Trump Slams Fauci And The Idiots

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:03):
You are entering the freedom. Huge Trump's arrangement syndrome is
reaching its end stage. A massive Pennsylvania ballot counting decision
from the Supreme Court. Big tech battle escalates with the

(00:24):
d o J. Trump takes on Fauci and so much more.
Buck Sexton, coding the news and disseminating information is actionable intelligence.
Make no mistake, Great, You're a great American again. This
is the buck Sexton Show. Homer CIA analysts, I can

(00:46):
speak to three hours without a phone call. Try doing
that sometime. No, welcome everyone to the buck Sexton Show.
Thank you so much for being here. You will notice
that right now there's a ten in most of the
media broadcasts out there. There's an anxiety that shows you,
in and of itself, how many people are really invested emotionally, psychologically,

(01:12):
professionally in a certain outcome of this election. And un
understand this, As I've been telling you all along, it
is entirely unclear to me how liberals will be able
to process a Trump reelection should that happen. It is
entirely beyond my comprehension how they will manage to comprehend this,

(01:34):
how they'll manage to actually deal with this without I
don't know, more craziness in the streets, rioting, looting, who knows,
or they'll just come up with another reason why the
president didn't win this time around. But you can see it.
It's getting worse because they're also saying crazier and crazier

(01:55):
stuff and you barely even notice it. And I'm talking
about the biggest name as the Democrat Party. I'm talking
about people with massive followings online at social media. These
are people who you would expect to exercise some degree
of judgment, some degree of or at least a willingness

(02:17):
to hold back with their most insane and outlandish emotions
about this upcoming election, which is now two weeks from today,
and as we know, I think over thirty million at
least as of yesterday, early ballots have already been cast.
So there's a lot of stuff going on already, and

(02:39):
we can see how this battleground is shaping up so far,
and it is going to be an absolute dog fight,
street fight. Come up with your come up with your
a term of term of art here, it's definitely gonna
get ugly. It's going to be ugly. You're seeing Trump't
derangement syndrome really reaching new heights, because remember the last

(03:00):
time we got to this phase, even Trump supporters. I
voted for the president in the first election. I was
a vocal supporter of him all throughout the general election,
encouraging everybody I could to vote for him. And I
thought I was doing something that it's probably not going
to work out. I just figured the Hillary machine too big,
too much. Turned out, Thank god, that was wrong. This

(03:23):
time around, though, the Liberals are going into this with
a state of panic in the back of their minds. Yeah,
they want to put on a big show of how
confident they are right now. Oh, look at Joe and
the polls. He's leading in every battleground state. He's leading
in just the national poll. He's leading it. Okay, well,
we'll see, we'll see. If anything, We've already come to

(03:46):
the conclusion of the Trump era that a lot of
the old political shibbalts, a lot of the old maxims
that we had lived by in politics turned out not
to be true. Right, Oh, the candidate with the best
ground game, to candidate with the most with the most
media buys and key markets or raises the most money.
Although that's never really been true. No, Trump was ninety

(04:10):
seven percent destined to lose in twenty sixteen, and they
want you to believe somehow that he's even more destined
to lose now. And I don't buy it, and I
know you don't buy it either. So just remember that
there is an advantage, There is an incentive in making
sure that Trump voters feel like this is hopeless. The

(04:34):
media is in on this, Trump's opponent Biden, all the
rest of them are in on this. And now we
got this debate coming up on Thursday, which I'll talk
more about, but I think this will be one of
the most watch presidential debates in history. I think this
what is going to be completely off the chain, off
the hook however you want to say it. And you

(04:56):
can tell based on the way the Democrats are looking
at all of this and how they're preparing their own
side that one. And this will tie into our discussion
about Pennsylvania and the ballot the delayed ballot counting that
the Supreme Court has now said will occur there. I'm
going to get to that. They want everyone to know
they're not going to concede on election night if it's close.

(05:19):
Depends on how close it is probably, but they're not
going to concede, so we're not going to be through
this is so imagine all the tension, all the anxiety
of this year. This has been a tough year for America.
I don't care what part of the country you're in. COVID,
the lockdowns, just the general sense of misery and frustration

(05:41):
that so many people have, including a lot of people
that feel real lost because of the family members that
have passed away from COVID. You know, the country's inn
a tough spot right now. And fascinatingly enough, though, despite
all those very true, those very true statements, you have
fifty five percent in the most recent polling of Americans
saying that they think they're better off now than they

(06:02):
were four years ago. I think that's only possible. The
only way you get to that perception is if you're
measuring Trump before COVID hit. How were you doing before COVID,
and people believe that they're going to go back to
that place as soon as we get through this. This
is temporary. It shall pass. The question now is how

(06:25):
soon and how much damage is being done in the meantime.
But that's all a very rational way of looking at this.
And you have to remember that we're dealing with an
entirely irrational opposition Democrat Party, mainstream media. Here is Elizabeth,
Elizabeth Warren, who I actually thought, despite her Native American

(06:48):
heritage debacle, despite all that, I really believe that Elizabeth
Warren was probably going to be the Democrat nominee. And
she came really, I think you'd say, in third place
behind Bernie and Biden. But this is so that's important
because here's somebody who's not just a random a TV
commentator who's trying to get attention, who's not just out

(07:10):
there trying to make a name for himself or herself
by being outrageous. This is someone who we believe, or
we are led to believe, should be taken very seriously. Right.
We should listen to her, we should believe that she's
thinking about her words. And then she says stuff like this,

(07:33):
which i'd have to say for a sitting United States
Senator for Massachusetts to say this, it's pretty crazy, but
it's really indicative of this moment. I don't I don't
think that this is an outlier statement, and that's what
I believe it is so important. I think that this
is where the Democrats really are now not all of them,
but a lot of the most of them. This is

(07:55):
now the ethos of the party. Here she is play
clip three. Climate crisis is here, and no it is not.
The science around this is not controversial. The science is clear.
In fact, you know what scares me to death is
every time we get more data and reanalyze the data,
what we discovers the problems even worse than we thought.
We have even less time than we thought. And so

(08:18):
what has Donald Trump done for four years? He not
only hasn't made things better, he has actively made them worse.
He withdraws from the Paris Climate Accord. He's put a
coal lobbyist in charge of the Environmental Protection Agency. What
could possibly go wrong? He has opened up for offshore

(08:40):
drilling and he has said yes to the oil companies
they can drill in the Arctic National Wildlife Preserve. Donald
Trump threatens the existence of human life, of all life
on this planet. Now that last line is what I
really wanted you to hear. Donald Trump threatens the existence

(09:02):
of human life on this planet. Donald Trump is going
to make humanity go extinct. Do you do you see that?
Do you hear that? Friends? Sitting senator from Massachusetts came
in third the Democrat primary. She says that out loud.
She says that over a loudspeaker at a press conference,

(09:24):
doesn't even doesn't even really get much notice. Yeah, that's
pretty standard. Trump is going to eradicate the human species.
I'm not I'm not making this up. I'm not exaggerating.
Donald Trump threatens the existence of human life. Those are
her words, her chosen practice, prepared words. How do you

(09:44):
handle a left wing opposition that speaks in this way,
that that takes these kinds of positions. How do you
have a civil political dialogue with people who keep looking
at you saying the data says unless you do everything
that we say, human life will cease to exist on
this planet. Wouldn't it be challenging to come up with

(10:05):
a crazier theory? Wouldn't you have to really struggle to
come up with something that is both cataclysmic in its
outlook and catastrophic in its implementation, which is what this
Green New Deal and all this climate stuff would be.
Wouldn't you see it that way? Yeah? And then there's

(10:26):
the other part of this here, we are still struggling
through COVID, still on this uneven footing, depending on what
stat you're in. Some places doing a little better than others,
but countries not normal. We don't get to really see
each other, socialize, live our lives, go out there. Nope,
everyone's being told all the time, wear a mask, stand inside,

(10:48):
be afraid of your fellow human beings, stay away from them.
Everybody not safe. Can't even go to Thanksgiving dinner. Fouch.
She says, sorry, no Thanksgiving for you this year. Right,
they're saying all of that, and you know, Elizabeth Warren
will also turn around and start talking about the climate crisis.

(11:09):
I mean, she was talking. I don't even remember what
it was she said, but you know they're going to
go drill somewhere. Who cares? Only people for whom this
is a religious belief. Think that anybody's sitting around wondering
about how awful it is that the president has a
person who's tied to the coal lobby working for the EPA,
or if that's even true, I don't even know. And

(11:33):
the point is I don't care. It doesn't matter. We
got much more important stuff right now. But her voice
is quivering, and she's at least projecting this sense of
imminent of imminent catastrophe unless we defeat Donald Trump at
the election. They can't just make a normal, good faith
argument about where Trump has succeeded, where he's failed, what

(11:55):
they do better. It's vote for Biden or else. The
world is going to come to an end. And that's
not me exaggerating. That's what their pitch is. That is
what Elizabeth Warren is telling you. Here an existential threat
to humanity. That is what Donald Trump represents. Now I
understand that by looking at the craziness of the other side,

(12:20):
there might be a complacency or I don't know, you
could go with complacency, or you could feel helplessness. How
could we combat this? How can you deal with this
level of ideological insanity? But I'm bringing up just because
I think when you see what the leaders of that
party are saying and what they're willing to say about

(12:42):
this president, you'll understand everything that's going to flow from
here until the next few weeks. Because I don't think
it's going to be over in two weeks. I think
they're going to extend it. You're going to see that
this is everything they've got, you know, and so much
of this I think is also tied into people who
are and I'll just say a people who have a

(13:02):
kind of emptiness. I've referred to Hillary Clinton before as
having a hole in her soul, and I think there
are a lot of people who have holes in their
souls right now, and perhaps even more so than usual
because of all the understandable anxiety and all the all
the friction and fear around COVID. But instead of taking

(13:23):
a longer term view about why we're really here on
this earth and thinking about a relationship with God and
taking it to that level of existential thought and consideration
and philosophy, they turn around and no, Trump is an
existential threat to people who don't know why they're here.
Trump is an existential threat to those who have to

(13:44):
seek some other form of understanding what their purpose is
every day, because if it's defeating this politician named Donald J. Trump,
who I think did a very good job as president,
as you know, is clearly not a threat to the world,
and it is more capable in every respect than his

(14:05):
competitor here, Joe Biden. You know, if that's really an
existential threat of the world, what are we to make
of what's happened for the last four years doesn't make
any sense. There is a senselessness in the arguments here,
So just be prepared for it, because it's gonna get
very nasty out there. It's gonna get ugly, and it's

(14:25):
gonna get evil. They didn't do anything really so far,
at least with ACB. It seemed like they couldn't come
up with anything. But you are going to hear things
said not just about Trump but about Trump voters too,
for the next two weeks that would shock a person
who was not prepared with an understanding of just how

(14:47):
deep into Trump't arrangement syndrome the left has gone. You've
got to keep in mind, You've got to remember that
because otherwise you're going to be caught off guard. You're
in the is the Buck Sex and Show podcast, and
if you're voting for that man who two weeks from

(15:09):
election day is calling for the arrest of his opponent,
then you have absolutely no idea what America is about.
Let me say it again, here's no idea what this
country is about. If you are supporting a man who
two weeks out is calling for the arrest of this money,
you can't you can't explain that away. You can't explain

(15:33):
that away to history. You can't explain that away to
your children or grandchildren. You just can't. And you can't
plead ignorance because you know better. I don't think you
can explain away spending more than fifteen seconds watching the
Joe Scarborough show in the morning. But that's me here.
He is one of the most fervent anti trumpers out there.

