April 19, 2024 • 34 mins
Professor Bill Jacobson, Cornell Law Professor discusses the abhorrent behavior we are seeing on Columbia University’s campus. Where is the freedom of speech rights for those students who don’t agree with the PLO supporters? 108 arrests yesterday, and they are right back at it, and they don’t care. Where’s Hochul? Bragg? James?
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
All right, thanks Scott Shan An hour two Sean Hannity's show,
Told Free. Let me give you our number this Friday.
It is eight hundred and nine to four one Sean,
if you want to be a part of the program. Now,
up to this point, I keep using a line that
Donald Trump has been able to do something that I've
never seen observing politics my passion for all of my life,
(00:23):
and that is he has defied all conventional political gravity
and he's been able to do so. He gets arrested,
his poll numbers gets up, he gets arranged, his poll
numbers go up, He gets a mug shot, his poll
numbers really go up. Now he's on trial in New York.
We've gone over and over the unfairness of all of this.
You got a judge that donated to Joe Biden, which
(00:47):
should have been causes enough for recusal. Never mind the
New York law that would apply for recusal, and his
daughter's political actions. You can't even talk about that. But
that is a real issue that would mandate recusal. I
think it would be brought up an appeal and it's
an easy win. Then you've got the issue, of course
(01:09):
that in New York, as a matter of law, what
he is being charged with as a misdemeanor. Let alone
the fact that the statute of limitations have long since passed.
Let alone that he is reaching for a federal election law,
that the Department of Justice has weaponized it as it
is even passed on not thinking they can get a conviction,
(01:31):
or not thinking it warranted an indictment, which says a
lot in and of itself. Never mind the fact that
the previous DA in Manhattan passed on charging Donald Trump here,
and that originally even this DA Alvin Bragg, passed on it,
but only political pressure brought him back to the case.
And here it is eight years later, and two hundred
(01:53):
you know, and three days is when the trials started
before election day. Oh, let's bring it up, and let's
force the president to stay inside a courtroom for over
a month and leave the playing field in swing states
open to only one candidate. And now one candidate is
Joe Biden. If any of that sounds fair to any
of you that are listening, you have no sense of
(02:15):
justice or fairness. This is law fair, This is a
dual justice system. This is unequal justice under the law.
It's not equal justice under the law, and it's not
equal application of our laws. But here we are, and
Donald Trump will be stuck in this courtroom anywhere for
six weeks, however long it takes the jury has been seated.
(02:36):
We'll go over that in a second. Kevin O'Leary had
a really good comment about all this, how this case
in particular is hurting America's brand, and how it's making
not only New York City but the entire country make
us look like a bunch of clowns.
Speaker 2 (02:51):
Listen, every time I bring this up, I get all
this Trump stuff, Trump stuff, forget about Trump.
Speaker 3 (02:56):
Okay, we don't do this in America.
Speaker 2 (02:58):
We don't go after the office of the president with
porn star cases. We give a broad swath of latitude.
If you're an ex president, you murdered somebody, I get it,
or been accused of murder.
Speaker 3 (03:11):
But what is.
Speaker 2 (03:13):
This This hurts the American brand. I keep saying that
I was in Geneva last week, one hundred and fifty
countries represented there. Everybody's talking about this, saying, what is
this porn star thing?
Speaker 4 (03:25):
Like?
Speaker 2 (03:25):
This is an American president, This is the office of
the United States of America's highest office, and we're doing this.
This is sheer stupidity. And I'll tell you what should happen.
This should be pushed until after he wins or doesn't win.
This should be not part of this election cycle at all.
And this is not a Trumpet loving comment. This is
about the American brand, where I bring capital from all
(03:46):
around the world to invest here, we look like clowns.
Speaker 3 (03:50):
I hate this.
Speaker 1 (03:51):
It's bad for the country on every level.
Speaker 5 (03:54):
But Stephen A.
Speaker 1 (03:54):
Smith, I thought he was on Hannity last night, made
a lot of good comments about this. Why can't they
beat him on a level playing field. The reality is,
and we'll get to the polls later. I don't think
that they can. Donald Trump has spoken out about the
issue of recusal. He has spoken out about the issue
of a gag order. Now understand every other person that
is a part of this case, including the star witness
(04:18):
for the prosecution, Michael Kohne, who himself was convicted for
lying before Congress. They're free to say anything they want
anywhere they want, on social media, on cable television, on
network television. Quoted in our major newspapers around the country.
They can all say whatever they want anyway here to
analyze all of this. Mark Bernovitch, former Attorney General State
(04:41):
of Arizona. Greg Jarrett, Fox News Legal Analysts, best selling author,
Welcome both of you, mister attorney general. Let's get your
overall view of what's going on. What's happening, the issue
of the gag order, the issue of recusal, the issue
of the charges, the issue of the statute limitations. Says
a lot to digest here.
Speaker 4 (05:00):
Yeah, and Sean, thanks for having me on. And as
you know, I was also a former federal prosecutor to
stay gang prosecutor, so I have literally during the course
of my career, handled thousands of criminal cases and what
is going on in New York is unprecedented, and frankly,
I think it's an embarrassment for the justice system. Now
we know that there's basic rules even in New York
(05:22):
the Criminal Procedure Code, a defending can wave his presence. Remember,
all of these rights are supposed to ensure a defendant
or the accused affair trial. And it seems like every
time there's a decision, it breaks against the accused. And
whether that was today's decision to not have the prosecution
turned over the first few witnesses, which is a very
common and typical order the judge would grant to keep
a trial moving, whether it's not allowing the accused the
(05:45):
wave his presence, as you mentioned, a gag order, and
we know under existing constitutional law that prior restraints on
speech are presumptively unconstitutional because you want to guarantee the
accused the accused a right of affair trial. So I
think the public understands the hypocrisy of what's going on,
and people like Michael Cohen and porn star is can
(06:06):
have documentaries and beyond you know, other networks, you know,
basically slamming the defendant where the DA can issue it
speaking indictments and say all sorts of nasty stuff, and
yet they can say whatever they want and the accused
is muzzled and gagged. It really the hypocrisy stinks on
so many different levels. And I mean, I think it's
gotten so bad Sehn that when Trump wins this case,
(06:29):
I bet you the New York DA is going to
charge him for converting the courthouse into a campaign fundraising event,
because that's what's going to happen. I actually think it's
going to listen sympathy. But in the meantime, you have
a former president of the United States being charged with
a crime that's too complicated to explain in thirty seconds
or less, which is always a bad sign for a prosecutor.
And you know, ultimately, I think that they're going to
(06:51):
lose this case, either at trial or on appeal. And
it's just a waste of time and money. And it's
clearly designed to fort someone for running for the highest
offices in.
Speaker 6 (06:59):
The world, you know.
Speaker 1 (07:00):
And here's the thing, and the judges not press the
prosecutor or the DA in this case Bragg to give
a full complete definition of what the actual charge is. Now,
Greg Jarrett, you've been following it as closely as I have.
Do you have a full complete understanding of what the
charge even is about against Donald Trump?
Speaker 6 (07:20):
No, absolutely not, and neither does the defense. You know,
he's not charging the underlying crime. He's simply citing it
as the crime that Trump was trying to conceal, which is,
we guess, federal election law violations, even though, as you
point out, Federal Election Commission investigated and said this isn't
(07:44):
a violation. The Department of Justice studied and said there's
no crime here. So the defense demanded in a bill
of particulars tell us what the underlying crime is, and
they just said, okay, mister Bragg, tell well, he offered
up four different possibilities, which means the defense has to
(08:06):
prepare for four different defenses, which is utterly absurd, but
it underscores the bias of this judge, and the gag
order issued by the judge is a blatantly unconstitutional prior
restraint on free speech. Our legal system, Shawn does not
take priority over the Bill of Rights.
