June 26, 2024 • 29 mins
Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, Jim Jordan and Chairman of the House Intel Committee Mike Turner, both from Ohio, discuss another Biden lie, where they uncovered that 51 former IC officials coordinated with the Biden campaign to label Hunter Biden’s laptop “Russian disinformation.”
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
All right, news round up, information overload, hour toll free.
(00:02):
Let me give you our number. It's eight hundred and
ninety four to one Sean on the zeve of this
first presidential debate, and we have a lot of news.
Let's take you back four years ago. What happened in
the weeks leading up to the twenty twenty election. Well,
we had in October the New York Post had a
blockbuster story. It was about Hunter Biden's laptop, A laptop
(00:26):
that we now know implicates Joe Biden as quote the
Big Guy is confirmed by Tony Bobolinsky, A laptop that
we now know from Hunter Biden's business partner, Devin Archer,
that Joe Biden lied to the country when he said
he never talked to his son, his brother, or anybody
for that matter about their foreign business dealings, when in fact,
(00:48):
Devin Archer said he used to call into meetings with
his foreign business associates and even met with some of them,
including the former First Lady of Moscow and Russian oligarch
Elena Battarina, who, according to Devin Archer, three and a
half million dollars in funds were sent from her to
(01:08):
the Biden quote Enterprise if you will, or the Biden Syndicate,
if you will, on top of what he claimed over
one hundred million dollars for real estate investment. And then
of course we had the FBI. They had verified the
authenticity of the laptop. They did that in March of
twenty twenty. But yet they went out all summer before
(01:29):
the election meeting with big tech companies and pre bunking
the laptop story by warning these big tech companies that
they would be victims of a foreign disinformation campaign and
it's likely going to be about Joe Biden and Hunter Biden.
Now they also knew that Rudy Giuliani's attorney had a
copy of the laptop, the very real laptop from Hell.
(01:53):
And then when that story broke and Facebook and Twitter
actually went to the FBI and asked, is this what
you will want warning us about? Is this disinformation or
is this accurate? They could have confirmed that it was
accurate because they had verified it, they chose to protect
Joe Biden. And then the story gets worse. Then we had,
(02:13):
you know, an effort led by Wincoln Tony Blinken to
gather fifty one what we thought were former intelligence officers,
none of whom ever examined the laptop out there debunking
the laptop as Russian disinformation. And this was all in
the lead up to the final debate in October of
(02:35):
twenty twenty, and Joe Biden, you know, was calling it
Russian disinformation and the fifty one Intel officers that were
organized by his people. Anyway, let's say, listen to Joe
and the lead up to that election, because he's lying
to the American public are.
Speaker 2 (02:53):
Fifty former national intelligence folks who said that what this
he's accusing me of is a Russian plan. They have
said that this has all the care. Four five former
heads of the CIA, both parties say what he's saying
is a bunch of garbage. Nobody believes it except them
his and his good friend Rudin Jielli.
Speaker 3 (03:15):
You mean the laptop is now another Russia Russia Russia
hoax story from the ball.
Speaker 2 (03:22):
AFRIDI Yes, yes, yes, shot the man, you're a one
horse colony.
Speaker 1 (03:32):
I'll tell you well, it all turns out not to
be true. Now we have the Committee, the House Judiciary Committee,
the Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government,
and the Permanent Select Committee on intelligence. They have now
come out with a very very extensive report, and in
this report they go into great specificity and they go
(03:55):
into great detail about how the intelligence community fifty one.
It's called how CIA contractors, in other words, not former
intel officials, but current intel workers for our government colluded
with the Biden campaign to mislead American voters. Anyway, joining
(04:15):
us now, we have Congressman Mike Turner. He is the
chairman of the House Intel Committee. Congressman, great to have
you back. I've read this report. It is beyond frightening
to me that you have so many former and then
we now know current at the time high ranking intelligence
officials that knew nothing. They did none of them examine
(04:39):
the laptop. None of them knew a thing about the laptop.
The only thing they knew is they wanted Joe Biden
to win. And they went out and they organized and
they lied to the American people to affect the outcome
of an election. Is that election interferencer, You are.
Speaker 4 (04:56):
Absolutely right, and what you just played is very important
for everyone to hear, and that is Biden lying to
the American public. That's what he sounds like when he's lying.
If you look at the video that we looked like
when he's lying, you are. Our committee worked to obtain
CIA emails and communications from representatives of the IC fifty
(05:16):
one that put out this claim that it was Russian disinformation.
As you correctly said, their claim was completely made up.
They had zero intelligence. They acknowledged under oath we deposed
them with Chairman Jordan and myself, the Judiciary Committee Intel
Committee deposed several of these individuals. They acknowledged that they
under oath that they did not do any effort to
(05:37):
verify their statements, and they specifically said in their documents
that we've obtained that they were doing this because they
expected Trump to attack Biden on the issue at the
upcoming debate, and they wanted to give the Vice president
a talking point on this response, which was totally a
lie and totally political. This should have never happened.
Speaker 1 (05:57):
Well, you go on in your executive summer and you
say the fifty one former intelligence officials hunter Biden's statement
was a political, blatant operation from the start. It originated
with a call from a top Biden campaign official now
Secretary of State, Anthony we call him Wincoln, Tony Blincoln
to former Deputy Central Intelligence Agency Director Mike Morell. The
(06:22):
committee's investigation revealed that without outreach from Blincoln, Morell would
not have written that statement, and Morell told the committees
that the Blincoln phone call triggered his intent to write
the statement, and the statement's drafters were open about the
goal of the project. We think that Trump will attack
Biden on the on this issue at this week's debate.
(06:44):
We want to give the Vice president a talking point
to use in response. Now, let me ask you something.
Is that an inkind contribution. Is there any violation of
law here?
Speaker 4 (06:56):
Well, they certainly ought to be answer to Jim Jordan
and myself for working together on legislation that would make
this illegal in the future. But what you just said
is incredibly important, and that is this was presented by
Biden not only as truth as these as if these
intelligent former intelligence members and some who as you indicated,
were under contract with the CIA, had done an independent
(07:18):
assessment of this, of the laptop, of the issue of
Russian disformation, they had perhaps access to intelligence, they had
zero intelligence, But they didn't just spontaneously do this. This
was initiated by Biden's campaign. Lincoln was working for the
campaign corral to these individuals, had them draft this letter
for which they've done no verification, all of which were lies,
(07:39):
and put it out as if it was some official
statement when in fact it was, as you indicated, election
interference lies, lies that than Biden himself took to the
podium at his debate and lied to the American public.
