October 13, 2025 • 17 mins
The ISMS is more than documentation; it is a governance framework built on the Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) cycle that embeds continual improvement into security operations. The “Plan” stage defines context, scope, risks, and objectives. “Do” implements controls and supporting processes. “Check” monitors, measures, and audits performance, while “Act” corrects deviations and drives enhancements. ISO 27001’s structure mirrors this lifecycle, ensuring that security management is iterative rather than static. Exam readiness requires understanding how each clause—from context to improvement—maps to PDCA phases and demonstrates the organization’s maturity over time.
Operationalizing PDCA involves leadership commitment, resource allocation, and structured performance review. Organizations often struggle with the “Check” and “Act” steps—areas where evidence of management review, audit results, and corrective actions prove whether continual improvement is functioning. Strong ISMS governance integrates metrics, roles, and communication channels that link executive policy with operational execution. In real audits, auditors look for this feedback loop and its documentation trail. Candidates must articulate how PDCA supports both compliance and business resilience, reinforcing ISO 27001’s risk-based philosophy. Produced by BareMetalCyber.com, where you’ll find more cyber audio courses, books, and information to strengthen your educational path. Also, if you want to stay up to date with the latest news, visit DailyCyber.News for a newsletter you can use, and a daily podcast you can commute with.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
An Information Security Management System, or ISMS, represents the structured framework through which organizations establish, maintain, and continually improve their approach to information protection. Unlike ad hoc security programs that react to incidents, an ISMS introduces discipline, accountability, and governance into the process. It encompasses people, processes, and technology—ensuring each operates in harmony to safeguard the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of data. Rather than focusing only on technical safeguards, the ISMS emphasizes a management system mindset (00:00):
a repeatable framework that identifies risks, implements controls, and measures outcomes. By grounding decisions in risk-based thinking, it ensures that every control and policy is not only justified but also proportionate to the organization’s unique threat landscape. Its ultimate purpose is adaptation—helping organizations evolve their defenses as business priorities, technologies, and external risks change.
(01:04):
The governance foundations of an ISMS form the pillars that sustain its effectiveness. Leadership is not a symbolic inclusion—it is a formal requirement within ISO 27001. Executives must demonstrate accountability by setting clear policies, assigning responsibilities, and ensuring adequate resourcing. Without leadership commitment, an ISMS risks becoming a paper exercise rather than a living program. Governance ensures that the ISMS aligns with the organization’s strategic goals and risk appetite, so that security decisions are neither overreaching nor under-protective. A properly governed ISMS includes regular oversight through management reviews, board reporting, and structured performance metrics. These mechanisms transform security from a technical function into a core part of corporate governance, where information protection is treated as seriously as financial integrity or regulatory compliance.
(02:02):
The lifecycle orientation of an ISMS is what makes it sustainable. Information security cannot be a “set and forget” initiative, because threats, technologies, and business contexts continuously evolve. The ISMS lifecycle—planning, implementing, monitoring, and improving—ensures that security remains dynamic rather than static. Each stage builds on the previous one, creating a cycle of learning and adaptation. This approach mirrors corporate risk management cycles and strategic planning rhythms, ensuring that information security is not isolated from the organization’s broader operations. A lifecycle mindset embeds resilience by keeping controls relevant, documentation current, and management engaged. It turns compliance from a one-time milestone into an enduring process of refinement and optimization.
(02:52):
The Do phase brings the strategy to life. This is the phase of action, where the planned controls, processes, and governance structures are implemented across the organization. Procedures are established to ensure that policies are consistently executed in daily operations. Resources are allocated, roles are clarified, and communication mechanisms are put in place. Equally important, the Do phase emphasizes the human element—ensuring staff understand their responsibilities through training, awareness programs, and skill development initiatives. A well-executed Do phase creates operational confidence, ensuring that everyone from executives to frontline employees participates in the security process. It transforms plans into habits and ensures that protection is woven into everyday workflows.
(03:41):
The Act phase is where improvement becomes institutionalized. Corrective and preventive actions are developed to address the deficiencies identified during the Check phase. For instance, if a control failed due to lack of staff training, the organization might expand its awareness programs. If metrics reveal a recurring issue in access control management, leadership may re-evaluate procedures or assign additional oversight. Management reviews occur here, providing an opportunity to realign the ISMS with the organization’s strategic objectives. The Act phase ensures that lessons learned translate into tangible progress and that improvement is not left to chance. Over time, this repetitive loop drives maturity—turning the ISMS into a self-sustaining, continually improving system.
