March 24, 2025 • 31 mins
John Solomon, Editor in Chief of Just the News has some breaking news today on our “friend” Judge Boasberg, who has lots of interesting ties illegal immigration.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:02):
Well, we have come to your city, goanna lay against
Talas and saying you a conscious zeng will be hire.
Speaker 2 (00:14):
Hi, tell.
Speaker 3 (00:17):
And if you want a little bag in a yin here.
Speaker 4 (00:19):
And come along. Do you know Elon Musk?
Speaker 2 (00:22):
Have you met with him?
Speaker 1 (00:23):
I have met him before, he was saying, I mean
he was kind of an erratic genius.
Speaker 5 (00:27):
He's now an erratic evil.
Speaker 2 (00:30):
Not so genius.
Speaker 1 (00:31):
They've got that little stock app.
Speaker 4 (00:33):
I added Tesla tude to give me a little boost
during the day two twenty five and dropping on.
Speaker 2 (00:39):
March twenty ninth.
Speaker 6 (00:40):
It's my birthday and all I want to see happen
on my birthday is for Elon.
Speaker 2 (00:45):
To be taken down.
Speaker 1 (00:46):
Yes, freedom is back in style.
Speaker 7 (00:50):
Welcome to the revolution.
Speaker 1 (00:52):
That we have coming to your city, gonna play against
Talas and saying.
Speaker 4 (00:59):
You got.
Speaker 1 (01:02):
The new Sean Hannity Show more I'm the scenes, information
on freaking news and more bold inspired solutions for America.
All right, thanks about shann An Hour two Sean Hannity Show,
eight hundred and nine to four one. Shawn is on
number if you want to be a part of the program.
Really fascinating cabinet meeting that took place earlier today. We'll
(01:24):
place some of the highlights coming up in a few moments.
One of the biggest obstacles problems now that the president
and the administration is facing is are these liberal activist
judges and with their backgrounds and the things that impositions
that they have uh and they are trying to circumvent
(01:46):
presidential authority, the duly elected office of the president, constitutionally
authorized authority. And we see that the judge, for example,
that block the president's deportations. You know, it's amazing that
liberals want to go to court to allow and fight
for the rights of trend de Arragua, illegal immigrants to
stay in our country, knowing what they are capable of.
(02:08):
The president this weekend put out a big truth social
and exposts conflict of interest, and he was specifically speaking
about the judge and the deportation case after he temporarily
ordered the administration to stop deporting these illegals under the
Alien Enemies Act. We've gone through this in great specificity,
(02:30):
in detail, there is court precedent as recently as nineteen
forty eight. It was not during wartime. It was Harry Truman,
and the court not only ruled that the law was constitutional,
but also said after the president makes a decision, it
is not subject to judicial review. The president now is
very defiant about these judges. Again, in many cases, you know,
(02:54):
if you look, for example, lower courts are growing, you know,
they're growing power over the president. For example, injunctions that
were issued under President Bush were only six under Obama,
twelve under Biden, fourteen under Donald Trump in his first
term sixty four. And that number just keeps getting bigger
and bigger and bigger. Now we're finding out some breaking
(03:17):
news and some information about the federal judge and the
deportation case, but this is only one of many cases.
Tom Homan was on this weekend speaking about how he
doesn't really care what this judge thinks, but he won't
defy the court order. And I do believe it's being
argued before the appeals Court in DC today. I'm not
sure how that's going to work out. Eventually, it may
(03:38):
work itself up to the US Supreme Court. But here's
Tom Homan over the weekend. So what do you mean
when you say I don't care what judges think.
Speaker 3 (03:47):
I don't care what that judges thank. As far as
this case, we're going to continue to arrest public safety
threats and national security threats. We're going to continue to
deportum of the United States. I understand his cases and
litigation through the Alien Enemies Act. Will abide by the
court orders as litigated. But my quote was, despite what
he thinks, we're going to keep targeting the worst of
(04:08):
the worst of the worst, which we've been doing since
day one, and reporting from the United States through the
various laws on the books. We're not making this up.
The Enemy's Act was actually a federal law. It's the
statues nacted by Congress and signed by a president. Now
that's on our litigation, but put that aside. We still
have Title AID authority to remove illegal answer United States,
and we're going to continue to concentrate on those who
(04:30):
were the biggest threat to our communities of public safety threats.
Speaker 4 (04:33):
But you're going to abide by court orders as long
as the know go through your your appeals process.
Speaker 1 (04:39):
But you are not going to defy those orders. No,
all right now. Also, Jim Jordan spoke about spoke out
about this judge. His name is Boseburgh. This is the
deportation judge. But what we're Watney watching and witnessing. Are
liberals trying to go to use a tactic called court
court shopping or jud shopping. They go to these liberal
(05:02):
activist judges and they get a ruling, they get an injunction,
and what they can't get done electorally at the ballot box,
what they can't get done legislatively in Congress, then they
use the courts for this is what they have historically done,
and now they're using it as a new weapon of lawfair,
a new venue of lawfare. In my view. Anyway, here
(05:25):
is as I said, what Jim Jordan said about.
Speaker 8 (05:29):
And then frankly, there's the broader issue of all these
judges injunctions and then decisions like Judge Boseburg, what he's
what he's trying to do, and how that case is working.
We're going to have hearings on all of that, because
particularly when you look at Judge Boseburg, it starts to
look like this is getting totally political from this guy,
particularly when you remember he's also the judge who was
(05:52):
part of the whole Trump Raja Phiza court granting those
warrants and allowed the Comy FBI to spy on President
Trump's campaign. So we're gonna look at that issue as well,
but hopefully we can get that bill pass next week
on the House floor, move it to the Senate, hopefully
get into the president's death.
Speaker 1 (06:07):
Now we're learning more thanks to our friends at justinnews
dot com and editor in chief and investigative reporter John Solomon,
who is now reporting that months before he blocked the
president's deportations of these illegal alien gang members, this judge
attended a privately funded legal conference in Idaho that featured
sponsors and speakers who have expressed clear anti Trump sentiments,
(06:30):
particularly on immigration, and a theme that echoed the Democratic
Party's twenty twenty four state admission of quote saving democracy.
And he was one of nine Democratic appointed judges who
attend this conference in Sun Valley, where two of the
four sessions were titled the Role of Judges in Democracy
in the State of Democracy Anyway. John Solomon is here
(06:52):
to share his investigative report with us. Sir, how are you?
Speaker 7 (06:56):
I am well, good to be with you, Sean.
Speaker 1 (06:58):
All right, let's get into it. You find out well, Listen.
