All Episodes

October 22, 2025 10 mins

Send us a text

Today I wanted to discuss a nifty piece of research that I came across some time ago and how it applies to behaviour.

Mark as Played
Transcript

Episode Transcript

Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Penelope Webb (00:05):
Welcome to The Exceptional Humans Podcast,
where we discuss questionsrelated to language, identity,
education, and behavior.
I'm your host, Penelope and Ihave a background in education,
linguistics, and behavioralscience.
Today I wanted to discuss anifty piece of research that I
came across some time ago andhow it applies to behaviour.

(00:30):
In this research published inthe Journal Nature, a University
of Virginia team, researchedwhat would happen when
participants were givenpractical problem solving tasks
to complete.
These tasks included solvingeight puzzles and problems that

(00:55):
could be solved by adding orremoving items.
For example, one puzzle requiredparticipants to either shade in
or erase squares on a grid tomake a pattern symmetrical.

(01:18):
In another task, participantswere to add or subtract items
from a travel itinerary tooptimize a holiday.
The interesting thing that thisexperiment found was that
regardless of the puzzle orproblem to be solved, the

(01:40):
majority of the time, theparticipants chose an additive
problem solving method insteadof one based on subtraction.
There may be a couple of reasonswhy humans tend to default to an
additive problem solving methodoverlooking the possibilities of

(02:07):
subtractive solutions.
The first reason may be thatadditive ideas tend to come to
mind more easily and quicklythan subtractive ideas, which
may require more thought.

(02:29):
Therefore, humans may accept anadditive solution without even
considering a subtractivesolution at all as they come to
mind more quickly during theproblem solving process.

(02:50):
This may be self-reinforcing asrapid solutions are often
rewarded within our institutionsand organizations.
Additionally, modern consumerbehavior also reinforces the

(03:15):
idea that we can solve ourproblems through purchasing
items.
This research is particularlyinteresting when we consider it
in relation to changingbehavior.
Often when we wish to change abehavior, we look at what we can

(03:42):
do to create behavioral momentumand therefore behavior change.
And the important word in thatsentence is do.
Very rarely do we consider whatwe can stop doing in order to

(04:06):
create behavioral change.
The few times that we doconsider stopping doing an
action are usually instanceswhere stopping that action is

(04:27):
either inappropriate, impossibleor inefficient.
Generally examples of theseconcern things such as food
intake, usually dieting, orstopping the consumption of

(04:49):
something with addictiveproperties, this could range
from caffeine to cigarettes tovaping to the use of
recreational substances.
However, a subtractive problemsolving approach can be

(05:10):
incredibly successful whenapplied to other behavioral
concerns that we may beexperiencing in our day-to-day
lives.
Doing less, having less, addingless can be incredibly effective

(05:33):
in regulating our sensory andnervous system, reducing
adversive stimuli and allowingus to contact reinforcement.

(05:54):
I will give you an example Iexperienced in supporting a
family with two neurodivergentchildren requiring behavior
support.
There was a plethora of concernsaround behavioral triggers,
behaviors of concern andincidents occurring from the
moment the family woke up.

(06:17):
Mum was extremely engaged inproviding support for the kids,
however, was experiencing quiteconsiderable career burnout
resulting in reduced parentalcapacity and considerable
frustration around her abilityto complete the activities of
daily living that she needed toengage in because of barriers to

(06:42):
her children's engagement intheir own activities of daily
living, such as getting out ofbed and eating breakfast.
This resulted in a situationwhere every morning the day
began with behaviors of concern.

(07:03):
Mom asked me what they could do.
What did they need to add?
What could they try?
And having worked with thisfamily for a while and having
seen just how much was alreadyin place, it actually became
fairly evident that there was adesperate need to do less, not

(07:26):
more.
What we actually ended uptrialing was a subtractive
approach.
We switched two components ofthe morning routine.
Previously, mom had doneeverything she had to do to get
the children out of bed andhaving breakfast before she went
and exercised.
My suggestion was that wetrialed getting her exercising,

(07:53):
then following up with thechildren about breakfast.
Mom would place preferredbreakfast items ready for the
children on the kitchen bench.
Inform the children thatbreakfast was available for them
and that she was going to go andcomplete her exercises.

(08:14):
She was exercising within thehome and her exercise regime
ranged from 20 minutes to anhour in length, depending on the
type of activity she was engagedin.
Clear expectations wereestablished that if the children
were not up and eating breakfastor had not finished eating

(08:38):
breakfast, by the time momfinished exercising, she would
be supporting them in thoseactivities as well as taking any
medications that they needed totake.
This subtractive problem solvingapproach was very effective in

(09:00):
reducing conflict in thehousehold first thing in the
morning, as well as reducing theincidents of behaviors of
concern.
The subtractive problem solvingapproach also explains why we
tend to experience positivemental health outcomes when we

(09:22):
do less, particularly when we dothings such as go on holidays.
On holidays, we do notexperience the same pressure and
stresses that we do from ourday-to-day life, engaging in
school, work and othercommitments.

