FBI Burn Bags, Hidden SCIF’s & Truth About Mar-A-Lago Raid |EP621

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
(00:00):
All men are created equal, but they are endowed by their
Creator with certain unalienableRights, by liberty.
If liberty means anything at all, it means right to tell
people what they do not want to hear.

(00:32):
Make America great again. Welcome back to the big big
show. Of course I'm your host Lance
Miliaccio with my Co host GeorgeBallantine back in the saddle
doing what we do. Of course, this is always edge
of the knife on this show because, you know, if it's, it's
always better to be hugged by the truth and comforted with a

(00:56):
lie. George Ballantine, my brother
from another mother. I'm happy to be back here.
Thank you so very much. You've been rocking and rolling,
doing what you got to do. Because, you know, I had some
stuff I had to knock out for myself.
I was kind of overwhelmed, stilltrying to get caught up with
everything I had going on. So it's always a little
difficult. And I want to thank the audience
for your, as always, your support, your patience and

(01:18):
everything else. Oh, it never happened.
Were they great? Good.
I'm happy. It's one thing Lance and I
always do. We always cover for each other,
so no matter what, one of us always gets you handled.
You know, there's times where I've been busy or something's
going on. So you know, that's what we do.
Brothers from another mother, but the same father.

(01:39):
Well, of course, as always, we'dlike to start off the show by
thanking our sponsors, of course, Original Glory Beer,
Mike Sadler and the team, You know, their plan has always been
to go national. They're working away, slaving
away doing it. Of course, if you can tell your
local liquor store or if you have distributors in the family,
tell them to get a hold of the Original Glory team.
They'd like to see the product in their on their shelves.

(02:01):
Of course, you can always do it.They got their American Pilsner,
their American Light, and of course their flavored product
cheered for delicious flavors. Spike beer product.
It's actually a really great product.
So check it out. And, of course, let me pull out
my prepper bar, the 62.2g prepper bar.
That's right, silver. I'm holding up the silver one.
Keep trying to work. Jonathan Rose, get a couple of

(02:21):
gold ones for George and I perforate easily.
Broken down, your choice of three different denominations
available in gold and silver right now comes with an asset
report. And I don't care whether that's
to protect you from economic uncertainty, you know,
inflation, or its unique utilityfor barter.
And Trey, the Prepper bar makes a perfect gift for all those
precious metal lovers out there.Supposed to be mined and minted
in the US. You can go to thebigmigbar.com.

(02:45):
That's right, the big migbar.comuse all caps prepper for your
promo code. That'll get you 10% off on the
silver, 5% off on the gold. If you buy a bar, send us a
photo. And and let me say something.
With everything going on, you guys are seeing more and more
corruption coming out of this government.
I really truly believe in gold and silver.
Having a few of these on hand isalways a great deal.

(03:06):
And to just be able to take up, break off a small piece to make
a payment. That way you've got a solution.
You're able to make a payment with a small piece.
Did I hear, did I hear break offLance?
Did I? I heard break off break me off a
piece of that prepper bar. There it is.
There it is. I told everybody, I said I can
get away when I'm going to hear no Flack because Lance wasn't

(03:28):
there for a few days and look. There it is.
It's all right, Lance. It's going to be all right,
buddy. Well, here we are.
Of course, you know, the administration's doing
everything they can. I'm not sure they're doing the
right thing on Epstein. I still haven't seen any files
on that. I do hear that Maxwell is, is,

(03:50):
is negotiating with her attorneys to make a deal with
the FBI and the Department of Justice.
She wants a fuel full immunity deal.
I'm sure they're talking about a5K1 downward departure, which
would be a reduction in her sentence for her cooperation.
But I do know this at this pointthat I would guess on the way

(04:14):
out of the door, those corrupt sons of bitches over at the FBI,
we're probably doing everything they could to destroy records,
burn records, shred records because the more Cash Patel digs
in and you know, he's been on our show.
We like cash. I trust cash.

(04:34):
I think he's, I think he's a solid guy.
I think there's been some resistance on him doing his job
for whatever reason. I don't know who it's coming
from, but I think they've been held back on some of the things
they want to do. Because if you've ever read his
book Government Gangster, and ifyou haven't, I would say to
support him, I'd recommend you pick up a copy.
Here it is right here. And I would tell you that this

(04:59):
book and, and here's a here's the autograph.
He's got a little, he's signed it.
You may actually sign the book to me.
I would tell you that it's an important thing not only to
support him, but also to really figure out what's going on.
Because, George, were you surprised at all?
I mean, we're hearing about documents sitting in burn bags
in hidden rooms. Before we get started.

(05:22):
I'm sorry, what? Before we get started.
Oh yeah. Like to do a little.
I got a little set in the mood for everybody and I got to
adjust my camera. So I'll do that while we're set
in the mood. Yeah, I've got to do mine too,
but. Over the past few days, it seems
like the left are freaking out over this Sydney Sweeney's
American Jeans ad that was released.

(05:45):
Explain that to me. Well, you know Sydney Sweeney.
No, I know it is. I just don't understand why
they're freaking out there's. Always because because they they
talk about in one of the commercials about having good
jeans, you know, and they showing like, you know, her good
jeans and blue eyes. So they're, they're say, no,

(06:06):
it's Nazi propaganda, but you know, good jeans and jeans, blue
jeans. Because she's a blonde with blue
eyes. That's nuts.
Oh my God, give me the freaking break.
Why? Because it's not some.
Fat transgender. No, hold on, let me finish.
But it's it's ironic how the howthe left, they didn't say
anything when Beyoncé's Levite jeans ads was released and the

(06:28):
left actually praised her as stylish and empowering women.
And now the left want to call Sydney Sweeney's American Eagle
jeans and Nazi. This problem is modern feminism
isn't about empowering women, it's about controlling them.
So here's a little something from the left.
Look, all we're saying is that we want representation, OK?

(06:51):
If if Republicans are going to have beautiful girls with
perfect titties in their ads, wewant ads for Democrats too.
You know, we want ugly fat bitches wearing pink wigs and
long ass fake nails being loud and twerking on top of a cop car
at a Waffle House because they didn't get extra ketchup.
You know, just because we're theparty of ugly people doesn't

(07:13):
mean we can't be featured in ads, OK?
And I know most of us are too fat to wear jeans, are too ugly
to go outside, but we want representation.
I thought that was funny. That was great, right?
Yeah, you know, but that that's really the point, right?
I mean, why does it matter whether it's Beyoncé or Sweeney

(07:34):
or anybody else? You know I remember the Calvin
Klein ads right? With Marky Mark.
What about Jordash jeans bro? Bro shield, Calvin Klein, Gene
adds. You know, the people were
attractive. I don't know when it became so,
you know, mainstream. I don't understand it where
being out of out of shape, you know, as you get older, I get

(07:56):
it. But I don't understand where
they think that some fat person packed into some underwear that,
you know, some 1820 year old kidpacked into some underwear, male
or female, or somebody that usessome kind of stupid pronoun that
that's supposed to sell jeans orthat's supposed to sell
clothing. I mean, if that's not doing a

(08:17):
disservice, the people. And what I don't like about it
is, and George, you tell me if I'm wrong, What I'm concerned
about really is, is it possible that what we're doing is setting
the completely wrong example, that it's really grooming.
It's really grooming to say you don't have to exercise, you
don't have to take care of yourself.

(08:37):
You can put a bunch of stupid shit, you know, piercings all
over your face. You can get your hair painted.
You can cut off your, your, you know, your weasel and decide
that you're going to be a woman all of a sudden.
Whatever the hell. Don't you feel like it's all
part of an operation? Because it feels very operative
to me. Well, I'll correct you on one
thing. It's not what we're doing, it's

(08:58):
what they are. What they're doing?
What they're trying to do and itlisten, they're I think they're
just mad because listen, this whole thing backfired on on them
because the American Jean stock just skyrocketed.
And now Dunkin' Donuts actually came out with something with a,
with a young guy with one of their ice drinks.
And it it's funny. I should have, I should have put

(09:19):
it on for you guys. Damn, I should have got it.
Was it the guy that was talking about his tan?
Yeah, I saw it. Yeah, it was just good.
Talking about, you know, he didn't want to be the king of
summer or whatever, but his, he did his colored chart.
But you know, how can you know that used to be advertising,
right? Advertising used to be extremely
funny, tongue in cheek. You know, it used to be that

(09:40):
every ad was an attempt at beinga Super Bowl ad.
Now that it's just funny how people are so focused on, oh,
they're going to hurt my feelings, oh, they made me feel
bad. Oh, I feel isolated.
Well. You know what you would think
they always. Like you would think they.
Don't know what? Happened this country used to
not be a country of pussies? You would think they would raise
a bunch of Dylan Mulvaney with Bud Light with the Jaguar LBGD

