Is it Safe to Fly? An Astrological Perspective

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:07):
Hey, there, it's Evan Nathaniel Grimm, and welcome to
the latest episode of AstrologyUnbound, and today I'm going to
be unpacking the astrologybehind the recent plane crashes
and aviation incidents andtragedies.
I will be diving into theastrology, the factors that
astrologically led to theseincidents and also what it
suggests about the future offlying in 2025 and beyond.

(00:30):
Before I dig into that, though,be sure to check out my
Substack newsletter for anin-depth look at the new and
full moons, the retrograde datesand cycles.
I also have manifestationguides, intention setting guides
, courses and a lot more.
Also, if you haven't downloadedmy 2025 horoscopes yet, you
definitely should.
There's only been one full moonand one new moon so far in 2025

(00:54):
.
So those horoscopes dig intoevery new and full moon in the
year ahead, for your sun moonand rising signs.
So definitely check those out.
For your sun moon and risingsigns.
So definitely check those out.
So let's get into it.
Obviously, you've all heard thenews about the sequence of plane
crashes and incidents in the USthis past week, the most
notable being the AmericanAirlines crash at the Ronald

(01:18):
Reagan Airport in Washington DCwith its collision with a
military helicopter.
Days later, we had a smallplane crash in Philadelphia,
other incidents as well privateplanes going down and, even
hours before I started filmingthis, an engine fire at the
airport in Houston.

(01:38):
So anytime there is a sequenceof events or concurrent events
that all sort of fit the sametheme, most people in the world
will say this is just aninexplicable coincidence.
But astrologers do have thetools to look at what the cosmic
or planetary factors are thatmay explain these

(02:02):
synchronicities, explain thesesynchronicities and in this case
there were very clear factorsthat actually led up to these
accidents and many astrologersnot just myself, were predicting
this about the last week ofJanuary, months in advance.
So I'm actually going to walkthrough the predictions that

(02:23):
were made leading up to againthese accidents and then unpack
again what the variables wereand also explain, you know again
, what this reflects about thefuture, because I know many
people, since this has happened,have been asking me what are
the risks after this?
And I'm going to use thisepisode to lay that out in a

(02:46):
very objective and compassionateway, because I understand that
these are genuine tragedies andlives were lost and we have to
respect that.
But insofar as my job is anastrologer, I should, I believe,
provide astrologicalperspectives and information,

(03:09):
especially in times of crisis.
So I will do my best again todeliver the information in a way
that doesn't cause unnecessaryanxiety but also, again, is
realistic about what the sort ofagain factors and transits are
showing.

(03:29):
So how did so many astrologersand psychics predict that the
last week of January would berisky for flying?
Now, I wasn't even aware of thescope of predictions from other
intuitives until I posted avideo a few days ago laying out

(03:52):
my predictions and how they werereflected in these events.
So, just to rewind back inNovember, sometimes I will do
private webinars or videos formy Substack followers, and I did
one in November after theelection where I was talking
about the election aftermath andeven actually the night of the

(04:14):
election.
I was doing sort of a livecoverage show, and in both of
those I discussed, how you know,there was some sort of flight
risk that I was seeing and,honestly, even going back to
October, I had talked about thismore so just privately, with
people I knew, but I kept seeingsomeone in the government

(04:38):
involved in a high-profile planecrash, and back then I kept
looking at Donald Trump's chart.
Actually.
So Donald Trump was born duringa lunar eclipse in Sagittarius,
with the Sun and Uranus alignedin Gemini, and I was framing my
prediction about these flightrisks through the lens of his

(05:02):
birth chart risks through thelens of his birth chart and
talking about how his chart is,for whatever reason, just
showing I mean not for whateverreason, but for some of the
reasons I just outlined wasshowing that just in general,
there's something connected,there's something energetically
connected to his birth chartsthat really speaks to just
aviation difficulties, reallyspeaks to just aviation

(05:23):
difficulties.
And at the time I was wonderingis there someone in his
administration who, for whateverreason, would be involved in
some kind of accident like that?
And as time evolved and Istarted looking at the month of
January because a lot of times Iwill look at, I'll do a really

(05:45):
obviously a close analysis of amonth, a week or two in advance
of that month so in lateDecember of last year I was
posting my January 2025predictions and it wasn't until
then that it started to dawn onme that there was a very, very

(06:07):
accident-prone energy in the airin the final 10 days of January
.
Now, the reason for that isbecause, first of all, we had
this really gnarly Mars-Mercuryopposition in a square, with
Chiron.
Mars-mercury opposition in asquare with Chiron, and that

(06:29):
took effect around January 21st,all the way through the 25th of
January.
And any time you have Marsopposite Mercury, which happens
just over every two years, itdoes indicate that generally,
very generally, there could be ahigher probability of
especially car accidents oraccidents through other modes of

(06:50):
transportation and engine fires.
Actually, you know, overheatedengines, reckless driving,
people driving too fast orimpatiently, but what made this
one especially problematic wasthe T-square to Chiron.
And so anytime, you know, againevery two plus years, when you

(07:10):
see Mars opposite Mercury, youjust have to set aside those few
days to be more careful whiledriving or riding a scooter or
bicycle or anything, but in thatsquare to Chiron.
If you go back to the forecast Iposted for January, I was
dwelling on this T-square for awhile and envisioning all kinds

(07:33):
of accidents.
And that square, again, is allthe more problematic because not
only is Mars fire and explosionand Mercury transportation, but
Chiron, you know, can beliteral wounds, it can be injury
.
So anyways, that T-square wassort of kicking off this energy

(07:55):
and, you know, sparking thesesort of intuitive downloads in
my mind about this againhigh-risk segment of the month.
But there was another layer tothis, which is the fact that
Mars is also retrograde, andanytime Mars retrogrades, it

