June 13, 2024 • 32 mins
Congressman Matt Gaetz of Florida, along with his colleague Sen JD Vance are calling on Secretary of State Antony Blinken to send them information regarding the Ukrainian NGO by June 28.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Well, I am come in your city, get un saying
you come down.
Speaker 2 (00:09):
Will be.
Speaker 3 (00:12):
Jan and if you want a little may I come alonge.
Speaker 4 (00:18):
What what happens to you if Donald Trump wins? What
do you do?
Speaker 3 (00:22):
What's your first I mean it sounds nuts, but like
I wouldn't be surprised as this guy through me in jail.
Speaker 5 (00:28):
You have a president of the United States who is
living embodiment of the rule of law, even with respect
to his only living son.
Speaker 6 (00:39):
Knows so long as nine our freedom can never be secure.
Speaker 3 (00:46):
Cout down on tea minus one hundred and forty four
days left still Election day.
Speaker 7 (00:57):
Are coming to you.
Speaker 3 (01:02):
Don't suck from coast to coast, from border to border,
from c to Shining Sea. Sean Kennedy is.
Speaker 7 (01:18):
On all right, thanks got Shannon Hour two Sean Hannity
Show told free it's eight hundred and nine to four
one Sean, if you want to be a part of
the program. So the House Republicans yesterday, thankfully, in spite
of their very tiny slim majority, we're able to hold
the Attorney General Merrick Garland in contempt. But don't hold
(01:40):
your breath expecting that Garland is going to get the
Peter Navarro or Steve Bannon treatment, or let's see the
Roger Stone treatment or the Man of War treatment, or
the Flynt treatment, or the treatment of Rudy or the
treatment of anybody else. Know there is a two tier
justice system under Joe Biden and Merrick Garland.
Speaker 4 (01:58):
We know that.
Speaker 7 (02:00):
And Merrick Garland was recently being grilled by the House
Judiciary Committee. Some of the best moments were with Congressman
Matt Gates, who will join us in a moment, and
he asks a simple question and whether or not Garland
would provide all documents and communications with the likes of
Alvin Bragg, Letitia James, Bonnie Willis's offices. Now, remember, in
(02:23):
the case of Leticia James and Alvin Bragg, they both
ran on campaigns to get Trump one man, one organization,
go after one family. And he's never once criticized those
people for running for that and then fulfilling a campaign
would ended up being a campaign promise. Anyway, here is
Matt Gates asking why won't he provide the documentation?
Speaker 8 (02:47):
Attorney General, You've told us that it's a dangerous conspiracy
theory to allege that the Department of Justice is communicating
with these state and local prosecutions against Trump.
Speaker 9 (02:59):
You can clear it all up for us right now.
Speaker 8 (03:00):
Will the Department of Justice provide to the committee all documents,
all correspondents between the Department and Alvin Bragg's office and
Fannie Willis's office and Letitia James's office.
Speaker 1 (03:12):
The offices you're referring to are independent offices of state.
Speaker 9 (03:17):
I get that, I get that.
Speaker 2 (03:18):
State.
Speaker 8 (03:18):
The question is whether you will provide all of your
documents and correspondence.
Speaker 9 (03:22):
That's the question. I don't need a history lesson.
Speaker 1 (03:25):
Well, I'm going to say again, we do not control
those offices.
Speaker 6 (03:29):
They make there the.
Speaker 8 (03:29):
Questions where you communicate with them, not whether you control them.
Speaker 9 (03:32):
Do you communicate with them? And will you provide those.
Speaker 1 (03:34):
Community to make it a request, we'll refer it to
our Office of Legislatives.
Speaker 9 (03:37):
But here's the thing.
Speaker 8 (03:38):
That you come in here and you lodge this attack
that it's a conspiracy theory, that there is coordinated law
fair against Trump, and then when we say fine, just
give us the documents, give us the correspondence, and then
if it's a conspiracy theory, that will be evident. But
when you say, well, we'll take your request, and then
we'll we'll sort of work it through the DOJ's accommodation process.
(03:59):
Then you're actually advancing the very dangerous conspiracy theory that
you're concerned about.
Speaker 7 (04:04):
Anyway, Congress from mcaid's Florida joins us. Now, you've had
some pretty fine moments in Congress. That's the right up
there with some of the top moments. Why wouldn't he
provide that documentation? Why wouldn't he provide that communication? Seems
pretty simple to me, And you're right, that would dispel
any quote conspiracy theory that he was talking about.
Speaker 4 (04:24):
In reference to this, we.
Speaker 10 (04:27):
Have a reasonable basis for suspicion that all of the
lawfare being brought against Donald Trump is being centralized in
decision making with senior officials at the Biden administration. Now
they may be at the Department of Justice, they may
even be at the White House. We want to see
the calendared meetings, the emails, the memos, the notes, the correspondents,
(04:48):
so we can determine whether or not we need legislation
to stop federal entities from goosing state attorneys general or
local das in too political prosecutions that federal prosecutors would
never do. Remember the Southern District of New York, which
is like you know, the nineteen twenty nine Yankees of
(05:09):
federal prosecutors, right, they did not bring any case against
Trump for any violation of election law because there was
no violation of law. But you saw then Alvin Bragg
animated into action, and we want to know about it.
And I think Jim Jordan and James Comer deserve a
lot of credit for getting this contempt proceeding together for Garland.
(05:32):
But was it the right one? Sean like to think
about what's going on? Zoom out for a second. We
got to ask what is the grave harm happening? And
to me, it is the far graver harm is the
coordinated lawair against Trump. It's not that Joe Biden wasn't
prosecuted for the documents kind of documents case. I kind
(05:53):
of thought both of the documents cases against Trump and
against Biden were kind of ticky, tacky and dumb, and
they seemed not to be in thinking with how we
would normally deal with an administrative dispute.
Speaker 7 (06:05):
So well they might have been, but one was treated
far differently than the other.
Speaker 10 (06:10):
Sure, and I think exposing that is helpful. But I
think that right now. The document case is like on
the slow boat to China. Meanwhile, you've got Jack Smith
seeking a determination on immunity that will allow him to proceed,
you know, in a blue jurisdiction where I think they
would convict Donald Trump of killing Jimmy Hoffa, abducting the
(06:32):
Limberg baby, and being the shooter on the Grassy Knoll
all in one trial if they had any.
Speaker 4 (06:37):
Oh, by the way, that is a guarantee.
Speaker 7 (06:39):
What's interesting is Eileen Cannon is actually questioning and having
a hearing on the legitimacy of the appointment of the
special prosecutor, and that is the Florida case. But I
think that would then raise the case in Washington, DC
as well, and will await whether or not immunity comes up.
Speaker 10 (06:59):
Now.
Speaker 7 (07:00):
Probably would have argued that case differently, You're the attorney,
not me, and I would have argued more for limited
immunity that would have been applicable over absolute immunity, because
I thought this absurd analogy that kept being brought up
again and again and again. I just think it got
so far off course. Well, does that mean Donald Trump
(07:22):
can employ Saled Team six to assassinate his political opponents?
Speaker 4 (07:26):
That's not what anybody's talking about.
