August 3, 2025 • 13 mins
In this episode, we delve into the transformative potential of AI in the education sector. From personalized learning to intelligent tutoring systems, we explore how AI is revolutionizing teaching methods and learning experiences. We'll also examine the ethical implications of data privacy and the digital divide in AI-enabled education. Join us as we discuss with experts the challenges and opportunities that AI presents in shaping the future of education.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:02):
The future forward AI and humanity, where machines meet human meaning.
Speaker 2 (00:16):
It's fascinating how AI is rapidly reshaping the educational landscape,
isn't it. From personalized learning platforms to AI tutors, the
possibilities seem endless.
Speaker 3 (00:27):
Absolutely, it's like witnessing a paradigm shift in how we
approach teaching and learning. But with this rapid advancement, we
need to carefully consider the ethical implications.
Speaker 2 (00:40):
Right precisely, data privacy, algorithmic bias, the digital divide. These
are crucial issues we can't ignore. And what about the
impact on educators. There's concern about job displacement, the need
for professional developments.
Speaker 3 (00:57):
Yeah, yeah, it's a valid concern. But I also see
AI as a tool that can empower educators, not replace them.
It can automate tedious tasks like grading, freeing up teachers
to focus on more meaningful interactions with students.
Speaker 2 (01:11):
I see interesting, so more personalized attention like those intelligent
tutoring systems mentioned in the Wikipedia article, the ones that
adapt to individual student needs exactly.
Speaker 3 (01:21):
Think of systems like the scholar system from the seventies,
which used reciprocal questioning. It's a precursor to the sophisticated
AI tutors we have today, like those custom learning platforms
dual Lingo for instance.
Speaker 2 (01:34):
Oh so, personalized learning isn't a new concept. It's just
that AI is making it more scalable. Right.
Speaker 3 (01:43):
AI is turgo charging personalized learning. But as the article
points out, there's a risk of isolation, of diminishing student
teacher interaction. That's something we need to be mindful.
Speaker 2 (01:53):
Of, definitely. And what about generative AI tools like chat GPT.
They're transforming how students access in but they're also concerns
about academic integrity right uh.
Speaker 3 (02:03):
Huh over alliance platiarism. These are real challenges. The article
even mentions AI content detectors, but their accuracy is still debatable.
It's a bit of a cat and mouse game, got it.
Speaker 2 (02:17):
So how do we navigate these challenges? How do we
ensure AI and education is equitable, ethical, and truly beneficial.
Speaker 3 (02:25):
Well, addressing the digital divide is key, ensuring everyone has
access to these technologies regardless of their socioeconomic background. And
then there's the issue of bias in AI algorithms. We
need to be aware of these biases and develop strategies
to litigate them.
Speaker 2 (02:41):
I see. So it's about responsible implementation, not just blind adoption.
It's about using AI to augment human capabilities, not supplant.
Speaker 3 (02:49):
Them precisely, and that requires a shift in mindset, both
for educators and students. It's about developing AI literacy, understanding
the potential and the pitfalls of these powerful tools. It's
about fostering critical thinking, not just consuming information.
Speaker 2 (03:06):
So it's not just about the technology itself, but how
we use it. It's about integrating it thoughtfully into the curriculum,
not just slapping it on as a band aid.
Speaker 3 (03:15):
Exactly. The article talks about the sociotechnical imaginary, the shared
narratives and visions that shape how we adopt new technologies.
We need to be critical of these narratives to ensure
they align with our educational goals and values, not just
the goals of you know, big tech.
Speaker 1 (03:32):
Right.
Speaker 2 (03:32):
So it's a complex issue with no easy answers, but
it's a conversation we need to keep having. It's about
shaping the future of learning, not just reacting to it.
Speaker 3 (03:40):
Absolutely, it's about humanizing technology, not technologizing humans. It's about
empowering learners, not just automating education. And that's what makes
this conversation so crucial, So.
Speaker 2 (03:53):
This jagged frontier of AI in education. It's a really
compelling image, incredibly powerful in some areas, shockingly inept in others, almost.
Speaker 3 (04:02):
Like well, a brilliant student who can ace calculus but
can't tie their shoes. Yeah, I get that. And it
brings up that core tension between the techno solutionists and
the well the skeptics. Right.
Speaker 2 (04:12):
The article mentions those post digital scholars warning against building
public systems on what was at alchemy and stochastic parrots.