(08:18):
does increase the odds of againMartian-type incidents or
accidents, which could be like afire, an explosion.
And also it is again squaringChiron in a Mars ruled sign of
Aries.
So with that Mars retrograde,squaring Chiron, it was kind of
giving the energy of like arescue mission or someone saving

(08:41):
someone, and I talked aboutthat in my Astrology of 2025
webinar, for you know again, mysub stack, where, even then, I
talked about how Mars squareChiron feels, like, I said, a
firefighter saving someone froma burning building.
That's how I described it, andthat was a few days before the
LA fires.
So, as you can see, there arethese aspects that were forming

(09:05):
throughout January that werevery precarious and you know
they do explain the fires in LA,but they also were continuing
to show risk around.
You know, fire and again, justexplosions throughout the month,
again just explosionsthroughout the month.

(09:30):
So, to take this a step further,we also had Pluto recently, a
few months ago, entering thesign of Aquarius for the last
time in this transit throughAquarius.
So just to clarify that, plutowent into Aquarius for the first
time back in March of 2023.
So I'll actually show you thedate here or I'll get the date.

(09:52):
So Pluto entered Aquarius Marchof 2023, march 23rd, and then
it went back and forth betweenAquarius and Capricorn for, you
know, about a year and a halfand it finally went into
Aquarius full-time, so to speak,like full-time November 19th of

(10:14):
2024.
And starting then we had thesort of official heralding of a
completely new era in society,of transformation and so on.
And anytime Pluto goes fullyinto a new sign, like all in, it

(10:34):
does trigger some type of, youknow, monumental event that you
know really does completelyalter the course of history.
So, for example, when Plutowent into Capricorn for the last
time, it was November of 2008,and by then we were deep, deep
into the Great Recession and thehousing crisis.
And, you know, again it wentinto Aquarius a few times in

(10:58):
recent years, but there wassomething different about this
last one because, again, it isfully.
But there was somethingdifferent about this last one
because again it is fully, youknow, sort of laying out the
effects of its upcoming transit.
So, starting November of thispast year, there was a no

(11:23):
turning back feel, but alsoPluto was basically committing
to a full excavation of thissign.
And all you have to do to, youknow, basically start to you
know, circumscribe the possibleoutcomes is to investigate the
themes of the sign of Aquarius.
And Aquarius does deal withthings like electricity and
power and politics andegalitarianism.
You know technology, innovation, social media, but it also does

(11:45):
deal with aviation.
And so anytime Pluto again goesinto a sign, you have to wonder
if we're going to witnesssomething destructive or extreme
relative to that sign.
So when it was in Capricorn,entering Capricorn, it was
showing us the extreme powerthat had been accumulated among

(12:08):
the banks and the lenders and soon.
And now that it's in Aquariusagain, it is putting the
spotlight on all Aquarian themes.
But anyways, that also createda backdrop, just generally from
November 19th onward, ofpossible aviation risk.
But so far every factor thatI've talked about is not quite

(12:36):
enough to warrant a predictionthat, hey, there's going to be
some type of plane crash BecauseMars opposite Mercury.
You don't know if Mercury isgoing to be a train or a car or
something like that, and at thattime the opposition was well,
mercury was in Capricorn anyways.
Pluto going into Aquarius showsthat it's in that sign for

(12:57):
about two decades.
That in of itself is not enoughto make a prediction about a
specific time regarding a planecrash.
But the next two factors servereally to me, served as the
catalyst for late January.
And so number one we had Uranusstation direct on January 30th

(13:21):
and Uranus, even though it's inTaurus, is the modern ruler of
Aquarius.
So again we're dealing withaviation themes.
Now, every year Uranus stationsdirect and when it does it
really does pick up a lot ofmomentum and it can bring about
either seismic activity, shocks,shocking events, changes in

(13:46):
technology or something likethat.
But again, it happens everyyear.
So it's not like every yearUranus stations direct and
something falls from the sky.
But it was interesting rightthat Uranus was stationing
direct about one week after theMars-Mercury opposition.
So now we're starting to get alittle bit more again, a bit

(14:11):
more wobbly, a bit more risky,but the sort of final piece of
the puzzle that came togetherwas Mercury's conjunction to
Pluto.
So again Mercury deals withlocomotive and transportation
and movement generally, withPluto also representing death
and destruction.

(14:31):
So the juxtaposition of Mercuryand Pluto aligning, which they
did align from January 27thuntil pretty much today,
february 2nd, at the time ofthis filming the juxtaposition
of that conjunction with Uranusstationing direct in the same
window to me was the strongestindicator of some type of

(14:56):
aviation incident occurring.
And if you look back at theprediction I made about January,
you can see in my body language, in my tone, in my expression
how I'm kind of going throughthis intuitive maze in real time
.
So in that video I was talkingabout January 21 through 25,

(15:18):
talking about Mars oppositeMercury, squaring Chiron.
I just kept harping on hey,this is a really, really
dangerous, accident-pronetransit and I'm exploring how
Mercury could be a car accidentcould be.
You know something vehicularmost likely.
And I say, well, you know it'sprobably not airplane related,

(15:42):
because I mean, you know that'sjust such a niche outcome and
you know something that would bevery number one, just
statistically improbable, butalso something, at least in the
US, but also something that youdon't really want to speak into
existence.
But then you can see in my bodylanguage how I'm starting to

(16:03):
change my tone as I realize that, oh well, mercury does go into
Aquarius after it does conjunctPluto and Uranus does station
direct on January 30th, a weeklater after the Mars-Mercury
opposition, in the sign that isassociated with aviation.
So I'm basically shifting fromprobably not to maybe probably