Speaker 10 (07:29):
I agree with you on the legal analysis, but I
would also say this is the downstream effect of taking
the unprecedented action of indicting Donald Trump for things that
no one would ever be charged for if they weren't
Donald Trump and running again and winning. Right, these prosecutors
just think they can haul the former president of the
United States before their court and that it's not going
(07:51):
to create these really sticky legal questions, but at times
six years to resolve and Judge Cannon. She's getting all
the criticism for the left wing punch and talking heads,
but she is actually the one using sound judicial economy
because whether or not Jack Smith was legitimately appointed is
a threshold question, and he wouldn't go through a trial
(08:12):
and witnesses and a jury and all of that stuff
if the threshold question is answered in a way that
would render this entire prosecution meaningless. So she is being
thoughtful and thorough, and I think the prosecutors Jack Smith
and really the whole batch of them, there is a
there's a huborus about it that they they just think
they're going to march in with the Emperor. Moderit of
(08:34):
the Biden administration and they can get away with anything
they want to get away with. I mean, my gosh,
Nathan Wade and Fannie Willis imagine the Huber as a
big prosecuting Donald Trump and thinking you could get away
with what they were up to.
Speaker 7 (08:45):
Let me, let me for a second, talk a little
bit more about Mark Carland than the being held in contempt,
because you and I both know, at least under Biden's
weaponized and politicized do OJE, nothing's going to happen. And
you know Garland, for example, you questioned him on the
issue of you know, why would the third highest ranking
(09:06):
official at Biden's doj under Merrick Garland actually leave that
prestigious position to go argue the case in New York City,
the Alvin Bragg case that never should have been brought,
the upcharge case from a misdemeanor whose statuted limitations and
long since passed in this novel political this novel legal
(09:27):
theory that somehow brought into play federal election law that
they never even fully defined as a charge until the
end of the trial. And anyway, you asked about this,
this appointment of a Colangelo and I have nothing to
do with it, do you believe him.
Speaker 4 (09:45):
Let me play the exchange.
Speaker 8 (09:47):
You had no problem dispatching Matthew Colangelo. Who's Matthew calanch
is false? I did not dispatch Matthew Colangelo.
Speaker 9 (09:54):
Matthew Colangelo.
Speaker 8 (09:55):
Matthew Colangelo became the Assistant Attorney General at the very
beginning of the Biden administration without having been Senate confirmed,
goes and gets the senior role at the DOJ, and
then after I believe it's Gupta, replaces Colangelo. Clangelo makes
this remarkable downstream career journey from the US Department of
Justice in Washington, DC and then pops up in Alvin
(10:19):
Bragg's office to go get Trump.
Speaker 9 (10:20):
And you're saying that's a that's just.
Speaker 8 (10:23):
A career choice that was made that has nothing to
do with the law.
Speaker 1 (10:26):
Fair coordinator, I'm saying it's false. I did not dispatch
mister Colangelo anywhere.
Speaker 9 (10:32):
Well, do you know how he ended up there.
Speaker 1 (10:34):
I assume he spoke, he applied for a job.
Speaker 9 (10:37):
There and got the job. But see, you know what,
tell you I had nothing to.
Speaker 4 (10:40):
Do with I don't believe him.
Speaker 10 (10:42):
Sean. Matthew Colangelo going from one of the top positions
of the Department of Justice to the Manhattan DA's office
to be a frontline prosecutor would be about as suspicious
as if he resigned from Fox News tomorrow and started
doing the morning weather updates in Tupelo, Mississippi. I mean
that is sort of the same downstream career trajectory. And
(11:04):
so he wasn't there because of some sort of realignment
in his professional goals. He was there to get Trump.
And what corroborates that theory is the book written by
one of the other prosecutors brought in for this particular purpose,
Mike Palmerant, who said we assembled the legal eagles because
we were going to find any basis in law with
(11:25):
which to hamper Trump's reascend to the presidency. And when
palm Rant was before the House Judiciary Committee, he pled
the Fifth when asked whether or not he broke the
law in his pursuit of Trump. Think about that, when
the prosecutor is pleading the fifth about whether or not
they broke the law, and someone else is suspiciously appearing
(11:46):
from the Department of Justice and Mary Garland is refusing
to reveal the correspondence memos notes communications. I don't think
we should be labeled conspiracy theorists or wanting to learn more,
and so I don't think it's sufficient to contempt Garland
for what we have. We have to get this information
and don't be discouraged about criminal referrals or contempt proceedings
(12:09):
that are dormant right now, because they can be born
like a tulip Gould in the spring when Donald Trump
has a new attorney general in January of twenty twenty five.
So these are live torpedoes that we are firing, and
with an attorney general far better than Jeff's sessions, I
think we could have a law system that is restored,
(12:32):
confidence that is restored, and a return to the facts
and the law away from what we've seen from the
Biden administration.
Speaker 7 (12:39):
One of the things I said about President Trump when
he was in office was that I felt he gave
Republicans in the House and the Senate of backbone. He's
back up on the hill today, and you know, he
talked about great unity within the party and a lot
of common sense.
Speaker 4 (12:55):
What is your reaction and what was the reaction?
Speaker 10 (12:58):
It was a pep rally, Sean and Fan. You know,
you and I have had a lot of conversations on
air and off air about the need for unity and
really in the absence of strong leadership following President Trump's
departure in the Republican Party, like no one was inspired
by McConnell or McCarthy and Johnson's no walk in the
Park right now either, And so having Trump back there,
like there was finally main character energy in the room
(13:21):
and you had the most liberal member, if you have
the most conservative members standing together applauding President Trump nodding
along as he talked about energy policy, gross the medics product.
President Trump wants to get rid of taxes on tips,
and I love that. I love the idea of unlocking
more economics potential for working class people in this country.
Speaker 7 (13:41):
So he by the way, I've worked in restaurants, you know,
since I was, you know, twelve years old, the washing
dishes in a restaurant. I was a cook, a busboy, waiter, bartender.
I'm all for it.
Speaker 4 (13:51):
I agree those are great.
Speaker 10 (13:53):
And you, by the way, you know the great Americans
who are doing those jobs and a little bit extra
in their pocket at the end of the night when
you're working for gratuities means a lot valets. You know,
just a lot of people that it can help, and
those are Trump voters, and it speaks of this broader
realignment that's happening. Both Mike Johnson and and President Trump spoke,
you know, very well about what we're seeing in the polling,
(14:15):
where working class people in all kinds of states, in
all kind of you know, regardless of race or gender,
working class people want the prosperity that President Trump brought us,
and it is it could be the most unifying thing,
not just in an election, but in this country for
a long time.
Speaker 7 (14:33):
Quick break more with Florida Congressman Mac Gates and your
calls coming up. Eight hundred and ninety four one, Sean,
as we move along this Thursday, all right, we continue
now with Florida Congressman Matt Gates is with us. Let
me ask you about the laptop and now that it
has been legitimized and brought into evidence in this case
of Hunter Biden. To me, that means that now the
(14:55):
real investigation begins because Joe led about it. We know
the the FBI pre bunked it, we know Hunter lied
about it, We know the media mob light about it.
We know fifty one former Intel officials led about it,
and it was very very critical and I think now
it begins the investigation process into whether or not Joe
(15:17):
Biden benefited from his son's foreign business dealings with no
experience while he was addicted to drugs.
Speaker 10 (15:23):
I believe that the laptop was validated when Democrats had
no basis to object to me entering it into the
committee record in the House for History Committee. That to
me was the moment that we sealed the question on
the validity of the laptop. But Sean, I mean, did
you really think we'd be sitting here at this time
in the one hundred and eighteen Congress and Republicans have
(15:46):
not even sent one subpoena to Hunter Biden for live
public testimony, not one. I think the American people need
to see you, Hunter Biden, answer these questions now that
the laptop has been validated. And I can't, for the
life of me, understand why we send these letters requesting
Hunter Biden's presence, but we don't send a subpoena with
the force of law. I mean, we're about to see
(16:07):
Steve Bannon report to a prison if if we're not
able to shake loose a last minute remedy from the judge,
And yet we are playing patty Cake oftentimes with Hunter
Biden specifically, and I don't get it. I hope, I
hope you asked about that.
