September 27, 2025 • 9 mins
What happens when you throw logic, arrogance, and pure anarchy into the same room? Sanity shows up armed with facts and patience thinner than a campaign promise. Nox rolls in slick, smirking, and ready to twist every word into his own brand of righteousness. And Chaos? He doesn’t care about platforms or policy—he just wants to set the whole damn system on fire for fun.
This isn’t some stuffy debate with ties and podiums. It’s a messy, explosive collision of egos, worldviews, and one-liners sharp enough to cut through political spin. Expect yelling, laughing, and maybe even a few tears when the three crash headfirst into the topics no one else dares to touch.
Raw. Unscripted. Absolutely unhinged. Welcome to politics, podcast style.
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/wilde-after-dark-sin-sanity-knox-captain-chaos--6746264/support.
✨ Follow & Connect
Website: The Wilde Chase
Spreaker: Wilde After Dark
Chaturbate: TheWildeChase
Stripchat: TheWildeChase
OnlyFans: TheWildeChase
🎙️ Disclaimer: This podcast contains adult themes, dark humor, and explicit conversations. Listener discretion is advised.
This isn’t some stuffy debate with ties and podiums. It’s a messy, explosive collision of egos, worldviews, and one-liners sharp enough to cut through political spin. Expect yelling, laughing, and maybe even a few tears when the three crash headfirst into the topics no one else dares to touch.
Raw. Unscripted. Absolutely unhinged. Welcome to politics, podcast style.
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/wilde-after-dark-sin-sanity-knox-captain-chaos--6746264/support.
✨ Follow & Connect
Website: The Wilde Chase
Spreaker: Wilde After Dark
Chaturbate: TheWildeChase
Stripchat: TheWildeChase
OnlyFans: TheWildeChase
🎙️ Disclaimer: This podcast contains adult themes, dark humor, and explicit conversations. Listener discretion is advised.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:01):
Welcome to the wild ballot, where we dive into the
chaos of politics and try to come out with our
brains intact. I'm Sanity, your voice of reason, and.
Speaker 2 (00:11):
I'm Chaos, ready to shake things up like a political earthquake.
Let's get messy.
Speaker 3 (00:16):
I'm Knox, the guy wondering why I keep showing up
to these debates. Today, we're tackling the Digital Privacy Act
because nothing screams freedom like arguing over who gets to
spy on your cat memes.
Speaker 1 (00:27):
All right, folks, this is a big one. The Digital
Privacy Act is stirring up trouble and we're here to
unpack it. Let's go. Let's set the stage. The Digital
Privacy Act, proposed in twenty twenty five, aims to regulate
how tech companies handle user data. It's got promises of
protecting your privacy, but also some red flags about government overreach. Knox,
(00:50):
give us the rundown. What's in this bill?
Speaker 3 (00:53):
Okay, here's the deal. The Act has two main parts. First,
it forces companies like x Meta or Google to delete
your data after ninety days unless you explicitly opt in
to keep it. Second, it sets up a federal oversight
board to enforce the rules. Think fines for tech companies
that mess up. Sounds user friendly, right, protect your data,
stick it to big tech. But here's the kicker. That
(01:16):
oversight board can dig into company records and user data
for investigations. So is it privacy or a government snooping
free for all?
Speaker 2 (01:26):
Are you kidding me? It's a trap. They're waving privacy
like a shiny toy while slipping in a surveillance state.
I bet they're already reading my exposts about alien conspiracies.
This is nineteen eighty four, with better Wi Fi, easy chaos.
Speaker 1 (01:40):
Let's not call it dystopia yet. Supporters, mostly centrists and
some progressives, say this bill empowers users. You'd get a
dashboard to see exactly what data companies have on you,
and you can hit delete whenever you want. That's a
good thing.
Speaker 2 (01:56):
No sure, until the government uses that dashboard track my
late night taco orders. I don't trust it.
Speaker 3 (02:02):
Chaos, Your tacos are safe, probably, But Sanity's right, there's
a case for the bill. Tech companies have been hoarding
data forever. This could force transparency. The question is whether
the government's cure is worse than the disease.
Speaker 1 (02:17):
Let's break this down. What are the strongest arguments for
and against this bill? Knox, you're the analyst.
