Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Happening right now.
Speaker 2 (00:01):
Number is eight hundred five to two zero one five
three four. Eight hundred five two zero one five three four.
And we're a little lighter than usual, so very good chance,
matter of fact, superb chance, actually guaranteed chance, no chance.
Speaker 1 (00:19):
You're guaranteed that you're.
Speaker 2 (00:20):
Going to come in obviously and be able to jump
right into the queue for the phone calls.
Speaker 1 (00:25):
Eight hundred five to zero one five three four.
Speaker 2 (00:30):
This is handle on the law, marginal legal advice where
I tell you have.
Speaker 1 (00:36):
Absolutely no case.
Speaker 2 (00:38):
Do you remember that cargo ship that crashed into the
Franciscott Key Bridge and destroyed destroy the bridge in Baltimore
last March. Well, you'd figure, based on the fact that
the waterway, and that's the only waterway into Baltimore was
blocked for weeks, shut down the entire port, that the
(01:03):
lawsuits would be hitting hot and heavy.
Speaker 1 (01:06):
You bet. So this one just hit. It's the US
Justice Department.
Speaker 2 (01:11):
Filing a lawsuit on behalf of the United States asking
for more than one hundred million dollars from the two
companies that owned and operated that container ship, claiming that
the cost cutting of these two companies and negligence on
the maintenance part led to quote, an entirely avoidable disaster,
(01:32):
and quoting from the lawsuit, the two companies and the
name of the companies don't have to go into it
sent ill prepared crews on an objectedly unseaworthy vessel to
navigates the United States waterways.
Speaker 1 (01:43):
So this is not to rebuild the bridge.
Speaker 2 (01:47):
This is not damaged to the bridge itself because the
Feds have no control over the bridge. This is the
city of Baltimore. What it is about is the navigable waterway.
That's what the Fed's control. So what they want is
to get paid back for clearing the waterway. That's what
(02:08):
they want, and that they're asking for one hundred million
dollars because what ended up happening they had and it
was months to clear the wreckage fifty thousand tons of steel, concrete,
asphalt from the water so that the port could reopen.
And of course, if you're looking at the businesses all suffering,
(02:32):
the port itself losing zillions of dollars, the employees of
the port, the container warehouses, I mean, it goes on
and on and on. So these lawsuits are going to
be I wouldn't be surprised if they hit a billion dollars.
I don't know how the company's going to survive that.
I'm sure it's not. But this is another one. And
what makes this one interesting is this is not for
(02:54):
the cost of the bridge. It is for keeping bringing
back the waterway of which the federal government controls the
waterways of the United States navigable, so commerce can actually continue. Okay,
just wanted to share that with you.
Speaker 1 (03:13):
Pauline. Hello, Pauline, welcome.
Speaker 3 (03:18):
I had heard property and on the trust it says
fifty percent interest.
Speaker 1 (03:25):
Pauline, I'm having a hard time understanding you.
Speaker 2 (03:27):
So you have to speak louder, you have to speak
more slowly, and you have to speak with.
Speaker 1 (03:32):
A little more diction. Let's try it again, okay.
Speaker 3 (03:36):
Okay, oh better inherit property on the trust it says
fifty percent interests For me, fifty percent interest. My sister
I paid the property text for the first payment. My
sister passed away. Now there is a trustee, her son,
(03:56):
and uh, there's another half of a property text it
needs to be paid. That's the second payment. And her
son said he's not going to pay that payment. Can
I enforce the trustee to pay the property tax for
the second payment.
Speaker 2 (04:13):
Does well you pay it personally or does the estate
pay it?
Speaker 1 (04:17):
Right now?
Speaker 2 (04:17):
When you say you inherit it, it's yours and your
sister's name, correct, yes, okay?
Speaker 1 (04:23):
Who is on title right now? Who owns the property?
The trust? You? Your sister? Who owns the property? Well?
Speaker 3 (04:31):
I own it now? Because okay.
Speaker 2 (04:36):
Then if you own the property and it's in your name,
why would anybody else pay the property tax?
Speaker 3 (04:43):
Because well, I don't own the whole property.
Speaker 2 (04:46):
Okay, that's my question. Who is holding onto the property?
Is it yours and your sister's name?
Speaker 1 (04:53):
Yes?
Speaker 2 (04:53):
Okay, And so there's the If it's just yours and
her name, there's no trust, you own it.
Speaker 1 (04:58):
What does a trustee have to do with it? Oh? Okay?
Speaker 3 (05:04):
I thought that since her name is on it, that
she has to pay her portion.
Speaker 2 (05:08):
Well, I know it's per in agreement. I mean if
you pay all of it. No, it's that That's what
title is about. And what happens is if you are
not happy with her paying half, you just sell the property.
Speaker 1 (05:21):
You forced to sell the property, that's all you go.
Speaker 2 (05:23):
Okay, you don't want to pay your half, we'll sell
the property and you cut a deal. And but see,
here's the here's the confusion. You both inherited the property.
So it's your name and her name. Uh, do you
have a joint tendancy?
Speaker 1 (05:38):
How is it not?
Speaker 2 (05:39):
How where's the trust involved in all of this? That's
the confusing part.
Speaker 3 (05:44):
Oh, the trust is because my sister passed away. Now
her son is taking care of the trust.
Speaker 2 (05:51):
Okay, so the trust owns the property and not you
and your sister.
Speaker 1 (05:59):
No, No, you're making no sense. But that's okay.
Speaker 2 (06:01):
I mean you're allowed to make no sense. You know
why because half the time I don't make any sense.
So I'll give you all right, I'll give you a
pass on that one.
Speaker 1 (06:09):
Hey, Roan, Hi there.
Speaker 4 (06:12):
Yes, so my wife has a lean against the house
and the judgment against the house in the Silicon Valley.
The buddy of Steve Jobs who owns the house is
in for a closure for the eighth time. Do I
have to be on the courthouse steps when they go
in auction off the house?
Speaker 5 (06:30):
Now?
Speaker 2 (06:30):
Unless you The only thing you have to do on
the courthouse steps is be there if you want to
if you want to buy the house.
Speaker 1 (06:36):
Right, Okay, so you still have a link, so you
have a lian. So whoever pay, whoever buys the house
has to pay your lean.
Speaker 4 (06:42):
Okay. So is it for the original amount of forty
grand or is it around sixteen hours it has been
going on for eight years?
Speaker 2 (06:48):
Well, I think the lean is for the entire amount
plus interest. So here's your lean, sixty thousand dollars. So
if someone wants to buy the property, they're going to
pay sixty thousand dollars for your lean at least.
Speaker 4 (07:00):
Okay, So what is the proper what is.
Speaker 1 (07:03):
The property worth? Ron? What's the property worth?
Speaker 4 (07:06):
One point nine million?
Speaker 2 (07:08):
Yeah, well you're gonna get your lean paid off. I
wouldn't worry about it. And you don't have to be there.
You don't have to be on the courthouse steps unless
you want the entertainment part of it, then you can
be there all day long.
Speaker 1 (07:18):
Jennifer, Hi Jennifer, Oh, Hi.
Speaker 6 (07:21):
Bill, Hey, My question is I've my family and I
moved in to live with my father in law, husband's
dad about ten years ago. So we've been living with
him for a back and taking care of them because
we knew, you know, he just needed us around, right.
So he he recently passed away and there's no the
(07:41):
living will is nowhere to be found.
Speaker 1 (07:43):
Okay. That means there is no will.
Speaker 2 (07:46):
Right if you don't find the will, Even if you
know there's a will, there's no will, So there's nothing
there to approbate.
Speaker 1 (07:54):
So now, okay, so what's your question.
Speaker 6 (07:56):
The question is there a way to transfer the name
his name into my husband's name.
Speaker 1 (08:05):
Okay?
Speaker 2 (08:06):
Let's talk about who's related to your father in law. Okay,
clearly your husband is son. Was your father in law
married at the time when he died?
Speaker 6 (08:18):
No?
Speaker 2 (08:19):
Okay, So now how many siblings does your brother have?
Speaker 6 (08:23):
Okay, he has one sister.
