August 4, 2025 • 46 mins
Black bears are a native animal to the state of Mississippi. In fact, back in the 1800s all the way to the early 1900s, Mississippi was a sought out destination for black bear hunting. However, due to multiple factors, they were almost pushed to extirpation. In this episode, we are going to learn through hands on experience and a discussion with Mississippi black bear program leader, Anthony Ballard, the conservation history of this particular charismatic megafauna, and dive into why their natural population rebound is stirring up so much controversy among Mississippi residents.
Connect with Lake Pickle and MeatEater
Lake Pickle on Instagram
MeatEater on Instagram, Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, and YouTube Clips
MeatEater Podcast Network on YouTube
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:02):
Welcome to Backwoods University, a place where we focus on wildlife,
wild places and the people who dedicate their lives to
conserving both. I'm your host, Lake Pickle. In this episode,
we're going to dive deep into the conservation history of
Mississippi's once celebrated but now controversial native species, the American
(00:23):
black bear. We're going to start this episode off by
going back and forth between two historical accounts from the
same state of Mississippi, separated by nothing but time. The
(00:47):
first being clips from local Mississippi news networks, dates ranging
from ten years ago to just this past June. The
second being excerpt from a book titled The Bear Hunter
by James T. McCafferty, which looks into the culture of
bear hunting in Mississippi from the eighteen hundreds to the
early nineteen hundreds. As we flip back and forth between
(01:08):
these two sources, I want you to pay attention to
the heavy contrast between then and now. Keep in mind
both are talking about the same state, but it sounds
like two different worlds. We'll kick off first with recent
clips from local Mississippi news networks.
Speaker 2 (01:28):
It's the biggest story on WAPT dot com justin Morgan
got a traio camera photo of a black bear roaming
in Mississippi. Is this first time you've found one at
Sumpson County?
Speaker 1 (01:43):
I think there have been a couple farther south, but
I don't recall one that far north. Excerpts from the
book The Bear Hunter by James T.
Speaker 3 (01:51):
McCafferty.
Speaker 4 (01:52):
In the nineteenth century, at least among America's sportsmen, the
Mississippi Delta was celebrated as a bear hunters mecca. Hunters
of means and often those without, flocked to Mississippi to
hunt the Delta's black bears.
Speaker 2 (02:05):
This is remarkable, all right. Action News five's Garner Montgomery
joined the Sliven Studio now with an exclusive video he.
Speaker 4 (02:11):
Shot of a black bear in the Soto County gardener.
Speaker 5 (02:15):
That's right, Joe, Enjoy. This is a real treat to
see the first black bear sighting into Soto County in
at least ten years.
Speaker 4 (02:22):
The Delta woods were full of bears in pioneer times.
One account from a man named George F. Maynard born
in eighteen fifty three, states so ubiquitous was the bear
in Cohoma County of his youth that when farmers failed,
oaks to make room for crops, soal bears and their
cubs would appear almost immediately to devour tender twigs of
the fallen monarchs. It was almost impossible to make a
(02:44):
corn crop in some parts of the county on account
of the depredations of that famous animal. People would go
out in the corn patch early in the morning and
kill a bear before breakfast.
Speaker 5 (02:54):
Black bears are considered an endangered species and the state
of Mississippi. They're mostly spotted in the southern Alta, but
there have only been a handful of bear sidings here
in northwest Mississippi in the past ten years.
Speaker 1 (03:05):
There were old bear hunters who never had a pound
of bacon in the house. They would kill a bear
and cure it like bacon, and make and save the
oil by the barrel, which was fine for cooking purposes.
They are tales of a famed bear hunter named Fincher Bobo,
who once killed six bears in a single day. From
plantation slave to English noblemen, from backwood squatter to American president,
(03:26):
and every station in between.
Speaker 4 (03:28):
They hunted bears in the Mississippi Delta.
Speaker 1 (03:32):
Two different accounts, two different time periods, but they're speaking
of the same place in the book, it sounds like
they're swimming in bears, while on the news report, a
black bear siding might as well fall in line with
the sasquatch or ufo claim. So the question we have
to answer is what happened to the black bears in Mississippi.
Luckily for us, it's very well documented. Historically, black bears
(03:57):
were abundant throughout Mississippi along with the rest to the southeast.
This fact was made obvious by the quotes from the
book along with several other publications. There were thousands of
them just in Mississippi alone by the early nineteen hundreds.
Throwback to the last episode about Miss Fanny Cook, we
know how much wildlife destruction was going on then There
was an estimate of less than twelve not twelve hundred
(04:20):
twelve in the entire state. This almost complete extirpation came
as a result of severe over harvest from the fur trade, market, hunting,
sport hunting, illegal take, and land use changes that resulted
in habitat degradation and loss. As a result of this,
the state of Mississippi closed bear hunting in nineteen thirty two.
(04:42):
Y'all may recognize this as the same year that the
Game and Fish Commission was established, Protecting bears from being
wiped out sat high on the priority list, along with
white tailed deer and the wild turkeys. That was nineteen
thirty two. Ninety three years have passed since then. Where
(05:05):
are we at with Mississippi black bears now? I think
it's time we find out. It's now June of twenty
twenty five, and the sound that you're hearing is me
riding in a side by side with the Mississippi Black
Bear Program leader Anthony Ballard. We're in Clavern County, Mississippi,
(05:26):
and we're headed to Dart a bear with a tranquilizer
that Anthony has caught in one of his traps. Anthony
believes this could be one of the biggest bears he's
ever caught. I think their only option.
Speaker 2 (05:41):
I don't.
Speaker 4 (05:43):
Where's the bear?
Speaker 2 (05:44):
I mean, are we close to us?
Speaker 3 (05:45):
Yeah, we're probably one hundred and fifty yards oh ocurring
that he's not.
Speaker 4 (05:49):
At the end of this stood bark, gotcha, gotcha.
Speaker 1 (05:52):
What you're hearing now is Anthony loading the dark gun
and explaining to the Mississippi Department of Wildlife, Fisheries and
Parks intern how to chart thes. Once we get the
bear sedated and out of the trap, we then set
off walking down the long lane food plot that ran
the top of a ridge to the bear trap situated
at the end of it. The goal is for everyone
(06:13):
to move slow and quiet. Anthony wants the bear as
calm as possible for the ease of getting a tranquilizer
duard into him. The trap is shaped like a cylinder
imagine a large barrel laid over on its side. It
has a door on one end through which Anthony put
bait to lower the bear inside the trap. Anthony can
monitor all of this live through the surveillance of a
(06:34):
cellular camera. Once the bear is inside, Anthony can drop
the trap door electronically. This bear had entered the trap
just the night before, so by the time we got there,
he had only been there for a matter of hours.
You won't man heard a swing around the doorside. Yeah, okay,
it carefully kind of drops off over there before before
very far as we approach the trap, it's always a
(06:57):
little unnerving. I mean, there is a wild bear there
after all. The plan is for me to swing to
the back end of the trap while Anthony goes to
the front. If the bear is in a favorable position,
Anthony will go ahead and shoot him with a tranquilizer dark.
If not, he'll signal to me and I'll begin tapping
on the back of the trap to make noise. Enticing
the bear to move. Anthony leans over. The bear is
(07:20):
asleep and not in a favorable darting position, so he
gives me the signal, and I know it's time to
make some noise. Judging off that sound, I think the
bear's awake. Yep, that's an awake bear. That bear cannot
be any more awake than he is right now. The
(07:40):
problem is he's still not in a position for a
good shot. So Anthony adjust and I continue to make
noise to try and make the bear move around more.
Speaker 2 (07:52):
His heads.
Speaker 4 (07:52):
This way, this is a.
Speaker 1 (07:54):
Game of inches. Anthony can't just wing a dart in
there and hope for the best. It has to be precise,
and we need the bear to turn just a little
bit more. Almost there, and there's the shot, got him.
The dart is in and now we wait for it
to take effect, which normally takes a few minutes. After
(08:15):
we are sertain the bear is unconscious, we open the
trap and begin to unload it.
Speaker 3 (08:20):
We're just gonna lift and pull back toward that tree,
say when when.
Speaker 2 (08:27):
His head.
Speaker 5 (08:29):
Come on?
Speaker 3 (08:30):
Man, come on, man, all right.
Speaker 1 (08:33):
We found out later that this bear weighed four hundred
and twelve pounds.
Speaker 3 (08:37):
All right, let's drive me.
Speaker 1 (08:43):
Four and twelve pounds. So, as you could imagine, it
was no easy task getting him out of the trap.
Speaker 4 (08:50):
Alright, knock, Holy smokes, Anthony.
Speaker 1 (08:57):
The rest of the time that we had the bear
sedated was somewhere around thirty minutes. In that time, we
got his body weight, a hair sample for genetics, a
blood sample to test for certain diseases and hormone levels,
and a tooth extraction for age. This is vital information
for the black bear program. When everything was collected, Anthony
injected the bear with a reversal drug. We then walked
(09:18):
up the hill where we could watch from a safe distance,
and in about ten minutes or so, the bear woke
up and bounded off back into the woods. To say
this whole thing was a cool experience would be quite
the understatement. The opportunity to get to do hands on
conservation with such a cool and historic species just doesn't
come around all that often, and the Mississippi black bear
(09:39):
program is doing some really cool and important work, which
I think it's time we all learned about. After this
eventful bear work up with Anthony, I sat down with
him for an interview so that we all can get
a deeper understanding of the Mississippi black bear, the program,
as well as the status, future and contra reversy surrounding
(10:01):
this native animal.
Speaker 4 (10:04):
How long has Mississippi had a black bear program.
Speaker 3 (10:08):
The early work was done by the Museum of Natural Science.
And when I say early, we're talking about you know,
mid to late nineties.
Speaker 4 (10:15):
Okay, so nineties, so post Fanny Cook times.
Speaker 3 (10:19):
Yes, yes, very much so. And that's just because there
weren't really that many bears in Mississippi.
Speaker 4 (10:24):
There's like twelve.
Speaker 3 (10:25):
Yeah, you had an occasional sighting here and there, you
had an occasional roadkill. I mean, we've got records of
mortalities all the way back to the seventies. The need
for an actual program and for wildlife and Fisheries to
take that over came in two thousand and two.
