Mi Casa Su Casa- Niko House

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
Too in your life.

Speaker 2 (00:02):
Good afternoon, everybody. Welcome to me Kasukasa with Nico House.
For my supporters, I owe you all apology. I know
that I have not been here consistently every Friday like usual.
There is a very legitimate reason for that. For those
of you who do not know, I did relocate to Miami,
and with that relocation came a few trials, a few tribulations,

(00:25):
but we finally did get through it.

Speaker 1 (00:27):
I did get my apartment.

Speaker 2 (00:29):
I do have somewhere to consistently film every Friday now,
and so you will be seeing me much more often
than just Fridays like like before. You will see me
making more consistent YouTube video posts.

Speaker 1 (00:42):
You will see me covering a lot more stories.

Speaker 2 (00:44):
And I have been trying to keep up with the
stories via just regular posts on my Facebook page and
my Twitter. But you will see me now beginning to
post as regularly and hopefully even more over the next
few months than I have been over the last month
or so.

Speaker 1 (01:02):
So I just wanted to start out by.

Speaker 2 (01:06):
Talking to you all about something that is potentially very
dangerous for what we're trying to do here. In because Sucasa,
which is YouTube, has essentially created this ad boycott. Right. So,
for those of you who don't know, I do have
a Patreon account and I also have a YouTube account,
and this YouTube account creates revenue for me so that

(01:28):
I can continue to bring quality product for you all.
I do pretty much almost everything all the products. I
have two iPads that I help that I use to broadcast.
I have my iPhone obviously, I have equipment. I have
a digital camera, a mini cam that the superper, the
jam pagball for me, but all the equipment for that

(01:50):
I buy. So a lot goes into doing what I'm
trying to do and creating what I'm trying to create
by bringing honest and truthful and raw news to you all,
and also trying to expand that. And so why I
collect YouTube ad revenue is to help offset. It doesn't
offset by a lot, maybe a couple of hundred dollars
a month, but at least it's.

Speaker 1 (02:11):
Something and we hope to see that grow in the future.

Speaker 2 (02:14):
However, because some people have managed to somehow bypass the
security system they were putting in advertisements for like cocaine,
for drugs, for crazy stuff, and now YouTube's algorithms have
made it such that if we mention anything that is
quote unquote too controversial that they will demonetize our YouTube videos.

Speaker 1 (02:37):
Which essentially can significantly hurt me.

Speaker 2 (02:40):
In fact, it's already begun to and if I cannot, I,
like I said.

Speaker 1 (02:46):
Do this mostly out of my own pocket.

Speaker 2 (02:48):
And so if I can't at least have that little
bit of revenue to offset the already expansive I mean,
they're expanding as we speak, and I still have to
bring more people on.

Speaker 1 (02:58):
I need to buy equipment for other people in different
and things like that.

Speaker 2 (03:02):
If that doesn't change soon, that will hurt the show,
and it potentially slow down my video, slow down my content,
and ultimately put me out of business. Because I do
have mouths. I have to feed out to feed myself,
I have to pay for bills, and I can't put
one hundred percent of my income towards this and do
it in a way that I believe that you all deserve.

Speaker 1 (03:23):
So with that being said.

Speaker 2 (03:25):
I believe that we do have a way to counteract that,
and that is my Patreon account where you can become
a monthly donor, and what you can do is literally
do donate five.

Speaker 1 (03:36):
Ten twenty dollars a month.

Speaker 2 (03:38):
We have ten patreons right now for a little bit
over one hundred dollars a month right now. I would
love love to see that increase to about twenty by
the end of the weekend. It doesn't have to be
a lot, but as you all can tell, I literally
give most of my day.

Speaker 1 (03:58):
To politics, educating myself.

Speaker 2 (04:00):
Health, bringing you all the truth in whatever way I can.
And the little bit of revenue I collected from YouTube
that is now being hindered and that Patreon account is
what allows me to do that without sacrificing.

Speaker 1 (04:13):
Too much of my own income, which I don't have that.

Speaker 2 (04:16):
Much of, mostly because I decide to do this full
time now.

Speaker 1 (04:20):
So the Patreon link is in.

Speaker 2 (04:24):
This video description, but also if you're trying to just
find a quick link to the pay trying to go
to the patreon right now during the video, can just
type in www dot patreon, p A t R e
O n dot com slash. Mika said, Sukasa exactly how
you would expect it to be spelled.

Speaker 1 (04:40):
Like I said, we have ten patreons right now.

Speaker 2 (04:42):
I would love to see that ten increase to twenty
by the end of the weekend, because well, YouTube is
trying to censor us once again.

Speaker 1 (04:49):
It's already happening to David Pacman.

Speaker 2 (04:51):
I've heard it's starting to have an Aga Goodman and
a few others. Anytime we mentioned anything controversial, they will
demonetize our videos, especially the ones of the videos that
tend to get more views. So go to Patreon, help
us out, help us continue to expand, help us continue
to bring you better quality.

Speaker 1 (05:09):
It doesn't have to be a lot. We have people
that donated five.

Speaker 2 (05:12):
Dollars, people that have donated ten dollars, twenty dollars, or
even have somebody who donated like two dollars a month,
and that two dollars helps out a mess. So thank
you all so much. We're gonna go ahead and get
started with the show. We have a lot to cover today.
We're gonna talk about Clinton, of course, right this little
book that he's released, and the Rolling Star article covering

(05:33):
this book that I do not necessarily approve of because
the rhetoric is a little if, little if if.

Speaker 1 (05:42):
I'll explain that later.

Speaker 2 (05:44):
The Unity Tour, the Old Soul famous Unity Tour that
so many people have been asking my opinion on, and
so many people have been forthright and say and trying
to determine whether or not this unity.

Speaker 1 (05:54):
Tour shouldn't be happening or not.

Speaker 2 (05:55):
I want to talk about that and give my I'm
gonna finally give my take on it. We're also going
to talk about Julian Desange all of a sudden becoming
a priority for the Trump administration. That's a big deal
for those of you who don't know, and.

Speaker 1 (06:08):
I will explain why. Surely. We're also going to talk
about Jordan Sheraton.

Speaker 2 (06:14):
And on the talking to the Flint panel about their
inaction dealing with the water problem in mid Flint, Michigan,
and also some of the events that took place at
that panel.

Speaker 1 (06:24):
And then finally, if we have time, I will.

Speaker 2 (06:27):
Talk about Aaron Hernandez in that situation as well, because
a lot of people have had a lot of differentiating
your pendent opinions about whether or not, you know, we
should have some type of sympthy forum, whether we should
have none with we should have a lot of sympathy
for them, his family, whether he's guilty, innocent.

Speaker 1 (06:44):
Whatever, and what.

Speaker 2 (06:46):
I just want to give my take on the Aaron
Hernandez suicide in the situation surrounding it, just because a
lot of people have asked me about it, and it's
been a point, a very contentious point, not only in
sports today but in just you know, political political debate
as well. So, first of all, Clinton's aids, some of them,
a couple of them, have actually written and released.

Speaker 1 (07:09):
A book about the Clinton campaign. I mean, it's not
really that surprising.

Speaker 2 (07:13):
There's a lot of money to be made off of
Clinton's name, but it's not exactly what you would think.