(10:04):
commercials. They tanked.
That's all tanking is that. The stupidest Jaguar ad you've
ever. Seen and then the Bud Light with
Dylan Mulvaney I mean it all tanked now they got Peyton man
and somebody else trying to bring the brand back and you
know but still the damage is done and we don't want that shit
just. You know, you know what?
Georgia just had an idea. Put some hot chicks and hot hot

(10:27):
guys on for the women, vice versa.
That's what we want. We'll just make regular ads.
Make it funny. How about making it funny?
How about it's OK to make fun ofpeople?
How it's OK to joke? George, I just had a great idea.
Listen. Big MIG commercial Consulting,

(10:48):
we'll have you guys come to us when you're getting ready to
create a commercial and we will advise you for a nominal fee of
what? Not dumb shit to do 'cause I had
Budweiser or what to come to George and I.
We could have immediately fixed that.
George had Bud Light come to us,we could have told him no.
That's really fucking stupid. Don't do that, Bud Light would
have said. Here's what we're going to do.
I'll be like, that is the dumbest fucking thing I've ever

(11:11):
heard of. You're going to screw your
company. I mean, would you have not known
to tell Jaguar that, George? Oh, what a what a doubt.
But not only are will we not tell them what not to do, we're
going to we would advise them onwhat to do too.
Exactly. So how do you appeal to the
intelligent side of the fence? You know, I feel like our
viewers, our listeners and subscribers, I always appreciate

(11:32):
them because I feel like they'renot only intelligent, they're
articulate. Even when they're kidding around
the chat and they're joking around, you can see because I
always, I always think. There's some funny motherfuckers
in there. Yeah, I think to have a good
sense of humor, you have to be intelligent.
People that laugh a lot, Even sarcasm requires a higher level
of intelligence. We love our comedians because of
their sarcasm, right? We love comedians that have a

(11:53):
quick wit and a fast tongue. You know, that's why really Joe
Rogan built his show on, right Quick wit, fast tongue.
He's a very bright guy, very intelligent.
I met him a couple of times. He used to come into a a
business, a nightclub I owned years ago.
And he's a good guy, extremely intelligent, really, really
interesting guy to talk to. And I would tell you that it's

(12:15):
interesting that somehow that's all that's like the anti, right?
That's not what people are supposed to do.
It's kind of like George, I've been watching all these shows.
I created a, a folder on my ex account.
And that folder is what I'm, what I'm calling is bullshit
views. And I'm taking all these views
that are supposedly happening ondifferent shows.
And I'm just, I'm going to, I'm going to do an article

(12:37):
eventually. And basically I'm looking at the
views for what they say people are looking at from all these
Twitch and kick streams. And oh, this guy's arguing.
And this it's, it's, it's not possible.
I don't believe the American public is that freaking stupid.
Part of me believes that Kick and Twitch are some kind of a
psyop for the views they're getting because the, the, the,

(12:59):
the lowbrow streaming that is supposedly getting tremendous
amounts of views. I don't understand it at all.
I really don't. I don't know what your views are
on that, George, but. I don't know, but I want to
remind everybody, hit that big red big mafia button come

(13:20):
official. Yeah, yeah, Rumble just did that
for us. So it's kind of exciting.
You know, normally it's the top streamers that get customized
buttons. We appreciate the support at
Rumble at Locals. All right, let's talk about the
burn bags. Do you know those?
Wait, usually the top streamers?We are a top fucking streamer
what are you talking about? Yeah, yeah.
But I'm saying that they only dothat kind of stuff for the top

(13:41):
streamers. We are a top streamer.
I know, that's what I was saying.
I know what you were saying. I know.
Did you know those were actual burn bags on the front of the
thumbnail? Did you know that's what they
look like? I thought it looked like almost
like the bag of Dicks. Just saying.
It did kind of look like a bag of Dicks, but those are actually
legitimate burn bags. That's what the government uses.

(14:03):
That's what they used to do. It's it's just, if you want to
put the thumbnail back up for a second, those are actually the
burn bags the government buys inbulk and the different agencies
use. I think it's strange.
I don't know why. I'd like to know.
So let's get let's get to this burn bag shit, because here's

(14:24):
some things about this right? And remember how I told you I
and I and I've been saying this Lance and I have to say this.
I'm sorry, but you've been like him.
I why can't we get arrest? Why is it this, this, this and
that? And I and I've been saying that
you know what they have to maybereinvestigate because you don't
know what what prior investigators, FBI, whatever

(14:45):
left out what they're hiding. You don't know what's going on.
So they have to make sure they get all their IS dotted and T's
crossed and boom, here you go. Here's a prime example of what's
going on. So, but question is now these
burn bags were put in a secret room.
How many I'd like to know, this is what I like to know and don't
interrupt me, please. How many people have access to

(15:07):
the secret room? Because it can't, can't be that
many number one. And then who with having who has
access, who put these burn bags in there?
And let's see these people get prosecuted because they are
what? Hindering an investigation,
right? Is that the right terminology,
Lance, hindering an investigation?

(15:30):
Well, I would think that it's it's a combination of things.
It's probably obstruction of justice.
That's what it. Yeah, probably obstruction of
justice and it is it is hindering an investigation
there. It would be also considered
malfeasance by government officials.
So at when you become a government official, you take an
oath to the public Constitution,then you take, then you actually
sign your contract with the US government.

(15:50):
And along with that, depending you might get your security
clearance approvals, depending on how long they've been
interviewing and whether or not they would have put you some of
the early security clearances. And then of course they also,
depending on what department you're in, they might find and
make you sign an additional agreement.
That's got to do with disclosingany of the information that's in
front of you would go along withyour security clearance.

(16:12):
It used to be a 16 page document.
I don't know what it is now, butit used to warn you about the
the consequences of behavior like what you just described,
George, Because taking material and destroying it because you're
trying to cover up a crime is extremely serious when you're in

(16:33):
a government official, because when you become a government
employee, right, or, or your, your elected official, the
obligations are different. So that becomes treason,
seditions, conspiracy and sedition.
When you start to do things to obstruct justice and you're
actually covering up a crime that you might have participated
in or others. What I think is really
interesting, and you made an interesting point, I don't

(16:54):
understand the secret room thingat the FBII understand
compartmentalized rooms, but a room that was secret is really
interesting. And then on top of it, a skiff.
Now for some of the people in the audience, they might not
know what that is. That's a sensitive compartmented
information facility. And what they basically are is
it's it's a secure room, maybe even a building.

(17:14):
Normally it could be even look like a sea container that's
suspended. You've probably seen some of
this stuff in the movies and they're it's relatively
accurate, but it's it it's. The CIA.
Had insulated so people can't eavesdrop.
The CIA had a secret room too, which they I think they found
documents. But so when they say burn bags,
is this stuff was actually supposed to be destroyed or they
just use that term? Yes, it was in those burn bags I

(17:38):
showed you. No, I got that part, but they.
Had it in those bags and the when you put items in those
bags, they're not supposed to bereopened unless it's by some
high, high level security. Clearance, listen to what I'm
saying please. When they go in those burn bags,
is that just a terminology they use to name that bag or they
actually supposed to be destroyed?
They're actually supposed to be destroyed.

(17:59):
And who fucked? So who fucked?
Who fucked up and forgot to destroy them?
I think what happened, I was trying to figure that out
yesterday. Here's my guess.
I'm going to guess that somebody, let's say you were the
employee, George and I came to you and I'm I'm comedy or
Clapper, I'm anybody, just a high level person.
I say, George, I need you to go get the Durham documents and I

(18:20):
want you to stuff it in these bags and I want you to do a a
burn on them. And you're thinking to yourself,
fuck Lance. I I'm not going to take orders
from him right now. We're on our way out and this
guy's trying to get me to come do a cover up and commit a
crime. I could be charged later.
So maybe in your defense, you decide to take those burn bags
and stick them in that room and act like you forgot.

(18:43):
And just in case they find him. And if they don't find him, when
the new FBI rolls in, the new leadership, Bongino and Patel,
you're going to say, hey, guys, by the way, I was told to put
stuff in burn bags. I didn't agree with it.
They're in that room. It's above my security clearance
to look at them or reopen them. You do that.
I, I, I, I don't know, more of astory.
I don't think they, I don't. Forgot I don't think any there.

