The Invisible Architect of Persuasion

Send us a text

Edward Bernays life and his legacy

Support the show

my email address [e-mail]
Twitter account is @rezava

Episode Transcript

SPEAKER_00 (00:00):
What if I told you that many of your choices, your
purchases, even your politicalopinions may not be entirely

(00:21):
your own?
That behind much of what youbelieve stands one man you've
probably never heard of.
His name was Edward Bernays, thefather of public relations, the
man who used psychology to selleverything from cigarettes to

(00:44):
presidents, the man who quietlyrewired democracy itself.
Hi, this is Reza Sanchide andthis is another episode of
Philosophy of Life.
Today, We explore the man andthe world he helped create.

(01:14):
Edward Bernays was born in 1891in Vienna.
He was no ordinary man.
He was the nephew of SigmundFreud, the father of
psychoanalysis.
At the time, Freud's work wasrevolutionary and deeply

(01:35):
unsettling.
He proposed that human beingsare not entirely rational.
Beneath our conscious thoughtslie hidden forces, primitive
urges, repressed desires, fears,anxieties, unconscious drives
that shape how we behave, oftenwithout us even realizing it.

(02:01):
Freud called this world beneathawareness the unconscious mind.
For centuries, we believed thathumans were primarily rational
creatures, making logicaldecisions.
Freud shattered that idea.
He showed that much of what wedo is not driven by logic, but

(02:23):
by emotion, desire, trauma, andunconscious needs seeking
expression.
And this is where Edward Bernayshad his insight.
He asked a simple but dangerousquestion.
If people are not driven purelyby logic, if their choices come

(02:48):
from deep emotional needs, thencouldn't these forces be studied
and used to influence behavioron a mass scale?
Not just for healing the mind,like Freud intended, but for
selling products, ideas, evenentire ideologies.

(03:11):
Desires, fears, irrationalurges.
Bernays saw something else.
Could these hidden forces beused to influence mass behavior?
His family moved to America.
He studied at CornellUniversity.

(03:32):
During World War I, he workedfor the U.S.
government, helping persuade theAmerican public to support the
war.
Here, for the first time,Bernays witnessed the power of
propaganda.
And after the war, he asked thequestion that would define his

(03:53):
life.
If propaganda can move nationsinto war, Why not use it for
business, for politics, forpeace?

(04:15):
After the war, the wordpropaganda carried a dark stain.
So Bernays rebranded it.
He called it public relations.
And with that, An entireindustry was born.
One of his most iconic campaignstargeted the social norms of

(04:36):
1920s America.
At that time, women had just wonthe right to vote.
They were entering theworkforce.
They were challenging oldtraditions.
But one symbol of independenceremained forbidden.
Cigarettes.
Smoking in public was consideredimproper.

(04:58):
unladylike, a sign of loosemorals.
For many women, this wasn't justabout cigarettes.
It was about equality, aboutfreedom, about claiming the same
space as men.
Bernays saw this tension and hesaw an opportunity.

(05:20):
He consulted psychoanalysts,many directly influenced by
Freud.
They agreed.
Cigarettes carried powerfulunconscious symbolism.
They represented male power,phallic authority, control.
If women could openly smoke,they were symbolically claiming

(05:42):
equality.
And so, Bernays orchestrated oneof the most famous PR stunts in
history.
During New York's Easter parade,young women hired by Bernays lit
cigarettes in public, right infront of photographers and
journalists.

(06:03):
He called them torches offreedom.
The newspapers ran the story.
The public took notice.
And overnight, a taboocollapsed.
Smoking for women was no longerimproper.
It was liberation.
And cigarette sales soared.

(06:26):
Once again, Bernays provedpeople don't just buy products.
They buy symbols.
They buy identity.
They buy meaning.

(06:50):
While Bernays was famous for hiscommercial campaigns, perhaps
his most disturbing work came inthe world of geopolitics.
In the 1950s, the United FruitCompany, today known as Shikita,
controlled vast amounts of land,railroads, and ports in Central

(07:12):
America.
In many ways, United Fruit wasmore powerful than the
governments of the countries itoperated in.
In Guatemala, a small country ofjust a few million people.
United Fruit owned nearly halfof all arable land, much of it

(07:35):
unused.
The company enjoyed extremelyfavorable deals, paying very
little in taxes, whilecontrolling major parts of the
nation's economy.
But things were changing.
In 1951, Jacobo Arbenz waselected president of Guatemala.

(07:58):
Arbenz was not a communist.
He was a nationalist, a reformerwho wanted to modernize
Guatemala's economy and reducepoverty.
His most significant reform wasland redistribution.
Under the agrarian reform law,unused land owned by large

(08:20):
companies, including UnitedFruit, would be expropriate and
redistributed to poor farmers.
For the peasants of Guatemala,this was a path toward food,
security, dignity, andindependence.
But for United Fruit, it was afinancial threat.

(08:43):
And United Fruit would not standby.
The company hired Edward Bernaysto reshape the narrative.
Bernays understood that framingthis simply as a dispute over
land would not gain sympathy inWashington.
So he reframed it.

(09:05):
He painted Arbenz not as anationalist, but as a communist
puppet.
He fed American journalistsstories that Guatemala was
falling under Soviet influence.
He arranged press tours, stagedevents, and strategically leaked
information, all designed tocreate fear.

(09:28):
Through Bernays' work, Guatemalabecame, in the eyes of the
American public, a dangerousfoothold for communism in the
Western Hemisphere.
A threat to US nationalsecurity.
In reality, there was littleevidence of Soviet control.

