Niko House - Mi Casa Su Casa

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
Good afternoon, everybody, Good morning, good evening, depending on which
country and side of the world you are at. This
is me Concessucasta with Nico House, the only place where
it's mandatory to talk politics at the dinner table. As
you all know, we try to keep it light. We
like to have a little fun when I'm on my

(00:21):
show because politics is already pretty dreary as it is,
but today it's going to be a lot, a lot
more serious. It's going to be a lot more educational.
And there's a good reason for that. There's a good
reason for that because, as you all know, Trump has decided,
without any congressional approval, that wow, without any approval from
the United Nations, without any investigation, to launch fifty nine

(00:46):
missiles at an air Force base in Syria. Now, surprisingly enough,
sweet Jesus see, and this is all It's scary to me.
Whenever CNN and Fox News agree something should be done,

(01:07):
everyone should be freaking the hell out. There should not
be one person content with Fox News and CNN agreeing
on anything. And if you sprink all of Ale Rachel
Meadow in there, it's it's all over like this is
this is this is the same thing we saw happen

(01:28):
in the first of Rock War with Bill Clinton. This
is the same thing we saw happen in Afghanistan. Uh,
this is the same thing we saw happen and it rock.
This is the same thing we saw happen in Libya.
I mean it seems to be a pattern. Right, they
say bad things are happening. We have no way of

(01:49):
confirming it. Oh, actually we know we do have ways
of confirming it. But the United States decides to take
it upon itself to act it already for some reason,
has a plan in play, Like do you know how
ridiculous it is that have fifty nine missiles just chilling?
Like you decided this? Okay, I'm not gonna wrote it
for you, cause I'm gonna tell you a little story

(02:10):
about a man named Trump who everybody thought was in control,
but he is absolutely not. A Syrian government who many
thought were causing a lot more damage than they actually are.
A story of a quote unquote unbiased, objective human rights

(02:34):
group that is merely supposed to be there to protect
the Syrian people, all of the Syrian people, supposed to
be supposedly nonpartisan, named the White Helmets. In the story
of CNN Fox News, MSNBC, mainstream media in general, telling
you lie after lie after lie after lie after lie,

(02:54):
because they have not said The only thing they said
accurate was that A Side is in charge of Syria.
That's pretty much the only thing they've ever said that
was accurate. They use these terms like regime because it
takes it takes away from the fact that Aside was
elected democratically with like seventy five percent of his people's vote.

(03:15):
So that's why they use terms black regime. They did it.
They did it with thedel Castro, they did it with
They're doing it with A Side and so and that's
and these are these are terms that they used to essentially,
you know, delegitimize a very legitimate regime. So let's talk
about the timeline of just just the last couple of days.
Let's talk about that. Right, A lot's happened. Right, A

(03:37):
lot's happened. Coincidentally, Steve Brannon or Bannon is fired, which
is crazy to me because at first I just kind
of like took it lightly because I'm like, maybe it's
just too much ego in the room between him and
Donald Trump. That's very legitimate concern, I'm sure for Donald Trump, like,
hey man, only one of us can be wrong. So

(03:57):
many times sty'll pretend like we're right and get away
with it. But I don't think that was it, because
it seems like everybody that Donald Trump made a big
deal about hiring and appointing are being pushed out. Michael
Flynn pushed out, and supposedly he was going to give

(04:20):
some testimony the other day or last week. It was
just last week. They said that we were going to
get testimony for Michael Flynn. Didn't get that, of course,
while am I surprised. Supposedly he was the link between
the Russia and Donald Trump. Yeah, I've heard that before
with Hillary Clinton case. Right then Bannon gets pushed out,

(04:41):
and surprisingly, surprisingly enough, this is a guy on the security.
He was on national security a part of his administration.
Niggas pushed out right fired. Doesn't say that Donald Trump
fired him. It said that he was just fired. So

(05:05):
I didn't think anything of it until right after that,
a chemical attack happens. So now I gotta start backtracking.
I'm like, a chemical attack, that's kind of random. I
thought that Donald Trump. Oh coincidentally, also because guess who
once again national security? Right? A couple of days. Right

(05:27):
around the time that Banning was fired, Donald Trump himself
said that Asad regime was no longer or no for him.
It never was. In fact, he ran on this very point,
it was not a priority. He didn't give a damn
about a regime change. In fact, he said, if the
Syrian people want a regime change, they could just vote
for it like everybody else, because that's what they did
the first time. As I'm sure many of you have

(05:49):
seen floating around the internet at this point, there are
a bunch of tweets from Donald Trump himself saying that
engaging Syria will only escalate the situation, not de escalated.
He insulted Braca Obama several times and said they came
out what I said there today. I'm a very flexible man. No,
Donald Trump, you are. You're not really flexible. You more
you have your sight set on something and then you

(06:10):
might pretend you to change your mind. Letter, But you're
not flexible. Let's let's not pretend that you are so.
But this is something different for Donald Trump because he's
not an interventionist. He's an isolationist. That has been his
thing for quite some time. This is even when he
was a democrat, right, He was always a democrat until

