All Episodes

October 26, 2020 53 mins

The Best Of Buck Daily is the top stories of the day from The Buck Sexton Show. Today Buck opens with the new ridiculous Covid-19 restrictions being enforced in California involving Thanksgiving. The Democrats just want to ruin your holidays and lives. Plus Rep. Jim Jordan joins to talk the latest on the Hunter Biden investigation and the 60 minutes interview with President Trump that was blatantly one sided


Please subscribe to the podcast! And get more exclusive content from Buck at BuckSexton.com.


Subscribe to Buck on YouTube: https://bit.ly/2UNT1Or


Find Buck on:

Twitter @BuckSexton  

Facebook @BuckSexton 

Instagram @BuckSexton 

Email the show: TeamBuck@IHeartMedia.com

Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.com

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Mark as Played
Transcript

Episode Transcript

Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Welcome to the Freedom Hut. This is the best of
Buck Daily podcast, the top stories of the day from
the Buck Sexton Show. For more Buck, head to buck
Sexton dot com and remember to subscribe to the podcast.
Welcome everybody. We are in the final countdown. Oh yes, indeed,

(00:20):
Election day just days away, almost one week almost, Look
the final week of this. I've got to say, the
very end here has been moving quickly. The opening phases
of this felt like an eternity, and really I just
I just hope that we have a good outcome. But
let's get into what matters right now and the center

(00:42):
of the debate over all this stuff. Now, I know
last week there was a ton of time spent on
Hunter Biden's laptop and also the prep for the debates.
How many of you even remember much of the debates?
I can tell you, I have to think pretty hard.
I can pull some aspects of it, Pennsylvania fracking, vulnerability
at Biden now has There are some areas for sure

(01:04):
that I think the President scored some points, but as
we know, look at the polls didn't really move the
needle very much. And we're now in these last days
where I think everyone's starting to focus in on a
couple of things and hopefully they get it. The economy
and COVID. That's it, in my opinion, that's what's going

(01:25):
to determine this race. It's amazing that that immigration is
barely even discussed at all. It's barely even an issue.
Healthcare ties into COVID in the economy. But if you
look at other major areas of decision point here, if
you look at other places where people are still deciding,

(01:46):
the fact that the president hasn't started any new wars,
the fact that the president has gotten these peace deals
in the Middle East, that's not going to be the
final the final straw that either that's him for four
more years or is the reason Joe Biden is victorious,
which I even saying it out loud, it makes me

(02:08):
kind of sad. But I think the COVID is the
most important narrative in the country right now for politics
and this election. And I don't think that I'm alone
on this one, but I do believe that there needs
to be a much bigger, a much bigger focus on
what is reality and what is just a lie. The
United States is about to go into another series of

(02:30):
it already has some lockdowns in places, but it's going
to go into another round of restrictions, lockdowns, whatever you
want to call it, to try to stop a virus
that plainly these restrictions cannot stop. It did not work
the first time around. It just ripped through areas until
the virus was done. That's what happened in New York,
in New Jersey, that's what happened in the South. That's

(02:51):
happened in a lot of places across the country. But
we forget all those lessons, or we're forced to forget
all of those lessons. And I think a part of
that it's just the media recognizes that by making us
all depressed and terrified and frightened, we're likelier to vote
for change. It's more, it's a greater possibility that Donald

(03:13):
Trump will not get four more years if the American
people feel like the country is in really bad shape
and terrible things are happening because of COVID. I mean,
this is all pretty obvious. You get this, but you're
starting to see just how far the look willing to
push us. And also there's a an increasingly obvious, I

(03:36):
would say joy maybe certainly desire to continue these restrictions
in Democrat states. They like all this control. They like
this forced collective action. This is exactly what you're seeing
now around COVID. Is exactly what the Democrats want. For
the war on climate change, for the war on fossil fuels,

(03:59):
for war on gun violence, right, all these things, they
want collective action in it that is inescapable, that is
forced by the state on you even if you don't
want it, and that is able to dictate even the smallest,
most minute aspects of your life. This is really a

(04:20):
dream come true. The power that they have in these
lockdowns is a dream come true for Democrats. They haven't
had anything like this in a very long time. During
the Global War on Terror, which was the last period
when the country felt like it was frightened and perhaps
more willing to give up its civil liberties than it
should have. During that period of time, Democrats were I

(04:43):
won't I mean, I could take a shot here and
say they're on the side of the terrorists, but that's
not really fair. But Democrats were always opposing the more
severe measures to fight the Jihadis and al Qaeda and
all of that. They were the dissenting voice. Not because
I think they have a problem of that. As we know,
in Barack Obama was the president, he was the guy

(05:05):
using the drones more than anybody else and just deciding
who would live and who would die in the battlefield
as an executive order. But the Democrats now are in
the position where they have put themselves as the arbiters
of everything you can and can't do in day to
day life. And they really like this. They enjoy this

(05:26):
and that and that your virtue, your worth as a
human being now is measured socially and by those around
you by your willingness to obey these dictates. This is
a massive change. This is a big problem. This is
not something that is just going to fade out on
its own. We're going to have to fight against this.