Speaker 3 (02:24):
Hit us with the pros first, all right, the proside's
got some weight. Number One, it gives users control. You
can see what ex or Google knows about you, every click,
every search, every weird ad for socks that follows you around.
Number two, it hits tech companies where it hurts. They're wallets.
Fines for non compliance could force them to behave. And three,
(02:47):
it sets a precedent governments worldwide might follow suit, making
data privacy a global stand.
Speaker 2 (02:53):
Oh please, you think big tech scared of fines, They'll
pay them and keep hoarding data. In that oversideboard, it's
just bureaucrats playing spy games.
Speaker 1 (03:02):
Chaos. Let's hear the cons, but keep it focused. What's
the biggest issue with this bill?
Speaker 2 (03:09):
Sanity? They're not here to save us, They want control.
This oversight board can investigate anything they call a violation.
What stops them from targeting people they don't like? Political activists, ex. Posters,
you name it. Plus, tech companies might over censor to
avoid fines, killing free speech.
Speaker 3 (03:29):
It's a chaos has a point for once the bill's
vague on what investigations means. If the Oversight Board's got
broad powers, they could snoop on anyone, say someone posting
spicy takes on X and Yeah, companies might play it
safe and censor more to dodge penalties. Remember section two
thirty debates. This feels like that, but sneakier.
Speaker 1 (03:49):
That's a real concern. The bill's language is fuzzy on
how much power the Oversight Board gets. Supporters say it's
just for enforcing privacy rules, but critics slippery slope to
censorship or surveillance. So how do we balance user control
with preventing abuse?
Speaker 2 (04:06):
You don't scrap the bill. Let people use VPNs and
burner accounts like the old days. Take back your privacy, Rooa.
Speaker 3 (04:15):
You sound like you're planning a digital revolution from your
mom's basement. But seriously, there's a middle ground. Tighten the
bill's language, limit the Oversight Board's scope, make its actions public.
Transparency could keep it in check.
Speaker 1 (04:32):
That's a practical fix, Knox, But would it satisfy the
privacy hawks or the free speech crowd. Let's dig deeper
after a quick break. We're taking a quick pause to
catch our breath. When we're back we'll dive into what
this bill means for everyday people and whether it's a
game changer or a government overreach.
Speaker 2 (04:53):
Stay with us and don't let big brothers steal your
data while we're gone.
Speaker 3 (04:57):
Or your taco's chaos.
Speaker 1 (04:59):
That this VPN, you can protect yourself from all hackers
trying to get into your personal data.
Speaker 4 (05:05):
But what who told you that that's crazy?
Speaker 3 (05:08):
Hackers can set up fake access points, They're able to
sniff out any important information, steal it, and you get
ripped off.
Speaker 4 (05:16):
That's not entirely true. What I was going to say was.
Speaker 2 (05:19):
That it's not a VPN.
Speaker 4 (05:20):
You're Internet browsing data can be tracked by your ISP.
Sell you a provider, ad companies, and hacker. All right,
would you just stop? This is getting ridiculous.
Speaker 3 (05:28):
I use Express VPN because it keeps my information anonymous
and lord vps, ExpressVPN, Express VPN.
Speaker 4 (05:34):
Okay, okay, okay, that's enough. You need to understand this.
There are good reasons to use a virtual private network
or a VPN, and I'll share what those are in
a moment. But judging by all of the content you'll
read or watch online, you'd be forgiven for thinking that
this piece of software is the ultimate solution to every
hacking and security problem we have in the world today.
Speaker 1 (05:56):
Welcome to all, Welcome back to the wild ballot. We're
talking about the Digital Privacy Act and whether it's a
win for users or a sneaky power grab. Let's zoom in.
How does this affect the average person scrolling X or
shopping online? Knox start us off.
Speaker 3 (06:13):
For the average Joe, this bill could be a wake
up call that dashboard Sanity mentioned. It's like a window
into what tech companies know about you, your location, your searches,
maybe even your late night pizza orders. If you can
see it and delete it, that's power. But most people
won't bother. They'll click accept and move on like always.
(06:34):
The real impact depends on enforcement. Will companies actually delete
your data or just hide it better?