(06:30):
very recently, even when he was insulting Barack Obama, he
was a Democrat. So he says that he does not
want to change the regime of Aside and it's not
his priority now. Coincidentally, also at this right after this,
NATO was like, ah ah, we got to get him

(06:56):
out of there. In fact, Britain doubled down saying that
you said that they were going to make sure and
that was still a priority for a Sides regime to
be changed. I'm like, oh, Snaps is getting real, It's
getting real. All this is happening within like a two
to three day time period. Now, what's also happening Just

(07:17):
four or five days ago, there were pissed talks with
the Syrian government. It's happened in Europe. They were going well.
They weren't going the best, they weren't like going like
the best ever ours. Obviously the problems will be solved,
but they were going well. They were productive. They may

(07:40):
had not they may not ha had a solution right
then in there, but they were working towards one Most importantly,
That's what that the piece talks demonstrated was that we
were working towards a solution. Now for the solution, it
would actually leave a side in charge on my page

(08:00):
if you like to look at it. So Beside actually
had everything to lose and nothing to gain by attacking
his own people, supposedly. Right. Uh. Now, I know that
things can happen coincidentally a lot in politics, but this

(08:21):
is a mighty, mighty big coincidence. You fire banning off
the Security Council, you get rid of Flynn, you do
a complete one point eighty on your side. Uh, you know,
on your on your side, whether or not you want

(08:41):
him to have a regime change or not. Uh. And
mind you, this is just a separate timeline. This is
just a timeline of events that were happening in the
political world. It's not even talking about military strategy and
things like that. So now we're going to go on
to military strategy, incentive and things like that. So chemical

(09:04):
attack happens, crazy, absolutely horrible. I don't know if it
was saring gas. We do know it's chemical, but we
don't know if it was saring gas. And at this point,
first of all, because we're gonna start questioning legitimacy and
what kind of attack it was legitimacy of the claim
of the type of attack because we know it wasn't attack.
We know lives of loss. We just don't know exactly
what happened. So apparently this was saring gas. Interestingly enough,

(09:35):
a Polar Supplies, a Polar Surprise winner named Seymour Hirsch
said that, well, Hillary actually was the one who brought
the chemical gas in twenty thirteen, the saring gas from
Libya via Turkey. Right, so this is this is a
Poster prize winner who outed this and as many of

(09:59):
you recalled this, this is a play This is straight
out of the playbook of the Obama administration in twenty
thirteen and gets where that led to not a damn
thing actually, because why it was never proven that a
side actually was the one who let this gas on
his own people. Uh but remember we talked about coincidence

(10:24):
of events, right, So the same way these events happen
and in a chemical attack happened the opc W. So
that's the that's the chemical organization, that the organization that
ensures that chemicals aren't being used in war. And they
go in to investigate. They go in right because the

(10:46):
side calls them. It's like him calling the cops and
then getting then getting arrested because this actually happens a
lot to people of colors presently enough. But he caused
them to investigate the rebels using chemical attacks. Now here's
what's even crazier about that. When the rebels used chemical attacks,
it never made the mainstream media. It never made the

(11:10):
first time that it happened. You all don't know about
it because it never made the news. But what did
make the news was the twenty thirteen attack. Why OPCW
was there investigating the chemical attacks that the rebels had used.
Guess what happened? Boom, all of a sudden chemical attack.
What a coincidence? Right, what accident? Nothing to see here, though, folks.

(11:39):
And look, and I'm not I mean and I know
that at this point it just sounded like a normal
like it's like a normal interjection. But and then of
course Hillary Clinton comes out of nowhere, She always comes
out of her damn cage to say something hawkish. Oh yeah,
we have to attack their air force base. Why Hillary,
matter of fact, you're not a politician anymore. Shut the

(11:59):
hell up, go somewhere. You weren't fighting for us for
civil rights. Whenever Trump and his little cleanup crew came
in here and tried to take all of them away
from from visa holders and UH and refugees. But now
you want to come out and talk about who we
have to attack, right, that's coincidental, But you sure you
have nothing nothing to gain from that, But she does.

(12:22):
We'll go into that letter. But guess who cleared these
weapons being the first the first chemical weapons being sent
to the rebels. Hillary Clon. Hillary Clinton did that. This
is verified, it's factual. The UN has already acknowledged this.

(12:45):
That's why nobody ever got a proved to have boots
on ground in Syria. That's why nobody backed the United
States because Hillary Clinton and her little gang of thugs
and UH and the Secretary of State office were responsible
for that attack. But they didn't make the news. They

(13:06):
just they quieted down a little bit. They just said,
we won't talk about it. They won't only say that aside.
They like they're just kind of like faded away. And
then all of a sudden, it was just like he
was attacking the rebels again. But that happened at twenty thirteen
and probably didn't get brought back up until very very

(13:27):
recently so chemical attacks happened, and I'm thinking it could
be a side. I'm not saying that it wasn't. I
actually have no I know aside, before he was elected democratically,
he was a very educated man, he was a very
beloved man. He was very secular. Serian constitution actually preached

