November 6, 2024 • 30 mins
Jeff Bartos, 2022 U.S. Senate candidate and 2018 Republican nominee for Lt. Governor and Mark Halperin, Editor-in-Chief of the new interactive video platform 2WAY, discuss the win for President Trump and the pickups in Congress. Oh and let’s not forget the vitriol from the left.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Stay right here for our final news roundup and information overload.
Speaker 2 (00:04):
In the final hour of the Sean Hannity Show.
Speaker 1 (00:07):
All Right, News round Up in information overload, our toll
free here's on number. It's eight hundred and nine to
four one, Sean, if you want to be a part
of the program, if you're just joining us. By the way,
Kamala Harris conceding to Donald Trump, he will be the
forty seventh president of the United States. What was a
historic comeback victory. We do have decision a desk is
(00:30):
now up. The House projection UH to two twenty three
for Republicans to two twelve earlier was it was low.
It could have been as low as only a three
seat advantage. That is a huge change for the better.
One of the things that has infuriated me this entire
election season, beyond the fact that Kamala of course, you know,
(00:54):
it was basically a mini coupe between I believe Barack Obama,
Chuck Schumer, and Nancy Pulla say. I think Nancy Pelosi
threatened Biden with the use of the twenty fifth Amendment,
and they pushed him out and Kamala was put in,
and she didn't get a single vote. It wasn't an
open primary. I think they should have had that, especially
with the people that are screaming threat to democracy, threat
(01:15):
to democracy every two seconds. It's anything but democratic in
my view. But putting all of that aside, is all
of the questions that Kamala in one hundred days never
got asked infuriates me. The fact that she was never
asked why does she think it's courageous not to say
radical Islamic terrorism or illegal alien or really press her
(01:38):
on why she wanted to decriminalize illegal immigration and offer
free housing, food, healthcare, education with a running made, free
legal driver's licenses, free college education, sex change operations. And
people laughed at it when they first heard it. Mediate
people didn't even know about it, and she wasn't asked
about it. She was never asked about what happened in
(02:01):
the summer of twenty twenty. We had five hundred and
seventy four riots, We had dozens of dead Americans, we
had billions in property damage, We had cops pelted with bricks, rocks, bottles,
molotov cocktails. She's tweeting out a bail fund going on
CBS saying, well, the rioters are not going to stop.
We're not going to stop, and they shouldn't stop. I'm like, huh.
(02:23):
I think Liz Cheney would define that his insurrection and rioting.
And there was no criticism, no questions asked about that.
There was no questions about her co sponsoring the Green
New Deal and pledging to eliminate the filibuster to pass
it with Bernie Sanders, or government healthcare Medicare for all
that she co sponsored with Bernie, and the elimination of
(02:43):
private health insurance. And I can go on and on
and on all right, So that frustrates me. And you know,
to watch in the aftermath of this landslide victory last
night of President Trump, you know, the state run media
mob as I call them, right, So I stand by that.
We'll defend that every day of the week, blaming Kamala's
(03:06):
loss on racism and sexism.
Speaker 3 (03:09):
Listen, willed me to say. I wanted to say.
Speaker 4 (03:11):
It, well, if she if she were six foot four
white man from from Arkansas or from you know, Florida,
and she ran a good middle of the road campaign
talking about reaching out, do you think she would be
losing by that much? If she if she could like
chew tobacco and carry a shotgun and talk about football
(03:32):
and uh and and be a guys guy. I mean,
you tell me.
Speaker 5 (03:37):
There are levels of sexism and racism that clearly a
lot of people in this country are willing to tolerate,
which is also something that you know, we may have
not we may have woken up in the same country
in the sense, but that becomes much more clear this morning.
Speaker 6 (03:55):
I think that we've got to be honest. Among Hispanic
men and Black men, there's a lot of misogyny, and
I think that we've got to deal with the reality
that he appealed to this whole false, macho thing that
some black men in a Latino men are went full.
Speaker 7 (04:15):
There are African American women who know a little bit
about being talked down to, you know, a little bit
about having their economic dreams crushed, who tried to dream
a big dream over the past couple of months, and
tonight they're trading in a lot of hope for a
lot of hurt, and they were hoping that maybe this time,
(04:38):
this time, one of their own could be seen as worthy.
Speaker 2 (04:43):
Black voters came through for Kamala Harris.
Speaker 8 (04:46):
White women voters did not. That is what it appears
happened in that state.
Speaker 9 (04:52):
Let's be honest about this, Okay, let's be absolutely blunt
about it. There were appeals to racism in this campaign,
and there is racial bias in this country, and there is
sexism in this country. And anybody who thinks that that
did not in any way impact on the outcome of
this race is wrong.
Speaker 10 (05:10):
White women who voted about fifty two percent right for
Donald Trump, uneducated white women, is my understanding. You have
Latino men actually voting more for him. I think this
was a referendum of cultural resentment in this country.
Speaker 1 (05:26):
All right, joining us now to discuss all of this,
I mean, this insanity in this blame and you know
anything but the fact that she ran one of the
worst political or presidential campaigns I've seen it in my lifetime.
We have two very different people that come from two
very different points of view, and Jeff Bartow's twenty twenty
two US stant and candidate twenty eighteen Republican nominee for
(05:50):
Lieutenant Governor Pennsylvania the Commonwealth, Mark Halprin, editor in chief
the new interactive video platform two Way, and I have
them on for very specific reasons because they both contributed
greatly to real information that people needed.
Speaker 3 (06:07):
And guys, it's great to have you back.
Speaker 8 (06:10):
Sean, thank you for having me.
Speaker 1 (06:12):
But Mark, let me start with you. You know, I've
said in two thousand and seven journalism is dead, and
I said it many times since then, and I would say,
right now, the legacy media, and that would be you know,
major newspapers, that would be the broadcast channels, that would
be cable television news. You know, punditry is it is,
(06:36):
it is over for them because they went so hard
into the Kamala Harris arena and they claim to be
journalists and they're not. And you bucked that trend and
I watched with fascination as you did it, and I
began to realize that you were just looking for truth
(06:57):
and information as a journalist. I don't know what your
political affiliation is, and I don't really care, and I
really I developed a great respect for you during this
cycle because I knew you were telling truth that other
people were not telling.
Speaker 3 (07:12):
What is the fallout from this for the.
Speaker 11 (07:14):
Media, Well, unfortunately, I don't think it will be any
because what's about to happen is the very same reporters, editors, anchors,
executive producers and correspondents who participated in the cover up
of Joe Biden's acuity declined with the Democratic Party, and
who covered this campaign, allowing Kamala Harris to every day
(07:34):
say that Donald Trump said he was going to be
a dictator on day one, and there were good people
on both sides, and it'll be a bloodbath. That exact
same group of people is about to cover the Trump administration.
