Deep State Coup Part Two

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:03):
You are entering the freedom huge Democrats plotting another coup
against President Trump, Murder spiking in thirty six of fifty
top US cities. Holland's top doc says there's no evidence

(00:23):
masks really worked against COVID. A seven year old bar
owner sent to jail under lockdown, Chieranny plus TikTok faces
sale or band. This is the Buck Sexon Show, where
the mission or mission is to decode what really matters
with passionable intelligence. Make no mistake American great, You're a

(00:45):
great American. Again the Buck Sexton Show begins. He's a
great guy. No, welcome everybody to the Buck Sexton Show.
Hope you had a great weekend. Thank you so much
for being here, as always an honor and a privilege
to have you here with me and mine. Do we

(01:06):
have much to get to today as we tend to.
I know it's August, but it's August in a presidential
election year, which means that there's going to be a
lot more going on in the news cycle than there
usually would be. And we also have a pandemic raging.
We have an anti cop protest movement making cities across
the country less safe. We have rioters running around in
the streets like lunatics on a regular basis, and an

(01:29):
economy that no one really knows the full damage done
to it until we get out of this current situation,
this current state. So that then brings me to what
I'm starting to see the early signs of, and it
is the Democrats making sure that they use everything they
can right now to create an unfalsifiable narrative of Trump

(01:55):
cheated if he wins. That's going to be a thing
you hear. And more than that, and this is where
I start to get really concerned. You see a movement
among Democrats to create narratives. And we know the power
of narratives. We know how dangerous they can be. For example,

(02:15):
cops kill unarmed black men as part of an epidemic
of racism across the country on a continuous and systematic basis. Therefore,
let's defund cops. Let's treat law enforcement like they're the enemy.
That's a terrible idea, and people are dying because of that.
So I think it's important we all keep that in

(02:37):
mind here, right, that narratives can push us to make
very very poor decisions. But you have, for example, the
story of Russia collusion, which has just faded into the background,
even though it was the single most prominent news story
of the first three years of the Trump presidency. It

(02:58):
was all alive. We used to hear from so called
experts and big time news journos, multi millionaire anchors on
a nightly basis that Christopher Steele, the author of the dossier,
was such a brilliant a brilliant intelligence mind. Clearly, if
he wrote this dossier, it must be true. We heard

(03:20):
that there were going to be all these massive revelations,
Adam Schiff and other Democrat members of Congress promising the
other shoe would drop TikTok TikTok any day. Now, No,
that was not true. That was all a lie. And
what we saw was that that lie wasn't just a
media lie used for the purposes of a political weapon

(03:43):
against the president, but also used as an excuse within
the apparatus of the federal government to go after the
president of the United States, to use the law enforcement
apparatus to try and create it's not not just an investigation,
but a prosecutable offense out of nothing, to force an impeachment,

(04:07):
to force a destruction of all that so far the
Trump administration had been able to accomplish. We see all
of this, and we understand very clearly that this was
a deep state coup effort. Right We see that they

(04:30):
were using these lives beyond just convincing people that Trump
was evil, the Trump was bad. They were using them
as the basis, as the predicate for investigation, as the
justification for spying tools to be used against the president
of the United States. And now we see something else happening.

(04:51):
The story that's out there about Trump won't concede. Trump
won't allow himself to be defeat in this election. It
doesn't matter. He won't step down. Now there's no basis
for this right there. There's no reason to believe that

(05:12):
this is actually true. But it doesn't matter that it's
not true, the same way it didn't matter that Russia
collusion was all a big lie. They are going with this.
They're doing everything they can here because it is useful
for as long as they can get away with it.

(05:32):
It's useful to say things like Trump is a fascist.
That's absurd. He's had the biggest opening for fascism imaginable
if that's what he had wanted. And look who the
real fascists are Cuomo yelling at people that they need
to do what he says or else, Newsom unleashing the

(05:55):
force of the state to lock people down. Unless it's
a protest, then it's okay. Remember how last week I said, sarcastically,
are rules just for the little people? We know they
are just for the little people. Mayor Bowser of DC
officially exempted. And I believe that I got the ball

(06:15):
rolling here with a megaviral tweak. I was gonna say
it that was seen all over the country saying, hold
on a second, why do we have a two week
quarantine in DC for anyone who comes from certain states?
But it doesn't apply to all the not socially distanced
mourners that John Lewis's fourth funeral ceremony. Really ah, it's

(06:41):
all political rules are for the little people. It does not.
They don't care how much they have to live, They
don't care how they're distorting and destroying principles on a
regular basis. It is useful in the moment. Hypocrisy is
powerful if you embrace it, and that's what they've done.
So we have these stories that President Trump is not

(07:05):
going to leave office. This is basically nothing. We have
stories about him as a fascist or even if people
coming Here's Jim Clyburn saying exactly that play thirteen. What
I said starting about two and a half maybe three
years ago, after one instead of the unions, that I
feel very strongly that this man has taken on a

(07:26):
strong arm tactics, and I feel very strongly that he
is Mussolini, who is Hitler. I said that back then,
and I believe that I believe very strongly this guy
never had an idea about being one to peacefully transfer power.
I don't think he plans to leave the White House.

(07:49):
He doesn't plan to have an unseted elections. I believe
that he plans to installed himself in some kind of
emergency way to n to office. And that's why the
American people had better wake up. Oh we're supposed to
wake up and believe this absurd lie. We're supposed to

(08:11):
believe that Trump is a fascist who won't leave office
if he loses. What are they sending this based on
absolutely nothing? But you know, in the meantime, you have
the liberal intelligensia such as it is, the lib establishment,
being very clear that they think that there might be

(08:33):
a contested election, so they're trying to convince you Trump
won't leave office if he loses. They're also telling you
there's going to be an election that they don't think
is going to be a clear victor on election night.
But I thought Trump was so terrible. He's gonna lose
by so much. Oh no, no no, no, they know it's
gonna be. It is going to be a tight election.
We all see that coming. And they're doing things like

(08:54):
having John Podesta in a war game. This is written
about in the New York Times, and this is how
it goes. A big popular win for Joe Biden and
a narrow electoral defeat, presumably reached after weeks of county
of votes in Pennsylvania in a war game. For this
war game, they cast John Podesta, who was Hillary Clinton's
campaign chairman, in the role of mister Biden. They expected

(09:17):
him when the votes came in to concede, just as
Missus Clinton had, but mister Podesta, playing Biden, shocked the
organizers by saying his party felt they wouldn't let him concede,
alleging voter suppression. He persuaded the governors of Wisconsin and
Michigan to send pro Biden electors to the Electoral College.

(09:37):
In that scenario, California, Oregon, and Washington then threatened to
secede from the United States if mister Trump took office
as planned. The House named mister Biden president. The Senate
and the White House stuck with mister Trump. At that
point in the scenario, the nation stopped looking to the
media for curers and waited to see what the military
would do. The military side in the election. These are

(10:03):
very influential, powerful Democrats. This is the New York Times
writing about this and their war gaming out what happens
if Biden doesn't concede the election and Democrats say, no, sorry,
not letting it happen. A hold on a second. I
thought they were worried that Trump wouldn't concede the election.
Oh what you're really getting here? I know you could
say this is fantasy, this is war gaming. Why they

(10:25):
waste their time on this? This is absurd? Or is it?
What you see here is a psychological refusal among the
Democrat party. And I don't mean this just a few Democrats,
a few crazies. Am I talking about Antifa here? I'm
talking about the very top levels. Think of how much
Trump has deranged them, and this presidency has emotionally wounded Democrats.

(10:47):
They can't psychologically process how the country could elect this man,
the thought of him being president for four years, us
going through a pandemic, and then the American people still
picking Donald Trump over the Democrat, doesn't matter the Democrat is.
They simply cannot bear it. They can't bear it to

(11:08):
the point where they're considering any and all options to
stop it from happening. Given that they already tried the
soft coup of the Russia collusion lie and the deep
state against Trump, given that they've tried to convinced some
stealth Democrats to leave behind in the administration or in

(11:29):
the executive branch, to use the twenty fifth Amendment to
remove Trump from office, all these that they tried this
preposterous impeachment of nothing that didn't go anywhere. Given all
these things, what do you think the Democrats are not
willing to do the next time around? When you ask
yourself that question, you see the options are narrowing. With

(11:51):
each passing week, they're narrowing. And that's also why they're
trying to change the rules now. They will not accept
Donald Trump winning four more years, just as they didn't
accept Trump winning the first four years. That is what
we're heading for now as a country. Understand that, understand

(12:12):
where we are going. There is no future in which
Donald Trump wins reelection and Democrats accepted, So we might
as well embrace this fight. Now you're in the freedom mind.
This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Call me a

(12:34):
cynic Joe if you will. But one thing I think
we all learned in the year two thousand is the
Republicans are pretty good at fixing the way we count
ballots in this country. And now with this whole furer
over mail in votes, we could be sitting down for
Thanksgiving dinner not really knowing specifically who the president elect

(12:57):
of the United States is. Now we all have to
pray that there's going to be a landslife for Joe
Biden in order to avoid this conflict. Notice how they're
already assuming that the problem is going to be with
Trump not accepting the results of the election, and then
they immediately will slip to But yeah, I mean, you know,
we're not going to be able to accept it if

(13:17):
Trump wins. Right, they go back and forth. They haven't
covered from all sides of course, mail in ballots. We've
run an experiment here in New York for a congressional
race with mail in ballots, and it is being described
even in the New York Times. This is a Democrat
primary as botched. Why the botched New York City primary

(13:40):
has become the November nightmare, that's the name of the
piece here. Nearly six weeks later, two congressional races remain undecided,
and officials are trading blame over the mishandling of tens
of thousands of mail in ballots. So you'll notice there's
been a knee jerk, reflexive reactionary, Oh my gosh, Trump

(14:05):
says mail in ballots are going to be a problem.
So we can't we simply can't allow that to be
the consensus opinion. We have to shoot down, shout down
anything Trump says. But mail in ballots are going to
be a problem. And you know, the best way that
I can see to describe this was actually an off

(14:28):
hand description from somebody who works for the Board of
Elections here in New York, and it's a person familiar
with the internal operations of the city's Board of Elections
but not authorized to speak on the record. Said that
having to increase the number of mail in ballots had
caused enormous struggles at the agency. Imagine saying this is

(14:50):
the quote from the person in the article. We don't
know who this is, but it really illustrates it. Well.
Imagine saying I'm having a dinner party for ten people
and then saying, no, it's a hundred people. It's a
very steep learning curve. You don't say, oh, but back,

(15:10):
people have been doing absentee voting for years. Yeah, that's
a small percentage of overall votes. And absentee votes often
don't even get counted before the election is determined. Right,
They would only get counted if the election is so
tight in certain states that you would need to see
based on the outstanding ballots. What happened in New York?

