Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Now the Mark Simone Show on seven ten woor filling
in for Mark.
Speaker 2 (00:06):
Here's Ken Rosatto.
Speaker 3 (00:08):
That's so nice to be here. Happy Friday, the end
of the week here and Mark taking a nice long weekend.
This is Ken Rosotto, former New York City TV news
anchor on duty and proud to be here. Thank you Mark,
Thank you Wor for letting me sit in the seat.
Do you'd probably best remember me from twenty years I
spent anchoring the morning show at Channel seven, and nowadays
(00:28):
I host a daily show over on a New Jersey
based channel. You could see it everywhere though it's called
on New Jersey. You could stream it atnenj dot com.
And I also have a food website called The Food Dude.
You could catch that at thefooddude dot us. Thefooddude dot
us absolutely free. Check out some holiday recipes. Good to
(00:49):
be with you. A lot to talk about today, Give
us a call take part one eight hundred three two
one zero seven ten one eight hundred three two one zero. Well,
it is certainly holiday season in the city. You feel
it everywhere just walking down the street here today, coming
into the studio to do the work here. You got everything,
(01:11):
you got the jingling in the air, and you got
the decorations up everywhere. It really does feel festive. Did
you catch that Rockefeller Center tree lighting the other night?
Ten o'clock at night? Gosh, I go to bed at
like seven, so at ten o'clock I had like one.
I always saying, well, you light the damn tree, for guys' sake,
just light it. At least they call it a Christmas tree,
though I give them credit for that. They call it
(01:33):
a Christmas tree, unlike what they did. Was it in Minneapolis,
the Minneapolis tree. They just called the Minneapolis tree, the tree,
the tree. It's like, that's real, really into the spirit
of the season, folks. The tree is God forbid we
offend anyone. Well, the whole point of the tree came
out of the season. Oh right away, we're gonna have
(01:53):
the people say, can you know that's a pagan thing,
the tree? Well, yes and no, yes and no. There's
a lot there's a lot of symbolism behind the tree. Yes,
it was not a direct Christian thing. We could do
a whole show on the origins of the tree. But
nonetheless it has been adapted and adopted into the holiday.
So it is part of the holiday as part of tradition.
(02:15):
So it's okay we call it a Christmas tree. You
don't have to be an apologist for it. It's okay.
You're not calling it a Christmas tree to offend people
who don't celebrate Christmas. You're calling it a Christmas tree
because guess what, it's a Christmas tree. That's it. And
honor and revere and help celebrate everybody else's religion too.
You're entitled to whatever you have in your faith, and
I applaud you, and I would respect anything that you
(02:38):
have in your respective religion, just like we asked that
you respect that we have a Christmas tree. Done enough
said on that. Okay, Hey, it's seven ten wo r
the Voice of New York. Did you hear that the
incoming mayor Mum Dundy says now that he will stop
all homeless encampment sweeps. Did you realize what that means?
(03:02):
That means that this time next year you will be
crawling over homeless people at every intersection, because somehow he
thinks that everybody has a right to every inch of
sidewalk in Manhattan. Oh, unless, of course you're trying to
be a capitalist. I'm sure if you tried to sell something.
Oh no, he'll lock you up for that. He'll give
you fines. Because no, we don't like capitalism. The city
(03:23):
and the whole country was built on it. No, but
we don't like that. But if you want to do drugs, drink,
urinate on your pants and your pants rather than do
whatever else to be disgusting in the city, you know
and know the ninety nine point nine percent of the
homeless are not just people who were working yesterday and
today it can get a check. There are some, of course,
(03:44):
who are down in their luck, and that does happen.
But if you ask anybody who deals with homeless on
a regular basis, the vast majority of people who are
homeless have either mental psychological problems and need help. And
that's what we should be doing, is helping that, okay,
or they have drug or alcohol addiction. Period. Very very
(04:05):
tiny fraction of a percent actually are homeless because mom
and dad both lost their jobs, they have the three kids,
and they're now living on the street. That does happen. Again,
like I said, but it's very very rare. But now
under incoming mayor Mom Donnie and note that I can
pronounce his name properly that he will stop all homeless
encampment sweeps. So naturally he doesn't have an answer for
(04:29):
what's going to happen. What are you going to do
when you're crawling over homeless people? Is that the better thing?
Is that the more respectful thing to do for a
human being to let them wallow in their feces in
the street and step over them. I guess that's the
better thing that's in the minds of a socialist. That's
the better thing than to try to help them up
and get them some help. Seven ten w R the
(04:51):
Voice of New York. We want to hear from you.
So that number again is eight hundred three two one
zero seven ten. How about Maurice Dubois over CBS Evening News.
I've met Maurice probably a dozen times. Just a total gentleman,
handsome as all heck, as handsome as he looks on TV,
he's even more handsome in person, nice gentleman, and he
(05:13):
is just that a gentleman. I don't care about the
politics whatever. I don't even know what his politics are,
quite frankly, I can't really tell everyone. So Kenny's got
to be a Democrat.
Speaker 4 (05:21):
He's an anchor.
Speaker 3 (05:21):
Well, I was an anchor. You all thought I was
a liberal. You had to see the stuff that I
would get. You a liberal? Are you lefty? If they
only knew, I would just sit there and laugh when
I get that stuff. I don't know where Maurice stands politically,
and that's the way it should be. What I do
know is he's a fantastic anchor, and he is a
fantastic person, and he is exiting CBS and that leaves
(05:42):
the CBS Evening News without anchors. They were the only
ones with an anchor team, and now they're the only ones.
And by the way, when I'm talking about the CBS
Evening News, I'm not talking about Channel too Local. I'm
talking about the network news that goes on from six
thirty to seven pm week nights. That's the CBS Evening News.
A lot of people confuse Channel to Local with CBS
(06:04):
Network co owned by the same parent company, but run
as two different entities. One is national and one is
just I say, just New York nine percent of the
population just New York. But nonetheless, that will leave them
from two anchors down to none. Because John Dickerson announced
that he was leaving at the end of December. Sent
(06:25):
CBS a few weeks ago had two anchors. Now they
will have none, literally in a matter of weeks, so
they better act fast. And no, I'm not available for
the record. I got stuff going on in my life.
Now you could have called me a couple of years ago.
I had some free free time. Seven w R The
Voice of New York. What do you think about this
(06:46):
pipe bomber arrest? Well, if you haven't heard a suspect
has been arrested in connection with the planting of the
pipe bombs, if you haven't checked news out for days.
The bombs were planted outside both the Democratic and re
Publican National Committees back on the eve of the January sixth,
twenty twenty one Capitol riot. Now, mainstream legacy left wing
(07:08):
media has tried and tried and tried to paint the
guy who was arrested as either a right wing extremist
or a centrist because he planted bombs in front of
both locations, the Republican and Democrat National Committees. But it
turns out he's not a centrist and he certainly is
not a MAGA right winger. The suspect is a thirty
(07:29):
year old man who lived in his mommy and daddy's
basement in a beautiful suburb of d C. His name,
according to authorities, is Brian J. Cole Junior. He lived
with his parents in a lovely suburb of DC called Woodbridge, Virginia.
It's not too far outside of DC. You can make
it there in about half an hour. It's about twenty
(07:49):
miles out of Washington. Now, normally I wouldn't mention somebody's
race and connection with an arrest. We had a rule
when I was a Channel seven, Channel five, and anyway,
it's kind of standard. Only time you have to you'd
say somebody is black, Asian, white, is if it is
in connection with other identifying features. So if the person
had a scar under his left eye, brown eyes, brown hair,
(08:12):
six foot four, had a limp, and is black, that's okay,
because now that gives you somebody to look for to
say it's a black male. Now you're identifying somebody as
one of maybe a million people. So that's not fair.
