September 12, 2025 • 12 mins
We explore the tension between morality and wealth. From ancient philosophy to modern social media outrage, we unpack why wealth makes people uncomfortable, what responsibility comes with it, and whether having money inherently means taking from others.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
(00:00):
Welcome back to The Wealth Effect,
(00:01):
where we don't just talk about money,
but what it
means to have it.
Today, we're going to step into something
that makes people feel uncomfortable.
It's a question that comes up in silent
moments of seeing rich people online.
Is it immoral
to be rich?
Let's fill
your pocket.
From the beginning, humanity has
always been uneasy with wealth.
(00:21):
In the temples of ancient Greece,
philosophers like Socrates, Plato,
and Epictetus asked what it
meant to live a good life.
Not a rich life, not a
powerful life, but a good life.
They viewed the pursuit of wealth as
dangerous, precisely because it often
distorted virtue.
Money was always seen, not as
(00:42):
evil itself, but as a test.
A distraction from higher aims of
wisdom, courage, and self-mastery.
Epictetus, who was born a slave,
understood this contradiction immediately.
To him, freedom
was internal.
You can own nothing
and yet be free.
You can own everything and
yet be a slave to your desire.
(01:04):
He saw wealth as
something fleeting.
In the early Christian tradition, wealth
was often seen as an
impediment to salvation.
The rich young ruler was told by
Jesus to give everything away.
And when he could
not, he turned away.
The warning was not against money per se,
but against its power to close the heart,
(01:26):
to shield us from compassion, to make
us believe we are more than others.
The medieval church saw
wealth as a moral hazard.
To have money was
to be tempted.
And the wealthy were
called to give it.
Not out of guilt, but
out of obligation.
The word charity comes from the
Latin word caritas, meaning love.
(01:49):
Giving was not
about generosity.
It was about
justice.
By the time the Renaissance came
around, wealth began to be reframed.
The merchant
class rose.
The banker became not a villain,
but someone everyone wanted to be.
Art, science, and commerce bloomed
under the financial support of the rich.
With the Enlightenment
(02:10):
came a new idea.
That a person could
be wealthy and good.
Even that their wealth, even to the point
where their wealth,
proved their moral worth.
As long as it was
earned and used wisely.
Critics of wealth argue it is not merely
that rich have more, but that the rich
having more means
others have less.
(02:31):
This inequity is not just
economical, but ethical.
They don't go against prosperity because
they secretly wish to have it for
themselves.
They see the world in which the
accumulation of riches often rides on the
shoulders of those
without power.
They ask, How can it be just to have
billions while others have nothing to eat?
(02:52):
How can there be good and profit
extracted from cheap labor, environmental
destruction, and
political influence?
They don't simply say
the rich have more.
They say the rich having more
means others must have less.
Not by coincidence,
but by force.
Their claim
is simple.
The existence of extreme wealth requires
(03:14):
the existence of extreme poverty.
They look at the working poor, the
factory collapses, the polluted river,
the homeless encampments next
to the iconic skyscrapers.
And they ask, How
can it be right?
How can a system that allows
this to happen be moral?
To them, the
(03:34):
problem isn't money.
It's the moral indifference
that money can buy.
It is the ability to live above
the river while the city floods.
And it's political power
that wealth consolidates.
Enabling the rich not only to escape
responsibility, but to write the rules
themselves.
In this view, wealth
(03:56):
is not a reward.
It's a sign of
a rigged system.
It's not a reflection
of goodness.
It's a sign
of extraction.
They read about record profits and then
look at the food banks overwhelmed by
working families.
They see celebrities auctioning off NFTs
for millions while teachers crowdsource
(04:16):
school supplies.
How can this
be right?
To them, the problem
isn't the money.
It's how money becomes
worshipped in that society.
How can this
be right?
It's because the problem is that
society starts to worship money.
It becomes insulation, a buffer between
the wealthy and the
consequences of their decisions.
(04:38):
It becomes
permission.
