July 29, 2024 • 33 mins
Gregg Jarrett, Fox News Legal Analyst & Best Selling Author & David Schoen, Civil Rights Attorney discuss the radical efforts of the Biden admin. Now they want to change the Supreme Court - just before Joe leaves. How can someone so cognitively challenged make decisions about our constitution? I mean Joe Biden who can’t tell the difference between Zelensky and Putin, and spends his days napping is now penning an op-ed for WAPO? Will the real author please stand up.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Thanks Scott. She had an hour two Sean Hannity Show
eight hundred and nine four one Sean, if you want
to be a part of the program. It is amazing
that you have a president that is a cognitive mess,
that can't run for re election at the last minute,
but yet he can write, but write an opinion piece
for the Washington Post that I'm sure he had absolutely
positively nothing to do with, and you know, saying that
(00:24):
we can and we must prevent the abuse of presidential
power and restore the public's faith in our judicial system.
And I'm listening to this and I'm looking at this
decision all because they don't like decisions that the Supreme
Court make. And then look, this has now been an
ongoing campaign. Remember when Chuck Schumer literally threatened Supreme Court
(00:50):
justice Remember the dosing of Supreme Court justice's homes, which
by law is illegal and nobody got punished for it.
But this is Chucky on the steps of the Supreme Court.
You know, do you listen to me, Gorsa and Kavanaugh
blah blah blah.
Speaker 2 (01:06):
I want to tell you Gorsas.
Speaker 3 (01:08):
I want to tell you Kavanaugh, you have released the whirlwind.
Speaker 2 (01:13):
And you will pay the price. You won't know what
hit you if you go forward with these awful decisions.
Speaker 1 (01:25):
Oh, we have more Chuck Schumer from over the weekend. Basically,
they're trying to now set up a justification to destroy
an entire branch of government to shape their worldview so
that they can gain more power. Here's more Schumer.
Speaker 4 (01:44):
President Biden this week is going to make a push
on the Supreme Court to reform the Supreme Court. What's
really possible there, what's realistic?
Speaker 5 (01:52):
Give us your real.
Speaker 4 (01:53):
View about whether this can happen this year in a
bipartisan way.
Speaker 2 (01:57):
Well, first, let's start off. The Supreme Court is a morass. First,
it's an ethical marass. The idea that wealthy individuals, many
of them right wing, can both have pay for cases
before the Court and at the same time give justices
gifts or trips is outrageous and frankly, Chief Justice Roberts
isn't doing enough to curb it. But it's a morass.
(02:19):
In even a worse way, this is a maga right
wing court. It's already taken the right away, the right
to choose. It could very well go further on that.
I fear it will. It's siding with the wealthiest of
individuals and the powerful interests over the average working family.
And it even threatens democracy when it says that a
(02:40):
president can get immunity even for certain acts in the presidency.
So this court is just a morass, both ethically and substantively.
Speaker 1 (02:52):
And then of course you have Elizabeth Warren saying the
Supreme Court is actively undermining our democracy. Understand what they're
trying to do here is they are trying to make
the Supreme Court an issue in this campaign, and they
are willing to alter the court to accumulate power, just
(03:13):
like they're willing to add DC statehood in Puerto Rico's
statehood because they think it will give them power in perpetuity.
It's always about power. You know, why are they talking
about mass amnesty for twelve million illegal immigrants because they
want They're hoping, well, we'll give you something a great value.
(03:33):
I hope you'll vote for us, right if we If
we give you something that you know people would pay
millions of dollars in Australia for, we'll give it to
you for free, You're going to vote for us, right,
That would be the implication.
Speaker 6 (03:44):
Listen, we've got all the Democrats who are ready for
meaningful ethics reform to bind the Supreme Court, and we're
working on changes to the Supreme Court. It can be
term limits, it could be adding the number of justices.
Things we can do without how to have a constitutional amendment.
So we've got a Supreme Court that is actively undermining
(04:06):
our democracy, and I think what Joe Biden will do
over the next six months is he's going to keep
drawing that to the attention of the American people and
reminding them when they vote in November, the Supreme Court
is on the ballot, and I believe we need to
create a pathway to citizenship. All of that is a
part of what we need to do for comprehensive immigration reform.
(04:30):
Kamala Harris will work with Congress and get that done.
Speaker 1 (04:33):
Anyway, joining us now to weigh in on all of this.
Welcome back to the program, our friend Greg Jared, Fox
News legal analyst, best selling author, David Jones, civil rights attorney.
Thank you both for being with us and former President
attorney for President Trump. Greg, I read your piece on
this and that this Biden proposal to reform the Supreme
(04:55):
Court is a shameless ployee for votes. I think you
and I are thinking the same way about this.
Speaker 5 (05:01):
Yeah, and they have zero chance of achieving it. You know,
Democrats cannot simply pass a law as Joe Biden wants,
imposing term limits on justices because life terms are embedded
in the Constitution. That means they'd have to amend the Constitution.
They can't do that. It is a tremendously high bar.
(05:24):
You know, you have to get two thirds at both
houses of Congress or consent by two thirds of the states,
and thereafter ratification is three fourths of the states. You
can't do that, I mean, that's an impossibility. The other
thing they're trying to do is impose ethical controls on justices. Well, sorry,
(05:44):
but that violates the sacred separation of powers principle. So,
as I wrote it my column, all of this is
is electoral problem for Democrats. It's not remotely viable.
Speaker 1 (05:58):
Let's get your take, David, because I find it so
obnoxious and to me, it's just another roundabout way for
them to make abortion front and center, because as I said,
they've got nothing that they can run on as a success.
They can't say, well, the borders are in better shape.
They can't say that our towns and cities are safer.
(06:19):
They can't say the economy is better. They can't say
energy prices are better. They can't say that the world
is safer. Because of their leadership, we have war on you,
war in the Middle East, war in Europe, and a
president that does not hold countries like China, Russia, Iran,
and North Korea responsible for any behavior they're involved in.
Speaker 7 (06:41):
Yeah, you and gregor exactly right. And beyond all of this.
The danger with the Chuck Schumer and that sort of
approach is that it misleads the public. They carve out
these sayings like an attack on democracy. What Chuck Schumer
is proposing and others like him is a true attack
on democracy. Elections have consequences, and we know that people
(07:01):
run on election platforms. Is that what Supreme Court justices
they might have a chance to appoint, to nominate and
then get put into office. That's part of the process.
Nine Supreme Court justices served us well since eighteen sixty nine.
We don't mess with the Constitution, this sacred document of
ours for political purposes. And they use these terms like
reform the Court. That's not an appropriate reform would indicate
(07:25):
an improvement or doing something better for the court. This
would pervert the Court's purpose. Same thing. You know, we
use the term progressives to refer to the hate squad.
There's nothing progressive about them. They're reactionary bigots, so we
can't buy into their terminology. I think Greg's exactly right,
and you're exactly right. The term limits. You know, Congress
(07:46):
can effect, but it shouldn't, and it served us very well.