(19:06):
There has to be limited amount of people who have access to
this room. Oh, 100%.
So question is, well, we need to, we need to find out like
what's the number? Is there 10 people, 550 a
hundred? What is it?
I mean, I'm, I can't say the number because I just don't
know. We need to get an FBI agent on

(19:28):
find out. Steve Gray should have Steve
Gray. We can talk about burn bags,
everything else. Matter of fact, you talk.
I'm going to text his ass right now, yeah.
We should have him on, but a skiff, you know, for you.
So you guys know I don't, this is, I don't understand this.
Also, skiffs are very expensive,right?
Because they, they make it so that you can't eavesdrop because
for people out there, there are a lot, there's lots of

(19:49):
eavesdropping equipment right now.
There's equipment that if they pointed it at your window, the
vibrations on the glass, they can, they can hear you talking.
So interestingly enough, they can use the glass for a
vibration unless you have it. Insulated with all kinds of
drapes and all sorts of things. So there are ways not only can

(20:10):
they use thermal, not only way can they penetrate your house
with LIDAR and other things and they can tell where you're at.
You've seen it in the movies, that's accurate.
Same thing with the eavesdropping.
So that's a skip is designed. So you can't do that.
You can't bring in phone devices, you can't bring in
iPads. All that stuff is supposed to be
left on the outside. It's supposed to be a
conversation you can have as if you were butt ass naked and

(20:30):
there's no risk of anybody overhearing it.
So skips are used for the highest level, you know, and you
know then then then allegedly always supposed to be to protect
classified, you know, I you know, eyes only restricted
information. I just text Steve so.
Yeah. Steve, I'm texting your brow
answer your. Text.
But George, think about what they said.

(20:52):
It was a secret skiff, meaning it was a skiff that the majority
of the FBI had no idea existed. So I don't know whether it was
behind a secret bookcase. You know, how did they access
it? I'm, I'm, I'm being sarcastic,
of course, about a secret bookcase, Although who knows?
What I'm saying is it would really be interesting to hear
more details about that. How did they locate it if it was

(21:13):
secret? You know, cash is the highest
level of the FBI. Nothing in the FBI should be
secret from him for, for, for him to state that it was secret.
It's kind of a big deal and thatalso means that somebody was
trying to cover something up, which I think in itself.
Well, how do you, I wonder how, how did you cover our
government? It doesn't.
It doesn't. It doesn't say how he came about
finding it. Was it a whistleblower?

(21:36):
I don't know. There, well, we I had did hear a
story actually interesting enough from somebody yesterday
on a quick phone call and there are whistleblowers coming out of
the woodwork, employees that didn't agree with what they were
being told to do now. Well, we talked.
About really employees didn't agree to do or are they now CYA
and are they covering their ass George?

(21:58):
You know, Lance, that's a tough to tell because you see that
when the whistleblowers did comeout and like for instance, Steve
Friend, who's the other one? Garrett, O'boyle, Kyle.
Seraphin, they all got, I mean, thrown to the curb.
No, you know, so it's why. Haven't they brought those guys
back? I mean, I know Garrett O'boyle

(22:20):
and Steve Friend want to go backto the FBI.
Aren't they back? No, I.
Don't know. And they haven't been paid their
back wages. I I think it's pretty shitty.
I mean, I like Kyle. And we don't know.
I mean, Kyle. 'S but I like Kyle.
Kyle's a good guy. I.
Trust Kyle. Why don't we get him on the show
and ask him? I, I think, I think that's an
important discussion, but I think, and maybe we should have,

(22:41):
you know, it'd be interesting, be interesting to have like a
FBI roundtable invite Steve Grayand maybe Garrett or or Steve
Friend or maybe even Kyle and, you know, have a discussion
about burn. I mean, we could do like a round
table, you know, get a couple ofthem on and you know, do like a
Hollywood square thing because those guys obviously are much
more experienced, much more knowledgeable than I am.

(23:02):
I don't even know what I know from my side.
I saw burn bags overseas, but once the stuff goes in the burn
bags, nobody's supposed to open it.
It doesn't have a super high level clearance and a lot of
times the material that's put inthe burn bag is pre shredded.
It's shredded, doesn't mean you can't put it back together, but
normally the government doesn't use those long string shreds.
They use the crosscut shred and that's damn near powder.

(23:24):
So I don't know how you'd reassemble the documents if it
had been shredded. So I assume these documents,
they were in a rush or maybe theperson that put them in there
didn't really want them to get burned.
Now it's serious stuff. This is all about the rush of
collusion hoax documents and what I think is really strange.
What George, Are you familiar with the Annex to Durham's

(23:44):
final? Report No I don't even why they
calling it the the annex like. I don't know either.
I don't know why they're callingit the Annex, but I'm assuming
it was a secondary report that Durham came out with.
But the question is, why classify that?
Why? Why is it not you?
Why is it not exactly where out to the people?
Why was he even classified? So didn't you?

(24:07):
When did the Durham report come out?
Was that when Trump was still president?
You know, I can't remember. But you know what?
I understand what, you know whatI can.
So it's the FBI who who who classified it probably.
And who was it? Christopher Wray at the time, I
think it was. So that explains it probably

(24:29):
why, because you know, it's going to expose them, them
they're the FBI agents too, likeyou, like Peter Strzok, all them
people. But, and that's probably why,
but you know, they say this is the reason why they raided Mar a
Lago is to get this out of Trump's hands.
Well, you know. Well.
And that's. Well, let's, let's dwell on that

(24:53):
for a minute. Let's now think about the
weaponization. You know, oh, everybody wants to
talk about the cartels, and theyused to talk about the mafia all
the time. They always talk about how much
control they had, right? How much influence they both
have. The cartels currently have a ton
of influence. I believe that that story that
George covered about Act Blue while I was gone, I think the

(25:15):
cartels have been using that to not only money launder their
their proceeds, but also to use it for influence backing Act
Blue backing politicians all across the country.
You know, many politicians don'tcare about where the money comes
from. They just want to get elected.
You you've seen it, You know, it's, you know, it's happening.
George did a great job of telling you guys.

(25:38):
If you remember the John Thaler and Jacqueline Brieger's story,
we covered that a year and a half ago, maybe two years ago
now. And that story was about exactly
what now Mark Fincham is talkingabout and how there was money
laundering in the mortgage industry.
But what I think is interesting,George, is this Mar a Lago, and

(25:59):
we're talking about the binder they wanted to get their hands
on. So the, the, the, the main.
So you guys know, the raid seemed offish, right?
They're going through Melania's underwear drawer.
They're going through Barron's room.
They'd already been the NationalArchives have been working
directly with Donald Trump, CashPatel and his security team

(26:20):
about how he had documents secured.
Everything was declassified. Then the FBI brings classified
folders, and they kind of spreadit out to do a photo shoot with
some documents, and they don't find the binder they want
because this binder was all about things that they didn't
want to go public. Now, Trump had already
declassified that binder on January 19th, 2021, so he was

(26:42):
completely authorized to hold it.
And that binder contained hundreds of pages about the
Crossfire Hurricane scandal. There was lots of damaging
information about the corrupt actors involved in our
government in that binder. But they wanted to that whole
raid was about recovering that binder.
Now that is a weaponization of the federal government.

(27:02):
I made a comment when I was posting this show about saying,
you know, and George, you, you can tell me if you think this
isn't true. The, the FBI operates like some
of the most sophisticated criminal entities in the world.
And I'm not suggesting that CashPatel is part of this.
I'm saying that the FBI has always operated as if they are
above the law. There are many criminal cases

(27:24):
across the United States where the FBI has fabricated evidence.
And you guys will be like, oh, no, no, it's not.
Yeah. Now, I'm not telling you that
people like Kyle Seraphin, SteveFriend, Garrett O'boyle, Steve
Gray, I'm not telling you those aren't the FBI agents I want.
I believe those are really good,credible guys.
I think those are guys that really believed in the work they

(27:44):
were doing, really wanted to do the right thing and had
leadership trying to turn them into criminals.
And that's why they all either whistleblow or retired or left.
And that's the the tough part when you have good people,
because in my opinion, those arethe kind of FBI agents I want.
I want ethical, high integrity individuals that I can trust.
Those are the kind of people I want in the FBII don't think

(28:07):
that's what we have. I, I don't get me wrong, I think
Cash Patel is probably doing everything he can Dan Bond
genius, probably doing everything he can to to get rid
of these people. But I'd like to hear about it in
the chat because here they did. They weaponized the FBI against
an ex sitting president to go find a binder because it was
going to expose corruption in our government.

(28:27):
George, what do you think, man? I mean, is that not the worst
possible case when a highly sophisticated government agency
becomes the tool of the deep state?
You know, I think they've been being around trying to get
criminals for so long they actually became criminals.

(28:47):
I mean, here's a big question. Good point.
How do we stop this from ever happening again?
Because what, like it or not, Trump's only here four years,
right? But let's let's talk about 10
years from down the road or 1520years.
How do we stop this from happening again, not only to
Trump, but to the American people going after PTA moms for

(29:09):
speaking out to fight for their kids or in churches, Christians.
I mean, this is what's crazy andI haven't seen anything yet
where there's where they stop this and that there has to be
something where there's more transparency and I'm not allowed

(29:30):
to high stuff. I think the only way they should
classify anything and they're allowed to classify something is
they they can only classify to the part and black out where
they protect the victims names or maybe the method of how
whatever they did OK I'll give them that.
But as far as everything else they should be automatically put

(29:52):
on the government website for people to see.
And if we have to wait till the case is over, fine I can
understand that too. I get that part that's OK.
But after that everything shouldbe out.
There should be no classifying nothing.
Then they shouldn't be. I, I agree with you and you
know, this whole thing where they cover things up and I, I've

(30:12):
got to say this, you know, Obama, he, he has this immunity,
right? Presidential immunity, which is
the highest level immunity. It's higher than absolute
immunity. I don't know how it's higher,
but it is. And I think that, you know, he's
got, he's going to be summoned before a grand jury allegedly.
Is he going to even testify? Who knows?
Is he even going to come before the grand jury?
He's going to tell the truth, but there's, there's some claims

(30:33):
out there and I don't know that I agree with them.
They're saying that he's got immunity for everything he did
during president of the United States.
And I, I have to disagree with that.
I know we've got a clip here we're going to play.
But I think that when you violate your role, meaning that
you exceed what you were supposed to be doing as
president of the United States, I don't think covering up a
crime, unknowingly covering up acrime has any immunity.

