yet.
293
00:24:54,397.2015 --> 00:25:19,967.2015
But imagine if you had the last hundred sales calls you did recorded and you gave that to the AI and started asking it questions like, what is our, what is the most common question we get during sales? Which questions indicate there's an objection that hasn't been addressed? What is our best answer to these questions? And what are the aha moments for the audience or for our prospect? The, there will be features within CRMs probably.
294
00:25:20,562.2015 --> 00:25:30,322.2005
That will ingest dozens or hundreds of previous sales calls, find patterns, and then help you craft better conversations like sales playbooks.
295
00:25:31,142.2015 --> 00:25:35,962.2015
I like your idea of what are the most common questions? What are the, some of that I hadn't really thought about that.
296
00:25:35,962.2015 --> 00:25:40,872.1995
I was looking more to create, scripting and stuff like that, but I like that use case.
297
00:25:40,892.1995 --> 00:25:41,342.2005
That's a good one.
298
00:25:42,2.2005 --> 00:25:42,332.2005
Yeah.
299
00:25:42,806.078051 --> 00:25:48,977.6885
I've got I just finished a big sales enablement project now that I have really strong ICPs and sales and messaging frameworks.
300
00:25:49,277.6885 --> 00:25:50,997.6885
Here's my list of next steps.
301
00:25:51,407.6885 --> 00:25:53,227.6885
Audit and update all the web pages.
302
00:25:53,847.6885 --> 00:25:56,327.6885
Give AI the persona, give AI the webpage.
303
00:25:56,817.6885 --> 00:25:58,887.6885
There's Write and launch new nurture sequences.
304
00:25:59,317.6885 --> 00:26:01,287.6885
Audit all the existing nurture sequences.
305
00:26:01,587.6885 --> 00:26:03,587.6885
Update the contact form and the thank you page.
306
00:26:03,917.6875 --> 00:26:07,27.6885
Create new sales focused content, especially articles and case studies.
307
00:26:07,587.6885 --> 00:26:11,557.6885
Create videos and guides for each of the key messages in the messaging framework.
308
00:26:11,937.6885 --> 00:26:13,932.5885
Audit all the articles and case studies.
309
00:26:14,422.6885 --> 00:26:16,172.6885
And then write new standard follow up emails.
310
00:26:16,672.6885 --> 00:26:23,352.6885
Those are all things that are, that will be better now that I have AI friendly ICPs that I can use to give a few pointers.
311
00:26:24,52.6885 --> 00:26:25,452.6875
And this will be a very manual process.
312
00:26:25,482.6885 --> 00:26:27,912.6875
I'm not trying to abdicate my job, right? I'm just looking.
313
00:26:28,442.6875 --> 00:26:32,142.6895
Here's my third and final AI like me changing the definition.
314
00:26:32,627.6895 --> 00:26:34,17.6895
AI is just another input.
315
00:26:34,777.6895 --> 00:26:35,457.6895
That's all it is.
316
00:26:35,537.6895 --> 00:26:36,507.6895
It's just another input.
317
00:26:37,127.6895 --> 00:26:39,187.6895
These are just, it's just another point of view.
318
00:26:39,197.6895 --> 00:26:41,497.6885
You can take it or leave it and move on.
319
00:26:41,997.6885 --> 00:26:42,457.6885
Yeah.
320
00:26:42,567.6885 --> 00:26:43,127.6875
It's interesting.
321
00:26:43,127.6885 --> 00:26:47,147.6875
You think about Gong, right? That's all those sales conversation pools.
322
00:26:47,697.6885 --> 00:26:59,317.6875
I've been able to find really interesting things like when they mentioned a specific customer as a customer story in the call, the, they, it actually moves to stage two faster.
323
00:26:59,427.6885 --> 00:27:05,697.6895
Or you're able to see if the buyer brings up price too early on the conversation, that it's not really going to move through.
324
00:27:05,787.6895 --> 00:27:07,467.6895
So I, it is a nice aid.
325
00:27:07,587.6895 --> 00:27:08,927.6895
A lot of that is a little bit manual.
326
00:27:08,927.6895 --> 00:27:09,987.5895
I know GOMD does a lot of quick.
327
00:27:10,127.6895 --> 00:27:11,937.6895
Aggregate analysis of that.
328
00:27:11,997.6895 --> 00:27:12,607.6895
But you're right.
329
00:27:12,737.6895 --> 00:27:18,347.6885
I'm just able to plot some small nuggets to create some trends, but I'm curious to see what more I can do.
330
00:27:18,647.6895 --> 00:27:18,867.6895
Okay.
331
00:27:18,867.6895 --> 00:27:26,617.6885
You mentioned it a few times, like a little bit of caution around using AI because of the poor quality that it can provide.