So I don't get the sense there's going to be
a big reconciliation. I do know that I heard on
two way over and over nearly every day, people saying
I don't much like Donald Trump. You know, I don't
(07:57):
really want to vote for him, but the media is
so biased I feel that I have to. It's of
a piece with the law there of the cases brought
against you, and I think, I think, you know, if
this were normal business and you had that record of
failure and professional irresponsibility, there'd be mass firings, and instead
everybody's just so I covered the Biden Harris administration. Now
(08:17):
I'm covering the Trump administration. So I'd like to think
there'd be some accountability, But I don't believe there's any
reason to think.
Speaker 1 (08:23):
That all right, quick break, We'll come right back more
with Jeff Bartows and Mark Halprin and your calls on
the other side of eight hundred and nine to four
one Sean this day after election Day. Right to continue
now with Jeff Bartos and Mark Alperner. Look back with us.
Now when you come on this program, you're pretty aware
(08:44):
of what I do for a living.
Speaker 3 (08:45):
I'm a member of the press. I'm a talk show host.
Speaker 1 (08:48):
I could produce thousands of hours mark of straight news
coverage that I've delivered on radio and TV, and I
could I could produce thousands of hours of investigative reporting
that the rest of the media ignores. Russia, Russia, Russia,
Obama's radical associations, to name a couple. I give opinion,
but I'm honest and I'm up front about it. We
(09:09):
talk about sports, we talk about culture. I would argue
that what I do in the press is I'm the
entire newspaper they claim to be journalists. You are a journalist.
I really view you as one of the few remaining journalists.
Am I right in my definition? And that's why I
have respect for you, because you don't cross that line
and everyone else does and they're not honest about it.
(09:31):
If they said, listen, I'm a liberal talk show host,
I'd be fine with it.
Speaker 3 (09:35):
But they don't do that.
Speaker 11 (09:37):
Yeah, and they have. Of course, they still despite their
dwindling market share, they still have huge influence on American society.
I view my job as holding well wait.
Speaker 1 (09:45):
A minute, but do they because if they did, with
all of the negativity they threw a Trump and all
the attacks, wouldn't Kamala Harris be the president elect today?
Speaker 2 (09:56):
No?
Speaker 11 (09:56):
No, because the first all, there's a backlash against it,
and second of all, because there's media like yours it's
countervailing to it. I'm just saying that they still have
a decent sized audience, that my job is to tell
interesting stories of our time and to hold all powerful
interests accountable to the public interest. And they view their
job as holding Donald Trump accountable to their conception of
(10:17):
the public interest. It's the difference, and it's and it's
it's not one hundred percent of people, but it's almost
one hundred percent of the people. And again, it's like
Joe Biden's loss of mental acuity. The press can deny it,
they can pretend it doesn't exist, but the American people
have eyes and ears and they see it. And that's
why again, ironically, I think the press did as much
(10:37):
to help Donald Trump win the opposite of what they wanted.
It's almost any other factor in the race.
Speaker 1 (10:42):
But the fact that they wanted it and they were
so openly biased about it, to me is alarming and
the dishonesty behind it. I asked both of you yesterday.
I try to reach out to sources all over the place.
I have Democratic sources that have conservative sources, Republican sources, whatever.
(11:03):
And I knew Jeff Bartows, Jeff, I knew you were
in the quote war room, not a real war room
for those people that have such sensibilities. But you were there,
you know, doing on the ground in Pennsylvania yesterday. And
I sought an answer to a question from you, and
I saw the same answer to the question from Mark
(11:24):
and it was about the early vote was so overwhelming
in Pennsylvania for Donald Trump that for Kamala Harris to win,
she went into election day yesterday with a math problem,
and that is that Republicans had so overwhelmed Democrats with
their early voting and that they so underperform. For example,
(11:47):
you know, they had a net gain of four hundred thousand.
That means they were up four hundred thousand votes. It
may sound like a lot, but in twenty twenty they
were up about one point one million votes. That's a
decline six to seven hundred thousand votes. And to make
that up they would need massive turnout in historically democratic
areas like Philadelphia. And I called you and I said, okay, Jeff,
(12:11):
tell me what is the turnout that is going on
in Philadelphia today?
Speaker 3 (12:16):
And you gave me an answer.
Speaker 1 (12:17):
You said, well, Temple University twenty five thousand students, Lehigh
University six thousand students, Penn State ten thousand students. Yeah,
we're seeing a big turnout there, but nowhere else really
in Philadelphia we see it. And they fell hundreds of
thousand short of what they would have needed to make
up from the early voting advantage that Republicans had historically.
(12:41):
And that was very helpful for me to give analysis
last night on Fox News.
Speaker 8 (12:46):
Yeah, Sean, it's and first of all, Mark your comments
about Mark or spot on. I really found myself over
the last two months following Mark on X and when
he was doing television interviews. For the reasons you just said,
so spot on. You know, I for me to do
my job, and of course I'm a volunteer and a
former candidate, But for me to do my job and
advise Dave McCormick, or advise the Trump campaign, or to
be useful to any of the people I'm trying to
(13:08):
help on the goals that I have, I have to
consume this information and try to understand it. Yesterday was
the very first time in my whole career. I'm an attorney,
I've been a candidate. It's the first time in my
career I found myself trapped for a moment in what
they call the echo chamber, and I was trapped in
this press echo chamber where everybody was spinning this idea
(13:30):
that turnout was LBJ nineteen sixty four historic, and we'd
never seen anything like it in Philadelphia, and you just
wait and see. And our numbers weren't showing it. As
I shared with you, our numbers weren't showing it. And
we were very confident in our analysis and our numbers.
And it turned out when I started to really push
the press as the day were on, I found out
that they were getting their information from each other. So
(13:51):
what I mean to say, is the press was their
sources were other members.
Speaker 2 (13:55):
Of the press.
Speaker 3 (13:56):
Is that amazing?
Speaker 8 (13:58):
With a sprinkling in of the mayor and the head
of the Philadelphia Democratic Party.
Speaker 2 (14:03):
It was.
Speaker 8 (14:04):
It was bizarre Sean. Later in the evening, I went
on local television on a panel with Democrats and I
was quizzing them again. I'm like, you do realize that
Puerto Rican vote, Hispanic vote is moving in historic numbers
to Donald Trump here in Pennsylvania as well as Georgia
and Florida and other places. And a panelist, the co
panelist whose Puerto Rican was telling me, no, my numbers
(14:24):
are wrong.
Speaker 2 (14:24):
Who where's what? I was right?
Speaker 8 (14:26):
I mean, we were, we were right. So it was
there in this echo chamber, I guess, and you gentlemen
both know this way better than me. Whether it's the
Liz Cheney with the guns, or whether it was the
Iowa poll that turned out to be sixteen points off,
whether it's the Commona momentum that wasn't there, whether it
was this Puerto Rican anger which wasn't there, and then
this Philly turnout hoax, I think we can call it.