The only time it's been changed throughout history anywhere from
five to six to ten, back to nine, is for
partisan political purposes. We can't do that, really, suggest the
Chief Justice Roberts is some flaming reactionary in the opinion
on immunity, Absolutely not. Nobody could fairly suggest that. But
(08:09):
Schumer puts our institutions in danger, and he puts people
in danger with the kind of rhetoric that he uses,
and he misleads the public. This all to me harkens
back to Jerry Nabler in twenty nineteen saying we can't
trust the voters to put in the right kind of
person for president. That's as undemocratic as statement as any
legislator or any American could ever make.
Speaker 1 (08:30):
Let me play for you, Kamala Harris saying that we
need to have the courage to stop using the term
radical Islamic terrorism, that we need to have the courage
to stop using the term illegal alien.
Speaker 8 (08:45):
Have the courage to object they use that term rattle
is ling terrorism also have their trajector illegal alien. The
(09:12):
worst of criminal behavior I have seen, the worst of
crime and undocumented immogrants is not.
Speaker 1 (09:19):
A cum Well, it's a crime when they're unvetted undocumented workers.
It is a crime when they murdered Joscelyn Nungary. It
is a crime after they brutalize her for hours. It
is a crime when they murder a mother of five,
Rachel Morin. It is a crime when they kill Lake
and Riley. It is a crime when they when these
(09:43):
unvetted illegal immigrants rape thirteen year old girls in broad
daylight in a park in Central Park, Greg Jarrett, that
is a crime, and frankly a crime in which they
have blood on their hands because their policies allowed for
this and facilitated this to happen.
Speaker 5 (10:00):
Of course, she failed in her job to do something
about the border and is now pretending that she was
never in charge of it. The problem with Kamala Harris
is that she has no foreign policy experience whatsoever. And
what I find so troubling is she has surrounded herself
(10:20):
with these national security advisors who are pro open borders
and in terms of Israel, are anti Israel and Hama sympathizers,
which is why her immediate response, together with Tony Blanken,
(10:41):
is urging restraint. Can you imagine if twelve American children
on a soccer field were murdered by a neighboring state
were restrained, are you kidding? We'd be tempted to level
that neighboring state into a smoking parking lot. So if
you elevate Vice President Harris to the presidency, she will
(11:07):
install these crazy advisors and rely on them entirely because,
as they say, she doesn't know anything about foreign policy.
Speaker 9 (11:20):
Take listen.
Speaker 7 (11:21):
She asks people to stop using the term radical Islamic terrorism.
My Muslim friends prefer that term because they believe that
the perpetrators, the terrorists, have perverted their religion Islam. So
the idea though that we shouldn't in any way refer
to him as being a function of radical Islam is
absurd when they're yelling allah bar when committing the terrorist
(11:45):
acts and.
Speaker 1 (11:46):
Make mean you mean like they're yelling ala hu akbar
at the at you know, in Washington, d C. Last
week when Prime Minister net Yah, who spoke before a
joint session of Congress.
Speaker 7 (11:57):
Right, and there's mean death to the Jews, killed the
Jews and so on. So this notion of separating Zionism
from Judaism, they've been given license now to simply engage
in violent activities. I've got five lawsuits going now on
behalf of hamas victims against these organizations, including the Associated Press,
for fomenting these things, for providing material support for encouraging
(12:19):
these things, including the organizations that are doing it on campus.
We know that this is an organized campaign financed by
Iran in large part that was not coincidental. Documents came
out on October seventh and October eighth in this country
already recognizing that the massacre was going to occur. So
this is radical Islamic terrorism and it shouldn't be called
(12:42):
anything else. And by suggesting that Islamophobia, to identify it
as that is simply wrong and dangerous. And you know
we've marked After meeting with Prime Minister Netanyahu, her focus
was on what's going on in Gaza, with the Palestinians,
rather than all of the thousands of Israelis been displaced,
thousands killed, and so on an under thread of rocket
(13:03):
fire every single day. This is our ally. We don't
feed our allies and terrorist groups equally a right.
Speaker 1 (13:09):
We continue now with Greg Jarrett and David Shown analyzing
this insane proposal of the Democrats as it relates to
the Supreme Court and term limits, et cetera. Clearly a
violation of separation of powers, and the insanity of Kamala
Harris and Joe Biden's policies towards radical Islamic terrorism. Kamala
(13:30):
doesn't even want us to use the word anymore. We've
got to be courageous, never use the term radical Islamic terrorism.
Her treatment of Prime Minister net Yahoo was an embarrassment.
They're surrendering the war on radical Islamic terrorism as an embarrassment.
If this doesn't scare everybody, the fact that she thinks
we need the courage to stop speaking the truth and
(13:50):
she wants to be the commander in chief and she's
giving into the radicals in our party, that's insane. Last question,
will this disqualify Josh Shapiro as a potential vpach.
Speaker 7 (14:00):
Look, I know they've got you know they're going to
make their choice. Where nothing disqualifies any of these folks.
It seems to me it depends on who you ask
and when you ask them. But the main problem is
Kamala Harris at the top of the ticket. She wants
to bolster it with, you know, a significant vice presidential choice.
But you can't hide what's at the top of the ticket.
Speaker 1 (14:19):
Well, just just qualify Shapiro. Who's pro Israel, Greg Jarrett.
Speaker 10 (14:24):
I don't.
Speaker 5 (14:25):
I don't think so, because she desperately wants Pennsylvania in
the D column in the presidential election. He's immensely popular,
sixty percent plus approval rating in Pennsylvania, and so as
I say politics, Trump's everything, she'll likely pick someone just
(14:46):
like Shapiro for political reasons.
Speaker 1 (14:49):
All I appreciate you both, Greg Jarrett, and our friend
David Cholm, thank you both. We appreciate it. Eight hundred
nine one, Shawn is on number. If you want to
be a part of the program, the radio show the
mainstream media a love state. This is the Sean Hannity Show,
(15:14):
HI twenty five now until the top of the hour,
toll free RD number is eight hundred and nine four
one shot. If you want to be a part of
the program, I want to remind you that since the
start of the Swords of Iron, that is the war
against radical Islamic terrorism, the word that Kamala Harris doesn't
want you to use, began on October the seventh. Well,
(15:34):
what have we witnessed? We saw all of it on
display this weekend as children were targeted with an iranium
missile in a soccer field and slaughtered, and Joe Biden
and Kamala Harris have been pressuring Israel not to fight
back and not to win their war on radical Islamic terrorism.
(15:55):
Again the word that Kamala doesn't want you to use.
But they've got a their war. It's about their very survival. Thankfully,
there are groups like the International Fellowship of Christians and Jews.
They've been around for over forty years. They were on
the ground in Israel within hours and they have been
protecting the vulnerable, feeding people, offering medical supplies, flack jackets,
(16:19):
bomb shelters. They do everything humanly possible. Now they're telling
the stories about what people went through on that horrific day.
Survivors like Keith now you happen to be the head
of security of the Eshkol region, which is in Israel's
southern border with Gaz. I've been there, and Keith protects
(16:40):
the people in that region. On that fateful day at
armored security truck donated to Keith's community by friends of
the Fellowship stop bullets from terrorists firing at Keith as
he drove into the danger. Now, that's only because of
support from people like you and me, and the support
of the International Fellowship of Christians and Jews, and they
(17:00):
helping the survivors remain steadfast and strong. They have the
whole series of stories like this. You can hear a
lot more of them when you visit their website, and
hopefully you can offer some support for them. It's one
word support IFCJ dot org. That support IFCJ dot org.