(05:47):
And if you want to know how absurd, how insane
it's going to get California. Why is it the most democrat,
most blue place, most blue state in the country, has
the craziest COVID restrictions. Oh, not a surprise at all. Right,
we all recognize that that's what we would have we
would have expected. But the new Thanksgiving rules, I know

(06:11):
we're about to go into Halloween here, but Thanksgiving will
be soon thereafter. The new Thanksgiving rules that have been
explained by Gavin Newsom out in California should show you
a glimpse into our future if we get a bid
the administration, and you will add the insanity at the

(06:32):
state level around COVID to insanity at the federal level.
They're telling you very openly that these are the plans
that they have, right. I mean, here's doctor Fauci himself
saying we want a federal national mask mandate. Play five. Well,

(06:52):
you know, one of the issues that people that talk
about mandating not be a good idea because then they'll
say they have to enforce it, and this to be
a difficulty enforcing it. But if everyone agrees that this
is something that's important and they mandated, and everybody pulls
together and say, you know, we're gonna mandate it, but
let's just do it, I think that would be a

(07:13):
great idea to have everybody do it uniformly. One of
the issues, though, I get the argument say, well, if
you mandate a mask, then you're gonna have to enforce it,
and that'll create more of a problem. Well, if people
are not wearing masks, then maybe we should be mandated
do you hear that little little hint of authoritarian glee
in his voice, there, doctor Fauci. This guy has been

(07:35):
a public health bureaucrat for decades, pretty much self paced,
self assessed work. You know, just show up, can't really
get fired, just do your thing, just be around forever.
I mean, this guy's almost eighty, right, and he's been
in the job for decades. And now he's like, yeah,
I think we should mandate. Does he know what a
mandate means. It means that police officers are going to

(07:57):
walk up to people what outside, No, oh, oh, yes, outside,
We're not sure, probably going to be outside When inside
doesn't work, meniga doesn't stop the virus because it won't,
then what will they do? Oh, well, you're not wearing
masks enough. You got to do it outside too. You're
gonna have police to help people put on a mask
or what Or we're gonna physically remove you. We're gonna arrescue,

(08:19):
We're gonna lay hands on you. They realize that they're
gonna be telling ninety nine percent of the people that
they tell to wear a mask are healthy post no
risk to anyone. See, this is the is the inversion
of judgment and logic and decency that has occurred in
this country. Now. It used to be health policy was about, yes, assisting,

(08:40):
but also separating the sick from the healthy when possible.
What we've done is separated everybody. Now this is just
nuclear option. And this was considered madness in the public
health community until this year. This wasn't some new idea.
They studied pandemics, they study the chance of the massive
exponential spread of an aerosolis virus like COVID nineteen. They said,

(09:04):
we can't do these lockdowns. Now, they can't get enough lockdowns.
And here's doctor Fauci, who this guy's been elected to nothing.
I mean, if Trump wins, you know what he should do,
He should fire Fouci. The next day out gone bring
me somebody who understands the balance between liberty and public

(09:28):
health and order. Bring me somebody that understands that there
are costs here. Just over the weekend I saw a
piece in Canada, in Ontario in the Ontario Star talking
about how doctors there are signing the alarm for all
of these cancers that are showing up now that our
late stage that should have been caught earlier, but people

(09:49):
weren't going in for cancer screenings. Now people are gonna die. Yeah,
that's right. Now you could say, oh, buck, we needed
to do that to save lives from COVID. Not clear
at all that the lockdowns actually save any lives. Remember
the initial premise it was fifteen days to flatten the curve.
That just meant spread out instead of getting let's say,

(10:12):
giving this easy numbers, instead of having one hundred cases
in ten days and not being able to get people
to healthcare they need, you have a hundred cases over
twenty days or thirty days. Right, that's what flattened the curve.
Is we have transitioned as a society because of the
media's anti Trump insanity and because Democrats and the left

(10:34):
are a bunch of busybodies who want to tell everybody
what to do all the time, and believe in the
mob mind ruling over society, that you don't have individual rights,
that your freedom is all just at the whim of
the state, and they want to control the state. But
we've now switched to a world in which we're supposed
to just kill this virus off entirely by doing everything.

(10:55):
They say, this is madness, But how bad is it?
How bad is it? Well, here an example other than
Fauci's saying mandated, which means people should get arrested now
for now, healthy people. Let's let's really explicitly get into this.
Healthy people in this country should be under federal mandate
and be threatened with loss of property and imprisonment for

(11:17):
not putting a paper or cloth mask over their mouth,
even with the very real outstanding questions about how effective
is this really? Could you mandate everybody have to wear goggles?
Why not? Why not just on the on the say
so of the state. Do they know? They don't know
how how easily gets transmitted to your eyes. They know

(11:40):
that the eyes are an area of transmission for viruses
in general, but they don't know. You're also seeing a
lot of people that I know who have who are
sound thinkers on this issue. Understand they are great doctors.
They're crap doctors. There are things that doctors know about
health and can really help you with. There are things
that are, you know, way beyond their ability. Any of

(12:01):
you go into a doctor and say, you know, I
have back pain or I have IBS, and see what
they say to you. They don't have some fix in mind, right,
They have ideas and modalities, and they might be able
to help some Again, good doctors, yes, but a lot
of doctors will be like, yeah, I don't know, you know,
take a pill or see what happens, or you know,
cut these twenty things out of your diet. There's all

(12:22):
kinds of things they don't really understand. And when you've
been exposed to that enough, you realize that you've got
to take control of your own health. You've got to
take control of your own risk. How insane though, have
the libs? How brainwashed have the libs gotten during this
COVID period? What do you think your Thanksgiving should look
like this year? Well, let me stop for a moment

(12:42):
and tell you about what the governor of California, you,
Gavin Newsom, And I'm sure soon you're gonna hear this
from other governors as well, like Cuomo in New York.
What does the Democrat governor of California think your Thanksgiving
should look like? Thanks for listening to the best of
buff Daily podcasts. Get more book by following him on
social media at buck Sexton on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram,

(13:05):
and don't forget to visit Bucksexton dot com. Thanksgiving is
one of the best holidays, a lot of food, family,
friends gathering together. It's a good holiday. I like Thanksgiving
a lot. Top three for sure. Okay, maybe top four,
but not in California. If you're going to listen to
the people that are now using the power of the

(13:26):
state to make healthy people obey because of the fears
of people who read too much New York Times, watch
too much CNN and can't just go about their lives
as adults who understand their risks and they should take
their own make their own decisions, their own mitigation measures.
You see, by holding us all in this forced state

(13:49):
of panic, the people that are unwilling to make sound
decisions about their own health force all of the rest
of us to be in a position where we have
to act like we agree with them and their way
is the only way. That's bad news. And here's a
great example of it. There are new California Department of

(14:13):
Public Health guidelines. Just wait and they'll start finding people
and they'll build demand you do this guidelines for COVID nineteen.
And you know, for example, they're telling people that for Thanksgiving,
no more than three households allowed to gather and you
masks must stay on after eating and drinking, and preferably

(14:36):
done in between bites. Yeah, that's right. Singing or shouting
strongly discouraged. Keep a social distance, maintain high hand hygiene,
limit the gathering to two hours or less. I mean,
I really want to tell all of these lockdown libs.