(30:56):
I think he has presidential immunity if he participated
because of national security interests or otherwise.
But I know this, he's a, he's a regular citizen now.
He's no different than you and I.
And if he lies or denies going to, to the grand jury, I would
have to believe that that is going to wash out his
presidential immunity completely'cause I think if he, if he
doesn't tell the truth, he's a private citizen.

(31:19):
I think what he did as presidentisn't covered by presidential
immunity. And I don't believe the
presidential immunity covers youif you the Mens Rea.
And then George, I'm gonna, I'm gonna let, I want you to hear
your thoughts. The Mens Rea is George and I are
gonna go rob a liquor store. We don't have a car.
So we, we decide we're gonna go buy a getaway car.
The Mens Rea is the first overt act and the mental state when

(31:41):
you're doing it. So if you say I'm gonna rob the
liquor store and I'm going to buy this car to rob the liquor
store, you don't even have to rob the liquor store.
The minute you, George and I go by the getaway car, we have
committed the crime. As far as they're concerned,
they can charge you. At that point.
They said they were getting ready to do it.
We didn't want anybody to get hurt.
So we went ahead and we arrestedthem.
But they had a strategy. They even if we sat down with a

(32:02):
piece of paper and said, well, here's where we enter the liquor
store, we're going to run out the back door.
We'll put the getaway car. That is an overt act creating
the getaway plan. I believe that if, if, if Obama
and he knew it, he knew the Russian collusion host was fake.
He knew that when you know FionaHill, I think that was named
Fiona Hill actually brought thatinformation.
He already knew it had been fabricated when he committed

(32:24):
that first overt act. I believe his presidential
immunity was wiped out because it wasn't an act that was done
under the premise of being president of the United States.
It was an act to attack an individual that was a president
of the United States. Obama was already a citizen.
I don't believe that all this stuff that he created.
He was. No, he was president.

(32:45):
He wasn't a citizen at the time.This is, this is now 2016.
Trump wasn't sworn in. Yeah.
Trump wasn't sworn in as president.
I'm telling you right now that Ithink right then he wiped out
all his presidential community because he was using his
position of power to commit a crime.
I mean, what do you think, George?
Well, that's that's where the term impeachment comes in.

(33:07):
And pretty much This is why theyhid this so they wouldn't think
about impeaching Obama. I mean, they still, as far as I
know, he they can still impeach him, which by the way, they.
Never found the binder, right? They never got the binder.
No, but they did it to Trump when he wasn't after he was out
of office, they impeached him. So they should do it to freaking
out Obama. And by the way, they should
overturn, they should overturn Trump's impeachments because

(33:31):
they're based on false and information.
They're all wasn't true anyway. Well, those impeachments never
went through. They never actually impeached.
He got impeached through Congress, so it's still standing
as that part. So you do want it be good to
remove them. Oh, I got you.
Yeah, yeah. And you, yeah, you get impeached
first, it goes to Congress. And if they impeach you, that
has to get, it has to pass through Senate and you need 2/3.

(33:54):
That's why it's tough to actually impeach a president.
Yeah. There's no way.
If you bring Obama for impeachment and it passes the
House, there's no way the SenateDemocrats are going to vote to
impeach him because that's he's long been their lifeline.
There's no way it's impossible. Let's play the clip.
All right, here we go to. Get going.

(34:14):
I want to address Obama for a second.
I know President Trump has everyright to be frustrated with him.
I think President Trump's analysis last week was right.
I think my immunity rule might protect him on the original
charges. That's what most legal experts
tell me, that that ruling is so sweeping, it will protect Obama
for what he did in office. However, Barack Obama can now be
summoned before a grand jury. He cannot take the 5th Amendment

(34:35):
because he has immunity from prosecution.
He'll have to tell the truth. If he lies as a private citizen
about what he did as president, he'll no longer have that
immunity. And that is a trap that Obama is
sitting potentially facing. And I want to say the irony to
that because on January 5th, 2017, he presided over a meeting
in the White House where the FBIhad just cleared Mike Flynn of

(34:55):
any wrongdoing. And they schemed in that meeting
how they might be able to jam upMike Flynn.
And they came up with the idea, we'll lure him into an
interview, catch him into a lie,and then prosecute him that way.
Barack Obama now is about to face a potential similar
situation as the one he created unfairly for Mike Clinton.
You know, I want to say something.
OK, so I get he can't plead the Fifth.

(35:17):
However, can he say that he's covered under?
Was it a presidential act where he doesn't have to answer
questions according to. You know, I'm not familiar
enough with the law, but I wouldthink it would be unlikely
because he's no longer president.
So to. Doesn't matter, he.
Would have to argue that it was the concern national security.

(35:37):
That's what I'm saying. So he'll, he can claim that and
say that and not answer those questions because it was all
while he was president. So it doesn't matter just
because he's not president anymore.
He's still, he's still beholden.I guess it would.
Depend on the amount of proof they have.
I believe they've caught him dead in all his lies.
I, I think that he's in a position where if they impeach

(35:59):
him, and you're right, they wouldn't be able to do it, but
they could charge him with treason and seditious
conspiracy. And I would believe that that
would cause a military tribunal to happen.
And if they got to that point where they could use a military
tribunal, I would believe that he would be convicted.
And because he was convicted, there might be some laws on the

(36:20):
books. It doesn't include the necessity
of impeachment. If they actually convicted him
for treason, seditious conspiracy and conspiracy
against the United States, I would have to, I would, I would
happen. I'd have to believe that that
would mean that there may be some way that his presidency and
his immunity would be wiped out.But again, I'm not a, I'm not an
expert on presidential immunity.I think it's ridiculous.

(36:42):
I think absolute immunity is ridiculous.
I think there's, there's a reason for the president to have
certain immunities, but I think that they've, they've abused it.
I think absolute immunity has been abused by the courts.
I think it's been abused by the prosecutors.
I think qualified immunity has been abused by the agencies.
I, you know, to me, only God gets absolute immunity.
That's really in it. I mean, he and he comes with

(37:04):
that in hand. I just, I don't know.
All right, well, there it is there.
Want to be right back? The big news show is going to
take a short break. We're here with George Valentin
and myself, Lance Miliaccio. We're bringing the rain,
bringing the pain. It's what we do.
Stay tuned. And while you're on break, take

(37:24):
the live link, stick it in your social media, push some new
people to the show. Let people know the big Migs on
here doing the work that we do, rise and grind and of course
like share. And if you can do the $5
subscription, join the big Mig mafia.
It's 5 bucks a month. Support the show or maybe throw
us a rumble rant tip we can use.All the money goes right back
into the show. It's what we do.

(37:45):
We're continuing to try to grow,grow, grow, grow.
Stay tuned. I might have, I might, I might
have. I might have.
I might have. I might have.
I might have. I might have to.
Let it right to see it. Got it.
Hello big head, and put it back again.
Are you ready to stand up for your community and support your

(38:07):
local sheriff? Join the Constitutional,
Sheriff's and Peace Officers Association and become a vital
member of the Sheriff's CitizensPosse.
At CS. Poa.org, We empower citizens
like you through weekly webinars, arming you with the
knowledge to back your constitutional County Sheriff.
Together, we can uphold our Constitution and ensure liberty

(38:29):
and justice for all. Your community needs you now
more than ever. Visit CSP oa.org and join the
Sheriff's citizens posse today. Make a difference.
Stand for freedom. That's CSP oa.org, your country,
your fight, your future. President Trump has a bold new

(38:56):
vision to help secure America's future through the power of
cryptocurrency. Partnering with pioneers like
Elon Musk, he's turning crypto into the next frontier of
financial freedom. But how can you, a generation
that value security and stability, advance your
retirement in this digital age? Introducing Block Trust IRA, the

(39:21):
world's first AI driven platformdesigned to help your
cryptocurrency investments thrive.
Thousands of retirees nationwideare already securing their
futures. Block Trust IRA, isn't it time
you join them? Visit blocktrustira.com now and
receive up to $2500 in funding bonuses.