Speaker 2 (08:25):
Okay, yeah, all right, so there's two of them. There
are two beneficiaries under the intestay in testacy laws, intestacy
means no will, and so it's your brother and his
sister who are going to be owners of that property.
Speaker 1 (08:42):
They're the beneficiaries. And how much is the property worth?
Speaker 6 (08:47):
Oh, maybe it was one hundred and twenty five thousand
many years ago, so I'm sure it's gone up.
Speaker 2 (08:53):
I'm sure it has any idea. Well, it's gonna have
to be appraised no matter what. But what will happen now?
It doesn't have to be a praise unless you guys
right over it. So what will happen is the two
of them open up approbate in Testasy under Testasy laws,
which means no will and we are the beneficiaries under
law because we're the kids and there's no there's no
wife out there, and that's it.
Speaker 1 (09:15):
We're we're the we inherit the place.
Speaker 2 (09:17):
According to law under law, and so a probate is open,
and judge then grants the two of them the property
and transfers the deed from dead father.
Speaker 1 (09:31):
In law to a live son and daughter. I'm assuming
your your husband is.
Speaker 2 (09:37):
Still alive, right, yes, yes, okay, uh, and his sister
is still alive.
Speaker 6 (09:43):
Yes, And she said she was, yeah, more than willing to.
So the question also is she was more than willing
to sign for it to be under my husband's name
because she's doing her own thing, and she.
Speaker 2 (09:55):
Oh she will, Okay, is she willing if she is
willing to give him her half an house?
Speaker 1 (10:00):
That's basically that's what you're.
Speaker 2 (10:02):
Saying, right, Yeah, take it, take it, real estate lawyer,
take it because I'm sure if it was one hundred
and twenty five thousand dollars years and years ago, it
has to.
Speaker 1 (10:11):
Be at least three times that much, at least, if
not more.
Speaker 2 (10:15):
So.
Speaker 1 (10:16):
Yeah, you take it. I would get a real estate
lawyer to draft up.
Speaker 2 (10:18):
That agreement like pronto, like immediately, and uh, thank the
sister in law, and just treat her really really well
until the deed is signed and your husband owns it outright,
then you can treat her any of you want.
Speaker 1 (10:33):
Okay, congratulations, Hello Peggy. Yes, ma'am, it's your turn. Peggy.
Did we just lose Peggy? We just lost Peggy.
Speaker 2 (10:49):
She'll call back because this is fantastic stuff. Okay, Okay,
I we a little problem here. Oh Peggy is coming back.
Do doo do doo, do doot doo.
Speaker 1 (10:59):
We have a little issue issue with phone calls here,
our phone system here. Hey Peggy, there you go.
Speaker 2 (11:07):
Yeah, Okay.
Speaker 7 (11:08):
In May, I went in for emergency surgery almost die.
I was in there for six days unconscious because they
kept me that way.
Speaker 2 (11:19):
Hold on, hold on, Okay, I got to stop you
because I have to, you know, I have to get
these facts in my head straight. Uh, you went in
for emergency surgery. What was the emergency.
Speaker 7 (11:30):
It's called sequel. That's where the in testing wraps around
the colon or okayl and wrapped round Okay.
Speaker 2 (11:40):
And they and they kept you unconscious for six days.
They put you in a coma and induced coma.
Speaker 7 (11:46):
Co No, they just kept me drugged.
Speaker 2 (11:48):
Oh yeah, okay, well you know so I used to
pay lots of money for that for far more than
six days. All right, So okay, so emergency surgery, h
six days they kept you drug in the hospital.
Speaker 1 (12:01):
And then what Then?
Speaker 7 (12:04):
I found out that my kidney had blown up somehow
for some reason, they put a stint in the kidney,
which was painful for over a month. When it took
the stint out of the kidney, it shriveled up into
a nub. Now I don't know if I have the kidney.
Speaker 1 (12:20):
I don't know what the stint or the kidney shriveled
up the kidney, the kidney shriveled up to a nub.
Speaker 2 (12:26):
Okay, and what what is what is your question?
Speaker 1 (12:30):
Sounds like you went through the ringer here.
Speaker 3 (12:33):
Oh I did?
Speaker 2 (12:34):
Okay, what's your question, Peggy?
Speaker 7 (12:38):
Because of the time frame, do I have any recourse?
Speaker 2 (12:41):
Well, I mean two years ago. Yeah, you're still okay
within the statue. Now, the only issue.
Speaker 1 (12:45):
Is did they malpractice?
Speaker 2 (12:48):
What did they do wrong during the surgery and the
subsequent six days and putting in the stent or not
putting in the stent or leaving it for X number
of times.
Speaker 1 (12:58):
These are all medical questions, Peggy.
Speaker 2 (13:01):
These are this is not for me to do unless
somehow you can figure out how to put the phone.
Speaker 1 (13:07):
Do you? Oh, I know what you can do? Do
you have a Yeah, if you have an.
Speaker 2 (13:11):
iPhone, you can just you know, put it right out
of the camera so I can see your scar and
then I'll tell you whether malpractice took place or not.
Speaker 1 (13:18):
So what you have to do is, uh, you know,
let's just start with this.
Speaker 2 (13:22):
Is I would suggest you call a medical malpractice attorney
just to skit on the phone and just and they'll
all talk to you and just say, hey, here's what happened. Uh,
do I have anything here? And what he'll do based
on the explanation and what you tell him is he'll
probably send you to another doctor, uh, to get an
opinion as to whether or not there is a case there.
(13:45):
And normally you don't pay for that. That's what these
medical malpractice attorneys do.
Speaker 1 (13:50):
They just suck up the costs of.
Speaker 2 (13:51):
Finding out and the reports and all that if it settles,
you pay for it later out of the settlement, and
if not, you're you know, you're not going to suck
it up at all.
Speaker 7 (14:00):
Uh So the doctor who did perform the surgery when
I went to back to the office, he was no
longer employed there.
Speaker 2 (14:07):
That doesn't mean necessarily, that does not mean that malpractice
took place.
Speaker 1 (14:12):
Now, I mean that it raises a flag. And you
want to know why. I mean, he could have been.
Speaker 2 (14:18):
Fired because he's just he treated the nurses wrong, or
he grabs some nurses, but he could have been fired
for that, or he was belligerent or obnoxious.
Speaker 1 (14:26):
I mean, you don't know. So you're whatever medical group
he's with is not going to help you. Trust me,
they're not going to help your case.
Speaker 2 (14:35):
But talk to a talk to a med mal attorney,
and start with the questions that you you gave me,
uh and then hopefully you're gonna get a better answer
than I can give you.
Speaker 1 (14:47):
Okay, try that. God, I was way too nice. Why
didn't make fun of her more? I have no idea.
Speaker 2 (14:54):
All right, data breaches, I mean we're used to these,
But let me tell you what happened this last couple
of months.
Speaker 1 (14:59):
Some reports are calling this one the mother of all
data breaches.
Speaker 2 (15:03):
Two point seven billion records stolen by cyber hackers from
a company known as National Public Data. And this is
a company that provides background checks for employees or two
employers about employees, and it's all over the country. It's massive.
You know, so many records are stolen online. We're so
vulnerable how our online identity is and we have zero
(15:26):
control over all this too. We have zero control how
well our identity is protected, but from these companies like
National Public Data. So with that, let me suggest contacting
the folks at LifeLock. They monitor millions of data points
a second for risks to your online identity, and LifeLock
it did texts alert you to potential identity threats you
(15:48):
may not even spot on your own, and if they.
Speaker 1 (15:50):
Do spot it, they'll call you, Hey, we have an
issue here.
Speaker 2 (15:54):
Let's get to work, and if you become a victim,
a dedicated US based restoration and specialist works to fix
your problem. And that's guaranteed. Terms apply or your money
back and terms apply. So go to LifeLock dot com
or call eight hundred LifeLock and if you use the
promo code handle it's forty percent off LifeLock dot com
(16:18):
or eight hundred LifeLock promo code handle.
Speaker 1 (16:23):
Mary. Let's go with you, Hello, Mary, Welcome.
Speaker 8 (16:26):
Hi. Yeah, Monday, there's going to be a sharing if
LA city Planning virtual and it's going to be just
tear down the house that I've been living in for
forty years as a family home and owned by our trust.