332
00:27:26,877.6885 --> 00:27:35,917.6885
How could marketers do a better job validating or improving their outputs and the content that's generated? Hopefully the marketer is.
333
00:27:35,917.6885 --> 00:27:44,437.6885
Using their brain, when you look at a thing, you have to really look at it critically imagine you hire a writer, and the writer comes back with four drafts of articles.
334
00:27:45,62.6885 --> 00:27:47,782.6885
You would never just automatically approve those by default.
335
00:27:47,792.6885 --> 00:27:49,102.6885
You would look at them with a skeptical eye.
336
00:27:49,272.6885 --> 00:27:54,132.6895
Why would AI be any different? So I think we just need to take it for what it is.
337
00:27:54,132.6895 --> 00:27:56,772.6895
It just quickly generated an outline or a draft.
338
00:27:57,32.6885 --> 00:28:01,316.1571667
Another one is I just don't think that it's all need to decide in our careers, like what we're passionate about.
339
00:28:01,316.1571667 --> 00:28:09,12.7895
What do you want to do with your life? What do you want to be when you grow up? And then don't abdicate that part of the job because that's something you care about.
340
00:28:09,512.7895 --> 00:28:22,522.7895
In my experience, so the content that I write, it's highly formatted, it's lots of structure, subheads and bullet lists and bolding and, tight sentences and some extreme, short paragraphs and tons of visuals.
341
00:28:23,182.7895 --> 00:28:24,972.7895
AI is not very good at any of that stuff.
342
00:28:25,82.7895 --> 00:28:26,602.7905
It doesn't really do those things well.
343
00:28:27,187.7895 --> 00:28:28,197.7895
Okay, no problem.
344
00:28:28,197.7895 --> 00:28:31,147.7895
I'm going to use AI earlier in the process to come up with ideas.
345
00:28:31,147.7895 --> 00:28:36,947.7895
So think about it's do you use it to write articles? What does that mean? There's 11 steps involved with like write articles.
346
00:28:37,357.7895 --> 00:28:38,247.7885
So break it down.
347
00:28:38,707.7895 --> 00:28:39,747.7895
Good for ideation.
348
00:28:39,877.7895 --> 00:28:40,237.7895
Yeah.
349
00:28:40,457.7895 --> 00:28:42,637.7895
If you don't, if you need an idea, it can help with that.
350
00:28:42,737.7885 --> 00:28:46,77.7895
Especially if you give it GA4 reports, it'll help you a lot with that.
351
00:28:46,637.7895 --> 00:28:48,777.7895
And then, this is a developing a point of view.
352
00:28:48,777.7895 --> 00:28:53,737.7895
What topics are missing? What strong opinions would be interesting? This is called POV development where we talked about a minute ago, thought leadership.
353
00:28:54,397.7895 --> 00:28:59,467.7895
And then, to create a draft outline, okay, it won't be very good, so fix it.
354
00:28:59,867.7895 --> 00:29:02,257.7895
And then make a first draft article, if you want.
355
00:29:02,287.7895 --> 00:29:04,37.7895
I don't do that, but that's what some people like.
356
00:29:04,247.7895 --> 00:29:13,157.7885
So break down big jobs into small jobs and look, the people who are the best at AI are looking at it at almost the task level.
357
00:29:13,657.7885 --> 00:29:19,167.7885
You break that, you break jobs down into small tasks and look for an AI use case for each of those tasks.
358
00:29:19,207.7885 --> 00:29:21,757.7885
And for some, there are good use cases, for some there are not.
359
00:29:22,257.7885 --> 00:29:27,547.7885
But in the end, yeah, AI suggested that I read an article about advanced lead generation tactics.
360
00:29:27,547.7885 --> 00:29:29,517.7885
That's actually a pretty cool idea.
361
00:29:29,987.7885 --> 00:29:35,767.7865
And so Friday morning, I started working on it and by Monday morning, I've got a it's about half done.
362
00:29:36,267.7865 --> 00:29:38,297.7855
That will be a good I'm excited about this article.
363
00:29:38,297.7855 --> 00:29:50,297.8855
Actually AI just gave me the idea, but no way can AI create a very differentiated article on that topic for me I might ask it a couple of points what else should this article have? My ideas for this Advanced Legion article.
364
00:29:50,347.8855 --> 00:29:51,897.8855
I'm, it's going to be good.
365
00:29:52,87.8855 --> 00:29:52,707.8855
I'm excited.
366
00:29:53,207.8855 --> 00:29:54,447.8855
It's super fascinating, too.
367
00:29:54,477.8855 --> 00:30:02,937.8855
What I find particularly interesting about what you just said is you can do that because of your domain expertise in your areas.