(39:45):
That's Block trustira.com, the experts in accelerating wealth
retirement. Hi folks.
I'm here today to introduce you to the Prepper bar from
prepperbar.com, the most unique precious metals product we have
seen in a long time. These 62G bars are perforated
and easily broken down into yourchoice of three different sizes

(40:08):
to fit a multitude of needs whether it be from asset
protection from inflation. Economic turmoil or its unique
utility for barter and trade, The Prepper Bar makes a perfect
gift for all the precious metal lovers out there.
Exclusively made here in the USAand selling out.
Fast. Available in both gold and
silver, these slim prepper bars fit neatly in your wallet and

(40:30):
their utility enables use in anysituation.
Forge through rigorous training in honed by the finest
instructors on Earth, these canine units serve beside our
nation's warriors as they fight to preserve who and cherish.
When these warriors complete their duty, the Warrior Dog
Foundation provides them with the home deserving of the

(40:52):
service they've given us all. At our state-of-the-art kennels.
They receive rehabilitation and care suitable for heroes because
that's what they are. Be a part of giving them a
future today. Visit warriordogfoundation.org.

(41:20):
All right, welcome back to the big Meg show.
Here we host Lance Migliacho, George bounty.
We got the big, big mafia in thechat, the big Meg army.
If you're out there watching or listening, come join the chat.
A lot of people in there, a lot of good times Welcome you to the
family properly. And guess what, there's a big
red button under the the video where it says big, big mafia.

(41:45):
I dare you to hit that button. Become part of the family.
Help us out. Subscription is $5 a month, pays
for software equipment, you nameit, it pays for it.
It helps at least doesn't pay for it fully, but it does help.
Hit the follow button, the the like button, the thumbs up
button, the share button. If you can share this while

(42:08):
we're live, that's great. Also repost and rumble.
There's a repost button. Say something nice and repost it
better say something nice. I'm sending Lance after you
guys, but let me give you a shout out to our sponsor,
Genesis Gold Group, their new innovation block trustira.com.
They are your partner in your Bitcoin journey that's powered
by Animus technologies and they are empowering all Americans

(42:28):
take control their financial future by providing secure,
intelligent an accessible cryptocurrency investment within
a familiar structure of an IRA. So in a world where traditional
retirement strategies are struggling keep pace with
inflation and economic uncertainty, and you see that
with freaking Jerome Powell not lowering our interest rates
block dress IRA offers a clear alternative gear to work with

(42:51):
individual investors to secure their future financial wealth.
So if you have a four O 1K or anIRA, you could transfer it over
or if you just like to start newones, you could do that.
Or if you rather just simply invest, well, guess what that's
available too, because they trade over 60 different crypto
currencies and their AI investments outperforms the

(43:14):
market with market leading management with no hidden fees.
None. The rapidly accelerating
American retirement wealth block. trustira.com.
I got the QR code right here. Save it to your photo files.
I'll take you right to the site.All right, you know we're in the
race here, right? Terminator's coming, baby.

(43:34):
The CIA is preparing for a powerful super intelligence game
changer to counter China's aggressive pursuit of AGI.
Well, all I can say is about freaking time.
This is going to be the race between US and the Chinese to
see who can build, protect and govern AI faster.
This is what the deputy director, CIA Ellis said.

(43:58):
Now you know China's, you know, they've been, they'll steal
technology, they'll they'll duplicate it.
They did it. I think they stole stuff away
from ChatGPT, Lance I don't knowbut.
There's a lot of stories about code that got stolen that they
had employees in different AI companies.
That's why they were able to getDeepSeek up so quickly, you

(44:21):
know, AGI, you know, and that term it's, it's so that's a
hypothetical type of AI now. I don't know if it's really
hypothetical, I think it's further along than they're
saying, but that allows the ability to, you know, understand
and learn and apply knowledge, Of course, a wide range of
cognitive tasks or skills like ahuman and, and potentially the

(44:41):
idea, the concept is for it to exceed a human meaning in speed.
You know, of course you have neurons, electrical impulses in
your brain and those fire very rapidly.
Speed of light, of course, and at the end of the day, they're
trying to create something that's much faster and has the

(45:02):
ability to access much more information across multiple
spectrums, meaning that it's layered upon, layered upon,
layered of hyper intelligence, giving it an IQ who knows what.
That is frightening to me. There is no way that that
computer isn't going to. If if you connected it to the

(45:22):
Internet as an example, and it was able to scrape all the stuff
off of TikTok, what, what do youthink it would decide after it
looked at social media on X, it looked at TikTok, it went on
Twitch and Kik and YouTube. George, what do you think that
computer would think of human beings when it got done looking
at those platforms? What do you think the

(45:42):
determination would be? We're talking about a hyper
intelligence, an IQ of multiple hundreds, maybe thousands, and
now it's looked at TikTok, it's looked at Twitch and Kick, it's
looked at YouTube and it's looked at X and other social
media platforms. What the conclusion is it going
to come up with? This is a society that's so dumb
when you I need to get rid of itin order for us for my AI to

(46:05):
thrive. Terminator.
I think if it spends, if it spends 5 minutes on just kick,
Twitch and TikTok, it's going towalk away and it's going to be
like, Oh yeah, we got to kill all these fucking insects.
These are some dumb sons of bitches that they're dangerous

(46:26):
for my development and where I want to take the world.
Yeah, it's time to kill them all.
I, I can't just do this today. When you get a minute, take 15
minutes and just surf across thefront page of YouTube, surf
across kick and Twitch. You know, just go across the
front of of Twitter and then askyourself, do we seem like a

(46:47):
biological being that should be able to continue on this planet?
If you were a superior being, ifyou had a higher level of
thinking, remember, you don't really have emotional
resistance. AI does not have emotional
resistance. Where it goes, well, it's OK.
We're gonna let them survive 'cause they're OK, they're
gonna, they're gonna mature. It is likely that AI would look

(47:10):
at us and say, no, I'm gonna squash.
You're gonna be like a Roach in a New York kitchen and you're
going to get stepped on. And I'm not saying that roaches
don't survive, but you might have to crawl into the deep,
dark tunnels underneath the, the, the earth's crust and that
that's where you might have to hide.
And I'm sure it'll send you. So to me, Terminator is, is not

(47:32):
it. It's right on track.
This is absolutely right on track.
And this is frightening. And now the CIA, an agency that
I don't necessarily trust, this is an agency that the JFK was
assassinated for saying I'm going to scatter the CIA to the
winds. We now know that they were
involved in the assassination ofa sitting president.

(47:54):
I don't think the Central Intelligence Agency should
continue to exist. I, I'm not saying we don't need
an agency, a foreign intelligence agency, but I think
that thing needs to be completely purged and started
from scratch because I don't think what we have in there is
good. And I don't know that I want
them in charge of a hyper intelligent AI.
What do you think, George? You want the CIA controlling our

(48:15):
hyper intelligent AII? Don't want the CIA controlling
anything. I mean, who knows?
Like, yeah, I, it's going to be,it's going to be tough.
I mean, I, I tell you, I keep seeing Terminator.
I have to figure out a way how to how to terminate Terminator

(48:36):
if it comes to I'm telling you you.
Bet you better create a superpowerful EMP.
A combination of EMP and perf that energy radio frequency
weapon. Kind of acid that eats the metal
away on that much. I would recommend EMP combined
with HERF because the EMP would shut down the system and the

(48:56):
HERF a high energy radio frequency weapon which is a
microwave weapon. You might be able to melt the
the most important components, but I'm sure that AI will try to
outthink you. Listen to this statement from
Ellis over at the CIA. We have in this is talking about
their AI solutions. Right now we have in house
capabilities we are bringing on to the high side.

(49:19):
If you aren't using those AI models in your daily work, then
you are not going to be successful at the CIA.
Frightening. And on top of it, the CCP having
its own version. Let's play this clip.

(49:42):
Is there a clip with it? Oh, no, I'm sorry.
I thought there was. I thought you had a clip.
Yeah, two days off and you're already fucked up.
Yeah, maybe. Maybe.
I'm still tired. I'm still extremely tired.
That was mentally taxing, all that.
That's why I told you to take a nap after the show, because we
got a lot of stuff to do later. All right, let's go.
Nancy Pelosi. I know you like this one.

(50:04):
You know I like this go. I know you do go, President.
Trump says Nancy Pelosi should be investigated for insider
trading. She should be freaking arrested,
locked up and thrown the key. Away he goes.
She has the highest return of anybody practically in the
history of Wall Street. Well, I mean, we all been saying
this for how I don't know how long.
You know, we got the stand. Nancy Pelosi stock tracker, he

(50:27):
was taking questions during his congressional bill signing
ceremony on Wednesday and actually on that bill signing he
did he, you know what, thank Godhe signed a bill to reform the
VA home loans and this is good for the veterans because you
know, there should be no homeless veterans on the
streets. But this is this came back to

(50:50):
actually Senator Josh Holley. He introduced in his Preventing
elected leaders from owning Securities Investments, which is
called the Pelosi Act, named after the multi minute after
her, of course, but you know they're asking.
But she's not the only one. No, no, there's a bunch of
others, but when they ask Trump if he supports the bill which

(51:12):
will ban members of Congress, president, you know, president
and VP from owning trading stocks, Trump said.
I like it conceptually before tearing it to Pelosi and ask her
husband Pelosi. So he did.
I mean, he likes it. And then he tore into him.
So, I mean, let's play the clip.And then we got we got more of

(51:32):
it. Let's talk about lots more.
Holly introduced legislation that would ban members of
Congress from owning or trading individual stocks.
That extends to the president and vice president.
Are you in favor of that? Legislation.
Well, I like it conceptually. I don't know about it, but I
like it conceptually. And, you know, Nancy Pelosi
became rich by having inside information.

