June 20, 2024 • 32 mins
Congressman Bryan Steil from Wisconsin’s first district, is taking Joe Biden to court. He wants to know what is happening with his administration's efforts to use federal funds to coerce voters.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Well, we have come in your city.
Speaker 2 (00:05):
I get saying you a comfort zone.
Speaker 3 (00:09):
Will be.
Speaker 4 (00:12):
Little tell.
Speaker 5 (00:14):
And if you want a little banging a Yuni, I
come along.
Speaker 4 (00:18):
Biden wrote the.
Speaker 6 (00:19):
Devastating nineteen ninety four crime Bill talking about super predators
that was biten.
Speaker 1 (00:26):
Like, if we don't acknowledge that there are some things,
some real pocketbook issues that are still front of mine.
Speaker 2 (00:35):
For people, we miss the mark.
Speaker 3 (00:37):
Because it's people are its hispanic.
Speaker 2 (00:39):
We're gonna lose expatic mails.
Speaker 5 (00:41):
Yeah, what a loose block.
Speaker 6 (00:48):
Only one hundred and thirty seven days until America vote.
Speaker 7 (00:55):
Quote that we have come in to your city.
Speaker 2 (01:00):
Don't get saying you a conscious song.
Speaker 6 (01:04):
From coast to coast, from border to border, from c
to Shining Sea. Sean Kennedy is on.
Speaker 7 (01:19):
Thanks gotch Hannon and our two Sean Hannity Show, toll free,
our numbers eight hundred nine four one Seawn if you
want to be a part of the program. There has
been a lot of uh well, uh I guess Warren
Leather if you will from our friend John Solomon, founder
and editor in chief Justinnews dot com, as he has
now broken three big exclusives in just the last week.
(01:43):
One Jim Jordan is asking the Department of Justice watchdog
to investigate whether the FBI is purging agents if they
have conservative views.
Speaker 2 (01:53):
It's a follow up.
Speaker 7 (01:54):
To a story that John broke just about a week
or two ago, issued number two. A Biden advisor had
contact with Parisma during the height of the corruption probe.
We now have emails that backed this up and that
the FBI knew since twenty sixteen that Hunter Biden's team
(02:17):
nearly scored one hundred and twenty million dollars in the
Ukrainian deal while Joe Biden was vice president. Well that's
new anyway. Justinnews dot com founder editor in chief investigative
reporter John Solomon is with us.
Speaker 5 (02:32):
How are you, sir, Well, good to be with you today.
Speaker 2 (02:35):
Let's work our.
Speaker 7 (02:35):
Way back in the order in which you broke these stories,
and let's go to the first one, where the FBI
news since twenty sixteen that Hunter's team scored nearly one
hundred and twenty million dollars Ukrainian deal while Joe was
a vice president. Okay, now that the laptop has finally,
four years later, been verified by the government, as they
(02:57):
are the ones that introduced it into evidence in the
case again Hunter Biden. I think all of this now
is basically evidence against Joe Biden. You know, with this
upcoming debate one week from today, I'm pretty sure that
Joe's going to say you're a You're a convicted felon.
Maybe we should have a drinking game based on how
(03:18):
many times he says it. But I would say, based
on the laptop that we now know and frankly knew
a long time ago, was very real. You reported the
FBI knew about it, you know, as early as March
of twenty twenty. For sure they had verified it and
that's why they were pre bunking it with big tech.
(03:38):
But putting that aside, the FBI learned tell us what
they learned as far back as twenty sixteen about Hunter
his partners and how they set up a new tax
venture in another country, a third party country that would
be that would be capitalized by a wopping one hundred
and twenty million dollar investment from the controversial owner of
(04:00):
the energy giant Verice Beholdings out of Ukraine, where Hunter
sat on the board, even though he'd admitted he had
no experience and was addicted to crack cocaine at that time.
Speaker 5 (04:12):
Yeah, I listened. I think you summarized it perfectly.
Speaker 3 (04:14):
Hunter Biden gets put on this board at a time
when the owner and the company are deemed corrupt by
the State Department and the owners being pursued by the
Serious Fraud Office in Great Britain on a fraud case
that was actually assisted by the FBI. The State Department,
the FBI, British traud authorities all believe this company was
(04:35):
corrupt and as a result they started pursuing them. And
Hunter Biden just magically appears on the board right at
the moment that all of these allegations are servicing, and wow,
the fraud case dies down for a while, and Hunter
Biden is looking along with his business partners Devin Archer
and others, to score big, bigger than just the million
dollars a year he was getting to be on the board.
Speaker 5 (04:56):
And they put together this concept.
Speaker 3 (04:58):
They're going to open a company and licked and which
is a tax friendly country.
Speaker 5 (05:02):
And the owner of Borisma.
Speaker 3 (05:05):
Mikolosochski, is going to capitalize it with one hundred and
twenty million dollars.
Speaker 5 (05:09):
Just think about that. Hunter Biden's on the board.
Speaker 3 (05:11):
He's supposed to be providing fiduciary responsibility for Barisma, and
he's working with the owner to move money to another
one of his companies in another country where he's going
to be a significant beneficiary along with his other business partners.
Speaker 5 (05:25):
That alone raises questions.
Speaker 3 (05:26):
But then when you think of the fact that this
is all going on while Joe Biden's administration is dealing
with this corruption issue involving Brezema, and Joe Biden is
the point man for Ukraine anti corruption efforts, it looks
all the more untoward. We didn't know about this one
hundred and twenty million dollars deal back when impeachment occurred,
Back when I broke the first stories in twenty nineteen.
It was sitting in the three point three nine million
(05:49):
pages of documents that the FBI sec and IRS gathered
from Hunter Biden as business partners during a twenty sixteen
securities investigation.
Speaker 5 (05:58):
We now have.
Speaker 7 (05:59):
How is it that we didn't have access to those
prior to this point. I mean, you know, here we
are eight years later, John.
Speaker 3 (06:06):
Well, listen, the president, President Trump should have had access
because these were exculpatory documents for his impeachment. They didn't
get these documents. Ron Johnson and Chuck Grassey had to
send an investigation going on it. They didn't get these documents.
I put in lots of foils over the years to
many agencies. I didn't get these documents. However, we got
them because Devin Archer, one of the defendants of that
(06:28):
securities case, gave them to Congress recently. It's the full
production of everything the United States government got from Hunter
Biden and his various business partners.
Speaker 5 (06:38):
There's a wretch, Trevor Schrovin. It's something interesting here.
Speaker 3 (06:40):
There's a lot of emails and correspondence that are in
these documents certified by the government that aren't on Hunter
Biden's laptop, which raises the question why aren't they.
Speaker 5 (06:49):
We'll have to find out.
Speaker 3 (06:50):
Over time, But there is a body of new evidence
that really puts into focus how much the government agencies,
the deep state, people call them new about what was
going on in Hunter Biden world and how it potentially
affected Joe Biden's duties.
Speaker 7 (07:05):
Well, certainly they didn't have any intention of bringing it
to the American people, just like Joe Biden was allowed
to get away with the lies about the Hunter Biden
laptop not being real and the FBI knew, damn well
it was real. In the summer of twenty twenty, leading
up to the election, in the fall of twenty twenty,
we know that the FBI, even though they had verified
(07:27):
the authenticity of Hunter's laptop, they were out there meeting
weekly with all these big tech companies and warning them
that may be victims of a disinformation campaign, and that
disinformation campaign may be about Joe Biden, it may be
about Hunter Biden. Anyway, fast forward, the New York Post
breaks the story that Hunter Biden laptop. All of this,
(07:50):
and they allowed the President to go out and lie,
then candidate Joe Biden to go out there and lie
and say it's false. They allowed Hunter to say it's false.
