August 5, 2025 • 47 mins
This week on Power Hour, Kamala’s shock Dem leadership admission, left meltdown over Sydney Sweeney ad, Trump hits migration milestone, CNN analyst calls Trump “historic" President, Netanyahu eyes Gaza takeover, and Meghan faces new bullying claims.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:02):
This is Power Hour with Gabriella Power.
Speaker 2 (00:08):
Hello and welcome to Power Hour. I'm Gabriella Power. Thank
you for your company. We have a massive show coming
up today, including my reaction to the protests on Sydney's
Harbor Bridge at the weekend, why the Victorian government has
become the laughing stock of the world yet again, and
will bring you all the US news, including jd. Vance
is a clear front runner to be the next president
(00:29):
of the United.
Speaker 3 (00:30):
States according to the betting markets.
Speaker 2 (00:32):
But let's start with Meatia meltdowns. Former Vice President Kamala
Harris has sat down with late show host Stephen Corbert
in her first interview since losing the US election.
Speaker 3 (00:47):
Now, the interview was.
Speaker 2 (00:48):
Really about promoting her new book, One hundred and seven Days,
which we'll get into in a moment, but Kamla finally
answered a key question many of us have been asking
for months now, and it's an important one.
Speaker 3 (01:00):
Who is leading the Democratic Party?
Speaker 1 (01:03):
Who's leading the Democratic Party? I'm just curious.
Speaker 4 (01:06):
There are lots of leaders, and it was generally.
Speaker 1 (01:08):
A leader of the Democratic Party, you know, like, oh,
that's a leader Donative Party. Who comes to mind.
Speaker 4 (01:14):
I think there are a lot of I'm not going
to go through names because then I'm going to leave
somebody out and then I'm going to hear about it.
But just let me say this. I think it is
a mistake for us who want to figure out how
to get out and through this and get out of it,
to put it on the shoulders of any one person.
(01:37):
It's really on all of our shoulders.
Speaker 2 (01:40):
That's right, there's no one the party is such a mess.
Speaker 3 (01:43):
It's on all of us. We're apparently all leading it, along.
Speaker 2 (01:46):
With AOC, Gavin Newsom, maybe even Hunt Biden. But as
we know, Stephen Colbert was recently asked and his show
will finish up next year because it was losing a
crazy amount of money and people have stopped watching it.
He might have something to do with his severe case
of trumpet derangement syndrome.
Speaker 1 (02:05):
Just less than a year ago, things were very joyful.
There was actually a lot of hope associated with your campaign,
and there was a lot of promise that we might
actually not only keep this absolute barbarian out of the
White House, but also we might actually make progresses as
(02:26):
a country with the type of people that we wanted
to see in office and a younger, more vital revived
political consciousness in America.
Speaker 2 (02:37):
Barbarian and of course he had to say joy. Can
someone remind Stephen Colbert of the progress the United States
is making? The results are everywhere, even seen in can't
deny that Trump's administration is the most influential this century.
Speaker 5 (02:53):
That Donald Trump administration is arguably the most influential this century,
and probably as well, dating back a good portion of
the last century as well. Love it like it, lump it.
Trump is remaking in the United States of America. Let's
talk about Taris first.
Speaker 2 (03:07):
Right, Well, let's get back to Kamala Harris, who's on
her book tour promoting one hundred and seven Days, which
is not about her time as Vice President of the
United States, where she was running the country with Joe
Biden for four years. It was about the one hundred
and seven days of her disastrous election campaign, which just
tells you everything, doesn't it, Just how little she achieved
(03:30):
as vice president, and despite burning through one point five
billion dollars in a few months and all of those
celebrity endorsements during the campaign, more Americans voted for Donald Trump.
Speaker 3 (03:42):
But it might be being too harsh.
Speaker 2 (03:44):
Maybe her book might have some brilliant insights something we
could all learn from her.
Speaker 4 (03:50):
And that's me on a call. So you'll see my
phone is actually on my lap. I'm and you know,
so I know I've been teased about this, but I
like these kinds of air ear pods that have the
thing because I've served on the Senate Intelligence Committee. I
have been in classified briefings, and I'm telling you, like,
(04:12):
don't be on the train using your ear pods and
thinking somebody can't listen to your conversation. I'm just telling
you that's a little bit more secure.
Speaker 3 (04:23):
So we'll wait for it.
Speaker 2 (04:26):
Because this is her big plug, teasing you with the
best pots about her book without giving all the details
away so she can make those sales.
Speaker 4 (04:36):
I mean, there's a lot of personal stuff in the book.
I mean, poor Dougie, you know, for example, my birthday
is in October, the elections in November. You see where
I'm going, And Dougie kind of dropped the ball up.
Speaker 6 (04:59):
My big b He didn't get you anything.
Speaker 3 (05:03):
Oh, you have to read the book, all right.
Speaker 1 (05:09):
Tell me the Peede, Tell me the Peede.
Speaker 2 (05:16):
Joining us now is comedian and host of Blaze TV's
Primetime with Alex Stein, Alex.
Speaker 3 (05:21):
Great to see you again.
Speaker 2 (05:23):
What did you make of Kamala Harris's book promotion on
Stephen Corbet's show. You know she could announce her when
she was asked about who's leading the Democratic Party, but
we know she's still upset with her husband Doug for
not spoiling her on her birthday last year. And her
advice to everyone is to not wear a pair of airports.
Speaker 6 (05:41):
Well, you know, one hundred and seven days.
Speaker 7 (05:43):
I don't think we'll sell one hundred and seven copies,
and for her for her husband under the bus. I
mean think about it like this. She spent what one
hundred and fifty million dollars or she's one hundred fifty
billion dollars on her campaign?
Speaker 6 (05:56):
Is that what it was? What was it though? And
she was still one hundred million dollars A dad, don't
put me on it. I don't know a girl, matten.
Speaker 3 (06:02):
But of course she's not going to carry amount of money.
Speaker 7 (06:04):
But I'm saying he's not going to get her a
gift because she's spending all this money.
Speaker 6 (06:08):
What is he supposed to buy her?
Speaker 7 (06:09):
I mean literally, there's nothing that he could buy her
that would compete with all the money that she wasted
on her campaign.
Speaker 6 (06:15):
So it's such an egregious amount.
Speaker 7 (06:16):
I actually feel bad for Doug and I'm sure he's
actually so happy that she didn't win so that he
could probably get a breather because being the first fella
would not be something that I would want to go
down in history as the first guy doing.
Speaker 6 (06:28):
I'll tell you that.
Speaker 2 (06:29):
Well, this promotion of her book, it's still going and
she's posted this to TikTok.
Speaker 8 (06:35):
Everyone thinks you've been kicking back drinking Marguerita's on the beach,
but really you've been hard at work writing a book,
meeting with leaders thinking about the future of our country.
Speaker 3 (06:48):
Who said that she's still cringe.
Speaker 2 (06:52):
Does it just make you want to run out and
buy this book?
Speaker 4 (06:55):
No?
Speaker 7 (06:56):
I mean, like I said, this book is not going
to be popular whatsoever. I don't know why she would
even want to relive this humiliation of a campaign and
go on this media. So we're trying to sell it
because really, like you said, why not talk about her
time as vice president? But you know, in the view
and anybody you know asking her any tough questions, and
you know they asked her to criticize.
Speaker 6 (07:17):
Her time and office.
Speaker 7 (07:19):
She just couldn't even talk about one thing that she
would have changed when Joe Biden was president.
Speaker 6 (07:22):
So she's just a phony. She doesn't even have a
good example of her time as vice president.
Speaker 7 (07:27):
So now she has to write about her horrible failed
campaign where a billion dollars, you know, just money is
just wasted.
Speaker 2 (07:33):
Let's talk about Sydney Sweeney and the work left are
still having a meltdown over her American Eagle ad and
now we're standing by for liberals to lose it even
more after a gun training company posted a video of
the actress showing off her shooting skills.
Speaker 3 (07:49):
Look at this.
Speaker 9 (07:50):
I did not expect this week.
Speaker 3 (07:53):
Hey as appeared. Oh my god, girl, that was really good.
Speaker 9 (08:15):
Dog nat jutting girl.
Speaker 3 (08:17):
Yes.
Speaker 2 (08:19):
It's also been revealed that Sidney Sweeney is a registered Republican,
and Donald Trump was asked about this.
Speaker 9 (08:25):
After Sidney, if you're not Republican?
Speaker 7 (08:30):
That who was?
Speaker 9 (08:31):
Sidney Cey is very hot Atrophy.
Speaker 1 (08:33):
She's a registered Republican.
Speaker 6 (08:36):
Oh now, I love her?
Speaker 3 (08:37):
At is that right?
Speaker 2 (08:38):
As Sidney Sweeney, you'd be surprised at how many people
are Republicans.
Speaker 3 (08:44):
That's what I wouldn't have known.
Speaker 2 (08:46):
But I'm glad you told me that if Sydney Sweeney
is a registered Republican. I think her ad is fantastic.
Speaker 4 (08:54):
Okay, thank you very much everybody.
Speaker 2 (08:57):
Such a classic Donald Trump response.
Speaker 3 (09:00):
But I think he makes a good point.
Speaker 2 (09:02):
You'd be surprised how many people are registered Republicans.
Speaker 6 (09:06):
No, you nailed it.
Speaker 7 (09:07):
I mean, seriously, there's so many people that have to
be closeted Republicans because of fear of cancelation. And that's
not you know, just to saying that's there's a real
world application to people being canceled for having a conservative viewpoint,
especially in Hollywood, in the Madley industry that's so incredibly progressive.
So this is a win for the conservative Sidney Sweeney
right now is as hot as high kids when it
(09:27):
comes to you know, her marketing campaign for American Eagle,
I think is up twenty percent.
Speaker 6 (09:31):
The stock value is not rocketed.
Speaker 7 (09:33):
So it just shows you that the people that support
Cidney Sweeney actually go out and spend money and support
these companies. So I think now this will be a
you know, more companies will follow suits seeing the success
of American Eagle.
Speaker 2 (09:46):
I think you're absolutely right, But the work left will
not let this go here is Sidney Sweeney being heckled,
not We're going to be raising Donald Trump is continuing
her sorry, his support of Sydney Sweeney. He posted, Sydney
Sweeney is a registered Republican, has the hottest ad out there.
(10:09):
It's for American Eagle and the genes are flying off
the shells. To your point, Alex, and he goes on
to say that the tide has seriously turned. Being woke
is for losers. Being Republican is what you want to be,
And of course he ends up with thank you for
your attention to this matter. But you know, I think
that's a Trump style of making a point about wok
(10:33):
is for losers. But it certainly seems that the work
era is pretty dead.
Speaker 7 (10:38):
No, And it has a feeling of constaalgia because there
was a time when Abercrombie and American Eagle were the
coolest clothing companies out there, and that was kind of
like that it was the good old days before we
realized it was the good old days. And I think
that's a quote from the office, you know, and you
know it's a little cliche, but it's true. So seeing
American Eagle have a resurgence like this it feels kind
(10:59):
of good in a weird way, in a world where
we have to take the small wins when we can
get them, you know, it feels like a win now.
Speaker 2 (11:07):
Texas Governor Greg Abbott has ordered the arrest of Texas
House Democrats after a warrant was issued by Texas House
speaker and dozens of Texas Democrats fled the state in
an attempt to block a Trump backed redistricting vote. Greg
Abbott called on the Department of Public Safety to arrest
the quote delinquent Texas House Democrats.