(04:30):
One of the defining strengths of the PDCA cycle within the ISMS is its adaptability. The model is scalable and can be applied to organizations of all sizes—from multinational corporations to small enterprises. Its structure offers predictability while still allowing flexibility in execution. Each iteration of the cycle builds upon the lessons of the previous one, fostering institutional learning. This adaptability ensures that even as technologies evolve, new threats emerge, or organizational priorities shift, the ISMS remains relevant. PDCA ensures that improvement is not reactive to crises but proactive, embedded into the normal rhythm of operations. It makes information security part of the organization’s strategic reflexes.
(05:14):
When properly executed, PDCA transforms information security from a compliance obligation into an organizational habit. Each iteration strengthens awareness, refines controls, and reinforces governance. The ISMS becomes an adaptive framework—one that evolves with experience, not just with regulation. This continual motion is what differentiates ISO 27001-certified organizations from those that treat security as a one-time project. The result is not only reduced risk but also an ingrained culture of vigilance and improvement. Employees become more security-conscious, managers make better-informed decisions, and executives can demonstrate accountability with confidence. PDCA ensures that security excellence is never a destination—it is a continuous, deliberate journey.
(06:05):
For more cyber related content and books, please check out cyber author dot me. Also, there are other prepcasts on Cybersecurity and more at Bare Metal Cyber dot com.
Governance structures play a vital role in sustaining the PDCA cycle within an ISMS. They establish the decision-making bodies, communication channels, and oversight mechanisms that keep the system moving. Many organizations form information security steering committees composed of executives, department heads, and key operational leaders. These groups review metrics, approve risk treatment plans, and monitor progress toward objectives. By integrating the ISMS into existing corporate compliance or risk committees, organizations avoid redundancy and ensure alignment with broader governance frameworks. Documented accountability is critical here—each improvement plan must have a responsible owner, a timeline, and measurable outcomes. Effective governance also emphasizes communication, ensuring that results and decisions are shared with relevant stakeholders so that everyone understands how security performance connects to organizational success.
(07:16):
Cultural reinforcement is equally essential. Even the most sophisticated management systems falter without human engagement. An ISMS thrives when employees see themselves as active participants in security, not passive recipients of policy. This means cultivating a culture where reporting incidents, near misses, or potential vulnerabilities is encouraged rather than punished. Awareness campaigns, ongoing training, and recognition programs help connect individual behavior to organizational outcomes. Over time, this builds a sense of shared responsibility—security becomes “how we do things here,” not an external mandate. When staff understand that information protection safeguards not just data but also reputation and trust, they are more motivated to sustain good practices. In this way, culture becomes the invisible infrastructure that supports every phase of PDCA.
(08:12):
A distinctive advantage of ISO’s approach is how well it aligns with other management system standards through the Annex SL structure—a universal framework used across all ISO systems. Because PDCA underpins standards like ISO 9001 for quality management and ISO 22301 for business continuity, organizations can integrate their ISMS with other governance programs. This integration avoids duplication and promotes a unified management strategy. For example, risk assessments conducted for quality or continuity objectives can inform information security planning, creating shared insight across disciplines. The harmonized structure makes it easier for organizations to expand their certifications or manage multiple frameworks simultaneously. In practice, this means security does not operate in isolation but as a complementary force supporting the entire business ecosystem.
(09:09):
Despite its advantages, implementing PDCA within an ISMS is not without challenges. Over-formalization can slow progress, as excessive documentation or procedural rigidity may discourage responsiveness. Some organizations struggle with defining meaningful performance metrics, making it difficult to measure real improvement. Leadership fatigue is another concern—management reviews can become repetitive if the focus shifts from learning to checkbox compliance. After initial certification, enthusiasm may wane, and sustaining momentum becomes harder. To overcome these issues, organizations must remember that PDCA is not about perfection but progression. Each cycle should simplify, refine, and strengthen—not merely repeat. The key lies in keeping the ISMS practical and dynamic, ensuring it evolves as the organization learns and grows.