(13:52):
it's secular. It's completely and totally secular. As then they
don't let religion dominate their culture. On top of that,
now they are. They do have religious people, but they
don't let religion dominate their culture. Now there's a big difference. Okay,
So what I do know is that a side hadn't

(14:12):
done this before. I do know that it was a
time that a side did have chemical weapons, but they
were supposedly taken out, and it wasn't saying that he had.
So I digress. We go to the chemical attack and
then people are hurt. This is a fact. There were
people hurt. But the way that we decided that it

(14:34):
was a sode who attacked these people before an investigation
was held, was that some people were picked up by
the white helmets and they said, oh, this is a BSU,
not this is an actual quote. Oh, there were chemical
bombs that were dropped from the sky. Okay, pause, How

(14:57):
the hell do you know a bomb is chemical before
it is dropped on you and deemed chemical? Because she said, oh,
a chemical bomb? They described as chemical bombs dropped from
the sky. You don't know if a bomb is chemical
unless you are a weapons expert. And I seriously doubt
any of those people that were attacked were weapons experts, right,

(15:22):
So that would But I can understand why a person
who is naive would say that because they saw bombs
and next thing you know, or maybe they heard bombs
and the next thing they know, they were inhaling some
type of chemical, some type of foreign agent. So I
get that, but I don't blame them for saying that.

(15:43):
I blame the United States for taking that as well.
If some distraught children and women who've never seen a
legitimate bomb before or a chemical weapon before say that
this has to be true, less and fifty nine missis
out there, but that doesn't make any sense to me. Right,
So here's the other side of the story. Collaborated by

(16:06):
a side government and the Russian soldiers that were there,
they admitted that they were doing an air strike, a
strategic air strike on a weapons cash on the rebels,
guess what happened. Something they didn't expect that they probably
wouldn't have done. It blows up, chemicals are released, and

(16:32):
there's a lot of different ways that could have went.
Let's be completely to be honest, because these air strikes
have happened consistently and they're used to it. The rebels
are used to it. The Syrian people, unfortunately, are used
to it. And they could have been standing by now.

(16:55):
It could have blown up and gas everywhere. It could
have been Oh, they're by to Obamas, let's be ready
to release the chemical agent into the air now. I
I don't believe the casualties were as high as they
should have been, because in China there was chemical seran.

(17:19):
This particular gas was used and it was homemade and
it only killed I believe twelve, but injured well over
two to three thousand people. And that wasn't even weaponized.
But now they're claiming that the Syrian government aside aside
in his regime, are they use this, they weaponized and
use it against the people. And it only killed a

(17:40):
few people and still horrible, but it would have injured thousands.
But even more importantly, the White Helmets, the non partisan
white helmets, which we're gonna get into a little bit
later more about them. We're able to pick up these
people bare handed, no hazmat suit, which if you have
ever been in any type of military training or any

(18:02):
chemical training, you know you don't go into a situation
like that with no mask on, no hands met to,
no gloves, because if you know anything about Cyriens, serience
seems through your skin, Syrin can seriously harm you. And
of course the white Hammon's helmets are on the scene

(18:22):
right We're gonna talk about them a little bit later.
I want to get away from the timeline. So then,
like rational people, the United Nations said, hold on, everybody,
if Asade did this, this is a big problem, but
we should conduct an investigation because that's the right thing
to do. I thought, well, damn, And we had are

(18:45):
you the United States on the Security Council in this meeting,
and they agreed, So I thought, shit, Trump might be rational.
I really thought that he had me fool, ladies and gentlemen.
He had me full. And I don't think it's him,
but he had me full. Four second we went to
that United meeting. We just drafted a resolution yesterday four
or five hours before we attack them, saying we're going

(19:08):
to conduct an investigation and give you a chance to
prove your innocence. What do we do? We bomb the
air base, the air base where they say that the
attacks came from. Now, I don't think per se that

(19:31):
everything would be destroyed by I believe a few of
the planes might have been destroyed. I believe some key
buildings may have been destroyed. We haven't seen the casualties.
We don't know. There's been speculation about what exactly happened.
We haven't seen the aftermath yet. But I will say this,
when conducting in an investigation, we want to get it

(19:52):
done in a timely manner, right, because anything can happen.
Assad could up and move all his planes, fabricate his
flight logs, everything, Right, they could send the the the OPCW,
the chemical organization to see what happened, to step in
right and say, hey, what happened, this happened, has happened,
this's happened, and that could take That will take like

(20:14):
maybe a day to two days time. But time is
indeed an issue when you're conducting an investigation such as this. Right, So,
although they may not have destroyed all the evidence. They
probably made it. They probably made it hard to recover
the evidence to clear a size name. But probably even
more importantly, they just bought the rebels time if they

(20:37):
are the guilty, if they are the perpetrators, they just
bought the rebels time to clear out everything, all of
the weapons, any of the attacks, anything that they could
have done, any weapons cases, any of our weapons that
were acquired by the rebels, anytime, anything, because the rebels

(20:58):
are and beholden to an authority besides money. We because
at that point, guess what you start. You catch these rubbles,
you gotta start asking yo, and it wasn't If they
could prove, if Aside himself could approved it was not him,
then you gotta start asking the next question, Oh the

(21:18):
hell was it? That means that there really were chemical
weapons in this stash, or somebody used chemical weapons at
the same time they lost those they launched those missiles,
and you gotta start asking who was it. They're gonna
start asking who was it? The UN half of the
UN already knows who it is, but these are this

(21:40):
is a president later in some terms later, and we're
still seeing ramifications of what Hillary Clinton allowed to happen.
So ironically enough, once again this is before the attack
actually happened, we draft the resolution saying that, yeah, there
should absolutely be an investigation. We should not jump the conclusions.