Speaker 7 (08:27):
Take a look.
Speaker 6 (08:27):
There's no exemption in the First Amendment for criminal trials.
The accused has a protected right to defend himself both
at trial and in the court of public opinion where
he's already been convicted, both by the DA and a
bias media. Here, Trump has an elevated right as the
leading candidate for president, and his accusers, who are trial
(08:52):
witnesses for the prosecution, have been publicly trashing Trump at
every turn. Yet prosecutors and the judge not gagging those witnesses,
only Trump preventing him from fairly responding. You know, Michael
Cohen is a confessed and convicted burdurer. He continues to lie.
Two weeks ago, a federal judge called him a serial perjurer,
(09:16):
but Trump is not allowed to point that out again.
This exposes the bias of the judge.
Speaker 1 (09:24):
All right, quick break right back, more with Attorney General
former Attorney General of Arizona, Mark Burnovitch, and more with
Greg Jarrett.
Speaker 5 (09:32):
Your calls.
Speaker 1 (09:32):
Also coming up the International Fellowship of Christians and Jews.
They are pointing out what is now a real urgent,
clear present danger. Hundreds of thousands of Israelis have been
displaced and they're providing food and medicine and supplies, housing,
everything they could possibly provide. They're also placing mobile bomb
(09:54):
shelters in well populated areas. As now, Israel is preparing
for the war first case scenario of even more rockets
being fired from the souths from the North, and maybe
Iran again, and you know, this could we don't know,
doesn't look like at this moment, but it could break
out into a full on regional war and Israel would
be the target of you know, basically a three war front,
(10:16):
which is difficult for anybody to ever fight back against.
But don't underestimate Israel. But anyway, it puts the whole danger,
puts the whole country at risk. They are in a
fight for their very survival. We're watching this unfold on
a daily basis. The situation is fluid, but the International
Fellowship of Christians and Jews, they're there on the ground
every day and they're providing support which the government really
(10:40):
doesn't have a lot of time to devote to those
people that have been displaced and those Israelis that are
in neat that's where you commit. You can help with
these mobile bomb shelters that they're placing strategically around the country.
You can help with food and medicine and supplies and
housing and tents and blankets and pillows, whatever you can offer.
They need your support, They need your help, They need
(11:03):
your generosity. Please go to their website and support IFCJ
dot org. It's one word, support IFCJ dot org. Anything
you can do will be greatly appreciated.
Speaker 6 (11:20):
Keeping the truth alive, sanity is on right now.
Speaker 5 (11:26):
We continue now.
Speaker 1 (11:27):
Greg Jarrett, former Age of Arizona, Mark Bernovich are with
us this Friday. All right, you both have had an
opportunity to look at the limited information we have on
every juror.
Speaker 5 (11:38):
Now.
Speaker 1 (11:38):
It was kind of bizarre the judge in this case
to say, you know, excoriate the media and then end
by saying, well, of course, anything that happens on the
record in the courtroom you are able to report. But
I just asked that you simple common sense. But he
didn't define what that is. Uh So I'm just going
with what Fox News has reported, the Guardian has reported,
(11:59):
in pretty much other media outlet has reported, And I
have no intention of giving out any information that would
be perhaps unknown about about a durwor or in any
way identify them as you look through the twelve jurors.
I don't know if you've had a chance, Mark Burnovitch
to look at them. Is there anything that stands out
(12:21):
among any of the twelve that you see?
Speaker 4 (12:24):
You know, Sean. One of the things that I find
so amazing about the trumpt Arrangement syndrome is with all
of these constitutional issues, whether it's the gag order or
whether it's this recent order about what the media can
and can't report. I mean, where's the ACLU, where's all
the First Amendment groups saying wait a minute, the judge
shouldn't be doing this. We have a right to report
whatever we want to report. So I think the shows
(12:46):
once again that when people talk about the rule of law. Remember,
the ends cannot justify the means, and clearly everything that's
happened thus far shows that the scales of justice are
tilted against the president. Now, as far as the jurors,
I will tell you honestly, when I use to pick juries,
I used to not like. This is from a prosecutor's perspective.
I did not like engineers on a jury because everything
(13:07):
they did had to be precise, like everything had to
fit in place, and well, why did the bullet bounce
off this or why did this happen? And so I
think as a defendant that it might be good for
the former president to have people on that jury that
might want to hold the TA accountable. Because remember the
job of a prosecutor is to do justice. It's not
(13:27):
to get a conviction any costs. You don't count success
in terms of years in prison. You count as justice
being done. And apparently Bragg doesn't understand that. If Greg
was just talking about, if you're a prosecutor you can't
explain the theory of your case in thirty seconds or less,
you shouldn't bring the case. And that's what I used
to tell young croskeuters in our office. So I think
having someone like an engineer that is used to position,
(13:50):
he's used to everything fitting into place. He might be
one of those people that says, wait a minute, this
doesn't make sense. The fact that there's people that are
educators on the jury. Now, once again, I to not
like having quite frankly, educators teachers on the jury because
they tend to lean a little left. Now that may
cut either way for the president, but they tend to
be a little more sympathetic to, you know, people that
(14:12):
are accused of crimes. But once again, this is the president,
and you throw out a lot of the normal rules
when it comes to the law and the jury. So,
based on what I've seen thus far, it's a Manhattan jury.
We know that you're already pushing rocks uphill if you're
president turns defense attorneys, so it's going to be a challenge.
But remember you have to have unanonymity in a criminal trial.
(14:34):
So if you're if you're the defense, you've got to
figure out, okay, who maybe won't keep people. And so
when we're doing testimony, you can see their eyes kind
of light up, you can see them nodding their heads,
and so that's who if I were the defense, I
would gear my defense towards that because clearly, at least
that that jury is going to be I think, predisposed
to make President Trump no matter what they hear. I mean,
(14:55):
you know, you know, well, let me.
Speaker 5 (14:57):
Let me get a Greg Jared's take on this.
Speaker 1 (14:59):
There is a a former attorney general or deputy assistant
Attorney general ross story report of this, Elliott Williams, who
said flagged a particular juror that said described as a
married investment banker with a master's degree, but the fact
that he's read Trump's best selling book The Art of
the Deal, claims to track Trump and his truth social posts.
(15:20):
He claimed that might be a problem when you look
at the jurors and what we know about them. What
is your reaction, Greg Jarrett, Well, my.
Speaker 6 (15:27):
Reaction is the jury selection has been dominated by a
flood of people likes of which I've never seen, who
said they cannot and will not be fair to Trump.
They don't want to be. But the unknown question here, Sean,
is how many of those who said otherwise, oh yes,
I could be fair. Our line with the hidden agenda
(15:49):
of getting on the jury to convict Manhattan, by its
very makeup, as you know, is an inherently hostile venue
for the accused in a politically charged case against a
political candidate that's hated. There these tours, I think are predisposed,
The outcome is preordained. Witches had a better chance of
(16:10):
a fair trial in Salem. I mean, now, this absolutely
should have been moved elsewhere, to Staten Island, for example,
where the jury pool would be more balanced. But Bragg
opposed it. So did Judge Marshawn, which is evidence to
me that they know their prosecutor.