Speaker 1 (07:18):
The book is about.

Speaker 2 (07:19):
The book is called Shattered, and the book actually describes
how Clinton's campaign actually had, or Clinton's campaign, Clinton herself
had really no reason to be running for president, and
there was a lot of infighting empower struggles, which infighting.

Speaker 1 (07:39):
Empower struggles is not.

Speaker 2 (07:41):
That big of a deal, but the reason why they're
infighting empower struggles started like they were in fire. There
was infighting empower struggles within Bernie's campaign, but amongst the
acts people who are trying to get Burnie elected.

Speaker 1 (07:53):
But a lot of those fights were started because.

Speaker 2 (07:55):
They just wanted to win so bad and they didn't want.

Speaker 1 (07:59):
Anyone else hindering that victory.

Speaker 2 (08:02):
And that's what a lot of the infighting from the
Bernie's campaign came from. But for clan's campaign. It was
because there were people, legitimately, which a lot of us believe,
that really wanted Hillary to win because they thought she
was the best candidate, because they thought that she was
doing it for the right reasons, and they thought that
there were people around her that also.

Speaker 1 (08:20):
Were doing it for the right reasons.

Speaker 2 (08:22):
However, when people and this is a quote from the
Rolling Star Stones article, when people were asking Hillary Clinton
why she was running, she actually couldn't give an answer.
She would say I'm running for president because I want
to be the president and things like that. Whenever they
would ask people close to her, she couldn't give an
answer either.

Speaker 1 (08:42):
And so.

Speaker 2 (08:44):
It really kind of, you know, exemplifies what many of
us have said, which is and also a question that
has been presented because, you know, in light of people
speculating that Hillary Clinton will run, even though speculation, that
speculation has been put.

Speaker 1 (08:58):
To rest, thank god. You know, it's a question that
was presented.

Speaker 2 (09:02):
Recently, why is Hillary Clinton running for office? People don't
want her? Right, people did not want her once and
it was a primary. So she said maybe because people
have run twice before. However, a lot of those peoples
would be what at the time.

Speaker 1 (09:20):
Would be considered radicals.

Speaker 2 (09:21):
Jill Stein would be considered and for whatever reason, the
modern world are radical, you know, because she wants like
universal health care, she wants war to stop, you know,
things like that. That makes you radical apparently in this country.
But what other people in the past run And you
ask them, if you ask Bernie Sanders, if you asked
Jill Stein, if you even asked once upon a time,
Jessin Jackson, if you ask them even Ralph Nader or

(09:44):
Rampaul or Ron Paul, they'll tell you why. They could
list off very easily why they want to run for
office again, and it will be their personal reasons, not
some political jargon. Right. Hillary Clinton, however, could not answer that,
And that's not surprising.

Speaker 1 (10:03):
Now here's what was weird about this article by the
Rolling Stones talking about the book Shattered, which is.

Speaker 2 (10:08):
A book written by Hillary Clinton's aides about the infighting
within Hillary Clayton campaign and.

Speaker 1 (10:12):
The uncertainty with Hillary Clinton herself.

Speaker 2 (10:16):
It was weird because they said that this book actually
released more it was more telling than the wiki leaks stump,
which was weird. I was like, why why would you
even bring that up right now? Like in that type
of way. It was like, this book actually tells us
more than any of those stupid wiki leaks stumps about
about Hillary Clay and not only Hillary Clinton, but.

Speaker 1 (10:35):
The American government. And I was like, the.

Speaker 2 (10:39):
Wiki leaks don't reveal that we were funding governments that
directly funded terrorist organizations.

Speaker 1 (10:47):
I don't give a damn how much is in this book.

Speaker 2 (10:50):
I can almost one hundred percent guarantee that there is
no type of article or no, not a single page
in that book.

Speaker 1 (10:59):
That is linking Hillary Clinton's you.

Speaker 2 (11:02):
Know, secretary of State, department a Department of State linking
them to terrorst organizations.

Speaker 1 (11:08):
So no rolling stones.

Speaker 2 (11:09):
Iking almost one hundred percent guarantee this book is not
more telling of Hillary Clinton and the government that she
was involved in our government as.

Speaker 1 (11:19):
A whole than the wiki leagues dump.

Speaker 2 (11:21):
First of all, but I'm not saying that this book
should not be read because it could give some insight
as to why Hillary Clinton's constantly failing and also going forward,
white establishment candidates in general keep failing and continue to
do so. Next, since we're on this subject, the Unity Tour,

(11:41):
how do I feel about it? So, first of all,
let me just go on record as saying I do
not care.

Speaker 1 (11:48):
If you despise Bernie Sanders.

Speaker 2 (11:50):
The truth of the matter is just because you got
your fragile little heartbroken because Bernie had a misstep. Bernie
had said some things that I don't agree with. Bernie
and says something that you don't agree with. Bernie says
some things that progressives in general do not agree with.
Does not mean that Bernie's intentions are not in the
right place.

Speaker 1 (12:07):
So we need to understand that. We need to understand
that Bernie Sanders is the longest lasting independent senator in
history for a very valid reason, and.

Speaker 2 (12:18):
That reason being is no matter how honest and truthful
Berne Sanders is, no matter how genuine of a character
he is, he also knows how to play the game,
and that is extremely important when you're trying to get
legislation as controversial as single payer, you know, as controversial
as tuition.

Speaker 1 (12:37):
You know it's free tuition.

Speaker 2 (12:38):
Well not free tuition, but you know, free tuition for
those who can't afford it to public universities. Any time
you have a person who is like that, you know,
very genuine has the record to back it up.

Speaker 1 (12:51):
I'm not saying Bernie hasn't made mistakes.

Speaker 2 (12:53):
Bernie hasn't made mistakes, but a lot of those mistakes
were based off the information that was made available to him.

Speaker 1 (12:57):
I think that Bernie Sanders not only you know, oh.

Speaker 2 (13:00):
Hi, I say this because people have we have the
gift of hindsight now. So a lot of people are saying,
Bernie Sanders voted to bamb Iraq, to bamb Yemen.

Speaker 1 (13:09):
You know, he voted to go in Afghanistan. Well, he
didn't vote going.

Speaker 2 (13:11):
That rac but he did vote going Afghanistan. He has
approved missile strikes on the Gaza Strip, he has approved
funding to certain.

Speaker 1 (13:18):
Things that should not have been funded.

Speaker 2 (13:19):
And you know why, because he was basing his logic
off of what he had available to him, the same
way that many of us, including myself. Why wasn't for
the war in the Rock, but I was for the
war in Afghanistan. I was for at first, before I
was learning about the two state is situation. I was

(13:40):
quote unquote pro Israel in my younger days. But this
is before this abundance of information became available to us.
And Bernie Sanders himself is what seventy three years old,
seventy four years old, So he's not probably inclined at
seventy years old, at sixty five years old at the time,
to go online and look up all these independent resources

(14:00):
to crosscheck, and they tell his friends, Hey, everything at
your the intelligence agencies are saying are wrong. In fact,
before this election, I would venture to say that most
of us at minimum thought the FBI was kind of trustworthy,
at least trustworthy. They may not always get it right,
but then we never thought that they would do a
deliberate attack on our liberties, or allowed a deliberate attack

(14:23):
on our liberties, or allow someone like Hillary Clinton to
slip through the cracks, or allow some you know, like
allow things like Russia has been, you know, it has
been hacking the election and not provide any proof whatsoever.