(22:00):
We need to do this the correct way because we
don't want another war in the rock. We don't want
another war. And againist than oh Hillary steps out of nowhere. Nah, nah,
we gotta kill them now, go bomb their base. Just
just just shoot some shit, Just go blow something up,
Just go blow something up. We don't know what you can.
Just shoot the tree down, go shoot some shoot thousand tree,
do whatever you can to make it an unsafe environment

(22:23):
for investigators to come in and solve this case in
a timely manner. That's what we just saw happen. So yeah,
the investigations might still happen, but at this very moment,
you're probably not the way maybe to another two to

(22:45):
three to four days, because we just blew up their base,
and they're gonna claim that they are giving aside and
more time to prove his innocence. But what's really happening
is that we're giving the actual perpetrators, whoever it may be,
a side or the other side, time to run away.
Too clear to I mean, it's just has anybody else

(23:05):
watched First forty eight, Like I don't know, Like it
is pretty simple. Investigations need to be done in timely manner.
We did not do this correctly. We just spent one
hundred million dollars launching at an air base with absolutely

(23:27):
no proof other than some people said, hey man, it
was some mom in the sky and this, and then
Trump himself said that he didn't even have proof. It's
just I saw those pictures of those children and it
really moved me. It's a it's a big deal. I'm
really flexible, and and this this I can say, it's
a possibility of me changing me, and it already has

(23:48):
changed me, and we probably gonna Like So, what you're
saying is you actually have absolutely no proof you're about
to spende hundred million of mile dollars and her dollars
in his dollars so we can launch at some air
force base you want to. Let's talk about the fact
that he warned both Syria and Russia before he attacked him,
because if you really pissed, if you really wanted to

(24:08):
short the base, why warnt anybody? Because you know you're
attacking under false pretense, and if, first of all, than God,
he wont Russia because I really don't want to enter
a nuclear warri And if you would have saw heavy
Russian casualties, that is exactly what would have happened. So
thank you Jesus that you want Russia. But you also
warned Syria because you knew you were in the wrong,

(24:32):
because you're trying to shift blame. You're trying to dodge
and create distractions so that the investigation can happen, because
the last time an investigation happened, the deep state lost
and Obama was not giving permission to invade Syria. Is
the facts. So bomba happened, the bombing happened, and now

(24:58):
we're still focused on Syria chemical weapons. We're arguing CNN
and Fox them are telling us what to talk about,
but now we gotta talk about the other stuff, the
good stuff. Right? Why why why why why does the
chemical attack in Syria make the news like it is

(25:22):
some horrible, horrible action When Saudi Arabia, if I recall,
is in Yemen right now smashing it to pieces with
assistance from US, smashing it up. You don't half of
y'all don't even know where Yemen is. Half of my
friends don't know what the hell Yemen is. Half of

(25:44):
y'all have never heard the word of Yemen before this conversation.
And there's a reason for that. We shouldn't be there.
There's absolutely nothing there. It's strategic positioning. Yemen is getting
throttled daily by US. But every time something happens in
Syria that could piss off a few, like there were

(26:06):
some casualties and that's horrible. They died a horrible death.
But Yemen, these people have been dying horrible deaths all
week long. I guarantee it. But they pushed this in
your face. They say, hey, eat it up, eat it up,
eat it up by get my ratings seeing it, or
they keep pushing in these pictures of the kids who

(26:26):
are who were injured by this attack. Now, who should
we talk about first? Should we talk about should we
talk about Tillerson first, the Secretary of State, or should
we talk about uh, the white helmets first. I'll let
you all choose Facebook, who should we talk about first?
Should we talk about Tillerson or should we talk about

(26:48):
the white helmets? They got five seconds answer. I'm gonna
make the decision for you five for we're gonna talk
about the White Helmets. Weren't talk about the White Helmets.
So the White help are supposed to be this non
partisan group that is there for all of Syria. We've

(27:12):
heard that before, right, they've shown you in these pictures.
CNN does not fact check. CNN is absolutely just they're horrible.
They're horrible, But then they don't fact check. They just
put some stuff out there. The White Helmets are these
great guys and they you know, they they're not partisan
and they work for all no to us. Here's some
fun facts about the White Helmets. The White Helmets only

(27:34):
operate in rebel controlled terraces controlled areas. The White Helmets
are supposed to be unarmed, only there for like medical purposes,
humanitarian purposes. Coincidentally, you can go on YouTube right now
and find hundreds of videos of them being of them
armed with Ak's assault rifles whatever. They're armed, heavily armed