(15:34):
Why is it that six weeks? Six weeks? Can you
imagine what the country would be going through? Can you
imagine what we would be facing as a country if
we went through a six week long Oh, let's fight
it out over how to count these different Remember it's

(15:57):
what you saw in Florida and the year two and
ended in Bush v. Gore. The Supreme Court play that
out across the entire country America. Every state has mail
in ballots, Every state is going to be contested under
all kinds of rules, and they'll they will argue over
not just how the rules are enforced about ballots. Democrats

(16:21):
left just because we know they always try to structure
the system to favor and outcome, not a system that
favors fairness. Democrats will contest the very rules themselves that
they will then also contest based on outcome. Oh, they
should not have been a requirement beforehand. Oh, this is
on constitutional, this is discriminatory. Everything they will They're going

(16:44):
kitchen sink, my friends, They're going to throw everything they
have at this. What were the problems in the New
York ellection. This includes Karl Maloney, who's been my congressman
in New York City for a very long time. And
it's a classic rich she's got a primary challenge, and
you're you're going through how many votes need to be

(17:07):
in question for there to be a problem, and looking
at this congressional primary, well, when you start to see
what the real difference is here, then all of a
sudden you understand, Hold on a second, we are signing
up for a disaster, an absolute disaster. If we allow

(17:29):
this to go forward. You're talking about in the low
thousands of votes that separate out these two these two candidates.
New York City Board of Elections sent more than seven
hundred and fifty thousand ballots with prepaid return envelopes. Four

(17:49):
hundred thousand were mailed back. And when you look at
the difference in these races, you're talking about a few
thousand votes right now, separate out who's ahead, who gets
to be a member of Congress from who doesn't. And
we're going to believe what that they're going to get

(18:11):
it better. Oh, here we go, mister patell trails the
incumbent Representative Karen Maloney by some thirty seven hundred votes.
More than twelve thousand ballots have been disqualified, twelve hundred
of them were missing postmarks. This is going to be
This election is going to turn into a This is

(18:32):
going to turn into a factional fight for control of
the United States government if we let the Democrats have
their way. Thanks for listening to The Bus Sesson Show podcasts.
Remember to subscribe on Apple Podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or
wherever you get your podcasts. One of the things that
are happening and you're reading about every day is we
have many vaccine candidates are in the final phase of

(18:55):
clinical trials, and we expect to have a vaccine available
very very early before the end of the year, far
ahead of schedule. There's never been a schedule. The FDA
has been great at my instruction, and they're doing it
in literally a tiny fraction of the time. This could
have taken years, and literally we're in months and we're
very close to having that vitalized, and then we're using

(19:18):
our military to distribute the vaccine all over Logistically, we've
also cut mountains of red tape to speed the development
of hundreds of new therapeutics and treatments, and that's coming
along very well. Remedisseverere has already out, it's been very successful,
and many other things are happening therapeutically, which is going

(19:39):
to be, frankly, as far as I'm concerned, in many
respects more important than the vaccine, because you can have
people get a shot or have a transfusion and they
leave the hospital to get better. Now, if you were trying,
as being of wargaming, to create a circumstance where you
could test whether Democrats love power more than the country.

(20:04):
Whether the media is, in fact, in this country, the
mainstream media, the corporate media, the enemy of the American people,
if you were trying to construct the true test of that,
even more so than in rooting against Americas in subtle
or not so subtle ways during a time of war,

(20:27):
saying oh no, we're just we're just about peace, man,
we just want the war to end. You know, the
things that you've seen the media do in the past.
But if you're looking for the purest distillation of their
lust for power at the expense of their fellow Americans,
I think you may see that in the next ninety days,
because here's what's going to happen. There will be an effort.

(20:50):
There will be an effort underway to undermine the confidence
and faith that the American people can have in Operation
warp Speed, which is Trump's name for the all out
get a vaccine program that the federal government's currently engaged in. Now,
let me and let me put aside for a second

(21:11):
any concerns that anybody has in general about vaccines. That's
not that's not a debate I want to have today,
and that's not what I'm talking about. I'm telling you
that specifically here The New York Times, which I can
assure you is all about vaccinations in all other circumstances,
is going to be at least up until the election. Now,
we probably won't have a vaccine, according to people in

(21:34):
the White House I've been talking to, until very end
of years, So that means likely December. It might be
the greatest Christmas present we've ever gotten in our lifetime, right,
all of a sudden, you know, vaccines are out there,
but you're also going to be told in the meantime, oh,
we're not sure it will be there. We don't know

(21:56):
if it's going to be that effective. Uh. You know,
there's going to be so much politics at play in
this whole conversation around a vaccine, because here's the narrative,
the Democrats are desperate to destroy Trump dealt with a
very difficult situation. But because of his ability to harness

(22:17):
both public and private sector research, use the Defense Production Act,
and use the Coronavirus Task Force led by Vice President
Pence to the best possible effect, we would have a
vaccine in what would be the shortest time period that
anybody's ever even imagined for something like this, and we're

(22:38):
going to get our lives back, and we're going to
get back the America in terms of the economy, the dynamism,
the economic growth, the wage growth, the super low unemployment.
We're going to get all of that back once this
vaccine gets distributed. They will do anything, anything to shut
that narrative down. They just don't want that to be

(23:00):
or perception, and that even includes I mean, I just
did by way of an offhand search. Sometimes this is
a very good way to measure perception and what's going
on in the with the media. I just did coronavirus
at New York Times or sorry, vaccine New York Times.

(23:20):
Rather in new search. Here's what comes up. This is
from today. A coronavirus vaccine is coming. Just don't call
it warp speed. Scientists need to show us the data
that's exactly what they're working on. Don't call it warp speed.
Huh why not? Why is that? Why is that bad?
Scientists worry about political influence over coronavirus vaccine project. It

(23:43):
just keeps going. Russia sets mass vaccination for October after
a shortened trial. We think, would you I'm just gonna
ask you this, would you rather inject yourself with something
the Russian government rushed through or the US government when
quickly as it could on. Just remember that as the
way New York Times Canada's key role in creating a

(24:07):
once awaited vaccine. My friends, you're going to see so
much of the following. Trump is not responsible for the
vaccine progress. Don't hold your breath on a vaccine. It
may not work that well. We may not be able
to get doses to minorities and those most affected disproportionately,

(24:30):
which is those that construct The media has for this,
even though the virus affects everybody, may not be able
to get it out there fast enough. It could have
been faster if it weren't for Trump. You'll hear that
they'll they'll find endless variations of negativity to infuse into
all reporting on the vaccine up until the election day.

(24:52):
Because think about this, what is the what is the
lives saved estimate that we would have if Trump gets
this vaccine done in let's say, by the end of
the year. And look, I understand this. Presidents don't fight wars.
Soldiers do. Presidents don't create a dynamic economy. Workers and

(25:12):
entrepreneurs and people working in business do right. So presidents
get more and less credit in a lot of ways
than they should. But let's understand Trump has been held
responsible by the media for every state failure against COVID,
for the bad economy, all this stuff. Well, guess what.
He also then needs to be given credit for spearheading

(25:35):
a mass vaccination program that may well be setting an
unprecedented record here for effectiveness and speed, right, and he
should get credit for that too. They want to make
sure that doesn't happen. They want him to get all
of the downside, including things he had nothing to do

(25:55):
with him that were completely out of his control, from
the fight against COVID, and none the upside from success.
Because here's here's the choice they really don't want people
to be faced with because I think we a lot
of us now this would go okay if it turns
out Trump can handle the pandemic and we do have
a vaccine and we are seeing finally our way out

(26:18):
of the woods, so to speak. You want a Trump
economic recovery or a Biden economic recovery. Mean Biden is
the proverbial sack of potatoes that Democrats are saying they
would vote for Rover Trump. Here I'm cor barbernar Rut there,
Malayja got the sun on them, and I know what's

(26:41):
going on. You know, I'm just gonna yearn sir and
the caramera and I've been doing this for like one
hundred and eighty years, and I'm kind of just gonna
be that guy. That's who they want you to vote for,
that's who they think is the dynamic leadership figure that
should be in charge. Then I'd says, we're supposed to
find out this week as vice president will be. We

(27:02):
will have to see. I feel like they're going to
keep delaying that better to give the media a talking
point for another week or two, to get in as
many and as diverse an array of name as possible
so that we're not talking about Biden because the vice
president thing, that's going to be exciting to everybody in
the media for like a couple of weeks and then
they'll probably move on to something else. But the Democrats

(27:26):
are going to be willing to say all kinds of
things between now in the election about vaccines that they
would never normally say, and it will change behaviors, it
will affect policy. It is reckless what they will do.
I'm telling you that right now, it's not just about
preventing Trump from getting the credit. They're going to want
to keep people more afraid, more in despair. Remember we

(27:48):
have had so many drug overdoses and suicides, depths of despair.
I mean the impact on public health right now. You know,
we Americans in particular have a very high at very
indulgent food culture. And I'm speaking, yes, you know, from

(28:10):
a guilty conscience on this one, but we also tend
to have a high output and like to be very
you know, aggressive about strength and working out and aerobic exercise.
That has been wiped away from millions and millions of US.
I know it sounds a little superficial, but it's not.
The impact on public health from that is massive, massive,

(28:33):
and they're not calculating any of that. They don't care
about any of that. They'll continue the lockdowns and they'll
be doubters of the vaccine until Joe Biden gets elected.
And then I can assure you, if Biden wins in
late November, there'll be all these news stories or made
to late November, all these news stories of ah because
of some Biden decisions. Now, there'll be more vaccine than

(28:54):
anybody anticipated, Oh it turns out the vaccine is really safe. Oh,
look at that, We actual actually have a cure for coronavirus.
But they're not going to say it until after the election,
because everybody knows that their single biggest asset right now
in their pursuit of political power is the misery and

(29:16):
the anxiety of the American people. And that's why they
need to make sure that the story continues that Trump
has done the worst job of anyone. Joe Scarborough, fake Republican,
actual Democrat, play Cliff too, so you can go through
that laundry list. It's people aren't making a decision based
on his personality. They're making a decision based on just

(29:39):
calamitous policies that have put the United States and the
worst position of any country on the planet. I mean,
we should not be where we are right now, the
worst position of any country on the planet. That's just
not true. The only real way to measure this would

(30:01):
be in per per capita, per capita deaths from COVID.
And when you do that, when you actually adjust for population,
guess what, you know, we are in a much better position,
have been in a much better position than a whole
lot of countries also, because Democrats were apoplectic screaming about
how when you do test and test and test more,

(30:21):
all this testing need, right, we have all this need
for testing. Now we know more about the infected population.
I think a lot of other countries, the infection, especially
among younger among the younger cohorts just ripped through them
and people cleared it and now they're okay, And that's
what happened. We are heading toward her immunity in America.