Speaker 1 (14:37):
Things like this. We all were asleep too. And it
wasn't only us.

Speaker 2 (14:43):
Tulsi Gabbert, for those of you who loved Toulci Gabbert
so much, Tulci Gabbert wasn't islamophobic. You know why, because
military breed the military of the United States military specifically
breeds Islamophobia. While I was in basic training, the amount
of they teach you how to refer to or Deasy's
or anyone in the Middle East, they teach you to
refer to them and racial slurs, and you're not even

(15:05):
realizing it until you remove yourself from that environment, and
you're like, hold on, I shouldn't because they tell us
to call them dirkas, they would tell us to call
them jihads, they would tell us to call them, I
mean hadjis. I mean all kinds of just racial slurs

(15:25):
that you thought were normal because someone who was superior
to you had told you that it was okay to
say these things. Toulci Gabbert is not an exception to
that rule. Tolsi Gabert was for the war in the Rut.
Tolsi Gabert was for the war in Afghanistan. But guess what,
she changed her mind after becoming awake, after understanding, after

(15:47):
seeing the damage, after talking to these people, after having
one on one conversations with people in Syria and people
who are actually affected by these false flag conflicts, and
she changed her tone. Bernie Sanders has made mistakes, but
Bernie Senders is a very genuine person.

Speaker 1 (16:05):
Bernie Sanders says some things about.

Speaker 2 (16:06):
The side that I do not necessarily agree with, but
that could be completely honest. Although I don't think Aside
is completely guilty.

Speaker 1 (16:12):
I can't say.

Speaker 2 (16:13):
For in fact, I absolutely cannot say it's completely innocent.
Why because I don't live in Syria that we're not
allowed to get accurate news reported from Syria Because one
side is reporting the extreme right wing analysis and the
other side is reporting, or not right wing analysis, but
the extreme military industrial analysis. The other side is reporting

(16:33):
Aside as the savior of all saviors.

Speaker 1 (16:36):
And when you have too extremes, the truth usually lies
in the middle right. So no, I don't agree with
Bernie Sanders on the side. I do agree with him
when he says we shouldn't have war.

Speaker 2 (16:47):
I do agree with him where he says that he
was there, we were.

Speaker 1 (16:50):
Wrong for invading the ruck. I do agree with him.

Speaker 2 (16:53):
I do believe him when he apologizes for past mistake
that he made. Now to this unity, I think it's
an absolute genius idea for those of you who don't think.

Speaker 1 (17:05):
Oh, who think, why would Bernie Sanders do this?

Speaker 2 (17:07):
He's letting the DNC use him, He's let let's let's
be completely honest. When has the DNC ever really been
able to use Bernie Sanders?

Speaker 1 (17:17):
What? In what way? In what way has the UNC
ever been the DNC. Excuse him at the UNC.

Speaker 2 (17:24):
The UNC is very successful National champions anyway. So but
in what way has the DNC ever been successful in
trying to use Berney Sam and attempting to use Bernie Sanders.

Speaker 1 (17:35):
They tried to win Hillary. Didn't work. They tried it
with Perez. Yeah, Perez is winning, but is he really winning?
He won? But is he winning? Well, let's find out.

Speaker 2 (17:48):
I always had some friends at the Miami at the
Miami rally for the Unity Tour, and they were telling
me people were turning their back on Perez.

Speaker 1 (18:01):
People were, you know, booing him.

Speaker 2 (18:05):
They wouldn't let him talk. They had nothing nice to
say about him. Hillary supporters weren't there. People think that
these rollers are for Hillary supporters.

Speaker 1 (18:14):
These rollers aren't Hillary supporters.

Speaker 2 (18:16):
Hillary supporters are by and large blue no matter what.

Speaker 1 (18:21):
So if Bernie Bernie won the election or if he
won the primary, they were going to vote for him.

Speaker 2 (18:27):
They would have because that's how I hate to say,
but that's how these fickle blue no matter what supporters are.
As much as they hated Bernie Sanders in the primary
just because they were standing in a way, if he
was standing in the way of the promised one, they
would have immediately changed that tune and fell absolutely in
love with him. You know how I know this because

(18:49):
we saw it happening with Obama.

Speaker 1 (18:52):
They hated this man.

Speaker 3 (18:53):
I specifically remember being eighteen nineteen years old, hearing all
types of racial slurs, ring, all types of just he's
a sexist, he's an asshole, he doesn't understand politics.

Speaker 1 (19:07):
Hillary Clinton had.

Speaker 2 (19:07):
To do those things, and as soon as soon as
Barack Obama won that primary, the entire tone of those
blue no matter what people, those people who swore up
and now that Hillary was a promise one.

Speaker 1 (19:20):
As soon as Barack Obama won, the tone change. It was. Wow. Wow,
I never really realized how well spoken he is. Wow.

Speaker 2 (19:27):
I really definitely realized how knowledgeable about policy it is.

Speaker 1 (19:31):
Wow, I never like all those things immediately changed.

Speaker 2 (19:34):
So those Hillary supporters, those Blue No matter what supporters,
are not who they are trying to impress at the
unity reality. Bernie Sanders is very aware of this.

Speaker 1 (19:45):
He's not an idiot. Press is aware of this.

Speaker 2 (19:49):
The DNC, like the Committee itself, is aware of this.
They were not expected. You don't need to convince blue
no matter what supporters to unified.

Speaker 1 (20:02):
You need us, you need us.

Speaker 2 (20:06):
The ones who are booing you, those are the supporters
you need. And although at this very moment they're putting
on a facade of unity, that's what they're doing. Nobody
is being fooled by it. We've seen how they've treated
the quote unquote progressives or even the ones who are
pretending to be aggressive. We saw how, you know, they

(20:27):
didn't put any weight behind the young man in Georgia.
We saw that they didn't put any weight behind the
young man. And I want to say it was Ohio,
but the special election that happened in like Ohio or
California where they could have beat the Republican but they
didn't because they refused to put anyway behind him because
he was a burning progressive.

Speaker 1 (20:44):
Specifically, we see how they're treating these people.

Speaker 2 (20:47):
We saw how they did Toulsi Gabbard when that email
to Toulsi Gabberd was released, what they were saying, they
weren't going to give him her funds because of her
you know, switch in her stands to switch in her stand.
We saw how they chief progressive. So nobody believes this
unity nonsense.

Speaker 1 (21:06):
But they don't have to believe. We don't have to
believe it. What we do need to keep doing, however,
is saying, hell.

Speaker 2 (21:13):
Yeah, keep doing the Unity Tour because we're going to
show you how unified we are, so you really understand
what state of mind we are in and how damn
your party really is until.

Speaker 1 (21:25):
You start answering to some of our demands.

Speaker 2 (21:27):
Because what happens when Tom Perez stands up there and
gets booed out of his mind, people turn their back
to him.

Speaker 1 (21:34):
They're screaming, you know, all kinds of obscenities at him.

Speaker 2 (21:37):
And when Bernie Sanders stands up there, Bernie, I just love.