Speaker 3 (11:28):
Can you tell us a bit more about what's going
on here?
Speaker 7 (11:31):
Well, you know, I was there, right, I was actually
there in Austin today at three pm, and they locked
the doors and they said that if these you know,
representatives didn't get back to the capital that they would
be basically held in contempt and they would be subject
to arrest. And so I really hope that they actually
follow through. Now, some politicians are.
Speaker 6 (11:48):
Going to be able to get away with it.
Speaker 7 (11:49):
They're going to be able to say that they had
some sort of you know, actual valid excuse. But really
what's happening is they're stopping the redistricting. They don't want
to vote on the redistricting because it takes away, you know,
a few of the liberal seats, which is good for Texas.
So that's what they're doing, and that's why they're running away,
and that's why that's why they're not there to approve
this redistricting.
Speaker 6 (12:07):
So it's all just a political theater.
Speaker 7 (12:10):
I was, but I'll admit this though, it did kind
of have a weird vibe when you saw the politicians,
you know, gleefully happy that these other politicians were about
to be arrested. That felt kind of weird, and I
don't know, just it was a it kind of felt
like a moral conundrum at the same time. But I'm
actually very happy that the conservatives held the leftists and
(12:31):
the progressives feet to the fire because they need to,
you know, this ad derelicted duty. They should be there
voting on this redistricting. But because they didn't have a form,
they weren't able to approve it, and you know, it's
just to cause a big problem at the state capitol.
Speaker 2 (12:44):
Okay, Alex Stein, thanks so much for joining us.
Speaker 6 (12:46):
Great to talk to you, always a pleasure. George Eganson, Well.
Speaker 2 (12:52):
Let's turn to what's happening here in Australia and over
the waykend more than one hundred thousand pro Palestine protest.
Speaker 3 (12:58):
It is marched along the Sydney Harbor Bridge.
Speaker 10 (13:01):
Are you.
Speaker 6 (13:27):
Now?
Speaker 2 (13:28):
Of course, there are plenty of people there demonstrating who
genuinely just want to see an end to the war,
like we all do. But this protest that was called
March for Humanity featured the Taliban flag, chants such as
death death to the IDF, and posters of a run
supreme leader Ali Harmony.
Speaker 3 (13:46):
And there was a lot of anger and a.
Speaker 2 (13:47):
Lot of hate directed at Israel, yet barely any condemnation
of Hamas, the terror group who refused to release the hostages,
who on the same day as this protest took place,
released a horrifying video of Israeli hostage Aviata David appearing
to dig his own grave in a terror tunnel. Now,
as I said at the start of this, not all
(14:09):
of these protesters, but many of them who showed up
there on Sunday were clearly supporting hermus and support for
terror on Australia's most iconic landmark is absolutely disgusting. The
same weekend, during a protest in Melbourne, the Australian flag
was burned by masked demonstrators who also painted abolish Australia,
(14:31):
and that is truly sickening. Joining us now is Guy
and his contributor Michael Kroger. Michael, thank you for joining us. Firstly,
can I get your reaction to this March for Humanity
protests that took place on Sunday?
Speaker 11 (14:44):
Well, like you, I agree, there were a lot of
good hearted people who went along because they're concerned about
the images they've seen of starving children in guards. But unfortunately,
underlying all of these Palestinians demonstrations is a healthy dose
of Jewish hatred and men he Semitism. And that's what's
sickening about some elements of these demonstrations, not only the
(15:06):
things happen that you mentioned, but if it's a much
for humanity, why weren't there any Australian flags. Not a
single Australian flag, American flag, British flag. There was an
Islamic state flag, no Western country's flag was there. There
were Hummas symbols, Nazi symbols, you know chance from the
(15:28):
River to the Sea, which is you know, death to Jews, etc.
Speaker 3 (15:33):
Etc.
Speaker 11 (15:34):
So you know what the undercurrent of these demonstrations. Is
is quite sickening and it scares Jewish Australians and that's
disgusting to vomit. And you know, the leaders of these
demonstrations need to stop all this Jewish hatred and racism.
Speaker 2 (15:52):
And just images of the Australian flag being burned, I
mean it's shocking. Is this extreme hate for the West
being normal? It's just being displayed.
Speaker 11 (16:02):
Yes, Well, don't forget a lot of these demonstrations by
the left actually demonstrations against the Western civilization and Western countries.
So it's why you have demonstrations against the Jews in
Israel but not against the Russians in the Ukraine. I
don't care about the mass slaughter and starvation going on
in the Sudan, which is many many more times deaths
(16:23):
and starvation that is in Gaza. But is there a
single demonstration by these people is humanists? Is there a
single demonstration by any of them about the tragedies in
Sudan or Ukraine? Now, of course not because you know
it doesn't take off anti Western culture, anti Western civilization
and Jews. Of course, if there are any Jews involved,
A lot of these extremists, you know, are not interested
(16:46):
So that's why I say there is Jewish hatred underpinning
some elements in these demonstrations, and that's disgusting in a
modern country like Australia.
Speaker 2 (16:56):
Today, let's look up the situation in Gaza as Prime
Minister Van Natna, who will reportedly bring his security cabinet
together this week to discuss expanding the ground offensive in Gaza. Now,
the Israeli military currently holds operations in around seventy five
percent of the Gaza strip, but under the Israeli leader's
new plan, the IDF would capture the rest of the enclave.
(17:18):
And this of course comes after ceasefire talks with her
Mass collapsed. But we do know that Israel's under a
lot of global pressure to end this war. Israel's absolutely
losing the pr war. About this, many argue that Israel
has gone too far. They argue that Israel has failed
when it comes to delivering enough aid. What do you
(17:39):
make of reports that Netna who is inclining towards actually
expanding the offensive, Well, which.
Speaker 11 (17:46):
As if that's what he's going to do. But after
a couple of years, you know, people are tiring of this.
You know, the israelis the Jewish community worldwide, never get
good press. Let's accept the fae that you know, there
is so much anti Semitism and Jewish hatred in countries,
mainly in Western countries. The hard left. It used to
(18:07):
be the hard right, the neo Nazis. Now it's the
hard left to are you know, racist, anti Semitites, anti Semites,
and you know, anything the Israelis do, anything, the Israeli
government does, anything the Jewish State does, they condemn. So
you know, this is just par for the course. But
what is concerning is that this war has gone on
for so long now the patience of some Western leaders
(18:29):
is being exhausted. And that's the greatest challenge for Netan.
Yahoo seventy five percent is not one hundred percent in
that twenty five percent of of course, the hostages, the
Israelis know where they are. The problem is they can't
get to them because they're surrounded by booby traps, bombs
and Hama's militia and the law be killed if the
Israelis attempt to go and rescue them. That's the problem
he's got, and it's a problem Gabbie hasn't been able
(18:51):
to solved in almost two years.
Speaker 2 (18:53):
I want to quickly ask you about Russia and also
President Trump. We know that Donald Trump has announced that
he will be substantially raising tariffs on India because it
continues to purchase Russian oil. So he took to social
a social media platform, his own truth social saying that
India is not only buying massive amounts of Russian oil,
they are then for much of the oil purchased, selling
(19:16):
it on the open market for big profits. They don't
care how many people in Ukraine are being killed by
the Russian war machine because of this, so be substantially
raising the tariff.
Speaker 3 (19:27):
What do you make of Donald Trump's move.
Speaker 11 (19:29):
Here, Well, it's entirely predictable. It's consistent with Trump's sort
of international foreign policy. Again, his patients with the Russians
has been exhausted. He thought he had a relationship with
He thought that relationship would lead to peace in the Ukraine.
It hasn't. He feels he's being played and now of
course he's ten to twelve day deadline is about to end.
(19:49):
See woodcops going there to meet Poot and I think
for the fifth time, but I don't think anything's going
to happen. So Trump is now moving towards shutting down
Western exports to and from Russia. So India has twenty
percent of its imports from China, ten percent of its
imports are from Russia, so it does a huge amount
of trade with Russia on the import side. And Trump
(20:11):
is doing exactly as you'd think Trump would do, basically
saying to the Indians, listen, this is not acceptable. We
want sanctions against Russia. And if you're not going to
play ball, then we're going to make it difficult for you.
Don't forget, India exports a huge amount to America, so
it's going to damage the Indian Indian economy. And that's
what Trump wants to do. He wants to stop the
(20:32):
Indians trading so much with Russia.
Speaker 2 (20:34):
Finally, on one more issue back here in Australia, the
Victorian government is being mocked right around the world for
their grand plan to tackle knife crime. As we know,
crime is out of control in Victoria, and so what
do they do. They get taxpayers to put the bill
for a machete be in.
Speaker 12 (20:51):
Look at this outside the Victoria Police headquarters on Spencer Street,
a purpose buil bin for a weapon wreaking havoc.
Speaker 3 (21:00):
Very important.
Speaker 2 (21:01):
Those knives, those machetes are create enormous damage.
Speaker 12 (21:05):
Come September one, it will be illegal to own a
machete and this is where Victorians are being asked to
drop them off during an amnesty period that will run
until November thirty.
Speaker 13 (21:15):
We've done this because we want to get these knives
off the streets, because these knives destroy light.
Speaker 2 (21:22):
Michael is really going to be effective. I mean, those
who want to launch a machete attack, they might spot
the bin and decide they're politely going to get rid
of it.
Speaker 11 (21:32):
No, that's exactly right. All those machete owning Victorians will
be rushing to these bins to fill them up with
the machetes. They won't be able to wait. They were
falling over themselves gab to line up with these machette bins.
I mean, what a preposterous, ridiculous idea. The Victorian Premier
is basically a laughing stock. We're a lawless staatey down
in Victoria, austral because everyone knows we're bankrupt and lawless. No,
(21:55):
I think if people want to get rid of the machetes,
they'll just discreduinly put them in their rubbish bin somewhere,
or someone else's Ashpin. But this is fascical and it
makes Victoria laughing stock.
Speaker 2 (22:04):
Oh yeah, it's done that exceptionally well. Time and time again,
Michael Kroger, thank you so much for joining us.
Speaker 6 (22:09):
Thanks jab.
Speaker 2 (22:13):
Joining us now is Gabrielle Qui Chia, former Trump White
House staffer.
Speaker 3 (22:16):
Gabrielle. Great to see you again.
Speaker 2 (22:18):
Let's start with Russia Gate, because Attorney General Pam Bondi
has reportedly ordered federal prosecutors to launch a grand jury
investigation into former Obama administration officials, which will examine accusations
of manufacturing intelligence about Russia's twenty sixteen election interference in
the US. Now, this comes after Director of National Intelligence
(22:40):
Tolsey Gabbard released declassified documents last month, and Fox News
reports that Pam Bondi believes there is clear cause for
deep concern and a need for next steps. What are
you expecting to come from this?
Speaker 9 (22:53):
Yeah, thanks for having me, Gabriella. Absolutely, these are the tapes.
