Niko House - Mi Casa Su Casa

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
Me Kaukasa with Yours Truly Nico House on a special edition.
Why the special, you may ask, Well, this is my
last presentation in New York City. I love the good
city of New York, but I have found opportunity in

(00:21):
the state of Florida, Miami to be specific. We're going
to be doing something just briefly because I know people
are interested in what I'm doing there. Uh, for what
I'm trying to do with the show, with with with
the network, with the production, all that good stuff. It's
it's just it's cheaper for me to do it there.
So that's the first thing I'm putting together at home

(00:42):
studio over the next in the next year, so I
am planning on actually renting out office space for a
bigger studio, and I'll be teaching myself all that good
stuff and also networking with people down there who also
know how to do the type of things that I
want to do with the show, whether.

Speaker 2 (01:02):
It be with the radio side or the production side
with the video.

Speaker 1 (01:07):
And also we are going I'm going down there because
well it's warm and Miami's awesome, and.

Speaker 2 (01:16):
Yeah, I know people are like, You're not going down
there for no work.

Speaker 1 (01:18):
You're going down there at a party, well, there will
be some of that. I will definitely assure you you
don't have to guess if I'm going down the party,
there will be some party evolved. But also there's been
some opportunity to come up, and this has been something
that we've actually been trying to get taken care of
even before I came to New York, which is I
was supposed to work with Tim Kenova and down there

(01:39):
to reform the democratic part of Timpanova's people. But when
I go down there, decided because of the way the
election turned out, which was kind of weird.

Speaker 2 (01:48):
I think a lot of people I predicted Donald.

Speaker 1 (01:51):
Trump winning and Bernie Sanders didn't win, but I thought
that Hillary was a lot better at cheating than she
was actually, So Donald Trump won. And so that's kind
of throwing a wrench into me being willing to hold
myself back.

Speaker 2 (02:05):
Until twenty twenty Florida run.

Speaker 1 (02:07):
Will I build myself, my brand, established myself, you know,
as a as a as a politician, if you will,
in a public figure.

Speaker 2 (02:15):
So I decided that I'm actually going to run as.

Speaker 1 (02:18):
Soon as possible in Florida in District twenty three for
those of you who don't know, that is w Washerman
Shows district.

Speaker 2 (02:25):
So yeah, I'm putting her on notice.

Speaker 1 (02:28):
But we'll see exactly what I'm going to run for
when it will be. We're going to try to reform
the Democratic Party in Florida from the ground up, because
we'll simply put the Green Party isn't that strong there.
It's not as established as it would be in New
York or like Michigan or California. Even so, we're doing

(02:48):
what we can how we can do it. For those
of you who know, I don't really promote either or
dim Exit or Green Party exclusively or.

Speaker 2 (02:57):
Even a Republican Party exclusively, or I.

Speaker 1 (02:59):
Tell you get in where you can get involved with
people that will accept you and network with you, and
you rebuild your party and make it progressive.

Speaker 2 (03:06):
I don't care what the label is, just make it progressive.

Speaker 1 (03:09):
And that's what me and a couple of people in
Florida are gonna try to do. So the next time
we have Bernie Sanders run, or we even have Tosly
Gavill run in twenty twenty, we can turn the state
you know, blue like we have before in the in
the past, turn it progressive and we can get some
get some key people in some good places, and hopefully
we can even put in a progressive governor while we're

(03:32):
down there.

Speaker 2 (03:33):
So, uh, we've got a lot of work to do,
but it's gonna be a good time.

Speaker 1 (03:37):
I'm excited and uh, we're gonna, we're gonna build, We're
gonna it's a less less a lot less stress for me,
because living in New York is very stressful.

Speaker 2 (03:46):
Uh, just paying your bills and you're stressful, right, And
so we're gonna, we're gonna, we're gonna do what we.

Speaker 1 (03:52):
Can to get me prepared to run for office for
president when that time comes, because that time is coming.

Speaker 2 (03:59):
We be twenty twenty.

Speaker 1 (04:00):
Four if Donald Trump wins again or whether we lose,
you know, or whether whether an establishing mecnadiate and the
Democratic Party or even burning Senator Tolsta Gabbert wins, and
I want to continue whatever great legacy they leave behind.

Speaker 2 (04:15):
So that's that's what.

Speaker 1 (04:16):
We're going to be doing in Miami, and hopefully you
all will be there. You know, I may be some
new people, Like I met a lot of great supporters
in New York. We worked and networked and we got
a lot of stuff done, and I want to do
that same thing in Miami. That's what we plan on doing,
so not for myself, not for myself, we are going

(04:37):
to go forward.

Speaker 2 (04:38):
With I left this out of the title because I
didn't want all his little group needs to jump on.

Speaker 1 (04:44):
But as you all know I am when it comes
to the Young Turks, I don't dislike them. I'm not
extremely fond of them. I have people within the Young
Turks that I like and I have some that I'm not.
You know that, in fact, they're a little suspect as
far as what they considered to be objective analytical news.

(05:10):
Jordan Sheraton is my homie. I talked to Jordan's. I
try to get up with him every couple of weeks
to check on him. You know, we look out for
each other when we're when we're in the same area,
we link up.

Speaker 2 (05:23):
Jimmy Door, I loved Jimmy. I can't really tell you.

Speaker 1 (05:26):
I loved Jimmy Door was the reason that I actually
started watching the Young Turks because I'll always catch his
soliloquies on Facebook, and I was like.

Speaker 2 (05:35):
Who is this guy and why is he so popular?
And so eventually I started watching him, Sean King. I
like Sean King as well. You know, he's a new
addition to the Young Turks.

Speaker 1 (05:44):
It's actually really weird that he ended up becoming part
of the Young Turks because, as you know, Young Turch
is in La Sean King is based out of New
York City now and he really really only does from
what I know, social justice, and that's what he's in it.
I don't know how that ended up becoming like he stopped,
he quit New York Daily News, so are the New

(06:08):
York Daily newspaper, and now he's doing full time with
the Young Turks, which is actually pretty pretty good for
them because if I recall, he has actually more followed
between his Twitter and his his Facebook, he has probably
more followers than the Young Turks network combined. Like, so
that's good for them and it's good for Sean. Congratulations,
I'm glad you found the independent, you know, news outlet

(06:28):
that will let you have more freedom.

Speaker 2 (06:30):
So but as you.

Speaker 1 (06:31):
All know, y'all probably know what this conversation is going,
and that is the tweets that Chain put out saying
that something to the to the effect of, oh I'm
gonna sell out, and in response, to some other tweet
but saying, oh, I'm gonna sell out because I voted
for Hillary Clinton.

Speaker 2 (06:51):
Well, our voted for the lesser of two evils.

Speaker 1 (06:53):
Well, how do you like, you know, the greater the
greater of two evils or something like that, And it
was in what was okay? So here was what was
weird to me. The original tweet was like something about
George Soros paying people to do things. And I was
so confused because that was the tweet that Chink was

(07:14):
responding to. And he actually did not address anything about
the George Soros part or the part about being paid,
you know, him paying for stuff, or the part of
by him.