And that's the way we had that as a rule. Okay, Well,
apparently CNN has has different rules. Jacob Tapper and I
say Jacob because that's what former President obamb music. Call
(08:34):
him Jacob Copper, Jacob Jacob. Jacob Tapper decided to describe
the person as if he were still on the loose
when he was already under arrest, and yesterday, Jacob Tapper
at CNN breathlessly identified this January sixth pipe bombing suspect
as a thirty year old white man.
Speaker 5 (08:56):
Listen to this, Brian Cole Junior, a thirty year old
white man from the DC suburbs is charts with transporting
and explosive device in interstate commerce and with malicious destruction
by means of explosions. Seeing an observed local and federal
law enforcement outside his home in Woodbridge, Virginia this morning.
Speaker 3 (09:14):
Now, Okay, I don't care, white, black, green, Asian doesn't
matter to me. The fact. The fact is this guy
is a suspect for planning pipe pomps. That's what he
suspected of doing. And you're innocent, un less proven guilty.
So I just want to make that clear here. Bottom
line is literally who was his producer? On the TV screen?
(09:35):
There is an image of the man who is clearly
African American, and you have Jacob Tapper voicing the story
as a thirty year old white man, It's like, who
are you going to believe me or your own lying eyes?
So right away you're thinking, either they're showing the wrong
video or whoever wrote Jacob Tapper's script is going to
have a meeting because that was wrong. But what's worse
(09:57):
is I didn't hear any correction later. Can you imagine
for a second if the reverse were true. Can you
imagine if the suspect arrested in an offense were white,
and that suspect were identified on the air as a
black man, then all you would hear is, oh, you're
(10:18):
trying to identify black with criminality. Right away, that's what
you'd hear. And you know what, they would be right.
They would be right, because it's wrong. If you're going
to mention somebody's race, you damn well better get it
right or else don't indict a whole race of people,
whether you're talking about black people, white people, or Asian
people or anyone else. But it seems that for CNN
(10:41):
and many in mainstream media, if you're indicting white people,
it's okay because Whites and Christians throw them under the bus.
You know, they got away with so much over the years.
Who really cares well. It turns out that thirty year
old so called white man is a thirty year old
black man. The color has no consequence, all right. He
(11:02):
comes from a very nice background. He comes from a
wealthy suburb, wealthy parents. His dad owns a bail bond's business.
He deals with a lot of money. His mom is
also professional, but he still hasn't launched at thirty. He's
living with his folks, although he worked for his dad.
His picture was released to the press when Jake Tapper
(11:24):
was doing the story, which makes you scratch your head
and wonder who wrote this story and why and how
do they get it so wrong? It's crazy anyway. Brian
Cole Junior is considered not a right wing maga guy,
but an activist for the left. He is a radical
anti Trump warrior. He has sued Trump, Ice, and the
Department of Homeland Security for quote racial injustice. He generally
(11:48):
has been known to support BLM style causes. He's also
the bail bond business that his father runs is specifically
there to help bail out gilly aliens. That's what they do.
So they are very much anti Ice, anti Homeland Security
in many ways, etc. These are far leftist people. They
(12:10):
are not moderates, They're not in the middle of the road,
they're not Republicans. These are leftists. So you wonder why
the Biden FBI for four years, who had the information
about this guy, they knew that he was out there,
they never bothered to investigate. No, for the Biden FBI,
it was more important to hunt down parents who show
(12:30):
up at school board meetings complaining that their little girls
have to get naked in the shower next to a
biological male who thinks that day that they're a woman.
Those are the parents that need to be identified by
the FBI and investigated. Little old ladies on their knees
four blocks away from an abortion clinic praying the Rosary
and begging God that somebody changes their mind about having
(12:52):
an abortion, Those are the people that the FBI needed
to investigate because they pose a threat to humanity. Roman
Catholics who like the truedditional Latin Mass and prey in
Latin because the church has done that for two thousand
fricking years, those are the people will have to be investigated.
But yet a guy who has all these ties to
radical causes, etc. And whose family actually bails out illegal aliens. Now,
(13:18):
the FBI says, leave them alone, we're not going to
investigate them, even though even though they had evidence they
had pings from the guy's cell phone. They claim the
FBI they had pings putting him in the location of
both the Republican National Committee and the Democrat National Committee
at the time the pipe bombs were planted. So that
(13:40):
should have been something that at least should have been
looked into by the FBI. But amazingly, either they didn't
do it, or they did it and it didn't fit
the narrative, so they chose not to do anything about it. Well,
believe me, this will be looked into now because this
guy was floating out there potentially posing a threat for
four years and it didn't have to.
Speaker 4 (13:59):
Be that way.
Speaker 3 (14:00):
Eight hundred three two one zero seven ten eight hundred
three to two one zero seven ten. Give us a call,
let us know what you're thinking. Luigi man Joni's High
Stay court hearing resumed yesterday, but we just find out
now that he will not be in court today. Apparently
he's a little under the weather. Either his eyebrows needed
trimming or something, but he wasn't feeling well. Poor Luigi Yeah,
(14:22):
it was okay. He was feeling well enough a year
ago allegedly to allegedly shoot somebody dead, a father and
a husband. He was feeling well enough then. But he
has tommy ache or something. Should we have to let
poor Luigi rest up today? Yeah, it was already a
year this week that he allegedly murdered United Healthcare CEO
Brian Thompson literally blocks from where I'm sitting here in
(14:43):
midtown Manhattan. So now the big theory here now. And
we heard about this on MENTI in the morning too.
It's amazing that the defense is trying to get the
case thrown out on technicalities about the reading of the
Miranda laws and when you have We're going to talk
with Greg Jarrett, who's the legal and political consultant over
(15:05):
it to Fox News Channel. You've seen Greg on the
air a million times, I'm sure, and Greg is an attorney.
He's going to talk about when you have to and
when you don't have to read Miranda rights to somebody.
If somebody volunteers information or in the process of an arrest,
say they have a backpack and something evidence falls out,
and it happens accidentally but not and you hadn't yet
(15:26):
read the Miranda rights. A lawyer will tell you the
details there. At that point, it's okay. It's most lawyers
will tell you that's admissible evidence at that point. If, however,
you stop somebody randomly on the street without reading Miranda
rights and you haven't announced their arrest and you start
rifling through their stuff and you find something illegal, that's
a whole different story. That's sort of the way the
(15:47):
defense is trying to paint this right now. So we'll
see what happens. We'll talk to the expert, Greg Jarrett
about that in just a little bit seven ten wo
R The Voice of New York. It is cold as
every every analogy I have I can't say on the radio.
Let's just suffice to say it's very very cold out there.
And if you haven't got out yet, make sure you
(16:08):
bundle up because you're gonna need to. And it's gonna
be that way through the day today. Some sun this morning,
it's gonna lead to some clouds later on in the day,
highs only in the upper twenties, then more clouds than
sun tomorrow and Sunday. Highs both days only in the
upper thirties, and no it's not yet even officially winter.
(16:29):
So once again and just a bit, we'll talk to
Fox News legal analyst Greg Jarrett. The time now is
ten twenty one WR. We're coming right back.
Speaker 1 (16:36):
This is the Mark Simone Show on seven to ten WR.
Ken from Mark Today, here's Ken Rosatto and we go
straight to our busy phone Steve in Manhattan.
Speaker 3 (16:47):
You're live on the air Friday morning. Good morning to.
Speaker 6 (16:49):
You, right, Ken, and it's great to have you. When
you fill it from off, it's really good. The thing
is about Luigi Mangioni. I know they love using his name,
but people just don't want to use the names. Like
the guy who shot the two godsmen last week and
murdered one of them, Lockingwall is his name. They never
(17:10):
hear them use his name. His name is out of
the cycle. There's also a lunatic back in June, people
forgetting both of Colorado. He fired bombed a bunch of
old ladies that was mohammed soilman and even murdering one
of the old ladies with a fire bomb. You never
hear his name repeated out. It just seems to be
a frenzy with this guy Luigi's name going on and
(17:30):
even with the guys who shot shot at Trump, Matthew Crooks,
they don't say his name really. Even at the Bomba
they called him the Bomba or the you know, the
alleged bomber and stuff. They won't use his name. I
find that to be not weird, but I find it
to be something in society that I know a lot
of Tinian Americans, an anti Italian American thing where they
(17:52):
get into a frenzy. You say this guy's name, but
the guy who shot the godsmen don't even know the
guy's name.