This is like the good news that we are all
looking for here in the United States, especially of course
with the Conservative Party, in the sense that this was
something that President Trump had even ran on saying that
he was well and fully aware that there was a
quote unquote deep state, that there was a higher power
(23:15):
of which has garnered not only our our own institutions
within the United States government, but certainly amongst even our
Five Eyes. And a lot of that documentation that we've
seen even during the Biden administration that came on out
was talking about how our own intelligence agencies were working
with the Five Eyes to get around all these loopholes
(23:36):
in saying, in say, executing surveillance on Trump officials, in
which a lot of those officials were not very much
trained when it comes to intelligence capabilities and unfortunately fell
at the hand of say our FBI services or even
our CIA. So what I anticipate is that there's going
to going to be more information I think we know.
(23:57):
Just to be quite frank with you, this is good
news for us, as I just stated in the beginning
of this. But the ultimate question is whether or not
those that are guilty of, say utilizing allies or adversaries
of other nations and weaponizing our own governments to go
after a political opponent, whether it's someone on the left
(24:18):
or on the right. The biggest element is are we
going to see result, Will they get a trial, will
they be put behind bars if found guilty. Those are
the types of results that I would be hoping for.
I don't anticipate that happening until, you know, maybe even
years down the road. There's so much that we've talked
about just in this term, two of which we've yet
(24:39):
to even see actual justice. When we talk about you know,
Biden in the auto pen, or say, you know President
Trump very famously saying on the debate stage that Hillary Clinton,
if he was in charge, you'd be going to jail.
We're still all holding on to those words because we
want to see more details, and we want these people
who have been projected to yet of quote unquote deep
(25:02):
state are not working in America's best interest to be
held accountable because those are very strong and very serious allegations,
and a lot of America voted President Trump and for
those purposes to get to see those come to light.
So at a bare minimum, I anticipate that the DOJ
is certainly going to have hearings and have these people
(25:22):
be called to the stand, But ultimately what results out
of that is the bigger picture. So I don't want
to put anything down stamped in writing just yet. There's
a lot of others items that we haven't forgotten about yet, Gatriela.
Speaker 2 (25:35):
Okay, well, let's talk about the Democrats. Elizabeth Warren has
been praising Democratic socialists around ma'm donnie, who's running for
New York City mayor, and as we know, he's as
radical as it gets. He's previously called to defund the police,
to trump proof New York City, and shift the city's
tax burden onto richer and whiter neighborhoods. But here is
Elizabeth Warren speaking alongside ma'm donnie at a campaign event.
Speaker 13 (25:59):
When someone stands up and says, I will lead this
city by making it more affordable. And here are my plans,
real plans, Plans to deliver on childcare, plans to deliver unhousing,
plans to deliver, gonna experiment. We're going to try things
on groceries. That is the Democratic message.
Speaker 2 (26:21):
Elizabeth Warren was also asked by Fox Music if ma'am
Donnie was what the future of the Democratic Party should
look like, and her auntsa was you bet.
Speaker 3 (26:30):
I mean, what do you make of this?
Speaker 9 (26:33):
I hope that she's wrong, because that wouldn't be looking
too hot. I mean, even if you look at say,
you know, Elizabeth Warren from Massachusetts or Mom Donnie coming
from New York, and as a New Yorker myself, New
York and Massachusetts are one of the most expensive states
to live in. Of course, albeit you have Boston in
Manhattan driving those numbers. But on the outskirts as well,
(26:54):
these individuals that live in these states are being hit
by a terrible economy, by high grocery PRIs And also
when she got laughed when she talks about the childcare
cost burden, because of the top ten states in the
United States, Massachusetts and New York lead the way when
it comes to the high cost in childcare. Again, these
(27:15):
are Democratic states. So when they say that this is
the future or this is the Democratic way, we'll shoot
me being from New York, or say someone living in
Massachusetts has been living the Democratic way and it hasn't
been going well. Also, on top of that, you want
to talk about the Democratic way, one of the stakeholds
of the Democratic Party was fighting tooth and nail to
(27:36):
maintain affirmative action. And I can't help myself. I have
to always bring this up with Elizabeth Warren. But she
was the same person that was exercising the Democratic way
and using a democratic program to get her own benefit
in affirmative action by claiming that she was Native American
on the bar exam. I will never let that one go,
and that should tell people enough outside of the horrible
(27:58):
history of what it costs, what the effects are, whether
it's crime or just your day to day childcare, the
education system. I mean, shoot, you name it. It's not
looking good for Massachusetts or New York. So there's such
a delusion here that I'm not surprised that she's just
latching on and probably more likely latching onto mom Donnie
(28:18):
and saying he's the future, because who knows. I anticipate
that this guy, he's pretty darn young. I think he's
going to be around for a while. And I don't
say that because I think that he's this great leader.
But it's the same. I mean, how many times we
have to see the same blueprint. This is like an
AOC two point zero type of situation, and she's she's
been stuck around the block for a long time at
this rate, and everybody kind of laughed, and of course
(28:39):
I do too, But these people are still here and
that's a bigger issue. So I think she's seeing herself
up well, to kind of cozy up with those that
she bought, to cozy up with, to stay in the
position that she is in right here, right now. Otherwise,
if they had half a brain, they realized what's going
on in their own state home.
Speaker 2 (28:58):
Well, while looking at the demo, let's look at who
could be the next US president. Of course in twenty
twenty eight and Jdi Vance is twice as likely to
be the next president of the United States does any Democrat,
according to Polymarket. Polymarket has his chance of becoming president
at twenty eight percent, and then Gavin Newsom at fourteen percent.
Speaker 3 (29:18):
What do you put this down to?
Speaker 9 (29:21):
I put this down to I honestly think a lot
of people. Again, I'm a conservative, there's no secret about
it whatsoever. But I can say that the sentiment of
those that are still I'm friends with that aren't necessarily conservative. Actually,
jad Advance was very well received by them. And I
was surprised by that because I think when he was
(29:41):
initially announced as the vice president, there was a little
bit of a lack of enthusiasm for Wow, this is
a suffer punch kick right in the moment that he
was announced. I remember distinctively on x between conservatives, and
I think this stems from to answer your question, Gabriel,
is that the day that jd Vance walked on stage
(30:02):
and did that vice presidential debate, that was such a
pivotal moment for him in so many ways, And coupling
that with how he's acted as a vice president, this
is probably the least dormant vice president we've ever had.
Conservatives were not happy with Vice President Pence at the time.
(30:23):
I mean, obviously people were not happy with Kamala Harris
as the vice President Obama. When Joe Biden was vice president,
people were just always calling him crazy Uncle Joe, and
he had hardly any stake in the game. We've really
lost here in America that sense of seriousness of responsibility
for someone as the vice president, and we've seen it,
I think also by default, because President Trump doesn't really
(30:45):
have the doors closed for press, so you're seeing so
many opportunities where the vice president has to actually take action,
speak and answer and fulfill a role that we a
lot of times just kind of put to the side.
So I think that that's really it. People are happy
with him. Whether you want to hyper focus on the
(31:05):
latest with President Trump, that people would like to debate
about for sure, but president or vice president Vance has
been very consistent since the day that he went into
those vice presidential debates, and he's only gotten stronger. And
seeing this administration and him acting in it as almost
people might have been able to or thought maybe to
(31:25):
chalk it up as oh, what was Beginner's luck, or
you probably were going to do pretty darn well again,
say Tim Walltz, But it's so much more than that now.
So I think that's where the numbers are coming from.
And no one, no one wants to see Gavin Newsom
as president. You can take two seconds and look at
his new PR stunt when he went on the Sean
Ryan Show and said that he would happily accept a
firearm and that he has no issue with the Second Amendment.
(31:48):
And then after that interview happened, and of course individuals
on the left and the right were bothered by Gavin
Newsom cause playing as some sort of conservative. It turned out,
and this, this is public information now, is that Gavin
Newsom did not accept that gun. And it was because
he said, in his own words, at the California laws
were too confusing for the average persone, let alone himself,
(32:12):
and he didn't want to have to deal with all
of the hoops to jump through to obtain that firearm
as a gift from Sean Raane.
Speaker 14 (32:17):
So if you don't.
Speaker 9 (32:18):
Understand the Constitution and you're making your own state difficult
in trying to exercise their natural rates, well then you're
probably not going to be president.
Speaker 2 (32:26):
Well, there's no denying he's certainly eyeing off the top job,
and I'm sure we will be hearing him on some
more podcasts. But let's look at some issues with such
as the border. As we know, the Trump administration is
keeping the border closed, and he's and the administration has
been carrying out deportations of illegal immigrants, and the United
(32:48):
States is now on track to see negative net migration
for the first time and at least fifty years.
Speaker 3 (32:53):
Take a look at this.
Speaker 5 (32:55):
How about net migration any United States? Get this, It's down.
It's going to be down at least sixty percent. We
may be dealing with. Get this negative net migration to
the United States in twenty twenty five. That would be
the first time there is negative net migration in this
country and at least fifty years. We're talking about down
(33:15):
from two point eight million in twenty twenty four.
Speaker 2 (33:19):
Gabrielle, This how significant is this? What does this mean
for America?
Speaker 9 (33:23):
This means that we got exactly what we voted for,
because we all know that this was a major platform
item for the president on his campaign trail, and certainly
in term one when we were in turn one, I
remember how many government shutdowns we had just because there
was such a threshold of which the Democrats didn't want
to come to the table and talk and even have
a conversation that was more or less focused surprisingly on
(33:46):
DAKA at that time. For President Trump's term one, term two,
there's no concessions that he's willing to make, and he's
locking down the border as he promised. I think a
lot of this comes from the absolut successes I've covered
a lot at the Pentagon in the military Partment of
Defense being integrated into border patrol is a huge improvement,
and this is a direct result of it, because you
have Northcom and Southcom working hand in hand with the
(34:09):
Mexican government and intel sharing of course what it's appropriate,
I imagine, not all of it. Also being able to
utilize jammers for drones. There is so much going on
there Seacott in El Salvador. We have exercised every avenue
at this moment that we possibly can in securing the
(34:31):
border outside of the traditional well we need more manpower
or maybe we need to build a wall. We're starting
to think a little bit more critically with the assets
that we already have. So I think this is great news.
I mean, I remember back in twenty eighteen, Yale University
actually spearheaded a study in which they took numbers all
the way from twenty sixteen from early twenty twenty sixteen,
(34:52):
and they were analyzing and trying to counter the US
Census Bureau for how many illegal immigrants were actually in
the United States. And what they found in their study
in twenty eighteen was that the United States government was
behind and they're reporting by fifty percent what they estimate
and spend similar estimations up to this day, and age
was around eleven point five million at that point back
(35:15):
in twenty fifteen, all the way up to twenty eighteen,
they were saying the same numbers, and Young University said,
hold on, actually it's higher. It's about fifty percent more.
We're looking at twenty plus more million illegal immigrants being
in the United States. So we always had a problem
in monitoring, and now it sounds like we're finally getting
to a place where we can start, quite literally from
(35:35):
ground zero. And it also positions these individuals that genuinely
do want to come to the United States when there
is a clean, secure border with protocols, with manpower, and
also individuals that can be protected and not being utilized
to be smuggled or trafficked into our country for whether
(35:55):
it's for human trafficking or for drug trafficking. So this
is such a win and it's again a direct result
of exactly what we vote for.
Speaker 3 (36:03):
Just finally, on the MAHA movement, RK.
Speaker 2 (36:06):
Junior says that he's officially moving to ban food stamps
from being used for soda. So this is to ban
the purchase of sugary sodas using Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program benefits.
He argues that tax dollars should not be going to
food that can make children sick.