Speaker 4 (10:39):
And what was the reason for that.
Speaker 3 (10:41):
In the early two thousands, you had a lot more
emphasis on looking at those populations, the subpopulations, particularly in
Arkansas and Louisiana, you know, habitat connectivity, looking at interbreeding
between different populations to kind of bolster genetic diversity. As
a result of that, a lot more dispersal into Mississippi.
(11:02):
And so there's there's some connections there of you know,
that original you can say, kind of apparent, you know, population,
and then those that kind of infant population moving into
the delta. More and more soles that were you know,
started to breed and reproducing there and then kind of
grow from there.
Speaker 1 (11:20):
So the black bear program was originally formed by the
Mississippi Museum of Natural Science, but it was handed off
to the Department of Wildlife out of necessity in two
thousand and two due to a noticeable increase in bears.
This can be attributed to dispersal of bears coming into
Mississippi from Arkansas Louisiana, as well as slow but natural
growth from the small resident population that was able to
(11:42):
do so because of the protections they were provided. In
nineteen thirty two and just a small personal request here,
nobody mentioned to clear breath that Arkansas bears were helping
out Mississippi bears. Okay, I mean they just talk enough
trash as it is.
Speaker 4 (11:56):
Let me ask this because I want to.
Speaker 1 (11:58):
I want to clarify this early to talking about bears
moving in from Arkansas and Louisiana. Like, I understand that
the let's say that the population of just Mississippi, the
black bear population of Mississippi. I understand that we wiped
it out to really really low numbers, but we never
fully wiped it out, right, that's correct, right.
Speaker 3 (12:17):
Yeah, So extinction is a species that just goes completely.
Speaker 2 (12:24):
It's gone.
Speaker 3 (12:24):
Right, everybody understands that extirpation is gone from a particular
region or area of state. We were near extirpation in Mississippi.
The lowest estimation was twelve bears in the state that's
functionally extirpated. That's essentially none. That's wild.
Speaker 2 (12:40):
Yeah.
Speaker 3 (12:40):
You know, people wonder why we don't have as many
bears as places like Louisiana or Arkansas. What's for two reasons.
Number One, we Arkansas and Louisiana never got quite that
low in their population estimates, and they also actively brought
bears from up north to bolster those populations. Mississippi never
actually did so.
Speaker 1 (13:00):
Louisian in Arkansas have had bears reintroduced, Yes to some degree, Yes,
they had bears reintroduced, and then they also moved bears,
you know, within those two states between subpopulations to kind
of even out those genetics and kind of foster those
numbers and facilitate that connectivity.
Speaker 3 (13:17):
Mississippi took a more passive approach. There was one attempted restocking,
I guess you could say, in nineteen thirty four. It
was unsuccessful. It was a I think three pairs, so
a total of six bears that were brought here for
whatever reason that was not successful. So all of the
bears that we have here in Mississippi are either dispersed
(13:40):
from higher density populations in Arkansas and Louisiana or they
were born here. There were never there were no bears
that were actually brought here to Mississippi.
Speaker 1 (13:49):
I do think it's prudent, though I have to speculate
a little bit here, but I do think that it
is important that it was tried to.
Speaker 4 (13:57):
Be reintroduced in nineteen thirty four. I mean, we know
because of.
Speaker 1 (14:02):
The last episode that Fanny Cook established the Game Commission
in nineteen thirty two, and one of the first things
they started doing there were several like restocking efforts of
native game animals, animals that they wanted to make.
Speaker 4 (14:14):
Sure were kept around.
Speaker 1 (14:16):
So immediately upon the establishment of that Game Commission, they
started restocking efforts of deer, They started it on turkeys,
they started it on quail, and so it's important to
know that they tried, and the general public that supported
the establishment of that commission, which is now in DWFP.
(14:37):
I think it's important to note that they did try
to restock them all right Backwoods University enrollees. If there
was going to be an exam at the end of
this episode, which there's not, but if there was, one
of the main takeaways would be this right here. So
lean in black bears were not, I repeat, were not
reintroduced to Mississippi. In the reilm of controversies surrounding this species,
(15:00):
which we're going to dive into in more detail later,
the misconception that black bears were wiped out completely and
then physically brought back in and reintroduced comes up all
the time, and it just isn't the case. They have
always been here. But I think it is extremely important
that we realized that it was attempted one time to
(15:20):
restock them in nineteen thirty four. Here's why. Take a
look at the list of animals of which restocking efforts
were made. White tailed deer high community value, wild turkeys
high community value, bob white quail high community value, Black
bears high community value at that time. Remember what the
stated reasons were for black bears almost being wiped out
(15:41):
in the first place, fur trade, market, hunting, sport, hunting,
habitat loss. Think back to quotes from the book and
tales of people traveling to Mississippi just to hunt bears.
I'm not sitting here claiming that black bears were this
perfect species that never caused a single problem. They did
as well as many other wildlife species, but they were unarguable,
he sought after and valued as a game animal.
Speaker 3 (16:03):
Of that, I have no doubt. You know, we were
talking earlier about the mindset of people moving through history.
You know, it's really easy to play money morning quarterback
and say, well, these people had the wrong idea about this,
(16:24):
or they you know, they completely disregarded this aspect of
conservation or whatever the case is. And like you said,
I think it's important to kind of put yourself in
that situation and maybe understand that you know, they weren't
working with Google. You know, they weren't working with major
universities that could do big time research. They weren't working
with a huge budget, and they were doing what they
(16:45):
could with what they had at the time. And I
think the important part is they had the right idea,
you know, and they may not have done everything exactly right,
but it was really a paradigm shift between a mentality
of kill everything, it doesn't matter, they'll replenish somehow, just
live for the day and take what you want, versus hey,
(17:06):
maybe we need to build some longevity into this and
some structure and some regulations to where we can preserve
the future. I think that's the biggest takeaway from that,
And there's.
Speaker 1 (17:15):
A common thread in that no like talking about like
you could go all the way back to the bison
episode when Jeremy was explaining to me, he said, a
lot of some of the follies in the market hunting
with bison is they were misunderstood and people thought they
were a migratory animal. So a lot of the market
hunters at the time would think, Hey, we can kill
(17:36):
every single one of these buffalo. The next herd's going
to migrate through so it was like a functional misunderstanding
the ecology, and that trickled down all the way to
the early nineteen hundreds with so many of the game animals.
The difference is that things like whitetail and turkey's got
a chance to rebound, whereas black bear's. It was just
(17:56):
a little bit of a different story, different timeline.
Speaker 3 (17:58):
Yeah, and I think it was a different timeline for
reasons may have had to do with management, but also
you got to think about the reproductive potential of black
bears versus something like deer a turkey. You know, if
you've got a good habitat and you've got good nutrition,
can that has a high caring capacity, you can make
a lot of turkey or a lot of deer in
a pretty short amount of time. Black bears don't breed
(18:21):
until three to five years of age. They're only going
to have two or three and the survival of those
cubs are you know, fifty to seventy percent. The timeline
in the pattern is just not comparable to something like
white tail deer, and it's just not as fast as
like you said, it's just on a different timeline.
Speaker 1 (18:38):
Anthony just gave us one of the most important pieces
of information regarding the trajectory and current status of the
Mississippi black bear population. We already knew that all these
species were almost wiped out in the early nineteen hundreds,
but what I didn't know was the different dynamics around
each of their ability to rebound. Thankfully, white tailed deer
and wild turkeys can reproduce relatively quickly, especially when compared
(18:59):
to the reproductive timeline of a black bear. I mean,
think about it. Many white tailed does begin reproducing at
a year old, in some instances even earlier than that,
and they typically breed every year, while turkey hens usually
start breeding around a year old and they can usually
nest every year after that. A black bear, however, does
it start breeding until the age three or sometimes five,
(19:20):
and may only have two to three cups. The timeline
is vastly different, which makes for an unavoidable longer time
of population recovery. This explains why, when all these species
were pushed to the brink around the same time, black
bears are seemingly the last in line on their way
to recovery.
Speaker 4 (19:38):
What is the overall function of the black bear program?
Speaker 1 (19:42):
Has the function stayed the same from its start with
the game and fish in two thousand and two to now,
or has it changed a little bit, has there been
stuff added to it?
Speaker 3 (19:51):
I would say it's always changing. Management is never the same, right,
you know, the outcomes are different, the goals are different
as different species fluctuate and there's different management needs. And
it's been the same with the bear program. You know,
early on it was a lot about you know, compiling
as much data as we could, as many observations as
we could, and really trying to just figure out what
(20:13):
was going on right with those early populations. And then
as that grew, you know, you're still looking at research,
You're still looking at these those same type parameters, but
you're looking at it on a larger scale because you
have more and more area to look at bears in.
And then eventually what's going to happen is you go
from a preservationist type of approach where harvest is completely banned.
(20:36):
You're focusing on allowing that animal to come back to
healthy numbers, and eventually the day is going to come
where we institute harvest again because we say, okay, you know,
the federal protections of black bears were removed in twenty
sixteen in Mississippi. At some day, there's going to come
a day where we say the state protections are removed
and we're now going to implement a hunting season. And
(20:59):
you know, people kind of say, all right, well, you're
just wanting this species to come back so that we
can have a hunting season, And it's really kind of
the opposite of that. You know, we're having a hunting
season because the population is healthy enough now to sustain it.
Speaker 1 (21:12):
Big important key takeaway number two, y'all ready, the end
goal of protecting black bears from nineteen thirty two up
until now is to restore them to a sustainable population.
And can any of y'all guess what is synonymous with
a sustainable population, A huntable population, a hunting season, a
return to allowing black bears to be used as a
(21:34):
natural and renewable resource, a return to what they were
sought after and valued for back in their earlier years
of abundance. And although it is taking a significantly longer
time to get there than it did several other of
our game species, they are following the same trajectory as
several other widely celebrated wildlife conservation wins. And when the
(21:54):
day comes that we reached this milestone with the black
Bears of Mississippi. In my opinion, it should be so
librated the same. You do hear a lot of like, oh,
the agency's doing this just so they can make another
tag and it'll make more money, or you know, and
it's you get like the kind of the sense that
they're they're almost putting it like his government overreach, and
(22:14):
you're some people kind of come right out and say, like,
we should be able to do what we want kind
of thing. And the reason that we don't go and
just do what we want is it didn't work last week.
