January 7, 2025 • 15 mins
The North East is making waves in the fight against climate change—but are carbon offsets a genuine solution or a convenient distraction? In this episode, we dig deep into the debate, exposing the cracks, celebrating the wins, and asking the tough questions everyone’s avoiding. 🕵️♂️
🌟 What You’ll Discover:
- The Controversy Unpacked: Why some say carbon offsets are a “get-out-of-jail-free” card for polluters.
- The Local Impact: How the North East is using offsets to tackle emissions—and where they’re falling short. 🌳
- Real Stories: From communities on the frontline of offset projects to corporations defending their strategies.
- Solutions That Matter: Beyond offsets—what’s the North East’s role in achieving true sustainability?
🌿 Why This Episode Matters:
- For Climate Advocates: Gain a deeper understanding of the pros and cons of carbon offsetting.
- For Business Leaders: Learn how to align carbon offset strategies with genuine climate goals.
- For Concerned Citizens: Discover how you can make informed choices about supporting or challenging offset initiatives.
✨ Key Highlights:
- The stark reality of emissions trading: Does it work, or is it greenwashing?
- How the North East’s carbon offset projects compare to global efforts.
- The biggest myths about carbon neutrality—and how to spot them.
💬 What Listeners Are Saying: “Thought-provoking and timely. This episode changed the way I view carbon offsets entirely.” “Finally, someone breaking down this complex topic in a way that makes sense! 🙌”
🎧 Join the Debate: Don’t sit on the sidelines—hit play and join the conversation about one of the most pressing climate issues of our time. Whether you’re a skeptic or a supporter, this episode will leave you with a clearer perspective and actionable ideas for change. 🌍⚡
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
(00:00):
Welcome to the deep dive. Today we're diving deep into Mayor Kim
(00:05):
McGinnis' new Northeast Carbon Marketplace initiative.
Oh yeah.
Yeah. Announced at the Net Zero Northeast England Summit, it
promises to offset emissions with local projects, things like
tree planting and peatland restoration.
Sounds interesting.
Yeah, we'll see. We'll explore its potential, raise some, you
know, critical questions about accountability, carbon
(00:26):
measurement, all that, and discuss if this is, you know, the
solution the region really needs. What do you think, you
know, just from the initial press release and things, what are
your first impressions?
It definitely grabbed everyone's attention at that summit,
that's for sure.
Yeah, it seems like the mayor's pretty excited about it, even
tying it back to some of those campaign promises about a,
quote, social carbon offsetting network.
(00:48):
Ah.
We think that even means.
Well, I mean, they haven't like explicitly defined it yet.
Right.
But you can see the kind of the threads of it in this
marketplace idea, right?
Like connecting local businesses to these environmental
projects, creates a visible impact people can connect with.
You know, it's a good story.
It's a good story.
Yeah, it's a good narrative.
(01:08):
So, okay, let's kind of break this down a little bit.
How would this marketplace actually work in practice?
So do businesses just like buy carbon credits?
Is that basically how it works?
Yeah, essentially.
Yeah.
Okay.
Think of it like a platform, you know,
organizations can offset their emissions.
(01:29):
Right.
They can connect with fund projects, you know,
things that align with their environmental goals.
Right, right.
And this is all localized, right,
within the Northeast Combined Authority area.
Exactly.
Okay.
So just to make sure I understand it, like a company in Newcastle
could offset their emissions by like funding the restoration
of a peat bog, say, up in Northumberland.
(01:50):
Exactly.
And that local connection is like a key selling point.
Okay.
Instead of, you know, some vague offsetting scheme halfway
across the world, businesses can actually like see the impact
their investment is having, you know.
Right, right here in their community.
Right in the backyard, yeah.
Yeah, I get that.
I can see the appeal of that.
But okay, let's get into some of the kind of trickier questions here.
(02:11):
This all hinges on this idea of offsetting, right?
But isn't the real goal like to reduce emissions in the first place,
like at the source, could this scheme let businesses off the hook
a little bit for making those cover choices, you know,
about actually reducing their emissions?