Speaker 1 (07:51):
I mean, it really is an incredible thing. And that
we had high ranking cif high ranking CIA officials, the
role of the CIA director at the time, or were
they made aware. We also invite into the program, Congressman
Jim Jordan of Ohio, Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee.
You know these fifty one former Intel officials, Jim Jordan,
(08:13):
you know, and what is a blatant political operation. I
was just asking Congressman Turner, if this is an inkind contribution,
if this is illegal in any way, do you see
any potential laws broken here?
Speaker 5 (08:25):
Well, I mean, I don't know. We're looking at all that.
But what we do know is the agents themselves, the
internal emails we got sewn, they knew they shouldn't be
doing this. They said, this is not a good look
for the CIA, this is political, this is pro Biden,
This should not be happening. So the good people doing
(08:45):
the real work to the CI is supposed to do
understood what was involved in this operation. Certainly Michael Morel
knew was he was auditioning for the CIA director position
and what he hoped is the future Biden administration. So
that's what that's what we know from the very documents
we got by subpoena and the CIA.
Speaker 1 (09:05):
What does it mean Jim Jordan when some of the
statements and the people that signed this document, including Mike Verrell,
were on active contract with the CIA at the time
that this of Hunter Biden's statements publication.
Speaker 5 (09:23):
Well, I mean good, go back to what you've said.
This better than anyone sean. Our government had the laptop
and the FBI the very day the New York Post
story comes out. This is something we didn't we didn't
get into quite an our report. But the very day
that the Post story comes out October fourteenth, twenty twenty,
that very day, the FBI is actually meeting with social
media companies and they get asked by Twitter is what's
(09:45):
what about this New York Post story? And someone in
the FBI says the laptop is real. That was quickly
they were quickly stopped when the lawyer for the FBI
jumped in no further comments. But the FBI then later
met with all the social media companies that same to
October fourteenth, and they tell them all, we have no
indication whatsoever that the laptop was hacked by Russia. So
(10:07):
they knew at the time it wasn't. And yet you
have people signing a statement that says it was. And
some of those people are actually being paid on some
kind of contract with the CIA at the moment they
signed that statement. That's how egregious this whole, this whole
process was. And my question is, again, what are they
going to try this time? What's coming this fall in
(10:29):
the run up to the most important election we have,
the election for commander in chief in president of the
United States.
Speaker 1 (10:33):
I don't know, but I honestly don't. I think they'd
stop at nothing. And what we all know, Congress Van Turner,
is that the FBI throughout the summer of twenty twenty
was out there pre bunking, meeting with big tech on
a weekly basis, as Congressman Jordan and I both have
pointed out in the lead up to this election, warning
(10:54):
them that they're going to be potentially victims of disinformation,
and both Facebook and Twitter, it's my understanding, both asked
if this was did the disinformation they were warning about,
they could have confirmed the truth that they had verified
the authenticity of the laptop. They didn't do it. And
they knew that Rudy Giuliani's attorney at a copy, so
(11:15):
they knew this laptop story was gonna leak eventually, and
it did well.
Speaker 4 (11:19):
And we got to give credit to then odon I
Director Director of National Intelligence Radcliffe, who under the Trump
administration went directly to the TV waves and air and
said this this We have no information whatsoever that this
is Russian disinformation. There's no intelligence whatsoever. Indicates that he
(11:40):
debunks what the IC fifty one are saying and makes
a very definitive statement officially that there is no intelligence
that supports their accusations.
Speaker 1 (11:50):
You know, I mean, is it is it? Is it
worse Jim Jordan, if Russia or China are spreading disinformation
in the lead up to an election, or is it
maybe worse when quote former intelligence officials that we count
on and depend on to protect us and protect integrity
(12:11):
of our elections if they're out there spreading this information. Yeah,
I don't know what's.
Speaker 5 (12:16):
Worse, right, great point.
Speaker 1 (12:18):
I mean we don't want I mean I expect I
expect our enemies to do stuff like that. I don't
expect fellow Americans to do that because they're so invested
in one candidate over another.
Speaker 5 (12:29):
Yeah, it should never get political. This was total political operation.
Speaker 4 (12:33):
We know that.
Speaker 5 (12:33):
The email that Morel sent out to all the people
when he was trying to solicit signers for the statement,
the email itself says, we want this statement so Biden
can use it in the upcoming debate because we know
Trump's going to raise this issue. I mean, that's what
the email said. So we know what was political. We
know they could have if they had some kind of
question that they legitimately fought. It was a Russian information operation.
(12:54):
They could have checked, after all, their own contract freaking
with the say, one person had what's called green badge
access of the signers that we know of, which means
he has unlimited access to CIA facility. He could have
figured this out, but I don't think they wanted to
because it was all about politics and when your government.
Remember this is in the broader context too, of all
the things the Biden administration told the American people about
(13:17):
COVID that weren't accurate, So we get all kinds of
The biggest purveyor of misinformation has typically been the US
government on Show Many.
Speaker 1 (13:25):
That to me is a concern, and now we know
that that very real laptop implicates Joe Biden as the
big guy. Hunter complains bitterly that half his income goes
to Pops and that he pays for Pops' home repairs,
and that Joe called into meetings, so he lied about
the laptop, and he lied about never's talking to his
son or brother or anybody about these issues. Mike Turner,
(13:48):
I mean, I would think this should be a big
issue in this debate tomorrow, But why do I doubt
fake news CNN we'll bring it up.
Speaker 4 (13:55):
That Shawn. This also has a tremendous amount of irony
because Brennan and klap from the Obama administration, former Director
of National Intelligence, former director of CIA signed this letter
and claim that this Hunter Biden laptop falsely completely a
lie with Russian disinformation. They were top perpetrators of the
(14:17):
Russia hoax against Trump, so here they are trying to
take down Trump by lying about Russia, and here they're
trying to put Biden in by lying about Russia.
Speaker 1 (14:26):
You just can't make it up. But this report is critical,
And what will they do this time? We know what
they did in twenty sixteen, we know what they did
in twenty twenty. What are they going to do this time?
Scary thoughts anyway, Jim Jordan, thank you, Mike Turner, thank you.
We appreciate both you, both of you in your hard work.
And hope the American people know that Joe Biden and
(14:48):
the media mob lied to them on the highest levels imaginable. Now,
there were two very interesting elections yesterday that took place
primary lie elections. One had to do with Lauren Bobert.