And when they got specific questions, meaning the FBI, from Twitter,
from Facebook, I believe two those two big tech companies
in particular, is this what you were warning us about
(08:12):
or is this real? They knew they could have verified
it was real, they refused to answer the question that's right,
and then the result of that was they censored the
story and you couldn't even send a private message with
a link to the New York Post article.
Speaker 3 (08:26):
You're right and listen it wasn't that hard for me.
You remember I came on your show very early and
told you that the FBI had already authenticated this laptop.
I actually had the ode and I John Radkiff, the
Director of National Intelligence, thing, there's no reason to believe
that this laptop had anything to do with Russia or
a foreign intelligence operation.
Speaker 5 (08:44):
It was very easy for me.
Speaker 3 (08:45):
I got the FBI's signature handwriting expert to go look
at the documents on the things that those are definitely
Hunter Biden's signature. We can compare to the guy that
made scores of cases for the FBI. I was able
to corroborate it in real time. And the real question
is none of those fifty one could do the same
work before they intelligence statements, before experts, before they wrote that.
Speaker 2 (09:05):
Letter because they didn't care.
Speaker 7 (09:07):
All they knew is they got a request from Wincoln
and Tony Blincoln who organized them and said, we need
you to say this to help Joe Biden get elected,
because this has the potential of destroying his candadacy.
Speaker 2 (09:19):
That's right, isn't that what? Really? It's that simple, isn't
it is?
Speaker 3 (09:22):
It is that simple pack journalism, and as a result,
the American public were misled in twenty nineteen, they were
misled during the impeachment proceedings, they were misled in twenty
twenty with the laptop going into the election, and for
most of the last four years, they've been misled again.
And you're starting to see some revision of history. The
Washington Post recently changed some of its fact checks about
(09:43):
Ukraine and Biden, but only because now they've been forced
to acknowledge that all these documents that the State Department
gave to me, that the FBI gave to me, that
Devon Archer gave to Congress, that they're real and the
story was exactly what we said it was back in
twenty nineteen.
Speaker 7 (09:58):
All right, clickbreak more with investigative reporter editor in chief
justinews dot com John Solomon. Your calls on the other side,
how we continue with editor in chief, founder investigative reporter
justinews dot com John Solomon is with us. Let's go
to issue number two, and that is that Joe Biden
has had an advisor that had contact with Barisma during
(10:22):
the height of the corruption probe, according to new emails
that you were able to find. And I got to
give you a lot of credit. I mean between your
four your requests, your contacts, I mean, you're really pounding
the pavement and demanding answers. The sad part is that
the government takes years, oftentimes to get back to you.
So these are stories you rightly point out. We should
(10:45):
have known. That would have been evidence in the Ukrainian
impeachment hopes against Donald Trump, this would be evidence against
Joe Biden. Certainly, the American people had a right to
know that the laptop was very real and verified by
the FBI prior to voting in twenty twenty, but they
wouldn't give that information away because they wanted to protect
(11:05):
Joe Biden. They allowed fifty one former Intel agents to
flat out lie and they knew it was a lie.
Speaker 5 (11:12):
Yeah, you are exactly right.
Speaker 3 (11:14):
I mean, listen, these things happened, and people say, well,
what's the consequence of having a biased intelligence community or
a biased law enforcement community, or just some leaders in
it that are biased, that are able to keep the
truth of the American people? What is we go to
elections misinformed? And I think that that's what we're learning
about twenty twenty. People made a decision in twenty twenty
(11:37):
based on information that wasn't complete in some cases untrue.
This new story is very important, it has relevance right now.
Yes it's very old, but the man who was involved
in this effort in twenty fourteen is currently Joe Biden's
one of his most important emissaries.
Speaker 5 (11:52):
To the Middle East. Middle East is a flame right name.
His name is Almost Hotstein.
Speaker 3 (11:56):
Back in twenty fourteen, right after Hunter Biden got on
the board right Reasma and found out it was in
under corruption investigation, something that the State Department and the
FBI supported alongside of the Great the British Serious Fraud Office,
Hunter Biden's team, including his law firm, his business partners,
and a lobbyist that had been hired by Barisma, arranged
(12:17):
a meeting for Almost Hochstein, then the head of it
was sort of the top and one of the top
energy experts in the Obama Biden State Department, to sit
down and meet with one of the Barisma officials.
Speaker 5 (12:28):
Now you can't tell from.
Speaker 3 (12:29):
The meetings whether that meeting actually ocurred was scheduled. You
could see it on a schedule to see people talking
about it, but you can see that they clearly had
a contact with Hochstein because they're talking about the information
Hopstein gave them and who they can work with.
Speaker 5 (12:42):
So at a.
Speaker 3 (12:43):
Moment when the State Department thought Barisma was corrupt, at
a moment when the FBI was assisting Great Britain to
bring a fraud case against this company, this gentleman, mister
Hostein makes it contact and has some contact with these
guys and is giving them some information that they seem
is valuable. They're passing it on. And by the way,
(13:03):
Hunter bidens directly in the know and in fact, at
one point he instructs his assistant, Hey, get that private
number or that number, that direct number I have for
Amos Hopstein, and get it to my business partners with Barisma.
So Hunter is directly involved in this. It's shocking. Just
think about that. Imagine if a company under investigation that
Donald Trump Junior was working for got access at the
(13:25):
State Department during an investigation, people would be up in arms.
Speaker 5 (13:28):
But this happened.
Speaker 3 (13:29):
And what's more interesting is that Amos Hopstein was once
asked about, Hey, is there any chance you had contact
with Breisma back in twenty fourteen. He did the I
don't remember. It's possible I could have, but I don't know,
can't tell, but he said, I will tell you this.
At the time, I believe that Brisma was corrupt and
that it needed.
Speaker 5 (13:47):
To be prosecuted.
Speaker 3 (13:48):
Now think about that he told that to the Senate
in twenty twenty without acknowledging that there had been this
contact that you now see in the documents.
Speaker 5 (13:55):
So a person who knows Brisma's corrupt.
Speaker 3 (13:58):
Still has contact with him with that. These are questions
I think the House Impeachment Inquiry still needs to answer.
Speaker 2 (14:04):
Well.
Speaker 7 (14:05):
I mean, it's pretty amazing and it's sad that it
takes this long.
Speaker 2 (14:08):
I will tell you this.
Speaker 7 (14:09):
Now that the laptop is completely verified, then I think
this is a game changer. I think now everything has
to be re examined. We only have two minutes left.
Let's talk very quickly about your report about Jim Jordan
asking the DJ watchdog group, and that's Michael Horrowitz the
Inspector General, to investigate whether the FBI has been purging
(14:33):
agents that have conservative views. We had talked about this
story when you broke it at first, and now it's
taken on a new development.
Speaker 5 (14:41):
Yeah, this is very important. Just think about this.
Speaker 3 (14:44):
In order to get a security care it's at least
this one employee. His colleague would be saying, does he
vocalized support for Trump? Does he oppose that vaccines or
have a concern about the vaccines? Did he attend a
Second Amendment rally? All three of those things are protected
by the First Amendment. You don't give up your First
Amendment when you work the FBI. You still have it
those rights. Well, today Jim Jordan said, Hey, this is
(15:04):
deeply concerning, and he asked Michael Horowitz to begin an investigation.
And then he wrote a second letter to the director
of the FBI, and a director who's repeatedly say we
don't play politics at the FBI, to say what is
going on here? And he made this very important decoration.
I think everybody has to see where I think where
Congress is headed on this. He said to the director himself,
(15:27):
the FBI appears to be purging itself of employees who
do not share it's preferred political views. That is a
powerful allegation from one of the most important people in Congress,
the chairman of the House Tusory Committee.