When applied effectively, PDCA delivers a wealth of benefits. Its structured rhythm introduces predictability into improvement activities, allowing teams to plan updates, audits, and reviews with clarity. Feedback loops become the driver of maturity, ensuring lessons from incidents or assessments lead to tangible change. Stakeholders gain visibility into the organization’s security posture through documented progress and measurable results. This transparency builds confidence—internally with employees and externally with regulators, partners, and customers. PDCA also enhances resilience (10:04):
when new threats or technologies emerge, organizations already accustomed to systematic review can adapt faster. In a constantly shifting threat landscape, this agility is among the greatest advantages a security program can have.
(10:54):
To understand PDCA’s real-world impact, consider how it applies in everyday organizational scenarios. A company experiencing a rise in phishing attacks may use the Check phase to analyze incident data and identify weak points in user awareness. The Act phase might then introduce targeted training and simulated phishing exercises. In the next Plan phase, leadership could update security objectives to reduce click-through rates by a defined percentage, followed by implementing new technical controls in the Do phase. Similarly, when expanding into a new market, an organization might re-examine data protection requirements under local laws, adjusting its risk treatment plan and scaling resources accordingly. Even failed supplier audits become valuable inputs—lessons learned fuel improvements in vendor management processes, ensuring stronger partnerships in the next cycle.
Over time, PDCA transforms from a procedural requirement into a natural rhythm of organizational life. Each completed cycle strengthens resilience, reduces audit surprises, and improves overall performance. The organization becomes accustomed to anticipating issues rather than reacting to them. Security metrics evolve from lagging indicators—like incident counts—to leading indicators such as employee engagement or early detection rates. This evolution reflects a deeper maturity, where the ISMS no longer serves merely as a compliance instrument but as a strategic asset. It equips leadership with insight, empowers teams with clear direction, and unites departments under a shared goal (11:46):
protecting the integrity of the organization’s information and reputation.
(12:33):
The long-term impact of PDCA within an ISMS is cultural as much as operational. It embeds resilience into the organization’s DNA, creating a proactive mindset that values improvement over stability. Regular audits and reviews become less about uncovering faults and more about discovering opportunities. This shift fosters optimism and innovation in security management, encouraging teams to seek better ways of working rather than simply meeting minimum requirements. As organizations mature through successive PDCA cycles, they experience fewer crises, faster recoveries, and stronger stakeholder confidence. The ISMS becomes not only a safeguard against risk but also a symbol of the organization’s capability to learn, adapt, and thrive in a complex digital world.
(13:22):
In conclusion, the ISMS lifecycle guided by PDCA ensures that information security remains adaptive, evidence-driven, and continuously improving. The Plan-Do-Check-Act cycle transforms security from a reactive task into an integrated management discipline. Supported by governance, culture, and documentation, it provides the structure necessary for enduring maturity. When embedded effectively, PDCA becomes more than a framework—it becomes a philosophy of sustainable security excellence. This prepares the foundation for exploring the evolving updates within the ISO 27000 family, where these principles find their modern expression in the latest standards and best practices.
a repeatable framework that identifies risks, implements controls, and measures outcomes. By grounding decisions in risk-based thinking, it ensures that every control and policy is not only justified but also proportionate to the organization’s unique threat landscape. Its ultimate purpose is adaptation—helping organizations evolve their defenses as business priorities, technologies, and external risks change.
(01:04):
The governance foundations of an ISMS form the pillars that sustain its effectiveness. Leadership is not a symbolic inclusion—it is a formal requirement within ISO 27001. Executives must demonstrate accountability by setting clear policies, assigning responsibilities, and ensuring adequate resourcing. Without leadership commitment, an ISMS risks becoming a paper exercise rather than a living program. Governance ensures that the ISMS aligns with the organization’s strategic goals and risk appetite, so that security decisions are neither overreaching nor under-protective. A properly governed ISMS includes regular oversight through management reviews, board reporting, and structured performance metrics. These mechanisms transform security from a technical function into a core part of corporate governance, where information protection is treated as seriously as financial integrity or regulatory compliance.
(02:02):
The lifecycle orientation of an ISMS is what makes it sustainable. Information security cannot be a “set and forget” initiative, because threats, technologies, and business contexts continuously evolve. The ISMS lifecycle—planning, implementing, monitoring, and improving—ensures that security remains dynamic rather than static. Each stage builds on the previous one, creating a cycle of learning and adaptation. This approach mirrors corporate risk management cycles and strategic planning rhythms, ensuring that information security is not isolated from the organization’s broader operations. A lifecycle mindset embeds resilience by keeping controls relevant, documentation current, and management engaged. It turns compliance from a one-time milestone into an enduring process of refinement and optimization.