368
00:30:03,167.8845 --> 00:30:15,822.8855
And so what I'm wondering right now is If you're early career marketer, how is AI going to impact your job or what your future job is? Because, we've all been working a little while we've been doing our work.
369
00:30:16,52.8855 --> 00:30:17,192.8855
We know it pretty well.
370
00:30:17,222.8855 --> 00:30:20,512.8855
We probably know our personas, so we can really use it to enhance our experience.
371
00:30:20,512.8855 --> 00:30:24,652.7855
But I do wonder what AI will do for more junior level marketers where.
372
00:30:24,822.8855 --> 00:30:31,592.8855
Some of the work that they would have traditionally done, it can be replaced by ChatGPT or something more advanced that'll come soon.
373
00:30:32,92.8855 --> 00:30:35,812.8845
I think the data shows right now that AI is a skills leveler.
374
00:30:36,312.8845 --> 00:30:38,332.8845
So I've done SEO for 24 years.
375
00:30:38,332.8845 --> 00:30:49,682.8845
You don't need me to get some of those results because a person with good prompts and good training can do many of those things without 20 years of experience.
376
00:30:50,247.8845 --> 00:31:06,787.8835
So I think in the short run, it will bring up the level of those more junior marketers, but whether or not they continue to grow in their skills will depend on them stepping away from AI and going deep into the topics, the audience, empathy, the data.
377
00:31:07,507.8855 --> 00:31:10,217.8835
So an example, advanced lead gen strategies.
378
00:31:10,367.8835 --> 00:31:13,177.8835
One of my tips is to find the pages.
379
00:31:13,527.8845 --> 00:31:18,477.8845
And traffic source combinations that have the highest conversion rates and focus on those.
380
00:31:18,667.8845 --> 00:31:30,547.8845
That's not like a normal thing, right? A conversion optimizer might not think of that, but if you can find which of your landing pages from which of your traffic sources have the high in combination, have the highest conversion rates and then make those work harder.
381
00:31:30,947.8855 --> 00:31:31,677.8855
That will work.
382
00:31:31,697.8855 --> 00:31:32,697.8855
You're going to get more leads.
383
00:31:32,727.8855 --> 00:31:42,347.8855
I am a hundred percent confident in that strategy, but if you just prompt AI, it's not going to recommend that it's going to recommend like copywriting things and calls to action and like this, the standard stuff.
384
00:31:42,827.8855 --> 00:31:47,317.8855
So junior marketers will get better faster, but they're going to plateau unless.
385
00:31:47,742.8855 --> 00:31:54,72.8855
They really keep do what we do, which is study like it's finals week and cram and try to learn everything you can and talk to experts every day.
386
00:31:54,72.8855 --> 00:31:56,922.8855
That's they may top out sooner if they're not studying hard.
387
00:31:57,422.8855 --> 00:32:38,37.9835
I think the subject domain expertise is super interesting because AI gives us an opportunity to learn faster, but the depth of knowledge is probably, a little more surface level, you talk about folks plateauing potentially, how do you think that the content is going to change because my fear is that it's all going to sound the same, because we're going to have junior level folks come in, do a lot of content, because, there's a need, there's a need to is that good or bad, what's your perspective, how are people going to, take all this information and establish subject matter expertise if they're just, starting out with this ChatGPT world? Cost of content that went down.
388
00:32:38,682.9845 --> 00:32:43,462.9845
That has gone down for years that went down because of Fiverr that it's now extremely low because of ChatGPT.
389
00:32:43,882.9845 --> 00:32:48,862.9845
The cost to create content and the ability to do content at scale these things have changed dramatically.
390
00:32:48,862.9845 --> 00:32:54,902.9835
And so there's going to be just tons more content, but the percentage of content that is differentiated.
391
00:32:55,377.9845 --> 00:33:02,137.9845
We'll dig, we'll go down to there's going to be fewer of us who are sticking our neck out, taking a stand, making strong opinion statements.
392
00:33:02,667.9845 --> 00:33:07,587.9855
There's sentences you can write that AI just can't write, I could give you a million examples.
393
00:33:07,717.9855 --> 00:33:10,367.9845
I was at a conference the other day and I said this just at random.
394
00:33:11,12.9855 --> 00:33:13,732.9855
Pastrami is the greatest of all deli meats.
395
00:33:13,912.9855 --> 00:33:15,122.9855
There is no competition.
396
00:33:15,372.9855 --> 00:33:16,632.9855
It is by far the best.
397
00:33:17,52.9855 --> 00:33:18,462.9855
It's an elevated corned beef.
398
00:33:18,472.9855 --> 00:33:20,2.9855
That's a good deli meat.
399
00:33:20,42.9855 --> 00:33:25,452.9845
I, maybe salami would be your second best, but I'm going pastrami number one, right? Of course.