(09:42):
A subtractive problem solvingapproach reduces the mental
load, reducing stress and beinga protective factor in the
longer term.
I'd be very curious to know ifyou have ever tried a
subtractive problem solvingapproach in creating behaviors

(10:03):
change for yourself or othersthat you care for.
And if you have had a positiveexperience with this approach.
The Exceptional Humans Podcastis written and recorded on Kabi
Kabi and Jinibara lands.
We would like to pay ourrespects to their elders past,

(10:23):
present, and emerging, and payour respects to all Aboriginal
and Torres Strait Islanderpeoples listening today.
Advertise With Us

Popular Podcasts

Stuff You Should Know
Dateline NBC

Dateline NBC

Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com

The Burden

The Burden

The Burden is a documentary series that takes listeners into the hidden places where justice is done (and undone). It dives deep into the lives of heroes and villains. And it focuses a spotlight on those who triumph even when the odds are against them. Season 5 - The Burden: Death & Deceit in Alliance On April Fools Day 1999, 26-year-old Yvonne Layne was found murdered in her Alliance, Ohio home. David Thorne, her ex-boyfriend and father of one of her children, was instantly a suspect. Another young man admitted to the murder, and David breathed a sigh of relief, until the confessed murderer fingered David; “He paid me to do it.” David was sentenced to life without parole. Two decades later, Pulitzer winner and podcast host, Maggie Freleng (Bone Valley Season 3: Graves County, Wrongful Conviction, Suave) launched a “live” investigation into David's conviction alongside Jason Baldwin (himself wrongfully convicted as a member of the West Memphis Three). Maggie had come to believe that the entire investigation of David was botched by the tiny local police department, or worse, covered up the real killer. Was Maggie correct? Was David’s claim of innocence credible? In Death and Deceit in Alliance, Maggie recounts the case that launched her career, and ultimately, “broke” her.” The results will shock the listener and reduce Maggie to tears and self-doubt. This is not your typical wrongful conviction story. In fact, it turns the genre on its head. It asks the question: What if our champions are foolish? Season 4 - The Burden: Get the Money and Run “Trying to murder my father, this was the thing that put me on the path.” That’s Joe Loya and that path was bank robbery. Bank, bank, bank, bank, bank. In season 4 of The Burden: Get the Money and Run, we hear from Joe who was once the most prolific bank robber in Southern California, and beyond. He used disguises, body doubles, proxies. He leaped over counters, grabbed the money and ran. Even as the FBI was closing in. It was a showdown between a daring bank robber, and a patient FBI agent. Joe was no ordinary bank robber. He was bright, articulate, charismatic, and driven by a dark rage that he summoned up at will. In seven episodes, Joe tells all: the what, the how… and the why. Including why he tried to murder his father. Season 3 - The Burden: Avenger Miriam Lewin is one of Argentina’s leading journalists today. At 19 years old, she was kidnapped off the streets of Buenos Aires for her political activism and thrown into a concentration camp. Thousands of her fellow inmates were executed, tossed alive from a cargo plane into the ocean. Miriam, along with a handful of others, will survive the camp. Then as a journalist, she will wage a decades long campaign to bring her tormentors to justice. Avenger is about one woman’s triumphant battle against unbelievable odds to survive torture, claim justice for the crimes done against her and others like her, and change the future of her country. Season 2 - The Burden: Empire on Blood Empire on Blood is set in the Bronx, NY, in the early 90s, when two young drug dealers ruled an intersection known as “The Corner on Blood.” The boss, Calvin Buari, lived large. He and a protege swore they would build an empire on blood. Then the relationship frayed and the protege accused Calvin of a double homicide which he claimed he didn’t do. But did he? Award-winning journalist Steve Fishman spent seven years to answer that question. This is the story of one man’s last chance to overturn his life sentence. He may prevail, but someone’s gotta pay. The Burden: Empire on Blood is the director’s cut of the true crime classic which reached #1 on the charts when it was first released half a dozen years ago. Season 1 - The Burden In the 1990s, Detective Louis N. Scarcella was legendary. In a city overrun by violent crime, he cracked the toughest cases and put away the worst criminals. “The Hulk” was his nickname. Then the story changed. Scarcella ran into a group of convicted murderers who all say they are innocent. They turned themselves into jailhouse-lawyers and in prison founded a lway firm. When they realized Scarcella helped put many of them away, they set their sights on taking him down. And with the help of a NY Times reporter they have a chance. For years, Scarcella insisted he did nothing wrong. But that’s all he’d say. Until we tracked Scarcella to a sauna in a Russian bathhouse, where he started to talk..and talk and talk. “The guilty have gone free,” he whispered. And then agreed to take us into the belly of the beast. Welcome to The Burden.

Music, radio and podcasts, all free. Listen online or download the iHeart App.

Connect

© 2026 iHeartMedia, Inc.