(02:52):
The Do phase brings the strategy to life. This is the phase of action, where the planned controls, processes, and governance structures are implemented across the organization. Procedures are established to ensure that policies are consistently executed in daily operations. Resources are allocated, roles are clarified, and communication mechanisms are put in place. Equally important, the Do phase emphasizes the human element—ensuring staff understand their responsibilities through training, awareness programs, and skill development initiatives. A well-executed Do phase creates operational confidence, ensuring that everyone from executives to frontline employees participates in the security process. It transforms plans into habits and ensures that protection is woven into everyday workflows.
(03:41):
The Act phase is where improvement becomes institutionalized. Corrective and preventive actions are developed to address the deficiencies identified during the Check phase. For instance, if a control failed due to lack of staff training, the organization might expand its awareness programs. If metrics reveal a recurring issue in access control management, leadership may re-evaluate procedures or assign additional oversight. Management reviews occur here, providing an opportunity to realign the ISMS with the organization’s strategic objectives. The Act phase ensures that lessons learned translate into tangible progress and that improvement is not left to chance. Over time, this repetitive loop drives maturity—turning the ISMS into a self-sustaining, continually improving system.
(04:30):
One of the defining strengths of the PDCA cycle within the ISMS is its adaptability. The model is scalable and can be applied to organizations of all sizes—from multinational corporations to small enterprises. Its structure offers predictability while still allowing flexibility in execution. Each iteration of the cycle builds upon the lessons of the previous one, fostering institutional learning. This adaptability ensures that even as technologies evolve, new threats emerge, or organizational priorities shift, the ISMS remains relevant. PDCA ensures that improvement is not reactive to crises but proactive, embedded into the normal rhythm of operations. It makes information security part of the organization’s strategic reflexes.
(05:14):
When properly executed, PDCA transforms information security from a compliance obligation into an organizational habit. Each iteration strengthens awareness, refines controls, and reinforces governance. The ISMS becomes an adaptive framework—one that evolves with experience, not just with regulation. This continual motion is what differentiates ISO 27001-certified organizations from those that treat security as a one-time project. The result is not only reduced risk but also an ingrained culture of vigilance and improvement. Employees become more security-conscious, managers make better-informed decisions, and executives can demonstrate accountability with confidence. PDCA ensures that security excellence is never a destination—it is a continuous, deliberate journey.
(06:05):
For more cyber related content and books, please check out cyber author dot me. Also, there are other prepcasts on Cybersecurity and more at Bare Metal Cyber dot com.
Governance structures play a vital role in sustaining the PDCA cycle within an ISMS. They establish the decision-making bodies, communication channels, and oversight mechanisms that keep the system moving. Many organizations form information security steering committees composed of executives, department heads, and key operational leaders. These groups review metrics, approve risk treatment plans, and monitor progress toward objectives. By integrating the ISMS into existing corporate compliance or risk committees, organizations avoid redundancy and ensure alignment with broader governance frameworks. Documented accountability is critical here—each improvement plan must have a responsible owner, a timeline, and measurable outcomes. Effective governance also emphasizes communication, ensuring that results and decisions are shared with relevant stakeholders so that everyone understands how security performance connects to organizational success.
(07:16):
Cultural reinforcement is equally essential. Even the most sophisticated management systems falter without human engagement. An ISMS thrives when employees see themselves as active participants in security, not passive recipients of policy. This means cultivating a culture where reporting incidents, near misses, or potential vulnerabilities is encouraged rather than punished. Awareness campaigns, ongoing training, and recognition programs help connect individual behavior to organizational outcomes. Over time, this builds a sense of shared responsibility—security becomes “how we do things here,” not an external mandate. When staff understand that information protection safeguards not just data but also reputation and trust, they are more motivated to sustain good practices. In this way, culture becomes the invisible infrastructure that supports every phase of PDCA.