400
00:33:25,842.9845 --> 00:33:26,212.9845
Okay.
401
00:33:26,322.9845 --> 00:33:28,722.9855
Everything I just said could never be written by an AI.
402
00:33:28,832.9855 --> 00:33:31,712.9855
And when you heard it, maybe your mouth watered, like it like triggered.
403
00:33:31,712.9855 --> 00:33:34,192.9855
It's like a, there's like an emotion, like you've got a perspective.
404
00:33:34,652.9855 --> 00:33:43,92.9855
You started thinking about, honey baked ham or something like what just happened in your brain is different than anything AI ever could have made happen in your brain.
405
00:33:43,182.9855 --> 00:33:46,422.9865
Because I expressed a strong opinion.
406
00:33:46,922.9865 --> 00:33:47,882.9865
Anyone can do that.
407
00:33:48,242.9865 --> 00:33:57,122.9865
Very few marketers do that in the future when there's so much low quality AI, average internet kind of stuff that content will sound even stronger.
408
00:33:57,677.9865 --> 00:34:01,457.9865
And the value of personal brands will go up even higher.
409
00:34:02,67.9865 --> 00:34:04,817.9865
The value of influencer collaborations will be even greater.
410
00:34:05,387.9865 --> 00:34:06,237.9865
Be a person.
411
00:34:06,737.9865 --> 00:34:09,697.9865
Draw a line in the sand, plant a flag, have a point of view.
412
00:34:10,287.9865 --> 00:34:10,847.9865
Try that.
413
00:34:11,657.9865 --> 00:34:13,7.9855
You will sound different.
414
00:34:13,217.9855 --> 00:34:19,477.9865
In the future, when there's 10 billion new URLs that are all generated from a machine, you'll sound, you'll, the difference will be even greater.
415
00:34:20,147.9865 --> 00:34:22,227.9865
so we've talked about content.
416
00:34:22,227.9865 --> 00:34:23,407.9865
We've talked about SEO.
417
00:34:23,627.9865 --> 00:34:48,652.9865
One thing that I'm trying to figure out myself is how do I get my content or information about my business into these GPTs? Do you have any thoughts on how a marketer could, potentially do that or what use cases that might be related that'll be relevant to them? I don't hear this question that much, but I think you just asked the most important question of 2025.
418
00:34:49,342.9865 --> 00:35:01,387.8865
Like I think that is actually, if it's not SEO, is it going to be called AIO? How do you train an the AI to mention your brand and your content? This is an awesome question.
419
00:35:01,967.9865 --> 00:35:02,967.9865
And very interesting.
420
00:35:03,287.9865 --> 00:35:07,327.9865
If you research it, you'll find that there's a lot of, it's public how chat GPT 3 was trained.
421
00:35:07,827.9865 --> 00:35:18,717.9865
It's like the common crawl, plus these databases called book1 and book2 and it's like this web2crawl dataset, which is like pages that have been linked to from reddit posts that had three or more upvotes.
422
00:35:18,717.9865 --> 00:35:21,137.9865
It's like a bunch of stuff that they used to train GPT 3.
423
00:35:21,817.9865 --> 00:35:25,617.9865
Some, not Wikipedia obviously, and Wikipedia was very heavily weighted in the dataset.
424
00:35:26,117.9865 --> 00:35:30,667.9865
AI just needs like huge amounts of information to even have grammar and no words.
425
00:35:30,667.9865 --> 00:35:33,367.9865
So not all of it is even relevant as like a knowledge source.
426
00:35:33,367.9865 --> 00:35:36,907.9855
It's just like examples of language, like all the subtitles from every movie.
427
00:35:36,997.9865 --> 00:35:38,237.9865
It's that's how you train an AI.
428
00:35:38,247.9865 --> 00:35:38,947.9855
Give it everything.
429
00:35:39,447.9855 --> 00:35:45,507.9855
The, my recommendation for getting AI to mention your brand is to have a very big digital footprint.
430
00:35:46,307.9855 --> 00:35:49,87.9855
It's to say yes to every podcast.
431
00:35:49,362.9855 --> 00:36:10,82.9845
to produce videos with transcripts, to do, to write guest posts for other brands to collaborate with editors to do good digital PR to appear on other people's websites in as many places as possible to write press releases, which appear everywhere to be in list posts, sounds weird, but if you see the sources of some AI responses, it's like a list post.
432
00:36:10,582.9845 --> 00:36:17,102.9835
So how they elaborate with trade publications, which are relevant topically, or associations.
433
00:36:17,747.9835 --> 00:36:44,194.6821667
Be a member of things if those memberships create content collaboration opportunities, but you should be doing hardcore content marketing and Serious digital PR if you expect to have any hope of AI saying that's the brand for that topic it's weirdly a lot of the same thing probably many of the same strategies we're doing now But with a slightly different angle It's building the strong foundation of content marketing first.