All right, we're gonna get to your calls coming up here.
(17:20):
There was an ABC interview was kind of like it
wasn't the town hall, but there were I guess there
was someone around eight people that were interviewed, and this
was the people at Butler, their swat team, and they
pointed out something that is just unfathomable to me that
there was zero communication with the US Secret Service before
(17:43):
the assassination attempt, and they claimed they were supposed to
have a face to face meeting with the Secret Service
before the rally, but that meeting never happened. There's no
excuse for this. And literally, you know, some of them
were aware of this guy walking around and keeping eyes
on him, but the Secret Service wasn't talking to them.
How does that make any sense?
Speaker 3 (18:04):
Listen, we were supposed to get a face to face
briefing with the Secret Service snipers whenever they arrived, and
that never happened. So I think that that was probably
a pivotal point where I started thinking things were wrong
because that never happened and we had no communication with
the Secret Service.
Speaker 10 (18:21):
You had no communication with the Secret Service at all
on that.
Speaker 3 (18:25):
Saturday, not until after the shooting, and.
Speaker 9 (18:27):
By then it was too late.
Speaker 1 (18:29):
Pretty unbelievable. Eight hundred and nine to four to one, Sean,
is our number. If you want to be a part
of the program. Let's get to our phones. Let's say,
how to Rusties in Utah, Rusty High, How are you
only done? Ninety eight days until election day? My friend?
What's on your mind?
Speaker 9 (18:44):
Hey? Sean? They stick my call. My question is is
how did Kamala become the only person be running for
president if since they didn't have any other Democrats running
for it? Was it because of the endorsements and stuff
that she received.
Speaker 1 (19:03):
I think part of it was her position. I think
part of it was the money, and there would be
problems if someone else were to take the space. I
think she just simply became the logical choice, considering had
anything ever happened to the president, she'd be next in line.
I think because of her radicalism. I think there's a
(19:24):
belief among Democrats that she's going to be easily controlled
and she represents the squad. She's it. I mean, she
represents this new radicalized, new green deal socialist Marxist leftist party,
and there's nobody more left wing than she is. He
is the perfect candidate for them. You know, the mission
(19:47):
for the next ninety eight days is to make sure
every American frankly really only for the next forty nine
days until early voting starts, is to make sure every
American knows how radical a record is. And we're doing
a very level best to make sure that happens. Because
the MEETIA is not going to do their job.
Speaker 9 (20:03):
For sure. I'm definitely spreading the word. It's like I
was talking to my uncle. He lives in Idaho. It's
like we're living in a movie and the script just
keeps getting worse and worse.
Speaker 1 (20:14):
It really does, right, Yeah, definitely, Well, yeah, that's pretty
pretty scary scary times, right, and.
Speaker 9 (20:21):
It's not comforting. And I hate bringing my kids up
in this day and age, but I just keep them
the best we.
Speaker 1 (20:27):
Could appreciate to call my friend. Thank you, Jerry, Connecticut.
Next Sean Hannity Show, Hi, Sean.
Speaker 11 (20:33):
I think President Trump is walking into a perjury trap
with this FBI interview. They call it a victim interview.
I think they want to make him the victim. And
I know you have President's Trump's here. So President Trump,
did you forget about crossfire? Hurricane? Did you forget about
James Caley boasting?
Speaker 1 (20:52):
What could they possibly get them on? I mean, I'm
listening closely to you because I think anytime you speak,
you know, I have a friend of mine, he recently
retired from the FBI, and he was very high up,
and we had conversations about this and he actually said
to me, you know, because my instinct would be if
the FBI ever wanted to talk to me, I'd want
(21:14):
to help them, but that would be my natural gut instinct.
And he looks at me and goes, no, you never
talk to them ever, because he knows, obviously, I'm in
a political space. He knows that the DOJ has been weaponized.
He and a lot of the old school people are
getting out as quickly as they can. We have one
(21:35):
contributor at Fox News now, Nicole Parker. She's told her story.
She left because of this very reason. And I mean
to have somebody that revered the FBI when he went
into it, to leave with such a bad taste in
his mouth, it is sad to me. I mean, I've
told the story many times. I had two relatives that
(21:56):
it was my grandfather's brothers kids, and I'm friends with
one of them. His name is Billy Flynn. He's called
into this program before and he and his brother. His
brother passed away, but he and his brother were in
the FBI. They in my family growing up, and there
was a lot of law enforcement NYPD, my mama prison guard,
my daddy was, my dad was in family corporation, you know,
(22:18):
so a lot of a lot of law enforcement, but
they were looked at as deity. I mean if if
their names came up, and of course as they had
another brother, Jack that was a Christian brother, he was
looked at his deity too, But they were looked at
with the with reverence. I mean that's how we were raised.
And and none of these people think the same way
(22:40):
about the FBI anymore that it's been weaponized. They all
see it and politicized, and they all talk about it.
What's happened?
Speaker 11 (22:48):
Did when? When? When the FBI staged the mar A
Lago photo and tampered with evidence in order to do
it and then leaked it to I believe the Washington
Post did a single a come forward and say, this
is the one of a political throwdown gun. We did
a corrupt act to hide a corrupt act and justify
(23:09):
a corrupt act. So that photo, in my judgment, is
an indictment of the top all of the bureau, top
to bottom inside out, because it was done for political
purposes in the tamper with evidence in the process. And
so President Trump, if you're going to do this, I
think you're a full but at least have them give
(23:31):
you the questions in writing. Have your lawyers review them
and submit written answers. You cannot trust them.
Speaker 1 (23:38):
I hadn't thought about it before. I can't disagree with
the word you're saying. I think that the president should
give written answers. I absolutely positively agree. And what a
sad state of affairs it is that you're right. I hadn't.
I hadn't thought about it before. But I think you're
a thousand percent right.
Speaker 11 (23:58):
They haven't given up on getting him, and that's what
he has to.
Speaker 1 (24:01):
Stand, nor has the int Look the look look what
they did. I mean, they were warned in August to
twenty sixteen not to use the Dirty Russian Disinformation dossie.
They were warned it was a political document. They knew
Hillary paid for it. Of all people, Bruce Orr was
the one that warned them, and they used it anyway
for not one but four PISA warrants, and that was
(24:21):
a backdoor way to spy on the Trump campaign and
the Trump presidency. You know now, Then years later they
go before Congress, Oh no, we know what we know
now about the Dirty Dacia. We wouldn't have used it.
We would never have signed off on those warrants. But
they weren't held accountable with the fifty one former Intel
agents in twenty twenty. It just they knew nothing about
(24:42):
Hunter's laptop, but they just flat out lied. Appreciate the call,
my friend, eight hundred nine to four to one, Shawn
our number. You want to be a part of the program.
Chris in New York, Chris, how are you glad you called?
Hey Sean, how are you doing break or breaker for
a hnity check? Hey Man, good to check. I'm glad
you're checking in. I do have friends in New York.