(15:55):
And look, we all understand this same thing with these
different anti Trump groups that have raised all this money
for Democrats to trash Trump. It's just about money, just
about influence, money power. No principles involved here. There's no
such thing as a principle never Trump pro Biden Conservative
opposition certainly not anymore. And you could argue, probably not

(16:15):
from the beginning either, there's no such thing. Just frauds.
There's people lying, pretending to be something that they're not.
But here you get Joe Scarborough saying that the big
problem he sees, one of many I'm sure with Donald Trump,
is that he was calling for the arrest of his opponent.
And I'm not going to call him out because he's
a conservative radio host, not one of the very very

(16:38):
big names. So before any of you guys. But somebody
yesterday I saw saying that, you know, could you imagine
if Democrats were calling for the arrest of their political opponents,
come on conservatives like, we can't And I'm looking at
this saying, what do you think the Muller probe was
all about? What do people think using a special counsel

(17:01):
that was unaccountable to anybody really, because you had an
Attorney general who was recused, so nobody was going to
step in and actually make sure this was on the
up and up. What do you call unleashing a special
counsel on people with the express purpose of taking down
to administration, prosecuting people within the administration up to and

(17:21):
including the president. If they could get away with it,
if they had enough to impeach and remove, they would
have done it, and then try to throw Donald Trump
in prison. You know that they want to throw General
Flynn in prison after thirty years of serving in the
United States Military and being the DA director under the
Obama administration because they lied about a conversation that he

(17:42):
had with a couple of FBI agents who lied about
why they were even talking to him in the first
place to get him. So now we're going to get
lectured by the other side. When the Hunter Biden emails
have come out and we see what's really going on,
we're gonna get lectured about how, oh, but you shouldn't
want anything. You shouldn't want to see your opponents prosecuted.
The Democrats tried to imprison Trump, Trump supporters, his family members,

(18:06):
everet around him for almost four uninterrupted years, and then
and then impeached him anyway when they couldn't actually get
the political muscle together to really make it happen to
get a removal from office. So now we're gonna be
lectured about how Trump says lock her up. Trump says
these things, and he actually has a point because Hillary
did break the law, and it looks like maybe Joe

(18:28):
Biden also did break the law. Hillary one hundred percent
broke the law. I don't care what moron James Comey says,
but now we have Joe Biden. Maybe he broke the
law two So do the law? Does the law count
or not? Thanks for listening to The Bus Sesson Show podcasts.
Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or

(18:49):
wherever you get your podcasts. There's a whole lock him
Up false conspiracy theories against the Bidens really is stunning.
I mean, he could be talking about the economy and
making false claims about that, but you know, blame it
on COVID. He could be talking about Supreme Court nominee
who is popular with his bass and what they've done

(19:10):
with the courts. Yet he's going after you know, these
Rudy Giuliani created, you know, false plots that we now
have learned could well be tied to Russian intelligence because
Giuliani was wittingly, unwittingly meeting with Russian intelligence agents, people
who have been designated by the US government as such.
What the heck is she talking about. Let's really dig

(19:34):
into this for a moment, shall we. That is Andrea Mitchell, who,
for reasons unbeknownst to me, is considered a person that
other human beings should listen to on matters of politics
and news over at NBC and has for a long time.
I know, she's been in the game for a long time.
She's over at NBC and she's saying things that are

(19:55):
the mainstream Democrat talking points. Right now. She's saying there's
a Russian conspiracy theory. She's saying that Rudy Giuliani was
talking to Russian agents and all this. They're bringing back
the whole Russia thing. It's as Yogi Berra said, deja
vu all over again. Right, That's where we are. This

(20:16):
is twenty sixteen, Part two. Do you recall. I think
it was early in the summer I said they're going
to bring back Russia collusion. I wasn't sure how. I
thought maybe they'd just make the same allegations. But I
knew because people have been hardwired on the left to
think of Russia as this omnipresent menace that can go
after you everywhere and anywhere. In favor of Donald Trump,

(20:38):
it's always on Trump's behalf too. It's never just an
attack on the country. It's always like Trump is so
tight with Putin and all this other stuff that they've
been told. But she's saying the Hunter Biden scandal is
a false conspiracy theory. What is false about it? Really
spend a moment to think about this today. What exactly
has been said that's not true? No intelligent person believes

(21:03):
that the laptop is not Hunter Biden's the laptop that
has intimate photos of Hunter Biden on it, And that's
putting it gently. No one thinks that that's not real,
that it's some deep fake. No one said that. The
campaign hasn't claimed that that's the case. They've only said
that Joe Biden didn't have an official meeting on his

(21:23):
schedule with this Russian Look, here's what you have to
start with. Run this thought experiment. If there was a
video of Joe Biden laughing, and again, this is a
this is a thought experiment theoretical right, So I'm not
and I don't want media matters or whatever to clip
this and all the equip buck sextance saying on this

(21:44):
radio show. No, I'm just saying, think this through. If
there was a video of Russian intelligence agents sitting down
with or sorry a Ukrainian businessman, forget about Russian intelligence agents,
Ukrainian businessmen sitting down with Hunter and Joe Biden talking
about the payment structure for this Barisma scheme and how

(22:05):
they're gonna make sure that the investigators get pushed away
from this and all this other stuff. Right, But if
it was on tape, smoking gun and we already have
smoking gun emails, but let's say it's on video. Do
you think any of the people that we're calling this
a conspiracy yesterday or today would change their minds tomorrow.
Do you think that any Democrat with power and influence

(22:30):
in the media or in the Democrat Party is able
to be swayed no matter what the evidence is here
around Barisma and this corrupt scheme answers no. So when
you understand that, when you see how it doesn't matter,
then you can also understand very quickly why is it
that they just keep saying things that are so obviously untrue? Because, friends,

(22:54):
when it comes to defeating Trump, for Democrats, the truth
does not matter. It's irrelevant. They don't care. How else
could you explain what they're trying to do here? How
else could you explain the way that they're just pretending
these stories. At first it didn't exist, and they tried

(23:15):
to suppress it, and then they tried to call him
a non story, but turned out that the suppression effort
became that day an even bigger story than the Hunter
Biden story, and so then it probably spread even further
than it would have otherwise. And then they said, oh,
it's not really, it doesn't show anything. He didn't do

(23:36):
anything wrong. That was always Joe Biden's line. When he
was pressed about this months and months ago. Oh, he
didn't do anything wrong. That's what it would yell at reporters,
the occasional reporter who would ask about the Bresma situation.
And now beyond that, I mean, going even further, they're
saying that it's a Russian disinformation campaign. They have exactly

(23:59):
zero evidence of this, but with incredible precision, like a
Swiss watch, all of a sudden, this became what you
would hear from the biggest news outlets and the biggest,
you know, Democrat mouthpieces in the whole country. You have
Politico here you go, Hunter Biden's story is Russian disinfo.

(24:25):
Dozens of former Intel officials say, our intelligence community is
never going to recover its reputations, never going to recover
from what's happened in these Trump years. I mean, the
fact that you had Brannan and Clapper and all these
other deep stayed clowns doing the stuff that they did

(24:45):
to try and destroy Donald Trump is stunning, absolutely stunning.
I mean, they're supposed to be nonpartisan professionals who don't
get into the political fray, and what we saw was
they're actually willing to be weaponized and used their access
and the powers of their office in order to pull

(25:07):
that off, right. That's that's what we've learned about my
old my old institution, the CIA place I worked for
for years and made some great friends there and have
some very fond memories of the place. But it was
a mess then. But we did have a purpose. We

(25:27):
did want to prevent the towers from getting hit with
more towers from getting hit with planes, or you know,
public squares getting bombed, these kinds of mass casualty attacks.
We had a reason for showing up to work every
day that for at least a time, seemed to transcend politics.
And with their with the not entire disappearance, obviously, I

(25:48):
saw what just happened in France with this guy who
got beheaded for showing a cartoon of the prophet Muhammad.
That's still a thing that can get you beheaded in France, apparently.
But with the with the decline of Islamic well of jihadism,
Islamic radicalism around the world as an imminent threat to
the US, what we see is now the biggest threat

(26:11):
is supposed to be internal. It's almost like all these
lib movies and TV shows that I've seen where the
bad guys always end up being you know that the
real threat to the United States always comes from some
corporation or some right wing group that's trying to seize
power from within, from within the government. Right, but it's

(26:33):
always very very right wing. They believe this, I mean
they've come to believe this at a time when the
left can call upon the biggest, wealthiest companies, most influential
companies in the world. Right, remember Facebook, Google, and we'll
talk about the DOJ suit coming up here against them
to try to finally break break up at least Google,
which I think is absolutely should happen. There should be

(26:54):
more competition, more competition in church from more accountability and
anti for people say, oh buck, let the market speak. Well,
I don't want to get I don't want to get
ahead of myself. We'll get there. But the left has
a stranglehold on these massive institutions, more influential, powerful, wealthy
than any other corporations really in the world. How there's

(27:16):
Walmart will sell you stuff. Facebook and Google determine what
you see, what you buy, how you communicate, far more influential, right,
I mean, I know Walmart does a very good job
of delivering stuff or you know, putting stuff in the
stores for a cheap price. But what these social media

(27:38):
giants do. The left controls them. And yet they're always
worried about Trump as the fascist. This is a this
is a fabrication, and this is a figment of their
imagination that Donald Trump is on the cusp of some
kind of right wing overthrow of our government system. And
this is the kind of language that they use. Meanwhile,

(27:59):
on the other side, they actually try to overthrow a president.
They just try. They just used the weaponization of a
law in the intelligence community to achieve that. Unfortunately they
were unable to succeed. But that doesn't mean the next
time around they won't. And why should we believe they
won't try it again? Think about this. They got away

(28:20):
with it. They weren't entirely successful, but who's been held
to account? And I know it would look it would
have been more powerful, more clicks, more downloads. If I
tell everybody, oh, the dirt Durham's gonna get everybody, He's
gonna line them up and frog march him out. The
Durham probe. Couldn't tell you that because I knew it
wasn't gonna happen. Or at least that was my very

(28:43):
strong feeling that I felt obligated to share with you.
And sure enough, here we are two weeks from an election. Yeah,
the Durham probe not so much, not so much. But
these former intelligence officials, these former intelligence officials who were
coming out and saying the Hunter Biden stories, rush and disinformation,
you also have to remember they see something in this

