All Episodes

September 24, 2020 106 mins

Season 4, Episode 186.


BLM fueled riots break out across the country once again, Rand Paul goes after Dr Fauci and Democrats are gearing up for their biggest smear campaign yet. Plus Julio Rosas and James Altucher join the show.


Please subscribe to the podcast! And get more exclusive content from Buck at BuckSexton.com.


Subscribe to Buck on YouTube: https://bit.ly/2UNT1Or


Find Buck on:

Twitter @BuckSexton  

Facebook @BuckSexton 

Instagram @BuckSexton 

Email the show: TeamBuck@IHeartMedia.com

Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.com

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Mark as Played
Transcript

Episode Transcript

Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:03):
You are entering the freedom much BLM riots in Kentucky
and across the country. Doctor Fauci versus doctor Paul on
Herd immunity and Democrats gear up for the biggest mere

(00:25):
campaign anyone's ever seen. Buck Sexton coding the news and
disseminating information with actionable intelligence. Make no mistake American, Great,
You're a great American again. This is the bucks Sexton Show.
Former CIA analysts can speak to three hours without a

(00:46):
phone call. Try doing that sometimes. No welcome friends to
the buck Sexton Show. Great to have you with me,
and no surprise is about what has happened in the
last twenty four hours. Yeah, sturing the show. I mentioned
to you that Brianna Taylor's a case had been decided
by a grand jury, and the Kentucky Attorney General gave

(01:10):
a lengthy statement about exactly how he came to the decision,
or rather how the grand jury came to the decision.
But he explained the law and how it applies here.
Let's just before I get into the riots and the
lunacy and the stupid Democrat commentary around this. All that
and the lies pile the top lies of the BLM

(01:32):
movement before I get let let's just make sure we
understand the facts as they are. These are the the
baseline things you must know before you can even really
have an opinion on the Brianna Taylor case, and certainly
before anybody could think they have a justification to protest
or even riot, although there's no justification for rioting over

(01:55):
this issue. And there are protests in Louisville, in New York,
you know, in Seattle, in Portland. I mean, there's this
is all over the place, right, all kinds of insanity,
people being intimidated, people being threatened on the street. But
let's just start with the facts. I think that's the
most helpful way to look at this problem. Today, police

(02:18):
were serving a legitimate warrant, and the police officers serving
the warrant weren't even the ones working the case before.
So their job was just to go in and affect
the arrest. That's it. They don't They weren't the ones
doing the investigation beforehand. There's no personal animist, there's no
we're gonna go get this person. They were just there

(02:38):
to affect and arrest. And when they and they knocked
on the door, it was not a no knock raid,
which we were told for months and which was a lie.
Now you could say, buck well, maybe that was a
good faith there. Why would every news outlet report that
it was a no knock raid before we knew whether
or not that was the case. Clearly, they just took

(02:58):
the side of Brianna Taylor's boyfriend in this, or they
believed him and assumed that it must be the police
who were lying, because the police upheld all or held
all along, that they were the ones who knocked, and
that there was nothing that they did in that process

(03:19):
that was unjust, that was wrong. Kenneth Walker was the
guy Brianna Taylor's boyfriends shot at police. So he opens
fire on the officers. Okay, he opens fire on the
officers Kenneth Walker, and they returned fire and they're shooting back,
and they don't hit Kenneth Walker. A police officer was

(03:43):
hitting the initial gunfire from Walker, but they hit Brianna Taylor.
Now there's also been the claim for many months now,
this goes back to March that Brianna Taylor was asleep.
So the story that people were told that the activists,
the anti cop movement out there BLM the Democrat media

(04:05):
CNN and CNN is a disgusting disgrace full of reckless morons,
and MSNBC's no better. But the story that people were
told all this time was that Brianna Taylor was asleep
in bed and was shot to death by cops who
did a no knock raid and they just bust in
and started shooting for no reason. That was the story

(04:28):
that people were told, and that that's spread all across
the country, and celebrities, even of the reach and stature
of Lebron James, made Brianna Taylor's case a huge cause.
Right look at Brionna, Look what happened to Brianna Taylor.
And people believe that what they initially were told about

(04:49):
this is still true. Now there must be a cover
up right now, there must be something else that's gone
on here. And it's very once you understand the facts,
it's very clear what did happen and what the real
assessment of the situation should be. It's a tragedy. It's
a tragedy. It was an accident. They were not trying
to shoot Brianna Taylor. This was caught in the crossfire.

(05:14):
That was That's what ended up happening here. Because you
can't shoot at cops that expect them not to shoot back.
I don't. I don't care how many so called lib
you know, they always get some former former you know,
sergeant from somewhere, some former law enforcement officer who somehow
just hates cops, you know, hates the police, and they
get tons of lawyers, you know, these ACLU types who

(05:36):
will go on air and all they want to do
is trash the police all the time. It doesn't matter
what they say about the right to self defense. Police
are going to defend themselves. I don't even care what
the regulations say. If you have a firearm and someone
is shooting at you, you're going to shoot back. You're
not going to sit there and wonder about maybe the

(05:58):
other person will miss because you don't want to have
to use your weapon. It's absurd. I understand. Why are
we even having this discussion. It's so obvious. Well, we're
having this discussion because there are people out there who
simply don't care what the facts and what the truth are.

(06:18):
We're having this discussion because there are people in the
police reform movement of the Democrat Party, and this is
a Democrat movement who even the examples you could point
to where you say, well, can't we all agree, can't
we all agree that law enforcements should be able to
defend themselves when shot, when fired at, when shot on.

(06:41):
And there are Democrats now who would say, no, we
can't all agree with that because of the legacy of
systemic racism in the police department, and maybe the cops
have to take a little extra care here and just
allow themselves to be put in lethal jeopardy, which is
never going to happen. But that's this is that this
is a deranged position, and we've been crawling toward this

(07:02):
for a while now. Remember it was that police officer
in Atlanta who wrestled the guy who was non compliant,
who fought the officers who resisted arrest, took one of
their weapons away, and then tried to use a taser
on the officer and as he turns to use a
taser in the officer with the officer fires, and they

(07:24):
claimed that this was a murder. No, No, you're supposed
to get tasered if you're a cop. You're supposed to
allow a perpetrator to use a less than lethal on
you and then hope that that perpetrator who is obviously
angry and full of adrenaline at that moment, doesn't decide

(07:45):
to take your side, or take your service weapon and
use it on you as a police officer and execute
you right there while you're helpless. That was what we
learned from the Atlanta case. We're a disgusting district attorney,
completely political, total hack, brought a murder charge against that officer.

(08:05):
Murder one. They could give that officer the death penalty.
That's how unjust the left is what it comes to
these issues. You see, the Left doesn't like police because
they don't want the mob. They don't want their emotional
rabble to be constrained by laws. They don't want people
to feel like they can't do whatever the mob demands

(08:28):
because there are people who stand in the way. There
are people who stand ready to, yes, do violence in
the name of the law so that you and I
can sleep soundly at night. Left doesn't like that. Meanwhile,
they'll use the force of the law for very minor transgressions.
Some of you may have seen the video of the
woman who was arrested at an outdoor baseball like little

(08:52):
league game, standing or sitting in the stands didn't have
a mask on, so they arrest her. Oh okay, people say,
well buck, no, they told her to put a mask on,
and then when she wouldn't, they said she's trespassing, and
then they arrested her. Okay, they arrested her for not
having a mask on. That's right. They took away her freedom.
They processed her because she didn't wear a mask outside,

(09:16):
and all the Libs will cheer for this. I hope
Fauci is proud of what he's done to this country.
That little moron. Yeah, I know I'm done with him.
I've been done with him for a while. But I'm
not even pretending to think this guy is I just
see the slimy bs arguments from him now all the time,
never admits all the catastrophically wrong things that have been
said by him in the past, and just continues to

(09:39):
make everybody feel like we have no future. We're gonna
have to keep wearing masks even after a vaccine. No vaccines, perfect,
gotta keep wearing masks. Probably multiple iterations of vaccines. Got
a social distance forever. I just want to tell Fauci,
go blank yourself. You don't know what you're talking about.
I don't care that you're the world's expert on this.
The world's expert didn't do a damn thing to help
us when this act she could have been slowed down

(10:01):
in the early days. You know, we turn around. We
asked the medical community give us, you know, oh, please
pass your wisdom to us from on high medical policy experts.
Oh wisdom like, let's get everybody on ventilators as fast
as possible. They're not going to tell you this right now,
but I know this from talking to other doctors. A
lot of lives could be saved. It could have been
saved they had just used oxygen masks instead of ventilators.

(10:24):
But I remember the whole push for Oh, Trump's not
using the Defense Production Act. Trump's not doing enough to
get the ventilators. No, now we got ventilators that we're
gonna have to turn into espresso machines. We got nothing
to do with them. Ventilators cause infection very quickly. They're
they're they're an absolute last resort. They're not men for
long for the long term usage of trying to keep

(10:44):
people breathing when they have this COVID problem, which is
why you know you went on the ventilator you'd a
fifty percent chance of dying on it. But the the
the top cast, the elites of the medical policy community,
they really, they really have been a great job. Heck
of a job you've done, Fauci. Heck of a job.

(11:05):
So back to Joe. Sorry, I'm particularly annoyed about that
today too. Back to Fauci, I'm sorry, I see. Back
to Brianna Taylor here. There was an injustice done yesterday,
and it was not the decision to forego murder charges
that the grand jury did not think there was a

(11:26):
There was a murder here and there wasn't. Obviously, shooting
at someone who's trying to shoot you and missing and
hitting somebody behind that person doesn't make you a murderer.
It makes you human. It means you made an error,
a tactical error under pressure that a lot of people
would make, even people who were trained. But there was

(11:48):
injustice yesterday. They're in fact, two injustices that I want
to talk to you about. Neither one of them have
to do with cops not being indicted for Brianna Taylor shooting.
You're in the Freedom Life. This is the Buck Sex
and Show podcast. It is shameful. What came out of

(12:11):
the Attorney General's office and the grand jury, not because
of grand jurors, but because we know that prosecutors craft
their own narrative. They can expand the number of witnesses
that go into a grand jury, or it can be
very narrow, and if there is an issue of fact
and law that still remains, individuals should have the right

(12:32):
to express their defense in a trial by their peers.
He did not do that. The Attorney Journal of Kentucky
did not do that. It is very obvious to us
that there was a grave injustice because did he call
the other witnesses who said they did not hear the
officers announced themselves? Were some of the officers in playing clothes?