Speaker 14 (36:21):
Take a listen, and US taxpayer should not be paying
to feed kids foods supporest kids in our country with
foods that are going to give them diabetes. And then
my agency ends up through Medicaid and Medicare paying for
those injuries. We're going to put an end to the
(36:43):
ad and we're doing it step by step to state
by state.
Speaker 2 (36:47):
Advocates of the ban argue that this is going to
improve public health outcomes and reduce long term medical costs.
Speaker 9 (36:54):
What's your response, Yeah, I think this is a great thing.
At the end of the day, for you have to
focus on nutrient dense foods, so to have that be
applied to the quite literally the opposite when it comes
to sugary foods and drinks while no one's getting their
nutrition and cyclical, that's when you have to start. It
(37:15):
goes back to everything of our fiber, of our being,
of not having to rely on the government. But if
you're relying on the government for your money, you're applying
that to food that's not good for you. By default,
that food is poisoning your body and you're sick, and
now you need to rely on the government to come
in and handle health care for you. It just it's
never ending cycle. So I think this is a step
in the right direction. I think a better step in
(37:37):
adding to this because I don't imagine this being the end,
and it shouldn't be the end. Is that in the
United States, healthier foods that don't have say your evil
seed oils, or your dyes, or your pesticide, whatever it
may be, your organic foods, all of them are significantly
more expensive then the poisonous foods. And so what I
would like to see from this government is build off
(37:58):
on the sentiment moving forward. The healthier foods you would
think that are just growing in the grass, that are
coming from a tree, whatever it may be, that don't
have as much ingredients. Actually that lack of ingredients reflects
in the pricing, and by that then more individuals would
be healthy, healthier, and it wouldn't be this mental gymnastics
(38:20):
where people who don't have a lot of money are saying, well,
you know what, I'm going to pay for something that's
of less money for more bang for my book, and
that probably has higher calories to get me through to
get me and my family buy, versus the healthier option
in which we still are left hungry. So I think
this is just one step into making all these very
(38:42):
positive changes when it comes to our food system here
in the United States.
Speaker 2 (38:46):
Gabrielle Kichiya Foma Trumpet, White House staffa thank you so
much for joining us on pala al A great to
speak with you.
Speaker 6 (38:52):
Thank you.
Speaker 3 (38:56):
Joining us now.
Speaker 2 (38:57):
Is the news quote columnist Angela Mallad angela great to.
Speaker 10 (38:59):
See nice to see you, Gabriela.
Speaker 2 (39:01):
Prince Harry has denied allegations that he gave his uncle
Prince Andrew, a bloody nose during an argument. This has
been revealed in this new book about the Duke of
York entitled The Rise and Fall of the House of York,
and there are claims that there was this altercation between
Prince Harry and Prince Andrew. They've got a physical altercation
(39:21):
back in twenty thirteen over something that Andrew said behind
Harry's back. What do you make of this story?
Speaker 10 (39:27):
Look, it's really interesting because in Spare we know that
Harry and William had a punch up, So it's not
within the realms of possibility that Harry had a punch
up with Andrew, and the notion that the two most
problematic members of the royal family could be, you know,
way back then in twenty thirteen could have been in
this real what would it be? Over Look, there's also
the claim in the book entitled is the Name of It?
(39:49):
Which is a very interesting title.
Speaker 4 (39:51):
For a book.
Speaker 10 (39:51):
About Prince Andrew and his erstwhile wife. There's also the
claim that Andrew warned Harry that he he hadn't done
his due diligence on Meghan Markel and that it acted
hastily in marrying her. I'm not sure about that, because
in his spare there's a story about Harry and Meghan
(40:12):
first meeting the Queen at Royal Lodge at you know,
where Andrew and his wife, Fergie love. There's a lot
of detail about Fergie teaching Meghan to Curtsey and that
sort of thing. I think Andrew and Fergie, who were
always seeking kind of dominance or sort of recognition within
the royal family, would have loved the fact that the
heir to the throne would have brought his new girlfriend
(40:35):
first to meet the Queen at their house. I just
don't buy that level of Rather, the argument was about
something else prior to Megan being involved. I just can't
imagine Andrew saying that to Prince Harry. I think at
that time, you know, when Meghan first came on the scene,
everyone was super happy that she was going to.
Speaker 3 (40:51):
Be part of the family.
Speaker 2 (40:52):
They were very welcoming until everything, of course turned But
there has been a few more details coming out about
booking bullying claim against Meghan Markle. It's been revealed that
Royal aides who accused Meghan Markle of bullying say that
they were frightened of what she would do to them
because of her capacity for revenge. Now, Megan's always denied
the allegations of bullying, but this has come from a
(41:14):
journalist who broke the story back in May twenty twenty
one about the bullying claims.
Speaker 3 (41:18):
More, can you tell us what exactly has been said here?
Speaker 10 (41:21):
That's right, So Valentine Lowe went on a podcast and
explained his book in a greater detail. He, of course,
as you said, broke those bullying allegations. Initially he said
that these staff were so impacted psychologically by working for her,
and they had this notion that she had this what
he called infinite capacity for revenge. Now, look, I think
(41:43):
the question is was Megan a bully? And I think
all the evidence points to the fact that she was.
It's not just Valentine Lowe's book, which seems to have
had multiple sources. There's also Jason Now who used to
work for the Meghan and Harry and he's the one
that initially bought the claim that led to the bullying investigation.
(42:04):
I think the fact that he a named person who
is now working for Prince William, so the fact he
is a loyal and trusted member within the royal family,
he brought this issue to the palace. Then there was
the bullying investigation that we never got the answers to.
And then of course the Australian aide Samantha Cohen, who
worked for the Queen in the family for so many years.
(42:24):
She'd in an interview with The Herald's son also mentioned
that she had been pulled in to be questioned about
the bullying allegations. Now there's no smoke without fights.
Speaker 3 (42:34):
The fact that.
Speaker 10 (42:35):
These still keep going, are these allegations, and the fact
that we know that the Sussexes have gone through so
many stuff, I think it's fairly accurate to say that.
Speaker 3 (42:45):
Megan is a bully. Yeah, I think you're right.
Speaker 2 (42:47):
Look, the man who tried to abduct a princess and
more than fifty years ago has been released from psychiatric
detention in ball left hospital and probation in.
Speaker 3 (42:57):
Back in twenty nineteen, and he's now been.
Speaker 2 (42:59):
Freed from this high security facility In an interview with
The Daily Mail, he claims that he was innocent.
Speaker 3 (43:05):
It was all meant to be a hoax.
Speaker 2 (43:06):
But I suppose it brings back the story and what
happened fifty years ago.
Speaker 3 (43:11):
It does. It so interesting.
Speaker 10 (43:12):
Princess Anne was twenty three at the time and she
had so much gusto. She was being driven with her
then husband Mark Phillips down the mall towards Buckingham Pallace.
She'd been to an event and this man held them up.
He basically threatened Princess Anne. He wanted to kidnap her.
He was asking for two million pounds in a ransom.
(43:33):
She at the time was super gutsy. She said something
align in the lines of it not bloody likely and
I haven't got two million dollars. And then the Duke
of eddenbra later said, look, had he captured her, it
would have been you know, having her in captivity would
have been a bait in the neck.
Speaker 3 (43:49):
Because she's so feisty.
Speaker 10 (43:51):
But I think what's interesting about this is it shows
the character of Princess sam way back then. She was
twenty three and she had there where fall and the
Hotspata really stand up to this guy. Who did actually
shoot three members of her team. So there were three
people that were injured in this altercation. As he said,
we say he went to prison. Her greatest concern afterwards,
(44:13):
in the interview that she gave afterwards, that he'd ripped
her blue velvet dress, which was one of her favorites.
So it goes to the.
Speaker 3 (44:21):
Character of the woman. She's the most hard working royal.
Speaker 10 (44:23):
She doesn't bat an eyelid at anything, and I just
love her gustiness.
Speaker 3 (44:28):
Absolutely no, I love that.
Speaker 2 (44:30):
Now the royal family has said goodbye to one of
its most treasured members.
Speaker 3 (44:33):
This is Queen.
Speaker 2 (44:34):
Elizabeth's horse, rather Tyrone, officially retired from royal duties after
working at nearly every royal occasion over the last fourteen years.
Speaker 3 (44:43):
Now.
Speaker 2 (44:43):
This horse has been described as a gentle giant. What
what can you tell us about him?
Speaker 10 (44:48):
It's interesting, isn't because we don't really think about all
the things that are adjacent to you know, we look
at a nice carriage, The Princess of Wales is in it,
she's going to trooping the color, but we don't actually
notice there has to be horses to get carry that carriage,
and a lot of work goes on behind the scenes
to make them able and well equipped to do that work.
So it's not just you pull a horse off the street,
(45:08):
you know, tied up to a carriage and of that
off at trots. They have to be educated and loud
noise because of course there's a lot of cheering along
the routes of these events and that sort of thing,
and the fact that they have to absolutely trust that
a loud noise will not cause a horse to bolt,
because you know, you have members of the royal family
within these carriages. This horse has worked alongside his sister
(45:31):
and his mother, so he's now going to a lovely
farm area where you know, horses that have been in
service are.
Speaker 3 (45:38):
Allowed to live out their days. Apparently when he got.
Speaker 10 (45:41):
There there was a big knay and he recognized as
sister after all these years. But you know, we know
the royal family love the horses and their dogs, so
I think there'd be a lot of you know, paths
behind the scene.
Speaker 2 (45:51):
Yes, and Prince William and Princess Catherine, they've been sailing
around the Greek islands, living their best lives out with
their children, enjoying.
Speaker 3 (45:59):
The Europeans a holiday.
Speaker 2 (46:00):
But there are reports that tender had to leave the
souper yacht that they were on to go out and
get something special for Prince George.
Speaker 3 (46:07):
But we don't know what that is.
Speaker 10 (46:08):
We don't know what it is, but we can assume.
And the reporter that's been sent to Greece to try
and find out what this was that Prince George wanted,
I think has got a pretty good clue. So imagine
if you're on the yacht. They haven't run out of pasta,
they haven't run out of curry, which is one of
George and Charlotte's favorite meals.
Speaker 3 (46:28):
But what is it on the island of zach Andfoss.
Speaker 10 (46:31):
I think that's the right pronunciation that they so badly want. Well,
in fact, this Greek island is one of the few
that actually has a McDonald's restaurant.
Speaker 5 (46:40):
So well, the.
Speaker 10 (46:40):
Journalist has gone there and he hasn't been able to
all out consume, you know, confirm what it is. You
can imagine a twelve year old boy just having a
hankering for some burger and chips, don't you think so?
I think that you know, But no one's coughing, They're
all just everyone's confirming that the tender was sent, but
no one's prepared to confirm that it was a McDonald's.
Speaker 3 (47:00):
But I wouldn't be surprised.
Speaker 2 (47:01):
Yes, it's a good sneaking suspicion that it could beat McDonald's.
Maybe George was sick of all the Greek food or
all the food on the cupop. But Angela mo Llard,
so great to talk to you. Thank you so much
for joining us. Thanks so much, that is pal Allah.
Thank you for your company. Make sure you subscribe to
Skyese Australia on YouTube
This is Power Hour with Gabriella Power.
Speaker 2 (00:08):
Hello and welcome to Power Hour. I'm Gabriella Power. Thank
you for your company. We have a massive show coming
up today, including my reaction to the protests on Sydney's
Harbor Bridge at the weekend, why the Victorian government has
become the laughing stock of the world yet again, and
will bring you all the US news, including jd. Vance
is a clear front runner to be the next president
(00:29):
of the United.