I miss a lot of them, but they all want
to come down and see me now.
Speaker 12 (25:03):
Absolutely So. My question for you today is what is
Vice President Harris's actual qualifications to be president? Because as
Vice president she was a complete failure. She owns all
of what Biden administration does. What are her actual qualifications?
Does she have a good prosecution record? Does she have
(25:26):
a good Senate record? What is her record? Because it
seems to me, just.
Speaker 1 (25:30):
Keep staying listen, if you keep staying tuned to this program,
I will continue to expose her failed and radical extremist record.
That's the only thing that I know I can do,
and I will do the job that the media mob
will never do. I am telling you that tonight we
(25:54):
appreciate you are vetting tonight. Well, tomorrow we're going to
examine her record in California. Tonight, I don't want to
give it away. The problem is if I start talking
about what I'm going to do today or tonight or whatever,
everybody steals my stuff. And I'm like, I don't mind
them stealing it after I did it. But we put
a lot of work into the fresearch. I'm like, you know,
(26:15):
and I'm not even looking for retribution. I actually wanted
to go viral, but we're spending a lot of time
doing the work the media should be doing. But they'll
never do. I promise you every day we're going to
continue to expose her, Okay, And.
Speaker 12 (26:29):
I really look forward to you all the people, all
the things that they're trying to hide. I hope you
bring out into the sun Sean and mister Hannity, and
we really greatly appreciate you.
Speaker 1 (26:39):
So I've got some doozies tonight. You're going to love tonight.
I promise you, Tonight is going to be very hard
hitting and all full of truth.
Speaker 11 (26:48):
Okay to it, Sean, looking forward to it.
Speaker 12 (26:50):
Thanks for taking my call, Sean, I appreciate you.
Speaker 1 (26:53):
You bet it, Thanks buddy. All right, we'll take a
quick break. Right back to our phones. Hey eight, one
hundred and ninety four one seawan ninety eight days until
election Day forty nine days early voting begins in Pennsylvania.
The best election coverage available on your radio dial continues.
Speaker 7 (27:11):
The final hour roundup is next.
Speaker 5 (27:14):
You do not want to miss it, and stay tuned
for the final hour free for all on the Sean
Hannity Show.
Speaker 1 (27:24):
That's our busy phones. Mel is in New York. Mel,
You're on the Sean Hannity Show. Welcome aboard.
Speaker 10 (27:29):
Hi, thank you so much for taking my call. I
really appreciate it. To me, I mean, I'm not going
to go buy anything I hear on the news. But
just as a citizen of the United States, nothing is
making sense. Just for starters. I don't feel Kamala is
(27:49):
suitable at all to be president. When I see her,
when I get the vibe from her, I think she
would probably make a official like a city council person
is to me, what she looks like and what she
sounds like, she would probably be good as a city
(28:11):
council person. Maybe for a small town, small city that
needs government involvement. But when you're talking about a whole country,
to run a whole country, it just doesn't She's going
from being a suitable city councilwoman, is what I see
(28:31):
her as, to a president. I mean, it's just not possible,
and it's fine.
Speaker 1 (28:40):
It is a very, very scary proposition. Her views are
so radical. I feel like I'm repeating myself when I
go over all of them. Maybe I can't, Maybe I
need to do it more often. Maybe I just need
to just say it every single time. You know, I
don't care if it's about defunding the police, you know,
(29:01):
equity over equality for example, or you know, just her
radical positions on you know, everything from defunding the police,
and the courage to stop using the term radical Islamic terrorism,
and the courage to stop saying illegal illegal aliens, being
against fracking, being against drilling, you know, mandatory gun buyback program,
(29:27):
new Green Deal, eliminate private health insurance, defund dismantle the police.
I mean, I just I could just keep going and
going and going. You know that illegal immigrants should get
free healthcare and they should get free education, and you know,
coase to the left of Bernie Sanders. I mean, I
(29:48):
just keep going on and on and on, and I
don't know if everybody America fully understands just how radicalized
she is and the type of president she'd be. She
would be. This would be like AOC on steroids being president.
And I don't have any other way to put it true.
So I'm trying to make people aware of it. They
(30:10):
didn't give us much time to vetter, but we're going
to do our very best.
Speaker 10 (30:14):
No, And I think she's trying very hard to market herself.
But as I look at the big picture and with
the illegal people coming in, I mean the very term
illegal means it's illegal for them to be here. So
in a nutshell, it's like she's not obviously fiscally minded.
(30:37):
And for an example, if you're living on credit card debt,
would you donate more than your take home pay to
illegal immigrants? And it's just it's like common sense of
a fifth grader. We don't have we have trillions of
dollars in debt. We can't afford to have legal aliens
(31:01):
on our dime. They're illegal. Are there any laws here?
None of it makes sense.
Speaker 1 (31:07):
There are laws they're circumventing the law, and they've been
aiding and a vetting in the law breaking, and then
they lied to us for three years. Then they try
to blame Trump and none. And yet we have people
being murdered and raped and they don't even mention these
people's names, or if they mentioned the name, they get
it wrong, and they apologize for calling somebody illegal alien.
(31:30):
It's insane. We are living in an insane time. These
are people that honestly, it's it's scaring the hell out
of me. We're going to get new King Rich's take
on the state of the race coming up in a minute.
Look for far too many veterans, people that serve this
country honorably and now find themselves homeless or at risk
of being homeless. I'll give you an example. Glenda Williams,
(31:52):
US Army Vet faced homelessness along with the five kids
who are struggling to keep up with the rent and
living in just a broken down the law lapidated unit
that had rodents and mold and broken windows. Thankfully, the
Tunnel to Towers Foundation was able to through your generosity
and their Homeless Veterans program, provide Glenda not just with shelter,
(32:12):
but with a safe, secure, environment where she and her
children can thrive. Now, could you just imagine what it
means to a veteran like Glenda to know that people
like you are there to help make sure that her
family is safe and secure in a stable home. Anyway,
for Glenda and people like her, friends like you make
all the difference. We hope all of you will commit
(32:33):
to eleven dollars a month join us here at Team Hannity.
You can do it by going to their website the
letter T the number two, the LETTERT dot org the
letter T the number two the letter T dot org
for the Tunnel to Towers Foundation. Quick break, right back,
we'll continue. Hey, I'm going to let you in on
(32:55):
a little wireless hack that can cut your cell phone
bill in half every month. Verizon AT and T and
T Mobile they want you to believe that you need
unlimited data so they can overcharge you. Well, here's the
fact most of you are buying way more data than
you'll ever need. Now, Puretalk, my cell phone company, only
charges you for data that you actually need. For example,
(33:16):
for twenty five bucks a month, you can get unlimited talk,
unlimited texts, and five gigs of data plus mobile hotspot
twenty five bucks. And do you know what you can
do with five gigs of data? Well, you can browse
the Internet for one hundred and thirty five hours, stream
one thousand songs, and watch ten hours of video. Stop
over paying for wireless, get five G coverage with pure Talk.