Speaker 2 (14:50):
It was.
Speaker 8 (14:51):
It was the last gasp of a campaign that was
born in desperation and never found a message in one
hundred days.
Speaker 1 (14:56):
Well, I was very grateful to you and to Mark
for getting me the end answer that I've been hoping for,
and I really appreciate it. And I've just come to
respect the fact that both of you got to the
truth and got it to me, and I was able
to convey that to my audience. And I knew it early.
I knew it wasn't happening anyway. I appreciate you both.
(15:16):
Jeff Bartos, Marca Helpert, thank you guys.
Speaker 3 (15:21):
All Right, Letard skin a.
Speaker 1 (15:22):
Simple man and that can only mean one thing on
this radio program, and that means all things self proclaimed
simple man. That means all things Bill O'Reilly, all things
Bill O'Reilly or Bill O'Reilly dot com. Mister O'Reilly, sir.
What an election this has been. What a historic moment.
Yesterday you texted me and do you remember what you
(15:45):
texted me me? That told me Bill, I've had less
than an hour's sleep.
Speaker 3 (15:53):
I am. I am literally punched trunk. I can't think anymore.
Speaker 2 (15:58):
More delirious than usual.
Speaker 3 (15:59):
To I am more delirious than usual.
Speaker 1 (16:03):
You have to excuse me today I've been telling the
audience all day you know how I feel today before
we get to the question I asked you, I am
very humbled and grateful. I am grateful because I really
feel that the stated agenda of Kamala Harris and Tim
Walls was so radical, so extreme, that it was dangerous
(16:25):
for our country, and I don't know if we would
have recovered. And I'm grateful that the American people and
everybody that listens to this radio show and watches Hannity
and listens and watches you that they went out in
massive numbers and it was a mandate election by every definition,
and I'm just appreciative. I'm very grateful that our fellow
(16:47):
countryman saw what was the handwriting on the wall, and
the mainstream, corrupt, state run media didn't tell them anything
about who she really was, and we had to penetrate
through all of that and get this into the consciousness
of the American people, and we succeeded, thankfully.
Speaker 2 (17:03):
Well, I agree with you, there was a crossroads election.
And I'm not as relieved as you are because the
Proposition three in Missouri past, Proposition one in New York past,
which were very far left progressive things about not alerting
parents when their children have abortion, when their daughters have abortions.
(17:26):
So the progressive movement was dealt a huge blow and
that was the important historically of yesterday's vote. They're not
down forever, though, they're still there. And I've been doing
a lot of interviews with foreign news agencies and most
of those people have no clue, and they're all trying
(17:47):
to say, well, Okay, Trump won, but why, And I say,
it's very easy. Americans want efficiency. Most Americans are not idealized.
They are hurting economically. They don't have as much money
as they had four years ago, and no matter what
depressed does, that's not going to override the personal pain.
(18:12):
And then when you add to that the unbelievable open
border and a lot of the other woke stuff. It's
heartening and encouraging that Americans got it, But because if
they hadn't, I would have said, is it over? It
was so obvious to me, and I think you too,
how incompetent Joe Biden was, and that Harris was a
(18:33):
terrible candidate who just cheerleaded the incompetence. That's what it came.
Speaker 1 (18:38):
Down to, right, Oh it was I think it was
a combination of many things, and I think it was
her radicalism, her extremism. He ran the worst campaign I
think I've ever seen in my life. I think, you know,
calling your opponent a racist, nazi fascist, lying to women
about abortion, lying to seniors about social security and medicare,
(18:59):
lying about pretty much everything is is. It's just not
the American people too smart for that. However, there is
a there there are there are flashing sirens, if you will,
inasmuch as there are too many of our fellow Americans
that buy into the socialist nonsense. And they really believe
(19:20):
in a cradle, you know, to grave, womb, to the tomb,
you know, socialist system. And and they want the Green
New Deal, which would be the destruction of the greatest
wealth creating system on earth, which is capitalism.
Speaker 2 (19:32):
Uh.
Speaker 1 (19:33):
They want open borders, they want defund dismantle, they don't
want fracking, they don't want drilling. They you know, these
these are very dangerous positions. They don't want America to
be the leader of the free world. That I'm not
talking about intervention and foreign conflicts. I'm talking about America
being the moral leader. With this philosophy that Reagan adopted
(19:54):
called peace through strength, and and that frightens me that
so many people see, you know, the they have that
world view.
Speaker 3 (20:01):
We saw that on display with the mob media last night.
Speaker 2 (20:05):
It is distressing that the states of California, Illinois, Massachusetts,
New York, most of New England, New Jersey have headed
in that direction. But what is heartening is hard working
Americans across the country understand efficiency versus incompetence. I was
(20:32):
getting worried about that. If you don't understand competence, I mean, people, Look,
Trump did a good job by any historical measure in
his four years in office. We're not counting January sixth,
but if you look at real wages up and you've
gone over this a million times, okay, and fairly tranquil overseas,
(20:55):
he did a good job. If that doesn't mean anything anymore,
then we're done. But yesterday's vote showed me it does
mean something. They were doing comparisons between Trump and Biden.
Biden lost the election for Harris. Harris is a terrible
candidate because you wouldn't answer any questions, and she did
(21:16):
mislead and it was obvious she did.
Speaker 1 (21:19):
He certainly didn't help, But I think she lost her
own election. That might be a small point of disagreement.
Speaker 2 (21:24):
I disagree with you because Biden handled the economy so
poorly that no know what Harris said, she couldn't overcome that.
Speaker 1 (21:34):
But she was in the room Bill if he bragged
about being in the room making all the big decisions. Kierley,
when asked repeatedly if she disagreed with Biden on anything,
he said, I can't think of anything.
Speaker 2 (21:45):
It was the moment that she lost the election on
the View. But her policy, because she's not a policy maker,
didn't cause the bad economy a fantastic rise in prices.
Biden did. So Biden lost, and Harris could not overcome
Biden because she threw in with him one hundred percent.
(22:07):
And look, when you're saying, I can't think of anything
I would have been done differently, And the essentials of
life are up more than twenty percent, and and you
surrender in Afghanistan and you can't think of anything that
was it once? And isn't that ironic that the View,
the most far left program on television, who loves Paris
(22:28):
and would do anything to get her elected, destroyed her.
Speaker 3 (22:31):
Isn't that it really is amazing?
Speaker 1 (22:33):
Well, we did have an interesting exchange yesterday because I
felt that nobody really understood the how profound it was
when I started four years ago telling conservatives and Republicans
that they've got to overcome their reluctance and resistance to
voting early. And I would go into great specificity, in
(22:54):
great detail, and I would say, it's not the system
we want, but it's the system we're stuck with. I
would I would prefer election day be a national holiday.
