December 13, 2024 • 29 mins
Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, Congressman Jim Jordan of Ohio is outraged by the findings of the IG’s report on January 6th. Preemptive pardons for Cheney and Benny Thompson are starting to make a lot more sense.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Coming up next, our final News Roundup and Information Overload Hour.
Speaker 2 (00:05):
All Right, News round Up, Information Overload Hour, toll free.
Here is our phone number. It's eight hundred nine to
four one Sean if you want to be a part
of the program on this Friday. You know, it's pretty
amazing if you go back in time, all the appearances.
Christopher Ray, FBI director, who has now resigned officially as
(00:25):
of January with Donald Trump coming back into office, which
is a good thing, because he did not do his job.
He did not restore the world's premier law enforcement agency
back to its former greatness. Hopefully Cash Bettel will do that.
I have every belief that he will. We can't weaponize
our Department of Justice, we can't weaponize our FBI, we
(00:48):
can't weaponize our intelligence community. We can't politicize these departments,
these agencies. And that's all happened under the Biden regime.
One of the things that we're finding out, and I
made the comment yesterday, I think the reason we found
out yesterday in the IG's report about January sixth, that
(01:11):
in fact, there were twenty six confidential human sources that
were at the.
Speaker 3 (01:17):
Rally in DC.
Speaker 2 (01:19):
Now, time after time Christopher Ray was on Capitol Hill
and was being asked specific questions about this. He did
an interview with Brett bare at one point, and here's
his answer where he doesn't answer.
Speaker 4 (01:32):
And the other Twitter question we get a lot is
did the FBI have undercover agents or paid informants or
assets among the mob that stormed the Capitol on January sixth.
Speaker 5 (01:42):
Well, as I'm sure you can appreciate, Brad, I can't
really appropriately talk about when, where, and how we use
confidential informants.
Speaker 4 (01:50):
Is it classified?
Speaker 5 (01:52):
Well, we have information that is about any number of
topics that is law enforcement sensitive. But you should not
read into my inability to answer a question because of
my obligations as that as a clue or a hint
in any way about how accurate your reader's tweet is.
Speaker 2 (02:15):
So he's telling Brett Baher won't answer the question if
the FBI had assets at the Capitol on January the sixth.
Now we found out there are twenty six confidential human sources.
They did have human sources on the ground. Apparently seventeen
of the twenty six entered restricted areas or entered the Capitol,
(02:36):
Three specifically deployed by the FBI. To be at the rally.
Two were paid by the FBI, and none of them
were arrested. It shouldn't surprise you, but you now it's
interesting to hear Benny Thompson. Looks like we have one
big cover up, and now there's talk about giving Liz Cheney,
(02:56):
you know, unconditional pardons. Anyway, Jim Jordan is the chairman
of the House Judiciary Committee. I'm sure they will be
ongoing investigations regarding this. Well, let's get your first reaction
to Christopher Ray and the fact that he wouldn't be
honest and open with your committee.
Speaker 6 (03:12):
Yeah, when he was asked the question, Sean, where their assets?
Says the answer should have been yes, twenty six of them,
some of them, as you pointed out, paid to be there,
reimbursed for coming there. And remember confidential human source, first
of all, is a fancy name for spy. These are
people who get paid money for stitching and spying on
fellow Americans. And so you had twenty six of them there,
(03:33):
seventeen into the restricted space. As you pointed out, four
went into the Capitol. They were not authorized to break
the law, they in fact did that, and none of
them have been charged so this again one more example
of unequal application the law. But I think what this
report really raises is a bunch of questions. How many
of them are still confidential human sources. How many of
(03:54):
them are still on the FBI pay role. How did
they enter the capital? Did they go in in the
first wave? Did they go through it one of the
broken windows? How did they get into capital? What kind
of communications were they giving to the FBI? Why they
were supposedly working for the FBI. Those are the things
we don't know that we need to get answers to,
and I believe has to tell will do that for
us and help the country in doing so.
Speaker 2 (04:16):
You see, I believe the only reason that this came out,
not only was the IG investigating, but the only reason
it came out is because Ray is leaving and he
knows that deep down in his heart that a lot
of information is going to be coming out that he's
that's not going to be favorable to him.
Speaker 3 (04:32):
Am I wrong? Am I assumption?
Speaker 6 (04:34):
I think You're exactly right. And remember there was not
just this IG report this week, but there was one
previous two earlier in the week before Chris Ray announced
he was resigning, where the IG said, when Chris Ray
first took the job, the FBI was investigating a week
and they spied on members excuse me, they spied on
staff of Capitol Hill members, and one of those staff
(04:55):
members that was getting spied on surveyal and getting the
metadata that they were getting his metadata. The guy who's
going to replace Chris Ray, Cash to tell. So I
don't think it's an accident that you had these two
reports this week, and it happens to be the same
week that Chris Ray announces he's resigning.
Speaker 2 (05:11):
Where are the records from the January sixth committee, Well,
we're going.
Speaker 6 (05:17):
To find out. Finny Thompson said some of them back
to the White House, so we'll have to find that out.
The good news is, like, like you, I think Cashpatel
is exactly the guy for this job. I think he
is going to answer the questions we are raising here,
questions the American people deserve to have answers too. And
(05:40):
let's just hope he gets confirmed. I think he's going
to I think you know, I tell you. But for
Cash to tell, we do not know how this all
this stuff started against President Trump clear back in sixteen,
when the Clinton campaign hired Perkins Killy law firm, who
hired Fusion GPS, who hired a foreigner, Christopher Steele, to
put together the fake false doff see that you talked
(06:00):
about so much that they used to go to FBI
call me, and this team used to go to devise
the court to get the warrant to spy on President
Trump's campaign. But for Caspetel, working for then Chairman David Nutits,
we don't know this information. That is exactly the kind
of guy we want running this agency. Now?
Speaker 2 (06:18):
Am I wrong in saying that this January sixth committee
had a predetermined outcome and they selectively edited what they
were telling the American people? For example, they had eyewitness testimony,
They had the testimony and correct me if I'm wrong.
Of the driver of President Trump that day, who said
(06:39):
and was on the record telling this committee that he
never tried to commandeer the vehicle. Why was that guy
not put in a hearing in prime time in this
Hollywood production of Liz Cheney and Bennie Thompson. Why wasn't
he featured? And why was a hearsay witness featured instead?
To make it sound like Donald Trump did this? And
(07:01):
meanwhile the person that was driving contradicted the story, and
they knew that the whole time, didn't they Yeah, they did.
Speaker 6 (07:08):
They had a narrative that they wanted to project out
there and portray this this picture to the American people,
which just wasn't acturate. And it started from the get go.
Remember that they said to Congressman Banks soon to be
Senator Banks and myself, you can't be on the committee.