Speaker 5 (15:39):
This is a question the FBI.
Speaker 3 (15:40):
Is going to be forced to answer in the next
couple of weeks.
Speaker 2 (15:43):
Well, great work.
Speaker 7 (15:44):
Editor in chief, founder and investigative reporter John Solomon, keep
counting the pavement. So are You're doing great work and
we appreciate you being with us.
Speaker 5 (15:52):
Thanks Sean, great to be with you.
Speaker 7 (15:54):
Eight hundred nine four one, Shawn is a number if
you want to be a part of the program, all right,
twenty five till the top of the hour's hold for
you on numbers eight hundred and ninety four one, Sean,
if you want to join us.
Speaker 5 (16:03):
All right?
Speaker 7 (16:03):
Can you think what your favorite childhood memory is? Maybe
the one that was caught on film or videotape. Do
you have an easy way to watch it? Do you
have a VCR? Do you have a film projector if
it's real to real? They don't even make VCRs anymore.
And anyway, now thanks to Legacy Box, you can save
these family memories in perpetuity because of their technology. And
(16:27):
now you can do it at the low, low price
because legacy box dot com slash Hannity is having their
nine dollars tape sale.
Speaker 2 (16:34):
Now.
Speaker 7 (16:34):
Legacy Box is really simple. You go to that website.
They're going to send you a box. And what do
you do? Okay, you go to your attic. You go
to your garage, you go to your closets, you go
to your basement. You look for every every family photo,
every VHS, caamquarter tape, real to real family tape. You
have other family members do it as well. You put
(16:56):
it in the box. They will hand digitize all of
these family memories, old tapes, film pictures, you name it.
You'll get the originals back and then you'll get all
of these memories preserved on a thumb drive or on
the cloud, whatever's easiest to use for you. And it's
like magic. And I got to tell you, I wish
I thought of this company. They have millions of customers
(17:17):
now and right now, you don't want the summer heat
to age these family memories. Now, think about this. You
might see videotapes of people that have passed away and
you get to see and hear from them again. How
cool is that? And from generations from now, people will
be able to know and see and hear what they're
great great great great great great great grandparents look like
(17:39):
and sounded like. And how great an experience will that
be for them. It's simple to do. You go to
legacy box dot com. Slash Hannity it's their nine dollars
tape sale going on right now Legacy box dot com
slash Hannity to unlock this really incredible offer. The Committee
on House Administration and their Chairman Brian Style, who will
(18:02):
join us in a minute, has now had to issue
fifteen subpoenas to fifteen Biden administration cabinet officials for documents
related to the Biden administration and their executive Order on
promoting what they call access to Voting.
Speaker 2 (18:19):
Now.
Speaker 7 (18:19):
Biden's Executive Order one four zero, one to nine. It
directs federal agencies to promote access to voting through the
use of federal agency resources. Now, evidence is already showing
that the executive order partners federal employees with partisan advocates
to register voters ahead of the election, which, as you know,
(18:41):
is only one hundred and what thirty seven days away,
early eighty eight days away from early voting. And the
Committee on the House Administration began an investigation into this
executive order, and Congressman Brian's Style is at the front
of it. He's from Wisconsin's first district and he has
said about this executive order is another by the Biden
administration to tilt the scales ahead of twenty twenty four.
(19:04):
I will continue to work to provide transparency and accountability
on this administration's latest scheme, as Congress did not appropriate
taxpayer funds for partisan activities, nor would they anyway. Congressman
Brian Styles, Wisconsin's first district is with us now. Congressman,
this to me is really really important because what we're
looking at here and what it sounds like to me,
(19:26):
correct me if I'm wrong, is that the administration wants
to use all the resources of the federal government to
stack the deck in their favor and register Democrats and
lead up to this twenty twenty four presidential election. Congress
needs to appropriate funding for such a thing, and so
(19:46):
far they've gotten away with it, and we're eighty eight
days away from early voting starting in Pennsylvania and then
all the other states roll out immediately thereafter.
Speaker 4 (19:54):
We share the same concern here, Sean, and this is
why is subpoene at fifteen Biden Administration agency officials to
get their strategic plan. We need to shine a light
on exactly what this administration is doing, and they're working
to tilt the scales using your taxpayer dollars. We already
have evidence where the Department of Education is allowing workforce
(20:15):
dollars to go towards registering students on liberal college campuses.
We've seen a small business administration partner with the State
of Michigan. And under this executive order, each agency is
required to put forward a strategic plan. That's what I
am trying to get my hands on. We've subpoenaed these agencies.
We are forcing them to get it to us by
next week, and then we're going to call them out
(20:36):
for engaging in partisan politics because they are not allowed
to utilize your tax payer dollars for partisan purposes. And
we know that's what this administration is trying to do.
Speaker 2 (20:47):
It certainly seems like it.
Speaker 7 (20:48):
And so what has been the response and what is
the timeframe under which you're giving these cabinet officials time
to appear before your committee and stop this before the election.
Speaker 4 (21:00):
The administration officials have until next week to provide us
these strategic plans before we take further court action to
force them to turn this over. There's no excuse that
these administration officials, such as Secretary Pete Buddhajes, won't turn
over their strategic plan as to how they're implementing Biden's
executive order, they're refusing to do it. That should give
(21:20):
pause to every American that didn't.
Speaker 7 (21:22):
Oho So they have refused to cooperate with a legitimate
with a legitimate congressional subpoena. Isn't that why Pete Navarro
and Steve Bannon and didn't they get held in contemp
for stuff like this?
Speaker 4 (21:36):
They have ut til next week to actually comply, but
we have been asking for these documents prior to that.
They should have already provided them to us. And the
fact that they're not willing to immediately provide a strategic
plan that's paid for with your tax dollars gives me
great pause. And we're going to continue to force them
to provide this because the American people deserve to know
how your taxpayer dollars being weaponized to drive out a
(21:59):
part in get out the vote effort by the Biden administration.
Speaker 2 (22:02):
It's pretty unbelievable.
Speaker 7 (22:04):
Is there anything that people listening to the show can
do to offer you support? Or we just have to
sit and wait until what to see of whether they
comply or not.
Speaker 4 (22:13):
Well, raising awareness of this is essential. People should be
reaching out to their own member of Congress encouraging them
to force this administration to turn over the strategic plan.
This is concerning for all of us at a period
of time where we want our elections to be secure.
The election process is always going to be partisans, but
the operations of our elections, the administration of our elections,
(22:34):
should be a nonpartisan affair, and the fact that the
Biden administration is working to tilt the scales in this
manner is incredibly concerning. It's important we're shining a light
on this because we have to force the Biden administration
to turn this over.
Speaker 7 (22:47):
So basically a voter mobilization scheme that's organized with taxpayer
dollars by the Biden administration, I doubt they're going to
put as much effort into registering and getting voters out
that are publican and conservatives they will Democrats.
Speaker 4 (23:02):
Well, you're exactly right, and that's why each administration, each
agency strategic plan that lays out exactly what they're doing
is what we're trying to get so we can shine
light on it. We have a pretty good understanding when
the Department of Education put forward their work study plan
that they're working to turn out voters on liberal college campuses.
When you look at the Small Business Administration engaging in
(23:24):
a contract with the state of Michigan, it's not hard
to understand why the administration is more interested in Michigan
than another state. The key focus here is the Biden
administration is using the taxpayer dollars. All indications are for
clear partisan purposes, and they're refusing to provide us their
strategic plan that they're required to produce under this executive order.
(23:46):
And that's giving everybody pause because this administration time and
again is shown they are not concerned with the letter
of the law and they're willing to do anything to
drive forward their partisan agenda.