I would prefer same day voting. I would prefer paper ballots,
proof of citizenship, voter ID signature verification, chain of custody controls,
updated voter roles, partisan observers, and every precinct in the
(23:17):
country watching the voting all day and the vote counting
all night, and we called the winner at the end
of the night. I mean, look how quickly Florida called
the election and we may not know Arizona for ten days.
I mean, there's something so work, so wrong with that.
But then you were asking me why I felt the
way I did because I told you that Trump was
(23:40):
going to win, And you said why and by the way,
which is a typical bill O'Reilly question, because that's who
you are, and I gave you a very specific answer.
Speaker 2 (23:51):
Yeah, you were on it. I made my prediction on Halloween.
I think you were ahead of me on the prediction front.
But I knew on Halloween that Trump would win, and
I base that up on the increased registration of Republican
voters in the Swing States. I had that data and
we discussed that last week on your program. But anyway, look,
(24:12):
it's a good day for the United States historically speaking.
But now Donald Trump has got to really understand where
he is in the world. So Grover Cleveland, as you mentioned,
is the only other non consecutive two term president, and.
Speaker 1 (24:28):
Grover's by the way, I didn't mention that, but it
is in your number one New York Times bestselling book,
right which is Confronting the Presidents, and you talk about
all of them. By the way, I really did enjoy
that book, and it deserved to be number one. I'm
glad it made it to number one. For a conservative
to be number one on the New York Times list,
you basically have to sell four times the amount of
(24:49):
anybody else, just six times.
Speaker 2 (24:51):
But I'm not going to quibble. But what's interesting about
confronting the Presidents is more relevant now because Donald Trump
has to understand where he is. Second terms are notoriously difficult,
when non consecutively Grover Cleveland fell apart in his second term.
Speaker 1 (25:13):
I'm going to predict it's not going to happen here,
but i'll tell you why after your answer.
Speaker 2 (25:17):
Okay, So that Trump's got to know that his challenge
is almost just beginning. And I said in my message
to day, Trump is the and I know this to
be true. He worked harder than any other presidential candidate
in history. No one, not even Teddy Roosevelt, who was
a maniac. No one worked harder to win an election
(25:40):
than Donald Trump. That worth ethic, and I've known a
man thirty five years that even surprised me, particularly after
he were shot. He didn't take a day off, he
didn't take any breaks. He's doing four or five events
a day, and he deserves to win. Kissed on the
work ethic and so but he got that. Even though
(26:01):
I believe that Republicans will croll the House and the Senate,
which is going to make his life a lot easier,
He's got to hustle fast and get you know, the
regulations taken off the fossil fuel industry. He's got to
stop the asylum applications for at least three months. He's
got to get down to Mexico City with the zoo
Secretary of the State, which I think will be Rubio,
(26:24):
and say, you guys better put the army on the
border again, and if you don't, we're going to declare
the cartels.
Speaker 1 (26:30):
By the way, Bill, do you doubt for a second
all that's going to happen. I know it's going to happen.
Speaker 2 (26:34):
I hope you're right. But this is what he's got
to do, and he's got to do it fast.
Speaker 3 (26:39):
You will do it fast. He's gonna move on day one,
mark my words.
Speaker 1 (26:43):
You remember how the Democrats were saying he says he's
going to be a dictator.
Speaker 3 (26:49):
Oh, he never said that.
Speaker 1 (26:50):
That was an interview that he had with me and
I said, what do you say about those people that
claim that you're going to be a dictator? And he goes,
he was joking. You know his sense of humor. I
know his sense of humor. We've known him for thirty years,
both of us, and they use that line and one
of the many lies that they told about him.
Speaker 2 (27:09):
And totally in your.
Speaker 1 (27:11):
Response by the way he meant that part, because remember
he built the wall, Congress wouldn't approve it, and he
found a way to do it anyway.
Speaker 2 (27:20):
On executive order. Anyway. Look, I'm optimistic that Trump understands
the problems and will aggressively try to solve them, and
that will set up Vance in four years. And you
have the tape. Now, if I'm still on the planet,
you run it. It's going to be Josh Shapiro running
(27:41):
against Senator Vance or now Vice President Vance.
Speaker 3 (27:45):
That's let me tell you why.
Speaker 1 (27:47):
I don't know if it's going to be Josh Shapiro.
I don't think Josh Shapiro is in the mainstream of
this new radical leftist Marxist Democratic Party. I just don't.
I think he may be rejected in the primaries.
Speaker 2 (28:00):
They're done. The progressive movement is still breathing.
Speaker 1 (28:04):
But that represents the base of that party that will
show up in those primaries.
Speaker 3 (28:10):
Mark my words. That is not a slam dunk bill.
Speaker 2 (28:13):
I'm I'm much my prediction. I'm sticking to it. Finally,
the media, and this is another irony, just like the
view in hating Trump.
Speaker 3 (28:23):
So much helped him.
Speaker 2 (28:24):
The corporate media not only helped him but destroyed itself forever.
Speaker 3 (28:29):
Isn't that amazing you?
Speaker 1 (28:31):
I said that last night on TV as well, that
legacy media is dead, you know, and it's it's it's
it's people like us. Look at Joe Rogan, the impact
Joe Rogan had. I don't know Joe Rogan, never met
Joe Rogan. I like his podcast. I don't know if
you've ever listened to it. I love long form interviews
when I have time, I mean to get through. The
(28:51):
three hour interview was like ridiculous with Donald Trump. It's
too long for me, but it was really well done.
And he likes to really digging deep and get to
know people will and let them talk. I mean, it's
it's it's actually fun and different. But anyway, look, Bill,
you didn't tell everybody that I gave you the perfect
prediction of what was going to happen early in the
(29:12):
day yesterday. And I knew that information, but I didn't
share it with this audience because my message yesterday. I
didn't want it to conflict from my message, which is
assume that your vote will be the deciding vote in
this election. And that was my message to my audience yesterday.
I don't like to hold things back, but I thought
it was important.
Speaker 2 (29:31):
Two quick points. McLachlin the pollster was very accurate for Trump,
so it.
Speaker 1 (29:37):
Was Robert Kahley and Matt Towery for all our postals
were great and.
Speaker 2 (29:41):
At LISS Polling amazing one hundreds.
Speaker 1 (29:46):
That's two or three cycles in a row for all
three of them, right, actually all four of them. Anyway,
Bill O'Reilly, appreciate you being with us. Thank you all
things simple man, Bill O'Reilly, Bill O'Reilly dot com, thank you.
And I feel relieved for our country and I'm grateful today.
I'm a very grateful host. All right, that's gonna wrap
(30:09):
things up at today Hannity Tonight, nine Eastern on the
Fox News Channel. Kamala conceeds. We'll have full complete reaction
to what was a blowout election, a landslide by Donald
Trump and the left's absolute meltdown. Laura Trump prep bear tonight,
Senator Marco Rubio, vivek Ramaswami, David Portnoy tonight. We're looking
(30:31):
forward to having him on all coming up. Say you DVR.