It's a pretty harsh.
Speaker 3 (04:21):
Critique, it is, but it speaks to a deeper concern
about the very nature of knowledge and learning. Are we
reducing education to a mere commodity, a knowledge business? As
the article puts it, is that what we want?
Speaker 2 (04:36):
And the whole venture capital angle, it adds another layer
of complexity. These African hyperscalers, data centers popping up. It
feels like a gold rush, doesn't.
Speaker 3 (04:45):
It It does? And who benefits? Is it the students
or is it the you know, the big tech companies,
the vcs. The article highlights this power shift away from
academics and towards corporations.
Speaker 2 (04:59):
Yeah, and that idea of AI resilient graduates. What does
that even mean?
Speaker 3 (05:04):
Is it about uh huh upwoar then, because I'd be
able to critique AI output understanding the biases baked into
these systems. Absolutely, it's about critical thinking, not just blind acceptance,
And for students in the majority world, it's also about
valuing their own knowledge systems, resisting the lure of Silicon
(05:27):
valleys narrative.
Speaker 2 (05:28):
I see. So it's not just about technical skills, but
also a kind of intellectual self defense, protecting yourself from.
Speaker 3 (05:37):
Thought, from enplosure, from having your own learning colonized by
these technologies. Yeah. I think that's a valid concern, and
it connects to the issue of trust. The article mentions
teacher skepticism, the lack of understanding about AI.
Speaker 2 (05:50):
Right, if teachers don't trust the technology, how can they
effectively integrate it into the classroom. It's not just about training,
it's about leave us.
Speaker 3 (06:00):
Building confidence, demonstrating the real value of AI and education,
not just the hype exactly, and addressing those very real
concerns about over reliance, about stifling creativity and critical.
Speaker 2 (06:12):
Thinking, Because, as the article points out, if students just
use AI to turn out essays, they're not really learning,
are they? They're just not.
Speaker 3 (06:20):
Gaming the system becoming dependent on these tools. Yeah, and
that leads to the issues raised about academic integrity, about plagiarism,
about well, about the very definition of learning itself.
Speaker 2 (06:34):
So we have this incredibly powerful technology with the potential
to transform education, but so she does.
Speaker 3 (06:42):
But we need to proceed with caution, with a critical eye,
with a focus on human values, not just technological advancement.
It's a complex landscape, full of both promise and peril,
and navigating it wisely is the challenge of our time.
Speaker 2 (06:57):
Really, So, this jagged frontier of AI and education, it's
a powerful image, right, like a student who can ace
calculus but can't tie their.
Speaker 3 (07:09):
Shoes, huh exactly. That encapsulates the tension between the techno
solutionists and the well everyone else. The article even mentions
post digital scholars warning about building systems on alchemy and
stochastic parrots pretty strong words.
Speaker 2 (07:23):
Right strong, And it makes you question what it's knowledge?
Speaker 1 (07:29):
Now?
Speaker 2 (07:29):
Are we just turning education into a knowledge business? Is
that the goal?
Speaker 3 (07:32):
Well, the venture capital pouring into egg tech suggests someone
sees a business opportunity. Those African hyperscalers, the data centers.
It feels like a gold rush.
Speaker 2 (07:43):
It does, and it makes you wonder who profits the
students or the vcs big tech. The article highlights that
shift in power away from academics and towards corporations.
Speaker 3 (07:56):
Definitely, And then there's this idea of creating AI resilient graduates.
What does that even mean?
Speaker 2 (08:03):
Yeah? Is it about being able to critique AI, spotting
the biases or is it something more fundamental?
Speaker 3 (08:10):
I think it's both. It's critical thinking, absolutely, but for students,
especially in developing nations, it's also about valuing their own
knowledge systems, resisting the Silicon Valley narrative, a kind of
intellectual self defense.
Speaker 2 (08:24):
Oh, intellectual self defense, that's interesting, protecting yourself from rap
what exactly?
Speaker 3 (08:33):
From enclosure, from having your learning colonized by these technologies,
which brings us back to trust. The article mentions teacher skepticism,
the lack of understanding about how AI works.
Speaker 2 (08:46):
If teachers don't trust it, how can they use it effectively? Right,
it's not just training, it's about building confidence, showing the
real value, not just the hype, Addressing those concerns about
over reliance stifled creativity.