(08:12):
A distinctive advantage of ISO’s approach is how well it aligns with other management system standards through the Annex SL structure—a universal framework used across all ISO systems. Because PDCA underpins standards like ISO 9001 for quality management and ISO 22301 for business continuity, organizations can integrate their ISMS with other governance programs. This integration avoids duplication and promotes a unified management strategy. For example, risk assessments conducted for quality or continuity objectives can inform information security planning, creating shared insight across disciplines. The harmonized structure makes it easier for organizations to expand their certifications or manage multiple frameworks simultaneously. In practice, this means security does not operate in isolation but as a complementary force supporting the entire business ecosystem.
(09:09):
Despite its advantages, implementing PDCA within an ISMS is not without challenges. Over-formalization can slow progress, as excessive documentation or procedural rigidity may discourage responsiveness. Some organizations struggle with defining meaningful performance metrics, making it difficult to measure real improvement. Leadership fatigue is another concern—management reviews can become repetitive if the focus shifts from learning to checkbox compliance. After initial certification, enthusiasm may wane, and sustaining momentum becomes harder. To overcome these issues, organizations must remember that PDCA is not about perfection but progression. Each cycle should simplify, refine, and strengthen—not merely repeat. The key lies in keeping the ISMS practical and dynamic, ensuring it evolves as the organization learns and grows.
When applied effectively, PDCA delivers a wealth of benefits. Its structured rhythm introduces predictability into improvement activities, allowing teams to plan updates, audits, and reviews with clarity. Feedback loops become the driver of maturity, ensuring lessons from incidents or assessments lead to tangible change. Stakeholders gain visibility into the organization’s security posture through documented progress and measurable results. This transparency builds confidence—internally with employees and externally with regulators, partners, and customers. PDCA also enhances resilience (10:04):
when new threats or technologies emerge, organizations already accustomed to systematic review can adapt faster. In a constantly shifting threat landscape, this agility is among the greatest advantages a security program can have.
(10:54):
To understand PDCA’s real-world impact, consider how it applies in everyday organizational scenarios. A company experiencing a rise in phishing attacks may use the Check phase to analyze incident data and identify weak points in user awareness. The Act phase might then introduce targeted training and simulated phishing exercises. In the next Plan phase, leadership could update security objectives to reduce click-through rates by a defined percentage, followed by implementing new technical controls in the Do phase. Similarly, when expanding into a new market, an organization might re-examine data protection requirements under local laws, adjusting its risk treatment plan and scaling resources accordingly. Even failed supplier audits become valuable inputs—lessons learned fuel improvements in vendor management processes, ensuring stronger partnerships in the next cycle.
Over time, PDCA transforms from a procedural requirement into a natural rhythm of organizational life. Each completed cycle strengthens resilience, reduces audit surprises, and improves overall performance. The organization becomes accustomed to anticipating issues rather than reacting to them. Security metrics evolve from lagging indicators—like incident counts—to leading indicators such as employee engagement or early detection rates. This evolution reflects a deeper maturity, where the ISMS no longer serves merely as a compliance instrument but as a strategic asset. It equips leadership with insight, empowers teams with clear direction, and unites departments under a shared goal (11:46):
protecting the integrity of the organization’s information and reputation.
(12:33):
The long-term impact of PDCA within an ISMS is cultural as much as operational. It embeds resilience into the organization’s DNA, creating a proactive mindset that values improvement over stability. Regular audits and reviews become less about uncovering faults and more about discovering opportunities. This shift fosters optimism and innovation in security management, encouraging teams to seek better ways of working rather than simply meeting minimum requirements. As organizations mature through successive PDCA cycles, they experience fewer crises, faster recoveries, and stronger stakeholder confidence. The ISMS becomes not only a safeguard against risk but also a symbol of the organization’s capability to learn, adapt, and thrive in a complex digital world.
(13:22):
In conclusion, the ISMS lifecycle guided by PDCA ensures that information security remains adaptive, evidence-driven, and continuously improving. The Plan-Do-Check-Act cycle transforms security from a reactive task into an integrated management discipline. Supported by governance, culture, and documentation, it provides the structure necessary for enduring maturity. When embedded effectively, PDCA becomes more than a framework—it becomes a philosophy of sustainable security excellence. This prepares the foundation for exploring the evolving updates within the ISO 27000 family, where these principles find their modern expression in the latest standards and best practices.
Popular Podcasts
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!
The Joe Rogan Experience
The official podcast of comedian Joe Rogan.
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.