Hannity nine Eastern on the Fox News Channel. We'll see
you tonight. Back here tomorrow thank you for making the
show possible.
Stay right here for our final news roundup and information overload.
Speaker 2 (00:04):
In the final hour of the Sean Hannity Show.
Speaker 1 (00:07):
All Right, News round Up in information overload, our toll
free here's on number. It's eight hundred and nine to
four one, Sean, if you want to be a part
of the program, if you're just joining us. By the way,
Kamala Harris conceding to Donald Trump, he will be the
forty seventh president of the United States. What was a
historic comeback victory. We do have decision a desk is
(00:30):
now up. The House projection UH to two twenty three
for Republicans to two twelve earlier was it was low.
It could have been as low as only a three
seat advantage. That is a huge change for the better.
One of the things that has infuriated me this entire
election season, beyond the fact that Kamala of course, you know,
(00:54):
it was basically a mini coupe between I believe Barack Obama,
Chuck Schumer, and Nancy Pulla say. I think Nancy Pelosi
threatened Biden with the use of the twenty fifth Amendment,
and they pushed him out and Kamala was put in,
and she didn't get a single vote. It wasn't an
open primary. I think they should have had that, especially
with the people that are screaming threat to democracy, threat
(01:15):
to democracy every two seconds. It's anything but democratic in
my view. But putting all of that aside, is all
of the questions that Kamala in one hundred days never
got asked infuriates me. The fact that she was never
asked why does she think it's courageous not to say
radical Islamic terrorism or illegal alien or really press her
(01:38):
on why she wanted to decriminalize illegal immigration and offer
free housing, food, healthcare, education with a running made, free
legal driver's licenses, free college education, sex change operations. And
people laughed at it when they first heard it. Mediate
people didn't even know about it, and she wasn't asked
about it. She was never asked about what happened in
(02:01):
the summer of twenty twenty. We had five hundred and
seventy four riots, We had dozens of dead Americans, we
had billions in property damage, We had cops pelted with bricks, rocks, bottles,
molotov cocktails. She's tweeting out a bail fund going on
CBS saying, well, the rioters are not going to stop.
We're not going to stop, and they shouldn't stop. I'm like, huh.
(02:23):
I think Liz Cheney would define that his insurrection and rioting.
And there was no criticism, no questions asked about that.
There was no questions about her co sponsoring the Green
New Deal and pledging to eliminate the filibuster to pass
it with Bernie Sanders, or government healthcare Medicare for all
that she co sponsored with Bernie, and the elimination of
(02:43):
private health insurance. And I can go on and on
and on all right, So that frustrates me. And you know,
to watch in the aftermath of this landslide victory last
night of President Trump, you know, the state run media
mob as I call them, right, So I stand by that.
We'll defend that every day of the week, blaming Kamala's
(03:06):
loss on racism and sexism.
Speaker 3 (03:09):
Listen, willed me to say. I wanted to say.
Speaker 4 (03:11):
It, well, if she if she were six foot four
white man from from Arkansas or from you know, Florida,
and she ran a good middle of the road campaign
talking about reaching out, do you think she would be
losing by that much? If she if she could like
chew tobacco and carry a shotgun and talk about football
(03:32):
and uh and and be a guys guy. I mean,
you tell me.
Speaker 5 (03:37):
There are levels of sexism and racism that clearly a
lot of people in this country are willing to tolerate,
which is also something that you know, we may have
not we may have woken up in the same country
in the sense, but that becomes much more clear this morning.
Speaker 6 (03:55):
I think that we've got to be honest. Among Hispanic
men and Black men, there's a lot of misogyny, and
I think that we've got to deal with the reality
that he appealed to this whole false, macho thing that
some black men in a Latino men are went full.
Speaker 7 (04:15):
There are African American women who know a little bit
about being talked down to, you know, a little bit
about having their economic dreams crushed, who tried to dream
a big dream over the past couple of months, and
tonight they're trading in a lot of hope for a
lot of hurt, and they were hoping that maybe this time,
(04:38):
this time, one of their own could be seen as worthy.
Speaker 2 (04:43):
Black voters came through for Kamala Harris.
Speaker 8 (04:46):
White women voters did not. That is what it appears
happened in that state.
Speaker 9 (04:52):
Let's be honest about this, Okay, let's be absolutely blunt
about it. There were appeals to racism in this campaign,
and there is racial bias in this country, and there is
sexism in this country. And anybody who thinks that that
did not in any way impact on the outcome of
this race is wrong.
Speaker 10 (05:10):
White women who voted about fifty two percent right for
Donald Trump, uneducated white women, is my understanding. You have
Latino men actually voting more for him. I think this
was a referendum of cultural resentment in this country.
Speaker 1 (05:26):
All right, joining us now to discuss all of this,
I mean, this insanity in this blame and you know
anything but the fact that she ran one of the
worst political or presidential campaigns I've seen it in my lifetime.
We have two very different people that come from two
very different points of view, and Jeff Bartow's twenty twenty
two US stant and candidate twenty eighteen Republican nominee for
(05:50):
Lieutenant Governor Pennsylvania the Commonwealth, Mark Halprin, editor in chief
the new interactive video platform two Way, and I have
them on for very specific reasons because they both contributed
greatly to real information that people needed.
Speaker 3 (06:07):
And guys, it's great to have you back.
Speaker 8 (06:10):
Sean, thank you for having me.
Speaker 1 (06:12):
But Mark, let me start with you. You know, I've
said in two thousand and seven journalism is dead, and
I said it many times since then, and I would say,
right now, the legacy media, and that would be you know,
major newspapers, that would be the broadcast channels, that would
be cable television news. You know, punditry is it is,
(06:36):
it is over for them because they went so hard
into the Kamala Harris arena and they claim to be
journalists and they're not. And you bucked that trend and
I watched with fascination as you did it, and I
began to realize that you were just looking for truth
(06:57):
and information as a journalist. I don't know what your
political affiliation is, and I don't really care, and I
really I developed a great respect for you during this
cycle because I knew you were telling truth that other
people were not telling.
Speaker 3 (07:12):
What is the fallout from this for the.
Speaker 11 (07:14):
Media, Well, unfortunately, I don't think it will be any
because what's about to happen is the very same reporters, editors, anchors,
executive producers and correspondents who participated in the cover up
of Joe Biden's acuity declined with the Democratic Party, and
who covered this campaign, allowing Kamala Harris to every day
(07:34):
say that Donald Trump said he was going to be
a dictator on day one, and there were good people
on both sides, and it'll be a bloodbath. That exact
same group of people is about to cover the Trump administration.