(16:47):
My brother is the executor, and he's the one that
wants to cheer it down.
Speaker 2 (16:53):
Okay, okay, hold on, Okay, Well, obviously he's not the executive.
Speaker 1 (16:56):
He's the trustee and it's owned by the trust.
Speaker 2 (16:59):
And is he asking permission to tear it down from
the city.
Speaker 8 (17:04):
Yeah. But on the other I have to tell you
to the all the children, the successors and myself are
having him removed legally, okay, pending in court?
Speaker 1 (17:22):
All right, So that's tending in court, right, all right?
So what's your question?
Speaker 8 (17:28):
Oh? My question is how do I prepare myself for Monday?
Speaker 1 (17:33):
Okay?
Speaker 9 (17:33):
What you do?
Speaker 2 (17:33):
Well? Yeah, okay, First of all, at this point, I
don't know how much say you have because he's the trustee.
Speaker 1 (17:43):
Why is he asking for permission to tear down a home?
Speaker 2 (17:47):
And I don't know why the Planning Commission would be involved.
That's kind of interesting. You think building in safety that
would be involved. Okay, So why does he want to
tear down the home?
Speaker 8 (18:01):
I just you.
Speaker 1 (18:03):
Don't know why he wants to tear down the home.
Speaker 2 (18:05):
He just wants to wants He's vindictive and wants to
tear down the home. So he's going in front of
the of La City Planning Uh and says I want
to tear down the home, And if anybody asks him,
he'll answer, I don't know. I just want to tear
down the home because I'm vindictive. So something's going on
(18:25):
that I don't understand.
Speaker 1 (18:27):
Also, also you can.
Speaker 2 (18:29):
Ask the city, which I you know, you've got to
get a hold.
Speaker 1 (18:32):
Of a land use attorney, Mary, That's what you have
to do.
Speaker 2 (18:36):
Because can you ask the city to postpone any hearing
pending the fact his removal as trustee?
Speaker 1 (18:42):
Of course you can. Now can you do it yourself?
Speaker 2 (18:45):
Probably these are open hearings, And before they make a decision,
someone goes up and says and they say, does anybody
have anything to say? These are open hearings unless it's
a close hearing, which I don't think it is. Then
you state your peace. But if you're talking about he's
destroying it. As soon as he gets the planning permission,
then he goes ahead and destroys it. And he has
(19:06):
a duty to the beneficiaries under the trust. And if
he's destroying the value of the trust just because he's vindictive,
well yeah, you've got some real issues here.
Speaker 1 (19:19):
So Mary, here's what I'm gonna do.
Speaker 2 (19:20):
I'm going to suggest you go to a land use
attorney and see if a land use attorney can make
more sense of what you just said than I have,
because my guess is no, probably not.
Speaker 1 (19:35):
Nancy, Hello, Nancy.
Speaker 2 (19:38):
Sony questions today regarding homes and trusts.
Speaker 1 (19:41):
It's all real estate stuff, all right, What can I
do for you? Nancy?
Speaker 10 (19:46):
Okay, my brother's half owner, I'm half owner. He has
his own living trust. I have my own living trusts
passed down by our parents. At one point, well, he
refuses to share a cost for property tax. He says
I'm the executor, and then he says, I'm your landlord. Now,
if I died tonight, could he take everything? Because it
(20:10):
didn't say tendons?
Speaker 9 (20:12):
What is that one?
Speaker 1 (20:14):
Okay? I didn't say, all right, joint tendancy. It didn't
say on the property.
Speaker 10 (20:19):
No, it said the other one, the other one.
Speaker 1 (20:22):
Uh, okay, all right, right, right, okay.
Speaker 2 (20:26):
So if you die tonight, let's let's see who's who
dies first. You die tonight or I die because.
Speaker 1 (20:31):
Of this phone call. I haven't decided yet. Okay. Uh
who owns the property? Right now? What? Where's the title
of the property? Is it the trust? Is it in
your name?
Speaker 10 (20:45):
The trust is in my name? He is?
Speaker 1 (20:46):
No, no, no, no, no, The trust is not in your name. Uh.
Speaker 2 (20:50):
The You may be a beneficiary under the trust, but
a trust is separate.
Speaker 1 (20:54):
I mean it could be it's not under your name.
Speaker 2 (20:56):
It could be titled with your name, but the trust
is in itself an entity who owns the property?
Speaker 1 (21:02):
Right there?
Speaker 2 (21:02):
You pull the title, you pull the deed and for
the address the owner is, who is it?
Speaker 1 (21:08):
Nancy?
Speaker 7 (21:10):
It's him and I because my dad's okay, then.
Speaker 2 (21:13):
If it's if it's the two of you, then there's
no trust involved. You own it individually. You can't own
it and a trust owns it. Somebody has to own
it unless you know you own part and the trust
owns part. And if you are the beneficiary under the trust,
and you are already on title and I don't get
(21:34):
any of it. So your question is he's saying he's
the landlord? Why would he be the landlord? Is something
that you also.
Speaker 10 (21:40):
Own maybe, you know, just not in present time, I
mean in the day the males owner.
Speaker 1 (21:49):
I understand, I understand completely. Yeah, you know, today is
just one of.
Speaker 2 (21:53):
Those interesting days. I must tell you for a couple
of reasons. First of all, I'm not making high nor
hair of these.
Speaker 1 (22:02):
Any of these questions. I have no idea what people
have in mind.
Speaker 5 (22:06):
Uh.
Speaker 2 (22:06):
Second of all, we are so low on phone calls
for some reason today. So I think it is time, Jacob,
I think it is time, uh for us to red
this up a little bit. Uh So, ladies and gentlemen,
without further ado, please let me introduce you to my
favorite song that hopefully you listen to for several minutes,
(22:28):
and that's baby Sharkaby Chebye. The only way to stop
this is for you to actually call. Other than that,
it's going to be, uh, this is going.
Speaker 1 (22:43):
To be our show, all right, let's turn that one up.
I'd like it to be a Louder's really Jack shot Shark.
Speaker 2 (22:58):
Do you know we may maybe want to change the
name of this show, you know, to the Baby Shark Legal.
Speaker 1 (23:08):
Baby Sharks Leaders Show, or maybe the rap Baby Shark
Legal Hour. What do you think?
Speaker 2 (23:15):
All right, let's go ahead and take a phone call,
because actually we do have a few and I'm just
having a good time with you guys.
Speaker 1 (23:21):
Ben, Hello, Ben, welcome.
Speaker 5 (23:24):
Hey, Just a quick question if there's any do you
know if there's any president set or removing an elected
official from office due to them breaking their ghosts ball?
Speaker 2 (23:36):
Yeah, there's plenty of precedent for removing elected officials. And
by the way, it's not just breaking the oath. I
mean you have to accuse them. Well, you don't even
have to. You can remove an elected official just by
putting up a vote, you know, under the law.
Speaker 1 (23:51):
You go, okay, I want this guy out. And here's
a why or not.
Speaker 2 (23:55):
I just want this guy out because he's ugly or
because I don't like the way he dresses. And enough
people agree with you. You have an election and out
he goes. It's recalled and he's out. When you say
breaking the oath, what does that mean? I don't know
what breaking the oath of office is.
Speaker 1 (24:11):
What did this person do?
Speaker 5 (24:14):
Well, just correct. I mean, without getting into it is
pretty in depth, but basically corruption corruption.
Speaker 2 (24:21):
So you know that money was given for whatever acts
or property or value was given for an elected official
doing something correct.
Speaker 5 (24:31):
Yeah, and you know it.
Speaker 1 (24:32):
You can prove it.
Speaker 2 (24:33):
If he were to go and file a lawsuit against you,
you go, here is the proof, you're honor or, ladies
and gentlemen of the jury.
Speaker 1 (24:40):
I have the proof, and you have that right.
Speaker 2 (24:44):
Essentially yet essentially Okay, this is a real yes or
no on this one. What kind of proof do you have?
Without getting into specific, do you have documents? Do you
have emails? Do you have texts? You have witnesses said
I saw him take money, I saw him do this.