(27:56):
a lot of the times. There's a video of them
right now on YouTube where a man, an innocent man,
is being executed by the Syrian rebels. He gets shot
in the back of the head and literally nothing's being
done about it. Literally seconds later, the White Helmets run
up and pick him up and back him seconds like

(28:17):
they were just waiting. They weren't trying to prevent anything,
they were just waiting there. Now, I'm always skeptical of
anybody that is celebrated by the mainstream in these particular situations.
So yeah, I had to do my research on the

(28:37):
White Helmets, and if you go to their website, it
says that they don't accept money from any government. It's
crazy how that always seems to have exceptions, right, because
the UK donated twenty four million dollars to the White Helmets,
the same UK that said we are absolutely making the

(28:58):
side of regime change and part hmm, So is that
why I saw the White Helmets screaming a lot of
walk bar with the ISIS group and then the rebel
group going ah like busting caps in the air like
it's super excited about attacking. I mean, they're they're sentences

(29:22):
of them talking about attacking uh innocent people. They don't
seem to be nonpartisan. I think they may have an agenda,
they have at least twenty four million dollars worth of
an agenda, but they don't they don't only set money
from the UK Guess who's the other country that donates

(29:43):
man's of dollars to them? You guessed it us. It's
America once again, sweet Jesus. So the white helmets are
a facade. So you just got hit with a plethora
of facades over the last what at this point twenty thirteen,

(30:05):
twenty fifth what four five four years? Five years almost
he got told that a side had a chemical attack
against him and that it was just absolutely no possibility
that it could be anybody else. When the Syrian rebels
actually were the ones who attacked first, and a side
called instead of attacking back, which is what he could

(30:27):
have done, he called the OLDPCW chemical people that come
and make sure to see and verify who was doing
the attacking, called the old PCW. And the old PCW
is there when the Syrians attack, like, because it would
make sense for a side to use a chemical agent
while olpcw's there, right, So, yeah, that was a facade

(30:51):
and it was never proven that aside actually used these
chemical weapons. Was never proven whatsoever. Then there was a
time where all these journalists, all of these journalists were
there claim to be civilian with their last videos in
a lepo. You remember that big thing, and it's supposedly
all of them were again Scade and you know this,

(31:14):
this is gonna be my last tweek before side and
blows us up. And it turns out they all like
worked for Alja's era and like other news networks, and
they were all paid to be there. Because I myself
was curious. I was really curious when the southern black
guy was in Aleppo, like talking about this last day there,
I'm like, bro, why are you even there? Like there's

(31:34):
no black people there? But hey, whatever you do, you guy.
I thought you'd like a sying wife for something I
don't know. But all of them coincidentally, it was a
well edited montage of people saying it was the last
their last days in a Leppo and I'm like, yo,

(31:55):
if these people I would question if these people were
on their last days, like how did the video get
edited so well? And why is it endnet so good?
And why do they all have like iPhone video quality?
And where did you get the iPhones from? If you
could leave the tounchry, why didn't you leave? Like it
is like a lot of questions that were going and

(32:15):
of course it came out it was fake and CNN
was posting this story everywhere, and everybody was posting this
story everywhere, and y'all were lied to again, and of
course it was anti aside that whole campaign. That's that's
like three times already you were lied to. You were
lied to about who does and who doesn't have chemical weapons,

(32:35):
because it's already been verified by the United Nations that
the rebels doing fact and did in fact have chemical weapons,
that those weapons were brought through Turkey from Libya, approved
by Hillary Clinton's administration. So you were lied to about that.
God knows how many times were lilied to about Hillary.

(32:56):
You were lied to about the White Helmets. You were
lied to about the fact that the White Helmets uh
even interactive with these people post attack, because they would
be and has matt suits if these were the victims,
because I don't believe they were the same victims. I
believe people were killed, but I do not believe they

(33:16):
were the same victims that the I don't believe the
White Helmets were actually talking to these victims. Any statement
white chemical bonds from the sky film like that could
be a man of statement. There's nothing that proves that
there's nobody, nobody like collaborated that nobody. So we were

(33:38):
allied to about We're I don't even know what chemical
agent was actually you, so we could be being lied
to about that. We're allied to about who did the attack.
They are telling we said an investigation could happen, it
should happen, we'd have the resolution for it with the

(33:58):
United Nations, and then we send missiles fifty nine missiles
at Syria. Why if we're going to do an investigation.
So theerception because because I have a lot of people,
I'm not a lot. I have a few friends. I
have a few friends, some smart people, very intelligent people,

(34:21):
but they were raised in the culture of being programmed,
and I fortunately was not. You can call it what
you want to. I just I've never appeared had I've
never felt the need to appeal to an authority or
appeal to a particular group of people to feel accepted
in the world of academia as a big deal. So
if you want to exist in academia and be respected

(34:41):
of academia by academics, a lot of the times you
have to appeal to their authorities. And so they still
program like a side pom his own people. Over and
Overain Okay, where the proof, Well, CNN said one time, Okay, yeah,
let's hear the story again. The truth of the matter
is there is no The truth of the matter is

