9th Circuit Sides w/ Trump

Handel on the Law. Marginal Legal Advice.

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
You're listening to KFI AM six forty the Bill Handles
show on demand on the iHeartRadio f It is KFI
AM six forty Bill Handle Here. It is a Saturday
morning as we start the legal show. Always great fun
three hours, three fun filled hours. If I harass you.

Speaker 2 (00:20):
And humiliate you, hopefully or occasionally I'll tell you, yeah,
you actually you have a decent case, and you have
to see a lawyer, which is generally my idea of
pretty good legal advice, as much as I hate to
say that. And the phone number, and it's always best
time to call boy. This is now my mantra. Top
of the hour, first hour is always the best time

(00:42):
to call because you're going to get right in. The
number is eight hundred five two zero one five three four,
eight hundred five two zero one five three four, and
you'll be talking to Matthew, our screener, and you'll be
asking you some questions, giving you a couple of rules

(01:02):
that of course you're going to ignore, like don't ask
Bill how he's doing. You don't care, buill this and
care you're gonna ask me how are you doing? Don't
say good morning? You do anyway, So after we get
through that crapple, and then you ask the question succinct
to the point.

Speaker 1 (01:20):
I don't want to hear long stories. It drives me
completely nuts.

Speaker 2 (01:23):
By the way, that's a good point because when I
tell you, for example, you have to go to small
claims court or g bill, I have a small claims court,
what do I do?

Speaker 1 (01:32):
I have a case? What do I do? I go?

Speaker 2 (01:33):
You make it as short as possible. You start talking
the way you're talking now and babbling and going through
all of these mechanations and convoluting and conflating things. Judge
is going to look at you and just go get out.
I don't want to hear it. Just get out. After
two minutes, the judge stops paying attention. So you know,

(01:54):
practice it, Make it short, make it sweet. That's what
you want to do. And then the rules are if
you are completely unintelligible, can I understand a word you say?

Speaker 1 (02:04):
Of course you're going to get on. If you have
special needs, for example, your.

Speaker 2 (02:09):
Mute, a deaf mute, and you have no ability to
it even communicate, you're getting right on and all the
other rules that follow. Okay, let's do it. This is
a handle on the law. Marginal legal advice where I
tell you you have absolutely no case. All right, this
You're talking a lot about this over the next several months.

(02:32):
And this has to do with President Trump, and one
of the whether you like President Trump or not, it
doesn't matter what side of the coin. You cannot argue
with the fact that he is stretching the boundaries of
presidential power that he is doing, and that's part and
parcel of what the administration.

Speaker 1 (02:50):
He firmly believes.

Speaker 2 (02:52):
And there are others that believe that the president should
have unbridled power and that Congress is there just to
push the president's agenda. Mike Johnson, Speaker of the House,
does not believe in checks and balances, does not believe
that there are two legislative branches or three. The executive
has his decision as the president and Congress, which is

(03:13):
supposed to be a separate division of government.

Speaker 1 (03:16):
Mike Johnson says, it's not. It's just to push forward
the president's agenda. Okay.

Speaker 2 (03:22):
So with that in mind, the LA demonstrations. Now, Donald
Trump hates California, hates Los Angeles with a passion, and
so the immigration issue ice going out and picking up
people all over the place at home depots and construction
sites and factories, I mean all over the place. Is

(03:44):
happening more in LA than it is anyplace else because
LA is sort of the poster child of the legal
immigration and so Ice Boom goes after it and he
calls in, he federalizes the National Guard keep part of
the immigration pickup and can't do that, according to the governor,

(04:06):
Gavin Duson, who filed lawsuitent instantly he goes, you can't
do that. I don't want you to do that. It's
the governors who asked the President to declare a nation
a declared emergency for the National Guard to be federalized. Well,
President went beyond that, went ahead and federalized them to
help with the immigration issue. And of course it went
to the Supreme Court, and the Supreme Court ruled basically

(04:30):
in favor of President Trump, saying that he had virtually
unlimited power to declare what an emergency is. He declared
the demonstrations in Los Angeles an open rebellion against the
government of the United States, not demonstrations and straight out

(04:50):
open rebellion, and based on that, he federalized the troops, brought.