Speaker 1 (25:02):
What kind of proof do you have?
Speaker 9 (25:06):
Uh?
Speaker 5 (25:07):
I can show that there like is in uh the
video video evidence of like basically the uh misappropriated fund.
Speaker 2 (25:17):
Oh, you can see him video of him taking funds
or transferring into accounts.
Speaker 5 (25:22):
Him or her necessarily I.
Speaker 1 (25:24):
Understand, I'll go go him.
Speaker 2 (25:25):
Generically there is video of him transferring or taking cash,
actual video.
Speaker 9 (25:31):
I know.
Speaker 1 (25:32):
Well then okay, then what do you then? What do
you have? Ben?
Speaker 2 (25:35):
We have to get through with this because you're you're
saying there's corruption here.
Speaker 5 (25:38):
There's a you know this hidden secret underground train network.
Speaker 1 (25:45):
Uh wow, and you can and.
Speaker 2 (25:47):
This hidden see if it's a hidden secret, how can
you prove it?
Speaker 1 (25:50):
If it's so hidden secret, what do you have witnesses?
Speaker 9 (25:52):
They have affida, I can show where the entrance to
it is.
Speaker 2 (25:58):
You can sew the entrance to it, you know, Ben. Okay,
let me go ahead and just answer your question from
a minute one. I just wanted to get go down
this rabbit hole with you. Number one is you can
recall an electrificial for any reason, any reason whatsoever, corruption
not corruption, And based on you say this person is corrupt.
(26:21):
And the way you're answering this question, let me bottom
line it for you. You have no idea what you're
talking about.
Speaker 1 (26:27):
Zero. You sound like a conspiracy nutwing Mike, there you are?
What can I do for you?
Speaker 5 (26:35):
You know?
Speaker 1 (26:35):
Mike? Mike is he? Yes? Go ahead?
Speaker 9 (26:39):
Okay, okay, very very quick questions. Try to waste your time.
Speaker 1 (26:44):
But I know that.
Speaker 9 (26:45):
Okay, there's no statute limitations for murder, correct, But I'm
just curious, is there a statue of limitations for a
tempted murder?
Speaker 1 (26:53):
Okay? Now, is there a story there or is this just.
Speaker 9 (26:56):
A hypothetical needs It's not hypothetical, high person. No, no, no,
not really no no, So tell me the backstory.
Speaker 1 (27:04):
Why are you asking that question?
Speaker 9 (27:07):
I'm curious because years later I kicked the person it
was self defense. But years before the person choked me,
I played possum. Okay, got up, they were shocks. They
ran away. But I was just curious.
Speaker 2 (27:21):
Okay, So someone attempted me. Someone tried to choke you, right,
someone choked you? Yeah, okay, and now and you played
possum and so up and he ran away?
Speaker 1 (27:32):
Okay? How many years ago? By the way, Mike, how
many years ago?
Speaker 9 (27:37):
Oh god, I'm you should be good at math, but
I'm fifty three. But I was about twenty four.
Speaker 2 (27:42):
So okay, so you're thirty years ago. All right, fair enough.
So let's say, uh, let me tell you this. What
if there were no statute like murder, what do we.
Speaker 1 (27:53):
Do with that?
Speaker 2 (27:55):
Do you go to the police and say, thirty years ago,
someone choked me, I played possum and he ran away.
Speaker 1 (28:04):
Do we know what that person? Who that person is?
I happen to okay, and where does that person live now? Locally?
Speaker 2 (28:13):
Well?
Speaker 9 (28:13):
They probably they probably dead.
Speaker 1 (28:15):
On the show, they're probably dead. Okay.
Speaker 2 (28:17):
That's even more difficult because charging dead people with the
crime becomes very problematic. I'll tell you why, because you know,
they have to be held up. I mean, you know,
they tend to topple over when they're dead, when they're
in front of the court.
Speaker 1 (28:33):
It's very, very difficult.
Speaker 2 (28:35):
So the answer is, yeah, yeah, what do you even
do with that?
Speaker 1 (28:41):
You know what?
Speaker 2 (28:42):
That may even be a promo. I haven't decided yet.
I mean that may that may be good enough to
be a promo.
Speaker 1 (28:47):
What do you think? All right? Al hello, al, hey, yes,
yes sir, What can I do for you?
Speaker 11 (28:55):
Okay?
Speaker 8 (28:55):
Uh.
Speaker 11 (28:56):
The situation was, I was a domestic pardon with a
individual and she passed away, and then one of my
friends say, hey, you're titled to her benefits. And I
called the county and they told me I was not entitled.
Speaker 1 (29:08):
Okay, So let me ask you this.
Speaker 2 (29:10):
When you say you were a domestic partner where you
registered as a domestic partner, yes, oh okay, then I
think you are entitled.
Speaker 1 (29:20):
And if the county says no, you go wait a minute.
Speaker 2 (29:22):
I am a registered domestic partner, and I think that
gives you the rights al to get the benefits. From
my understanding is you're you're right there. So who in
the county said, uh uh no, thank you?
Speaker 1 (29:36):
An individual?
Speaker 11 (29:36):
This was a clerk.
Speaker 2 (29:38):
Okay, you go, you buy passed the clerk, you go
to someone else, you make a phone call, you go
to someone else, and you go to a supervisor.
Speaker 1 (29:44):
And you can just look this one up.
Speaker 2 (29:46):
I am convinced that you are entitled as a domestic partner.
By the way, why would you file as a domestic
partnership as opposed to getting married?
Speaker 11 (29:57):
That's what she wanted to do at the time. Then
she ended up passing away. I guess the last year
she went to go stay with her daughter because she
died of cancer.
Speaker 2 (30:06):
Oh oh, that's tough. And how long were you the
two How long were the two of you together?
Speaker 11 (30:11):
Five years?
Speaker 1 (30:12):
Okay? And when did you file for domestic partnership?
Speaker 11 (30:19):
Well, she's she's passed away a couple of years ago,
so it seven years ago. I'd say, okay.
Speaker 1 (30:26):
By the way, why did you, Oh, so you're waiting.
Speaker 2 (30:28):
You waited because you didn't know that you were entitled
to benefits.
Speaker 11 (30:32):
Well what happened was I called and they said no,
you're not a title. And one of my friends said.
Speaker 1 (30:37):
Hey, yeah you are. Yeah, and I agree with your friends,
So you just have to follow up on that.
Speaker 2 (30:41):
And there's no question I think your friend is right,
and whatever clerk out there that I just said, basically
I think was wrong.
Speaker 1 (30:48):
Okay, let me talk to you about breath. Bad breath,
Your bad breath, my bad breath.
Speaker 2 (30:54):
So what happens, Well, obviously it's from either being sick
or they've had. Probably the foods you eat, and that
happens not only stays in your mouth, but also comes
out of your gut, where a lot of food that
you eat actually starts well digesting and rotting and decomposing
and all the good stuff that causes your breath.
Speaker 1 (31:14):
And garlic onions, for example, that just stays in you.
Speaker 2 (31:16):
And I love garlic and onions, and I even eat
enough garlic so that it oozes out of my pores.
So let me tell you about dealing with Zelman's minty
mouth mints. Zelman's minty mouthmits far more than a mint.
First of all, tastes care of your mouth part because
it is a mint, it's mint coating around this little
capsule that you swallow or bite into and then it
goes into your gut and starts working there with the
(31:36):
foods you eat. And then at the same time or
simply because you have dry mouth, this works wonders and
then you just feel good about your breath and you
feel good about yourself. You know it's a fresh clean
you know, after you shower and you haven't showered for
weeks at a time, like I do, and you just
feel good. That's what happens with Zelman's minty mouth mints
when you swallow them and bite into them, and it's
(32:00):
all good stuff. So go to Zelmans dot com fifteen
percent off. We use the code to handle at checkout
fifteen percent off of Zelmanmintingmouthmans to take advantage of that.
Speaker 1 (32:10):
I don't know why you don't uh handle.
Speaker 2 (32:13):
The promo code is handle at checkout Zelmans Z E
L M I N S Zelmans dot com.
Speaker 1 (32:19):
This is handle on the law
Happening right now.