Speaker 1 (21:44):
You so much. Have my baby's playing Bernie? Oh my god.

Speaker 2 (21:49):
Like When that type of thing happens, that demonstrates to
the DNC that we are not playing and we are
not to be played with.

Speaker 1 (21:59):
That is the type of reaction that Tom Perez, that
Debuie Wesherman shows that all.

Speaker 2 (22:06):
These democrats, establishment democrats, these corporate democrats need to see.

Speaker 1 (22:11):
They need to understand there shouldn't be a bunch of
tearing at the Unity Tour. There shouldn't.

Speaker 2 (22:21):
Because that would be fallacious, That would be disingenuous, because
it's not real.

Speaker 1 (22:26):
Nobody's happy.

Speaker 2 (22:28):
Hillary supporters, by and large, yes, you run into the trolls.

Speaker 1 (22:32):
We know that do a lot of people paid by
Hillary Clan's campaign. We know.

Speaker 2 (22:40):
That Hillary supporters a lot of the times don't want
to believe everything that it's facts. You know, they don't
believe fact all the time, right, But by and large,
I can honestly say, because I can't gave you a
lot of.

Speaker 1 (22:51):
People on a daily basis, most of the Hillary supporters
have jumped shit. They know they're like, well, damn, I'm
not exactly with these Democrats are are on our side.

Speaker 2 (23:03):
I'm not really sure that Hillary clin is running for
the right reasons. And they can admit that most of them,
not all of them.

Speaker 1 (23:09):
There's still a large part that is not that does
not admit that.

Speaker 2 (23:12):
But the important thing is most of them understand that.

Speaker 1 (23:17):
But the problem is the establishment.

Speaker 2 (23:19):
Politicians do not understand that at all, even a little bit.
Tom Peress, remember he admitted, he admitted this that the
DNC primary was rick that the Democratic primary is ricked.

Speaker 1 (23:37):
He admitted this. Now he's chanted soon he's chanted. Tone.
I wonder why a couple of.

Speaker 2 (23:50):
Powers that beer like, hey, man, if you want to
make it towards the next establishment election. I called the
establishment election because obviously the elections do not belong to
those progressive is that they don't even belong to the Libertarians.
It belong to the establishment, those who loves that it's
called because they're benefiting from it.

Speaker 1 (24:07):
Tom Perez has seen the he's seeing at this very
moment the light. And the longer this.

Speaker 2 (24:15):
DNC unity tour continues, the more opportunity that the entire
nation will have to demonstrate that we are not to
be trifled with.

Speaker 1 (24:27):
We will be taken seriously, or you will see another
four year of Donald Trump.

Speaker 2 (24:31):
You will see another four years of Republican Congress, you
will see another four years of a Republican Senate. You
will see Republicans completely totally dominate the landscape of politics
for the next sixteen years if necessary, because guess what
if they keep dominating. What they're not understanding is yes,
if they keep dominating, then the people will be hurt.

Speaker 1 (24:51):
But I hate to break it to you, many of
us have been hurt.

Speaker 2 (24:55):
Many of us have been suffering financially, many of us
experience race daily. Many of the LGBTQQ community are still suffering,
whether or not polities or pastor or not. Many progressive
politicians are still losing. But here's the kicker, and here's

(25:19):
what democrats do not realize.

Speaker 1 (25:21):
Eventually you will hear us.

Speaker 2 (25:23):
You know why, because once you all have dug yourself
in a deep enough hole that it doesn't matter anymore.
And Republicans have been known to waver much more than
Democrats once you dug yourself into a deep enough hole.
If I'm a corporation, if I'm a lobbyist, I don't
have to spend money on y'all anymore.

Speaker 1 (25:41):
Y'all have shot yourselves in the foot. I might spit
money on maybe five.

Speaker 2 (25:46):
Ten Southern dixiecrats that you know are Democrats and progressives
in disguise. But in the grand scheme, the status quote
will be conservatism. I hate to break it to you,
but hell, that's been Conservatism has been the status quo
for two centuries. Many of us have suffered from it before,

(26:10):
and we're tired of it. Incrementalism will no longer stand
with progressives. Hell, incrementalism will no longer, you know, stand
with a lot of these Republicans out here, which is
why Bernie has so many votes We need single payer,
we need social security.

Speaker 1 (26:32):
Until a better option is available. We need change. We
need these wars to end. We need the military industrial
complex to end.

Speaker 2 (26:40):
We just spend millions, hundreds of million dollars on bombing
air force base or air base for no reason. We're
committing atrocities daily, and it costs us money. If you
don't if you don't feel for human life, most people,
at least at minimum, feel for money.

Speaker 1 (27:00):
We don't want incrementalism any more.

Speaker 2 (27:06):
So this Unity Tour absolutely must be had, but it's
not because we want to show how unified we are.
We want this tour to continue for the same reasons
that we saw last night and what we have seen throughout.

Speaker 1 (27:20):
The previous rallies with the Unity Tour.

Speaker 2 (27:21):
We want to hear the bulleying, We want to hear
the bullton Perez, want.

Speaker 1 (27:26):
To see people turning their backs on him.

Speaker 2 (27:28):
And then as soon as soon as Bernie Sanders walks
onto that stage, the roars begin, which signifies exactly what
many of us feel. I don't want to hear what
you have to say unless you are reiterating what that
old bald man is saying and has been saying from

(27:50):
the beginning of his career.

Speaker 1 (27:53):
That basic human empathy. Empathy needs to become.

Speaker 2 (27:57):
The norm and political policy. Why because people say we don't, well,
we can't just help everybody.

Speaker 1 (28:05):
We're not trying to help any everybody. That's not the issue.

Speaker 2 (28:09):
The issue is the reason people are in the situations
they're in right now, And the reason that people are
in the situation they're in right now are because of
shit government policy, because of policies that have allowed corporations
to run rampant and supposedly they are all of a
sudden free speakers there. It's crazy, right because they say

(28:30):
that corporations are people. But if I go bankrupt me personally,
if I'm a sole proprietorship and I go bankrupt my
small business, I go bankrupt. Nico Deshaun House goes bankrupt.
If best Buy decides to go belly up, or even

(28:52):
if they they don't even have to be, they can
be in the green in actuality instead declare bankruptcy. The
only thing that disappears, or if you're on Trump for.

Speaker 1 (29:00):
Example, because he did that, he's an expert of this.

Speaker 2 (29:02):
The only thing that disappears is your assets. If you
liquidate everything that you want and leave enough assets to
satisfy the bank. The only thing the bank is going.

Speaker 1 (29:15):
To take or your.

Speaker 2 (29:16):
Assets, that does not make you a person. A corporation
cannot be a person. A corporation that cannot suffer like
an individual. A corporation cannot feel pain, cannot feel hungry.

Speaker 1 (29:30):
Like an individual.

Speaker 2 (29:33):
A corporation can effect all those things for an individual,
but a corporation is in no way form or fashion individual.

Speaker 1 (29:41):
And the courts knew this.

Speaker 2 (29:45):
One vote a very corporate human being corporate judge was
the reason that this happened. But at the end of
the day, we have to answer to you. We have
to we have to make an empathy the norm in
this Unity Tour, hopefully will continue to demonstrate that that

(30:07):
is how the majority of.