Speaker 7 (07:01):
When we were going through and unraveling that onion that
was the FBI and the Russia collusion, we learned how
much the far left had infiltrated the FBI. They were
taking FBI agents and prosecutors on junkins where they would
indoctrinate them on their preferred liberal policies or preferred liberal agenda,
and then partnerships were formed. That's one of the things
that we unraveled during the FBI Russia collusion case. Well,
(07:24):
a similar thing is going on in the judiciary, and
people say, well, bait a second. Judges can't take duncans.
They're supposed to be above approach. Actually not. Judges are
allowed to take these free trips, and it depends who
sends them there. And over the last summer, as Trump
was moving towards winning the presidency, Judge Boseburg was wined
and dined out in a sun Valley, Idaho, beautiful place,
(07:45):
great summer destination, and the people were sponsoring them there.
The group that brought in there, the Rhodell Institute, overtly
anti Trump. Basically, the speakers, the funders, the CEO of
the Roadell Institute extremely anti Trump. And so it's you
have a judge for three or four days on the
(08:06):
till of a special interest, and that special interest is
bombarding him with far left people. Far left sentiments like
Donald Trump's immigration policies are bad, Donald Trump's pardons were haphazards.
These are things that the faculty teaching at this conference
had written about and spoken about in the past. I
(08:26):
think a lot of people are going to look at
this and say, well, maybe this is something Congress can
get involved with. Maybe it's time for Congress to say,
you know, judges should be above approach. Let's not let
him take free trips and get indoctrinated, much like we
saw the FBI agents and prosecutors were during the Russia
collusion case. So really fascinating stuff. You take a look
at some of the teachers at this conference, they were
as virulent anti Trump and far left as you can get,
(08:49):
everything from criticizing his ability to do pardons to the
way he's handled immigration. And of course that's important because
Judge of Mosburg's main ruling affect immigration policy.
Speaker 4 (09:00):
See right now.
Speaker 1 (09:01):
Governor DeSantis and a lot of judicial experts are all
advocating that Congress get involved and prevent these lower level
judge from being able to re surp the power of
a constitutionally elected president. Is that the best answer, in
your view, Yeah.
Speaker 7 (09:19):
Listen, I've been doing a lot of interviews Andy Biggs,
Jim Jordan. There is some legislation that's coming to the
forefront in Congress the next week or so. One of
the ideas that's out there is a single judge in
a single blue city shouldn't be allowed to impose a
nationwide injunction, and that maybe it's time to create a
feis alike panel of multiple judges, and if a judge
wants to impose a nationwide injunction like what Judge Bozburg's done,
(09:43):
that it goes to a more senior group of multiple
judges to balance out the partisanship and politics that some
of these district judges are showing. And I think this
is a second issue. We're going to talk to Jim
Jordan about this tonight. But is it time for Congress
to say, do we really want judges going to conferences
where they're being whined and dyed by people like the
Henry LUs Foundation, the Rockefeller Brothers Foundation, and the Hewlett Foundation.
(10:07):
All three foundations clearly have a political bent to them,
including being against Donald Trump and for a much more looser,
more Biden like immigration policy. Certainly not where Americans are.
I think that's the second issue for Congress arrestled with,
which is maybe it's time to OUTLAWMB these junkets.
Speaker 1 (10:25):
Well, I think the junkets is only part of it.
What about the fact that at the lowest level in
our judiciary that they have that they're using their activism.
I would argue it's activism to assert the constitutional authority
of a duly elected president, and with that comes the
president of the president's own constitutional authority and under this
(10:49):
particular law. I mean, if you look at the Supreme
Court decision in nineteen forty eight, it upheld the law.
It had been used by four prior presidents, and it
actually said in the ruling that there was no remedy
through judicial review once it's invoked by the president.
Speaker 7 (11:08):
That's right. Yeah, Listen, Judge Bozburg is in his ruling
goes against several things. He says it has to be
in war time. The course have said it doesn't have
to be in more time. It's been upheld in use
in non war time.
Speaker 1 (11:20):
By the way, after World War One and World War
Two it was used and that's not wartime.
Speaker 7 (11:25):
I no, that's exactly right. And I think President Trump
has a leg up on a lot of these constitutionusies.
My guess is it'll take all the way to the
Supreme Court before it gets rectified. But this you talked
about earlier, what these foreign liberal causes are doing. They're
judge shopping, right, They're going to districts and judges. They
wait for certain judges to get on the wheel, and
they foul their in juncts in that day. How did
(11:45):
they learn what judges would be most predisposed to doing
an injunction or being aligned with their values? Each conferences
are sort of the sorting of the wheat and the chaft.
It's sort of the schmoozing that let's you say, hey,
that judge might be good for a immigration are not
judges bad on this but good on abortion. These conferences
have been used by these liberal groups to identify which
(12:07):
judges are going to shop for on what issues. And
I think this whole system of the abuse of the
judicial power, the judge shopping, and then the junkets, they're
all intertwined. Left has a very sophisticated process of how
they do this, and I think today we're getting a
much better sense of how Judge Boseburg gets into that system.
Speaker 1 (12:26):
All right, quick break more with investigative reporter, editor in
chief Justinnews dot com John Solomon. Your calls on the
other side, eight hundred and nine four one, Shawn, as
we continue. We continue now, John Solomon is with US,
investigative reporter, editor in chief of justinnews dot com. There
was a very small cast of us, if you will,
that we're I'm feeling the layers of the onion as
(12:48):
it related to the Russia collusion hoax, and it has
been debunked, and a lot of that was also rooted
in the PISA warrants and the dirty Russian disinformation dossier
that was used as the foundation to secure those those warrants.
And one of the most fascinating things is years later,
(13:10):
at least three of the four people that signed off
on those fires visa warrants you can call me, signed
off personally on three of the four all said, knowing
what they know now, they wouldn't have signed them because
that But meanwhile, we know through your reporting that they were.
That dossier that was the foundation of that visa warrants
was debunked in December of twenty six, twenty sixteen, right
(13:34):
after it was implemented just before the election, so they
knew it was false, but they continue to use it
as the foundation for those visa applications. What rolled did
this judge play in that case, Well.
Speaker 7 (13:45):
He takes it over after the four or pisas are
signs of the fourth extension occurred under another judge. He
takes over the case after that. He you know, he
says a few terse things to the FBI, but at
the end of the day, he doesn't impose that significant
a punishment, not the sort of punishment that would make
the FBI stand up straight and say hey. And then
he gets a moment where the FBI lawyer who filed
(14:07):
knowingly filed a false information in one of those vices
that he is about to be sentenced, and the judge,
Judge Boseburg, is actually sympathetic to the FBI lawyer and
spares him from any real basically gives him a slap
on the hand when he could have gone to prison.