So I don't get the sense there's going to be
a big reconciliation. I do know that I heard on
two way over and over nearly every day, people saying
I don't much like Donald Trump. You know, I don't
(07:57):
really want to vote for him, but the media is
so biased I feel that I have to. It's of
a piece with the law there of the cases brought
against you, and I think, I think, you know, if
this were normal business and you had that record of
failure and professional irresponsibility, there'd be mass firings, and instead
everybody's just so I covered the Biden Harris administration. Now
(08:17):
I'm covering the Trump administration. So I'd like to think
there'd be some accountability, But I don't believe there's any
reason to think.
Speaker 1 (08:23):
That all right, quick break, We'll come right back more
with Jeff Bartows and Mark Halprin and your calls on
the other side of eight hundred and nine to four
one Sean this day after election Day. Right to continue
now with Jeff Bartos and Mark Alperner. Look back with us.
Now when you come on this program, you're pretty aware
(08:44):
of what I do for a living.
Speaker 3 (08:45):
I'm a member of the press. I'm a talk show host.
Speaker 1 (08:48):
I could produce thousands of hours mark of straight news
coverage that I've delivered on radio and TV, and I
could I could produce thousands of hours of investigative reporting
that the rest of the media ignores. Russia, Russia, Russia,
Obama's radical associations, to name a couple. I give opinion,
but I'm honest and I'm up front about it. We
(09:09):
talk about sports, we talk about culture. I would argue
that what I do in the press is I'm the
entire newspaper they claim to be journalists. You are a journalist.
I really view you as one of the few remaining journalists.
Am I right in my definition? And that's why I
have respect for you, because you don't cross that line
and everyone else does and they're not honest about it.
(09:31):
If they said, listen, I'm a liberal talk show host,
I'd be fine with it.
Speaker 3 (09:35):
But they don't do that.
Speaker 11 (09:37):
Yeah, and they have. Of course, they still despite their
dwindling market share, they still have huge influence on American society.
I view my job as holding well wait.
Speaker 1 (09:45):
A minute, but do they because if they did, with
all of the negativity they threw a Trump and all
the attacks, wouldn't Kamala Harris be the president elect today?
Speaker 2 (09:56):
No?
Speaker 11 (09:56):
No, because the first all, there's a backlash against it,
and second of all, because there's media like yours it's
countervailing to it. I'm just saying that they still have
a decent sized audience, that my job is to tell
interesting stories of our time and to hold all powerful
interests accountable to the public interest. And they view their
job as holding Donald Trump accountable to their conception of
(10:17):
the public interest. It's the difference, and it's and it's
it's not one hundred percent of people, but it's almost
one hundred percent of the people. And again, it's like
Joe Biden's loss of mental acuity. The press can deny it,
they can pretend it doesn't exist, but the American people
have eyes and ears and they see it. And that's
why again, ironically, I think the press did as much
(10:37):
to help Donald Trump win the opposite of what they wanted.
It's almost any other factor in the race.
Speaker 1 (10:42):
But the fact that they wanted it and they were
so openly biased about it, to me is alarming and
the dishonesty behind it. I asked both of you yesterday.
I try to reach out to sources all over the place.
I have Democratic sources that have conservative sources, Republican sources, whatever.
(11:03):
And I knew Jeff Bartows, Jeff, I knew you were
in the quote war room, not a real war room
for those people that have such sensibilities. But you were there,
you know, doing on the ground in Pennsylvania yesterday. And
I sought an answer to a question from you, and
I saw the same answer to the question from Mark
(11:24):
and it was about the early vote was so overwhelming
in Pennsylvania for Donald Trump that for Kamala Harris to win,
she went into election day yesterday with a math problem,
and that is that Republicans had so overwhelmed Democrats with
their early voting and that they so underperform. For example,
(11:47):
you know, they had a net gain of four hundred thousand.
That means they were up four hundred thousand votes. It
may sound like a lot, but in twenty twenty they
were up about one point one million votes. That's a
decline six to seven hundred thousand votes. And to make
that up they would need massive turnout in historically democratic
areas like Philadelphia. And I called you and I said, okay, Jeff,
(12:11):
tell me what is the turnout that is going on
in Philadelphia today?
Speaker 3 (12:16):
And you gave me an answer.
Speaker 1 (12:17):
You said, well, Temple University twenty five thousand students, Lehigh
University six thousand students, Penn State ten thousand students. Yeah,
we're seeing a big turnout there, but nowhere else really
in Philadelphia we see it. And they fell hundreds of
thousand short of what they would have needed to make
up from the early voting advantage that Republicans had historically.
(12:41):
And that was very helpful for me to give analysis
last night on Fox News.
Speaker 8 (12:46):
Yeah, Sean, it's and first of all, Mark your comments
about Mark or spot on. I really found myself over
the last two months following Mark on X and when
he was doing television interviews. For the reasons you just said,
so spot on. You know, I for me to do
my job, and of course I'm a volunteer and a
former candidate, But for me to do my job and
advise Dave McCormick, or advise the Trump campaign, or to
be useful to any of the people I'm trying to
(13:08):
help on the goals that I have, I have to
consume this information and try to understand it. Yesterday was
the very first time in my whole career. I'm an attorney,
I've been a candidate. It's the first time in my
career I found myself trapped for a moment in what
they call the echo chamber, and I was trapped in
this press echo chamber where everybody was spinning this idea
(13:30):
that turnout was LBJ nineteen sixty four historic, and we'd
never seen anything like it in Philadelphia, and you just
wait and see. And our numbers weren't showing it. As
I shared with you, our numbers weren't showing it. And
we were very confident in our analysis and our numbers.
And it turned out when I started to really push
the press as the day were on, I found out
that they were getting their information from each other. So
(13:51):
what I mean to say, is the press was their
sources were other members.
Speaker 2 (13:55):
Of the press.
Speaker 3 (13:56):
Is that amazing?
Speaker 8 (13:58):
With a sprinkling in of the mayor and the head
of the Philadelphia Democratic Party.
Speaker 2 (14:03):
It was.
Speaker 8 (14:04):
It was bizarre Sean. Later in the evening, I went
on local television on a panel with Democrats and I
was quizzing them again. I'm like, you do realize that
Puerto Rican vote, Hispanic vote is moving in historic numbers
to Donald Trump here in Pennsylvania as well as Georgia
and Florida and other places. And a panelist, the co
panelist whose Puerto Rican was telling me, no, my numbers
(14:24):
are wrong.
Speaker 2 (14:24):
Who where's what? I was right?
Speaker 8 (14:26):
I mean, we were, we were right. So it was
there in this echo chamber, I guess, and you gentlemen
both know this way better than me. Whether it's the
Liz Cheney with the guns, or whether it was the
Iowa poll that turned out to be sixteen points off,
whether it's the Commona momentum that wasn't there, whether it
was this Puerto Rican anger which wasn't there, and then
this Philly turnout hoax, I think we can call it.
Speaker 2 (14:50):
It was.
Speaker 8 (14:51):
It was the last gasp of a campaign that was
born in desperation and never found a message in one
hundred days.