Speaker 2 (07:23):
The only thing he.

Speaker 1 (07:23):
Addressed was the part about him being a sellout. And
it was weird because they think of it like this.
People have been calling a.

Speaker 2 (07:28):
Chink to sell out for quite some time now.

Speaker 1 (07:30):
Right as soon as he jumped ship to Hillary's bandwagon
after the DNC convention, he was being called to sell
out quite frequently, over and over again on his Facebook lot.

Speaker 2 (07:39):
I watched the show, so their Facebook.

Speaker 1 (07:41):
Live page, he was being called to sell out on
Twitter while he was while they were alive, he were
being called to sell out and on his YouTube page.

Speaker 2 (07:47):
He was being called to sell out, so this.

Speaker 1 (07:48):
Wasn't really new for him, but that particular tweet is
what drew his response, and it was a little petty response.
And I don't know why you would dress it in
that fashion, because if you're going to convince the world
you're not a sellout, especially after you kind of did
a very good job convincing the world at this point
that you somewhat are a sellout, it's you probably shuld

(08:09):
address on your show where you aren't trapped by one
hundred and forty characters to explain to the world why
you kind of it, why you sold out. I mean
to keep it high, right, So people were asked, I
just put the tweet up, and I asked, why is
he being so insecure about this? If you stand by
what she did, then there's really no need to explain yourself.

(08:31):
If you feel like, if you've done a good enough
job explaining yourself why you did that, you really don't
need to explain yourself.

Speaker 2 (08:37):
But here's why.

Speaker 1 (08:39):
And this is when people pointed this out all over
my status if you were friends with me on Facebook
or if you follow my personal page, they said that
he didn't address elections facts. He didn't, which is weird
because he had a reporter in Jordan Sherifs who actually
did a dress election fraud, but they never brought up
on the show. So that was a problem he never addressed.

Speaker 2 (09:01):
He did it. He was always taking shots at CNN.

Speaker 1 (09:03):
But for those of you who know him and CNN
have beef like they're competing networks. Of course, he's always
taken shots at CNN. Of course he's always taken shots
at MSNBC. So that really isn't significant. So you done
in Brazil this that situation was kind of like a
bonus for him. It didn't really it didn't really show
me anything like, oh yeah, you're trying to fight corruption.
And then there was the whole he was behind Bernie,

(09:25):
and then Super Tuesday came. Bernie lost, which everybody expected
him to do on that particular Super Tuesday because that
was in the South where essentially the Democratic Party had
the establishment. Democratic Party has complete and total control, and
the Black Caucus unfortunately, had switched from any type of
you know, moral burden to do the right thing and

(09:47):
endorse Hillary Clinton early, so and he switched.

Speaker 2 (09:50):
He jumped off the ship.

Speaker 1 (09:51):
It didn't try to jump back on after Bernie started
winning again. So yeah, there's a lot of reasons to
believe taking out if we're going to be honest about it.
And I think that's where his insecurities come from. He
knows for a fact that the things that he did
are considered so out worthy.

Speaker 2 (10:08):
Like I'm not, it's nothing personal. I don't really dislike
the guy.

Speaker 1 (10:14):
I think that he maybe his heart's in the right place,
But I also think that he's egotistical.

Speaker 2 (10:18):
I think he's very statistical.

Speaker 1 (10:20):
I think his political analyzes are not as I feel
like they're not as.

Speaker 2 (10:26):
Substantive as he thinks they are.

Speaker 1 (10:28):
I think they're not as informative as and insightful as
he thinks they are. And I think a lot of
his analyzes are basic.

Speaker 2 (10:36):
He takes popular opinion in the in the in the in.

Speaker 1 (10:41):
The liberal progressive world and tries to regurgitate it, and
that is not really impressive to a lot of people.
We've grown past that we don't like it when C
and M does it, we don't like it when MSNBC
does it, So why we didn't like it when you
do it? Which is a lot of what Chink has
been doing as of late. He just you know, he's

(11:02):
good at attack when he's good at being the good guy,
but when it's time for him to be the good guy,
when it's hard, Chank has failed to do so. And
I think that is what people are a little upset about.
As far as him being considered a sellout. I don't
think people hate him or dislike him, but when you're

(11:24):
not only are you you were considered a sell out,
but you're but you're kind of a condescending sellout. On
top of that, when people wouldn't jump ship to Hillary,
you were condescending as hell. And I know because I
was watching. Now I'll granted once again, so let me
caveat by saying that he did not prevent other people

(11:45):
from covering Joe Stein like Jordan. We actually saw Jordan
ad A Raley. I believe I saw Jordan at the
Detroit rally when I introduced Joe Stein, and he was
allowed to cover her completely and totally. And that's amazing.
That's one thing that Chank and t YT does. They
let their people, uh be progressive, be reporters and be

(12:07):
actual journalists. Now I'm not talking about t YT right now,
I'm talking about Chang, and Chank himself has said some
pretty disparaging things about Joe Stan.

Speaker 2 (12:17):
He said disparaging things about.

Speaker 1 (12:19):
Burning supporters, burning your buzz people, you know, try to
fear monger at us H, what Donald Trump would do, which,
by the way, what Donald Trump is doing now actually
isn't really any worse than what I would expect Hillary
Clinton to do, because right now, if Clinton was president,
he'd be preparing for worth Russia and we will still
have to deal with TPP. What Trump is doing right
now is completely reversible. But that we'll get into that

(12:41):
a little bit later. But when you're when you're and
then he talked about talks about these justice democrats and
like you have the answers right, and when you're very condescending,
when you have that egotistical report approach to journalism and
you seem to be batting old for you know, for
a hundred and your analysis, then people are going to start,

(13:04):
you know, they're going to have their opinions about you.
And it's not necessarily a good thing or a bad
thing or not that they're right or they're wrong. It's
just real and they're entitled to their opinion, and you
shouldn't take it personal.

Speaker 2 (13:15):
You know, it's just you take it, you take it.

Speaker 1 (13:18):
With you take it with a grain of salt, and
you move on like that's just it.

Speaker 2 (13:23):
It's the entertainment industry. Now.

Speaker 1 (13:25):
What you don't want to do is show your insecurity
by addressing things that you believe aren't valid, or if
you're going to address it, in my personal opinion, don't
do it in one hundred and forty characters and then
ignore three fourths of the statement that you were responding to,
because now it looks a little suspect whether or not
you believe in the whole George Soros thing, which of
course is you know anything about your soils. He is

(13:45):
extremely involved in both the Democratic and Republican Party, So yes,
like that's the thing that people need to be aware of.
That's not a conspiracy theory that he puts money into
both of these parties.

Speaker 2 (13:55):
This is a verifiable fact. And you ignored that.