434
00:36:44,544.6821667 --> 00:37:10,259.6831667
And then how do you augment what you're doing with AI tools? What do you think that's going to mean for, search and how buyers think about, the content they're either they're seeing in, these AI tools or whether, the next improvements to Google looks like, how do you think that changes? This is also a very fun and totally unclear question, but no one knows yet, but I'll take a, I'll take a shot at it.
435
00:37:11,119.6831667 --> 00:37:19,639.6831667
Right now, SEOs evaluate digital PR opportunities by looking at domain authority and domain rating and links.
436
00:37:20,549.6831667 --> 00:37:22,479.6821667
I want to be mentioned on the website with links to it.
437
00:37:22,479.6831667 --> 00:37:24,349.6831667
I got a DRAD link today.
438
00:37:24,359.6831667 --> 00:37:25,499.6831667
Like they care about links.
439
00:37:26,249.6831667 --> 00:37:28,499.6831667
I don't think AI cares about links.
440
00:37:29,264.6831667 --> 00:37:32,274.6831667
I have no reason to believe it does, right? I've never seen any support for that.
441
00:37:32,534.6831667 --> 00:37:33,784.6831667
It just reads a lot of stuff.
442
00:37:34,344.6831667 --> 00:37:51,954.6831667
So more important than having a mention of your brand on a place that links back to you, a place with high domain authority, it's probably better to have a mention of your brand on any website, as long as that mention has the elevator pitch for what you do, because that is another instance on the internet.
443
00:37:52,134.6831667 --> 00:37:56,14.6841667
It's like citations for local SEO, where a name, address, and phone number mattered.
444
00:37:56,404.6841667 --> 00:37:57,384.6841667
You just want that.
445
00:37:57,404.6841667 --> 00:37:58,274.6841667
It's like my intro.
446
00:37:58,714.6841667 --> 00:38:00,524.6841667
Orbit Media is a web design and development company.
447
00:38:00,524.6841667 --> 00:38:01,474.6841667
We're located in Chicago.
448
00:38:01,474.6841667 --> 00:38:05,814.6841667
We focus on search and conversion optimized B2B lead gen websites, blah, blah, blah.
449
00:38:06,94.6831667 --> 00:38:13,194.6831667
Whatever that thing is, you want that thing, that little chunk of language that summarizes your brand to appear in lots of places.
450
00:38:13,334.6831667 --> 00:38:14,894.5841667
And I don't think that links well.
451
00:38:15,484.6841667 --> 00:38:19,794.6841667
Or domain authority or New York times versus the East Peoria news.
452
00:38:19,804.6841667 --> 00:38:22,224.6841667
I don't know that's going to matter as much in the future.
453
00:38:22,724.6841667 --> 00:38:26,54.6841667
That's almost pure speculation, if I'm being honest.
454
00:38:26,554.6841667 --> 00:38:27,754.6841667
Yeah, I don't know.
455
00:38:27,754.6841667 --> 00:38:33,514.6861667
That's why this is really interesting to do this, have these conversations because we're, we just don't know what's going to happen.
456
00:38:33,514.6861667 --> 00:38:35,964.6861667
And I'll be curious to see where we go.
457
00:38:36,464.6861667 --> 00:38:42,594.6861667
So Andy, at FutureCraft Marketing, we are all about giving practical tips and tricks to our listeners.
458
00:38:42,784.6861667 --> 00:38:44,254.6861667
So I've got a few questions for you.
459
00:38:44,284.6861667 --> 00:38:46,254.6861667
And I just want your quick hit answer.
460
00:38:46,254.6861667 --> 00:38:46,714.6861667
Okay.
461
00:38:47,44.6861667 --> 00:39:00,94.5861667
The first one, what's your best quick AI tip? Give it a web page and give it a persona and say, to what extent does this page meet or not meet my personas information needs? Wow.
462
00:39:00,94.5861667 --> 00:39:05,874.5861667
And you will find gaps, plug those gaps, and it's both, it's good for both search and conversion.
463
00:39:06,614.5861667 --> 00:39:11,234.5851667
Cheese and mousetrap, it will and it's cost nothing and you can do it before lunch.
464
00:39:11,794.5851667 --> 00:39:32,954.5851667
What's your best prompt, workflow, or GPT you like to use? That one I said earlier is what are the most important questions that people in my industry are afraid to answer? Or what are the most thought provoking topics that, it's like the the content strategy question that reveals thought provoking topics that are less frequently addressed in your category.
465
00:39:33,554.5851667 --> 00:39:34,584.5861667
Those are really fun.