(30:45):
I know you're not supposed to say that, Oh, that's
like the most evil and vicious thing I managed, but
we are heading toward her immunity. Despite the best efforts
of the United States, Government of the States, of the
Democrat Party and a lot of Republicans to pretend that
we could stop the spread of this virus. It's simply

(31:06):
not true. We're heading to herd immunity. But we're doing
so with the maximum amount of pain, suffering, stupidity, and
economic devastation possible. We have made this whole thing so
much worse. And it was going to be bad, but
we have made it so much worse. The failure to
protect senior citizens. I mean, when you look at the

(31:27):
average age of those deceased from this, the median age
of those diseased, it's increasingly clear it's over eighty. It's
people who are at risk from any and all health
health challenges that could be lethal, right, whether it's the
flu or heart disease or anything else. And instead of
an all out focus to protect those communities, you know,

(31:50):
to give our seniors who are eighty eighty five another
good fifteen years of life if possible, right, instead of
that folk or more than fifteen. But you know, instead
of that focus, we have a focus that was on
everyone lock them down and just smash their face into

(32:12):
the nonsense of universal masking outdoors always all the time,
endless lockdown, not opening schools. It's a disaster, but it's
a disaster that a lot of people have been egging
on because you know what the ultimate truth of this
situation is to your average Democrat, and they should, really

(32:35):
they should do a poll on this question. But to
your average Democrat, if asked whether Donald Trump or COVID
nineteen is the bigger disaster to hit America, I bet
you a vast majority would say it is Donald Trump
who is the true pandemic. They are insane. You're in

(32:56):
the Freedom hud. This is the Buck Sex and Show post. Well,
Bernie Sanders just acknowledged the reality. I mean, Joe Biden's
campaign really is a trojan horse for the far left
of the Democratic Party. Bernie Sanders and Alexandrocasio Cortez wrote
his criminal justice platform, which is going to let violent

(33:17):
felons out of prison, which is going to eliminate the
use of bail, so violent felons are going to get
out of prison or going to get out of jail
while they're pending their trial for violent crimes. But it's
not just that. I mean, look at what Joe Biden
himself said on the campaign trail that Data O'Rourke is
going to run his gun control policy, which is going
to be gun confiscation. They're going to give amnesty to

(33:37):
millions and millions of illegal immigrants so they can take
your jobs and also get their healthcare funded by you.
At the same time, they're going to take away your
health insurance on the job. They're also going to take
radical steps like turning Washington, DC into a state or
packing the Supreme Court to rubber step their left wing agenda.

(33:58):
I understand now in more detail than ever before, that
Joe Biden is actually the perfect candidate for the Democrat
Party right now. He's perfect for them. Let me explain why,
because he's been in politics so long and he's an
entirely unremarkable white male senator from Delaware. Right people that

(34:22):
don't pay that much attention to politics, perhaps some of
the swing voters will not really know about the leftism
which Senator Cotton. Their points out that Joe Biden will
infuse all across America, the socialism that will really be
a driving characteristic of a Joe Biden presidency. But also
Joe Biden has no political legacy to protect. He in

(34:44):
his sense, becomes the man brought in to shake everything up,
to destroy, to do whatever is necessary, whatever the left
wants him to do, and they will revere him for
all time afterwards for it. But he has no There's
no Biden, there's no Biden's son who's going to to
run for president. There's no Biden name that's going to
echo through the ages as someone that is going to

(35:06):
be elected just based upon that. No Biden will do
his part for the left. He'll be well compensated, which
is very important to him and his family and heirs
and do whatever whatever they want him to do, without
any regard for what the future looks like. Right in
a sense, he's brought in as as the guy who

(35:28):
doesn't care what comes politically ten years down the line.
This is his shot to be president. The left knows it,
and so he's being offered up and he'll do whatever
they He'll do whatever they want him to do, and
the most disastrous of their policies Biden's not smart enough
to figure this out, will be left at his feet.

(35:48):
But things like amnesty, once they get that through, my friend,
there's no undoing it. So Biden then just becomes the
perfect weapon of the socialist left. That's what's happening. Thanks
for listening to the Buss and Show podcasts. Remember to
subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio, Apple or wherever you
get your podcasts. Biden supports raising your taxes. They want

(36:12):
to raise your taxes three, four or even five times.
And on businesses, they want to put all your businesses,
which is basically from a lot of standpoint, your jobs
out of business. He wants to pack the court with
radical far left judges. Indoctrinate your children with what they're

(36:32):
teaching in schools, which we're ending and we've ended. And
they want to have open borders, sanctuary cities, but open borders.
They want to rip down your wall. Think of this.
Wants to rip down your wall. We're spending billions of
dollars building one of the most incredible structures you've ever seen.
It's one of the largest developments ever in the history
of this country. Think of that. The wall, it's you know,

(36:55):
hundreds of miles long, over five hundred miles. They want
to daniel wall. It's what kept a lot of very,
very sick people out of our country, and now it's
keeping bad people out of our country, people that we
don't want. The Trump said, there, what could you point
you and say, it's not true about Joe Biden, higher taxes,
sanctuary cities, abolished borders, and doctorate your children. I mean,

(37:18):
they would quibble with the terminology, but all of that's true.
That is what Joe Biden would do. That is what
Joe Biden wants, That's what the Democratic Party wants. All true.
So why is it that that's not really reflected in
perception in so many of the states that are going
to be in play for this election well, because as

(37:39):
you know, there's going to be different messages for different groups.
And oh gosh, Governor witt Marop in Michigan, when she's
not being a tyrant, oh yeah, she's making sure that
Michiganders know that Joe Biden's on their side. Play fifteen.
I think Joe Biden's message resonates with Michiganders. Were hard working,
good people who want competent governance that looks out for

(38:01):
us and keeps us safe. And Joe Biden offers the
kind of steady, ethical leadership that we're craving right now.
And number two, the fact that they've announced that they're
taking ads off makes me very suspicious. You know, I've
seen poles that have them up double diges. I've seen
poles that have it in single diges. The fact of
the matter is just by them announcing that, we know

(38:22):
that the divorce group here in Michigan is going to
backfill that to some extent. And so this is still
going to be a competitive race. It is going to
tighten up, and no one should be taking Michigan for granted.
That's what's going to happen. Democrats who are in the
more purple and in play states are going to be

(38:43):
taking a message to their people of just platitudes and bs.
Oh gosh, Joe Biden. Yeah, he just wants good governance
and looking out for you. And Joe Biden's a moron,
really not a smart guy. No one thinks he's a
smart guy. No one thinks he's good at anything really
other than running for Senate in a state that and
no offense at Delaware. You know, once you kind of

(39:03):
get in trench there, I mean, you're kind of the
senator from Delaware, and I'd be a whole lot of challenges.
So you know, the guy really is about as you know, politically,
is as impressive as being like the mayor of Buffalo,
but he does sit in the United States, or mayor
of any kind of mid mid tier city. But nonetheless,

(39:25):
Joe Biden is the offering of the Democrat Party in
this year. This is what they're telling us we need
to be doing. I think it's completely absurd. And he's
also at the forefront of a party that right now
wants to defund police. They haven't given up on this,

(39:45):
they're still acting like this isn't the most insane policy
decision of recent memory. I mean, you know, it's one
you could argue about the virus stuff and COVID the lockdowns.
There are arguments to be had on different side to
that issue. I think that unfortunately hysteria has won out
over reason and adult thinking. But you can at least

(40:08):
there are different sides to these issues. When it comes
to defunding the cops, there's no intelligent argument for yeah,
let's just let's just in places where they're having more
violent crime and where they can't get violent crime under control,
let's give police less resources and less political support to
do their jobs. There's no serious argument for that, and
Trump points this out play a team. Biden's record can

(40:31):
be summed up as four decades of betrayal, calamity, failure.
Biden signed a joint manifesto with Bernie Sanders. He has
an agreement with Bernie Sanders, which means Biden is now
running as the most extreme left candidate in history. This manifesto,
as I call it, this is far left of where
Bernie was. So it was supposed to be going to

(40:53):
the right, and it's far left. When asked whether he
would defend and defund our police, Biden said, we're going
to fund him. He wants to defund. He's going to
defund the police. He's going to cut it way down,
cut it way back, just like in New York they've
already cut it by a billion dollars in Crime is
soaring in New York. Crime is soaring. In Chicago, they're
cutting back on their police. We are doing just the opposite.

(41:16):
Yes that I was in Florida and I got the
entire law enforcement group, including all the sheriffs in Florida.
They endorsed Donald Trump for president, very strong endorsement. Biden
will take away your guns. He'll take away your second Amendment.
Biden will band fracking, killing over six hundred thousand Pennsylvania jobs.

(41:37):
And Biden will side with the anarchists and the agitators,
the mob that you've been watching in Portland and Seattle.
They want all cities to be like that. This is
according to the Wall Street Journal. Homicides are rising at
a double digit rate this year is compared to last
year in thirty six of America's top fifty cities. Almost

(42:00):
four out of five cities, folks substantial increase in crime.
They kind of increase in homicides than in any given
year would give that mayor that police commissioner concern over
whether they would keep their job when the next decision
is made the next time. Around thirty six out of
fifty cities we're ty believe. And this is with a

(42:20):
lockdown in place for months, far fewer people on the streets,
far fewer incidental contacts between individuals that could lead to
a violent exchange, far fewer targets for criminals to go after,
and yet we're seeing big spikes in murder. This is
because of the far left narrative of BLM and the

(42:43):
Democrat Party. They have made everything worse for everyone. As
I have been telling you, this is what has happened.
It's not surprising. In fact, no one is surprised who
is intelligent and serious that the narrative of BLM from
the Democrats was in any way anything other than a disaster. Right.
There was no oh, we're gonna have police reform, greater transparency,

(43:07):
greater transparency for police violence is not going to stop
dozens of people from getting shot on a bad weekend
in Chicago. It's not gonna do anything for that. We
all know that. But the far left is getting their
way here. There is a sense of I think snapback
as well. There's there's blowback from the Trump presidency and

(43:28):
that the left is both enraged and descendant at this
point in time. And while as I said, Governor Whitmer,
oh gosh, yeah, you're gonna have all these all these
like real down home Democrats who just oh gosh, I
want everyone to be fine, and I just want Oh,
Biden just wants to make sure you and your kids
are safe. Oh sure, they're gonna be telling you all
that crap. That's what they're gonna say in Michigan, in Ohio,

(43:53):
in Florida. You know, their Democrats surguates are gonna go
out with that message. But to the base, it's gonna
be very different. To the base, they're going to be
speaking the truth about how this is going to be
the most left wing presidency in history. It's gonna be
like Bernie without the burn Black Cliff three. We're gonna
fight out our differences fter Biden is elected, But right now,

(44:17):
the immediate task is to come together to defeat Trump,
and then as progressives, we're going to do everything that
we can to make the Biden administration the most progressive
administration that it can become. But right now, my message
to how it support is, hey, not only you get
out to vote, vote early, but get your friends, your
co workers, your co students out to vote as well.