(12:52):
So that if you're in the middle of the night
coming into a private home, which is another very sacred
place in America's hearts, America aren't in the middle of
the night playing clothes and people were sleep and they
could not see who you were. Did he not add
that narrative so that grand juris could understand what it means.
And then, let me just say this, it was a
defective warrant um just making stuff up at this point,

(13:15):
that's representative of Sheila Jackson Lee. Hyeah find witnesses who
didn't hear a thing. Well, the witness in the apartment
are joining because they were This was an apartment three,
and the person in apartment four heard the knock and
very clearly said I heard them say police open up
warrant or you know, police search warrant. So you can
find other people who didn't see something that that doesn't

(13:37):
that's not how proof works. Right. You can find someone
who's two blocks away from a shooting, did you see
the shooter? No, that's not that. That's meaningless. All that
matters is that there's a witness who heard this. It
doesn't matter that there are other people elsewhere who didn't
hear it. That that's not how evidence works. Unless they
were closer to the sound of the noise. But even then,

(14:01):
where were they? And oh, she knows better about the
investigation than the people that spent months doing this. Now
she's just making stuff up. This is just being a
sore loser because she wanted a political outcome here. That's
what Representative Jackson Lee wanted. She wanted people to be
prosecuted because there's anger, because there's anger among Democrats, because

(14:23):
there's anger within a segment of the black community over
this shooting. It is a tragedy. It's a sad thing.
Bad things do happen. Bad things do not equal somebody
goes on trial for murder. You know this is not
a complicated idea. But Democrats, when they can't get their way,

(14:43):
they'll pretend that they just can't comprehend. Well, I don't understand.
You know, this is terrible, This is such an awful
thing that they didn't what they thought there should be
a murder charge. Oh, I get it, you know, you
know what you really see. They just want to see
a cop here get charged and go through that and
be and maybe then when the verdict comes out, they'll

(15:04):
say well, you know, no, of course not. They when
the verdict happens then and it's not guilty, because the
cop is clearly not guilty, then they'll call for more
civil unrest, more riots. You know what the injustice was
that was done yesterday by the grand jury. It was
the decision to indict on three counts of wanton endangerment

(15:26):
because one officer, not even the one who shot fatally
Brianna Taylor, one officer fired rounds that went into a
neighboring apartment. Anybody who knows anything about ballistics understands that
that can happen. Okay, that's why it's such a it's
such a big deal when police have to pull their
weapons and use them. You know. So now it's you know,

(15:49):
by the way a bullet could go through a person,
depending on the caliber and the and the proximity, a
bullet could go through a person and hit a person
behind them. So so now you're gonna hold that person
accountable for that too. If there if it's a legally
justified use of force, you're expecting the perfect usage of force. No,
so what they did was put these three wanton endangerment

(16:13):
charges under Kentucky law against one officer who didn't kill Brianna.
He didn't even kill Brianna Taylor. Right, there's murder and
there's killing. Killing means you take someone's life. Murder is
you illegally and immorally take someone's life. He didn't do
either of those things. He just fired at her boyfriend,
who I've also got to say, people are banging at
your door at three o'clock in the morning, you just

(16:34):
start blasting, You just start blasting at them. I mean,
that's a risky thing to do, especially when it's very
possible their police, and especially when based on some of
the additional evidence here, it is still believed by law
enforcement that Walker was involved in the drug trade. Okay,
he thought it was drug dealers coming to rob him.

(16:56):
They just happened to be coming to that apartment to
rob him at three am. He just happened to be
the luck of the draw there for him. Let's use
let's use our heads, folks. But no, the injustice here
was the charging of one officer with three counts of
wanton endangerment as just an offering and offering to the
mob trying to buy them off. Here you go. We

(17:20):
won't let him off entirely. Guys. We know this was
a bad situation. But let's let's try to charge this officer.
He could theoretically go to prison for fifteen years for this, folks.
It's not a little thing. Three felony counts of wanton endangerment.
That's that's injustice. You don't charge somebody. You don't use

(17:41):
the power prosecutor's office to try to make the angry,
ignorant mob happier. That's not what you're supposed to do.
That's not that's not the system we live under. You know,
if they're gonna tell me that I can't in New
York City have you know two or three ar fifteens
and a couple of handguns and a you know, a
couple of shotguns, which is what I'd like to have

(18:01):
if I could. They're gonna tell me the under law,
I can't do any of those things. They be are
darnwell actually enforce the law as it's written. We keep
saying no. They want to defund police, and they want
to disarm you, and they want to punish people that
try to protect themselves. The injustice from the court yesterday
was charging an officer with anything, and then there was

(18:23):
a whole lot more injustice and it wasn't about the
non charging of officers. Thanks for listening to The bus
Essen Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcast, the
iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. I think
it's grossly and sufficient. It does not deal with the
fact that the light of Brianna tell Us was taken.

(18:47):
It does not address being a victim of being killed.
The value of a light is not at all addressed
in these charges. You could get in dangerment if you
shot in the air and nothing. He took a woman's life,
a woman who was in no way should have even

(19:10):
been in that situation because the person you were pursuing
was not there. She committed no crime. She'll only act
that night when she went to bed that night, and
she is dead. The indictment does not address the life.
When we save black lives matter, this indictment says it
does not matter. Reckless demagoguery from a man who has

(19:33):
excelled in that area and excelled its starting race riots too.
Stretching back for decades now, the Reverend Al Sharpton saying
that black lives do not matter because of this, because
of this decision from the court. That's his claim. I
heard other commentators saying the same thing. That they love

(19:55):
overseeing an MSNBC to put people on TV who will
say just that that this this tells us that the
court does not find than black lives matter. Oh here
here CNN b Cary Sellers play nine. I think it's
pretty clear that the black lives do not matter. I
think it's pretty clear that justice is fleeting um that
if you are a person of color, particularly a black

(20:17):
woman in this country. Um, you know, the quest for
justice in the road to get justice is longer and
harder than most. And I think that yesterday there was
there was more concern for the walls of the apartment
next door. Uh. These charges these officers face, or that
officer faces as a sham. Um. You know, when you

(20:38):
have one person who's charged for just shooting a gun
Willie Millie, as we say, down South, with a fifteen
thousand dollars bond, sometimes you just have to smile at
the absurdity. See it. It doesn't actually play kate the
angry mob and the demagogues who rile them up when
you put forward these charges of reckless endangerment, which is
which is clearly what this was meant to be. It

(21:00):
was a consolation prize. Here you go, guys, we'll charge
one of the cops. So then at least the headlines
can say one officer charged. He's gonna beat the charge.
It charge is nonsense, all right. The charge is effectively,
you know, shooting back at someone who shot at you
and not putting every round. Imagine if they actually hit
Walker with all the rounds they fired, then it would

(21:21):
be oh my gosh, excessive force. Look at it. I mean,
there's there's no way to make people happy. They've they've
set themselves into a narrative that they will not move from.
They're they're just dedicated to this. Now. It doesn't matter
what the facts turned out to be. Akari Seller's, Reverend
Awl name, you know, any of them, you know Chris
Cromo over at CNN, all misstating facts on this consolate.

(21:45):
None of them say, wow, I guess it. We shouldn't
have been saying all along that it was a no
knock rate. It wasn't a no knock right. Well, now
they're just gonna say the eyewitnesses got it. They did
the same thing with Mike Brown. You had black eyewitnesses
that said Mike Brown in Ferguson, Missouri, charged the officer,
attacked the officer, and the officer shot him while the
while Mike Brown was charging at him, running at him

(22:05):
to tackle him. Mike Brown was very large man, by
the way, the officer was not. And they just say, oh, well,
they they you know, memories and they get it wrong.
And so you see that's the thing. They'll just there's
no such thing as facts for this group. There's no
such thing as facts when it comes to all these
issues for the left, because even when we have things
that we should all say, Okay, here's what happened, to

(22:27):
the best of our ability to know anything, here's what happened.
Lest they know, we don't think, we don't agree that's
what happened. Now, what happened is the thing that we
tell you, we want to say happened. That's their approach.
It's very hard to very hard to argue with somebody
when you can't when you can't even work from the
same reality. They're operating from a different reality. I mean,

(22:51):
they're going to talk about how the settlement, or rather
the charges didn't deal with Brianna the value of Brianna
Taylor's life. The charges have to do not with showing
how much they value someone's life. The charges are about
did this person or persons commit a criminal act for
which we the state, are going to punish them, ruin
their lives. But that's what justice demands. Do they commit

(23:16):
a criminal act? Did they have the men's ray of
the state of mind necessary to be held criminally culpable
for this? The law isn't just I'm upset about something
that I want someone to be punished. That's not the law.
That's not If it were, we would all we would
all constantly be getting marched off to prison camps by
libs who are upset about all the co two we're

(23:37):
putting in the air. Right, that's not the law. There
is no good faith argument that what happened here is wrong,
meaning that there was no murder. There were no murder charges.
It's not a murder. It's just not. I mean, they
can argue about this all day. It is a tragedy.
It is a tragedy. If a city employee was driving

(24:02):
a garbage truck and the brakes failed and that city
employee ran over somebody in a crosswalk, that's horrible. That's
a tragedy. It's awful. Bad things happen in the world.
That's a terrible thing, and we should all do what
we can in society has an obligation to help out
that family that has that law. But you don't a lot.

(24:22):
I mean, if the brakes failed, you don't lock up
the guy driving the truck as a murderer. Doesn't matter
how upset people are. Not a murderer, you know, this
is an important distinction here. But you see, they're trying
to they're trying to use emotion to overcome and erode
the law. They're saying the most inflammatory things possible. And
here you have multiple commentators that I saw, and I'm

(24:43):
sure there are a whole lot more saying that this
judgment shows that they believe quote black lives do not
matter and quote wow, you see a lot of people
yesterday talking about hot Brianna Taylor's family got twelve million
dollars from the city of Louisville. That's the city of
Louisville say we are really sorry about what happened. This

(25:03):
should not have happened, and we're going to try to
help take care of your family and try to ease
your pain in some way, even though they'll never be
they will never be able to make it right. Money
doesn't make it right. And I totally get that and
accept that. But that's where the you know, the societal
culpability here, the systems culpability comes in paying for an accident,

(25:24):
a tragic accident. You don't lock people up for an accident.
I know, you say, buck, but they they chose, those
officers chose to draw their weapons. They did what they
were supposed to do when someone is shooting at you
and you're a cop and you've said police search warrant,
and they shoot at you, you shoot back. Full stuff.

(25:46):
We're not gonna budge on this, you know, we're gonna
have to start digging in folks and being a little
absolute on some basic principles because the left is playing
games with all of this. Now, Oh, maybe they maybe
they didn't need to shoot back. Maybe they could get
like a magic you know, net gun and just wrap
the net around somebody so that then they don't have
to shoot the I mean, this is the kind of
idiocy I hear liberals. I'm being serious. I hear them

(26:08):
talking about things like this. Now, maybe we have some
there's a dark gun they can use or something else
to incapacitate a person shooting. No, we have less than lethals.
They try to use them sometimes when someone shooting at you,
you're not shooting back with a taser. But they don't
really care about the truth here, about what's really happening.