Speaker 2 (06:41):
Exactly? People are lazy and tech companies know it. This
bill sounds nice, but his theater. Meanwhile, the government's peeking
over your shoulder, ready to flag your ex posts for misinformation.
I say, fight back, go off, great chaos.
Speaker 1 (06:57):
Not everyone's ready to live like a digital hermit. But
you're right that trust is an issue. If people don't
trust the government or tech companies to follow through the
bills just a feel good law, Knox, any data on
how people feel about this?
Speaker 3 (07:11):
I checked some recent ex posts and a few webpoles.
About sixty percent of users like the idea of controlling
their data, but seventy percent don't trust the government to
enforce it fairly. And get this a trending X thread
called the Oversight Board NSA two point zero. People are spooked.
Speaker 2 (07:30):
See the people get it. This bill's a wolf in
sheep's clothing. We need to protect free speech in privacy
without letting bureaucrats play judge and jury.
Speaker 1 (07:39):
Okay, but let's talk solutions. If this bill is flawed,
how do we fix it? Or do we ditch it entirely?
Speaker 3 (07:46):
Don't ditch it, fix it. Cap the Oversight Board's powers,
make their investigations transparent, and add a sunset clause so
the law expires unless it's working. Also fund some public
education so people, actually, we'll use that dashboard. Most won't
unless it's stupidly easy.
Speaker 2 (08:04):
Fine, Knox, that's not terrible, But I still say we
should all learn the code and build our own platforms.
Screw big tech and big government chaos.
Speaker 1 (08:14):
I'm not sure we're all ready to become programmers. But
I like Knox's fixes. Transparency and simplicity could make this
bill work without the creepy vibes. Let's wrap this up
with some final thoughts. All right, we've torn into the
Digital Privacy Act from every angle. Time for closing arguments. Chaos,
you're up. What's your take?
Speaker 2 (08:36):
This bill's a shiny trap. It promises privacy behinds the
government a skeleton key to your data. Scrap it, or
at least got the oversight board power to the people,
not the suits.
Speaker 3 (08:47):
Chaos, You're half right, which is a new record. The
bill's got potential to reign in big tech, but the
oversight board's a problem. Tighten the rules, make it transparent,
and maybe we've got something. Otherwise, it's just another law
nobody trusts.
Speaker 1 (09:03):
I'm with you both on the need for balance. The
Digital Privacy Act could empower users, but only if it's clear, limited,
and trustworthy. Without that, it's just noise. All right, listeners,
what do you think? Is this bill a step toward
freedom or a surveillance state in disguise? Hit us up
on X with your takes.
Speaker 2 (09:23):
Yeah, and if you're with me, post hashtag scrap the act,
let's start a revolution.
Speaker 3 (09:28):
Or just post something sensible your call.
Speaker 1 (09:30):
Thanks for joining us on the wild ballot. We'll be
back next week to wrestle with another political beast. Until then,
keep questioning, keep debating, and maybe check your privacy settings.
Speaker 2 (09:42):
And hide your tacos.
Speaker 3 (09:43):
Good night, everybody,
Welcome to the wild ballot, where we dive into the
chaos of politics and try to come out with our
brains intact. I'm Sanity, your voice of reason, and.
Speaker 2 (00:11):
I'm Chaos, ready to shake things up like a political earthquake.
Let's get messy.
Speaker 3 (00:16):
I'm Knox, the guy wondering why I keep showing up
to these debates. Today, we're tackling the Digital Privacy Act
because nothing screams freedom like arguing over who gets to
spy on your cat memes.
Speaker 1 (00:27):
All right, folks, this is a big one. The Digital
Privacy Act is stirring up trouble and we're here to
unpack it. Let's go. Let's set the stage. The Digital
Privacy Act, proposed in twenty twenty five, aims to regulate
how tech companies handle user data. It's got promises of
protecting your privacy, but also some red flags about government overreach. Knox,
(00:50):
give us the rundown. What's in this bill?
Speaker 3 (00:53):
Okay, here's the deal. The Act has two main parts. First,
it forces companies like x Meta or Google to delete
your data after ninety days unless you explicitly opt in
to keep it. Second, it sets up a federal oversight
board to enforce the rules. Think fines for tech companies
that mess up. Sounds user friendly, right, protect your data,
stick it to big tech. But here's the kicker. That
(01:16):
oversight board can dig into company records and user data
for investigations. So is it privacy or a government snooping
free for all?