She had changed districts in Colorado, going to a more
friendly district and she won by a wide margin. You know,
(15:11):
I know a lot of people say, Okay, she should
have she was in the in the theater, she shouldn't
have been vaping, and she should have told the truth
about it. And the woman's been on an apology tour left,
right and sideways. It's not the worst thing in the world.
It's sad that she's going through a breakup, which she
was going through at the time, you never know the
(15:33):
circumstances behind it. And so I mean the fact that
so many people have been wanting to bludgeon her. I
think a lot of it really has to do with
the support of Donald Trump. And you might remember the
video of her, you know, at the Capitol, and she,
you know, was touting her Second Amendment right in our
nation's capital, and nobody seemed on the left to like that.
(15:55):
And there's a lot of people that are just haters
out there of all things conservative. Anyway, the people of
Colorado clearly thought differently of it, and she won a primary.
So I say good for her, and I think, you know,
she's apologized enough at this point. You know, there's so many,
so many times you can beg for, you know, forgiveness.
Speaker 4 (16:13):
You know.
Speaker 1 (16:13):
I love that everybody's so perfect in their lives. The
other big primary, I don't think anybody was expecting this
concession speech last night from Jamal Jamal Bowman. Remember he
tried to pull the fire alarm to stop the vote
in Congress. Yeah, that guy. Anyway, he out did himself,
leaving no doubt who he blamed for his landslide loss.
(16:36):
And of course the very thing that led to his defeat,
you know, was his virulent hatred of Apak and his
you know, being a part of the radical you know,
pro Hamas squad members and and the hate Israel crowd
in in Congress, and anyway to borrow a praise from
(16:59):
Congress home Omar. You know, I guess it was quote
all about the Benjamins. I mean, he hit out against
dark money after he was defeated by George Latimer, a
pro Israel centrist, and he remained unapologetic about his opposition
to Israel's war in Gaza. Well, what is Israel supposed
to do when their own people are attacked by radical
(17:22):
Islamic terrorists that have in their own charter a call
for the destruction of Israel. They kill, you know, twelve
hundred Israelis, they kidnapped hundreds more, including Americans, that they're
involved in murder, rape, kidnapping, tortures, and beheadings. And you're
blaming Israel. Why don't you blame the people responsible for
(17:46):
starting the war. But he went on and on and on.
Speaker 3 (17:50):
I don't know.
Speaker 1 (17:50):
Maybe it had had, you know, something to do with
his unhinged speeches this weekend with AOC that was a
little over the top. Anyway, This is a part of
that rally from the weekend.
Speaker 3 (18:01):
Did you not please.
Speaker 1 (18:05):
The stampe Bronck camp cleek yack, please them st.
Speaker 5 (18:13):
I am the hip hop congressman.
Speaker 6 (18:17):
I want to hear South Bronx saying right now, South Bronx,
South south Bronx, We're all gonna sew.
Speaker 2 (18:28):
A pak.
Speaker 5 (18:32):
The pawa off the my out pro and we're gonna
cheek calling for permanent cease fire.
Speaker 6 (18:43):
Say sire now, say sire now, says sire now, say
fire now, say sire now.
Speaker 1 (18:52):
Okay, good riddance to a horrible person. And uh, let's
get to our busy phones. Let's say hi to Diana.
He's in Arizona, Diana. How are you glad you called hi?
Speaker 7 (19:03):
Sean? How are you thank you for taking my call?
I watch you every day and appreciate what you do.
I have an idea for President Trump for tomorrow's debate.
I'm really concerned about the fairness of the debate and
them controlling the mic. So what I think would be
(19:26):
a good idea would be for him to have a
press conference directly after the debate, specifically for the purpose
of only addressing every question that they asked him and
would not let him answer, would not let him finish,
or they cut him off, just very calmly, go, you know,
(19:48):
address the questions that he couldn't finish answering. And so
it'll be really clear forever both sides to hear what
he has to say and to hear his answers.
Speaker 6 (19:58):
I the only with that.
Speaker 1 (20:00):
And I think you're you're thinking through this, and I
think you are are tapping into what is obvious that
this is going to be, you know, a three on
one of a fake news CNN debate with fake Jake
and fake Dana that have shown nothing but contempt and
hatred for Trump, and they're basically part of the you know,
democratic socialist apparatic, and that's who they are. They claim
(20:22):
to be journalists and they're not. However, the real viewing
is going to be during the debate. So he's really
going to have to do his best to under difficult circumstances,
as per usual, unfair circumstances when it comes to Trump,
I guess, as per usual, And he's going to have
to do his best to cut through all the clutter
(20:43):
and all the noise and all the distractions and all
the attacks and all the bias and reach the American
people with his message. He doesn't have a lot of
time to do it. If he has asked the first question,
I'll have two minutes to respond, Then Joe will have
one minut and then he'll have another minute to respond.
Then there's this discretionary minute of fake Jake and fake Dana,
(21:06):
which I don't like at all, And then of course
fake news CNN editorially will put a truncated version of
the question on the screen. So I think you'll see
a lot of bias in the way they praised the
question that they put on the screen. With all of
that said, I have a lot of confidence in President
Trump's ability to go in there and do the job
(21:28):
he needs to do. I'm not worried so much about
what Joe Biden does. I'm not worried if it's jacked up,
hyper caffeinated Joe, or whether or not it's cognitively impaired Joe.
Joe's gonna do what Joe's gonna do. Joe's gonna try
and piss off Trump. Joe's gonna try and make it
all about Trump, and Joe's gonna try and dodge and
duck and weave and you know, slither away and not
(21:49):
answer any questions about his record. And I think it's
Donald Trump's job job to point it out, and I
think he'll do the best he can do under the circumstances. Now,
Nuke Gingritz says something very very I think important. He says, Yeah,
the debate's important, no doubt about it. However, after the debate,
people are going to go back into the grocery store
(22:09):
and they're going to pay. You know, we just had
consumer confidence, you know, go down again in June because
more people are more pessimistic about the Biden economy. Biden's
inflation has forced more than twenty five percent of Americans
to skip meals. Two thirds of the country say economically
they're gulping water. Secretary of the Treasury Janet yelling she
(22:30):
doesn't notice the higher prices at the store. I'm like, well,
what's wrong with you? What stores are you going on?
Where are you going shopping? Because you know, most Americans
a dozen eggs are up ninety eight percent orange juice,
seventy one percent bread, fifty three percent cookies, fifty three
percent yogurt, forty nine percent soft drinks, forty five percent,
(22:51):
coffee forty four percent, ground b thirty five percent, God
forbid you on steak. Forget that chicken thirty three percent.