(44:41):
You see, Bernie Sanders greatest vulnerability in running for president,
his greatest political vulnerability was the honesty of his positions.
He is not really that different at all from the
mainstream Democrat Party. In fact, he has clearly brought the
mainstream Democrat Party closer to him than the other way around.

(45:04):
Look at look at healthcare, look at you, look at education,
look at college student loans. All these things, the areas
now of shift in the Democrat Party have all been
toward the left. That there is not some rise of
centrism and technocratic realism in the Democrat Party at all.
That does not exist at all. What do you have

(45:26):
Bernie Thunders style policies? And that's why I think Scarborough,
I mean, that's why I think Sanders here is speaking
to the base in a in a way that they know,
they know that all they have to do is show up. Yeah,
maybe they don't like bid, no one's enthusiastic about them.
They show up, they vote for this guy, and they'll

(45:47):
get Sanders policies from a super old white dude like
Sanders in that regard, who is going to put a
female minority on the vice president ticket and is gonna
then catapult that VP to run in four years. And
let's also be very clear, why why would Joe Biden

(46:08):
not a year or two into his presidency for personal
or health reasons, say I'm going to step aside and
let my vice president take over. Now he then becomes
they're they're absolute hero, right. He can do whatever policies
the left wants. He can step aside, hand over the reins,
and he will have saved and the Democrats, I saved

(46:30):
them from four more years of Trumpism. That that to
him and he gets to just, you know, ride off
into the sunset and they're all going to talk about
how wonderful he is and how he saved the Republic.
And it's a and doesn't have to do anything really,
He's just to show up. In a sense, it's like
Biden as VP for Obama. They don't have the guys.
A moron. He just has a show up but be

(46:51):
Obama's VP. But now he gets to be the presidential
contender just because he was there He's the I just
show up guy, and somehow, like magic, it keeps working
for him. Just show up, be wrong, be corrupt, be dumb,
doesn't matter. Show up, and he will. He will have

(47:11):
the most, you know, the most incredible opportunity to become
a beloved, truly beloved Democrat figure. Now again, I said
they're gonna make him maybe do a lot of crazy
policy stuff. We'll see. He might do that. He also
might just move aside and let the left wing VP
that he picks do all of that, and he will

(47:31):
have just been the transition piece. Either way, he wins
minimum effort, maximum positive outcome for Joe Biden. Can't we
all see how this is shaking out? It makes sense,
It makes sense easier if you're a far left Democrat.
Increasingly that's just a Democrat. But if you're somebody on
the far left the Democrat party, it is a more

(47:55):
easy rationalization to come out and say vote for Joe
Biden right in this context than it was for Hillary.
What Hill could even really do? Her voice there? Right
there we go with Hillary. You were voting for her
to be president for eight years and you were going
to have to deal with her. Hear her speeches protect

(48:17):
you know, defend her and protect her reputation despite her unlikability,
her rampant self dealing and greed and corruption. Democrats were
going to have to deal with all that with Joe Biden.
Vote for Biden, but you're going to get the first
female minority president out of the bargain. And and you're

(48:40):
going to fool enough people in those flyover states Michigan, Wisconsin,
Ohio that you're gonna have Biden and then give them
a left wing policy agenda. It's perfect, it's perfect if
you're a left winger. This is this is really, in
a lot of ways, the best possible situation for you.
You'll get the policies and the legacy you want by

(49:03):
pretending that you're offering up a moderate establishment Democrat who
wants to unite the country, who is just a facade,
it's just a trojan horse. As many have been saying,
you're in the freedom mind. This is the Buck Sex
and Show podcast. But the six hundred dollars is essential,

(49:27):
But it's essential for America's working families. And again, to condescend,
to disrespect their motivation is so amazing, how how insistent
the Republicans are about a working family and their six
hundred dollars, and how cavalier they are about other money

(49:48):
that is going out. Why not a thousand dollars a week, Nancy?
I mean, come on, why be so cavalier with people's
troubles and there and their problems in their future? Why
not a thousand dollars a week in COVID relief for
everybody who's home. Does anyone want to try to answer that?
I mean, under Democrat logic, the more money the federal

(50:12):
government gives to people who are staying home, the more
it cares about them, the more considerate an understanding and
decent they are. Forget about whether that disincentivizes people going
back to work. You see, Democrats fundamentally seem to think
that value and wealth are created through government policy. That
if the government passed a law, if Nancy passed a

(50:36):
law that said that everybody in America is worth a
million dollars and just put a million dollars in a
bank account for everybody, then we would all be millionaires.
They never think about what that would actually mean to
our monetary system, to the price of goods, to the economy,
to the creation of actual wealth goods and services and

(50:58):
the free transactions that those things enable and allow to
create greater productivity and to make us all better off. Right,
you go to the grocery store. The shelves are full
of food, so many different kinds of you know, milk available,
almond milk, you know, hazelnut milk, cow milk, gold milk,
you didn't even know, I guess. Spend twenty minutes in

(51:19):
the milk section. That's capitalism, right, That is an economy
that has dynamism and people are rewarded for their work.
If you just have the government determining on its own
what things are, what things should be costing, and how
much people should make, it all starts without price, without incentives,
It all starts to collapse and fall apart. Now, I'm

(51:41):
not saying the old econom milk collapse if we continue
six hundred dollars a week of unemployment insurance. I'm just
pointing out that it's a disingenuous position for Democrats to say, oh, well,
we just need to extend six hundred again. Republicans are
only fighting that because they're condescending and mean. Now, Republicans
are saying, look, we want to get people money, but
we do need people to start going back to work.

(52:02):
Why should somebody be able to stay home and collect
a paycheck when grocery store workers and truckers and others
are out there engaged with their communities and providing a
necessary service, you know, frontline workers, cops, firemen. Teachers not
so much. A lot of teachers think that they should
be able to stay home and get paid fully. You know,

(52:22):
it's pretty amazing as you see this play out, I
just don't know what it's going to take. They're also
shutting down private schools now increasingly because they don't want
This is classic cartel activity. The public school sector doesn't
want them to be an alternative. Imagine what it looks
like if people have the dollars given to them by

(52:43):
the federal government that their student would have been receiving
per capita to go to public school and they start
setting up private associations of education private schools and they
don't have terrible COVID problems and kids are doing well
in the schools. I mean, this could destroy the public
school cartel, which is an enormous center of power for

(53:03):
Democrats because of all the union dues that go to
Democrat politicians. Forced union dues, and because these public schools
are indoctrination centers for left wing politics and Democrat attitudes
and views of history and so on and so forth.
That's what happens. That's what's at stake right now with

(53:25):
all of this. So I'm I'm sympathetic very much. So.
I mean, I have friends who are out of work.
I have friends who have lost their jobs, and I
know that it's very tough right now. I want people
have been getting six hundred dollars a week of unemployment insurance,
which is which is helpful, certainly, and they add that
to their state level of uninsurance, and you know, there's

(53:47):
certainly there's certainly some assistance that comes from all of this.
But are we going to transition back or not locking
schools down for another year? Endless six six hundred dollars
a week, unemployment insurance, all the stuff, folks. We can't
keep doing this. The costs of all this, we're not
going to feel them until we stop, and then we're

(54:08):
going to realize what an economic catastrophe this is. Thanks
for listening to the show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on
Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts,
listen to the scientists. The Democrats all shout constantly as
if that's an answer, as if that's a policy, as

(54:31):
if that really tells us all that much. Trump has
been listening to the scientists. I think in the case
of the FOUCH, you know the mitigation, the measures you
gotta take, you know the data. I think far too
much listening to the scientists on policy matters. Policy is
about what all of us have to live under and
deal with. These health experts are largely technicians with knowledge

(54:52):
in one area that can tell us factual truths about
certain things and a lot of questions that they can answer.
I would remind everybody they tell us factual truths about
certain things, and then what we do with that is policy.
What the government puts in place, or mandates or decides
as a result of that information's policy. We've had the

(55:13):
bleed over of the experts as the policy deciders, and
then the complaints about how we're not listening to them enough,
which is crazy, but we know that there's there's an
actually not a principle that's at work here. Doctor Deborah
Burks slammed The New York Times because the Times is
now on a on a gihad against the Trump administration

(55:38):
relationship with top doctors Faucci, Redfield, and Burks. We all
know Fauci, right, We've got Redfield, he's at the he's
a CDC director, and he said, guys, we got to
send people back to school. This is We've got to
send kids back to school. This is nuts. So there
there are going to go after him now too. Listen
to the scientists until the scientists say anything of The

(55:58):
Times doesn't like, and then that doesn't that doesn't count anymore.
And then you also have the attack on the relationship
between Trump and doctor Burkes. And Trump has even responded
to this this morning in a tweet. It got his attention.
And this is just remember we got a pandemic and

(56:19):
they're still playing stupid games. So the Times is writing
this stuff. Crazy Pelosi, as Trump calls her, said horrible
things about doctor Deborah Burkes, going after her because she
was too positive on the very good job we're doing
on combating the China virus, including vaccines therapeutics in order
to counter Nancy. Deborah took debate and hit us pathetic.