(26:30):
This was all about a narrative. It's all about a storyline,
and ultimately we have to confront this. People get uncomfortable
doing it. They don't want to hear it. They many
of them still believe it. The story that the police
are systematically hunting black men and murdering them without consequence,
that is the central premise of Black Lives Matter movement,

(26:52):
is a lie. It's a lie. It's just not true.
And they can keep saying it and keep getting worked
up about it, and it's not true. No part of that.
It is not systematic, it is not continuous, it is
not widespread, it is not unpunished, And oftentimes they're picking
cases where it's not even an unjust shooting. Not always,

(27:15):
but most of the time. Most of the time, the
shootings that they pick to make a major cause for
the movement, they lie about what happened, and then we
find out the truth. They just pretend like we don't
know what really happened anymore. Friends, This is about rage
and resentment and envy mobilized for the purposes of the

(27:35):
Democrat Party. That's what is really going on here. Just
tearing us apart, hurting us as a country. We do
not benefit from this. No one benefits from this except
those who use this for their own power. Doesn't make
our community safer, doesn't make us get along better as

(27:56):
a people. America is this incredibly dis country, and we
do get along very well overall as a people. You
look at us compared to all a lot of other
countries and what goes on there. Democrats want to pull
all that apart. They want to undo the very foundation
of our justice system. They want to pretend that just

(28:17):
because people feel a certain way, the facts don't get
to interfere with their feelings. And that's not true. That's
not true. But you're going to see a lot more
lies about this, and you're never going to see a
leftist have a debate with somebody who understands these facts
and his adept on it, because they would get crushed.

(28:39):
They can't. They can't actually handle an exchange here. They're
gonna say, is it fair? No, it's never fair. When
someone is killed by the state in an accident, that's
never fair. It's wrong, it's tragic, it's bad. Is it murder?
That's a different question. And our whole legal system is
built upon what is the guilt? What is the hope

(29:00):
ability of an individual in an act under the circumstances presented.
It's not a bad thing happened, Let's go find someone
to blame for it. Criminally, it's not how it works,
but that is what we're seeing from these protesters now,
who did exactly what we knew they would. Running around
the country now attacking police in the streets. Two cops

(29:23):
shot last night in Louisville. Let's get into that. You're
in the Freedom Hunt. This is the Buck Sex and
Show podcast. Riots were expected in Louisville and riots happened.
We've got somebody joining us now who is there on

(29:43):
the front lines letting us know what really went down.
Julio Rosas is with us now. He is a senior
writer at townhall dot com. Julio, glad you're safe in Salaman.
What happened last night? What'd you see? So there are
a lot of marches, there's a lot of rioting in
the aftermath of the grand jury decision that was announced yesterday.

(30:05):
The city was kind of bracing for that. Unfortunately, the
riots kind of came to fruition around seven o'clock, eight
o'clock last night at the Hall of Justice is where
the city government is kind of located around in the
downtown area. People started to set fires all over the place,
and then at one point they tried to set fire
to the wooden boards that were protecting the windows on

(30:27):
the Hall of Justice, and so at that point the
Louisville Police Department declared it to be on lawful assembly
and they said that they hadn't leave or else the
crowd control of munitions were going to be used, and
so officers inside the building had to come out to
put out the fires, but they were just absolutely pelted
with all sorts of throwing projectiles, and so they had
to retreat back inside. The crowd then left the area

(30:49):
because they didn't want to be tear gas and so
they were they were trying to going through the side
streets because they were trying to evade police from cutting
them off. And then at one point it was over
on Broadway Street where they were marching towards the police
officers that were up ahead. The officers fired two flash
bangs in the air that exploded overhead, and then about

(31:11):
two seconds later that's when we started hear gunshots ringing
out and people really started to scatter because obviously we
don't know who's being shot at. And then at that
point a large number of police officers just swarmed into
the area to clear everybody out. So there were gunshots
from what I read, two officers were hit. What do

(31:32):
we know about them? And what do we know of
the person who shot them? So the police chief later
that night, I went to the hospital where they were
the two officers were taken to. The police chief said
that they did receive non life threatening gun shot wounds
and that they are expected to make a full recovery.
And at the time, he said that they had a

(31:53):
suspect and custody and that's as far as I know.
And they did finally release the names of the two
police officers. And of course, you know, this whole thing
is about resulting of black lives matter and you know,
protecting minorities. While one of the officers was shot was
African American and they have a suspect in custody. Julio, Yes,

(32:13):
yes they do. What do we know about the suspect? Uh?
Not much from from lasted from last I heard, I haven't.
I haven't seen much of an update in term in
terms of that. I think that they're also still looking
because there were also other there was also other gunshots
that that happened in that area and along with the
rest of the Saluisville because again it was just it

(32:34):
was just chaos. It was just another It was just
unfortunately kind of a repeat what we'd be seen across
the country. It was, I mean, assuming it was very
similar to what we saw and what you saw, I
should say, on the front lines in Kenosha, a sort
of Kenosha was just because they it's a smaller, much
smaller town with a much smaller police force. So that's
why they were overwhelmed with trying to protect the Connie Courthouse.

(32:58):
And then the rest of the downtown area was was
at the mercy of the riders and looters, and so
Louisville had had state troopers on standby. They were able
to clear out the Jefferson Square Park after the gunshots,
uh and after the officers were hit. And so this
was what I can't say, this was not a peaceful

(33:18):
mostly this was not a mostly peaceful march because because
as as they were marching through, people were breaking off
and setting fires, they were breaking the uncovered windows, and
they were being cheered on by the crowd. And of
course you know there was members of the media they're
including myself, and they were telling people, you know, like
you know, stop recording, you know, get the cameras out

(33:39):
of here, and they were threatening the people who had
the big cameras because obviously you can't really hide that.
So this was not this was not a mostly peaceful march.
That that much, I can tell you were speaking of
Julio rossa senior writer a town hall Julio, look at
about a minute. I want to ask you, though, what
you think in terms of any preparation coordination there were

(34:00):
is that video of the U haul full of protests
and ryot material that pulled up broad Daylight right in
downtown Louisville. What can you tell us about that? Yeah,
so that there was there was a woman who was
saying shields, And at first I thought she was asking
for people who had shields to move up to the
front of the crowd, which is a very common tactic.
But then as I got closer to her, I could

(34:22):
hear her saying, we have shields, we have shields, and
she was pointing to the U haul truck. At that point,
people were just rushing and they were grabbing all sorts
of stuff, banners, homemade shields and and all that. And
so there is definitely organization behind this, especially when you
see in places like Portland where you know they have
it down to an art form essentially, but there is

(34:44):
a supply chain and there is organization within this. How
far and how far up and how it deep it goes,
I'm not entirely too sure, but it was. It was
a pretty shocking thing to see because that was the
first time I had ever seen anything like that. Really,
just real quick, Are we expecting more in Louisville? And
I think it's going to calm down? And so I think,

(35:05):
because unfortunately we did have those two officers shot, the
police kind of are taking zero chances where we saw
last night. They really cracked down pretty hard. They actually
rounded up a lot of reporters in their in their
crackdown and resting people, including two reporters with the Daily Callers.
So I think they're going to really be bringing the

(35:25):
hammer down on anything the fairs that might happen we'll see,
could happen elsewhere in the country. Julio Rosas of town Hall,
everybody Julio stays safe man. Thanks again for all your reporting.
We appreciate it. Thank you. Thanks for listening to The
Bus Sesson Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcast,
the iHeart Radio app, or wherever you get your podcasts.

(35:47):
So now we're in another wave of riots going to
be happening in cities across the country most likely. Now.
On the one hand, I have to say, I do
believe that when these BLM riders do this stuff that
they do, they're unintentionally cutting campaign commercials for the Trump campaign.
I mean, they're helping the cause of Trump getting reelected

(36:11):
by showing the American people, especially those who are not
brainwashed Democrats, right, those voters that maybe would go either way,
that kind of believe Joe Biden is not such a
bad guy, and he's been around a long time, but
you know, Trump was good on the economy. They see
the lunatic Democrats marching through the streets, screaming in people's
faces when they're just sitting there eating, screaming at people

(36:34):
as they're trying to sleep in their homes at night.
You know, wake up, wake up. There's no justice, no peace.
All this stuff that they're doing. People see that and
they say, I'm probably not going to want to reward
that kind of childish and destructive behavior. I'm not going
to say that I like that and not going to

(36:55):
give my vote to the party that clearly represents that,
which is what the Democrat Party does. But beyond that,
I want to note that there's there are inherent contradictions
in the BLM movement that they're never forced to address.
That the people that are out there marching are never
asked about. You know, you'll notice they don't do a
lot of man on the street stuff with BLM, do

(37:16):
their reporters. In fact, we heard before from from Julio
Rossas that they don't want reporters to show what they're
really doing. Right, that's that's considered, and they expect obedience
because they think journos journalists are on their team, and
so they expect that they'll they'll be helpful in the
propaganda of these movements as mostly peaceful, which is what

(37:39):
generally speaking, the journos do. They pretend that they're mostly
peaceful protests even though they're not not a mostly peaceful
protest when you have people passing out free riot shields
right after a grand jury makes a decision about charges,
mostly the right decision. But as I said, I don't
think that the cops are to face the three charges
of wanted and endangerment. I think that's just a total

(38:00):
cave that's cowardice. That's trying to buy off the mob.
That's all that is. There's there's no justification for that
looking to charge one of the cops with something. So
they didn't let them all off. That's all that is.
That's that was the decision that was made, and I'm
sure the grand jury felt that way too. Okay, well
we don't we don't want to let the you know,
this was bad, so something someone has to get punished

(38:23):
for something that's not justice. But on this point about
what is fair, what is right, and what is just,
I would note that the the bl movement should be
asked about some things. I mean, they should have to
explain to people, you know, why is it that they

(38:44):
do this stuff and they commit injustices while claiming that
they fight for justice, they attack innocence in the name
of protecting the innocent. They don't see these contradictions. Even
if they could, they don't care. This is about raw
power and only a fool can't see that. Why doesn't ever,

(39:06):
why doesn't ever understand this right off the bat. You
can't claim to be a movement about justice and then
go and destroy the property of people who have done
nothing to you. They're going and attacking businesses. They're they're
breaking windows, they are stealing money. Right, Destroying property is
a form of theft because you are causing get you

(39:29):
are taking money from that point. When you break a
store front window, you are taking money from that store,
from the people who own it and people who work there.
You're taking from them. Now, we have to get back
to what kids learn in kindergarten here about keep your
hands to yourself, don't take other people's stuff. BLM movement
seems to have forgotten all that, doesn't care about any

(39:51):
of that. You cannot claim to be a movement concerned
with justice and do injustice regularly, repeatedly, unapologetically, which is
what bl does. They say that they're fighting for justice
with these acts of destruction and intimidation against innocent people,
but in reality, these Biden voters might as well be

(40:13):
making Trump campaign commercials because Ohio soccer moms are not
big on mob violence. When they go into that voting booth.
I hope they certainly remember that something else. I hope
people remember remember when all those big companies in America
were bowing down to and begging forgiveness from and paying
off a bad faith Marxist movement built on lies that

(40:35):
has now led to enormous destruction, immisrated communities and a
number of dead cops. I hope you remember. I hope
you never forget how many companies immediately bent the knee
blm rioters going around feeling like they're not only supported
by the media, but they're funded by corporate America. It's