Speaker 3 (17:58):
Remember, I got a pause only because we only have
about thirty seconds left to break to the bottom of
the hour here. But just to let you know, part
of it is, I think, is the fact that it's
Luigi Mangoni and he looks like the character from Luigi
Brothers and whatnot. And I think they've made fun of that.
Not that we're talking about a guy who's attempted or
(18:19):
i'm sorry, an alleged murderer here, but you know, just
that's part of it. I think you're not wrong. I
get it. It's like if somebody is in a large
group of people, they're easier to poke fun at and
so we've had a lot of people poke fun at
Italian Americans, and yet Italian Americans don't push back as much.
I get it. I see what you're saying, and you're
not wrong there. But I will say I have been
(18:41):
mentioning those other names myself. It all depends on the individual.
I think it's easier to say Luigi Mangoni than it
is to say some of the other names. For a
lot of the announcers, it's lazy, but I think that
may be the simple answer as to why the other
names don't get mentioned as much. We go over to
Frank in Manhattan. Good morning, Yeah, good morning.
Speaker 7 (19:01):
I'm with into Borrow h for a outreach organization, no profit,
and we did a survey of Bronx Manhattan and Brooklyn
of an average of eight hundred plus people who appear homeless,
and we did it on tape and we did it
written down, and out of it we realized one critical
(19:22):
thing that at least ten to fifteen percent of them
are homeless for two reasons. First of all, they have
very very low incomes, they're not employable because of age
of disability, and some are vets and the number of
apartments available if you have an apartment, good luck if
you don't. But your characterization that it's a very rare
thing that people are homeless for lack of money or whatever,
(19:43):
other parents died or whatever, that's very inaccurate. And there's
no coach drives, by the way for the homeless. They
stopped that this year.
Speaker 3 (19:50):
I don't know, but frank here, with all due respect,
I could cite about six different surveys that show just
the opposite. And we've done this. I worked at Channel
seven twenty years. We used to have those these he's
year after year after year, you know, and with all
due respect, I mean, anyone could call and say, we
did a survey, we have it on tape. Well, let's
see the tape. You know, when you see people wallowing
(20:11):
in urine in the street, and by the way, you
could very well have, sadly, a veteran who is also
you know, you could put the two together. You could
have a veteran who is a drug addict who is
on the street. So just because I'm saying they are
a drug addict, they could be a veteran who is
a drug addict. And that is a shame that a
society we have let this happen. But to say that
we have just the average mom, dad's son, you know what,
(20:33):
I've lived in and around Manhattan. I'm fifty eight years old.
I don't see the nice, neat little family on the
street that you're trying to talk about and trying to
paint the picture of Sorry, just doesn't exist, or at
least not in the numbers you're talking about. Robin Franklin Square,
good morning.
Speaker 8 (20:47):
Hey, good morning.
Speaker 9 (20:49):
I'm sorry. You know, I'm a retired try police officer
and tried the police officer, and just I kind of
disagree with you a little bit. Invariably, when the perpetrator
commits a crime, if the perpetrate, they'll put a description
(21:09):
over the air like say five to ten eighty pounds
and local news channel seven to and four, sometimes the
network a lot of times in the paper like news data.
I get if they don't put the If you just
put up a descriptions like that, that's that's three hundred
and fifty million people. Now, you said, if you say
if the person is black, you're categorizing them as it
(21:32):
like one in a million people. But a description like
that is kind of useless, right, If you're putting the
description over the air.
Speaker 3 (21:40):
I gotta put the rob I gotta cut you because
it's ten thirty three, it's time for news. But I'm
just to clarify. I'm not saying you're wrong there. What
I'm saying is if you only have a description in
years ago. I remember when I started in TV news
in the market, if sometimes you would have we're looking
for twenty four year old African American men. That is
not fair because there could be one hundred twenty four
(22:01):
year old African American men. Every one of them is
gonna get stopped. But if you say you have a
twenty four year old African American man with a scar
underneath his left eye, he has hazel eyes, and he
has dreads, and he's about five 't ten and wearing
brown pants, that is a description to look for, Okay,
And that's where you're talking about, you know, clarification. I'm
(22:22):
not trying to go down that path. All I'm saying
is it was unusual to me that CNN simply had
the description that was read was a white guy who's thirty,
you know, but we already had his picture on and
he wasn't a white guy and didn't even look thirty
by the way, but we're showing his picture and saying
the wrong thing. Clearly somebody got it wrong at CNN,
(22:44):
and I'm just saying I didn't get an apology or
didn't hear an apology from them, and I think they
should clarify. Seven ten w R. At the time now
is ten thirty three, and coming up next, we're going
to speak with Fox News legal analyst Greg Jarrett.
Speaker 1 (22:57):
Now more of the Marximone Show on seven or filling
in form Mark. Here again is Ken Rosado.
Speaker 3 (23:05):
And good to be with you on your Friday. He
is a news commentator, author at attorney who serves as
a legal and political analyst on Fox News Channel. He
spent many years himself as an anchor and a trial lawyer.
Busy man, we say good morning to you, Greg Jarrett.
Speaker 10 (23:20):
Hey Cam, good to be with you.
Speaker 11 (23:21):
Thanks for having me.
Speaker 3 (23:22):
Yea, I've been a huge fan, by the way, forever
I've been you know, I was on Channel seven for
twenty years, but i always watched you guys over at
Fox News Channel and I'm a huge, huge fan. So
I'm a little starspart. Forgive me, forgive it a little
shaken here, Greg. First off, How serious is it? Let's
talk about the Jack Smith subpoena. How serious is the
Jack Smith subpoena for all? Is it all for show?
(23:43):
Do you think you think there's a shot that we're
actually going to see a conviction and jail time.
Speaker 11 (23:48):
Out of all this, Well, it's too early to make
that prediction, but I will say that there is a
grand jury convenient Florida. Some thirty subpoenas apparently have gone out,
among them Jack Smith as special Council, and they're looking
into an ongoing criminal conspiracy, how government officials weaponized the law,
(24:13):
classic sort of lawfare against Trump or anybody in his orbit.
And with respect to Jack Smith, they're looking into the
two federal criminal cases he brought against Trump in both
Florida and Washington, d C. Those were dismissed. But this
Arctic Frost investigation that included, you know, secretly surreptitiously obtaining
(24:42):
phone records of members of Congress, including United States Senators,
and then seeking a court order from Judge James Bosberg
in Washington to defy the law and not notify the
members of Congress that their records were being seized and studied.
(25:05):
You know, there's a provision in the federal statutes that
if you're going to do that, you have to give
those people notice. And they didn't do that, and Bofford
signed off on it. So you know, this is an
investigation into Jack Smith's conduct and whether it crossed the
line into criminality.
Speaker 3 (25:27):
Seven to ten, wo are the Voice of New York.
This is the Marx Simone Show. Ken Rossano went from
Mark on a Friday along with Greg Jarrett from Fox
News Channel. Look, it is amazing how much arrogance we
see from Judge Boseburg. And the question is do you
have the authority of the judicial branch running a muck
(25:50):
right now? Because to see every little US district judge
imparting their opinion where it's going to end up getting overturned.
It seems almost every case he gets overturned by the
Supreme Court. Who has authority over them? Is it the
Justice Department? Is it the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court?
Or does Congress have to step in? We have three
(26:12):
co equal branches, so I guess that gets a little
hairy there, But at some point we have to say enough,
we have an executive in charge right now, who is elected,
who's doing the constitutional job that he has. Why do
these US district judges get in the way every step
of the way.