Speaker 3 (22:26):
We tried that.
Speaker 1 (22:27):
Yeah, like exactly, people did what they want and that's
why we started. If we kept on doing what we wanted,
you wouldn't have any deer to be worried.
Speaker 4 (22:34):
About, right, Like that's just the truth. Yeah.
Speaker 1 (22:38):
Would you say the main goal now of the black
Bear program is to one day be able to facilitate
a hunting season. Is that the main goal or is
there like other priority of goals.
Speaker 3 (22:49):
I would say there's two main goals. The first main
goal is to have a good solid research foundation to
make management decisions, because unless you know how many bears
you have. Unless you know how fast your population is growing,
and you can answer those questions, you can't make informed
(23:09):
management decisions about a hunting season. So, you know, the
question always gets asked, how many bears do we have?
And what people want is for me to spit out
an answer we have this between this many and this
many bears. What we're trying to do right now in
the research that we're doing with Mississippi State University, basically
they're building two different models based on the data that
we've collected either here recently or historically throughout the program's history,
(23:34):
and they're building a density estimate. So once you can
identify enough individuals genetically, you can say, all right, you
probably have this many individuals in this particular area. All right,
So you can extrapolate and say you probably have this
type of vocumency in this larger area, and eventually you
get to a point where it's representative of an entire
portion of the state or even the whole state.
Speaker 4 (23:55):
All right.
Speaker 3 (23:56):
The second piece of that puzzle, it's called your population
projection model. What that is going to do is we
take all of the historical data that we've ever had,
every mortality we've had all the life spans that we
know of what our immigration immigration from different states is,
how many offspring that bears had, how old were they
when they first had offspring. All of these different things
(24:19):
go into that model to tell you, Okay, here's how
many bears you have. Now, now what is your projected population?
Based on these parameters, what might be your population two, five, ten,
fifteen years from now. At that point you get basically
a growth curve, right, So then you can start adding
in as a factor something like harvest. Okay, if we
(24:40):
harrest this many bears, and if we harvest this many females,
this many males, how is our population going to react.
That's when you can start sectioning off different parts of
the state, and that's when you can start setting regulations.
That's how those recommendations are come about. And so as
much as I wish it was just as simple as
counting bears and spending out a number, there's a lot
(25:01):
more that goes into it that you know, we have
to make that informed decision, and we're trying to make
that based on the absolute most homework we can have
done so that we can we can get it right.
Because you know, you only get one shot at that,
and you got to get it right.
Speaker 1 (25:18):
Anthony told me that the question of how many bears
are there in Mississippi sits high atop the list of
questions he gets commonly asked, And if you couldn't tell
from his response, it's something that they are not taking lightly.
There's a hefty amount of work and research going into it,
and hopefully it's something that they will have a number
for before the end of this year. A plan to
(25:38):
follow up with Anthony as soon as that number is ready,
so stay tuned for that. I want to ask him
how we use this information and how does it play
into making management decisions and setting hunting seasons.
Speaker 3 (25:50):
Most likely what happens is, you know, you'll have different
bear management zones, units, whatever you'd want to call them,
and then set harvest regulations on each one of them
according to what your data says.
Speaker 4 (26:01):
That last bear work up you and I did, and
you go in there, you dart him, you knock him out,
took a tooth extraction, you took a blood sample, you
took a hair sample, took a body weight, Like what
do you what is all that data for?
Speaker 2 (26:13):
Like?
Speaker 4 (26:13):
What are you trying to gain from all that the hairs.
Speaker 3 (26:15):
For genetics, you can get a lot from genetics, but
at the very minimum, you can identify that individual because
you can say that in this particular case M. Thirty three,
he was first caught as a you know, X year
old in twenty twenty three, he's now a y year
old in twenty twenty five, and we can say that
(26:35):
he at least lived from twenty twenty three to twenty five.
The tooth that we pull, we send that off to
a lab. I send all the teeth off once a
year and they do what it's called cementum annualize, so
they'll take a small sliver of that, they'll stay in it,
look at it under microscope, and they can count those
cementum annuli rings like rings on a tree. Because you
have basically a growing in a dormant stage in bears,
(26:57):
that's pretty pronounced, and so in the model it's more
valuable to say that you have a ten year old
versus you have an adult. The blood sample, really it's
just a catalog for me. We spend those down and
freeze them, and then if we have a let's say
a project that comes up in another year or two
where we say, we want to look at hormone levels
in certain individuals, or we want to look at this
(27:20):
particular you know, tighter for a disease that may have
been president in the population. Now we have you know,
fifty samples to look through, versus starting from zero and
trying to pull blood on bears as we go, gotcha,
And so some of it is more for catalog purposes,
and then some of it is for stuff that we're
actively using. But a workup's work up, and we always
(27:41):
usually pull those things as we go to you know,
to make sure we have them, and it takes you know,
an extra five or ten minutes to get that stuff,
and it really does go a long way in looking
at that data in the long term.
Speaker 1 (27:54):
So think about the end the field bear workup that
you heard taking place towards the beginning of this episode.
If you remember, I said that it yields vital information
for the bear program. And now we understand why all
of this data adds into the model that will help
determine population size, population growth, and helps us make management
(28:15):
decisions like determining when a hunting season can be reopened.
The nuts and bolts of conservation. Pretty cool, right, somewhere
in recent years there's been like a significant uptick in
bears just here in Mississippi, And I don't know what
to attribute that to, like more spillover from Louisiana, more
spill over from Arkansas. Is that even happening or am
(28:38):
I just like it?
Speaker 2 (28:40):
Was?
Speaker 4 (28:40):
There any truth to that?
Speaker 3 (28:41):
Well, in your population, you're going to have basically an
inflection point in that growth curve, so you have you know,
if you have very small numbers, you're gonna have very
small growth rates, and then at a certain saturation, that
curve is gonna is gonna steep, gonna get a lot steeper,
and start to go up at an increasing rate. So
you can start increasing at an increasing rate. So it's
(29:02):
hard to tell exactly where we are on that growth rate,
And again that's kind of why we're doing this research
to see. I think it's been kind of a convergence
of factors because you do have more bears on the landscape,
you have more sightings, but you also have a growing
public awareness of bears in Mississippi. I think a lot
(29:23):
of that can be attributed to social media, a lot
of it can be attributed to security and game cameras,
just being so readily accessible. There's eyes everywhere. Everybody has
a ring doorbell, everybody has cell cameras that are sending
pictures all the time. There's more people that are leaving
out cameras year round versus just during deer season. Usually
(29:44):
they're on a feeder. And I think all of those
things together has kind of come together and made it
seem like there's just bears all over the place. When
you know, it's quite possible that five different people have
seen the same bear that's gone and visited five feeders.
It's hard to tell how much of that is actually,
you know, is real, and how much of that growth
(30:04):
is is you know, because of the population, and how
much of it is kind of artificially inflated because of
the public awareness and the visibility of bears.
Speaker 1 (30:13):
From my perspective, understanding to a degree what black bears do,
like how they function, their ecology, all that stuff. I
think it's awesome that this native animal is being able
to return to its native range here in Mississippi for
a plethora of reasons. One of them like the possibility
that there would be a hunting season on those again.
Speaker 3 (30:35):
That would be awesome, awesome.
Speaker 1 (30:36):
To be able to hunt a bear here. There's so
much history with it. Yeah, and there are some people
that feel that way. There's also a lot of people
that don't feel that way. There's been a growing amount.
Speaker 4 (30:45):
Of controversy around black bears, and I want.
Speaker 1 (30:48):
To tackle some of those topics. Yeah, here's the obvious one,
or one of the more obvious ones. Bears are dangerous.
They're gonna eat me, They're gonna eat my kids, They're gonna.
Speaker 4 (30:58):
Eat my dog. That's it's like an on going fear
that you see with bears pop up. How do you
deal with that?
Speaker 3 (31:06):
It's hard to tell people not to be afraid of things.
I found that it's better to educate people about the
animal than it is to tell them not to be
afraid of it, right, because when you really boil it
all down, people fear what they don't know. And I
think in a lot of people's minds, it is an
animal that lives somewhere else, and then when they find
(31:28):
out that it lives close to them, they start thinking
about it in a completely different way. Now it's real.
You know, you were asking about the goals of the
program earlier. Research is certainly one of the big ones,
and I think the other half of that coin is education,
you know, because the more people that we can make
understand what bears are and what they are not and
(31:48):
just a few simple things you know, to get by
with bears around, the more educated public you're going to have.
And I think the more that fear level goes down.
You know, I've taken people out on bear workups that
were absolutely scared to death or hated bears, and then
by the end of it, their mind is completely changed,
or it's at least changed to a point where they
(32:09):
appreciate what we do and the process and the animal
itself versus just being this thing that they completely don't understand.
Speaker 1 (32:19):
Anthony gave us a lot of good information there, but
the statement that's stuck with me the most, and the
one that I can't quit thinking about, is people fear
what they don't know. I also found it interesting that
he's had firsthand experience taking people out on bear workups
that initially had negative feelings toward bears, but after seeing
the animal with their own eyes and getting some actual
(32:41):
exposure to it, their opinions changed for the positive. I've
said it before on this podcast, and I'll say it again.
You can't love what you don't understand. I would encourage
any of you out there that are currently on the
negative side, maybe on the fence about black bears in
(33:01):
their conservation, to give yourself a chance to learn about
the animal before making a judgment on it. One of
the things about Mississippi that I love is that we
do have a very large and popular hunting community. Big
part of that is white tail deer hunting. One of
the things that you hear pop up around controversy of
(33:22):
a growing population of black bears is the fear that
they are going to basically decimate your deer herd.
Speaker 4 (33:29):
You hear that they're really bad.
Speaker 1 (33:30):
On fawns, they eat a lot of fawns. They're gonna, man,
if you have bears, you're not gonna have any deer.
I heard one guy say, They're like, wherever you find
a bear, you ain't gonna find a deer.
Speaker 2 (33:40):
Right.