Speaker 1 (13:58):
You ignored you know you do you have some skeptical
financial assistance, right, And I'm not saying that, guys, your
your analyzis or your your program. I didn't say that
because people you need money to function. I don't think
that you know, you can't you can take money that's
and still be progressive because it's not like you got

(14:20):
that from, like you're not taking money from the fossil
fuel industry and feeding us nonsense.

Speaker 2 (14:24):
So I get that. Okay, cool, got it.

Speaker 1 (14:27):
But at the same time, you didn't respond to that
part of the tweet, and so that's what I also
think people were concerned about, is that they think that
now you're in bed with big money, and that's the
problem considering that you're supposed to be a progressive news outlet.
And people were also a little weirded out when you
got the deal on television when your whole show has
been about being anti.

Speaker 2 (14:45):
Mainstream media, and they're like, well, how did he do that?

Speaker 1 (14:47):
He literally has been bashing in this whole election cycle
and then you end up with a television show like
on mainstream media.

Speaker 2 (14:52):
So okay, that's that's that.

Speaker 1 (14:54):
As far as my opinion about that situation, Shank not
a bad guy.

Speaker 2 (14:58):
I don't think he wishes to bad on any body.

Speaker 1 (15:00):
I don't think that he is a you know, I
think he is progressive, but I think he has he's
a little full of himself sometimes and sometimes he does
have to be his ego needs to be checked and
his analysis have to be you know, brought back into
the forefront to help him understand that, Hey, man, you
know always right, but you don't always have to, you know,
condescend at people that you don't agree with in the
liberal left. So that's my opinion about that moving forward,

(15:24):
some people.

Speaker 2 (15:25):
Speaking speaking of George Sorels.

Speaker 1 (15:27):
So of course the criticisms and the support of the
Women's March are still coming and full of effect.

Speaker 2 (15:34):
And I have to apologize I haven't put up my.

Speaker 1 (15:37):
Video in my interviews from the Woman's March that I
probably have a lot of y'all like, oh, this is
not what I was expecting because I was at the
Women's March in mad But it's because I was moving
unpacking and I'm getting ready to move.

Speaker 2 (15:47):
And I'll have it up as soon as I can.

Speaker 1 (15:50):
Because the interviews are extremely important, and so I'm gonna
have that up as soon as I can.

Speaker 2 (15:54):
But I see a lot of jokes and this is
and this is something that I don't I don't like,
I don't like the and I take stuff like this
very seriously.

Speaker 1 (16:05):
I see a lot of jokes about where's my money
at where's my money, that George Soros is supposed to
be paying protesters. You know where I was protesting and
I didn't get paid BLA, the hashtask going on and
so on and so forth.

Speaker 2 (16:19):
Let's be very very clear.

Speaker 1 (16:21):
You need to be able to recognize an effort to
delegitimize a very legitimate concern of big money in politics
and in activism, because that is a thing. I don't
know where people got this idea that money like that
George Soros is just this this phantom guy that we
can't track anything he does. Because we can track what

(16:42):
he does, we can track his influence, just like we
can track the influence of the Koch brothers. We haven't
forgot about them. Bernie shined a light on everything that
they do to influence election. We can track these things.

Speaker 2 (16:53):
Now. People may have misconceptions.

Speaker 1 (16:57):
People may convey it conveyed their their their uncomfortability with
George Soross's contributions in a way that may not be
completely accurate.

Speaker 2 (17:06):
The facts may not be completely there.

Speaker 1 (17:07):
But I'm not expecting everyone to be a damn political analyst,
and they don't. They may not understand exactly how the
policies work or how it's the money. It's how the
money is matriculated through the through the activism and the protesting.

Speaker 2 (17:20):
But I'm here to clarify that today.

Speaker 1 (17:22):
See you an example, because when you're making fun of
legitimate concerns, or when we miss and when we miss
someone making an effort to delegitimize legitimate concerns, then that's
how that's how they want us to feel uncomfortable, and
they want us to feel like, oh, if I say this,

(17:44):
if I make make this statement, people are going to
make fun of me because they think it's not they
think it's not legitimate anymore.

Speaker 2 (17:50):
They think it's it's it's a joke, or I'm being
a conspiracy theorist or whatever.

Speaker 1 (17:54):
So when people were saying that the DNC co opted
the Women's March, which is very clear that they did,
or that you watched me shows winn have been speaking
in DC, you need to understand a few things. One,
nobody is saying that every single protesting was paid.

Speaker 2 (18:16):
Let's clear that. Let's clear the air on that.

Speaker 1 (18:18):
But just like y'all are saying, oh, where's my check
at I didn't get a check for protesting? Okay, that
nobody said that you were paid. But I can tell
you for the fact that at the.

Speaker 2 (18:28):
DNC convention there were people paid to fill those seats.

Speaker 1 (18:31):
That doesn't mean everybody there got paid to fill the seats,
and that doesn't mean everybody knows about that particular aspect.

Speaker 2 (18:38):
But I was there, I was in Philly. I know delegates.

Speaker 1 (18:41):
I was literally looking on craigslists where they were advertising
to pay people to fill seats. I've met and I've
met people who were organizing for Hillary Clinton who were
We're talking about how unions were paid to come up
and you know, just stand there and pretend.

Speaker 2 (19:01):
To be a Heralian supporter pert.

Speaker 1 (19:04):
So just because you didn't get a paycheck doesn't mean
that that does not happen. That just shows me if
you're literally condemning that and saying that's.

Speaker 2 (19:12):
Ridiculous, that's that's conspiracy theory.

Speaker 3 (19:14):
I think.

Speaker 1 (19:15):
I don't want to seem like an asshole, but you're
kind of you're naive, You're singing naive. If you think
that doesn't happen, you really underestimate what people are willing
to do to create the image of success, to create
the image of unity and solidarity, and times where there
really isn't as much and everybody is on the same page.

(19:35):
You don't know, Like the camera angles, that's like saying
those those camera angles that Hillary Clinton were doing with
conspiracy theories.

Speaker 2 (19:41):
They're saying that there weren't that many people there, but
they're actually no.

Speaker 1 (19:44):
Camera angles is another way to It's like it can
it can be equip kate to pay protests because you
get your.

Speaker 2 (19:51):
Cameramen to do the right thing.

Speaker 1 (19:53):
With that camera angle, you can look at a lot
more people are there than there actually are. It you
look like she has a lot more supporters than there
actually are. So no, the idea of paid protests is
still a very realistic woman because in regards to the
Women's March, and that needs to be that should be,
that needs to be understood. Okay, so there's that. Now

(20:16):
there's another way to pay for protests. For those of
you who do not know which I this is. I'm
a little irritated by this and I'm getting I'm getting
heated because I've seen a lot of craziness all over
Facebook about like the DNC, like they wouldn't do something.

Speaker 2 (20:30):
I don't know if it's solo rows, but let's be
very clear. Cool here got an email.

Speaker 1 (20:34):
Blast about the fundraiser for the Women's March?