(33:37):
Just i'le pound two to fifty, say the keyword save now,
check in with one of pure Talk's US Customer service
team members, no contract assigned, no activation fee, and you
can even keep your phone and your phone number. Pound
two to fifty keywords save now, do it now You
save an additional fifty percent off your first month from
pure talk
Thanks Scott. She had an hour two Sean Hannity Show
eight hundred and nine four one Sean, if you want
to be a part of the program. It is amazing
that you have a president that is a cognitive mess,
that can't run for re election at the last minute,
but yet he can write, but write an opinion piece
for the Washington Post that I'm sure he had absolutely
positively nothing to do with, and you know, saying that
(00:24):
we can and we must prevent the abuse of presidential
power and restore the public's faith in our judicial system.
And I'm listening to this and I'm looking at this
decision all because they don't like decisions that the Supreme
Court make. And then look, this has now been an
ongoing campaign. Remember when Chuck Schumer literally threatened Supreme Court
(00:50):
justice Remember the dosing of Supreme Court justice's homes, which
by law is illegal and nobody got punished for it.
But this is Chucky on the steps of the Supreme Court.
You know, do you listen to me, Gorsa and Kavanaugh
blah blah blah.
Speaker 2 (01:06):
I want to tell you Gorsas.
Speaker 3 (01:08):
I want to tell you Kavanaugh, you have released the whirlwind.
Speaker 2 (01:13):
And you will pay the price. You won't know what
hit you if you go forward with these awful decisions.
Speaker 1 (01:25):
Oh, we have more Chuck Schumer from over the weekend. Basically,
they're trying to now set up a justification to destroy
an entire branch of government to shape their worldview so
that they can gain more power. Here's more Schumer.
Speaker 4 (01:44):
President Biden this week is going to make a push
on the Supreme Court to reform the Supreme Court. What's
really possible there, what's realistic?
Speaker 5 (01:52):
Give us your real.
Speaker 4 (01:53):
View about whether this can happen this year in a
bipartisan way.
Speaker 2 (01:57):
Well, first, let's start off. The Supreme Court is a morass. First,
it's an ethical marass. The idea that wealthy individuals, many
of them right wing, can both have pay for cases
before the Court and at the same time give justices
gifts or trips is outrageous and frankly, Chief Justice Roberts
isn't doing enough to curb it. But it's a morass.
(02:19):
In even a worse way, this is a maga right
wing court. It's already taken the right away, the right
to choose. It could very well go further on that.
I fear it will. It's siding with the wealthiest of
individuals and the powerful interests over the average working family.
And it even threatens democracy when it says that a
(02:40):
president can get immunity even for certain acts in the presidency.
So this court is just a morass, both ethically and substantively.
Speaker 1 (02:52):
And then of course you have Elizabeth Warren saying the
Supreme Court is actively undermining our democracy. Understand what they're
trying to do here is they are trying to make
the Supreme Court an issue in this campaign, and they
are willing to alter the court to accumulate power, just
(03:13):
like they're willing to add DC statehood in Puerto Rico's
statehood because they think it will give them power in perpetuity.
It's always about power. You know, why are they talking
about mass amnesty for twelve million illegal immigrants because they
want They're hoping, well, we'll give you something a great value.
(03:33):
I hope you'll vote for us, right if we If
we give you something that you know people would pay
millions of dollars in Australia for, we'll give it to
you for free, You're going to vote for us, right,
That would be the implication.
Speaker 6 (03:44):
Listen, we've got all the Democrats who are ready for
meaningful ethics reform to bind the Supreme Court, and we're
working on changes to the Supreme Court. It can be
term limits, it could be adding the number of justices.
Things we can do without how to have a constitutional amendment.
So we've got a Supreme Court that is actively undermining
(04:06):
our democracy, and I think what Joe Biden will do
over the next six months is he's going to keep
drawing that to the attention of the American people and
reminding them when they vote in November, the Supreme Court
is on the ballot, and I believe we need to
create a pathway to citizenship. All of that is a
part of what we need to do for comprehensive immigration reform.
(04:30):
Kamala Harris will work with Congress and get that done.
Speaker 1 (04:33):
Anyway, joining us now to weigh in on all of this.
Welcome back to the program, our friend Greg Jared, Fox
News legal analyst, best selling author, David Jones, civil rights attorney.
Thank you both for being with us and former President
attorney for President Trump. Greg, I read your piece on
this and that this Biden proposal to reform the Supreme
(04:55):
Court is a shameless ployee for votes. I think you
and I are thinking the same way about this.
Speaker 5 (05:01):
Yeah, and they have zero chance of achieving it. You know,
Democrats cannot simply pass a law as Joe Biden wants,
imposing term limits on justices because life terms are embedded
in the Constitution. That means they'd have to amend the Constitution.
They can't do that. It is a tremendously high bar.
(05:24):
You know, you have to get two thirds at both
houses of Congress or consent by two thirds of the states,
and thereafter ratification is three fourths of the states. You
can't do that, I mean, that's an impossibility. The other
thing they're trying to do is impose ethical controls on justices. Well, sorry,
(05:44):
but that violates the sacred separation of powers principle. So,
as I wrote it my column, all of this is
is electoral problem for Democrats. It's not remotely viable.
Speaker 1 (05:58):
Let's get your take, David, because I find it so
obnoxious and to me, it's just another roundabout way for
them to make abortion front and center, because as I said,
they've got nothing that they can run on as a success.
They can't say, well, the borders are in better shape.
They can't say that our towns and cities are safer.
(06:19):
They can't say the economy is better. They can't say
energy prices are better. They can't say that the world
is safer. Because of their leadership, we have war on you,
war in the Middle East, war in Europe, and a
president that does not hold countries like China, Russia, Iran,
and North Korea responsible for any behavior they're involved in.
Speaker 7 (06:41):
Yeah, you and gregor exactly right. And beyond all of this.
The danger with the Chuck Schumer and that sort of
approach is that it misleads the public. They carve out
these sayings like an attack on democracy. What Chuck Schumer
is proposing and others like him is a true attack
on democracy. Elections have consequences, and we know that people
(07:01):
run on election platforms. Is that what Supreme Court justices
they might have a chance to appoint, to nominate and
then get put into office. That's part of the process.
Nine Supreme Court justices served us well since eighteen sixty nine.
We don't mess with the Constitution, this sacred document of
ours for political purposes. And they use these terms like
reform the Court. That's not an appropriate reform would indicate
(07:25):
an improvement or doing something better for the court. This
would pervert the Court's purpose. Same thing. You know, we
use the term progressives to refer to the hate squad.
There's nothing progressive about them. They're reactionary bigots, so we
can't buy into their terminology. I think Greg's exactly right,
and you're exactly right. The term limits. You know, Congress
(07:46):
can effect, but it shouldn't, and it served us very well.
The only time it's been changed throughout history anywhere from
five to six to ten, back to nine, is for
partisan political purposes. We can't do that, really, suggest the
Chief Justice Roberts is some flaming reactionary in the opinion
on immunity, Absolutely not. Nobody could fairly suggest that. But
(08:09):
Schumer puts our institutions in danger, and he puts people
in danger with the kind of rhetoric that he uses,
and he misleads the public. This all to me harkens
back to Jerry Nabler in twenty nineteen saying we can't
trust the voters to put in the right kind of
person for president. That's as undemocratic as statement as any
legislator or any American could ever make.