Speaker 3 (16:29):
Would you.
Speaker 1 (16:31):
You would think the judge would know that the issue
of recusal will be a major point if there is
a conviction upon appeal. But we'll wait and we'll see.
Appreciate both of you, Mark Bernovich, Greg Jarrett, have a
great weekend. Eight hundred and ninety four to one, Shawn
is a number if you want to be a part
of the program.
Speaker 6 (16:50):
Exposing government waste and abuse of your liberties every day,
Sean Hannity is on right now.
Speaker 1 (17:00):
Twenty five to the top of the hour, toll free
are number eight hundred and ninety four one Seawan. If
you want to be a part of the program, your calls,
your comments coming up straight ahead. I want to update
you the situation at Columbia University. Well, we finally saw
some action here. You have the president of an Ivy
League institution. Now think about this. How many parents, maybe
(17:22):
they have children, and they hope and they pray that
maybe one day their child might be able to achieve
admittance to one of the nation's top and most prestigious
universities like Columbia, Havid or any of these places. Well,
it turns out it's the last place I think I
want my kids to be going to college. So so
(17:44):
earlier in the week, we saw the president of Columbia
go before Congress and literally has asked a very simple,
fundamental moral question. Now understand and think about this answer
through the prism of the times that we're living in.
Woke Ism on college campuses, pc ism all over college campuses.
Speaker 5 (18:08):
Oh my sensibilities.
Speaker 1 (18:10):
Oh, I feign the vapors, I got the vapors.
Speaker 5 (18:13):
Somebody used the wrong pronoun.
Speaker 1 (18:15):
You know this kid in North Carolina that gets suspended
and put on his record racist for using the term
illegal alien, which the federal government uses as official language
and has for a very long time. But when asked
about the comment about well from the river to the sea,
which means the annihilation, complete wiping out of Israel. Well,
(18:38):
the Columbia president says, well, I'd really rather they not
use it. It could be hurtful, but doesn't say that
should that should not be the kind of speech used
on that college campus. Now, this is a college university,
and I went through this the other day where you
have a tenured academic who got criticized rightly so after
the October seven terrorists at ten by the terror group AMAS. Well,
(19:03):
this professor's name is Joseph Massad. He referred to it
as awesome and a studding victory of the Palestinian resistance.
The sight of the Palestinian resistance fighters storming Israeli checkpoints
separating Gaza and Israel was astounding heat penned. Really, perhaps
the major achievement of the resistance is the temporary takeover
(19:25):
of these settler colonies. Twelve hundred Israelis were murdered that day.
You know, countless numbers of women were raped, little babies
were beheaded, hundreds were taken hostage, some are still hostages,
if they're even still alive. Then you have another professor
Hamiddbashi is his name, And what do we learn from
(19:48):
this guy? Every dirty, treacherous, ugly, pernicious happening in the world.
Just wait a few days and the ugly name Israel
will pop up in the atrocities.
Speaker 5 (19:59):
He writes on Facebook in twenty eighteen.
Speaker 1 (20:02):
And I can go on now for the next ten
minutes talking about professors that are radicalized, that are teaching
at Ivy League institutions. And this president, like the former
Havid president and these other presidents, needs to go.
Speaker 4 (20:18):
Well.
Speaker 1 (20:18):
Anyway, we do have an update. Finally the police got involved.
But it has gotten so bad throughout the week that
I want to play some of the audio that we have.
I want to play Columbia University protesters yelling, oh, we
are Hamas, and we basically said we are terrorists, kind
of like the chanting that we heard in Michigan. Death
(20:42):
to America, Death to Israel, Death to America, Death to Israel.
Then I want you to listen to a pro Palestinian
protester reading a message from Gaza thanking the Columbia students
for standing in solidarity with Palestine, and a pro Palestine
protester chanting a Columbia universe.
Speaker 5 (21:01):
Just listen to this.
Speaker 1 (21:02):
And imagine this is supposed to be the top of
the top, the krem de la creme in terms of
a college campus and university where you would think there's
diversity of thought, where you can have the free and
open exchange of ideas, ideals and opinions that have been
so radicalized that conservatives are run out of college campuses
(21:23):
if they dare to utter a word. But yet we
gotta have people yelling we are hamas.
Speaker 8 (21:35):
From I said to the US, we're standing on weavering solidary.
What's the students for Christas the pols sign at Columbia University,
We've done with the SGV member.
Speaker 3 (21:57):
Because I'm just doing.
Speaker 9 (21:59):
It, and the contest to the demands for Columbia to
completely financially dove us from the occupation entity from the
occupation entity.
Speaker 8 (22:16):
On April seventeen, twenty twenty four, seventy prudents that Columbia
began Columbia. And that's the solitary complements.
Speaker 9 (22:31):
But the brain that the guesting diversity's publicity.
Speaker 5 (22:34):
Bernifies a grade.
Speaker 8 (22:42):
We support from other clipically.
Speaker 3 (22:47):
And are proud if they're.
Speaker 8 (22:48):
Willingness to remain stech fast.
Speaker 9 (22:53):
Let's sacrifice for our.
Speaker 3 (22:55):
Truest coon sacrifice.
Speaker 9 (22:58):
We encourage make the support so.
Speaker 1 (23:05):
That follow up.
Speaker 3 (23:08):
We've earned the action on your compass and within your old.
Speaker 7 (23:18):
Lass you.
Speaker 3 (23:24):
Yes read by Gray Oh my wall sign is a well.
Speaker 1 (24:10):
Anyway, joining us now is Professor Bill Jacobson, Cornell Law Professor.
Speaker 5 (24:14):
Welcome back, professor, How.
Speaker 4 (24:16):
Are you good?
Speaker 7 (24:17):
Thanks for having me back.
Speaker 1 (24:19):
What's going on? I want to get your reaction to
all of this. You know, your parent thinks that it's
a great thing. You get admitted to an Ivy League institution,
and this is what you're sending your kids into. This
is the environment they're going into.
Speaker 7 (24:32):
Yeah, I think people don't realize this has been building
for thirty years on campuses. It just has burst out
to the surface. But the radicalization of the campus is
the radicalization of the faculty. The homogenization of anti US,
anti Israel animosity from faculty. Faculty drives a lot of this.
(24:53):
The students come and go, but the faculty of there
for decades and so what is happening now is that
the faculty have been advocating, and you cited a couple
of examples in the intro, have been advocating for violence,
have been advocating for the destruction of Israel, and they
also advocate for the destruction of the United States. And
is it any wonder that after thirty years of that,
(25:15):
students are becoming radicalized. So it's a much worse situation
than I think most people in this country realize.
Speaker 1 (25:21):
Let me get your thought on this, because I never
thought we'd be discussing this in our lifetime. And that
is the vile, the repulse of the virulent anti Semitism
that has emerged on college campuses, in the halls of Congress.
We hear it all throughout Europe, European nations. I never
(25:42):
thought i'd hear in Australia Gas the Jews f the Jews,
but we heard that too.
Speaker 6 (25:49):
Where is all of this hatred coming from, Well, it's
coming multiple places.
Speaker 7 (25:54):
One I mentioned the utter radicalization of the faculty at
certainly the elite college is more than any place the
Columbia's of the world. But it's also a lot of
it is coming from the anti Semitism that exists in
the Arab world of the Arab media, not all of it,
but Palestinian media is notoriously anti Smitic, notorious for demonizing
(26:17):
and dehumanizing Jews. There are groups like Palestinian Palestine Media
Watch and Memory who just show you what they're putting
on their TV. Unwrought, the Refugee Agency, the schools they
run are inundated with gross, gross Nazi like depictions of Jews,
and so a lot of that carries over. So the
(26:38):
so called Palestinian activists are parrotying the same sort of
vile antisemitism, and it's being imported into our country. So
I think it's coming from many different directions, but it's here,
it's now, and we have to face.