(56:43):
So Trump is upset with doctor Burkes about this Pelosi's
talking some smack. Here, here's what doctor Burke says, Play twelve.
The House Speaker on another network just said that she
does not have confidence in either the President or you,
Doctor Burkes, do you want to respond? I have tremendous
respect for the speaker, and I have tender this respect

(57:03):
for her long dedication to the American people. And I
think it was unfortunate that New York Times wrote this
article without speaking to me. I could have brought forth
the data. I provide data every single day with an analysis.
The day that they're talking about that, I was quote pollyanish.
It said there was improvement in the New York metro,

(57:23):
but ongoing cases in Boston, in Chicago, a new outbreak
in Houston in full log rhythmic spread. And knew it
concerning operates in Baltimore, New Haven, and Washington, DC. This
was not a Pollyannish view. I have never been called
pollyanish or non scientific or non data driven. And I

(57:44):
will stake my forty year career on those fundamental principles
of utilizing data to really implement better programs to save
more lives. In programs to save lives, Doctor Burkes's like
I know what I'm doing here. I've done a good job.
Back off, I thought we're supposed to listen to scientists
until we're undermining them for political reasons. Right, we see,

(58:08):
we see the games that the Libs play. I understand
what they're up to. None of this is surprising to
me in the least. But I do think I think
it's important that we all understand. We all see very
clearly that they're not being honest when they say listen
to scientists. Here, here's Netta saying it herself. Blake Clip

(58:28):
seven Political reported that in a closed meeting on Friday,
you accuse doctor Deborah Burkes of the Coronavirus Task Force
of spreading disinformation about the pandemic. Is that true? And
do you have confidence in her? I think the president
is spending spreading disinformation about the virus, and she is.

(58:48):
She is his appointee. So I don't have confidence of there. No,
does not have confidence. Wait. I thought we're supposed to
listen to the scientists. Oh except for this scientist because
she's not negative enough. You see, they're they're lying, folks.
They just pick and choose as they go through. They
are lying to you. This is not about science or scientists.

(59:10):
This is about who gets to make determinations about America's
future and tells you and can tell you what to do.
Who gets power. The great disease of the Democrat Party
is it's obsession with being in charge of other people
in every way constantly. It's just a it's a psychology
of harassment, of obsession with the petty, dictatorial delights. People

(59:38):
like Cuomo are showing us this every day. There's so
much more of it. I you know, over the weekend,
I went to play. I played tennis, which I like
to do. I played in Central Park. You're in New York.
I would probably the most famous park in New York,
one of those famous parks in the world. They've got
some tennis sports there and it was remarkable to me.
I mean, they're people, We're all standing outdoors, we're all
about to go play tennis, and everyone has a mask

(01:00:02):
on and we're outside and I mean, I'm wearing a mask.
It's required to wear a mask. And then because of
the way they set this up, everyone has to congregate
right before they all walk out of the courts in
one tiny area. And I'm thinking to myself, what's more
important here to stay far away from the possible, unlikely,

(01:00:23):
but possible virus breath into the air that people are
doing right where they're they're shooting these aerosolized viruses out
of their mouths in the air, or to be wearing
this cloth from which people are still breathing through and
breathing out viral particles because they make an assault. They
packed us all in like sardines before we walk onto

(01:00:43):
the court. You're all close together waiting there. You got
to wait there, all close together. And then you get
to why am I wearing a mask? If they're gonna
make me do this the policies, it doesn't make any sense.
I got into an uber here in New York to
go to the court, and I see the guy. He's
got it. He's got AC going, he's got his windows

(01:01:04):
all up, and he sees me get into the car.
You know what he does, pulls his mask up. Guess
what that does? Absolutely nothing. This guy is in an
enclosed environment, he has the windows up AC on. He
if he has COVID, which I'm not worried about it.
I don't think he doesn't. If he did, I'll deal
with it right. But he's he's just filling this car,

(01:01:27):
this enclosed area with COVID with his open mouth, breath
the whole time. But I'd get into the car, he
pulls up his mask. It's theater, friends, it's theater. You.
There are countless ways in which we see that this
is just it's absurd. This doesn't make any sense. It
doesn't make any sense. Look, doctor Burke's recently said that

(01:01:51):
given that the spreads ever brought folks, remember when I
told I told you that contact tracing was a joke,
And I was right, because the thing is all over
the place. Not going to trace this. We had a requirement.
We weren't going to even enter phase one in New
York until we get enough tracers in place. Stupidity a joke.
Oh we're going to trace this, Yeah, sure we are.

(01:02:13):
It's now in rural areas all across the country, folks.
This is spreading everywhere. It's spreading everywhere. But the death
rate is much lower. As long as seniors are are
sequestered as needed and protected in different areas of the country,
we're going to have a pretty low death rate in
this phase the pandemic. And then when we get through
this phase, we're going to be closer to her immunity,

(01:02:35):
if not be at a degree of herd immunity, so
that we don't ever have these kinds of major outbreaks
like this again. And if that's what ends up, if
herd immunity ends up stopping the outbreak, all this stuff
they've made you do, all the masking and all the
all the hospitals and all this stuff. The fifteen days
that's now heading for one hundred and fifty days, we're
gonna be at one hundred fifty days in the next
two weeks, fifteen days to one hundred and fifty days

(01:02:57):
to stop the spread. And when we find out is
that about one hundred and thirty five of those days
we're totally unnecessary. All we have to do is basic precautions.
Don't go to work if you're sick, wash your hands,
keep your distance from people as you can, and go
about living your life. What I have the same outcome.
Here's a story that you're not going to see in

(01:03:19):
CNN or in these mainstream And when I say not
going to see, it might be on you know, the
bottom of the website linked somewhere and get a total
of five thousand clicks or something over the course of
twenty four hours. Right, it might be a nothing burger
story for them, but I think it's important because we
are told that if you have any questions about about

(01:03:42):
what about masking, you're a bad person who doesn't listen
to science. The Netherlands is a very sophisticated, highly educated
European country with a very high quality of life, excellent
health services. And here I just I just tell you
the Netherlands the Dutch, right, the Dutch people don't wear masks.

(01:04:07):
They don't wear masks. The only place they wear masks
is on public transport because there's no ability to socially
distanced by the way. If that's if that were the
requirement here, I'd be fine with that. Okay, mass transit,
even if it's a little bit, a little bit helpful,
maybe it's worth it there, Doctor Burke said recently, if
you live with an elderly relative or somebody, maybe take

(01:04:28):
that extra that extra layer of protection and put a
mask on. But for mask the what we've been led
to believe recently is that mass masking will stop this pandemic,
and people who don't mask constantly are the reason for
the pandemic. I want to pound this table as hard
as I can. That is bull. The science does not

(01:04:48):
support that, has never supported that. People are nuts. They've
lost it over this. It's just not true. It's just
not true. We've had mask wear I mean in California,
in New York, everyone's bearing wearing masks all the time
everywhere they go, and we've been on lockdown for months
and months. Another disease is spread all over the country,

(01:05:09):
all over the country. Here you go the head of
infectious disease in swed Lumburg, which is the reason the
region rather hit hardest by the pandemic. In Holland, the Netherlands,
same thing. Pointed to a Norwegian study, again very sophisticated,

(01:05:31):
very high level of healthcare and scientific scientific capability. A
Norwegian study showing that two hundred thousand people must wear
surgical masks for one week to stop a single COVID
nineteen case. This is the deli mail that's starting to

(01:05:52):
sound about right, Given how ineffective these masks are. What
you're telling everybody is we're gonna have a million people
that are going to wear masks to stop five ten
COVID cases from happening. Of those five or ten COVID cases.
What are the chances that it's somebody who's going to

(01:06:12):
be deathly ill? Very very small. So the disease is
still spreading everywhere despite the mask wearing, and no one's
even allowed to talk about it. In the Netherlands, they
do not They do not wear masks. Face masks in
public places are not necessary based on all the current evidence,

(01:06:33):
said Cohen Brens, spokesman for the National Institute for Public
Health and the Environment in the Netherlands. Quote there is
no benefit and there may even be negative impact. Is
I just want to know. Is the National it's basically
the equivalent of the National Health Service of the Netherlands.
Are they a bunch of science denying lunatics. Is that

(01:06:55):
what we're supposed to believe. No, they're talking about actual studies,
study of whether masks work. You know what everybody else
relies on. Wear a mask because we say so, because
we think it'll help maybe, but we don't know, But
wear it or else fear fear. If it was so effective,
my friends, if it was really meaningfully effective, look at

(01:07:18):
the way that these viruses spread. You know, they always
talk about the R one number, and if you know,
if each person infects two people, then you get to
exponential spread. If the mask was even fifty percent effective,
you'd be able to shut down the pandemic very quickly
anywhere you want it. If the mask is ten percent effective,
does it really make a difference. No, If ninety percent

(01:07:38):
of the spread that you would have from an infective
person happens even if they have a mask on, then
what are we doing? What don't we really think the
benefit is? And there are drawbacks to it. I was
walking around yesterday's ninety degrees here in New York could
barely breathe. It sucks, Okay, I hate it, and people
that are walking around tho goal, just wear it through
your part, No idiots, I'm outside, I'm not infected, and

(01:07:59):
I'm not getting infected, and I'm not infecting anybody else.
Stop living in a fantasy land of fear, you know.
I just want to know why the Dutch, why the
Dutch are able to go through life like this and
they're they're fine, and they're they're not they have they've

(01:08:19):
had a better health outcome than other European states with
severe lockdowns and mask wearing, you know. And this was
all in response to a major study. The nation's top
scientists have examined key data and research and declared there
is no firm evidence to back the use of face coverings. Indeed,

(01:08:41):
they argue that wearing the wretched things may actually hamper
the fight against the disease. So the Dutch, who are
such anti science savages. The Dutch are like, guys, look
at the data. It does not support mask wearing. It
just does. Does anyone seem does anyone care? Does it

(01:09:03):
even matter anymore? Or are people so invested in their
belief about the magic of the mask that it doesn't
matter what science tells us. You're in the freedom hunt.
This is the Buck Sex and Show podcast. Oh and
it's not just the mask wearing, it's also the other

(01:09:27):
lockdown policies. This coming from the Blaze place that I
remember working when it just had a handful of employees.
I was there when nothing started. Exclusive Arizona bar owner
charged with crime for violating COVID nineteen executive order says
the business may not survive. Deborah Wall. This is a
story from Aaron Colon. Deborah Wall owns a small neighborhood

(01:09:51):
bar and apache junction Arizona called Lucky Strikes our business
has been financially devastated by COVID nineteen lockdowns, and on
the one day she opened up to offer takeout services
in April, she was charged with a crime. As a result,
Wall is facing thousands of dollars in fines from the
misdemeter and from citations issued by the Arizona Department of Liquor.

