Episode 3 — What is a “control” and what is a “safeguard”?

In the context of the CIS framework, a “control” is a broad security domain representing a strategic objective, while a “safeguard” refers to a specific, actionable measure within that control. Each of the 18 CIS Controls addresses a distinct functional area—such as asset management, access control, or data protection—and defines its importance in defending against real-world attacks. Safeguards, previously called sub-controls, are the tactical steps that operationalize those objectives, guiding organizations through precise activities like enabling audit logging, enforcing encryption, or maintaining patch management. This layered design bridges the gap between strategy and implementation, allowing teams to move from abstract policy to measurable action. Controls outline what must be achieved; safeguards explain how to do it. By treating safeguards as atomic, verifiable units of progress, organizations can track compliance and maturity with exceptional clarity.

Each safeguard also includes a security function (Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, or Recover) and an Implementation Group designation. This structure mirrors the logical flow of defense—from knowing what you have, to protecting it, detecting anomalies, responding to incidents, and recovering from disruptions. Understanding this hierarchy helps security leaders communicate effectively across technical and executive audiences. For example, a policy stating “implement multi-factor authentication” (Control 6) translates operationally into Safeguard 6.5: “Require MFA for all administrative access.” This specificity ensures consistency across business units and vendors while supporting automated compliance checks. In audits or assessments, referencing safeguards provides evidence that controls are functioning as intended. The distinction between controls and safeguards is central to maintaining both strategic oversight and operational rigor, enabling enterprises to build defenses that are traceable, testable, and continuously improvable across evolving threat landscapes.
 Produced by BareMetalCyber.com, where you’ll find more cyber audio courses, books, and information to strengthen your educational path. Also, if you want to stay up to date with the latest news, visit DailyCyber.News for a newsletter you can use, and a daily podcast you can commute with.

Episode Transcript

(00:00):
Welcome to Episode 3, Implementation Groups and Scoping Basics, where we explore how organizations size their efforts within the CIS Controls. Understanding implementation groups and scoping is crucial because they define what applies to you, how deeply you must implement each safeguard, and what success looks like. By learning these fundamentals now, you set a stable foundation for the rest of the course. In this episode, you will discover how to select your implementation group, outline your system boundaries, and record your choices so that audits and assessments later go smoothly.

(00:34):
Implementation groups, often shortened to I Gs, are the CIS framework’s way of matching complexity to capability. They divide the same set of controls into three tiers that represent growing levels of maturity and risk tolerance. This tiered model helps organizations begin where they are, not where they wish they could be. The idea is to make security improvement attainable by scaling expectations and focusing only on the safeguards that match an organization’s size, resources, and exposure. This allows a small business and a large enterprise to use the same framework without overwhelming either one.

(01:10):
Implementation Group One, often called essential cyber hygiene, defines the baseline defenses that all organizations should achieve. It assumes limited staff, modest technical tools, and a low tolerance for downtime. Its goal is to protect against the most common and indiscriminate attacks. Implementation Group Two adds more structure—formal policies, monitoring, and role separation—suiting organizations with moderate risk or light regulatory obligations. Implementation Group Three represents advanced maturity, where specialized teams and layered defenses protect critical systems or sensitive data under heavy compliance oversight. Each builds on the one before it, forming a staircase of capability.

(01:54):
Selecting the right starting group is not a matter of ambition but of realism. Begin where your organization can sustain effort. If you cannot maintain the evidence and review cadence for higher groups, it is better to start at Group One and expand later. The key factors to weigh are size, technical complexity, and threat exposure. For example, a local nonprofit handling only donor information can remain in Group One, while a financial institution with multiple networks and compliance rules will align with Group Two or Three. Choosing wisely ensures your security plan is actionable instead of aspirational.

(02:29):
Scoping begins once you know your group. It defines the boundaries of what systems, data, and activities fall under the CIS Controls. Scope answers the question, “What exactly are we protecting?” It depends on your risk appetite—how much uncertainty your organization is willing to tolerate—and on business priorities. A narrow scope might cover only production servers and employee laptops; a broad scope could include development environments, partners, or customer-facing services. Setting boundaries early allows clear accountability and prevents wasted effort on assets that do not affect your mission.

