Questions? Comments? Send us a message!
The BJR method is a novel mathematical approach to methadone conversion that aims to improve upon existing methods by providing a smoother, less discontinuous, and less linear output for a reasonable and safe methadone dose. Here's how it improves upon existing conversion approaches:
Addresses Limitations of the Plonk Method: The Plonk method uses a linear equation to calculate methadone dosage, which assumes a linear relationship between methadone and morphine. This method is considered useful only in the lower range of morphine equivalent doses (300-600mg), and it calculates overly high doses of methadone at higher morphine doses. The BJR method, in contrast, uses a parabolic equation, which is thought to more accurately reflect the relationship between morphine and methadone dosage.
Reduces Discontinuities of the Ayonrinde Method: The Ayonrinde method uses a changing-ratio approach that takes into account the need for lower relative doses of methadone with escalating morphine equivalents. However, this method has significant discontinuities at the ratio transition points. The BJR method produces a smoother curve without these abrupt changes.
Provides a Starting Dose: Unlike the Ayonrinde method which intercepts the y-axis at zero, the BJR method, similar to the Plonk method, outputs a starting dose for opioid-naive patients. The BJR method's y-intercept is set at 15mg, which is the starting dose for opioid-naive patients, though this may be adjusted to 7.5mg or less for frail elderly patients.
Moderates Doses at Higher Levels: At higher doses of oral morphine, the BJR method outputs lower doses of methadone than other methods, including the Ayonrinde method. This is intended to improve patient safety by reducing the risk of excessive sedation and respiratory depression.
Simplified Formula: The BJR method provides a simple formula for methadone conversion, which does not require conversion tables and protocols. This can be a useful tool in palliative medicine. The formula is as follows: methadone mg = 1.5 * √(morphine mg) + 15
In summary, the BJR method is designed to address some of the limitations of existing methadone conversion methods, aiming to provide a safer, more accurate, and more convenient approach to methadone dosing. The method has shown promising results in case studies, and it provides a simplified model for conversion that may be useful in palliative medicine. However, it requires further validation before it can become a standard of care.
**NOTE: THIS IS FOR ACADEMIC PURPOSES ONLY. DO NOT ACT ON ANYTHING IN THIS PODCAST WITHOUT CONSULTING AN EXPERIENCED MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL.**
Thank you for your interest in Ethics in Palliative Medicine! Follow us at https://epionepalliative.com and on X: @PallCareEthics
Popular Podcasts
Las Culturistas with Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang
Ding dong! Join your culture consultants, Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang, on an unforgettable journey into the beating heart of CULTURE. Alongside sizzling special guests, they GET INTO the hottest pop-culture moments of the day and the formative cultural experiences that turned them into Culturistas. Produced by the Big Money Players Network and iHeartRadio.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
Model Wars
On the surface, the modeling industry in the 80s was about parties and pretty clothes, but underneath the flash, there were drugs, sex, and violence. And Paul Fisher, a former straight-A student from the San Fernando Valley, rose to prominence amidst the turmoil. After a chance encounter with an alleged mobster, Paul suddenly found himself with a million dollars in funding and the chance to start a modeling agency in New York City. The city was then embroiled in a “model war” between industry titans Eileen Ford and John Casablancas, and Paul tried to make his mark. But even as Paul thrived in the party-heavy culture of the time, burning cash like a furnace, he came face to face with the darkest forces in the industry. As his shady backers put the screws to him, Paul faced down deadly consequences, trying to make a star while saving his soul.