In fact, the judge fought with the prosecutors who wanted
that FBI a lawyer to face more serious penalty, So
(14:28):
he was a sympathist to the very sort of abuse
that his judgeship as the head chief judge of the
Vice of Court. Should have been again, should have been reprimanding,
should have been punishing in such a way that there
would be a deterred future people not too cheap and
in the court. And then as Judge Bosberg is running
the fiser cord for a couple of years, the FBI continues,
even after insisting under Chris Ray, we got this fixed,
(14:49):
your honor, don't worry, We're okay. And so the judges
start proving MORPHISA warrants and two dozen MORPHISA warns continue
to have material flaws. So the problem with the judge
is he basically enabled the system to continue just the
way it did under russiacusion. Then, when given a chance
to make an example, to make a deterrence, he decided
to give the FBI lawyb who was at the heart
(15:11):
of lily filing a false piece of information to the court.
He gives him a pass, a tap in the hand
when prosecutors wanted a more serious punishment.
Speaker 1 (15:20):
But we both know that in August of twenty sixteen
that everybody was warned not to use that dirty Russian
disinformation dossier, and they were told there was a political document.
They were told by of all people, Bruce or putting
aside what role his wife might have had. Didn't she
work for Fusion GPS? If I remember correctly, now they.
Speaker 7 (15:40):
Are, that's right. And remember the CIA was telling the FBI, Hey,
we think Christopher Steele's orbit has been infiltrated. The CIA
was warning the FBI, and still they proceeded with because
at the end of the day, it wasn't about the facts,
it was about the political outcome.
Speaker 1 (15:55):
Really amazing times we lived through at amazing times. We're
living in Solomon. We appreciate you being with us. Thank
you was always great work. Justinews dot com editor and
chief investigative reporter, Thank you, sir. So we've been watching
all the and we've been chronicling everything that's been happening.
Happening with Tesla. It's one of the reasons that we're
giving away at Tesla. I'm buying it myself. One lucky winner,
(16:17):
we'll win a Tesla, the Tesla of your choice. I
hope and encourage all of you to go to Hannity
dot com to register, and if you go there, you
just click on the Tesla. It's a picture of Tesla.
The icon. The contest and you will then have to
put in the word of the day. Today's word is liberty.
We saw an Austin police officers found a suspicious or
(16:38):
found suspicious devices intended to start a fire at a
North Austin Tesla dealership just after eight am this morning.
The bomb squad was called in. I mean just it's
getting more sad and more pathetic and more dangerous by
the day. Now the Attorney General, Pam Bondi has weighed
in on all of this. Specifically, he went after Jasmin
(17:00):
Crocket because of things she has been saying, like take
down Elon Musk. If you remember back in twenty eighteen,
you had Maxine Waters telling a crowd I'm going to
I will take Trump out tonight. This is not the
first time. Now the Attorney General specifically mentioned Jasmine Crockett
(17:22):
and said she should tread very carefully with her plans
to quote take down Tesla boss Elon Musk because of
what rescuing her astronauts or you know, creating the most
innovative car in history. Whether whether you'll ever want an
electric car or not is neither here nor there. I mean,
the technology is amazing. On March twenty ninth, she said,
(17:43):
it's my birthday, and she said, all I want to
see happen on my birthday is for Elon to be
taken down. Well, that sounds like a threat to me anyway.
Here's Jasmine Crockett responding back to Pam BONDI listen and so, yeah.
Speaker 6 (17:59):
I'm excited to see that Elon musk that his money
as it relates to Tesla. Well, Tesla's tanking right now,
and I'm okay with that. So just in case the
slow people listening decides to click this up later, I
just want to say that I have never promoted violence whatsoever.
Yet I've also never made excuse for those violent actors
(18:22):
such as the ones on January sixth. So, Pam BONDI,
if you have an issue with terrorism, maybe you should
talk to your boss about locking back up those guys
that he let out that participated in January sixth.
Speaker 1 (18:36):
What does it mean when you say I'm going to
take somebody down? That sounds like a physical threat to me.
And here's just Jasmine Crockett then going further, this time
speaking about Senator Ted Cruz and how he needs to
be knocked over the head like hard.
Speaker 6 (18:51):
I think that you punch.
Speaker 1 (18:53):
I think you punch.
Speaker 6 (18:54):
I think you're okay with you okay with punching, you know,
I think, and I love Colin, and I think towards
the end he started to punch a little harder.
Speaker 1 (19:03):
But like it's sed grouse.
Speaker 6 (19:05):
I mean, like this dude has to be knots over
the head like hard, right, Like there is no niceties
with him, like at all, Like you go clean.
Speaker 1 (19:14):
Off on him, right. I mean, this is now the
radical left wing Democratic Party, and this is their radicalism.
And you know, they cheer a guy that murders a
CEO of United Healthcare, and they worship Luigi Mangioni and
in this particular case, celebrating making jokes about and threats
(19:36):
to Elon Musk. And the people that will get hurt
here are the people that work for Elon Musk, and
those are the people in his dealerships. Those are the
people that work on the line that build these teslas
and the most American car, by the way, made in
America today. And then the people that repair these cars.
They won't have as much work to do. So they
(19:57):
act like the party that cares about working men and women. Well,
they're hurting working men and women by doing all of this.
But they're a party now that is just completely rudderless
and as I've been saying, soulless. You know how, you
can't stand for the mothers that lost their children at
the Joint Session of Congress. You can't stand for the
(20:18):
first lady. You can't stand for the president. You can't
stand for a young man that beat his battle with
cancer and became a Secret Service agent. He's twelve years old.
You can't stand for that young man. You can't stand
for another young man who lost to his hero father,
who who was informed that night that he got into
West Point. You can't stand for the wife of a
(20:39):
hero police officer that was killed in the line of duty.
I mean, all you really can stand for is more
war in Ukraine and wave your bingo cards at a
president of the United States. You talk, and then they're
wondering why you know. AOC and Bernie Sanders are now
emerging as the voices of resistance in their party, the
(21:00):
radical left and their rise, and they will be a
force to reckon with. Moderate voices are not going to
want to be heard this Democratic Party. All right, let's
get to our busy phones. Say hi to Mark out
in the left wing utopia United Socialist state of California.
How are you? I'm Mark, glad you call it. By
(21:21):
the way, I have a list of stuff about California.
Speaker 4 (21:24):
You ready, I'm ready, absolutely.