(16:28):
not to, maybe Not definitely.
Because, as an astrologer, whenI'm broadcasting things in the
public, it's like I don't reallywant to say, hey guys, this is
going to happen, take it orleave it like.
This is what it is.
I think with astrology wealways experience a spectrum of
possible themes and outcomes andno astrologer can ever be like

(16:50):
definitely this will happen inthis location, with this person
involved every time and hit thebullseye.
Hit the bullseye, but in thatcase I was sort of weaving my
way towards a possible outcome.
And then, as I sort of like youcan see me kind of pause on
that and think, well, you know,it is the sign associated with

(17:15):
aviation, so it's like sort ofan admission that well, maybe
this is, maybe it is airplanerelated.
And then I say that mercuryconjunct pluto is reminiscent of
princess diana's car crash.
I call it a princess dianatransit, which, admittedly, is
not like the best way to expressit.
Obviously her life was aboutmuch more than that accident,
but it was a shorthand way ofsaying that this does look

(17:41):
potentially deadly and it alsodoes look like there is someone
potentially high profile orregal involved in the accident
and the reason I said that,though, is because you know the
day of Princess Diana's carcrash, mercury was transiting in
a retrograde phase in the signof Virgo, aligned with her natal
Pluto.

(18:01):
Now, if you have you know,mercury-pluto heart aspects in
your charts, it's not a reasonto assume anything about your
life in that area.
You have to consult anastrologer to actually
understand all the you knowdispositors and the rulership
and the house placements youknow of your Mercury-Pluto

(18:22):
aspect to you know.
Actually get an understandingof it Doesn't mean you're doomed
, and, again, astrology shows usthere's a spectrum of outcomes,
but so far we have all theingredients for some type of,
again, plane crash.
Now people were asking me in thecomments about why are you, but

(18:48):
how would anyone know?
It was like US-centric right orcentered around the US, and is
it showing even a bias amongpsychics, mediums and
astrologers to just like becalling things out in the US?
Like what if there was a planecrash two weeks ago, three weeks
ago, in some other part of theworld, which there probably was?
The reason that it was actuallypossible to call out the US is

(19:16):
because of actually anotherfactor I want to mention, which
is that not only did Uranusstation direct on January 30th,
you know, just a day after theAmerican Airlines crash in DC,
but Uranus also stationed directin a wide square to the United
States moon.
The United States birth charthas July 4th 1776, has the moon

(19:42):
27 degrees of Aquarius.
The moon represents the peopleand anytime again, your
Ronestations direct, there canbe this enormous upheaval.
So those are the drivingfactors and that final factor
pinpointed these events in theUnited States, in my belief.

(20:04):
Now are there other countries'charts, with the moon in
Aquarius between 23 and 29degrees of Aquarius?
Probably Obviously.

(20:30):
The sheer number of planecrashes in the past week in the
US is statistically an anomalyrelative to the number of
crashes the United Statesusually experiences.
And of course, if we rewind thetape, even in December I was
calling this out.
So in late November, when I wasdoing predictions about
December, even I said theaviation sector is the most

(20:53):
challenged sector in Decemberairplanes either with
malfunctions or actual crashesor bodies ending up in the wheel
.
Well, on commercial flights inthe US and even in, I think it
was two cases there was actually.
There were actually bulletsthat hit some airplanes and then

(21:14):
we had the drone sightings inNew Jersey.
It's kind of reaching thislevel of madness, right, with
all types of you know againaviation.
And then we have the spaceshuttle, you know which, still
with the astronauts still notbeing able to return home, and I
talked about that also in myJanuary predictions.

(21:36):
So the next question becomes youknow, what is it going to look
like from here on out, liketomorrow, next month, next year?
And today I definitely want togive you again some general
guidelines, right, some generalguidelines for navigating this,

(22:02):
right, some general guidelinesfor navigating this.
But before I do that, just acaveat that, regardless of what
the astrology shows and therisks that it shows, you should
always exercise your ownintuition in making your
decisions about whether or notto book a flight or to travel.
I don't think that you know,even if the astrology shows that
there's a risk, I don't thinkthat you know, even if the

(22:22):
astrology shows that there's arisk, it doesn't mean that every
flight is compromised, right?
So use your own judgment.
Let this podcast episode be arough guideline for you.
I mean a helpful guideline,right?
So let's walk through it.

(22:47):
It, and the best way to actuallypredict the risk timeline is to
think about how long thefactors I already mentioned are
at play and we'll rank them inorder from most important to
least important factor.
So by understanding how longthese transits are again active,
I think we can actually makeagain a general sort of we can
actually assign sort of a rangeof dates here.

(23:08):
So let's start off with Mercuryconjunct Pluto.
I mean in Aquarius right, thesign associated with aviation.
I think that this ispotentially the highest order of
importance.
So as I'm filming this rightnow, luckily Mercury is already

(23:29):
eight degrees away from Pluto.
It has moved beyond Pluto,ahead of Pluto, and eight
degrees apart is pretty muchessentially outside the orb of
influence for a conjunction.
Certainly it still counts as aconjunction, but within the next
day or two Mercury is not inthis conjunction.
So by February 4th it isabsolutely outside of that

(23:53):
conjunction with Pluto and thefact is that because of that I
do think it reduces, it doesgreatly reduce, the probability
of a plane crash like an actualdeadly plane crash.
The other factor that maybe istied in importance is Uranus'

(24:17):
direct motion.
Now, how long can we countUranus as turning apparent
direction in the sky, orchanging apparent direction?
I say apparent because ofcourse Uranus is not actually
deciding to move backwards atany point.
It just appears that way, fromour vantage point, uranus, in my
opinion, is stationing all theway through February 12th.