Speaker 1 (08:30):
Let me play for you, Kamala Harris saying that we
need to have the courage to stop using the term
radical Islamic terrorism, that we need to have the courage
to stop using the term illegal alien.
Speaker 8 (08:45):
Have the courage to object they use that term rattle
is ling terrorism also have their trajector illegal alien. The
(09:12):
worst of criminal behavior I have seen, the worst of
crime and undocumented immogrants is not.
Speaker 1 (09:19):
A cum Well, it's a crime when they're unvetted undocumented workers.
It is a crime when they murdered Joscelyn Nungary. It
is a crime after they brutalize her for hours. It
is a crime when they murder a mother of five,
Rachel Morin. It is a crime when they kill Lake
and Riley. It is a crime when they when these
(09:43):
unvetted illegal immigrants rape thirteen year old girls in broad
daylight in a park in Central Park, Greg Jarrett, that
is a crime, and frankly a crime in which they
have blood on their hands because their policies allowed for
this and facilitated this to happen.
Speaker 5 (10:00):
Of course, she failed in her job to do something
about the border and is now pretending that she was
never in charge of it. The problem with Kamala Harris
is that she has no foreign policy experience whatsoever. And
what I find so troubling is she has surrounded herself
(10:20):
with these national security advisors who are pro open borders
and in terms of Israel, are anti Israel and Hama sympathizers,
which is why her immediate response, together with Tony Blanken,
(10:41):
is urging restraint. Can you imagine if twelve American children
on a soccer field were murdered by a neighboring state
were restrained, are you kidding? We'd be tempted to level
that neighboring state into a smoking parking lot. So if
you elevate Vice President Harris to the presidency, she will
(11:07):
install these crazy advisors and rely on them entirely because,
as they say, she doesn't know anything about foreign policy.
Speaker 9 (11:20):
Take listen.
Speaker 7 (11:21):
She asks people to stop using the term radical Islamic terrorism.
My Muslim friends prefer that term because they believe that
the perpetrators, the terrorists, have perverted their religion Islam. So
the idea though that we shouldn't in any way refer
to him as being a function of radical Islam is
absurd when they're yelling allah bar when committing the terrorist
(11:45):
acts and.
Speaker 1 (11:46):
Make mean you mean like they're yelling ala hu akbar
at the at you know, in Washington, d C. Last
week when Prime Minister net Yah, who spoke before a
joint session of Congress.
Speaker 7 (11:57):
Right, and there's mean death to the Jews, killed the
Jews and so on. So this notion of separating Zionism
from Judaism, they've been given license now to simply engage
in violent activities. I've got five lawsuits going now on
behalf of hamas victims against these organizations, including the Associated Press,
for fomenting these things, for providing material support for encouraging
(12:19):
these things, including the organizations that are doing it on campus.
We know that this is an organized campaign financed by
Iran in large part that was not coincidental. Documents came
out on October seventh and October eighth in this country
already recognizing that the massacre was going to occur. So
this is radical Islamic terrorism and it shouldn't be called
(12:42):
anything else. And by suggesting that Islamophobia, to identify it
as that is simply wrong and dangerous. And you know
we've marked After meeting with Prime Minister Netanyahu, her focus
was on what's going on in Gaza, with the Palestinians,
rather than all of the thousands of Israelis been displaced,
thousands killed, and so on an under thread of rocket
(13:03):
fire every single day. This is our ally. We don't
feed our allies and terrorist groups equally a right.
Speaker 1 (13:09):
We continue now with Greg Jarrett and David Shown analyzing
this insane proposal of the Democrats as it relates to
the Supreme Court and term limits, et cetera. Clearly a
violation of separation of powers, and the insanity of Kamala
Harris and Joe Biden's policies towards radical Islamic terrorism. Kamala
(13:30):
doesn't even want us to use the word anymore. We've
got to be courageous, never use the term radical Islamic terrorism.
Her treatment of Prime Minister net Yahoo was an embarrassment.
They're surrendering the war on radical Islamic terrorism as an embarrassment.
If this doesn't scare everybody, the fact that she thinks
we need the courage to stop speaking the truth and
(13:50):
she wants to be the commander in chief and she's
giving into the radicals in our party, that's insane. Last question,
will this disqualify Josh Shapiro as a potential vpach.
Speaker 7 (14:00):
Look, I know they've got you know they're going to
make their choice. Where nothing disqualifies any of these folks.
It seems to me it depends on who you ask
and when you ask them. But the main problem is
Kamala Harris at the top of the ticket. She wants
to bolster it with, you know, a significant vice presidential choice.
But you can't hide what's at the top of the ticket.
Speaker 1 (14:19):
Well, just just qualify Shapiro. Who's pro Israel, Greg Jarrett.
Speaker 10 (14:24):
I don't.
Speaker 5 (14:25):
I don't think so, because she desperately wants Pennsylvania in
the D column in the presidential election. He's immensely popular,
sixty percent plus approval rating in Pennsylvania, and so as
I say politics, Trump's everything, she'll likely pick someone just
(14:46):
like Shapiro for political reasons.
Speaker 1 (14:49):
All I appreciate you both, Greg Jarrett, and our friend
David Cholm, thank you both. We appreciate it. Eight hundred
nine one, Shawn is on number. If you want to
be a part of the program, the radio show the
mainstream media a love state. This is the Sean Hannity Show,
(15:14):
HI twenty five now until the top of the hour,
toll free RD number is eight hundred and nine four
one shot. If you want to be a part of
the program, I want to remind you that since the
start of the Swords of Iron, that is the war
against radical Islamic terrorism, the word that Kamala Harris doesn't
want you to use, began on October the seventh. Well,
(15:34):
what have we witnessed? We saw all of it on
display this weekend as children were targeted with an iranium
missile in a soccer field and slaughtered, and Joe Biden
and Kamala Harris have been pressuring Israel not to fight
back and not to win their war on radical Islamic terrorism.
(15:55):
Again the word that Kamala doesn't want you to use.
But they've got a their war. It's about their very survival. Thankfully,
there are groups like the International Fellowship of Christians and Jews.
They've been around for over forty years. They were on
the ground in Israel within hours and they have been
protecting the vulnerable, feeding people, offering medical supplies, flack jackets,
(16:19):
bomb shelters. They do everything humanly possible. Now they're telling
the stories about what people went through on that horrific day.
Survivors like Keith now you happen to be the head
of security of the Eshkol region, which is in Israel's
southern border with Gaz. I've been there, and Keith protects
(16:40):
the people in that region. On that fateful day at
armored security truck donated to Keith's community by friends of
the Fellowship stop bullets from terrorists firing at Keith as
he drove into the danger. Now, that's only because of
support from people like you and me, and the support
of the International Fellowship of Christians and Jews, and they
(17:00):
helping the survivors remain steadfast and strong. They have the
whole series of stories like this. You can hear a
lot more of them when you visit their website, and
hopefully you can offer some support for them. It's one
word support IFCJ dot org. That support IFCJ dot org.