Speaker 1 (21:27):
But forty eight percent of likely California voters say they
would consider now voting for a Republican for governor in
twenty six. Republican party registration in California is twenty up
is twenty five percent, meaning a total of twenty five
percent eighty three percent of voters. How much do you
pay for a gallon of gasoline out there?
Speaker 4 (21:47):
It's about anywhere from about five to six bucks, depending
on where you're at.
Speaker 1 (21:52):
Yeah, you know how much I pay in the Free
State of Florida this weekend. Two dollars and seventy nine
cents a gallon. That's it.
Speaker 4 (22:00):
Surprise, not surprised. I mean, first of all, Sean, I
just wanted to say thank you to you and the
entire Fox team for just staying the course these past years.
It's been a long road and there's still a lot
of work to do. But I had a couple of
just an observation and then a quick question for you.
I think one of the biggest problems facing the Dems
is Trump has truly cornered the market, if you will,
(22:20):
on all common sense issues. So they're falling because what
can they really stand for? You know, border security, Well
can't stand for that, keeping men out of women's locker rooms,
deporting criminals, even stopping the war as you mentioned earlier.
I mean, I don't know how you can't be for that,
But they've really boxed themselves into the corner. And I
think this is really where the real derangement exposes itself
(22:41):
because if you ask any one of these folks kind
of an individually, hey are you forgetting criminals out of
your neighborhoods? What they're going to say, of course, but
they can't be for Trump. One of my concerns is
we've developed into this society of instant kind of gratification.
I want it now, I got to happen now, And
I kind of call it the Arukas Sault syndrome, right,
And I think we have to keep reminding people that
(23:03):
Trump is working the long game here. It takes time
to achieve long lasting and sustainable results, and I hope
that people will recognize that and stay the course with him.
And you as you've done. So here's my question. I'm
not as concerned about AOC and Bernie. I think they
can create some damage, but I just don't see them
as being viable in a bigger sense. But Gavin, who
(23:26):
has really ruined much of our state. As you know,
people have short term memory, Sean, and I'm concerned. And
I watch him slick and kind of grease his way
into the alternative media and position himself. Now you know him,
You've seen him. I'm sure you've met with him. That's
the guy who I'm concerned about. What's your take on it?
Speaker 1 (23:44):
On Bernie?
Speaker 7 (23:45):
No, on Gavin?
Speaker 1 (23:46):
On Gavin, Oh, Gavin, you're worried about Gavin being the
next president?
Speaker 4 (23:52):
I got to tell you, I know.
Speaker 1 (23:55):
Let me go through the rest of this poll with you.
Let me go through what people in your state think,
all right. Eighty three percent think gas prices are too high.
Sixty nine percent think California's political leaders have not done
enough to bring down energy and utility costs. Seventy one
percent believe the governor and legislative leaders have not addressed
California in their high cost of living. Seventy three percent
(24:16):
support the funding of the anti crime prop thirty six,
which has not occurred. Seventy two percent feel homelessness is
a massive problem, sixty percent oppose free healthcare to illegal immigrants,
sixty two percent support a full independent investigation of the
recent wildfires, and only twenty four percent of Californians think
that men should be able to compete in female sports.
(24:38):
Does that sound like Gavin is in touch with the
people even in his own state. I mean, things are changing.
How do you think that's going to fly nationwide? The
fact that Gavin is slick and can communicate. I know
Gavin really well. He's got a big problem and that
is his past positions, and in a campaign, all of
that will come too late.
Speaker 4 (24:59):
I hope you're right. I agree. I've just seen this
guy and he's he's a slippery snake. So I just
still have my concerns. I hope you're right. Thank you again,
Sean for everything.
Speaker 1 (25:08):
Appreciate it, Appreciate your call. Thank you. Rick is in
New York. We're going from one socialist utopia to the next.
What's up, Rick? How are you doing?
Speaker 2 (25:18):
Sion? I'm so glad you're our voice. I'll tell you what,
Rustling boy.
Speaker 1 (25:22):
Thank you forgiving it to me. I appreciate it. What's
on your mind?
Speaker 2 (25:26):
Well, I was, h yeah, I see how that it
seems like the liberals seem like they weaponize against themselves.
I'm watching how they're going after Elon Musk's electric cars,
and you know, for years, as a conservative, I'm like,
you know what, they're kind of forcing us to do
these electric cars. I don't really want to own one.
I'm a muscle car guy myself. But and then all
(25:49):
of a sudden, now they're running their own people off
the road, and they're graffiti, you know, vandalizing their own
people that are driving these cars. Most most of your
electric our drivers are kind of a liberal.
Speaker 1 (26:02):
Well here's the cool thing. I can tell you this
now from my own personal experience. I'm a muscle car guy.
I'm like a Corvette Z six. You know, guy, Uh,
do you realize that Tesla s plaid has over a
thousand horse power. It goes from zero to sixty and
two point zero seconds. It feels like a rocket ship
when you drive it. It's self driving and the technology
(26:23):
is incredible. Oh so, I mean it's beyond innovation. Now,
with all that said, I'm pro choice in the sense
that buy whatever car you want. But I am buying
a Tesla in a show of solidarity to speak out
against what they're doing to somebody who has not done
anything to deserve this. It's evil what they're doing.
Speaker 2 (26:44):
Yeah, you've won me over, though I signed up for
to win the Tesla. I'll drive one next to my Kuda.
Speaker 1 (26:50):
Oh really, you got a Kuda?
Speaker 2 (26:53):
Oh yeah, I got a couple of hours. I'm building
one now in the garage. So I just parted up
like three or four days ago with the engine.
Speaker 1 (26:59):
Oh good for you. You're a real motorhead. You really
get in there and get your hands starting. I used
to do all that. I don't have time anymore. I
wish I did. And by the way, i look into
the hood of a new car and I'm like, okay,
I just shut it because there's nothing I can do
to help that car anyway. My friend appreciate it. Uh,
And don't forget Hannity dot Com. And the word of
the day is, uh, what's at Liberty today? If you
want to sign up? You can sign up once a
(27:20):
day every day. Real quick. Let's say hi to Tom
and Texas, all right, God bless Texas. Finally, a red state.
What's going on? Tom?
Speaker 5 (27:29):
Hi, Sean, how are It's a pleasure to talk to you.