(41:01):
a troubling circumstance. Friends. The elites are using the mob
against those who stand in the way of total control
of those in charge. This is not a new tactic.
This has been done in many countries and many times
in history in the past. Right, the people that are
calling the shots, that have special privileges and tremendous wealth,

(41:24):
they get the angry, insecure, unsuccessful mob to start burning
down other businesses, to start attacking the political competition, so
that the people who are angry are making sure that
the people who see what's really going on aren't able
to throw out the bums who are making all the

(41:45):
decisions at the top. There's a strategy behind this, you know,
the democratic elites. I mean, the greatest fraud of those
elites and the activist class is the pretense that they
care about working class people. There was a video last
night where you saw a protester going up to a
two police officers with a megaphone. This was in Washington, DC,

(42:08):
our nation's capital, and he was saying, look at you,
you're protecting McDonald's. You're an idiot. If the cops weren't there,
they would have trashed the McDonald's, berated any employees who
were inside, terrified any patrons who were just trying to
have a simple meal. And these idiot protesters would feel
righteous about it. On an MSNBC. They treat them like

(42:30):
they were the freedom writers. They treat them like they
were people fighting for civil rights. It's appalling, it's appalling
what they do. But this is where we are. This
is the society that we live in now. I mean,
just imagine for a second if in response to charging
Kyle Rittenhouse with first degree murder, still amazing, that that's

(42:54):
what end up happening, but it is where we are.
Imagine if Trump supporters in cities across the country rioted
at police, destroyed buildings to live media and I mean
Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer and the rest of them,
they would demand martial law suspension of habeas corpus and
order the National Guard to open fire. They have no

(43:14):
problem with it, no issue with it at all, They
would demand it. In fact, you cannot be a movement
devoted to justice that commits injustice, which is what they're doing.
You cannot explain or justify destroying the businesses, the homes,
the peace of mind, the safety of people who happen

(43:37):
to live in a city where there happened to be
some angry leftists. It's completely unacceptable, and it's why BLM
does not deserve your support, does not deserve even does
not deserve deference, doesn't deserve respect. It is a destructive
Marxist movement based entirely in racial division and resentment and

(44:01):
anger that hurts people. It is hurting this country, and
the Democrats are using this. It's a Catharsis for their
Trump's Arrangement syndrome. It's become an outlet for their rage
about the fact that Donald Trump has been president and
his supporters all still support him and people think he's
done a pretty darn good job. Don't ever forget that

(44:23):
this is all tied in together, that this is for
the left a way to try to seize the moral
high ground while they're really just complaining about Trump's America.
You're in them. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast.

(44:44):
Every time this happens, we obsess over details, as if
there are enough details to make America finally believe that
black folks are worthy of living. The details did nothing
for Tamia Rice. They did nothing for Iannah Jones who
was asleep on a co coach. They did nothing for
Walter Scott when we saw on video he was running away,

(45:04):
and they certainly didn't do anything for Brianna Taylor. The
details never seem to be enough to treat our lives
as valuable by a system that has a foundation based
on our labor and not our humanity. The demand is simple,
stop killing us. We know that black victims will never
be perfect enough for this system. We simply simply want

(45:25):
to be allowed to live, to rest, and to thrive.
That's a black black policing reform activist named Brittany Cunningham,
and that's a very good example of the poisonous and
deranged rhetoric of Black Lives matter. Does she really think
that people don't care about black that that's really her belief?

(45:47):
She really thinks that no one cares about black lives.
Black police officers don't care about black lives. Members of
the black community that are out there saying that they
want more security, more police than neighbors, they don't care
about black What really is the charge here that the
system doesn't value black life. There are a lot of
people in prison right now for killing black people as

(46:08):
well as other people. A lot of people are being
punished for this. But what is the real the central premise,
the reason we have the Black Lives Matter movement is
the killing of Mike Brown. Mike Brown deserved to be
shot by a police officer. Doesn't matter that he was black,
doesn't matter what color he is. He deserved what happened

(46:30):
under the circumstances as we know them. If you attack
someone who is a police officer and try to harm them,
they will shoot you, and that is justified. So the
movement is founded on a lie, hands up, don't shoot,
and then there are successive lies after that. She mentioned
Walter Scott, a case in South Carolina and as the

(46:52):
system doesn't value his life, that cop was charged with murder.
The cops going to spend the rest of his life
in prison. What is she missing here? That wasn't it.
So she's even talking about cases where people said, yeah,
actually that cop did cross the line. That is successive force.
Guy's life is ruined over. So she's throwing in cases

(47:13):
like that. No one says that police don't commit abuse.
Police are human beings. Police can be criminals, they can
be racist, they can, but you know, we're talking about
less than one one hundredth of one percent or one
one thousandth of one percent, and you're gonna throw all
the other seven or eight hundred thousand score law enforcement
officers under the bus all the time because one person

(47:34):
does something that sometimes is bad. Sometimes they lie about
it and make it sound like it's bad when it's not.
But it's stunning. We simply want to be allowed to live.
And then we go to the how many people are
killed every year by police and how many young Black
Americans are killed by other young black Americans every year.
We all know the disparity is about you know, six

(47:57):
or seven thousand to ten, But because it's the state,
and it's the system, and there's all these political implications
around it, they want to focus on the ten to
fifteen cases a year under questionable or perhaps even illegal
immoral circumstances where a young black man is shot by police.
They focus on those cases, and there's no effort to

(48:19):
deal with the thousands and thousands of young black men
who are killed, sometimes for just being in the wrong neighborhood,
sometimes for having you know, their hat on in a
way that offends some gangbanger or whatever it may be.
There's no effort to deal with that none. This movement
ignores the thousands of deaths and focuses on a dozen
or twenty a year, maybe maybe thirty out what depends

(48:43):
on the year. And then it's a huge national We
have to go through these national convulsions over this all
under this premise, Lebron James even said this that we're
being hunted literally every time we leave our house. That's
that's a psychosis. That's not true. The state is not
hunting black people every time to leave their homes, staying
on hunting anybody every time they leave their homes. This

(49:03):
is a lie. But you know what these lies do.
They energize, they mobilize, They get people angry, and when
you're angry, you're much more susceptible to being controlled. As
long as somebody tells you where to focus that anger.
You're looking for that outlet, and then that leads to
things like what happened last night in Louisville where you

(49:24):
had two cops shot? This is what it sounded like.
Is that happened? Play clip one O the shot guns?
Who goes out look us they're blessed the police? So gunshots,

(49:54):
two cops hit, could have been killed, maybe never see
their families again, not not going to live another day.
Young black man is in custody for shooting both of them.
What do you think? What do you think he believes
about police? I mean, there are police reform experts who
are going on TV who are saying things like we
simply want to be allowed to live or constantly being killed.

(50:16):
This is shrill, insane hysteria. It's not true that police
are not constantly killing on armed black It's a lie.
It's a lie. More people die every year from lightning
strikes than unarmed black people are killed by police, fact
every year in America. So they're complaining about something that
is statistically less common than a lightning strike, and they

(50:41):
lie about some of these incidents in order to get
people even more upset about them than they would otherwise be.
But folks, this is about agitation. This is about undermining
our system, undermining our society, dividing us, turning us against
each other. It's really very ugly. This thing, this whole movement,
doesn't inspire. It's not about peace and love and bring

(51:04):
people together. It's about anger and rage and division and
resentment and envy. The Democrat Party embraces it. Democrat parties
along with it, and there they will hold people up
who say things like here is a former police sergeant
who went on MSNBC speaking about the black Attorney General

(51:25):
and what he said at the press conference yesterday. Playclip three. Well, listen,
not only is he being intellectually dishonest about that, you know,
I find all of his remarks with regards to this
whole entire press conference offensive. And let me just speak
to this whole celebrity influencer thing. While look, they can't
speak for Kentuckians. Let me say this as a black woman,
he does not speak for black folks. He's skin folk,

(51:46):
but he is not kin folk. And so just like
he thinks they can't speak for Kentucky because he's up
there with a black face, he does not speak for
all of us. This was not a tragedy, This was
a murder. He should be ashamed of himself. Share Dorsey
is wrong and her analysis is garbage. She doesn't strike

(52:08):
me as somebody who knows what the heck she's talking
about at all. But she's doing exactly what they wanted
to do at MSNBC's she's undermining or negating the blackness
of the Attorney General of Kentucky. I mean to make
this really about, ultimately the left wanting different racial treatment

(52:29):
for people in the justice system. Right that if you
are black, if you're white, if you're some other ethnicity,
they're supposed to be a different set of rules depending
on what the left decides. That is a recipe for
destroying the entire justice system. That is a recipe for
pulling this country apart at the seams. But that's what

(52:49):
they want right now. The left is angry, The Democrat
Party is angry, and they won't They can't control it,
they don't want to control it. Then brings me to
the most in some ways insufferable part of all this
are Kamala Harris and Joe Biden. Now, Oh, prayers up
for the police officers who are shot. You know, will

(53:11):
you more helpful if Kamala and Joe stopped defaming cops,
stopped giving cover to the lies, and told their voters,
told the Biden Kamala voters out there, don't attack police officers.
Way more helpful than their thoughts and prayers. Thoughts and

(53:34):
prayers are always fine, but they're actually in a position
to do something about this. All right, I'm the surgeon
that's called in to do heart surgery. Yeah, I might
get thoughts and prayers, but that's not all I'm expected
to do. I'm supposed to save somebody. Biden and Kamala
could save lives, but they don't want to upset their
supporters by saying, don't shoot cops. Thanks for listening to

(53:54):
the buses and show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts,
the Ihard Ray, or wherever you get your podcasts. It
is outdated. It is wrongheaded thinking to think that the
only way you're going to get communities to be safe
is to put more police officers on the street. Well,
we have to do, and what we will do is

(54:16):
reimagine public safety. What kind of bullcrap is that? First
of all, it's a straw man. No one saying the
only way to make community safer is to put police
on the street. But that is a very important thing
to do. Do you want to make communities safer? Encourage
people to get married and stay married, Encourage people to

(54:38):
finish high school. Don't tell people the cops or the enemy.
These are ways. Encourage parents to raise their children in
a two parent household. Those are ways. Oh yes, by
the numbers, by the social science, those are ways to
make communities safer. But that's not when people want to hear. No,

(55:01):
much much more pleasant to the Democrat based to hear
that the problem are the cops. The problem are the
people who are there to make sure that little old
ladies aren't bludgeoned by crackheads on their way to the
grocery store. The problem are the cops. Sure, sure they are.
What could be more disgusting and disingenuous in this But

(55:22):
Libs live in these, these these bubbles, these echo chambers
of the various websites and news networks that just tell
them this lie, and they never will look, they'll never
be confronted by people on the other side. And then
they fall back into the slogans. But do you not
believe there's systemic racism. Do you know these are feelings,
These are feelings, These are not arguments. Do you not

(55:43):
believe there's a history of a pressure in this country? No,
that's of course, Yeah, there's a pressure, there's racism. But
how do we how do we build a society that
functions as best as it can and a society that
is ultimately acting in the interests of individual rights and
justice with its every act. Well, they don't even think

(56:04):
about that, do they. But put Harris is so funny.
Reimagining public safety. This is taken straight out of like
the faculty lounge handbook at Sarah Lawrence College or something.
Let's reimagine let's like, reimagine public safety. What does that
even mean? Reimagine it? How And you want to do

(56:25):
that while there's fifty percent increase in shootings in New
York City and other cities having big spikes and shootings
and murders, Yeah, reimagine it while people are getting killed. Ultimately,
the left also thinks the only bad people the left
things exists are white male oppressor Republicans. They're the only
bad people, according to the left wing ideology. Everyone else

(56:47):
who does bad things it's society's fault. It's because of
you know, some lack of a social programmer. You know,
there's some there's a collective responsibility for all the other
ills of society. But the only people that are irredeemably
evil and bad are white male Republican oppressors. That's it.