(35:04):
there is no proof. I'm not saying that the side
is an absolutely amazing God. I don't know what he is.
I've never met the guy personally. Soci actually went to
meet him and say he was perfectly normal. I mean
I would be. I would probably turn insane if I
was always worried that the United States was going to
push me out, I would turn the say too. But

(35:28):
it's so crazy to me that every single narrative that
has been pushed about aside his government, the rebels, who's
funding the rebels, every single thing, either the narrative has
been manipulated to to turn Aside into the antagonist, or

(35:48):
it's been completely not mentioned. Or the fact that somehow,
some way we keep making Syria this extremely special case
like because let's be completely and totally honest, that's what
was happening. It was becoming what it is, what it

(36:08):
should be to an isolation this country, which we probably
should become, not necessarily isolation is but we need to
pull out a lot. Our pull out game is not strong,
but we were not as worried and from the from
the sense that we wanted peace in Syria, but we
knew it had to come from the Syrian people. And

(36:31):
the objective truth is that is what needs to happen.
We shouldn't be funding rebels, we shouldn't be funding anybody.
Syrians have to fight for their country like everyone else
has had to, and that's I think that's pretty reasonable. Unfortunately,
I hate that. I hate that there's war at all,
or hate that's conflict at all. But that's just government,
that's politics. But it was becoming that they weren't important

(36:57):
to us, to the American, to the average American. But Yemen,
it's still happening. It's happening right now. When we invaded Ukraine. Oh,
by the way, just case you didn't know that whole
of Russia invader Ukraine thing, I don't know if I've
ever told you all this, but no, we invaded Ukraine

(37:17):
and then Russia invaded Ukraine back, and then Ukraine voted
to be part of Russia, and we pretended that Russia
was just coercing them to vote, And no, I would
want to be protected by Russia too, do you know
why because Barack Obama himself said he wanted to put
troops up and down Eastern Europe. We already had a
plan to spend like over one hundred billion in Eastern Europe.

(37:41):
Why Because Eastern Europe is a path to geography lesson,
Eastern Europe is the path to the Middle East. So essentially,
by having a strong foothold in the Middle East and
having a strong foothold in Eastern Europe, we could attack
from all sides and we would dominate the world. But

(38:03):
when I have been lied to not once, not twice,
not three times, fourto not five tomes, but at this
point an uncomfortable amount of times about one person, because
I mean, this is like, this is like high school politics. Right.
If somebody keeps telling me the same live about a person,
are they lie to me multiple talking about a person,
I'm gonna start not believe anything you say about that person,
Like the boy who cried wolf, right, I'm not gonna

(38:25):
believe everything. I'm questioning some of the things you say
because it's gotten to the point where because I've never
heard anything positive about from American media about Asad at all,
and with Saddam it was somewhat different, right, It was

(38:46):
somewhat different because nobody, including Iraqis, really liked Saddam, Right,
nobody including Iraqs like like Iraqi like Saddam. So at
least Iraqis were kind of collaborated some of the negative stuff.
And I believe that Saddam was more than likely, for
the most part, a bad person. Weirdly enough, we caught

(39:08):
him and they he couldn't sit trial. We just allowed
him to behead him. That's also weird. First of all,
when since we catch war criminals and then we be
the judge, you're an executioner. That's a whole different discussion. Right.
We didn't even give Saddam a chance to talk. We
didn't even put him in front of ICC so that
she lets you know there is something fishy going on.

(39:29):
I know Saddam probably is a shit person, but that
we are not. The judge in the United States is
not the judge jury executioner. It's not. But when you
lie to me that many times, I started to get
a little worried. I get freaked out a little bit.
I can't believe anything you say about the side now
because you lied to me over and over again. But

(39:52):
his people. I have Syrian friends who actually like Asade,
who say nothing but good things about a side, who
say the narrative that we're getting is completely wrong. I've
actually never met a Syrian who said otherwise. Personally, I'm
sure there are some who agree with the rebels, but

(40:13):
if they knew that we were funding them, they probably
wouldn't agree with them because most countries don't like us.
So is that right? I just we have absolutely no
reason to believe anything the government, anything, the mainstream media, CNN, anybody, UK,
anybody says about a side right now, Whether or not
a side is good or a bad guy is legitimately

(40:35):
still up for debate because we don't know. We've never
had any legitimate discussion. We've never had a side at
the UN giving us a speech and then like calling
out our meeting face to face with the president, which
everybody would love to see, having a three way discussion
between putin aside and whoever our president is at the time,

(40:56):
calling them out saying this is exactly what your people
have done to me. Because we always hears the claims
of what is from our people, of what a side
has done to his people, but we never hear asade
get a chance to defending himself other than through our
media's odds. Now, the next thing that we're going to
talk about is who stands a benefit. It's gonna sound

(41:22):
like I mean, it's y'all should be used to hearing
it by now. The rothschilds. I know, damn spoiler alert,
you heard it fifty times over, but it's true. Sorry, lord,
I'm not joking. His name is His name is Lord Rothschild.
And surprisingly enough, Chaney, Oh what a surprise, have interest

(41:47):
in a company company called Genie Oil and Gas. That's
where Genie is at right now, Syria, guess who gave
Cheney and raw Child? Of course, because rath Child is Jewish.
For the fact, the correct way to pronounce his name
is actually all cut, so if anybody ever heard him
call that, that's another name for rath Child. But anyway,

(42:11):
they gave Cheney and rath Child. This a particular part
of Syria that's currently occupied illegally with international backlash that
it is currently being drilled in. This is not a
conspiracy theory. This is not like, oh, everything's about the
raw Child. No, this is the business insider told us this.