(24:40):
Now, the reason is becauseFebruary 12th is the Leo full
moon and that full moon issquaring, actually, uranus.
So to me, that full moon marksthe final moment where we are
really still inside the pocketof this whole situation.
Inside the pocket of this wholesituation and you know again,

(25:02):
like we have evidence that thisagain there are many factors
layered on top of each otherthat are playing out at the same
time.
It's a confluence of factorsthat is enabling basically all
of these incidents to happen allat once.
Because, you know again, I wokeup this morning and it was like
, oh God, there's an engine firein Houston on another
commercial flight.

(25:23):
And of course there are otherfactors.
Just as a quick aside, thereare other factors, including
policy decisions and, like youknow what the FAA decides to do,
and like the air trafficcontrol situation I'm not
pretending like it's just aboutastrology I know that some of
you in the comments have beensaying, well, it's this
administration's fault or it'sthat administration's fault,

(25:43):
like I'm not here to address thepolitics, but I will
acknowledge of course there aremany political factors and
stakeholders in the equationthat have also contributed to,
you know, this occurring.
But anyways, so to me, likeFebruary 12th is really that

(26:07):
line of demarcation, and I'm notsaying it's the pinnacle or the
peak or the climax, wherethere's more incidents.
I'm just saying everythingbeyond February 12th feels quite
a bit better to me.
And if I'm digging into theother transits surrounding this,
you know Mercury is stillsquaring Uranus there at that

(26:27):
time, which does create thissort of frenetic energy with
travel.
But once Mercury enters Piscesaround Valentine's Day, I do
think that at that point we arepretty solidly out of that risk
window, that immediate I shouldsay that immediate risk window.
So Mercury enters PiscesFebruary 14th at 4.06 am Pacific

(26:51):
time, while the moon is inVirgo, opposing Neptune and
Saturn.
So I think that by that timepeople should have a pretty good
handle on you know what'shappening with flight right now
and how is the administration,how is the Trump administration
managing this?
What's their go forwardstrategy?

(27:12):
Now, of course, the full moonsquaring Uranus, you don't know.
I mean it could be anothershocking event.
I've been saying lately that Ithink it's more to do with maybe
an earthquake or seismicactivity.
But at this point, given againthe sheer number of accidents,
it's not impossible that wecould be reading about another

(27:34):
again high-profile accident inthe news.
Accident in the news, and alsoyou know the other factors I
mentioned.
You know, beyond that, we haveMars retrograde until February
23rd, and anytime Mars isretrograde there is this
increased risk of fire orexplosion.

(27:55):
But again, that doesn't reallyspeak to aviation specifically,
it's just a general rule ofthumb.
However, it is squaring Chironall the way until April 17th,
when it finally leaves the signof Cancer and then after that,
though, it goes into Leo, againopposes Pluto in a square to the
Sun.
So even then I think there'ssomewhat of a risk.

(28:16):
But where I'm going with thisis that I do think we're still
in the pocket of immediate riskthrough February 14th, in the
morning of February 14th.
After that I think it starts tode-escalate.
However, mars remainsretrograde.
So after February 23rd, whenMars stations direct, the risk

(28:39):
subsides even more, and thenthere's still a slightly lower
but ongoing risk through April17th, while Mars is squaring
Chiron.
I just think that that generatesthe possibility of like
accidents, fires and so on.
However, even after April 17th,we have the opposition between

(29:01):
Mars and Pluto again, and at thevery outset of Taurus season we
have a T-square Mars, the Sunand Pluto all squaring each
other.
Even if I extend that byanother day, april 20th, we get
the Moon and Aquarius squaringthe Sun and Taurus, you know,
conjunct Pluto opposing Mars inLeo, you know, with Mercury

(29:25):
conjunct Neptune.
I mean, maybe that's more of amaritime or boating-related
incident, but you know, I'm notgoing to lie.
Like even around April 20th itdoes look a little bit risky.
So, but again, I do think thatafter Mars leaves the square to
Chiron, it's like we're gettinginto like a fairly lower risk

(29:46):
territory, with the exception ofthe sort of April 20th, 21st
timeframe, even 22nd, but theneventually, you know of the
opposition to Pluto,Specifically around May 16th,
15th.
We're really out of that, we'rereally out of that opposition.

(30:08):
So again, I don't want you tothink that nobody can fly
through mid-May, but I wanted toagain, and there's still more
to come in this podcast withthis.
But I'm just quickly summarizingthis.
You know, if you are someonewho is already hyperintuitive,

(30:29):
you trust yourself, um, you know, then trust your own intuition.
You know, don't just likeprioritize the astrology here,
but you know, if you're someonewho likes to take a balanced
approach to everything you know,just consider the astrology
again being a little bit higherrisk through that Mercury-Uranus

(30:52):
square, february 14th.
So up until the morning ofFebruary 14th, again, I still
think we're in that pocket ofhigher or immediate risk.
After that I think it starts tosubside substantially to a
point where you can just sort ofsay that the short answer is
that by Valentine's Day thingsease up Again.