I just wanted to talk a little bit about the
spenditures that everybody seems the thinker out of line. And
I think they're out of line too. But when I
take a look at it, when I look at all
the lists of expenditures that are that are misspent that
you put on TV every night, what occurs to me
is how come no one takes a look at the
(27:51):
organization chart of the US government. You know, We've got
a Congress that says, oh, we carry the power of
the purse, and all they seem to do is is
do a top line, top line funding level down to
all these different agencies that have the responsibility of spending
the money that they appropriate. And when I look at
the organization chart of the United States government, it starts
(28:14):
with the Constitution and it has the three branches, Article one, two,
and three of the Constitution. But when I get down
to the agency levels that the Congress seems to spend
saying that you have the authority to spend the money
and determine how it's spent. They all report to the
President of the United states, they don't report back to
the legislative branch, and they don't report over to the
(28:34):
judicial branch with respect with respect to their organizations. So
I guess I'm of the opinion that President Trump can
select anyone who wants to, thank God for Elon Musk
to take a look at him. It hasn't been looked
at seriously for one hundred and fifty years.
Speaker 2 (28:50):
I don't think.
Speaker 1 (28:51):
Well what we have all said, and even Democrats have
said they wanted, which is the elimination of waste brought
in abuse, that is now a moral imperative that we
not put forty trillion dollars in debt on our children
and grandchildren. And it's not fair to the hard working
men and women in this country to have their money
wasted like this. It just isn't. And that's why Democrats
(29:13):
they want to die on this hill. Let them die
on it. If they want to die on you know,
men and women's sports and standing up of the rights
of the illegals over with the safety of Americans, let them.
Speaker 8 (29:27):
The final hour of the Sean Hannity Show was up next.
Speaker 1 (29:31):
Hang on for Shawn's conservative solutions. All right, everybody knows
that I'm more into health, wellness, fitness, nutrition than I've
ever been. I'm not perfect yet, but I'm trying to
get better and better, and I really, you know, I'm
keeping as much sugar out of my diet as possible.
(29:54):
And that meant that I had to give up cereal,
which I love, I love, love love cereal, but they're
high insuran and corn syrup and chemical additives, and especially
these cereal made in America, it's unbelievable. So it's just
garbage compared to other countries. It's amazing that they can
make one brand of cereal here in America with all
this junk in it, and then they make a whole
(30:15):
different brand, same name, and they'll sell the healthier brand
in Canada and in Europe. It's insane. Well that's until
recently my life changed and I added cereal back into
my life thanks to meeting Peter Harris. He and his
father created grainberry cereals and the purpose was to bring
the healthiest, most natural choice to the cereal aisle. And
(30:36):
you're going to love it. And unlike these other cereals
that are high in sugar, have corn syrup and these
chemical additives, grainberry instead is focused on controlling sugar levels
and being heart healthy and Grainberry uses natural plant based fiber.
It has a ton of antioxidants. Grainberry cereal is healthy
and it tastes great, which matters to me anyway. It's
(30:57):
an all round healthy food choice and I've added it
back to my diet thanks to Graenenberry. Now there are
seven different Grainberry cereals you could choose from, like multi
brand Flakes, honey nut, original, toasted oats, oats, apple, cinnamon,
Linda's favorite which is Grainberry Raisin brand. Just go to
Grainberry now remember the name. It's hard. You have to
go through the cereal aisle which is massive, and you
(31:20):
have to really look for it, or you might find
it in your health food aisle. But you're going to
find it if you look for it. Look for the name,
or talk to your grocer or talk to the manager Grainberry.
Remember the name Grainberry. Today when we come back, Miranda
Devine will join us next our toll free numbers eight
hundred and ninety four one Sean if you want to
be a part of the program and the cabinet meeting
from earlier today as well,
Well, we have come to your city, goanna lay against
Talas and saying you a conscious zeng will be hire.
Speaker 2 (00:14):
Hi, tell.
Speaker 3 (00:17):
And if you want a little bag in a yin here.
Speaker 4 (00:19):
And come along. Do you know Elon Musk?
Speaker 2 (00:22):
Have you met with him?
Speaker 1 (00:23):
I have met him before, he was saying, I mean
he was kind of an erratic genius.
Speaker 5 (00:27):
He's now an erratic evil.
Speaker 2 (00:30):
Not so genius.
Speaker 1 (00:31):
They've got that little stock app.
Speaker 4 (00:33):
I added Tesla tude to give me a little boost
during the day two twenty five and dropping on.
Speaker 2 (00:39):
March twenty ninth.
Speaker 6 (00:40):
It's my birthday and all I want to see happen
on my birthday is for Elon.
Speaker 2 (00:45):
To be taken down.
Speaker 1 (00:46):
Yes, freedom is back in style.
Speaker 7 (00:50):
Welcome to the revolution.
Speaker 1 (00:52):
That we have coming to your city, gonna play against
Talas and saying.
Speaker 4 (00:59):
You got.
Speaker 1 (01:02):
The new Sean Hannity Show more I'm the scenes, information
on freaking news and more bold inspired solutions for America.
All right, thanks about shann An Hour two Sean Hannity Show,
eight hundred and nine to four one. Shawn is on
number if you want to be a part of the program.
Really fascinating cabinet meeting that took place earlier today. We'll
(01:24):
place some of the highlights coming up in a few moments.
One of the biggest obstacles problems now that the president
and the administration is facing is are these liberal activist
judges and with their backgrounds and the things that impositions
that they have uh and they are trying to circumvent
(01:46):
presidential authority, the duly elected office of the president, constitutionally
authorized authority. And we see that the judge, for example,
that block the president's deportations. You know, it's amazing that
liberals want to go to court to allow and fight
for the rights of trend de Arragua, illegal immigrants to
stay in our country, knowing what they are capable of.
(02:08):
The president this weekend put out a big truth social
and exposts conflict of interest, and he was specifically speaking
about the judge and the deportation case after he temporarily
ordered the administration to stop deporting these illegals under the
Alien Enemies Act. We've gone through this in great specificity,
(02:30):
in detail, there is court precedent as recently as nineteen
forty eight. It was not during wartime. It was Harry Truman,
and the court not only ruled that the law was constitutional,
but also said after the president makes a decision, it
is not subject to judicial review. The president now is
very defiant about these judges. Again, in many cases, you know,
(02:54):
if you look, for example, lower courts are growing, you know,
they're growing power over the president. For example, injunctions that
were issued under President Bush were only six under Obama,
twelve under Biden, fourteen under Donald Trump in his first
term sixty four. And that number just keeps getting bigger
and bigger and bigger. Now we're finding out some breaking
(03:17):
news and some information about the federal judge and the
deportation case, but this is only one of many cases.