(57:08):
Every everybody else at least has a saving grace. Everybody
else is you know, you can look at the totality
of the circumstances. You know, Yeah, guy's in MS thirteen
hit man, but you know, he had a tough go
in the early days in Honduras before he came here illegally,
and we didn't take him in, so, you know, we
didn't make him a citizen. So really, the fact that

(57:29):
he's you know, cutting people's heads off with a machete,
I mean, you know, let's not blame him. Oh my gosh,
you voted for Trump, evil evil, bad person, you white
male Trump supporters. It's look, you know what I'm saying,
It's true. You know, this is the reality. The Libs
will always find a way to justify the behavior of

(57:49):
other people, you know, and that's one of the great
things about being a white male liberal is at least
you get a little bit of you have to constantly
bow and unless you're super rich and connected, and then
and you kind of just, you know, are the puppeteer,
pushing around the rest of the Democrats, making them do
what you want and pretending, you know, you get to
be in the Pelosi roll or the Schumer roll, right,

(58:09):
But if you're a white male liberal, you get to think, well,
at least I'm sort of one of the good people.
I'm not one of the really terrible people. So that's
that's the reality of the country we live in now.
And I just want to say that the reimagining public
safety is a phrase that intelligent people could not say

(58:32):
without feeling ridiculous, you know, without without knowing that they're
just being complete demagogues, trying to get people all fired
up and angry about something instead of actually dealing with
the problems. Speaking of fired up and angry, that's always
a good transition on this show, speaking of fired up

(58:52):
and angry. I don't trust this moment of calm we're
having in the Supreme Court nomination battle. Something's going on,
something's up. I know they are gonna try something. I

(59:16):
don't know what it is. I'm thinking about it constantly,
trying to figure out what is the angle. I've said
to you, Yes, they're gonna there's gonna be mass disturbances
on the street. They're going to I mean, they're they're
gonna call out everything they've got. But they called out
pretty much everything they had for Kavanaugh didn't work. They
came close. People often forget that if blasi Ford was

(59:41):
the only person they put forward and Kavanaugh had not
come out just in an absolute defense of his character
and of his soul in front of the country and
the way that he did, which why they were so
angry at him, saying, oh, he was so angry. They
wanted to watch him. They wanted to watch him collapse
and be destroyed. They wanted to see that. They wanted

(01:00:02):
to enjoy that. Instead, Kavanaugh came out as a man
and came out firing. God bless him for it. But
they threw everything they had it. They're gonna try something here.
They're gonna try to do something that. Ah I wish,
I wish I could see it coming so that I

(01:00:23):
could try to prepare conservatives in the right for it
and you know, get word to the White House. Even
if I could, woman, I could, but if I knew
what it was, I don't know what it is. But
we do know that they're not going to let this
go easily, even Elisabeth War and hurts. Been a while
since we've heard from Elisabeth War. Oh, oh gosh, Jake, golly,

(01:00:46):
I'm bush grow up. But Daddy always says, I was
one one million Cherokee and I'm from Oklahoma, and you know,
I just let's let's take the banks and take all
of the money and give it around. Are the people
that haven't done anything for it? Let's do yeah? Oh gosh, yeah.

(01:01:07):
Here she is blasting Republicans over the Ginsburg situation. Not
the Ginsburg situation, it's the Supreme Court seat that is
open situation. Play fourteen. Rifkinsburg was a woman who never
let any man silence her. The most fitting tribute to
her is to refuse to be silenced and to name

(01:01:28):
exactly what Donald Trump and Senate Republicans are trying to
steal another Supreme Court seat. This kind of sleazy double
dealing is the last gasp of a desperate party that
is undemocratically overrepresented in Congress and in the halls of power.

(01:01:48):
Across our country. The last gasp of a corrupt Republican
leadership numb to its own hypocrisy that doesn't reflect the
is of the majority of Americans or the values that
we hold dear. The last gasp of a right wing,
billionaire fueled party that wants to hold on to power

(01:02:12):
a little longer in order to oppose its extremist agenda
on the entire country. What is she even saying? Really,
I know she thinks it. Oh, I'm just so upset. No,
I'm gonna just oh yeah, I'm gonna be yell, I
got upset about the right wing? Brilliant. What does this

(01:02:33):
even mean? They're trying to steal? How are they stealing?
What is theirs? Democrats? You're you're acting like crazy people here. Okay,
if I own a home and I walk into my home,
I'm not trespassing. You can say it's trespassing, but you're wrong.
They're not stealing anything. Stealing implies the illicit taking of

(01:02:58):
something from someone else who has a right to have it.
It's not stealing. It's a constitutional obligation to fill the seat.
But they're just gonna keep lying. If this is not hard,
there's nothing to stop Republicans. There's no rule, there's no law,
there's no nothing to stop them from doing this. But

(01:03:18):
they just can't accept. They won't accept that this is
the reality. They won't accept that things have changed a bit.
It's really it's really stunning, isn't it. They're completely completely
unhinged over all this, and they won't even rule out

(01:03:39):
Supreme Court packing. Here's Joe Biden play fifteen. Will you
go along with what some Democrats are proposing to expand
the court? Well, I'm not gonna do. And I hope
you'll understand this play the press of this game. He
wants to change the subject, to set him about while
they are constans principles by moving forward in the middle

(01:04:02):
of an election, elections have already started. He wants us
talking about whether or not we're going to expand the
cord or we're gonna quart back. I'm not gonna get
into that. I'm not gonna get into that. Go by
you know, they called the lid for his campaign again today.
I think by noon. Eight out of twenty what is it,
eight out of twenty four days so far, Biden campaigns like,

(01:04:26):
am We're done, it's lunchtime? Done for the day. No events, no, no, no, uh, interviews, nothing.
And now it's so funny now some of the lib
jurdos out there, or he's just doing debate debate prep. Really,
he's doing debate for this guy hasn't done enough public
speaking and debating over he's gotta do a debate prep.

(01:04:46):
I mean yeah, for like a couple of days beforehand.
But come on, really, yeah, he was doing debate prep.
That's why you know September or the first week of September,
he missed a couple of days because he was doing
Like they're a little cover for this guy, no matter what,
but they want to leave open all these options so
that they can tell their base they're gonna do something.

(01:05:07):
But here here's the truth. Friends, they're gonna they're gonna
pack the court as soon as they think it's in
their interest to pack the court. They're not gonna. There's
no promise they're gonna make. Remember this all. We got
to this point because Harry Reid blew up the filibuster
Because if benefit of Democrats who are in power at
the time, you know they can help it. They have

(01:05:28):
a lost for power. They will do whatever they can
to increase that power. There are no norms or rules
or principles that will be allowed to get in the way.
Now they gotta live with that. Now they got to
live with the consequence of their actions, and you know,
take it long and hard. Sorry stinks for them, What

(01:05:50):
a shame. Too bad. But I'm telling you they're gonna
do something, and I'm gonna keeping you know, send of
your thoughts on this one. Let me know what you
think they're gonna do. They they cannot, I mean emotionally, psychologically.
The Democrats will not be able to process the possibility
of a truly right of center Supreme Court. Just I mean,

(01:06:14):
it's not gonna be like you know, it's not gonna
be like putting ted cruise on the court. I can
tell you that it's gonna be you know, if if
if one is far left lunatic, you know, Soda Mayor
and ten is just as Scalia right, they the Court's

(01:06:34):
gonna be at like a six if we get Anykony Barrett.
That's the thing. But they're used to it being at
like a three or four. And sorry, that's not that's
not written in the constitution. It's not the way it
has to be. Lives maybe don't make the court so important.
You're in this is the Buck Sexton Show podcast to

(01:06:58):
serve on the board of the Ukrainian energy company facing
serious corruption charges. You were the vice president running point
on Ukraine. The average Joe here's that and says that
sounds fishy. What's your understanding of what your son was
doing for an extraordinary amount of money. I don't know
what he was doing. I know he was on the board.
I found out he was on the board after he
was on the board, and that was it. And there's

(01:07:20):
nobody that knows a lot of time. Isn't this something
you want to get to the bottom of. No, because
I trust my son, But that doesn't pass the small test,
Like when you're a vice president, isn't there a higher standard.
Don't you need to know it's happening with your family.
Don't you need to put down some guardrails unless there
was something that was there was something on his face
that was wrong. There's nothing on his face that was wrong.

(01:07:42):
So look, if you want to talk about problems, you know,
let's talk about Trump's family. I mean, come on, this
is so guys are amazing. So you think that everything
that happened was kosher. You know, there's not one single
bit of evidence, not one little tiny bit does this
anything done was wrong? You know that, but you keep

(01:08:03):
asking me these questions. It's okay, he you know, you're
you're you know, you're doing what you have to do.
Look at how surly and defensive Biden got in this
interview that was a part of an Axios interview asking
I mean about about Hunter Biden, who look, Democrats want
to pretend that they're all about transparency and accountability and

(01:08:25):
good government. And that's of course laughable. But here's one
of the reasons why it's laughable. You're running foreign policy
for the US government in a country like Ukraine that
desperately needs US help. Okay, this isn't like you're the
point man for the US relationship with Great Britain, which
is kind of like, you know, goes as it is.
I mean, it's not really gonna the Brits will be Okay,

(01:08:47):
no one's gonna There's not gonna be some huge change
in our policies. Ukraine really needed us, and your son
is getting paid whatever it's close to a million dollars
and sit on the board of a company in an
area he knows nothing about It's about the appearance of impropriety.
Joe Biden, You moron. He does not one bit of
evidence anything's wrong. No, the evidence is this looks bad

(01:09:09):
and people lose faith in the system because of it. Right,
So I just want to say that's that's obvious. But
even when he gets asked the question, you have to notice,
even when he's just he's talking about this issue, it's
clear that he is outraged that a journal would even

(01:09:31):
ask him. He's outraged that a journal would even push
him on this because they're supposed to be on his team.
He's not supposed to get real questions. And I'm supposed
to be asked real questions. No, no, no, of course not.
He's supposed to have people that just give him a
constant BackRub on TV and tell him how amazing he

(01:09:51):
is and how the American people should vote for him,
even though, like I firmly believe that he does not
have He does not have a the company, he doesn't
have the first physical, psychological, emotional constitution to be president
United States. Folks. I don't think he's up for the job.
I really mean that. I don't. I don't. I don't
say that'd be provocative. I think that, and I think Democrats,
some of them, some of the people at the top