(09:49):
But in the Cold War climate ofthe 1950s, fear was enough.
The campaign worked.
In 1954, with full support fromthe Eisenhower administration,
the CIA launched Operation PBSuccess, a covert operation to

(10:11):
overthrow Arbenz, a small forceof mercenaries combined with
psychological warfare,destabilized the Guatemalan
government.
Arbenz resigned.
The democratic experimentcollapsed.
A military dictatorship tookover, one that would rule with

(10:34):
repression and violence fordecades.
Tens of thousands of Guatemalanswere killed in the civil war
that followed.
Millions suffered in theirbrutal regimes.
Generations were displaced orimpoverished.

(10:54):
The damage wasn't limited toGuatemala.
The precedent of foreignintervention in Latin America
echoed throughout the region,fueling instability, poverty,
and authoritarianism across thecontinent.
And at the heart of it was apublic relations campaign.

(11:18):
Bernays never fired a bullet.
He never ran an army.
But with words, images, andheadlines, he helped justify the
destruction of a nation'sdemocracy.
He showed that the tools ofpersuasion could not only sell
products.

(11:38):
They could destabilize entiregovernments.
This was persuasion weaponized.
and it remains one of thedarkest chapters in the legacy
of Edward Bernays.

(12:08):
After Guatemala, it became clearthat Edward Bernays' work went
far beyond selling products orshaping fashion.
He had developed something farmore powerful, a system of
engineered consent, a newphilosophy of control.

(12:28):
He called it exactly that, theengineering of consent.
And this idea would sit at thecenter of his thinking for
decades.
In 1928, Bernays published hismost famous book, Propaganda.

(12:49):
In it, he wrote, In Bernays'view, modern democracies were
too complex.
The public was too emotional,too disorganized, too easily

(13:15):
swayed by passion fears, andtribalism, he believed that true
democracy could not survivewithout guidance, without
skilled managers of publicopinion, without people like
himself.
The masses needed to be led, notruled by force, but gently

(13:42):
pushed, subtly guided,emotionally directed.
This, to Bernays, was not evil.
In fact, he saw it as a publicservice.
He wasn't an obvious villain.
He wasn't a dictator.

(14:04):
He was the quiet engineer,working behind the curtain,
shaping opinion to keep societystable.
But here's where the paradoxbecomes dangerous.
because once you believe themasses must be controlled for
their own good, where do youdraw the line?

(14:27):
What begins as persuasion easilybecomes manipulation, and
manipulation, when weaponized,becomes domination.
The ethical line blurs evenfurther when you compare his
so-called service to thedevastation caused by his

(14:47):
influence.
Thousands dead in Guatemala.
Dictatorships across LatinAmerica.
Generations living under fearand oppression.
At that scale, even Bernays owndefense that this manipulation

(15:08):
was necessary or harmlesscollapses.
Because when words justifycoups, when headlines prepare
invasions, when public opinionbecomes a weapon, the philosophy
of consent becomes somethingmuch darker.

(15:29):
It becomes the quiet machinerybehind manufactured reality.
A machinery that no longerserves freedom, but replaces it.

(15:51):
Edward Bernays lived for over acentury.
By the time he died in 1995, hisblueprint had become the
operating system of modern life.
Advertising became emotional.
Politics became theater.
News became entertainment.

(16:12):
Consumerism became identity.
But this was not just a changein business or media.
This was something far deeper.
The most devastating legacy ofBernays life is that persuasion
itself became reality.
The ordinary person no longerlives outside the system of

(16:38):
influence.
They live inside it.
We are no longer simply targetedby persuasion.
We exist inside engineeredenvironments designed to shape
how we think, feel, and act.
Every product we buy, everypiece of news we read, every

(17:02):
vote we cast, every belief wehold may already have been
touched by invisible handsguiding us long before we make
the choice.
For Bernays, manipulation was atool But that tool has now
become the air we breathe.

(17:23):
And once persuasion becomesdaily reality, the very
distinction between free willand guided behavior begins to
fade.
We no longer ask, am I beingmanipulated?
Instead, manipulation itselfbecomes normalized.

(17:46):
simply part of modern existence.
This was never meant to be anequation for daily life.
Yet, today, engineered consenthas become the foundation of how
we interact with the world.

(18:08):
Bernays opened the door, and wehave walked through it
willingly.

(18:28):
Now comes the real question.
If our desires can be shaped, ifour opinions can be engineered,
are we truly free?
Bernays would say, yes, but onlybecause we're guided.
But if persuasion becomesinvisible, if we no longer

(18:51):
recognize it, is that stillfreedom?
We live in the attentioneconomy.
Every click, every scroll, everypurchase feeds the machine
Bernays helped create.
And the most unsettling part?

(19:12):
We enjoy it.
We like being entertained.
We like being sold comfortablenarratives.
We like the illusion of choice.
Freedom today may not meanindependence, but rather the
freedom to choose whichmanipulation we prefer.

(19:43):
Edward Bernays is gone.
But his world remains.
A world where perception isreality, where emotion trumps
fact, where consent isengineered.
The first step toward waking upto this reality is acceptance.

(20:08):
Acceptance that we are beingmanipulated.
Acceptance that much of what webelieve, consume and desire has
already been shaped long beforewe ever made our choices.
Because only through acceptancecan awareness begin.

(20:28):
And awareness is the first stepto reclaiming freedom.
Thank you for joining me onanother episode of Philosophy of
Life.
Until next time, stay curious,stay awake.