Speaker 1 (04:54):
In the Marines, etc.

Speaker 2 (04:55):
And the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal said, yeah, well,
one of the things that Trump argu is that the
courts can't even review it. If the president makes a decision,
it's beyond review of the court.

Speaker 1 (05:07):
Court said, now, you can't go that far.

Speaker 2 (05:09):
But great difference is going to be given to a
president's decision, and it has to be such a wild
ass decision.

Speaker 1 (05:17):
Let me give you an example.

Speaker 2 (05:18):
One person protesting who's arrested, and the President declares out
an open rebellion in the United States and brings in
the National Guard. Okay, of course that's ridiculous, that's hyperbolic,
but I think it would almost be to that extent
before the courts would say, uh, you can't do it.
So at this point, Ninth Circuit has ruled that the

(05:40):
president does have that ability, and of course that's going
out the Supreme Court, and we'll see what the Supreme
Court has to say about that. All right, let's go
ahead and take some some phone call. As a matter
of fact, Morris right on point. Hello Morris, welcome.

Speaker 3 (05:57):
Good morning. Yes, about four days ago, I was seven
eleven North Hollywood and ice arrived or about eight vehicles
playing clothes and they jumped out of their cars all
at once with them. They had them long rifles and
I just stood there.

Speaker 4 (06:14):
I was about six.

Speaker 3 (06:15):
Hundred feet away, and whoever's coming out of the store,
they just stopped and demanded ida. And my question is
I am not a US citizen. I took my green
card or permanent residin card and photocopy there. I don't
carry it with me. What are my rights if they
should pick me up like this? I mean, where do
they take me? Where do I go with?

Speaker 5 (06:33):
Yeah?

Speaker 1 (06:33):
I know that's a good question. A couple of questions.

Speaker 2 (06:35):
First, you were leaving the seven eleven or were you're
just outside or.

Speaker 1 (06:40):
Were you going in?

Speaker 3 (06:42):
I was outside?

Speaker 1 (06:44):
You hadn't gone in yet?

Speaker 2 (06:46):
No, okay, you see that was the question because if
you had already bought a big gulp. The rules are
a little bit different in terms of what the government
can do.

Speaker 1 (06:56):
What are your rights?

Speaker 2 (06:57):
Well, you can be theoretically, you can wait, you can't,
you can be questioned, you can't be picked up.

Speaker 1 (07:05):
They have pretty much the.

Speaker 2 (07:06):
Right to ask you for your idea. Unfortunately, there are
all kinds of laws that say maybe you don't and
you need there should be reasonable cause. But this day
it's thrown out all over the place. All you can
do is say I'm an American citizen, keep your green
copy of your Green Card with you. But to be
honest with you, at this point, Morris, I don't know

(07:27):
what is enforceable what is not enforceable, because every single
thing that you would think the government cannot do, the
government is doing. And even if the courts are saying
you can't do it, the government is saying, too bad,
We're gonna do it anyway, you know, much like the
order to return prisoners from Venezuela. The prisoner the detainee

(07:50):
is on an airplane and the government orders the airplane
to come back, or the courts and the government says,
we don't care. That's what we're up in the middle
of right now. So the answer is, I can't tell
you what rights we have. All you can do is
be smart. Smart you carry your Green card, they ask
you a question, yes, sir, I'm a Green card holder,

(08:10):
then they'll pretty well leave you alone. But it's scary,
it is. I mean, there's no way around it.

Speaker 1 (08:15):
I can't prove I'm a citizen. I can't.