(29:04):
for themselves. It's all about now it's changed so much
because of instantaneous and omnipresident digital media. It's about your profile.
You know, who gets the top jobs the next Biden administration.
The people who are the best known, have the best
connections and the most clout in many ways, honestly, the

(29:26):
most famous in their field or the most well you know,
well known in their area of practice. So for some
of these former intelligence people, if they want to be
the CIA director, deputy director, FBI director, you name it,
a great way to do it is by signing your
name to things like this. So you got these fifty

(29:47):
former intelligence officials sign this letter casting doubt on the
provenance of a New York Post story. Here's what it says.
Quote the emails allegedly belong to Joe Biden's on has
all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation. The
letters signed on Monday centers around a batch of documents

(30:08):
released by The New York Post last week that purport
to tie the Democratic nomintee to his son, Hunter's business
dealings under the banner headline Biden's Secret Emails. The Post
reported it was given a copy of Hunter Biden's laptop
hard drive by President Donald Trump's personal lawyer, Rudy Giuliani,
who said he got it from a Mac shop owner
in Delaware, who also alerted the FBI. While the letters

(30:31):
signatories presented no new evidence, they said their national security
experience had made them deeply suspicious that the Russian government
played a significant role in this case, and cited several
elements of the story that suggested the Kremlin's hand at work.
Nick Shapiro, a former top aide under CI director John Brennan,

(30:54):
provided political with the letter on Monday. He noted that
the IC leaders who have signed this letter worked of
the passport presidents, including Trump. That means nothing. The real
power here, however, is a number of former working level
IC officers. Look friends, the CIA and the intellience community
are full of a bunch of libs. Elizabeth Warren was

(31:15):
a United States centator and was a professor Harvard Law School,
and she says the president's an existential threat to human life. Okay,
do you think that that mentality? She's an elite, you know,
Harvard professor, rich lady living in Massachusetts, and she says
stuff like that, and people clap for her. You don't
think that there are plenty of folks working in the

(31:35):
intelligence community, working in law enforcement who also feel that way.
And if you felt that way, if you really believe
the president was an existential threat to this nation, to
our institutions of governance, or to human life on planet Earth,
what would you not be willing to do? So we
know the crazy is there, We know the crazy is

(31:56):
widespread within the Democrat Party. So what else do we
have to do here for everyone to understand that that's
going to have consequences. They're signing a letter. This letter
is an embarrassment, an absolute embarrassment. They're just basically saying,
don't believe it, rely on our resumes and our perceived

(32:17):
credibility in the public's eye. Don't don't believe that this
is real because we say so, This is scary. I
mean really, the suppression campaign around the Hunter Biden emails
for me is still and on the make believe Russian.
The disinformation is calling this Russian disinformation. That's the great irony.

(32:40):
But whatever works. We're in this final stretch here for
the Democrats. Whatever they have to pull off, whatever they
have to say, they'll do it. They'll do it. And
that's what you're seeing play out right now. You're in
the U. This is the Buck Sex and Show podcast.

(33:02):
This is the Laptop from Hell. They say right in
the laptop that you know the big man has to
get ten percent, and then in another case they say
fifty percent. This is one hundred percent. This is and
even if he didn't get and he does get and
he lives like a king, even if he didn't get
all of this money, and everybody's known this in Washington
for a long time, this isn't surprising. Nobody's surprised by this.

(33:26):
But even if he didn't, you can't go to China
had the sudden walk out with one and a half
billion dollars to manage. You can't go to Ukraine and
have him get one hundred and eighty three thousand dollars
a month with a three million dollar up front payment.
You can't get three and a half million dollars from
the mayor of Moscow's wife. Three and a half million
dollars and you have no experience. You didn't have a

(33:47):
job until your father became vice president. It's a disgrace.
How is Joe Biden going to escape all this at
the upcoming presidential debate this Thursday? How is he going
to evade all of these questions and allegations. Clearly the
President's going to bring them up, and this could be it.

(34:08):
I just hope that Trump is able to stay focused
and stay on task, pick his punches and throw them
one by one, don't flail so to speak. Right, He
need to be precise when he goes after and Biden
on this stuff, because this also goes to a much
larger issue and beyond even just the corruption. Think about

(34:28):
how much you've been lectured for the last four years.
I mean, I'm getting angry, and I rarely get angry,
but I'm getting angry about what I'm seeing unfold here
with the media. Because the favorite thing that they always
say about Trump is he lies. He lies. That's all
they'll say. Right. I mean, I remember back in February

(34:49):
being on the Bill Mars Show, and it was just
impossible to get a word in edgewise or because it's
just what Trump lies. So he's a liar. So everything
he says doesn't matter because he's a liar. How do
you argue with that? What do you to somebody when
they say that? First of all, I think that's not true.
And we've discussed many times here on the show. The
president can be a little bit, a little bit grandiose,

(35:10):
a little bit of a salesman, but he's been upfront
about who he is and what he wants to do.
And that's the fundamental truth of his presidency, the one
that matters to all of us. Not you know, whether
he thinks he get the biggest crowd size at some
event or not. Who cares. But Joe Biden's a liar, friends,
And not only is he a liar, he has the

(35:30):
entire media complex acting as his as his conspirators, his
co conspirators in the lies. You know, it's one thing
to have a president who has the entirety of ninety
five percent of the media apparatus constantly opposed to him,
and they talk about the risk that he poses a fascism.

(35:52):
That's the media in a fascist country. You know what
the media does, the bidding of the fascist. What's more
likely you get a Joe Biden presidency and all of
a sudden there'll be an effort to completely suppress the
truth and support him no matter what he does, which
is the one that should scare people who believe in
the free exchange of ideas. More, we all know it's

(36:14):
not Trump. Thanks for listening to The Bus Sesson Show podcasts.
Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or
wherever you get your podcasts. So, the very fact that
these emails come into the public sphere from Rudy Giuliani,
the fact that Andre Durkoch seems to know more about

(36:35):
these emails than almost anybody else, tells you where they're
coming from. I mean, at some point you sort of
have to believe what you see, which is that when
visuals who are either identified Russian agents or are conspiring
with Russian agents are providing the information upon which mainstream
media are reporting, you have to understand what the deal

(36:56):
is here. And again I'm not alone here. Fifty intelligence
high level intelligence agents people who have worked in the
intelligence agencies came out and said that this is mostly
from propaganda that means nothing. That means nothing. It's obvious
why they would take that position. There's a benefit for them,

(37:17):
right They both politically or invested in Joe Biden beating
Donald Trump, and some of them. I'm telling you want
to get back into the game at the top of
the intel community and be important and powerful again. And
one way to do that is by signing letters like this.
Who do you think the Biden transition team is going
to want to have running their CIA or their you know,

(37:37):
become their DNI if they managed to get to that
point by beating Donald Trump, people that will sign a
letter like this when it counts. Everyone knows this, everyone
can see it. But where is their evidence that this
is disinformation? It doesn't exist. But the evidence for Russia
collusion also did not exist. It was a fabrication, was

(38:00):
a falsehood from top to bottom. There was no collusion.
And yet now we're at a point where they're telling
us the exact opposite of what is true is true.
This is the ultimate gas lighting and that's what this
has turned into. If Joe Biden was a solid candidate.
If Joe Biden was inspiring and people really believe that

(38:21):
he'd do a great job, why would people need to
resort to this kind of stuff. Why would the attacks
on Trump to have to involve lies? Because now, remember
if it's Russian disinformation, now Trump is the liar, you see,
So it actually goes from defense to offense. Not only

(38:41):
is this thing not true, Trump is part of a
conspiracy against Hunter and Joe Biden with it. That's why
this is so useful. You can never disprove it. How
can you disprove it's Russian disinformation? Well, you know, prove
it isn't. That's the way they approach it, at least,
I mean, a normal rational person wouldn't say that, but
that's what they're doing. And beyond that, it's not just

(39:03):
oh one hundredn't do anything wrong. It's this is the
problem that we have now because of Donald Trump, you see.
So they turned defense to offense. The shield becomes the sword,
and that's that's all a part of this as well.
It last couple of weeks here, friends, is it is
game time? You know, it's game time, So I don't know,

(39:24):
you know, it's kind of an intense show today, and
I'm just because I'm feeling like we're in the fight,
and I'm not gonna lie to you. I think Trump's
gonna win, but it's gonna be close, it's gonna be ugly,
and it's not gonna be over on November third. In
my mind, maybe it will. I love it when I
make predictions and I hope they're wrong, and they are wrong,
but not always. That tends not to be really the

(39:45):
only thing I can think of in recent memory. Well
ACB hearings didn't get as crazy as I thought they would,
the efforts to stop that, and Trump's election in twenty sixteen.
But other than that, on the big ones, I tend
to get it right. But I'm trying to avoid getting
into the the Jeffrey Tubin story. I don't think this
is a this is just it's prurientto the right word,

(40:08):
or you know, this is salacious. I don't know. You
know this looks it's Tubin's a Tuban's a jerk. And
so people see a guy like this who's a hack
and who's nasty to people and has a really, you know,
really bad history of behavior that makes him an odious fellow,
and he does something that is this level of embarrassing.
I can't even really describe it on radio. I mean,

(40:30):
he's special. Fun fun time. Is that how I described it?
You describe something else like that? I felt it applied here. Okay,
fun fun time. Yeah, So Jeffrey Tubin was having some
some self fun fun time on a zoom call, which,

(40:54):
as you know, includes video with some esteemed colleagues of
The New Yorker, which is probably the snootiest left wing
publication or you know, liberal publication out there. It's the snootiest,
right the most. Oh, I subscribe to the New Yorker.
Listen to me. I'm so fantasy. I believe in the
New Yorker. I mean, yeah, some of the cartoons are clever,

(41:16):
but other than that. And yeah, it's not from a
big story. You know. Initially it came out and they
said that there was so I guess we are good.
You know, we needed we need a break from all
those guy's falling in Trump and all this stuff. So
initially this story came out and it said that he
exposed himself accidentally on a zoom call. And now to this,

(41:37):
because we're a lot of us are working from home.
I work from home other people. I thought, all right, look,
you know everything's got a camera on it these days,
we're all super connected all the time. You know, if
he left a laptop open, thought he closed out a
window and was on the other side of his apartment.
I think he lives in New York where, you know,
space is small, even if you're rich, you don't have
very big space. If you're not rich, like me, a

(42:00):
very small space. But you know you can see. Okay,
look this can happen. It's embarrassing. But then they suspended him.
I thought, whoa, whoa. I mean, come on, it's an accident, right,
I mean, this is like, you know, come on, And
I thought, no, this is more than that. It wasn't.
He was changing on the other side of the bedroom

(42:22):
or something and left the zoom call open, and someone
got a quick flash of say I'd say, look, come on,
we're ad at all. I mean, it wasn't intentional, you know,
he says, sorry, you let that go. This is a
little worse because he was on a zoom call on
apparently on another zoom call at the same time, and
the other zoom call was clearly more interesting because he
decided to engage in self fun fun time on the video.

