Vatican II: Rejected - Fr. Nicolás E. Despósito 04-25-16

Summary

Fr. Nicolás E. Despósito presents a traditionalist Catholic critique of the Second Vatican Council (Vatican II) and the post-conciliar papacy, particularly targeting the legitimacy of recent popes and the doctrinal errors attributed to Vatican II and its teachings. Fr. Despósito emphasizes the Catholic Church as the “pillar and ground of truth,” underscoring the necessity of adhering strictly to all Catholic dogmas without compromise or doubt. Vatican II is labeled heretical, especially for promoting religious liberty, ecumenism, collegiality, and distinguishing between the Church of Christ and the Catholic Church. These errors, Despósito argues, invalidate the council’s authority and the papal legitimacy of Paul VI and his successors, implying a vacancy of the papal office (“the sea of Peter is vacant”). Fr. Despósito also condemns "Pope" Francis’s apostolic exhortation Amoris Laetitia for promoting a pastoral approach that tolerates adulterous unions and contradicts Catholic doctrine on the indissolubility of marriage. Furthermore, Fr. Despósito criticizes “false traditionalists” who accept the papacy but reject Vatican II as non-binding, accusing them of neo-Gallicanism, which undermines the Church’s infallibility. The homily concludes with a call for Catholics to reject Vatican II’s errors fully, remain faithful to true doctrine, and live a life of holiness and good works.

Highlights

• The Catholic Church is the “pillar and ground of truth” and cannot teach error.
• Vatican II is condemned as a heretical council due to teachings on religious liberty, ecumenism, collegiality, and ecclesiology.
• Acceptance of Vatican II errors means rejecting the true papal authority of Paul VI and his successors.
• "Pope" Francis’ Amoris Laetitia is criticized for endorsing Communion for adulterous unions, contradicting traditional Catholic doctrine.
• Faith must be integral; doubting or rejecting any dogma invalidates one’s status as Catholic.
• “False traditionalists” who accept the papacy but reject Vatican II are accused of neo-Gallicanism and doctrinal inconsistency.
• The faithful are urged to reject Vatican II and its consequences fully and to live in fidelity, holiness, and good works.

Key Insights

• The Church as the Infallible Pillar of Truth: Fr. Despósito emphasizes the Church’s indefectibility, quoting St. Paul to assert that the Church, as the “pillar and ground of truth,” cannot promulgate error. This highlights a traditionalist understanding of Church authority that demands absolute doctrinal purity and continuity from all ecclesiastical teachings, rejecting any development perceived as contradictory to the deposit of faith.
• Vatican II as a Heretical Council: Vatican II is portrayed not merely as flawed but as fundamentally heretical, particularly for endorsing religious liberty (the right to choose one’s religion), ecumenism (dialogue and cooperation with other religions), and collegiality (shared governance among bishops). These teachings are seen as contradictory to previous dogmatic teachings, implying that the council cannot be considered a true ecumenical council with infallible magisterial authority.
• Invalidity of Post-Vatican II Papal Authority: The argument that Paul VI and his successors lack true papal authority stems from the claim that a genuine ecumenical council is infallible and cannot promulgate heresy. Since Vatican II promulgated heresy, it follows that those who convened and promulgated it did not possess legitimate ecclesiastical authority, leading to the conclusion that the papal seat is effectively vacant.
• Critique of Amoris Laetitia and Pastoral Practices: "Pope" Francis’ apostolic exhortation is criticized for undermining the indissolubility of marriage by suggesting that adulterous unions might contain “elements of matrimony” sufficient to allow reception of Holy Communion under certain conditions. This pastoral approach is viewed as a direct contradiction to traditional Catholic teaching, effectively confirming people in sin and eroding the moral and doctrinal integrity of the Church.
• Integral Faith and the Danger of Partial Acceptance: Fr. Despósito stresses that Catholic faith is “integral,” meaning that all dogmas must be accepted without doubt or exception. Rejecting or doubting even one dogma results in the loss of the virtue of faith and the status of being Catholic. This underscores a rigid and uncompromising approach to doctrine, reflecting traditionalist Catholic theology.
• Neo-Gallicanism among False Traditionalists: Fr. Despósito identifies a significant issue among some traditional Catholics who accept the post-Va