Speaker 2 (08:17):
I don't carry my passport around. I'm a naturalized American citizen.
So the only birth certificate I actually have is a
my Brazilian birth circ birth certificate. It certainly doesn't make
me an American citizen. So do I carry my naturalization papers?
I don't even know where they are, but I have

(08:38):
the passport, and you know, it's a good idea these days.

Speaker 6 (08:41):
Now.

Speaker 2 (08:41):
Obviously, if I'm stopped and the cops or the ice
is going to start questioning me as to whether I'm
an American and what are they going to say, They're
gonna pick me up? Of course not but or Morris,
of course not. But scary stuff out there. This is
handle on the law. Can't if I handle here on
a Saturday morning. Back we go, more handle on the law,

(09:04):
marginal legal advice.

Speaker 1 (09:08):
You're Mark, You're up, welcome.

Speaker 7 (09:10):
Hi Bill, my name is Mark in let me see here.
In March of twenty twenty five, I was given a
notice from my cardiologist that I had an unpaid bill
from November of twenty twenty two. I went to Medicare.
To make the story short, I went to Medicare and
asked why they didn't pay. They said because it was
filed as a routine bill and Medicare doesn't pay routine bills.

(09:34):
So I gave all this information back to the doctor.
I've heard nothing from them except that their office is
crowded and busy. But anyway, so I've just sent to
a collection agency and they say they're threatening collections. I'm asking,
what's the implication of that.

Speaker 2 (09:49):
Well, the implications are they're threatening collections and the only
thing you really have to worry about is digging your credit,
because that's the ammunition that these people have so wrong.
You've been wrongly determined to have gotten medical care that
should have been paid for by medicare.

Speaker 1 (10:07):
What I would do is call the doctor's office. Hey,
I'm getting ding.

Speaker 2 (10:10):
This is your fault, and it's I'm going to go
back against you, that's all. If my credit is ruined,
put it all in an email. If my credit is ruined,
I'm going to go after you. Have they admitted that
they've done anything wrong or are they simply saying we're
too busy and we're not going to deal with it
right now?

Speaker 7 (10:28):
They say they're too busy. Finally, and have been getting
back to them for three months. Time I get one deters,
I email them back. But anyway, finally, a girl said
She tried to call Medicare, but Medicare said they couldn't
handle it because that day they were working with trainees
or something. But otherwise they've been non responsive for three right, Well,
all you.

Speaker 2 (10:45):
Can do is let them know that you're going to
hold them responsible for it. For any attack on your credit,
and any lawsuit you'll cross complaint.

Speaker 1 (10:53):
That's all you can do.

Speaker 2 (10:54):
And if your credit is ding, you instantly dispute it.
The best thing you can get against your credit is
a medical bill that's taken the creditors paid the least
attention to that because everybody has medical bills and by
far the vast majority of bankruptcies are because of medical bills.

(11:16):
So as a matter of fact, they there's a movement
saying medical bills are taken out of that mix completely.

Speaker 1 (11:21):
So that's all you can do.

Speaker 2 (11:23):
You know, all you can do is that's where you
really get got caught between a rock and a hard
place with this stuff.

Speaker 1 (11:30):
I mean, it is really horrific. Adrian Hi, Adrian, welcome, Hi.

Speaker 8 (11:36):
Bill a long time listener.

Speaker 4 (11:39):
Was part of the I was part of the Eaton
Canyon fire and the roofs had to be replaced. The
adjusters came out, they determined that the roof would be replaced.
The insurance company paid them twelve thousand dollars. Then they
came back and then adjuster came out. You know, the
city came out told him they needed to do more
repairs to the roof. It wasn't up city standards. So

(12:01):
now we're up to That was sixteen thousand dollars in
the city. Inspector came back and they went up to
twenty two thousand dollars. But they don't want to replace
the fashion around the roof. My insurance company is saying
that it's not covered because of it as dry rot.
I'm trying to figure out from twelve thousand to twenty
two thousand, shouldn't that be included in the.