(01:10:14):
With her business barely surviving, she can't afford to pay,
and she doesn't believe she did anything wrong, and so
now they are she's facing the possibility of getting, you know,
getting arrested over this. Now, now we're arresting seven year
old ladies that have run their business for years and
years and years because they didn't do things exactly as

(01:10:35):
the state mandated, based on what is increasingly obviously capricious
and arbitrary junk bullcrap scientific interpretation where it's really just
fear and control, folks. I mean the guy, I want
to know someone explained this to me, okay, because I'm
trying to make sure everyone understands really what's at stake

(01:10:57):
here and how how bad all this is as as
far as I'm concerned, in America's new COVID tyranny, A
governor could issue an executive order that you must eat
vegan as a health emergency, whether it's from a heart disease,
climate change, take your pick. And if you refuse to comply,
that governor could imprison you. Sorry, but it's for your health,

(01:11:19):
they'd say, as they clank the door on your metal cell.
Thanks for listening to the Bus Sesson Show podcasts. Remember
to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever
you get your podcasts. How are some of the worst
hit states by COVID cases at least this summer doing
right now? What does the policy look like? Are they

(01:11:40):
finally on the other side of that oh so difficult curve.
We've got Congressman Andy Biggs with us now from the
great state of Arizona. Congressman, good to have you back.
Gonna be with you, Buck. Let's start before we get
into more general national level policy, how we get our
lives back, how we end the tyranny, how we start
living again as a country in freedom and in some

(01:12:04):
degree of prosperity. Just let's focus on Aerrorzona, because you
were getting a lot of attention for big spike in cases.
How are you guys doing there? How's hospital capacity? What
are the cases looking like? Are you on the other
side of the curve? Tell us what you can. Yeah,
I think we are so one thing buck is As
in so many places, the numbers don't tell the story.

(01:12:25):
They were counting. Essentially almost three thousand beds is full.
That we're basically surge beds which they never used and
we never got there and so were The hospitalization rate
is way down over the last six weeks, The case
fatality rate is way down over the last six weeks.

(01:12:45):
The percentage of beds that are going to COVID patients
is down, and there's a lot of a lot of
space in the hospitals, and you know what, it's time
for this governor to really open this thing up. Where
are you right now in terms of lockdown? I think
people keep referring to a reopened. No major state that

(01:13:06):
I know of has reopened. That's not really the way
that people should be thinking about it. We're just in
a less severe lockdown. Certainly the case in New York
where they've changed where I'm doing this show right now,
they keep changing what the opening status is, even from
the metrics that they themselves sent. How are you doing
in Arizona and what would you like to see happen

(01:13:27):
over the next day thirty days. Well, the governor issued
about a month ago lockdown on bars swimming in public
swimming pools and water parks, you know, this type of thing.
The reality is he could open that up and we're
gonna be fine. We're gonna be fine. We have to

(01:13:48):
trust people to be free, and that's what I would
like to see. The other issue is he's basically put
this weird thing on the schools where he says, yeah,
we're gonna push back the opening of school, but then
he's going to leave it up to the locals. And
so this becomes a problem because you've got some districts
where the unions are saying that they don't want to
open no matter what, and then you've got parents who

(01:14:10):
want to send their kids to school. The data is
real clear on this, and we just need him to
make a decision. That's really, in my opinion, forward thinking.
Now we're speaking of Concresman any bigs of Arizona. There
is a package, a relief package that's supposed to get
done in the Congress, and we're hearing that there's a

(01:14:32):
Gulf there's a wide separation right now between Democrats and Republicans.
Can you tell us give us an update on the
status of this when? When can people listening to this
expect that there will be the additional COVID relief bill,
which will include unemployment payments among other things. And what
do you want to see included in this? I mean,
we haven't really talked about this version of it yet

(01:14:54):
this iteration on the show. So bring us up to speed, Congressman. Okay, So,
first of all, Buck, you need to know that there's
still something over a trillion dollars that has not been
dispersed from the last building. And that's the last report
I got late last week. And the chasm that you
described is there. It's present. The Democrats want to continue

(01:15:16):
the lockdowns, they want to continue to keep the economy closed.
They want to continue to incentivize people not to go
back to work. That's what That's what all of their
their deal is. And they want to actually spend upwards
of another two trillion dollars, maybe even as high astool.
They want more than three trillion, but I think they'd
be willing to settle for two. Training the Republicans in
the Senate. Some of them have come out and I

(01:15:37):
think they're exactly right. They said, we just can't keep
shoveling trillions of dollars out the door and give us
this mounting national debt because that undermines the foundation of
the economy. So what I think you're going to see
is you're going to see something with regard to unemployment bonuses.
So the federal bonus currently is six hundred bucks that

(01:15:58):
just expired. For Republicans want in the Senate want two
hundred bucks. The Democrats want to continue with six hundred bucks.
There's also this desire to send twelve hundred dollars per
person back out I you know, just in direct payments.
I don't understand what that's about. The reality is. And
then the big issue for Republicans, of course, is liability

(01:16:21):
protection for people who are trying to open up businesses
and get the economy going again, churches who want to
do at social clubs, everybody who wants to get back
in the game and they're following CDC guidelines or local guidelines.
They want some kind of protection from that. That's that's
the substance of really what people are talking about. Then

(01:16:43):
there's a whole and you know this buck, there's a
whole lot of orbit and periphery around that where people
want to come and spend just a ton of money.
But with the last party questions, what would I like
to see? I would like to see liability protection. I
would like to see a payroll tax holiday. And I
would like to say, let's call it good and let's
incentivize people to go back to work instead of uncentivising

(01:17:04):
people not to go back to work and incentivising people
to stay closed. That's a huge problem. How long do
you think that your Democrat colleagues in the Congress may
hold this thing hostage with unreasonable demands and extend out
there for the anxiety that people already feel over these
different issues of the unemployment checks and so on and
so forth. They will stick with it as long as

(01:17:26):
they as they're polling numbers tell them that they're that
they're at least breaking even They want to leverage this.
They this chaos really benefits and they think politically and
so and I hate to put anything in political terms,
but that's the way my opponents think. They are looking
to see how long can we keep this thing in
a state of chaos and not start losing ground with

(01:17:48):
the American voter. That's what this is about, Buck. And
so if it's a week, um, they'll take a week.
If it's two weeks, they'll take two weeks. But that's
that's really what's driving then. And Congressman, before we let you,
I know it's difficult to make predictions about much of
anything these days, but you are in the state of Arizona,
or Congressman there, how are we looking for a Trump

(01:18:11):
victory in the fall in your home state? Yeah, I
think if the election were held today, I think Trump
would win. It would be a close election, but President
Trump would win. I would suspect that you would be
looking at the congressional makeup roughly the same. And we'll
have to see how it plays out, because in the
order for us to get an additional seat back or

(01:18:33):
something like that, we really need President Trump to win
by five to seven points here in Arizona, and right
now he's probably going to win by two to four,
two to four percent if it were held today. I
think though, that the tide is turning and people want
safety and security, they want predictability, and they want the
economy to come back and they look at President Trump
as capable of delivering on all those things. And as

(01:18:54):
part of all that, I know, I said one more
for you, but I got another one. I meant to
get to schools opening. Uh. In New York, there's a
you know, I know it's state by state. I know
the situation here best because it's it's my home state.
But there they were talking about a hybrid program. They
said they're gonna have new guidance. They pushed back the
new guidance. They said they're not going to open schools fully.
They may open them partially, they're not. I mean, it's

(01:19:16):
a complete mess, Congressman. I mean I'm speaking about it
as a mess because it is a mess. What's happening
in Arizona and what do you want to see as
as school open policy nationwide? So first of all, in Arizona, Uh,
it's it's kind of a bit of a mess right
now too. The governor pushed back the opening of schools,
and then he didn't give any real guidance or direction

(01:19:37):
on what he wanted to see. I want to see
us back in schools, but if you're not gonna but
our unions are not wanting to go back in Arizona, UM.
Some districts are saying that they that their teachers have
to come in, so even if they're doing remote, they're
gonna have to do it from the school site itself.
What I would like to see is if if that's
if we're gonna be um all over the board, you're
where you're gonna have some remote some I would like

(01:20:00):
to see us go to kind of a scholarship accounts
or stick it on the backpack of the kid that
we get thirteen thousand bucks a kid here and let
them choose to go to charter, private wherever they want
to go. Because I can tell you parents want to
get their kids in schools, and the charters and privates
are the ones that are moving to open up, and
the traditionals are not. So I would like to see

(01:20:22):
that money go to the kids and let the parents
make the decision on what they think is best for
the kid, whether it's remote learning or in person learning
through a charter or private or some districts that actually
may open up. Congressman any Biggs, appreciate you joining, sir,
come back soon. Thank you, Buck, take care. You're in
the freedom life. This is the Buck Sex and show podcast.

(01:20:47):
I have been very opposed to TikTok. I was one
of the first to expose the Chinese links, and I
have urged that TikTok be closed down in America. There's
a new proposal the New Chin and Meadows brought it
up yesterday to have Microsoft take it over. There are
some questions that have to be answered. How will the
day to be stored and secured? Do the Chinese will

(01:21:09):
still the Chinese have links into TikTok, So before I
would be for such a merger, I'd have to get
some answers to these questions. What I will confirm is
because TikTok acquired a US company had was subject to
scifious jurisdiction of the Civious Committee unanously made a recommendation.
That's one alternative, which told forced to sale presence. As

(01:21:30):
I said, can also use AIPA as He's discussed, and
there is enormous bipartisan support. We are not keeping TikTok
in its current form where the app can send back
information and location on a hundred billion Americans. TikTok is
in some trouble or at least it might get sold.
It could get banned. It has already been banned in India,

(01:21:55):
where it was in very widespread usage. Producer Mark, do
TikTok yet? Are you tiktoking? I watch TikTok's. I don't
make tiktoks? What about you know producer Mark makes the
most delicious gravy? You know nothing, doesn't you know Mark
is a very bad cook? Okay, well then then don't
make that TikTok. That's a fair that's a fair thing

(01:22:17):
to say. I'll tell you this. Um, I've I've checked out.
I know people say book, how could you want you
download TikTok? I know it's but I thought, you know
a better. I need to understand this thing. So I
do have it on my phone, which I guess means
that the Chinese do pop perhaps have this back end
access into my all my data and my information or
collecting all kinds of stuff on me. I'm aware, I'm aware.