Speaker 1 (14:56):
Well, I was very grateful to you and to Mark
for getting me the end answer that I've been hoping for,
and I really appreciate it. And I've just come to
respect the fact that both of you got to the
truth and got it to me, and I was able
to convey that to my audience. And I knew it early.
I knew it wasn't happening anyway. I appreciate you both.
(15:16):
Jeff Bartos, Marca Helpert, thank you guys.
Speaker 3 (15:21):
All Right, Letard skin a.
Speaker 1 (15:22):
Simple man and that can only mean one thing on
this radio program, and that means all things self proclaimed
simple man. That means all things Bill O'Reilly, all things
Bill O'Reilly or Bill O'Reilly dot com. Mister O'Reilly, sir.
What an election this has been. What a historic moment.
Yesterday you texted me and do you remember what you
(15:45):
texted me me? That told me Bill, I've had less
than an hour's sleep.
Speaker 3 (15:53):
I am. I am literally punched trunk. I can't think anymore.
Speaker 2 (15:58):
More delirious than usual.
Speaker 3 (15:59):
To I am more delirious than usual.
Speaker 1 (16:03):
You have to excuse me today I've been telling the
audience all day you know how I feel today before
we get to the question I asked you, I am
very humbled and grateful. I am grateful because I really
feel that the stated agenda of Kamala Harris and Tim
Walls was so radical, so extreme, that it was dangerous
(16:25):
for our country, and I don't know if we would
have recovered. And I'm grateful that the American people and
everybody that listens to this radio show and watches Hannity
and listens and watches you that they went out in
massive numbers and it was a mandate election by every definition,
and I'm just appreciative. I'm very grateful that our fellow
(16:47):
countryman saw what was the handwriting on the wall, and
the mainstream, corrupt, state run media didn't tell them anything
about who she really was, and we had to penetrate
through all of that and get this into the consciousness
of the American people, and we succeeded, thankfully.
Speaker 2 (17:03):
Well, I agree with you, there was a crossroads election.
And I'm not as relieved as you are because the
Proposition three in Missouri past, Proposition one in New York past,
which were very far left progressive things about not alerting
parents when their children have abortion, when their daughters have abortions.
(17:26):
So the progressive movement was dealt a huge blow and
that was the important historically of yesterday's vote. They're not
down forever, though, they're still there. And I've been doing
a lot of interviews with foreign news agencies and most
of those people have no clue, and they're all trying
(17:47):
to say, well, Okay, Trump won, but why, And I say,
it's very easy. Americans want efficiency. Most Americans are not idealized.
They are hurting economically. They don't have as much money
as they had four years ago, and no matter what
depressed does, that's not going to override the personal pain.
(18:12):
And then when you add to that the unbelievable open
border and a lot of the other woke stuff. It's
heartening and encouraging that Americans got it, But because if
they hadn't, I would have said, is it over? It
was so obvious to me, and I think you too,
how incompetent Joe Biden was, and that Harris was a
(18:33):
terrible candidate who just cheerleaded the incompetence. That's what it came.
Speaker 1 (18:38):
Down to, right, Oh it was I think it was
a combination of many things, and I think it was
her radicalism, her extremism. He ran the worst campaign I
think I've ever seen in my life. I think, you know,
calling your opponent a racist, nazi fascist, lying to women
about abortion, lying to seniors about social security and medicare,
(18:59):
lying about pretty much everything is is. It's just not
the American people too smart for that. However, there is
a there there are there are flashing sirens, if you will,
inasmuch as there are too many of our fellow Americans
that buy into the socialist nonsense. And they really believe
(19:20):
in a cradle, you know, to grave, womb, to the tomb,
you know, socialist system. And and they want the Green
New Deal, which would be the destruction of the greatest
wealth creating system on earth, which is capitalism.
Speaker 2 (19:32):
Uh.
Speaker 1 (19:33):
They want open borders, they want defund dismantle, they don't
want fracking, they don't want drilling. They you know, these
these are very dangerous positions. They don't want America to
be the leader of the free world. That I'm not
talking about intervention and foreign conflicts. I'm talking about America
being the moral leader. With this philosophy that Reagan adopted
(19:54):
called peace through strength, and and that frightens me that
so many people see, you know, the they have that
world view.
Speaker 3 (20:01):
We saw that on display with the mob media last night.
Speaker 2 (20:05):
It is distressing that the states of California, Illinois, Massachusetts,
New York, most of New England, New Jersey have headed
in that direction. But what is heartening is hard working
Americans across the country understand efficiency versus incompetence. I was
(20:32):
getting worried about that. If you don't understand competence, I mean, people, Look,
Trump did a good job by any historical measure in
his four years in office. We're not counting January sixth,
but if you look at real wages up and you've
gone over this a million times, okay, and fairly tranquil overseas,
(20:55):
he did a good job. If that doesn't mean anything anymore,
then we're done. But yesterday's vote showed me it does
mean something. They were doing comparisons between Trump and Biden.
Biden lost the election for Harris. Harris is a terrible
candidate because you wouldn't answer any questions, and she did
(21:16):
mislead and it was obvious she did.
Speaker 1 (21:19):
He certainly didn't help, But I think she lost her
own election. That might be a small point of disagreement.
Speaker 2 (21:24):
I disagree with you because Biden handled the economy so
poorly that no know what Harris said, she couldn't overcome that.
Speaker 1 (21:34):
But she was in the room Bill if he bragged
about being in the room making all the big decisions. Kierley,
when asked repeatedly if she disagreed with Biden on anything,
he said, I can't think of anything.
Speaker 2 (21:45):
It was the moment that she lost the election on
the View. But her policy, because she's not a policy maker,
didn't cause the bad economy a fantastic rise in prices.
Biden did. So Biden lost, and Harris could not overcome
Biden because she threw in with him one hundred percent.
(22:07):
And look, when you're saying, I can't think of anything
I would have been done differently, And the essentials of
life are up more than twenty percent, and and you
surrender in Afghanistan and you can't think of anything that
was it once? And isn't that ironic that the View,
the most far left program on television, who loves Paris
(22:28):
and would do anything to get her elected, destroyed her.
Speaker 3 (22:31):
Isn't that it really is amazing?
Speaker 1 (22:33):
Well, we did have an interesting exchange yesterday because I
felt that nobody really understood the how profound it was
when I started four years ago telling conservatives and Republicans
that they've got to overcome their reluctance and resistance to
voting early. And I would go into great specificity, in
(22:54):
great detail, and I would say, it's not the system
we want, but it's the system we're stuck with. I
would I would prefer election day be a national holiday.
I would prefer same day voting. I would prefer paper ballots,
proof of citizenship, voter ID signature verification, chain of custody controls,
updated voter roles, partisan observers, and every precinct in the
(23:17):
country watching the voting all day and the vote counting
all night, and we called the winner at the end
of the night. I mean, look how quickly Florida called
the election and we may not know Arizona for ten days.