Speaker 4 (33:41):
Where do you go with all that? Is there any
truth to that?
Speaker 3 (33:43):
The short answer is no. First, let's look at how
many states have bear populations, something like thirty nine or
forty I think most provinces in Canada. I think if
that were the case, then you would have deer populations
that were decimated else most of North America. We know
that falls are going to get eaten by predators. Okay,
(34:05):
that's a fact of life. There's a certain percentage every
year that you can expect to get eaten by predators.
Some of those predators are bobcats, coyotes, and black bears.
We know that black bearries will eat them opportunistically, right,
And there's studies that I've looked at from Virginia, from Michigan,
from even Tensaul, Louisiana that say that essentially, yes, there's
(34:29):
going to be predation. There's a certain percentage that are
going to get eaten. So let's say somewhere between twenty
and thirty percent is what you normally see survival rate.
That's the ones that actually make it to let's say
six months old. Okay, that's seventy odd percent of falls
that are getting eaten, is going to say, relatively constant
(34:49):
through time.
Speaker 4 (34:51):
Right, regardless of BlackBerry presents are not right due to predation.
Speaker 3 (34:56):
Now, what proportions are eaten by coyotes, bobcats, or black
bears may change depending on the density of those predators
on the landscape. So basically you're talking about the difference
between additive or compensatory predation. All right, So basically, let's
take Tensaw as an example. Let's say we had Tensaw
(35:16):
that had was only a two predator system, so you
only had coyotes and bobcats, and then the recovery of
the black bear happened, and over time you have a
greater and greater density of black bears. That doesn't mean
you have a greater and greater proportion of white tailed
deer falls that are getting predated. It means that those
proportions within that percentage that are getting predated upon is changing,
(35:37):
so that Faon would have gotten eaten now he's getting
eaten by a black bear, whereas without the black bear
he might have gotten even by a kyot or bobcat.
I think it's pretty reductive to say that there's one
particular predator that can cause these huge shifts when the
data just doesn't bear that out. Has it happened locally somewhere, maybe,
(35:58):
but on the grand scheme of thing on a landscape level,
it just doesn't seem to be the case. Let's take
that a step further. The Bacheler lands within the Mississippi
River all right. You have these big islands and these
big money camps where it's you know, hundreds of thousands
of dollars to buy a share, and that's some of
the most salt after deer hunting and turkey hunting in
the southeast, maybe in the country. Very well managed deer
(36:23):
herds out of this world. Genetics, great nutrition, super healthy
deer herds, right, great turkey populations, abundant turkey populations. And
most of those areas up and down the Misissippi River
are absolutely stacked with black bears. And you know, if
that were the case, and if black bears had that
(36:43):
big of a negative population on deer or turkey, that's
not what you would see in those areas.
Speaker 1 (36:49):
Is there any particular animal that on a population level
suffers from the presence of black bears that we know of?
Speaker 3 (36:57):
I mean, about ninety percent of a bear's diet, you know,
eighties and ninety percent is going to be a plant
matter of some sort.
Speaker 4 (37:03):
Really, yeah, hear me out.
Speaker 1 (37:05):
The concern of not wanting other native game populations to
suffer is a legitimate concern. However, what Anthony is telling
us here is that with bears, this is not something
to worry about not only does current research prove it,
but think about the historical record of Mississippi from earlier
prior to our own decimation of these species, Mississippi had
(37:28):
white tailed deer, wild turkeys, bob white quail, bison, and
black bears all in abundance, along with many other game
and non game species. I don't know, it's almost like
God designed it to be that way or something crazy, right,
So in like the grand scope, like if you were
to take all this stuff that people are hinging on
(37:49):
for reasons that they don't like bears for all these
different factors, or they're just some people are just scared
of them. Some of these folks not all the way
that they are talking about bears. It leads me to
ask the question, I'm like.
Speaker 4 (38:02):
What would you like us to do?
Speaker 1 (38:04):
Are you suggesting that we exterminate them? Because like some
of the folks that come up with that, it's like
that's what they actually are suggesting that we exterminate the bears,
and most of these are part of the hunting community.
My response to that is, like, name a single time
in our conservation history and our history with wildlife as
a hunting community, as a sustainable hunting community, because that's
(38:27):
what we are name a time in our history where
we have elected to wipe out a native animal.
Speaker 3 (38:32):
Humans have an, I guess an intrinsic way of looking
at wildlife as how they benefit from that species. Right, Yeah,
So we look at whitetail deer, we hold it as
a very valuable species. We look at turkey, we say
they're very valuable because we hunt turkey, we consume turkey,
we enjoy turkey. There's nothing wrong with that. We don't
(38:53):
look at armadillo's with that same value.
Speaker 1 (38:56):
Right.
Speaker 3 (38:57):
So a lot of the way that we look at
the inherent value of different vcs is based on kind
of a self serving attitude. So I think that's part
of it. And once there is an opportunity that's opened
up bears as a resource, I think a lot of
that's going to go away. One of the questions I
get a lot of times is what good do bear do?
I think what they're really saying is what do they
(39:19):
do for me? What good are they for me? And
you know, my question back to those people a lot
of times is what good is a wild turkey? What
does a wild turkey do biologically that we couldn't do without. Well,
that's blasphemy. You can't say that, you know, but you
think about it, you know. And the reason that we
value them as humans so much is because they liked
(39:40):
to hunt them and we benefit from that. They're they're pretty,
and we enjoy them. And believe me, I'm not hating
on turkey hunters, sure, but it's kind of that same principle,
and so I look at it more of a kind
of an on a historic scale, our conservation story is
based on recognizing the damages that we were doing and
then taking steps over the next years and decades, in
(40:02):
centuries even to right those wrongs and to try to
rebuild that in a in a responsible way that benefits
the animals where we have you know, good huntable, sustainable populations,
and also doesn't encroach on people, on the rights of humans.
And it's a delicate balance, you know. And it's also
(40:23):
it can be particularly delicate with bears because they do
CAUs you know, damage, and and they do get into things.
And you know, I'm not I'm not going to sit
here and say that they don't. And no bear managers
is naive enough to say that they you know, that's
not an issue, but it's it's one of those things
where I feel like it goes a lot back to education.
And you know, once you can start building those little
(40:44):
things in to make people's lives easier that do live
around bears, and once you start building those habits in,
then you can start appreciating the species on a more
greater level than what do they do for for me immediately.
And I mean, you know, there's there's all kinds of
animals that can be nuisance. You know, you got to
think about the biology of the animal.
Speaker 1 (41:04):
Right.
Speaker 3 (41:05):
Bears have a seven times better sense of smell than bloodhounds.
That's quite a sniffer, right, And they're biologically wired specifically
during certain times of the year to find food, to
find it in abundance, and it takes a lot of
food to support a three to four hundred pound animal, right.
(41:25):
So you know, you hear about nuisance bears and problem
bears and that kind of stuff, and certainly that can happen.
But let's take of a deer feeder, for instance. Regardless
of your feelings on deer feeders, we can agree that
basically what you're doing is putting out several hundred pounds
of free calories out in the middle of the woods.
Speaker 2 (41:46):
A bear is.
Speaker 3 (41:47):
Biologically wired to find large amounts of calories at one
time and try to consume that, and so, yes, it's aggravating,
and I sympathize with people that lose you know, cameras
and four wheeler seats and that kind of stuff. But
you know, bears are biologically wires to find food. They're
naturally curious, they're very strong, and they're very intelligent. They're
(42:08):
really good at getting any things. And it kind of
goes back to that. The thing I tell people sometimes is,
you know, it's not my job to make you like bears.
It's my job to make you prepared to understand the
how to live with bears. Because the more of those
little things that you can build into your daily routine,
talking about, you know, driving a truck instead of walking,
(42:29):
taking a garbage can out the day of versus the
night before, those little small changes in your daily life
that could potentially keep a bear off your property, keep
food out of a bear's mouth that would have otherwise
found it. That's when you start trying to kind of
win the battle of you know, living with bears and
(42:50):
solving those problems before they occur. Ask a farmer if
a deer can be a nuisance, you know, but but
we value deer right right, And so it's always this
balance of how do we get around those things and
how do we mitigate those conflicts while also maintaining that
whole balance that we're trying to maintain between wildlife and humans.
(43:13):
Black bears, deer, turkey are all native wildlife species. They
have cohabitated for longer than we've been here. And you know,
it's not like it's an invasive species that are being
brought in that have been brought in. They're native species,
and you know, native species find a way to create
(43:35):
an equilibrium and to survive with each other versus an
invasive species that throw that balance off.
Speaker 1 (43:43):
I truly think that with time and more access to
bears as a resource, a lot of the controversy around
this will dissipate, and the fact of the matter is
the population is growing. To wrap this up, I want
to ask Anthony how he feels to be in his
position at such a critical moment in this conservation story.
Speaker 3 (44:02):
From a historical perspective, it just doesn't get any cooler.
Man like to be a part of the teddy Roosevelt
story and the whole Collier stories and the Robert Bobos
and the historical figures through time that have shaped our
habitat and have shaped our history. And to be part
(44:26):
of the North American wildlife model and the recovery of
one of the most recognizable and charismatic species in the world,
there's just nothing cooler than that.
Speaker 2 (44:38):
And to be.
Speaker 3 (44:42):
A part of an eventual hunting season that comes back
to Mississippi for the first time since those days is man,
that's just a flag on the moon moment, you know,
and it's you know, it's kind of hard to be
in this position without acknowledging all of those people that came,
you know, the biologists that busted their behind for decades,
(45:04):
you know, to kind of get us where we are.
And we were talking about the different timelines. You know,
nobody that I work with have been able to see
the first hunting seasons back again on those species. I
think this is the last really like one of the
greatest recovery stories and conservation stories in our state's history.
(45:26):
And man, it just does not get any cooler than that.
To be part of that next chapter.
Speaker 1 (45:32):
You know, our history with our wild life and our
wild lands is complicated, but it has yielded some incredible
success stories through the power of conservation, and I think
we have a real shot at having another success stories
with the Mississippi Black Bears. And believe me, the day
that that hunting season gets opened up in Mississippi, I'll
(45:52):
be somewhere doing a victory dance. It's just too cool
to not celebrate. I want to thank all of you
for listening to Backwoods University as well as Bear Grease
in this country life, and I want to give a
big shout out to ONEX Hunt for making this podcast possible.