(42:36):
This is not a joke. This isn't something. It's like
people hear things that are like any businessman like if
I hear, okay, two businessmen who are in the oil industry,
like took advantage of a position or to get oil, Like,
that's not really surprising to me.

Speaker 2 (42:53):
That's what I expect.

Speaker 1 (42:56):
Right. So roth Child and Cheney are invested in Syria.
So I don't have to tell you about Rothschild at
this point, but I should elaborate on Channy because Channy's
God knows, this man came out. Yeah, we gotta attack Syria.
You know it, Channy Bruh, Your opinions on what we

(43:17):
should do and sketch situations is condemned. We don't believe you.
You suck at military strategy. In fact, you've never cared
about military strategy. In fact, I'm pretty sure that the
only reason you were put in vice president because you

(43:37):
were the link to the deep state. I know that
Bush probably is too, but I don't think Bush is
actually a bad person. I think he was like, oh damn,
what did I get myself into? What did I let
my dad get myself get me into? I literally, I'm
so serious. I think that about George W. And Jeb.
I think they're both like kind of like naive but
not naive at the same time. I don't think Jeb

(44:00):
is a bad person, either believe it or not so.
But Dick Tanney is a horrible, horrible warhol. He's horrible,
the orb person, nothing good about him. Dick Cheney was
approached by the Obama administration, not by the Obama I

(44:24):
digress apologize it was an Obama It was Trump by
the Trump administration. And the reason they were approached. He
was approached is because Tillerson was being pagged for Secretary
of State, but he didn't initially want to take it.
Of course, it just wasn't really out of the north
because a lot of people were rejecting a position to

(44:47):
Trump administration. All wait, he can say, Niko, you need
my vice president. I'd be like, hell no, this is
a sinking ship and you just left the docs. Bro, sorry,
I'm not getting nowhere near it. So what is it, Trump, dude.
Trump walks up, till Cheney says, hey, man, look, I
need Tillerson. I know that he respects you, but I

(45:09):
need you to get him on my team. So this
is Cheney at this point. Cheney not only gets Tillerson
on the squad, so he has his He now has
a mouthpiece in the Trump administration. Because to Cheney, for
whatever reason, I actually hated the Trump administration. He denounced

(45:32):
Trump's Trump administration, but they approached him. Tillerson was on
the is now the Secretary of State. Uh and Cheney
is an advisor now it's a general advisor. Now what
a coincidence that Tillerson is now now Tillerson being direct

(45:53):
who was directly convinced to join the Trump administration from
Cheney and saying, yeah, we gotta He didn't say we
have to quell the the the quell the problems going
on in Syria and let them figure it out. He
directly contradicted Trump and said no, asad regime needs to
be changed. Why are we letting the men who has

(46:21):
vested interest in Syria a point and convinced a man
to be the Secretary of State and make decisions about Syria?
Once again, I can talk about all day about the
raw Child. We know exactly what they want. They don't

(46:42):
give it. They want world domination. It's pretty freaking obvious
at this point. But Chaney, we should see coming from
a mile away but he's here and we're not doing
anything about it. Till her Centers was direct hired, convinced
to come on to Trump's campaign. Wanted nothing to do

(47:04):
with Trump's campaign, but neither the Cheney. But Cheney saw
an opportunity. He put his man in place, and tada,
because he wasn't confirmed. He was very recently confirmed, because
he didn't even know if he wanted to be on
the camp on the administration less than two months later.

(47:25):
I want to regime change. That's not what I want.
My secretary of State said we didn't want Hillary Clinton
being president, because that's what she was saying when she
was a Secretary of State, and she made her goals
pretty clear. This is literally, oh once again, Israel was

(47:51):
the one who gave the land away to to Cheney
and Bush, or to Chene excuse me, and and Rothschild
to drill. But they're so worried about being attacked. Yeah,
because if you're drilling, my lad I'm gonna attack your
ass too. If it's so worried about being attacked, you

(48:15):
have been had, ladies and gentlemen, you've been playing for fools.
Nothing you have heard on that mainstream media on seeing
it on Foxton, the MSNBC, Rachel Meadow, any of these
these talking heads, these intel hounds that come out of nowhere,
never really nobody knows who they are, but all of

(48:36):
a sudden they want you to do. They used to
throw that word intel out there, and they're important now
and you can't think for yourself. But this guy who
has all the intail. No intel can tell you why
something happened, but intel cannot predict. They cannot predict that.
I just had a conversation with somebody else the other
day was yesterday, actually literally actually because I was talking
to my friend and he was like, he said, uh nah,

(48:58):
I don't think that you know, he's intel, he's I
don't think that it's leaning towards you know, a conflict,
an open all our conflict. I said, no offense, bro,
But your intel can only tell you what happened and
maybe a little bit why it happened, But it can't
predict the future. Nless you're sitting in that in that
in that oval office, or unless you're sitting in one
of these congressional committees, you don't know what could happen.