And after they had kind of there was a story
in Political saying, oh, it was fine, Speaker McCarthy, then
Leader McCarthy said that mister Banks and I were going
(07:30):
to be on the committee, and polos the story saying
Poloski was going to be fine with that. And then
that suddenly changes because we went out and started talking
about the very things you highlighted here this intro, things
about Nancy Polsi and her not providing the type of
security presidents that needed to be there. On January sixth,
we were highlighting that in the press, and then the
very next day to you, oh, wait a minute, we're
not gonna let mister Banks and mister Jordan serve on
(07:51):
this committee. So from the get go, they had a
specific narrative that they were going to tell the people,
tell the American people that was not accurate. And we
caught him and knew numerous lies throughout this this, this
whole the whole hearing process, using the whole committee process,
numerous lies. But that doesn't matter now the truth is
coming out. Now, the truth is coming Why.
Speaker 2 (08:11):
Why would Benny Thompson want to preemptive pardon if he
didn't do anything wrong.
Speaker 6 (08:16):
That's Benny Thompson about that? I don't know, I don't
know that that.
Speaker 2 (08:22):
Pounds to me like he's afraid about the truth coming
out and about selectively basically feeding the American people a
bunch of disinformation when they knew the truth that this was.
This was a witch hun from the get go. And
then it raises a bigger question, what do we do
about the dirty disinformation Russian dossier bought and paid for
(08:45):
by Hillary? What do we do about that dossier being
used to spy on Donald Trump and and and ruining
other people's lives carter Page in particular, you know, what
do we do about all of the abuse of power
and the weaponization of in the Justice Department, the corruption
(09:05):
and politicizing of the FBI and the Intelligence Committee. What
do we do about the fifty one former Intel officials
that knew nothing about the very real Hunter laptop, never
examined it. But hold the American people out of all
the markings of Russian disinformation, they knew nothing about it
except whinkin. Tony Blincoln said that Joe Biden needed a
(09:26):
talking point for a debate in the lead up three
weeks before in election.
Speaker 6 (09:30):
Yeah, no, you stop it from happening again. And that's
what the American people voted for on November fifth. That's
President Trump's mission. President Trump is not into in exacting
any type of retribution against people who did these wrong things,
but we do have to make sure the American people
have the truth. And the way you do that is
you put the right kind of leadership in these respective
agencies who are going to get the truth of the
(09:52):
Americans people.
Speaker 2 (09:53):
Let me ask you, is it possible Betting Thompson and
Liz Cheney committed crimes.
Speaker 6 (09:58):
I don't know that they did. I doubt that they
are crimes, but I do think they misled the American people.
And we have to show all the things they said
that we're wrong, and here's the proof, here's the facts.
And it started with this. The Inspector General reports this
week they were in fact spying on Capitol Hill staffers.
One of those was cast to tell the guy who's
going to now take over the FBI they were, in fact,
(10:19):
they did, in fact have a spy confidence of human
sources there on the Capitol and at January six who
broke the law and were not prosecuted. So you point
out the facts and all these further questions we have,
you have someone like Cash to tell help us get
the answers to those questions, so again that it doesn't
happen in the future, and then you focus on getting
our coming back on track, securing our border, doing all
(10:40):
the things that President Trump promised the American people he
was going to do. That's how winning is the best restribution.
President Trump says that better than anyone, and does that
better than anyone.
Speaker 2 (10:50):
Listen, I tend to agree with you, and I don't
want these these departments and agencies further weaponized. But I'm
not sure how how you prevent this from ever happening again,
if God forbid, they ever get back in power.
Speaker 6 (11:05):
Yeah, well, you stay vigilent, and let's the American people
have a way of figuring out and stopping this kind
of stuff. They did it on November fifth, after eight
years of this Bologney government being turned on the very
people it's supposed to serve, government going after the Republicans,
the leader of the Republican Party, President Trump, and did
all the things they did to him. The American people said,
(11:26):
enough for this. We want that guy back in power.
We want that guy back leading our country. That guy
back is our Coxtandon chief, and we want to keep
Republicans in in the majority so that we can fix
the problems that the left created.
Speaker 2 (11:38):
All right, quick break right back more with our friend.
He is the chairman of the very important House Judiciary Committee,
Jim Jordan of Ohio. Than your calls coming up, eight
hundred and nine to four one sean, as we continue
this Friday.
Speaker 3 (11:51):
All right, we continue now.
Speaker 2 (11:52):
He's the chairman of the House Judiciary Committee. Jim Jordan
is with us from Ohio and my Pollyannis. Believing that
if Donald Trump secures the borders, gets rid of the
known terrorists in this country, I'm not sure how we're
going to find them, the known cartel members, the known
drug dealers in the country, gang members in the country, murderers, rapists,
(12:15):
other violent criminals that Harris and Biden have led into
the country, if they get rid of defund dismantle no
bail laws. If he's able to make America the most
energy dominant country on Earth, which I think goes a
long way to solving inflation and our economic problems, our
debt problems. It could show up social security and medicare.
(12:37):
If Donald Trump restores American strength and rebuilds our military,
which we need desperately, eliminates woke from the military, DEI
from the military, increases recruitment, which I think is going
to take a lot of money, but I think we
can bring in a lot of money through energy.
Speaker 3 (12:58):
If he just accomplishes. Is that to me?
Speaker 2 (13:01):
And then we had two trillion dollars in cutting out
of waste, fraud and abuse and departments that we never
needed and returned to constitutional order of limited government, greater freedom.
Speaker 3 (13:13):
How real is that to you?
Speaker 6 (13:15):
I think it's very real. I mean, no, no, you know,
I always say we make the job too complicated. What
did you tell the voters you're going to do when
you ran for it? If you win, go do what
you said. No one did it better than President Trump
in his first term, and I'm convinced he's going to
have that same determination, same attitude and get things done
that he told the American people is going to get
done and they elected him to do. So let's just
focus on that and stay focused on those common sense things.
(13:39):
Government more efficient, securing the border, getting our economy roaring
and earning and turning and churning like it was before,
getting that happen. Just stay focused on that. And President
Trump is doing that, and he's, as they said now
a couple of times, he's putting people in these key
positions who reflect the attitude the American people voted for
on November fifth, and that that to me is so
(13:59):
darn important, and it's why it's so important these people
get confirmed.
Speaker 3 (14:03):
All right? Last question, Yes or no?
Speaker 2 (14:05):
Based on everything we know about Joe Biden, Jim Biden
and other Biden family members, do you think it would
be wise for Joe Biden to pardon himself and these
other family members.
Speaker 6 (14:19):
I think he's going to pardon his brother, I really do.
Speaker 3 (14:22):
I don't know what about himself.
Speaker 6 (14:25):
No, I don't think that's common, but and I don't
think President Trump and Pam Bondy and the Justice Park
would ever try to go after the former president, even
though obviously that wasn't the case with Jack Smith and
Merrick Ireland and the Biden administration. But I do think
it's likely he pardons his brothers.