Speaker 6 (26:54):
Up to it.
Speaker 5 (26:54):
All Right, we'll take a quick break.
Speaker 1 (26:56):
We'll come back the latest out of this insanity all
week that's been going on a Columbia More with Professor
Bill Jacobson of Cornell, a Cornell Law professor. Your calls
also coming up eight hundred nine four one Sean if
you want to be a part of the program. As
we continue our coverage, Israel fights back and the Iranians
lie in cower, straight ahead, corn.
Speaker 5 (27:23):
Stand up Chuck and dog faced pony soldier.
Speaker 2 (27:26):
That's just a few of the fighter moments you recall
when you walk down Joe's memory Lane.
Speaker 3 (27:32):
You can't make this up, and with Biden in office,
you don't have to. This is the Shawnity Show.
Speaker 1 (27:45):
We continue Professor Bill Jacobson, he is a Cornell law professor,
as we discuss the virulent and repulsive anti Semitism on
college campuses, in this case Columbia.
Speaker 5 (27:58):
Well, how does this end?
Speaker 1 (28:00):
Because I love the fact that Israel, in spite of
the advice don't advice of Joe Biden don't means do
I guess could be a great bumper sticker. But in
spite of it, they is They hit Iran hard. And
what I was really impressed with as I was watching
this all on fold last night, is they hit deep
(28:22):
inside of Iran. And I did not think it would
be as easy as it was for Israel. We know
that they have the nuclear sites all around the country.
They're spread out, they're buried underground. But the fact with
great precision that Israel was able to get deep inside,
even close to one of the nuclear sites and close
(28:43):
to Tehran and other parts of it of Iran tells
me that the Israelis have them. They were able to
stop every missile that was fired into Israel, but one
out of hundreds that were fired, and Iran wasn't able
to stop a thing, and that's why they're denying it
even took place. But we have all the evidence in
(29:04):
fact that it did take place. That surprised me, and
that might be a moment where the world can say
and pause and recognize, Oh, if we want, we can
stop their nuclear program right here, right now, so we
don't wake up one day and learn that the radical Mullows,
with their extreme ideology of convert or dye, have nuclear
(29:25):
capability that I'm pretty convinced that they would use to
as a means to an end for them. I think
they'd do it. I think they'd use it. I think
they're that sick and that ugly and that evil and
not twisted your thoughts.
Speaker 7 (29:38):
Absolutely, they announced every day their goal is to eliminate Israel.
That is their goal. They announced it every single day.
They march death to America, Death to Israel. So yes, absolutely,
But Israel's in't a really big predicament because on the
one hand, they need to defend themselves. On the other hand,
they're faced with an uprising within the Democrat Party in
(30:00):
the United States that puts pressure on the Biden administration
and people within the bureaucracy at the State Department, who
are not friendly to Israel and who want to cut
off weapons supply and who want to really hang Israel
allowed to dry. So Israel has to be very careful.
I suspect that if it wasn't for fear of what
the Biden administration would do, the response would have been
(30:21):
much stronger. They might have actually taken out those nuclear sites.
But they have to thread a needle with the current
administration because the current administration has held them back in Gaza,
has held them back from Rafa, has been trying to
save Hamas. So it's a very big predicament and I
think people don't understand. You know, a lot of people
like to criticize Benjamin Nett and Yahoo, but he's got
(30:43):
to weave his way between a lot of competing forces,
one of which is the hostility deep within the Biden administration.
Speaker 5 (30:51):
So let me tell you something.
Speaker 1 (30:52):
Bb deserves a lot of credit because he did not,
in the end give a rip about what Joe Biden said.
His country is in a fire for their survival, and
what he did last night shows that Joe Biden's words
and Joe Biden's threats and Joe Biden's lectures are meaningless
to Israel and meaningless to the Prime minister. And he
(31:13):
did what was right for the survival of his country,
and I applaud him.
Speaker 3 (31:16):
A lot of that.
Speaker 7 (31:17):
Yeah, he has really, I think done an excellent job.
And you know, because his domestic politics in the US,
Biden and Chuck Schumer they want Yahugan, they want somebody
who will be completely compliant with our own failed foreign policy.
The worst thing advice you could give to any ally
of ours is to, you know, rely on the wisdom
(31:38):
of Joe Biden's foreign policy because he has historically been
the worst.
Speaker 4 (31:42):
I forget who it was.
Speaker 7 (31:43):
I think Obama's former Defense secretary said He's been on
the wrong side of every foreign policy issue his entire life. So,
you know, Israel needs to weave its way through US politics,
so it continues to get on supplies, but they should
not follow the failed policies, failed advocacy of the Biden administration.
Speaker 1 (32:04):
Well, I agree completely, professor. You're a rare commodity these days,
somebody that has common sense, that actually has the ability
to teach our kids.
Speaker 5 (32:14):
We really appreciate your time. Start. Thank you for being
with us.
Speaker 7 (32:17):
Thanks for having me on all right, eight.
Speaker 1 (32:20):
Hundred and ninety four one Shawn is a number if
you want to be a part of the program. I
want to remind you about Berner by RNA. You have
to think about that God forbid moment when some perpetrator
wants to bring harm to you, your family, you, your business,
your employees. And that's what Berner is all about. Now
let me backtrack. I have been a believer in the
Second Amendment my entire life. I have had a license
(32:43):
to carry a firearm my entire adult life. Now with
that said, I love technology and I love options, and
that's what Berner is providing an effective, non lethal alternative
that can safeguard you, your family, your business, your employees. Now,
this is different than a firearm. It's legal in all
(33:03):
fifty states, no permits or background checks needed. It's designed
for easy use and the beauty of burner. I could
hit a target forty to fifty feet away with ease,
and it fires powerful deterns like tear gas and kinetic rounds.
And that means you can incapacitate any attacker for thirty
to forty minutes, which gives you time to escape and
(33:25):
you time to get the police to get involved. It
happens again and again and again, and Linda, I mean,
it's probably one of the few waves people in New
York could actually defend themselves.
Speaker 4 (33:34):
Yeah.
Speaker 10 (33:34):
I mean, you're looking at these protests. You're looking at
people coming in. There was a man yesterday with a
hockey stick in the middle of New York City whacking
women on the sidewalk unconscious.
Speaker 5 (33:44):
Like, if I have my burner, that's your city, by
the way, good luck.
Speaker 10 (33:46):
Oh that is not my city, my friend, that is
not you know, let me tell you something.
Speaker 5 (33:50):
That's nobody's city.
Speaker 1 (33:51):
That's to pay for a car for you, so you
wouldn't go on the subway, but you stubbornly refused.
Speaker 5 (33:57):
But anyway, I digress.
Speaker 10 (33:59):
You have a personal self defense plan. Burner should be
a part of it. And we're showing you the videos,
read the news stories. We don't need to convince you.
All you have to do is open your eyeballs. It's everywhere.
You need this as a part of your personal self
defense plan.
Speaker 5 (34:13):
End of story.
Speaker 1 (34:14):
All right, go to Berner check out their videos. You'll
be blown away. B y r na dot com slash
Hannity b y r na dot com slash Hannity and
if you mentioned my name and you love their product
like I do, you get ten percent off.