(31:34):
I don't want people to becanceling flights based on this
podcast.
If you have a flight February11th or 12th or something, again
use your own intuitionarcation.
After that, leo, full moon.
After Mercury leaves Aquarius,I think you can just essentially
just move forward with withthings and, uh, you know,
proceed as as per usual.
But again, if you want like anactual sort of step ladder of

(31:57):
risk levels, it's the highestrisk or it was the highest risk
recently.
It was the highest risk, youknow, up until pretty much today
.
February 2nd Goes down a notchthrough February 14th, goes down
another notch through February23rd due to Mars Direct, and
then it goes down another notchon April 17th when Mars leaves

(32:19):
the square to Chiron.
But I think it may.
You could argue that it stayskind of where it is because of
the opposition to Pluto.
Right away, if anything, someastrologers might argue, the
risk goes up again, which Idon't think is out of the
question.
I mean, you know, I willinvestigate that further in the
coming weeks, like I haven't,you know, uh, fully dived into

(32:41):
this question as a you know,this specific question about
aviation in the month of April.
But I will say that, like,again, mars opposite Pluto
creates a destructive force, soso, anyways, that's, um, you
know, a timeline of events andum events, and there is a Kazemi

(33:03):
pretty soon here.
I want to look that up reallyquick.
There is a Kazemi with,obviously, mercury and the Sun,
the Mercury-Kazemi squaringUranus, while the Moon is
actually conjunct Mars.
And I think that on Sunday,february 9th, we could just

(33:30):
learn a lot more informationabout one of these accidents or
the air traffic controlsituation, or something about
negligence or on the part of oneof these stakeholders, or even
that a system was compromisedthrough a cybersecurity attack.
And I want to take thisopportunity to break down a

(33:53):
little bit more about theserecent transits and what they
suggest about sort of thelead-up to these accidents,
especially the American Airlinesaccident and collision with the
helicopter.
So, first of all, thatMars-Mercury opposition I
highlighted January 21 to 25,that opposition, you know, does

(34:17):
increase the likelihood thatpeople would be overwhelmed by
the multitude of informationthey're processing.
It could make it harder tocoordinate staffing at like an
air traffic control center.
It could make people morediscombobulated, more rushed,
more impatient and sometimestasked with keeping track of so

(34:38):
many different things at once,with keeping track of so many
different things at once.
And I have Mars-OppositeMercury in my own birth chart.
So I honestly feel like thisqualifies me to speak on this
opposition, more so thanprobably the vast majority of
astrologers, because there's alived experience with an aspect
like that that I think is veryhard to understand from the
outside.
I actually think Mars-OppositeMercury is one of the most

(34:59):
misunderstood aspects becauseit's so rare, with an aspect
like that that I think is veryhard to understand from the
outside.
Like I actually think Marsopposite Mercury is one of the
most misunderstood aspectsbecause it's so rare I mean very
few, probably like 0.001% ofthe population has it or
something like that.
It's very rare.
It only happens for a few days,once every two plus years.
So basically, the odds are verysmall of having it in your
chart, but when you do, it canlead to all kinds of bizarre

(35:24):
ways of processing informationor bizarre ways of moving your
body around or traveling orspeaking.
And you know, I've experiencedthis opposition throughout my
life as number one actuallyhaving family members who have
been in, you know, majoraccidents, especially through
motorcycles.
Having family members who havebeen in major accidents,
especially through motorcyclesI've experienced it in my own

(35:51):
life as just always needing moreinformation and wanting to just
feed on more knowledge, morebooks, more classes, more
historical documentaries orwhatever.
But one of the things I noticeis that it can be very easy to
be overwhelmed andoverstimulated by, again,
information.
So you could call it like aneurodivergence or like an ADHD
type of aspect, and I think mostpeople I've done readings for

(36:12):
with this opposition are eitherneurodivergent, adhd, or they
have poor memory or they havememory loss from head trauma,
like there's all kinds of youknow all kinds of ways that this
plays out.
But when you see it in mundaneastrology, you just you know,
really I think you consider thefact that people might be, again

(36:33):
, more overwhelmed byinformation but also wanting
more information overwhelmed byinformation but also wanting
more information.
So anyways, as it concerns thecrash and the accidents and you
know, especially the AmericanAirlines one, you know, I do
think that that opposition showsthat at the air traffic control

(36:55):
center in the days leading upto the accident there probably
were staffing complications.
Control center in the daysleading up to the accident there
probably were staffingcomplications.
There probably were all kindsof misunderstandings about when
people are coming in to work andwho's taking care of which
flight paths.
And you know, even when peopleare operating any kind of
vehicle, whether it's a or likeany kind of transportation

(37:16):
vehicle, a helicopter, a plane,a car, they can like misread the
instructions.
So Mars opposite Mercury and Ican tell you by experience
there's almost somethingslightly dyslexic about it where
, you know, even if someonedoesn't have dyslexia, during a
transit like Mars oppositeMercury, they can kind of like

(37:40):
misplace or misorganize thesequence of things.
So if they receive instructionsthat are seemingly usually
simple or obvious, they mightjust misconstrue right from left
or up from down.
And I'm not saying that that'sall that was going on with the
helicopter, but from what I'veread in the news, the helicopter
was flying too high and at alevel where it was on a

(38:06):
collision course with theAmerican Airlines flight.
But also, seemingly, the pilotsor the pilot of the helicopter
was not even perceiving thelocation of the American
Airlines flight.
They were looking ahead orlooking to location of the
American Airlines flight.
They were looking ahead orlooking to the side for a
different flight.
So that honestly does reflect,I think, a Mars-Mercury

(38:27):
opposition.
Now, the Mars-Mercuryopposition was no longer
technically in effect by thetime of the collision.
However, the way transits workin astrology is that they can
have this sort of aftermath orsorry, this lasting effect, days
afterwards.
So it doesn't mean that justbecause Mercury goes into
Aquarius and leaves Capricorn,that suddenly everybody is, you

(38:53):
know, perfectly buttoned upagain.
So I think that that shows thatthere was a residual effect of
the Mars-Mercury opposition fromthat second to last week of
January and that the overhang ofthat did contribute to this
collision.
Now, another factor here that Iwant to point out with this

(39:16):
accident is the Mercury-Plutoconjunction in Aquarius, which I
mentioned in the predictionvideo.
May have had something to dowith cybersecurity, may have had
something to do withcybersecurity, or may have
something to do withcybersecurity.
It may indicate a cybersecurityattack, and so it's not
impossible that someone hackedinto the system, the systems of

(39:38):
one of these, you know again,airplanes or helicopters, to
manipulate the flight path.
Not impossible, unlikely, butnot impossible.
And also another factor withMercury-Pluto is that it can
lead to self-destructivedecisions through a vehicle.