Speaker 1 (12:25):
No idea the rule. I have absolutely no idea.

Speaker 2 (12:30):
You have to look at your insurance policy, and it
depends on how the insurance policy is written. There's all
kinds of exclusions written in an insurance policy that says.

Speaker 1 (12:38):
We'll cover this and or will not cover this.

Speaker 2 (12:41):
The only good news about insurance policies at this point, Adreen,
is they're pretty clear. I mean, they are pretty specific
as to what is covered and what is not covered.
It used to be all it was all minutia was all.
You have to read it with a microscope and you
couldn't understand it.

Speaker 1 (12:56):
Well, the laws changed, lawsuits were filed.

Speaker 2 (12:59):
So the bottom line is, you know, should fascia be
involved in repairing a roof?

Speaker 1 (13:03):
No idea.

Speaker 2 (13:04):
I'm not a roof bavin. That's it, Mario, Hi, Mario, welcome.

Speaker 9 (13:11):
Yes, Bill, I live in next next to a liquor
store owner parking lot.

Speaker 8 (13:17):
No, it's not so.

Speaker 9 (13:19):
There's the individuals that are spending the nine being on
my gate, you know, and leaving trash and stuff. I
talked to the owner, I talked to the police department,
and no, nobody seems to care. Can I suit the
liquor store owner?

Speaker 2 (13:33):
You know that's not easy to do? That, really, isn't.
You got to get the police involved more. By the way,
how is it you buy a house next to a
liquor store?

Speaker 1 (13:42):
Mario? Why would you do that?

Speaker 4 (13:44):
I did it.

Speaker 9 (13:45):
It was my father in law did so I'm stuck
with the problem.

Speaker 1 (13:51):
Well, you're stuck with the house.

Speaker 2 (13:52):
I mean, you could sell it for fifteen cents, because
that's all it's worth next to a liquor store. Now
you've got to get I mean, could you. It's it's
very difficult. It would cost you a ton of money.
What you have to do is you have to get
the police involved, and we gone.

Speaker 3 (14:09):
I gone, my wife's gun.

Speaker 1 (14:11):
Yeah, I know, I know, but that's you see, here's
the problem.

Speaker 2 (14:13):
You don't have the authority to go in and rouse
someone from someone else's property. They're not on your property,
you see, they're on their property and it's it's against
the law. They're all right, Then have them arrested for
peeing on your property. That you can do, all right,

(14:35):
that's unfortunately, Really I understand, Mario. I'm not trying to
make it miserable for you. It's already miserable for you.
Now he has some rights the owner, but he doesn't
care clearly. I mean, he's fine with people peeing on
his property. He's fine with the garbage, et cetera. I
don't know what to tell you, is can you put
a fence up between the two properties? Is that possible?

Speaker 9 (14:59):
There is a fan But like I said, they eat
on the gate, you know, And I get.

Speaker 10 (15:04):
To what do you mean they eat?

Speaker 1 (15:05):
They eat on the gate? What does that mean?

Speaker 8 (15:08):
No, they keep they tee, they pee.

Speaker 2 (15:11):
Oh they pee on them, but it's on his gate,
right or on your gate, on my gate. Well, then
put up a gate where where they they're going to
pee on something on the.

Speaker 1 (15:19):
Other side, a wooden gate or something you can't see.
I mean, I don't know why.

Speaker 3 (15:24):
You know.

Speaker 1 (15:25):
That's all you can do is make it a practical measure.

Speaker 2 (15:28):
Now, if it were me, I'd electrify the FETs and
fry these bastards.

Speaker 1 (15:33):
But unfortunately you can't do that, can you. God? Don't
you wish life was easier than that and it weren't
all these.

Speaker 2 (15:40):
Pesky laws that get in the way of you, like
really making life miserable people.

Speaker 1 (15:46):
Let me tell you about AI for a moment.

Speaker 2 (15:48):
Artificial intelligence AI is everywhere and if your business isn't
using it, you're losing money, productivity, a competitive edge for sure.