Speaker 2 (20:38):
Anybody? How much did you contribute to the Women's March?
Did anybody see it? Go fund me for the Women's March? Anybody? Now,
if you're listening, whether it be.

Speaker 1 (20:51):
YouTube, Facebook, I want you all to share this right
now because this needs to be This needs to be
clarified and cleared up right now, because that's one thing
that people have not thought about. Who had seen a
GoFundMe of Patreon whatever for the Women's March? So who
do you think paid for the permits? Who do you

(21:15):
think paid for the spaces?

Speaker 2 (21:18):
Better? Yet, I was talking to an NYPG officer.

Speaker 3 (21:22):
Do you know why they weren't out there in riot
gear being abrasive and trying to push people back and
keep people in line because they were paid security.

Speaker 1 (21:33):
Every police officer in the NYPD who was out there
was getting paid extra because the NYPD was paid to
protect them.

Speaker 2 (21:41):
Who the hell had money to pay for that?

Speaker 1 (21:48):
I'm not saying the NYD they aren't paid off. They
were paid because it was a permittive protest and you
have to pay for security. They were yellow taping, they
were bringing out the the polls, blocking people off.

Speaker 2 (22:02):
You have to pay for labor, you have to pay
for security. It was not if you knew how many
police officers were out, it's not cheap. So who paid
for that?

Speaker 1 (22:13):
Who paid for the NYPD, Who paid for the LSPD,
Who paid for these officers to monitor this situation and
make sure that didn't get out in hand, which you
probably wasn't going to. Why do you? Why else would
anybody be that friendly? Because I talked to a lot
of the NYPD officers while I let the women's march,
and they were having a good old time. They weren't complanning. Actually,
if one, as one officer described, he said, yeah, man,

(22:35):
this is some This is easy money.

Speaker 2 (22:37):
And I was like, easy money, what do you mean?
And he said, oh man, I'm getting paid extra for this.
We're all getting paid for this. I don't have to
do is really sit here and you know, chat up
and have a good time. Who's paying for it? I
can tell you it's somebody, because I had to come
from the people paying.

Speaker 1 (22:55):
For the protests. So once again, did anybody say you
go fund me? Did anybody see a Patreon? Anybody see
a crowd rise? Did anybody see any type of fund raiser?

Speaker 2 (23:10):
For this Women's March.

Speaker 1 (23:11):
No y'all showed up and for whatever reason, everything was there,
just handed on a platter for you. In DC, y'all
had speakers come out.

Speaker 2 (23:22):
Who set this up? Who paid for the permit in DC?
Who paid to have the insurance on the equipment? Who
paid for the equipment?

Speaker 1 (23:29):
Where did the equipment come from?

Speaker 2 (23:32):
Where?

Speaker 1 (23:33):
How?

Speaker 2 (23:39):
That's what that's That's a.

Speaker 1 (23:41):
Way that people who are quote unquote funding activism would
pay for it.

Speaker 2 (23:47):
They don't even have to pay protests.

Speaker 1 (23:49):
You pay for the setup, you pay for the promotion,
You make sure everybody knows, and the people show up,
they don't even have to bring anything. It could be
the Democratic Party, it could be with George Soros, it
could be whoever. But there was a lot of there
was a lot of infighting in the leadership of the
Woman's March.

Speaker 2 (24:08):
Because it had became so elitist exclusive.

Speaker 1 (24:12):
It was first all white, then it kind of let
a black person in at some point, and then like
they had it, they changed the name, and then it
was some crazy stuff going on.

Speaker 2 (24:21):
But this, this is this is reality, y'all.

Speaker 4 (24:24):
Y'all, you really need to understand how much people are
willing to do how much they're willing to pay to
have their outcome at the end of the day, they're patient.

Speaker 1 (24:36):
This is this, This is reality. I really can't explain
it enough. And it's what scares me the most, I
think is that it's people my age will a little
bit younger than me, who are taking this as a
joke because they haven't lived in the real world. I've
seen the real world. I've been in the military, I've
worked in the corporate world, I've been in the legal field.
I've been everywhere. I mean, I've been in every type

(24:58):
of field, and I've seen people play dirty. They paid
to play period, and it needs to be understood. So
the whole trying to make light of the fact that this,
for whatever reason, this protest was plastered all over television,

(25:19):
being went from the Women's March to the Women's March
against Trump to an anti Trump rally.

Speaker 2 (25:25):
I watched the headlines evolve throughout the.

Speaker 1 (25:28):
Day, but at the same time the Standing Rock protests
all over the country that there were a lot all
over the country. What's happening happening and Standing Rock right now?
Is he being broadcast at all? Nowhere to be found
on television CNN hasn't brought it up. But the Muslim band,

(25:53):
which should be talked about rightfully so has not been
brought up either. I means being brought up, but the.

Speaker 2 (26:03):
Details of said band have not been brought up outside
of yeah, it's a Muslim band.

Speaker 1 (26:08):
Trump hates Muslims the Democratic Party to take over, Like
that's what it always comes back to. How are you
going to be him in twenty twenty, How are you
going to come back to him during this election? How
are you going to stop him from doing this whatever?
Like it's what it always comes back to. All these
all these marching come back to the Democratic Party because yes,

(26:29):
w Washingman Schultz spoke at this, this woman's march. But
and I would have to verify this. I'm almost willing
to go out on a limb and make a bet
and say, I bet not one Libertarian, Green Party or
Republican female was reached out to to speak at that
woman's march. I can almost one hundred percent guarantee it.

(26:54):
The realization that their special interests everywhere said really settle
in for some of y'all, and people people can say
all day, oh you know, y'all be you're being paranoid
everybody's being paranoid because we don't want to face that.

Speaker 2 (27:08):
We don't really want to deal with the reality of.

Speaker 1 (27:11):
How much money and power and greed influences almost every
single action that's taken. I've seen people in the Burning
movement who take advantage of that movement every single day
for personal game. Not for personal games that benefits anybody else,
but legitimate personal game.

Speaker 2 (27:33):
So we need to be wary of that. Moving on.

Speaker 1 (27:41):
Tolsi Gabbard, Toulsi Gabbert has has won my heart.

Speaker 2 (27:48):
Now say what took you so long? Well, there's a lot.

Speaker 1 (27:51):
There's a lot about Toulsi Gabert action kind of scared me.
I'm not going to go into all the details, but
a couple of men and things that scared me about
tulci military background. As a person who is a vet,
it's for her to be a captain in the military
who is deployed. Her view on life scares me. Her

(28:17):
view on life scares me. Her islamophobic rhetoric from the
past scared me because.

Speaker 2 (28:23):
This is stuff that I knew about way way back
in the day.

Speaker 1 (28:26):
The reality of what it takes to be an officer
in the military and deployed scared me because I knew
it had played some influence on her.

Speaker 2 (28:36):
Outlook on life and her outlook of the.

Speaker 1 (28:40):
Conflict in the Middle East. Another thing that scared me
was her her seat at the table, if you will.
She was very high ranking in the Democratic National Committee,
and I believe she was the vice device chair.