Speaker 11 (26:29):
Well, I think because they have, in the age of Trump,
politicized their positions.
Speaker 2 (26:36):
And you know, they are no longer many of.
Speaker 11 (26:39):
Them making rulings based on the law rather on politics.
And you know, both Brigant particular has been slapped down
repeatedly by the Supreme Court. In one notable case, he's
surped the power of Texas jurisdiction by issuing and immigration
(27:01):
deportation ruling that he had.
Speaker 2 (27:05):
No power to make.
Speaker 11 (27:07):
And you know, the Spring Court told him so. Bothford
nevertheless persists. But I think the most important authority is
indeed the Spring Court and the seminal ruling they issued
Long Overdue several months ago, when the High Court finally said,
you know, district court judges are not empowered to issue
(27:32):
nationwide injunctions. They have authority over their small districts and
that's it. And so I think that, as I say,
Long Overdue is helping to rein in all of these
injunctions that have been issued. You know, why should a
(27:53):
judge in say San Jose, California, be able to issue
an injunction that affects the entire nation. The Supreme Court
said you can't. You're exceeding your authority, and they should
have done it a long time ago.
Speaker 3 (28:08):
Greg. I think in many cases, so many of these
judges know that they're going to be overturned, but yet
they go ahead and make their order. It's like they're
trying to throw an impediment just to slow things down.
Why can't they get slapped for that? If it can
be proven that the judge is clearly acting above and
beyond their jurisdiction, then is there any kind of consequence
(28:30):
for the judge? Will there be any kind of punishment?
I mean, two three strikes, you're out. You do that
two or three times, we're going to have you remove
from the bench at some point. I think if that
happens to one judge, then they won't be issuing these silly,
frivolous rulings.
Speaker 11 (28:47):
The only way to remove a federal judge constitutionally is
through impeachment, and it's the same standards that apply to
other top federal officials, including the President of the United States.
Trees and bribery, high crimes, and misdemeanors. And the last
section is sort of fungible. What does that really mean?
(29:08):
It can mean anything. And in fact, in the past,
over the last ten or fifty years, you know, there
have been federal judges who have been impeached for deliberately
abusing and misusing the law. But you know, it's a
very difficult thing to do. You know, it used to
(29:32):
be that federal district court judges would make decisions not
only based on the law, but with an eye to
getting overturned, and nobody wanted to get overturned, so they
were cautious in their ruling.
Speaker 2 (29:45):
So all of that is now gone.
Speaker 11 (29:47):
And you know, I think people like Bozburg know they're
going to get overturned, but they do it anyway because
you know, they're stricken with a severe psychopathology called Trump
to Arrangement syndrome PDSs, and you know, and they just
can't help themselves.
Speaker 3 (30:04):
Yeah, clearly. And it's just so infuriating because you would
think that if you're in that position, you understand the
law better than others, and instead it feels like he
is playing us with the law more than others. With
just about a minute left, and I know that should
we should be giving you more time on this, but
in the Luigi Mangoni murder trial. I've had heard so
(30:25):
many bad arguments on behalf of Mangoni regarding when when
he was read as Miranda, riots, etc. In this case, though,
the argument is that some of this evidence could be
thrown out by the judge. What is your opinion on
what you're hearing?
Speaker 11 (30:38):
Well, I doubt it will happen.
Speaker 7 (30:40):
You know.
Speaker 11 (30:40):
Look, it's a standard move by defense attorneys and I
used to do it as a trial attorney myself. Is
you challenge the seizure of evidence that's incriminating and try
to get it tossed out under the Fourth Amendment unreasonable
search and seizure. Most of the time it doesn't succeed.
And here for example, you know the arresting officers, you
(31:04):
know looked into the bag. Well they have to, you know,
the gun, the manifesto was in the bag, highly incriminating.
Speaker 2 (31:10):
They had to do that.
Speaker 11 (31:11):
When you take somebody into custody, you know, you pap
them down to make sure they don't have a weapon.
And you know, in this particular case, looking inside.
Speaker 2 (31:20):
His backpack was merited.
Speaker 11 (31:23):
You know, you don't know if he's got a weapon
or a bumb In fact, he did have a weapon
in that bag, so I think that'll survive scrutiny and
in the end be admissible evidence.
Speaker 3 (31:34):
There you go, all right. Fox News Channel legal and
political analyst Greg Jarrett, thank you so much for coming
on this morning. Happy holidays.
Speaker 2 (31:41):
Do you thank you same to you can't thanks appreciate it.
Speaker 3 (31:45):
Seven ten wore the Voice of New York. I number
is eight hundred three to two one zero seven ten.
Eight hundred three to two one zero seven ten. We're
going to take your calls next year. Seven ten wo R.
Speaker 1 (31:56):
This is the Mark Simone Show on seven ten. Well
you Ken from today. Here's Ken Rosado and.
Speaker 3 (32:04):
Good to be with you on your Friday. The phone
lines are open. We have a couple of minutes left
here for the hour. Eight hundred three to two one
zero seven ten, eight hundred three to two one zero
seven ten. Did you hear Stephen A. Smith yesterday who
was on the on the View, Uh and uh listen
listen to what he had to say. Just listen to
the energy too. And he had a back and forth
with Sonny hoston. I think he put her in her place.
(32:26):
Listen up. I'd love to give you the opportunity to
perhaps change your position.
Speaker 4 (32:30):
On what you said. I'm not changing the thing.
Speaker 2 (32:33):
You want to say loud and wrong.
Speaker 4 (32:35):
Well, you could call it loud and wrong all you
want it. You're entitled to your opinion. I'm entitled to
mot yes.
Speaker 3 (32:39):
And so this is Stephen A. Smith. First of all,
Sonny Hoston was quite a bit I think obnoxious to him.
The attitude that what Steven A. Smith has an opinion
that differs from you, So you're telling him he's wrong
and he has the opportunity now to correct himself. Come on, Sonny,
that's unfair. I mean, Steven A. Smith has about five
hundred times your audience for a reason, because he's a
(33:00):
smart man. He knows what he's talking about. But it's
just there's a certain arrogance. I still I don't understand
why anybody would agree to go on the View today.
God bless anybody who can put up with the cackling
for an hour. But it's just it's amazing to me
that somebody would be that arrogant. Can you imagine for
a second if there were a mail who were sitting
(33:23):
on that set as an anchor, and Sonny Hostin were
the guest, and Sunny Hostin were told by that mail anchor,
let me give you the opportunity to correct yourself, that
man would immediately be accused of mansplaining, immediately, total double standard.
By the way, what we were talking about was Senator Kelly,
(33:43):
who may have put his foot in his mouth, by
the way, and could be in big trouble because of
allegedly leaking classifying information. We'll get into more detail in
the next hour about this, but apparently when he made
his commentary about the bombing of that Narco boat, he
allegedly let some information out that may have been classified
at the time. Seven ten wo R the Voice of
(34:06):
New York. This is Ken Risotto and from Mark and
we'll be back after the.
Speaker 1 (34:08):
News now the Mark Simone Show on seven ten woor
filling in for Mark.
Speaker 2 (34:15):
Here's Ken Rosatto.
Speaker 3 (34:17):
Oh so good to.
Speaker 2 (34:18):
Be with you.
Speaker 3 (34:18):
It is a Friday, isn't that nice? I said this
last time I was here too, and just I think
it bears reminding everybody. Mark has to deal with everybody
Monday through Thursday. You know Monday, everybody's are like good,
it's Monday Tuesday. They're tired from Monday Wednesday. There halfway
through the week, they can't wait Thursday, there's some anticipation.