Speaker 3 (00:30):
States according to the betting markets.
Speaker 2 (00:32):
But let's start with Meatia meltdowns. Former Vice President Kamala
Harris has sat down with late show host Stephen Corbert
in her first interview since losing the US election.
Speaker 3 (00:47):
Now, the interview was.
Speaker 2 (00:48):
Really about promoting her new book, One hundred and seven Days,
which we'll get into in a moment, but Kamla finally
answered a key question many of us have been asking
for months now, and it's an important one.
Speaker 3 (01:00):
Who is leading the Democratic Party?
Speaker 1 (01:03):
Who's leading the Democratic Party? I'm just curious.
Speaker 4 (01:06):
There are lots of leaders, and it was generally.
Speaker 1 (01:08):
A leader of the Democratic Party, you know, like, oh,
that's a leader Donative Party. Who comes to mind.
Speaker 4 (01:14):
I think there are a lot of I'm not going
to go through names because then I'm going to leave
somebody out and then I'm going to hear about it.
But just let me say this. I think it is
a mistake for us who want to figure out how
to get out and through this and get out of it,
to put it on the shoulders of any one person.
(01:37):
It's really on all of our shoulders.
Speaker 2 (01:40):
That's right, there's no one the party is such a mess.
Speaker 3 (01:43):
It's on all of us. We're apparently all leading it, along.
Speaker 2 (01:46):
With AOC, Gavin Newsom, maybe even Hunt Biden. But as
we know, Stephen Colbert was recently asked and his show
will finish up next year because it was losing a
crazy amount of money and people have stopped watching it.
He might have something to do with his severe case
of trumpet derangement syndrome.
Speaker 1 (02:05):
Just less than a year ago, things were very joyful.
There was actually a lot of hope associated with your campaign,
and there was a lot of promise that we might
actually not only keep this absolute barbarian out of the
White House, but also we might actually make progresses as
(02:26):
a country with the type of people that we wanted
to see in office and a younger, more vital revived
political consciousness in America.
Speaker 2 (02:37):
Barbarian and of course he had to say joy. Can
someone remind Stephen Colbert of the progress the United States
is making? The results are everywhere, even seen in can't
deny that Trump's administration is the most influential this century.
Speaker 5 (02:53):
That Donald Trump administration is arguably the most influential this century,
and probably as well, dating back a good portion of
the last century as well. Love it like it, lump it.
Trump is remaking in the United States of America. Let's
talk about Taris first.
Speaker 2 (03:07):
Right, Well, let's get back to Kamala Harris, who's on
her book tour promoting one hundred and seven Days, which
is not about her time as Vice President of the
United States, where she was running the country with Joe
Biden for four years. It was about the one hundred
and seven days of her disastrous election campaign, which just
tells you everything, doesn't it, Just how little she achieved
(03:30):
as vice president, and despite burning through one point five
billion dollars in a few months and all of those
celebrity endorsements during the campaign, more Americans voted for Donald Trump.
Speaker 3 (03:42):
But it might be being too harsh.
Speaker 2 (03:44):
Maybe her book might have some brilliant insights something we
could all learn from her.
Speaker 4 (03:50):
And that's me on a call. So you'll see my
phone is actually on my lap. I'm and you know,
so I know I've been teased about this, but I
like these kinds of air ear pods that have the
thing because I've served on the Senate Intelligence Committee. I
have been in classified briefings, and I'm telling you, like,
(04:12):
don't be on the train using your ear pods and
thinking somebody can't listen to your conversation. I'm just telling
you that's a little bit more secure.
Speaker 3 (04:23):
So we'll wait for it.
Speaker 2 (04:26):
Because this is her big plug, teasing you with the
best pots about her book without giving all the details
away so she can make those sales.
Speaker 4 (04:36):
I mean, there's a lot of personal stuff in the book.
I mean, poor Dougie, you know, for example, my birthday
is in October, the elections in November. You see where
I'm going, And Dougie kind of dropped the ball up.
Speaker 6 (04:59):
My big b He didn't get you anything.
Speaker 3 (05:03):
Oh, you have to read the book, all right.
Speaker 1 (05:09):
Tell me the Peede, Tell me the Peede.
Speaker 2 (05:16):
Joining us now is comedian and host of Blaze TV's
Primetime with Alex Stein, Alex.
Speaker 3 (05:21):
Great to see you again.
Speaker 2 (05:23):
What did you make of Kamala Harris's book promotion on
Stephen Corbet's show. You know she could announce her when
she was asked about who's leading the Democratic Party, but
we know she's still upset with her husband Doug for
not spoiling her on her birthday last year. And her
advice to everyone is to not wear a pair of airports.
Speaker 6 (05:41):
Well, you know, one hundred and seven days.
Speaker 7 (05:43):
I don't think we'll sell one hundred and seven copies,
and for her for her husband under the bus. I
mean think about it like this. She spent what one
hundred and fifty million dollars or she's one hundred fifty
billion dollars on her campaign?
Speaker 6 (05:56):
Is that what it was? What was it though? And
she was still one hundred million dollars A dad, don't
put me on it. I don't know a girl, matten.
Speaker 3 (06:02):
But of course she's not going to carry amount of money.
Speaker 7 (06:04):
But I'm saying he's not going to get her a
gift because she's spending all this money.
Speaker 6 (06:08):
What is he supposed to buy her?
Speaker 7 (06:09):
I mean literally, there's nothing that he could buy her
that would compete with all the money that she wasted
on her campaign.
Speaker 6 (06:15):
So it's such an egregious amount.
Speaker 7 (06:16):
I actually feel bad for Doug and I'm sure he's
actually so happy that she didn't win so that he
could probably get a breather because being the first fella
would not be something that I would want to go
down in history as the first guy doing.
Speaker 6 (06:28):
I'll tell you that.
Speaker 2 (06:29):
Well, this promotion of her book, it's still going and
she's posted this to TikTok.
Speaker 8 (06:35):
Everyone thinks you've been kicking back drinking Marguerita's on the beach,
but really you've been hard at work writing a book,
meeting with leaders thinking about the future of our country.
Speaker 3 (06:48):
Who said that she's still cringe.
Speaker 2 (06:52):
Does it just make you want to run out and
buy this book?
Speaker 4 (06:55):
No?
Speaker 7 (06:56):
I mean, like I said, this book is not going
to be popular whatsoever. I don't know why she would
even want to relive this humiliation of a campaign and
go on this media. So we're trying to sell it
because really, like you said, why not talk about her
time as vice president? But you know, in the view
and anybody you know asking her any tough questions, and
you know they asked her to criticize.
Speaker 6 (07:17):
Her time and office.
Speaker 7 (07:19):
She just couldn't even talk about one thing that she
would have changed when Joe Biden was president.
Speaker 6 (07:22):
So she's just a phony. She doesn't even have a
good example of her time as vice president.
Speaker 7 (07:27):
So now she has to write about her horrible failed
campaign where a billion dollars, you know, just money is
just wasted.
Speaker 2 (07:33):
Let's talk about Sydney Sweeney and the work left are
still having a meltdown over her American Eagle ad and
now we're standing by for liberals to lose it even
more after a gun training company posted a video of
the actress showing off her shooting skills.
Speaker 3 (07:49):
Look at this.
Speaker 9 (07:50):
I did not expect this week.
Speaker 3 (07:53):
Hey as appeared. Oh my god, girl, that was really good.
Speaker 9 (08:15):
Dog nat jutting girl.
Speaker 3 (08:17):
Yes.
Speaker 2 (08:19):
It's also been revealed that Sidney Sweeney is a registered Republican,
and Donald Trump was asked about this.
Speaker 9 (08:25):
After Sidney, if you're not Republican?
Speaker 7 (08:30):
That who was?
Speaker 9 (08:31):
Sidney Cey is very hot Atrophy.
Speaker 1 (08:33):
She's a registered Republican.
Speaker 6 (08:36):
Oh now, I love her?
Speaker 3 (08:37):
At is that right?
Speaker 2 (08:38):
As Sidney Sweeney, you'd be surprised at how many people
are Republicans.
Speaker 3 (08:44):
That's what I wouldn't have known.
Speaker 2 (08:46):
But I'm glad you told me that if Sydney Sweeney
is a registered Republican. I think her ad is fantastic.
Speaker 4 (08:54):
Okay, thank you very much everybody.
Speaker 2 (08:57):
Such a classic Donald Trump response.
Speaker 3 (09:00):
But I think he makes a good point.
Speaker 2 (09:02):
You'd be surprised how many people are registered Republicans.
Speaker 6 (09:06):
No, you nailed it.
Speaker 7 (09:07):
I mean, seriously, there's so many people that have to
be closeted Republicans because of fear of cancelation. And that's
not you know, just to saying that's there's a real
world application to people being canceled for having a conservative viewpoint,
especially in Hollywood, in the Madley industry that's so incredibly progressive.
So this is a win for the conservative Sidney Sweeney
right now is as hot as high kids when it
(09:27):
comes to you know, her marketing campaign for American Eagle,
I think is up twenty percent.
Speaker 6 (09:31):
The stock value is not rocketed.
Speaker 7 (09:33):
So it just shows you that the people that support
Cidney Sweeney actually go out and spend money and support
these companies. So I think now this will be a
you know, more companies will follow suits seeing the success
of American Eagle.
Speaker 2 (09:46):
I think you're absolutely right, But the work left will
not let this go here is Sidney Sweeney being heckled,
not We're going to be raising Donald Trump is continuing
her sorry, his support of Sydney Sweeney. He posted, Sydney
Sweeney is a registered Republican, has the hottest ad out there.
(10:09):
It's for American Eagle and the genes are flying off
the shells. To your point, Alex, and he goes on
to say that the tide has seriously turned. Being woke
is for losers. Being Republican is what you want to be,
And of course he ends up with thank you for
your attention to this matter. But you know, I think
that's a Trump style of making a point about wok
(10:33):
is for losers. But it certainly seems that the work
era is pretty dead.
Speaker 7 (10:38):
No, And it has a feeling of constaalgia because there
was a time when Abercrombie and American Eagle were the
coolest clothing companies out there, and that was kind of
like that it was the good old days before we
realized it was the good old days. And I think
that's a quote from the office, you know, and you
know it's a little cliche, but it's true. So seeing
American Eagle have a resurgence like this it feels kind
(10:59):
of good in a weird way, in a world where
we have to take the small wins when we can
get them, you know, it feels like a win now.
Speaker 2 (11:07):
Texas Governor Greg Abbott has ordered the arrest of Texas
House Democrats after a warrant was issued by Texas House
speaker and dozens of Texas Democrats fled the state in
an attempt to block a Trump backed redistricting vote. Greg
Abbott called on the Department of Public Safety to arrest
the quote delinquent Texas House Democrats.
Speaker 3 (11:28):
Can you tell us a bit more about what's going
on here?
Speaker 7 (11:31):
Well, you know, I was there, right, I was actually
there in Austin today at three pm, and they locked
the doors and they said that if these you know,
representatives didn't get back to the capital that they would
be basically held in contempt and they would be subject
to arrest. And so I really hope that they actually
follow through. Now, some politicians are.
Speaker 6 (11:48):
Going to be able to get away with it.