(40:02):
So you know, because Pluto it'sa delicate subject, but Pluto
can be like self-destructionbasically, and when Mercury's
involved, you know, it could belike basically a mission where
it's like someone is planning tobasically go out through this

(40:23):
collision.
So it's not impossible thatsomebody who was flying either
the plane or the helicopter wasintentionally colliding.
And obviously we've seen thatin rare cases.
I believe there was a flight inGermany, like a decade ago,
where the pilot locked himselfin the cabin and took the plane
down.
It's possible.

(40:44):
I doubt that.
It honestly, I doubt that itwould be the pilots of the
airplane.
I think if anything, it wouldbe the pilot, one of the pilots
of the helicopter, but becausethe helicopter?
The reason I say that isbecause the helicopter was
flying above the altitude it wassupposed to and that's very
bizarre, especially for amilitary craft.
So anyways, you have to wonderif that's part is a potential

(41:08):
factor.
Now, another thing I want tomention is I want to loop back
to the Princess Diana reference.
When I made this predictionabout January, you know I said
this could be a Princess Dianatype transit.
Now there was at least oneindividual that I saw in the
list of victims of the AmericanAirlines flight who sort of gave

(41:30):
off this sort of aura similarto like a Princess Diana.
I'm not saying that she waslike some kind of reincarnation
of her, but you know it was aRussian figure skater.
You know it was a Russianfigure skater and when I saw a
picture of her I was like Ithink she kind of had a similar
hairstyle to Princess Diana.

(41:50):
So I thought that was reallyeerie, that I was talking about
a Princess Diana type event.
Not to say that the accident haseverything to do with her, but
also, what I was going to say isanother eerie coincidence
leading up to these accidentswas that you was that I was
mentioning to a friend of minethe movie Black Hawk Down, and I

(42:11):
don't even remember how it cameup, but I've only seen the
movie once.
It's rarely in my mind.
Oh, you know what it was.
I was watching, finally, topGun, maverick, because I've only
seen the first movie.
And about a week and a half agoI watched Top Gun Maverick,
because I've only seen the firstmovie.
And about a week and a half agoI watched Top Gun Maverick and
I was like for some reason Imean I guess for an obvious

(42:32):
reason, because it's anotherlike sort of military movie I
was like, have you seen BlackHawk Down?
And then I saw the news a weeklater about the American
Airlines crash and it wasinvolving a Black Hawk
helicopter.
Airlines crash and it wasinvolving a Blackhawk helicopter
.
And this happens actually quiteoften for me where I'll see
something in just my own lifethat is synchronistic to

(42:54):
something that happens in theworld and I'm just like always
asking myself in retrospect,like why didn't I kind of play
around with that theme and speakabout it?
But, um, you know, similar tohow, actually before the LA
fires, I kept telling somebodythat I didn't want to try to

(43:15):
turn on the like the automatic,um electric fireplace in my
house, cause I didn't want tolike, you know, I didn't want to
like create some kind ofexplosion in that case is
because I had transiting Mars onmy South node and Leo and
eventually retrograde on mySouth node and Leo even to a
point where, like, we went to aKorean restaurant and, um, you
know, we got this, um, hot potdish that was on top of like a,

(43:39):
you know, a portable flame, andthe dish got so hot that, like,
we actually were going to flagthe waiter and say, hey, can you
actually turn off this flame?
Because it was starting to boilup and it got to so overheated
that the actual pot you know, itwas like a stone pot it
exploded and shattered.

(43:59):
And it shattered, you know, toa point where, like, we couldn't
even eat that food anymore andwe were, like, you know, it was
like shrapnel.
We were dodging, I mean, youknow, not quite that dramatic,
but it was just really bizarre.
And so I had this like firetheme in my head for like weeks
before the LA fires and, anyways, before the Trump rally in

(44:22):
Pennsylvania last July.
I have a portrait in my housewhere somebody has a spear.
Based on the angle that I waslooking at the portrait, I could
see my face reflected in theportrait and the spear was going
right through my head and I waslike God, like I hope that
doesn't mean that something'sgoing to happen to me.
And then, two days later orsomething like that um, trump

(44:42):
had the bullet grazed his ear athis rally.
To get back to the plane crashesAfter I posted the video on my
socials relaying the predictionsI had made about January,
people started tagging me inother videos from other psychics
and other astrologers whobasically made the same

(45:05):
prediction.
And there was one psychic wholiterally said they woke up from
a dream that there would be aplane crash the last week of
January and it was just astunningly accurate prediction,
to a point where she didn'tpinpoint the location.
I don't think, but it was stilllike very direct, like there's

(45:26):
going to be this crash.
And other astrologers wereciting again the last week of
January and even like people whoaren't making content, you know
, they're just sending memessages that they had their own
dreams about like an accident.
They had a dream about a planecrash but of course they didn't
post about it.

(45:47):
They were just like I had adream about it a week ago.
So there was a convergenceamong all types of intuitives
that these accidents wouldhappen and again I believe it's
reflected in the astrology.
But psychics were also seeingit.
And again, go back to my substack videos Well, the videos
for the subscribers from back inNovember.

(46:09):
It's like I was talking about it, harping on it.
I was like, is there somethinggoing on with Air Force One?
Is there something going onwith, like a plane crash?
It kept recurring in my mindand I kept seeing JFK references
at the time.
I still am, actually and I waslike you know what is this Like?