Then Uncle Ken comes in on Friday, kind of like
(34:40):
the grandpa who gets the baby after mommy and daddy
has changed the diaper, and I get to play with
everybody and have a good time. So I thank you
to the Great Mark Simone and to the good folks
at iHeartRadio and war for letting me come in. It
is an honor to sit in the seat of the
person who I regard as one of my heroes. I
listen to this show every single day, so I am
(35:01):
one of you all. I am one of the big
fans of the Great Mark Simone. Anyway, it is good
to be here for those who are wondering. I know
that named Ken Rosotta. Where is he from? I used
to work at Channel seven. I was with Eyewitness News
there for twenty years. Very proud to be there. I'm
not there anymore, but I used to be. I was
there from what two thousand and three to twenty twenty three.
(35:23):
I did the morning show, and for a good chunk
of that time I also anchored the noon show, and
I was with the great Lori Stokes and remember Bill Evans,
all those great folks. We did that a lot of
good times there, and then I was even a Channel
five before that. These days, I host a daily show
on a New Jersey based news channel called on New Jersey.
We hope you check us out sometime. You can stream
(35:45):
it ANYWHERENNJ dot comnenj dot com on New Jersey. I
also run a food website for all you foodies. It's
called thefood Dude dot Us. Thefooddude dot Us lots of
free recipes there, so check that out too. A lot
to talk about on this busy news week. My gosh,
(36:06):
it a lot happened this week. One of the things
I read which drives me crazy because I am a
big coffee hol like. I don't have any other vices,
all right. I've never done a drug in my life,
an illegal one, at least I've never done one. I
don't smoke cigarettes. I don't even drink alcohol because I
have a heart issue. I have atrial fibrillation, so I'm
not supposed to drink alcohol. So you know, I admit,
(36:29):
you're not supposed to drink caffeine either with atrial fibrillation.
But I do just a little.
Speaker 4 (36:34):
Now.
Speaker 3 (36:35):
There's a survey here, a study actually that says it's
never been a better time to quit caffeine. And this
I believe was in the New York Times that says
the cafes across the US are embracing the low and
no caffeine lifestyle with options that are a far cry
from dusty tea bags and rewarmed cafe. Well, yeah, I
will say that that's true. You go to a lot
(36:56):
of places and they have the machas and all these
other things. Double check to make sure that the calorie
count isn't through the roof. All these coffee places or
traditional coffee places, if you haven't noticed, are now offering
all these alternatives to coffee teas and different mixed drinks
and flavor drinks. But if you read the fine print,
a lot of these things are like six hundred galleries
(37:18):
apiece and a lot of sugars in there. So you
may not get caffeine, but you get a lot of
other stuff. But this study goes on to say how
it's better for you to try to wean yourself off
of caffeine, and this is the time to do it.
I don't know what do you think about it? Eight
hundred three to two one zero seven ten eight hundred
(37:39):
three to two one zero seven ten. You gotta have
some kind of ice in life, right, Why not a
little caffeine the Clintons, Yes, Hillary and Bill. After Congress
released tens of thousands of documents related to Jeffrey Epstein,
House Oversite chair James Comer more in that former President
Bill Clinton and former Secretary of State Clinton could face
(38:00):
legal repercussions because apparently they didn't want to go and
testify in front of Congress. And remember what happened when
Biden was president and some of the former Trump people
didn't testify. Yeah, they had FBI agents with CNN Live
knocking down their doors, raiding their homes, going through their
personal items, and arresting them. Let's see if the same
(38:23):
thing happens the other way, if there is the double
standard or not. Because if you're called to testify before
Congress and you evade that, good luck with that. So
this is in connection with Epstein. You know, before we
found out that that Trump had zero connection now with Epstein,
and before all the files were released, etc. All we
(38:43):
heard for about a week or two from the Democrats
was release the files, release the files. Trump us something
to hide. Well, now that everything's released. Have you heard
anything about Epstein? Cricket? Cricket cricket? That's the Democrats? Now?
Why because now we're finding out there a lot of
connections on the left with Epstein. We kind of knew
(39:04):
that all along. Listen, here's proof of the pudding for
the four years that Biden was in charge of everything.
Do you think for a second, when they had full
charge of all the Epstein files, if there was anything
in there that was derogatory toward Trump? Don't you think
during that four year period that's all you would have heard,
Especially when Trump announced he was running for election again,
(39:26):
that would have been the first thing that was brought out.
But no, you didn't hear anything then, and they had
to access themselves to everything. So that's why now you're
not hearing anything. Why because people like the Clintons are
being called and look, we're innocent till proven guilty. So
I want to make sure I say that clearly. But
the fact that we have all these Democrats now going
(39:46):
to be hauled before Congress, to be talked to, you know,
let's see, let's see if they get the same treatment
that Steve Bannon got or that Peter Navarro got remember
they had their doors knocked down in the middle of
the night, curious to see what happen. Eapens seven wore
the Voice of New York. This is Ken Rozotto inframark
on your Friday. The Supreme Court has allowed Texas to
(40:09):
use their redistricting map that was challenged initially as racially discriminatory.
So the Supreme Court yesterday gave the green light to
Texas's efforts to use that new congressional map. Here's what
I find interesting. When the folks in Texas, rather they
duly voted in with their state House and state Senate
(40:32):
a new districting map in the state right, you had
people on the left screaming, bloody murder. California does so
specifically to eliminate any ability for people on the right
to have a say.
Speaker 1 (40:47):
So.
Speaker 3 (40:47):
Now, out of like forty five Congress seats or fifty
Congress seats in California with the redistricting, Republicans will be
lucky to have maybe three or four, and they represent
forty to forty five percent of the state's electorate going
to have any say yet, have you heard anybody challenging
California not a word, not a word and the districting
(41:07):
that they had before. The redistrict thing that just happened
was voted in by the state. The people actually voted
it in by popular referendum, and it got overturned with
another popular referendum. But the point is it wasn't that.
It wasn't like executive fiat that created the district before
or the districts. It was a popular referendum. You didn't
(41:29):
hear a word when it got overturned. Why because more
Democrat districts were being formed. But now you have a
predominantly red state Texas. They did it with the state
legislature through a means that they can do so legally,
and it legally passed redistricting plan, and it may give
(41:49):
the Republicans three, four or five more seats, but it
may not. Yeah, the people still have to say they
get to vote, so it may or may not give
a few more seats to the Republicans. But yet, of
course Texas gets challenged. Well, the Supreme Court rightfully so
said shut up, sit down, stay in your lane. I
was just talking to Fox News legal consultant Greg Jarrett
(42:11):
a little while ago, and we talked about these US
Circuit Court and district judges not staying in their lanes.
And they literally are just like pebbles under or in
your shoe. Rather you step down, you feel that little pebble.
They're annoying. They slow things down for a few weeks
and then it gets fast tracked to the US Supreme
Court and overturned. But at some point, I think the
(42:31):
Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, Justice Roberts, needs to
tell the US district judges, hey, stay in your lane,
mind your business. Stop doing this. We're going to keep
slapping you seven to ten WR the Voice of New York.
Apparently the Afghan terrorist who was arrested just miles from
DC came in under Biden. His name is John Shah Safi.
(42:56):
Allegedly he was an unvetted Afghan national who provided support
to the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria Korasan isis K,
as it is known. He allegedly also provided weapons to
his father, who's a commander of a militia group in Afghanistan.
So this is a potential national security mess. And again
because this is from the Department of hall Land Security,
(43:17):
by the way this memo is put out, it'd be
interesting to see if anything gets done with that if
they get investigated, they being the former officials with the
Biden administration. But once again another example illustrating what happened
when we had an open borders policy. No, we're not
talking about Oh Dan, you are anti Hispanic. Well, I
don't think that name is Hispanic. Doesn't sound Hispanic to me.
(43:39):
Yan Shah Safi is not exactly Hispanic. So we're talking
about people who from every country on the planet just
happened to use Mexico to come through because the border
between the US and Mexico was wide open, so anybody
from anywhere, including remember the Chinese nationals were streaming in
by San Diego, the border with San Diego in Mexico.