Speaker 3 (14:43):
All right, we appreciate your time.
Speaker 2 (14:46):
He is the chairman of the very powerful important House
Judiciary Committee.
Speaker 3 (14:50):
Jim Jordan, Thank you, sir.
Speaker 6 (14:52):
All right, take care Mary Christen Mary.
Speaker 2 (14:54):
Christmas twenty five now till the top of the hour,
eight hundred and ninety four one Seawn your calls coming
up in me moments. You know, the holidays, it can
be really difficult for the kids that lost a mother
or father in the line of duty. Now when Sergeant
Stevens plans stuff at a heart attack, he was on
fire duty. You know you were there through the Tunnel
(15:15):
to Towers Foundation to lift.
Speaker 3 (15:17):
This family up.
Speaker 2 (15:18):
And you did it during last year's Season of Hope,
which is going on again right now, and with your
help and your generosity, dozens and dozens of families have
received the gift of a mortgage free home or especially
adapted smart home for this holiday season, and through the
Tunnel to Towers program, heroes their families, those that sacrifice
(15:39):
so much for all of us, our communities, our cities,
our country. Well, guess what they are having the burden
of a mortgage lifted off their shoulders and they're placed
in something called their home, and you do that for them.
Speaker 3 (15:54):
It's our way of saying thank you.
Speaker 2 (15:56):
And anyway, your generosity makes all of this, this possible
for people, and frankly the darkest time in their life.
And your gift to the foundation during the season of hope,
it may be the most meaningful gift you give this
holiday season. Your kindness, your generosity is going to bring
help and hope to the heroes and their families who
(16:17):
are so deserving of our gratitude. Anyway, go to the
Tunnel to Towers website. It's the letter T, the number two,
the letter T dot org. The letter T the number two,
the letter T dot org for the Tunnel to Towers Foundation. Well,
it's hard to explain, it's inexplicable. How is it possible
(16:38):
that it's happening. The left in this country continues to
worship at the altar of this alleged assassin of the
United Healthcare CEO. In this case, it's squad member, squad leader.
Really the Speaker of the House, and Hakeem Jeffreys or
(17:00):
a name only, and that would be AOC. Alexandria Cassio Cortes.
Here's her explaining how Americans view denied insurance claims as
acts of violence in the wake of this assassination.
Speaker 3 (17:15):
Listen, all of that pain.
Speaker 7 (17:17):
That people have experienced is being concentrated on this event,
and it's really important that we take a step back.
This is not to comment, and this is not to
say that an act of violence is justified. But I
think for anyone who is confused or shocked or appalled,
(17:39):
they need to understand that people interpret and feel and
experience denied claims as an act of violence against them.
People go homeless over the financial devastation of a diagnosis
that doesn't get addressed, or you know, the amount that
(18:01):
they're going to have to cover with a surprise bill
and things like that. And when we kind of talk
about how systems are violent in this country in this
passive way, our privatized healthcare system is like that. For
a huge amount of Americans.
Speaker 2 (18:17):
Well, if you don't like your plan, well maybe you're
stuck with the one Obamacare exchange that forty percent of
the country only has one choice, and there are many
problems with our healthcare system, and they got dramatically worse
because of Democrats and Barack Obama and Obamacare. All right,
(18:38):
let's get to our busy phones. Let's go to New
Orleans and New Orleans as they say, anyway, John is
with us?
Speaker 3 (18:44):
John?
Speaker 2 (18:44):
How are you glad you called? I think you guys
have the Super Bowl this year? Isn't that true?
Speaker 6 (18:50):
Yes? We do.
Speaker 8 (18:51):
But if you don't like to.
Speaker 2 (18:53):
You mind if I do a public service for people
that are not familiar with New Orleans. Whatever you do
when you go to Bourbon Street, when you go to
New Orleans and you're out partying, and you're out drinking,
and you're with your friends and you're having a good time,
whatever you do, don't drink a hurricane unless you want
(19:14):
to be vomiting within the hour.
Speaker 6 (19:17):
Good?
Speaker 3 (19:17):
Is that good advice? John?
Speaker 8 (19:19):
But the trick is, don't have more than one and
sip it slowly. You'll enjoy it a lot better.
Speaker 2 (19:26):
I don't I wouldn't recommend. I don't think anybody's going
to take that part of your advice. So my advice
is to stay away altogether. That's like a long Island
iced tea stay away from that too, anyway, what's on
your mind today?
Speaker 8 (19:40):
I have a concern with Biden and his what's called
preemptive pardons and the illegal immigration problem that President Trump
will be facing when he comes in in the new
administration January twentieth, is that as unhinged is the present administration,
(20:05):
is if whether or not Biden might consider a preemptive
pardon for all the illegal immigration illegal aliens that he's
allowed into the country during his administration, that could cause
problems for our court systems and immigration court systems. If
(20:27):
he should decide to do something as unhinged as that,
What could Trump do to?
Speaker 3 (20:35):
Boy?
Speaker 2 (20:35):
That's here, You're raising a very tough legal issue, and uh,
the power of the pardon is absolute, so I'm not
sure if there be a remedy for that. That would
be a scary scenario. And he in he is sabotaging
pretty much everything before Trump gets in. I mean, if
you would have but I'm not even sure they know
(20:55):
the names of most of these people, So I don't
know how you pardon people you know don't know the
names of them. They know the names of some of them,
but not all of them. And that would be the
single greatest, most outrageous because in the process he'd be
pardoning gang members, partel members, known terrorists. We have terrorists
(21:18):
in the country. You know, we're gonna we're gonna give
a preemptive pardon to the trenda Arragua Venezuelan gang in
sixteen states that all of them get get pardons, All
the murderers get, you know, preemptive pardons, all the rapists,
all the other violent criminals get preemptive pardons. I mean,
(21:38):
it would probably be the end of the Democratic Party,
and I don't care how much opposition.
Speaker 3 (21:44):
I don't see that happening. But you know what I
don't know. I mean, these.
Speaker 2 (21:49):
People are radical, they are extreme, and that's why, you know,
that's why I had such urgency in the lead up
to this election. I mean, I feel like the Yes,
you know, next week, at the end of next week,
I'll begin my long vacation of the year. You know,
I've been doing this a long time. But I don't
think I worked any harder or cared any more. And
(22:11):
I've always cared and I've always worked hard because I
knew who was an inflection point. I thought if Kamala
Wan was a point and overturn and it's stuff like,
you know, the crazy idea that you just mentioned that
stuff like that could happen because she did promise amnesty
and of course free sex change operations for illegal immigrants.
(22:31):
So I guess if you're offering that taxpayer funded and
taxpayer funded college and you know, four star hotels in
New York City, I mean, I guess you're capable of anything.