Speaker 7 (11:49):
They're going to be able to say that they had
some sort of you know, actual valid excuse. But really
what's happening is they're stopping the redistricting. They don't want
to vote on the redistricting because it takes away, you know,
a few of the liberal seats, which is good for Texas.
So that's what they're doing, and that's why they're running away,
and that's why that's why they're not there to approve
this redistricting.
Speaker 6 (12:07):
So it's all just a political theater.
Speaker 7 (12:10):
I was, but I'll admit this though, it did kind
of have a weird vibe when you saw the politicians,
you know, gleefully happy that these other politicians were about
to be arrested. That felt kind of weird, and I
don't know, just it was a it kind of felt
like a moral conundrum at the same time. But I'm
actually very happy that the conservatives held the leftists and
(12:31):
the progressives feet to the fire because they need to,
you know, this ad derelicted duty. They should be there
voting on this redistricting. But because they didn't have a form,
they weren't able to approve it, and you know, it's
just to cause a big problem at the state capitol.
Speaker 2 (12:44):
Okay, Alex Stein, thanks so much for joining us.
Speaker 6 (12:46):
Great to talk to you, always a pleasure. George Eganson, Well.
Speaker 2 (12:52):
Let's turn to what's happening here in Australia and over
the waykend more than one hundred thousand pro Palestine protest.
Speaker 3 (12:58):
It is marched along the Sydney Harbor Bridge.
Speaker 10 (13:01):
Are you.
Speaker 6 (13:27):
Now?
Speaker 2 (13:28):
Of course, there are plenty of people there demonstrating who
genuinely just want to see an end to the war,
like we all do. But this protest that was called
March for Humanity featured the Taliban flag, chants such as
death death to the IDF, and posters of a run
supreme leader Ali Harmony.
Speaker 3 (13:46):
And there was a lot of anger and a.
Speaker 2 (13:47):
Lot of hate directed at Israel, yet barely any condemnation
of Hamas, the terror group who refused to release the hostages,
who on the same day as this protest took place,
released a horrifying video of Israeli hostage Aviata David appearing
to dig his own grave in a terror tunnel. Now,
as I said at the start of this, not all
(14:09):
of these protesters, but many of them who showed up
there on Sunday were clearly supporting hermus and support for
terror on Australia's most iconic landmark is absolutely disgusting. The
same weekend, during a protest in Melbourne, the Australian flag
was burned by masked demonstrators who also painted abolish Australia,
(14:31):
and that is truly sickening. Joining us now is Guy
and his contributor Michael Kroger. Michael, thank you for joining us. Firstly,
can I get your reaction to this March for Humanity
protests that took place on Sunday?
Speaker 11 (14:44):
Well, like you, I agree, there were a lot of
good hearted people who went along because they're concerned about
the images they've seen of starving children in guards. But unfortunately,
underlying all of these Palestinians demonstrations is a healthy dose
of Jewish hatred and men he Semitism. And that's what's
sickening about some elements of these demonstrations, not only the
(15:06):
things happen that you mentioned, but if it's a much
for humanity, why weren't there any Australian flags. Not a
single Australian flag, American flag, British flag. There was an
Islamic state flag, no Western country's flag was there. There
were Hummas symbols, Nazi symbols, you know chance from the
(15:28):
River to the Sea, which is you know, death to Jews, etc.
Speaker 3 (15:33):
Etc.
Speaker 11 (15:34):
So you know what the undercurrent of these demonstrations. Is
is quite sickening and it scares Jewish Australians and that's
disgusting to vomit. And you know, the leaders of these
demonstrations need to stop all this Jewish hatred and racism.
Speaker 2 (15:52):
And just images of the Australian flag being burned, I
mean it's shocking. Is this extreme hate for the West
being normal? It's just being displayed.
Speaker 11 (16:02):
Yes, Well, don't forget a lot of these demonstrations by
the left actually demonstrations against the Western civilization and Western countries.
So it's why you have demonstrations against the Jews in
Israel but not against the Russians in the Ukraine. I
don't care about the mass slaughter and starvation going on
in the Sudan, which is many many more times deaths
(16:23):
and starvation that is in Gaza. But is there a
single demonstration by these people is humanists? Is there a
single demonstration by any of them about the tragedies in
Sudan or Ukraine? Now, of course not because you know
it doesn't take off anti Western culture, anti Western civilization
and Jews. Of course, if there are any Jews involved,
A lot of these extremists, you know, are not interested
(16:46):
So that's why I say there is Jewish hatred underpinning
some elements in these demonstrations, and that's disgusting in a
modern country like Australia.
Speaker 2 (16:56):
Today, let's look up the situation in Gaza as Prime
Minister Van Natna, who will reportedly bring his security cabinet
together this week to discuss expanding the ground offensive in Gaza. Now,
the Israeli military currently holds operations in around seventy five
percent of the Gaza strip, but under the Israeli leader's
new plan, the IDF would capture the rest of the enclave.
(17:18):
And this of course comes after ceasefire talks with her
Mass collapsed. But we do know that Israel's under a
lot of global pressure to end this war. Israel's absolutely
losing the pr war. About this, many argue that Israel
has gone too far. They argue that Israel has failed
when it comes to delivering enough aid. What do you
(17:39):
make of reports that Netna who is inclining towards actually
expanding the offensive, Well, which.
Speaker 11 (17:46):
As if that's what he's going to do. But after
a couple of years, you know, people are tiring of this.
You know, the israelis the Jewish community worldwide, never get
good press. Let's accept the fae that you know, there
is so much anti Semitism and Jewish hatred in countries,
mainly in Western countries. The hard left. It used to
(18:07):
be the hard right, the neo Nazis. Now it's the
hard left to are you know, racist, anti Semitites, anti Semites,
and you know, anything the Israelis do, anything, the Israeli
government does, anything the Jewish State does, they condemn. So
you know, this is just par for the course. But
what is concerning is that this war has gone on
for so long now the patience of some Western leaders
(18:29):
is being exhausted. And that's the greatest challenge for Netan.
Yahoo seventy five percent is not one hundred percent in
that twenty five percent of of course, the hostages, the
Israelis know where they are. The problem is they can't
get to them because they're surrounded by booby traps, bombs
and Hama's militia and the law be killed if the
Israelis attempt to go and rescue them. That's the problem
he's got, and it's a problem Gabbie hasn't been able
(18:51):
to solved in almost two years.
Speaker 2 (18:53):
I want to quickly ask you about Russia and also
President Trump. We know that Donald Trump has announced that
he will be substantially raising tariffs on India because it
continues to purchase Russian oil. So he took to social
a social media platform, his own truth social saying that
India is not only buying massive amounts of Russian oil,
they are then for much of the oil purchased, selling
(19:16):
it on the open market for big profits. They don't
care how many people in Ukraine are being killed by
the Russian war machine because of this, so be substantially
raising the tariff.
Speaker 3 (19:27):
What do you make of Donald Trump's move.
Speaker 11 (19:29):
Here, Well, it's entirely predictable. It's consistent with Trump's sort
of international foreign policy. Again, his patients with the Russians
has been exhausted. He thought he had a relationship with
He thought that relationship would lead to peace in the Ukraine.
It hasn't. He feels he's being played and now of
course he's ten to twelve day deadline is about to end.
(19:49):
See woodcops going there to meet Poot and I think
for the fifth time, but I don't think anything's going
to happen. So Trump is now moving towards shutting down
Western exports to and from Russia. So India has twenty
percent of its imports from China, ten percent of its
imports are from Russia, so it does a huge amount
of trade with Russia on the import side. And Trump
(20:11):
is doing exactly as you'd think Trump would do, basically
saying to the Indians, listen, this is not acceptable. We
want sanctions against Russia. And if you're not going to
play ball, then we're going to make it difficult for you.
Don't forget, India exports a huge amount to America, so
it's going to damage the Indian Indian economy. And that's
what Trump wants to do. He wants to stop the
(20:32):
Indians trading so much with Russia.
Speaker 2 (20:34):
Finally, on one more issue back here in Australia, the
Victorian government is being mocked right around the world for
their grand plan to tackle knife crime. As we know,
crime is out of control in Victoria, and so what
do they do. They get taxpayers to put the bill
for a machete be in.
Speaker 12 (20:51):
Look at this outside the Victoria Police headquarters on Spencer Street,
a purpose buil bin for a weapon wreaking havoc.
Speaker 3 (21:00):
Very important.
Speaker 2 (21:01):
Those knives, those machetes are create enormous damage.
Speaker 12 (21:05):
Come September one, it will be illegal to own a
machete and this is where Victorians are being asked to
drop them off during an amnesty period that will run
until November thirty.
Speaker 13 (21:15):
We've done this because we want to get these knives
off the streets, because these knives destroy light.
Speaker 2 (21:22):
Michael is really going to be effective. I mean, those
who want to launch a machete attack, they might spot
the bin and decide they're politely going to get rid
of it.
Speaker 11 (21:32):
No, that's exactly right. All those machete owning Victorians will
be rushing to these bins to fill them up with
the machetes. They won't be able to wait. They were
falling over themselves gab to line up with these machette bins.
I mean, what a preposterous, ridiculous idea. The Victorian Premier
is basically a laughing stock. We're a lawless staatey down
in Victoria, austral because everyone knows we're bankrupt and lawless. No,
(21:55):
I think if people want to get rid of the machetes,
they'll just discreduinly put them in their rubbish bin somewhere,
or someone else's Ashpin. But this is fascical and it
makes Victoria laughing stock.
Speaker 2 (22:04):
Oh yeah, it's done that exceptionally well. Time and time again,
Michael Kroger, thank you so much for joining us.
Speaker 6 (22:09):
Thanks jab.
Speaker 2 (22:13):
Joining us now is Gabrielle Qui Chia, former Trump White
House staffer.
Speaker 3 (22:16):
Gabrielle. Great to see you again.
Speaker 2 (22:18):
Let's start with Russia Gate, because Attorney General Pam Bondi
has reportedly ordered federal prosecutors to launch a grand jury
investigation into former Obama administration officials, which will examine accusations
of manufacturing intelligence about Russia's twenty sixteen election interference in
the US. Now, this comes after Director of National Intelligence
(22:40):
Tolsey Gabbard released declassified documents last month, and Fox News
reports that Pam Bondi believes there is clear cause for
deep concern and a need for next steps. What are
you expecting to come from this?
Speaker 9 (22:53):
Yeah, thanks for having me, Gabriella. Absolutely, these are the tapes.
This is like the good news that we are all
looking for here in the United States, especially of course
with the Conservative Party, in the sense that this was
something that President Trump had even ran on saying that
he was well and fully aware that there was a
quote unquote deep state, that there was a higher power
(23:15):
of which has garnered not only our our own institutions
within the United States government, but certainly amongst even our
Five Eyes. And a lot of that documentation that we've
seen even during the Biden administration that came on out
was talking about how our own intelligence agencies were working
with the Five Eyes to get around all these loopholes
(23:36):
in saying, in say, executing surveillance on Trump officials, in
which a lot of those officials were not very much
trained when it comes to intelligence capabilities and unfortunately fell
at the hand of say our FBI services or even
our CIA. So what I anticipate is that there's going
to going to be more information I think we know.