(14:59):
I want to only four letter words in my feelings
about one how of it they are, how nonsensical all
of this is. And I'm not saying that there's not
a risk of COVID. Yeah, if someone in your family
gets COVID, there is. There is definitely a risk. But
there's a lot of risks from a lot of things,
and putting these restrictions in place from the government doesn't

(15:23):
really help anybody, and it makes things in many ways
a lot worse. The number of people who are scared
beyond rational, beyond rational bounds here is enormous in this
country because the media has made everybody terrified because this
is their only chance. Don't you see. This is how
they have Joe Biden beating Donald Trump. It's the only way.

(15:44):
Joe Biden's a loser. Joe Biden's not impressive, not very bright,
not very good in anything. He's just kind of a
pathetic Democrat machine politician who is just hoping that he
gets just like he got real lucky by being picked
by I'm going to be VP. He's open to get
real lucky right now and be President of the United States.

(16:04):
The only reason is because of COVID. Without COVID, Donald
Trump sails to reelection. We all know it. So digging
in on this issue and letting everybody understand what's really
at stake here is absolutely essential. I know there are
going to be other shows and we'll do well. I'll
do a little bit. I'm an update on the Hunter
Biden stuff today. Fine, but this matters more, I'm telling you,
And people get mad at me when I say this.

(16:26):
The Hunter Biden emails are not going to cost Biden
the election. If I'm wrong, you know, I'll eat Crowe.
But the Hunter Biden emails are not going to do it.
Who do the American people think will bring us out
of this COVID nightmare faster and better? That's all that
matters for the election. That's it. And of course that

(16:48):
means the economy, and it means they're freedoms, and it
means a lot of things. But that is the choice
that people are faced with right now, and I think
that we've lost a little bit of time in making
the case. Here's a cent here's an ascent point. Biden's
plan for dealing with COVID is rooted in magical thinking.
That's completely illogical that two hundred thousand deaths are on

(17:12):
Donald Trump's shoulders. What about what's going on in France
and Italy and Germany and the rest of the world,
where they've in many cases had more per capita deaths
than we've had. Is Trump responsible for all of those
two There was never a plan to stop this virus.
It's not possible to stop this virus, and yet that's
what Biden is offering to people. This is completely false,

(17:36):
hope right. The real way is to stop terrifying everybody.
Let people start to go back to normal life who
are at lower risk and build up her immunity over time,
and get some vaccines out there and just go back
to living. That's the choice. Do you want Biden dictating
what you can do, whether you can leave your house,

(17:56):
or do you want to have your life back? That's
what this election is about. You're in the freedom hunt.
This is the best of Buck Daily Podcast. To the
tough stories of the day from the Buck Sexton Show. Okay, team,
what is the latest with these Hunter Biden emails, the
investigation into Biden family corruption, and also what's going on

(18:18):
in the absolutely pivotal state of Ohio just days before
this election. We got Congressman Jim Jordan with us now
to answer these questions. Congressman, thanks for thanks for being
with us. Good to be with you, Buck. So the
Hunter Biden emails a lot of attention on the right
for this last week came up in the debates. Nothing
really all that memorable in the exchange from at least
what the what the polls afterwards showed working about should

(18:42):
we expect more? And is this gonna matter? Well, it
should matter, but you know the mainstream press won't, won't
report it, and even though it's handful, who will Twitter
and Facebook sensor it? But I mean the facts are
not in question. I mean, we have the drop slip
Hunter Biden signed adoptions up when he drop the laptop
off of days story in Delaware. We have the Director

(19:03):
of National Intelligence and the FBI both saying this is
not Russian disinformation. We have an eyewitness who says the
laptop is real the emails are real, and that the
one email which reference is the Big Guy is in
fact a reference to the Vice president. And oh that
same that same eyewitness has actually met with Vice President Biden.
So the facts are not in question whatsoever. But again

(19:25):
the mainstream press won't report it. I think the American
people are are figuring this out, and it is going
to have an impact on the election. It's going to
help President Trump woin how would it be possible for
because the Joe Biden connection to Hunter Biden's activities, that
seems to be the place where there would be real
political vulnerability, right. That's that's straight up corruption, And I'd
also wonder how that could be legal. It feels like

(19:48):
we're not going to find out before the election if
there is some connection there because of the the financial
investigation that would have to go on, and who's even
going to do that? But could we find out, I mean,
you know, your committee, could you guys actually get that information.
It'd be tough because you know, Jerry Nadler is not
gonna not gonna want to do what Republicans is gonna
want to do on our committee. But um, frankly, it

(20:10):
sort of raises the question, why didn't Why wasn't this
looked into earlier? I mean, Chris Rays had this laptop
for a while. Why just now interview the business partner,
mister Bob o Lensky, Why just now start to look
into it? Uh, you know, why didn't Chris Ray look
into this earlier? But frankly, it's sort of a pattern

(20:31):
with the head of the FBI because remember it took
it took Rick Ronelle to release the transcripts of these
people who told us that there was nothing there, no
Russian colusion on that issue. So, um, that to me
is a is a big question that I think needs
answered as well. Be nice, if nice, if decidic. Maybe
mister Grassli or mister Johnson would ask Christopher Ray that
question in front of a committee at some point here