Speaker 2 (28:55):
Actually, now, you don't get there without playing ball, because.

Speaker 1 (29:02):
That whole team was was Hillary camp Right, we all
recall if you we all saw the the Platform committee,
we all saw like who was playing ball? And if
you weren't playing ball, you were gone.

Speaker 2 (29:19):
So we know.

Speaker 1 (29:22):
That Toulci had to be at some point playing for
the team of the Democratic establishment.

Speaker 2 (29:29):
So that scared me a little bit too, to be
completely honest.

Speaker 1 (29:33):
Now, as far as her ability to ability to win,
if just from an organizational standpoint, in a in a
analysis standpoint, her she's not exciting, she's not She's very articulate,
but she's not a brilliant speaker. Her horrorration skills are

(29:54):
a little lackluster. So her ability to win also worried.

Speaker 2 (29:58):
It was that.

Speaker 1 (30:00):
But here's why totally want me over uh when she
went to a side knowing what that could be.

Speaker 2 (30:10):
Uh, because what y'all have to understand, is they don't.

Speaker 1 (30:16):
Why do you criticize a congress woman going to talk
to someone that's saying, Hey, I want to stop the
needless death and violence and innocent casualties that are causing
this refugee crisis, and see.

Speaker 2 (30:31):
What we want to stop it?

Speaker 1 (30:32):
So cannot I'm just going to go talk to them,
and we're gonna come up with the resolution. We're gonna
see what this is really about. We want to see
what we can do, and we're going to move forward.
Now when she comes back from this, when you have
the Daily Coast slaughtering her, talking about she's a stooge

(30:52):
for for for for a side.

Speaker 2 (30:56):
I'm not a stooge. Hold up.

Speaker 1 (30:57):
I thought that would make you a diplomat, going to
talk to when you don't necessarily disagree with that you
don't necessarily life, but for the good of your country
and for the good of the people of that country,
you talk to them. That's what a congresswoman should be doing.
Dailly co started slaughtering her, Washington Post started slaughtering her.
She even had a petition against her, which was wild.

(31:22):
It didn't get any momentum apparently, But I mean Jess.
That ability for her to go somewhere and then come back, go,
we try to resolve a conflict, and she comes back
and then she's a stooge. That's kind of weird to me.
That let me know a little something that let me
know that she was fighting for the right team. That
let me know that she was there and she was

(31:47):
when she came back with the information that she had.
The information that she had must be pretty damn valuable.
Her ability to resolve that situation and get progressives behind
her must be pretty damn valuable. And if it's valuable
for her, it's scary for the establishment because what we
have to realize is that they played identity politics to

(32:11):
win the primaries. That's how they I mean, she cheated too,
but it was all about her being a woman.

Speaker 2 (32:16):
I'm a woman. I'm a woman, black people loving me.
I'm a woman.

Speaker 1 (32:18):
I'm there for black people. Look at me with the
name I carry hot sauce in my bag on you.
That's what she did. But this is a Tossy got Bard.
Tossy got Bard is an Indian American woman, young, good.

Speaker 2 (32:33):
Looking, if I do say so myself.

Speaker 1 (32:35):
Prior service veteran who's familiar with the Democratic establishment, but
has evolved and evolved.

Speaker 2 (32:41):
Through Bernie Sanders campaign.

Speaker 1 (32:43):
Do you really think the Democratic establishment wants to deal
with that problem.

Speaker 2 (32:47):
Come twenty nineteen. They do not want to deal with.

Speaker 1 (32:53):
A minority woman, veteran, a popular congresswoman who was working
for Bernie Sanders when they cheated him. That is the
last thing, not only not only is she a minority,
Let's be let's be very clear, because I mean, you
don't really need to understand how this minority situation in

(33:14):
particular works. She is an Indian, She's a Deasi.

Speaker 2 (33:20):
She's a Deasi.

Speaker 1 (33:22):
She in New York, Dessian Arabs dominate parts of the
city in large numbers, in very important districts.

Speaker 2 (33:31):
In Chicago, Deasian Arabs absolutely dominate Chicago.

Speaker 1 (33:35):
If I recall, the Muslim population of Chicago is actually
greater in number than the Christian population in California. You
have the same thing in very key areas. So, yes,
she is a female, but more importantly, she is a minority.
Probably most importantly when the time comes to be talked about,

(33:56):
she is a veteran.

Speaker 2 (34:01):
That is the last problem they want.

Speaker 1 (34:02):
So they have gone out of their way because you
can see it's happening. The actions are happening parallel to
each other. They're slash slandering her name at the same
for doing.

Speaker 2 (34:13):
The right thing, for taking action.

Speaker 1 (34:14):
Remember, Tolcy Gabbert was also one of the actually yeah,
one of the I think.

Speaker 2 (34:18):
She was the only commless woman and yeah, that's pretty
much it.

Speaker 1 (34:21):
She was only comfortss woman to go to Standing Rock
when she did this. Like I said, this is running
out of parallel right, Corey Booker got a headline. Cory
Booker says that we should investigate what happened at Standing Wrong.

Speaker 2 (34:33):
Oh my god, I just love Corey book so much.
He should be president one day. Oh I don't care
that he will come out the closet and he's gay
and everybody knows that he doesn't want to say anything
about it. That doesn't matter.

Speaker 1 (34:47):
They're running parallel, so at the same time, once again,
they're slandering her name for going and trying to resolve
the situation with a side.

Speaker 2 (34:54):
They're still trying to push Corey Booker.

Speaker 1 (34:57):
On us in the mainstream media with every little thing
that he does.

Speaker 2 (35:03):
Right, they are trying to up a candidate and keep
a candidate who can beat.

Speaker 1 (35:07):
Him from being in this spot. But I think that's
a little bit too late. I think Tosy Gabbert runs,
it's over. I think it's a done deal. If Bernie
Sanders run, it's already a done deal. I think that
there's a chance that Bernie can run. There's a chance
that Total can run. I think there's a chance they
can run together. I wouldn't put it past them if

(35:28):
I think if Bernie is winning to I think they
will talk about it. I think they will decide amongst
themselves who will be the person that would run for president.

Speaker 2 (35:38):
And I am excited. I am so excited to see
what happened in twenty nineteen.

Speaker 1 (35:43):
And this is this what I told you all, for
those of you who don't know when, when they were
writing hit pieces on Tolsy Gabbert for going to see
a side, they were writing hit pieces in Daily Coasts,
in Washington Posts, and some of her own publication are
some of Hawaii's own publication. The establishment is worried about
Tulci Gabbert. She knows how they operate too, and she

(36:07):
doesn't I know were talking about this earlier, but she
doesn't jump to her defense, saying, how could you say
something like that, I would never do something like I'm
not gonna I'm not aside stooge. She she backs up
herself with the facts, not the fiction, not the fluff,
but the reality of the situation and what she's been
doing to actually fix these problems. She's done it in Syria.