(42:47):
So this is gonna be a tough that's a tough
one to live down. Although I'm sure CNN is gonna
bring it. He'll be back, He'll be fine. He's already
a very wealthy guy, so he'll be all right, right,
And that's the thing. But I guess I don't even
know what the what the well, there are a few
lessons learned from this one, but I think one of

(43:07):
them is, you know, you never want to be that
guy who people think is so nasty and so vicious,
such a jerk in the media or in any business,
that when something like this happens to you, there's very
few people that are willing to show any sympathy, very
few people that are willing to say now, And I'm
talking about the initial allegation, which is different from what

(43:29):
it turned out to be. So maybe maybe that's a
lesson from it. And the other one is all mics
are on and all video cameras are are recording, and
you just you know, you don't know, you don't know.
But that story, I think everyone also focused it on
that because they just wanted something that wasn't The sky
is falling in Russia and all this really intense election stuff.

(43:52):
I think there was just a psychological need for a
story that was something else in the at the top
of the news ticker for a few for a few hours.
So that one broke yesterday. And now producer Mark has
reminded me that we can always use the euphemism fun
fun time because we can say that on radio, right Mark,
there's no FCC issue there, So there we go. Yeah,

(44:12):
that's the perfect way to describe it on radio. I
think that's right, you know, And you know, just for
everybody out there, if you're gonna have fun fun time,
make sure you've closed your high level work call zoom.
That's important, you know, important safety tip for all involved.
And I will say it's a level there's a level
of embarrassment that even when somebody is pretty is a

(44:35):
pretty honestly pretty awful person, there's a level of embarrassment
where you see it you really just go oh man.
And I think this reaches that one. This reaches that one.
So I guess we'll just take the lessons learned and
now we can go back to the Russian disinformation. You're
in the freedom. This is the Buck Sex and Show Podcast.

(45:02):
You know, we just stand for the principle the American
people have a right to know what's going on here.
The Director of National Intelligence today, I know, made it
clear that there is no evidence to suggest that the
information on that computer reported in the New York Post
is a result of any disinformation campaign, and the American
people have a right to know about the business dealings

(45:26):
of the Biden family. I mean, I mean, lou, we
just spent the last three and a half years where
the Democrat nominee in twenty sixteen had worked with a
foreign entity to try and dig up dirt on President Trump,
and I don't remember the media shutting off access to
that information. And yet they have shut off this information

(45:49):
as much as they can, although it doesn't seem like
it's going to work to prevent people from being able
to at least access it, whether they believe it or not.
That's another part of this too. There's the suppression that
comes from preventing distribution, and then there's also the suppression

(46:09):
that comes from forcing people or bringing people to doubt
the veracity of something. So it's one thing if the
email never gets into your inbox, let's say, so to speak,
that's you can block information that way. It's another thing
if you've already been trained to believe the email after
comes in is fake, it's not true what it's saying is.
So that's another part of what the media has been

(46:31):
doing here. What Penn says is obviously true. Pence's claimed
here the American people have a right to know. I
don't think anybody could make a serious case to dispute that.
And so since that's true, since that's the situation, what
is the hold up? Then with the media, they're just
throwing up these smoke screens. And for a media apparatus

(46:55):
that has been completely fascinated with getting Donald Trump's tax
return as if that was going to be some smoking
gun and bring down his presidency. That was a huge story.
It was a huge story. Before they even had the
tax returns, they just would make stuff up about what
they thought might be in them and then report on
what their guesses were. Then you have this where all

(47:19):
of a sudden that this huge scoop, this big story,
is not touched by the mainstream meat outlets at first,
and then all they try to do is kill the
story after the fact. I mean, the New York Times
printed something earlier this week saying that there was a
staffer on the New York Post who worked for the
New York Post who was uncomfortable with going forward with

(47:40):
the story. Okay, there are a lot of close calls
that get made in newsroom sometimes. Who cares, what's the
New York Times doing? Well, we all know what they're doing,
carrying water for the Democrats. I mean to the point
where at least I think they're getting a good workout.
They're probably building up those lats and traps and carrying
all that water for Joe Biden and Kamala Harris, isking
the media physically stronger in theory. And then you also

(48:05):
have what the VP is inting at here, and the
DOJ came down with the today the anti trust actions
that are coming up. We've got this one against Google.
But first, here's the Vice president on the role of
big tech in all this play fourteen. And let me
be real clear, President Donald Trump and I are not

(48:26):
gonna let big tech block the truth. We're not gonna
let big tech censor what Americans read or see or
say in this election or ever. That's great, if it's true.
I hope they can make it true. And then we

(48:48):
also have this from the DOJ today, DOJ saying that
they're bringing an anti trust, a full on antitrust lawsuit
against Google. Now, this is gonna get antitrust and monopolies,
and this is an area where people know the terms,

(49:08):
but it's it gets down deep in the weeds very quickly.
But this is the biggest challenge from the government against
a tech company to come up in many, many years.
I mean, this goes you'd have to go back to
probably what Microsoft in the in the late nineties and
early two thousands for anything to be similar to this.
I mean, this is it's been a long time since

(49:30):
you've had something like this, and it's massive. I mean
Google is effectively a trillion a trillion dollar company and
it takes in about one hundred and sixty billion dollars
of revenue every year. The way Google makes most of
its money is through advertising, but there's also this other

(49:52):
way that it's and this is what comes up in
the suit that the DOJ has filed. And Bill Barr
said that they were gonna they were gonna take big
T to task on this stuff. They were not going
to allow this to just continue. But what you see
here is the area of vulnerability that they're going after
so far, is big tech thinking, or in this case,

(50:14):
Google thinking that it's allowed to make all this money
off of advertising, but then cut these deals with all
the smartphone makers that the default Internet browser is the
default Internet browser for all your smartphones is going to
be Google. So you open your phone, Google's already installed.
That's what you're using. You do a search on your phone,

(50:36):
it's using Google. There is Being, and there's Yahoo, and
there's there. Used to be asked, Jeeves, I think that
one went away? Am I forgetting? Is there another one
that anyone really uses these days? Producer Mark? I don't know.
I don't think so. I'm pretty sure there's not really,
and it's certainly no near competitors. I mean, Google has

(50:57):
eighty to ninety percent of the overall search engine market,
which means that its ability to determine what companies are
successful and what ideas are promoted and presented. And Google
is a fantastically powerful company, and now they're going to
be held to the same standard as other companies when
it comes to anti competitive practices. I think in a

(51:20):
stock actually jumped up a little bit on the news
of this. Which is interesting because the breakup value might enhanced.
I don't know. I don't really even understand how that works,
to be honest with you, But I mean, I have
the basics of it, but I don't know why people
would necessarily assume that. And now we're going to get
into a real fight between a company that has effectively

(51:41):
endless resources and the federal government, which also has effectively
endless resources, because you know where the federal government gets
its checkbook from you, and it'll keep writing those checks.
Got no problem with that at all. So look, I
think this is the right move. I think that we

(52:02):
do have to regulate big tech. And I wish that
I could say that this was, oh, let the free,
let the market speak, let the free, but it's not
a free market. It's not. There are a lot of
government regulations that are already in place that affect companies,
that affect the way that you'd be able to compete
with some of these monopolies. And remember, monopolies are really

(52:22):
only possible if you go back and look at sort
of the Austrian school and the Milton Friedman take on this,
monopolies are only possible with government collusion. So this is
a problem that government has had a hand in, and
now the government is going to try to do something
to fix it. And I agree when government tries to
fix things it often makes it worse. But if we

(52:45):
keep losing the big tech meaning politically, Now they're trying
to separate this. They're trying to say that, oh, this
has nothing to do with suppression of conservatives. Well it doesn't.
It doesn't. It's a different issue, but it has shown people.
I think there's a greater willingness now to take on
the antitrust aspects of a case like this against Google,

(53:07):
because we realize that these companies are pushing ideas and
they are friends to those certain people in power, and
that's something that has to be looked at more closely.
They've gotten this free pass. Remember Google's old mantra was
don't be evil. It's quite a strange thing. I know
Google is now part of Alphabet, that's the primary holding

(53:27):
you know, the holding company that Google's a part of.
But don't be evil is not something that you would
think a neutral Internet platform. It just wants to be
helpful and give people great free products, and it means
of communication. They wouldn't have to tell people that, but
there's there's some other things that are going on behind
the scenes here. It's a very left wing, very left

(53:49):
wing company, very left wing institution, and now it's going
to have to answer for some of what it's doing.
Because wouldn't it be nice if there were search engines
that we're really competitive with and weren't so dominant in
the marketplace? Who is then? When Google is doing you know,
the main site is a BLM, he's basically a BLM

(54:11):
poster or is all about I don't know, some other
political issue. He'd say, Okay, look, I don't really like this.
I don't like this company stands for I'm going to
go with you know, Yahoo's version of this or something
like that. So we shall see how this plays out.
But don't hold your breath because it's gonna take a
long time and Google's gonna fight like mad and they've

(54:32):
got the resources to do it. Thanks for listening to
the Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app,
or wherever you get your podcasts. As promised, our friend
Sean Parnell joins us now. He is a former Army ranger,
decorated combat veteran, author, best selling author and currently running

(54:55):
in an absolutely critical race in Pennsylvania for a House seventeen.
Sean Parnell joins us. Now, Sean, my man, great to
have you, Hey, great to be here. Buck. How's it going?
Oh man, it's it's crazy for me, but I feel
like it's probably even crazier for you. Right now, two
weeks out from from the big day. I want to
get into what you're seeing nationally and also specifically in

(55:17):
your congressional race out in western Pennsylvania. But first we
have this Supreme Court decision four four. It came down
so tie, which means that it reverts to the lower
court decision in Pennsylvania, which said that well, i've actually Sean,
let's have you're you're in that state. So it's really
gonna matter folks like you, what just happened here. What
do the Supreme Court decide to do? Well, they allowed

(55:39):
for a ballot extension, Buck. The Supreme Court effectively moved
the election day from November third and November sixth, and
so what's really disconcerting about this is that ballots can
be returned up to three days after election day and
don't require a postmark. Now, look, this is not me

(56:02):
trying to throw partisan jabs, right, But I think anybody
that's approaching this in a fair minded way sort of
scratches their head and say and says, what is going
on here? How does this make sense? Pennsylvanians deserve free
and fair elections, And I think people were worried that
the Democrats are going to see, you know how many

(56:24):
votes they're down on election Day and then they're going
to go into overdrive over the next three days to
try to deliver those votes. And look, you know, we've
known all along, Buck, that Republicans are going to show
up on election day around here. And again, I'm not
trying to be hyperbolic, but I've never seen an enthusiastic
enthusiasm for a president like I have here in Pennsylvania.