(20:52):
soon talking to Congressman Jim Jordan of Ohio. Uh, Congressman,
the you know, the FB eye director. There's at least
some reporting saying that the president may choose to very
soon after, assuming he's reelected, ask for a resignation. Would
you support I mean, let's just call it what it is.
Would you support the firing of FBI Director Christopher Ray? Well,

(21:15):
that's that's totally up to If that's what the presidents
to do, of course I'd support it. But that's the
president's call, and you know, we'll see what he decides.
I think the president is going to get re elected.
I think there's a chance this thing could break in
a big way for the president. If that happens, I
think you're going to see us keep the Senate and
regained the House. You know, all the energies on our side.
I said to I said earlier today, when's the last

(21:35):
time you saw a Biden vote parade or any Biden
parade out there? So, um, I think the energy is
on our side. But if what what the president decides
to do with this cabinet is totally the president's call,
I will say this what I said earlier. I'm surprised
that you know, it took Rick Rnell to get this
information that was critically important that seemed to me the
FBI director could have given us years ago. Uh. The

(21:56):
FBI director has had Hunter Biden's laptop now for months
and and hasn't done done squat with it. So um,
you know, but but whether these stays or goes, that's
the presidence call. Uh. Congressman. Also want to ask you
about the Durham probe, which I was skeptical would be
finished and or would matter before the election, based on
just my knowledge of the federal bureaucracy, having been a

(22:16):
federal bureaucrat myself. What happened with the Durham probe, Congressman, Well,
I mean part of it was, um. You know, during
the early days of the coronavirus lockdown, the Grand Jury
wasn't meeting, so that did slow things down. But I
am as frustrated as I think all Americans because look,
I've been I've been on this issue for three years.
And three years ago, Buck, there was just a handful
of us in the Congress who were looking at it.

(22:37):
There were just a handful of you guys in the
press who were looking at it. And it was kind
of a lonely place, and we took a lot of
heat for it. But it turned out we were right, um,
that this was a this was a complete hoax, Um,
And we were hopeful that Bill Barr would do uh,
that this would be done this summer. And remember if
Bill Barr told us in the spring that there would
be something this summer, and yet here we are in

(23:00):
the fall and still nothing now eight days before an election.
But I think part of the reason that was slowed
down was the coronavirus. In the end, people need to
be held accountable because if they're not, if they can
do this to a president, if they can do this
to a three star general Michael Flynn, imagine what they
can do to you and I. And that's that's something
I've said repeatedly. But that's the part that scares me
the most, and that's the main reason why you need

(23:21):
to hold people accountable who were engaged in this ridiculous behavior.
Speaking of Congressman Jim Jordan of Ohio, Congressman, the battle
for the House, people are saying is going to be
well right now, at least the pole seemed to be
favoring Democrats. You seem confidence in the other direction. I
know that you can't see the future, but I want

(23:41):
your analysis of what you think the future will be
next week when it comes to who's going to be
in control and whether we have to go through more
time with Nancy Nancy Pelosi, a Speaker of the House,
tell me it's not going to be so ac Conressman,
I hope not. And look the energy is on our side.
As I said, you know, if you if you didn't
see all these crazy calls out there and you were
just looking at enthusiasm, energy stuff. You see with your

(24:03):
own eyes these parades, these these Bowl parades, everything else,
and all the energy at presidents rallies, you would swear
President Trump's gonna win in the landslide. So I think
the President is going to win. As I said, I
think there's a chance it could. It could break big
in our direction. If that's the case, then we're going
to take back the House. And the other thing that
helps us is we've got great candidates. You know, in
the end campaigns, it's still elections are a lot largely

(24:25):
about who the candidate is. And we have recruited, particularly
a lot of women conservative candidates who I think are tremendous.
I've raised a lot of money for the House Freedom Fund,
and we have went out and recruited conservative candidates like
Yvette Harold in New Mexico, like Genie Ives in suburban Chicago.
Some some good candidate this Lauren Bobert, this wonderful candidate

(24:47):
in Colorado. So we got good candidates out there. Kevin
McCarthy's done a good job of raising the money as
well for our team. I think there's a chance if
this thing breaks big for the president, which I think
is U couldn't tack, happen. Tell us before I let
you go, Congressman, your confidence that the great state of
Ohio is gonna go red once again, absolutely critical. It

(25:09):
feels like without Ohio we don't get four more years
at Trump. It's gone to Yeah. I mean, look, it
feels just like sixteen in some ways better than sixteen.
And in twenty sixteen, the President won Ohio by eight
and a half, and I feel like the same dynamics
in place to happen this time. I think he's gonna win,
and he deserved the fuck. No one has done. No

(25:30):
one has done more of what they said they would
do than this president. Remember he said he said he
would cut taxes. He did. He said he'd reduced regulations,
he did. He said he build the wall, he did.
He said he would have a growing an had the
best economy before the virus, and now it's coming back.
He said. He said he'd get out of the randal.
He did. He said he put the embassy in Jerusalem.
He did. He said he would take on China, and
he did. He said he would put out a list
of people he would select from to put on the

(25:50):
Supreme Court, and he did. Justice Justice course is Justice
Cavanall and now today Justice Cony Barrett. So this guy
has done more of what he said he would do
than any president in our lifetime. And I think Indian
the American people recognize that, and that's why they're going
to real up. Congressman Jim Jordan, everybody. Congressman, thanks so much.
We'll talk to you soon. Take care. Brother. Thanks for

(26:11):
listening to the Best of Buck Daily podcast. For more Buck,
head to buck Sexton dot com and remember to subscribe
to the podcast. The sixteen minutes interview is out, friends,
and watch the whole thing. Just because I wanted to
give a nice reminder to myself as we go in
to actually cast our ballots here, nice reminder of just

(26:35):
how fake the fake news really is. I mean, what
a bunch of frauds they actually are. That's what I
want us all to know. And I also raised some
questions for me, like what does it take to become
a sixty minutes correspondent? And you just gotta be is
it like Biden? You just gotta be around forever and
never want to give up power, never want to stop
hoarding the productive positions and resources of society. You know, me, me, me,