Speaker 1 (30:08):
The United States citizens feel.

Speaker 2 (30:13):
Moving on, Donald Trump, hold on, let me got to
take us up my water. I'm taking some water. Who
it's a great value water, some good stuff. I wish
I guess said like fifty thousand packs to Flint, but
unfortunately cannot afford that.

Speaker 1 (30:36):
So moving on.

Speaker 2 (30:40):
Jeff Sessions, our favorite man, our man, who is you
know he's renowned for this famous line, uh, his line,
what do we say? Good people don't smoke marijuana. Well,
my response to Jeff Sessions is, I must be.

Speaker 1 (30:57):
A bad man, boy.

Speaker 2 (31:00):
I must be a bad man because look, I'm not
gonna say that I indulge in for twenty regularly, but
I will say that I am not necessarily opposed for
twenty nor have I ever been opposed for twenty. So
with that being said, Jeff Sessions has come out and

(31:21):
said and proclaimed that all of a sudden, Julian Assange
is a priority. Now as most of you know this,
you know, revelation comes counter.

Speaker 1 (31:35):
To what Trump is said. Trump is said he loves
Julian Massage.

Speaker 2 (31:40):
Trump said that he loves Wiki leaks, and it also
runs count to everything the Republicans have been saying in general,
which is the pretty much have been. They pretty much
have been expressing, you know, gratefulness because without Wiki leaks,
Hillary Clinton very well mayhad.

Speaker 1 (31:59):
Run the election. There had what there probably would have
almost guaranteed been more Democrats in office.

Speaker 2 (32:06):
And so most for the most part, until very recently,
they've all loved Julian Massange.

Speaker 1 (32:15):
Jeff Sessions has changed his tomb.

Speaker 2 (32:18):
Trump has not commented, but he has said that Julian
Assange is now a priority. Here's a problem with this.
He's been a priority. Let's be very clear, he's been one.
This isn't this isn't news. The problem is they have nothing.

(32:42):
They have absolutely nothing. He's already been exonerated by the
United Nations. He's already they the United Nations has come
out and said that Julianussange is being arbitrarily held against
his will. They's already been proven that he hasn't hacked.
He personally has not hacked anything.

Speaker 1 (33:01):
He's just an editor in chief. He releases documents for
a nonprofit.

Speaker 2 (33:10):
They have no proof that he hacked personally anything. They
have no proof that he conspired to hack anything. The
documents were legally accessed. Actually, if you read the Independent
dot uk article, they were legally accessed by people with
the appropriate clearance.

Speaker 1 (33:33):
He simply released them.

Speaker 2 (33:35):
Now, this is not to be confused, ladies and gentlemen
with Gucci for two point zero.

Speaker 1 (33:40):
Not the same people, not.

Speaker 2 (33:41):
The same guys on not the same thing, two different
two different leaks.

Speaker 1 (33:45):
Okay, So let's understand.

Speaker 2 (33:47):
That Gudavitu did hack and he was perfectly okay with it.

Speaker 1 (33:50):
He really didn't care.

Speaker 2 (33:51):
He admitted it, which is why he uh, this is
why he had to go under a different moniker guccifer
of course, and Juliana Singe had no problem releasing things
under his name under wikilease because he didn't hack anything,
he didn't do anything wrong. The UN has collaborated this,

(34:13):
but most importantly we know this, and we know this.
Do you generating him of this? And on the other
side of that argument.

Speaker 1 (34:24):
We're still wedding for proof. I know you the people
the argument.

Speaker 2 (34:28):
FBI can't release everything though they can't release see I
can't release everything.

Speaker 1 (34:33):
So in my experience, right, in my experience, I've worked
and I've worked in the military. I was a paralegal specialist,
I've done investigations, I've conducted investigations. I know how they go.

Speaker 2 (34:50):
And if you're going to make a public statement accusing
someone of something, if you want to make public statements
because because remember remember before, whenever we said that Hillary
Clinton had obviously had been she had obviously been cheating,
it wasn't like you needed all the proof in the world,
because there was plenty of proof if you just paid

(35:11):
any type of attention. I mean, whether you want to
talk about the fact that the percentages were switching from
the exit polls to the complete removal of the exit polls.

Speaker 1 (35:22):
From registration switches and drops only benefiting one candidate.

Speaker 2 (35:25):
These things were consistent with what I would consider pretty
redeemable proof.

Speaker 1 (35:31):
Right. I think that that's pretty obvious. So all we
asked was a little proof. It's a little bit. Not
two anonymous people have said that Russia did it. Putting
was directly responsible for everything. He was actually in the computer.

Speaker 2 (35:46):
He shrank himself when the computer and was directly affecting votes,
because I mean, the storyline itself doesn't match up. Okay,
first of all, like we all know, this storyline doesn't.

Speaker 1 (35:57):
Match up with the timeline.

Speaker 2 (36:00):
Not only that, but at this point you would have
to consider Vladimir puling in Russia to be the most
advanced tactical you know, Espion could there. You know how
many how much the story has evolved and brashed out.
This man apparently influenced the primaries, not the prime excuse me.

Speaker 1 (36:24):
He apparently influenced the DNC convention. He apparently hacked voter machines.
He apparently also worked with a Signe.

Speaker 2 (36:37):
He apparently also as well, to add tom Bian worked
with Gucci for two point oh He apparently also worked
with Seth Rich.

Speaker 1 (36:53):
He apparently also worked with Donald Trump.

Speaker 2 (36:58):
He apparently also was working against all the other Republicans
as well. This man, Vladimir Putin, according to the Democrats
and now some of the Republicans, mainstream media, whoever you ask,
apparently Vladimir Putin is literally the most influential character in

(37:21):
any election in the history.

Speaker 1 (37:24):
Of the world.

Speaker 2 (37:26):
This man worked with everybody and did everything, apparently, including
hacking paper ballots, which I didn't know was a thing.
He infiltrated every single small precinct apparently.

Speaker 1 (37:41):
And gave it a Trump. I don't know how he
did it, didn't know how he did it, but apparently
he did it.

Speaker 2 (37:48):
Now, obviously this is sarcasm because oh yes, a little
bit of proof always said, Hey man, you know, well listen,
because I mean, we don't want we don't want you
to feel like we did whenever we were like, hey,
Hillary's a cheating bitch, but nah.

Speaker 1 (38:03):
We don't want you to feel like that when.

Speaker 2 (38:05):
Y'all didn't want to We y'all want to believe us even.

Speaker 1 (38:07):
Though we had proof. So will hear the proof? Well, listen,
what do you have to say? We're waiting. Okay, so
we're the proof. Well, these two anonymous hold hold up,
stop a back drooping back quod drop back when we
had lawyers.

Speaker 2 (38:24):
Judges, best private investigators saying no, Hillary is definitely cheating.

Speaker 1 (38:28):
When people on her staff were saying this, y'all said
that wasn't enough proof.

Speaker 2 (38:33):
So I know you're not about to hear me with
no anonymous sources.

Speaker 1 (38:38):
I know that's not what you're about to tell me.
But hey, I know you're gonna give us some time. Well,
we know you're gonna give us some more proof later on.
We understand.