Speaker 7 (23:57):
Well, we know for a fact there's nobody in this
medicalized government that is ever going to make any outreach
to any Republican or conservative voters. So they're going to
use taxpayer dollars to benefit themselves. If this is allowed
to continue, do you believe you'll have enough time to
not only get their plan, but to also get them
before Congress and stop this. I mean, is this something
(24:20):
you can take to the courts right now?
Speaker 4 (24:22):
One hundred percent. We have an opportunity to stop this.
This is where getting these plans and executing on our
subpoenas essential. We'll get that next week hopefully.
Speaker 7 (24:32):
Yeah, they're rewriting the plans now to accommodate what they
think that you'd want to hear is what I would pet.
Speaker 4 (24:38):
I'm incredibly concerned about everything this administration is doing. But
if we can show, which I believe we will, that
they're engaged in partisan activities, we will have an opportunity
to go to the court, get an injunction and get
this stop.
Speaker 7 (24:50):
Appreciate your hard work here, Congressman. We're going to stay
on top of this story. Please update us as necessary.
Congressman Brian Style of Wisconsin, thank you so. I appreciate
you always being with us.
Speaker 5 (25:02):
Thanks for having me on.
Speaker 7 (25:03):
Eight hundred and ninety four one. Shawn is a number
if you want to be a part of the program.
Hi to our busy pones we go. Steve Is in Michigan. Steve, Hi,
how are you glad you called?
Speaker 2 (25:11):
Sar.
Speaker 8 (25:12):
I'm pleasure speaking with you a long time listeners for
signed caller calling you. Thank you so she getting a
birthplace of the Republican Party and listening to you on
WKHM ninety seventy Am. Now I have I'd like your
thoughts on this. Biden is not going to be our
presidential candidate for the Democrat Party. He's going to fall
on his face on this debate on a week from yesterday,
(25:35):
and based on what you and mister Riley were talking
about yesterday, I think the Democrat Party is going to
sneak in our Governor Dretchen Whitner to be their candidate,
and i'd like your thoughts on that.
Speaker 7 (25:48):
I think she would be the most likely person to
replace Joe if that were to happen, or at least
the favorite in terms of what the Democratic establishment would
want to do. I think the mechanics, if you will,
the inner workings of the DNC are very different than
the base of the Democratic Party, and I think that
(26:09):
have a hard time, you know, leapfrogging over Vice President
Harris to do that. But I think that's definitely on
the table. I don't think she's a particularly strong candidate myself,
but yeah, I mean, anything can happen. I mean, honestly,
I watched Joe Biden, and I just think at any
moment he could just you know, fall over and that's it.
(26:31):
And it's sad to watch and see and I often
wonder why the people around him that are supposed to
love him the most are allowing him to do this,
but apparently they don't have any problems with it. But
it's bad for the country. His policy is a disastrous
It's bad for the world because every hostile actor is
taking full advantage of America abdicating its role on the
(26:54):
world stage as the leader of the free world, and
that we're paying a very dear in every way imaginable.
Speaker 5 (27:02):
You know.
Speaker 7 (27:02):
That's why I'm hoping and praying in one hundred and
thirty seven days, early voting starts in eighty eight days,
that people are going to start paying attention, and that
people will realize that the consequences are severe if this
guy ever got elected to another term, or if frankly,
any Democrat because the whole party's been radicalized. Anyway, we'll see.
Well watch Steve, thank you and Michigan appreciate it. Let's
(27:24):
say hi to Pete and Oregon. Pete, how are you
glad you Caltzar.
Speaker 1 (27:28):
I'm doing great, Sean, thank you for asking and I
really enjoy your show and listening to you a long time.
Speaker 2 (27:34):
Thank you, my friend. I'm glad you're out there, what's
going on in Oregon.
Speaker 1 (27:37):
Well, I just wanted to give you kind of a
perspective from a lot of background in dementia and Alzheimer's.
I went through it with my father and just to
see them the way they decline day by day, week
by week, and just looking at Joe Biden over the
last five years, there is absolutely not a doubt in
(27:59):
my mind that is what's happening with him and why
his family WO put him out there on a daily basis.
They ought to be really ashamed of themselves.
Speaker 7 (28:09):
Look to me, it's obvious, it's transparent. I think that
this attempt to refer to all of Joe's mishaps as
deep fake gafs and don't believe your lying eyes and
so on and so forth, I think it's a desperate
attempt on their part and it's just another outright lie.
(28:30):
I mean, they're very good at lying. Inflation was supposed
to be transitory. The border was closed and the border
was secure, Biden even saying the same thing, I secured
the border, he said it this week. Every other issue
that you know our cities are safe and secured, they're not.
It's just it's been a disaster, and I really am.
(28:52):
Look and I say that, and I've come under some
pretty pretty heavy criticism, is that I'm expecting a very
different Joe Biden at the debate one week from today. Now,
how do I how do I juxtapose those two positions?
Speaker 2 (29:08):
It's simple.
Speaker 7 (29:09):
Is the guy that we saw at the State of
the Union was jacked up. I don't know what it was.
Speaker 2 (29:14):
Was it? Was it red Bull?
Speaker 7 (29:15):
Was it extra strength Excedron that has caffeine in it?
Was it a caffeine pill? They actually have caffeine pills
you can buy. I have no idea. Was it something else?
I don't know. But the guy that we saw at
the State of the Union we'd never seen before and
we haven't seen since. And that makes that kind of
draws the conclusion in my mind is the reason we
(29:37):
don't see it more often is because whatever hyper caffeinated
red Bull they're given Joe Biden probably isn't healthy for
or else we'd probably see it a lot more often,
wouldn't we.
Speaker 5 (29:50):
I think so.
Speaker 1 (29:52):
But I will say this, I have to agree with
your previous caller. I think they are going to pull
him right before or had convention and just set him
aside and say, h Joe, look you you did a
great job, but we got to move on. And I
don't I can't guess who they would put in there.
I don't know about Whittner. I know, you think that
might be the most possible for a person to go
(30:12):
in there, but they got they don't have really anybody
on deck, so to speak for that position. I just
I can't think of one Democratic candidate that would. I
think they'd get destroyed by Trump.
Speaker 7 (30:26):
I think they they the obvious choice would be Vice
President Harris, which would be a disaster if they look
outside of that.
Speaker 1 (30:35):
I don't know.
Speaker 7 (30:36):
Maybe maybe maybe I'm totally blinded by the time that
I spent with Gavin Newsom and and the number of
times that I went in and pressed him hard on
the issue of whether he would be willing to be
the candidate if they came to him, and him saying
outright no, that it would be Vice President Harris. The
only other person that I really can think of that
they might go to would be Gretchen Whitmer. And however,
(31:00):
with all that said, unless you know, barring an unmitigated
disaster or Joe falling on his face, he could be
one fall away from losing the nomination. I think that
as of now, he's the guy, and I think they'll
stick with him, and I think they've convinced himself he's
sufficiently close enough in the polls that they can pull
this off. And look, I wish the poles weren't as
(31:22):
close as they are, but I think people need to
look at it, take it seriously, and vote as if
the future of the country depends on it, because it does.
There's a lot of hanging in the balance. This is
not just a tipping point. This is an inflection point
for the country and maybe a point of no return.
Speaker 2 (31:41):
I really don't know the answer.
Speaker 7 (31:44):
Anyway, I appreciate to call my friend eight hundred ninety
four one Sean if you want to be a part
of the program.
Speaker 2 (31:50):
All right, we'll take a quick break. We'll come right back.
Speaker 7 (31:52):
We have a lot more coming up straight ahead, including
at the top of the hour, Chris Kobok is going
to join us. He's the Kansas Attorney General, and much
more straight ahead
Well, we have come in your city.