(03:05):
In or out of scope is not just a checkbox decision; it must be defensible. Systems that store or process business-critical or regulated data are almost always in scope. Test or demonstration systems may be excluded, but only with documentation explaining why. Some organizations mark lower environments or legacy platforms as out of scope while maintaining compensating controls, such as isolation. The goal is transparency, not avoidance. When in doubt, include rather than exclude, because auditors often question gaps that seem arbitrary or undocumented.

(03:41):
Modern environments blur these boundaries further, mixing on-premises, cloud, and hybrid infrastructures. The CIS Controls can handle all of them if scope is described clearly. For cloud services, you must understand where the provider’s responsibility ends and yours begins. The same safeguard—say, data encryption—may be handled automatically by the provider in one service but must be configured by your team in another. Hybrid environments demand consistent definitions so that controls such as inventory or patching work the same way everywhere.

(04:16):
Business units and shared services complicate scope because they may use different systems under one corporate umbrella. For example, a marketing department and a manufacturing line may share a single network but have distinct risk profiles. Scoping must identify which business processes are included and how common services, such as authentication or backups, apply to each. Documenting these shared elements clarifies ownership and prevents duplicated or missing responsibilities when controls are tested.

(04:47):
Third parties also influence scope through what are called inherited controls. If a service provider performs a function on your behalf—such as hosting, network monitoring, or payroll processing—you can inherit their controls, but only with evidence. That evidence may come from audit reports, certifications, or service-level agreements. You are still responsible for verifying that their coverage matches your requirements. Inherited does not mean ignored; it means acknowledged and monitored. Understanding this distinction protects your organization from assuming compliance that does not actually exist.

(05:23):
Documenting your scoping decisions must be done in plain, auditable language. Record which systems are included, who owns them, why they were selected, and how the boundaries were determined. Include diagrams or lists showing network segments, applications, and cloud accounts. Note any exclusions and their justifications. This written record becomes part of your evidence library and should be reviewed during every audit cycle. Clear documentation prevents confusion, ensures continuity when staff change, and demonstrates to auditors that scope decisions are intentional.

(05:58):
Scope is not permanent; it must evolve with change. Each major system upgrade, merger, or new business initiative can alter boundaries. Reassessing scope after major change is essential to maintain accuracy. Many organizations tie this review to change management processes so that security implications are considered before projects go live. The earlier you revisit scope, the less likely you are to leave gaps that attackers or auditors could exploit later. Treat scoping as a living document that grows with your environment.

(06:29):
Common scoping mistakes include defining boundaries that are too narrow, failing to account for cloud components, and overlooking shared or inherited services. Another frequent error is delegating scope definition solely to technical teams without input from business leaders. The result is a technical diagram that does not match organizational priorities. Avoiding these mistakes requires cross-functional discussion and plain-language documentation that everyone can understand. Scope must reflect how the organization actually operates, not just how systems are architected.

(07:03):
Evidence for scoping choices includes your written scope statement, supporting inventories, network diagrams, and lists of systems covered by each control. Auditors may also ask for contracts or third-party attestations when controls are inherited. To strengthen your position, link each scoped system to relevant safeguards and show who is responsible for implementation. The more your documentation connects people, systems, and controls, the easier it becomes to demonstrate full and accurate coverage.

(07:32):
Before moving on, finalize your scope with a simple checklist. Confirm that ownership is assigned, systems are inventoried, external dependencies are identified, and exclusions are justified. Store these documents in your evidence library and review them at least annually. This preparation ensures that the next episodes—those diving into each specific control—build on a solid, defensible foundation.

(07:57):
By now, you have learned that implementation groups and scoping decisions are not paperwork exercises but strategic tools. They align your resources with your risks and keep your security program both realistic and credible. As you continue through the series, you will apply these principles repeatedly, refining your scope as you grow. With clarity on what is covered and why, you can confidently begin implementing the CIS Controls in a way that fits your organization’s size, mission, and maturity.