You know, gas utility thirty two percent, rice milk, regular
unleaded gas. You know, electricity all up thirty percent, potatoes, bacon.
You know it's it's all through the roof. And you know,
(23:14):
we're spending about twelve grand more for the same items
we were spending on in twenty twenty, and yet they've
lied and told us that it's transitory and that it's fixed.
Now Biden inflation is twenty percent over twenty percent higher,
and interest rates are so much dramatically higher to try
and tame Biden inflation. So people are still going to
have to go shopping, and people are still going to
(23:36):
fill up their cars, and people are going to still
see the state of the world. They're going to see
the disaster of his immigration policies, the disaster of his
energy policies. They're going to see the disaster of defund
dismantled nobail laws, and they're going to live in Biden's America.
And you know, whether it's jacked up Joe, whether he
has the best debate in his life. It's not going
(23:58):
to change the reality of a man today. But I
don't know how capable he is. I'm it's good to me.
It's going to be fascinating to watch. But do I
have any worries about Donald Trump in tomorrow Night's debate,
knowing the circumstances he's walking into. I have concern I
think it's unfair, But do I might worried about it?
(24:19):
Not at all? I really am not so my heart,
My heart's not troubled. Remember I you know, I spent
two hours with him just what week and a half,
two weeks ago, whatever it was. I'm I'm telling you
he dialed in, I spent and he can. He can
talk on any topic at length. If he didn't do
any preparation at all, and I'm sure he probably did,
you know, a decent amount. Uh, he would be fine.
(24:42):
And he knows what's coming. He's very smart, and I
think Donald Trump would like to win this election. And
I think that's one of the reasons. I think we've
been seeing a much more focused, much more disciplined Donald
Trump on the campaign trail than maybe we saw in
twenty twenty. But we'll see. Anyway, I have appreciate the call, Diana.
We're going to stay in Arizona with Scott. Scott, you're
(25:03):
on the Sean Hennity Show.
Speaker 6 (25:04):
Hi nice, Sean. How you doing Sofa just wants to
be thank you for everything you do. This country needs
it and it is appreciated with everything you do.
Speaker 1 (25:16):
Hey, listen, I appreciate you giving me this microphone every
day in that camera, or else I'd be driving around
in my car talking to myself. I'd be a lunatic.
Speaker 6 (25:24):
Yeah, I hear you. And keeping with a similar theme
here too from the previous color. You know, I don't
know all the rules of the debate, and you actually
mentioned a few things that might enlighten a little bit.
But so we know when when Biden's gonna be talking,
they're gonna cut Trump's mic off. And I just had
this idea popped it in my head, and I don't know,
(25:45):
I'm sure it probably isn't allowed. But when Joe's talking,
and you know, when he's talking, he's going to be
spealing lies, He's either going to be saying things are
misleading or just out and out lies. And when he
says something that is just a blatant, especially referring back
to what Trump's administration when he did or didn't do.
(26:05):
If Trump could just have a little sign since his
mike's turned off, he just holds up those signs. It
just says lie or that's a lie or not true,
or something just to respond to when Joe's talking, just
to let everyone know, no, that's a lie. And you know,
he probably do it one time and CNN people would
freak out and say, yes, he's he's a threat to democracy. See,
(26:27):
but I don't know, maybe it was just something that
he could do let people know. Yep, it's a lie.
It's a lie. It's a lie. Because that's all Joe's
gonna do. It's just constantly lie.
Speaker 1 (26:35):
He's going to have to do the best with a
format that he had little to know, say in, he
had a venue that he had little to know, say in,
with moderators that he had little to know say in.
And that's the first time this has ever happened in
the history of modern televised presidential debates. And the media
(26:58):
doesn't care that it's on because it's Donald Trump that
is being treated unfairly. If it was Joe Biden, they
would be screaming bloody murder. I give him a lot
of credit. I mean, I actually do believe that Biden
dictated these terms. I'll only do these networks. I insist
on these rules. And Trump has no say in the
(27:21):
moderators or the format, and he's going to shut off
his micros. I'm not doing it. And if Trump said no,
he would have said, Okay, Well, the Trump doesn't want
a debate. He's a chicken. And I think they didn't
expect Trump to say yes. But Trump took advantage of it.
You got to give him. You got to give him credit.
He's got cuts. I could appreciate the call. Let's get
back to our phones. I'marillo, Texas, Tony next Sean Hennity Show.
Speaker 3 (27:44):
So suggestion for the debate tomorrow night. I would love
to see President Trump stand up there and say, the
American people are concerned about the health of their president.
I took a drug test an hour before the debate.
Doctor Ronnie Jackson is here. I'm willing to take one
after the debate. Are you willing to take a drug
test after the debate is over.
Speaker 1 (28:03):
He's not going to do it. He can't do it.
Speaker 6 (28:05):
I don't think.
Speaker 3 (28:08):
The other question I had was about the Supreme Court
ruling today. If Ken Paxton doesn't have standing on my
behalf as the representative for the people of the state
of Texas, who the hell does have standing?
Speaker 1 (28:22):
Maybe I agree with you completely, and I stand with
Alito and Gorsic and Clarence Thomas on this, and I
thought it was a terrible decision. I really do very
disappointed in Kavanaugh, Amy Coney, Barrett, and John Roberts. Very disappointed.
I wish I had more time to get into it, though,
but I'm just up on the clock, my friend, God
(28:43):
bless you. Eight hundred and nine four one, Shawn is
a number. By the way, we will be coming to
from Atlanta tomorrow doing this radio show. I will be
on Fox for the eight o'clock hour and on immediately
after the debate and hosting Hannity at eleven o'clock Eastern time.
So we got a great night. You're gonna see a
lot of You're gonna hear and see a lot of
(29:03):
me tomorrow. I hope you don't get sick of me.
Speaker 3 (29:07):
All right.
Speaker 1 (29:07):
That's gonna wrap things up at today, great preview of
the big debate tomorrow night, and much much more. Doctor
Ronnie Jackson will join us, Kaylee Mcananny, Charlie Hurt, Victor
Davis Hansen, Bad news on the economy, Charles Payne, Sarah Carter,
John Solomon with breaking news all coming up. Set you
DVR Hannity nine Eastern Monday through Friday on Fox, so
(29:29):
you never miss an episode ever. Ever, We'll see you tonight,
back here tomorrow. Thank you for making this show possible.