(36:30):
She's done it with Standing Rock, She's done it with
Bernie Sanders. She's done it by completely condemning the military
industrial complex over and over and over again. She's done
it by introducing the legislation, the anti terror, the anti
providing arms, satirism legislation is something to that extent.

Speaker 2 (36:47):
She's done it over and over and over again.

Speaker 1 (36:50):
She's won her her She won her race like by
like eighty percent.

Speaker 2 (36:55):
She won. It was ridiculous. She destroyed her candidate, her competitor.
And that's excited. It's exciting to see the Democratic.

Speaker 1 (37:06):
Party freak out like this because it's fear that is
driving them to behave like this, and that fear is
well warrant, because, like I said, if Tocy Gabbert, Tocy
Gabbert will destroy anybody in the Democratic Democratic primary.

Speaker 2 (37:25):
Corey Booker could not be.

Speaker 1 (37:28):
Right now, especially if she has Bernie Sanders as a Syracus.
So let us be clear, don't believe everything you read
if you see random hit because we haven't heard from
the Daily Coast in forever, like to keep it high,
like we haven't really heard at anything at all from
Daily Coast. So if you start seeing that, then Daily

(37:49):
Coast come out, know where the first thing to do
is better hit piece. I win of Bernie s Andandery supporters, surrogates.
It's probably for good reason, right, So disappointing news, disappointing
news of federal the federal federal judge in Boston has
has essentially said that he's not going to continue the

(38:10):
the temporary the temporary ban.

Speaker 2 (38:13):
On Trump's executive order. And so it's a loss for for.

Speaker 1 (38:21):
It's a win for trup administration, but it's a loss
for us. But I mean it's still it's still being
upheld by a lot of people across the country, a
lot of judges across the country, federal judges. But it's
a loss because it's obviously is the democratic state. I'm
not sure if the judge of democratic I didn't get
to read that. And it's the developing story, but it's
I don't really see his logic because even in the

(38:43):
peace they say, like it's judge uphelds are upholds ban
against legal residents, excuse me, against legal residents of America
from you know, the seventh Muslim nations that Trump a.

Speaker 2 (39:01):
Banned him from, because that's exactly what they are. They're
literally legal residents.

Speaker 1 (39:05):
These are people with the visa, These are people with
the green car that are still being detained. Yeah, Trump
went back and fixed that error, but at the same
time they're still being detained.

Speaker 2 (39:14):
It's happened in lax.

Speaker 1 (39:16):
There are people here working, there are people here, you know,
there's a lot of people here for a long time.

Speaker 2 (39:21):
That have been here that are being detained just because
they want to go visit their country. It's wild.

Speaker 1 (39:26):
But this federal judge they end up upholding it, and
it's very disappointing. So it's we just got to keep battling,
got to keep fighting, We got to keep educating, and
got to keep showing Trump that we are better than him.
Now really quick, while we were talking about Trump, I
try to have to make this about him because CNN,
Like I try to make my whole show about him

(39:46):
because CNN or he doesn't get a job a good
enough job trying to push Trump's you know, horribleness on
us on a.

Speaker 2 (39:53):
Regular But.

Speaker 1 (39:55):
Some people have been having we've had to have a
discussion today whether or not we should be mad or
happy that Hillary Clinton didn't win instead of Trump, whether
Hillary Clinton was in actuality do lesser of to evils. Nope,
I'm still happy. I'm still pretty happy. I'm still pretty content.

Speaker 2 (40:14):
With what happened.

Speaker 1 (40:16):
I'm not happy about what Trump's doing, So don't confuse
it to just because I'm happy Lllary Clinton doesn't didn't win,
doesn't mean I'm happy with what Donald Trump is doing.

Speaker 2 (40:24):
But let me be very very clear.

Speaker 1 (40:26):
If TPP went through, TPP would not be immediately reversible,
not for twenty twenty five thirty years. If Hillary Clinton
was going to go to war with Russia, you can't
reverse war, as in, you can't get those lives back,
you can't get you can't redevelop that relationship. Like you know,

(40:47):
I don't know why people don't really get that what
we're seeing right now with Trump is shitty. It's bad,
it's not good. But what Trump is doing it's reversible.
The band is reversible. The thing that the things that
he's doing unfortunately to the women's health, the clinics and

(41:07):
things like that. They be funded, the planned parenthood, Thank god,
those things are reversible and in democratic states they have
the ability to add more funds to planned parenthood. So
these like these are reconcilable things that can be reconciled
in three to four years. We just have to tread,
you know, treads carefully and be more mindful and aware
of what's happening in our individual states. But those things

(41:30):
are reconcilable and can be controlled at the state level.

Speaker 2 (41:35):
Right or wrong, I'm right, just case you're wondering.

Speaker 1 (41:41):
But if Hillary Clinton would have won, if Hillary Clinton
would have won office instead of Donald Trump, what we
are dealing with at that point is the legitimization of
election fraud. That would be exonerating election fraud. That would
be exonerating Debu Washington. That would be exonerating scene, and

(42:01):
that would be exonerating down in Brazil.

Speaker 2 (42:04):
That would be putting people in a.

Speaker 1 (42:05):
Position and say, we told y'all that Hillary was a
better candidate than Bernie Sanders, and that all of the polls,
all of the past elections, everything that we know about
elections was wrong because We literally had we literally have
people analysts saying it doesn't matter that Bernie Senters has

(42:25):
broken every single crowd turnout record in presidential election history.

Speaker 2 (42:30):
That doesn't mean they turn out to vote.

Speaker 1 (42:34):
No, That's exactly what that means, actually, Idiots, Like when
you have prowd sizes that large, it usually determines the
outcome of the victory in that particular state or in
a particular election.

Speaker 2 (42:48):
Remember what happened with Barack Obama in.

Speaker 1 (42:51):
The first time he ran utterly destroyed John McCain because
of turnout, And same thing with Hillary Clan in the South,
he destroyed her and because of the black community, these
were some of his largest crowds. North Carolina had a
large turnout and.

Speaker 2 (43:10):
Destroyed her there.

Speaker 1 (43:13):
He actually won North Carolina in two thousand and eight,
and it was because he spent a lot of time
there had high crowd turnout. To tell me that crowd
turnout doesn't affect the outcome up election, it's complete lunacy,
because it's never been that case. And you're going to
say right now, just this election is that case. Bernie

(43:35):
was beating her in every single facet of the election
other than the fallacious.

Speaker 2 (43:40):
Polls, but the one poll that has been one hundred.

Speaker 1 (43:42):
Percent accurate every single election since what in nineteen seventy
predicted Bernie Sanders will win, and somehow Hillary Clayton pulls
it off. Right now, we're not. I refused to delegitimized
democracy by legitimizing that victory because it wasn't a victory,

(44:07):
and that cannot be reversed, that cannot be reconciled. We
cannot give Hillary Clinton a platform to put us in
bed with another establishment Democrat right after. We cannot give
Hillary Clinton a platform to push through TPP destroying jobs.