Speaker 2 (00:01):
Number is eight hundred five to two zero one five
three four. Eight hundred five two zero one five three four.
And we're a little lighter than usual, so very good chance,
matter of fact, superb chance, actually guaranteed chance, no chance.
Speaker 1 (00:19):
You're guaranteed that you're.
Speaker 2 (00:20):
Going to come in obviously and be able to jump
right into the queue for the phone calls.
Speaker 1 (00:25):
Eight hundred five to zero one five three four.
Speaker 2 (00:30):
This is handle on the law, marginal legal advice where
I tell you have.
Speaker 1 (00:36):
Absolutely no case.
Speaker 2 (00:38):
Do you remember that cargo ship that crashed into the
Franciscott Key Bridge and destroyed destroy the bridge in Baltimore
last March. Well, you'd figure, based on the fact that
the waterway, and that's the only waterway into Baltimore was
blocked for weeks, shut down the entire port, that the
(01:03):
lawsuits would be hitting hot and heavy.
Speaker 1 (01:06):
You bet. So this one just hit. It's the US
Justice Department.
Speaker 2 (01:11):
Filing a lawsuit on behalf of the United States asking
for more than one hundred million dollars from the two
companies that owned and operated that container ship, claiming that
the cost cutting of these two companies and negligence on
the maintenance part led to quote, an entirely avoidable disaster,
(01:32):
and quoting from the lawsuit, the two companies and the
name of the companies don't have to go into it
sent ill prepared crews on an objectedly unseaworthy vessel to
navigates the United States waterways.
Speaker 1 (01:43):
So this is not to rebuild the bridge.
Speaker 2 (01:47):
This is not damaged to the bridge itself because the
Feds have no control over the bridge. This is the
city of Baltimore. What it is about is the navigable waterway.
That's what the Fed's control. So what they want is
to get paid back for clearing the waterway. That's what
(02:08):
they want, and that they're asking for one hundred million
dollars because what ended up happening they had and it
was months to clear the wreckage fifty thousand tons of steel, concrete,
asphalt from the water so that the port could reopen.
And of course, if you're looking at the businesses all suffering,
(02:32):
the port itself losing zillions of dollars, the employees of
the port, the container warehouses, I mean, it goes on
and on and on. So these lawsuits are going to
be I wouldn't be surprised if they hit a billion dollars.
I don't know how the company's going to survive that.
I'm sure it's not. But this is another one. And
what makes this one interesting is this is not for
(02:54):
the cost of the bridge. It is for keeping bringing
back the waterway of which the federal government controls the
waterways of the United States navigable, so commerce can actually continue. Okay,
just wanted to share that with you.
Speaker 1 (03:13):
Pauline. Hello, Pauline, welcome.
Speaker 3 (03:18):
I had heard property and on the trust it says
fifty percent interest.
Speaker 1 (03:25):
Pauline, I'm having a hard time understanding you.
Speaker 2 (03:27):
So you have to speak louder, you have to speak
more slowly, and you have to speak with.
Speaker 1 (03:32):
A little more diction. Let's try it again, okay.
Speaker 3 (03:36):
Okay, oh better inherit property on the trust it says
fifty percent interests For me, fifty percent interest. My sister
I paid the property text for the first payment. My
sister passed away. Now there is a trustee, her son,
(03:56):
and uh, there's another half of a property text it
needs to be paid. That's the second payment. And her
son said he's not going to pay that payment. Can
I enforce the trustee to pay the property tax for
the second payment.
Speaker 2 (04:13):
Does well you pay it personally or does the estate
pay it?
Speaker 1 (04:17):
Right now?
Speaker 2 (04:17):
When you say you inherit it, it's yours and your
sister's name, correct, yes, okay?
Speaker 1 (04:23):
Who is on title right now? Who owns the property?
The trust? You? Your sister? Who owns the property? Well?
Speaker 3 (04:31):
I own it now? Because okay.
Speaker 2 (04:36):
Then if you own the property and it's in your name,
why would anybody else pay the property tax?
Speaker 3 (04:43):
Because well, I don't own the whole property.
Speaker 2 (04:46):
Okay, that's my question. Who is holding onto the property?
Is it yours and your sister's name?
Speaker 1 (04:53):
Yes?
Speaker 2 (04:53):
Okay, And so there's the If it's just yours and
her name, there's no trust, you own it.
Speaker 1 (04:58):
What does a trustee have to do with it? Oh? Okay?
Speaker 3 (05:04):
I thought that since her name is on it, that
she has to pay her portion.
Speaker 2 (05:08):
Well, I know it's per in agreement. I mean if
you pay all of it. No, it's that That's what
title is about. And what happens is if you are
not happy with her paying half, you just sell the property.
Speaker 1 (05:21):
You forced to sell the property, that's all you go.
Speaker 2 (05:23):
Okay, you don't want to pay your half, we'll sell
the property and you cut a deal. And but see,
here's the here's the confusion. You both inherited the property.
So it's your name and her name. Uh, do you
have a joint tendancy?
Speaker 1 (05:38):
How is it not?
Speaker 2 (05:39):
How where's the trust involved in all of this? That's
the confusing part.
Speaker 3 (05:44):
Oh, the trust is because my sister passed away. Now
her son is taking care of the trust.
Speaker 2 (05:51):
Okay, so the trust owns the property and not you
and your sister.
Speaker 1 (05:59):
No, No, you're making no sense. But that's okay.
Speaker 2 (06:01):
I mean you're allowed to make no sense. You know
why because half the time I don't make any sense.
So I'll give you all right, I'll give you a
pass on that one.
Speaker 1 (06:09):
Hey, Roan, Hi there.
Speaker 4 (06:12):
Yes, so my wife has a lean against the house
and the judgment against the house in the Silicon Valley.
The buddy of Steve Jobs who owns the house is
in for a closure for the eighth time. Do I
have to be on the courthouse steps when they go
in auction off the house?
Speaker 5 (06:30):
Now?
Speaker 2 (06:30):
Unless you The only thing you have to do on
the courthouse steps is be there if you want to
if you want to buy the house.
Speaker 1 (06:36):
Right, Okay, so you still have a link, so you
have a lian. So whoever pay, whoever buys the house
has to pay your lean.
Speaker 4 (06:42):
Okay. So is it for the original amount of forty
grand or is it around sixteen hours it has been
going on for eight years?
Speaker 2 (06:48):
Well, I think the lean is for the entire amount
plus interest. So here's your lean, sixty thousand dollars. So
if someone wants to buy the property, they're going to
pay sixty thousand dollars for your lean at least.
Speaker 4 (07:00):
Okay, So what is the proper what is.
Speaker 1 (07:03):
The property worth? Ron? What's the property worth?
Speaker 4 (07:06):
One point nine million?
Speaker 2 (07:08):
Yeah, well you're gonna get your lean paid off. I
wouldn't worry about it. And you don't have to be there.
You don't have to be on the courthouse steps unless
you want the entertainment part of it, then you can
be there all day long.
Speaker 1 (07:18):
Jennifer, Hi Jennifer, Oh, Hi.
Speaker 6 (07:21):
Bill, Hey, My question is I've my family and I
moved in to live with my father in law, husband's
dad about ten years ago. So we've been living with
him for a back and taking care of them because
we knew, you know, he just needed us around, right.
So he he recently passed away and there's no the
(07:41):
living will is nowhere to be found.
Speaker 1 (07:43):
Okay. That means there is no will.
Speaker 2 (07:46):
Right if you don't find the will, Even if you
know there's a will, there's no will, So there's nothing
there to approbate.
Speaker 1 (07:54):
So now, okay, so what's your question.
Speaker 6 (07:56):
The question is there a way to transfer the name
his name into my husband's name.
Speaker 1 (08:05):
Okay?
Speaker 2 (08:06):
Let's talk about who's related to your father in law. Okay,
clearly your husband is son. Was your father in law
married at the time when he died?
Speaker 6 (08:18):
No?
Speaker 2 (08:19):
Okay, So now how many siblings does your brother have?
Speaker 6 (08:23):
Okay, he has one sister.