(26:58):
until you get to be one hundred? Is that? Is that?
How it? We're I just wber was wondering, Leslie Stall,
what does this person know about anything? You know? What? Well,
what exactly am I supposed to be impressed by? Here?
She it's it's she has the presentation. It's kind of
like a poor man's Barbara Walters? Is that it? Or
maybe Barbara Walters a poor man's Leslie Stall. I don't know,

(27:18):
but you know this, uh, this sort of grand dame
of the mainstream news or whatever? What is? You know what?
It says Katie Kurriic. But she was younger. I'm trying
to think that there's a few others that are in
this category too, But well, why does anyone listen to them?
What do they do that makes someone think, oh, yeah,
you know what? I really care about? What the what

(27:40):
the Leslie Stall questions are in this one? Anyway, I'm
I'm not surprised at all. We see what happened. I
think they put up a full interview now because Trump
was threatened to put up the full interview, and it's
a good thing that he did, because what you see
is that Leslie stall was It's just horrible. The whole
thing was awful. Every question is some is an attack

(28:02):
on the president. She doesn't ask him, you know, what
have you done that's positive about COVID and what would
you do in the future. She says, how do you
feel about the fact I'm paraf You know, I'm giving
you a version here, an exaggeration or whatever. But it's
it's some some type of why are you the worst

(28:25):
ever at dealing with COVID? Please discuss right? It always
starts from a position of negativity toward the president. He
picks up on this. He's very he's very aware of it.
And here you go. Here's here's what President Trump says
to her play too. Yeah, I wish you would interview
Joe Biden like you interview me. It would be so good.

(28:47):
You know what I thought? I thought, But when I
watch him walk out of a store and he's walking
with a ice cream and the question the media asked
him what kind of ice cream? What flavor? Screamed you have?
And he's in the midst of a scandal. He's not.
He's taking of course, Helie, of course he is. It's

(29:08):
the biggest, second, biggest scandal. So the biggest scandal was
when they spied on my campaign. They spied on my campaign.
There's no real evidence of that, of course there is.
It's all of the place, Leslie. They spy on my campaign,
and they get Can I say something? You know, this
is sixty minutes and we can't put on things. We

(29:28):
can't pay because it's bad for Biden. We can't things
we can't very Leslie. They spied on my campaign. We
can't totally verified it's been Just go down and get
the papers. They spied on my campaign. They got caught. No,
and then they went much further than that, and they
got caught and you will see that, Leslie, and you
know that, but you just don't want to know. As

(29:50):
a matter of fact, I don't know that. So what
does she know? Has she been asleep for the last
four years? What do we call the Attorney General of
the United States City attorney General said that there was
spying on the campaign. The highest law enforcement officer in
the United States. Yes, there was spying on the Trump campaign.
Remember that the whole Bill Barr, Oh my gosh, he

(30:12):
said spying, and he goes, yeah, it's called spying. That's
what happened. Does she not know that we can't verify,
We can't put things on that we can't verify. This
is a this is a new a new trick, a
new tool in the fake news media tool kid, where
they just when they don't want to talk about something,

(30:33):
they pretend that you can't really verify. And this really
does go to what you'll have with with the most
extreme conspiracy theorists. Here's a really easy way for conspiracy
theorist to argue everything. You know. I'll say, guys, come on,
you know, the country wasn't foundered by founded by you know,
lizard people from the planet Zargon. The country was actually

(30:56):
founded by the founding fathers George Washington say, yeah, were
you there? Do you do you show me a photograph?
Do you know what proof do you have? And normal
people understand that this is insane, but Democrats do a
version of this. Now, Oh well, we can't report on
the Hunter Biden emails because we haven't we don't have
the hard drive ourselves, or we can't verify that it's

(31:18):
not Russian disinformation. Well, then try your job is to
verify things, like, what do you mean you can't verify this?
But the Democrats did this as well. It's it's deeply
intellectually disingenuous, but this is what they do. The Democrats
did this. You remember with under the Obama administration when
there were a lot of mass casualty terror attacks that

(31:40):
would happen. Remember all those ISIS inspired attacks. San Bernardino massacre,
the Pulse nightclub mass shooting, mass murder. There were these
big attacks that happened, and the people who did them
in the case of a Pulse Nightclub was like guy
Omar Martin, He's on the phone, He's like, I am
doing this for I'm doing this for Jihad and for Allah.

(32:02):
And then the Obama FBI. This should have been a
big tip off, right, Oh, the FBI. Yeah, was the
Obama FBI. The Obama FBI redacted parts of the transcript
for things like I pledge allegiance to redacted. Why we
all know he's saying, you know, I am doing this
in support of my brothers and sisters in redacted, and

(32:26):
they would do this thing if we may never know
the real motive. Remember that game. We may never know
the real motive. Okay, well we'll really really extrapolate that
one out. Really go with that for a minute. Can
you ever really know the real motive? Can you know
the real motive? If somebody confesses on video and says
I did this because of you know, X, Y, and Z,

(32:49):
maybe they're lying. Doesn't matter what proof you have. You
can't get inside that person's head. You can never know
the real motive. But notice they only do this when
they don't want to talk about radical Islam and jihad.
Because the Obama administration was running around bowing to the
Islamic world begging forgiveness for all of the bad stuff
America has done. You remember that, So then it didn't

(33:11):
look good when they were coming. When they were inspired,
i should say, within our own country to murder their
fellow human beings in the name of a political entity
known as Isis. That was a bunch of head chopping
women raping evil murderers who all deserve to die in
a pink misted courtesy of the United States Military. Thank
you very much for those men and women serving who

(33:32):
were part of that effort. So you can always play
this game. We may never know the real motive and
Leslie Stall sixteen minutes correspondent, we can't verify that. Well,
if you're going to say that there's such a thing
as Russian disinformation, that looks at Russian disinformation that plants
the laptop, gets to you know, gets to Hunter Biden's
private photos, learn knows all of his contacts, puts all