All right, news round up, information overload, hour toll free.
(00:02):
Let me give you our number. It's eight hundred and
ninety four to one Sean on the zeve of this
first presidential debate, and we have a lot of news.
Let's take you back four years ago. What happened in
the weeks leading up to the twenty twenty election. Well,
we had in October the New York Post had a
blockbuster story. It was about Hunter Biden's laptop, A laptop
(00:26):
that we now know implicates Joe Biden as quote the
Big Guy is confirmed by Tony Bobolinsky, A laptop that
we now know from Hunter Biden's business partner, Devin Archer,
that Joe Biden lied to the country when he said
he never talked to his son, his brother, or anybody
for that matter about their foreign business dealings, when in fact,
(00:48):
Devin Archer said he used to call into meetings with
his foreign business associates and even met with some of them,
including the former First Lady of Moscow and Russian oligarch
Elena Battarina, who, according to Devin Archer, three and a
half million dollars in funds were sent from her to
(01:08):
the Biden quote Enterprise if you will, or the Biden Syndicate,
if you will, on top of what he claimed over
one hundred million dollars for real estate investment. And then
of course we had the FBI. They had verified the
authenticity of the laptop. They did that in March of
twenty twenty. But yet they went out all summer before
(01:29):
the election meeting with big tech companies and pre bunking
the laptop story by warning these big tech companies that
they would be victims of a foreign disinformation campaign and
it's likely going to be about Joe Biden and Hunter Biden.
Now they also knew that Rudy Giuliani's attorney had a
copy of the laptop, the very real laptop from Hell.
(01:53):
And then when that story broke and Facebook and Twitter
actually went to the FBI and asked, is this what
you will want warning us about? Is this disinformation or
is this accurate? They could have confirmed that it was
accurate because they had verified it, they chose to protect
Joe Biden. And then the story gets worse. Then we had,
(02:13):
you know, an effort led by Wincoln Tony Blinken to
gather fifty one what we thought were former intelligence officers,
none of whom ever examined the laptop out there debunking
the laptop as Russian disinformation. And this was all in
the lead up to the final debate in October of
(02:35):
twenty twenty, and Joe Biden, you know, was calling it
Russian disinformation and the fifty one Intel officers that were
organized by his people. Anyway, let's say, listen to Joe
and the lead up to that election, because he's lying
to the American public are.
Speaker 2 (02:53):
Fifty former national intelligence folks who said that what this
he's accusing me of is a Russian plan. They have
said that this has all the care. Four five former
heads of the CIA, both parties say what he's saying
is a bunch of garbage. Nobody believes it except them
his and his good friend Rudin Jielli.
Speaker 3 (03:15):
You mean the laptop is now another Russia Russia Russia
hoax story from the ball.
Speaker 2 (03:22):
AFRIDI Yes, yes, yes, shot the man, you're a one
horse colony.
Speaker 1 (03:32):
I'll tell you well, it all turns out not to
be true. Now we have the Committee, the House Judiciary Committee,
the Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government,
and the Permanent Select Committee on intelligence. They have now
come out with a very very extensive report, and in
this report they go into great specificity and they go
(03:55):
into great detail about how the intelligence community fifty one.
It's called how CIA contractors, in other words, not former
intel officials, but current intel workers for our government colluded
with the Biden campaign to mislead American voters. Anyway, joining
(04:15):
us now, we have Congressman Mike Turner. He is the
chairman of the House Intel Committee. Congressman, great to have
you back. I've read this report. It is beyond frightening
to me that you have so many former and then
we now know current at the time high ranking intelligence
officials that knew nothing. They did none of them examine
(04:39):
the laptop. None of them knew a thing about the laptop.
The only thing they knew is they wanted Joe Biden
to win. And they went out and they organized and
they lied to the American people to affect the outcome
of an election. Is that election interferencer, You are.
Speaker 4 (04:56):
Absolutely right, and what you just played is very important
for everyone to hear, and that is Biden lying to
the American public. That's what he sounds like when he's lying.
If you look at the video that we looked like
when he's lying, you are. Our committee worked to obtain
CIA emails and communications from representatives of the IC fifty
(05:16):
one that put out this claim that it was Russian disinformation.
As you correctly said, their claim was completely made up.
They had zero intelligence. They acknowledged under oath we deposed
them with Chairman Jordan and myself, the Judiciary Committee Intel
Committee deposed several of these individuals. They acknowledged that they
under oath that they did not do any effort to
(05:37):
verify their statements, and they specifically said in their documents
that we've obtained that they were doing this because they
expected Trump to attack Biden on the issue at the
upcoming debate, and they wanted to give the Vice president
a talking point on this response, which was totally a
lie and totally political. This should have never happened.
Speaker 1 (05:57):
Well, you go on in your executive summer and you
say the fifty one former intelligence officials hunter Biden's statement
was a political, blatant operation from the start. It originated
with a call from a top Biden campaign official now
Secretary of State, Anthony we call him Wincoln, Tony Blincoln
to former Deputy Central Intelligence Agency Director Mike Morell. The
(06:22):
committee's investigation revealed that without outreach from Blincoln, Morell would
not have written that statement, and Morell told the committees
that the Blincoln phone call triggered his intent to write
the statement, and the statement's drafters were open about the
goal of the project. We think that Trump will attack
Biden on the on this issue at this week's debate.
(06:44):
We want to give the Vice president a talking point
to use in response. Now, let me ask you something.
Is that an inkind contribution. Is there any violation of
law here?
Speaker 4 (06:56):
Well, they certainly ought to be answer to Jim Jordan
and myself for working together on legislation that would make
this illegal in the future. But what you just said
is incredibly important, and that is this was presented by
Biden not only as truth as these as if these
intelligent former intelligence members and some who as you indicated,
were under contract with the CIA, had done an independent
(07:18):
assessment of this, of the laptop, of the issue of
Russian disformation, they had perhaps access to intelligence, they had
zero intelligence, But they didn't just spontaneously do this. This
was initiated by Biden's campaign. Lincoln was working for the
campaign corral to these individuals, had them draft this letter
for which they've done no verification, all of which were lies,
(07:39):
and put it out as if it was some official
statement when in fact it was, as you indicated, election
interference lies, lies that than Biden himself took to the
podium at his debate and lied to the American public.
Speaker 1 (07:51):
I mean, it really is an incredible thing. And that
we had high ranking cif high ranking CIA officials, the
role of the CIA director at the time, or were
they made aware. We also invite into the program, Congressman
Jim Jordan of Ohio, Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee.