(56:47):
And truthfully, you know, we don't focus enough on this,
but the proof is in the numbers of our voter registrations, Buck,
and we are just we are absolutely destroying the Democrats
and voter registration. And I say this all the time,
but Pennsylvania is actually more favorable for the president today
than it was in two thousand and sixteen. The only
difference is is sort of sort of the chaos that's

(57:10):
surrounding the mail in ballots. Now that's really interesting to
hear because we keep seeing that the big headline is
Trump is down in every national poll, in every battleground state.
You know, this is what the drumbeat is from the media,
and I think it's it's men at least in part,
to demoralize, and they're very happy about it, you know,
the same way that they were talking about Amy Coney

(57:33):
Barrett polls showing that a majority of the American people
didn't want are confirmed, and that was a big talking point. Well,
then the hearing's happened, and now for majority of the
American people wants are confirmed. And now now poles don't
matter all of a sudden about that. Right, So we
know that the the the evidence, the basis for all
this change is so very very quickly. What are you

(57:54):
seeing right now in Pennsylvania that that is favorable for
the president? I mean you're telling me that that earlier,
I mean that that voter registration is up. Do we
have any sense of how the early voting is going. Well,
Democrats were beating us in early voting and it's not
even close. But look, bottom line is this the people
that are voting right now on the Democratic side of

(58:15):
the aisle. And this is just you know, you know,
my campaign talking right but they're buying large people that
we're going to show up on election day, and it
looks to us like they're cannibal cannibalizing their own election
day vote. We talk about the numbers in the state
of Pennsylvania, Buck, and these are hard numbers. You know,
the Republicans have registered over like almost over two hundred

(58:40):
thousand new Republican voters since twenty sixteen. That is, that's
some of those people are undoubtedly Democrats that maybe voted
for Trump in twenty sixteen, that maybe switched party registration,
but nowhere near all of them. And so in Pennsylvania,
President Trump won the state of Pennsylvania by forty four
thousand votes thereabouts in twenty sixteen. And we've got one

(59:00):
hundred and sixty one hundred and eighty plus thousand newly
registered Republicans here in the state of Pennsylvania, by the way,
who aren't reflected in the polls, who are definitely turning
out and voting for President Trump. Now in my district,
Republicans are also beating Democrats and voter registration I think
we've registered a thousand more Republicans than the Democrats have

(59:21):
registered for themselves. And so, look, those are the numbers
that I look at, and I look at the numbers
here in Pennsylvania seventeen as well. And if the district
had existed in two thousand and sixteen, President Trump would
have won this district by over ten thousand votes, and
Senator to Me in the very same year won the
district by seventeen thousand votes. Now, you will never hear

(59:43):
that portrade on the media, right, you will never hear
those hard numbers portrayed on the media because they'd rather
focus on polling whose methodology, quite frankly, is dated. And
here's why, Buck. Look, we've got Governor Tom Ridge, who's
a guy that I was back immensely, who's a lifetime
Republican here from western Pennsylvania. It was a congressman in

(01:00:06):
western Pennsylvania. A governor is voting for Joe Biden. But
almost every Democrat that I talked to in Beaver County,
all of which is in my district, are voting for Trump.
How do you pull that? How do you find statistical
sampling that would represent that? It's very, very difficult to
pull Western Pennsylvania. And I will tell you this, this
race both Pennsylvania in PA seventeen is going to be

(01:00:29):
a razor thin margin. It just is. Speaking of Sean Parnell,
he is a former Army ranger and he is now
running against Connor lamb out in Western Pennsylvania Congrettial District seventeen. Sean,
you know you and I talk off line a lot too.
We've known each other for years. What is your response
to this obviously concerted and really ruthless campaign to pretend

(01:00:55):
that once again Donald Trump may win, according to the
Democrat because of Russian interference, this time a Russian disinformation
campaign on Hunter Biden's emails. Buck. Look, I've never seen
I've never seen the media like this, and it's not
just the national media. I've never seen the media soe

(01:01:17):
in the tank for a political party before in my life.
And I look, man, I think it's dangerous. You know,
the people rely on the media to get the truth
and the facts out about both parties. Look, I want
the media to ask me tough questions, but the media
should also ask Democrats tough questions as well, Like, for example,
Connor lamb is not on the record about court packing.

(01:01:39):
Connor Lamb is not on the record about removing the filibuster.
Connor Lamb is not on the record about issues that
would fundamentally transform our country. And this is not Sean
Parnell saying this stuff. These are Democrats, national Democrats in
Washington who say they're going to do this stuff if
they win. Now, if we had a responsible media at

(01:02:00):
the local and national level, they'd be asking the Democrats
these questions and getting them on the record. And the
fact that this Hunter Biden's story, this is a this
is a huge deal. The fact that the Biden family,
what it looks like they profited off their name to
the tune of tens of millions of dollars funneled through
Hunter Biden and into the Biden family from countries like Russia, Ukraine,

(01:02:25):
and China. And that to me is just it's just
unbelievable to me that that one the Democrats and the
media are pushed peddling this Russia disinformation nonsense to where
even the DNI has come out and said, no, that's
not true. But what's worse is that nobody has has

(01:02:46):
even really asked Joe Biden in any sort of concerted
way about it to the CBS reporter who did it,
I can't remember whose name. Hey, kudos to him for
actually asking the question. But the American people need and
deserve an answer on these questions before election day, and
it's just staggering to me that he can get away
with it. He can seemingly can get away with it. Now. Sean,

(01:03:09):
your race is being looked at as one of those
bellweather congressional races for the rest of the country, particularly
because you know you're you're a veteran running against a
veteran in a swing state, as a contentious an election
as anybody's ever seen, and a swing state that now
is going to have the extension, the three day extension
as you mentioned, to get ballots in don't even have

(01:03:30):
to necessarily be postmarked. What should people know about about
your opponent, Connor Lamb and how you stack up against him,
and people be hearing this that are in and around
your district, Well, I would say that, you know, when
people you know people in Pennsylvania seventeen, they think you
know Ilhan Omar and Alexandria Cossio Cortez are both radical, right,

(01:03:53):
but sometimes they don't think that Connor Lamb is, even
though his voting record is exactly the same. And when
I say is that if you look at Ilhan Omar
and you look at Alexandro Accascio Cortez, they're outward with
their radicalism. Connor Lamb is almost more dangerous because he
keeps it under wraps and nobody here locally holds him

(01:04:13):
accountable for his radical voting record. You know, Connor Lamb
is a case study in contrast of somebody that comes
around every two years and tells people what he thinks
that they want to hear in district and then goes
to Washington and does something completely different. And by the way,
said he was going to be pro gun as an
f rating with the NRA today, said he's going to

(01:04:33):
be pro life, votes against the Born Alive Act twice,
said he was going to support President Trump and the
Republicans who put him in office, voter to impeach the President.
Said he was going to oppose Pelosi, votes with Pelosi
over ninety percent at a time, takes FOP endorsements in
twenty eighteen, and two years later he's marching with defund
the police radicals. I mean, he is just a case study.

(01:04:56):
In contrasts, it sounds like Joe Biden a little bit
like with it. The whole Joe Biden presidency is premised
along a guy that you know, he's not you can
trust him. He's not so bad, he's not so radical.
Joe Eden says that, and then you say, well, we'll
hold on a second. You were saying you wanted to
ban fracking like five minutes ago. That's pretty radical. Yeah, well,

(01:05:17):
not only not only Joe Biden, but Kamala Harris said
she bans fracking day one. And the Unity Task Force,
which is Joe Biden's environmental and Energy task force. The
chair of that task Force is Bernie Sanders, The coachair
of that task force is Alexander Accostio Cortez. And Connor
Lamb is on that task force as well and works

(01:05:39):
for them. Now, all of these people had been on
the record saying that they're gonna ban fracking, all of them,
and so are you gonna believe what they say two
weeks before an election when they desperately need the votes
of people in Pennsylvania? Are you gonna believe what they've
said all along? You know, up to and including the primary?

(01:05:59):
I would say, look at what they said in the primary,
look at how they flipped plot, but also look at
their voting record, right like every single one of those people,
I mean, Kamala Harris Co sponsored the Green New Deal
in the Senate, Alexander Roccio Cortez introduced the band Fracking Act.
In the House, Connor Lamb voted to block our withdrawal

(01:06:19):
from the Paris Climate Accord and voted to pave the
way for a future Democratic president the band fracking on
private and federal land. Look at what these people do.
Don't necessarily listen to what they say when they're desperately
asking for your vote in an election season. Sean Parnell, everybody,
he's running in Pennsylvania's seventeenth hopefully going to be the
next congressman from that district. We're pulling for him. Sean,

(01:06:43):
my friend, always great to talk to you. You've you've
run a heck of a race so far, man, and
we just we know you're gonna finish strong. Thanks for
joining us. Thanks Buck, you're in the Freedom Hud. This
is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. They want to take
away your guns, your oil, and your god. Okay, that's

(01:07:06):
what they want. They want to take away your second amendments.
They want to take away a fracking and oil. They
don't care if they want to take it away. They
want to go to the green New Deal. That's not
for Texas. Texas is not going to be losing their guns,
and they're not going to be losing their oil, and
they're not going to be losing their religion or their god.
Presidents telling people the truth about about the fracking the oil.

(01:07:28):
I mean, you can't have a Democrat party here that
thinks that, as we talked about the beginning of the
show today, climate change is an existential threat. CO two
emissions are an existential threat, and then say that they're
not going to be hostile to fossil fuel usage and
emissions and all the rest of it, and guns too.
I believe, and this is not a some of my predictions,

(01:07:50):
I'm very confident, and this one's a little more speculative,
but I think at some point they're going to use
their newfound health authority, you know, health emergency authority under
a Biden administration, they will expand that to the health
emergency around the gun violence epidemic. You know. I take

(01:08:10):
the Democrats at their word when it comes to what
they say they want to do, when they can get
away with saying it, not in a general election a
few weeks before people are going to cast votes, but
when they're just thinking out loud or telling their base
what they're going to try to accomplish, I think they
should be taken taken seriously on that one. And this

(01:08:33):
is also true on the issue of taxes, because it's
so strange. They keep saying that they're not going to
raise taxes, but then it comes out, no, they are
going to raise taxes, but they're only going to raise
taxes they say on some people. Well, does that go
to include small business owners? Let's say who can be
taxed at the maximum individual rate? Is that you know where? Really?

(01:08:54):
Does this? Does this change in tax policy? Leave us
all here? There's Kamala claiming that Trump, of course is
a liar. We'll talk about this play eight. And by
the way, you know, in those debates, as per usual,
you can rely on Donald Trump to engage in distortions

(01:09:18):
and basically lie to the American people. So let's be
clear about this. Joe Biden will not increase taxes on
anyone who makes less than four hundred thousand dollars a
year period. Right, keep in mind that state and local
taxes are almost certain to go up in all these
Democrat Democrat places. And now everyone says, oh, well, Buck

(01:09:42):
moved to Texas or moved to these other states, and
that's good. And my brother just did. My brother's down
in Austin, Texas right now. I'm gonna go visit him
opening about three or four weeks after the election. But
they can get you at the federal level too, and
that's part of the game here, that's part of the plan.
They want to go after you on the federal side
for more money. So remember that. And they also are

(01:10:06):
going to find all kinds of ways to increase taxes
without saying they're really increasing taxes. They don't really under
They don't really believe that economics one oh one is
what it is. They think that they can always find
a way around it. New York and New Jersey, by
the way, I know that only some of you live
in one of those two states, but California as well
is super high tax and going to be higher tax soon.