Speaker 2 (01:26):
Are you kidding me? It's a trap. They're waving privacy
like a shiny toy while slipping in a surveillance state.
I bet they're already reading my exposts about alien conspiracies.
This is nineteen eighty four, with better Wi Fi, easy chaos.
Speaker 1 (01:40):
Let's not call it dystopia yet. Supporters, mostly centrists and
some progressives, say this bill empowers users. You'd get a
dashboard to see exactly what data companies have on you,
and you can hit delete whenever you want. That's a
good thing.
Speaker 2 (01:56):
No sure, until the government uses that dashboard track my
late night taco orders. I don't trust it.
Speaker 3 (02:02):
Chaos, Your tacos are safe, probably, But Sanity's right, there's
a case for the bill. Tech companies have been hoarding
data forever. This could force transparency. The question is whether
the government's cure is worse than the disease.
Speaker 1 (02:17):
Let's break this down. What are the strongest arguments for
and against this bill? Knox, you're the analyst.
Speaker 3 (02:24):
Hit us with the pros first, all right, the proside's
got some weight. Number One, it gives users control. You
can see what ex or Google knows about you, every click,
every search, every weird ad for socks that follows you around.
Number two, it hits tech companies where it hurts. They're wallets.
Fines for non compliance could force them to behave. And three,
(02:47):
it sets a precedent governments worldwide might follow suit, making
data privacy a global stand.
Speaker 2 (02:53):
Oh please, you think big tech scared of fines, They'll
pay them and keep hoarding data. In that oversideboard, it's
just bureaucrats playing spy games.
Speaker 1 (03:02):
Chaos. Let's hear the cons, but keep it focused. What's
the biggest issue with this bill?
Speaker 2 (03:09):
Sanity? They're not here to save us, They want control.
This oversight board can investigate anything they call a violation.
What stops them from targeting people they don't like? Political activists, ex. Posters,
you name it. Plus, tech companies might over censor to
avoid fines, killing free speech.
Speaker 3 (03:29):
It's a chaos has a point for once the bill's
vague on what investigations means. If the Oversight Board's got
broad powers, they could snoop on anyone, say someone posting
spicy takes on X and Yeah, companies might play it
safe and censor more to dodge penalties. Remember section two
thirty debates. This feels like that, but sneakier.
Speaker 1 (03:49):
That's a real concern. The bill's language is fuzzy on
how much power the Oversight Board gets. Supporters say it's
just for enforcing privacy rules, but critics slippery slope to
censorship or surveillance. So how do we balance user control
with preventing abuse?
Speaker 2 (04:06):
You don't scrap the bill. Let people use VPNs and
burner accounts like the old days. Take back your privacy, Rooa.
Speaker 3 (04:15):
You sound like you're planning a digital revolution from your
mom's basement. But seriously, there's a middle ground. Tighten the
bill's language, limit the Oversight Board's scope, make its actions public.
Transparency could keep it in check.
Speaker 1 (04:32):
That's a practical fix, Knox, But would it satisfy the
privacy hawks or the free speech crowd. Let's dig deeper
after a quick break. We're taking a quick pause to
catch our breath. When we're back we'll dive into what
this bill means for everyday people and whether it's a
game changer or a government overreach.
Speaker 2 (04:53):
Stay with us and don't let big brothers steal your
data while we're gone.
Speaker 3 (04:57):
Or your taco's chaos.
Speaker 1 (04:59):
That this VPN, you can protect yourself from all hackers
trying to get into your personal data.
Speaker 4 (05:05):
But what who told you that that's crazy?
Speaker 3 (05:08):
Hackers can set up fake access points, They're able to
sniff out any important information, steal it, and you get
ripped off.
Speaker 4 (05:16):
That's not entirely true. What I was going to say was.
Speaker 2 (05:19):
That it's not a VPN.
Speaker 4 (05:20):
You're Internet browsing data can be tracked by your ISP.
Sell you a provider, ad companies, and hacker. All right,
would you just stop? This is getting ridiculous.