But that's a scary thought. But I don't see any
answer to that. Anyway, I appreciate the good call. Eight
hundred ninety four one Seawan Rick, South Carolina, Next Sean
(22:54):
Hennity Show.
Speaker 3 (22:54):
Glad you called. Who Hello, what's going on? Rick? How
are you hey, buddy?
Speaker 1 (23:01):
How are you doing talking about drones? Yes, sir, I'm
glad to talk to you on the show, sir. Been
listening to you for a little while, but you've been
hearing about these drones in New Jersey and New York.
I am a hobbyist drone flyer, and I've been told
by law enforcements in military that if you are a hobbyist,
(23:22):
you are not allowed to go three to five hundred feet.
If you do, you're supposed to fly a file of
flight plan with FAA and let them know that you
are flying in aircraft airspace. I would say, I guess
is what they're saying.
Speaker 2 (23:38):
But well, it does become a risk for you know,
depending on how you go and if you're near an airport,
for example, I think there are ordinances and restrictions. There
are towns and cities that have you know, certain ordinances
and restrictions. You can't fly them at all. But that
that sounds about right, But I mean you do the
(24:00):
risk the hire you fly of maybe becoming you know,
a risk to you know, a helicopter or you know
a jet that just took off or a plane that
just took off. I mean that is that is definitely
a risk. You got to be careful responsible only that.
Speaker 1 (24:18):
Not only that, but you also lose a risk of
actually your drone disconnecting from your remote and it's flying
away by itself, and then God knows what's gonna happen.
So that matter, you know, with everybody saying that these drones,
nobody knows what's going on with these drones, nobody knows
anything about them. Why has it the military? Why hasn't
somebody stepped up and say, hey, we need to do
(24:40):
some research, find out what these drones are doing, why
they're doing what they're doing, and get them out of
the sky. Because to me, that's that, you know, hearing
about these drones and Neil, I live in South Carolina.
I haven't seen none yet, but down here. From what
I understand, if we see drunes like that flying around
and they keep doing it, we're taking them down.
Speaker 2 (24:59):
I mean, that's pretty But if Donald Trump were president,
I'm sure we would know the answer by now. And
if it was a hostile regime, one of those drones
would be on the ground and the others would be
out of the sky very quickly. Anyway, appreciate it, Rick,
have fun. I have a friend of mine's the drone operator.
(25:19):
Loves it absolutely and is great at it. Went to
drone's school. He works at Fox. He's a drone camera operator,
really good at it. Okay, let's say, hi, did Jake
he's in the state of New Joys and where all
these drones have been spotted.
Speaker 3 (25:35):
What's going on, Jake? Have you seen one?
Speaker 8 (25:38):
No?
Speaker 9 (25:38):
I haven't seen him all yet. Sehan, how are you?
Speaker 3 (25:41):
I'm good? Glad you called.
Speaker 1 (25:43):
I'll be honest.
Speaker 6 (25:43):
I'm a little free by the.
Speaker 3 (25:44):
Way, your governor is an idiot.
Speaker 9 (25:47):
Oh, he's such an idiot. These drones are just flying
over our heads. I'm just curious because there's either like
three things this could be. It's either the Deep State, China,
and Iran. And I doubt it's Iran because then they
would probably fly the drones over Israel unless they're just
scared of bb and not Biden. But I don't know,
John Kirby, I think's just making up things in Lloyd
Austin's probably sleeping because you might still be sick, and
(26:08):
we got to get an answer to this. I'm just curious, Sean,
what do you think it is? China, the Deep State
of Iran.
Speaker 2 (26:14):
Look, it's one of two things. I don't know. I
really don't now. Either they're so incompetent that they don't
know where they originated from, who's operating them, what their
capabilities are, whether it has a payload surveillance capability. If
they don't know, that is the more scary scenario for me,
(26:36):
considering the first spotting was November the eighteenth. Their lack
of urgency raises a lot of questions in my mind.
Why is there no urgency here. So it's either they
don't know or they're lying and they know damn well
where they came from and they're just not telling us.
You know, I would prefer Option B. However, I hate
(26:59):
to be lied to, especially by our government. But again,
they lied about the Chinese by balloon, they lied about
Joe's cognitive state, they lied about the borders, they lied
about the economy, they lied about inflation. You know, They've
lied about a lot of things, so lying would not
shock me in this case. Or you know, and if
(27:22):
that maybe it's their drones. I don't know, Maybe it
turns out to be ends up being much ado about nothing.
But the longer they just deny their very existence and
the Kirbyes of the world, well, we can't corroborate that
any of this at all is true.
Speaker 3 (27:42):
It just all it's doing is infuriating people.
Speaker 2 (27:44):
They had forty nine sightings in your state of New
Jersey this past Sunday. Now do you think forty nine
of your fellow neighbors in New Jersey are lying about
what they saw and what they described and the videos
that were seeing and the pictures that people have taken.
You think those people are lying because I don't think
they're lying.
Speaker 9 (28:06):
No, it can't Sean, it can't be fake.
Speaker 8 (28:08):
They're real.
Speaker 1 (28:09):
Shouldn't it has to be real.
Speaker 9 (28:11):
I'm just wondering. I want to televerr New Jersey. We
have to get rid of Murphy next year. Also, do
you think it could be like the deep stale or
you don't believe in those things?
Speaker 3 (28:19):
No, I think it could be anybody anything. I have
no idea.
Speaker 2 (28:22):
It could be, you know, American drones. They could be
doing a test. Could it be China?
Speaker 3 (28:28):
Sure?
Speaker 2 (28:28):
Could it be Iran? Yef and Drew thinks it's Iran.
We have other congressmen and women that have speculated it's
likely China. We just had on Congressman Zach None of
Iowa eighty percent of drones or this size or made
in China and originate from there. But if they don't
know where they launch from and who's operating them and
(28:50):
what they're capable of, that that should scare every American.
And either they know and they won't and they don't
care they or they just flat out lying. And as
more and more time goes on and then they showed
this lack of urgency, the more convinced.
Speaker 3 (29:09):
I am, they're just flat out lying to us.
Speaker 2 (29:11):
Otherwise there would be major activity of our military to
get to the bottom of it. Anyway, I appreciate the call.
All the best, my friend. All right, that's gonna wrap
things up to today. What on earth is going on
with these drones. We'll update you on Hannity tonight nine
Eastern on the Fox News Channel. Not giving service to
(29:34):
Trump people in Washington seriously, anyway, loaded up tonight, Tommy Laryn,
Riley Gaines will join us, Senator Ram Paul, Greg Jarrett,
Mary Catherine Ham, Tammy Bruce will join us, Charlie Hurt
will join us, and much much more, nine Eastern CUDVR, Hannity,
Fox News.
Speaker 3 (29:50):
See you tonight. Back here Monday. Have a great weekend.
Coming up next, our final News Roundup and Information Overload Hour.