Permission to pollute, to avoid taxes, to
fire workers and still collect bonuses.
And it becomes silence, the ability to opt
out of shared pain to watch the world burn
from their yacht.
It becomes the gated community where
empathy is filtered through tinted windows
and philanthropy to
(05:00):
fend off criticism.
Wealth in this view doesn't
just grant privilege.
It grants power to
redefine morality itself.
It gives the rich the tools to rewrite the
rules, to fund the politicians who protect
their interests, to lobby for laws which
sealed their assets, to dictate the terms
(05:20):
of the public conversation through media
ownership and think tank influence.
In this view, wealth isn't a
reward for hard work or ingenuity.
They think of
it this way.
When seeing people with wealth, this
person has successfully
extracted more than
they've given.
They do not ignore that some fortunes
are built with brilliance, innovation,
(05:42):
and vision.
But they point out that even these
stories are incomplete without extraction,
without examining the conditions
that made it possible.
The labor outsourced, the tax avoided,
the subsidies granted, and
the communities displaced.
The argument is not about saying
that rich people are evil.
(06:03):
They're not
anti-success.
They're anti-exploitation, anti-system
that requires winners to stand on losers.
They remind us that behind every self-made
story is often an invisible web of
workers' infrastructure,
historical context, and privilege.
That wealth is often rarely
accumulated and is often extracted.
(06:25):
That fortunes don't
grow in a vacuum.
They grow in soil prepared by
others, sometimes at their expense.
Because when profit is possible without
responsibility, when fortunes rise while
wage stagnates, when CEOs make 400 times
what their workers do, the question isn't
whether the system is working,
(06:47):
it's who is it working for.
And when the answer is the few, then
the moral case against wealth isn't
as radical
as it sounds.
It's a reasonable response to a world
where 1% of the population controls nearly
half the wealth, while the rest is
left for everyone else to fight over.
This moral lens doesn't reject ambition,
(07:09):
it rejects the kind of ambition that turns
a blind eye to
consequences.
It rejects a society where value is
measured only in dollars and success is
defined of how much you've
accumulated before anyone notices.
And it calls back to a deeper meaning,
that no one is free until we all are.
And that's the true measure of a society,
(07:31):
is not how many millionaires are produced,
but how few people
are left behind.
Let's not
stop there.
Let's tilt the diamond
to see the other face.
Wealth can be moral,
profoundly moral.
In fact, when earned ethically and used
wisely, it can be one of the most moral
forces on earth.
(07:51):
Yes, wealth
can corrupt.
Yes, fortunes can be built
on the back of others.
But wealth, true wealth, can be moral,
not just justified, not just tolerated,
but deeply good.
Because what is wealth, if not potential
in a physical form, potential to solve
problems, to serve, to uplift others,
(08:13):
to create value, to
innovate in ways to improve
others' lives.
These are services.
When some people build a business
that feeds families, heals bodies, and
enlightens minds, and that business
succeeds, isn't that a kind of good?
Wealth earned through creation,
contribution, and risk is a reflection of
(08:35):
courage and vision.
It is a byproduct
of usefulness.
The inventor, the artist, the builder,
the teacher, the entrepreneur,
when they are well paid, it sends
a message to them that you matter.
And wealth, when used as a tool, not
a trophy, it becomes a form of power
that you can channel into justice,
(08:56):
into access, into education,
and into community.
Consider this.
Almost every leap forward in
humanity's progress required wealth.
Vaccines weren't
scaled by monks.
They were scaled
by funded labs.
Universities weren't
built by the poor.
They were built
by endowments.
Civil movements
(09:16):
weren't free.
They were bankrolled
by someone with money.
The philanthropist who builds hospitals,
the venture capitalist who funds clean
energy, the athlete who builds schools,
the founder who gives equity to employees.
These are not
stories of greed.
They're stories
of humanity.
And when wealth is in the
right hands, it's not a threat.
(09:39):
And that leads us to the
question, what do you do with it?