You know these fifty one former Intel officials, Jim Jordan,
(08:13):
you know, and what is a blatant political operation. I
was just asking Congressman Turner, if this is an inkind contribution,
if this is illegal in any way, do you see
any potential laws broken here?
Speaker 5 (08:25):
Well, I mean, I don't know. We're looking at all that.
But what we do know is the agents themselves, the
internal emails we got sewn, they knew they shouldn't be
doing this. They said, this is not a good look
for the CIA, this is political, this is pro Biden,
This should not be happening. So the good people doing
(08:45):
the real work to the CI is supposed to do
understood what was involved in this operation. Certainly Michael Morel
knew was he was auditioning for the CIA director position
and what he hoped is the future Biden administration. So
that's what that's what we know from the very documents
we got by subpoena and the CIA.
Speaker 1 (09:05):
What does it mean Jim Jordan when some of the
statements and the people that signed this document, including Mike Verrell,
were on active contract with the CIA at the time
that this of Hunter Biden's statements publication.
Speaker 5 (09:23):
Well, I mean good, go back to what you've said.
This better than anyone sean. Our government had the laptop
and the FBI the very day the New York Post
story comes out. This is something we didn't we didn't
get into quite an our report. But the very day
that the Post story comes out October fourteenth, twenty twenty,
that very day, the FBI is actually meeting with social
media companies and they get asked by Twitter is what's
(09:45):
what about this New York Post story? And someone in
the FBI says the laptop is real. That was quickly
they were quickly stopped when the lawyer for the FBI
jumped in no further comments. But the FBI then later
met with all the social media companies that same to
October fourteenth, and they tell them all, we have no
indication whatsoever that the laptop was hacked by Russia. So
(10:07):
they knew at the time it wasn't. And yet you
have people signing a statement that says it was. And
some of those people are actually being paid on some
kind of contract with the CIA at the moment they
signed that statement. That's how egregious this whole, this whole
process was. And my question is, again, what are they
going to try this time? What's coming this fall in
(10:29):
the run up to the most important election we have,
the election for commander in chief in president of the
United States.
Speaker 1 (10:33):
I don't know, but I honestly don't. I think they'd
stop at nothing. And what we all know, Congress Van Turner,
is that the FBI throughout the summer of twenty twenty
was out there pre bunking, meeting with big tech on
a weekly basis, as Congressman Jordan and I both have
pointed out in the lead up to this election, warning
(10:54):
them that they're going to be potentially victims of disinformation,
and both Facebook and Twitter, it's my understanding, both asked
if this was did the disinformation they were warning about,
they could have confirmed the truth that they had verified
the authenticity of the laptop. They didn't do it. And
they knew that Rudy Giuliani's attorney at a copy, so
(11:15):
they knew this laptop story was gonna leak eventually, and
it did well.
Speaker 4 (11:19):
And we got to give credit to then odon I
Director Director of National Intelligence Radcliffe, who under the Trump
administration went directly to the TV waves and air and
said this this We have no information whatsoever that this
is Russian disinformation. There's no intelligence whatsoever. Indicates that he
(11:40):
debunks what the IC fifty one are saying and makes
a very definitive statement officially that there is no intelligence
that supports their accusations.
Speaker 1 (11:50):
You know, I mean, is it is it? Is it
worse Jim Jordan, if Russia or China are spreading disinformation
in the lead up to an election, or is it
maybe worse when quote former intelligence officials that we count
on and depend on to protect us and protect integrity
(12:11):
of our elections if they're out there spreading this information. Yeah,
I don't know what's.
Speaker 5 (12:16):
Worse, right, great point.
Speaker 1 (12:18):
I mean we don't want I mean I expect I
expect our enemies to do stuff like that. I don't
expect fellow Americans to do that because they're so invested
in one candidate over another.
Speaker 5 (12:29):
Yeah, it should never get political. This was total political operation.
Speaker 4 (12:33):
We know that.
Speaker 5 (12:33):
The email that Morel sent out to all the people
when he was trying to solicit signers for the statement,
the email itself says, we want this statement so Biden
can use it in the upcoming debate because we know
Trump's going to raise this issue. I mean, that's what
the email said. So we know what was political. We
know they could have if they had some kind of
question that they legitimately fought. It was a Russian information operation.
(12:54):
They could have checked, after all, their own contract freaking
with the say, one person had what's called green badge
access of the signers that we know of, which means
he has unlimited access to CIA facility. He could have
figured this out, but I don't think they wanted to
because it was all about politics and when your government.
Remember this is in the broader context too, of all
the things the Biden administration told the American people about
(13:17):
COVID that weren't accurate, So we get all kinds of
The biggest purveyor of misinformation has typically been the US
government on Show Many.
Speaker 1 (13:25):
That to me is a concern, and now we know
that that very real laptop implicates Joe Biden as the
big guy. Hunter complains bitterly that half his income goes
to Pops and that he pays for Pops' home repairs,
and that Joe called into meetings, so he lied about
the laptop, and he lied about never's talking to his
son or brother or anybody about these issues. Mike Turner,
(13:48):
I mean, I would think this should be a big
issue in this debate tomorrow, But why do I doubt
fake news CNN we'll bring it up.
Speaker 4 (13:55):
That Shawn. This also has a tremendous amount of irony
because Brennan and klap from the Obama administration, former Director
of National Intelligence, former director of CIA signed this letter
and claim that this Hunter Biden laptop falsely completely a
lie with Russian disinformation. They were top perpetrators of the
(14:17):
Russia hoax against Trump, so here they are trying to
take down Trump by lying about Russia, and here they're
trying to put Biden in by lying about Russia.
Speaker 1 (14:26):
You just can't make it up. But this report is critical,
And what will they do this time? We know what
they did in twenty sixteen, we know what they did
in twenty twenty. What are they going to do this time?
Scary thoughts anyway, Jim Jordan, thank you, Mike Turner, thank you.
We appreciate both you, both of you in your hard work.
And hope the American people know that Joe Biden and
(14:48):
the media mob lied to them on the highest levels imaginable. Now,
there were two very interesting elections yesterday that took place
primary lie elections. One had to do with Lauren Bobert.
She had changed districts in Colorado, going to a more
friendly district and she won by a wide margin. You know,
(15:11):
I know a lot of people say, Okay, she should
have she was in the in the theater, she shouldn't
have been vaping, and she should have told the truth
about it. And the woman's been on an apology tour left,
right and sideways. It's not the worst thing in the world.