Tom Homan was on this weekend speaking about how he
doesn't really care what this judge thinks, but he won't
defy the court order. And I do believe it's being
argued before the appeals Court in DC today. I'm not
sure how that's going to work out. Eventually, it may
(03:38):
work itself up to the US Supreme Court. But here's
Tom Homan over the weekend. So what do you mean
when you say I don't care what judges think.
Speaker 3 (03:47):
I don't care what that judges thank. As far as
this case, we're going to continue to arrest public safety
threats and national security threats. We're going to continue to
deportum of the United States. I understand his cases and
litigation through the Alien Enemies Act. Will abide by the
court orders as litigated. But my quote was, despite what
he thinks, we're going to keep targeting the worst of
(04:08):
the worst of the worst, which we've been doing since
day one, and reporting from the United States through the
various laws on the books. We're not making this up.
The Enemy's Act was actually a federal law. It's the
statues nacted by Congress and signed by a president. Now
that's on our litigation, but put that aside. We still
have Title AID authority to remove illegal answer United States,
and we're going to continue to concentrate on those who
(04:30):
were the biggest threat to our communities of public safety threats.
Speaker 4 (04:33):
But you're going to abide by court orders as long
as the know go through your your appeals process.
Speaker 1 (04:39):
But you are not going to defy those orders. No,
all right now. Also, Jim Jordan spoke about spoke out
about this judge. His name is Boseburgh. This is the
deportation judge. But what we're Watney watching and witnessing. Are
liberals trying to go to use a tactic called court
court shopping or jud shopping. They go to these liberal
(05:02):
activist judges and they get a ruling, they get an injunction,
and what they can't get done electorally at the ballot box,
what they can't get done legislatively in Congress, then they
use the courts for this is what they have historically done,
and now they're using it as a new weapon of lawfair,
a new venue of lawfare. In my view. Anyway, here
(05:25):
is as I said, what Jim Jordan said about.
Speaker 8 (05:29):
And then frankly, there's the broader issue of all these
judges injunctions and then decisions like Judge Boseburg, what he's
what he's trying to do, and how that case is working.
We're going to have hearings on all of that, because
particularly when you look at Judge Boseburg, it starts to
look like this is getting totally political from this guy,
particularly when you remember he's also the judge who was
(05:52):
part of the whole Trump Raja Phiza court granting those
warrants and allowed the Comy FBI to spy on President
Trump's campaign. So we're gonna look at that issue as well,
but hopefully we can get that bill pass next week
on the House floor, move it to the Senate, hopefully
get into the president's death.
Speaker 1 (06:07):
Now we're learning more thanks to our friends at justinnews
dot com and editor in chief and investigative reporter John Solomon,
who is now reporting that months before he blocked the
president's deportations of these illegal alien gang members, this judge
attended a privately funded legal conference in Idaho that featured
sponsors and speakers who have expressed clear anti Trump sentiments,
(06:30):
particularly on immigration, and a theme that echoed the Democratic
Party's twenty twenty four state admission of quote saving democracy.
And he was one of nine Democratic appointed judges who
attend this conference in Sun Valley, where two of the
four sessions were titled the Role of Judges in Democracy
in the State of Democracy Anyway. John Solomon is here
(06:52):
to share his investigative report with us. Sir, how are you?
Speaker 7 (06:56):
I am well, good to be with you, Sean.
Speaker 1 (06:58):
All right, let's get into it. You find out well, Listen.
Speaker 7 (07:01):
When we were going through and unraveling that onion that
was the FBI and the Russia collusion, we learned how
much the far left had infiltrated the FBI. They were
taking FBI agents and prosecutors on junkins where they would
indoctrinate them on their preferred liberal policies or preferred liberal agenda,
and then partnerships were formed. That's one of the things
that we unraveled during the FBI Russia collusion case. Well,
(07:24):
a similar thing is going on in the judiciary, and
people say, well, bait a second. Judges can't take duncans.
They're supposed to be above approach. Actually not. Judges are
allowed to take these free trips, and it depends who
sends them there. And over the last summer, as Trump
was moving towards winning the presidency, Judge Boseburg was wined
and dined out in a sun Valley, Idaho, beautiful place,
(07:45):
great summer destination, and the people were sponsoring them there.
The group that brought in there, the Rhodell Institute, overtly
anti Trump. Basically, the speakers, the funders, the CEO of
the Roadell Institute extremely anti Trump. And so it's you
have a judge for three or four days on the
(08:06):
till of a special interest, and that special interest is
bombarding him with far left people. Far left sentiments like
Donald Trump's immigration policies are bad, Donald Trump's pardons were haphazards.
These are things that the faculty teaching at this conference
had written about and spoken about in the past. I
(08:26):
think a lot of people are going to look at
this and say, well, maybe this is something Congress can
get involved with. Maybe it's time for Congress to say,
you know, judges should be above approach. Let's not let
him take free trips and get indoctrinated, much like we
saw the FBI agents and prosecutors were during the Russia
collusion case. So really fascinating stuff. You take a look
at some of the teachers at this conference, they were
as virulent anti Trump and far left as you can get,
(08:49):
everything from criticizing his ability to do pardons to the
way he's handled immigration. And of course that's important because
Judge of Mosburg's main ruling affect immigration policy.
Speaker 4 (09:00):
See right now.
Speaker 1 (09:01):
Governor DeSantis and a lot of judicial experts are all
advocating that Congress get involved and prevent these lower level
judge from being able to re surp the power of
a constitutionally elected president. Is that the best answer, in
your view, Yeah.
Speaker 7 (09:19):
Listen, I've been doing a lot of interviews Andy Biggs,
Jim Jordan. There is some legislation that's coming to the
forefront in Congress the next week or so. One of
the ideas that's out there is a single judge in
a single blue city shouldn't be allowed to impose a
nationwide injunction, and that maybe it's time to create a
feis alike panel of multiple judges, and if a judge
wants to impose a nationwide injunction like what Judge Bozburg's done,
(09:43):
that it goes to a more senior group of multiple
judges to balance out the partisanship and politics that some
of these district judges are showing. And I think this
is a second issue. We're going to talk to Jim
Jordan about this tonight. But is it time for Congress
to say, do we really want judges going to conferences
where they're being whined and dyed by people like the
Henry LUs Foundation, the Rockefeller Brothers Foundation, and the Hewlett Foundation.
(10:07):
All three foundations clearly have a political bent to them,
including being against Donald Trump and for a much more looser,
more Biden like immigration policy. Certainly not where Americans are.
I think that's the second issue for Congress arrestled with,
which is maybe it's time to OUTLAWMB these junkets.
Speaker 1 (10:25):
Well, I think the junkets is only part of it.
What about the fact that at the lowest level in
our judiciary that they have that they're using their activism.