Speaker 5 (34:28):
We'll continue
All right, thanks Scott Shan An hour two Sean Hannity's show,
Told Free. Let me give you our number this Friday.
It is eight hundred and nine to four one Sean,
if you want to be a part of the program. Now,
up to this point, I keep using a line that
Donald Trump has been able to do something that I've
never seen observing politics my passion for all of my life,
(00:23):
and that is he has defied all conventional political gravity
and he's been able to do so. He gets arrested,
his poll numbers gets up, he gets arranged, his poll
numbers go up, He gets a mug shot, his poll
numbers really go up. Now he's on trial in New York.
We've gone over and over the unfairness of all of this.
You got a judge that donated to Joe Biden, which
(00:47):
should have been causes enough for recusal. Never mind the
New York law that would apply for recusal, and his
daughter's political actions. You can't even talk about that. But
that is a real issue that would mandate recusal. I
think it would be brought up an appeal and it's
an easy win. Then you've got the issue, of course
(01:09):
that in New York, as a matter of law, what
he is being charged with as a misdemeanor. Let alone
the fact that the statute of limitations have long since passed.
Let alone that he is reaching for a federal election law,
that the Department of Justice has weaponized it as it
is even passed on not thinking they can get a conviction,
(01:31):
or not thinking it warranted an indictment, which says a
lot in and of itself. Never mind the fact that
the previous DA in Manhattan passed on charging Donald Trump here,
and that originally even this DA Alvin Bragg, passed on it,
but only political pressure brought him back to the case.
And here it is eight years later, and two hundred
(01:53):
you know, and three days is when the trials started
before election day. Oh, let's bring it up, and let's
force the president to stay inside a courtroom for over
a month and leave the playing field in swing states
open to only one candidate. And now one candidate is
Joe Biden. If any of that sounds fair to any
of you that are listening, you have no sense of
(02:15):
justice or fairness. This is law fair, This is a
dual justice system. This is unequal justice under the law.
It's not equal justice under the law, and it's not
equal application of our laws. But here we are, and
Donald Trump will be stuck in this courtroom anywhere for
six weeks, however long it takes the jury has been seated.
(02:36):
We'll go over that in a second. Kevin O'Leary had
a really good comment about all this, how this case
in particular is hurting America's brand, and how it's making
not only New York City but the entire country make
us look like a bunch of clowns.
Speaker 2 (02:51):
Listen, every time I bring this up, I get all
this Trump stuff, Trump stuff, forget about Trump.
Speaker 3 (02:56):
Okay, we don't do this in America.
Speaker 2 (02:58):
We don't go after the office of the president with
porn star cases. We give a broad swath of latitude.
If you're an ex president, you murdered somebody, I get it,
or been accused of murder.
Speaker 3 (03:11):
But what is.
Speaker 2 (03:13):
This This hurts the American brand. I keep saying that
I was in Geneva last week, one hundred and fifty
countries represented there. Everybody's talking about this, saying, what is
this porn star thing?
Speaker 4 (03:25):
Like?
Speaker 2 (03:25):
This is an American president, This is the office of
the United States of America's highest office, and we're doing this.
This is sheer stupidity. And I'll tell you what should happen.
This should be pushed until after he wins or doesn't win.
This should be not part of this election cycle at all.
And this is not a Trumpet loving comment. This is
about the American brand, where I bring capital from all
(03:46):
around the world to invest here, we look like clowns.
Speaker 3 (03:50):
I hate this.
Speaker 1 (03:51):
It's bad for the country on every level.
Speaker 5 (03:54):
But Stephen A.
Speaker 1 (03:54):
Smith, I thought he was on Hannity last night, made
a lot of good comments about this. Why can't they
beat him on a level playing field. The reality is,
and we'll get to the polls later. I don't think
that they can. Donald Trump has spoken out about the
issue of recusal. He has spoken out about the issue
of a gag order. Now understand every other person that
is a part of this case, including the star witness
(04:18):
for the prosecution, Michael Kohne, who himself was convicted for
lying before Congress. They're free to say anything they want
anywhere they want, on social media, on cable television, on
network television. Quoted in our major newspapers around the country.
They can all say whatever they want anyway here to
analyze all of this. Mark Bernovitch, former Attorney General State
(04:41):
of Arizona. Greg Jarrett, Fox News Legal Analysts, best selling author,
Welcome both of you, mister attorney general. Let's get your
overall view of what's going on. What's happening, the issue
of the gag order, the issue of recusal, the issue
of the charges, the issue of the statute limitations. Says
a lot to digest here.
Speaker 4 (05:00):
Yeah, and Sean, thanks for having me on. And as
you know, I was also a former federal prosecutor to
stay gang prosecutor, so I have literally during the course
of my career, handled thousands of criminal cases and what
is going on in New York is unprecedented, and frankly,
I think it's an embarrassment for the justice system. Now
we know that there's basic rules even in New York
(05:22):
the Criminal Procedure Code, a defending can wave his presence. Remember,
all of these rights are supposed to ensure a defendant
or the accused affair trial. And it seems like every
time there's a decision, it breaks against the accused. And
whether that was today's decision to not have the prosecution
turned over the first few witnesses, which is a very
common and typical order the judge would grant to keep
a trial moving, whether it's not allowing the accused the
(05:45):
wave his presence, as you mentioned, a gag order, and
we know under existing constitutional law that prior restraints on
speech are presumptively unconstitutional because you want to guarantee the
accused the accused a right of affair trial. So I
think the public understands the hypocrisy of what's going on,
and people like Michael Cohen and porn star is can
(06:06):
have documentaries and beyond you know, other networks, you know,
basically slamming the defendant where the DA can issue it
speaking indictments and say all sorts of nasty stuff, and
yet they can say whatever they want and the accused
is muzzled and gagged. It really the hypocrisy stinks on
so many different levels. And I mean, I think it's
gotten so bad Sehn that when Trump wins this case,
(06:29):
I bet you the New York DA is going to
charge him for converting the courthouse into a campaign fundraising event,
because that's what's going to happen. I actually think it's
going to listen sympathy. But in the meantime, you have
a former president of the United States being charged with
a crime that's too complicated to explain in thirty seconds
or less, which is always a bad sign for a prosecutor.
And you know, ultimately, I think that they're going to
(06:51):
lose this case, either at trial or on appeal. And
it's just a waste of time and money. And it's
clearly designed to fort someone for running for the highest
offices in.
Speaker 6 (06:59):
The world, you know.
Speaker 1 (07:00):
And here's the thing, and the judges not press the
prosecutor or the DA in this case Bragg to give
a full complete definition of what the actual charge is. Now,
Greg Jarrett, you've been following it as closely as I have.
Do you have a full complete understanding of what the
charge even is about against Donald Trump?
Speaker 6 (07:20):
No, absolutely not, and neither does the defense. You know,
he's not charging the underlying crime. He's simply citing it
as the crime that Trump was trying to conceal, which is,
we guess, federal election law violations, even though, as you
point out, Federal Election Commission investigated and said this isn't
(07:44):
a violation. The Department of Justice studied and said there's
no crime here. So the defense demanded in a bill
of particulars tell us what the underlying crime is, and
they just said, okay, mister Bragg, tell well, he offered
up four different possibilities, which means the defense has to
(08:06):
prepare for four different defenses, which is utterly absurd, but
it underscores the bias of this judge, and the gag
order issued by the judge is a blatantly unconstitutional prior
restraint on free speech. Our legal system, Shawn does not
take priority over the Bill of Rights.