Yeah, that's the big debate, isn't it?
Yeah.
A lot of critics are warning that focusing on offsets
(02:35):
could allow businesses to delay making those changes
to their operations.
Like it's almost like buying a get out of jail free card
and then continuing with business as usual.
Right, right.
And there is some research that backs up those concerns.
Oh, really?
Like what kind of research?
Well, there was a 2021 Oxfam study.
They found that a lot of these offset projects actually overestimate their impact.
(02:57):
So it can create this false sense of progress
and potentially delay investment in cleaner technologies,
which is, you know, not ideal.
So companies might think they're doing more good than they actually are.
Exactly, yeah.
And that's a, you know, it's a dangerous path to go down.
It's crucial that this marketplace doesn't just become a greenwashing exercise.
Rick is planting a tree today, doesn't just like magically erase
(03:20):
the emissions you're pumping out right now.
No, no.
And that's the other issue with relying too heavily on tree planting, you know?
It takes time.
It takes time for trees to grow and reach their full carbon absorbing potential.
We're talking decades, not months.
Right.
So even if everything goes perfectly, those emissions are still like hanging around
(03:40):
in the atmosphere for years while we wait for these trees to mature.
Yeah, exactly.
And I mean, what if like those trees get wiped out by disease
or, you know, there's a fire or something?
Yeah, yeah.
Absolutely.
That's another key concern, right?
The long-term reliability of tree planting as an offset is definitely questionable.
And that raises more questions about like, how do we measure those benefits?
(04:02):
How do we even know for sure that a young forest is sequestering the amount of carbon
that, you know, we're claiming it is?
Yeah.
How do you even put a number on that?
It seems like there's a lot of room for error or even like manipulation
when it comes to calculating these carbon credits.
You're absolutely right.
And that's why transparency and robust verification, like those are going to be
(04:24):
absolutely essential if this marketplace is going to have any credibility at all.
Okay.
We need to be sure those carbon credits represent real, measurable, environmental
benefits, not just, you know, fuzzy accounting.
Yeah, yeah.
Okay, so even with the best of intentions, there are some potential pitfalls here.
So let's unpack this carbon credit system a little bit more, maybe for people who aren't as
(04:47):
familiar with it.
What are they exactly and how are they calculated?
Because I think a lot of people find this whole thing kind of mystifying.
It's definitely a world unto itself, but we can break it down.
In essence, a carbon credit is like a permit, right?
Yeah.
Representing the right to emit a certain amount of greenhouse gas.
Wait, so you can like buy the right to pollute?
Well, it's a bit more nuanced than that.
(05:08):
The idea is that it's more about balancing the scales, right?
Yeah.
By, you know, funding projects that remove or avoid emissions, you're kind of offsetting your own impact.
Okay, but who decides how many credits a project gets?
How do we know they're actually legit?
There are like various methodologies and standards for calculating them.
Some are definitely more rigorous than others, you know?
(05:30):
Right.
Think of it like different currencies, right?
Some are backed by gold, others, not so much.
So are some carbon credits basically worthless?
Not necessarily worthless, but they might not represent the, you know, the actual environmental benefit they're claiming.
Right.
That's why third-party verification is so important.
Okay.
Like reputable organizations, they'll use really stringent standards to, you know, assess the projects,
(05:54):
make sure the carbon reductions are real, measurable, and permanent.
Makes sense.
So like a credit from a verified peatland restoration project might be more trustworthy than, say,
one from some random tree planting scheme with no oversight.
Exactly.
And that brings us back to the Northeast carbon marketplace.
(06:15):
Like one of their biggest challenges is going to be guaranteeing the integrity of those credits.
Yeah.
They've mentioned using blockchain technology for transparency, which is interesting.
Blockchain.
Isn't that like for cryptocurrency and stuff?
Yeah.
Yeah.
But it's essentially like a decentralized tamper-proof ledger, right?
(06:36):
So it could be a way to, you know, track the origin and validity of each credit.
Right.