466
00:39:35,194.5861667 --> 00:39:38,494.5851667
What counter narrative opinions, that's a great combination of words.
467
00:39:38,924.5841667 --> 00:39:45,614.4851667
What counter narrative opinions are the least likely to be discussed on the big blogs or by the famous thought leaders in my vertical? And that's it.
468
00:39:45,944.5851667 --> 00:39:50,404.5851667
Some of the answers will be worthless and a couple of them might be really fun to jump into.
469
00:39:51,74.5851667 --> 00:40:03,84.5831667
How do you keep up with all of this information coming out with AI? So what's your best tip for keeping up with all this information about AI and marketing right now? Here's a counter narrative tip.
470
00:40:03,194.5841667 --> 00:40:07,314.5841667
I recommend ignoring the new, the, all the information about tools.
471
00:40:07,814.5841667 --> 00:40:09,544.5841667
I pay no attention to tools at all.
472
00:40:10,124.5841667 --> 00:40:10,794.5841667
Couldn't care less.
473
00:40:10,814.5841667 --> 00:40:12,84.5841667
People are always emailing me.
474
00:40:12,394.5841667 --> 00:40:14,414.5841667
I was on an AI mastermind, which is a great way to learn.
475
00:40:14,564.5841667 --> 00:40:19,44.5841667
That's a, that's actually one of the best answers is just form small groups of people and share trade notes.
476
00:40:19,244.5841667 --> 00:40:25,454.5851667
On a regular basis, like what did you learn? What did I learn? What can I teach you? What can you teach me? But I was in this AI mastermind group where.
477
00:40:25,819.5851667 --> 00:40:33,119.5851667
They were just their format was to say what new tools and then I would leave this meeting with 11 new tabs and not knowing what to do.
478
00:40:33,739.5851667 --> 00:40:35,909.5841667
AI startups launched three a day.
479
00:40:36,69.5851667 --> 00:40:38,859.5841667
Like it's like several times a day, a new AI startup launches.
480
00:40:39,359.5841667 --> 00:40:48,989.5841667
Great time to ignore it, wait for it to settle down, just pick a language model and just use it and not, don't chase trends or tools and sign up for a bunch of new stuff.
481
00:40:49,559.5841667 --> 00:40:50,439.5841667
Stick with vanilla.
482
00:40:50,449.5841667 --> 00:40:53,889.5841667
It's quite powerful and you can do almost anything you want.
483
00:40:54,389.5841667 --> 00:40:57,189.5841667
I'm really curious what your answer to this question is going to be then.
484
00:40:57,429.5841667 --> 00:41:06,999.6831667
What technology should our listeners check out that they may not know about? Give you one if you want to make on page SEO recommendations, get a tool to show you what your page is missing.
485
00:41:07,624.6831667 --> 00:41:23,344.6826667
MarketMuse is a tool that I always, that I use every day, almost every day, right? It's like the client almost, it's like you find a striking dissonant keyphrase, I ranked number 11 for this phrase, how could I rank higher for that phrase, what's missing from the copy? Oh, this copy is missing these six topics, let's make it a better page.
486
00:41:23,714.6836667 --> 00:41:31,794.6836667
So I use MarketMuse for that, MarketMuse is friendly with AI, you can export that list of phrases and give it to AI with the page and ask AI to make those copy edits.
487
00:41:32,139.6836667 --> 00:41:36,369.6836667
I'm going to recommend copy edits and then you can choose which ones you like and just ignore the rest.
488
00:41:37,19.6836667 --> 00:41:41,69.6836667
So yeah, my, my Mark tech stack is pretty simple.
489
00:41:41,399.6836667 --> 00:41:43,979.6836667
There's, I've got a email service provider.
490
00:41:43,979.6836667 --> 00:41:52,539.6836667
I've got a CRM, I've got Moz, SEMrush, Ahrefs, I've got ChatGPT, I've got GA4 and Google Search Console, and I've got MarketMuse.
491
00:41:53,94.6836667 --> 00:41:54,704.6836667
I don't really need anything else.
492
00:41:54,764.6836667 --> 00:41:55,584.6836667
That sounds like a lot.
493
00:41:55,584.6836667 --> 00:41:57,774.6836667
Actually, I put a bunch of SEO tools in there.
494
00:41:58,334.6836667 --> 00:42:00,14.6836667
But it's, that's totally sufficient.
495
00:42:00,674.6836667 --> 00:42:09,534.6826667
It's funny, ChatGPT and I often talk about our AI marketing tech stack because we feel like if we didn't monitor it, that we'd grow exponentially every day.
496
00:42:10,114.6826667 --> 00:42:12,174.6826667
Thank you so much, Andy, for joining us today.
497
00:42:12,174.7826667 --> 00:42:15,854.7826667
I definitely learned a lot and some is really interesting conversation.