(01:10:13):
echelon Democrat Party, they know this, but they're just he's
just supposed to get them past the election and then
they'll figure everything out afterwards. And they're they're little cheap
in the Democrat Party where just go man. You know,
they'll do whatever they're told, and they'll go along with this.
And you know when when when President Kamala takes the reins,
they're gonna look, they're not gonna be even a little

(01:10:36):
bit remorseful about this. They're gonna say, look at what
we pulled off. Ha ha. We stopped Trump from getting
four more years by putting forward this, this empty suit
buffoon that should be focused on, you know, feeding nuts
to the squirrels and reading picture books to his you know,
his grandkids, which is fine, nothing wrong with that, but

(01:10:56):
he shouldn't be president, right, He shouldn't. He should be
doing those other things that I said. Stead he wants
the nuclear codes, and Democrats are saying, if you don't
give it to him, you're a bad person. Thanks for
listening to The Bus Sesson Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe
on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get
your podcasts. Okay, it's been a little bit since we've

(01:11:19):
talked to our friend James Altucher. He's an entrepreneur, podcaster, writer,
all those good things. He's with us now. They're talking
about what's going on in this country and here in
New York City in particular. What's going on James, Hey, Buck,
how's it going? And thanks so much for having me
on the show again. Yeah, man, And it looks to
me like somehow and New York I believe is maybe

(01:11:43):
the most concentrated example of this. But I feel like everyone,
as we're getting closer now than ever to a vaccine,
the panic is getting dialed up among a lot of
people on the left and a lot of people in
the mainstream media as if things are going to get
almost get the feeling that they believe things are gonna
get worse if we have a vaccine. Yeah, it's it's strange.

(01:12:06):
I mean, here we are, We're in the seventh month
of economic lockdowns, and cases are minimal at this point.
We already know so much more about this virus than
we did in March. Like in March, we had no
idea about the contagion rate, the fatality rate, treatments, you

(01:12:27):
know what, will ventilators work or not, will masks work
or not? And so we crushed the economy like could
you imagine let's say there was no pandemic and somebody said, Okay,
everybody who has a business, we need you to shut
that business down for a minimum of six months and
everybody has to stay at home. We're just doing this

(01:12:49):
for fun. You would say that's insane. You're going to
crush the economy so bad that society and culture will
never be the same again. And that would have been
the correct answer, but there was this justification that we
had this virus. And now you know, who knows what
would have happened differently if we didn't have a liked them.
But we do know for sure the economy has been crushed.

(01:13:12):
It's just obliterated. New York City is a great example
where I mean, just yesterday the Bulasio fired nine thousand
critical City employees with and we don't know, there's no plan,
we don't know when that's gonna stops. There's no plan
on any of this right now. And you know, I
wonder what your thoughts are as we get further in
your I know that you had that editorial that you

(01:13:35):
wrote in the New York Post and then Seinfeld responded
in the New York Times, and I agree with you
it was weird that he was attacking you personally because
the argument that you're making a lot of people I
know who are in New York and who understand a
scene here have been making version versions of it. And
it's not a person. It's not anyone being a good
person or a bad person. This is what I see
happening in the place where I live. And you were

(01:13:57):
not living in a thirty million dollar mansion at the
time in the hands for what I understand now that
we're a little deeper into this only a month later,
now I am living in the thirty million dollar manasion. Yeah,
I'm just kidding. That would be nice. But you know,
now that we're even a little deeper into this, what
are the trends that you're seeing. We're supposed to get
to opening of indoor dining in New York City. Obviously,
other cities across the country also are watching what's going

(01:14:19):
on here, taking some of their cues. They're all Democrat controlled.
So what do you think I mean, are we gonna
I believe I used to think that they were trying
to lock us down until the election, and I want
to put this theory past you. And then if Biden wins,
all of a sudden, the easy answer is, oh, things
are getting better and we're gonna be okay, we don't
need to pay it anymore. I actually don't think that's

(01:14:41):
true anymore. Now. It's lockdown well beyond the election, and
to use the pressure and the authoritarian impulse that the
Democrats have here to push through policies and effectively. I
think they liked this control. I think they want to
keep doing this deep into twenty twenty one, even if

(01:15:01):
Biden wins. Yeah, I believe that too. I mean, look,
Biden's talked about a national mandate for masks, which is
just insane. I'm not saying anything about masks, but I'm
just saying, a national mandate. That means, whether you live
in the densest part of New York City or you
live in the mountains of Montana and you're going out

(01:15:22):
to get your mail a mile away, you have to
wear a mask. Like it. It's insane to make any
kind of national law. I guess so what I think
is happening, and you're seeing this in New York City.
First off, you're seeing already economic collapse, which is why
the mayor is being forced to, you know, do all
these firings just to save you know, to save money.

(01:15:43):
But what you're really seeing, and nobody will will acknowledge this,
what you're really seeing is what is called traditionally fascism.
So fascism you could think of as a state controlled
capitalism mixed with identity politics. So in i'll and I
hate to go straight to Nazi Germany to describe this,

(01:16:06):
but you know, originally the Nazi Party was called the
National Socialists. The Nazi Party when they took over, took
over every single part of capitalism, what you you know,
what you bought, who could sell, what you ate, you know,
how you moved. And that's what's happening in New York
City is that we were told to all close down

(01:16:28):
our businesses and to stay at home, not even to
go outside, and now the economy's ruined. And then identity politics.
Obviously in Germany there was heavy identity politics either you
were German or you weren't. But now in New York
City you have the mayor, you know, talking about how
we can't open restaurants because the wealthy don't need to

(01:16:50):
eat out as much, completely disregarding the fact that half
a million people will be unemployed if restaurants closed down,
and you know, critical revenues that are used to pay
city employees and healthcare workers will be gone. And you know,
what do you call identity politics mixed with you know,
extreme state control capitalism? This is what fascism is. It's

(01:17:12):
not a far right movement, it turns out to be
a far left movement. I think your analysis is fine
from all these cities, and eventually, you know, for the
first time ever, and and Buck, I know you'll you'll
acknowledge this, for the first time ever, you and I
can have a conversation about the practical aspects of state secession.

(01:17:35):
You know, a state leaving the United States. A year ago,
that would have been an insane conversation, but now there's
actually a path to that being possible, which is almost
as insane. Well, yeah, I think that the riffs that
we're seeing, these political riffs as they play out, especially
with the exodus from states like California and New York,

(01:17:56):
and there's that's gonna continue this narrative of you know,
the the Democrats socialist project. It took a while for
it to reach catastrophic failure, but it is failing in
these places. You know that there are certain states at
a tremendous concentration of wealth. A lot of New York's
a great example. California is a great example. And it
takes time to ruin something that was so wealthy and

(01:18:19):
so fortunate. Right, It's kind of like the Braddy kids
who inherit the family company and the family fortune. They
don't go bankrupt day one, but over time they pretty
much sometimes we'll ruin it. And I think that's what
we're seeing now. I mean, now when you get to
the Cuomo Newsom level. Newsom is spending time saying that
only electric cars, I think, are going to be sold
at California starting in you know, a twenty thirty five

(01:18:40):
or I mean, this is this is looney tune stuff. Yeah,
I mean, and look, California, which has always been considered
so progressive and so open to equal opportunity in theory,
is actually the reverse of that. California has or one
hundred and ninety two career paths that require blue collar licensing.

(01:19:02):
So if you want to braid hair or be a
manicurist in La or San Francisco, you've got to spend
money to get a license, and for one hundred ninety
two other professions as well, more than any other state.
What do people want who are protesting? The thing that
they want most is prosperity and jobs, And the actual

(01:19:24):
laws of states like California and New York are preventing
people who most need jobs from getting jobs because the
state is trying to control every aspect of how we
make money, how we raise our families, how we find
prosperity for ourselves. And I'm not being ideological, like this
is just how you how people survive, and it seems

(01:19:46):
like the laws are trying to prevent us from doing that. Oh,
you have to stay indoors, and then if you want
to work, you have to apply for all these licenses
just to I don't know, braid hair or In New York,
now nobody can eat out. It's not it's illegal to
eat in a restaurant. And meanwhile, there's not really I'm
not saying there's no health risk at all. But people

(01:20:09):
will do what is right for them if they need
to quarantine because we know, okay, the coronavirus affects older
people and people with pre existing conditions, those people will
quarantine the same way they would in a flu epidemic,
the same way kids my quarantine in the nineteen thirties.
If polio broke out in their school, people would take

(01:20:29):
off from school for a little bit. You didn't need
laws and shut down the entire economy in order to
in order to survive these epidemics that we survived each time.
What do you think about the argument, speaking of James
al Tutor, author, writer, podcaster, what James and at Fellow
New Yorker, the argument that lockdowns didn't even have the

(01:20:51):
intended effect of suppressing the virus. Where do you come
down on that? Well, the lockdown the entire purpose of
the lockdowns from the very beginning of this, I mean
back in late February early March, I spoke with one
of the top epidemiologists from Imperial College who was helping
you guide policy and everything, and he was saying, Okay,
we need, we need. We don't know if this virus

(01:21:13):
can be contained or not, and we didn't know that then,
but we need to at least try containment, meaning you know,
some form of quarantine, and he said the reason for that,
which was which became the official reason in every country,
was to so called flatten the curve, to make sure
that hospitals wouldn't get overwhelmed by a sudden spike in cases.