I would argue it's activism to assert the constitutional authority
of a duly elected president, and with that comes the
president of the president's own constitutional authority and under this
(10:49):
particular law. I mean, if you look at the Supreme
Court decision in nineteen forty eight, it upheld the law.
It had been used by four prior presidents, and it
actually said in the ruling that there was no remedy
through judicial review once it's invoked by the president.
Speaker 7 (11:08):
That's right. Yeah, Listen, Judge Bozburg is in his ruling
goes against several things. He says it has to be
in war time. The course have said it doesn't have
to be in more time. It's been upheld in use
in non war time.
Speaker 1 (11:20):
By the way, after World War One and World War
Two it was used and that's not wartime.
Speaker 7 (11:25):
I no, that's exactly right. And I think President Trump
has a leg up on a lot of these constitutionusies.
My guess is it'll take all the way to the
Supreme Court before it gets rectified. But this you talked
about earlier, what these foreign liberal causes are doing. They're
judge shopping, right, They're going to districts and judges. They
wait for certain judges to get on the wheel, and
they foul their in juncts in that day. How did
(11:45):
they learn what judges would be most predisposed to doing
an injunction or being aligned with their values? Each conferences
are sort of the sorting of the wheat and the chaft.
It's sort of the schmoozing that let's you say, hey,
that judge might be good for a immigration are not
judges bad on this but good on abortion. These conferences
have been used by these liberal groups to identify which
(12:07):
judges are going to shop for on what issues. And
I think this whole system of the abuse of the
judicial power, the judge shopping, and then the junkets, they're
all intertwined. Left has a very sophisticated process of how
they do this, and I think today we're getting a
much better sense of how Judge Boseburg gets into that system.
Speaker 1 (12:26):
All right, quick break more with investigative reporter, editor in
chief Justinnews dot com John Solomon. Your calls on the
other side, eight hundred and nine four one, Shawn, as
we continue. We continue now, John Solomon is with US,
investigative reporter, editor in chief of justinnews dot com. There
was a very small cast of us, if you will,
that we're I'm feeling the layers of the onion as
(12:48):
it related to the Russia collusion hoax, and it has
been debunked, and a lot of that was also rooted
in the PISA warrants and the dirty Russian disinformation dossier
that was used as the foundation to secure those those warrants.
And one of the most fascinating things is years later,
(13:10):
at least three of the four people that signed off
on those fires visa warrants you can call me, signed
off personally on three of the four all said, knowing
what they know now, they wouldn't have signed them because
that But meanwhile, we know through your reporting that they were.
That dossier that was the foundation of that visa warrants
was debunked in December of twenty six, twenty sixteen, right
(13:34):
after it was implemented just before the election, so they
knew it was false, but they continue to use it
as the foundation for those visa applications. What rolled did
this judge play in that case, Well.
Speaker 7 (13:45):
He takes it over after the four or pisas are
signs of the fourth extension occurred under another judge. He
takes over the case after that. He you know, he
says a few terse things to the FBI, but at
the end of the day, he doesn't impose that significant
a punishment, not the sort of punishment that would make
the FBI stand up straight and say hey. And then
he gets a moment where the FBI lawyer who filed
(14:07):
knowingly filed a false information in one of those vices
that he is about to be sentenced, and the judge,
Judge Boseburg, is actually sympathetic to the FBI lawyer and
spares him from any real basically gives him a slap
on the hand when he could have gone to prison.
In fact, the judge fought with the prosecutors who wanted
that FBI a lawyer to face more serious penalty, So
(14:28):
he was a sympathist to the very sort of abuse
that his judgeship as the head chief judge of the
Vice of Court. Should have been again, should have been reprimanding,
should have been punishing in such a way that there
would be a deterred future people not too cheap and
in the court. And then as Judge Bosberg is running
the fiser cord for a couple of years, the FBI continues,
even after insisting under Chris Ray, we got this fixed,
(14:49):
your honor, don't worry, We're okay. And so the judges
start proving MORPHISA warrants and two dozen MORPHISA warns continue
to have material flaws. So the problem with the judge
is he basically enabled the system to continue just the
way it did under russiacusion. Then, when given a chance
to make an example, to make a deterrence, he decided
to give the FBI lawyb who was at the heart
(15:11):
of lily filing a false piece of information to the court.
He gives him a pass, a tap in the hand
when prosecutors wanted a more serious punishment.
Speaker 1 (15:20):
But we both know that in August of twenty sixteen
that everybody was warned not to use that dirty Russian
disinformation dossier, and they were told there was a political document.
They were told by of all people, Bruce or putting
aside what role his wife might have had. Didn't she
work for Fusion GPS? If I remember correctly, now they.
Speaker 7 (15:40):
Are, that's right. And remember the CIA was telling the FBI, Hey,
we think Christopher Steele's orbit has been infiltrated. The CIA
was warning the FBI, and still they proceeded with because
at the end of the day, it wasn't about the facts,
it was about the political outcome.
Speaker 1 (15:55):
Really amazing times we lived through at amazing times. We're
living in Solomon. We appreciate you being with us. Thank
you was always great work. Justinews dot com editor and
chief investigative reporter, Thank you, sir. So we've been watching
all the and we've been chronicling everything that's been happening.
Happening with Tesla. It's one of the reasons that we're
giving away at Tesla. I'm buying it myself. One lucky winner,
(16:17):
we'll win a Tesla, the Tesla of your choice. I
hope and encourage all of you to go to Hannity
dot com to register, and if you go there, you
just click on the Tesla. It's a picture of Tesla.
The icon. The contest and you will then have to
put in the word of the day. Today's word is liberty.
We saw an Austin police officers found a suspicious or
(16:38):
found suspicious devices intended to start a fire at a
North Austin Tesla dealership just after eight am this morning.
The bomb squad was called in. I mean just it's
getting more sad and more pathetic and more dangerous by
the day. Now the Attorney General, Pam Bondi has weighed
in on all of this. Specifically, he went after Jasmin
(17:00):
Crocket because of things she has been saying, like take
down Elon Musk. If you remember back in twenty eighteen,
you had Maxine Waters telling a crowd I'm going to
I will take Trump out tonight. This is not the
first time. Now the Attorney General specifically mentioned Jasmine Crockett
(17:22):
and said she should tread very carefully with her plans
to quote take down Tesla boss Elon Musk because of
what rescuing her astronauts or you know, creating the most
innovative car in history. Whether whether you'll ever want an
electric car or not is neither here nor there. I mean,
the technology is amazing. On March twenty ninth, she said,
(17:43):
it's my birthday, and she said, all I want to
see happen on my birthday is for Elon to be
taken down. Well, that sounds like a threat to me anyway.