Speaker 1 (15:57):
So this is about net Sweet, a company that helped.

Speaker 2 (16:00):
You control costs increase efficiency. It's the number one business
cloud business management system out there, and it takes AI
and makes your business run more efficiently. It takes all
of the information that you your business has accounting, financial
management inventory.

Speaker 1 (16:20):
If you do that, I do HR. If you have
more than one employee. You should be doing that.

Speaker 2 (16:25):
And instead of using multiple systems, instead of using an
accounting system that is already obsolete, net Suite just turns
all of that around.

Speaker 1 (16:36):
For you and allows you to do what you do best.

Speaker 2 (16:39):
And that is get business, do business, maintain business, service
your customers.

Speaker 1 (16:44):
NetSuite.

Speaker 2 (16:45):
If your business does two million dollars or more a year,
take a look at NetSuite. Go to NetSuite dot com
slash handle NetSuite. That's an office suite, so it's a
free download to see if NetSuite can work for you.
NetSuite dot com slash handle.

Speaker 1 (17:02):
This is Handle on the Law.

Speaker 8 (17:05):
You're listening to Bill Handle on demand from kf I
am six forty.

Speaker 1 (17:12):
Day by handle here on a Saturday morning. Back we go.

Speaker 2 (17:15):
More Handle on the Law, Marginal legal advice.

Speaker 1 (17:22):
Oh, a couple of good ones here.

Speaker 2 (17:24):
I love this, h David, let's check you out. Hello David, Welcome.

Speaker 8 (17:31):
Hi Bill, Yes, sir, Yeah. My dad's a surveyor and
he did a fifty foot line for a client. This
has been going on over a year, and he messed
the line up just a little bit, and he was

(17:53):
distracted the entire time he was doing the survey because
the client's wife was in the shadoh and he doesn't
like that does mess up his concentration, all.

Speaker 2 (18:06):
Right, So he blew it bottom line as he blew
it fair enough.

Speaker 8 (18:09):
He admitted, okay, admitted it all right, and he tried
he tried to rectify it, and he tried to the
client you know, you know it was a fifty foot
dog year.

Speaker 1 (18:22):
Yeah, Hang on a minute, David, Hold on a minute.

Speaker 2 (18:24):
He tried to rectify it from the time he did
the survey, and he tried to rectify it. What happened
was anything built was you know what damage was sustained by?

Speaker 1 (18:38):
Who's ever pissed off at him?

Speaker 8 (18:42):
Yeah? I mean he he went to a lawyer before
my dad even got an answer, and the lawyer all
of a sudden wanted, you know, in the letter was
like pain and suffering and.

Speaker 1 (18:54):
Oh that's crap.

Speaker 2 (18:55):
Yeah, that's a pain and suffering because the survey was
done wrong. What happened as a result of the bad survey?
How was the person suing your dad damage? Did he
build on the wrong line? Did he sell a property
and said it was X number of yards x number
of acreage and it wasn't because of the survey, What happened?

Speaker 1 (19:17):
What damages were there?

Speaker 8 (19:21):
The neighbors were in a dispute, and since this has
been going on for like a year.

Speaker 2 (19:28):
Okay, they were in dispute, But what happened? I understand
the neighbors were in dispute, But where the damages? Okay,
there you go. There are no damages. So the bottom
line is your dad blew it. Hey, I blew it,
and you know what, I'm going.

Speaker 1 (19:43):
To fix it now.

Speaker 2 (19:44):
And you haven't built anything on it, you haven't sustained
any damage.

Speaker 1 (19:48):
So let me fix it.

Speaker 2 (19:49):
And you're back to square one. And then you guys
figure it out. Pain and suffering. What kind of pain
and suffering do you have with a bad survey that
nothing happens as a result of it.

Speaker 8 (19:59):
Well, sense that it happened. The neighbor had to move
their fence, which was.