(01:21:34):
That was the entire reason for any sort of shutdown.
And the idea was to never eradicate the virus with shutdowns.
That was never once spoken about. And now they're saying, well,
now we have to keep every the economy closed until
the virus eradicate. When have we ever done that for
any sort of illness or disease. We didn't do the

(01:21:56):
pro polio. We didn't do it for flu. There's been
pandemics in nineteen fifty eight, nineteen sixty eight, you know,
two thousand and three, two ten. We've never done this before.
And I think, if anything, that the lockdowns could be
exasperating problems, not only problems with the virus because now

(01:22:17):
everybody's quarantined inside, potentially giving it to each other, but
also you know, there's there's collateral damage. Has been mentioned
in the media a lot, but there's collateral damage from
keeping people at home. There's rising abuse cases. There's rising suicide,
there's rising drug addictions, there's rising divorces, there's rising deaths

(01:22:38):
from not being able to be treated for cancer or
blood pressure or strokes or whatever. So again, I think
people should have been trusted to quarantine themselves, which is
essentially what happened anyway, and we probably would not have
had any significant difference in deaths, but the economy would
have kept going instead of the precarious situation we're in now,

(01:23:00):
where you know, New York City is going to have
to fire tens of thousands of people. Other major cities
will entire, you know, fifty five million people at one
point or rather applied for unemployment insurance that during this period.
This is like horrific. Yeah, well, I hope people wake up,
I don't know, you know, instead of shouting at people
to put their masks on outside on the street like
a moron. I hope everyone will just understand what's really

(01:23:23):
going on here, and maybe we can start to turn
New York City and the rest of the country around
with it. James Altucher guys check out his show, his podcast,
read his stuff online. James, always great to have you man.
Stay safe. Thanks Buck, Thanks for having me on the show.
You're in the Freedom Hunt. This is the Buck Sex
and Show podcast. Doctor Falci. Today, you said you are

(01:23:49):
not for economic lockdown, yet your mitigation recommendations, from dating
to baseball, to restaurants to movie theaters have led to
this economic lockdown. Do you have any second thoughts about
your mitigation recommendations considering the evidence that despite all of
the things we've done the US, our death rate is

(01:24:10):
essentially worse than Sweden. I don't regret saying that the
only way we could have really stopped the explosion of
infection was by essentially, I want to say shutting down.
I mean essentially having the physical separation and the kinds
of recommendations that we've made. You've been a big fan
of Cuomo and the shutdown in New York. You've lauded

(01:24:32):
in New York for their policy. New York had the
highest death rate in the world. How can we possibly
be jumping up and down and saying, oh, Governor Quomo
did a great job. He had the worst death right
in the world. No, you misconstrued that, Senator, and you've
done that repetitively in the past. They got hit very badly.
They've made some mistakes right now, if you look at

(01:24:53):
what's going on right now, the things that are going
on in New York to get their test positivity a list,
all right, I can't even I can't handle this guy anymore. Okay, bull,
I got a call from the Test and Trace Corps
yesterday the day before that. They don't know anything. They're
just harassing me. You know, you know, are you making

(01:25:15):
sure you stay inside? Yeah? Of course. Are you doing
everything that we tell you to do? Yeah? Sure? Do
you know how to get a COVID test if you
need to? Yeah? I mean, I'm being serious. This is
what they asked me on the phone. They call me
if they have a human being called we look, I'm
polite as a person doing their job. I'm not gonna
hold a whole I don't hold them accountable for these
stupid policies, right, They're just doing what they what they're
told is their job. But the heck is this and

(01:25:38):
Rampaul's totally right. Fauci runs around being a little fanboy
for Cuomo. Cuomo is the worst, the worst COVID response
in the world from this moron. And it's the numbers.
Look at the debts, look at the numbers. Okay, the
worst in the world. And Fauci's now, well, they've done
all these good things. What have we done now that

(01:25:59):
we were doing earlier on Oh, we're not sending COVID
positive seniors in nursing homes. Okay, Quoma, figure that one
out the hard way. But see, this is the problem, folks.
It's all now. Well, sure you got hit really hard,
even though you have lockdowns, and even though you had
all these things. And yes, it's true that the lockdowns
were never meant to stop the virus from spreading permanently.

(01:26:21):
But because you're doing these things that we tell you
to do so well now in places like New York,
that's why the test positivity is so low. Well, what
about the fact that if it worked really well, it
would have worked really well in April, It would have
worked really well for the ten weeks that New York

(01:26:45):
was just on a total panic and people were dying,
you know, by the thousands every day. Yeah, that it
would have been different. It would have been different, right.
But no, now that we've been through it, they're going
to tell oh, it's because we're doing things so well
now that these areas are at lower degrees, which also

(01:27:07):
means I'm want to note that if we do see
a resurgence of cases in the wintertime and coinciding with
the flu season, you know what they're gonna tell us guaranteed,
you guys aren't doing a good enough job with our recommendations.
It's your fault, the class. This is the classic maneuver
of unaccountable bureaucrat morons. There's another there's another possibility here

(01:27:28):
over t sell immunity and cross immunity, which is, there
are a lot of papers written by real doctors, real
scientists at the top level and the international community saying
that they're actually finding this is a big component of it.
But the journals don't want to hear that, and they
the journals want to want to flex their web md
muscles against actual mds like this buffoon over at NBC

(01:27:51):
Plate twenty one. So the answer is no, it is
not nine percent of people that are susceptible to the infection.
So I guess my question is for I'm not a doctor,
I defer to your bertise on this and to his
But so Americans, here one thing from the CDC director
and another thing from you. Who are we to believe.
You're supposed to believe the science, and I'm telling you
the science. So he's not telling a science. I'm telling

(01:28:11):
you the science, and that's the answer. And if you
want to look up all the data, you're free to.
You can also talk to the following epidemiologist. Guess why
is he still going out before converts and speaking if
you say he's stand today in the presence that he
was as stated the last time, Americans are looking for
the best information, right, yeah, I'm giving it the best information.
And it's confirmed by people like Martin Coldorff, who's a

(01:28:32):
Harvard epidemiologist at Harvard Medical School. Let me finish, please,
Jay Bardacharia and Johnny and EDI's both epidemiologists at Stanford.
So he's naming doctors who have written on this and
who have looked at all the data, who are world class.
And yet if you still bring up cross A cross
immunity and T cell immunity added to antibodies to get

(01:28:54):
us to what is closer to herd immunity, right, the
disease spreads much less quickly. Even if thirty or forty
percent of the population is immune, you have a much
smaller field for it. To spread right, So that is
much more likely to be what has caused to slowdown
than these these policies that didn't work in the beginning,
but now we're told, oh, will they have worked? Now?

(01:29:15):
You know it's they're they're never gonna folks, just get
ready for this now. They'll never admit they were wrong
because they've done so much damage and they've been such
smug jerks about these mandates and lockdowns. They'll never admit
they were wrong. Thanks for listening to The bus Essen
Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app,

(01:29:37):
or wherever you get your podcasts. Ain't no party like
a Team Buck party, because a Team Buck party don't stop. Yeah,
we got Buck turned up to eleven. It's time for

(01:30:07):
roll call. Alrighty, roll call everybody, Facebook dot com, slash
Buck Sexton if you want to send us the Facebook
message on Instagram Buck Sexton or Team Buck at iHeartMedia
dot com so all fun things there. You can send
us those emails and let's get to what do we

(01:30:30):
got here? Let's get to uh, Maureen, come on, Maureen,
and well no, oh that's the that's not Maureen, that's high.
That bad Yeah, that was really bad. I just realized
that one. I'm definitely one of those people who's been
singing songs with the wrong lyrics for so long now
that I refuse to believe that I've had it. I've

(01:30:50):
had it wrong that long. Do you know what I mean?
Did you really think it was come on, Maureen? No, no, no, no,
no no. I knew that one as soon as as
soon as I said it. But there are others that
I'm like, no, it can't be that, you know, So
I'd love to hear some examples when you think of them. Yeah,
I'll definitely think of stuff. I've definitely had songs though
that for a long time, I was singing the wrong lyrics.

(01:31:12):
And then someone's like, that's not the lyrics. I'm like,
yes it is. You know, it's hard to believe that
you've been singing the wrong song lyrics for a very
long time. But anyway, I missed the nineties when I, oh,
I want to be Jesse's girl. Yeah, he's right. I
wish that I had. I wish that I could be
Jesse's girl or whatever. I had that one wrong. I

(01:31:35):
think everyone had that one wrong. Yeah, I wish I
had Jesse's girls. What he's saying, right, I think I
said I wish I was. Anyway, there's some other ones.
Producer Nick has pointed that out. All right, let's get
back to what Marien actually has to say. Hey, bucking
producer maur quick question. Once President Trump names his SCO
to his pick, is it legally allowed for the Senate
to just immediately vote on it with no hearings whatsoever?

(01:31:57):
I feel the hearings or nothing but theatrics and an
invitation should for the left to drag things out and
create a hostile environment for an appointee. After the immediate vote,
she should be sworn in the very next day. Thanks
for all you and Mark do for us, Maureen. I
think that, yeah, they don't have to have hearings. I

(01:32:18):
think it's up to the Senate. They just have to
give They have to have a vote for the advice
and consent clause to be to be fulfilled. And yeah,
I think that they shouldn't. I think they absolutely should
not do the hearing. I think that the hearing is
a mistake. I think that it's a bad idea. It
just allows them another line of attack against Amy Coney Barrett.

(01:32:39):
They'll play games. They'll try to extend it out. They'll
play timeline games. They'll say there needs to be a
you know, a federal investigation of Amy Coney Barrett's you know,
I don't know, stockholdings or something. They'll come up with something.
These people are. These people are ruthless and crazy, and
they don't want to believe it. They've been the party
of baby killers for the last forty years. They don't

(01:33:01):
want to believe. They don't want anyone to. And there's
some part of them they realize is that the Supreme
Court doesn't give you this wave of a hand that says, oh, yeah, no,
you can totally do abortion any time of pregnancy. A
lot of people are gonna think, hmm, maybe this isn't
the innocuous thing that they've been saying it is. Let's

(01:33:22):
see what we have here. Next up in the mix, Joe, Hello, men,
just listen to today's show and is always tremendous. I
gotta admit I'm liking this take no prisoner's attitude you've
adopted of late. This is the time to put our
foot down and end the madness. So I, for one,
appreciate that tone your setting as I'm sure your other

(01:33:44):
listeners due to keep up the fight, you and producer
Mark continue with the fun, entertaining and informative show. You
guys are good team. Shields high Joel, thank you right
see producer Mark. The people have spoken good. They like us, Yeah,
they like us exactly. It's nice we get to keep
jobs a little longer. Isn't that exciting? I like to
hear that. Yes, yeah, I like I like that too,
Like I want to get one of these jobs that

(01:34:05):
I don't want to do. I've done that before. That's
no fun. Yeah, we have fun. What is the worst
What is the worst job you've ever had? Like, I
mean going back to when you're scoop and ice cream
as a teenager, Like, what's the what's the one job
you're like? This sucks? Oh, because worst job I've ever
had I probably can't say on this radio show. I
actually did scoop ice cream once. That was Um, it

(01:34:27):
wasn't as bad as you think, but it was still
I mean manual labor. I was an unpaid camp counselor
for a summer called the Counselor in Training where you're
one year shy what you need to be. They had
this program and then you would guarantee to be a
camp counselor of the year after it. But I realized
once I was in it. One, if they like you,
they'll just hire you. You don't have through the trading.

(01:34:49):
And two all I was doing was making peanut butter
and jelly sandwiches and carrying around big bags of equipment
all day in the hot sun, like by myself. It
was the worst word job in the world. For free.
It was a free job. No, I'm sorry, shouldn't say free.
I think they gave me a for eight weeks. I
think I got a one hundred and fifty dollars stipend

(01:35:11):
or a two hundred dollars stipend or something like that,
you know, so I could get myself a nice walkman. Hey,
when you were a kid, that's all that mattered. Yeah,
I was like fourteen or fifteen. I guess you grew
up in what the sixties, So one hundred and fifty
dollars was a lot of money. Yeah. No, I mean
you could buy a whole twenty acre farm for one
hundred and fifty dollars when I was a kid. Get jerk,

(01:35:34):
but yeah, yeah, that was a bad That was a
bad gig. I'm trying to think of other gigs that
I've had. Tutoring. I tutored to make extra money when
I was or just to make money when I was
in high school, and tutoring is entirely dependent. The kids
were always well behaved. It was dealing with the parents
that was a that was a challenge. You know. The
parents would be like, why didn't he get an A?