(49:22):
Because first of all, this man is a rational. Second
of off. I don't think Trump is in control anymore.
I think, as much as we want to contay that,
we want to insult him. For four days ago or so,
Trump was saying he wants to stay out of Syria,
powers that be are trying to force his hand and

(49:46):
say no, you absolutely are going to do what you
were told because I have too much money writing on this.
So here we are. It is up to us to

(50:07):
decide how we're going to react to this. They're going
to try to cause you to enlist with these horrible pictures,
and they're gonna try to get the military galvanized behind
this unless to us take millions of more innocent lives.
But let me tell you, Hm, we there's a there's
a blueprint out already for I's gonna go with seven countries.

(50:29):
I wish I can remember all of them. Iraq was Rock, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria,
I want to say, Samalia, Iran. And there's one more.
I think Lebanon. Maybe not Lebanon, but there's one more.

(50:51):
And we're already what three fourths of the way through,
if not I think four fifths of the way through.
Oh and Yemen. There you go, Thank you, Lois so
question why, all of a sudden, we are so eager
to go to war with Syria while we're so you

(51:14):
got to talk about Syria when Yemen is not being
mentioned at all. Actually nothing is being We're still taking
in this in housing Iraq, it's still happening. There's a
lot of stuff still happening, but it's not being brought up.
It just gaslighted you with this Donald Trump thing all
day for the last two months, the first hundred days.

(51:34):
Then off, it's the first hundred days. Then on, when
was Trump's hundredth day? Is it? Is it? No, it's
not hundred days the past this hundred day? Yeh has it?
Hold up? Did it this thing? No, it's twenty eight
day January twenty eight and February twenty eight, March twenty eight. Well, damn,
now I think about it. I think this one hundred day,
it's almost up too. Mainstream media didn't need something else

(51:57):
to talk about, so I guess this is what they're
riding on. It's so crazy how that just works out
for everybody, right, just pass one hundredth day. We just
passed Trump's hundredth day. We literally just passed it, and tada,

(52:18):
they have another story to pump. So Coincidental comes out
with a statement saying for those of you who just
join it, comes out with the statement saying that we're
not going to attack Asade because we don't want a
regime change. If they want a regime change, they have
to vote like everybody else. He says, he fires Stee's

(52:40):
bent Steve Bannon, not him, The administration fire Steeves. Steve
Bannon from National Security. Michael Flynnan obviously is gone early
in the game. And then chemical attack attacks happen. The
White Helmets go to save the day with absolutely no
has matt gear on on, which is completely totally unsafe

(53:01):
because sayrien gas actually seeps into your skin, it will
cause internal injury. Oh yeah, White Helmets are evil. And also,
like we do, the chemical attach happens, we have an investigation,
but we don't even a lot of investigation and go
out in new way. We agree to the investigation and
then send fifty nine missiles less than three hour four

(53:22):
to five hours later after we agree to the investigation,
to move back the investigations for whatever reason, because now
now the culprit is likely not going to be caught.
There's going to be no proof of who community attack. Unfortunately,
the rebels in the eyes of the people will be exonerated,

(53:44):
but in the eyes of our government in mainstream media
side will not be exonerated. This is facts, facts of life, unfortunately.

(54:05):
So that's it for the night, though it will be
more coming. As I said, I'm finally kind of getting
my life together. Let's say, moving from New York to
Miami is a big, big step. So that's what I've
been constantly on the last month. And you know, I
gotta make sure I take care of myself. Self care
is important and I can't stress myself out of the
politics and keeping jobs and all that good stuff. So

(54:28):
but that's what I've been doing. So once I get
that taken care of, you will start seeing my ugly
move daily once again. So until then, until till next time,
I always remember question everything and share this please and
always always remember find your balance. Thanks for watching, have
a good day.

Speaker 2 (55:00):
Hmm okay, mhm, okay, thank you so much, Nico House.

Speaker 3 (55:40):
Okay, guys, I'm gonna reboot my computer here, uh to
to get a better reception for for the next show. Okay,
So there's gonna be a couple of minutes of dead air.
Then then we'll be bringing you the Opperamant Report. Interesting
stuff coming up tonight, guys. I got first coming up.
Johnna Captain is going to be on again trying to

(56:03):
explain his mind control theory. I give every chance in
the whirl. And then we have Rick Lovett who also
lived with Tiffany Jenks, and he describes his perspective of
the murder of Tiffany Jenks. And he has a website
on Facebook too, called The Simple Facts About the Death
of Tiffany Jenks. So we have a whole two different
perspectives here on this situation with this murder that happened

(56:23):
up there in Portland, Oregon. Okay, we'll be right back
after I read Boots. It's gonna be a couple minutes
of dead air.