Speaker 1 (20:04):
Ah, and I asked you that. Hold on, I said,
what happened? A fence had to be moved?

Speaker 8 (20:10):
Yeah, not the client, the neighbor.

Speaker 2 (20:12):
Oh, it doesn't matter, It doesn't matter. The neighbor had
to move the fence as a result of a bad
land survey, right, yes, Okay, So your dad theoretically would
be responsible for moving the fence back.

Speaker 8 (20:27):
Yeah, but before he had a chance to do that,
the neighbor went and put up a bigger and better fence.

Speaker 2 (20:32):
Well did he let them? Did he let did the
neighbor know that it was a bad survey? And did
your dad let them know that he has to redo
the survey?

Speaker 8 (20:40):
Yes?

Speaker 1 (20:41):
Okay, let me bottom line? Does your dad have e
ando insurance? Does he?

Speaker 3 (20:45):
Does?

Speaker 1 (20:45):
He have mal practice insurance?

Speaker 8 (20:48):
He just has LLC?

Speaker 1 (20:51):
What is an LLC insurance? That's the that's the.

Speaker 8 (20:55):
No, it's not insurance. That he's not insured.

Speaker 1 (20:57):
He's okay, he wasn't insured. Okay, so he doesn't have insurance.

Speaker 2 (21:00):
Well, he's going to have to defend what's his liability
whatever damages as a result of the bad survey. And
are there defenses? Of course there are. I tried to
fix it. I told them there was a problem. They
didn't let me do it. All kinds of defenses and
we'll see, Yeah, is there going to be a lawsuit?

Speaker 1 (21:20):
Who the hell cares? But I'll tell you one thing.

Speaker 2 (21:22):
When a lawyer starts talking about pain and suffering because
of a survey, and you move defence the wrong way,
that's kind of stretching it. But yeah, there's liability there certainly.
Oh okay, Arden, Hi Arden, welcome.

Speaker 7 (21:39):
Hello, I'm a yes US stamp collector.

Speaker 2 (21:43):
Hello, yeah, yeah, all right, you are a US stamp collector, correct, okay?

Speaker 5 (21:48):
And I buy a stamp on eBay, which is the
biggest marketplace for a stands, and I paid eighteen hundred
dollars for a classic US amp, and I told the
seller that I was gonna send it in for authentication.

Speaker 4 (22:05):
Uh.

Speaker 5 (22:05):
Then I got back at its counterfeit, and I told
the seller, and then seller said, well, get a second opinion.
If the second opinion concurs with the fort first, reimburse it.

Speaker 2 (22:19):
And you paid for it up front, and then he
sold it to Yes, you.

Speaker 11 (22:23):
Have to do that, okay, all right, So anyway, I
got a second opinion and it concurred, said it was counterfeit,
and now the seller is signment. And so then I
filed small clans court in California. We both live in
San Diego County, and I investigated as best.

Speaker 5 (22:45):
I could, and I figured out where he lives, has
some gated community, and I hired a server and he
went to this gated community and uh, the guard called
this house and the people that how have the same
name as this guy, but they say, oh, he doesn't
live here, right, and the guard also says he's not

(23:07):
on the list.

Speaker 1 (23:08):
Okay.

Speaker 5 (23:08):
And also I happen to check that this guy was
involved in federal fraud in the past, so he's slippery guy.

Speaker 1 (23:16):
All right.

Speaker 11 (23:16):
So my question is eBay won't give me the name
of the guy all all they tell you is the
name of this eBay store.

Speaker 1 (23:26):
Okay.

Speaker 2 (23:26):
Subpoena, you fight, you filed, you filed the lawsuit, and
you ask for you just issue a subpoena against eBay
for information.

Speaker 4 (23:37):
Okay, yeah, file question.

Speaker 2 (23:39):
Yeah, you asked for a subpoena. It's it's going to
be a court order. They have to provide the information.

