A life cycle assessment of nanopesticides

A recent study investigated the environmental impact of nano-encapsulated imidacloprid (nano-IMI) compared to the conventional pesticide imidacloprid. While nano-IMI reduces pesticide runoff and potential harm to freshwater ecosystems, its production carries a higher ecological risk due to energy-intensive processes. The research emphasizes the need for greener production methods to maximize the benefits of nanopesticides while minimizing their overall environmental footprint.

Read the full article at https://www.paperleap.com/blog/articles/a-lifecycle-risk-assessment-of-nanopesticides-0cccug

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
Welcome to the paper Leap podcast, where a science takes
the mic. Each episode, we discuss cutting edge research, groundbreaking discoveries,
and the incredible people behind them, across disciplines and across
the world. Whether you're a curious mind, a researcher, or
just love learning, you're in the right place before we start.

(00:21):
Don't forget to subscribe so you never miss an insight.
All the content is also available on paperleap dot com. Okay, ready,
let's start.

Speaker 2 (00:32):
When you look at a glass of water, even if
it's drawn from a river near farmland and looks clear,
you should be aware that it could contain chemical residues
from pesticides, molecules that may harm fish, insects, and even
ripple up the food chain. For decades, this has been
one of the biggest trade offs of modern agriculture. Pesticides

(00:54):
protect crops and boost food supply, but they often come
at a heavy environmental cost. A new web of technology
promises to change that story. Scientists are developing nanopesticides, pesticides
wrapped in microscopic carriers designed to release their active ingredients
more efficiently and in a targeted way. In theory, this

(01:16):
means farmers can use less pesticide while keeping pests at bay,
reducing the amount that drifts into waterways. But are these
nanoformulations truly safer for the environment. A recent study published
in Environmental Science and Ecotechnology takes a hard look at
this question. The research team carried out one of the

(01:37):
first life cycle risk assessments of nanopesticides. Their test case
was a metacloprid, a widely used insecticide, compared with its
nano encapsulated cousin, nanoimi. The idea behind nanopesticides is simple.
Instead of spraying pesticides in their raw chemical form, scientists

(01:58):
enclose them in nanosized caps think of them as microscopic
delivery drones. These capsules protect the active ingredient from breaking
down too quickly, help it stick words needed, and release
it more slowly over time. For emitacloprid, which has been
linked to cliins in pollinators like bees and shows up
in rivers worldwide, this approach could mean less pesticide in

(02:21):
the wrong places. Farmers still get crop protection, but ecosystems
get some relief. Making these nanocapsules requires extra chemicals, energy,
and processing steps. That's why the research team didn't just
look at what happens after pesticides are sprayed. They examined
the entire life cycle from production to environmental breakdown. The

(02:43):
researchers used a combination of models to simulate how both
regular emitacloprid IMI and nanoimi behave. Specifically, they used life
cycle assessment to obtain a big picture accounting of all
environmental impacts from production, use, and disposal. Also, they use
the use tox model, a tool for estimating the toxicity

(03:06):
of chemicals to freshwater ecosystems. And finally, they employed simple
box for nano a special model that predicts how nanoparticles
move and transform in the environment. Together, these methods allowed
them to compare the toxicity of the chemicals and how rainfall,
soil interactions, and particle behavior affect where they end up.

(03:29):
The results show a double edged sword. Surprisingly, producing nanoimi
carries about four times the ecological risk of producing conventional emtacuprid.
That's because encapsulating pesticides requires extra solvents like methanol and
energy intensive processes like freeze drying. On the other hand,

(03:51):
once in the environment, nanoimi looks much safer. In fact,
after application NANOIMI was two to five orders of magnitude,
less risky for freshwater ecosystems than IMI. In plain English.
Rivers and lakes downstream of farms see much lower exposure
levels from the nanoversion. That's because most of the nanoparticles

(04:15):
stick to soil rather than washing into waterways. One aspect
to consider is that rainfall matters a lot. Under heavy rainfall,
conventional amtocloprid floods into rivers, amplifying ecological risks. NANOIAM meanwhile,
stays mostly locked in soil, making it far less likely
to harm fish in aquatic insects. But while freshwater ecosystems

(04:38):
seem safer with NANOIMI, the study warns that more of
the compound lingers in soils. That raises new questions. How
do soil organisms respond to long term exposure. Could residues
accumulate in ways we don't yet understand. Agriculture is at
a crossroads. The world needs more food, but traditional farming

(04:59):
practices are straining ecosystems. Pesticides like emittocloperate are powerful tools,
but their environmental side effects have fuel debates and bands
in some regions. Nanotechnology offers a way forward smarter pesticides
that work harder but spill less into the environment. The
global market for nanopesticides is booming, valued at seven hundred

(05:21):
and thirty five million dollars in twenty twenty four. It's
projected to more than double by twenty thirty two. Farmers
and agribusinesses are excited about these new tools, and regulators
are erasing the catch up. The study makes one thing clear.
We can't just assume nano means better. Yes, nanopesticides may

(05:41):
reduce risks to rivers and lakes, but their production currently
leaves a larger environmental footprint. The researchers suggest that applying
green chemistry principles, for example, swapping out toxic solvents for
safer alternatives or using plant based nanocarriers, could make production
clean and close that gap. Instead of looking only at

(06:03):
what happens downstream, the approach taken by the study considers
everything from cradle to grave, a perspective urgently needed as
we design the next generation of farming technologies. However, the
data on nanoimi reported in this study came from lab
scale production, not full industrial manufacturing. Real world field data

(06:24):
on nanopesticide drift and breakdown are still scarce. While freshwater
risks seem lower, the long term effects on soil organisms
remain a question mark. Still, nanoformulations like nanoimi hold real
promise for reducing pesticide pollution in water. If production methods
can be made greener, they may represent a win win

(06:45):
for farmers and ecosystems alike. That's it for this episode
of the paperlea podcast. If you found it thought provoking, fascinating,
or just informative, share it with the fellow science nerd.
For more research highlights and full articles, visit paperleef dot com.
Also make sure to subscribe to the podcast. We've got

(07:08):
plenty more discoveries to unpack. Until next time, Keep questioning,
keep learning,