Make sure they haven't been like double counted or, you know, fabricated or something.
Right.
Right.
Okay.
So maybe that helps with like the accounting side of things.
Mm-hmm.
But what about the bigger picture?
We were talking about how tree planting has its limitations.
Right.
Are there like other types of projects that could offer a faster, more reliable kind of carbon offset?
(07:01):
Absolutely.
Absolutely. And it's good to see that the Northeast carbon marketplace isn't putting all its eggs in the tree planting basket.
Like they've also emphasized peatland and wetland restoration.
Okay.
Why are those better than trees?
Well, I mean, trees are great, but, you know, they release that stored carbon back into the atmosphere when they die and decompose.
Right.
(07:21):
Right.
Peatlands are different.
They act like, like giant carbon sinks.
Okay.
If they're left undisturbed, they can actually lock away carbon for centuries.
Really?
And they're incredibly efficient, you know?
Wow.
Some studies have suggested that peatlands can sequester carbon two to four times faster than forests.
(07:42):
Wow, that's impressive.
So it sounds like restoring peatlands should be like a top priority.
I agree.
And it's not just about the carbon sequestration.
Healthy peatlands, they also improve water quality.
They reduce flood risk and they provide habitat for, you know, a whole bunch of different wildlife.
It's a win-win.
Yeah, yeah, for sure.
Okay.
So it seems like the Northeast carbon marketplace is kind of on the right track, at least by including peatland restoration.
(08:08):
But even with the best projects, there's still the issue of making sure those carbon credits are actually reflecting reality.
Like, how can we be confident that this whole system isn't just like smoke and mirrors?
Transparency is key.
Yeah.
Businesses need to be able to like trace those credits back to the source.
See the data, understand the methodologies they use for the calculations.
(08:30):
Right.
And like we said, independent verification by, you know, reputable third parties, that's crucial.
So a company buying these credits shouldn't just take the seller's word for it.
They should be able to actually like dig into the details and see the proof.
Exactly.
Imagine a system where, you know, you could click on a carbon credit and see the entire history of that project, you know?
(08:51):
Right.
Like the location, the methodology, the verification reports, even photos and videos.
Wow.
That kind of radical transparency, that would build trust.
Yeah.
And it would, you know, weed out the bad actors.
That would be a game changer.
But let's be honest, there have been some pretty high profile carbon offsetting schemes that haven't exactly lived up to the hype.
(09:14):
Oh yeah.
I mean, are we just setting ourselves up for more of the same?
Yeah.
It's a valid concern.
There have been cases where, you know, projects have overestimated their impact or where the carbon benefits haven't been permanent.
Right.
Remember, even with the best intentions, this is a really complex system.
Yeah.
There's plenty of room for, you know, error and unfortunately even manipulation.
(09:36):
So some skepticism is definitely warranted.
Mm-hmm.
But isn't it better to like try something new, even if it's not perfect, than to just, you know, throw up our hands and say it's all too hard?
I agree.
The key is to learn from those past mistakes and build a system that is robust, transparent and accountable.
Right.
You know, the Northeast Carbon Marketplace, it has the potential to be a model for other regions, but it needs to be done right.
(10:02):
Right.
And that brings us to kind of the heart of the matter.
Okay.
Even with a really well-designed marketplace, can offsetting ever truly be a solution to the climate crisis?
Or is it just a way to delay the inevitable shift away from fossil fuels?
That's the million-dollar question, isn't it?
Yeah.
We've talked about the kind of mechanics of the marketplace and the challenges of these carbon credits.
(10:25):
But what about the ethics of offsetting in general?
Like, is it just a way for businesses to, you know, buy their way out of making real changes?
Well, that's where things get really interesting.
It really boils down to this, you know.
Is offsetting a genuine step towards decarbonization or is it just like a convenient way to delay real action?
Yeah.
(10:45):
It's like that old saying, is it better to plant a tree or to just prevent one from being cut down in the first place?
Mm-hmm.
I mean, ideally we'd be doing both, right?
Exactly.