Speaker 2 (00:05):
All Right, News round Up, Information Overload Hour, toll free.
Here is our phone number. It's eight hundred nine to
four one Sean if you want to be a part
of the program on this Friday. You know, it's pretty
amazing if you go back in time, all the appearances.
Christopher Ray, FBI director, who has now resigned officially as
(00:25):
of January with Donald Trump coming back into office, which
is a good thing, because he did not do his job.
He did not restore the world's premier law enforcement agency
back to its former greatness. Hopefully Cash Bettel will do that.
I have every belief that he will. We can't weaponize
our Department of Justice, we can't weaponize our FBI, we
(00:48):
can't weaponize our intelligence community. We can't politicize these departments,
these agencies. And that's all happened under the Biden regime.
One of the things that we're finding out, and I
made the comment yesterday, I think the reason we found
out yesterday in the IG's report about January sixth, that
(01:11):
in fact, there were twenty six confidential human sources that
were at the.
Speaker 3 (01:17):
Rally in DC.
Speaker 2 (01:19):
Now, time after time Christopher Ray was on Capitol Hill
and was being asked specific questions about this. He did
an interview with Brett bare at one point, and here's
his answer where he doesn't answer.
Speaker 4 (01:32):
And the other Twitter question we get a lot is
did the FBI have undercover agents or paid informants or
assets among the mob that stormed the Capitol on January sixth.
Speaker 5 (01:42):
Well, as I'm sure you can appreciate, Brad, I can't
really appropriately talk about when, where, and how we use
confidential informants.
Speaker 4 (01:50):
Is it classified?
Speaker 5 (01:52):
Well, we have information that is about any number of
topics that is law enforcement sensitive. But you should not
read into my inability to answer a question because of
my obligations as that as a clue or a hint
in any way about how accurate your reader's tweet is.
Speaker 2 (02:15):
So he's telling Brett Baher won't answer the question if
the FBI had assets at the Capitol on January the sixth.
Now we found out there are twenty six confidential human sources.
They did have human sources on the ground. Apparently seventeen
of the twenty six entered restricted areas or entered the Capitol,
(02:36):
Three specifically deployed by the FBI. To be at the rally.
Two were paid by the FBI, and none of them
were arrested. It shouldn't surprise you, but you now it's
interesting to hear Benny Thompson. Looks like we have one
big cover up, and now there's talk about giving Liz Cheney,
(02:56):
you know, unconditional pardons. Anyway, Jim Jordan is the chairman
of the House Judiciary Committee. I'm sure they will be
ongoing investigations regarding this. Well, let's get your first reaction
to Christopher Ray and the fact that he wouldn't be
honest and open with your committee.
Speaker 6 (03:12):
Yeah, when he was asked the question, Sean, where their assets?
Says the answer should have been yes, twenty six of them,
some of them, as you pointed out, paid to be there,
reimbursed for coming there. And remember confidential human source, first
of all, is a fancy name for spy. These are
people who get paid money for stitching and spying on
fellow Americans. And so you had twenty six of them there,
(03:33):
seventeen into the restricted space. As you pointed out, four
went into the Capitol. They were not authorized to break
the law, they in fact did that, and none of
them have been charged so this again one more example
of unequal application the law. But I think what this
report really raises is a bunch of questions. How many
of them are still confidential human sources. How many of
(03:54):
them are still on the FBI pay role. How did
they enter the capital? Did they go in in the
first wave? Did they go through it one of the
broken windows? How did they get into capital? What kind
of communications were they giving to the FBI? Why they
were supposedly working for the FBI. Those are the things
we don't know that we need to get answers to,
and I believe has to tell will do that for
us and help the country in doing so.
Speaker 2 (04:16):
You see, I believe the only reason that this came out,
not only was the IG investigating, but the only reason
it came out is because Ray is leaving and he
knows that deep down in his heart that a lot
of information is going to be coming out that he's
that's not going to be favorable to him.
Speaker 3 (04:32):
Am I wrong? Am I assumption?
Speaker 6 (04:34):
I think You're exactly right. And remember there was not
just this IG report this week, but there was one
previous two earlier in the week before Chris Ray announced
he was resigning, where the IG said, when Chris Ray
first took the job, the FBI was investigating a week
and they spied on members excuse me, they spied on
staff of Capitol Hill members, and one of those staff
(04:55):
members that was getting spied on surveyal and getting the
metadata that they were getting his metadata. The guy who's
going to replace Chris Ray, Cash to tell. So I
don't think it's an accident that you had these two
reports this week, and it happens to be the same
week that Chris Ray announces he's resigning.
Speaker 2 (05:11):
Where are the records from the January sixth committee, Well,
we're going.
Speaker 6 (05:17):
To find out. Finny Thompson said some of them back
to the White House, so we'll have to find that out.
The good news is, like, like you, I think Cashpatel
is exactly the guy for this job. I think he
is going to answer the questions we are raising here,
questions the American people deserve to have answers too. And
(05:40):
let's just hope he gets confirmed. I think he's going
to I think you know, I tell you. But for
Cash to tell, we do not know how this all
this stuff started against President Trump clear back in sixteen,
when the Clinton campaign hired Perkins Killy law firm, who
hired Fusion GPS, who hired a foreigner, Christopher Steele, to
put together the fake false doff see that you talked
(06:00):
about so much that they used to go to FBI
call me, and this team used to go to devise
the court to get the warrant to spy on President
Trump's campaign. But for Caspetel, working for then Chairman David Nutits,
we don't know this information. That is exactly the kind
of guy we want running this agency. Now?
Speaker 2 (06:18):
Am I wrong in saying that this January sixth committee
had a predetermined outcome and they selectively edited what they
were telling the American people? For example, they had eyewitness testimony,
They had the testimony and correct me if I'm wrong.
Of the driver of President Trump that day, who said
(06:39):
and was on the record telling this committee that he
never tried to commandeer the vehicle. Why was that guy
not put in a hearing in prime time in this
Hollywood production of Liz Cheney and Bennie Thompson. Why wasn't
he featured? And why was a hearsay witness featured instead?
To make it sound like Donald Trump did this? And
(07:01):
meanwhile the person that was driving contradicted the story, and
they knew that the whole time, didn't they Yeah, they did.
Speaker 6 (07:08):
They had a narrative that they wanted to project out
there and portray this this picture to the American people,
which just wasn't acturate. And it started from the get go.
Remember that they said to Congressman Banks soon to be
Senator Banks and myself, you can't be on the committee.