Speaker 2 (38:48):
Anythings take time, Okay, we'll be back in a.

Speaker 1 (38:50):
Couple of days, for a couple of weeks, for a
couple of months. So DNC has an.

Speaker 4 (38:53):
Opportunity to prove that the Russia hacked their there there
there certain right, Okay, cool, So DNC, of course, why
wouldn't they.

Speaker 1 (39:04):
Give their service to the FBI.

Speaker 5 (39:06):
Absolutely, we want to prove to you all that we
aren't the cheaters that we kind of see we are,
even though we definitely are those types of cheaters, that
we're not complete total liars, and that seeing them in
MSNBC and Richel Madow Anderson Cooper and all these people
are on lying for us that Russia and putting our
actions the most evil entities on the face of the.

Speaker 1 (39:22):
Planet and the threat to our democracy as we know it.
We want to prove that.

Speaker 2 (39:26):
So, of course, when the DNC is asked by the
FBI to give them the computers, what do they do?

Speaker 1 (39:34):
They don't give them the damn computers.

Speaker 2 (39:36):
The NBI still has not seen the servers for the DNC,
and literally m Julian Ussance quote unquote had hacked this
or anybody related to him his organization have hacked the
DNC directly.

Speaker 1 (39:51):
If Gucci for two point oh even.

Speaker 2 (39:53):
Though he did it, was working for Russia, it would
be able to be probably it would be able to
be collaborated by the information on that server, if.

Speaker 1 (40:03):
He did work with rushall while he was doing it.

Speaker 2 (40:06):
If the DNC server was actually hacked, instead of having
the documents legally accessed, as Julian Assigne had attested to, why.

Speaker 1 (40:20):
Not give them to the damn FBI so we could
put this noise to rest.

Speaker 2 (40:24):
You know, journalists like myself, David pac Man, h Good
Mint and.

Speaker 1 (40:27):
Black w losing my claudy stuff. We can all shut
the hell up, move on with our lives and lose
our careers. You know, you can shut us all up
right now. All you have to do is give the
FBI the servers.

Speaker 2 (40:38):
What does the DNC say? They say no, And that's
not exactly how I expected that story to end, now
how most people expect that story.

Speaker 1 (40:47):
But that's the thing most people.

Speaker 2 (40:49):
Most people actually don't know that the DNC.

Speaker 1 (40:53):
Refused to give these people the servers. Most people don't
know that. Here's what's crazy about that. It's not crazy
we should expect us by now. You think CNN like
announced it.

Speaker 2 (41:06):
Hey, y'all, we don't know what's going on with our
homeboys over there at the DNC, But they're not even
giving them the servers to the VR, Like, what's up
of that. We've been defending them this whole time and
we thought they were innocent.

Speaker 1 (41:17):
Damn No, they're not reporting that.

Speaker 2 (41:19):
CNN hasn't reported that, MSNBC has a reported that nobody
has except for us in the independent journalism world. But
why probably because Putin really isn't as influential.

Speaker 1 (41:38):
In this selection as they try to claim he is.

Speaker 2 (41:41):
I'm not saying that Putin hasn't tried, but I know
that he tried.

Speaker 1 (41:47):
I know he tried at some at some level. Let
me tell let me tell you why.

Speaker 2 (41:51):
I know because you know a pac you know, a
PA is For those of you who don't know, that's real,
it's really legal way to influence our election, legal way.
Russia actually does have lobbyists that also.

Speaker 1 (42:05):
Attempt to us influence our elections. Oh but they're not
the only They're not the only countries. They're not the
only countries at all.

Speaker 2 (42:13):
Japan, China, countries, in Europe, everybody, everybody, every corporation, everything
tries to influence our elections.

Speaker 1 (42:23):
I mean, why wouldn't they because.

Speaker 2 (42:24):
We all try to influcause the United States tried to
influence theirs.

Speaker 1 (42:29):
But the claim that is being made about Russia, it's
absolute insanity.

Speaker 2 (42:36):
They're trying to say that this man literally influence every
single aspect of our election with absolutely no substantive proof.

Speaker 1 (42:49):
What kind of nonsense is that sounds? Anybody else? Proof
of being the putting right? You proof, proof, proof of
They be.

Speaker 2 (42:57):
Throwing out all kinds of proofs, but no they don't
have any.

Speaker 1 (43:00):
So moving on. You know, I get hot when I
talk about Russia. I get mad. I get so mad.

Speaker 2 (43:08):
I think I feel like it's so much common sense, like, oh,
it takes a little common sense. It takes a little bit,
that's all. But no, no, no common sense apparently left
in the United States of America.

Speaker 1 (43:21):
Only common sense we have left ist or right here
ladies and gentlemen.

Speaker 2 (43:26):
Anyway, back to what I was saying, So we have
our problems abroad, but we also have problems messically. M
and Jodan Sheariti t try to dress yesterday at the
Flint panel in Flat Michigan about the water problem. He
asked them very very o you know, he wasn't and

(43:48):
Jordan can be an asshole if he wants to be.

Speaker 1 (43:50):
Trust me, I know the guy.

Speaker 2 (43:52):
He can't be an asshole. But even very direct but
very you know, hey, guys, how are you doing joining
share typically tyt politics. I just want to know while
y'all run multiple stores studies, the studies that all have
federal funding from federal grants all say that the water

(44:15):
is safer than what it is or allsoy that these
filters can be used in a safer manner than what
they actually can be. And all the independent studies without
the federal grants tend to say this that they can't
be used. But when y'all are telling people this information,
y'all leave out the information about the independent studies and
only include information about the federal grands.

Speaker 1 (44:37):
Or about the information from the federal grand funding.

Speaker 2 (44:41):
And you know what they say pretty much that every
question that Jordan asks, they just say, I don't I
don't know.

Speaker 1 (44:50):
We can't answer those questions. We follow strict regulations, We
follow strict I can't really count how many times they
say we follow strict regulations. And Jordan's asking them this
very it's not even complex questions. They're not even very
complex questions. They just say, hey, man, hey, guys. I
think it was all guys in one girl, lady, what's

(45:12):
what's up? What's what? Why? Why did I keep telling them?

Speaker 2 (45:14):
Why why are you all looking at this study that
has federal funding and why is all a matter of fact,
why are the federal funding askew in terms.

Speaker 1 (45:22):
Of there is comparison to the independent funding which says
this water is shit? They don't have an answer.

Speaker 2 (45:31):
People were dying, people's eyes are burning when they jump
into the shower.

Speaker 1 (45:34):
From the steam. And then on top of all this,
not only did not given answers, but.

Speaker 2 (45:39):
The throwing people in jail for expressing how pissed they are,
in jail.

Speaker 1 (45:49):
For expressing how pissed they are at a public function
at a church.

Speaker 2 (45:59):
I can'tn't really begin to talk about how disgusted I
am with the government that would allow something like this
to happen.

Speaker 1 (46:07):
So I think we've all reached that point.

Speaker 2 (46:10):
I don't think that's a single person in this country
who isn't livid about what's happening right now in Flint, Michigan.

Speaker 1 (46:17):
Conservative or liberal, somebody needs to go to jail.