Perhaps the question is not whether wealth
is moral, but what it demands of you once
you have it.
Because wealth, like fire, can
cook your food or burn your house.
It is neutral
in theory.
but never
in practice.
It bends towards
its owner.
The truly moral question
(10:00):
is not about being rich.
It's about
being aware.
About being aware of your impact, your
footprint, of the invisible systems,
your dollars touch.
What do you fund
when you spend?
What do you support
when you invest?
What kind of future are you
building with your capital?
The Stoics see wealth not as
(10:20):
a gift but a responsibility.
Money only makes you
more of who you are.
If you are kind, money
lets you be generous.
If you are selfish, money
makes you dangerous.
To condemn all wealth is to
blind yourself to its potential.
To lump every millionaire in every
monopolist is to confuse
(10:41):
means with motive.
If you want to pursue wealth, and I
believe you should, pursue it with open
eyes, earn with your
own real effort.
And never forget,
wealth is not the goal.
It's a means to
a greater end.
You don't need to be a
billionaire to make a difference.
You need to be committed to using what
you have, be it time, money, talent,
(11:03):
or influence, in ways that leaves a
positive impact in the communities you
come across.
Pause and imagine this
thought experiment.
Tomorrow morning, you wake up and there's
suddenly a hundred million dollars in your
bank account.
What do you
do next?
You didn't cheat.
You didn't steal it.
It was just wired
into your account.
(11:23):
Do you hide it?
Do you give
it all away?
Do you live
exactly as before?
Think carefully, because this thought
experiment lies the moral test of wealth.
Almost no one would give it all away,
but almost no one would hoard it either.
Yes, there's a dark side to money,
but light shines just as often,
(11:45):
if not more.
So let's be clear, wealth isn't the enemy
of virtue, it's selfish self-interest.
But wealth that sees, wealth that gives,
and wealth that builds, that's not
something to turn your
back on and call immoral.
And when you become rich in any form,
(12:06):
ask yourself, who else will be richer
because I lived?
Who else will live a better
life because I existed?
Thanks for listening.
Until next time.
Welcome back to The Wealth Effect,
(00:01):
where we don't just talk about money,
but what it
means to have it.
Today, we're going to step into something
that makes people feel uncomfortable.
It's a question that comes up in silent
moments of seeing rich people online.
Is it immoral
to be rich?
Let's fill
your pocket.
From the beginning, humanity has
always been uneasy with wealth.
(00:21):
In the temples of ancient Greece,
philosophers like Socrates, Plato,
and Epictetus asked what it
meant to live a good life.
Not a rich life, not a
powerful life, but a good life.
They viewed the pursuit of wealth as
dangerous, precisely because it often
distorted virtue.
Money was always seen, not as
(00:42):
evil itself, but as a test.
A distraction from higher aims of
wisdom, courage, and self-mastery.
Epictetus, who was born a slave,
understood this contradiction immediately.
To him, freedom
was internal.
You can own nothing
and yet be free.
You can own everything and
yet be a slave to your desire.
(01:04):
He saw wealth as
something fleeting.
In the early Christian tradition, wealth
was often seen as an
impediment to salvation.
The rich young ruler was told by
Jesus to give everything away.
And when he could
not, he turned away.
The warning was not against money per se,
but against its power to close the heart,
(01:26):
to shield us from compassion, to make
us believe we are more than others.
The medieval church saw
wealth as a moral hazard.
To have money was
to be tempted.
And the wealthy were
called to give it.
Not out of guilt, but
out of obligation.
The word charity comes from the
Latin word caritas, meaning love.
(01:49):
Giving was not
about generosity.
It was about
justice.
By the time the Renaissance came
around, wealth began to be reframed.
The merchant
class rose.
The banker became not a villain,
but someone everyone wanted to be.
Art, science, and commerce bloomed
under the financial support of the rich.
With the Enlightenment
(02:10):
came a new idea.
That a person could
be wealthy and good.