(33:56):
the EMA. I mean, yeah, you could always say, oh,
it's a super deep fake. This is like people are
talking about moon landing stuff, right, Oh, it's it's all
a deep fake. Usually you laugh at them. The Democrats
are now the actual conspiracy theorist, you see when they
have facts and evidence that goes against here's Leslie Stall.
We can't verify it. We can't verify your campaign with
spied on, Okay, other than the mountains of evidence provided

(34:20):
by congressional investigation as well as by the Attorney General
of the United States, who also stated openly that yes,
there was spying. Can't verify that. Though she makes it
sound like we're not going to air that on TV.
She's a partisan lib imbecile, but she plays her part.
You know, it probably makes two three million dollars a

(34:41):
year to show up there and it's not a very
good interviewer. Another part of this just not very good
at this. That's one thing that I've always found so interesting.
I mean, Brian Stelter, I'll never forget this guy. The
one time he had me on his show, he tried
to come at me. This is when I was a
scene uncontributed years ago. Try to come at me on
some issue of terrorism. How I knew that something was

(35:01):
radical Islam versus you know it was actually a version
if we may never know the motive. Brian Stelter wanted
to ambush me on a show about we may never
know the motive. Then it's like, okay, Brian, I actually
have expertise in this area and got about fifteen or
twenty IQ points on you, so good luck with this one.
And he looked very foolish in the interview. They never
even told me. They just cut it out of the show.
It was a pretake. They just cut it out of
this It was on a Friday, they cut it out

(35:22):
for Sunday. But I also remember this guy. I had
never seen anyone at that point who had his own
show on cable news, with the exception of Ronan Farrow,
who looked like, you know, a lost kindergarten, are like,
I've got by a show assad BC. I've never seen
somebody with such unbelievable lack of TV skills, basic TV skills,

(35:45):
reading off a prompter, interviewing, asking questions. Who had their
own show, their own show on cable news. It was remarkable, right,
that was Brian Selter. There are others like that too.
Who the moment they don't have a staff of I
mean some of these CNN shows have twenty thirty people
working on the staff, you know, sending them research, writing
all their questions or whatever. The moment that's gone, all

(36:07):
of a sudden, you go, is this person even very
well informed? Is this person particularly bright? The answers no,
but they've played the game. They do what they're supposed to,
and they rise. Anyway, it's all smoke and mirrors, friends,
There's so much of this in the mainstream media, so
much of this in the mainstream news divisions of all

(36:28):
these different networks. Basically, the elevation of highly self involved, narcissistic,
democrat dumbasses into positions where we're all supposed to go, oh, well,
they're the height of journalism. Yeah, you mean, like Dan
rather you mean like Brian Williams, you mean like Katie Kuric,

(36:49):
like Leslie Stall, any of these people impressive to you.
I'm just a just a lowly syndicated radio host man.
And on a general test of knowledge of politics or
anything else else, you know, these people would get smoked
right by yours. Truly, it wouldn't even be close. It'd
be embarrassing for them. Why exactly do we have to
listen to them? Why does sixty minutes get access to

(37:11):
the president because of the pomp and circumstance around the
storied sixty minutes. It's all just for show friends, It's
not real. It's no real ethics, no real integrity. And
you saw that with this Leslie Stall thing, and they
weren't going to air the whole thing, but they realized
what position, what chance did they have here? Trump and

(37:34):
all conservatives should do this. And it's a note for
me too. I always want to copy if I'm ever
going into hostile territory again, I want a copy of
the whole thing. Now. Bill Marshaw, for example, that's live,
so live is a little bit different. Live is live,
But if you're doing a taped interview, you absolutely have
to tape it yourself as a conservative, otherwise you get
the Daily Show treatment. But they do that to you

(37:56):
on actual news shows. Right. The Daily Show got away
with it because they were a left wing propaganda show
with jokes, but they'll do that to you in sixty minutes.
They'll cut it up, and they'll do this to every
Republican politician that did. The President himself, but he had
a copy of it, so they had to show us
the whole thing because otherwise their edited version versus the
actual interview would show what a bunch of frauds they are.

(38:18):
So they got caught, so they had to edit, and
they could not air it right that would look even worse.
So they put the whole thing out there. And Leslie
Stall looks like a cry baby left wing idiot idiot honestly,
no different in her political sensibility or awareness of the
world around her or sense of fairness. Then you know,
we might as well have had you know, Deborah Messing

(38:41):
or Suzanne what's her name, the one I can't even
remember her name, right, you know, the actress that's always
out there to all these idiot actresses that go out
there that are lecturing us on politics all the time,
especially of that generation. You know Jane Fonda. You might
as well have had Jane Fonda do this interview. It
would have been the same interview. Trump, Well, why don't
you stop making people you go to your rallies and

(39:05):
make them Why don't you make them wear masks? What
we're going to have mask mandate where we're going to
have people forcefully remove them from his rallies? Is that
really what's supposed to happen. Friends, The fake news media
thinks that if Biden wins, it's all going to go
back to normal. They don't understand. They have radicalized their
opponents in the media. They have radicalized the opposition. I mean, CNN.

(39:25):
The only thing that can be done now is to
nuke the site from orbit, so to speak, just to
be sure. There's no bringing these places back as they
currently are configured. You need massive overhauls of leadership, of talent,
of mission, all of it. These places are effectively enemy
combatants on the ideological battlefield, and that's not going to

(39:46):
change in a Biden administration. And we're not going to
forget that. This is the best of Buck Daily podcast,
The top stories of the day from the Buck Sexton Show.
For more Buck, head to Buck Sexton dot com and
remember to subscribe to the podcast. We're in a dangerous
tipping point right now. We're entering what's going to be
the steep slope of the curve of the epidemic curve.