(51:54):
She made a fortune with her husband.
And I I think that's disgraceful.
So in that sense, I'd like it, but I'd have to really see the,
I'd have, you know, I studied these things very carefully and
this just happened. So I'll take a look at it.
But conceptually, I like it. And what I do think is Nancy
Pelosi should be investigated because what she has the highest

(52:14):
return of anybody practically inthe history of Wall Street, save
a few. And how did that happen?
It happened by she knows exactlywhat's going to happen, what's
going to be announced. She buys stock and then the
stock goes up after the announcements made.
And she ought to be investigated.

(52:34):
Well, Lance, your favorite Congresswoman Pelosi, she
actually melted down after this.Well, it's true though.
She was true. The laws of the United States
are supposed to be equally applied.
We have statutes on the books for insider trading, but when
you become a congressional member, you do not get a higher
level of of status in the UnitedStates.

(52:56):
The equal application law means that Nancy Pelosi, George
Ballentine, Lance Miniatio, Donald Trump, Jake Tapper,
doesn't matter who, we all have the same level.
So all of us are not supposed toinsider trade.
That's what the law says. We can't insider trade.
It's very clear. And there are other laws about
money laundering and all kinds of things that apply.
In the case of Nancy Pelosi being on those committees, she

(53:18):
finds out, let's say, for example, that Raytheon is going
to get a new contract with the federal government.
Let's say they're going to get $100 billion contract.
We'll just make something up. She hears about in the committee
that they're going to approve the contract.
She calls her husband or texts her husband by Raytheon options.
And of course, when the announcement comes that Raytheon
just got $100 billion contract, the options become highly

(53:40):
valuable. She has been doing this for
years. She's not the only one.
Dan, Dianne Feinstein and many other congressional members,
that is insider trading at its worst.
They know about the policies that are going to get announced
and they are at they're taking advantage of it.
I think they all need to face the consequences.
Look, if they're going to arrestregular citizens, if they're
going to arrest Martha Stewart for insider trading, but how

(54:03):
come this ugly ass, cranky, nasty aged bitch who's ruined
San Francisco is allowed to continue committing her crime
wave her and her husband? That's my comment.
Because, well, you know, look, this is a reason why she didn't

(54:26):
retire yet she's still trying toprotect her heads.
She's still trying to also take advantage and and assemble as
much wealth as possible. My opinion is arrest her, indict
her, arrest her and sees all herassets.
So she walks out of Congress a broke ass, nasty, ugly, crusty
ass bitch. You want to play the clinic?

(54:49):
Yeah. Yeah, it was.
Let me just read what he said. I'm sorry that we had some sort
of technical issue. Nancy Pelosi became rich.
Why do you have to read that? We're here to talk about the
60th anniversary of Medicaid. That's what I agreed to come to
talk. Yeah, but I want that means in
the election. I wanted to give you a chance
just to respond. He accused you of insider
trading. What's your response to that?

(55:11):
That's very ridiculous. In fact, I very much support the
stop the the trading of members of Congress.
Not that I think anybody's doinganything wrong.
If they are, they are prosecutedand they go to jail.
But because of the confidence that it stills in the American
people don't worry about this. But I have no concern about the

(55:33):
obvious investments that had been made over time.
I'm not into it. My husband is.
But it isn't anything to do withanything insider.
But the president has his own exposure.
So he's always projecting. He's always projecting.
And let's not give him any more time on that, please.
We're going forward here. And I'm very proud of my family.

(55:55):
And while he might make fun of us while somebody inspired by
him breaks into our home and hits my in a deadly fashion,
hits my husband over the head, and he thinks that's a riot.
I'd rather not go into some of my other complaints about him
right now, rather to talk about the 60th anniversary of
Medicaid. So I hope you all paid attention

(56:17):
because she said in beginning she goes, that's not what I
agreed to, to come on the show. I agreed to come on about, Yeah,
what they're going to say. So all these people that come on
like the news, they they won't come on unless they know what
what they're going to be talkingabout questions and stuff.
It's not like you're going to hit them with some some left
field stuff because they'll never come on the show.

(56:38):
They. Want to be blindsided, so they
try to preliminarily control thenarrative.
Now, in the case of Nancy Pelosi, think about it like
this. Because she's a committee
member, I think she gets paid 190 something or 200,000 a year.
Think about the millions and millions of dollars that
congressional members spend to get elected.
The primary pay right now, whichI think is too low, but I would
put a bunch of caveats on it. I think they're not paid enough,

(57:01):
but $174,000 a year is what you get paid as a congressional
member. Think about the comment that one
of the members of Congress made about how you're making it
undesirable for somebody to wantto run for Congress and that had
to do with the the stock trading.
They are looking at this as an opportunity to get inside
information so that they can getthemselves, they can enrich
themselves. Nancy Pelosi has a 200 +

(57:23):
1,000,000 dollar net worth. She claims only her husband does
the trading. Do you think that they're not
talking about what's going? No, absolutely not.
You can't beat the S&P 500 year after year perfectly.
Nancy Pelosi has never had a down year.
She's never gone backwards in her stock portfolio.
And that's the thing. At the end of the day, there's a
thing called the Nancy Pelosi stock tracker and you can go

(57:45):
check it out. You can go look at her returns.
My point is, would you really take the $174,000 job if you
didn't think you were going to get dark money, foreign money,
super PAC money? You weren't going to use your
election money for all kinds of odd things.
No, you wouldn't. You wouldn't put up with it.
And that's my point. The members of Congress, they
were never supposed to be full time, but it was supposed to be

(58:06):
a part time job. They were supposed to have
careers outside of Congress, businesses outside of Congress.
That's not what it's turned into.
It's a grift and she needs to bedrug out of Congress by her feet
for insider trading. I say the FBI goes and Tasers
there, you know, hog ties her and pulls her out of there along

(58:27):
with all the other members of Congress that have insider
trading. This is ridiculous because if
you so my point is if if the laws aren't going to apply to
her, then I don't want them to apply to me.
I don't want to reply to George.I I would like if we're going to
go lawless, let's go full lawless.
Let's make America, you know, outlaw again.
Let's go full outlaw. That's my comment.

(58:48):
So they actually the Pelosi Act,which we all talked about it
actually passed out of committeein an 8 to 7 vote.
I mean, I got the clip. We could play it or not because,
but then I don't understand thispart.
And I understand why President Trump, President Trump unloaded
on, on Senator Josh Holley because he's blocking the review
of Pelosi stock trading over thepast 35 years.

(59:10):
Why would he be blocking the, the review?
I mean, he's been, he's been facing a lot of criticism lately
and, and a lot of people aren't happy with him.
I just played the clip ahead. And do it.
We, we have an opportunity here today to do something that the
public has wanted us to do for decades.
And that is to ban members of Congress from profiting on

(59:33):
information that frankly, only members of Congress have in the
buying and selling of stock. 86%of Americans say that members of
Congress should not be able to buy and sell shares of stock,
individual stock, while they aremembers of this body.
And they are absolutely correct.And the reason is you can see
it. There was just another ethics
referral in the House last week.We've seen the former speaker of

(59:56):
the House make millions of dollars in profits.
We've seen members of both parties, I'm sad to say, be
investigated for their stock trades.
And the reason for all of this is, is that, quite frankly,
members of this body are Privy to information that the normal
person just is not. Now, is that insider trading?
It is not under the laws. Sometimes people say, well, we
already have insider trading laws.