Even that their wealth, even to the point
where their wealth,
proved their moral worth.
As long as it was
earned and used wisely.
Critics of wealth argue it is not merely
that rich have more, but that the rich
having more means
others have less.
(02:31):
This inequity is not just
economical, but ethical.
They don't go against prosperity because
they secretly wish to have it for
themselves.
They see the world in which the
accumulation of riches often rides on the
shoulders of those
without power.
They ask, How can it be just to have
billions while others have nothing to eat?
(02:52):
How can there be good and profit
extracted from cheap labor, environmental
destruction, and
political influence?
They don't simply say
the rich have more.
They say the rich having more
means others must have less.
Not by coincidence,
but by force.
Their claim
is simple.
The existence of extreme wealth requires
(03:14):
the existence of extreme poverty.
They look at the working poor, the
factory collapses, the polluted river,
the homeless encampments next
to the iconic skyscrapers.
And they ask, How
can it be right?
How can a system that allows
this to happen be moral?
To them, the
(03:34):
problem isn't money.
It's the moral indifference
that money can buy.
It is the ability to live above
the river while the city floods.
And it's political power
that wealth consolidates.
Enabling the rich not only to escape
responsibility, but to write the rules
themselves.
In this view, wealth
(03:56):
is not a reward.
It's a sign of
a rigged system.
It's not a reflection
of goodness.
It's a sign
of extraction.
They read about record profits and then
look at the food banks overwhelmed by
working families.
They see celebrities auctioning off NFTs
for millions while teachers crowdsource
(04:16):
school supplies.
How can this
be right?
To them, the problem
isn't the money.
It's how money becomes
worshipped in that society.
How can this
be right?
It's because the problem is that
society starts to worship money.
It becomes insulation, a buffer between
the wealthy and the
consequences of their decisions.
(04:38):
It becomes
permission.
Permission to pollute, to avoid taxes, to
fire workers and still collect bonuses.
And it becomes silence, the ability to opt
out of shared pain to watch the world burn
from their yacht.
It becomes the gated community where
empathy is filtered through tinted windows
and philanthropy to
(05:00):
fend off criticism.
Wealth in this view doesn't
just grant privilege.
It grants power to
redefine morality itself.
It gives the rich the tools to rewrite the
rules, to fund the politicians who protect
their interests, to lobby for laws which
sealed their assets, to dictate the terms
(05:20):
of the public conversation through media
ownership and think tank influence.
In this view, wealth isn't a
reward for hard work or ingenuity.
They think of
it this way.
When seeing people with wealth, this
person has successfully
extracted more than
they've given.
They do not ignore that some fortunes
are built with brilliance, innovation,
(05:42):
and vision.
But they point out that even these
stories are incomplete without extraction,
without examining the conditions
that made it possible.
The labor outsourced, the tax avoided,
the subsidies granted, and
the communities displaced.
The argument is not about saying
that rich people are evil.
(06:03):
They're not
anti-success.
They're anti-exploitation, anti-system
that requires winners to stand on losers.
They remind us that behind every self-made
story is often an invisible web of
workers' infrastructure,
historical context, and privilege.
That wealth is often rarely
accumulated and is often extracted.
(06:25):
That fortunes don't
grow in a vacuum.
They grow in soil prepared by
others, sometimes at their expense.
Because when profit is possible without
responsibility, when fortunes rise while
wage stagnates, when CEOs make 400 times
what their workers do, the question isn't
whether the system is working,
(06:47):
it's who is it working for.
And when the answer is the few, then
the moral case against wealth isn't
as radical
as it sounds.
It's a reasonable response to a world
where 1% of the population controls nearly
half the wealth, while the rest is
left for everyone else to fight over.
This moral lens doesn't reject ambition,
(07:09):
it rejects the kind of ambition that turns
a blind eye to
consequences.
It rejects a society where value is
measured only in dollars and success is
defined of how much you've
accumulated before anyone notices.