Speaker 2 (46:27):
A lot of people really need to go to jail.
And it isn't the ones who are sitting in jail
last night for expressing how angry they are, because they
deserve to be that angry, and it's disgusting that they
would be thrown in jail for showing their discontent for
a government that has obviously forsaken them in every single way,

(46:48):
forsaking them, forsaking their children.

Speaker 1 (46:53):
I've seen the damage.

Speaker 2 (46:54):
It's very real. I can't even really put it in
a words. No human beings should have to deal with that.
You can talk about property damage, physical damage to people's
outward appearance, mental damage to people's cognitive ability.

Speaker 1 (47:21):
It's bad.

Speaker 2 (47:24):
And all we ask is that, yeah, we want to
see hands roll, but can we just get healthy water
right now? At least that we do want to see
a hands roll, but can we at least get healthy water?

Speaker 1 (47:34):
And they can't even give you a direct answer. Ridiculous,
It's absolutely ridiculous.

Speaker 2 (47:46):
The unbroadled criminality of allowing this to happen for so
long should absolutely be punished, and people should absolutely be pissed.

Speaker 1 (48:05):
But thank you all whoever. Jordan, of course, the truth
against the machine who't covered it.

Speaker 2 (48:14):
And everybody else who went, you know, is keep letting them,
keep letting them know how pissed we are. And we're
with you, Flints whenever where we can be. You know
that we could prosecute these people for you.

Speaker 1 (48:24):
We would. We're gonna.

Speaker 2 (48:33):
Move on to two of my last and final thoughts,
one about quote unquote unity with the d n C
and the other about aaronnandez Uh. About the d n C,
we need to understand one thing. We cannot unify behind

(48:56):
a frivolous cause, a cause that is non existent. We
can't keep faking. We can't keep faking unity. We can't
keep faking progression. The damage is already too great from faking.
Like we want to see people with single pair of

(49:17):
health care, with better health and insurance. The damage is
already too great for faking. Like we want to see
our politicians prosecuted in the same manner that we would
be whenever Hillary Clinton is releasing emails.

Speaker 1 (49:31):
And getting hacked and walking scott free and running for president.

Speaker 2 (49:36):
And these people, these devils in Flint, Michigan, are getting
off and not being prosecuted, are literally responsible for them,
for lives that are damaged permanently.

Speaker 1 (49:48):
We can't keep faking like half of this country is
not impoverished.

Speaker 2 (49:55):
Why because because of Obama's numbers. Oh yeah, you know
the unemployment rates shrinking. Full time workers are being hired
at a higher rate. Full time workers aren't being hired at.

Speaker 1 (50:07):
A higher rate. You know.

Speaker 2 (50:08):
One of the key contributed to that. One people stop applying.
But two a lot of people have overlooked this. You
know what it takes to be a full time worker,
and like what almost all the states now thirty two
hours a week.

Speaker 1 (50:21):
Thirty two hours used.

Speaker 2 (50:23):
To be forty lower out of thirty and all of
a sudden, even some part time workers start looking like
their full time unemployment has not gone quote unquote down.
They just change the mettrics because they control the board game.
We will not continue to fake unity in progress anymore

(50:47):
because we are in danger right now even as we speak.
If people saying Trump is horrible, Trump is bad, we
have to unify, forget everything that happened before. No, because
y'all haven't even acknowledged what has happened in the past,
which is why it is so dangerous.

Speaker 1 (51:04):
This is why we ended up with a Trump. This
is why we end up with.

Speaker 2 (51:10):
The Republican Congress, in Republican Senate, and Republican judges. Because
Obama said he was going to do a job and
didn't get done. Because Bill Clinton said he was going
to do a job, didn't get done.

Speaker 1 (51:26):
That and some other stuff for Bill Clinton.

Speaker 2 (51:28):
But Hillary Clinton claimed she was on a side of
progress that she obviously was not.

Speaker 1 (51:34):
On, and it got exposed.

Speaker 2 (51:38):
And you all are blaming Russia, Bernie voters, Jill Stein
and her voters, third party people, Libertarians, Gary.

Speaker 1 (51:47):
Johnson, everybody. You want to blame everyone else.

Speaker 2 (51:52):
Instead of looking at your party, looking at the Democrats,
looking at Hillary Clinton, looking at Barack Obama. Hell even
looking at Brine Sanders and saying, this is your fault.
I put you in charge of representing me. I put
my trust in you, and you sold us down the river.

(52:15):
And you won't even take accountability for your actions. And
when they won't take accountability for their actions, their supporters
won't hold them accountable.

Speaker 1 (52:24):
I'll see, Garrett, I have absolutely seen more.

Speaker 2 (52:27):
This is the difference between Hillary supporter, hard core Hillary supporter,
and a hardcore Burning supporter. I have seen more Bernie
supporters holding Bernie Sanders accountable for the things he said
and still supporting him because you can support them and
hold them accountable without is having this denialism like where
you just deny everything they've ever done as being bad.

Speaker 1 (52:43):
No.

Speaker 2 (52:43):
I hold Bernie Standers support accountable once a day. But
nobody is held Hillary claim accountable. The DNC has not
held themselves accountable. They call for a tour of unity,
and yet.

Speaker 1 (53:02):
You haven't even why why do we need to unify?
Explain that to me, Tom Perez, What did you do
that was so wrong? Why is there a need for unity?

Speaker 2 (53:11):
Is it possibly because y'all have done something to a
cause the fragmentation to begin with, is.

Speaker 1 (53:20):
That the reason where is where does that come from?
We need a union to it because of what y'all
have done.

Speaker 2 (53:27):
But yeah, y'all refused to acknoledge and the one time
that Tom President anoledgey, he retracted the statement almost immediately.

Speaker 1 (53:32):
Hillary Clinton has showed no remorse for what she has done.
She's never apologized for the fact she did the total opposite.
She did the top She hired w Washertman in shorts.

Speaker 2 (53:46):
So if you have these corporate Democrats, these established the
Democrats who can cheat and cheat and cheat, and the
only thing they lose is an election.

Speaker 1 (53:57):
We lose our ability to get mad, we lose our.

Speaker 2 (54:02):
Gun control, we lose our ed you know, our education
system start suffering. We lose everything when people like Hillary
Clinton los an election.

Speaker 1 (54:13):
Because it wasn't only her that we lost that lost
the election.

Speaker 2 (54:17):
She lost it for all the Democrats, progressive or not,
who are running around the country because it's your job
as the leader of the Democratic Party at that point
in time to galvanize the voters and get them out
and droves to vote for those progressives.

Speaker 1 (54:33):
But nobody knew what you were running for.

Speaker 2 (54:39):
So no, until people start holding their people, their their candidates,
their party, their establishment accountable. I hate to say this
like the Republicans did, because the Republicans did, in fact
hold their establishment accountable, which is how we ended up
with Trump. It's true, it's facts. I hate to hate
and say it, but it's true. The Republican Conservatives held

(55:01):
their party. They held Jeb Bush accountable for George w
They held Market Rugby accountable for not showing.

Speaker 1 (55:07):
Up to his Congress, his senatorial meetings.

Speaker 2 (55:13):
They held they held what's his name, Good god, I
can't remember the name of the weirdo, you know, the
one that looks like Elf with the with the nose
Texas guy.

Speaker 1 (55:26):
Come on, guys, help me out, help me out anyway.
You know.