498
00:42:16,354.7826667 --> 00:42:17,54.7826667
Super fun.
499
00:42:17,224.7826667 --> 00:42:19,184.7826667
And ChatGPT, thanks for your input on that sales trick.
500
00:42:19,184.7826667 --> 00:42:22,754.7826667
I'd like the idea of, using that to train and onboard a new reps.
501
00:42:23,254.7826667 --> 00:42:23,884.7826667
Super smart.
502
00:42:23,924.7826667 --> 00:42:24,724.7821667
That'll become standard.
503
00:42:24,724.7821667 --> 00:42:25,244.7826667
I think someday.
504
00:42:25,744.7826667 --> 00:42:31,674.7806667
I think it's going to be interesting to see how sales enablement tools like the high spots and seismic change.
505
00:42:32,279.7806667 --> 00:42:43,499.7796667
It's got to be more interactive, right? they can service the content the prospects are looking at and identify, but it's like that next step of how do you inform your salespeople to get more efficient, faster, be interesting.
506
00:42:43,939.7806667 --> 00:42:46,189.7796667
It'll be a video avatar of your prospect.
507
00:42:46,804.7806667 --> 00:42:48,584.7806667
That you'll just start talking to it.
508
00:42:48,944.7806667 --> 00:42:49,854.7806667
It's going to get weird.
509
00:42:50,4.7806667 --> 00:42:52,674.7806667
What do you think? 12 months? Not long.
510
00:42:53,24.7806667 --> 00:42:53,654.7806667
Not long.
511
00:42:53,704.7806667 --> 00:42:56,964.7816667
I would give it end of the year, end of the year.
512
00:42:57,194.7816667 --> 00:42:58,594.7816667
ChatGPT's on record.
513
00:42:58,604.7816667 --> 00:43:06,124.7816667
Before the end of the year, the sales training tools will have a video avatar that is trained on your value prop and your target audience's needs.
514
00:43:06,274.7816667 --> 00:43:08,344.7816667
I think you're very likely right in that prediction.
515
00:43:08,914.7816667 --> 00:43:14,544.7806667
I'm certainly leaving with a ton of good takeaways here and also hungry for a pastrami sandwich.
516
00:43:14,544.8806667 --> 00:43:15,844.8816667
Thank you so much, Andy.
517
00:43:15,874.8806667 --> 00:43:18,304.8806667
Really appreciate the time today and enjoy the conversation.
518
00:43:19,84.8806667 --> 00:43:19,454.8796667
Thank you.
519
00:43:19,454.8806667 --> 00:43:19,824.8796667
This was fun.
520
00:43:19,824.8796667 --> 00:43:25,264.8786667
All Erin, what'd you think? So smart, really cutting edge stuff there.
521
00:43:25,274.8786667 --> 00:43:32,794.8786667
I think it's hard to get ahead in the SEO world and is so competitive and Andy's really at the top of his game.
522
00:43:32,804.8786667 --> 00:43:37,344.8786667
But, I really think a lot of it is due to the quality and effort that they put in there.
523
00:43:37,354.8786667 --> 00:43:39,832.8776667
So Ken, what was your takeaway? Yeah.
524
00:43:39,832.8776667 --> 00:43:50,132.8776667
The thing that I found throughout the conversation with him was that GPTs can really be used to address gaps in your work.
525
00:43:50,467.8776667 --> 00:43:57,537.8776667
In your thinking, in your content strategy and I don't think we've talked much about that.
526
00:43:57,577.8776667 --> 00:44:08,447.8776667
And so I'm going to be leaving here today about how I can incorporate that into my content creation, probably persona work, content strategy, and messaging.
527
00:44:09,167.8776667 --> 00:44:28,47.8776667
about Erin? I really enjoyed the conversation when you asked him about getting content into GPTs what is that going to look like? Obviously, we're still in the hypothetical, age, but I do think there's a point to be made where people are going to go there to different GPTs to learn about, solutions.
528
00:44:28,67.8776667 --> 00:44:41,777.8766667
So whether it's comparing or understanding features, I do think what he said about creating that foundational marketing layer and getting your stuff everywhere and having a really authentic voice was something that resonated with me.
529
00:44:42,465.8776667 --> 00:44:46,715.8776667
he really is on the cusp of all of this work.
530
00:44:46,715.8776667 --> 00:44:53,975.8771667
he's really put a lot of thought into how AI can be leveraged, but also where maybe it doesn't make sense right now.
531
00:44:53,975.8771667 --> 00:44:59,565.8766667
So I really appreciated his perspective really challenged my thinking in some ways, and I'm going to try some stuff out.
532
00:45:00,105.8776667 --> 00:45:03,205.8776667
But again, thank you, Andy, for joining us today.