Speaker 2 (08:25):
Okay, yeah, all right, so there's two of them. There
are two beneficiaries under the intestay in testacy laws, intestacy
means no will, and so it's your brother and his
sister who are going to be owners of that property.
Speaker 1 (08:42):
They're the beneficiaries. And how much is the property worth?
Speaker 6 (08:47):
Oh, maybe it was one hundred and twenty five thousand
many years ago, so I'm sure it's gone up.
Speaker 2 (08:53):
I'm sure it has any idea. Well, it's gonna have
to be appraised no matter what. But what will happen now?
It doesn't have to be a praise unless you guys
right over it. So what will happen is the two
of them open up approbate in Testasy under Testasy laws,
which means no will and we are the beneficiaries under
law because we're the kids and there's no there's no
wife out there, and that's it.
Speaker 1 (09:15):
We're we're the we inherit the place.
Speaker 2 (09:17):
According to law under law, and so a probate is open,
and judge then grants the two of them the property
and transfers the deed from dead father.
Speaker 1 (09:31):
In law to a live son and daughter. I'm assuming
your your husband is.
Speaker 2 (09:37):
Still alive, right, yes, yes, okay, uh, and his sister
is still alive.
Speaker 6 (09:43):
Yes, And she said she was, yeah, more than willing to.
So the question also is she was more than willing
to sign for it to be under my husband's name
because she's doing her own thing, and she.
Speaker 2 (09:55):
Oh she will, Okay, is she willing if she is
willing to give him her half an house?
Speaker 1 (10:00):
That's basically that's what you're.
Speaker 2 (10:02):
Saying, right, Yeah, take it, take it, real estate lawyer,
take it because I'm sure if it was one hundred
and twenty five thousand dollars years and years ago, it
has to.
Speaker 1 (10:11):
Be at least three times that much, at least, if
not more.
Speaker 2 (10:15):
So.
Speaker 1 (10:16):
Yeah, you take it. I would get a real estate
lawyer to draft up.
Speaker 2 (10:18):
That agreement like pronto, like immediately, and uh, thank the
sister in law, and just treat her really really well
until the deed is signed and your husband owns it outright,
then you can treat her any of you want.
Speaker 1 (10:33):
Okay, congratulations, Hello Peggy. Yes, ma'am, it's your turn. Peggy.
Did we just lose Peggy? We just lost Peggy.
Speaker 2 (10:49):
She'll call back because this is fantastic stuff. Okay, Okay,
I we a little problem here. Oh Peggy is coming back.
Do doo do doo, do doot doo.
Speaker 1 (10:59):
We have a little issue issue with phone calls here,
our phone system here. Hey Peggy, there you go.
Speaker 2 (11:07):
Yeah, Okay.
Speaker 7 (11:08):
In May, I went in for emergency surgery almost die.
I was in there for six days unconscious because they
kept me that way.
Speaker 2 (11:19):
Hold on, hold on, Okay, I got to stop you
because I have to, you know, I have to get
these facts in my head straight. Uh, you went in
for emergency surgery. What was the emergency.
Speaker 7 (11:30):
It's called sequel. That's where the in testing wraps around
the colon or okayl and wrapped round Okay.
Speaker 2 (11:40):
And they and they kept you unconscious for six days.
They put you in a coma and induced coma.
Speaker 7 (11:46):
Co No, they just kept me drugged.
Speaker 2 (11:48):
Oh yeah, okay, well you know so I used to
pay lots of money for that for far more than
six days. All right, So okay, so emergency surgery, h
six days they kept you drug in the hospital.
Speaker 1 (12:01):
And then what Then?
Speaker 7 (12:04):
I found out that my kidney had blown up somehow
for some reason, they put a stint in the kidney,
which was painful for over a month. When it took
the stint out of the kidney, it shriveled up into
a nub. Now I don't know if I have the kidney.
Speaker 1 (12:20):
I don't know what the stint or the kidney shriveled
up the kidney, the kidney shriveled up to a nub.
Speaker 2 (12:26):
Okay, and what what is what is your question?
Speaker 1 (12:30):
Sounds like you went through the ringer here.
Speaker 3 (12:33):
Oh I did?
Speaker 2 (12:34):
Okay, what's your question, Peggy?
Speaker 7 (12:38):
Because of the time frame, do I have any recourse?
Speaker 2 (12:41):
Well, I mean two years ago. Yeah, you're still okay
within the statue. Now, the only issue.
Speaker 1 (12:45):
Is did they malpractice?
Speaker 2 (12:48):
What did they do wrong during the surgery and the
subsequent six days and putting in the stent or not
putting in the stent or leaving it for X number
of times.
Speaker 1 (12:58):
These are all medical questions, Peggy.
Speaker 2 (13:01):
These are this is not for me to do unless
somehow you can figure out how to put the phone.
Speaker 1 (13:07):
Do you? Oh, I know what you can do? Do
you have a Yeah, if you have an.
Speaker 2 (13:11):
iPhone, you can just you know, put it right out
of the camera so I can see your scar and
then I'll tell you whether malpractice took place or not.
Speaker 1 (13:18):
So what you have to do is, uh, you know,
let's just start with this.
Speaker 2 (13:22):
Is I would suggest you call a medical malpractice attorney
just to skit on the phone and just and they'll
all talk to you and just say, hey, here's what happened. Uh,
do I have anything here? And what he'll do based
on the explanation and what you tell him is he'll
probably send you to another doctor, uh, to get an
opinion as to whether or not there is a case there.
(13:45):
And normally you don't pay for that. That's what these
medical malpractice attorneys do.
Speaker 1 (13:50):
They just suck up the costs of.
Speaker 2 (13:51):
Finding out and the reports and all that if it settles,
you pay for it later out of the settlement, and
if not, you're you know, you're not going to suck
it up at all.
Speaker 7 (14:00):
Uh So the doctor who did perform the surgery when
I went to back to the office, he was no
longer employed there.
Speaker 2 (14:07):
That doesn't mean necessarily, that does not mean that malpractice
took place.
Speaker 1 (14:12):
Now, I mean that it raises a flag. And you
want to know why. I mean, he could have been.
Speaker 2 (14:18):
Fired because he's just he treated the nurses wrong, or
he grabs some nurses, but he could have been fired
for that, or he was belligerent or obnoxious.
Speaker 1 (14:26):
I mean, you don't know. So you're whatever medical group
he's with is not going to help you. Trust me,
they're not going to help your case.
Speaker 2 (14:35):
But talk to a talk to a med mal attorney,
and start with the questions that you you gave me,
uh and then hopefully you're gonna get a better answer
than I can give you.
Speaker 1 (14:47):
Okay, try that. God, I was way too nice. Why
didn't make fun of her more? I have no idea.
Speaker 2 (14:54):
All right, data breaches, I mean we're used to these,
But let me tell you what happened this last couple
of months.
Speaker 1 (14:59):
Some reports are calling this one the mother of all
data breaches.
Speaker 2 (15:03):
Two point seven billion records stolen by cyber hackers from
a company known as National Public Data. And this is
a company that provides background checks for employees or two
employers about employees, and it's all over the country. It's massive.
You know, so many records are stolen online. We're so
vulnerable how our online identity is and we have zero
(15:26):
control over all this too. We have zero control how
well our identity is protected, but from these companies like
National Public Data. So with that, let me suggest contacting
the folks at LifeLock. They monitor millions of data points
a second for risks to your online identity, and LifeLock
it did texts alert you to potential identity threats you
(15:48):
may not even spot on your own, and if they.
Speaker 1 (15:50):
Do spot it, they'll call you, Hey, we have an
issue here.
Speaker 2 (15:54):
Let's get to work, and if you become a victim,
a dedicated US based restoration and specialist works to fix
your problem. And that's guaranteed. Terms apply or your money
back and terms apply. So go to LifeLock dot com
or call eight hundred LifeLock and if you use the
promo code handle it's forty percent off LifeLock dot com
(16:18):
or eight hundred LifeLock promo code handle.
Speaker 1 (16:23):
Mary. Let's go with you, Hello, Mary, Welcome.
Speaker 8 (16:26):
Hi. Yeah, Monday, there's going to be a sharing if
LA city Planning virtual and it's going to be just
tear down the house that I've been living in for
forty years as a family home and owned by our trust.