(44:02):
So people came from all over the world because the
Biden administration wanted them to. They put out the memo
to the universe, come on in, here's your big chance.
You come in. Even if we catch you in air quotes,
We'll let you go and you could get lost in
the US and become a citizen eventually and nobody will care.
And that's exactly what happened. Now we have the mess
that we have. Even if out of the ten to
(44:24):
fifteen or twenty million people who were here illegally. You
might have three four five thousand bad guys and all
the rest might be the nicest people in the world.
The problem is now you don't know because nobody got vetted,
and how do you even vet somebody who comes from
a country that is not our friend? They're not going
to volunteer that. Oh, you guys got some of the
(44:45):
bad guys we let out of prison. No, I don't
think Venezuela is going to do that. For instance, seven
to ten wor the Voice of New York, give us
a call. Eight hundred three two one zero seven ten.
Eight hundred three to two one zero seven ten. This
is Rosato in on the Mark Simone Show on Your Friday,
eleven seventeen. By the way, in terms of weather, any
morning sun is going to cloud over a little bit later,
(45:08):
it's going to be very very very cold today. Highs
only in the upper twenties. This is really the day
to wear hat, gloves, et cetera. Tomorrow and Sunday more
clouds than sun. Highs only in the upper thirties. So
the cold is here, and we're still only in fall,
not winter. So seven ten wor the Voice of New
York check this out. There have been flashes of light
(45:31):
on the Moon suggesting there might be somebody up there
doing work and we don't know about it. So there
have been experts looking at this. You can go on
go on x or YouTube and see it just you know,
or do a Google search flashes of light on the
Moon and you'll see the video I'm talking about. It
looks like a reflector of some sort. Now some have
(45:52):
suggested maybe it's just a shiny piece of rock and
the sun was hitting it at a certain point. But
then someone else pointed out, no, this is on the
dark side of the Moon. It couldn't be. So how
did this happen? So it's going to be kind of
interesting to see if we do any further research. For
all we know, it could be us doing something top
secret up there, or it could be any one of
the other countries who may have sent something up there.
(46:13):
But I would think if somebody sent a ship to
the Moon, we would know about it, right, or at
least I hope we do. But according to NASA, what
does it say here? It says this was originally captured
by an astronomer in Japan who caught these bright flashes
back on October thirtieth, revealing a large round dot briefly
(46:35):
illuminating the Moon's surface before disappearing. It was two flashes.
They were two days apart, so that's interesting. One of
them lasted a few seconds. So check it out. Go
online see what I'm talking about it. It's kind of creepy.
Wonder if maybe somebody's up there living and just fail
to tell us. Sevin Wor also a NASA and the
(46:55):
ESA that's the European Space Agency, have declared that this
lifeless comet, that's what they keep calling it, that is
headed our way, apparently keeps giving some kind of a
heart beat, like as it's spinning. You know, a comet
not only goes forward but also spins. It's like imagine
an earth spinning that's also moving forward. And the white
(47:18):
stuff you see coming off is for the most part
vapor and dust that comes off as the comet is
moving forward. Well, apparently the comet appears to be giving
off what looks like a heart beat, and some experts
are saying, well, that's just because it's spinning and as
it spins you see this heartbeat, but it's beating at
a strange rhythm like, it's not beating boom boom boom,
(47:42):
it's beating boo boom like our heart boo boom. Well,
how does that happen? So this has been a weird
comet headed our way. We caught it about under a
year ago as it started heading our way, and it's
still headed toward earth, although the experts say it's not
going to come that close, but from astronomical point of view,
it is pretty close. So we'll see what happens with that.
(48:04):
And then finally, have you heard about this? Being that
it's Christmas time in the city Jackie Vernon, the voice
of Frosty the Snowman, Well, he must have been a
jolly happy soul prior to getting married to his last
wife here Hazel Sawyer, because according to a son, his
son David said that in a podcast recently, the dad
(48:26):
had apparently several families, at least three before he married
his present wife and never told anybody. So imagine, I mean,
I think about how exhausting that is. One family's enough.
Imagine having three secret families, never telling anybody about any
of the families. Of course, this was the day before
cell phones and the internet and rumors like that. But
next time you hear Frosty the Snowman's voice, think about
(48:49):
that hop happy, jolly soul and the life that he led.
Jackie Vernon and that according to his son, David all Right.
Seven to ten wor the Voice of New York, we'd
love to hear what you have to say. What's going
on in your holiday season? Are you all prepared for
the holidays yet? Because I haven't even started. We'd love
to hear where you are in the whole scheme of things.
Eight hundred three to two one zero seven ten, eight
(49:12):
hundred three to two one zero seven ten. Coming up
just a little bit, we'll speak with healthy living expert
Paul Fulford about the overuse of weight loss drugs. Seven
ten wo R it's eleven twenty. We're coming right back with.
Speaker 1 (49:25):
Your calls now more of the Mark Simone Show on
seven ten WR.
Speaker 2 (49:31):
Filling in from Mark here again is Ken Roseanna.
Speaker 3 (49:35):
Hey, good to be with you on your Friday. We
go straight to our busy phones. Kimberly in Westchester, good.
Speaker 12 (49:39):
Morning to good morning. I was supposed to hear that
you are somewhat caffeine.
Speaker 2 (49:46):
I know her, Kim.
Speaker 3 (49:49):
I won't say your last year. Kim and I. Let's
just tell I'll tell her, I'll tell everyone this. Kim
and I work together at a little radio station in
Mount Kisco in nineteen God, what year was ago? Yeah,
let's say it was in the eighties.
Speaker 12 (50:02):
Yeah, yeah, how are young? One time? I'm doing much
better now getting to chat with you and hear you
Infra Marks doing a fantastic job. So love listening to you.
And I am laughing at the caffeine story. I dropped
caffeine out of my uh and I do have a hid,
but that wasn't the reason. It just was making me ill.
(50:25):
But then now I'm eking back to dye coke with lime.
They're bringing that back, and I'm here because I I
love that.
Speaker 3 (50:33):
You gotta get some I think we all need some vice, right,
just something. But you know, I used to drink, I had.
I used to make wine, you know, not only drinking.
I would make wine. I don't do that anymore. I'm
just like boring. You know, I never smoked a sugarette.
Did you smoke back in the eighties?
Speaker 8 (50:50):
No?
Speaker 12 (50:50):
No, never, never, never.
Speaker 3 (50:52):
That's good.
Speaker 12 (50:52):
But I do have a question because you were such
a food connoisseur as well, so Macha. I'm jealous as
I see people drinking all the time and it's so pretty.
But I think it has caffeine in this do?
Speaker 3 (51:05):
I mean, what are some does?
Speaker 8 (51:06):
Yeah?
Speaker 3 (51:07):
From what I've read this. In fact, somebody said this
sent me something to when I was in the commercial there.
But apparently it's it's from green tea plants, and allegedly
because it's it's it's when it's not aged to brown tea,
that's when you get more concentrated caffeine. But they have
things like it has things like elsianine and that gives
(51:28):
you the energy without the jitters of caffeine. So the
energy you get from Macha is really more from the
natural enzymes and things like that as opposed to caffeine,
although there is some caffeine for sure, So if you're
trying to avoid caffeine, watcha. It may not be the
way to go. That is from doctor Ted.
Speaker 10 (51:46):
Say.
Speaker 12 (51:47):
Can I appreciate it?
Speaker 3 (51:49):
Can't believe we got to talk off the air. I listen,
I see you on on Facebook messager. We'll chat off
the here, but we'll get together and have some Machay Christmas.
Good to talk.
Speaker 12 (52:00):
They can't make.
Speaker 3 (52:02):
Oh, I love her. She was one of the nicest
people I worked with up at that station. Seven ten
wore The Voice of New York. At eleven twenty nine,
good morning to David and queens.