(01:10:28):
New York and New Jersey for top earners which you
live in New York City, making over four hundred thousand
dollars a year. It doesn't make you rich by any
it makes you upper middle class. I know that sounds crazy,
but it's true. In New York. If you look at
the projections, because of how expensive quality, how expensive daily
living in real estate is here, fifty eight percent would
be there the top top rate according to the Wall

(01:10:51):
Street Journal. Here you'd have a fifty eight percent all
in state, local, federal, You make four hundred grand. It's
not that far off from Sweden, my friends. That starts
to really that starts to really get up there. But
you're going to see more of this because Democrats are
going to have to enlarge government. They do have a
year of massive spending and dwindling or dropping it should

(01:11:15):
say revenue that they're going to use for all of this.
So just get ready for it, and you're not going
to be told the truth. Oh one other thing I
wanted to note here Pelosi speaking of the spending. I
don't think Pelosi is gonna there's not going to be
a deal today. When you hear this, that could change,
but unlikely, as I go on air right now, not

(01:11:38):
going to be any deal. And that just tells you
a lot about these Democrats. People really are suffering. The
Republicans wanted to get money out there. Nancy Pelosi's offer
to struggling small businesses and workers across America right now
who need help, They've got bills they can't pay, who
are in a really tough spot. Nancy Pelosi's explanation for

(01:12:00):
them is that they'd rather have no that she'd rather
they have no money than have money. But Nancy not
get her political wish list from the Congress and signed
by the President. That's really what it all comes down to.
So Nancy's willing to watch workers suffer, which I don't

(01:12:22):
think it's surprising to anybody, but here we have very clear,
very very blatant evidence of that. So the party that
claims that they care so much about working people is
in fact making sure that working people will have a
harder time paying their bills. No deal. It's been weeks
and weeks of negotiating. Pelosi is gonna end up. It
seems again, it could change. It seems like no deal

(01:12:43):
because today's the deadline and Pelosi doesn't want Americans to
feel better, not until after the election. Thanks for listening
to the show past, Remember to subscribe on Apple Podcasts,
the iHeart Radio app, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Let's talk about vacans for some good news. I feel
like we could use a little bit of good news today.

(01:13:05):
There's at least one major vaccine developer believes right now
that there will be a if it is approved, there
will be distribution of a vaccine under an emergency authorization
by as soon as now, some distribution of it by
as soon as December. So that's a good thing. That's it.

(01:13:31):
That's really encouraging, and that's something that we should all say, Okay, well,
at least operation warp speed. It looks like it's going
to going to come to it. It's happy conclusion in
that regard. They'll get there quickly. But then we also
have to deal with the once again change in what

(01:13:54):
the parameters are here. We were told locking down until
a vaccine was crazy, and now we are firmly being
pushed into the locking down until after a vaccine will
be necessary. This is from today CNBC. Coronavirus likely to

(01:14:17):
become endemic as the flu, and a vaccine might not
be able to stop it, according to a top u
K scientist. So now you have scientists telling you we're
going to have coronavirus for the foreseeable future, years maybe
decades to come. Now, I'm not sure that's true, but

(01:14:39):
let's just understand that they're already saying this. Do you
want to wear a mask the rest of your life?
Do you want to live in fear of your fellow
human beings for the next ten or fifteen or twenty year.
Look how long we've had influence outbreaks. It's going to
become endemic, meaning within the population, and vaccines won't stop it.
Now we'll have hopefully better therapeutics, we'll bring the fatality

(01:14:59):
rate even and lower. But at some point people are
just gonna have to stop being terrified. They're just gonna
have to be willing to roll the dice. You never know.
You know, you can step off the curb and get
hit by a bus because the driver you know, thought
he was taking tail and all, and he took a
few ambient you know, you just don't know, and you

(01:15:20):
can only take certain mitigation. Sorry, I had to measures.
In life, you're still always going to be at risk.
You leave your house, you're a risk. You stay at home,
you're online, you know, buying stuff and everything else. There's
risks everywhere around you. Now, I don't say that to
make you anxious or nervous. I say that to make
you feel free. You do the best you can. You

(01:15:42):
make them most intelligent decisions possible, especially when it comes
to your health. You know, I'm trying to eat healthier
these days, and I'll just tell you sometimes these days,
I'm like, you know what, I just yeah, I want
to have a cookie. Shouldn't do it, but I'm gonna
do it, and I'm gonna work on my willpower. And
I'm aware of what's going on here. But you know,
it would be healthier for me if I just ate

(01:16:03):
green veggies and chicken breast three or four times a day.
I can't do that right now. I'm just not in
that space. But I'm I'm understanding this. I understand that i'm,
you know, not not as healthy and not as probably
well functioning a machine as I could be. I'm just saying,
we all, we all have to start on we all
have to start pushing back to normal life. And the

(01:16:26):
problem I have with Fauci and the rest of the
Lockdown chorus is there's never they just keep saying that
we can we can have our lives back. When the
virus is gone and we know it's never coming back,
that will be a very long time, and it could
even be forever. And that's unacceptable. I find that entirely
unacceptable as a proposition and as a part of this.

(01:16:48):
That's why they're pushing all this vaccine stuff. Now. No,
I don't mean pushing vaccines, pushing doubt about vaccines. Here
is a bunch of Democrats out there making sure that
the American people know they think these Democrats that you
can't trust the Trump administrations. F DA, here you go,

(01:17:13):
please play nine. But you know President Trump has promised
a coronavirus vaccine by the end of the year or
maybe sooner. Would you trust that vaccine? No, I would
not trust his word. I would trust the word of
public health experts and scientists, but not Donald Trump. First
of all, I don't trust the president on vaccines. I
think it's going to be a very skeptical American public

(01:17:36):
about taking the vaccine, and they should be. He will
push anything to get reelected. Don't fall for it. And
by the way, I will take the vaccine after Ivanka
takes it. You would be hesitant to receive the vaccine
if it were approved by the end of the year,
I'm gonna yes, I would be hesitant. I mean, if
doctors and scientists like doctor Fauci are taking that vaccine,

(01:18:01):
of course I will take the vaccine. But we also
know that we can't trust the president and take his word.
I trust vaccines, I trust the scientists, but I don't
trust Donald Trump because at this moment, the American people
can't either. How is that supposed to work? The President's

(01:18:21):
going to what, He's going to break into the computers
of all the scientists at the FDA. He's well, how
is that even supposed to happen? How could we have
a situation where the President saying this vaccine is safe
and the FDA would not have already approved it. It It
makes no sense, right. This would be like saying, we're
afraid the President is going to do a you know,

(01:18:44):
an air strike on Iran tomorrow, but you know the military,
you know, we know the military won't go along with it. Well, okay,
but if the military won't do it, then it's not
going to happen. So what are they even talking about.
They keep saying believe the science without the scientists signing
off on this. Trump wouldn't be able to be in
a position to tell anybody to take it. And I know,

(01:19:07):
but putting aside for a second that they just love
any narrative where he's a moral monster right where he's
doesn't doesn't love his own family, doesn't love anyone. It's
just as they've created such a such a caricature of
this guy, who's a really likable, decent guy. That's part
of this that doesn't really get enough attention. But the
president's a nice guy. I mean, he's got you know,

(01:19:28):
he throws elbows and he's a tough New York guy
in a lot of ways. But you know, he also
can be very sympathetic. He's too loyal, I think, to
a lot of the people around him. And he's not
some some evil monster who wants to eat everyone's babies.
I mean, that's not the President of the United States.
But you get that sense from the media very clearly.
He would lie about a vaccine and put everyone at risk. Really,

(01:19:50):
and how would it even It doesn't even make sense.
It's a thing that people who think they're smart but
are actually dumb say out loud, there's no way this
is a serious consideration or concern at this point. But
New York State under Governor Cuomo has already said that
they are not going to you know, they're not going

(01:20:13):
to sign off on this in the state of New
York where I live right now, unfortunately, until they have
their own health experts. So the FDA can't be trusted,
but the New York Public Health authorities can. New York
public health authorities. We're telling you, hey, go down to
the go down to the Chinese Lunar New Year Festival
in Chinatown in New York, and you know, make sure
you get as close to everybody as possible. They stopped

(01:20:34):
just short of saying, why don't you have some people
sneeze in your face and see how that goes for you.
That's how stupid and reckless they were in the early
stages of the coronavirus outbreak. But now we're supposed to
think they're better than the One thing I'll tell you this,
the federal government has a lot of flaws, has a
lot more money and resources than any state or local agency.
When I went from the CIA to working at the
NYPD Intel Division, and the Intel Division is the best

(01:20:56):
funded part of the NYPD, It is remarkable. Never forget
what I was told. I had to bring my own
pens to the office, and they were serious. I said,
where's the supply closet. I know, we don't have a
supply closet for that, bring your own pens. I thought
this was like a new guy thing. Nope, it was real.
So the idea that the state health authorities will be

(01:21:18):
better than the FDA to turning the safety of a
vaccine is just complete and utter nonsense. And I think
we should all understand that up front here. And we
shouldn't understand also that they're really trying hard to make
sure that people can't hear any alternative points of view,

(01:21:38):
despite the fact, despite the fact that the so called
experts have been wrong so many times. Here's the President
slamming Governor Cuomo specifically on this issue Place sixteen. So
he's going to put together the same group of people
probably that he used to put together in the nursing
homes where eleven thousand people died because they put heavily

(01:22:00):
infected people in with the general population. Is that the
people he's going to use to help us out? Now,
it's not. It doesn't work that way. There's a case
of a politician that's so sad. We have Johnson and Johnson,
Fiz and Madurn at the greatest companies in the world.
This has nothing to do with government, and they've come
up with incredible vaccines. And when a politician is a

(01:22:24):
real low life, when a politician is willing to say
that and kill people and scare people from using something
that's going to be great and really solve a big problem,
they ought to be ashamed of themselves. I mean, he
probably listens to his brother Fredo. You know, Fredo has
bad ratings on CNN. He probably listens to Fredo too much.

(01:22:48):
The president ed States calling him Fredo. Wow, here's Fredo
talking about the president backing up his brother. I suppose
play seven. Where's it getting these people? They're starving? Mister President.
We need tests. The more we count, the more we
find trouble. You said you'd get more. Where are they?
States need help, they need guidance, They're going to you.