(16:47):
My brother is the executor, and he's the one that
wants to cheer it down.
Speaker 2 (16:53):
Okay, okay, hold on, Okay, Well, obviously he's not the executive.
Speaker 1 (16:56):
He's the trustee and it's owned by the trust.
Speaker 2 (16:59):
And is he asking permission to tear it down from
the city.
Speaker 8 (17:04):
Yeah. But on the other I have to tell you
to the all the children, the successors and myself are
having him removed legally, okay, pending in court?
Speaker 1 (17:22):
All right, So that's tending in court, right, all right?
So what's your question?
Speaker 8 (17:28):
Oh? My question is how do I prepare myself for Monday?
Speaker 1 (17:33):
Okay?
Speaker 9 (17:33):
What you do?
Speaker 2 (17:33):
Well? Yeah, okay, First of all, at this point, I
don't know how much say you have because he's the trustee.
Speaker 1 (17:43):
Why is he asking for permission to tear down a home?
Speaker 2 (17:47):
And I don't know why the Planning Commission would be involved.
That's kind of interesting. You think building in safety that
would be involved. Okay, So why does he want to
tear down the home?
Speaker 8 (18:01):
I just you.
Speaker 1 (18:03):
Don't know why he wants to tear down the home.
Speaker 2 (18:05):
He just wants to wants He's vindictive and wants to
tear down the home. So he's going in front of
the of La City Planning Uh and says I want
to tear down the home, And if anybody asks him,
he'll answer, I don't know. I just want to tear
down the home because I'm vindictive. So something's going on
(18:25):
that I don't understand.
Speaker 1 (18:27):
Also, also you can.
Speaker 2 (18:29):
Ask the city, which I you know, you've got to
get a hold.
Speaker 1 (18:32):
Of a land use attorney, Mary, That's what you have
to do.
Speaker 2 (18:36):
Because can you ask the city to postpone any hearing
pending the fact his removal as trustee?
Speaker 1 (18:42):
Of course you can. Now can you do it yourself?
Speaker 2 (18:45):
Probably these are open hearings, And before they make a decision,
someone goes up and says and they say, does anybody
have anything to say? These are open hearings unless it's
a close hearing, which I don't think it is. Then
you state your peace. But if you're talking about he's
destroying it. As soon as he gets the planning permission,
then he goes ahead and destroys it. And he has
(19:06):
a duty to the beneficiaries under the trust. And if
he's destroying the value of the trust just because he's vindictive,
well yeah, you've got some real issues here.
Speaker 1 (19:19):
So Mary, here's what I'm gonna do.
Speaker 2 (19:20):
I'm going to suggest you go to a land use
attorney and see if a land use attorney can make
more sense of what you just said than I have,
because my guess is no, probably not.
Speaker 1 (19:35):
Nancy, Hello, Nancy.
Speaker 2 (19:38):
Sony questions today regarding homes and trusts.
Speaker 1 (19:41):
It's all real estate stuff, all right, What can I
do for you? Nancy?
Speaker 10 (19:46):
Okay, my brother's half owner, I'm half owner. He has
his own living trust. I have my own living trusts
passed down by our parents. At one point, well, he
refuses to share a cost for property tax. He says
I'm the executor, and then he says, I'm your landlord. Now,
if I died tonight, could he take everything? Because it
(20:10):
didn't say tendons?
Speaker 9 (20:12):
What is that one?
Speaker 1 (20:14):
Okay? I didn't say, all right, joint tendancy. It didn't
say on the property.
Speaker 10 (20:19):
No, it said the other one, the other one.
Speaker 1 (20:22):
Uh, okay, all right, right, right, okay.
Speaker 2 (20:26):
So if you die tonight, let's let's see who's who
dies first. You die tonight or I die because.
Speaker 1 (20:31):
Of this phone call. I haven't decided yet. Okay. Uh
who owns the property? Right now? What? Where's the title
of the property? Is it the trust? Is it in
your name?
Speaker 10 (20:45):
The trust is in my name? He is?
Speaker 1 (20:46):
No, no, no, no, no, The trust is not in your name. Uh.
Speaker 2 (20:50):
The You may be a beneficiary under the trust, but
a trust is separate.
Speaker 1 (20:54):
I mean it could be it's not under your name.
Speaker 2 (20:56):
It could be titled with your name, but the trust
is in itself an entity who owns the property?
Speaker 1 (21:02):
Right there?
Speaker 2 (21:02):
You pull the title, you pull the deed and for
the address the owner is, who is it?
Speaker 1 (21:08):
Nancy?
Speaker 7 (21:10):
It's him and I because my dad's okay, then.
Speaker 2 (21:13):
If it's if it's the two of you, then there's
no trust involved. You own it individually. You can't own
it and a trust owns it. Somebody has to own
it unless you know you own part and the trust
owns part. And if you are the beneficiary under the trust,
and you are already on title and I don't get
(21:34):
any of it. So your question is he's saying he's
the landlord? Why would he be the landlord? Is something
that you also.
Speaker 10 (21:40):
Own maybe, you know, just not in present time, I
mean in the day the males owner.
Speaker 1 (21:49):
I understand, I understand completely. Yeah, you know, today is
just one of.
Speaker 2 (21:53):
Those interesting days. I must tell you for a couple
of reasons. First of all, I'm not making high nor
hair of these.
Speaker 1 (22:02):
Any of these questions. I have no idea what people
have in mind.
Speaker 5 (22:06):
Uh.
Speaker 2 (22:06):
Second of all, we are so low on phone calls
for some reason today. So I think it is time, Jacob,
I think it is time, uh for us to red
this up a little bit. Uh So, ladies and gentlemen,
without further ado, please let me introduce you to my
favorite song that hopefully you listen to for several minutes,
(22:28):
and that's baby Sharkaby Chebye. The only way to stop
this is for you to actually call. Other than that,
it's going to be, uh, this is going.
Speaker 1 (22:43):
To be our show, all right, let's turn that one up.
I'd like it to be a Louder's really Jack shot Shark.
Speaker 2 (22:58):
Do you know we may maybe want to change the
name of this show, you know, to the Baby Shark Legal.
Speaker 1 (23:08):
Baby Sharks Leaders Show, or maybe the rap Baby Shark
Legal Hour. What do you think?
Speaker 2 (23:15):
All right, let's go ahead and take a phone call,
because actually we do have a few and I'm just
having a good time with you guys.
Speaker 1 (23:21):
Ben, Hello, Ben, welcome.
Speaker 5 (23:24):
Hey, Just a quick question if there's any do you
know if there's any president set or removing an elected
official from office due to them breaking their ghosts ball?
Speaker 2 (23:36):
Yeah, there's plenty of precedent for removing elected officials. And
by the way, it's not just breaking the oath. I
mean you have to accuse them. Well, you don't even
have to. You can remove an elected official just by
putting up a vote, you know, under the law.
Speaker 1 (23:51):
You go, okay, I want this guy out. And here's
a why or not.
Speaker 2 (23:55):
I just want this guy out because he's ugly or
because I don't like the way he dresses. And enough
people agree with you. You have an election and out
he goes. It's recalled and he's out. When you say
breaking the oath, what does that mean? I don't know
what breaking the oath of office is.
Speaker 1 (24:11):
What did this person do?
Speaker 5 (24:14):
Well, just correct. I mean, without getting into it is
pretty in depth, but basically corruption corruption.
Speaker 2 (24:21):
So you know that money was given for whatever acts
or property or value was given for an elected official
doing something correct.
Speaker 5 (24:31):
Yeah, and you know it.
Speaker 1 (24:32):
You can prove it.
Speaker 2 (24:33):
If he were to go and file a lawsuit against you,
you go, here is the proof, you're honor or, ladies
and gentlemen of the jury.
Speaker 1 (24:40):
I have the proof, and you have that right.
Speaker 2 (24:44):
Essentially yet essentially Okay, this is a real yes or
no on this one. What kind of proof do you have?
Without getting into specific, do you have documents? Do you
have emails? Do you have texts? You have witnesses said
I saw him take money, I saw him do this.