Speaker 3 (08:59):
Because if students just use AI, to turn out essays.
They're not learning, they're gaming the system, becoming dependent. And
that's where the problems with academic integrity, plagiarism, even the
definition of learning itself come in.
Speaker 2 (09:12):
It's like, h we have this incredibly powerful tool, right,
but we're still figuring out how to use it responsibly.
We need to proceed with caution, a critical eye, focus
on human values, not just technological advancement.
Speaker 3 (09:27):
It's a complex landscape full of promise and peril navigating
it wisely. That's the challenge.
Speaker 2 (09:34):
Really. So this personalized learning thing, it's a bit of
a mixed bag.
Speaker 3 (09:37):
Yeah, it is. The article highlights this real tension between
its potential and the well the reality. Like those two
students Smith mentions succeeding with writing conferences, it makes you
think maybe the tech isn't the key here, right.
Speaker 2 (09:52):
Smith calls conferences the heart of the writing process. So
it's about that human connection, that personalized attention, not just
software exactly.
Speaker 3 (10:00):
And the three takeaways they reinforce that building on prior knowledge,
providing support, continuous assessment. Those are core teaching principles regardless
of technology. Confirming just provides a framework.
Speaker 2 (10:12):
But the advocates for personalized learning. They emphasize tech, don't they,
Software systems, student ed instruction. That it's all.
Speaker 3 (10:18):
Very Silicon Valley. It is, And that's where the skepticism
comes in. Hargreaves and Surely questioning whether instant information translates
to deep learning, Cone calling it a business tactic, a
way to sell more software.
Speaker 2 (10:34):
Oh, a business tactic. That's a harsh critique. He even
says meaningful learning never requires technology.
Speaker 3 (10:40):
Wow, strong words, but he has a point. Are we
just digitizing worksheets, adjusting difficulty levels based on test scores?
Is that personalization?
Speaker 2 (10:49):
And then there's Garcia del Miro advocating for more teacher
input and research, more studies in low income schools. It's
like sier Physiger, are we listening to the people on
the ground?
Speaker 3 (11:00):
Valid question? Because if teachers don't trust the technology, if
they don't see the value, how can it truly benefit students.
It's not just about implementation, it's about buy in.
Speaker 2 (11:11):
Right, buy in. And then there's this whole venture capital angle.
Data center's popping up in Africa. It feels like a
gold rush. Who profits from all this?
Speaker 3 (11:21):
Yeah? Is it the students or is it the tech companies?
The vcs. That's a question the article raises, and it
connects to this idea of AI resilient graduates AI resilient.
Speaker 2 (11:32):
What does that even mean? Is it about coding skills
or something more.
Speaker 3 (11:37):
I think it's deeper. It's about critical thinking, being able
to evaluate AI output, recognize biases. For students in developing nations,
it's also about valuing their own knowledge systems, resisting that
silicon value narrative like intellectual self defense.
Speaker 2 (11:53):
Intellectual self defense, that's fascinating. Protecting yourself from grid, what.
Speaker 3 (11:59):
From enclosure, from having your learning colonized by these technologies,
which brings us back to trust. If teachers are skeptical,
if they don't understand the technology, how can they integrate
it effectively.
Speaker 2 (12:13):
It's not just training, it's about building confidence, showing the
real value, not just the hype. Addressing those concerns about
over alliance stifled creativity.
Speaker 3 (12:23):
Because if students just use AI to churn out essays,
they're not learning, They're gaming the system, becoming dependent, and
that's where the real problems start. Academic integrity, plagiarism, the
very definition of learning is at.
Speaker 2 (12:36):
Stake, so personalized learning it's powerful, potentially transformative, but.
Speaker 3 (12:41):
Dot it's a double edged sword. We need to proceed
with caution, a critical eye, focus on human values, not
just technological advancement. It's a complex landscape full of promise
and peril. Navigating it wisely that's the challenge, really, and
that's where we'll leave it for today. Thanks for joining
uspend Ring and Runda, the Rana ppend Randan Run, the
(13:09):
Taranda Papandur and Arandad, the Terrando Papendo and Randa
The future forward AI and humanity, where machines meet human meaning.
Speaker 2 (00:16):
It's fascinating how AI is rapidly reshaping the educational landscape,
isn't it. From personalized learning platforms to AI tutors, the
possibilities seem endless.