Speaker 8 (23:43):
Now.

Speaker 2 (23:44):
I don't know the rules, whether they're exempt because it's
a social media it's uh, you know, enter the Internet
and do they have the same rules. But the good
news for you is it's you're in the same state, California,
same county as a matter of fact. And then you
have to hunt this guy down. I'm I mean, he's
got to be served personally. You're not going to get
you are not going to get any cooperation from the gate. Uh,

(24:06):
someone's gonna have to wait and serve him personally, and
even to the point where if you know where he works,
you park outside of where he works.

Speaker 1 (24:17):
You just wait for him.

Speaker 2 (24:19):
And it's going to cost you some money for process serving,
although you'll get that back the court will award you the.

Speaker 1 (24:24):
Money for process serving.

Speaker 2 (24:25):
Yeah, people who sell you counterfeit stamps in this case
are sleeve balls, and it's not this is probably not
the first time he's been the first time that he
has been served. Also, you want to call the police,
and what I would do is put a criminal compaint
complaint in because that's criminal violation in addition to some

(24:47):
civil responsibility.

Speaker 1 (24:50):
Yeah, it's no fun. It's no fun.

Speaker 7 (24:54):
Lives.

Speaker 1 (24:56):
Yeah, you can find out, that's easy. You have his name,
you have his name, you.

Speaker 2 (25:00):
Have a dress, Okay, then you find then you produce
the lawsuit. You know, you file the lawsuit and you
track them down and serve them. Yeah, but those people
really hard to get hold of, and you know, they're
professional flakes. That's what they do, you know, that's what
they do to decent human beings, and it just drives

(25:20):
your nuts. This is when you want to live in
a complete total dictatorship, where someone picks them up, puts
them up against the wall and has a conversation. Zelman's
minty mouth not a mint, way way beyond a mint.
And I've been telling you about Zelman's for a while.
These little capsules covered with a strong minty coating and
you pop two or three in your mouth. When the

(25:41):
mint part is done, you swallow the capsules or bite
into them, and they go to work in your gut
where bad breath also starts and stays there, not just
in your mouth. So it's a double hit. Well, a
lot of people have been buying the three pack and
here's what Zelman's is doing is if you go to
the next step up, if I have a five pack, you

(26:02):
will get twenty percent off until July fourth, and that
is I've never seen this bargain like this before. So
if you want to try zelm, if you know what
Zelmans is about, you'll know this is a terrific offer.
And believe me, this is a quote breath mint that
does so so far more than a mint. It's hours
and hours of fresh breath. I'm in coffee breath. I

(26:22):
do that every morning. And I love garlic and onions.
I mean, all of us have smelling breath. There's no
way around it. Go to Zelmans dot com slash kfi
z l m I n s Zelmans dot com slash
kfi until July fourth, five, pack twenty percent off zelmans
dot Com slash Kfi. This is Handle on the Law, Kay,

(26:49):
fine handle here on a Saturday morning.

Speaker 1 (26:52):
Back we go more Handle on the law. Jake, Hello Jake,
what can I do for you?

Speaker 3 (27:00):
Who are right?

Speaker 10 (27:01):
So? I got pulled over by none other than University
of California Police department. But there wasn't anywhere near.

Speaker 7 (27:12):
U c l A.

Speaker 10 (27:14):
This was like further south. I was in Westwood, almost
near Well, I was in Westwood. So I don't know.
Is that is that even though that's not their jurisdiction.
Are they allowed to do that?

Speaker 1 (27:33):
That's a good question.

Speaker 2 (27:35):
I would think not because, uh, campus police departments are
campus police departments.

Speaker 1 (27:43):
They may be peace officers. I'm trying to figure out
what they are or not.

Speaker 2 (27:48):
But you know, jurisdictionally, for them to pull you over,
did they ticket you?

Speaker 8 (27:55):
Yes?

Speaker 10 (27:56):
Okay, two violations and I own so I didn't notice
it till till now.