Speaker 3 (05:28):
I use Express VPN because it keeps my information anonymous
and lord vps, ExpressVPN, Express VPN.
Speaker 4 (05:34):
Okay, okay, okay, that's enough. You need to understand this.
There are good reasons to use a virtual private network
or a VPN, and I'll share what those are in
a moment. But judging by all of the content you'll
read or watch online, you'd be forgiven for thinking that
this piece of software is the ultimate solution to every
hacking and security problem we have in the world today.
Speaker 1 (05:56):
Welcome to all, Welcome back to the wild ballot. We're
talking about the Digital Privacy Act and whether it's a
win for users or a sneaky power grab. Let's zoom in.
How does this affect the average person scrolling X or
shopping online? Knox start us off.
Speaker 3 (06:13):
For the average Joe, this bill could be a wake
up call that dashboard Sanity mentioned. It's like a window
into what tech companies know about you, your location, your searches,
maybe even your late night pizza orders. If you can
see it and delete it, that's power. But most people
won't bother. They'll click accept and move on like always.
(06:34):
The real impact depends on enforcement. Will companies actually delete
your data or just hide it better?
Speaker 2 (06:41):
Exactly? People are lazy and tech companies know it. This
bill sounds nice, but his theater. Meanwhile, the government's peeking
over your shoulder, ready to flag your ex posts for misinformation.
I say, fight back, go off, great chaos.
Speaker 1 (06:57):
Not everyone's ready to live like a digital hermit. But
you're right that trust is an issue. If people don't
trust the government or tech companies to follow through the
bills just a feel good law, Knox, any data on
how people feel about this?
Speaker 3 (07:11):
I checked some recent ex posts and a few webpoles.
About sixty percent of users like the idea of controlling
their data, but seventy percent don't trust the government to
enforce it fairly. And get this a trending X thread
called the Oversight Board NSA two point zero. People are spooked.
Speaker 2 (07:30):
See the people get it. This bill's a wolf in
sheep's clothing. We need to protect free speech in privacy
without letting bureaucrats play judge and jury.
Speaker 1 (07:39):
Okay, but let's talk solutions. If this bill is flawed,
how do we fix it? Or do we ditch it entirely?
Speaker 3 (07:46):
Don't ditch it, fix it. Cap the Oversight Board's powers,
make their investigations transparent, and add a sunset clause so
the law expires unless it's working. Also fund some public
education so people, actually, we'll use that dashboard. Most won't
unless it's stupidly easy.
Speaker 2 (08:04):
Fine, Knox, that's not terrible, But I still say we
should all learn the code and build our own platforms.
Screw big tech and big government chaos.
Speaker 1 (08:14):
I'm not sure we're all ready to become programmers. But
I like Knox's fixes. Transparency and simplicity could make this
bill work without the creepy vibes. Let's wrap this up
with some final thoughts. All right, we've torn into the
Digital Privacy Act from every angle. Time for closing arguments. Chaos,
you're up. What's your take?
Speaker 2 (08:36):
This bill's a shiny trap. It promises privacy behinds the
government a skeleton key to your data. Scrap it, or
at least got the oversight board power to the people,
not the suits.
Speaker 3 (08:47):
Chaos, You're half right, which is a new record. The
bill's got potential to reign in big tech, but the
oversight board's a problem. Tighten the rules, make it transparent,
and maybe we've got something. Otherwise, it's just another law
nobody trusts.
Speaker 1 (09:03):
I'm with you both on the need for balance. The
Digital Privacy Act could empower users, but only if it's clear, limited,
and trustworthy. Without that, it's just noise. All right, listeners,
what do you think? Is this bill a step toward
freedom or a surveillance state in disguise? Hit us up
on X with your takes.
Speaker 2 (09:23):
Yeah, and if you're with me, post hashtag scrap the act,
let's start a revolution.
Speaker 3 (09:28):
Or just post something sensible your call.
Speaker 1 (09:30):
Thanks for joining us on the wild ballot. We'll be
back next week to wrestle with another political beast. Until then,
keep questioning, keep debating, and maybe check your privacy settings.
Speaker 2 (09:42):
And hide your tacos.
Speaker 3 (09:43):
Good night, everybody,
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
The Joe Rogan Experience
The official podcast of comedian Joe Rogan.