Speaker 3 (00:27):
Absolutely, it's like witnessing a paradigm shift in how we
approach teaching and learning. But with this rapid advancement, we
need to carefully consider the ethical implications.
Speaker 2 (00:40):
Right precisely, data privacy, algorithmic bias, the digital divide. These
are crucial issues we can't ignore. And what about the
impact on educators. There's concern about job displacement, the need
for professional developments.
Speaker 3 (00:57):
Yeah, yeah, it's a valid concern. But I also see
AI as a tool that can empower educators, not replace them.
It can automate tedious tasks like grading, freeing up teachers
to focus on more meaningful interactions with students.
Speaker 2 (01:11):
I see interesting, so more personalized attention like those intelligent
tutoring systems mentioned in the Wikipedia article, the ones that
adapt to individual student needs exactly.
Speaker 3 (01:21):
Think of systems like the scholar system from the seventies,
which used reciprocal questioning. It's a precursor to the sophisticated
AI tutors we have today, like those custom learning platforms
dual Lingo for instance.
Speaker 2 (01:34):
Oh so, personalized learning isn't a new concept. It's just
that AI is making it more scalable. Right.
Speaker 3 (01:43):
AI is turgo charging personalized learning. But as the article
points out, there's a risk of isolation, of diminishing student
teacher interaction. That's something we need to be mindful.
Speaker 2 (01:53):
Of, definitely. And what about generative AI tools like chat GPT.
They're transforming how students access in but they're also concerns
about academic integrity right uh.
Speaker 3 (02:03):
Huh over alliance platiarism. These are real challenges. The article
even mentions AI content detectors, but their accuracy is still debatable.
It's a bit of a cat and mouse game, got it.
Speaker 2 (02:17):
So how do we navigate these challenges? How do we
ensure AI and education is equitable, ethical, and truly beneficial.
Speaker 3 (02:25):
Well, addressing the digital divide is key, ensuring everyone has
access to these technologies regardless of their socioeconomic background. And
then there's the issue of bias in AI algorithms. We
need to be aware of these biases and develop strategies
to litigate them.
Speaker 2 (02:41):
I see. So it's about responsible implementation, not just blind adoption.
It's about using AI to augment human capabilities, not supplant.
Speaker 3 (02:49):
Them precisely, and that requires a shift in mindset, both
for educators and students. It's about developing AI literacy, understanding
the potential and the pitfalls of these powerful tools. It's
about fostering critical thinking, not just consuming information.
Speaker 2 (03:06):
So it's not just about the technology itself, but how
we use it. It's about integrating it thoughtfully into the curriculum,
not just slapping it on as a band aid.
Speaker 3 (03:15):
Exactly. The article talks about the sociotechnical imaginary, the shared
narratives and visions that shape how we adopt new technologies.
We need to be critical of these narratives to ensure
they align with our educational goals and values, not just
the goals of you know, big tech.
Speaker 1 (03:32):
Right.
Speaker 2 (03:32):
So it's a complex issue with no easy answers, but
it's a conversation we need to keep having. It's about
shaping the future of learning, not just reacting to it.
Speaker 3 (03:40):
Absolutely, it's about humanizing technology, not technologizing humans. It's about
empowering learners, not just automating education. And that's what makes
this conversation so crucial, So.
Speaker 2 (03:53):
This jagged frontier of AI in education. It's a really
compelling image, incredibly powerful in some areas, shockingly inept in others, almost.
Speaker 3 (04:02):
Like well, a brilliant student who can ace calculus but
can't tie their shoes. Yeah, I get that. And it
brings up that core tension between the techno solutionists and
the well the skeptics. Right.
Speaker 2 (04:12):
The article mentions those post digital scholars warning against building
public systems on what was at alchemy and stochastic parrots.
It's a pretty harsh.
Speaker 3 (04:21):
Critique, it is, but it speaks to a deeper concern
about the very nature of knowledge and learning. Are we
reducing education to a mere commodity, a knowledge business? As
the article puts it, is that what we want?
Speaker 2 (04:36):
And the whole venture capital angle, it adds another layer
of complexity. These African hyperscalers, data centers popping up. It
feels like a gold rush, doesn't.
Speaker 3 (04:45):
It It does? And who benefits? Is it the students
or is it the you know, the big tech companies,
the vcs. The article highlights this power shift away from
academics and towards corporations.