Speaker 2 (55:31):
They held, they held everyone.

Speaker 1 (55:34):
Accountable, and they end up with Trump.

Speaker 2 (55:36):
They're not happy with it, but they told the establishment
what they weren't going to put up with anymore.

Speaker 1 (55:40):
When we had the opportunity to do that, when.

Speaker 2 (55:44):
The Democrats, the left, the progressives had the opportunity to
do that, we failed miserably.

Speaker 1 (55:50):
And people have not been held accountable. Now, for those
of you.

Speaker 2 (55:57):
Who have been keeping up with the Aaron Hernandez situation,
Ted Cruz, thank you they helped ted who's accountable for
being just horrifically disgusting of discussing human being. But anyway,
with with with with the Aaron Hernandez situation, and most
of you know he did commit suicide. He did get

(56:19):
life for one of his cases and it was being appealed,
and he got acquitted for another one because it turned
out his person his the key witness in that case
was co worce into giving to testifying. Now, was Aaron
Hernandez a good or a bad person? I think that

(56:41):
he was a very troubled human being. I feel like
he was absolutely in gang affiliated behavior. If you understood
his background, then you would easily see that the chances
that he may not have committed those murders, but he
probably was around them when it happened. It was very

(57:03):
likely because he's at a rough life. His father passed
at a young age. He took it very hard. That's
when he turned to the game life.

Speaker 1 (57:11):
Now you're talking about a man who.

Speaker 2 (57:12):
Was extremely successful in All American and Connecticut All American
and college at the Florida win a National championship with
Tim Tebow, with playing the Super Bowl Game with the Patriots,
had a crazy contract. Everyone who ever met him outside
of that lifestyle said that they couldn't believe that he

(57:33):
was who had who people have.

Speaker 1 (57:34):
Portrayed him to be. But I have seen how toxic
that lifestyle can be.

Speaker 2 (57:52):
I have seen it, and Aaron Hernandez had a way
out and he should have taken it and ran on
and left everybody else behind.

Speaker 1 (58:04):
He was stupid. I don't know if he was evil.
I know he was troubled, I know he had issues.

Speaker 2 (58:11):
But I will not say because a court said, hey,
he's guilty or innocent, that somebody should not be mourned,
that their family should not be more, that we shouldn't
be talking about suicide prevention of suicide way. I would
not say that simply because of course system convicted someone,
because I've seen hundreds of times of course systems has

(58:32):
gotten the wrong person. We can say that aaronnand is
a stupid, we can say that he probably did it,
we can say that all these things. But I've heard
too many people arguing over whether a man we should
recognize the fact that the man was obviously suffering mentally,
we should warn him or more for his family, at minimum, calling.

Speaker 1 (58:52):
Him evil, calling him disgusting, a disgusting human being. You
don't know what was going on in that man's life.

Speaker 2 (58:58):
If you did your research instead of basing all of
your information off core cases, then you would know this.
This man has had a very, very, very troubled life.
My life does not stop at journalism. The things that
I go go through on a daily basis does not
stop at journalism. Like his head, like his his his
life does not.

Speaker 1 (59:17):
Stop at football.

Speaker 2 (59:19):
And we lose your father at such a young age,
such an impressionable age, and the only people you have
to turn to are not the best in the world.

Speaker 1 (59:26):
It affects you.

Speaker 2 (59:29):
And then his appearance, his demeanor starts looking like that.
And when you go on court, whether you're guilty or innocent,
you're a profiled.

Speaker 1 (59:37):
Period.

Speaker 2 (59:39):
I'm not here to discuss whether he is guilty or innocent.
But what I am here discussing is just to help
you all understand. We can't judge everybody.

Speaker 1 (59:51):
We have no room to judge. We don't know what
drove him over the edge, whether we had whether he
he is good, whether he is evil.

Speaker 2 (01:00:02):
People in his life, his mother, his father, his daughter,
his you know, his wife or his girlfriend, his friends,
They came because they thought he was innocent and at
least they thought he was a good person. We should
absolutely more than people who were murdered, but we should
also more of the fact that a life was taken
that meant something to a daughter, to a mother, to

(01:00:23):
a girlfriend, whatever. But don't use the court case, Especially
liberals who are the same ones that criticized the justice.

Speaker 1 (01:00:31):
System, want to come regular basis, especially the Florida justice system.

Speaker 2 (01:00:37):
Don't use a court case to say it man is
evil because you don't know, You don't know, there's no
way you could. He's crazy, he's stupid. He did a
lot of stupid things. He put himself in stupid situations.
But the first court case already proved that things. The

(01:00:59):
details are a little bit more foggy than what have
been discussed. So that's my take on that. I'm you know,
mourning for his family, mourning for his daughter especially. Nobody

(01:01:19):
should should have to lose their fathers in such a
such a way. Such is It's sad, unnecessary. So please,
if you have someone where you think they can use
the mentorship, take them under your wing. Make sure they
don't end up like Aaron Hernandez. Whenever they're about to
do something stupid, talk to them. Don't let them throw
away great opportunities to return back to a comfortability that

(01:01:41):
comes from losing your father and you.

Speaker 1 (01:01:43):
Seeking that type of mentorship, because that's what happens.

Speaker 2 (01:01:49):
Trust me, I know I've been there, not to the
level of Aaron Hernandez, but if I showed you some
of these wounds on my shoulder, some of these scars
on my.

Speaker 1 (01:01:57):
Face, I've been there.

Speaker 2 (01:02:01):
When you only have these boys to have your back,
and they've had your back every other time that you
needed it.

Speaker 1 (01:02:08):
When they need your back, you're.

Speaker 2 (01:02:10):
Likely going to do the same thing for them, because
that's all you have left in the world. That's all
the support you have left at all support you feel.
So don't let anybody end up like Aaron Nandez. Don't
call it he just thought that guy he's an asshole.
He's not good or evil who just misguided. Most of
the time, there are some evil people in this world.
Most of the time people just misguided. Use this as

(01:02:35):
a learning experience and as a teaching tool. Thank you
all so much for watching me. Kasa Sucassa and I said.
The Patreon link is in the buy or in the
video description. YouTube has cut our revenue dramatically if I
talk about anything controversial for the time being, because of
some things that happen with the YouTube filter, I can't

(01:02:57):
get paid from YouTube, which means I can buy more
equipment MS can and more people with mean that I
can do the coverage that I will.

Speaker 1 (01:03:02):
Normally be able to do. So please, we're at ten
people right now. I would love to see that number
increase to twenty by that of the weekend.

Speaker 2 (01:03:12):
You don't need to donate a lot five ten dollars
a month that you won't even miss, that you won't
even see, and it's going to something that you know
will help you in the future.

Speaker 1 (01:03:20):
I do your work for you.

Speaker 2 (01:03:21):
You want to learn about politics, I'm here and I'll
make it entertaining.

Speaker 1 (01:03:25):
So thank you all so much. Once again. I will
be back next week.

Speaker 2 (01:03:30):
You will be seeing some videos for me this weekend,
and you will start seeing me more consistently because I
finally have my apartment. I'm finally kind of somewhat settled in.

Speaker 1 (01:03:39):
Miami, and I am back. Thank you all so much
for watching