Speaker 7 (16:23):
When we come back, we'll continue on one more question
from Matt Gags, then we'll get to your calls. Eight
hundred and ninety four one Shawn is our number if
you want to be a part of the program, right
twenty five to the top of the hour. Eight hundred
and ninety four one Sean is a number of your
calls coming up. Also our final moments with Matt Gates,
Florida Congressman. In a second, we want to remind you, look,
these are really tough, crappy economic times for so many Americans,
(16:45):
and obviously the Biden economy, Biden inflation is just it's
just it's just destroying people unnecessarily. So, I mean, I've
been giving you these numbers out in the last you know,
number of weeks, and they're just horrible. It's just terrible. Here,
the twenty five percent of Americans have had to four
go meals. Why because they can't afford them, or the
(17:06):
two thirds of Americans are struggling just to put food
on their table and they're gasping for air. I mean,
that's how tough it is for so many families. But
there may be a way out. If you are a homeowner,
average home price went up eight point seven percent last year.
That means you have equity in your home and rather
than paying high high interest credit card numbers and rates
(17:29):
that they have out there, well, you can call our
friends at American Financing and if you refinance right now,
they're saving their average customer again on average eight hundred
and fifty four bucks a month. That's like a ten
thousand dollars a year raise. That's all the difference between
being in the red and in the black financially each
and every month. And find out for free, get a
(17:51):
no obligation consultation when you called today, it's eight six
six six one five ninety two hundred eight six six
six five ninety two hundred, or check them out on
the web.
Speaker 4 (18:02):
It's American Financing dot.
Speaker 2 (18:03):
Net, NMLS twenty two three three four, Animalist Consumer Access
dot Org APR for rates and the five started six
point seventy nine percent for well qualified bors. Called eight
sixty six one five ninety two hundred for details about
credit costs in terms I.
Speaker 7 (18:12):
Wanted to hold Matt Gates for one more question here,
because Senator JD. Vanson and Congressman Gates have now called
Don Secretary of State Wink and Tony Blincoln to send
them information regarding the Ukrainian NGO by June the twenty eighth.
In June of this year, Ukrainian Corporation early June this
year published an online article entitled Rollercoaster from Trump Is
(18:37):
to Communists and the forces in the US are impeding
aid to Ukraine and how they do it. And the
pair of Republican lawmakers wrote Wink and Blink in a
letter and that the title of the article over sells
the product. It's substantially a thin piece, largely an excuse
to smear a large group of Americans who have been
(18:58):
skeptical of aid to Ukraine in one form of another.
Now put it this way, Joe Biden is about to
sign an agreement with Zelensky. It's amazing that he has
no problem with Zelensky going on offense against Vladimir Putin,
while Europe is sat back and has not stepped up
to do their part to protect their own continent. The
(19:20):
letter goes on in the but it is being broadcast
as part of a coordinated media strategy that has all
the hallmarks of a US targeting influence operation, and they
went on to call it an enemy's list.
Speaker 4 (19:34):
Matt Gates, what the hell's going on here?
Speaker 10 (19:37):
US taxpayers are paying for Ukrainian NGOs to criticize US
politicians for holding America first views towards Ukraine. It's crazy
to wrap your head around. I mean, think about that.
We are borrowing money from China to give it to
Ukraine to offer comments on which of our politicians they
(19:58):
deem enemies and ad vance. And I want answers. We
want to know who approved this. And this is part
of really rooting out the deep state, figuring out who
in the bowels of these agencies thought it was appropriate
to greenlight some of these hyper political NGOs. These nngos
are destroying the world. They're destroying our country by bringing
illegal immigrants across the border, and we got to get
(20:21):
the money out of those enterprises. It's why we can't
be voting on the whole funding of the government all
at once. Why we need single subject bills so that
we can isolate these bad anti American programs that cost
us money and zero them out. And I am so
proud to be working with Senator jd Vance on this.
He's been a leader at helping us find some of
(20:43):
the problems at the Department of State. And you know,
I think we've got to expose it and excise it.
Speaker 4 (20:49):
Who do you like the VP Matt Gaates, well, one of.
Speaker 10 (20:52):
The senators, you know, I like Marco Rubio, like jd Vance.
You got to have somebody who's going to return to
being like a John Adams vice president who will preside
over the Senate. This notion that you let the Senate
majority leader dictate the calendar and the events, that's a
new construct. We need to go back to the constitutional
vice president as the president of the Senate. So somebody
(21:13):
like Marco, somebody like jd I think they would do
a terrific job because they know how to manage it
and at the same time, they don't have such reverence
for the bad institutions that will allow them to gum
things up the way we saw under McConnell.
Speaker 7 (21:28):
I to admit, Marco's been doing some serious ass kicking
when it comes to going on these liberal media shows.
I mean he's been pounding these people and they I
mean leaving them speechles, It's been fun to watch anyway.
Speaker 10 (21:41):
You imagine either Marco or JD debating Kamala Harris, It's
going to be delightful to watch.
Speaker 7 (21:46):
That'll be my CTV for sure. Would it would be
even better if they let me moderate. I'd be a
really good moderator. I think I did a very good
job with the Santas and with the Gavin Newsom.
Speaker 4 (21:59):
Don't you think I.
Speaker 10 (22:01):
Think that they had to identify Gavin Newsom by decticual records.
At the end of that debate, you gave everybody fair time.
You were a totally fair moderator. As a matter of fact,
I even complimented you on it afterwards. But I think
that actually it was a really substance to debate. If
you think about it, We've got a ton of substance
out of the liberal vision for America versus the conservative
visions for America. And I think it was regardless of
(22:22):
your politics, I think it was really enlightening. And you know,
we gotta get back to this, listen.
Speaker 7 (22:26):
I just stuck to the basics. I told both sides.
I said, look, I'm not giving you obviously, you don't
give questions. Had I said the topics are going to
be predictable. It's going to be basically, it's going to
be simple, bread and butter issues that impact the people
of your respective states.
Speaker 4 (22:43):
That's it, and.
Speaker 7 (22:44):
That's what it was anyway, Matt Gates, thanks for spending
extra time with us.
Speaker 4 (22:48):
We appreciate it all right soon, my friend Patricia.
Speaker 7 (22:53):
Free State of Florida. Next, Sean Hannity Show. Hi, Hi, Hi,
what's going on?
Speaker 2 (22:59):
That was for a prompt. I'm sorry, Hi, Sean. Welcome
to Florida. I wanted to say that for sure, because
I am from the great State of Florida.
Speaker 10 (23:07):
A paradise.
Speaker 4 (23:09):
Thank you.
Speaker 7 (23:09):
Did you see Governor DeSantis last night wants me to
be like he wanted to swear me in as a
member of the Chamber of Conbers. I guess it'd be
a volunteer position, because I want in an out Burger
to move to Florida.
Speaker 2 (23:24):
I would imagine that he would definitely want you on
that kind of a committee.
Speaker 4 (23:29):
Would I would volunteer. I would get on my hands
and knees and.
Speaker 7 (23:33):
Beg the people at in an out Burger to move
to Florida, because I love in an out Burger and
I love Cronburger, and I wish that you know Chicken
Salad Chick.
Speaker 4 (23:42):
Where in Florida do you live Jacksonville?