Speaker 2 (00:05):
I get saying you a comfort zone.
Speaker 3 (00:09):
Will be.
Speaker 4 (00:12):
Little tell.
Speaker 5 (00:14):
And if you want a little banging a Yuni, I
come along.
Speaker 4 (00:18):
Biden wrote the.
Speaker 6 (00:19):
Devastating nineteen ninety four crime Bill talking about super predators
that was biten.
Speaker 1 (00:26):
Like, if we don't acknowledge that there are some things,
some real pocketbook issues that are still front of mine.
Speaker 2 (00:35):
For people, we miss the mark.
Speaker 3 (00:37):
Because it's people are its hispanic.
Speaker 2 (00:39):
We're gonna lose expatic mails.
Speaker 5 (00:41):
Yeah, what a loose block.
Speaker 6 (00:48):
Only one hundred and thirty seven days until America vote.
Speaker 7 (00:55):
Quote that we have come in to your city.
Speaker 2 (01:00):
Don't get saying you a conscious song.
Speaker 6 (01:04):
From coast to coast, from border to border, from c
to Shining Sea. Sean Kennedy is on.
Speaker 7 (01:19):
Thanks gotch Hannon and our two Sean Hannity Show, toll free,
our numbers eight hundred nine four one Seawn if you
want to be a part of the program. There has
been a lot of uh well, uh I guess Warren
Leather if you will from our friend John Solomon, founder
and editor in chief Justinnews dot com, as he has
now broken three big exclusives in just the last week.
(01:43):
One Jim Jordan is asking the Department of Justice watchdog
to investigate whether the FBI is purging agents if they
have conservative views.
Speaker 2 (01:53):
It's a follow up.
Speaker 7 (01:54):
To a story that John broke just about a week
or two ago, issued number two. A Biden advisor had
contact with Parisma during the height of the corruption probe.
We now have emails that backed this up and that
the FBI knew since twenty sixteen that Hunter Biden's team
(02:17):
nearly scored one hundred and twenty million dollars in the
Ukrainian deal while Joe Biden was vice president. Well that's
new anyway. Justinnews dot com founder editor in chief investigative
reporter John Solomon is with us.
Speaker 5 (02:32):
How are you, sir, Well, good to be with you today.
Speaker 2 (02:35):
Let's work our.
Speaker 7 (02:35):
Way back in the order in which you broke these stories,
and let's go to the first one, where the FBI
news since twenty sixteen that Hunter's team scored nearly one
hundred and twenty million dollars Ukrainian deal while Joe was
a vice president. Okay, now that the laptop has finally,
four years later, been verified by the government, as they
(02:57):
are the ones that introduced it into evidence in the
case again Hunter Biden. I think all of this now
is basically evidence against Joe Biden. You know, with this
upcoming debate one week from today, I'm pretty sure that
Joe's going to say you're a You're a convicted felon.
Maybe we should have a drinking game based on how
(03:18):
many times he says it. But I would say, based
on the laptop that we now know and frankly knew
a long time ago, was very real. You reported the
FBI knew about it, you know, as early as March
of twenty twenty. For sure they had verified it and
that's why they were pre bunking it with big tech.
(03:38):
But putting that aside, the FBI learned tell us what
they learned as far back as twenty sixteen about Hunter
his partners and how they set up a new tax
venture in another country, a third party country that would
be that would be capitalized by a wopping one hundred
and twenty million dollar investment from the controversial owner of
(04:00):
the energy giant Verice Beholdings out of Ukraine, where Hunter
sat on the board, even though he'd admitted he had
no experience and was addicted to crack cocaine at that time.
Speaker 5 (04:12):
Yeah, I listened. I think you summarized it perfectly.
Speaker 3 (04:14):
Hunter Biden gets put on this board at a time
when the owner and the company are deemed corrupt by
the State Department and the owners being pursued by the
Serious Fraud Office in Great Britain on a fraud case
that was actually assisted by the FBI. The State Department,
the FBI, British traud authorities all believe this company was
(04:35):
corrupt and as a result they started pursuing them. And
Hunter Biden just magically appears on the board right at
the moment that all of these allegations are servicing, and wow,
the fraud case dies down for a while, and Hunter
Biden is looking along with his business partners Devin Archer
and others, to score big, bigger than just the million
dollars a year he was getting to be on the board.
Speaker 5 (04:56):
And they put together this concept.
Speaker 3 (04:58):
They're going to open a company and licked and which
is a tax friendly country.
Speaker 5 (05:02):
And the owner of Borisma.
Speaker 3 (05:05):
Mikolosochski, is going to capitalize it with one hundred and
twenty million dollars.
Speaker 5 (05:09):
Just think about that. Hunter Biden's on the board.
Speaker 3 (05:11):
He's supposed to be providing fiduciary responsibility for Barisma, and
he's working with the owner to move money to another
one of his companies in another country where he's going
to be a significant beneficiary along with his other business partners.
Speaker 5 (05:25):
That alone raises questions.
Speaker 3 (05:26):
But then when you think of the fact that this
is all going on while Joe Biden's administration is dealing
with this corruption issue involving Brezema, and Joe Biden is
the point man for Ukraine anti corruption efforts, it looks
all the more untoward. We didn't know about this one
hundred and twenty million dollars deal back when impeachment occurred,
Back when I broke the first stories in twenty nineteen.
It was sitting in the three point three nine million
(05:49):
pages of documents that the FBI sec and IRS gathered
from Hunter Biden as business partners during a twenty sixteen
securities investigation.
Speaker 5 (05:58):
We now have.
Speaker 7 (05:59):
How is it that we didn't have access to those
prior to this point. I mean, you know, here we
are eight years later, John.
Speaker 3 (06:06):
Well, listen, the president, President Trump should have had access
because these were exculpatory documents for his impeachment. They didn't
get these documents. Ron Johnson and Chuck Grassey had to
send an investigation going on it. They didn't get these documents.
I put in lots of foils over the years to
many agencies. I didn't get these documents. However, we got
them because Devin Archer, one of the defendants of that
(06:28):
securities case, gave them to Congress recently. It's the full
production of everything the United States government got from Hunter
Biden and his various business partners.
Speaker 5 (06:38):
There's a wretch, Trevor Schrovin. It's something interesting here.
Speaker 3 (06:40):
There's a lot of emails and correspondence that are in
these documents certified by the government that aren't on Hunter
Biden's laptop, which raises the question why aren't they.
Speaker 5 (06:49):
We'll have to find out.
Speaker 3 (06:50):
Over time, But there is a body of new evidence
that really puts into focus how much the government agencies,
the deep state, people call them new about what was
going on in Hunter Biden world and how it potentially
affected Joe Biden's duties.
Speaker 7 (07:05):
Well, certainly they didn't have any intention of bringing it
to the American people, just like Joe Biden was allowed
to get away with the lies about the Hunter Biden
laptop not being real and the FBI knew, damn well
it was real. In the summer of twenty twenty, leading
up to the election, in the fall of twenty twenty,
we know that the FBI, even though they had verified
(07:27):
the authenticity of Hunter's laptop, they were out there meeting
weekly with all these big tech companies and warning them
that may be victims of a disinformation campaign, and that
disinformation campaign may be about Joe Biden, it may be
about Hunter Biden. Anyway, fast forward, the New York Post
breaks the story that Hunter Biden laptop. All of this,
(07:50):
and they allowed the President to go out and lie,
then candidate Joe Biden to go out there and lie
and say it's false. They allowed Hunter to say it's false.