All right, we're gonna get to your calls coming up here.
(17:20):
There was an ABC interview was kind of like it
wasn't the town hall, but there were I guess there
was someone around eight people that were interviewed, and this
was the people at Butler, their swat team, and they
pointed out something that is just unfathomable to me that
there was zero communication with the US Secret Service before
(17:43):
the assassination attempt, and they claimed they were supposed to
have a face to face meeting with the Secret Service
before the rally, but that meeting never happened. There's no
excuse for this. And literally, you know, some of them
were aware of this guy walking around and keeping eyes
on him, but the Secret Service wasn't talking to them.
How does that make any sense?
Speaker 3 (18:04):
Listen, we were supposed to get a face to face
briefing with the Secret Service snipers whenever they arrived, and
that never happened. So I think that that was probably
a pivotal point where I started thinking things were wrong
because that never happened and we had no communication with
the Secret Service.
Speaker 10 (18:21):
You had no communication with the Secret Service at all
on that.
Speaker 3 (18:25):
Saturday, not until after the shooting, and.
Speaker 9 (18:27):
By then it was too late.
Speaker 1 (18:29):
Pretty unbelievable. Eight hundred and nine to four to one, Sean,
is our number. If you want to be a part
of the program. Let's get to our phones. Let's say,
how to Rusties in Utah, Rusty High, How are you
only done? Ninety eight days until election day? My friend?
What's on your mind?
Speaker 9 (18:44):
Hey? Sean? They stick my call. My question is is
how did Kamala become the only person be running for
president if since they didn't have any other Democrats running
for it? Was it because of the endorsements and stuff
that she received.
Speaker 1 (19:03):
I think part of it was her position. I think
part of it was the money, and there would be
problems if someone else were to take the space. I
think she just simply became the logical choice, considering had
anything ever happened to the president, she'd be next in line.
I think because of her radicalism. I think there's a
(19:24):
belief among Democrats that she's going to be easily controlled
and she represents the squad. She's it. I mean, she
represents this new radicalized, new green deal socialist Marxist leftist party,
and there's nobody more left wing than she is. He
is the perfect candidate for them. You know, the mission
(19:47):
for the next ninety eight days is to make sure
every American frankly really only for the next forty nine
days until early voting starts, is to make sure every
American knows how radical a record is. And we're doing
a very level best to make sure that happens. Because
the MEETIA is not going to do their job.
Speaker 9 (20:03):
For sure. I'm definitely spreading the word. It's like I
was talking to my uncle. He lives in Idaho. It's
like we're living in a movie and the script just
keeps getting worse and worse.
Speaker 1 (20:14):
It really does, right, Yeah, definitely, Well, yeah, that's pretty
pretty scary scary times, right, and.
Speaker 9 (20:21):
It's not comforting. And I hate bringing my kids up
in this day and age, but I just keep them
the best we.
Speaker 1 (20:27):
Could appreciate to call my friend. Thank you, Jerry, Connecticut.
Next Sean Hannity Show, Hi, Sean.
Speaker 11 (20:33):
I think President Trump is walking into a perjury trap
with this FBI interview. They call it a victim interview.
I think they want to make him the victim. And
I know you have President's Trump's here. So President Trump,
did you forget about crossfire? Hurricane? Did you forget about
James Caley boasting?
Speaker 1 (20:52):
What could they possibly get them on? I mean, I'm
listening closely to you because I think anytime you speak,
you know, I have a friend of mine, he recently
retired from the FBI, and he was very high up,
and we had conversations about this and he actually said
to me, you know, because my instinct would be if
the FBI ever wanted to talk to me, I'd want
(21:14):
to help them, but that would be my natural gut instinct.
And he looks at me and goes, no, you never
talk to them ever, because he knows, obviously, I'm in
a political space. He knows that the DOJ has been weaponized.
He and a lot of the old school people are
getting out as quickly as they can. We have one
(21:35):
contributor at Fox News now, Nicole Parker. She's told her story.
She left because of this very reason. And I mean
to have somebody that revered the FBI when he went
into it, to leave with such a bad taste in
his mouth, it is sad to me. I mean, I've
told the story many times. I had two relatives that
(21:56):
it was my grandfather's brothers kids, and I'm friends with
one of them. His name is Billy Flynn. He's called
into this program before and he and his brother. His
brother passed away, but he and his brother were in
the FBI. They in my family growing up, and there
was a lot of law enforcement NYPD, my mama prison guard,
my daddy was, my dad was in family corporation, you know,
(22:18):
so a lot of a lot of law enforcement, but
they were looked at as deity. I mean if if
their names came up, and of course as they had
another brother, Jack that was a Christian brother, he was
looked at his deity too, But they were looked at
with the with reverence. I mean that's how we were raised.
And and none of these people think the same way
(22:40):
about the FBI anymore that it's been weaponized. They all
see it and politicized, and they all talk about it.
What's happened?
Speaker 11 (22:48):
Did when? When? When the FBI staged the mar A
Lago photo and tampered with evidence in order to do
it and then leaked it to I believe the Washington
Post did a single a come forward and say, this
is the one of a political throwdown gun. We did
a corrupt act to hide a corrupt act and justify
(23:09):
a corrupt act. So that photo, in my judgment, is
an indictment of the top all of the bureau, top
to bottom inside out, because it was done for political
purposes in the tamper with evidence in the process. And
so President Trump, if you're going to do this, I
think you're a full but at least have them give
(23:31):
you the questions in writing. Have your lawyers review them
and submit written answers. You cannot trust them.
Speaker 1 (23:38):
I hadn't thought about it before. I can't disagree with
the word you're saying. I think that the president should
give written answers. I absolutely positively agree. And what a
sad state of affairs it is that you're right. I hadn't.
I hadn't thought about it before. But I think you're
a thousand percent right.
Speaker 11 (23:58):
They haven't given up on getting him, and that's what
he has to.
Speaker 1 (24:01):
Stand, nor has the int Look the look look what
they did. I mean, they were warned in August to
twenty sixteen not to use the Dirty Russian Disinformation dossie.
They were warned it was a political document. They knew
Hillary paid for it. Of all people, Bruce Orr was
the one that warned them, and they used it anyway
for not one but four PISA warrants, and that was
(24:21):
a backdoor way to spy on the Trump campaign and
the Trump presidency. You know now, Then years later they
go before Congress, Oh no, we know what we know
now about the Dirty Dacia. We wouldn't have used it.
We would never have signed off on those warrants. But
they weren't held accountable with the fifty one former Intel
agents in twenty twenty. It just they knew nothing about
(24:42):
Hunter's laptop, but they just flat out lied. Appreciate the call,
my friend, eight hundred nine to four to one, Shawn
our number. You want to be a part of the program.
Chris in New York, Chris, how are you glad you called?
Hey Sean, how are you doing break or breaker for
a hnity check? Hey Man, good to check. I'm glad
you're checking in. I do have friends in New York.
I miss a lot of them, but they all want
to come down and see me now.
Speaker 12 (25:03):
Absolutely So. My question for you today is what is
Vice President Harris's actual qualifications to be president? Because as
Vice president she was a complete failure. She owns all
of what Biden administration does. What are her actual qualifications?