Yeah.
And that's where the Northeast Carbon Marketplace gets these kind of mixed reviews.
Right.
You know, there's a lot of enthusiasm for the, you know, local focus, the potential for change.
(11:07):
The potential for transparency and, you know, the way that it kind of engages businesses in this conversation about sustainability.
Yeah.
Yeah.
I can see that.
It makes it feel more tangible, right?
Than just throwing money at some far-off project like we were saying earlier.
Exactly.
But then on the other hand, you have like the skeptics who say it's just a distraction.
You know, it's a fancy way to slap a green label on business as usual.
(11:30):
And they worry that it'll let companies off the hook for making those really tough choices.
Like, you know, investing in renewable energy or actually overhauling their supply chains and things.
And I mean, let's be honest, there's a real risk of greenwashing here, right?
Mm-hmm.
Companies love to, you know, tout their eco credentials these days.
Absolutely.
But even if, you know, even if some businesses are using this marketplace just for PR,
(11:54):
isn't there still value in funding projects that are genuinely sequestering carbon?
Mm-hmm.
Like at least it's, you know, directing investment towards something positive.
That's a good point.
Yeah, it's like even if someone's donating to charity for a tax break,
you know, the charity still benefits from that donation.
Exactly.
Yeah.
But the key here, and this is something the marketplace organizers really need to be careful about,
(12:17):
the key here is making sure that offsetting is paired with actual emissions reductions.
Right.
It can't just be one or the other.
So it's about using this as like a catalyst for change, not just, you know, a free pass to keep polluting.
Exactly.
Think of it this way.
Imagine a company, they're offsetting their emissions by funding peatland restoration.
(12:38):
Okay.
But at the same time, they're actively working to reduce those emissions in the first place.
That's a much more powerful and a much more credible approach, right?
Yeah, yeah.
It shows they're kind of committed to the long game.
Exactly.
Not just looking for a quick fix.
Right.
And that kind of holistic thinking, that's what we need from everyone involved, you know,
(12:59):
businesses, policymakers and individuals.
Yeah, for sure.
Okay.
So the Northeast carbon marketplace might be like a piece of the puzzle, but it's not the whole picture.
We still need to keep pushing for those like systemic changes, right?
Those bigger changes that move us away from fossil fuels altogether.
Absolutely.
And that actually brings us back to something we touched on earlier.
(13:21):
Are there, you know, other innovative solutions out there that could maybe complement this marketplace?
I mean, trees and peatlands are great.
Yeah.
But what else is on the horizon?
Right.
Is there anything they can like suck up carbon even faster or maybe address some of those concerns
we've been talking about, about like reliability and permanence?
(13:42):
There's some really interesting research happening around biochar, for example.
Okay.
It's this charcoal-like material.
Okay.
Made from agricultural waste that you can add to soil.
Right.
To enhance its fertility and also lock away carbon for centuries.
So you're basically turning trash into a climate solution.
That's pretty cool.
(14:03):
Yeah, it is.
And there are other exciting avenues being explored like using seaweed to absorb carbon or even,
you know, direct air capture technology.
That literally sucks CO2 right out of the atmosphere.
Well, that sounds like something out of a science fiction movie.
It does, doesn't it?
But these technologies are becoming increasingly viable.
And, you know, who knows?
(14:24):
Maybe the Northeast Carbon Marketplace could even play a role in supporting their development and deployment.
Yeah, it's like an incubator for climate solutions.
I love that.
The more we experiment, the more we learn, the faster we can develop the tools we need to,
you know, tackle this crisis head on.
Okay.
So we've explored the Northeast Carbon Marketplace.
We've talked about its potential, its limitations.
(14:45):
The broader context of carbon offsetting, is it the silver bullet solution?
Probably not.
Right.
But could it be a valuable tool for driving progress?
Absolutely.
And I think that's the key takeaway here.
It's not about finding, you know, one perfect solution.
It's about exploring every avenue, every innovation, every opportunity to, you know,
to move us towards that more sustainable future.