And after they had kind of there was a story
in Political saying, oh, it was fine, Speaker McCarthy, then
Leader McCarthy said that mister Banks and I were going
(07:30):
to be on the committee, and polos the story saying
Poloski was going to be fine with that. And then
that suddenly changes because we went out and started talking
about the very things you highlighted here this intro, things
about Nancy Polsi and her not providing the type of
security presidents that needed to be there. On January sixth,
we were highlighting that in the press, and then the
very next day to you, oh, wait a minute, we're
not gonna let mister Banks and mister Jordan serve on
(07:51):
this committee. So from the get go, they had a
specific narrative that they were going to tell the people,
tell the American people that was not accurate. And we
caught him and knew numerous lies throughout this this, this
whole the whole hearing process, using the whole committee process,
numerous lies. But that doesn't matter now the truth is
coming out. Now, the truth is coming Why.
Speaker 2 (08:11):
Why would Benny Thompson want to preemptive pardon if he
didn't do anything wrong.
Speaker 6 (08:16):
That's Benny Thompson about that? I don't know, I don't
know that that.
Speaker 2 (08:22):
Pounds to me like he's afraid about the truth coming
out and about selectively basically feeding the American people a
bunch of disinformation when they knew the truth that this was.
This was a witch hun from the get go. And
then it raises a bigger question, what do we do
about the dirty disinformation Russian dossier bought and paid for
(08:45):
by Hillary? What do we do about that dossier being
used to spy on Donald Trump and and and ruining
other people's lives carter Page in particular, you know, what
do we do about all of the abuse of power
and the weaponization of in the Justice Department, the corruption
(09:05):
and politicizing of the FBI and the Intelligence Committee. What
do we do about the fifty one former Intel officials
that knew nothing about the very real Hunter laptop, never
examined it. But hold the American people out of all
the markings of Russian disinformation, they knew nothing about it
except whinkin. Tony Blincoln said that Joe Biden needed a
(09:26):
talking point for a debate in the lead up three
weeks before in election.
Speaker 6 (09:30):
Yeah, no, you stop it from happening again. And that's
what the American people voted for on November fifth. That's
President Trump's mission. President Trump is not into in exacting
any type of retribution against people who did these wrong things,
but we do have to make sure the American people
have the truth. And the way you do that is
you put the right kind of leadership in these respective
agencies who are going to get the truth of the
(09:52):
Americans people.
Speaker 2 (09:53):
Let me ask you, is it possible Betting Thompson and
Liz Cheney committed crimes.
Speaker 6 (09:58):
I don't know that they did. I doubt that they
are crimes, but I do think they misled the American people.
And we have to show all the things they said
that we're wrong, and here's the proof, here's the facts.
And it started with this. The Inspector General reports this
week they were in fact spying on Capitol Hill staffers.
One of those was cast to tell the guy who's
going to now take over the FBI they were, in fact,
(10:19):
they did, in fact have a spy confidence of human
sources there on the Capitol and at January six who
broke the law and were not prosecuted. So you point
out the facts and all these further questions we have,
you have someone like Cash to tell help us get
the answers to those questions, so again that it doesn't
happen in the future, and then you focus on getting
our coming back on track, securing our border, doing all
(10:40):
the things that President Trump promised the American people he
was going to do. That's how winning is the best restribution.
President Trump says that better than anyone, and does that
better than anyone.
Speaker 2 (10:50):
Listen, I tend to agree with you, and I don't
want these these departments and agencies further weaponized. But I'm
not sure how how you prevent this from ever happening again,
if God forbid, they ever get back in power.
Speaker 6 (11:05):
Yeah, well, you stay vigilent, and let's the American people
have a way of figuring out and stopping this kind
of stuff. They did it on November fifth, after eight
years of this Bologney government being turned on the very
people it's supposed to serve, government going after the Republicans,
the leader of the Republican Party, President Trump, and did
all the things they did to him. The American people said,
(11:26):
enough for this. We want that guy back in power.
We want that guy back leading our country. That guy
back is our Coxtandon chief, and we want to keep
Republicans in in the majority so that we can fix
the problems that the left created.
Speaker 2 (11:38):
All right, quick break right back more with our friend.
He is the chairman of the very important House Judiciary Committee,
Jim Jordan of Ohio. Than your calls coming up, eight
hundred and nine to four one sean, as we continue
this Friday.
Speaker 3 (11:51):
All right, we continue now.
Speaker 2 (11:52):
He's the chairman of the House Judiciary Committee. Jim Jordan
is with us from Ohio and my Pollyannis. Believing that
if Donald Trump secures the borders, gets rid of the
known terrorists in this country, I'm not sure how we're
going to find them, the known cartel members, the known
drug dealers in the country, gang members in the country, murderers, rapists,
(12:15):
other violent criminals that Harris and Biden have led into
the country, if they get rid of defund dismantle no
bail laws. If he's able to make America the most
energy dominant country on Earth, which I think goes a
long way to solving inflation and our economic problems, our
debt problems. It could show up social security and medicare.
(12:37):
If Donald Trump restores American strength and rebuilds our military,
which we need desperately, eliminates woke from the military, DEI
from the military, increases recruitment, which I think is going
to take a lot of money, but I think we
can bring in a lot of money through energy.
Speaker 3 (12:58):
If he just accomplishes. Is that to me?
Speaker 2 (13:01):
And then we had two trillion dollars in cutting out
of waste, fraud and abuse and departments that we never
needed and returned to constitutional order of limited government, greater freedom.
Speaker 3 (13:13):
How real is that to you?
Speaker 6 (13:15):
I think it's very real. I mean, no, no, you know,
I always say we make the job too complicated. What
did you tell the voters you're going to do when
you ran for it? If you win, go do what
you said. No one did it better than President Trump
in his first term, and I'm convinced he's going to
have that same determination, same attitude and get things done
that he told the American people is going to get
done and they elected him to do. So let's just
focus on that and stay focused on those common sense things.
(13:39):
Government more efficient, securing the border, getting our economy roaring
and earning and turning and churning like it was before,
getting that happen. Just stay focused on that. And President
Trump is doing that, and he's, as they said now
a couple of times, he's putting people in these key
positions who reflect the attitude the American people voted for
on November fifth, and that that to me is so
(13:59):
darn important, and it's why it's so important these people
get confirmed.
Speaker 3 (14:03):
All right? Last question, Yes or no?
Speaker 2 (14:05):
Based on everything we know about Joe Biden, Jim Biden
and other Biden family members, do you think it would
be wise for Joe Biden to pardon himself and these
other family members.
Speaker 6 (14:19):
I think he's going to pardon his brother, I really do.
Speaker 3 (14:22):
I don't know what about himself.
Speaker 6 (14:25):
No, I don't think that's common, but and I don't
think President Trump and Pam Bondy and the Justice Park
would ever try to go after the former president, even
though obviously that wasn't the case with Jack Smith and
Merrick Ireland and the Biden administration. But I do think
it's likely he pardons his brothers.
Speaker 3 (14:43):
All right, we appreciate your time.
Speaker 2 (14:46):
He is the chairman of the very powerful important House
Judiciary Committee.