And when they got specific questions, meaning the FBI, from Twitter,
from Facebook, I believe two those two big tech companies
in particular, is this what you were warning us about
(08:12):
or is this real? They knew they could have verified
it was real, they refused to answer the question that's right,
and then the result of that was they censored the
story and you couldn't even send a private message with
a link to the New York Post article.
Speaker 3 (08:26):
You're right and listen it wasn't that hard for me.
You remember I came on your show very early and
told you that the FBI had already authenticated this laptop.
I actually had the ode and I John Radkiff, the
Director of National Intelligence, thing, there's no reason to believe
that this laptop had anything to do with Russia or
a foreign intelligence operation.
Speaker 5 (08:44):
It was very easy for me.
Speaker 3 (08:45):
I got the FBI's signature handwriting expert to go look
at the documents on the things that those are definitely
Hunter Biden's signature. We can compare to the guy that
made scores of cases for the FBI. I was able
to corroborate it in real time. And the real question
is none of those fifty one could do the same
work before they intelligence statements, before experts, before they wrote that.
Speaker 2 (09:05):
Letter because they didn't care.
Speaker 7 (09:07):
All they knew is they got a request from Wincoln
and Tony Blincoln who organized them and said, we need
you to say this to help Joe Biden get elected,
because this has the potential of destroying his candadacy.
Speaker 2 (09:19):
That's right, isn't that what? Really? It's that simple, isn't
it is?
Speaker 3 (09:22):
It is that simple pack journalism, and as a result,
the American public were misled in twenty nineteen, they were
misled during the impeachment proceedings, they were misled in twenty
twenty with the laptop going into the election, and for
most of the last four years, they've been misled again.
And you're starting to see some revision of history. The
Washington Post recently changed some of its fact checks about
(09:43):
Ukraine and Biden, but only because now they've been forced
to acknowledge that all these documents that the State Department
gave to me, that the FBI gave to me, that
Devon Archer gave to Congress, that they're real and the
story was exactly what we said it was back in
twenty nineteen.
Speaker 7 (09:58):
All right, clickbreak more with investigative reporter editor in chief
justinews dot com John Solomon. Your calls on the other side,
how we continue with editor in chief, founder investigative reporter
justinews dot com John Solomon is with us. Let's go
to issue number two, and that is that Joe Biden
has had an advisor that had contact with Barisma during
(10:22):
the height of the corruption probe, according to new emails
that you were able to find. And I got to
give you a lot of credit. I mean between your
four your requests, your contacts, I mean, you're really pounding
the pavement and demanding answers. The sad part is that
the government takes years, oftentimes to get back to you.
So these are stories you rightly point out. We should
(10:45):
have known. That would have been evidence in the Ukrainian
impeachment hopes against Donald Trump, this would be evidence against
Joe Biden. Certainly, the American people had a right to
know that the laptop was very real and verified by
the FBI prior to voting in twenty twenty, but they
wouldn't give that information away because they wanted to protect
(11:05):
Joe Biden. They allowed fifty one former Intel agents to
flat out lie and they knew it was a lie.
Speaker 5 (11:12):
Yeah, you are exactly right.
Speaker 3 (11:14):
I mean, listen, these things happened, and people say, well,
what's the consequence of having a biased intelligence community or
a biased law enforcement community, or just some leaders in
it that are biased, that are able to keep the
truth of the American people? What is we go to
elections misinformed? And I think that that's what we're learning
about twenty twenty. People made a decision in twenty twenty
(11:37):
based on information that wasn't complete in some cases untrue.
This new story is very important, it has relevance right now.
Yes it's very old, but the man who was involved
in this effort in twenty fourteen is currently Joe Biden's
one of his most important emissaries.
Speaker 5 (11:52):
To the Middle East. Middle East is a flame right name.
His name is Almost Hotstein.
Speaker 3 (11:56):
Back in twenty fourteen, right after Hunter Biden got on
the board right Reasma and found out it was in
under corruption investigation, something that the State Department and the
FBI supported alongside of the Great the British Serious Fraud Office,
Hunter Biden's team, including his law firm, his business partners,
and a lobbyist that had been hired by Barisma, arranged
(12:17):
a meeting for Almost Hochstein, then the head of it
was sort of the top and one of the top
energy experts in the Obama Biden State Department, to sit
down and meet with one of the Barisma officials.
Speaker 5 (12:28):
Now you can't tell from.
Speaker 3 (12:29):
The meetings whether that meeting actually ocurred was scheduled. You
could see it on a schedule to see people talking
about it, but you can see that they clearly had
a contact with Hochstein because they're talking about the information
Hopstein gave them and who they can work with.
Speaker 5 (12:42):
So at a.
Speaker 3 (12:43):
Moment when the State Department thought Barisma was corrupt, at
a moment when the FBI was assisting Great Britain to
bring a fraud case against this company, this gentleman, mister
Hostein makes it contact and has some contact with these
guys and is giving them some information that they seem
is valuable. They're passing it on. And by the way,
(13:03):
Hunter bidens directly in the know and in fact, at
one point he instructs his assistant, Hey, get that private
number or that number, that direct number I have for
Amos Hopstein, and get it to my business partners with Barisma.
So Hunter is directly involved in this. It's shocking. Just
think about that. Imagine if a company under investigation that
Donald Trump Junior was working for got access at the
(13:25):
State Department during an investigation, people would be up in arms.
Speaker 5 (13:28):
But this happened.
Speaker 3 (13:29):
And what's more interesting is that Amos Hopstein was once
asked about, Hey, is there any chance you had contact
with Breisma back in twenty fourteen. He did the I
don't remember. It's possible I could have, but I don't know,
can't tell, but he said, I will tell you this.
At the time, I believe that Brisma was corrupt and
that it needed.
Speaker 5 (13:47):
To be prosecuted.
Speaker 3 (13:48):
Now think about that he told that to the Senate
in twenty twenty without acknowledging that there had been this
contact that you now see in the documents.
Speaker 5 (13:55):
So a person who knows Brisma's corrupt.
Speaker 3 (13:58):
Still has contact with him with that. These are questions
I think the House Impeachment Inquiry still needs to answer.
Speaker 2 (14:04):
Well.
Speaker 7 (14:05):
I mean, it's pretty amazing and it's sad that it
takes this long.
Speaker 2 (14:08):
I will tell you this.
Speaker 7 (14:09):
Now that the laptop is completely verified, then I think
this is a game changer. I think now everything has
to be re examined. We only have two minutes left.
Let's talk very quickly about your report about Jim Jordan
asking the DJ watchdog group, and that's Michael Horrowitz the
Inspector General, to investigate whether the FBI has been purging
(14:33):
agents that have conservative views. We had talked about this
story when you broke it at first, and now it's
taken on a new development.
Speaker 5 (14:41):
Yeah, this is very important. Just think about this.
Speaker 3 (14:44):
In order to get a security care it's at least
this one employee. His colleague would be saying, does he
vocalized support for Trump? Does he oppose that vaccines or
have a concern about the vaccines? Did he attend a
Second Amendment rally? All three of those things are protected
by the First Amendment. You don't give up your First
Amendment when you work the FBI. You still have it
those rights. Well, today Jim Jordan said, Hey, this is
(15:04):
deeply concerning, and he asked Michael Horowitz to begin an investigation.
And then he wrote a second letter to the director
of the FBI, and a director who's repeatedly say we
don't play politics at the FBI, to say what is
going on here? And he made this very important decoration.
I think everybody has to see where I think where
Congress is headed on this. He said to the director himself,
(15:27):
the FBI appears to be purging itself of employees who
do not share it's preferred political views. That is a
powerful allegation from one of the most important people in Congress,
the chairman of the House Tusory Committee.
Speaker 5 (15:39):
This is a question the FBI.