(01:00:16):
We don't need a stock ban. Well.
The information that members of Congress are Privy to is
technically not covered by the insider trading laws, but nobody
really believes that the information that we get isn't
valuable. It is quite valuable, which is
why back during COVID, you saw members of Congress of both
parties engage in a flurry of stock trading right after they

(01:00:36):
were getting COVID briefings. Where members of the public
getting those briefings, they were not.
Where members of the public Privy to the kind of information
that was being given to members of Congress?
No, they were not. And so when you look at what
members of Congress are Privy to, what they are able to trade
on the access that they have, it's just qualitatively
different than your average Joe or Jane.
Which is why we ought to put into place common sense

(01:01:01):
guardrails that say if you want to be a member of Congress, you
can put your you want to, you want to save great.
You can buy mutual funds. You can brought buy broadly
diversified investment vehicles.You should not be able to buy
and trade individual stock shares in which frankly, we have
an interest in the work that we do.
We have information that no other people get, no other
members of the public have. This bill would finally redress

(01:01:22):
that. Finally.
I mean, this is right here, Lance.
This is Nancy's Pelosi's 2023 trading games, which tops 65%,
beating out several hedge funds.Come on, how is that possible?
Because she cheats. And I would argue that the the,

(01:01:45):
the information that Congress isgetting, it is insider
information. It is because they know about
contracts, they know about information before anybody else
does. I'm so sick of them having a
different level of of obligationto the federal statutes that I
think we should come out with a new act called the Citizens
Congressional Act, that basically anything that the

(01:02:08):
congressional members are allowed to do, citizens in the
United States are allowed to do from here on out.
If you can do it in Congress, wecan do it on the streets.
So, you know, if we're going to be above the law, if that's
where we're going, if we're going to a lawless society, if
we're going to a society where our governmental agencies
believe they're above the law, if the FBI thinks they can burn
evidence and obstruct judges, then we should be able to burn

(01:02:29):
evidence and obstruct judges. If our judiciary is going to be
biased and is going to pass downrulings and in my opinion are
violations of the laws that theyswore to protect, then I want to
be able to have that same authority.
I want the same authority of a, of a Department of Justice
member or you know, that I want to be able to commit crimes, do
whatever I want to do. Let's go to a cool lawless

(01:02:49):
society. Let's just arm up and hit the
streets. You know, that's where let's go
wild, Wild West, right? We can go back to gun fights on
the streets. I mean, my point is if if, if
you're going to have laws that are on the books and those laws
have to apply to everybody, how Congress came up with some
bullshit that they can take insider information and then

(01:03:10):
benefit from it. Then Nancy Pelosi can come up
fabulously rich while she's ruined.
San Francisco is bullshit, man. I, I got to tell you, I see it
often on the show. They're lucky I'm not president
of the United States. They want to see a weaponized
president. Just go ahead and put me in.
I'll be snatching and grabbing these people as fast as they.
I wouldn't even give them an opportunity to speak.
I'd just drag them right out of Congress, take them down to

(01:03:32):
Gitmo. And that, that that'd be the
last time you guys would see him.
I might be a dictator, but I'll tell you, at the end of the day,
I would have a clean house. All the Vipers would be gone
permanently. And I would seize all their
money, just like I'd seize all the assets of the Federal
Reserve families. They'd be wiped out overnight.
If you you want to see a weaponized presidency, Yeah,
just put George and I in there. I'll show you what's going to

(01:03:54):
happen. We'll go in there and clean
house. I guarantee this.
I'll have the highest approval rating in the United States as I
start snatching and grabbing people.
George Soros, Alexander Soros, they'd be gone day one.
Bill Gates, he's out of there, gone.
You'd never see him again. Mark Zuckerberg, gone.
Rocking and rolling. It's what we would do.

(01:04:14):
OK. Louisiana Medicaid millionaire
George wants a Lamborghini Eris.But of course, this woman, it's
interesting how Medicaid's get abused.
This is, this is a poster child.This woman goes out, she claims
she needs Medicaid benefits, butshe's, she, she gets to roll
around that earth. You see right there, allegedly

(01:04:36):
she has companies that made her $9.6 million funneling money all
over the place. But through 21 and 24, she's
trying to get free Medicaid benefits because you know, she's
got to pay for gas in the earth.George, you want a Lamborghini
Earth, don't you? I mean, I'll take if it's given
to me, but I prefer something else.

(01:04:57):
But all right, I mean, I'm not sure.
She's lying about her income, allegedly saying she was making
$1900 biweekly or something and and.
Actually paid for this car. Well, she's 35 years old.
I couldn't get to the bottom of what her businesses are, but
it's interesting. Supposedly she made about 9 and
a half, $1,000,000 in those businesses.

(01:05:18):
She had deposits in one account of 489,000 and of course 325,000
attributed to her daily businessactivities.
And I mean she's made 45,000 in vehicle payments to Audi
finance. She she put $100,000 wire down

(01:05:38):
on that heiress and then she spent another 13,000 on the
heiress to 2022. She's made multiple 6 figure
withdrawals via cashier's checkswhere she bought property,
cosmetic surgery, high end jewelry and luxury services.
But she needs Medicaid benefits.This is why they need solemn

(01:06:00):
Global. Solemn Global's got an AI, you
know, product that is for vetting out Medicaid and
Medicare fraud, among many things.
I know that Donald Trump's got aplan for that.
We'll be talking about that on one of the shows later today.
But this is unbelievable. This is exactly what's wrong
with the system. Look at her smiling away.

(01:06:21):
So I guess she was arrested. I don't know if I'm sure she's
already bonded out because she'ssitting on tons of cash.
It's a problem with the system, right?
She thought she was going to game the system for her.
Money after getting off of medicMedicaid or she had the money
while she was getting Medicaid? Well, I don't know that she ever
got approved because she was denied at first on Medicaid, but
they're talking about the fraudulent applications, acting

(01:06:42):
like she wasn't making any moneyand that she needed Medicaid
benefits. Oh, so OK, yeah.
And of course, when people commit fraud against Medicaid
and Medicare, the people that really need it, their benefits
get worse, right? Because of course the amount of
money that's being wasted on Medicaid, Medicare, you know
that Doge and Elon must found literally billions of dollars.

(01:07:06):
All right, let's let's go on because we got a lot to cover.
Let's do it. I mean, I I don't know if we're
a lot to talk about this or not because we said why are we
talking about it? But you know us, we're going to
talk about it. I told you we're going to try to
talk about every shit. You're.
Not going to talk about Epstein,are you?
Yes, I am talking about. Don't do it, George.
Epstein, Epstein, Epstein show. I'm doing it.
I'm fucking doing it. Donald Trump doesn't like when

(01:07:28):
we talk about Epstein well. Too bad because he's talking
about him, so I'm going to talk about him.
So new Epstein video prison video investigation uncovers
irregularities. Now this is actually CBS News
Can you believe it? Their their investigative report
revealed that the video forensicanalysis revealed a bunch of

(01:07:51):
major regularities in the DO JS 10 hour and 52 minute Epstein
prison video. What the hell is that noise?
I got a weird background noise anyway, but so does.
Get your phone vibrating on the desk or something.
Oh, maybe it is. You heard it.
Yeah. Oh, wow, that's pretty cool.
Maybe Lance heard it. So this one is here's a clip and

(01:08:16):
you'll see where the wall meets where the railing is.
You'll see an orange shirt appear.
Now they said nobody else was onthe floor, but here comes an
orange shirt. Let's I'm going to play it.
We're going to show it. That's what we do. 8:00 PM.
The report says someone, probably Noel, carries a bundle
of bedding or clothing up the stairs.

(01:08:37):
It's a rare instance the video does catch movement on the
stairs, but barely. Let's see that zoomed in and in
slow motion again. Several of the video forensic
experts we spoke with were skeptical about the report's
conclusion and thought that the video could be showing an inmate
walking up the stairs. Authorities say this was the
last time anyone approached his cell block until his body was

(01:08:59):
discovered the next morning. Again, while the video does not
contradict that, experts who viewed the video say the limited
field of view makes it impossible to definitively
conclude that no one used those stares in that time period.
Beyond this, there are other issues our investigation and
others have uncovered. At 11:21 PM and 34 seconds, a
cursor appears briefly on screen, indicating the video may

(01:09:22):
have been recorded with a cameraor a screen recording and was
not an export of the RAW file. The FBI said it had seized the
prison's hard drive. I don't know.
Still claiming that's the right cell.
There's no, no, no, no, no, no. They're not talking about no,
no. OK, so you have to look beyond

(01:09:43):
those railings. That's where the block is.
They're not talking about that cell anymore.
Now, now now that that we debunkthat this next one doesn't have
audio, so I'm going to put it with us.
So you're going to see the the mouse curse in the video.
So how this video, what happens is somebody was screen recording
it and recorded their mouse in it.
So we know it's altered now. I mean, come on, look, there's

(01:10:05):
no, there's no audio with this, but look at the cursor there.
That's not that's a curse in thevideo.
Watch, look, there it comes again.
What kind of shit is that, Lance?
Stop talking about Epstein, George.
I mean, seriously, people, it's just going to keep playing,
yeah. I trust this video.
Just look like I can tell you that I trust the FBI and if I

(01:10:26):
was Pinocchio, my my nose would be, you know, 10 feet long right
now telling you that I trust theFBII trust the judiciary, I
trust the DOJ or I trust the BOPor this video.
It's all garbage. I don't believe any of it.
I don't believe that anybody wasn't on the floor for 810
hours straight, 7 hours straight, whatever the hell
they're claiming. I don't believe no guards walked

(01:10:47):
through. I don't believe there was no
activity whatsoever. I don't believe.
No, this next video shows activity.
There's actually, I'm the commentator is going to tell you
because it's it's narrated so. And this homemade I'm seeing,
right? Well, they say that's Epstein,
So listen, hold your thought. That's the officer station in
the background. Only two employees have been

(01:11:09):
publicly identified, Tova Noel, a corrections officer pulling a
double shift that began at 4:00 PM, and Michael Thomas, a
materials handler who won't arrive until midnight.
Epstein is seen for the first and only time on camera at 7:49.
PM when the department. Of Justice said he was escorted
to his cell from another wing ofthe unit.