(15:07):
Well said.
And as we wrap up this deep dive, I want to leave our listeners with a question to ponder.
We've talked about the challenges of offsetting, right?
The potential for greenwashing, the complexities of carbon accounting.
So if you were designing a carbon marketplace, how would you address those issues?
What kind of safeguards would you put in place to make sure that it delivers, you know,
(15:28):
genuine lasting benefits for our region and, you know, for the planet as a whole?
That's a fantastic question.
And I really hope our listeners will grapple with that, you know, really think about it.
Because ultimately, this is a challenge that demands our collective creativity,
you know, our critical thinking and our unwavering commitment to finding solutions.
(15:49):
Well said. And on that note, we'll leave you to ponder those possibilities.
Thanks for joining us on this deep dive.
Welcome to the deep dive. Today we're diving deep into Mayor Kim
(00:05):
McGinnis' new Northeast Carbon Marketplace initiative.
Oh yeah.
Yeah. Announced at the Net Zero Northeast England Summit, it
promises to offset emissions with local projects, things like
tree planting and peatland restoration.
Sounds interesting.
Yeah, we'll see. We'll explore its potential, raise some, you
know, critical questions about accountability, carbon
(00:26):
measurement, all that, and discuss if this is, you know, the
solution the region really needs. What do you think, you
know, just from the initial press release and things, what are
your first impressions?
It definitely grabbed everyone's attention at that summit,
that's for sure.
Yeah, it seems like the mayor's pretty excited about it, even
tying it back to some of those campaign promises about a,
quote, social carbon offsetting network.
(00:48):
Ah.
We think that even means.
Well, I mean, they haven't like explicitly defined it yet.
Right.
But you can see the kind of the threads of it in this
marketplace idea, right?
Like connecting local businesses to these environmental
projects, creates a visible impact people can connect with.
You know, it's a good story.
It's a good story.
Yeah, it's a good narrative.
(01:08):
So, okay, let's kind of break this down a little bit.
How would this marketplace actually work in practice?
So do businesses just like buy carbon credits?
Is that basically how it works?
Yeah, essentially.
Yeah.
Okay.
Think of it like a platform, you know,
organizations can offset their emissions.
(01:29):
Right.
They can connect with fund projects, you know,
things that align with their environmental goals.
Right, right.
And this is all localized, right,
within the Northeast Combined Authority area.
Exactly.
Okay.
So just to make sure I understand it, like a company in Newcastle
could offset their emissions by like funding the restoration
of a peat bog, say, up in Northumberland.
(01:50):
Exactly.
And that local connection is like a key selling point.
Okay.
Instead of, you know, some vague offsetting scheme halfway
across the world, businesses can actually like see the impact
their investment is having, you know.
Right, right here in their community.
Right in the backyard, yeah.
Yeah, I get that.
I can see the appeal of that.
But okay, let's get into some of the kind of trickier questions here.
(02:11):
This all hinges on this idea of offsetting, right?
But isn't the real goal like to reduce emissions in the first place,
like at the source, could this scheme let businesses off the hook
a little bit for making those cover choices, you know,
about actually reducing their emissions?
Yeah, that's the big debate, isn't it?
Yeah.
A lot of critics are warning that focusing on offsets
(02:35):
could allow businesses to delay making those changes
to their operations.
Like it's almost like buying a get out of jail free card
and then continuing with business as usual.
Right, right.
And there is some research that backs up those concerns.
Oh, really?
Like what kind of research?
Well, there was a 2021 Oxfam study.
They found that a lot of these offset projects actually overestimate their impact.
(02:57):
So it can create this false sense of progress
and potentially delay investment in cleaner technologies,
which is, you know, not ideal.
So companies might think they're doing more good than they actually are.
Exactly, yeah.
And that's a, you know, it's a dangerous path to go down.
It's crucial that this marketplace doesn't just become a greenwashing exercise.
Rick is planting a tree today, doesn't just like magically erase
(03:20):
the emissions you're pumping out right now.
No, no.