(01:22:41):
But but here's what has really happened. We've had a
wake wake up call that the Trump administration is largely
provided to the American people about China. China and what's
true about the Chinese government intentions for the future, how
they try to get economic advantage over us. I mean
these are all very important, at least I think very

(01:23:05):
important areas of much greater public attention. And the surveillance
state that they operate at home now has its tentacles
extended all over the world. Information increasingly is power. We
recognize this. The information advantage that is used by different
countries for their economics sector is the single greatest advantage

(01:23:28):
in any country could have. That's really in an information
based economy, obviously, where you are able to best your competitors.
And the Chinese have been stealing our intellectual property for
decades in a way that nobody can ever really fully
understand other than just say it has been massive, systematic,

(01:23:49):
and catastrophic for our long term competitive advantages. Catastrophic I
think we're already there. Doesn't mean we shouldn't stop it now,
but who knows what the long term consequences of this
are going to be. And that then brings me to
what we're going to do about TikTok because people are concerned.

(01:24:12):
A lot of Democrats and Republicans are concerned that this app,
which if you don't really know what it is, it's
like watching Instagram but only videos, and they're these short
videos that pop up in your feed, and they all
have the pretty much not all of them. They usually
they have music. And I'll tell you this, it's addictive.
I mean, you could sit there and waste forty minutes

(01:24:34):
of your life looking at TikTok videos as in the
blink of an eye. It just feels like what, you know,
you got videos about how to do different So I'm
just constantly watching on a loop video of people making
different kinds of meat, you know, just lots of cooking
of steak and barbecue, and people, I think think, oh,
TikTok's at Chinese app These are Americans making all this

(01:24:56):
content that you're watching, at least in America, so you're
why your fellow Americans do all this stuff. But there
are very real concerns about what it means to have
Chinese back end access to all this data. And you
start to look at the biometric data and all this
going back to the Chinese government, and people just know

(01:25:18):
that they're they're not okay with this. We don't want
to China to effectively be operating a mass surveillance tool
with a complicit US public on US soil. That that's
really where this whole thing has has turned into a massive,

(01:25:38):
you know, a massive news story, and they may sell
this to Microsoft. So then I suppose we would say, okay,
we at least it's in an American company's hands, which
is certainly better than the alternative. But China is a
problem for us, My friends, we're finally understanding this. I
think that's where that's if, if nothing else, a a

(01:26:00):
part of this discussion that I think is heading in
the right direction. At least China is a major problem
for the US. That's not going to change anytime soon.
And they also could be trying to influence our elections.
Your Secretary of State Pompeio talking about exactly that play eleven,

(01:26:22):
the Chinese Communist Party, and you saw this with our
closure of the consul in Houston is running espni's operations
inside the United States and attempting deep influence targeting of
American business leaders, of American congressman, of city council members.
We saw it happened up to a state senator in Wisconsin.
This is a deep effort to conduct influence operations to

(01:26:43):
undermine American democracy and put our nation at risk. This administration,
President Trump, for the first time has said this is
enough for this, We're going to fix this, and has
given us all the guidance, and you've seen us act
on it, whether it was what we did to the
consult with Houston. You saw the FBI indict several pl
members who were studying here in the United States engaged
an activity that was clearly unlawful. We're taking seriously this threat.

(01:27:06):
We're going to protect the American people from these Chinese
influence operations. It's about time, friends, It's about time we
should be protecting the American people from exactly that. And
and there was a by partisan failure for decades to
understand the threat of the Chinese government post. So you

(01:27:28):
have these the surveillance issue, the theft of intellectual property,
and this is all around us. I mean, I look,
I have a Chinese app on my phone. I know
you're all gonna yell at me for it, and I
understand that, and I probably you know, but at this point,
I'm like, well, they've already had it on and they're
going to sell it to a US company in the
next thirty days, and they probably already got whatever they've done.
Plus they've they've I got the one of those emails

(01:27:49):
of up. They hacked OPM office Personal Management of the
federal governments. They have all kinds of data on me already.
They know a lot about the Buckster. Not not that
much exciting stuff China to know, but nonetheless, and there's
the way that the Chinese government. Now you may say,
buck the Wigers, this is an internal problem. Yes, it's
a humans right, human rights violation, it's terrible, but what

(01:28:10):
are we really going to do about it? Remember, how
a country is willing to treat its own population is
an excellent proxy for understanding how much worse it will
treat other populations around the world if it gets the
opportunity to. And that's why it's important that Secretary of
Pompeio keeps pointing out how China's repression against the Wigers

(01:28:31):
is so unacceptable and the whole global community needs to
speak out against this. Despite what it means for the
economic bottom line play ten well, the risk to the
people in that region has been great. I've talked about
this as the greatest human rights violation of this century
to date. And what we've attempted to do is make
clear to China, if you want to participate in the
world stage. You can't engage and behavior like this. So

(01:28:53):
we've begun to impose sanctions on the individuals and businesses
involved in this. Most recent set of sanctions put up
by the Department of Treasury will put the businesses operating
there unnoticed. They've got to change their behavior. They've got
to stop using slight labor, they've got to stop participating
these systems that have been connected to forced sterilizations, forced deportions.

(01:29:13):
These are terrible things that are taking place there, and
we're going to impose real costs on those businesses. This
company is involved in the cotton trade, and so it
has deep connectivity to Western businesses, including those in the
United States, and we've been very clear. We've told US
businesses to take a real deep look into their supply change.
And I'll think companies, some brand names here in America

(01:29:34):
want to be connected to what's taking place there. Amen,
the fight is on between the US and China for
global supremacy in the twenty first century. I'm just glad
now it's a two way fight. Thanks for listening to
The bus Essen Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts,
the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts, Liberty,

(01:29:57):
Truth and Great Hair. Feel those funky beats. It's time
for roll call. Indeed, time for roll call. Let's get

(01:30:22):
to it, my friends. Always a pleasure to hear from
all of you at a nice, relaxing weekend. I hope
you did the same, but we know this week is
gonna be madness with the news cycle, and I need
to hear what the team thinks. What you want to hear,
more about what you want us to be doing here
in the hut. So let's let's get it. Let's get
it rocking. Remember Facebook dot com slash buck Sexton. If

(01:30:45):
you want to send us a message, you can also
send them on Instagram at buck Sexton Direct Message, or
email Team Buck at iHeartMedia dot com. All right, and
make sure're gonna buck Sexton dot com. We got great
stuff there, and pass the buck. Tell somebody list in
the podcast who has not yet listened to the podcast, TJ.
Hey Buck. My wife and I went in for an

(01:31:06):
ultrasound for our second child the other day. The ultrasound
tech seems to think there's going to be an explosion
of births in this country since COVID started. At least
there'll be one good thing that comes out of this pandemic. Indeed, TJ. Although,
as I saw someone pointed out to much acclaim on Twitter,
it's going to be a whole lot of during lockdown.

(01:31:26):
It will be a whole lot of firstborn children. People
are thinking that maybe having you know, a lot of kids,
what you gotta be lockdown could be tough of just
that was the joke that people were making. That was
the joke. Lastly, I have a Nostradamis prediction to make
for the last election debate, if they actually happen, when
we are much closer to having a COVID vaccine, I
predict that Trump will say something along the lines of,

(01:31:49):
regardless of who wins the election, my administration will have
a COVID vaccine ready by the end of the year
or before the next inauguration, at which point the left
will accuse him of holding the vaccine as ransom for
people to vote for him. Of course, I'll vote for
him regardless, across broken glass, over burning coals, whatever it takes.

(01:32:10):
She'll tieh TJ. Yeah, the vaccine politics that we're all
going to see, that we're all going to be subjected to,
will be really, really ugly. That's for sure. That's definitely
gonna happen. There's gonna be a lot of ugly vaccine politics.
And the way as I was saying or in the show,

(01:32:30):
the media is going to raise all kinds of doubts
about whether it'll actually be here on time and will
it be effective, and it'll ramp up the closer we
get to the election. This is how propaganda works. Yeah,
there are real concerns about effective is there are real
questions about this, But the way the media does it
will be timed for maximum negative impact on public perception

(01:32:52):
as we go into the actual election. That's what's going
to happen. That's the reality that we face. So yeah, man,
I think that's absolutely true TJ. And we should get
ready for it. And yep, I think there will be
a whole lot of There'll be a whole lot of
babies born right around the New Year's would be my guests,
because that's when people went into quarantine. And you know

(01:33:14):
when the quarantine huts a rockin, don't come a knockin,
John Buck. What I think we've seen so far are
a lot of tiny infringements on our rights. Obviously it's wrong,
but each of the infringements aren't inconvenient enough to make
Americans attempt mass non compliance. People have a for the

(01:33:37):
greater good mentality. I hope Fauci pushes for a goggle
mandate because I don't see people complying with that. The
useful idiots will, sure, but I think all the rest
of us who have been drunk under the greater good
mentality will wake up and say enough is enough. John,
I think you're right. It's it's the proverbial boiling boiling

(01:33:58):
frog in the pot. We're boiling pot with the frog
in it. And that's the idea. That's the situation that
I think I think we face. And they've been steadily
chipping away at right, steadily chipping away at our sense
of telling the government, blank off, humaniacs, you can't stop

(01:34:19):
this disease. You're not helping, you're making things worse, and
your morons. Let us live our lives, let every individual
take common sense precautions themselves. But with the government mandates
on this or nuts. And I asked the question, and
they never answer, why don't we have all these government
mandates every year for flu season? They won't answer it
now because that raises problems for what they're trying to

(01:34:42):
accomplish in this moment. But here's what I will tell you.
There will come a point in the future when people
will start to raise that for flu season as well.
The government loves all this control. Democrats love all this control.
They don't want this to stop. Karen, Hey Buck, your
show keeps me informed to enter Jane while I'm doing
housework and yard work. I really appreciate how hard you

(01:35:03):
improducer Mark work to make it happen. Thank you, Karen.
It is not a lot of work, but we love it.
But we appreciate that you appreciate it. Your impressions of
Doctor's Fauci Bernie Sanders, Nancy Pelosi, and Elizabeth Warrener spot on.
You have a great ear for voices and accents. Thank you. Karen.
You said you feel uneasy about doing Trump, but I've
heard you fall into Trump voice for half a sentence

(01:35:24):
here and there, and it's really good. Go for it,
you know you want to, Probably, Karen, I know I
see the very best, the best. No, my heart's not it.
My heart's not in it. When you force it, it's
really bad, right, Yeah, it just happens, That's true. Of
so many impressions though. This is why people will say Buck,
do so and so, even friends of mine, and I'm
I can't. It's just you hear it in your head,