Speaker 7 (23:45):
Okay, I don't think they haven't been Jacksonville yet, but
they're all over Tampa. I mean, I love those places.
They're like my favorite places in the world.
Speaker 2 (23:53):
And waffle House in there, so I'll have to look
for one.
Speaker 4 (23:58):
Well, what else is on your mind today?
Speaker 2 (23:59):
Well, you know, I've been wanting to call for a
while and I decided that I would just try today
because I've been seeing, you know, the floating VP list
out there, and I get so frustrated with that because
I don't know if it's really coming from Trump or
if it's just again the deep date trying to get
us to go for somebody that we really don't want.
(24:22):
But anyways, I think we have a great VP list,
and the ones that are being floated there, I have
really not a horrible thing about them, but I would
like to float a different idea for Trump. I tried
to send him emails and stuff, but you know, he's
busy and.
Speaker 4 (24:44):
I'm going to give you a little tip.
Speaker 7 (24:45):
And I've told my audience I can't open mail because
of past bad experiences without going into great specifics and details,
and people think I'm rude.
Speaker 4 (24:55):
I am not rude.
Speaker 7 (24:57):
For years and years in my career, I would always
answer everybody back that I could. And I don't get
mail anymore, and people send it to me and they
think that I'm a snob.
Speaker 4 (25:07):
I am not a snob.
Speaker 2 (25:07):
I promise I understand that. I know you'all are very
busy people. But I in the beginning of the whole
run for the primary, by the.
Speaker 7 (25:17):
Way, I meant that I didn't finish my thought. Trump
doesn't have an email account.
Speaker 2 (25:21):
Oh okay, Well, I'm on truth every day. I'm trying
to get in touch with him, but.
Speaker 4 (25:28):
He does read truth. They might get him there.
Speaker 2 (25:31):
I might get lucky one day. But I'm hoping he's
listening to you, because he does listen to you. And
I want to float DeSantis as a good VP nomination.
And let me tell you, in the beginning of the
primary run, I was very frustrated when DeSantis was trying
to run for president, and I was bummed, to be honest,
(25:52):
because I think that he is a very strong VP
candidate because of what he's done Florida. Florida is like
a micro cosm of the United States. You know, I
call it a little America really because of what he's
done in this count in this state. And I just
(26:13):
feel like the one important thing that Trump needs to
consider is who is going to be president when he
is finished in four years. Who can withstand the left
wing craziness that that VP and future president is going
to get. And I think that DeSantis has shown himself
(26:35):
to be a leader and he can stand against the
media and the crazies that are out there. He's done
it in Florida, and I really believe that he would
be an awesome VP. What do you think?
Speaker 7 (26:48):
Look, you don't have to sell me on Governor DeSantis.
I'm a big fan of his and I would hate
to lose him though as governor of Florida. What is
Governor Dessanta's forty five? Maybe forty now, I don't know.
I think he's got a really bright future ahead of him.
I could absolutely see him as president in the future.
(27:08):
I think that Matt Ats mentioned two really good guys
as well. I think Senator Rubio has shown himself to
be very very strong, as has jd Vance, and I
think they support the Trump vision, which is most important
for a VP, and I think they'd be you know,
strong additions to the ticket. But you know this, it's
(27:32):
got to be a choice that that Trump makes. It's
it's but yeah, I think we have a deep bench,
and I think there are a lot of young people
that I'd like to see get into the mix. I
think it's you know, we're heading now into a time
where after Donald Trump is going to be a new generation,
and I think that that new generation needs positions of power.
(27:54):
When Donald Trump gets it, gets you know, hopefully back
in the White House. I hope that happens, but we'll see.
I wouldn't be against it, but I wouldn't like the
idea of losing for governor. So I'm kind of torn
a little. Patricia, thank you. Let's look back to her
busy phones Arizona. By the way, Trump up by eight today.
(28:16):
A pole comes out ted, you're next on the Sean
Hannity show.
Speaker 6 (28:19):
Him good as Sean, How are you doing?
Speaker 4 (28:22):
I'm good? How are you doing?
Speaker 6 (28:24):
Very good? Like I said from Yuma, Arizona, I'm down
here in Yuma, man.
Speaker 7 (28:29):
And now you're right in the right in the heart
of you know, the the Adam schiffhold down there with
the illegal immigration.
Speaker 6 (28:36):
Well, we're not too happy with our governor either, but.
Speaker 7 (28:40):
She she's completely useless, an open borders useless governor who
rightly now I believe is being investigated.
Speaker 6 (28:49):
Right most of them are most of them. We've got
one in Texas trying to trying to hold them off.
But the Asians, look, I've seen on this town.
Speaker 7 (29:01):
We're talking about the thirty thousand Chinese nationals that have
come in and just since October in the twenty six
thousand last year. I think that's what you're referring to.
Speaker 6 (29:12):
Exactly. I've watched them walk around, and all of them
wearing the same black outsit and white tennis shoes. They're
ending up in North Dakota near our nuclear reserves, and.
Speaker 7 (29:23):
They're buying up thousands and thousands of acres of farmland, ranchland,
and land near military installations. Now, we think if I
went over to China one day, entered the country illegally
and started buying up farmland and ranch land and land
near their military installations, how do you think that would
end for me?
Speaker 6 (29:41):
It's not happening.
Speaker 3 (29:42):
It will not happen.
Speaker 4 (29:44):
Yeah, because they're smarter than we are.
Speaker 6 (29:47):
Exactly they're sovereign. They've kept their solving solvncy. This is
my question to you, is why I was called originally
in Cuba, remember the Bay of Pigs.
Speaker 7 (29:59):
Of course you're talking about the hypersonic missiles now off
the coast of our state. Yes, I'm very concerned about it.
Speaker 6 (30:06):
Right they're whining about, Oh, it's just one ship. No,
it's not one ship. It's a nuclear sub nuclearly capable.
There's more than two ships down there. I don't care
what they're trying to lie on TV about. We've got
the Chinese trying to put a chain and they know
it works, and we know it works. And we had
an Abril on the news this morning talking about, you know,
(30:30):
them blocking off our our ability to get in and
out of the China seed in the protect your ban,
what is your your what's your geopolitical beliefs? On this man,
it looks like.
Speaker 4 (30:45):
You want to know what it is.
Speaker 7 (30:46):
And I said this the other day and people took
it the wrong way in the liberal media. I said,
there is a reason that China never never paid a
price for COVID or intellectual property theft or unfair trade
practic or the spy balloon or hostile maneuvers against our
fighter jets and international airspace, or against our navy and
(31:09):
international waterways is a reason, and I believe it's because
the Biden families compromised. The sheer amount of millions and
millions of dollars made by the Biden family, led by
Hunter with no experience while he's addicted to drugs, I
believe has compromised their ability to confront our top geopolitical foes.
Speaker 4 (31:29):
Am I wrong?
Speaker 6 (31:31):
No, you're not wrong, You're exactly right. And now here's
the thing. He's commander in chief. We are being targeted
from multiple paths around the world that have no more
beliefs than to annihilate America, which when war that's how
(31:51):
where you where you lease. But hopefully when this trial
goes off in California for Biden or that they will
uncover the true corruptness within this family. That's quote unquote
pounding the paddle right now to get re elected when
(32:14):
he should be running this country as ahead of this country.
Speaker 7 (32:18):
Just don't hold your breath anyway, Thank you, my friend.
Good points you're making, Gary, but good dangerous times
Well, I am come in your city, get un saying
you come down.
Speaker 2 (00:09):
Will be.