And that's the other issue with relying too heavily on tree planting, you know?
It takes time.
It takes time for trees to grow and reach their full carbon absorbing potential.
We're talking decades, not months.
Right.
So even if everything goes perfectly, those emissions are still like hanging around
(03:40):
in the atmosphere for years while we wait for these trees to mature.
Yeah, exactly.
And I mean, what if like those trees get wiped out by disease
or, you know, there's a fire or something?
Yeah, yeah.
Absolutely.
That's another key concern, right?
The long-term reliability of tree planting as an offset is definitely questionable.
And that raises more questions about like, how do we measure those benefits?
(04:02):
How do we even know for sure that a young forest is sequestering the amount of carbon
that, you know, we're claiming it is?
Yeah.
How do you even put a number on that?
It seems like there's a lot of room for error or even like manipulation
when it comes to calculating these carbon credits.
You're absolutely right.
And that's why transparency and robust verification, like those are going to be
(04:24):
absolutely essential if this marketplace is going to have any credibility at all.
Okay.
We need to be sure those carbon credits represent real, measurable, environmental
benefits, not just, you know, fuzzy accounting.
Yeah, yeah.
Okay, so even with the best of intentions, there are some potential pitfalls here.
So let's unpack this carbon credit system a little bit more, maybe for people who aren't as
(04:47):
familiar with it.
What are they exactly and how are they calculated?
Because I think a lot of people find this whole thing kind of mystifying.
It's definitely a world unto itself, but we can break it down.
In essence, a carbon credit is like a permit, right?
Yeah.
Representing the right to emit a certain amount of greenhouse gas.
Wait, so you can like buy the right to pollute?
Well, it's a bit more nuanced than that.
(05:08):
The idea is that it's more about balancing the scales, right?
Yeah.
By, you know, funding projects that remove or avoid emissions, you're kind of offsetting your own impact.
Okay, but who decides how many credits a project gets?
How do we know they're actually legit?
There are like various methodologies and standards for calculating them.
Some are definitely more rigorous than others, you know?
(05:30):
Right.
Think of it like different currencies, right?
Some are backed by gold, others, not so much.
So are some carbon credits basically worthless?
Not necessarily worthless, but they might not represent the, you know, the actual environmental benefit they're claiming.
Right.
That's why third-party verification is so important.
Okay.
Like reputable organizations, they'll use really stringent standards to, you know, assess the projects,
(05:54):
make sure the carbon reductions are real, measurable, and permanent.
Makes sense.
So like a credit from a verified peatland restoration project might be more trustworthy than, say,
one from some random tree planting scheme with no oversight.
Exactly.
And that brings us back to the Northeast carbon marketplace.
(06:15):
Like one of their biggest challenges is going to be guaranteeing the integrity of those credits.
Yeah.
They've mentioned using blockchain technology for transparency, which is interesting.
Blockchain.
Isn't that like for cryptocurrency and stuff?
Yeah.
Yeah.
But it's essentially like a decentralized tamper-proof ledger, right?
(06:36):
So it could be a way to, you know, track the origin and validity of each credit.
Right.
Make sure they haven't been like double counted or, you know, fabricated or something.
Right.
Right.
Okay.
So maybe that helps with like the accounting side of things.
Mm-hmm.
But what about the bigger picture?
We were talking about how tree planting has its limitations.
Right.
Are there like other types of projects that could offer a faster, more reliable kind of carbon offset?
(07:01):
Absolutely.
Absolutely. And it's good to see that the Northeast carbon marketplace isn't putting all its eggs in the tree planting basket.
Like they've also emphasized peatland and wetland restoration.
Okay.
Why are those better than trees?
Well, I mean, trees are great, but, you know, they release that stored carbon back into the atmosphere when they die and decompose.
Right.
(07:21):
Right.
Peatlands are different.
They act like, like giant carbon sinks.
Okay.
If they're left undisturbed, they can actually lock away carbon for centuries.
Really?
And they're incredibly efficient, you know?
Wow.
Some studies have suggested that peatlands can sequester carbon two to four times faster than forests.