(46:13):
If you like this episode, share it with your friends
and family this week and stick around because there's a
whole lot more on the way.
Welcome to Backwoods University, a place where we focus on wildlife,
wild places and the people who dedicate their lives to
conserving both. I'm your host, Lake Pickle. In this episode,
we're going to dive deep into the conservation history of
Mississippi's once celebrated but now controversial native species, the American
(00:23):
black bear. We're going to start this episode off by
going back and forth between two historical accounts from the
same state of Mississippi, separated by nothing but time. The
(00:47):
first being clips from local Mississippi news networks, dates ranging
from ten years ago to just this past June. The
second being excerpt from a book titled The Bear Hunter
by James T. McCafferty, which looks into the culture of
bear hunting in Mississippi from the eighteen hundreds to the
early nineteen hundreds. As we flip back and forth between
(01:08):
these two sources, I want you to pay attention to
the heavy contrast between then and now. Keep in mind
both are talking about the same state, but it sounds
like two different worlds. We'll kick off first with recent
clips from local Mississippi news networks.
Speaker 2 (01:28):
It's the biggest story on WAPT dot com justin Morgan
got a traio camera photo of a black bear roaming
in Mississippi. Is this first time you've found one at
Sumpson County?
Speaker 1 (01:43):
I think there have been a couple farther south, but
I don't recall one that far north. Excerpts from the
book The Bear Hunter by James T.
Speaker 3 (01:51):
McCafferty.
Speaker 4 (01:52):
In the nineteenth century, at least among America's sportsmen, the
Mississippi Delta was celebrated as a bear hunters mecca. Hunters
of means and often those without, flocked to Mississippi to
hunt the Delta's black bears.
Speaker 2 (02:05):
This is remarkable, all right. Action News five's Garner Montgomery
joined the Sliven Studio now with an exclusive video he.
Speaker 4 (02:11):
Shot of a black bear in the Soto County gardener.
Speaker 5 (02:15):
That's right, Joe, Enjoy. This is a real treat to
see the first black bear sighting into Soto County in
at least ten years.
Speaker 4 (02:22):
The Delta woods were full of bears in pioneer times.
One account from a man named George F. Maynard born
in eighteen fifty three, states so ubiquitous was the bear
in Cohoma County of his youth that when farmers failed,
oaks to make room for crops, soal bears and their
cubs would appear almost immediately to devour tender twigs of
the fallen monarchs. It was almost impossible to make a
(02:44):
corn crop in some parts of the county on account
of the depredations of that famous animal. People would go
out in the corn patch early in the morning and
kill a bear before breakfast.
Speaker 5 (02:54):
Black bears are considered an endangered species and the state
of Mississippi. They're mostly spotted in the southern Alta, but
there have only been a handful of bear sidings here
in northwest Mississippi in the past ten years.
Speaker 1 (03:05):
There were old bear hunters who never had a pound
of bacon in the house. They would kill a bear
and cure it like bacon, and make and save the
oil by the barrel, which was fine for cooking purposes.
They are tales of a famed bear hunter named Fincher Bobo,
who once killed six bears in a single day. From
plantation slave to English noblemen, from backwood squatter to American president,
(03:26):
and every station in between.
Speaker 4 (03:28):
They hunted bears in the Mississippi Delta.
Speaker 1 (03:32):
Two different accounts, two different time periods, but they're speaking
of the same place in the book, it sounds like
they're swimming in bears, while on the news report, a
black bear siding might as well fall in line with
the sasquatch or ufo claim. So the question we have
to answer is what happened to the black bears in Mississippi.
Luckily for us, it's very well documented. Historically, black bears
(03:57):
were abundant throughout Mississippi along with the rest to the southeast.
This fact was made obvious by the quotes from the
book along with several other publications. There were thousands of
them just in Mississippi alone by the early nineteen hundreds.
Throwback to the last episode about Miss Fanny Cook, we
know how much wildlife destruction was going on then There
was an estimate of less than twelve not twelve hundred
(04:20):
twelve in the entire state. This almost complete extirpation came
as a result of severe over harvest from the fur trade, market, hunting,
sport hunting, illegal take, and land use changes that resulted
in habitat degradation and loss. As a result of this,
the state of Mississippi closed bear hunting in nineteen thirty two.
(04:42):
Y'all may recognize this as the same year that the
Game and Fish Commission was established, Protecting bears from being
wiped out sat high on the priority list, along with
white tailed deer and the wild turkeys. That was nineteen
thirty two. Ninety three years have passed since then. Where
(05:05):
are we at with Mississippi black bears now? I think
it's time we find out. It's now June of twenty
twenty five, and the sound that you're hearing is me
riding in a side by side with the Mississippi Black
Bear Program leader Anthony Ballard. We're in Clavern County, Mississippi,
(05:26):
and we're headed to Dart a bear with a tranquilizer
that Anthony has caught in one of his traps. Anthony
believes this could be one of the biggest bears he's
ever caught. I think their only option.
Speaker 2 (05:41):
I don't.
Speaker 4 (05:43):
Where's the bear?
Speaker 2 (05:44):
I mean, are we close to us?
Speaker 3 (05:45):
Yeah, we're probably one hundred and fifty yards oh ocurring
that he's not.
Speaker 4 (05:49):
At the end of this stood bark, gotcha, gotcha.
Speaker 1 (05:52):
What you're hearing now is Anthony loading the dark gun
and explaining to the Mississippi Department of Wildlife, Fisheries and
Parks intern how to chart thes. Once we get the
bear sedated and out of the trap, we then set
off walking down the long lane food plot that ran
the top of a ridge to the bear trap situated
at the end of it. The goal is for everyone
(06:13):
to move slow and quiet. Anthony wants the bear as
calm as possible for the ease of getting a tranquilizer
duard into him. The trap is shaped like a cylinder
imagine a large barrel laid over on its side. It
has a door on one end through which Anthony put
bait to lower the bear inside the trap. Anthony can
monitor all of this live through the surveillance of a
(06:34):
cellular camera. Once the bear is inside, Anthony can drop
the trap door electronically. This bear had entered the trap
just the night before, so by the time we got there,
he had only been there for a matter of hours.
You won't man heard a swing around the doorside. Yeah, okay,
it carefully kind of drops off over there before before
very far as we approach the trap, it's always a
(06:57):
little unnerving. I mean, there is a wild bear there
after all. The plan is for me to swing to
the back end of the trap while Anthony goes to
the front. If the bear is in a favorable position,
Anthony will go ahead and shoot him with a tranquilizer dark.
If not, he'll signal to me and I'll begin tapping
on the back of the trap to make noise. Enticing
the bear to move. Anthony leans over. The bear is
(07:20):
asleep and not in a favorable darting position, so he
gives me the signal, and I know it's time to
make some noise. Judging off that sound, I think the
bear's awake. Yep, that's an awake bear. That bear cannot
be any more awake than he is right now. The
(07:40):
problem is he's still not in a position for a
good shot. So Anthony adjust and I continue to make
noise to try and make the bear move around more.
Speaker 2 (07:52):
His heads.
Speaker 4 (07:52):
This way, this is a.
Speaker 1 (07:54):
Game of inches. Anthony can't just wing a dart in
there and hope for the best. It has to be precise,
and we need the bear to turn just a little
bit more. Almost there, and there's the shot, got him.
The dart is in and now we wait for it
to take effect, which normally takes a few minutes. After
(08:15):
we are sertain the bear is unconscious, we open the
trap and begin to unload it.
Speaker 3 (08:20):
We're just gonna lift and pull back toward that tree,
say when when.
Speaker 2 (08:27):
His head.
Speaker 5 (08:29):
Come on?
Speaker 3 (08:30):
Man, come on, man, all right.
Speaker 1 (08:33):
We found out later that this bear weighed four hundred
and twelve pounds.
Speaker 3 (08:37):
All right, let's drive me.
Speaker 1 (08:43):
Four and twelve pounds. So, as you could imagine, it
was no easy task getting him out of the trap.
Speaker 4 (08:50):
Alright, knock, Holy smokes, Anthony.
Speaker 1 (08:57):
The rest of the time that we had the bear
sedated was somewhere around thirty minutes. In that time, we
got his body weight, a hair sample for genetics, a
blood sample to test for certain diseases and hormone levels,
and a tooth extraction for age. This is vital information
for the black bear program. When everything was collected, Anthony
injected the bear with a reversal drug. We then walked
(09:18):
up the hill where we could watch from a safe distance,
and in about ten minutes or so, the bear woke
up and bounded off back into the woods. To say
this whole thing was a cool experience would be quite
the understatement. The opportunity to get to do hands on
conservation with such a cool and historic species just doesn't
come around all that often, and the Mississippi black bear
(09:39):
program is doing some really cool and important work, which
I think it's time we all learned about. After this
eventful bear work up with Anthony, I sat down with
him for an interview so that we all can get
a deeper understanding of the Mississippi black bear, the program,
as well as the status, future and contra reversy surrounding
(10:01):
this native animal.
Speaker 4 (10:04):
How long has Mississippi had a black bear program.
Speaker 3 (10:08):
The early work was done by the Museum of Natural Science.
And when I say early, we're talking about you know,
mid to late nineties.
Speaker 4 (10:15):
Okay, so nineties, so post Fanny Cook times.
Speaker 3 (10:19):
Yes, yes, very much so. And that's just because there
weren't really that many bears in Mississippi.
Speaker 4 (10:24):
There's like twelve.
Speaker 3 (10:25):
Yeah, you had an occasional sighting here and there, you
had an occasional roadkill. I mean, we've got records of
mortalities all the way back to the seventies. The need
for an actual program and for wildlife and Fisheries to
take that over came in two thousand and two.
Speaker 4 (10:39):
And what was the reason for that.
Speaker 3 (10:41):
In the early two thousands, you had a lot more
emphasis on looking at those populations, the subpopulations, particularly in
Arkansas and Louisiana, you know, habitat connectivity, looking at interbreeding
between different populations to kind of bolster genetic diversity. As
a result of that, a lot more dispersal into Mississippi.