Speaker 3 (00:12):
Jan and if you want a little may I come alonge.
Speaker 4 (00:18):
What what happens to you if Donald Trump wins? What
do you do?
Speaker 3 (00:22):
What's your first I mean it sounds nuts, but like
I wouldn't be surprised as this guy through me in jail.
Speaker 5 (00:28):
You have a president of the United States who is
living embodiment of the rule of law, even with respect
to his only living son.
Speaker 6 (00:39):
Knows so long as nine our freedom can never be secure.
Speaker 3 (00:46):
Cout down on tea minus one hundred and forty four
days left still Election day.
Speaker 7 (00:57):
Are coming to you.
Speaker 3 (01:02):
Don't suck from coast to coast, from border to border,
from c to Shining Sea. Sean Kennedy is.
Speaker 7 (01:18):
On all right, thanks got Shannon Hour two Sean Hannity
Show told free it's eight hundred and nine to four
one Sean, if you want to be a part of
the program. So the House Republicans yesterday, thankfully, in spite
of their very tiny slim majority, we're able to hold
the Attorney General Merrick Garland in contempt. But don't hold
(01:40):
your breath expecting that Garland is going to get the
Peter Navarro or Steve Bannon treatment, or let's see the
Roger Stone treatment or the Man of War treatment, or
the Flynt treatment, or the treatment of Rudy or the
treatment of anybody else. Know there is a two tier
justice system under Joe Biden and Merrick Garland.
Speaker 4 (01:58):
We know that.
Speaker 7 (02:00):
And Merrick Garland was recently being grilled by the House
Judiciary Committee. Some of the best moments were with Congressman
Matt Gates, who will join us in a moment, and
he asks a simple question and whether or not Garland
would provide all documents and communications with the likes of
Alvin Bragg, Letitia James, Bonnie Willis's offices. Now, remember, in
(02:23):
the case of Leticia James and Alvin Bragg, they both
ran on campaigns to get Trump one man, one organization,
go after one family. And he's never once criticized those
people for running for that and then fulfilling a campaign
would ended up being a campaign promise. Anyway, here is
Matt Gates asking why won't he provide the documentation?
Speaker 8 (02:47):
Attorney General, You've told us that it's a dangerous conspiracy
theory to allege that the Department of Justice is communicating
with these state and local prosecutions against Trump.
Speaker 9 (02:59):
You can clear it all up for us right now.
Speaker 8 (03:00):
Will the Department of Justice provide to the committee all documents,
all correspondents between the Department and Alvin Bragg's office and
Fannie Willis's office and Letitia James's office.
Speaker 1 (03:12):
The offices you're referring to are independent offices of state.
Speaker 9 (03:17):
I get that, I get that.
Speaker 2 (03:18):
State.
Speaker 8 (03:18):
The question is whether you will provide all of your
documents and correspondence.
Speaker 9 (03:22):
That's the question. I don't need a history lesson.
Speaker 1 (03:25):
Well, I'm going to say again, we do not control
those offices.
Speaker 6 (03:29):
They make there the.
Speaker 8 (03:29):
Questions where you communicate with them, not whether you control them.
Speaker 9 (03:32):
Do you communicate with them? And will you provide those.
Speaker 1 (03:34):
Community to make it a request, we'll refer it to
our Office of Legislatives.
Speaker 9 (03:37):
But here's the thing.
Speaker 8 (03:38):
That you come in here and you lodge this attack
that it's a conspiracy theory, that there is coordinated law
fair against Trump, and then when we say fine, just
give us the documents, give us the correspondence, and then
if it's a conspiracy theory, that will be evident. But
when you say, well, we'll take your request, and then
we'll we'll sort of work it through the DOJ's accommodation process.
(03:59):
Then you're actually advancing the very dangerous conspiracy theory that
you're concerned about.
Speaker 7 (04:04):
Anyway, Congress from mcaid's Florida joins us. Now, you've had
some pretty fine moments in Congress. That's the right up
there with some of the top moments. Why wouldn't he
provide that documentation? Why wouldn't he provide that communication? Seems
pretty simple to me, And you're right, that would dispel
any quote conspiracy theory that he was talking about.
Speaker 4 (04:24):
In reference to this, we.
Speaker 10 (04:27):
Have a reasonable basis for suspicion that all of the
lawfare being brought against Donald Trump is being centralized in
decision making with senior officials at the Biden administration. Now
they may be at the Department of Justice, they may
even be at the White House. We want to see
the calendared meetings, the emails, the memos, the notes, the correspondents,
(04:48):
so we can determine whether or not we need legislation
to stop federal entities from goosing state attorneys general or
local das in too political prosecutions that federal prosecutors would
never do. Remember the Southern District of New York, which
is like you know, the nineteen twenty nine Yankees of
(05:09):
federal prosecutors, right, they did not bring any case against
Trump for any violation of election law because there was
no violation of law. But you saw then Alvin Bragg
animated into action, and we want to know about it.
And I think Jim Jordan and James Comer deserve a
lot of credit for getting this contempt proceeding together for Garland.
(05:32):
But was it the right one? Sean like to think
about what's going on? Zoom out for a second. We
got to ask what is the grave harm happening? And
to me, it is the far graver harm is the
coordinated lawair against Trump. It's not that Joe Biden wasn't
prosecuted for the documents kind of documents case. I kind
(05:53):
of thought both of the documents cases against Trump and
against Biden were kind of ticky, tacky and dumb, and
they seemed not to be in thinking with how we
would normally deal with an administrative dispute.
Speaker 7 (06:05):
So well they might have been, but one was treated
far differently than the other.
Speaker 10 (06:10):
Sure, and I think exposing that is helpful. But I
think that right now. The document case is like on
the slow boat to China. Meanwhile, you've got Jack Smith
seeking a determination on immunity that will allow him to proceed,
you know, in a blue jurisdiction where I think they
would convict Donald Trump of killing Jimmy Hoffa, abducting the
(06:32):
Limberg baby, and being the shooter on the Grassy Knoll
all in one trial if they had any.
Speaker 4 (06:37):
Oh, by the way, that is a guarantee.
Speaker 7 (06:39):
What's interesting is Eileen Cannon is actually questioning and having
a hearing on the legitimacy of the appointment of the
special prosecutor, and that is the Florida case. But I
think that would then raise the case in Washington, DC
as well, and will await whether or not immunity comes up.
Speaker 10 (06:59):
Now.
Speaker 7 (07:00):
Probably would have argued that case differently, You're the attorney,
not me, and I would have argued more for limited
immunity that would have been applicable over absolute immunity, because
I thought this absurd analogy that kept being brought up
again and again and again. I just think it got
so far off course. Well, does that mean Donald Trump
(07:22):
can employ Saled Team six to assassinate his political opponents?
Speaker 4 (07:26):
That's not what anybody's talking about.
Speaker 10 (07:29):
I agree with you on the legal analysis, but I
would also say this is the downstream effect of taking
the unprecedented action of indicting Donald Trump for things that
no one would ever be charged for if they weren't
Donald Trump and running again and winning. Right, these prosecutors
just think they can haul the former president of the
United States before their court and that it's not going
(07:51):
to create these really sticky legal questions, but at times
six years to resolve and Judge Cannon. She's getting all
the criticism for the left wing punch and talking heads,
but she is actually the one using sound judicial economy
because whether or not Jack Smith was legitimately appointed is
a threshold question, and he wouldn't go through a trial
(08:12):
and witnesses and a jury and all of that stuff
if the threshold question is answered in a way that
would render this entire prosecution meaningless. So she is being
thoughtful and thorough, and I think the prosecutors Jack Smith
and really the whole batch of them, there is a
there's a huborus about it that they they just think
they're going to march in with the Emperor. Moderit of
(08:34):
the Biden administration and they can get away with anything
they want to get away with. I mean, my gosh,
Nathan Wade and Fannie Willis imagine the Huber as a
big prosecuting Donald Trump and thinking you could get away
with what they were up to.