Speaker 3 (14:50):
Jim Jordan, Thank you, sir.
Speaker 6 (14:52):
All right, take care Mary Christen Mary.
Speaker 2 (14:54):
Christmas twenty five now till the top of the hour,
eight hundred and ninety four one Seawn your calls coming
up in me moments. You know, the holidays, it can
be really difficult for the kids that lost a mother
or father in the line of duty. Now when Sergeant
Stevens plans stuff at a heart attack, he was on
fire duty. You know you were there through the Tunnel
(15:15):
to Towers Foundation to lift.
Speaker 3 (15:17):
This family up.
Speaker 2 (15:18):
And you did it during last year's Season of Hope,
which is going on again right now, and with your
help and your generosity, dozens and dozens of families have
received the gift of a mortgage free home or especially
adapted smart home for this holiday season, and through the
Tunnel to Towers program, heroes their families, those that sacrifice
(15:39):
so much for all of us, our communities, our cities,
our country. Well, guess what they are having the burden
of a mortgage lifted off their shoulders and they're placed
in something called their home, and you do that for them.
Speaker 3 (15:54):
It's our way of saying thank you.
Speaker 2 (15:56):
And anyway, your generosity makes all of this, this possible
for people, and frankly the darkest time in their life.
And your gift to the foundation during the season of hope,
it may be the most meaningful gift you give this
holiday season. Your kindness, your generosity is going to bring
help and hope to the heroes and their families who
(16:17):
are so deserving of our gratitude. Anyway, go to the
Tunnel to Towers website. It's the letter T, the number two,
the letter T dot org. The letter T the number two,
the letter T dot org for the Tunnel to Towers Foundation. Well,
it's hard to explain, it's inexplicable. How is it possible
(16:38):
that it's happening. The left in this country continues to
worship at the altar of this alleged assassin of the
United Healthcare CEO. In this case, it's squad member, squad leader.
Really the Speaker of the House, and Hakeem Jeffreys or
(17:00):
a name only, and that would be AOC. Alexandria Cassio Cortes.
Here's her explaining how Americans view denied insurance claims as
acts of violence in the wake of this assassination.
Speaker 3 (17:15):
Listen, all of that pain.
Speaker 7 (17:17):
That people have experienced is being concentrated on this event,
and it's really important that we take a step back.
This is not to comment, and this is not to
say that an act of violence is justified. But I
think for anyone who is confused or shocked or appalled,
(17:39):
they need to understand that people interpret and feel and
experience denied claims as an act of violence against them.
People go homeless over the financial devastation of a diagnosis
that doesn't get addressed, or you know, the amount that
(18:01):
they're going to have to cover with a surprise bill
and things like that. And when we kind of talk
about how systems are violent in this country in this
passive way, our privatized healthcare system is like that. For
a huge amount of Americans.
Speaker 2 (18:17):
Well, if you don't like your plan, well maybe you're
stuck with the one Obamacare exchange that forty percent of
the country only has one choice, and there are many
problems with our healthcare system, and they got dramatically worse
because of Democrats and Barack Obama and Obamacare. All right,
(18:38):
let's get to our busy phones. Let's go to New
Orleans and New Orleans as they say, anyway, John is
with us?
Speaker 3 (18:44):
John?
Speaker 2 (18:44):
How are you glad you called? I think you guys
have the Super Bowl this year? Isn't that true?
Speaker 6 (18:50):
Yes? We do.
Speaker 8 (18:51):
But if you don't like to.
Speaker 2 (18:53):
You mind if I do a public service for people
that are not familiar with New Orleans. Whatever you do
when you go to Bourbon Street, when you go to
New Orleans and you're out partying, and you're out drinking,
and you're with your friends and you're having a good time,
whatever you do, don't drink a hurricane unless you want
(19:14):
to be vomiting within the hour.
Speaker 6 (19:17):
Good?
Speaker 3 (19:17):
Is that good advice? John?
Speaker 8 (19:19):
But the trick is, don't have more than one and
sip it slowly. You'll enjoy it a lot better.
Speaker 2 (19:26):
I don't I wouldn't recommend. I don't think anybody's going
to take that part of your advice. So my advice
is to stay away altogether. That's like a long Island
iced tea stay away from that too, anyway, what's on
your mind today?
Speaker 8 (19:40):
I have a concern with Biden and his what's called
preemptive pardons and the illegal immigration problem that President Trump
will be facing when he comes in in the new
administration January twentieth, is that as unhinged is the present administration,
(20:05):
is if whether or not Biden might consider a preemptive
pardon for all the illegal immigration illegal aliens that he's
allowed into the country during his administration, that could cause
problems for our court systems and immigration court systems. If
(20:27):
he should decide to do something as unhinged as that,
What could Trump do to?
Speaker 3 (20:35):
Boy?
Speaker 2 (20:35):
That's here, You're raising a very tough legal issue, and uh,
the power of the pardon is absolute, so I'm not
sure if there be a remedy for that. That would
be a scary scenario. And he in he is sabotaging
pretty much everything before Trump gets in. I mean, if
you would have but I'm not even sure they know
(20:55):
the names of most of these people, So I don't
know how you pardon people you know don't know the
names of them. They know the names of some of them,
but not all of them. And that would be the
single greatest, most outrageous because in the process he'd be
pardoning gang members, partel members, known terrorists. We have terrorists
(21:18):
in the country. You know, we're gonna we're gonna give
a preemptive pardon to the trenda Arragua Venezuelan gang in
sixteen states that all of them get get pardons, All
the murderers get, you know, preemptive pardons, all the rapists,
all the other violent criminals get preemptive pardons. I mean,
(21:38):
it would probably be the end of the Democratic Party,
and I don't care how much opposition.
Speaker 3 (21:44):
I don't see that happening. But you know what I
don't know. I mean, these.
Speaker 2 (21:49):
People are radical, they are extreme, and that's why, you know,
that's why I had such urgency in the lead up
to this election. I mean, I feel like the Yes,
you know, next week, at the end of next week,
I'll begin my long vacation of the year. You know,
I've been doing this a long time. But I don't
think I worked any harder or cared any more. And
(22:11):
I've always cared and I've always worked hard because I
knew who was an inflection point. I thought if Kamala
Wan was a point and overturn and it's stuff like,
you know, the crazy idea that you just mentioned that
stuff like that could happen because she did promise amnesty
and of course free sex change operations for illegal immigrants.
(22:31):
So I guess if you're offering that taxpayer funded and
taxpayer funded college and you know, four star hotels in
New York City, I mean, I guess you're capable of anything.
But that's a scary thought. But I don't see any
answer to that. Anyway, I appreciate the good call. Eight
hundred ninety four one Seawan Rick, South Carolina, Next Sean
(22:54):
Hennity Show.
Speaker 3 (22:54):
Glad you called. Who Hello, what's going on? Rick? How
are you hey, buddy?