Speaker 7 (08:27):
Take a look.
Speaker 6 (08:27):
There's no exemption in the First Amendment for criminal trials.
The accused has a protected right to defend himself both
at trial and in the court of public opinion where
he's already been convicted, both by the DA and a
bias media. Here, Trump has an elevated right as the
leading candidate for president, and his accusers, who are trial
(08:52):
witnesses for the prosecution, have been publicly trashing Trump at
every turn. Yet prosecutors and the judge not gagging those witnesses,
only Trump preventing him from fairly responding. You know, Michael
Cohen is a confessed and convicted burdurer. He continues to lie.
Two weeks ago, a federal judge called him a serial perjurer,
(09:16):
but Trump is not allowed to point that out again.
This exposes the bias of the judge.
Speaker 1 (09:24):
All right, quick break right back, more with Attorney General
former Attorney General of Arizona, Mark Burnovitch, and more with
Greg Jarrett.
Speaker 5 (09:32):
Your calls.
Speaker 1 (09:32):
Also coming up the International Fellowship of Christians and Jews.
They are pointing out what is now a real urgent,
clear present danger. Hundreds of thousands of Israelis have been
displaced and they're providing food and medicine and supplies, housing,
everything they could possibly provide. They're also placing mobile bomb
(09:54):
shelters in well populated areas. As now, Israel is preparing
for the war first case scenario of even more rockets
being fired from the souths from the North, and maybe
Iran again, and you know, this could we don't know,
doesn't look like at this moment, but it could break
out into a full on regional war and Israel would
be the target of you know, basically a three war front,
(10:16):
which is difficult for anybody to ever fight back against.
But don't underestimate Israel. But anyway, it puts the whole danger,
puts the whole country at risk. They are in a
fight for their very survival. We're watching this unfold on
a daily basis. The situation is fluid, but the International
Fellowship of Christians and Jews, they're there on the ground
every day and they're providing support which the government really
(10:40):
doesn't have a lot of time to devote to those
people that have been displaced and those Israelis that are
in neat that's where you commit. You can help with
these mobile bomb shelters that they're placing strategically around the country.
You can help with food and medicine and supplies and
housing and tents and blankets and pillows, whatever you can offer.
They need your support, They need your help, They need
(11:03):
your generosity. Please go to their website and support IFCJ
dot org. It's one word, support IFCJ dot org. Anything
you can do will be greatly appreciated.
Speaker 6 (11:20):
Keeping the truth alive, sanity is on right now.
Speaker 5 (11:26):
We continue now.
Speaker 1 (11:27):
Greg Jarrett, former Age of Arizona, Mark Bernovich are with
us this Friday. All right, you both have had an
opportunity to look at the limited information we have on
every juror.
Speaker 5 (11:38):
Now.
Speaker 1 (11:38):
It was kind of bizarre the judge in this case
to say, you know, excoriate the media and then end
by saying, well, of course, anything that happens on the
record in the courtroom you are able to report. But
I just asked that you simple common sense. But he
didn't define what that is. Uh So I'm just going
with what Fox News has reported, the Guardian has reported,
(11:59):
in pretty much other media outlet has reported, And I
have no intention of giving out any information that would
be perhaps unknown about about a durwor or in any
way identify them as you look through the twelve jurors.
I don't know if you've had a chance, Mark Burnovitch
to look at them. Is there anything that stands out
(12:21):
among any of the twelve that you see?
Speaker 4 (12:24):
You know, Sean. One of the things that I find
so amazing about the trumpt Arrangement syndrome is with all
of these constitutional issues, whether it's the gag order or
whether it's this recent order about what the media can
and can't report. I mean, where's the ACLU, where's all
the First Amendment groups saying wait a minute, the judge
shouldn't be doing this. We have a right to report
whatever we want to report. So I think the shows
(12:46):
once again that when people talk about the rule of law. Remember,
the ends cannot justify the means, and clearly everything that's
happened thus far shows that the scales of justice are
tilted against the president. Now, as far as the jurors,
I will tell you honestly, when I use to pick juries,
I used to not like. This is from a prosecutor's perspective.
I did not like engineers on a jury because everything
(13:07):
they did had to be precise, like everything had to
fit in place, and well, why did the bullet bounce
off this or why did this happen? And so I
think as a defendant that it might be good for
the former president to have people on that jury that
might want to hold the TA accountable. Because remember the
job of a prosecutor is to do justice. It's not
(13:27):
to get a conviction any costs. You don't count success
in terms of years in prison. You count as justice
being done. And apparently Bragg doesn't understand that. If Greg
was just talking about, if you're a prosecutor you can't
explain the theory of your case in thirty seconds or less,
you shouldn't bring the case. And that's what I used
to tell young croskeuters in our office. So I think
having someone like an engineer that is used to position,
(13:50):
he's used to everything fitting into place. He might be
one of those people that says, wait a minute, this
doesn't make sense. The fact that there's people that are
educators on the jury. Now, once again, I to not
like having quite frankly, educators teachers on the jury because
they tend to lean a little left. Now that may
cut either way for the president, but they tend to
be a little more sympathetic to, you know, people that
(14:12):
are accused of crimes. But once again, this is the president,
and you throw out a lot of the normal rules
when it comes to the law and the jury. So,
based on what I've seen thus far, it's a Manhattan jury.
We know that you're already pushing rocks uphill if you're
president turns defense attorneys, so it's going to be a challenge.
But remember you have to have unanonymity in a criminal trial.
(14:34):
So if you're if you're the defense, you've got to
figure out, okay, who maybe won't keep people. And so
when we're doing testimony, you can see their eyes kind
of light up, you can see them nodding their heads,
and so that's who if I were the defense, I
would gear my defense towards that because clearly, at least
that that jury is going to be I think, predisposed
to make President Trump no matter what they hear. I mean,
(14:55):
you know, you know, well, let me.
Speaker 5 (14:57):
Let me get a Greg Jared's take on this.
Speaker 1 (14:59):
There is a a former attorney general or deputy assistant
Attorney general ross story report of this, Elliott Williams, who
said flagged a particular juror that said described as a
married investment banker with a master's degree, but the fact
that he's read Trump's best selling book The Art of
the Deal, claims to track Trump and his truth social posts.
(15:20):
He claimed that might be a problem when you look
at the jurors and what we know about them. What
is your reaction, Greg Jarrett, Well, my.
Speaker 6 (15:27):
Reaction is the jury selection has been dominated by a
flood of people likes of which I've never seen, who
said they cannot and will not be fair to Trump.
They don't want to be. But the unknown question here, Sean,
is how many of those who said otherwise, oh yes,
I could be fair. Our line with the hidden agenda
(15:49):
of getting on the jury to convict Manhattan, by its
very makeup, as you know, is an inherently hostile venue
for the accused in a politically charged case against a
political candidate that's hated. There these tours, I think are predisposed,
The outcome is preordained. Witches had a better chance of
(16:10):
a fair trial in Salem. I mean, now, this absolutely
should have been moved elsewhere, to Staten Island, for example,
where the jury pool would be more balanced. But Bragg
opposed it. So did Judge Marshawn, which is evidence to
me that they know their prosecutor.
Speaker 3 (16:29):
Would you.
Speaker 1 (16:31):
You would think the judge would know that the issue
of recusal will be a major point if there is
a conviction upon appeal. But we'll wait and we'll see.