It's sad that she's going through a breakup, which she
was going through at the time, you never know the
(15:33):
circumstances behind it. And so I mean the fact that
so many people have been wanting to bludgeon her. I
think a lot of it really has to do with
the support of Donald Trump. And you might remember the
video of her, you know, at the Capitol, and she,
you know, was touting her Second Amendment right in our
nation's capital, and nobody seemed on the left to like that.
(15:55):
And there's a lot of people that are just haters
out there of all things conservative. Anyway, the people of
Colorado clearly thought differently of it, and she won a primary.
So I say good for her, and I think, you know,
she's apologized enough at this point. You know, there's so many,
so many times you can beg for, you know, forgiveness.
Speaker 4 (16:13):
You know.
Speaker 1 (16:13):
I love that everybody's so perfect in their lives. The
other big primary, I don't think anybody was expecting this
concession speech last night from Jamal Jamal Bowman. Remember he
tried to pull the fire alarm to stop the vote
in Congress. Yeah, that guy. Anyway, he out did himself,
leaving no doubt who he blamed for his landslide loss.
(16:36):
And of course the very thing that led to his defeat,
you know, was his virulent hatred of Apak and his
you know, being a part of the radical you know,
pro Hamas squad members and and the hate Israel crowd
in in Congress, and anyway to borrow a praise from
(16:59):
Congress home Omar. You know, I guess it was quote
all about the Benjamins. I mean, he hit out against
dark money after he was defeated by George Latimer, a
pro Israel centrist, and he remained unapologetic about his opposition
to Israel's war in Gaza. Well, what is Israel supposed
to do when their own people are attacked by radical
(17:22):
Islamic terrorists that have in their own charter a call
for the destruction of Israel. They kill, you know, twelve
hundred Israelis, they kidnapped hundreds more, including Americans, that they're
involved in murder, rape, kidnapping, tortures, and beheadings. And you're
blaming Israel. Why don't you blame the people responsible for
(17:46):
starting the war. But he went on and on and on.
Speaker 3 (17:50):
I don't know.
Speaker 1 (17:50):
Maybe it had had, you know, something to do with
his unhinged speeches this weekend with AOC that was a
little over the top. Anyway, This is a part of
that rally from the weekend.
Speaker 3 (18:01):
Did you not please.
Speaker 1 (18:05):
The stampe Bronck camp cleek yack, please them st.
Speaker 5 (18:13):
I am the hip hop congressman.
Speaker 6 (18:17):
I want to hear South Bronx saying right now, South Bronx,
South south Bronx, We're all gonna sew.
Speaker 2 (18:28):
A pak.
Speaker 5 (18:32):
The pawa off the my out pro and we're gonna
cheek calling for permanent cease fire.
Speaker 6 (18:43):
Say sire now, say sire now, says sire now, say
fire now, say sire now.
Speaker 1 (18:52):
Okay, good riddance to a horrible person. And uh, let's
get to our busy phones. Let's say hi to Diana.
He's in Arizona, Diana. How are you glad you called hi?
Speaker 7 (19:03):
Sean? How are you thank you for taking my call?
I watch you every day and appreciate what you do.
I have an idea for President Trump for tomorrow's debate.
I'm really concerned about the fairness of the debate and
them controlling the mic. So what I think would be
(19:26):
a good idea would be for him to have a
press conference directly after the debate, specifically for the purpose
of only addressing every question that they asked him and
would not let him answer, would not let him finish,
or they cut him off, just very calmly, go, you know,
(19:48):
address the questions that he couldn't finish answering. And so
it'll be really clear forever both sides to hear what
he has to say and to hear his answers.
Speaker 6 (19:58):
I the only with that.
Speaker 1 (20:00):
And I think you're you're thinking through this, and I
think you are are tapping into what is obvious that
this is going to be, you know, a three on
one of a fake news CNN debate with fake Jake
and fake Dana that have shown nothing but contempt and
hatred for Trump, and they're basically part of the you know,
democratic socialist apparatic, and that's who they are. They claim
(20:22):
to be journalists and they're not. However, the real viewing
is going to be during the debate. So he's really
going to have to do his best to under difficult circumstances,
as per usual, unfair circumstances when it comes to Trump,
I guess, as per usual, And he's going to have
to do his best to cut through all the clutter
(20:43):
and all the noise and all the distractions and all
the attacks and all the bias and reach the American
people with his message. He doesn't have a lot of
time to do it. If he has asked the first question,
I'll have two minutes to respond, Then Joe will have
one minut and then he'll have another minute to respond.
Then there's this discretionary minute of fake Jake and fake Dana,
(21:06):
which I don't like at all, And then of course
fake news CNN editorially will put a truncated version of
the question on the screen. So I think you'll see
a lot of bias in the way they praised the
question that they put on the screen. With all of
that said, I have a lot of confidence in President
Trump's ability to go in there and do the job
(21:28):
he needs to do. I'm not worried so much about
what Joe Biden does. I'm not worried if it's jacked up,
hyper caffeinated Joe, or whether or not it's cognitively impaired Joe.
Joe's gonna do what Joe's gonna do. Joe's gonna try
and piss off Trump. Joe's gonna try and make it
all about Trump, and Joe's gonna try and dodge and
duck and weave and you know, slither away and not
(21:49):
answer any questions about his record. And I think it's
Donald Trump's job job to point it out, and I
think he'll do the best he can do under the circumstances. Now,
Nuke Gingritz says something very very I think important. He says, Yeah,
the debate's important, no doubt about it. However, after the debate,
people are going to go back into the grocery store
(22:09):
and they're going to pay. You know, we just had
consumer confidence, you know, go down again in June because
more people are more pessimistic about the Biden economy. Biden's
inflation has forced more than twenty five percent of Americans
to skip meals. Two thirds of the country say economically
they're gulping water. Secretary of the Treasury Janet yelling she
(22:30):
doesn't notice the higher prices at the store. I'm like, well,
what's wrong with you? What stores are you going on?
Where are you going shopping? Because you know, most Americans
a dozen eggs are up ninety eight percent orange juice,
seventy one percent bread, fifty three percent cookies, fifty three
percent yogurt, forty nine percent soft drinks, forty five percent,
(22:51):
coffee forty four percent, ground b thirty five percent, God
forbid you on steak. Forget that chicken thirty three percent.
You know, gas utility thirty two percent, rice milk, regular
unleaded gas. You know, electricity all up thirty percent, potatoes, bacon.