I mean, there's something so work, so wrong with that.
But then you were asking me why I felt the
way I did because I told you that Trump was
(23:40):
going to win, And you said why and by the way,
which is a typical bill O'Reilly question, because that's who
you are, and I gave you a very specific answer.
Speaker 2 (23:51):
Yeah, you were on it. I made my prediction on Halloween.
I think you were ahead of me on the prediction front.
But I knew on Halloween that Trump would win, and
I base that up on the increased registration of Republican
voters in the Swing States. I had that data and
we discussed that last week on your program. But anyway, look,
(24:12):
it's a good day for the United States historically speaking.
But now Donald Trump has got to really understand where
he is in the world. So Grover Cleveland, as you mentioned,
is the only other non consecutive two term president, and.
Speaker 1 (24:28):
Grover's by the way, I didn't mention that, but it
is in your number one New York Times bestselling book,
right which is Confronting the Presidents, and you talk about
all of them. By the way, I really did enjoy
that book, and it deserved to be number one. I'm
glad it made it to number one. For a conservative
to be number one on the New York Times list,
you basically have to sell four times the amount of
(24:49):
anybody else, just six times.
Speaker 2 (24:51):
But I'm not going to quibble. But what's interesting about
confronting the Presidents is more relevant now because Donald Trump
has to understand where he is. Second terms are notoriously difficult,
when non consecutively Grover Cleveland fell apart in his second term.
Speaker 1 (25:13):
I'm going to predict it's not going to happen here,
but i'll tell you why after your answer.
Speaker 2 (25:17):
Okay, So that Trump's got to know that his challenge
is almost just beginning. And I said in my message
to day, Trump is the and I know this to
be true. He worked harder than any other presidential candidate
in history. No one, not even Teddy Roosevelt, who was
a maniac. No one worked harder to win an election
(25:40):
than Donald Trump. That worth ethic, and I've known a
man thirty five years that even surprised me, particularly after
he were shot. He didn't take a day off, he
didn't take any breaks. He's doing four or five events
a day, and he deserves to win. Kissed on the
work ethic and so but he got that. Even though
(26:01):
I believe that Republicans will croll the House and the Senate,
which is going to make his life a lot easier,
He's got to hustle fast and get you know, the
regulations taken off the fossil fuel industry. He's got to
stop the asylum applications for at least three months. He's
got to get down to Mexico City with the zoo
Secretary of the State, which I think will be Rubio,
(26:24):
and say, you guys better put the army on the
border again, and if you don't, we're going to declare
the cartels.
Speaker 1 (26:30):
By the way, Bill, do you doubt for a second
all that's going to happen. I know it's going to happen.
Speaker 2 (26:34):
I hope you're right. But this is what he's got
to do, and he's got to do it fast.
Speaker 3 (26:39):
You will do it fast. He's gonna move on day one,
mark my words.
Speaker 1 (26:43):
You remember how the Democrats were saying he says he's
going to be a dictator.
Speaker 3 (26:49):
Oh, he never said that.
Speaker 1 (26:50):
That was an interview that he had with me and
I said, what do you say about those people that
claim that you're going to be a dictator? And he goes,
he was joking. You know his sense of humor. I
know his sense of humor. We've known him for thirty years,
both of us, and they use that line and one
of the many lies that they told about him.
Speaker 2 (27:09):
And totally in your.
Speaker 1 (27:11):
Response by the way he meant that part, because remember
he built the wall, Congress wouldn't approve it, and he
found a way to do it anyway.
Speaker 2 (27:20):
On executive order. Anyway. Look, I'm optimistic that Trump understands
the problems and will aggressively try to solve them, and
that will set up Vance in four years. And you
have the tape. Now, if I'm still on the planet,
you run it. It's going to be Josh Shapiro running
(27:41):
against Senator Vance or now Vice President Vance.
Speaker 3 (27:45):
That's let me tell you why.
Speaker 1 (27:47):
I don't know if it's going to be Josh Shapiro.
I don't think Josh Shapiro is in the mainstream of
this new radical leftist Marxist Democratic Party. I just don't.
I think he may be rejected in the primaries.
Speaker 2 (28:00):
They're done. The progressive movement is still breathing.
Speaker 1 (28:04):
But that represents the base of that party that will
show up in those primaries.
Speaker 3 (28:10):
Mark my words. That is not a slam dunk bill.
Speaker 2 (28:13):
I'm I'm much my prediction. I'm sticking to it. Finally,
the media, and this is another irony, just like the
view in hating Trump.
Speaker 3 (28:23):
So much helped him.
Speaker 2 (28:24):
The corporate media not only helped him but destroyed itself forever.
Speaker 3 (28:29):
Isn't that amazing you?
Speaker 1 (28:31):
I said that last night on TV as well, that
legacy media is dead, you know, and it's it's it's
it's people like us. Look at Joe Rogan, the impact
Joe Rogan had. I don't know Joe Rogan, never met
Joe Rogan. I like his podcast. I don't know if
you've ever listened to it. I love long form interviews
when I have time, I mean to get through. The
(28:51):
three hour interview was like ridiculous with Donald Trump. It's
too long for me, but it was really well done.
And he likes to really digging deep and get to
know people will and let them talk. I mean, it's
it's it's actually fun and different. But anyway, look, Bill,
you didn't tell everybody that I gave you the perfect
prediction of what was going to happen early in the
(29:12):
day yesterday. And I knew that information, but I didn't
share it with this audience because my message yesterday. I
didn't want it to conflict from my message, which is
assume that your vote will be the deciding vote in
this election. And that was my message to my audience yesterday.
I don't like to hold things back, but I thought
it was important.
Speaker 2 (29:31):
Two quick points. McLachlin the pollster was very accurate for Trump,
so it.
Speaker 1 (29:37):
Was Robert Kahley and Matt Towery for all our postals
were great and.
Speaker 2 (29:41):
At LISS Polling amazing one hundreds.
Speaker 1 (29:46):
That's two or three cycles in a row for all
three of them, right, actually all four of them. Anyway,
Bill O'Reilly, appreciate you being with us. Thank you all
things simple man, Bill O'Reilly, Bill O'Reilly dot com, thank you.
And I feel relieved for our country and I'm grateful today.
I'm a very grateful host. All right, that's gonna wrap
(30:09):
things up at today Hannity Tonight, nine Eastern on the
Fox News Channel. Kamala conceeds. We'll have full complete reaction
to what was a blowout election, a landslide by Donald
Trump and the left's absolute meltdown. Laura Trump prep bear tonight,
Senator Marco Rubio, vivek Ramaswami, David Portnoy tonight. We're looking
(30:31):
forward to having him on all coming up. Say you DVR.
Hannity nine Eastern on the Fox News Channel. We'll see
you tonight. Back here tomorrow thank you for making the
show possible.
The Sean Hannity Show News
Host
Sean Hannity
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.