(01:35:46):
and you do it when you hear it. You know,
if you try to force it, it it doesn't really work
as well. You know, I've got a great producer Mark impression. Buck.
Don't forget about that interview this afternoon. Buck, be on
time today. Buck, send that email you said you're gonna send. Buck.
Where's the multipodcast? See? I sound just like him. We'll

(01:36:07):
do all those things that I won't say any of
that stuff anymore. I'm just telling you guys, by impersonation
to producer markus spot, it's not really an impersonation. It's
more of a recounting of the things I tell you
to do. Well, you know, close enough, Andrew Bucket Producer Mark.
I laughed out loud as I was driving home of
your podcast and you played the mask debate montage that

(01:36:28):
should be used more often. Yes, indeed, the mask debate
is a very important thing to keep in mind. You
gotta be on. You gotta make sure that you're focused
during the mask debate. I masked debated this weekend. Yeah,
I can happen. You know, sometimes you're just out in
public and someone sees you and you're all of a

(01:36:49):
sudden you find yourself, you know, in the midst of
a mask debate, and they can get very upset when
they see that. I've heard of public mask debate is
actually a crime. It can be, especially if you get
a little violent during the mask debase. All right. Also,
if you form a team buck group on PS four,

(01:37:10):
I'll learn how to play Call of Duty and join
you and that tall guy in Texas Shields Hie. Well, Andrew,
I'm certainly thinking about it. Although my brother, my older brother,
who's the one with the PS four that he gave
to me, came back and took it away already. He's like,
actually I want it this week. I'm like, well, I
don't have a PS four. If you don't have a
PS four, how do you play PS four? The Governor

(01:37:32):
wants you to know that PS four for some of you,
who's going to be a bit of a waste of time. However,
what do I mean by waste of time? It means
you're not doing the mask and the delay that you
need to do. Instead, you're going to be pretending to
be a special operation show the soldier killing all the
bad guys. Why do you want to kill the bad guys?
Because when you own someone, you're playing in multiplayer by

(01:37:54):
squatting down on them and making up scene gestures after
you've shot them with a sniper rifle of philomatic weapon.
Things actually kind of funny. See, I played some I've
played some Call of Duty PS four stuff, Michael, hey Buck.
Can the CIA get involved in domestic law enforcement in
this country if things get too far out of control?
I guess they're I guess they're less visible than local

(01:38:16):
state police or even the FBI. Michael. Now, they can't
buy law, and you wouldn't want them too. There'll be
a lot of CI people like, good heads, what will
we do our cappuccino machine has been toppled by the rioters.
I will write a memo. That's what the CIA doing
law enforcement would be like. I'm just telling you the truth.
They're like, oh no, I've been typing so much today

(01:38:40):
about how we need law and order that my hands hurt.
I need to put them in I need to put
my podgy little fingers in some vasoline. It's I'm just
telling you it's not CIA is not what people think
it is. Um, Mitch, hey Buck, faithful listener one zero, oh,
KF A bleven ten KF ab Omaha and the podcast.

(01:39:04):
All right, thank you so much. I'm an over the
road driver for ups at Night. Maybe you've already said this,
but is that strange how few federal politicians have gotten
the COVID nineteen virus. I wonder if it weren't for
hippo laws, we would have found out by now the
bulk of critics of hydroxy chloroquin have been taking it
prophylactically in secret. Well, Mitch, first of all, we love

(01:39:28):
kf ab Omaha. That's one of our original stations that
came out here with us on the show, and we've
had a great listenership there for years now and we
really really do appreciate It's a big shout out to
kfaby Omaha. And as for politicians maybe taking hydroxy chloroquin
as a prophylaxis, I M I'm sure there are people

(01:39:53):
who are taking it prophylactically and not telling anybody, especially
if they're going to be exposed for a certain period time,
the same way you would for malaria. Right take. I
forget exactly how it works, but I know for some malarials,
you take it for I think a week before you're
in the endemic area and then up to a month
when you come back, to make sure that it never
gets a toe hold, that the parasite, which malaria is

(01:40:13):
a parasite, doesn't get a toe hold in your system
to replicate itself and then take over. And then malaria
is really rough because not only can it kill you
the first time around, you can have malaria relapses where
the parasite, if your immune system gets compromised, can come
back and really mess you up later on. So malaria
is a debilitating, terrible disease. So people take the prophylaxis

(01:40:34):
for it. I bet there are people out there who,
especially if they're in a high risk situation or taking
malari prophylaxis I mean taking covid hydroxy chloric and prophylaxis
and not talking about it. I just don't understand why
they keep talking about studies of super sick people in
the hospital see and we all look at them and say,
that's not that's not what the use case is supposed
to be. The use case is supposed to be an

(01:40:56):
onset of symptoms, which is exactly the use case for tamiflo.
If you go to a doctor and you've had the
flu standard flu for five days, they're gonna say, no,
don't take tamiflu for the most I mean, unless maybe
you're a special situation. I don't know, but generally speaking,
they're gonna tell you if you don't take tamiflu in
the first forty eight hours, it's not really that effective
for you, because it's trying to stop the virus replication,

(01:41:19):
and tama flu doesn't cure you. It just means for
some people there's a lesser duration and less severity of symptoms,
but you've got to take it early on, and that's
you know. It's also true of PREP, which is a
pre exposure prophylaxis for HIV. So if you think you've

(01:41:39):
been exposed to h you're going to be or in
a high risk group for HIV exposure, you take PREP
before and it's less likely than if you do get
exposed to HIV that you'll actually have the virus take
hold in your system and have a full scale infection.
So I think there are people taking hydroxy chloroquine who
aren't talking about it. But I can't even get to

(01:42:00):
tell you how many. I have no idea you're in.
This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast, all right. Next
up here we have actually a proucer Mark. How's your weekend, buddy? Well?
Uh not great. Hockey's back. So I just spent the

(01:42:22):
weekend screaming explutives at my television. Well, at least you
got to have that bit of escapism, I guess so. Well,
all the Rangers and Metstu. Who the two teams that
are playing right now is make my life miserable? Who's
better in their sport? Of the two teams, It's a
toss up. They're both about the same right now. I

(01:42:43):
think the Rangers have a better future. Are they bottom
of the barrel in the league? No? No No, they're both
about league average league average. Okay, should be better, but
they aren't. Yeah. I definitely did not watch any NBA
games because you're gonna kneel during the anthem, you're not
gonna have the bucks they're watching, No surprise on that one.
You wouldn't have watched anyway. I was about to say that,

(01:43:03):
but at least I want to get the credit for
not watching too. This has become a favorite conservative past time.
Now we're like, we will not watch that spot. I
will not watch uh curling if they take a knee,
you know, and then they take a knee. I've decided
to give up watching curling. Have you ever seen curling
you've been talking about and of course I know what

(01:43:23):
curling is. Yeah, yeah, I will give up all. I
will not watch figure skating this year because someone took
the knee or you know, we do a lot of
That sounds a lot like cancel culture to me, a producer,
Mark producer, Mark brings up a very interesting point of
the debate. But no, it's not cancel culture if it's

(01:43:43):
always been canceled because you've never watched it because you
don't care. You can't cancel any sports because you've never
watched sports. I'm saying, but I want the credit. Oh,
I've I have abstained from watching you know, the NHL
this year or MLB. It's like, well, I've abstained for
the last thirty eight years. Big protests from Buck, there,
big protest movement from the Bucks or that that's fair,

(01:44:05):
that's true. All right, we get Katie up here in
Roll call, Hey, Buck, I don't recommend getting a game system.
I've been playing the Switch all summer and I'm utterly useless.
On the other hand, I've lost a few pounds because
I'm playing video games instead of eating Ben and Jerry's.
So there's that shields high. What do we think of
video games as a weight loss tool? Producer Bark Though
we used to be Remember they had like we Tennis

(01:44:27):
and we bowling and all that stuff. Again last I
feel like that lasted a month and everyone's like, I
want to sit I don't want to do this crap.
Oh yeah, I mean all the better games came out,
like Mario Carton and all that stuff. Exactly want to
sit on your butt while you're going what Luigi in
like firing little you know, mushrooms or whatever at people.
I don't even know what they I used to I did,
used to play a lot of Mario card I just forget,

(01:44:47):
I would hope. So everyone Car was amazing. Mary Carr
was amazing, especially if you had maybe imbibed a few
beverages before. For some people, perhaps even in their high
school or college years, some substances that we're not entirely
legal at the time before playing the Mario card not
that I recommend that, but I do understand that that
was an entertaining thing to do sometimes. Well, I mean

(01:45:07):
with the switch, you can do that even better now, Mario, Yeah, no,
it's totally true. So wait, what's the switch? The switch
is the newest Nintendo platform. I did not even the
handheld end freak end. You can plug it into your TV. Wow,
I know nothing about this. I'm learning something new every day.
Speaking of weight loss tools, I got a haircut, a

(01:45:28):
real professional haircut this weekend, and it was like someone
shaved a yak with a weed whacker. But it's amazing
how much lighter the skull feels now. And so that's
a that's a thing. It was about to say, did
you ask your gardener to do it? Pretty much? That
showed up and he was like, has anyone cut your
hair in a long time? He's like, it looks like
someone's been cutting a little bit. I was like, well, yes,

(01:45:49):
but he's like, how long has it been? I had
not gotten an official haircut. I go to a barber.
By the way, I don't go to a stylist salon
before you make no, it's a barber shop. Okay, they
got a little barber thing out front. I got to
a barber. Is it is it men and women not
just dudes? Okay, yeah, but it It had been six

(01:46:11):
months since I had actually got a haircut. It's the
longest I think I've ever gone. Wow. Yeah, all right.
Toby Buck and producer Mark Mike's later touched on the
subject of postmodernism last week. That's that fancy Yale guy stuff.
Is it a subject I think you could deep dive into. Yes,
maybe that instead of the multipodcast would be helpful for
people to understand the riots we are seeing. Shields high. Yes,

(01:46:33):
let's talk about some postmodernism. No, I'm just kidding, Toby.
That's a good idea. We got a lot of ideas,
but we don't have much time to execute on all
of them because we're very, very busy bees here in
the Freedom Hunt. We'll add it to the list of
things that Buck says he's going to do, but it
doesn't correct. So everybody please do pass the buck speaking
of that guy, and tell somebody down on the podcast

(01:46:53):
this week. Our numbers keep going up because of all
of you, and we'll be back tomorrow with you, same time,
same play, same love of freedom. She'll tie

All Episodes

Episode Transcript

Host

Buck Sexton

Popular Podcasts

Stuff You Should Know

Dateline NBC

Las Culturistas with Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}Deep State Coup Part Two