Does she have a good prosecution record? Does she have
(25:26):
a good Senate record? What is her record? Because it
seems to me, just.
Speaker 1 (25:30):
Keep staying listen, if you keep staying tuned to this program,
I will continue to expose her failed and radical extremist record.
That's the only thing that I know I can do,
and I will do the job that the media mob
will never do. I am telling you that tonight we
(25:54):
appreciate you are vetting tonight. Well, tomorrow we're going to
examine her record in California. Tonight, I don't want to
give it away. The problem is if I start talking
about what I'm going to do today or tonight or whatever,
everybody steals my stuff. And I'm like, I don't mind
them stealing it after I did it. But we put
a lot of work into the fresearch. I'm like, you know,
(26:15):
and I'm not even looking for retribution. I actually wanted
to go viral, but we're spending a lot of time
doing the work the media should be doing. But they'll
never do. I promise you every day we're going to
continue to expose her, Okay, And.
Speaker 12 (26:29):
I really look forward to you all the people, all
the things that they're trying to hide. I hope you
bring out into the sun Sean and mister Hannity, and
we really greatly appreciate you.
Speaker 1 (26:39):
So I've got some doozies tonight. You're going to love tonight.
I promise you, Tonight is going to be very hard
hitting and all full of truth.
Speaker 11 (26:48):
Okay to it, Sean, looking forward to it.
Speaker 12 (26:50):
Thanks for taking my call, Sean, I appreciate you.
Speaker 1 (26:53):
You bet it, Thanks buddy. All right, we'll take a
quick break. Right back to our phones. Hey eight, one
hundred and ninety four one seawan ninety eight days until
election Day forty nine days early voting begins in Pennsylvania.
The best election coverage available on your radio dial continues.
Speaker 7 (27:11):
The final hour roundup is next.
Speaker 5 (27:14):
You do not want to miss it, and stay tuned
for the final hour free for all on the Sean
Hannity Show.
Speaker 1 (27:24):
That's our busy phones. Mel is in New York. Mel,
You're on the Sean Hannity Show. Welcome aboard.
Speaker 10 (27:29):
Hi, thank you so much for taking my call. I
really appreciate it. To me, I mean, I'm not going
to go buy anything I hear on the news. But
just as a citizen of the United States, nothing is
making sense. Just for starters. I don't feel Kamala is
(27:49):
suitable at all to be president. When I see her,
when I get the vibe from her, I think she
would probably make a official like a city council person
is to me, what she looks like and what she
sounds like, she would probably be good as a city
(28:11):
council person. Maybe for a small town, small city that
needs government involvement. But when you're talking about a whole country,
to run a whole country, it just doesn't She's going
from being a suitable city councilwoman, is what I see
(28:31):
her as, to a president. I mean, it's just not possible,
and it's fine.
Speaker 1 (28:40):
It is a very, very scary proposition. Her views are
so radical. I feel like I'm repeating myself when I
go over all of them. Maybe I can't, Maybe I
need to do it more often. Maybe I just need
to just say it every single time. You know, I
don't care if it's about defunding the police, you know,
(29:01):
equity over equality for example, or you know, just her
radical positions on you know, everything from defunding the police,
and the courage to stop using the term radical Islamic terrorism,
and the courage to stop saying illegal illegal aliens, being
against fracking, being against drilling, you know, mandatory gun buyback program,
(29:27):
new Green Deal, eliminate private health insurance, defund dismantle the police.
I mean, I just I could just keep going and
going and going. You know that illegal immigrants should get
free healthcare and they should get free education, and you know,
coase to the left of Bernie Sanders. I mean, I
(29:48):
just keep going on and on and on, and I
don't know if everybody America fully understands just how radicalized
she is and the type of president she'd be. She
would be. This would be like AOC on steroids being president.
And I don't have any other way to put it true.
So I'm trying to make people aware of it. They
(30:10):
didn't give us much time to vetter, but we're going
to do our very best.
Speaker 10 (30:14):
No, And I think she's trying very hard to market herself.
But as I look at the big picture and with
the illegal people coming in, I mean the very term
illegal means it's illegal for them to be here. So
in a nutshell, it's like she's not obviously fiscally minded.
(30:37):
And for an example, if you're living on credit card debt,
would you donate more than your take home pay to
illegal immigrants? And it's just it's like common sense of
a fifth grader. We don't have we have trillions of
dollars in debt. We can't afford to have legal aliens
(31:01):
on our dime. They're illegal. Are there any laws here?
None of it makes sense.
Speaker 1 (31:07):
There are laws they're circumventing the law, and they've been
aiding and a vetting in the law breaking, and then
they lied to us for three years. Then they try
to blame Trump and none. And yet we have people
being murdered and raped and they don't even mention these
people's names, or if they mentioned the name, they get
it wrong, and they apologize for calling somebody illegal alien.
(31:30):
It's insane. We are living in an insane time. These
are people that honestly, it's it's scaring the hell out
of me. We're going to get new King Rich's take
on the state of the race coming up in a minute.
Look for far too many veterans, people that serve this
country honorably and now find themselves homeless or at risk
of being homeless. I'll give you an example. Glenda Williams,
(31:52):
US Army Vet faced homelessness along with the five kids
who are struggling to keep up with the rent and
living in just a broken down the law lapidated unit
that had rodents and mold and broken windows. Thankfully, the
Tunnel to Towers Foundation was able to through your generosity
and their Homeless Veterans program, provide Glenda not just with shelter,
(32:12):
but with a safe, secure, environment where she and her
children can thrive. Now, could you just imagine what it
means to a veteran like Glenda to know that people
like you are there to help make sure that her
family is safe and secure in a stable home. Anyway,
for Glenda and people like her, friends like you make
all the difference. We hope all of you will commit
(32:33):
to eleven dollars a month join us here at Team Hannity.
You can do it by going to their website the
letter T the number two, the LETTERT dot org the
letter T the number two the letter T dot org
for the Tunnel to Towers Foundation. Quick break, right back,
we'll continue. Hey, I'm going to let you in on
(32:55):
a little wireless hack that can cut your cell phone
bill in half every month. Verizon AT and T and
T Mobile they want you to believe that you need
unlimited data so they can overcharge you. Well, here's the
fact most of you are buying way more data than
you'll ever need. Now, Puretalk, my cell phone company, only
charges you for data that you actually need. For example,
(33:16):
for twenty five bucks a month, you can get unlimited talk,
unlimited texts, and five gigs of data plus mobile hotspot
twenty five bucks. And do you know what you can
do with five gigs of data? Well, you can browse
the Internet for one hundred and thirty five hours, stream
one thousand songs, and watch ten hours of video. Stop
over paying for wireless, get five G coverage with pure Talk.
(33:37):
Just i'le pound two to fifty, say the keyword save now,
check in with one of pure Talk's US Customer service
team members, no contract assigned, no activation fee, and you
can even keep your phone and your phone number. Pound
two to fifty keywords save now, do it now You
save an additional fifty percent off your first month from
pure talk
The Sean Hannity Show News
Host
Sean Hannity
Popular Podcasts
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.