(46:30):
What kind of high profileaccident are we witnessing here?
And uh, I think it was like twodays before the American
airlines crash.
I was on my way to the gym, um,in San Diego County.
I was kind of waiting out thiswhole situation in LA and I was.
So I was driving anyways to thegym that morning and there was
a car accident that happened,like two cars behind me, as
traffic just came to a halt andthe cars, like you know, weaved

(46:53):
around me actually and had tostall just in front of me to
Aquarius.
Today this was January 27th,yeah, and so that was already
enough evidence to be like well,mercury Pluto, this is
dangerous.
And I drove back to LA the nightof January 28th, a day before

(47:15):
the plane crash, and the wholedrive up from San Diego to LA I
was like really nervous, like Iwas almost like starting to
panic just driving up therebecause I kept thinking about
Mercury conjunct Pluto andAquarius.
I was like and the reason I washonestly like starting to panic
, just driving up there becauseI kept thinking about Mercury
conjunct Pluto and Aquarius, Iwas like, and the reason I was
honestly kind of panicked isbecause it was on my north node.
So I was like this would be atransit, honestly, where
something like that would happenfor me.

(47:35):
Luckily, I was fine, but it wasjust living in my nervous
system.
I was like I feel like there'sjust going to be something big
with an accident.
But you know, of course, didn'tpost about that thought at the
time.
But you know, again, the lastthree months it's just been
swirling in my head and I'vebeen speaking about it in

(47:56):
various terms Like hey guys,airline industry is pretty
challenged, talked about how in2025 even there could be like a
huge investigation into Boeing,like there's so many different
ways to slice this.
But you know, I think we shouldjust also give credit to
astrology as a practice right,like as a field of knowledge,

(48:20):
like not even to astrologers,like not here to pat myself on
the back or anyone else's Likeit almost feels like every other
astrologer was predicting that,like, late January would be
something airplane related, likeit's more so a testament to the
accuracy of astrology right,just as a as a as a field of of

(48:42):
study.
You know, astrology is reliable.
I think, like, how else wouldso many astrologers call out the
same events?
You know, obviously this was atragedy, this is a tragedy, and
you know we can't diminish that,but I don't think there's
anything wrong with you know.

(49:02):
Going back to okay, these werethe predictions, these are the
predictions.
These predictions converged.
A bunch of astrologers saidthis you know, we can, you know,
highlight that as a reason tohopefully elevate astrology's
credibility.
You know, in government, in, youknow, crafting government

(49:23):
policy and so on, like you know,I was, uh, polling my Instagram
followers the other day, beinglike, should I just apply for a
press pass?
I mean, you know, I would loveto cover the news from this
astrological angle.
I mean, I have a sub stack, youknow, basically have, um, my
own sort of like news channel.
So it's like, why not?
You know, and people were like,oh well, you know, the

(49:45):
administration's gonna, we'regoing to go after you for that
or they're gonna, you know, um,you're just going to have, you
know, this sort of likespotlight on you in a bad way.
But I was like, you know, Ifeel like, even if like I mean,
even if people in governmentalready have astrologers it's
like let's make this moremainstream, let's again bring

(50:07):
back the credibility of it, andI think that it can be used to
inform policy.
I mean, I'm going to go thatfar with it.
I mean Mercury conjunct Plutoand Aquarius, you know, for a
week, like let's rewind the tape.
You know, if you have the rightastrologers in the room, enough
astrologers in the room to justbounce ideas off each other it
doesn't have to be oneastrologer, right.

(50:28):
Like, let's say, you have 10 ofthe top minds in astrology and
you know psychic mediumship,we're all coming together and
it's like, okay, I think this, Ithink that, okay, oh, let's
pinpoint it, let's triangulate.
Okay, I think it's happeninghere.
Even this example you seeMercury conjunct Pluto in
Aquarius, while Uranus isstationing direct.

(50:49):
Okay, well, let's increase thestaffing at the air traffic
control centers during this week.
Like simple solution rightthere, so it can save lives.
It's not an exaggeration to saythat astrology can save lives.
And if you're a skeptic watchingthis.
Of course, you're going tolaugh at this, but you know
there's um, so many astrologers,uh, who have made accurate

(51:12):
predictions, uh, over thethousands of years, uh to to
corroborate this claim.
So, um, so, anyways, uh, youknow, I'm sure there's many of
you who are new to this podcastDefinitely consider subscribing,
giving it a rating.
If you're watching on YouTube,you've already, hopefully, seen

(51:32):
some of these episodes, but I'mbringing back the visual version
for this episode because Iwanted to get this message out
to as many people as possible ina way that's not abridged or
clickbaity, in a way that's not,um, you know, abridged or click
baity, because, you know, I waslike thinking to myself should
I just do like a short formvideo, uh, to explain all of
this?
And I, and I realized it's waytoo nuanced for that right Like

(51:55):
way way too nuanced.
And, um, I do also have shortform videos that were a talk
about this for people who wantto access that, but I don't give
off or I don't give out likethe specific dates, like I do in
this podcast, like on the shortform videos, because I think
that could be taken out ofcontext and, you know, easily

(52:17):
couched as like, oh, evan isjust telling everybody to stop
flying until February 14th, likethat's not what I'm saying
today.
So I want to reiterate that.
You know, and even I'm flyingat the end of February, so, um,
I'm choosing to um, you know,again, I am choosing to take a
risk.
I mean, I do think it's takinga risk, but it's like okay, I'm
not going to miss my friend, myfriend's bachelor party for that

(52:39):
, you know.
So, um.
So, again, you know, exerciseyour own intuition, use common
sense.
Like don't, um, stop everythingyou're doing.
Um, but remember the dates Imentioned.
Work with that information, howyou will.
And I guess, the last thing I'llsay and I almost forgot to say
this, this is actually reallyimportant but the two things

(53:00):
I'll say you know, pluto is inAquarius for 19 years, 20 until
2044.
Does that mean that there's arisk of an accident for 19 years
?
No, what it means is that,again, its final ingress into
Aquarius was that catalyst andwas the harbinger of these
tragic events which we justwitnessed.