(44:33):
We can't give Hillary Clinton a platform to put a
vice president in power that would essentially pardon her or
exonerate her from all wrongdoing with her Clinton Foundation. I
absolutely refuse, I absolutely refuse, and that's what we would

(45:01):
have done. So, yes, I know it's crazy to think about,
but this is as a black man.

Speaker 2 (45:07):
I'm gonna share my personal experience.

Speaker 1 (45:09):
And you can call it confirmation bias, you can call
it whatever you want to, but this is my personal experience.

Speaker 2 (45:13):
As a black man.

Speaker 1 (45:14):
I have always preferred to know a racist when he
opens his mouth, so I can know how to go
about my approach when I interact with this person. At
the end of the day, I know how Trump moves
because he's so damn egotistical. He puts his plans out
there for us to attack. We can fight against what

(45:36):
Trump does because we know how he moves, because that's
what narcissists do. They love the attention, They love the adoration,
they love being loved, and because of that, that is
his weakness. Hillary loves the attention, but she loves the
power more believe that, and she will do whatever she

(45:57):
will behind closed doors.

Speaker 2 (45:58):
You will never know about it.

Speaker 1 (46:00):
She will make her racist statements, she will hire her,
she will hire her little white femininst cabinet. She will
do whatever she can to make it appear as if
she's doing nothing wrong. And guess what, unemployment will still
Maybe we even continue to say four percent, but it's

(46:22):
unemployment really four percent whenever these corporations are hiring people
for it, seven dollars an hour, eight dollars an hour.
Property is still ridiculously low. Tell me that, how is
poverty at an all time high? Because they love to throw.

Speaker 2 (46:34):
Out the four percent of unemployment?

Speaker 1 (46:36):
But how is poverty at an all time high? But
unemployments at four percent. One of the numbers have to
be lying to y'all.

Speaker 2 (46:44):
I don't care how good O Barack Obama can smile.

Speaker 1 (46:46):
I don't care how nice you can talk. I don't
care how good is family looks together. But the reality
of the situation is Obama has been Some of y'all
dream that y'all are not actually living percent poverty are
four percent of undeploying, but poverties that are all ti high.
You know how much it's the poverty line is. That's

(47:07):
something like twenty to twenty four thousand. I can't exactly remember.
Maybe somebody can tell me. But if poverty is that high,
how can you legitimately claim that unemployment is at four percent?
But if I work full time making just say I'm
a fortunate person.

Speaker 2 (47:24):
I'm making nine dollars an hour. If I work full time,
I don't reach above the poverty line. If okay, may
fifteen dollar an hour and I.

Speaker 1 (47:36):
Work full time, I still don't reach it by the
poverty line. I get close, I'm really close. I'm grabbing it,
I'm touching it, but I don't lift above the poverty line.

Speaker 2 (47:48):
You have to go into.

Speaker 1 (47:49):
Debt with the cause of degree just to have hopes
of barely climbing out of the poverty line. Live it.

Speaker 2 (47:54):
And not only that, but you have to live in
a state where you can get paid that high.

Speaker 1 (48:01):
But meanwhile, the inflation of mortgages and how you know,
not necessarily the mortgages, but the price of houses, which
of course affect mortgages are happening. The inflation of apartments,
of prices and leases, it's happening. These things are are
a problem. And I know I've done, I'm done the

(48:22):
state of New York. I'm doing it again in Florida.
Like it's going to be a problem. The wages are
not raising, but the costs of things as simple as
a haircut are raising. And Hillary Clinton was not going
to solve that problem. Donald Trump problem is probably not
going to solve it either, But y'all would have been

(48:43):
the problem.

Speaker 2 (48:44):
Is just like Lebron.

Speaker 1 (48:45):
Obama because he's I mean, I'm gonna be completely honest
with y'all. Is because he talks good and he's black,
like he's like an embodiment of a hybrid of politics
and pop culture.

Speaker 2 (48:56):
And we have fallen forward, we have been slain by
his charm. I get it.

Speaker 1 (49:01):
He tells funny jokes. But that's pretty much as far
as it goes for me. Hillary Clinton was not going
to be better than donnad Trump policy wise.

Speaker 2 (49:16):
Rhetoric. Yeah, Hillary Clinton's pretty good with the rhetoric game.
That's what she does.

Speaker 1 (49:20):
The damn attorney Like, somebody tells me, oh, but she
talks really well, she used really positive rhetoric. Of course,
you can talk your way out of a damn if
you can talk your way out of an email scandal
like that.

Speaker 2 (49:35):
You you you're you're nice with the rhetoric, and I
get it.

Speaker 1 (49:41):
But just because you use nice rhetoric, well, I mean,
I really feel like this is pretty common sense. But
you know, actions speak louder than words, as anybody ever
heard that phrase, because that's pretty much the embodiment of
how I feel about Hillary Clinton. Your actions have absolutely
a lot of different words. Why because where has she

(50:03):
been at? She has not been here. Her clan foundation
has gotten rid of the Global initiative because well, she's
not in position to affect any type of policy anymore.
She's not in position to affect to make deals and
sign off on things that she shouldn't be signing off on.
She's in a position to do things like, you know,
so twenty percent of r uranium and the Russia life,
So what.

Speaker 2 (50:23):
Good is she? That's reality, that's the actions. People say,
what about the pipelines? You damn what about the pipeline?

Speaker 1 (50:34):
You mean the same pipeline that Hillary Clinton said the
workers have their right to work and protesters should respect that.

Speaker 2 (50:41):
Yeah, I remember the pipelines. I remember. It was not better.
She isn't better, she.

Speaker 1 (50:51):
Won't be better, and it was we were better off
without her. Trump, we can fight. Trump has his weaknesses,
but let's be very very clear. Trump is not really
the big problem. The big problem is people like banning.
The big problem is Congress being all Republican, the Senate

(51:12):
being Republican, the Supreme Court being Republican. And guess where
that problem came from. That people seem to continue to
forget that came from him. And with Clinton being so
selfish and ambitious that she sacrificed, we were on the
cusp of history.

Speaker 2 (51:31):
We were on the cusp. We were pretty much.

Speaker 1 (51:33):
Going to be in a position to make sure Republicans
never got to affect our lives again. By letting Bernie
Sanders and him galvanizing people and getting people to vote
democratic or Democrat or progressive, telling people.

Speaker 2 (51:50):
To get out.

Speaker 1 (51:51):
Jerremndaring if Bernie Sanders would have won, Jeremanderin would have
only been able to do so much.

Speaker 2 (51:58):
Very we need to understand that.

Speaker 5 (52:01):
So no, I'm not mad. We do what we did,
what we said we're going to do. We got we
make sure Hillary didn't win. We said we're gonna have
to fight Trump, and we're doing that. And we said
we're going to proper progressive candidates.

Speaker 2 (52:19):
We said we want people to run. We're doing that,
and we're winning.