Speaker 10 (52:12):
Hey Ken, good morning ken By. Now most people have
gotten their so called inflation reduction checks from the buck
tooth Kathy HLKL, and I hope people don't fall through
this shameless attempt to win votes. This is money that
they stole from you, and people should be going up
on WECo charges.
Speaker 6 (52:31):
Thank you.
Speaker 3 (52:31):
I know you're right, David. I appreciate the call. You know,
that is funny. People think that it's like a gift
from Heaven that money. You got back a few hundred
dollars in that check, and I'm glad. I mean I
know senior citizens who got it who could really use
it too, and a lot of people could use that.
But the point is it's your money. So that means
they took too much of your money to begin with,
they shouldn't have. And then they will give you back
(52:51):
two percent of what you gave us. Really well, we
didn't give it to you, took it from us. Seven
to ten wo r The Voice of New York to
my friend Vincent in Brooklyn.
Speaker 2 (53:00):
Good morning, Vincenzo, Good morning Ken.
Speaker 8 (53:03):
I got my two hundred dollars check from Kathy Hokel
a couple of weeks ago, and it went in an
instant to buy some stuff Thanksgiving. Ken. I think I
believe with the whole crime reporting, especially crimes committed by
people in the minority community. I believe the mainstream legacy
(53:25):
media got together years ago and said, even though the
FBI statistics and local New York City statistics and the
Department of Correction statistics accurately state black on black crime
is the biggest, the biggest issue, one of the biggest
(53:49):
issues in the black community. Another thing second to black
on black crime, when black's not busy attacking each other,
that attack white people. That's the second largest group. And
quoting to FBI statistics, one in four black men by
(54:12):
the time they are thirty years old will have gone
through the system once. And I believe the legacy media,
having known this, said hey, we have to shy away
from this because this may stigmatize people in the African
(54:34):
American community.
Speaker 3 (54:35):
So I got to jump in only because it's new,
sim Vincent, but so I'm not trying to cut you
off all know, but it's you make a lot of points,
and the points you're making clearly are statistics from the FBI,
and there are a lot of statistics, right. The question
is how do we help and how do we help
change that?
Speaker 8 (54:53):
How do we help change it? To bring back night
school so people who have have to how to drop
out of school to go to work if they want
to better their lives. Bring back night schools like their
wa in New York City when I was growing up,
bringing that so people could retrain for their new careers.
(55:14):
Nobody AI is never going to replace plumbing, corpentry, electricians.
Don't let anybody fool you, and somebody's going to have
to be trained to repair the AI robot.
Speaker 3 (55:29):
Uh And Vincent, as I as I drive down Manhattan
and I see all these big beautiful buildings, A I didn't
put them up physically. They got to be put up
by human beings, right, there'll always be a need for
that visit. I gotta cut us only because of the news.
But my friend, have a good holiday if I don't
talk to you between now and Christmas, all right, Vincent,
be well, my friend, Yeah, you know, I mean the
main thing is and they're listen years ago. The news
(55:52):
organizations through the Associated Press. That's how it usually works.
The AP is sort of the umbrella. They don't run
the news organizations, but they have something called the AP
style Book, and a lot of news organizations follow that.
So if the if the style book says this is
the way we're doing things, meaning the Associated Press, generally
news organizations tend to follow suit seven ten wor The
(56:14):
Voice of New York. It is now eleven thirty three
and in just a little bit we're gonna be talking
with somebody who's gonna who's a health expert. He's gonna
tell us about people who may be abusing weight loss drugs.
His name is Paul Fulford. He's coming up in just
a little bit, and we'll also take more of your
calls through the hour. Seven ten WR The Voice of
New York.
Speaker 1 (56:34):
This is the Mark Simone Show on seven ten woor
Ben from Mark Today.
Speaker 2 (56:39):
Here's Ken Rosotti and very good.
Speaker 3 (56:42):
To be here on your Friday morning.
Speaker 4 (56:44):
Well.
Speaker 3 (56:44):
He is a healthy living expert who has worked with
leaders in medical aesthetics and he hosts the Optimized Outcomes
with Paul Fulford podcast, which talks about health and longevity.
We say good morning to you, Paul Fulford, good morning,
how you doing good? To be good to have you
on I should say, I just want to clarify. You
sound like you're in studio because we have you on zoom,
(57:05):
so it sounds like you're literally sitting next to me.
It's so clear. For years, Paul, so many people have
suffered with obesity and all the physical breakdown that comes
with it. I used to weigh nearly four hundred pounds
years ago, and I had gastric bypass. I did fen
fen got down each time, I got down a certain amount,
but never got all the way until the weight loss
drugs right, and for the last thirty pounds because I
(57:28):
needed to stabilize blood sugar, I was put on ozepic.
But talk about how too many people are using it
who should not be, and how it wastes muscle as well.
Speaker 4 (57:38):
That's a great question.
Speaker 13 (57:40):
And you know it's termed like ozembic body right, man
in New York. You don't sugarcoat anything, so let's unpack it, right.
Just imagine scrolling Instagram, every celebrity looks like they accidentally
walked through the dryer on high heat. You know, it's
shrinking faster than a Yankees playoff lead You blink and boom,
(58:01):
jaw lines are sharper, arms get smaller, faces get hollower, right,
And it's in celebrity in the you know, the Hollywood cultures.
It's almost a disappearing act. And I'm not body shaming, right,
It's just me saying, why does everybody you know, these
people in Hollywood look like they're on a diet of
almond their almond milk. In their rights, it's just it's
(58:24):
one of those things where what they do and what
the glp ones do, which are the ozepics and wa
Goobi's of the world, is they put you on a
cloric deficit, which makes it so that you consume your
fat stores and if you experience rapid weight loss, then
your body is looking for fuel source, so it starts
(58:45):
to go and basically use your muscle as a fuel source.
So when you have a rapid weight loss and it's
not managed and other interventions are done, you're going to
lose muscle, not just fat.
Speaker 3 (58:55):
So let me clarify for everybody we're talking to. And
by the way, the numbers are anywhere from twenty five
to forty percent of total weight loss could be muscle,
and that's a lot. And by the way, when we
say muscle, everybody thinks biceps. Muscle is heart as well.
Muscle could be liver, muscle could be your organs. So
you know, you have to be very careful when it
comes to not doing this the right way. My doctor
(59:16):
had a talk with me about this and he said,
you're going to consume this much protein each day if
we're on this, And by the way, the main reason
was because my blood sugar levels were ride at the
pre diabetic level. That's why. And I'm still on the
baby dose point two five. But he said, you're going
to consume one to one and a half grams of
protein per pound body weight. You're going to do resistance
(59:38):
exercises that will help preserve your muscle, and you're going
to drink lots of fluids every day. That's what I did. Now.
In spite of that, I still look a little bit
gaunt at times. I had another doctor friend of mine
save me and say, if your doctor still has you
want to take it off. Unfortunately, it's because of blood sugar,
it's not because of weight loss. But too many people
say I need to lose five pounds after the holidays,
(59:59):
give me prescription. That's not what you want.
Speaker 13 (01:00:02):
To do well, And that's and again that was the
original intention behind these medications, right, Like when you look
at what a lot of things are FDA cleared for
in use in practicality, they're not always prescribed for what
they're cleared for, and you get ancillary and side effect
benefits that can happen. And that was what was noticed
(01:00:24):
for your diabetic patient. Are people that need blood sugar
like yourself, they were experiencing this weight loss. And I
think the biggest problem is like I've got family members
that before these drugs, right, would gain and lose the
same one hundred and fifty pounds their whole life as
long as I can remember. And each time they went
off the strict regimen they were on and went back
(01:00:46):
to the way they were doing things, they got fatter
faster because they had less muscle. Right, So what your
doctor was telling you is absolutely perfect advice.
Speaker 4 (01:00:55):
I mean, you have to strength.