(01:23:12):
Where is it? The help that can be offered is
being frozen by him. People are afraid to do things
they could because he doesn't want them to. Why you
have to ask yourself that, now, why isn't he attacking
this virus the way he did people who want to
enter the country illegally. His best plan in the face

(01:23:36):
of the pandemic moving by any metric, is to attack
the man that you trust most at the federal level
to fight back. What exactly has Fauci told us that's
been useful in the fight against the virus. We see
a lot of people get sick. We saw in the
early stages in particular, and then again the summer a
lot of people every day were dying. What was what
was Fauci telling us wear a mask? It was first

(01:24:00):
it was don't wear a mask, and then it was
wear a mask, and then it was you know, distant socially,
you know the virus is going to spread, you know, however,
it's going to spread all over And yeah, okay, so
we've heard that. But what was the great oh? Testing
and trace? Right? Test and trace that was supposed to
be the big thing. Trace fell apart because as I

(01:24:21):
knew just from applying logic to it, that was completely absurd, right,
that was that was frankly madness. So trace just was
a joke. When you have so many cases, there's no
way you're gonna be able to trace anything. And then
when you look at testing, you'd say, hold on a second,
what exactly has gone on here with the testing that

(01:24:42):
has allowed us to control the virus better? If anything,
we just have a lot of cases of low level
COVID with minimal to no symptoms that are showing up.
And people are looking at the rate of testing right
now and they're saying, oh, of positivity, and they're saying,
oh my gosh, we need to lock down again. We
need to lock down again. The only way through this
is for people that are at very low risk to

(01:25:03):
get this clear it and be fine afterwards, just like
President Trump, who wasn't even at low risk as we know.
But instead they attack the most basic concepts of disease mitigation,
like herd immunity, which is what a vaccine is supposed
to get you too. And now they're even saying, oh,
we a vaccine may not do it, and herd immunity

(01:25:24):
is bad, so let's just keep hiding. This is what
public health experts is saying. Doctor Fauci said, don't go
be with your family for Thanksgiving. I mean, I think
the guy's a jerk, and I've been saying it for
a long time. I think he's really a problem, and
Trump thinks he's an idiot. Play eighteen. People are tired
of COVID. I have to think his rallies I've ever had,

(01:25:46):
and we have COVID. People are saying, whatever, just leave
us alone. They're tired of it. People are tired of
hearing Cauchy and all these these people, these people that
have gotten it wrong. Fauci's a nice guy. He's been
hit for five hundred years. He called every one of
them wrong, and he's like this wonderful guy, a wonderful stage.

(01:26:11):
And yet we keep him. Every time he goes on television,
there's always a bomb, but there's a bigger bomb if
you fire him. It's true, It's true. This is what
happens with these so called nonpartisan bureaucrat types who get
very senior in some federal federal agency. When they are
messing up constantly, the idea of firing them becomes politically impossible, unpalatable.

(01:26:34):
You can't fire them. Why, Well, because it looks like
you're trying to suppress. Well, what if he's just done
a really bad job. Well, they won't believe that. Notice
that there's so much anger directed at President Trump. Meanwhile,
he's supposed to listen to Fauci, and he has listened
to Fauci, but no one on the left. No Democrats
are angry at Fauci for his mistakes. There's no way, No,

(01:26:56):
they revere him. He's like a saint. Why is that
he was supposed to be the expert here. You know,
he's like the accountant, and you know Trump is having
tax problems, so to speak. It doesn't the accountant deserve
a little bit of blame, I mean, the guy that's
supposed to know everything that's going on here. No, of
course not. I'm not even saying the majority of blame.

(01:27:16):
Just something. Nope, not allowed. Fauci is beyond reproach. He's
practically a saint. And the reason for that is not
because he's some genius who saved so many lives. It's
because right now it is useful for the Democrats to
have a guy who is a clear Democrat. Part is
in making sure that everyone is as frightened and depressed

(01:27:38):
about this virus as possible going in the election. That's
why he's untouchable. You're in there. This is the Buck
Sex and Show podcast. So our Republican majority refused to
consider the Supreme Court nominee of a duly elected Democratic

(01:27:59):
president on the supposed principle that the American people should
have a voice in selecting their next Supreme Court justice.
Now they're moving forward with a Supreme Court nomination while
a presidential election is already underway. This is the most rushed,
most partisan, least legitimate Supreme Court nomination process in our

(01:28:22):
nation's history, in our nation's entire history, and it should
not proceed. Therefore, I will move to adjourn the Senate
until after the November third election, with the ability to
come back into session if there's a bipartisan agreement on
a COVID relief package. Fortunately, Chuck Schumer is not the

(01:28:42):
Senate majority leader. Unfortunately the Constitution says that everything that
he says is bogus. Well, that's not a surprise, and
it's what we're what we know to expect from good
old Chuck Schumer. This will certainly come up on Thursday,
when Amy Coney Barrett will be up for her the
first beginning, the beginning of this process which I describe

(01:29:03):
you yesterday, where they'll have a vote, and they gotta
have the they want to have a vote and they
got the closure to stop the fillibuster. Then they got
a day of like and in the Senate proceedings. Unless
you work in the Senate, it's it's a lot of
a lot of people walking around, you know, with teacups
in their hands, getting into the minutia. But yeah, you're
gonna have something this week for ACB and it looks

(01:29:24):
like by Sunday she'll probably be confirmed, right getting close
up against the actual election, almost one week out from
the election. And I just think it's funny that Chuck
Schumer now is presenting this to us like the Democrats
are sending on some high principle here. Now. They lost
decisions and elections have consequences. They made a bad decision
and they lost. That's what ends up happening in life.

(01:29:47):
That's what's happening to them now, and they're still just
complaining about it. I haven't entirely given up the notion
that maybe there's some possibility that the Democrats try some
last minute thing to do rail and they're gonna try
some minor things, but I don't think they're be able
to derail it. But it's looking unlikely. It's looking unlikely,
and at least the President will be in a position
on Thursday to say, hey, not only did we find

(01:30:10):
hunters emails, but it looks like I just got my
or I'm about to get It won't be done then,
but I'm about to get the third Supreme Court justice
appointed by President Trump on the court in his first
not even eight years, in his first four years in office.
A pretty remarkable circumstance, no way around that. And we'll

(01:30:30):
have to see if that factors in heavily the debate
on Thursday, the last debt. Oh, they're gonna be able
to mute people. I see in this debate right Who
wants to guess right now whether the moderators are gonna
mute equally both sides. Who wants to place a bet
on that one? I'm pretty confident we're going to see,
given who these moderators are, a whole lot of live bias.
But I do also believe the Trumpster is gonna fight

(01:30:52):
right through it. Thanks for listening to the Bust. Remember
to subscribe on Apple Podcasts, the iHeart Radio for wherever
you get your podcasts. The show ain't over yet, folks,
keeping it real, It's time for roll call Facebook dot

(01:31:29):
com slash buck Sexton. You know, Producer Mark. You know
what I did last night? So I was telling people
how to write in But then I would, I thought,
Producer Mark. I cooked a chicken breast recipe that I
saw on TikTok, and all I had to do was
watch the TikTok video a few times and I did
a fabulous job. Good for you, thank you. That was

(01:31:50):
like the highlight of my night. I felt pretty proud
of that one. I'm glad. How about you, buddy, Anything
fun and exciting going on? Oh? Oh? Nothing? Really? You
get like a meatball sub last night? Do you at
anything cool? Nothing? I just ate the dinner that my
wife left for me. What you leave for you? I
don't even remember what it was anymore. But we have
tacos tonight because of pot roast tacos. Oh tacos. I

(01:32:13):
can't go wrong with tacos exactly. Yeah. I mean, you know,
there's there's great tacos, there's good tacos. But as long
as you've got shredded cheddar and sour cream, it's always
at least good, exactly. It's really what you put on
the tacos doesn't really matter what the meat is yeah,
because sometimes that tacco meat can be a little suspect.
But you know, I'm sure I went with chicken this time. Oh,

(01:32:34):
chopped up chicken breast. I remember they used to give us,
and I feel like this has fallen out of favor
when I was when I was a schoolboy, back in
the day, in grammar school, they would give us sloppy joe's.
I feel like no one has I think that that's
not really a thing anymore. Does that even eat sloppy
joe's anymore? What even are sloppy joes? Like? Does anyone
know what meat they are? It's kind of like ground

(01:32:55):
meat with some it's kind of gooey with some spices,
and they put it on a hamburger bum but it's
not a hamburger. But I remember they used to They
used to serve this to us. We had terrible food
in my school growing up, and they used to serve
this to us all the time. And I remember even
then thinking this is not good. I don't know why
they're giving us this school food is always awful and
you didn't even go to public school. And I also

(01:33:16):
remember meat loaf used to get a really bad rap
all the time. You know on shows they say, oh,
you know the so you know, oh honey, you made
the meat loaf again. Meat loaf can be quite delicious. Actually, yeah,
my wife makes a great turkey one stuff with mozzorella cheese.
But really, I just learned to brag not only about
my cooking skill, but beyond that that. I'm on TikTok
and starting to like I've just started. I'm just beginning.

(01:33:39):
Are you making TikTok's No, not yet yet working on that,
but in the meantime, I'm definitely, you know, doing what
I can to learn about it. And that's where the
cool kids are now more. There's a lot of conservatives
on there. I'm starting to see that welleah, now that
they're forcing a sale of it. If I think people
are less concerned about the China needs espionage component. So

(01:34:03):
and the Chinese already have my information because as I
work for the federal government and they hacked the OPM,
so there was that. Yeah, good times. Alrighty, let's get
to the actual roll call and remember Facebook, Facebook dot com,
slashbuck Sexton, Team Bucket's Team Bucket, iHeartMedia dot com. If
you want to email us or if you want to

(01:34:24):
send an Instagram message, please do Buck Sexton follow me there,
Philip right joy byars like the old Queen's babushka wearing
a Paisley apron and headscarf, gossiping over the garden fence.
If it wasn't for your hilarious impersonations, the use of
the View sound bites would be intolerable. If you and

(01:34:45):
other commentators would stop citing them, the View would probably
shrivel up and blow away. Thanks for being on shields high, So, Philip,
I agree, There's always this part of me that feels
like sometimes by citing something to buck slap it, by
playing an audio so that we can eviscerate the stupidity,
we are giving additional air to that idiocy. But you know,

(01:35:09):
I try to establish limits with this because there are
also times. There are also circumstances where you would look
at this and say, this is pretty mainstream thinking on
the left. I mean, this is actually what a lot
of Democrat voters, you know, they watch. I mean, there
are millions of people that watch The View every day,

(01:35:31):
and they a majority of them clearly agree with the
women on that show, or at least the left wing
lean of that show, And since you've asked about of
view clips, here is the most famous, most well known
of those hosts expressing her feelings on the election. Six.
What is he talking about? I'm in a depressing now

(01:35:53):
because I am. Every time I see him, he depresses me.
Everything he says is pissing me off and depressing me.
I don't know what rocket he's on, but I'm getting
off the rocket he's on. That's ridiculous. Uh. Yeah, so
she's not happy about Trump a case you couldn't tell.
Not a fan, not a fan at all. But yeah,