Appreciate both of you, Mark Bernovich, Greg Jarrett, have a
great weekend. Eight hundred and ninety four to one, Shawn
is a number if you want to be a part
of the program.
Speaker 6 (16:50):
Exposing government waste and abuse of your liberties every day,
Sean Hannity is on right now.
Speaker 1 (17:00):
Twenty five to the top of the hour, toll free
are number eight hundred and ninety four one Seawan. If
you want to be a part of the program, your calls,
your comments coming up straight ahead. I want to update
you the situation at Columbia University. Well, we finally saw
some action here. You have the president of an Ivy
League institution. Now think about this. How many parents, maybe
(17:22):
they have children, and they hope and they pray that
maybe one day their child might be able to achieve
admittance to one of the nation's top and most prestigious
universities like Columbia, Havid or any of these places. Well,
it turns out it's the last place I think I
want my kids to be going to college. So so
(17:44):
earlier in the week, we saw the president of Columbia
go before Congress and literally has asked a very simple,
fundamental moral question. Now understand and think about this answer
through the prism of the times that we're living in.
Woke Ism on college campuses, pc ism all over college campuses.
Speaker 5 (18:08):
Oh my sensibilities.
Speaker 1 (18:10):
Oh, I feign the vapors, I got the vapors.
Speaker 5 (18:13):
Somebody used the wrong pronoun.
Speaker 1 (18:15):
You know this kid in North Carolina that gets suspended
and put on his record racist for using the term
illegal alien, which the federal government uses as official language
and has for a very long time. But when asked
about the comment about well from the river to the sea,
which means the annihilation, complete wiping out of Israel. Well,
(18:38):
the Columbia president says, well, I'd really rather they not
use it. It could be hurtful, but doesn't say that
should that should not be the kind of speech used
on that college campus. Now, this is a college university,
and I went through this the other day where you
have a tenured academic who got criticized rightly so after
the October seven terrorists at ten by the terror group AMAS. Well,
(19:03):
this professor's name is Joseph Massad. He referred to it
as awesome and a studding victory of the Palestinian resistance.
The sight of the Palestinian resistance fighters storming Israeli checkpoints
separating Gaza and Israel was astounding heat penned. Really, perhaps
the major achievement of the resistance is the temporary takeover
(19:25):
of these settler colonies. Twelve hundred Israelis were murdered that day.
You know, countless numbers of women were raped, little babies
were beheaded, hundreds were taken hostage, some are still hostages,
if they're even still alive. Then you have another professor
Hamiddbashi is his name, And what do we learn from
(19:48):
this guy? Every dirty, treacherous, ugly, pernicious happening in the world.
Just wait a few days and the ugly name Israel
will pop up in the atrocities.
Speaker 5 (19:59):
He writes on Facebook in twenty eighteen.
Speaker 1 (20:02):
And I can go on now for the next ten
minutes talking about professors that are radicalized, that are teaching
at Ivy League institutions. And this president, like the former
Havid president and these other presidents, needs to go.
Speaker 4 (20:18):
Well.
Speaker 1 (20:18):
Anyway, we do have an update. Finally the police got involved.
But it has gotten so bad throughout the week that
I want to play some of the audio that we have.
I want to play Columbia University protesters yelling, oh, we
are Hamas, and we basically said we are terrorists, kind
of like the chanting that we heard in Michigan. Death
(20:42):
to America, Death to Israel, Death to America, Death to Israel.
Then I want you to listen to a pro Palestinian
protester reading a message from Gaza thanking the Columbia students
for standing in solidarity with Palestine, and a pro Palestine
protester chanting a Columbia universe.
Speaker 5 (21:01):
Just listen to this.
Speaker 1 (21:02):
And imagine this is supposed to be the top of
the top, the krem de la creme in terms of
a college campus and university where you would think there's
diversity of thought, where you can have the free and
open exchange of ideas, ideals and opinions that have been
so radicalized that conservatives are run out of college campuses
(21:23):
if they dare to utter a word. But yet we
gotta have people yelling we are hamas.
Speaker 8 (21:35):
From I said to the US, we're standing on weavering solidary.
What's the students for Christas the pols sign at Columbia University,
We've done with the SGV member.
Speaker 3 (21:57):
Because I'm just doing.
Speaker 9 (21:59):
It, and the contest to the demands for Columbia to
completely financially dove us from the occupation entity from the
occupation entity.
Speaker 8 (22:16):
On April seventeen, twenty twenty four, seventy prudents that Columbia
began Columbia. And that's the solitary complements.
Speaker 9 (22:31):
But the brain that the guesting diversity's publicity.
Speaker 5 (22:34):
Bernifies a grade.
Speaker 8 (22:42):
We support from other clipically.
Speaker 3 (22:47):
And are proud if they're.
Speaker 8 (22:48):
Willingness to remain stech fast.
Speaker 9 (22:53):
Let's sacrifice for our.
Speaker 3 (22:55):
Truest coon sacrifice.
Speaker 9 (22:58):
We encourage make the support so.
Speaker 1 (23:05):
That follow up.
Speaker 3 (23:08):
We've earned the action on your compass and within your old.
Speaker 7 (23:18):
Lass you.
Speaker 3 (23:24):
Yes read by Gray Oh my wall sign is a well.
Speaker 1 (24:10):
Anyway, joining us now is Professor Bill Jacobson, Cornell Law Professor.
Speaker 5 (24:14):
Welcome back, professor, How.
Speaker 4 (24:16):
Are you good?
Speaker 7 (24:17):
Thanks for having me back.
Speaker 1 (24:19):
What's going on? I want to get your reaction to
all of this. You know, your parent thinks that it's
a great thing. You get admitted to an Ivy League institution,
and this is what you're sending your kids into. This
is the environment they're going into.
Speaker 7 (24:32):
Yeah, I think people don't realize this has been building
for thirty years on campuses. It just has burst out
to the surface. But the radicalization of the campus is
the radicalization of the faculty. The homogenization of anti US,
anti Israel animosity from faculty. Faculty drives a lot of this.
(24:53):
The students come and go, but the faculty of there
for decades and so what is happening now is that
the faculty have been advocating, and you cited a couple
of examples in the intro, have been advocating for violence,
have been advocating for the destruction of Israel, and they
also advocate for the destruction of the United States. And
is it any wonder that after thirty years of that,
(25:15):
students are becoming radicalized. So it's a much worse situation
than I think most people in this country realize.
Speaker 1 (25:21):
Let me get your thought on this, because I never
thought we'd be discussing this in our lifetime. And that
is the vile, the repulse of the virulent anti Semitism
that has emerged on college campuses, in the halls of Congress.
We hear it all throughout Europe, European nations. I never
(25:42):
thought i'd hear in Australia Gas the Jews f the Jews,
but we heard that too.
Speaker 6 (25:49):
Where is all of this hatred coming from, Well, it's
coming multiple places.
Speaker 7 (25:54):
One I mentioned the utter radicalization of the faculty at
certainly the elite college is more than any place the
Columbia's of the world. But it's also a lot of
it is coming from the anti Semitism that exists in
the Arab world of the Arab media, not all of it,
but Palestinian media is notoriously anti Smitic, notorious for demonizing
(26:17):
and dehumanizing Jews. There are groups like Palestinian Palestine Media
Watch and Memory who just show you what they're putting
on their TV. Unwrought, the Refugee Agency, the schools they
run are inundated with gross, gross Nazi like depictions of Jews,
and so a lot of that carries over. So the
(26:38):
so called Palestinian activists are parrotying the same sort of
vile antisemitism, and it's being imported into our country. So
I think it's coming from many different directions, but it's here,
it's now, and we have to face.