Speaker 7 (08:45):
Let me, let me for a second, talk a little
bit more about Mark Carland than the being held in contempt,
because you and I both know, at least under Biden's
weaponized and politicized do OJE, nothing's going to happen. And
you know Garland, for example, you questioned him on the
issue of you know, why would the third highest ranking
(09:06):
official at Biden's doj under Merrick Garland actually leave that
prestigious position to go argue the case in New York City,
the Alvin Bragg case that never should have been brought,
the upcharge case from a misdemeanor whose statuted limitations and
long since passed in this novel political this novel legal
(09:27):
theory that somehow brought into play federal election law that
they never even fully defined as a charge until the
end of the trial. And anyway, you asked about this,
this appointment of a Colangelo and I have nothing to
do with it, do you believe him.
Speaker 4 (09:45):
Let me play the exchange.
Speaker 8 (09:47):
You had no problem dispatching Matthew Colangelo. Who's Matthew calanch
is false? I did not dispatch Matthew Colangelo.
Speaker 9 (09:54):
Matthew Colangelo.
Speaker 8 (09:55):
Matthew Colangelo became the Assistant Attorney General at the very
beginning of the Biden administration without having been Senate confirmed,
goes and gets the senior role at the DOJ, and
then after I believe it's Gupta, replaces Colangelo. Clangelo makes
this remarkable downstream career journey from the US Department of
Justice in Washington, DC and then pops up in Alvin
(10:19):
Bragg's office to go get Trump.
Speaker 9 (10:20):
And you're saying that's a that's just.
Speaker 8 (10:23):
A career choice that was made that has nothing to
do with the law.
Speaker 1 (10:26):
Fair coordinator, I'm saying it's false. I did not dispatch
mister Colangelo anywhere.
Speaker 9 (10:32):
Well, do you know how he ended up there.
Speaker 1 (10:34):
I assume he spoke, he applied for a job.
Speaker 9 (10:37):
There and got the job. But see, you know what,
tell you I had nothing to.
Speaker 4 (10:40):
Do with I don't believe him.
Speaker 10 (10:42):
Sean. Matthew Colangelo going from one of the top positions
of the Department of Justice to the Manhattan DA's office
to be a frontline prosecutor would be about as suspicious
as if he resigned from Fox News tomorrow and started
doing the morning weather updates in Tupelo, Mississippi. I mean
that is sort of the same downstream career trajectory. And
(11:04):
so he wasn't there because of some sort of realignment
in his professional goals. He was there to get Trump.
And what corroborates that theory is the book written by
one of the other prosecutors brought in for this particular purpose,
Mike Palmerant, who said we assembled the legal eagles because
we were going to find any basis in law with
(11:25):
which to hamper Trump's reascend to the presidency. And when
palm Rant was before the House Judiciary Committee, he pled
the Fifth when asked whether or not he broke the
law in his pursuit of Trump. Think about that, when
the prosecutor is pleading the fifth about whether or not
they broke the law, and someone else is suspiciously appearing
(11:46):
from the Department of Justice and Mary Garland is refusing
to reveal the correspondence memos notes communications. I don't think
we should be labeled conspiracy theorists or wanting to learn more,
and so I don't think it's sufficient to contempt Garland
for what we have. We have to get this information
and don't be discouraged about criminal referrals or contempt proceedings
(12:09):
that are dormant right now, because they can be born
like a tulip Gould in the spring when Donald Trump
has a new attorney general in January of twenty twenty five.
So these are live torpedoes that we are firing, and
with an attorney general far better than Jeff's sessions, I
think we could have a law system that is restored,
(12:32):
confidence that is restored, and a return to the facts
and the law away from what we've seen from the
Biden administration.
Speaker 7 (12:39):
One of the things I said about President Trump when
he was in office was that I felt he gave
Republicans in the House and the Senate of backbone. He's
back up on the hill today, and you know, he
talked about great unity within the party and a lot
of common sense.
Speaker 4 (12:55):
What is your reaction and what was the reaction?
Speaker 10 (12:58):
It was a pep rally, Sean and Fan. You know,
you and I have had a lot of conversations on
air and off air about the need for unity and
really in the absence of strong leadership following President Trump's
departure in the Republican Party, like no one was inspired
by McConnell or McCarthy and Johnson's no walk in the
Park right now either, And so having Trump back there,
like there was finally main character energy in the room
(13:21):
and you had the most liberal member, if you have
the most conservative members standing together applauding President Trump nodding
along as he talked about energy policy, gross the medics product.
President Trump wants to get rid of taxes on tips,
and I love that. I love the idea of unlocking
more economics potential for working class people in this country.
Speaker 7 (13:41):
So he by the way, I've worked in restaurants, you know,
since I was, you know, twelve years old, the washing
dishes in a restaurant. I was a cook, a busboy, waiter, bartender.
I'm all for it.
Speaker 4 (13:51):
I agree those are great.
Speaker 10 (13:53):
And you, by the way, you know the great Americans
who are doing those jobs and a little bit extra
in their pocket at the end of the night when
you're working for gratuities means a lot valets. You know,
just a lot of people that it can help, and
those are Trump voters, and it speaks of this broader
realignment that's happening. Both Mike Johnson and and President Trump spoke,
you know, very well about what we're seeing in the polling,
(14:15):
where working class people in all kinds of states, in
all kind of you know, regardless of race or gender,
working class people want the prosperity that President Trump brought us,
and it is it could be the most unifying thing,
not just in an election, but in this country for
a long time.
Speaker 7 (14:33):
Quick break more with Florida Congressman Mac Gates and your
calls coming up. Eight hundred and ninety four one, Sean,
as we move along this Thursday, all right, we continue
now with Florida Congressman Matt Gates is with us. Let
me ask you about the laptop and now that it
has been legitimized and brought into evidence in this case
of Hunter Biden. To me, that means that now the
(14:55):
real investigation begins because Joe led about it. We know
the the FBI pre bunked it, we know Hunter lied
about it, We know the media mob light about it.
We know fifty one former Intel officials led about it,
and it was very very critical and I think now
it begins the investigation process into whether or not Joe
(15:17):
Biden benefited from his son's foreign business dealings with no
experience while he was addicted to drugs.
Speaker 10 (15:23):
I believe that the laptop was validated when Democrats had
no basis to object to me entering it into the
committee record in the House for History Committee. That to
me was the moment that we sealed the question on
the validity of the laptop. But Sean, I mean, did
you really think we'd be sitting here at this time
in the one hundred and eighteen Congress and Republicans have
(15:46):
not even sent one subpoena to Hunter Biden for live
public testimony, not one. I think the American people need
to see you, Hunter Biden, answer these questions now that
the laptop has been validated. And I can't, for the
life of me, understand why we send these letters requesting
Hunter Biden's presence, but we don't send a subpoena with
the force of law. I mean, we're about to see
(16:07):
Steve Bannon report to a prison if if we're not
able to shake loose a last minute remedy from the judge,
And yet we are playing patty Cake oftentimes with Hunter
Biden specifically, and I don't get it. I hope, I
hope you asked about that.