Speaker 2 (04:59):
Yeah, and that idea of AI resilient graduates. What does
that even mean?
Speaker 3 (05:04):
Is it about uh huh upwoar then, because I'd be
able to critique AI output understanding the biases baked into
these systems. Absolutely, it's about critical thinking, not just blind acceptance,
And for students in the majority world, it's also about
valuing their own knowledge systems, resisting the lure of Silicon
(05:27):
valleys narrative.
Speaker 2 (05:28):
I see. So it's not just about technical skills, but
also a kind of intellectual self defense, protecting yourself from.
Speaker 3 (05:37):
Thought, from enplosure, from having your own learning colonized by
these technologies. Yeah. I think that's a valid concern, and
it connects to the issue of trust. The article mentions
teacher skepticism, the lack of understanding about AI.
Speaker 2 (05:50):
Right, if teachers don't trust the technology, how can they
effectively integrate it into the classroom. It's not just about training,
it's about leave us.
Speaker 3 (06:00):
Building confidence, demonstrating the real value of AI and education,
not just the hype exactly, and addressing those very real
concerns about over reliance, about stifling creativity and critical.
Speaker 2 (06:12):
Thinking, Because, as the article points out, if students just
use AI to turn out essays, they're not really learning,
are they? They're just not.
Speaker 3 (06:20):
Gaming the system becoming dependent on these tools. Yeah, and
that leads to the issues raised about academic integrity, about plagiarism,
about well, about the very definition of learning itself.
Speaker 2 (06:34):
So we have this incredibly powerful technology with the potential
to transform education, but so she does.
Speaker 3 (06:42):
But we need to proceed with caution, with a critical eye,
with a focus on human values, not just technological advancement.
It's a complex landscape, full of both promise and peril,
and navigating it wisely is the challenge of our time.
Speaker 2 (06:57):
Really, So, this jagged frontier of AI and education, it's
a powerful image, right, like a student who can ace
calculus but can't tie their.
Speaker 3 (07:09):
Shoes, huh exactly. That encapsulates the tension between the techno
solutionists and the well everyone else. The article even mentions
post digital scholars warning about building systems on alchemy and
stochastic parrots pretty strong words.
Speaker 2 (07:23):
Right strong, And it makes you question what it's knowledge?
Speaker 1 (07:29):
Now?
Speaker 2 (07:29):
Are we just turning education into a knowledge business? Is
that the goal?
Speaker 3 (07:32):
Well, the venture capital pouring into egg tech suggests someone
sees a business opportunity. Those African hyperscalers, the data centers.
It feels like a gold rush.
Speaker 2 (07:43):
It does, and it makes you wonder who profits the
students or the vcs big tech. The article highlights that
shift in power away from academics and towards corporations.
Speaker 3 (07:56):
Definitely, And then there's this idea of creating AI resilient graduates.
What does that even mean?
Speaker 2 (08:03):
Yeah? Is it about being able to critique AI, spotting
the biases or is it something more fundamental?
Speaker 3 (08:10):
I think it's both. It's critical thinking, absolutely, but for students,
especially in developing nations, it's also about valuing their own
knowledge systems, resisting the Silicon Valley narrative, a kind of
intellectual self defense.
Speaker 2 (08:24):
Oh, intellectual self defense, that's interesting, protecting yourself from rap
what exactly?
Speaker 3 (08:33):
From enclosure, from having your learning colonized by these technologies,
which brings us back to trust. The article mentions teacher skepticism,
the lack of understanding about how AI works.
Speaker 2 (08:46):
If teachers don't trust it, how can they use it effectively? Right,
it's not just training, it's about building confidence, showing the
real value, not just the hype, Addressing those concerns about
over reliance stifled creativity.
Speaker 3 (08:59):
Because if students just use AI, to turn out essays.
They're not learning, they're gaming the system, becoming dependent. And
that's where the problems with academic integrity, plagiarism, even the
definition of learning itself come in.
Speaker 2 (09:12):
It's like, h we have this incredibly powerful tool, right,
but we're still figuring out how to use it responsibly.
We need to proceed with caution, a critical eye, focus
on human values, not just technological advancement.
Speaker 3 (09:27):
It's a complex landscape full of promise and peril navigating
it wisely. That's the challenge.
Speaker 2 (09:34):
Really. So this personalized learning thing, it's a bit of
a mixed bag.