(01:11:29):
It's important to note here, youdon't actually see Epstein
ascend the stairwell to his cellblock.
Remember what Dan Bongino said? There's video clear as day.
He's the only person in there and the only person coming out.
You can see it. Let's zoom in and play that
again in slow motion. Here's the sliver of stairs.
Epstein is here with his escort and they walk off screen.

(01:11:52):
When the FBI released the video,they said anyone entering or
attempting to enter the tier where Epstein cell was located
from the common area would have been captured by this footage.
But with the primary entrance here, the pathway from the
entrance to the stairs is completely out of view of the
camera. For the next hour or so,
corrections officers and inmatesare seen moving about, preparing

(01:12:12):
for all prisoners to be locked down.
At 821, another inmate is seen being escorted toward the stairs
leading to Epstein's cell area. No movement is detected on the
stairs. Again, by 824, all of the
inmates appear to have been taken to their cells.
Noel told the Inspector General she visited Epstein's cell at
about 10:00 PM. You can see her head in that

(01:12:33):
direction here, albeit closer to1030, but not climb the stairs.
The rules require rounds to be made every 30 minutes, but
according to the report, this was the only time anyone checked
on the inmates that night. There was even a sign printed on
orange paper posted on the guardstation saying mandatory rounds
must be conducted every 30 minutes on Epstein.

(01:12:55):
As per God, this was because of concerns about his risk for
suicide. Why would they put as per God
that that just right there just is?
I don't know. I just don't get it.
But love Dan Bongino. But he said you heard him, he
goes Epstein was the only one you'll see in the video on the

(01:13:15):
floor. But that's not true because you
see another inmate on the floor later on.
So there's a lot of questions about this, you know, a lot of
questions and not so many answers.
But Lance here is his just to show you if you could see the
cell, this is where a cell is right there.
That's why you don't or the camera, The view of the camera

(01:13:39):
we got doesn't show. It's like behind that wall.
My cake from the camera angle wehave somebody could track along
the wall and that reel into the wall they can.
Track around the wall they can. Well, no, they really can't.
But on this night, three or fourother cameras happened to not be

(01:13:59):
working. How?
Convenient. If you look at the images, you
could see that if somebody tracked on that wall on the
right and kind of ducked down and scooted that way, they would
be off camera. Oh yeah, but if the other
cameras were working, they wouldn't be well, unfortunately.
Allegedly none of those cameras were working because the system
hadn't been updated since 1999, which is total bullshit.

(01:14:22):
Yeah, they all install our intelligence.
I mean, come on, I bet those cameras are work.
I want. Did they, have they gotten days
prior to this to see those cameras were working before?
And if not, how long have they been out for?
No one's ever asked that or gotten that information.
There's something, Lance. You're the, you're the, you're

(01:14:44):
the law person. Put the FOIA request in, please.
Yeah, no kidding. Figure it out buddy, it's on
you. Crazy accident, George.
It is. And you know what I don't
understand about this? Yeah.
This next thing this isn't and Ihave Saudi Arabia.
It's a carnival ride that comes crashing down with loaded with
passengers. But we see this happening all

(01:15:06):
over the world. We never had this years ago.
You never seen things break. Roller coasters are always safe.
You never seen the the steel breaking, but you see that now
what's going on? Cheap steel from China, perhaps
cheap labor that don't know whatto do.
And look at this, look at this accident.

(01:16:08):
And you see the carnival workingthat was wearing the vest.
She runs away instead of trying to help the poor people.
Nice. Yeah.
Helpful. Really.
Like what the hell? I mean, we never had accidents
like this before. I know we're going kids.
Did you ever hear of any things breaking like that?
No. Even your local carnival that
goes from town to town, state tostate, never.

(01:16:28):
Seen all those rides right all. Roads and those.
You know, you used to go to Sherwood, you remember Sherwood
Island, They used to have that big, that big ride place out
there. Sherwood Island?
Where the fuck is that? Yeah, they used to have this.
There was a big carnival kind ofthing out there in New York.
No, we used to go to Great adventure, Action park and
stuff. Whatever.
Yeah, I mean, but never you've seen stuff.

(01:16:50):
This is what probably chief steel coming out of China or or
dumbass laborers don't know whatthey're doing, whatever.
More people to get hurt. I don't listen.
We're out of time for today. Of course, you'll see us here at
the same time, 11:00 AM, Monday through Friday.
One of the fastest growing showson Rumble, we've been told, and
that's because of you guys. So thank you so very much.
Your time is your most valuable commodity.

(01:17:11):
We appreciate you tuning in. And don't forget tomorrow, 11 AM
this show. Then, of course, 1:00 PM Global
Finance Forum, the number one finance show on Rumble.
And then the Crypto power hour, 3:00 PM Eastern standard.
Oh, number one crypto show on Rumble.
George will have another one of his big educational pieces up

(01:17:32):
his sleeve. I don't know what we're covering
tomorrow, but it would be a big one.
As always, if you want to learn about crypto, if you want to get
involved, that's the show to watch.
Don't forget to follow G Valentin Latch Miliac show and
the Big Ming show on X and you can follow George Valentin,
Lance Miao on the Big League show on True social gab Getter,
you name it you'll find us locals.
You can do the $5 subscription. Please do join the Big League

(01:17:54):
mafia for 5 bucks a month or give us a rumble rant tip.
We appreciate that. All that goes back into the
show, George. By the way, now it's yesterday
that I'm going to. We're definitely moving a crypto
power, our show to a different time frame, most likely in the
morning at 9:00 AM. We haven't fully decided but
it's looking like 9:00 AM. Just to let people know We'll

(01:18:15):
see you guys tomorrow. 11 AM Eastern y'all Have a blessed
night. Are you ready to stand up for

(01:18:38):
your community and support your local sheriff?
Join the Constitutional Sheriff's and Peace Officers
Association and become a vital member of the Sheriff's Citizens
Posse at CSP oa.org. We empower citizens like you
through weekly webinars, arming you with the knowledge to back
your Constitutional County Sheriff.

(01:18:58):
Together, we can uphold our Constitution and ensure liberty
and justice for all. Your community needs you now
more than ever. Visit CSP oa.org and join the
Sheriff's citizens posse today. Make a difference.
Stand for freedom. That's CSP oa.org, Your country,
your fight, your future. President Trump has a bold new

(01:19:28):
vision to help secure America's future through the power of
cryptocurrency. Partnering with pioneers like
Elon Musk, he's turning crypto into the next frontier of
financial freedom. But how can you, a generation
that value security and stability, advance your
retirement in this digital age? Introducing Block Trust IRA,

(01:19:53):
world's first AI driven platformdesigned to help your
cryptocurrency investments thrive.
Thousands of retirees nationwideare already securing their
futures. Block Trust IRA, isn't it time
you join them? Visit blocktrustira.com now and
receive up to $2500 in funding bonuses.

(01:20:17):
That's Block trustira.com. The experts in accelerating
wealth retirement. Hi folks.
I'm here today to introduce you to the Prepper bar from
prepperbar.com, the most unique precious metals product we have
seen in a long time. These 62g bars are perforated
and easily broken down into yourchoice of three different sizes

(01:20:40):
to fit a multitude of needs. Whether it be from asset
protection from inflation, economic turmoil or its unique
utility for barter and trade, the Prepper bar makes a perfect
gift for all the precious metal lovers out there.
Exclusively made here in the USAand selling out fast.
Available in both gold and silver, these slim prepper bars

(01:21:00):
fit neatly in your wallet and their utility enables use in any
situation. Forged through rigorous training
and honed by the finest instructors on earth, these
canine units serve beside our nation's warriors as they fight
to preserve who we cherish. When these warriors complete
their duty, the Warrior Dog Foundation provides them with

(01:21:23):
the home deserving of the service they've given us all.
At our state-of-the-art kennels.They receive rehabilitation and
care suitable for heroes becausethat's what they are.
Be a part of giving them a future today.
Visit warriordogfoundation.org.

All Episodes

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

Fudd Around And Find Out

Crime Junkie

The Breakfast Club

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}FBI Burn Bags, Hidden SCIF’s & Truth About Mar-A-Lago Raid |EP621

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

.css-r6mb8g{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:1;overflow:hidden;}Fudd Around And Find Out

Crime Junkie

The Breakfast Club

All Episodes

FBI Burn Bags, Hidden SCIF’s & Truth About Mar-A-Lago Raid |EP621

Fudd Around And Find Out