Speaker 13 (01:00:56):
Train, you want to eat one to one and a
half grams of protein for your ideal body weight. It's
it's also you kind of look at it from a
standpoint you want to have a good portion of healthy fats,
and you want to eat nutrient dense foods to get
your carbs as well.
Speaker 3 (01:01:14):
Absolutely everybody. This is Paul Fulford on with us right now.
He is a healthy living expert. He's worked with leaders
in medical aesthetics and he hosts the Optimized Outcomes with
Paul Fulford podcast seven to ten w o R, the
Voice of New York. This is the Marx Simoncio, Ken
Risottowin from Mark Today, also Paul. For decades, parents have
always said clean your plates. And then, of course fifty
(01:01:35):
years ago, we used to hear there are children starving
in insert your country here, right, and that sort of
ingrained in us that you got to finish everything on
your plate. But that is the worst thing you could
do to children.
Speaker 13 (01:01:45):
Write well, yes, in no right, you know, I would
say that it's portion control, just like anything else. Right,
if you put it on their plate, just make sure
it's the right portion. And again, like we still want
to you know, I have a little niece and it's
almost like bribing her to get to eat the protein.
Speaker 4 (01:02:05):
She just wants to eat the mac and cheese, right,
So if you.
Speaker 13 (01:02:09):
Put it on the plate, they have to finish it,
but do it in the right portions, you know, do
it in the like ninety grams of proteins, thirty grams
of healthy fats, and fifty grams of healthy carbs. Right,
just do it in the right portions and say they
don't get you know, whatever that treat is that we
have to bribe them with unless they finish their plate.
Speaker 3 (01:02:26):
That's a good idea. Say that you got to play
the game with kids. Not being a dad. I only
know from the from having been a kid, that's it.
Speaker 13 (01:02:34):
But well you know that ways I think too when
you look at this from a psychological standpoint and these
kids looking at their idols, right, that's just the part
that hits hard, you know. And there's new research that shows,
you know, children are developing body image issues before they
lose their baby teeth, you know.
Speaker 4 (01:02:51):
And and the thing is.
Speaker 13 (01:02:53):
In New York kids are more aware, they grow up faster,
They see everything, they absorb culture like a sponge on
the f train.
Speaker 11 (01:03:00):
Right.
Speaker 13 (01:03:00):
It's one of those things that you know, it's a
dangerous thing, and it's one of those things kids should
be learning multiplication not macros.
Speaker 4 (01:03:11):
Absolutely.
Speaker 3 (01:03:12):
I remember we're talking thirty five forty years ago, Paul
I saw a TV show. It was a news a
news show. I won't mention which of the brands it was,
but where they took a series of babies, maybe a
year old, and they or too between one and two,
and they put them in a room and they showed
them pictures, and they showed pictures of people of every
(01:03:33):
different race and ethnicity, and then they showed those same
races and ethnicities as thin and as obese, and in
every single case, the children reacted to obese people in
a negative way. Now, there could have been conditioning by
that point, because the children are one to two years old.
There's already conditioning, of course, but it was interesting to
(01:03:56):
see that race did not impact them anyway, whether it
is white, black, whatever, Asian, whatever. It was obesity that
impacted them. So you have to wonder what that's about.
Is it something genetic? What is it? But whatever, in
our minds, we tend to gravitate right towards somebody who
appears whatever our definition of healthy is, whether it be
(01:04:18):
for reproductive reasons or whatever. But there is a healthy
way to go about it, and then an unhealthy way.
And I think America is obsessed with the unhealthy.
Speaker 13 (01:04:26):
Yeah, and you're actually right, there are psychological cues that
are ingrained in us that.
Speaker 4 (01:04:33):
You realize.
Speaker 13 (01:04:33):
You see these things in its subconscious right, where stronger
jawline typically denotes more power. And when you look at
a woman versus a man in a traditional sense, you know,
an hourglass shape signifies beauty, a V shape for a
man signifies you know, strength and power. Right, So there
(01:04:55):
are these subconscious cues that our body looks at things
to being proportionate in how our brain process is information
that you can see that even at a young age
like you're bringing up in that study, there are things
that are ingrained and we are sort of our environment, right,
like certain people tend to have biases based on what
(01:05:19):
they're around as well.
Speaker 3 (01:05:20):
Absolutely well, listen, we want to get a website for
more info, Paul, what's your website?
Speaker 6 (01:05:25):
So the.
Speaker 13 (01:05:28):
Vice manufacturer I work for is Sinoshoreleutronic dot com and
for all things optimized outcomes, which the podcast discussed all
things in a way that are what I'm trying to
coin as biofunctional aesthetics, which is biology, bi biohacking, biology,
(01:05:49):
functional medicine, and medical aesthetics.
Speaker 4 (01:05:51):
They're all blending together now.
Speaker 13 (01:05:52):
I mean, yeah, we can take you know, we can
take seven to ten years off somebody's face. But if
they're only going to three live three more, what's the point, right?
You know, people want anti aging as much as longevity,
and it's and it's very much you know, in the
in the public eye. The podcast is optimized outcomes and
that's on YouTube, Spotify and Apple Podcasts.
Speaker 3 (01:06:15):
Very good, Healthy Living Expert podcast host Paul Fulford. Great
to have you on. We got to have you on again.
Thanks for coming on the Marx Simunk Show this morning.
Speaker 4 (01:06:24):
Absolutely, thank you for having me on. I appreciate it.
Speaker 3 (01:06:26):
You bet. It's Ken Rizzatto and from Mark on your Friday.
And when we come back, we will take more of
your calls. The numbers one eight hundred three to two
one zero seven ten one eight hundred three two one
zero seven ten for wo R.
Speaker 1 (01:06:39):
Now more of the marximone Show on seven to ten
wo R.
Speaker 2 (01:06:43):
Filling in form Mark. Here again is Ken Rosado.
Speaker 3 (01:06:47):
We got enough time to take another call. Let's go
over to Danny in Little Neck. Good morning to Danny.
Speaker 14 (01:06:53):
I Ken, I believe the obesity problem this country is
the result of the too much food and too much
bad food. You look at photos from many, many years
ago in this country, you didn't see the level of
overweightness that people experiencing today.
Speaker 3 (01:07:09):
Yeah, this is the only country in the world where
the poorest people are the heaviest. And it's because the
food that we have is so preprocessed and packaged and
just not helpful. And this is what too many people,
especially people who don't have the money to buy more
expensive foods, this is what they're eating and it's literally
killing us. So absolutely, you know, we'll take one more
called Danny, thank you for that. Happy holidays to you.
(01:07:31):
Let's go over to Norman, also on Long Island. Norman. Whoops,
let's see Norman. There you are. How are you? Good morning?
Speaker 10 (01:07:36):
Hi?
Speaker 4 (01:07:37):
Hi?
Speaker 15 (01:07:37):
Hi can good morning. You know, during World War Two,
we followed the Geneva Convention and they would go back.
I was watching the movie The Battle of the Coral Sea.
We would go back and strike the same carrier five
six times to make sure it's sank. So what's changed
in the law with the Geneva Convention.
Speaker 3 (01:07:56):
Well, I think in this case we're talking about whether
Congress declared a war or not. In this case, the
President declared war on drugs, and we made it clear
if you come over with a drug boat, we're gonna
come after you. Listen, this is not a fishing boat.
You don't go fishing on a twenty foot speed boat
two hundred and fifty miles off ashore at two in
the morning. So anyone says, how do you know it's
(01:08:17):
not a fishing boat, because it's not. It's as simple
as that. Seven ten wor the Voice of New York.
Mark will be back in the seat Monday. Thank you,
to you, to you, Mark, and to woar Buck and
Clay are coming up ahead at three o'clock. It is
Sean Hannity, Chase, Jesse kellyes of course on at six,
Jimmy Fayla on at nine, and Marcus in every weekday
ten to noon. You're listening to seven ten wor Henrasattowan.
(01:08:40):
Have a great day. Thanks a lot,