Speaker 3 (09:37):
Yeah, it is. The article highlights this real tension between
its potential and the well the reality. Like those two
students Smith mentions succeeding with writing conferences, it makes you
think maybe the tech isn't the key here, right.
Speaker 2 (09:52):
Smith calls conferences the heart of the writing process. So
it's about that human connection, that personalized attention, not just
software exactly.
Speaker 3 (10:00):
And the three takeaways they reinforce that building on prior knowledge,
providing support, continuous assessment. Those are core teaching principles regardless
of technology. Confirming just provides a framework.
Speaker 2 (10:12):
But the advocates for personalized learning. They emphasize tech, don't they,
Software systems, student ed instruction. That it's all.
Speaker 3 (10:18):
Very Silicon Valley. It is, And that's where the skepticism
comes in. Hargreaves and Surely questioning whether instant information translates
to deep learning, Cone calling it a business tactic, a
way to sell more software.
Speaker 2 (10:34):
Oh, a business tactic. That's a harsh critique. He even
says meaningful learning never requires technology.
Speaker 3 (10:40):
Wow, strong words, but he has a point. Are we
just digitizing worksheets, adjusting difficulty levels based on test scores?
Is that personalization?
Speaker 2 (10:49):
And then there's Garcia del Miro advocating for more teacher
input and research, more studies in low income schools. It's
like sier Physiger, are we listening to the people on
the ground?
Speaker 3 (11:00):
Valid question? Because if teachers don't trust the technology, if
they don't see the value, how can it truly benefit students.
It's not just about implementation, it's about buy in.
Speaker 2 (11:11):
Right, buy in. And then there's this whole venture capital angle.
Data center's popping up in Africa. It feels like a
gold rush. Who profits from all this?
Speaker 3 (11:21):
Yeah? Is it the students or is it the tech companies?
The vcs. That's a question the article raises, and it
connects to this idea of AI resilient graduates AI resilient.
Speaker 2 (11:32):
What does that even mean? Is it about coding skills
or something more.
Speaker 3 (11:37):
I think it's deeper. It's about critical thinking, being able
to evaluate AI output, recognize biases. For students in developing nations,
it's also about valuing their own knowledge systems, resisting that
silicon value narrative like intellectual self defense.
Speaker 2 (11:53):
Intellectual self defense, that's fascinating. Protecting yourself from grid, what.
Speaker 3 (11:59):
From enclosure, from having your learning colonized by these technologies,
which brings us back to trust. If teachers are skeptical,
if they don't understand the technology, how can they integrate
it effectively.
Speaker 2 (12:13):
It's not just training, it's about building confidence, showing the
real value, not just the hype. Addressing those concerns about
over alliance stifled creativity.
Speaker 3 (12:23):
Because if students just use AI to churn out essays,
they're not learning, They're gaming the system, becoming dependent, and
that's where the real problems start. Academic integrity, plagiarism, the
very definition of learning is at.
Speaker 2 (12:36):
Stake, so personalized learning it's powerful, potentially transformative, but.
Speaker 3 (12:41):
Dot it's a double edged sword. We need to proceed
with caution, a critical eye, focus on human values, not
just technological advancement. It's a complex landscape full of promise
and peril. Navigating it wisely that's the challenge, really, and
that's where we'll leave it for today. Thanks for joining
uspend Ring and Runda, the Rana ppend Randan Run, the
(13:09):
Taranda Papandur and Arandad, the Terrando Papendo and Randa
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
New Heights with Jason & Travis Kelce
Football’s funniest family duo — Jason Kelce of the Philadelphia Eagles and Travis Kelce of the Kansas City Chiefs — team up to provide next-level access to life in the league as it unfolds. The two brothers and Super Bowl champions drop weekly insights about the weekly slate of games and share their INSIDE perspectives on trending NFL news and sports headlines. They also endlessly rag on each other as brothers do, chat the latest in pop culture and welcome some very popular and well-known friends to chat with them. Check out new episodes every Wednesday. Follow New Heights on the Wondery App, YouTube or wherever you get your podcasts. You can listen to new episodes early and ad-free, and get exclusive content on Wondery+. Join Wondery+ in the Wondery App, Apple Podcasts or Spotify. And join our new membership for a unique fan experience by going to the New Heights YouTube channel now!
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.