Speaker 6 (26:54):
Up to it.
Speaker 5 (26:54):
All Right, we'll take a quick break.
Speaker 1 (26:56):
We'll come back the latest out of this insanity all
week that's been going on a Columbia More with Professor
Bill Jacobson of Cornell, a Cornell Law professor. Your calls
also coming up eight hundred nine four one Sean if
you want to be a part of the program. As
we continue our coverage, Israel fights back and the Iranians
lie in cower, straight ahead, corn.
Speaker 5 (27:23):
Stand up Chuck and dog faced pony soldier.
Speaker 2 (27:26):
That's just a few of the fighter moments you recall
when you walk down Joe's memory Lane.
Speaker 3 (27:32):
You can't make this up, and with Biden in office,
you don't have to. This is the Shawnity Show.
Speaker 1 (27:45):
We continue Professor Bill Jacobson, he is a Cornell law professor,
as we discuss the virulent and repulsive anti Semitism on
college campuses, in this case Columbia.
Speaker 5 (27:58):
Well, how does this end?
Speaker 1 (28:00):
Because I love the fact that Israel, in spite of
the advice don't advice of Joe Biden don't means do
I guess could be a great bumper sticker. But in
spite of it, they is They hit Iran hard. And
what I was really impressed with as I was watching
this all on fold last night, is they hit deep
(28:22):
inside of Iran. And I did not think it would
be as easy as it was for Israel. We know
that they have the nuclear sites all around the country.
They're spread out, they're buried underground. But the fact with
great precision that Israel was able to get deep inside,
even close to one of the nuclear sites and close
(28:43):
to Tehran and other parts of it of Iran tells
me that the Israelis have them. They were able to
stop every missile that was fired into Israel, but one
out of hundreds that were fired, and Iran wasn't able
to stop a thing, and that's why they're denying it
even took place. But we have all the evidence in
(29:04):
fact that it did take place. That surprised me, and
that might be a moment where the world can say
and pause and recognize, Oh, if we want, we can
stop their nuclear program right here, right now, so we
don't wake up one day and learn that the radical Mullows,
with their extreme ideology of convert or dye, have nuclear
(29:25):
capability that I'm pretty convinced that they would use to
as a means to an end for them. I think
they'd do it. I think they'd use it. I think
they're that sick and that ugly and that evil and
not twisted your thoughts.
Speaker 7 (29:38):
Absolutely, they announced every day their goal is to eliminate Israel.
That is their goal. They announced it every single day.
They march death to America, Death to Israel. So yes, absolutely,
But Israel's in't a really big predicament because on the
one hand, they need to defend themselves. On the other hand,
they're faced with an uprising within the Democrat Party in
(30:00):
the United States that puts pressure on the Biden administration
and people within the bureaucracy at the State Department, who
are not friendly to Israel and who want to cut
off weapons supply and who want to really hang Israel
allowed to dry. So Israel has to be very careful.
I suspect that if it wasn't for fear of what
the Biden administration would do, the response would have been
(30:21):
much stronger. They might have actually taken out those nuclear sites.
But they have to thread a needle with the current
administration because the current administration has held them back in Gaza,
has held them back from Rafa, has been trying to
save Hamas. So it's a very big predicament and I
think people don't understand. You know, a lot of people
like to criticize Benjamin Nett and Yahoo, but he's got
(30:43):
to weave his way between a lot of competing forces,
one of which is the hostility deep within the Biden administration.
Speaker 5 (30:51):
So let me tell you something.
Speaker 1 (30:52):
Bb deserves a lot of credit because he did not,
in the end give a rip about what Joe Biden said.
His country is in a fire for their survival, and
what he did last night shows that Joe Biden's words
and Joe Biden's threats and Joe Biden's lectures are meaningless
to Israel and meaningless to the Prime minister. And he
(31:13):
did what was right for the survival of his country,
and I applaud him.
Speaker 3 (31:16):
A lot of that.
Speaker 7 (31:17):
Yeah, he has really, I think done an excellent job.
And you know, because his domestic politics in the US,
Biden and Chuck Schumer they want Yahugan, they want somebody
who will be completely compliant with our own failed foreign policy.
The worst thing advice you could give to any ally
of ours is to, you know, rely on the wisdom
(31:38):
of Joe Biden's foreign policy because he has historically been
the worst.
Speaker 4 (31:42):
I forget who it was.
Speaker 7 (31:43):
I think Obama's former Defense secretary said He's been on
the wrong side of every foreign policy issue his entire life. So,
you know, Israel needs to weave its way through US politics,
so it continues to get on supplies, but they should
not follow the failed policies, failed advocacy of the Biden administration.
Speaker 1 (32:04):
Well, I agree completely, professor. You're a rare commodity these days,
somebody that has common sense, that actually has the ability
to teach our kids.
Speaker 5 (32:14):
We really appreciate your time. Start. Thank you for being
with us.
Speaker 7 (32:17):
Thanks for having me on all right, eight.
Speaker 1 (32:20):
Hundred and ninety four one Shawn is a number if
you want to be a part of the program. I
want to remind you about Berner by RNA. You have
to think about that God forbid moment when some perpetrator
wants to bring harm to you, your family, you, your business,
your employees. And that's what Berner is all about. Now
let me backtrack. I have been a believer in the
Second Amendment my entire life. I have had a license
(32:43):
to carry a firearm my entire adult life. Now with
that said, I love technology and I love options, and
that's what Berner is providing an effective, non lethal alternative
that can safeguard you, your family, your business, your employees. Now,
this is different than a firearm. It's legal in all
(33:03):
fifty states, no permits or background checks needed. It's designed
for easy use and the beauty of burner. I could
hit a target forty to fifty feet away with ease,
and it fires powerful deterns like tear gas and kinetic rounds.
And that means you can incapacitate any attacker for thirty
to forty minutes, which gives you time to escape and
(33:25):
you time to get the police to get involved. It
happens again and again and again, and Linda, I mean,
it's probably one of the few waves people in New
York could actually defend themselves.
Speaker 4 (33:34):
Yeah.
Speaker 10 (33:34):
I mean, you're looking at these protests. You're looking at
people coming in. There was a man yesterday with a
hockey stick in the middle of New York City whacking
women on the sidewalk unconscious.
Speaker 5 (33:44):
Like, if I have my burner, that's your city, by
the way, good luck.
Speaker 10 (33:46):
Oh that is not my city, my friend, that is
not you know, let me tell you something.
Speaker 5 (33:50):
That's nobody's city.
Speaker 1 (33:51):
That's to pay for a car for you, so you
wouldn't go on the subway, but you stubbornly refused.
Speaker 5 (33:57):
But anyway, I digress.
Speaker 10 (33:59):
You have a personal self defense plan. Burner should be
a part of it. And we're showing you the videos,
read the news stories. We don't need to convince you.
All you have to do is open your eyeballs. It's everywhere.
You need this as a part of your personal self
defense plan.
Speaker 5 (34:13):
End of story.
Speaker 1 (34:14):
All right, go to Berner check out their videos. You'll
be blown away. B y r na dot com slash
Hannity b y r na dot com slash Hannity and
if you mentioned my name and you love their product
like I do, you get ten percent off.
Speaker 5 (34:28):
We'll continue
The Sean Hannity Show News
Host
Sean Hannity
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.