You know it's it's all through the roof. And you know,
(23:14):
we're spending about twelve grand more for the same items
we were spending on in twenty twenty, and yet they've
lied and told us that it's transitory and that it's fixed.
Now Biden inflation is twenty percent over twenty percent higher,
and interest rates are so much dramatically higher to try
and tame Biden inflation. So people are still going to
have to go shopping, and people are still going to
(23:36):
fill up their cars, and people are going to still
see the state of the world. They're going to see
the disaster of his immigration policies, the disaster of his
energy policies. They're going to see the disaster of defund
dismantled nobail laws, and they're going to live in Biden's America.
And you know, whether it's jacked up Joe, whether he
has the best debate in his life. It's not going
(23:58):
to change the reality of a man today. But I
don't know how capable he is. I'm it's good to me.
It's going to be fascinating to watch. But do I
have any worries about Donald Trump in tomorrow Night's debate,
knowing the circumstances he's walking into. I have concern I
think it's unfair, But do I might worried about it?
(24:19):
Not at all? I really am not so my heart,
My heart's not troubled. Remember I you know, I spent
two hours with him just what week and a half,
two weeks ago, whatever it was. I'm I'm telling you
he dialed in, I spent and he can. He can
talk on any topic at length. If he didn't do
any preparation at all, and I'm sure he probably did,
you know, a decent amount. Uh, he would be fine.
(24:42):
And he knows what's coming. He's very smart, and I
think Donald Trump would like to win this election. And
I think that's one of the reasons. I think we've
been seeing a much more focused, much more disciplined Donald
Trump on the campaign trail than maybe we saw in
twenty twenty. But we'll see. Anyway, I have appreciate the call, Diana.
We're going to stay in Arizona with Scott. Scott, you're
(25:03):
on the Sean Hennity Show.
Speaker 6 (25:04):
Hi nice, Sean. How you doing Sofa just wants to
be thank you for everything you do. This country needs
it and it is appreciated with everything you do.
Speaker 1 (25:16):
Hey, listen, I appreciate you giving me this microphone every
day in that camera, or else I'd be driving around
in my car talking to myself. I'd be a lunatic.
Speaker 6 (25:24):
Yeah, I hear you. And keeping with a similar theme
here too from the previous color. You know, I don't
know all the rules of the debate, and you actually
mentioned a few things that might enlighten a little bit.
But so we know when when Biden's gonna be talking,
they're gonna cut Trump's mic off. And I just had
this idea popped it in my head, and I don't know,
(25:45):
I'm sure it probably isn't allowed. But when Joe's talking,
and you know, when he's talking, he's going to be
spealing lies, He's either going to be saying things are
misleading or just out and out lies. And when he
says something that is just a blatant, especially referring back
to what Trump's administration when he did or didn't do.
(26:05):
If Trump could just have a little sign since his
mike's turned off, he just holds up those signs. It
just says lie or that's a lie or not true,
or something just to respond to when Joe's talking, just
to let everyone know, no, that's a lie. And you know,
he probably do it one time and CNN people would
freak out and say, yes, he's he's a threat to democracy. See,
(26:27):
but I don't know, maybe it was just something that
he could do let people know. Yep, it's a lie.
It's a lie. It's a lie. Because that's all Joe's
gonna do. It's just constantly lie.
Speaker 1 (26:35):
He's going to have to do the best with a
format that he had little to know, say in, he
had a venue that he had little to know, say in,
with moderators that he had little to know say in.
And that's the first time this has ever happened in
the history of modern televised presidential debates. And the media
(26:58):
doesn't care that it's on because it's Donald Trump that
is being treated unfairly. If it was Joe Biden, they
would be screaming bloody murder. I give him a lot
of credit. I mean, I actually do believe that Biden
dictated these terms. I'll only do these networks. I insist
on these rules. And Trump has no say in the
(27:21):
moderators or the format, and he's going to shut off
his micros. I'm not doing it. And if Trump said no,
he would have said, Okay, Well, the Trump doesn't want
a debate. He's a chicken. And I think they didn't
expect Trump to say yes. But Trump took advantage of it.
You got to give him. You got to give him credit.
He's got cuts. I could appreciate the call. Let's get
back to our phones. I'marillo, Texas, Tony next Sean Hennity Show.
Speaker 3 (27:44):
So suggestion for the debate tomorrow night. I would love
to see President Trump stand up there and say, the
American people are concerned about the health of their president.
I took a drug test an hour before the debate.
Doctor Ronnie Jackson is here. I'm willing to take one
after the debate. Are you willing to take a drug
test after the debate is over.
Speaker 1 (28:03):
He's not going to do it. He can't do it.
Speaker 6 (28:05):
I don't think.
Speaker 3 (28:08):
The other question I had was about the Supreme Court
ruling today. If Ken Paxton doesn't have standing on my
behalf as the representative for the people of the state
of Texas, who the hell does have standing?
Speaker 1 (28:22):
Maybe I agree with you completely, and I stand with
Alito and Gorsic and Clarence Thomas on this, and I
thought it was a terrible decision. I really do very
disappointed in Kavanaugh, Amy Coney, Barrett, and John Roberts. Very disappointed.
I wish I had more time to get into it, though,
but I'm just up on the clock, my friend, God
(28:43):
bless you. Eight hundred and nine four one, Shawn is
a number. By the way, we will be coming to
from Atlanta tomorrow doing this radio show. I will be
on Fox for the eight o'clock hour and on immediately
after the debate and hosting Hannity at eleven o'clock Eastern time.
So we got a great night. You're gonna see a
lot of You're gonna hear and see a lot of
(29:03):
me tomorrow. I hope you don't get sick of me.
Speaker 3 (29:07):
All right.
Speaker 1 (29:07):
That's gonna wrap things up at today, great preview of
the big debate tomorrow night, and much much more. Doctor
Ronnie Jackson will join us, Kaylee Mcananny, Charlie Hurt, Victor
Davis Hansen, Bad news on the economy, Charles Payne, Sarah Carter,
John Solomon with breaking news all coming up. Set you
DVR Hannity nine Eastern Monday through Friday on Fox, so
(29:29):
you never miss an episode ever. Ever, We'll see you tonight,
back here tomorrow. Thank you for making this show possible.
The Sean Hannity Show News
Host
Sean Hannity
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
The Joe Rogan Experience
The official podcast of comedian Joe Rogan.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Special Summer Offer: Exclusively on Apple Podcasts, try our Dateline Premium subscription completely free for one month! With Dateline Premium, you get every episode ad-free plus exclusive bonus content.