Speaker 3 (15:40):
Is going to be forced to answer in the next
couple of weeks.
Speaker 2 (15:43):
Well, great work.
Speaker 7 (15:44):
Editor in chief, founder and investigative reporter John Solomon, keep
counting the pavement. So are You're doing great work and
we appreciate you being with us.
Speaker 5 (15:52):
Thanks Sean, great to be with you.
Speaker 7 (15:54):
Eight hundred nine four one, Shawn is a number if
you want to be a part of the program, all right,
twenty five till the top of the hour's hold for
you on numbers eight hundred and ninety four one, Sean,
if you want to join us.
Speaker 5 (16:03):
All right?
Speaker 7 (16:03):
Can you think what your favorite childhood memory is? Maybe
the one that was caught on film or videotape. Do
you have an easy way to watch it? Do you
have a VCR? Do you have a film projector if
it's real to real? They don't even make VCRs anymore.
And anyway, now thanks to Legacy Box, you can save
these family memories in perpetuity because of their technology. And
(16:27):
now you can do it at the low, low price
because legacy box dot com slash Hannity is having their
nine dollars tape sale.
Speaker 2 (16:34):
Now.
Speaker 7 (16:34):
Legacy Box is really simple. You go to that website.
They're going to send you a box. And what do
you do? Okay, you go to your attic. You go
to your garage, you go to your closets, you go
to your basement. You look for every every family photo,
every VHS, caamquarter tape, real to real family tape. You
have other family members do it as well. You put
(16:56):
it in the box. They will hand digitize all of
these family memories, old tapes, film pictures, you name it.
You'll get the originals back and then you'll get all
of these memories preserved on a thumb drive or on
the cloud, whatever's easiest to use for you. And it's
like magic. And I got to tell you, I wish
I thought of this company. They have millions of customers
(17:17):
now and right now, you don't want the summer heat
to age these family memories. Now, think about this. You
might see videotapes of people that have passed away and
you get to see and hear from them again. How
cool is that? And from generations from now, people will
be able to know and see and hear what they're
great great great great great great great grandparents look like
(17:39):
and sounded like. And how great an experience will that
be for them. It's simple to do. You go to
legacy box dot com. Slash Hannity it's their nine dollars
tape sale going on right now Legacy box dot com
slash Hannity to unlock this really incredible offer. The Committee
on House Administration and their Chairman Brian Style, who will
(18:02):
join us in a minute, has now had to issue
fifteen subpoenas to fifteen Biden administration cabinet officials for documents
related to the Biden administration and their executive Order on
promoting what they call access to Voting.
Speaker 2 (18:19):
Now.
Speaker 7 (18:19):
Biden's Executive Order one four zero, one to nine. It
directs federal agencies to promote access to voting through the
use of federal agency resources. Now, evidence is already showing
that the executive order partners federal employees with partisan advocates
to register voters ahead of the election, which, as you know,
(18:41):
is only one hundred and what thirty seven days away,
early eighty eight days away from early voting. And the
Committee on the House Administration began an investigation into this
executive order, and Congressman Brian's Style is at the front
of it. He's from Wisconsin's first district and he has
said about this executive order is another by the Biden
administration to tilt the scales ahead of twenty twenty four.
(19:04):
I will continue to work to provide transparency and accountability
on this administration's latest scheme, as Congress did not appropriate
taxpayer funds for partisan activities, nor would they anyway. Congressman
Brian Styles, Wisconsin's first district is with us now. Congressman,
this to me is really really important because what we're
looking at here and what it sounds like to me,
(19:26):
correct me if I'm wrong, is that the administration wants
to use all the resources of the federal government to
stack the deck in their favor and register Democrats and
lead up to this twenty twenty four presidential election. Congress
needs to appropriate funding for such a thing, and so
(19:46):
far they've gotten away with it, and we're eighty eight
days away from early voting starting in Pennsylvania and then
all the other states roll out immediately thereafter.
Speaker 4 (19:54):
We share the same concern here, Sean, and this is
why is subpoene at fifteen Biden Administration agency officials to
get their strategic plan. We need to shine a light
on exactly what this administration is doing, and they're working
to tilt the scales using your taxpayer dollars. We already
have evidence where the Department of Education is allowing workforce
(20:15):
dollars to go towards registering students on liberal college campuses.
We've seen a small business administration partner with the State
of Michigan. And under this executive order, each agency is
required to put forward a strategic plan. That's what I
am trying to get my hands on. We've subpoenaed these agencies.
We are forcing them to get it to us by
next week, and then we're going to call them out
(20:36):
for engaging in partisan politics because they are not allowed
to utilize your tax payer dollars for partisan purposes. And
we know that's what this administration is trying to do.
Speaker 2 (20:47):
It certainly seems like it.
Speaker 7 (20:48):
And so what has been the response and what is
the timeframe under which you're giving these cabinet officials time
to appear before your committee and stop this before the election.
Speaker 4 (21:00):
The administration officials have until next week to provide us
these strategic plans before we take further court action to
force them to turn this over. There's no excuse that
these administration officials, such as Secretary Pete Buddhajes, won't turn
over their strategic plan as to how they're implementing Biden's
executive order, they're refusing to do it. That should give
(21:20):
pause to every American that didn't.
Speaker 7 (21:22):
Oho So they have refused to cooperate with a legitimate
with a legitimate congressional subpoena. Isn't that why Pete Navarro
and Steve Bannon and didn't they get held in contemp
for stuff like this?
Speaker 4 (21:36):
They have ut til next week to actually comply, but
we have been asking for these documents prior to that.
They should have already provided them to us. And the
fact that they're not willing to immediately provide a strategic
plan that's paid for with your tax dollars gives me
great pause. And we're going to continue to force them
to provide this because the American people deserve to know
how your taxpayer dollars being weaponized to drive out a
(21:59):
part in get out the vote effort by the Biden administration.
Speaker 2 (22:02):
It's pretty unbelievable.
Speaker 7 (22:04):
Is there anything that people listening to the show can
do to offer you support? Or we just have to
sit and wait until what to see of whether they
comply or not.
Speaker 4 (22:13):
Well, raising awareness of this is essential. People should be
reaching out to their own member of Congress encouraging them
to force this administration to turn over the strategic plan.
This is concerning for all of us at a period
of time where we want our elections to be secure.
The election process is always going to be partisans, but
the operations of our elections, the administration of our elections,
(22:34):
should be a nonpartisan affair, and the fact that the
Biden administration is working to tilt the scales in this
manner is incredibly concerning. It's important we're shining a light
on this because we have to force the Biden administration
to turn this over.
Speaker 7 (22:47):
So basically a voter mobilization scheme that's organized with taxpayer
dollars by the Biden administration, I doubt they're going to
put as much effort into registering and getting voters out
that are publican and conservatives they will Democrats.
Speaker 4 (23:02):
Well, you're exactly right, and that's why each administration, each
agency strategic plan that lays out exactly what they're doing
is what we're trying to get so we can shine
light on it. We have a pretty good understanding when
the Department of Education put forward their work study plan
that they're working to turn out voters on liberal college campuses.
When you look at the Small Business Administration engaging in
(23:24):
a contract with the state of Michigan, it's not hard
to understand why the administration is more interested in Michigan
than another state. The key focus here is the Biden
administration is using the taxpayer dollars. All indications are for
clear partisan purposes, and they're refusing to provide us their
strategic plan that they're required to produce under this executive order.
(23:46):
And that's giving everybody pause because this administration time and
again is shown they are not concerned with the letter
of the law and they're willing to do anything to
drive forward their partisan agenda.