Speaker 7 (16:23):
When we come back, we'll continue on one more question
from Matt Gags, then we'll get to your calls. Eight
hundred and ninety four one Shawn is our number if
you want to be a part of the program, right
twenty five to the top of the hour. Eight hundred
and ninety four one Sean is a number of your
calls coming up. Also our final moments with Matt Gates,
Florida Congressman. In a second, we want to remind you, look,
these are really tough, crappy economic times for so many Americans,
(16:45):
and obviously the Biden economy, Biden inflation is just it's
just it's just destroying people unnecessarily. So, I mean, I've
been giving you these numbers out in the last you know,
number of weeks, and they're just horrible. It's just terrible. Here,
the twenty five percent of Americans have had to four
go meals. Why because they can't afford them, or the
(17:06):
two thirds of Americans are struggling just to put food
on their table and they're gasping for air. I mean,
that's how tough it is for so many families. But
there may be a way out. If you are a homeowner,
average home price went up eight point seven percent last year.
That means you have equity in your home and rather
than paying high high interest credit card numbers and rates
(17:29):
that they have out there, well, you can call our
friends at American Financing and if you refinance right now,
they're saving their average customer again on average eight hundred
and fifty four bucks a month. That's like a ten
thousand dollars a year raise. That's all the difference between
being in the red and in the black financially each
and every month. And find out for free, get a
(17:51):
no obligation consultation when you called today, it's eight six
six six one five ninety two hundred eight six six
six five ninety two hundred, or check them out on
the web.
Speaker 4 (18:02):
It's American Financing dot.
Speaker 2 (18:03):
Net, NMLS twenty two three three four, Animalist Consumer Access
dot Org APR for rates and the five started six
point seventy nine percent for well qualified bors. Called eight
sixty six one five ninety two hundred for details about
credit costs in terms I.
Speaker 7 (18:12):
Wanted to hold Matt Gates for one more question here,
because Senator JD. Vanson and Congressman Gates have now called
Don Secretary of State Wink and Tony Blincoln to send
them information regarding the Ukrainian NGO by June the twenty eighth.
In June of this year, Ukrainian Corporation early June this
year published an online article entitled Rollercoaster from Trump Is
(18:37):
to Communists and the forces in the US are impeding
aid to Ukraine and how they do it. And the
pair of Republican lawmakers wrote Wink and Blink in a
letter and that the title of the article over sells
the product. It's substantially a thin piece, largely an excuse
to smear a large group of Americans who have been
(18:58):
skeptical of aid to Ukraine in one form of another.
Now put it this way, Joe Biden is about to
sign an agreement with Zelensky. It's amazing that he has
no problem with Zelensky going on offense against Vladimir Putin,
while Europe is sat back and has not stepped up
to do their part to protect their own continent. The
(19:20):
letter goes on in the but it is being broadcast
as part of a coordinated media strategy that has all
the hallmarks of a US targeting influence operation, and they
went on to call it an enemy's list.
Speaker 4 (19:34):
Matt Gates, what the hell's going on here?
Speaker 10 (19:37):
US taxpayers are paying for Ukrainian NGOs to criticize US
politicians for holding America first views towards Ukraine. It's crazy
to wrap your head around. I mean, think about that.
We are borrowing money from China to give it to
Ukraine to offer comments on which of our politicians they
(19:58):
deem enemies and ad vance. And I want answers. We
want to know who approved this. And this is part
of really rooting out the deep state, figuring out who
in the bowels of these agencies thought it was appropriate
to greenlight some of these hyper political NGOs. These nngos
are destroying the world. They're destroying our country by bringing
illegal immigrants across the border, and we got to get
(20:21):
the money out of those enterprises. It's why we can't
be voting on the whole funding of the government all
at once. Why we need single subject bills so that
we can isolate these bad anti American programs that cost
us money and zero them out. And I am so
proud to be working with Senator jd Vance on this.
He's been a leader at helping us find some of
(20:43):
the problems at the Department of State. And you know,
I think we've got to expose it and excise it.
Speaker 4 (20:49):
Who do you like the VP Matt Gaates, well, one of.
Speaker 10 (20:52):
The senators, you know, I like Marco Rubio, like jd Vance.
You got to have somebody who's going to return to
being like a John Adams vice president who will preside
over the Senate. This notion that you let the Senate
majority leader dictate the calendar and the events, that's a
new construct. We need to go back to the constitutional
vice president as the president of the Senate. So somebody
(21:13):
like Marco, somebody like jd I think they would do
a terrific job because they know how to manage it
and at the same time, they don't have such reverence
for the bad institutions that will allow them to gum
things up the way we saw under McConnell.
Speaker 7 (21:28):
I to admit, Marco's been doing some serious ass kicking
when it comes to going on these liberal media shows.
I mean he's been pounding these people and they I
mean leaving them speechles, It's been fun to watch anyway.
Speaker 10 (21:41):
You imagine either Marco or JD debating Kamala Harris, It's
going to be delightful to watch.
Speaker 7 (21:46):
That'll be my CTV for sure. Would it would be
even better if they let me moderate. I'd be a
really good moderator. I think I did a very good
job with the Santas and with the Gavin Newsom.
Speaker 4 (21:59):
Don't you think I.
Speaker 10 (22:01):
Think that they had to identify Gavin Newsom by decticual records.
At the end of that debate, you gave everybody fair time.
You were a totally fair moderator. As a matter of fact,
I even complimented you on it afterwards. But I think
that actually it was a really substance to debate. If
you think about it, We've got a ton of substance
out of the liberal vision for America versus the conservative
visions for America. And I think it was regardless of
(22:22):
your politics, I think it was really enlightening. And you know,
we gotta get back to this, listen.
Speaker 7 (22:26):
I just stuck to the basics. I told both sides.
I said, look, I'm not giving you obviously, you don't
give questions. Had I said the topics are going to
be predictable. It's going to be basically, it's going to
be simple, bread and butter issues that impact the people
of your respective states.
Speaker 4 (22:43):
That's it, and.
Speaker 7 (22:44):
That's what it was anyway, Matt Gates, thanks for spending
extra time with us.
Speaker 4 (22:48):
We appreciate it all right soon, my friend Patricia.
Speaker 7 (22:53):
Free State of Florida. Next, Sean Hannity Show. Hi, Hi, Hi,
what's going on?
Speaker 2 (22:59):
That was for a prompt. I'm sorry, Hi, Sean. Welcome
to Florida. I wanted to say that for sure, because
I am from the great State of Florida.
Speaker 10 (23:07):
A paradise.
Speaker 4 (23:09):
Thank you.
Speaker 7 (23:09):
Did you see Governor DeSantis last night wants me to
be like he wanted to swear me in as a
member of the Chamber of Conbers. I guess it'd be
a volunteer position, because I want in an out Burger
to move to Florida.
Speaker 2 (23:24):
I would imagine that he would definitely want you on
that kind of a committee.
Speaker 4 (23:29):
Would I would volunteer. I would get on my hands
and knees and.
Speaker 7 (23:33):
Beg the people at in an out Burger to move
to Florida, because I love in an out Burger and
I love Cronburger, and I wish that you know Chicken
Salad Chick.
Speaker 4 (23:42):
Where in Florida do you live Jacksonville?
Speaker 7 (23:45):
Okay, I don't think they haven't been Jacksonville yet, but
they're all over Tampa. I mean, I love those places.
They're like my favorite places in the world.
Speaker 2 (23:53):
And waffle House in there, so I'll have to look
for one.
Speaker 4 (23:58):
Well, what else is on your mind today?