(01:36:14):
that's sometimes you have to address. I mean, that's like
when we when we talk about and WHOOPI Goldberg is
a celebrity, I mean a real not like a new
TV news celebrity, but she was in movies and she's
a Hollywood celebrity. There are other people as well who
are not very well informed on politics, and I think
say very very foolish things, but they have such a
huge following. I always, I always find it remarkable. You know,

(01:36:35):
they'll say, Taylor Swift comes out in favor of Joe Biden. Yeah, great,
now you and I know that that means that should
mean nothing to a well informed person of good judgment.
But Taylor Swift has pretty smart. How many Twitter followers
does she have, like a hundred million or something? I
think she's a lot Trump probably, Yeah, I think she's
more than Trump, you know. Online, She's one of the

(01:36:58):
most famous people in the world. And so when she
says something, even if it's coming from a place of
being ill informed and being a conformist, really to what
the left demands all the time, which is that everybody
vote Democrat constantly. Even from that perspective, you have to remember,

(01:37:19):
still gets a lot of people to listen to what
she says. And I kind of liked what was the
album that she put out maybe five four or five
years ago? There was some good I'm not going to
sing it to up Proucer Mark because I don't want
to say Tuesday and I need you to show up
for work the rest of the week, but there was
some stuff. You know, my wife loves her her favorite artist. Yeah, no,

(01:37:40):
she looks she says she's a megastar, obviously. And there
was another one who's not quite as famous, who this
week said that she's coming out in favor of Biden
and she doesn't care what it does to her career,
which was hilarious. I can't remember. I want to maybe
it was Demilovado. Does that sound right? I think it
was somebody like that. So somebody his name. You know,

(01:38:01):
if you're like me and you don't really follow pop
music today, you have heard the name, but you don't know.
I think it was Demilovado anyway. But I just thought
that was funny too. The bravery of being a pop
musician in America today and saying you're not a Trump supporter?
How how brave, fearless and brave? Yes, of course. By
the way, Trump and t Swizzle same amounts of Twitter followers,

(01:38:22):
really eighty seven point three million? Look at that? Yeah,
but there you go. I mean, the leader of the
free world, young lady who's attractive and sings good. That's
there you go, same Twitter following. That's that's that's how.
That's the world we live in right now, folks. Justin

(01:38:45):
Buck and Mark. I attended the Trump peaceful protest and
in Carson City, and I saw a group of guys
with a Buck Sexton twenty twenty four shirt. I want
to know where I can get my own. Sounds like
a solid plan to me. After Trump leads us for
the next four years. Shields Hie justin. That's amazing. I
didn't even know there was such a T shirt in
circulation or that anyone owned one, So please let me

(01:39:09):
know if you find out. I would love to get
some of those T shirts for myself to give out
to people. I don't think. I think if I wore it,
you don't want to be the guy that wears the
T shirt of your own band kind of a thing.
But did you know about this, producer Mark, No, I didn't.
Years ago, some Team Buck folks made a T shirts
that said had kind of a screen shot photo of

(01:39:31):
me and said truth Liberty, the Buck sex and show
truth Liberty and great hair. So that was that was fun.
I'm sure whomever made the shirts are listeners. So if
you are, email us at Team Buck at iHeartMedia dot
com and I'll get in contact with you. There we go. Yeah,
we would. We would love to actually see some photos
of this and check it out for ourselves. That would
be a lot of fun. Really appreciate the support, guys,

(01:39:53):
I mean, it's what keeps us going on on cold,
rainy days in New York City during COVID lockdown at
least I got all of you out there across America,
and that certainly is very encouraging. And yeah, you know,
producer Mark appreciates it too. He wants to give you
all a huggle, though he doesn't necessarily put it in
those terms, you know, COVID. Yeah, exactly, exactly. It's a

(01:40:15):
safety thing, a safety thing. Next up here, Douglas, Hello,
bucking producer Mark. One of the things I like most
about the podcast, apart from the group therapy and dealing
with this crazy liberal world and I mean crazy, all
the other tips and insights. For example, I am totally
into smooth jazz now that you got me hooked on Bosh.
Thanks Douglas. I really appreciate that. Man. I try to

(01:40:36):
throw things in that aren't just you know, news cycle
and political analysis and cultural philosophy and stuff like that.
I try to, you know, throw other things in there,
just so you might pick something up. I think of
all the times people have a lot of things have
come from this audience. For me, I've gotten people who
have told me to watch a movie or a show,
they send me a roll call message, or they just

(01:40:57):
you know, they tweet something at me and I'll check
it out I got into I can tell you this
Team Buck people got me into Hell on Wheels. Very
good show got me into Bosh. Actually very good show,
Poll Dark, which I liked. M you know a fair amount,

(01:41:20):
And yeah there are. There are a bunch of shows
that I know of only because of people in this
audience telling me to watch them. And I think I
put a lot of people. I was an early evangelist
for the Last Kingdom, so I got a lot of
people to watch that show in my life and people
that I know. But that also came from somebody a
Team Buck told me to watch a lot because I
liked the Viking show that was on the History Chant

(01:41:43):
of History Channel, but it got a little weird, and
I thought that the first I thought the first season
of The Last Kingdom was a better show than the
first season of the Viking Show. So if I lined
them up side by side, yeah, there we go. Now
we have Michael who right, mister Sexton, I'm a sixty

(01:42:10):
year old conservative Democrat. Keyes are listening to your program
on ninety eight point nine FM w h y N
in Springfield, Massachusetts. Since you were once a spy, what
spy authors do you read? If any my favorite is
the late Charles McCarry, who was a deep cover deep
cover operative back in the day. I also like Alan First,

(01:42:31):
Joseph Cannon, and Daniel Silva. Thanks hey, Michael, thanks so
much for listening. And Springfield, mass I know that I
know that city reasonly well because that's where when I
didn't have a car and had to go to college.
That was the place you could take a train to
to get to Amherst, Massachusetts. So I know I know Springfield,
So shout out for why n And in terms of

(01:42:52):
I think I went to a couple of really good
restaurants in Springfield back in the day. I can't remember
them now I was like twenty years ago. In terms
of CIA books, um Man, I haven't. Since I left
the agency, I'm much less interested in that espionage world.
I don't really spend as much time reading about it
thinking about it as I used to. I'm more into
just history now instead of the history of whether it's

(01:43:15):
special operations or espionage and intelligence activities. So I mean, look,
I think Tom Clancy is for me still the greatest
thriller writer. But I haven't really I haven't really read
some of the some of the greats that are out there.
I've never read Daniel Silvo, who you write about here,

(01:43:36):
so that so my knowledge on this is limited. I'll
tell you honestly, I haven't read a lot of spy thrillers.
I know John Leacarey is really really popular, right, Tinker
Taylor soldier spy. Vince Flynn is very popular. Vince Flynn
is very popular. So I don't know, I haven't. I
spend so much of my time reading nonfiction. I really

(01:43:56):
have to make a concerted effort. I have to say,
you know what, I'm gonna read some fiction, and it
rarely happens for me, but it does happen. Another Team
Buck recommendation, uh Gates of Fire by Pressman about the
fight at Thermopoli between the Persians and the and the Spartans.

(01:44:17):
Great book, very read. It's a novel, it's a historic
it's historical fiction, but super readable, like like a an
action movie for your brain. I don't you know, or
I guess i'll action. You know what I mean that
you have to read instead of watch. So I really
enjoyed that one. That also came from someone on the
team years ago. So I do I listen to the
recommendations that come in all the time you're in. This

(01:44:43):
is the Buck Sex and Show podcast, throwing some more
roll call your way. We have JJ who writes in hey, Buck,
just a random thought, if there's any justice in the world.
The HBO movie about the COVID nineteen pandem doctor Fauci
will be played by Gilbert Godfried. Face stipers off and

(01:45:06):
shields high. Well, Gilbert Godfrey, it's more ape like, I
can't even really get up there. He has that gravelly
but it's his octave is higher. You know. He's obviously
a Iago in the Disney the original Disney Aladdin animated film.
I don't think I could do with Gilbert Godfrey, and
I would probably scratch up my throat trying to do it.

(01:45:27):
So yes, indeed, Michael Foucci doesn't want to be political
yet ends up on sixty minutes. Fauci really pisses me off,
but Trump talking about him more as a pet really
cracks me up. The next time he pulls his TV crap,
Trump needs to tell him to report to the Oval
Office and bring the published and peer revealed studies he

(01:45:49):
used to support the crap. He shouts, shields high. So yeah, yeah, totally.
I look, you know, I've I've been anti Fouch and
he's a guy went to my high school. Right, we
should have something, if not uncommon, at least a little
bit of a bonding point there. But Nope, Nope, I'm

(01:46:11):
sure he'll be He'll be like a Fauci gymnasium. Just
give it a few years. There will never be a
Buck gymnasium there, no matter how much I do, whatever,
whatever my career turns into. Because the Jesuits, some of
them are great, most of them are commies, and I'm
not I'm not backing off of that one because it's
pretty much true. I also think that there are a

(01:46:31):
lot of Catholic leaders who are way, way to sanguine
about Catholics voting for a party that, as you know,
is openly advocating for things in direct violation of core Catholic,
core Catholic beliefs. But conversation for another day. But yeah,
I know Fauci's very political. Dennis, Right, you know you're

(01:46:54):
my number one podcast man. I'm a great past the
Buck listener, waiting like a trap just to be sprung
as soon as someone says, where can I get no
nonsense news? And opinion. Bam, Buck Sexton, I shout, and
then not only explain not only will you be well
informed but thoroughly entertained as well my dear daughter in
law's latest jump on board. But how can I continue
to pass the buck when you have diss my dearly

(01:47:14):
beloved Fleetwood Mac. Oh no, Dennis, I'm sorry, take it back. Buck.
I'll give you pass this time only because of your
young age, you have not fully comprehended the complexities of
Fleetwood Mac. Thanks for your great work and although mine
is a little lower today, Shield tie Dennis, thank you,
Shield tie back to you and yeah, yeah, you know
what we could strike since you're a big pass the
buck person and you're clearly doing God's work with that,

(01:47:36):
and we thank you so much. We can strike my
fleet Fleetwood Mac comments from the record. I'm never I'm
never backing off of the boss, but we can strike
Fleetwood Mac from the record. Thank you. Your first TikTok
will be the viral one with the Fleetwood Mac song.
There is there is there a Fleetwood Mac TikTok right now. Yeah,
there was the guy who was on a skateboard drinking
cranberry juice to the Fleetwood Mac Song and Dreams. It's

(01:48:00):
huge everywhere. Now I'd have to check that one out.
That's gonna beet a show tonighteen. Please do pass the buck.
There's a great time in the height of the election.
A lot of people are interested in politics. Somebody asks,
where do you get your information? Tell them to download
this podcast until tomorrow. Shields High

All Episodes

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

Dateline NBC

Death, Sex & Money

Stuff You Should Know

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}Trump Slams Fauci And The Idiots

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

.css-r6mb8g{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:1;overflow:hidden;}Dateline NBC

Death, Sex & Money

Stuff You Should Know

All Episodes

Trump Slams Fauci And The Idiots

Dateline NBC