(07:42):
Wow, that's impressive.
So it sounds like restoring peatlands should be like a top priority.
I agree.
And it's not just about the carbon sequestration.
Healthy peatlands, they also improve water quality.
They reduce flood risk and they provide habitat for, you know, a whole bunch of different wildlife.
It's a win-win.
Yeah, yeah, for sure.
Okay.
So it seems like the Northeast carbon marketplace is kind of on the right track, at least by including peatland restoration.
(08:08):
But even with the best projects, there's still the issue of making sure those carbon credits are actually reflecting reality.
Like, how can we be confident that this whole system isn't just like smoke and mirrors?
Transparency is key.
Yeah.
Businesses need to be able to like trace those credits back to the source.
See the data, understand the methodologies they use for the calculations.
(08:30):
Right.
And like we said, independent verification by, you know, reputable third parties, that's crucial.
So a company buying these credits shouldn't just take the seller's word for it.
They should be able to actually like dig into the details and see the proof.
Exactly.
Imagine a system where, you know, you could click on a carbon credit and see the entire history of that project, you know?
(08:51):
Right.
Like the location, the methodology, the verification reports, even photos and videos.
Wow.
That kind of radical transparency, that would build trust.
Yeah.
And it would, you know, weed out the bad actors.
That would be a game changer.
But let's be honest, there have been some pretty high profile carbon offsetting schemes that haven't exactly lived up to the hype.
(09:14):
Oh yeah.
I mean, are we just setting ourselves up for more of the same?
Yeah.
It's a valid concern.
There have been cases where, you know, projects have overestimated their impact or where the carbon benefits haven't been permanent.
Right.
Remember, even with the best intentions, this is a really complex system.
Yeah.
There's plenty of room for, you know, error and unfortunately even manipulation.
(09:36):
So some skepticism is definitely warranted.
Mm-hmm.
But isn't it better to like try something new, even if it's not perfect, than to just, you know, throw up our hands and say it's all too hard?
I agree.
The key is to learn from those past mistakes and build a system that is robust, transparent and accountable.
Right.
You know, the Northeast Carbon Marketplace, it has the potential to be a model for other regions, but it needs to be done right.
(10:02):
Right.
And that brings us to kind of the heart of the matter.
Okay.
Even with a really well-designed marketplace, can offsetting ever truly be a solution to the climate crisis?
Or is it just a way to delay the inevitable shift away from fossil fuels?
That's the million-dollar question, isn't it?
Yeah.
We've talked about the kind of mechanics of the marketplace and the challenges of these carbon credits.
(10:25):
But what about the ethics of offsetting in general?
Like, is it just a way for businesses to, you know, buy their way out of making real changes?
Well, that's where things get really interesting.
It really boils down to this, you know.
Is offsetting a genuine step towards decarbonization or is it just like a convenient way to delay real action?
Yeah.
(10:45):
It's like that old saying, is it better to plant a tree or to just prevent one from being cut down in the first place?
Mm-hmm.
I mean, ideally we'd be doing both, right?
Exactly.
Yeah.
And that's where the Northeast Carbon Marketplace gets these kind of mixed reviews.
Right.
You know, there's a lot of enthusiasm for the, you know, local focus, the potential for change.
(11:07):
The potential for transparency and, you know, the way that it kind of engages businesses in this conversation about sustainability.
Yeah.
Yeah.
I can see that.
It makes it feel more tangible, right?
Than just throwing money at some far-off project like we were saying earlier.
Exactly.
But then on the other hand, you have like the skeptics who say it's just a distraction.
You know, it's a fancy way to slap a green label on business as usual.
(11:30):
And they worry that it'll let companies off the hook for making those really tough choices.
Like, you know, investing in renewable energy or actually overhauling their supply chains and things.
And I mean, let's be honest, there's a real risk of greenwashing here, right?
Mm-hmm.
Companies love to, you know, tout their eco credentials these days.
Absolutely.