Speaker 1 (23:01):
How are you doing talking about drones? Yes, sir, I'm
glad to talk to you on the show, sir. Been
listening to you for a little while, but you've been
hearing about these drones in New Jersey and New York.
I am a hobbyist drone flyer, and I've been told
by law enforcements in military that if you are a hobbyist,
(23:22):
you are not allowed to go three to five hundred feet.
If you do, you're supposed to fly a file of
flight plan with FAA and let them know that you
are flying in aircraft airspace. I would say, I guess
is what they're saying.
Speaker 2 (23:38):
But well, it does become a risk for you know,
depending on how you go and if you're near an airport,
for example, I think there are ordinances and restrictions. There
are towns and cities that have you know, certain ordinances
and restrictions. You can't fly them at all. But that
that sounds about right, But I mean you do the
(24:00):
risk the hire you fly of maybe becoming you know,
a risk to you know, a helicopter or you know
a jet that just took off or a plane that
just took off. I mean that is that is definitely
a risk. You got to be careful responsible only that.
Speaker 1 (24:18):
Not only that, but you also lose a risk of
actually your drone disconnecting from your remote and it's flying
away by itself, and then God knows what's gonna happen.
So that matter, you know, with everybody saying that these drones,
nobody knows what's going on with these drones, nobody knows
anything about them. Why has it the military? Why hasn't
somebody stepped up and say, hey, we need to do
(24:40):
some research, find out what these drones are doing, why
they're doing what they're doing, and get them out of
the sky. Because to me, that's that, you know, hearing
about these drones and Neil, I live in South Carolina.
I haven't seen none yet, but down here. From what
I understand, if we see drunes like that flying around
and they keep doing it, we're taking them down.
Speaker 2 (24:59):
I mean, that's pretty But if Donald Trump were president,
I'm sure we would know the answer by now. And
if it was a hostile regime, one of those drones
would be on the ground and the others would be
out of the sky very quickly. Anyway, appreciate it, Rick,
have fun. I have a friend of mine's the drone operator.
(25:19):
Loves it absolutely and is great at it. Went to
drone's school. He works at Fox. He's a drone camera operator,
really good at it. Okay, let's say, hi, did Jake
he's in the state of New Joys and where all
these drones have been spotted.
Speaker 3 (25:35):
What's going on, Jake? Have you seen one?
Speaker 8 (25:38):
No?
Speaker 9 (25:38):
I haven't seen him all yet. Sehan, how are you?
Speaker 3 (25:41):
I'm good? Glad you called.
Speaker 1 (25:43):
I'll be honest.
Speaker 6 (25:43):
I'm a little free by the.
Speaker 3 (25:44):
Way, your governor is an idiot.
Speaker 9 (25:47):
Oh, he's such an idiot. These drones are just flying
over our heads. I'm just curious because there's either like
three things this could be. It's either the Deep State, China,
and Iran. And I doubt it's Iran because then they
would probably fly the drones over Israel unless they're just
scared of bb and not Biden. But I don't know,
John Kirby, I think's just making up things in Lloyd
Austin's probably sleeping because you might still be sick, and
(26:08):
we got to get an answer to this. I'm just curious, Sean,
what do you think it is? China, the Deep State
of Iran.
Speaker 2 (26:14):
Look, it's one of two things. I don't know. I
really don't now. Either they're so incompetent that they don't
know where they originated from, who's operating them, what their
capabilities are, whether it has a payload surveillance capability. If
they don't know, that is the more scary scenario for me,
(26:36):
considering the first spotting was November the eighteenth. Their lack
of urgency raises a lot of questions in my mind.
Why is there no urgency here. So it's either they
don't know or they're lying and they know damn well
where they came from and they're just not telling us.
You know, I would prefer Option B. However, I hate
(26:59):
to be lied to, especially by our government. But again,
they lied about the Chinese by balloon, they lied about
Joe's cognitive state, they lied about the borders, they lied
about the economy, they lied about inflation. You know, They've
lied about a lot of things, so lying would not
shock me in this case. Or you know, and if
(27:22):
that maybe it's their drones. I don't know, Maybe it
turns out to be ends up being much ado about nothing.
But the longer they just deny their very existence and
the Kirbyes of the world, well, we can't corroborate that
any of this at all is true.
Speaker 3 (27:42):
It just all it's doing is infuriating people.
Speaker 2 (27:44):
They had forty nine sightings in your state of New
Jersey this past Sunday. Now do you think forty nine
of your fellow neighbors in New Jersey are lying about
what they saw and what they described and the videos
that were seeing and the pictures that people have taken.
You think those people are lying because I don't think
they're lying.
Speaker 9 (28:06):
No, it can't Sean, it can't be fake.
Speaker 8 (28:08):
They're real.
Speaker 1 (28:09):
Shouldn't it has to be real.
Speaker 9 (28:11):
I'm just wondering. I want to televerr New Jersey. We
have to get rid of Murphy next year. Also, do
you think it could be like the deep stale or
you don't believe in those things?
Speaker 3 (28:19):
No, I think it could be anybody anything. I have
no idea.
Speaker 2 (28:22):
It could be, you know, American drones. They could be
doing a test. Could it be China?
Speaker 3 (28:28):
Sure?
Speaker 2 (28:28):
Could it be Iran? Yef and Drew thinks it's Iran.
We have other congressmen and women that have speculated it's
likely China. We just had on Congressman Zach None of
Iowa eighty percent of drones or this size or made
in China and originate from there. But if they don't
know where they launch from and who's operating them and
(28:50):
what they're capable of, that that should scare every American.
And either they know and they won't and they don't
care they or they just flat out lying. And as
more and more time goes on and then they showed
this lack of urgency, the more convinced.
Speaker 3 (29:09):
I am, they're just flat out lying to us.
Speaker 2 (29:11):
Otherwise there would be major activity of our military to
get to the bottom of it. Anyway, I appreciate the call.
All the best, my friend. All right, that's gonna wrap
things up to today. What on earth is going on
with these drones. We'll update you on Hannity tonight nine
Eastern on the Fox News Channel. Not giving service to
(29:34):
Trump people in Washington seriously, anyway, loaded up tonight, Tommy Laryn,
Riley Gaines will join us, Senator Ram Paul, Greg Jarrett,
Mary Catherine Ham, Tammy Bruce will join us, Charlie Hurt
will join us, and much much more, nine Eastern CUDVR, Hannity,
Fox News.
Speaker 3 (29:50):
See you tonight. Back here Monday. Have a great weekend.
The Sean Hannity Show News
Host
Sean Hannity
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
The Joe Rogan Experience
The official podcast of comedian Joe Rogan.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Special Summer Offer: Exclusively on Apple Podcasts, try our Dateline Premium subscription completely free for one month! With Dateline Premium, you get every episode ad-free plus exclusive bonus content.