Speaker 8 (28:04):
UH.

Speaker 10 (28:05):
One was failure to yield at a red light and
I stopped.

Speaker 2 (28:09):
Oh good luck, Yeah, fine, did what the judge? You're
gonna take your word for it? Yeah, I know, Yeah,
that's not that doesn't matter. The issue here is the
jurisdictional part of this real I've never heard I have
never heard of campus police. Maybe they do have jurisdiction
outside of campuses, not know how far it goes. But

(28:31):
you know the answer is, I've never heard of that, actually, Jojo, Hi, Jojo, welcome.

Speaker 6 (28:42):
Hey, Okay, then I have a question. My husband, okay
has well he is. Dad died sixteen years years ago.

Speaker 1 (29:01):
Your husband died. Your husband died sixteen years ago? Do
they have that right, Jojo?

Speaker 6 (29:06):
No, no, no, dad, your.

Speaker 1 (29:10):
Dad died sick. Okay, your dad died sixteen years ago.

Speaker 2 (29:13):
Okay, his father, right, Your dad's your father in law,
drive six died sixteen years ago.

Speaker 4 (29:21):
Thank you.

Speaker 1 (29:22):
You've made that very very easy. Okay.

Speaker 2 (29:24):
Oh I'm sorry, Okay, go ahead, yeah, no, go ahead, Okay.

Speaker 6 (29:29):
Anyway, we left Stamix, moved back to my hometown of Pennsylvania,
and anyway, his mother now is going to be eighty
two years old this year. However, my husband has told
me several times. When she passes, he does not want

(29:54):
to go back.

Speaker 3 (29:56):
Now the estate will what do you mean?

Speaker 6 (29:58):
Wait?

Speaker 2 (29:58):
Wait, wait he does when he passes, he does not
want to go back, as in to get buried someplace else,
to get parked, to get cremated someone I don't understand, no, Genland.
When she passes, yes, she's got to be eighty two, okay,
and she doesn't want to go back anywhere else?

Speaker 1 (30:17):
Is that what you said?

Speaker 6 (30:19):
My husband doesn't want to go back to Phoenix for
the scenial.

Speaker 1 (30:24):
Oh okay, got it? All right, boy, you're making this one easy,
all right? So uh, okay, your husband doesn't want to
go back to Phoenix for the funeral. Okay, now what
he doesn't want to go back?

Speaker 10 (30:34):
Well, that's fine.

Speaker 6 (30:36):
The estate is probably worth about half a million dollars
and will be split up between the three brothers, the
youngest one being in charge of the finance.

Speaker 1 (30:52):
You know what, I tell you something?

Speaker 2 (30:54):
At this rate, I mean, I'd love to keep on
talking to you for another six or seven hours, which
is it would take to go through this, But I
just I don't have the patience.

Speaker 1 (31:05):
I don't just yeah, what can I tell you? All right?

Speaker 2 (31:09):
Let me tell you if you as painful as that was,
if you live in chronic pain or you know someone
who does that, I'm talking about chronic pain constant. My wife,
Lindsey is a sufferer of chronic pain, and it's tough
to see someone live like that. Your heart goes out

(31:29):
and how does she deal with it? She deals with
it but with her Pain Game podcast to help other people.
And this is a community of people who listen to
it talk to each other, and it's all about dealing
with chronic pain. And she's heroic about it, and she
basically teaches you and teaches you to understand how the

(31:51):
show gives pain purpose. I know that sounds counterintuitive, but
believe me, you'll understand if you were someone you know
lives in pain and the trunt I'm associated with it,
it is so worthwhile listening to the Pain Game podcast.
It's the Pain Game Podcast wherever you listen to podcasts.
Season three is just dropping now, The Pain Game Podcast.

(32:15):
This is Handle on the Law.

Speaker 8 (32:18):
You're listening to Bill Handle on demand from KFI AM
six forty