(01:35:55):
And like, well, I don't know. I gave the kid
a great outline and we went through this stuff. But
you know, maybe he's got to study a little harder,
or maybe he's just not that smart. You know, these
are like you can't I don't know the parents. I'm
not a miracle worker. I don't know what to say,
you know what I mean, I'm doing the best I can.
You mean you didn't just take the test for them? No,
that's you gotta pay more money for that. And apparently

(01:36:16):
now you can go to prison for that as we
see from these uh this like college admission scandal. Thing
most fun job I probably ever have was being a
soccer coach. That was awesome. I want to coach again
one day. It's so fond to you ever coach, No you.
I mean you could coach ice hockey that I probably could.
I've never played though, Yeah, but if you know enough
about the game, like, I'm a much better coach than

(01:36:38):
I was a player, just because I can understand and
conceptualize the things. Who's gonna teach you the game? What
do you mean you don't know any sports? I mean
I guess soccer, I played them. I know tennis and
I know soccer. How do you How do you coach soccer? Hey,
score a goal, occasionally, run around the field with the ball. Wow,
look at you. You know that's funny is that the

(01:36:58):
audience is ninety five percent with you on the soccer hate.
So I can't even I can't even begin, you know,
I can't even like watching. Tried as a kid to
play quarterback or something. It would have been fun to
play football, And football didn't really exist in New York
City as a sport that was played in high school.
We just didn't have the fields or the programs for it,
so it didn't So that's why you get a lot
of soccer and lacrosse instead. But if you have soccer

(01:37:20):
and lacrosse fields, you have football fields. Um. Yeah, but
they didn't have the they didn't have the programs, meaning
they wouldn't have they have enough kids in football is
very expensive football team and yeah, I mean there's there's
and plus you got to compete with the uh you know,
you got to compete with this, the soccer and the
lacrosse teams that want those those fields. So yeah, there's
not a lot. I think if you get out in

(01:37:40):
the burbs, there's a little bit more football, but not really.
It's not like in the South. I watched Friday Night
Lights and there's football's life. We love it. Yeah, yeah,
you know they build major stadiums like in Texas for
high school football. I know that's you've seen Friday Night Lights,
right of course. Yeah yeah, all right, Andy? Right, Hey,
Buck and Mark, long time. I'm listener. Going back to

(01:38:01):
real news at the Blaze and Saturday Commie Bear crew. Wow, Andy,
you do go back my man original Saturday squad. Listen
every day. Buck is by far the air apparent to
mister Limbaugh. Don't tell my competitors that, Andy, but thank
you anyway. Listening to the Tuesday podcast, and I think
you can't take your eye off Romney. He's a shyster

(01:38:21):
and my expectations that he will not allow the Rather,
he will allow the vote and vote no with the Democrats.
He's never said he would side with Trump, just that
he would allow a vote. He's got an ego the
size of Cleveland and will capitalize on any opportunity he
sees to make himself a maverick. Allah. John McCain, Andy,

(01:38:41):
I do not disagree with you, Man, I said. I
didn't say that we're celebrating Mitt. I'm just saying, Okay,
he's moving the right direction, and if he does the
right thing here, we got to say good stuff. Mitt. Right,
we give credit where it is due, you know, I
always say that, and we do so. If Mitt votes
for assuming it's Amy Coney Barrett, we're gonna we're gonna

(01:39:05):
have like a mid appreciation day on the show, Well,
a mid appreciation the twenty seconds. Maybe I'll bring my
baseball glove. Yeah, what is that for? It's a it's
a baseball mit. Oh yes, yes, no, I knew that.
Uh So we'll see, man, Jim, I mean, rather, Andy,

(01:39:25):
I think you could be correct on this one. Though.
We're gonna watch mid very closely. He is a he's
a slippery one. That's for sure, you're in the freedom Hud.
This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. More roll call

(01:39:45):
Jim gets us going here. Lame duck President one a
president who lost an election but serves from November to
January twentieth two. A president who served eight years and
its ineligible to be voted toward the end of his
eighth year. Obama was a lame duck. Trump is not.
Shields and Gabbles High. Okay, Jim, thank you for the clarification.

(01:40:12):
We appreciate it. Ken, Dear Buck, I discovered you pretty
recently now I listen to you on your iHeart podcast. Yes,
new Team buck Ken. Nothing makes me happier than new
Team Buck joining him the fold year. I find you
refreshingly unpolished and relatable in comparison to your contemporaries. Okay,
I'll take it unpolished. I'm not sure you know, but

(01:40:32):
does that mean I look scruffy. You're also extremely perceptive
and I've become one of my go to resources for analysis.
Keep up the excellent work. Since I'm a long haul
trucker and live on the road, I guess that makes
me team Gypsy Shields High. Hey, Ken, we love Team
Buck truckers man. Great to have you on board. I
promise we'll keep you entertained, updated informed. That's how we roll,

(01:40:55):
and we'll keep we'll keep along there with you. Please
tell some of your your fellow truckers out there, you
know you're hanging out, you know, getting a milkshake or whatever.
You know, you'd say, Hey, you gotta check out this
guy's podcast, Pass the Buck. Is that what you think
truckers do? Well? I was I can't. I would say,
not a beer. They're you know, their livelihood is dependent

(01:41:15):
on being reliable and high level drivers, so they can't
be drinking beer that you know. I'm of course, but
you think they just all go to the truck shop
together share a milkshake every night. I don't know if they.
I mean, milkshake is a good thing. I like milkshakes.
What's wrong with milkshakes? And milkshakes are granted. I'm just
curious your mindset of what truckers do. I mean, when
they're at the stop, I assume they get food and

(01:41:36):
you know chat. I don't know. Fine, fair, all right,
I saying, yeah, the truckers team Buck truckers will weigh
on this. They'll tell us whether they indeed so. Look,
milkshake is technically a little high calorically can be a
little fatty. I understand forever these guys want to be
able to fit into their trucks. They're not just drinking
a milkshake every night. I mean, I'm pretty sure if
you if you want to gain weight, one of the

(01:41:58):
best ways to do would just be, you know, after
you've eaten dinner, it's time to go to bed, just
have make yourself a nice big milkshake and just just
pound that thing because you're you're looking at it's easy
to drink eight hundred, eight hundred to one thousand calories
that way easy. Yeah, that's why I don't like, Like,
I enjoy milkshakes, but it's not my go too because
like I'm drinking it, let me eat ice cream. It's solid.

(01:42:19):
It makes me feel like I'm enjoying something. Yes, Yes,
and Team Bucks milkshake brings all the ears to the yard. Um, No,
you went there? Yeah all right, Chris rides producer Mark
is your color commentator when sports come up, background and insight,
shield side Yeah, no, he's so. Yeah, we don't have

(01:42:40):
Mark you play by play on the show. That would
be weird. Hey, Mark, just start pretending like you're watching sports,
but he does tell us about what's going on this sport. Well,
since since we're on the subject, anything interesting happening this
week in sports? Yeah, I mean you've got the Stanley
Cup Finals. The who's in the Stanley Cup Finals? It's
the Tampa Bay Lightning and the Dallas Stars. A good
series so far. Yeah, okay, cool, I'm glad that's the

(01:43:06):
big thing on my ducket. I like it. Nick. Hey Buck,
listen to your show yesterday, and I have an answer
for how the left will block the Scotus vote. Okay,
I'm all ears. Nick. You keep saying it'll be done
because historically and legally it is correct. That is the
very argument they will use because historically the USA is
a racist country run by old white men and a

(01:43:28):
constitution was written by rich white men, so they cannon
must be ignored. Any Senator who says differently will be
branded a racist and be canceled. Unfortunately, this is the
world we live in. This is one time I'd like
to be wrong, but no, I'm not. Hang tough, my friend, Nick.

(01:43:49):
We'll see. I don't think I don't think that's gonna
be there, but I don't know. I don't think that's
gonna be the approach. But I like that you're thinking
outside the box because I don't know how procedurally that
would really change the thing. I mean, maybe that's going
to be part of their of their pressure campaign, but
I think that they're gonna They're gonna think something else up.

(01:44:11):
I don't know. Todd, thank you for highlighting the story
of Jake Gardner on your show Monday. It is a travesty,
a tragedy. It's just heartbreaking. Nebraska maybe fly over country
to most of the rest of the America and the
butt of a lot of jokes. But we are good people,
optimistic and hard working, loyal and kind, God fearing and
America loving. This is not the way Nebraskans treat each other.

(01:44:32):
Don Klein and whoever sat on that grand jury should
be ashamed of themselves for the rest of their lives
for bringing those charges against mister Gardner. They have blood
on their hands for cowering to the mob. You're right,
his own local government betrayed him, and now another VET
has committed suicide. It didn't have to happen. Buck, You
really showed your class and character by speaking up about

(01:44:53):
Jake Gardener and his story and taking the strong stance
you did. Thank you. If this can happen in Nebraska,
it can happen anyw where. It's terrifying. Well, Todd really
appreciate you writing in with this, and we certainly do
our best to raise important stories like this to the
national level national consciousness, and it is. It's a heartbreaking story,

(01:45:13):
and certainly we have always appreciated I mean Nebraskans have
a special place in my heart because kfab Omaha was
one of the first big stations to put this show
on the air now going on almost exactly four years ago,
so we've had Nebraskans listening in now for years, and
we really appreciate the way that they've made Team Buck

(01:45:34):
a part of their daily lives. Horace Buck, I have
to disagree with you on the Brionna Taylor shooting. Let's
not forget her boyfriend was wanted for selling drugs. He
wasn't a terrorist about to blow up a building. They
could have waited until the exit the building and apprehended
him at that time or any other time. There was
no need to confront him in his girlfriend's apartment. They
knew it was his girlfriend's apartment. A cornered person that

(01:45:55):
is more likely to resort to fight over flight. I
do believe you've heard that some police were is worthwhile.
If so, what reform do you see a problem with
no knock warrants? I know you don't have a problem
with stopping frisk another place we disagree. But if you
agree there should be some police reform, what does it
look like to you? Horace? This is gonna sound like
I'm dodging, but we're at the very very end of

(01:46:16):
the show. I'll say this, no knock warrants. The reason
that they would do that is because, especially for drug cases,
if you knock and you give somebody a few minutes
to put all the drugs in the toilet, you're not
gonna find drugs on the scene necessarily, right, or they're
gonna hide the stash. So that's why that exists. And
as for police reform, it's a very broad range of issues.
I actually seek prosecutorial reform more than specifically police reform.

(01:46:40):
So that's the best answer I can give you with
a clock ticking down to zero. But thank you for
writing in and a team until tomorrow, shields, high
Advertise With Us

Popular Podcasts

Dateline NBC
Death, Sex & Money

Death, Sex & Money

Anna Sale explores the big questions and hard choices that are often left out of polite conversation.

Stuff You Should Know

Stuff You Should Know

If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.

Music, radio and podcasts, all free. Listen online or download the iHeart App.

Connect

© 2024 iHeartMedia, Inc.