(11:02):
And so there's there's some connections there of you know,
that original you can say, kind of apparent, you know, population,
and then those that kind of infant population moving into
the delta. More and more soles that were you know,
started to breed and reproducing there and then kind of
grow from there.
Speaker 1 (11:20):
So the black bear program was originally formed by the
Mississippi Museum of Natural Science, but it was handed off
to the Department of Wildlife out of necessity in two
thousand and two due to a noticeable increase in bears.
This can be attributed to dispersal of bears coming into
Mississippi from Arkansas Louisiana, as well as slow but natural
growth from the small resident population that was able to
(11:42):
do so because of the protections they were provided. In
nineteen thirty two and just a small personal request here,
nobody mentioned to clear breath that Arkansas bears were helping
out Mississippi bears. Okay, I mean they just talk enough
trash as it is.
Speaker 4 (11:56):
Let me ask this because I want to.
Speaker 1 (11:58):
I want to clarify this early to talking about bears
moving in from Arkansas and Louisiana. Like, I understand that
the let's say that the population of just Mississippi, the
black bear population of Mississippi. I understand that we wiped
it out to really really low numbers, but we never
fully wiped it out, right, that's correct, right.
Speaker 3 (12:17):
Yeah, So extinction is a species that just goes completely.
Speaker 2 (12:24):
It's gone.
Speaker 3 (12:24):
Right, everybody understands that extirpation is gone from a particular
region or area of state. We were near extirpation in Mississippi.
The lowest estimation was twelve bears in the state that's
functionally extirpated. That's essentially none. That's wild.
Speaker 2 (12:40):
Yeah.
Speaker 3 (12:40):
You know, people wonder why we don't have as many
bears as places like Louisiana or Arkansas. What's for two reasons.
Number One, we Arkansas and Louisiana never got quite that
low in their population estimates, and they also actively brought
bears from up north to bolster those populations. Mississippi never
actually did so.
Speaker 1 (13:00):
Louisian in Arkansas have had bears reintroduced, Yes to some degree, Yes,
they had bears reintroduced, and then they also moved bears,
you know, within those two states between subpopulations to kind
of even out those genetics and kind of foster those
numbers and facilitate that connectivity.
Speaker 3 (13:17):
Mississippi took a more passive approach. There was one attempted restocking,
I guess you could say, in nineteen thirty four. It
was unsuccessful. It was a I think three pairs, so
a total of six bears that were brought here for
whatever reason that was not successful. So all of the
bears that we have here in Mississippi are either dispersed
(13:40):
from higher density populations in Arkansas and Louisiana or they
were born here. There were never there were no bears
that were actually brought here to Mississippi.
Speaker 1 (13:49):
I do think it's prudent, though I have to speculate
a little bit here, but I do think that it
is important that it was tried to.
Speaker 4 (13:57):
Be reintroduced in nineteen thirty four. I mean, we know
because of.
Speaker 1 (14:02):
The last episode that Fanny Cook established the Game Commission
in nineteen thirty two, and one of the first things
they started doing there were several like restocking efforts of
native game animals, animals that they wanted to make.
Speaker 4 (14:14):
Sure were kept around.
Speaker 1 (14:16):
So immediately upon the establishment of that Game Commission, they
started restocking efforts of deer, They started it on turkeys,
they started it on quail, and so it's important to
know that they tried, and the general public that supported
the establishment of that commission, which is now in DWFP.
(14:37):
I think it's important to note that they did try
to restock them all right Backwoods University enrollees. If there
was going to be an exam at the end of
this episode, which there's not, but if there was, one
of the main takeaways would be this right here. So
lean in black bears were not, I repeat, were not
reintroduced to Mississippi. In the reilm of controversies surrounding this species,
(15:00):
which we're going to dive into in more detail later,
the misconception that black bears were wiped out completely and
then physically brought back in and reintroduced comes up all
the time, and it just isn't the case. They have
always been here. But I think it is extremely important
that we realized that it was attempted one time to
(15:20):
restock them in nineteen thirty four. Here's why. Take a
look at the list of animals of which restocking efforts
were made. White tailed deer high community value, wild turkeys
high community value, bob white quail high community value, Black
bears high community value at that time. Remember what the
stated reasons were for black bears almost being wiped out
(15:41):
in the first place, fur trade, market, hunting, sport, hunting,
habitat loss. Think back to quotes from the book and
tales of people traveling to Mississippi just to hunt bears.
I'm not sitting here claiming that black bears were this
perfect species that never caused a single problem. They did
as well as many other wildlife species, but they were unarguable,
he sought after and valued as a game animal.
Speaker 3 (16:03):
Of that, I have no doubt. You know, we were
talking earlier about the mindset of people moving through history.
You know, it's really easy to play money morning quarterback
and say, well, these people had the wrong idea about this,
(16:24):
or they you know, they completely disregarded this aspect of
conservation or whatever the case is. And like you said,
I think it's important to kind of put yourself in
that situation and maybe understand that you know, they weren't
working with Google. You know, they weren't working with major
universities that could do big time research. They weren't working
with a huge budget, and they were doing what they
(16:45):
could with what they had at the time. And I
think the important part is they had the right idea,
you know, and they may not have done everything exactly right,
but it was really a paradigm shift between a mentality
of kill everything, it doesn't matter, they'll replenish somehow, just
live for the day and take what you want, versus hey,
(17:06):
maybe we need to build some longevity into this and
some structure and some regulations to where we can preserve
the future. I think that's the biggest takeaway from that,
And there's.
Speaker 1 (17:15):
A common thread in that no like talking about like
you could go all the way back to the bison
episode when Jeremy was explaining to me, he said, a
lot of some of the follies in the market hunting
with bison is they were misunderstood and people thought they
were a migratory animal. So a lot of the market
hunters at the time would think, Hey, we can kill
(17:36):
every single one of these buffalo. The next herd's going
to migrate through so it was like a functional misunderstanding
the ecology, and that trickled down all the way to
the early nineteen hundreds with so many of the game animals.
The difference is that things like whitetail and turkey's got
a chance to rebound, whereas black bear's. It was just
(17:56):
a little bit of a different story, different timeline.
Speaker 3 (17:58):
Yeah, and I think it was a different timeline for
reasons may have had to do with management, but also
you got to think about the reproductive potential of black
bears versus something like deer a turkey. You know, if
you've got a good habitat and you've got good nutrition,
can that has a high caring capacity, you can make
a lot of turkey or a lot of deer in
a pretty short amount of time. Black bears don't breed
(18:21):
until three to five years of age. They're only going
to have two or three and the survival of those
cubs are you know, fifty to seventy percent. The timeline
in the pattern is just not comparable to something like
white tail deer, and it's just not as fast as
like you said, it's just on a different timeline.
Speaker 1 (18:38):
Anthony just gave us one of the most important pieces
of information regarding the trajectory and current status of the
Mississippi black bear population. We already knew that all these
species were almost wiped out in the early nineteen hundreds,
but what I didn't know was the different dynamics around
each of their ability to rebound. Thankfully, white tailed deer
and wild turkeys can reproduce relatively quickly, especially when compared
(18:59):
to the reproductive timeline of a black bear. I mean,
think about it. Many white tailed does begin reproducing at
a year old, in some instances even earlier than that,
and they typically breed every year, while turkey hens usually
start breeding around a year old and they can usually
nest every year after that. A black bear, however, does
it start breeding until the age three or sometimes five,
(19:20):
and may only have two to three cups. The timeline
is vastly different, which makes for an unavoidable longer time
of population recovery. This explains why, when all these species
were pushed to the brink around the same time, black
bears are seemingly the last in line on their way
to recovery.
Speaker 4 (19:38):
What is the overall function of the black bear program?
Speaker 1 (19:42):
Has the function stayed the same from its start with
the game and fish in two thousand and two to now,
or has it changed a little bit, has there been
stuff added to it?
Speaker 3 (19:51):
I would say it's always changing. Management is never the same, right,
you know, the outcomes are different, the goals are different
as different species fluctuate and there's different management needs. And
it's been the same with the bear program. You know,
early on it was a lot about you know, compiling
as much data as we could, as many observations as
we could, and really trying to just figure out what
(20:13):
was going on right with those early populations. And then
as that grew, you know, you're still looking at research,
You're still looking at these those same type parameters, but
you're looking at it on a larger scale because you
have more and more area to look at bears in.
And then eventually what's going to happen is you go
from a preservationist type of approach where harvest is completely banned.
(20:36):
You're focusing on allowing that animal to come back to
healthy numbers, and eventually the day is going to come
where we institute harvest again because we say, okay, you know,
the federal protections of black bears were removed in twenty
sixteen in Mississippi. At some day, there's going to come
a day where we say the state protections are removed
and we're now going to implement a hunting season. And
(20:59):
you know, people kind of say, all right, well, you're
just wanting this species to come back so that we
can have a hunting season, And it's really kind of
the opposite of that. You know, we're having a hunting
season because the population is healthy enough now to sustain it.
Speaker 1 (21:12):
Big important key takeaway number two, y'all ready, the end
goal of protecting black bears from nineteen thirty two up
until now is to restore them to a sustainable population.
And can any of y'all guess what is synonymous with
a sustainable population, A huntable population, a hunting season, a
return to allowing black bears to be used as a
(21:34):
natural and renewable resource, a return to what they were
sought after and valued for back in their earlier years
of abundance. And although it is taking a significantly longer
time to get there than it did several other of
our game species, they are following the same trajectory as
several other widely celebrated wildlife conservation wins. And when the
(21:54):
day comes that we reached this milestone with the black
Bears of Mississippi. In my opinion, it should be so
librated the same. You do hear a lot of like, oh,
the agency's doing this just so they can make another
tag and it'll make more money, or you know, and
it's you get like the kind of the sense that
they're they're almost putting it like his government overreach, and
(22:14):
you're some people kind of come right out and say, like,
we should be able to do what we want kind
of thing. And the reason that we don't go and
just do what we want is it didn't work last week.
Speaker 3 (22:26):
We tried that.