533
00:45:03,435.8776667 --> 00:45:05,815.8776667
We really saw a lot of value in your session.
534
00:45:06,5.8776667 --> 00:45:08,545.8776667
Erin, to wrap us up, we're gonna do a tech review.
535
00:45:09,35.8776667 --> 00:45:16,807.8766667
What tech tool are we reviewing today? I took a look at Gamma, which is a solution that helps you create presentations.
536
00:45:17,307.8766667 --> 00:45:17,997.8776667
Okay, cool.
537
00:45:18,197.8776667 --> 00:45:21,197.8786667
That sounds like something I could use a ton.
538
00:45:21,217.8786667 --> 00:45:22,157.8776667
I've heard it before.
539
00:45:22,157.8786667 --> 00:45:23,947.8786667
I used it a while ago.
540
00:45:23,997.8786667 --> 00:45:28,644.8776667
Erin, how does it stack up for you? I think there's still some opportunity for improvement.
541
00:45:28,994.8776667 --> 00:45:36,134.8786667
There's a lot of potential and that you can basically give it some text and it translates those into slides and gives you the imagery.
542
00:45:36,409.8786667 --> 00:45:41,919.8786667
Gives you the flow, prescribes what that presentation could look like.
543
00:45:41,919.8786667 --> 00:45:43,229.8786667
And they have a bunch of different formats.
544
00:45:43,239.8786667 --> 00:45:44,679.8786667
So I think that is very cool.
545
00:45:45,359.8786667 --> 00:45:49,199.8786667
I think where it's lacking for me is just that, that next level.
546
00:45:49,199.8786667 --> 00:45:59,709.8786667
I think if you're doing a very base level presentation where you don't have a ton of depth of content that you need, or you don't need, different data points where you're putting in graphs and things of that nature.
547
00:45:59,919.8786667 --> 00:46:00,439.8786667
It's good.
548
00:46:00,599.8786667 --> 00:46:03,59.8786667
It's, it's pretty handy and it can be a really good starting point.
549
00:46:03,349.8786667 --> 00:46:09,69.8776667
The other downside that I see is there isn't an opportunity to add your own brand or your own templates.
550
00:46:09,69.9776667 --> 00:46:12,669.8806667
So you are constrained by what they have in there.
551
00:46:13,69.8786667 --> 00:46:16,93.1796667
And that can be a challenge if you're looking for something a bit more custom.
552
00:46:16,516.1796667 --> 00:46:23,741.1796667
Yeah, I remember when I was using it, I wanted to do Three icons with a word under each of them.
553
00:46:24,21.1796667 --> 00:46:29,851.1796667
And I kept saying create a slide with three icons and spaces for words under each of them, and it kept giving me four.
554
00:46:29,901.1796667 --> 00:46:37,931.1796667
So I just think some of the more advanced or intermediate things that Gamma has, it doesn't stack up, but you're right.
555
00:46:37,941.1806667 --> 00:46:39,951.1796667
It probably has some great use cases.
556
00:46:40,1.1796667 --> 00:46:44,901.1796667
Okay, on the scale of one to ten, where do you rank it? I'm going to give it a four today.
557
00:46:45,31.1796667 --> 00:46:52,466.1796667
That being said, I'm still going to keep an eye on it and keep trying it, because I think it's got a ton of potential and We're always giving presentations.
558
00:46:52,496.1796667 --> 00:46:55,666.1796667
So I think that the use case is awesome.
559
00:46:55,666.1796667 --> 00:46:57,546.1796667
And I think it's a really hard problem to solve for.
560
00:46:57,546.1796667 --> 00:46:59,596.1796667
So if they can crack it, it'd be really interesting.
561
00:46:59,844.1796667 --> 00:47:00,884.1796667
Yeah, I agree with you.
562
00:47:01,64.1796667 --> 00:47:07,874.1796667
Probably the reason why this is probably one of the lower scores that we've given is this is a really hard topic, right? And you're right.
563
00:47:07,904.1796667 --> 00:47:13,384.1791667
If someone can figure out how to make power points better, you're gonna have much business like you won't know what to do with.
564
00:47:13,394.1781667 --> 00:47:17,389.0791667
So I'm excited for what they do moving forward.
565
00:47:18,69.1791667 --> 00:47:20,169.1791667
With that, I think we are done for the day.
566
00:47:20,169.1791667 --> 00:47:26,939.1791667
We had a great interview with Andy and I'm really excited to go try some of the stuff that he mentioned.
567
00:47:27,209.1791667 --> 00:47:30,969.1791667
But thank you all for listening and joining us and we'll talk to you soon.
568
00:47:31,469.1791667 --> 00:47:35,979.1791667
And until next time, let's keep crafting the future of marketing together.