(53:21):
Just like Pluto's ingress intoCapricorn did coincide with the
Great Recession, but it doesn'tmean that we had a recession for
the whole 15, 16 years thatPluto was in Capricorn, right.
Oftentimes Pluto going into asign represents this catalyst.
Now it sometimes is not, likePluto went into Sag in the

(53:42):
mid-90s, but 9-11 happened whenPluto was opposing Saturn, so in
alignment with Antares andAldebaran, which is a whole
different episode.
But I do believe that there'sreason for hope that, okay,
these were tragic events, butPluto and Aquarius also in

(54:03):
previous Pluto and Aquariuscycles aligns with, like, all
types of new technologies beingreleased.
Oftentimes it's weaponstechnology, but I think in this
case we will witness a lot ofnew innovations in flight and
flying and flying technologythat is really a reaction to
these tragedies.
So, like in the next 19 years,you're going to be able to take

(54:24):
flights with zero turbulence,for example, you're going to be
able to take flights where youknow basically there is
hopefully zero essentially zerorisk of an accident because of
whatever technologicalsafeguards that are put in place
.
There will be the capabilitiesto fly even higher and faster
and get to a place quicker withless risk all at the same time.

(54:45):
So I don't want you to.
So I just wanted to clarifythat, because it's not that you
are at risk of getting into aplane crash the whole time that
Pluto's in Aquarius.
But a third thing I want tomention.
Uh, second things right.
I have three things I want tomention to close out this
episode.
While Mars is squaring Chironand Mars is in Cancer, the moon,

(55:13):
the transiting moon, naturallybecomes the dispositor of that
Mars in Cancer because Mars isin a moon-ruled sign or the
moon-ruled sign.
So if you're like really reallywanting to be nitpicky about
the times when it's the highestrisk to fly while Mars is
retrograding, cancer and thenstill squaring Chiron through

(55:36):
April 17th, I think it'sgenerally safer to fly when the
moon is not in the sign ofAquarius, because if you go back
to the American Airlines crashof January 29th, the moon was in
Aquarius, the sign again offlight and aviation.

(55:57):
Dispositing Mars retrograde incancer, with Mars being
explosion and fire, swearingChiron, which is again can be
wounds, cancer, with Mars beingexplosion and fire, squaring
Chiron, which is again can bewounds.
So I would argue that everytime again, only while Mars is
in cancer, squaring Chiron,anytime the moon is in the sign
of Aquarius, if I'm being realwith you, there is a slightly

(56:18):
higher risk.
I'm not saying it's such amassive risk that you should
again all sort of plan yourflights around it if you already
have a flight booked.
But that's some deeper levelastrology that I think is
important to mention.

(56:39):
And the third and final thing inthis subsection, I guess, to
close it out, is that Uranus isleaving Taurus, meaning this
year in July, meaning it willnot be technically squaring the
US moon at that point, but abouta year from now it will station
direct again at 27 degrees ofTaurus, which, yes, is an
impartial square to the US moon,which, yes, does conjure these

(57:04):
themes again.
So, early February of 2026,maybe around that time you do
want to be cautious about flying, not to say you shouldn't fly,
but be again cognizant of thattransit.
So, and I haven't, I guess, Imean I might as well like look

(57:25):
into Aquarius season next yearwhile I'm at it, because it will
station direct again duringaquarius season of 2026.
So I mean, well, you know,aquarius season next year
honestly looks even moredangerous as I'm looking at this
, because we have mars and plutoand mercury and and the sun and
Venus all bundled up together,technically all in a conjunction

(57:48):
next January.
Wow, I really don't like that.
And then, uh, uranus stationsdirect, I think, in early
February of 2026.
Yeah, stations direct February3rd, it looks like, uh, you know
, right after a Leo full moon,mars conjunct Pluto.
Still, yeah, I mean, nextAquarius season is another risky

(58:11):
time, now that I think about it, with the lunar nodes at nine
degrees of the mutable signs,which always recalls Antares and
Aldebaran, which I talked aboutjust now with 2001.
So, yeah, I mean I'm not a fanof next Aquarius season either
for flying, but that's not tosay again that safeguards can't

(58:34):
be implemented ahead of timethat mitigate that risk
significantly.
So, yeah, I know I covered a lotof detail today.
Some of it was meandering, itwasn't all in perfect sequence,
but hopefully it was stilldigestible and helpful.
And, you know, probably, to behonest, it probably did cause
some anxiety, but I was hopingdefinitely to minimize that and

(58:56):
I still am trying to minimizethat, because my goal of doing
shows like this is not to againgenerate clicks or scare you or
make you think that you know youhave to be watching the
astrology transits every hour tofigure out your flight schedule
.
This is generally just in thespirit of service to the public

(59:20):
and that's why this is free.
So, if you stuck around, thankyou, I do appreciate you.
It's really late at night here,by the way, so that's why I
talked really slow during thisepisode.
So, if you want to play, ifyou're on YouTube, you hopefully
figured that out that you canjust play it at 1.5 speed or
something.
But, either way, I doappreciate you sticking around

(59:42):
and, again, definitely subscribeto the podcast or whatever that
means, follow it, rate it, uh,share it and, uh, you know,
stick around for the nextepisode next week and, um, again
, you know, consider subscribingto my sub stack, though, cause
that's where I do offer a lot ofpredictions way ahead of time,
uh, like in this case.