Speaker 1 (22:27):
Yeah, like exactly, people did what they want and that's
why we started. If we kept on doing what we wanted,
you wouldn't have any deer to be worried.
Speaker 4 (22:34):
About, right, Like that's just the truth. Yeah.
Speaker 1 (22:38):
Would you say the main goal now of the black
Bear program is to one day be able to facilitate
a hunting season. Is that the main goal or is
there like other priority of goals.
Speaker 3 (22:49):
I would say there's two main goals. The first main
goal is to have a good solid research foundation to
make management decisions, because unless you know how many bears
you have. Unless you know how fast your population is growing,
and you can answer those questions, you can't make informed
(23:09):
management decisions about a hunting season. So, you know, the
question always gets asked, how many bears do we have?
And what people want is for me to spit out
an answer we have this between this many and this
many bears. What we're trying to do right now in
the research that we're doing with Mississippi State University, basically
they're building two different models based on the data that
we've collected either here recently or historically throughout the program's history,
(23:34):
and they're building a density estimate. So once you can
identify enough individuals genetically, you can say, all right, you
probably have this many individuals in this particular area. All right,
So you can extrapolate and say you probably have this
type of vocumency in this larger area, and eventually you
get to a point where it's representative of an entire
portion of the state or even the whole state.
Speaker 4 (23:55):
All right.
Speaker 3 (23:56):
The second piece of that puzzle, it's called your population
projection model. What that is going to do is we
take all of the historical data that we've ever had,
every mortality we've had all the life spans that we
know of what our immigration immigration from different states is,
how many offspring that bears had, how old were they
when they first had offspring. All of these different things
(24:19):
go into that model to tell you, Okay, here's how
many bears you have. Now, now what is your projected population?
Based on these parameters, what might be your population two, five, ten,
fifteen years from now. At that point you get basically
a growth curve, right, So then you can start adding
in as a factor something like harvest. Okay, if we
(24:40):
harrest this many bears, and if we harvest this many females,
this many males, how is our population going to react.
That's when you can start sectioning off different parts of
the state, and that's when you can start setting regulations.
That's how those recommendations are come about. And so as
much as I wish it was just as simple as
counting bears and spending out a number, there's a lot
(25:01):
more that goes into it that you know, we have
to make that informed decision, and we're trying to make
that based on the absolute most homework we can have
done so that we can we can get it right.
Because you know, you only get one shot at that,
and you got to get it right.
Speaker 1 (25:18):
Anthony told me that the question of how many bears
are there in Mississippi sits high atop the list of
questions he gets commonly asked, And if you couldn't tell
from his response, it's something that they are not taking lightly.
There's a hefty amount of work and research going into it,
and hopefully it's something that they will have a number
for before the end of this year. A plan to
(25:38):
follow up with Anthony as soon as that number is ready,
so stay tuned for that. I want to ask him
how we use this information and how does it play
into making management decisions and setting hunting seasons.
Speaker 3 (25:50):
Most likely what happens is, you know, you'll have different
bear management zones, units, whatever you'd want to call them,
and then set harvest regulations on each one of them
according to what your data says.
Speaker 4 (26:01):
That last bear work up you and I did, and
you go in there, you dart him, you knock him out,
took a tooth extraction, you took a blood sample, you
took a hair sample, took a body weight, Like what
do you what is all that data for?
Speaker 2 (26:13):
Like?
Speaker 4 (26:13):
What are you trying to gain from all that the hairs.
Speaker 3 (26:15):
For genetics, you can get a lot from genetics, but
at the very minimum, you can identify that individual because
you can say that in this particular case M. Thirty three,
he was first caught as a you know, X year
old in twenty twenty three, he's now a y year
old in twenty twenty five, and we can say that
(26:35):
he at least lived from twenty twenty three to twenty five.
The tooth that we pull, we send that off to
a lab. I send all the teeth off once a
year and they do what it's called cementum annualize, so
they'll take a small sliver of that, they'll stay in it,
look at it under microscope, and they can count those
cementum annuli rings like rings on a tree. Because you
have basically a growing in a dormant stage in bears,
(26:57):
that's pretty pronounced, and so in the model it's more
valuable to say that you have a ten year old
versus you have an adult. The blood sample, really it's
just a catalog for me. We spend those down and
freeze them, and then if we have a let's say
a project that comes up in another year or two
where we say, we want to look at hormone levels
in certain individuals, or we want to look at this
(27:20):
particular you know, tighter for a disease that may have
been president in the population. Now we have you know,
fifty samples to look through, versus starting from zero and
trying to pull blood on bears as we go, gotcha,
And so some of it is more for catalog purposes,
and then some of it is for stuff that we're
actively using. But a workup's work up, and we always
(27:41):
usually pull those things as we go to you know,
to make sure we have them, and it takes you know,
an extra five or ten minutes to get that stuff,
and it really does go a long way in looking
at that data in the long term.
Speaker 1 (27:54):
So think about the end the field bear workup that
you heard taking place towards the beginning of this episode.
If you remember, I said that it yields vital information
for the bear program. And now we understand why all
of this data adds into the model that will help
determine population size, population growth, and helps us make management
(28:15):
decisions like determining when a hunting season can be reopened.
The nuts and bolts of conservation. Pretty cool, right, somewhere
in recent years there's been like a significant uptick in
bears just here in Mississippi, And I don't know what
to attribute that to, like more spillover from Louisiana, more
spill over from Arkansas. Is that even happening or am
(28:38):
I just like it?
Speaker 2 (28:40):
Was?
Speaker 4 (28:40):
There any truth to that?
Speaker 3 (28:41):
Well, in your population, you're going to have basically an
inflection point in that growth curve, so you have you know,
if you have very small numbers, you're gonna have very
small growth rates, and then at a certain saturation, that
curve is gonna is gonna steep, gonna get a lot steeper,
and start to go up at an increasing rate. So
you can start increasing at an increasing rate. So it's
(29:02):
hard to tell exactly where we are on that growth rate,
And again that's kind of why we're doing this research
to see. I think it's been kind of a convergence
of factors because you do have more bears on the landscape,
you have more sightings, but you also have a growing
public awareness of bears in Mississippi. I think a lot
(29:23):
of that can be attributed to social media, a lot
of it can be attributed to security and game cameras,
just being so readily accessible. There's eyes everywhere. Everybody has
a ring doorbell, everybody has cell cameras that are sending
pictures all the time. There's more people that are leaving
out cameras year round versus just during deer season. Usually
(29:44):
they're on a feeder. And I think all of those
things together has kind of come together and made it
seem like there's just bears all over the place. When
you know, it's quite possible that five different people have
seen the same bear that's gone and visited five feeders.
It's hard to tell how much of that is actually,
you know, is real, and how much of that growth
(30:04):
is is you know, because of the population, and how
much of it is kind of artificially inflated because of
the public awareness and the visibility of bears.
Speaker 1 (30:13):
From my perspective, understanding to a degree what black bears do,
like how they function, their ecology, all that stuff. I
think it's awesome that this native animal is being able
to return to its native range here in Mississippi for
a plethora of reasons. One of them like the possibility
that there would be a hunting season on those again.
Speaker 3 (30:35):
That would be awesome, awesome.
Speaker 1 (30:36):
To be able to hunt a bear here. There's so
much history with it. Yeah, and there are some people
that feel that way. There's also a lot of people
that don't feel that way. There's been a growing amount.
Speaker 4 (30:45):
Of controversy around black bears, and I want.
Speaker 1 (30:48):
To tackle some of those topics. Yeah, here's the obvious one,
or one of the more obvious ones. Bears are dangerous.
They're gonna eat me, They're gonna eat my kids, They're gonna.
Speaker 4 (30:58):
Eat my dog. That's it's like an on going fear
that you see with bears pop up. How do you
deal with that?
Speaker 3 (31:06):
It's hard to tell people not to be afraid of things.
I found that it's better to educate people about the
animal than it is to tell them not to be
afraid of it, right, because when you really boil it
all down, people fear what they don't know. And I
think in a lot of people's minds, it is an
animal that lives somewhere else, and then when they find
(31:28):
out that it lives close to them, they start thinking
about it in a completely different way. Now it's real.
You know, you were asking about the goals of the
program earlier. Research is certainly one of the big ones,
and I think the other half of that coin is education,
you know, because the more people that we can make
understand what bears are and what they are not and
(31:48):
just a few simple things you know, to get by
with bears around, the more educated public you're going to have.
And I think the more that fear level goes down.
You know, I've taken people out on bear workups that
were absolutely scared to death or hated bears, and then
by the end of it, their mind is completely changed,
or it's at least changed to a point where they
(32:09):
appreciate what we do and the process and the animal
itself versus just being this thing that they completely don't understand.
Speaker 1 (32:19):
Anthony gave us a lot of good information there, but
the statement that's stuck with me the most, and the
one that I can't quit thinking about, is people fear
what they don't know. I also found it interesting that
he's had firsthand experience taking people out on bear workups
that initially had negative feelings toward bears, but after seeing
the animal with their own eyes and getting some actual
(32:41):
exposure to it, their opinions changed for the positive. I've
said it before on this podcast, and I'll say it again.
You can't love what you don't understand. I would encourage
any of you out there that are currently on the
negative side, maybe on the fence about black bears in
(33:01):
their conservation, to give yourself a chance to learn about
the animal before making a judgment on it. One of
the things about Mississippi that I love is that we
do have a very large and popular hunting community. Big
part of that is white tail deer hunting. One of
the things that you hear pop up around controversy of
(33:22):
a growing population of black bears is the fear that
they are going to basically decimate your deer herd.
Speaker 4 (33:29):
You hear that they're really bad.
Speaker 1 (33:30):
On fawns, they eat a lot of fawns. They're gonna, man,
if you have bears, you're not gonna have any deer.
I heard one guy say, They're like, wherever you find
a bear, you ain't gonna find a deer.
Speaker 2 (33:40):
Right.
Speaker 4 (33:41):
Where do you go with all that? Is there any
truth to that?
Speaker 3 (33:43):
The short answer is no. First, let's look at how
many states have bear populations, something like thirty nine or
forty I think most provinces in Canada. I think if
that were the case, then you would have deer populations
that were decimated else most of North America. We know
that falls are going to get eaten by predators. Okay,
(34:05):
that's a fact of life. There's a certain percentage every
year that you can expect to get eaten by predators.