Speaker 1 (25:02):
What kind of proof do you have?
Speaker 9 (25:06):
Uh?
Speaker 5 (25:07):
I can show that there like is in uh the
video video evidence of like basically the uh misappropriated fund.
Speaker 2 (25:17):
Oh, you can see him video of him taking funds
or transferring into accounts.
Speaker 5 (25:22):
Him or her necessarily I.
Speaker 1 (25:24):
Understand, I'll go go him.
Speaker 2 (25:25):
Generically there is video of him transferring or taking cash,
actual video.
Speaker 9 (25:31):
I know.
Speaker 1 (25:32):
Well then okay, then what do you then? What do
you have? Ben?
Speaker 2 (25:35):
We have to get through with this because you're you're
saying there's corruption here.
Speaker 5 (25:38):
There's a you know this hidden secret underground train network.
Speaker 1 (25:45):
Uh wow, and you can and.
Speaker 2 (25:47):
This hidden see if it's a hidden secret, how can
you prove it?
Speaker 1 (25:50):
If it's so hidden secret, what do you have witnesses?
Speaker 9 (25:52):
They have affida, I can show where the entrance to
it is.
Speaker 2 (25:58):
You can sew the entrance to it, you know, Ben. Okay,
let me go ahead and just answer your question from
a minute one. I just wanted to get go down
this rabbit hole with you. Number one is you can
recall an electrificial for any reason, any reason whatsoever, corruption
not corruption, And based on you say this person is corrupt.
(26:21):
And the way you're answering this question, let me bottom
line it for you. You have no idea what you're
talking about.
Speaker 1 (26:27):
Zero. You sound like a conspiracy nutwing Mike, there you are?
What can I do for you?
Speaker 5 (26:35):
You know?
Speaker 1 (26:35):
Mike? Mike is he? Yes? Go ahead?
Speaker 9 (26:39):
Okay, okay, very very quick questions. Try to waste your time.
Speaker 1 (26:44):
But I know that.
Speaker 9 (26:45):
Okay, there's no statute limitations for murder, correct, But I'm
just curious, is there a statue of limitations for a
tempted murder?
Speaker 1 (26:53):
Okay? Now, is there a story there or is this just.
Speaker 9 (26:56):
A hypothetical needs It's not hypothetical, high person. No, no, no,
not really no no, So tell me the backstory.
Speaker 1 (27:04):
Why are you asking that question?
Speaker 9 (27:07):
I'm curious because years later I kicked the person it
was self defense. But years before the person choked me,
I played possum. Okay, got up, they were shocks. They
ran away. But I was just curious.
Speaker 2 (27:21):
Okay, So someone attempted me. Someone tried to choke you, right,
someone choked you? Yeah, okay, and now and you played
possum and so up and he ran away?
Speaker 1 (27:32):
Okay? How many years ago? By the way, Mike, how
many years ago?
Speaker 9 (27:37):
Oh god, I'm you should be good at math, but
I'm fifty three. But I was about twenty four.
Speaker 2 (27:42):
So okay, so you're thirty years ago. All right, fair enough.
So let's say, uh, let me tell you this. What
if there were no statute like murder, what do we.
Speaker 1 (27:53):
Do with that?
Speaker 2 (27:55):
Do you go to the police and say, thirty years ago,
someone choked me, I played possum and he ran away.
Speaker 1 (28:04):
Do we know what that person? Who that person is?
I happen to okay, and where does that person live now? Locally?
Speaker 2 (28:13):
Well?
Speaker 9 (28:13):
They probably they probably dead.
Speaker 1 (28:15):
On the show, they're probably dead. Okay.
Speaker 2 (28:17):
That's even more difficult because charging dead people with the
crime becomes very problematic. I'll tell you why, because you know,
they have to be held up. I mean, you know,
they tend to topple over when they're dead, when they're
in front of the court.
Speaker 1 (28:33):
It's very, very difficult.
Speaker 2 (28:35):
So the answer is, yeah, yeah, what do you even
do with that?
Speaker 1 (28:41):
You know what?
Speaker 2 (28:42):
That may even be a promo. I haven't decided yet.
I mean that may that may be good enough to
be a promo.
Speaker 1 (28:47):
What do you think? All right? Al hello, al, hey, yes,
yes sir, What can I do for you?
Speaker 11 (28:55):
Okay?
Speaker 8 (28:55):
Uh.
Speaker 11 (28:56):
The situation was, I was a domestic pardon with a
individual and she passed away, and then one of my
friends say, hey, you're titled to her benefits. And I
called the county and they told me I was not entitled.
Speaker 1 (29:08):
Okay, So let me ask you this.
Speaker 2 (29:10):
When you say you were a domestic partner where you
registered as a domestic partner, yes, oh okay, then I
think you are entitled.
Speaker 1 (29:20):
And if the county says no, you go wait a minute.
Speaker 2 (29:22):
I am a registered domestic partner, and I think that
gives you the rights al to get the benefits. From
my understanding is you're you're right there. So who in
the county said, uh uh no, thank you?
Speaker 1 (29:36):
An individual?
Speaker 11 (29:36):
This was a clerk.
Speaker 2 (29:38):
Okay, you go, you buy passed the clerk, you go
to someone else, you make a phone call, you go
to someone else, and you go to a supervisor.
Speaker 1 (29:44):
And you can just look this one up.
Speaker 2 (29:46):
I am convinced that you are entitled as a domestic partner.
By the way, why would you file as a domestic
partnership as opposed to getting married?
Speaker 11 (29:57):
That's what she wanted to do at the time. Then
she ended up passing away. I guess the last year
she went to go stay with her daughter because she
died of cancer.
Speaker 2 (30:06):
Oh oh, that's tough. And how long were you the
two How long were the two of you together?
Speaker 11 (30:11):
Five years?
Speaker 1 (30:12):
Okay? And when did you file for domestic partnership?
Speaker 11 (30:19):
Well, she's she's passed away a couple of years ago,
so it seven years ago. I'd say, okay.
Speaker 1 (30:26):
By the way, why did you, Oh, so you're waiting.
Speaker 2 (30:28):
You waited because you didn't know that you were entitled
to benefits.
Speaker 11 (30:32):
Well what happened was I called and they said no,
you're not a title. And one of my friends said.
Speaker 1 (30:37):
Hey, yeah you are. Yeah, and I agree with your friends,
So you just have to follow up on that.
Speaker 2 (30:41):
And there's no question I think your friend is right,
and whatever clerk out there that I just said, basically
I think was wrong.
Speaker 1 (30:48):
Okay, let me talk to you about breath. Bad breath,
Your bad breath, my bad breath.
Speaker 2 (30:54):
So what happens, Well, obviously it's from either being sick
or they've had. Probably the foods you eat, and that
happens not only stays in your mouth, but also comes
out of your gut, where a lot of food that
you eat actually starts well digesting and rotting and decomposing
and all the good stuff that causes your breath.
Speaker 1 (31:14):
And garlic onions, for example, that just stays in you.
Speaker 2 (31:16):
And I love garlic and onions, and I even eat
enough garlic so that it oozes out of my pores.
So let me tell you about dealing with Zelman's minty
mouth mints. Zelman's minty mouthmits far more than a mint.
First of all, tastes care of your mouth part because
it is a mint, it's mint coating around this little
capsule that you swallow or bite into and then it
goes into your gut and starts working there with the
(31:36):
foods you eat. And then at the same time or
simply because you have dry mouth, this works wonders and
then you just feel good about your breath and you
feel good about yourself. You know it's a fresh clean
you know, after you shower and you haven't showered for
weeks at a time, like I do, and you just
feel good. That's what happens with Zelman's minty mouth mints
when you swallow them and bite into them, and it's
(32:00):
all good stuff. So go to Zelmans dot com fifteen
percent off. We use the code to handle at checkout
fifteen percent off of Zelmanmintingmouthmans to take advantage of that.
Speaker 1 (32:10):
I don't know why you don't uh handle.
Speaker 2 (32:13):
The promo code is handle at checkout Zelmans Z E
L M I N S Zelmans dot com.
Speaker 1 (32:19):
This is handle on the law
Popular Podcasts
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.