Speaker 1 (52:23):
On top of that, there's little things happening around the country,
precincts organizing progresses, galvanized and organizing their presets from the
ground up.

Speaker 2 (52:31):
That's happening. So understand, we're winning.

Speaker 1 (52:37):
It may not seem like it because that's not what's
seeing that's putting on the headline, but they're not going
to cover the little things that we're doing to make
sure that Trump is gone and that Republican Party is
out come twenty eighteen or twenty nineteen and twenty twenty.
So with that being said, I feel like I've talked
about this earlier on my Facebook page, but we.

Speaker 2 (52:57):
Are in a position right now. We feel exhausted, right We.

Speaker 1 (53:01):
Feel exhausted emotionally, mentally, physically from fighting and fighting and fighting.
It seems like we've been fighting forever since. For some
people a lot, this is their lives. It's has been
their lives for many of us. I'm young, so this
is recent for me. But it's you know, it's exhausting.

Speaker 2 (53:18):
I get it.

Speaker 1 (53:19):
I hate opening my phone somedays because it seems like
everything that we see is like a blow to the
to the revolution, if you will. But if you're a historian,
if you're a teacher, professor, then you know right now
we are at We're at a crossroads, and we are

(53:40):
in a very important chapter in the.

Speaker 2 (53:41):
Future of our of our of our history as a
human race. It's not just it's not just about America
the United States.

Speaker 1 (53:49):
At this point, we are at a very important cuts
in chapter are across roads for the human race, and
what we do now will affect how the human race proceeds,
How we deal with Trump, how we deal with the elections,
how we deal with mid terms, how you organize at
your precing.

Speaker 2 (54:09):
Level, will determine what happens in Great Britain.

Speaker 1 (54:12):
We'll determine what happens in Australia, what happens in Yemen,
what happens in the Rock, what happens in.

Speaker 2 (54:16):
Syria, what you do tomorrow, what affects.

Speaker 1 (54:24):
A life, It could save a life in the Middle
East four years from now, three years from now. We
have abilities to network like we've never seen before. We
have more access to information than people are more educated
on the political process than ever in the history of
the United States.

Speaker 2 (54:44):
We have the youth coupling up with the with the
with the older people, and.

Speaker 1 (54:48):
We're using the wisdom of our ages, of our generation
to help each other. We have crowdfunding and putting. We're
putting people uh with with who are big, our strongest fighters,
and our largest voice a in the forefront, because their
pockets may not.

Speaker 2 (55:03):
Be as deep. Where where we have all the tools.

Speaker 1 (55:10):
And we have the benefit of hindsight, we are in
a position right now where we could change everything. We
are at a position where we could evolve beyond money
controlling everything we can we could. We're at a position

(55:31):
where we could save the planet. We're a position where
I mean, it's it's crazy, I know, it's it's we
have a lot of negative going on right now.

Speaker 2 (55:40):
But the positive is it's trying to it's being.

Speaker 1 (55:42):
Suppressed so much that we're not realizing. But we are
really in a position to succeed. We really are, and
we're going to do it together. But you can't give up.
You can't let your exhaustion, you know, push keep you down.

Speaker 2 (56:00):
You have to get up. You have to fight.

Speaker 1 (56:01):
You have to go to that meeting, that boring democratic
meeting in your that boring Green Party meeting, or that
protest that may be a little bit too far because
you just got off work.

Speaker 2 (56:10):
You want to deal with the traffic and final parking.
You have to go fight. You have to have those conversations,
even if you're out at the bar.

Speaker 1 (56:18):
You to be having the conversation that we're having right
now about politics, about the truth about your candidates. You
need to continue to push back, to have discourse, to disagree,
to create awareness.

Speaker 2 (56:32):
Yes, trust me, anybody knows.

Speaker 1 (56:36):
I know it is extremely exhausting dealing with this every day.
But I'll be damned if I'm not extremely excited because
guess what the inauguration with January twentieth, the election was November,
what November eighth or ninth? I can't even remember the
day of the election, but they were telling us, watch
when this election is over, the political post are going

(56:56):
to stop, and no they have been.

Speaker 2 (56:58):
There have been more political posts out than before.

Speaker 1 (57:03):
We are not going to take this presidential election and
the results of this election line down, Not when there's
so much at stake, Not when there's so much we
can personally do to affect the outcome of the next election.

Speaker 2 (57:19):
Like I told you all, what you do tomorrow, what you.

Speaker 1 (57:23):
Do tonight, can save a life in Syria, can save
a life in Yemen, can save the life of a refugee,
could give them a home, could affect the outcome of
the relations in the UN, could affect that outcome of
relations in the U.

Speaker 2 (57:40):
I know it sounds crazy, it sounds par fected.

Speaker 1 (57:41):
It sound like, how can what can I do to
affect that? When you organize, Yeah, it's pretty insignificant. But
what happens when all those ants get together.

Speaker 2 (57:58):
To handle business? They can ant hill and you can't
tell them the thing.

Speaker 1 (58:06):
So continue to continue to do so, fright through the exhaustion,
right through the depression.

Speaker 2 (58:14):
No, you're not gonna always.

Speaker 1 (58:15):
Agree with everybody, but but more times than not, you
all have the same goal.

Speaker 2 (58:21):
More times than not.

Speaker 1 (58:22):
And so with that being said, like I said, this
is my last show in New York, So New York,
I love y'all.

Speaker 2 (58:31):
I'll be back. Don't worry.

Speaker 1 (58:32):
We have a lot of protests up here, so in
a lot of events, So I'll be back. But uh,
next time y'all see me, I will be in Miami
wearing a tank top, setting the p in Colada, though
wearing abandoned suit in February. Thank you all so much
for the love and support, and I will be posting

(58:55):
more YouTube videos than I have been this week. I
know I haven't been giving on my analysis in my
opinion on things, but it's been a basically said.

Speaker 2 (59:00):
So it'll be back. It'll be back.

Speaker 1 (59:02):
But in the meantime, Nico House is signing off. Thank
you all for listening and thank you for watching me.

Speaker 2 (59:08):
Cons I have a good night.

Speaker 1 (59:12):
The Operaman Report is brought to you by subash Technosis
dot com. Subash Technosis is a search engine optimization and
website design company located in India. So you know you're
gonna save a lot of money and get top quality service.
To boot, they offer all kinds of services a business
process outsourcing, data entry, banking, BPO services, recruitment process outsourcing,

(59:36):
software testing, offshore research, networking, customer care, press release, content
writing and distribution, and much much more.

Speaker 2 (59:46):
They offer website development, e commerce.

Speaker 1 (59:49):
Solutions, mobile responsive designs now. I've personally worked with Subash
for over ten years. This is the man that puts
out my press releases. They've done work my websites, so
I can personally recommend subash technosis dot com. You can
find a link to Subash Technosis at Oppermanreport dot com
and also Awake.

Speaker 3 (01:00:10):
Radio dot us.

Speaker 1 (01:00:12):
Welcome to our new sponsor