(40:07):
We know what that looks like from the spring, we
know what looks like from the summer. These cases are
going to contain to build. There's really no backstop here.
I don't see forceful policy intervention happening anytime soon. We
have a moment of opportunity right now to take some
forceful steps to try to abate the spread that's underway.
But if we don't do that, if we miss this window,
this is going to continue to accelerate and it's going
to be more difficult to get under control. Now in

(40:29):
a lot of parts of the country, it doesn't feel
really really bad right now because it's a little bad everywhere.
We don't have regions where it's extremely dense in any
one region like we did when it was epidemic in
New York or epidemic in the South. Outside of states
like Wisconsin or Iowa, most states just have a lot
of spread. But most states aren't at the point where
they're extremely pressed right now. That's going to change over

(40:50):
the next two to three weeks. I think things are
going to look much more difficult, and so we need
to take some steps right now. There's no public support
for our shutdowns nationally like we did in the spring.
That's not going to happen. So we need to reach
for either measure. Yeah, Gottlieb, that's Scott Gottlieb. They're one
of the worst after Fauci. What are we supposed to do? What? Okay?

(41:10):
So no lockdowns? You know what they do now? They
demand all the all the restrictions of a lockdown, but
they say we're not locking down, you know, or they
give you, you you know, four out of five of the
things you need for a lockdown, but then they because
there's one thing you don't have, mandatory stay at home
orders for example, they say that's not a lockdown. No,

(41:32):
we are still under lockdown. There are you know? They
open New York City for twenty five percent dining, and
I can tell you I try to find a place
to eat. It's a joke. Restaurants aren't open. So so
what is that? That's just a talking point, you see,
without restaurants being able to open. They can't actually be

(41:52):
serving customers meeting unless they are actually going to have
people sitting in chairs, turning tables, doing what they need
to do to make this a business. They're just not opening.
But the people in charge are frauds, people like Cuomo
and the Blasio and Gavin Newsom and Gretchen Whitmer and
all these Democrats in Congress who are acting like they
demand the lockdowns, and then they blame Trump for the

(42:15):
economic fallout from the lockdowns that they demand, and then
pretend that they have an idea that's not lockdowns to
make all this better. What is the Biden plan for COVID?
Anyone who says listen to the scientists should punch himself
in the face. What does that even mean. We've been
listening to scientists all along, hasn't done anything, folks. Kurve

(42:38):
goes up, Kurve goes down, Kurve goes up, Kurve goes down.
Oh yeah, if we only had everybody just holding hand,
actually not holding hand, that's bad, right, But if you
had everybody in agreement, we would all just wear the
same dirty cloth mask that's porous and that air goes
above and below the actual mask itself as well as
gets blown through it. If we all just did that,

(43:00):
it would all go away. Really, Yeah, how's that? How's
that Danish study that was that was with the actual
scientific controls necessary to get a real answer. Oh, the
study they buried? The study they buried, right, I wonder why? Yeah?
How's all the other stuff that you can find on
the CDC website about the helpfulness of mask wearing an

(43:20):
influenza season, or the likelihood of a mask protecting you
if you walk into a room and you don't have
immunity to measles, if you wear a cotton mask, you
know how effective that's going to be for you? Nine ineffective. Okay,
that's what the actual studies say. But but but the
measles goes through the cloth and it stops it. Yeah, sure,

(43:42):
sure it does. But here we are, Gottlieb and others
are now saying, oh, if only you listen to us more,
everything would be better. Okay, what do you want us
to do? Not lockdowns? Just a lot of stuff that
sounds like a lockdown. Shutdown businesses, limit non essential travel

(44:02):
whatever that means, put curfews in place, the Mayor of Chicago,
Lori Lightfoot's actually come out and said that she wants
a ten pm curfew to apply to Chicago. Into Homes
play twenty. How will non essential businesses closing at ten pm?
How will that help get the numbers down? Well, this
is all about mitigating the risk of gatherings and making

(44:23):
sure that people wear their masks. So we're trying to
do a series of mitigation efforts to look at the
places where we know that the risk is highest, for
example in bars, and mitigate against that risk. But the
other thing that we are trying to also do, and
it's difficult to break through, is people are getting comfortable
in their homes and are having social gatherings. Those are

(44:46):
a huge source of the spread. So it's not just
what you do outside of your home, it's also what
you do inside your home and making sure that you
don't invite people in that are not part of your
immediate family or otherwise ESSENTI to be there, like a
home care worker or something along those lines. That's where
we're really seeing the spread. The case investigations a contract

(45:08):
tracing is pointing to home social settings as the primary
area of risk. Now, who can go to your home.
Now that's the business of the state, and who you
socialize with, as we know from the news and restrictions,
how long you have family members over after two hours
you got to send everybody home. Is there any signs

(45:28):
for that we have reached a level of stupidity here
that we really need to confront head on. Do you
know how much it would how much it would help
the country, how many billions of dollars we would save,
how many people would would live in extra ten or
fifteen years if, oh, if we just banned refined sugar

(45:50):
a lot. Oh, by the way, anyone who knows anything
about diet and obesity and what's happened to this country,
you would save thousands and thousands and thousands of if
you're treated sugar like it was a you know, Schedule
one controlled substance, right, you can't sorry, no more, no
more sugar added in anything. You'd save a lot of
you'd stop type two diabetes, you'd stop obesity, well not

(46:12):
all of it, but a huge piece of it. Why
don't we do that because it's not the business of
the state. Because a lot of people can have sugar
and they're fine. Most people have sugar and they're fine,
so we don't restrict everybody else from being able to
have a food product. They want to restrict you from
having a life. They want to restrict you. And it's
not like for a week or two. That's how they

(46:32):
got us. They let they made us concede our rights
for two weeks. Okay, we'll be reasonable, two weeks. We
can all do two weeks. Now it's eight months, right,
with a little bit of ups and downs in terms
of the severity of the restrictions during that period. Now
it's going on eight nine months, and they're saying masks
and social distancing for all of next year too. That's
the Democrat way. Do you think the lever admit that