Some of those predators are bobcats, coyotes, and black bears.
We know that black bearries will eat them opportunistically, right,
And there's studies that I've looked at from Virginia, from Michigan,
from even Tensaul, Louisiana that say that essentially, yes, there's
(34:29):
going to be predation. There's a certain percentage that are
going to get eaten. So let's say somewhere between twenty
and thirty percent is what you normally see survival rate.
That's the ones that actually make it to let's say
six months old. Okay, that's seventy odd percent of falls
that are getting eaten, is going to say, relatively constant
(34:49):
through time.
Speaker 4 (34:51):
Right, regardless of BlackBerry presents are not right due to predation.
Speaker 3 (34:56):
Now, what proportions are eaten by coyotes, bobcats, or black
bears may change depending on the density of those predators
on the landscape. So basically you're talking about the difference
between additive or compensatory predation. All right, So basically, let's
take Tensaw as an example. Let's say we had Tensaw
(35:16):
that had was only a two predator system, so you
only had coyotes and bobcats, and then the recovery of
the black bear happened, and over time you have a
greater and greater density of black bears. That doesn't mean
you have a greater and greater proportion of white tailed
deer falls that are getting predated. It means that those
proportions within that percentage that are getting predated upon is changing,
(35:37):
so that Faon would have gotten eaten now he's getting
eaten by a black bear, whereas without the black bear
he might have gotten even by a kyot or bobcat.
I think it's pretty reductive to say that there's one
particular predator that can cause these huge shifts when the
data just doesn't bear that out. Has it happened locally somewhere, maybe,
(35:58):
but on the grand scheme of thing on a landscape level,
it just doesn't seem to be the case. Let's take
that a step further. The Bacheler lands within the Mississippi
River all right. You have these big islands and these
big money camps where it's you know, hundreds of thousands
of dollars to buy a share, and that's some of
the most salt after deer hunting and turkey hunting in
the southeast, maybe in the country. Very well managed deer
(36:23):
herds out of this world. Genetics, great nutrition, super healthy
deer herds, right, great turkey populations, abundant turkey populations. And
most of those areas up and down the Misissippi River
are absolutely stacked with black bears. And you know, if
that were the case, and if black bears had that
(36:43):
big of a negative population on deer or turkey, that's
not what you would see in those areas.
Speaker 1 (36:49):
Is there any particular animal that on a population level
suffers from the presence of black bears that we know of?
Speaker 3 (36:57):
I mean, about ninety percent of a bear's diet, you know,
eighties and ninety percent is going to be a plant
matter of some sort.
Speaker 4 (37:03):
Really, yeah, hear me out.
Speaker 1 (37:05):
The concern of not wanting other native game populations to
suffer is a legitimate concern. However, what Anthony is telling
us here is that with bears, this is not something
to worry about not only does current research prove it,
but think about the historical record of Mississippi from earlier
prior to our own decimation of these species, Mississippi had
(37:28):
white tailed deer, wild turkeys, bob white quail, bison, and
black bears all in abundance, along with many other game
and non game species. I don't know, it's almost like
God designed it to be that way or something crazy, right,
So in like the grand scope, like if you were
to take all this stuff that people are hinging on
(37:49):
for reasons that they don't like bears for all these
different factors, or they're just some people are just scared
of them. Some of these folks not all the way
that they are talking about bears. It leads me to
ask the question, I'm like.
Speaker 4 (38:02):
What would you like us to do?
Speaker 1 (38:04):
Are you suggesting that we exterminate them? Because like some
of the folks that come up with that, it's like
that's what they actually are suggesting that we exterminate the bears,
and most of these are part of the hunting community.
My response to that is, like, name a single time
in our conservation history and our history with wildlife as
a hunting community, as a sustainable hunting community, because that's
(38:27):
what we are name a time in our history where
we have elected to wipe out a native animal.
Speaker 3 (38:32):
Humans have an, I guess an intrinsic way of looking
at wildlife as how they benefit from that species. Right, Yeah,
So we look at whitetail deer, we hold it as
a very valuable species. We look at turkey, we say
they're very valuable because we hunt turkey, we consume turkey,
we enjoy turkey. There's nothing wrong with that. We don't
(38:53):
look at armadillo's with that same value.
Speaker 1 (38:56):
Right.
Speaker 3 (38:57):
So a lot of the way that we look at
the inherent value of different vcs is based on kind
of a self serving attitude. So I think that's part
of it. And once there is an opportunity that's opened
up bears as a resource, I think a lot of
that's going to go away. One of the questions I
get a lot of times is what good do bear do?
I think what they're really saying is what do they
(39:19):
do for me? What good are they for me? And
you know, my question back to those people a lot
of times is what good is a wild turkey? What
does a wild turkey do biologically that we couldn't do without. Well,
that's blasphemy. You can't say that, you know, but you
think about it, you know. And the reason that we
value them as humans so much is because they liked
(39:40):
to hunt them and we benefit from that. They're they're pretty,
and we enjoy them. And believe me, I'm not hating
on turkey hunters, sure, but it's kind of that same principle,
and so I look at it more of a kind
of an on a historic scale, our conservation story is
based on recognizing the damages that we were doing and
then taking steps over the next years and decades, in
(40:02):
centuries even to right those wrongs and to try to
rebuild that in a in a responsible way that benefits
the animals where we have you know, good huntable, sustainable populations,
and also doesn't encroach on people, on the rights of humans.
And it's a delicate balance, you know. And it's also
(40:23):
it can be particularly delicate with bears because they do
CAUs you know, damage, and and they do get into things.
And you know, I'm not I'm not going to sit
here and say that they don't. And no bear managers
is naive enough to say that they you know, that's
not an issue, but it's it's one of those things
where I feel like it goes a lot back to education.
And you know, once you can start building those little
(40:44):
things in to make people's lives easier that do live
around bears, and once you start building those habits in,
then you can start appreciating the species on a more
greater level than what do they do for for me immediately.
And I mean, you know, there's there's all kinds of
animals that can be nuisance. You know, you got to
think about the biology of the animal.
Speaker 1 (41:04):
Right.
Speaker 3 (41:05):
Bears have a seven times better sense of smell than bloodhounds.
That's quite a sniffer, right, And they're biologically wired specifically
during certain times of the year to find food, to
find it in abundance, and it takes a lot of
food to support a three to four hundred pound animal, right.
(41:25):
So you know, you hear about nuisance bears and problem
bears and that kind of stuff, and certainly that can happen.
But let's take of a deer feeder, for instance. Regardless
of your feelings on deer feeders, we can agree that
basically what you're doing is putting out several hundred pounds
of free calories out in the middle of the woods.
Speaker 2 (41:46):
A bear is.
Speaker 3 (41:47):
Biologically wired to find large amounts of calories at one
time and try to consume that, and so, yes, it's aggravating,
and I sympathize with people that lose you know, cameras
and four wheeler seats and that kind of stuff. But
you know, bears are biologically wires to find food. They're
naturally curious, they're very strong, and they're very intelligent. They're
(42:08):
really good at getting any things. And it kind of
goes back to that. The thing I tell people sometimes is,
you know, it's not my job to make you like bears.
It's my job to make you prepared to understand the
how to live with bears. Because the more of those
little things that you can build into your daily routine,
talking about, you know, driving a truck instead of walking,
(42:29):
taking a garbage can out the day of versus the
night before, those little small changes in your daily life
that could potentially keep a bear off your property, keep
food out of a bear's mouth that would have otherwise
found it. That's when you start trying to kind of
win the battle of you know, living with bears and
(42:50):
solving those problems before they occur. Ask a farmer if
a deer can be a nuisance, you know, but but
we value deer right right, And so it's always this
balance of how do we get around those things and
how do we mitigate those conflicts while also maintaining that
whole balance that we're trying to maintain between wildlife and humans.
(43:13):
Black bears, deer, turkey are all native wildlife species. They
have cohabitated for longer than we've been here. And you know,
it's not like it's an invasive species that are being
brought in that have been brought in. They're native species,
and you know, native species find a way to create
(43:35):
an equilibrium and to survive with each other versus an
invasive species that throw that balance off.
Speaker 1 (43:43):
I truly think that with time and more access to
bears as a resource, a lot of the controversy around
this will dissipate, and the fact of the matter is
the population is growing. To wrap this up, I want
to ask Anthony how he feels to be in his
position at such a critical moment in this conservation story.
Speaker 3 (44:02):
From a historical perspective, it just doesn't get any cooler.
Man like to be a part of the teddy Roosevelt
story and the whole Collier stories and the Robert Bobos
and the historical figures through time that have shaped our
habitat and have shaped our history. And to be part
(44:26):
of the North American wildlife model and the recovery of
one of the most recognizable and charismatic species in the world,
there's just nothing cooler than that.
Speaker 2 (44:38):
And to be.
Speaker 3 (44:42):
A part of an eventual hunting season that comes back
to Mississippi for the first time since those days is man,
that's just a flag on the moon moment, you know,
and it's you know, it's kind of hard to be
in this position without acknowledging all of those people that came,
you know, the biologists that busted their behind for decades,
(45:04):
you know, to kind of get us where we are.
And we were talking about the different timelines. You know,
nobody that I work with have been able to see
the first hunting seasons back again on those species. I
think this is the last really like one of the
greatest recovery stories and conservation stories in our state's history.
(45:26):
And man, it just does not get any cooler than that.
To be part of that next chapter.
Speaker 1 (45:32):
You know, our history with our wild life and our
wild lands is complicated, but it has yielded some incredible
success stories through the power of conservation, and I think
we have a real shot at having another success stories
with the Mississippi Black Bears. And believe me, the day
that that hunting season gets opened up in Mississippi, I'll
(45:52):
be somewhere doing a victory dance. It's just too cool
to not celebrate. I want to thank all of you
for listening to Backwoods University as well as Bear Grease
in this country life, and I want to give a
big shout out to ONEX Hunt for making this podcast possible.
(46:13):
If you like this episode, share it with your friends
and family this week and stick around because there's a
whole lot more on the way.
Popular Podcasts
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com