(23:57):
Just to be quite frank with you, this is good
news for us, as I just stated in the beginning
of this. But the ultimate question is whether or not
those that are guilty of, say utilizing allies or adversaries
of other nations and weaponizing our own governments to go
after a political opponent, whether it's someone on the left
(24:18):
or on the right. The biggest element is are we
going to see result, Will they get a trial, will
they be put behind bars if found guilty. Those are
the types of results that I would be hoping for.
I don't anticipate that happening until, you know, maybe even
years down the road. There's so much that we've talked
about just in this term, two of which we've yet
(24:39):
to even see actual justice. When we talk about you know,
Biden in the auto pen, or say, you know President
Trump very famously saying on the debate stage that Hillary Clinton,
if he was in charge, you'd be going to jail.
We're still all holding on to those words because we
want to see more details, and we want these people
who have been projected to yet of quote unquote deep
(25:02):
state are not working in America's best interest to be
held accountable because those are very strong and very serious allegations,
and a lot of America voted President Trump and for
those purposes to get to see those come to light.
So at a bare minimum, I anticipate that the DOJ
is certainly going to have hearings and have these people
(25:22):
be called to the stand, But ultimately what results out
of that is the bigger picture. So I don't want
to put anything down stamped in writing just yet. There's
a lot of others items that we haven't forgotten about yet, Gatriela.
Speaker 2 (25:35):
Okay, well, let's talk about the Democrats. Elizabeth Warren has
been praising Democratic socialists around ma'm donnie, who's running for
New York City mayor, and as we know, he's as
radical as it gets. He's previously called to defund the police,
to trump proof New York City, and shift the city's
tax burden onto richer and whiter neighborhoods. But here is
Elizabeth Warren speaking alongside ma'm donnie at a campaign event.
Speaker 13 (25:59):
When someone stands up and says, I will lead this
city by making it more affordable. And here are my plans,
real plans, Plans to deliver on childcare, plans to deliver unhousing,
plans to deliver, gonna experiment. We're going to try things
on groceries. That is the Democratic message.
Speaker 2 (26:21):
Elizabeth Warren was also asked by Fox Music if ma'am
Donnie was what the future of the Democratic Party should
look like, and her auntsa was you bet.
Speaker 3 (26:30):
I mean, what do you make of this?
Speaker 9 (26:33):
I hope that she's wrong, because that wouldn't be looking
too hot. I mean, even if you look at say,
you know, Elizabeth Warren from Massachusetts or Mom Donnie coming
from New York, and as a New Yorker myself, New
York and Massachusetts are one of the most expensive states
to live in. Of course, albeit you have Boston in
Manhattan driving those numbers. But on the outskirts as well,
(26:54):
these individuals that live in these states are being hit
by a terrible economy, by high grocery PRIs And also
when she got laughed when she talks about the childcare
cost burden, because of the top ten states in the
United States, Massachusetts and New York lead the way when
it comes to the high cost in childcare. Again, these
(27:15):
are Democratic states. So when they say that this is
the future or this is the Democratic way, we'll shoot
me being from New York, or say someone living in
Massachusetts has been living the Democratic way and it hasn't
been going well. Also, on top of that, you want
to talk about the Democratic way, one of the stakeholds
of the Democratic Party was fighting tooth and nail to
(27:36):
maintain affirmative action. And I can't help myself. I have
to always bring this up with Elizabeth Warren. But she
was the same person that was exercising the Democratic way
and using a democratic program to get her own benefit
in affirmative action by claiming that she was Native American
on the bar exam. I will never let that one go,
and that should tell people enough outside of the horrible
(27:58):
history of what it costs, what the effects are, whether
it's crime or just your day to day childcare, the
education system. I mean, shoot, you name it. It's not
looking good for Massachusetts or New York. So there's such
a delusion here that I'm not surprised that she's just
latching on and probably more likely latching onto mom Donnie
(28:18):
and saying he's the future, because who knows. I anticipate
that this guy, he's pretty darn young. I think he's
going to be around for a while. And I don't
say that because I think that he's this great leader.
But it's the same. I mean, how many times we
have to see the same blueprint. This is like an
AOC two point zero type of situation, and she's she's
been stuck around the block for a long time at
this rate, and everybody kind of laughed, and of course
(28:39):
I do too, But these people are still here and
that's a bigger issue. So I think she's seeing herself
up well, to kind of cozy up with those that
she bought, to cozy up with, to stay in the
position that she is in right here, right now. Otherwise,
if they had half a brain, they realized what's going
on in their own state home.
Speaker 2 (28:58):
Well, while looking at the demo, let's look at who
could be the next US president. Of course in twenty
twenty eight and Jdi Vance is twice as likely to
be the next president of the United States does any Democrat,
according to Polymarket. Polymarket has his chance of becoming president
at twenty eight percent, and then Gavin Newsom at fourteen percent.
Speaker 3 (29:18):
What do you put this down to?
Speaker 9 (29:21):
I put this down to I honestly think a lot
of people. Again, I'm a conservative, there's no secret about
it whatsoever. But I can say that the sentiment of
those that are still I'm friends with that aren't necessarily conservative. Actually,
jad Advance was very well received by them. And I
was surprised by that because I think when he was
(29:41):
initially announced as the vice president, there was a little
bit of a lack of enthusiasm for Wow, this is
a suffer punch kick right in the moment that he
was announced. I remember distinctively on x between conservatives, and
I think this stems from to answer your question, Gabriel,
is that the day that jd Vance walked on stage
(30:02):
and did that vice presidential debate, that was such a
pivotal moment for him in so many ways, And coupling
that with how he's acted as a vice president, this
is probably the least dormant vice president we've ever had.
Conservatives were not happy with Vice President Pence at the time.
(30:23):
I mean, obviously people were not happy with Kamala Harris
as the vice President Obama. When Joe Biden was vice president,
people were just always calling him crazy Uncle Joe, and
he had hardly any stake in the game. We've really
lost here in America that sense of seriousness of responsibility
for someone as the vice president, and we've seen it,
I think also by default, because President Trump doesn't really
(30:45):
have the doors closed for press, so you're seeing so
many opportunities where the vice president has to actually take action,
speak and answer and fulfill a role that we a
lot of times just kind of put to the side.
So I think that that's really it. People are happy
with him. Whether you want to hyper focus on the
(31:05):
latest with President Trump, that people would like to debate
about for sure, but president or vice president Vance has
been very consistent since the day that he went into
those vice presidential debates, and he's only gotten stronger. And
seeing this administration and him acting in it as almost
people might have been able to or thought maybe to
(31:25):
chalk it up as oh, what was Beginner's luck, or
you probably were going to do pretty darn well again,
say Tim Walltz, But it's so much more than that now.
So I think that's where the numbers are coming from.
And no one, no one wants to see Gavin Newsom
as president. You can take two seconds and look at
his new PR stunt when he went on the Sean
Ryan Show and said that he would happily accept a
firearm and that he has no issue with the Second Amendment.
(31:48):
And then after that interview happened, and of course individuals
on the left and the right were bothered by Gavin
Newsom cause playing as some sort of conservative. It turned out,
and this, this is public information now, is that Gavin
Newsom did not accept that gun. And it was because
he said, in his own words, at the California laws
were too confusing for the average persone, let alone himself,
(32:12):
and he didn't want to have to deal with all
of the hoops to jump through to obtain that firearm
as a gift from Sean Raane.
Speaker 14 (32:17):
So if you don't.
Speaker 9 (32:18):
Understand the Constitution and you're making your own state difficult
in trying to exercise their natural rates, well then you're
probably not going to be president.
Speaker 2 (32:26):
Well, there's no denying he's certainly eyeing off the top job,
and I'm sure we will be hearing him on some
more podcasts. But let's look at some issues with such
as the border. As we know, the Trump administration is
keeping the border closed, and he's and the administration has
been carrying out deportations of illegal immigrants, and the United
(32:48):
States is now on track to see negative net migration
for the first time and at least fifty years.
Speaker 3 (32:53):
Take a look at this.
Speaker 5 (32:55):
How about net migration any United States? Get this, It's down.
It's going to be down at least sixty percent. We
may be dealing with. Get this negative net migration to
the United States in twenty twenty five. That would be
the first time there is negative net migration in this
country and at least fifty years. We're talking about down
(33:15):
from two point eight million in twenty twenty four.
Speaker 2 (33:19):
Gabrielle, This how significant is this? What does this mean
for America?
Speaker 9 (33:23):
This means that we got exactly what we voted for,
because we all know that this was a major platform
item for the president on his campaign trail, and certainly
in term one when we were in turn one, I
remember how many government shutdowns we had just because there
was such a threshold of which the Democrats didn't want
to come to the table and talk and even have
a conversation that was more or less focused surprisingly on
(33:46):
DAKA at that time. For President Trump's term one, term two,
there's no concessions that he's willing to make, and he's
locking down the border as he promised. I think a
lot of this comes from the absolut successes I've covered
a lot at the Pentagon in the military Partment of
Defense being integrated into border patrol is a huge improvement,
and this is a direct result of it, because you
have Northcom and Southcom working hand in hand with the
(34:09):
Mexican government and intel sharing of course what it's appropriate,
I imagine, not all of it. Also being able to
utilize jammers for drones. There is so much going on
there Seacott in El Salvador. We have exercised every avenue
at this moment that we possibly can in securing the
(34:31):
border outside of the traditional well we need more manpower
or maybe we need to build a wall. We're starting
to think a little bit more critically with the assets
that we already have. So I think this is great news.
I mean, I remember back in twenty eighteen, Yale University
actually spearheaded a study in which they took numbers all
the way from twenty sixteen from early twenty twenty sixteen,
(34:52):
and they were analyzing and trying to counter the US
Census Bureau for how many illegal immigrants were actually in
the United States. And what they found in their study
in twenty eighteen was that the United States government was
behind and they're reporting by fifty percent what they estimate
and spend similar estimations up to this day, and age
was around eleven point five million at that point back
(35:15):
in twenty fifteen, all the way up to twenty eighteen,
they were saying the same numbers, and Young University said,
hold on, actually it's higher. It's about fifty percent more.
We're looking at twenty plus more million illegal immigrants being
in the United States. So we always had a problem
in monitoring, and now it sounds like we're finally getting
to a place where we can start, quite literally from
(35:35):
ground zero. And it also positions these individuals that genuinely
do want to come to the United States when there
is a clean, secure border with protocols, with manpower, and
also individuals that can be protected and not being utilized
to be smuggled or trafficked into our country for whether
(35:55):
it's for human trafficking or for drug trafficking. So this
is such a win and it's again a direct result
of exactly what we vote for.
Speaker 3 (36:03):
Just finally, on the MAHA movement, RK.
Speaker 2 (36:06):
Junior says that he's officially moving to ban food stamps
from being used for soda. So this is to ban
the purchase of sugary sodas using Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program benefits.
He argues that tax dollars should not be going to
food that can make children sick.
Speaker 14 (36:21):
Take a listen, and US taxpayer should not be paying
to feed kids foods supporest kids in our country with
foods that are going to give them diabetes. And then
my agency ends up through Medicaid and Medicare paying for
those injuries. We're going to put an end to the
(36:43):
ad and we're doing it step by step to state
by state.
Speaker 2 (36:47):
Advocates of the ban argue that this is going to
improve public health outcomes and reduce long term medical costs.
Speaker 9 (36:54):
What's your response, Yeah, I think this is a great thing.