Speaker 7 (23:57):
Well, we know for a fact there's nobody in this
medicalized government that is ever going to make any outreach
to any Republican or conservative voters. So they're going to
use taxpayer dollars to benefit themselves. If this is allowed
to continue, do you believe you'll have enough time to
not only get their plan, but to also get them
before Congress and stop this. I mean, is this something
(24:20):
you can take to the courts right now?
Speaker 4 (24:22):
One hundred percent. We have an opportunity to stop this.
This is where getting these plans and executing on our
subpoenas essential. We'll get that next week hopefully.
Speaker 7 (24:32):
Yeah, they're rewriting the plans now to accommodate what they
think that you'd want to hear is what I would pet.
Speaker 4 (24:38):
I'm incredibly concerned about everything this administration is doing. But
if we can show, which I believe we will, that
they're engaged in partisan activities, we will have an opportunity
to go to the court, get an injunction and get
this stop.
Speaker 7 (24:50):
Appreciate your hard work here, Congressman. We're going to stay
on top of this story. Please update us as necessary.
Congressman Brian Style of Wisconsin, thank you so. I appreciate
you always being with us.
Speaker 5 (25:02):
Thanks for having me on.
Speaker 7 (25:03):
Eight hundred and ninety four one. Shawn is a number
if you want to be a part of the program.
Hi to our busy pones we go. Steve Is in Michigan. Steve, Hi,
how are you glad you called?
Speaker 2 (25:11):
Sar.
Speaker 8 (25:12):
I'm pleasure speaking with you a long time listeners for
signed caller calling you. Thank you so she getting a
birthplace of the Republican Party and listening to you on
WKHM ninety seventy Am. Now I have I'd like your
thoughts on this. Biden is not going to be our
presidential candidate for the Democrat Party. He's going to fall
on his face on this debate on a week from yesterday,
(25:35):
and based on what you and mister Riley were talking
about yesterday, I think the Democrat Party is going to
sneak in our Governor Dretchen Whitner to be their candidate,
and i'd like your thoughts on that.
Speaker 7 (25:48):
I think she would be the most likely person to
replace Joe if that were to happen, or at least
the favorite in terms of what the Democratic establishment would
want to do. I think the mechanics, if you will,
the inner workings of the DNC are very different than
the base of the Democratic Party, and I think that
(26:09):
have a hard time, you know, leapfrogging over Vice President
Harris to do that. But I think that's definitely on
the table. I don't think she's a particularly strong candidate myself,
but yeah, I mean, anything can happen. I mean, honestly,
I watched Joe Biden, and I just think at any
moment he could just you know, fall over and that's it.
(26:31):
And it's sad to watch and see and I often
wonder why the people around him that are supposed to
love him the most are allowing him to do this,
but apparently they don't have any problems with it. But
it's bad for the country. His policy is a disastrous
It's bad for the world because every hostile actor is
taking full advantage of America abdicating its role on the
(26:54):
world stage as the leader of the free world, and
that we're paying a very dear in every way imaginable.
Speaker 5 (27:02):
You know.
Speaker 7 (27:02):
That's why I'm hoping and praying in one hundred and
thirty seven days, early voting starts in eighty eight days,
that people are going to start paying attention, and that
people will realize that the consequences are severe if this
guy ever got elected to another term, or if frankly,
any Democrat because the whole party's been radicalized. Anyway, we'll see.
Well watch Steve, thank you and Michigan appreciate it. Let's
(27:24):
say hi to Pete and Oregon. Pete, how are you
glad you Caltzar.
Speaker 1 (27:28):
I'm doing great, Sean, thank you for asking and I
really enjoy your show and listening to you a long time.
Speaker 2 (27:34):
Thank you, my friend. I'm glad you're out there, what's
going on in Oregon.
Speaker 1 (27:37):
Well, I just wanted to give you kind of a
perspective from a lot of background in dementia and Alzheimer's.
I went through it with my father and just to
see them the way they decline day by day, week
by week, and just looking at Joe Biden over the
last five years, there is absolutely not a doubt in
(27:59):
my mind that is what's happening with him and why
his family WO put him out there on a daily basis.
They ought to be really ashamed of themselves.
Speaker 7 (28:09):
Look to me, it's obvious, it's transparent. I think that
this attempt to refer to all of Joe's mishaps as
deep fake gafs and don't believe your lying eyes and
so on and so forth, I think it's a desperate
attempt on their part and it's just another outright lie.
(28:30):
I mean, they're very good at lying. Inflation was supposed
to be transitory. The border was closed and the border
was secure, Biden even saying the same thing, I secured
the border, he said it this week. Every other issue
that you know our cities are safe and secured, they're not.
It's just it's been a disaster, and I really am.
(28:52):
Look and I say that, and I've come under some
pretty pretty heavy criticism, is that I'm expecting a very
different Joe Biden at the debate one week from today. Now,
how do I how do I juxtapose those two positions?
Speaker 2 (29:08):
It's simple.
Speaker 7 (29:09):
Is the guy that we saw at the State of
the Union was jacked up. I don't know what it was.
Speaker 2 (29:14):
Was it? Was it red Bull?
Speaker 7 (29:15):
Was it extra strength Excedron that has caffeine in it?
Was it a caffeine pill? They actually have caffeine pills
you can buy. I have no idea. Was it something else?
I don't know. But the guy that we saw at
the State of the Union we'd never seen before and
we haven't seen since. And that makes that kind of
draws the conclusion in my mind is the reason we
(29:37):
don't see it more often is because whatever hyper caffeinated
red Bull they're given Joe Biden probably isn't healthy for
or else we'd probably see it a lot more often,
wouldn't we.
Speaker 5 (29:50):
I think so.
Speaker 1 (29:52):
But I will say this, I have to agree with
your previous caller. I think they are going to pull
him right before or had convention and just set him
aside and say, h Joe, look you you did a
great job, but we got to move on. And I
don't I can't guess who they would put in there.
I don't know about Whittner. I know, you think that
might be the most possible for a person to go
(30:12):
in there, but they got they don't have really anybody
on deck, so to speak for that position. I just
I can't think of one Democratic candidate that would. I
think they'd get destroyed by Trump.
Speaker 7 (30:26):
I think they they the obvious choice would be Vice
President Harris, which would be a disaster if they look
outside of that.
Speaker 1 (30:35):
I don't know.
Speaker 7 (30:36):
Maybe maybe maybe I'm totally blinded by the time that
I spent with Gavin Newsom and and the number of
times that I went in and pressed him hard on
the issue of whether he would be willing to be
the candidate if they came to him, and him saying
outright no, that it would be Vice President Harris. The
only other person that I really can think of that
they might go to would be Gretchen Whitmer. And however,
(31:00):
with all that said, unless you know, barring an unmitigated
disaster or Joe falling on his face, he could be
one fall away from losing the nomination. I think that
as of now, he's the guy, and I think they'll
stick with him, and I think they've convinced himself he's
sufficiently close enough in the polls that they can pull
this off. And look, I wish the poles weren't as
(31:22):
close as they are, but I think people need to
look at it, take it seriously, and vote as if
the future of the country depends on it, because it does.
There's a lot of hanging in the balance. This is
not just a tipping point. This is an inflection point
for the country and maybe a point of no return.
Speaker 2 (31:41):
I really don't know the answer.
Speaker 7 (31:44):
Anyway, I appreciate to call my friend eight hundred ninety
four one Sean if you want to be a part
of the program.
Speaker 2 (31:50):
All right, we'll take a quick break. We'll come right back.
Speaker 7 (31:52):
We have a lot more coming up straight ahead, including
at the top of the hour, Chris Kobok is going
to join us. He's the Kansas Attorney General, and much
more straight ahead
The Sean Hannity Show News
Host
Sean Hannity
Popular Podcasts
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.