But even if, you know, even if some businesses are using this marketplace just for PR,
(11:54):
isn't there still value in funding projects that are genuinely sequestering carbon?
Mm-hmm.
Like at least it's, you know, directing investment towards something positive.
That's a good point.
Yeah, it's like even if someone's donating to charity for a tax break,
you know, the charity still benefits from that donation.
Exactly.
Yeah.
But the key here, and this is something the marketplace organizers really need to be careful about,
(12:17):
the key here is making sure that offsetting is paired with actual emissions reductions.
Right.
It can't just be one or the other.
So it's about using this as like a catalyst for change, not just, you know, a free pass to keep polluting.
Exactly.
Think of it this way.
Imagine a company, they're offsetting their emissions by funding peatland restoration.
(12:38):
Okay.
But at the same time, they're actively working to reduce those emissions in the first place.
That's a much more powerful and a much more credible approach, right?
Yeah, yeah.
It shows they're kind of committed to the long game.
Exactly.
Not just looking for a quick fix.
Right.
And that kind of holistic thinking, that's what we need from everyone involved, you know,
(12:59):
businesses, policymakers and individuals.
Yeah, for sure.
Okay.
So the Northeast carbon marketplace might be like a piece of the puzzle, but it's not the whole picture.
We still need to keep pushing for those like systemic changes, right?
Those bigger changes that move us away from fossil fuels altogether.
Absolutely.
And that actually brings us back to something we touched on earlier.
(13:21):
Are there, you know, other innovative solutions out there that could maybe complement this marketplace?
I mean, trees and peatlands are great.
Yeah.
But what else is on the horizon?
Right.
Is there anything they can like suck up carbon even faster or maybe address some of those concerns
we've been talking about, about like reliability and permanence?
(13:42):
There's some really interesting research happening around biochar, for example.
Okay.
It's this charcoal-like material.
Okay.
Made from agricultural waste that you can add to soil.
Right.
To enhance its fertility and also lock away carbon for centuries.
So you're basically turning trash into a climate solution.
That's pretty cool.
(14:03):
Yeah, it is.
And there are other exciting avenues being explored like using seaweed to absorb carbon or even,
you know, direct air capture technology.
That literally sucks CO2 right out of the atmosphere.
Well, that sounds like something out of a science fiction movie.
It does, doesn't it?
But these technologies are becoming increasingly viable.
And, you know, who knows?
(14:24):
Maybe the Northeast Carbon Marketplace could even play a role in supporting their development and deployment.
Yeah, it's like an incubator for climate solutions.
I love that.
The more we experiment, the more we learn, the faster we can develop the tools we need to,
you know, tackle this crisis head on.
Okay.
So we've explored the Northeast Carbon Marketplace.
We've talked about its potential, its limitations.
(14:45):
The broader context of carbon offsetting, is it the silver bullet solution?
Probably not.
Right.
But could it be a valuable tool for driving progress?
Absolutely.
And I think that's the key takeaway here.
It's not about finding, you know, one perfect solution.
It's about exploring every avenue, every innovation, every opportunity to, you know,
to move us towards that more sustainable future.
(15:07):
Well said.
And as we wrap up this deep dive, I want to leave our listeners with a question to ponder.
We've talked about the challenges of offsetting, right?
The potential for greenwashing, the complexities of carbon accounting.
So if you were designing a carbon marketplace, how would you address those issues?
What kind of safeguards would you put in place to make sure that it delivers, you know,
(15:28):
genuine lasting benefits for our region and, you know, for the planet as a whole?
That's a fantastic question.
And I really hope our listeners will grapple with that, you know, really think about it.
Because ultimately, this is a challenge that demands our collective creativity,
you know, our critical thinking and our unwavering commitment to finding solutions.
(15:49):
Well said. And on that note, we'll leave you to ponder those possibilities.
Thanks for joining us on this deep dive.
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Special Summer Offer: Exclusively on Apple Podcasts, try our Dateline Premium subscription completely free for one month! With Dateline Premium, you get every episode ad-free plus exclusive bonus content.
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!