At the end of the day, for you have to
focus on nutrient dense foods, so to have that be
applied to the quite literally the opposite when it comes
to sugary foods and drinks while no one's getting their
nutrition and cyclical, that's when you have to start. It
(37:15):
goes back to everything of our fiber, of our being,
of not having to rely on the government. But if
you're relying on the government for your money, you're applying
that to food that's not good for you. By default,
that food is poisoning your body and you're sick, and
now you need to rely on the government to come
in and handle health care for you. It just it's
never ending cycle. So I think this is a step
in the right direction. I think a better step in
(37:37):
adding to this because I don't imagine this being the end,
and it shouldn't be the end. Is that in the
United States, healthier foods that don't have say your evil
seed oils, or your dyes, or your pesticide, whatever it
may be, your organic foods, all of them are significantly
more expensive then the poisonous foods. And so what I
would like to see from this government is build off
(37:58):
on the sentiment moving forward. The healthier foods you would
think that are just growing in the grass, that are
coming from a tree, whatever it may be, that don't
have as much ingredients. Actually that lack of ingredients reflects
in the pricing, and by that then more individuals would
be healthy, healthier, and it wouldn't be this mental gymnastics
(38:20):
where people who don't have a lot of money are saying, well,
you know what, I'm going to pay for something that's
of less money for more bang for my book, and
that probably has higher calories to get me through to
get me and my family buy, versus the healthier option
in which we still are left hungry. So I think
this is just one step into making all these very
(38:42):
positive changes when it comes to our food system here
in the United States.
Speaker 2 (38:46):
Gabrielle Kichiya Foma Trumpet, White House staffa thank you so
much for joining us on pala al A great to
speak with you.
Speaker 6 (38:52):
Thank you.
Speaker 3 (38:56):
Joining us now.
Speaker 2 (38:57):
Is the news quote columnist Angela Mallad angela great to.
Speaker 10 (38:59):
See nice to see you, Gabriela.
Speaker 2 (39:01):
Prince Harry has denied allegations that he gave his uncle
Prince Andrew, a bloody nose during an argument. This has
been revealed in this new book about the Duke of
York entitled The Rise and Fall of the House of York,
and there are claims that there was this altercation between
Prince Harry and Prince Andrew. They've got a physical altercation
(39:21):
back in twenty thirteen over something that Andrew said behind
Harry's back. What do you make of this story?
Speaker 10 (39:27):
Look, it's really interesting because in Spare we know that
Harry and William had a punch up, So it's not
within the realms of possibility that Harry had a punch
up with Andrew, and the notion that the two most
problematic members of the royal family could be, you know,
way back then in twenty thirteen could have been in
this real what would it be? Over Look, there's also
the claim in the book entitled is the Name of It?
(39:49):
Which is a very interesting title.
Speaker 4 (39:51):
For a book.
Speaker 10 (39:51):
About Prince Andrew and his erstwhile wife. There's also the
claim that Andrew warned Harry that he he hadn't done
his due diligence on Meghan Markel and that it acted
hastily in marrying her. I'm not sure about that, because
in his spare there's a story about Harry and Meghan
(40:12):
first meeting the Queen at Royal Lodge at you know,
where Andrew and his wife, Fergie love. There's a lot
of detail about Fergie teaching Meghan to Curtsey and that
sort of thing. I think Andrew and Fergie, who were
always seeking kind of dominance or sort of recognition within
the royal family, would have loved the fact that the
heir to the throne would have brought his new girlfriend
(40:35):
first to meet the Queen at their house. I just
don't buy that level of Rather, the argument was about
something else prior to Megan being involved. I just can't
imagine Andrew saying that to Prince Harry. I think at
that time, you know, when Meghan first came on the scene,
everyone was super happy that she was going to.
Speaker 3 (40:51):
Be part of the family.
Speaker 2 (40:52):
They were very welcoming until everything, of course turned But
there has been a few more details coming out about
booking bullying claim against Meghan Markle. It's been revealed that
Royal aides who accused Meghan Markle of bullying say that
they were frightened of what she would do to them
because of her capacity for revenge. Now, Megan's always denied
the allegations of bullying, but this has come from a
(41:14):
journalist who broke the story back in May twenty twenty
one about the bullying claims.
Speaker 3 (41:18):
More, can you tell us what exactly has been said here?
Speaker 10 (41:21):
That's right, So Valentine Lowe went on a podcast and
explained his book in a greater detail. He, of course,
as you said, broke those bullying allegations. Initially he said
that these staff were so impacted psychologically by working for her,
and they had this notion that she had this what
he called infinite capacity for revenge. Now, look, I think
(41:43):
the question is was Megan a bully? And I think
all the evidence points to the fact that she was.
It's not just Valentine Lowe's book, which seems to have
had multiple sources. There's also Jason Now who used to
work for the Meghan and Harry and he's the one
that initially bought the claim that led to the bullying investigation.
(42:04):
I think the fact that he a named person who
is now working for Prince William, so the fact he
is a loyal and trusted member within the royal family,
he brought this issue to the palace. Then there was
the bullying investigation that we never got the answers to.
And then of course the Australian aide Samantha Cohen, who
worked for the Queen in the family for so many years.
(42:24):
She'd in an interview with The Herald's son also mentioned
that she had been pulled in to be questioned about
the bullying allegations. Now there's no smoke without fights.
Speaker 3 (42:34):
The fact that.
Speaker 10 (42:35):
These still keep going, are these allegations, and the fact
that we know that the Sussexes have gone through so
many stuff, I think it's fairly accurate to say that.
Speaker 3 (42:45):
Megan is a bully. Yeah, I think you're right.
Speaker 2 (42:47):
Look, the man who tried to abduct a princess and
more than fifty years ago has been released from psychiatric
detention in ball left hospital and probation in.
Speaker 3 (42:57):
Back in twenty nineteen, and he's now been.
Speaker 2 (42:59):
Freed from this high security facility In an interview with
The Daily Mail, he claims that he was innocent.
Speaker 3 (43:05):
It was all meant to be a hoax.
Speaker 2 (43:06):
But I suppose it brings back the story and what
happened fifty years ago.
Speaker 3 (43:11):
It does. It so interesting.
Speaker 10 (43:12):
Princess Anne was twenty three at the time and she
had so much gusto. She was being driven with her
then husband Mark Phillips down the mall towards Buckingham Pallace.
She'd been to an event and this man held them up.
He basically threatened Princess Anne. He wanted to kidnap her.
He was asking for two million pounds in a ransom.
(43:33):
She at the time was super gutsy. She said something
align in the lines of it not bloody likely and
I haven't got two million dollars. And then the Duke
of eddenbra later said, look, had he captured her, it
would have been you know, having her in captivity would
have been a bait in the neck.
Speaker 3 (43:49):
Because she's so feisty.
Speaker 10 (43:51):
But I think what's interesting about this is it shows
the character of Princess sam way back then. She was
twenty three and she had there where fall and the
Hotspata really stand up to this guy. Who did actually
shoot three members of her team. So there were three
people that were injured in this altercation. As he said,
we say he went to prison. Her greatest concern afterwards,
(44:13):
in the interview that she gave afterwards, that he'd ripped
her blue velvet dress, which was one of her favorites.
So it goes to the.
Speaker 3 (44:21):
Character of the woman. She's the most hard working royal.
Speaker 10 (44:23):
She doesn't bat an eyelid at anything, and I just
love her gustiness.
Speaker 3 (44:28):
Absolutely no, I love that.
Speaker 2 (44:30):
Now the royal family has said goodbye to one of
its most treasured members.
Speaker 3 (44:33):
This is Queen.
Speaker 2 (44:34):
Elizabeth's horse, rather Tyrone, officially retired from royal duties after
working at nearly every royal occasion over the last fourteen years.
Speaker 3 (44:43):
Now.
Speaker 2 (44:43):
This horse has been described as a gentle giant. What
what can you tell us about him?
Speaker 10 (44:48):
It's interesting, isn't because we don't really think about all
the things that are adjacent to you know, we look
at a nice carriage, The Princess of Wales is in it,
she's going to trooping the color, but we don't actually
notice there has to be horses to get carry that carriage,
and a lot of work goes on behind the scenes
to make them able and well equipped to do that work.
So it's not just you pull a horse off the street,
(45:08):
you know, tied up to a carriage and of that
off at trots. They have to be educated and loud
noise because of course there's a lot of cheering along
the routes of these events and that sort of thing,
and the fact that they have to absolutely trust that
a loud noise will not cause a horse to bolt,
because you know, you have members of the royal family
within these carriages. This horse has worked alongside his sister
(45:31):
and his mother, so he's now going to a lovely
farm area where you know, horses that have been in
service are.
Speaker 3 (45:38):
Allowed to live out their days. Apparently when he got.
Speaker 10 (45:41):
There there was a big knay and he recognized as
sister after all these years. But you know, we know
the royal family love the horses and their dogs, so
I think there'd be a lot of you know, paths
behind the scene.
Speaker 2 (45:51):
Yes, and Prince William and Princess Catherine, they've been sailing
around the Greek islands, living their best lives out with
their children, enjoying.
Speaker 3 (45:59):
The Europeans a holiday.
Speaker 2 (46:00):
But there are reports that tender had to leave the
souper yacht that they were on to go out and
get something special for Prince George.
Speaker 3 (46:07):
But we don't know what that is.
Speaker 10 (46:08):
We don't know what it is, but we can assume.
And the reporter that's been sent to Greece to try
and find out what this was that Prince George wanted,
I think has got a pretty good clue. So imagine
if you're on the yacht. They haven't run out of pasta,
they haven't run out of curry, which is one of
George and Charlotte's favorite meals.
Speaker 3 (46:28):
But what is it on the island of zach Andfoss.
Speaker 10 (46:31):
I think that's the right pronunciation that they so badly want. Well,
in fact, this Greek island is one of the few
that actually has a McDonald's restaurant.
Speaker 5 (46:40):
So well, the.
Speaker 10 (46:40):
Journalist has gone there and he hasn't been able to
all out consume, you know, confirm what it is. You
can imagine a twelve year old boy just having a
hankering for some burger and chips, don't you think so?
I think that you know, But no one's coughing, They're
all just everyone's confirming that the tender was sent, but
no one's prepared to confirm that it was a McDonald's.
Speaker 3 (47:00):
But I wouldn't be surprised.
Speaker 2 (47:01):
Yes, it's a good sneaking suspicion that it could beat McDonald's.
Maybe George was sick of all the Greek food or
all the food on the cupop. But Angela mo Llard,
so great to talk to you. Thank you so much
for joining us. Thanks so much, that is pal Allah.
Thank you for your company. Make sure you subscribe to
Skyese Australia on YouTube
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
New Heights with Jason & Travis Kelce
Football’s funniest family duo — Jason Kelce of the Philadelphia Eagles and Travis Kelce of the Kansas City Chiefs — team up to provide next-level access to life in the league as it unfolds. The two brothers and Super Bowl champions drop weekly insights about the weekly slate of games and share their INSIDE perspectives on trending NFL news and sports headlines. They also endlessly rag on each other as brothers do, chat the latest in pop culture and welcome some very popular and well-known friends to chat with them. Check out new episodes every Wednesday. Follow New Heights on the Wondery App, YouTube or wherever you get your podcasts. You can listen to new episodes early and ad-free, and get exclusive content on Wondery+. Join Wondery+ in the Wondery App, Apple Podcasts or Spotify. And join our new membership for a unique fan experience by going to the New Heights YouTube channel now!