Speaker 2 (23:59):
Well, you know, I've been wanting to call for a
while and I decided that I would just try today
because I've been seeing, you know, the floating VP list
out there, and I get so frustrated with that because
I don't know if it's really coming from Trump or
if it's just again the deep date trying to get
us to go for somebody that we really don't want.
(24:22):
But anyways, I think we have a great VP list,
and the ones that are being floated there, I have
really not a horrible thing about them, but I would
like to float a different idea for Trump. I tried
to send him emails and stuff, but you know, he's
busy and.
Speaker 4 (24:44):
I'm going to give you a little tip.
Speaker 7 (24:45):
And I've told my audience I can't open mail because
of past bad experiences without going into great specifics and details,
and people think I'm rude.
Speaker 4 (24:55):
I am not rude.
Speaker 7 (24:57):
For years and years in my career, I would always
answer everybody back that I could. And I don't get
mail anymore, and people send it to me and they
think that I'm a snob.
Speaker 4 (25:07):
I am not a snob.
Speaker 2 (25:07):
I promise I understand that. I know you'all are very
busy people. But I in the beginning of the whole
run for the primary, by the.
Speaker 7 (25:17):
Way, I meant that I didn't finish my thought. Trump
doesn't have an email account.
Speaker 2 (25:21):
Oh okay, Well, I'm on truth every day. I'm trying
to get in touch with him, but.
Speaker 4 (25:28):
He does read truth. They might get him there.
Speaker 2 (25:31):
I might get lucky one day. But I'm hoping he's
listening to you, because he does listen to you. And
I want to float DeSantis as a good VP nomination.
And let me tell you, in the beginning of the
primary run, I was very frustrated when DeSantis was trying
to run for president, and I was bummed, to be honest,
(25:52):
because I think that he is a very strong VP
candidate because of what he's done Florida. Florida is like
a micro cosm of the United States. You know, I
call it a little America really because of what he's
done in this count in this state. And I just
(26:13):
feel like the one important thing that Trump needs to
consider is who is going to be president when he
is finished in four years. Who can withstand the left
wing craziness that that VP and future president is going
to get. And I think that DeSantis has shown himself
(26:35):
to be a leader and he can stand against the
media and the crazies that are out there. He's done
it in Florida, and I really believe that he would
be an awesome VP. What do you think?
Speaker 7 (26:48):
Look, you don't have to sell me on Governor DeSantis.
I'm a big fan of his and I would hate
to lose him though as governor of Florida. What is
Governor Dessanta's forty five? Maybe forty now, I don't know.
I think he's got a really bright future ahead of him.
I could absolutely see him as president in the future.
(27:08):
I think that Matt Ats mentioned two really good guys
as well. I think Senator Rubio has shown himself to
be very very strong, as has jd Vance, and I
think they support the Trump vision, which is most important
for a VP, and I think they'd be you know,
strong additions to the ticket. But you know this, it's
(27:32):
got to be a choice that that Trump makes. It's
it's but yeah, I think we have a deep bench,
and I think there are a lot of young people
that I'd like to see get into the mix. I
think it's you know, we're heading now into a time
where after Donald Trump is going to be a new generation,
and I think that that new generation needs positions of power.
(27:54):
When Donald Trump gets it, gets you know, hopefully back
in the White House. I hope that happens, but we'll see.
I wouldn't be against it, but I wouldn't like the
idea of losing for governor. So I'm kind of torn
a little. Patricia, thank you. Let's look back to her
busy phones Arizona. By the way, Trump up by eight today.
(28:16):
A pole comes out ted, you're next on the Sean
Hannity show.
Speaker 6 (28:19):
Him good as Sean, How are you doing?
Speaker 4 (28:22):
I'm good? How are you doing?
Speaker 6 (28:24):
Very good? Like I said from Yuma, Arizona, I'm down
here in Yuma, man.
Speaker 7 (28:29):
And now you're right in the right in the heart
of you know, the the Adam schiffhold down there with
the illegal immigration.
Speaker 6 (28:36):
Well, we're not too happy with our governor either, but.
Speaker 7 (28:40):
She she's completely useless, an open borders useless governor who
rightly now I believe is being investigated.
Speaker 6 (28:49):
Right most of them are most of them. We've got
one in Texas trying to trying to hold them off.
But the Asians, look, I've seen on this town.
Speaker 7 (29:01):
We're talking about the thirty thousand Chinese nationals that have
come in and just since October in the twenty six
thousand last year. I think that's what you're referring to.
Speaker 6 (29:12):
Exactly. I've watched them walk around, and all of them
wearing the same black outsit and white tennis shoes. They're
ending up in North Dakota near our nuclear reserves, and.
Speaker 7 (29:23):
They're buying up thousands and thousands of acres of farmland, ranchland,
and land near military installations. Now, we think if I
went over to China one day, entered the country illegally
and started buying up farmland and ranch land and land
near their military installations, how do you think that would
end for me?
Speaker 6 (29:41):
It's not happening.
Speaker 3 (29:42):
It will not happen.
Speaker 4 (29:44):
Yeah, because they're smarter than we are.
Speaker 6 (29:47):
Exactly they're sovereign. They've kept their solving solvncy. This is
my question to you, is why I was called originally
in Cuba, remember the Bay of Pigs.
Speaker 7 (29:59):
Of course you're talking about the hypersonic missiles now off
the coast of our state. Yes, I'm very concerned about it.
Speaker 6 (30:06):
Right they're whining about, Oh, it's just one ship. No,
it's not one ship. It's a nuclear sub nuclearly capable.
There's more than two ships down there. I don't care
what they're trying to lie on TV about. We've got
the Chinese trying to put a chain and they know
it works, and we know it works. And we had
an Abril on the news this morning talking about, you know,
(30:30):
them blocking off our our ability to get in and
out of the China seed in the protect your ban,
what is your your what's your geopolitical beliefs? On this man,
it looks like.
Speaker 4 (30:45):
You want to know what it is.
Speaker 7 (30:46):
And I said this the other day and people took
it the wrong way in the liberal media. I said,
there is a reason that China never never paid a
price for COVID or intellectual property theft or unfair trade
practic or the spy balloon or hostile maneuvers against our
fighter jets and international airspace, or against our navy and
(31:09):
international waterways is a reason, and I believe it's because
the Biden families compromised. The sheer amount of millions and
millions of dollars made by the Biden family, led by
Hunter with no experience while he's addicted to drugs, I
believe has compromised their ability to confront our top geopolitical foes.
Speaker 4 (31:29):
Am I wrong?
Speaker 6 (31:31):
No, you're not wrong, You're exactly right. And now here's
the thing. He's commander in chief. We are being targeted
from multiple paths around the world that have no more
beliefs than to annihilate America, which when war that's how
(31:51):
where you where you lease. But hopefully when this trial
goes off in California for Biden or that they will
uncover the true corruptness within this family. That's quote unquote
pounding the paddle right now to get re elected when
(32:14):
he should be running this country as ahead of this country.
Speaker 7 (32:18):
Just don't hold your breath anyway, Thank you, my friend.
Good points you're making, Gary, but good dangerous times
The Sean Hannity Show News
Host
Sean Hannity
Popular Podcasts
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Special Summer Offer: Exclusively on Apple Podcasts, try our Dateline Premium subscription completely free for one month! With Dateline Premium, you get every episode ad-free plus exclusive bonus content.
The Breakfast Club
The World's Most Dangerous Morning Show, The Breakfast Club, With DJ Envy, Jess Hilarious, And Charlamagne Tha God!
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.