And it calls back to a deeper meaning,
that no one is free until we all are.
And that's the true measure of a society,
(07:31):
is not how many millionaires are produced,
but how few people
are left behind.
Let's not
stop there.
Let's tilt the diamond
to see the other face.
Wealth can be moral,
profoundly moral.
In fact, when earned ethically and used
wisely, it can be one of the most moral
forces on earth.
(07:51):
Yes, wealth
can corrupt.
Yes, fortunes can be built
on the back of others.
But wealth, true wealth, can be moral,
not just justified, not just tolerated,
but deeply good.
Because what is wealth, if not potential
in a physical form, potential to solve
problems, to serve, to uplift others,
(08:13):
to create value, to
innovate in ways to improve
others' lives.
These are services.
When some people build a business
that feeds families, heals bodies, and
enlightens minds, and that business
succeeds, isn't that a kind of good?
Wealth earned through creation,
contribution, and risk is a reflection of
(08:35):
courage and vision.
It is a byproduct
of usefulness.
The inventor, the artist, the builder,
the teacher, the entrepreneur,
when they are well paid, it sends
a message to them that you matter.
And wealth, when used as a tool, not
a trophy, it becomes a form of power
that you can channel into justice,
(08:56):
into access, into education,
and into community.
Consider this.
Almost every leap forward in
humanity's progress required wealth.
Vaccines weren't
scaled by monks.
They were scaled
by funded labs.
Universities weren't
built by the poor.
They were built
by endowments.
Civil movements
(09:16):
weren't free.
They were bankrolled
by someone with money.
The philanthropist who builds hospitals,
the venture capitalist who funds clean
energy, the athlete who builds schools,
the founder who gives equity to employees.
These are not
stories of greed.
They're stories
of humanity.
And when wealth is in the
right hands, it's not a threat.
(09:39):
And that leads us to the
question, what do you do with it?
Perhaps the question is not whether wealth
is moral, but what it demands of you once
you have it.
Because wealth, like fire, can
cook your food or burn your house.
It is neutral
in theory.
but never
in practice.
It bends towards
its owner.
The truly moral question
(10:00):
is not about being rich.
It's about
being aware.
About being aware of your impact, your
footprint, of the invisible systems,
your dollars touch.
What do you fund
when you spend?
What do you support
when you invest?
What kind of future are you
building with your capital?
The Stoics see wealth not as
(10:20):
a gift but a responsibility.
Money only makes you
more of who you are.
If you are kind, money
lets you be generous.
If you are selfish, money
makes you dangerous.
To condemn all wealth is to
blind yourself to its potential.
To lump every millionaire in every
monopolist is to confuse
(10:41):
means with motive.
If you want to pursue wealth, and I
believe you should, pursue it with open
eyes, earn with your
own real effort.
And never forget,
wealth is not the goal.
It's a means to
a greater end.
You don't need to be a
billionaire to make a difference.
You need to be committed to using what
you have, be it time, money, talent,
(11:03):
or influence, in ways that leaves a
positive impact in the communities you
come across.
Pause and imagine this
thought experiment.
Tomorrow morning, you wake up and there's
suddenly a hundred million dollars in your
bank account.
What do you
do next?
You didn't cheat.
You didn't steal it.
It was just wired
into your account.
(11:23):
Do you hide it?
Do you give
it all away?
Do you live
exactly as before?
Think carefully, because this thought
experiment lies the moral test of wealth.
Almost no one would give it all away,
but almost no one would hoard it either.
Yes, there's a dark side to money,
but light shines just as often,
(11:45):
if not more.
So let's be clear, wealth isn't the enemy
of virtue, it's selfish self-interest.
But wealth that sees, wealth that gives,
and wealth that builds, that's not
something to turn your
back on and call immoral.
And when you become rich in any form,
(12:06):
ask yourself, who else will be richer
because I lived?
Who else will live a better
life because I existed?
Thanks for listening.
Until next time.
Popular Podcasts
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com