(46:54):
this was all completely ineffective and just made everybody miserable
and ruined everybody's year, and ruined everybody's business and did
all these things, And they're just a bunch of morons
who panicked and didn't want to be blamed, so they
just kept on adding more and more of these little
petty restrictions on our lives. Do you think the people
that think that telling folks to mask up in between

(47:16):
bites of food are are intelligent enough to understand that
their policies are failing and that this means nothing and
all they're doing is making everything work. Kind of like
BLM made everything worse for everyone. These COVID restrictions are
just making everything worse. Oh, I'm sorry, it's it's stopping
the disease from spreading. Really is it's stopping the disease
from spreading. We had seventy I'm sorry, eighty thousand cases

(47:38):
and one day over the weekend. Europe has countries that
have per capita even more. I think Spain right now
is at fifty thousand, or maybe it's France fifty thousand
cases a day. And those countries are much smaller than
the US, you know, four or five times smaller in
the case of Spain. So what exactly are we doing here?

(47:59):
What's being accomplished by all this? Everyone's so scared, they
terrified everybody. They didn't admit they were wrong, and now
they continue to use that fear to push bad ideas
and bad solutions, and so Democrats can walk around like, oh,
we would have handled this just great. Even Hillary Clinton,

(48:20):
who as Secretary of State, could not point to anything
that she did that was worthwhile other than fly a
lot at taxpayer expense on a big fancy plane that
she's good at. But here she is saying that you
know she would have she would have made this whole
thing no problem at all. I mean, the Monday morning
quarterbacking on COVID that you're getting from people who don't

(48:43):
even understand how to play football in this analogy is
mind blowing. Here's Hillary play six And you noted that
a lot of countries that didn't best in the pandemic
were led by women. Whether it might just send our
darn Hangla Merkle. Do you think a woman president in
the United States who would handle the pandemic better? I

(49:03):
have no doubt, especially if it were me. No, I
mean I was born for that. I mean that's why
I knew i'd be a good president. I was ready
for crises and emergencies, and I would have done what
you see these women leaders doing. You listen to the science,
You bring in people in an open, inclusive way. You
communicate constantly. You make the case by explaining why what

(49:28):
you're doing is in the long term interest not only
of health but also of the economy. Yeah, I have
no doubt in my mind at all that I would
have stepped up to that crisis. So women are better
at dealing with COVID nineteen as a crisis than manage
Hillary Clinton's line here. Oh, and she's a woman in
Trump's not, so clearly she would have done better. Friends.

(49:52):
It's just it's just crazy times right now. There's no
accountability for these statements. When people say things like two
hundred thousand Americans are dead because of Trump, no one
ever stops in the media says, Okay, how many would
it be dead with a Hillary Clinton h zero? Does
anybody believe that fifty thousand, one hundred thousand, one hundred

(50:13):
and fifty thousand. It's a virus, friends, it's a virus
that spreads. We have not been able to stop it,
and they will not tell you the truth about the
ineffectiveness of the measures they've already instituted, and how much
this has led to an increase in all the things
that we said, along undiagnosed cancers, people dying from diseases,

(50:34):
of despair, now the increases and alcoholism. You know, I'm
just starting to see in the New York Times they're
adding they're adding some coverage now of how those of
us who said, like me back in August. Schools are safe,
children should be able to go back to school. There
is a completely acceptable level of risk, which is almost

(50:54):
no risk to K through twelve children from COVID nineteen.
The data one hundred proves that. But do you think
all the people they were like, oh my gosh, you're
gonna murder all the teachers and the teachers unions and
we wear our masks and all this stuff. Do you
think anything and said, wow, we were in hysterics for
no reason. That was really absurd. Nah, No, apologies none.

(51:19):
Do you think that they're sorry for the fact that now,
especially low income kids are falling even further behind. Remember
it's not even just in their test scores or anything
like that. In their overall development. Kids need to be
around other kids. Kids need to be interacting in the world.
We're locking kids up like their prisoners and telling them

(51:42):
a stericist scream, which is already way too much of
that going on anyway. And I swear if I have
if I see one more parent out in a public
place with their kids with their iPad out with no
headphones on, I feel like there should be a law
that I can just I can a common deer fancy
way of saying, steel their iPad until they promise to
get the kid headphones. I don't know when we decided

(52:04):
we were going to be barbarians and kids are gonna
be allowed to blast their video games in a public
place where there are other people who are trying to,
you know, think about what their life is up to
right now. And this is I know, a little bit
of a digression, but I swear I keep seeing this
and I look at them, Dude, do we just have
no manners anymore as a society. You know, that's that's fine.

(52:25):
Blast your iPad so that nobody can enjoy their meal,
or nobody can you know, be on a train or
a bus and have their own thoughts. R They have
to hear the video game that someone's you know, seven
year old is playing. But if you pull your mask
down in between bites of you know, between bites of
food and don't put it back on right away, you're
a murderer. They're turning us against each other with stupidity.

(52:46):
The statists, people who believe in government power above all else.
They're enjoying this whole process, and they're destroying our society.
They really are. They They're pulling us apart at the seams,
and it's all the takedown Trump. They're psychosis is such
a large part of this. The reason for their anger
and their fear is so much more result of Trump.
Actually that it is the virus. I know that's crazy,

(53:08):
but these people, these anti Trumpers, are nuts. They are nuts.
They have been brainwashed into a level of insanity that's
hard to comprehend if you're not also insane with Trump's
arrangement syndrome.
Advertise With Us

Popular Podcasts

Dateline NBC
Death, Sex & Money

Death, Sex & Money

Anna Sale explores the big questions and hard choices that are often left out of polite conversation.

Stuff You Should Know

Stuff You Should Know

If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.

Music, radio and podcasts, all free. Listen online or download the iHeart App.

Connect

© 2024 iHeartMedia, Inc.