Here's Jasmine Crockett responding back to Pam BONDI listen and so, yeah.
Speaker 6 (17:59):
I'm excited to see that Elon musk that his money
as it relates to Tesla. Well, Tesla's tanking right now,
and I'm okay with that. So just in case the
slow people listening decides to click this up later, I
just want to say that I have never promoted violence whatsoever.
Yet I've also never made excuse for those violent actors
(18:22):
such as the ones on January sixth. So, Pam BONDI,
if you have an issue with terrorism, maybe you should
talk to your boss about locking back up those guys
that he let out that participated in January sixth.
Speaker 1 (18:36):
What does it mean when you say I'm going to
take somebody down? That sounds like a physical threat to me.
And here's just Jasmine Crockett then going further, this time
speaking about Senator Ted Cruz and how he needs to
be knocked over the head like hard.
Speaker 6 (18:51):
I think that you punch.
Speaker 1 (18:53):
I think you punch.
Speaker 6 (18:54):
I think you're okay with you okay with punching, you know,
I think, and I love Colin, and I think towards
the end he started to punch a little harder.
Speaker 1 (19:03):
But like it's sed grouse.
Speaker 6 (19:05):
I mean, like this dude has to be knots over
the head like hard, right, Like there is no niceties
with him, like at all, Like you go clean.
Speaker 1 (19:14):
Off on him, right. I mean, this is now the
radical left wing Democratic Party, and this is their radicalism.
And you know, they cheer a guy that murders a
CEO of United Healthcare, and they worship Luigi Mangioni and
in this particular case, celebrating making jokes about and threats
(19:36):
to Elon Musk. And the people that will get hurt
here are the people that work for Elon Musk, and
those are the people in his dealerships. Those are the
people that work on the line that build these teslas
and the most American car, by the way, made in
America today. And then the people that repair these cars.
They won't have as much work to do. So they
(19:57):
act like the party that cares about working men and women. Well,
they're hurting working men and women by doing all of this.
But they're a party now that is just completely rudderless
and as I've been saying, soulless. You know how, you
can't stand for the mothers that lost their children at
the Joint Session of Congress. You can't stand for the
(20:18):
first lady. You can't stand for the president. You can't
stand for a young man that beat his battle with
cancer and became a Secret Service agent. He's twelve years old.
You can't stand for that young man. You can't stand
for another young man who lost to his hero father,
who who was informed that night that he got into
West Point. You can't stand for the wife of a
(20:39):
hero police officer that was killed in the line of duty.
I mean, all you really can stand for is more
war in Ukraine and wave your bingo cards at a
president of the United States. You talk, and then they're
wondering why you know. AOC and Bernie Sanders are now
emerging as the voices of resistance in their party, the
(21:00):
radical left and their rise, and they will be a
force to reckon with. Moderate voices are not going to
want to be heard this Democratic Party. All right, let's
get to our busy phones. Say hi to Mark out
in the left wing utopia United Socialist state of California.
How are you? I'm Mark, glad you call it. By
(21:21):
the way, I have a list of stuff about California.
Speaker 4 (21:24):
You ready, I'm ready, absolutely.
Speaker 1 (21:27):
But forty eight percent of likely California voters say they
would consider now voting for a Republican for governor in
twenty six. Republican party registration in California is twenty up
is twenty five percent, meaning a total of twenty five
percent eighty three percent of voters. How much do you
pay for a gallon of gasoline out there?
Speaker 4 (21:47):
It's about anywhere from about five to six bucks, depending
on where you're at.
Speaker 1 (21:52):
Yeah, you know how much I pay in the Free
State of Florida this weekend. Two dollars and seventy nine
cents a gallon. That's it.
Speaker 4 (22:00):
Surprise, not surprised. I mean, first of all, Sean, I
just wanted to say thank you to you and the
entire Fox team for just staying the course these past years.
It's been a long road and there's still a lot
of work to do. But I had a couple of
just an observation and then a quick question for you.
I think one of the biggest problems facing the Dems
is Trump has truly cornered the market, if you will,
(22:20):
on all common sense issues. So they're falling because what
can they really stand for? You know, border security, Well
can't stand for that, keeping men out of women's locker rooms,
deporting criminals, even stopping the war as you mentioned earlier.
I mean, I don't know how you can't be for that,
But they've really boxed themselves into the corner. And I
think this is really where the real derangement exposes itself
(22:41):
because if you ask any one of these folks kind
of an individually, hey are you forgetting criminals out of
your neighborhoods? What they're going to say, of course, but
they can't be for Trump. One of my concerns is
we've developed into this society of instant kind of gratification.
I want it now, I got to happen now, And
I kind of call it the Arukas Sault syndrome, right,
And I think we have to keep reminding people that
(23:03):
Trump is working the long game here. It takes time
to achieve long lasting and sustainable results, and I hope
that people will recognize that and stay the course with him.
And you as you've done. So here's my question. I'm
not as concerned about AOC and Bernie. I think they
can create some damage, but I just don't see them
as being viable in a bigger sense. But Gavin, who
(23:26):
has really ruined much of our state. As you know,
people have short term memory, Sean, and I'm concerned. And
I watch him slick and kind of grease his way
into the alternative media and position himself. Now you know him,
You've seen him. I'm sure you've met with him. That's
the guy who I'm concerned about. What's your take on it?
Speaker 1 (23:44):
On Bernie?
Speaker 7 (23:45):
No, on Gavin?
Speaker 1 (23:46):
On Gavin, Oh, Gavin, you're worried about Gavin being the
next president?
Speaker 4 (23:52):
I got to tell you, I know.
Speaker 1 (23:55):
Let me go through the rest of this poll with you.
Let me go through what people in your state think,
all right. Eighty three percent think gas prices are too high.
Sixty nine percent think California's political leaders have not done
enough to bring down energy and utility costs. Seventy one
percent believe the governor and legislative leaders have not addressed
California in their high cost of living. Seventy three percent
(24:16):
support the funding of the anti crime prop thirty six,
which has not occurred. Seventy two percent feel homelessness is
a massive problem, sixty percent oppose free healthcare to illegal immigrants,
sixty two percent support a full independent investigation of the
recent wildfires, and only twenty four percent of Californians think
that men should be able to compete in female sports.
(24:38):
Does that sound like Gavin is in touch with the
people even in his own state. I mean, things are changing.
How do you think that's going to fly nationwide? The
fact that Gavin is slick and can communicate. I know
Gavin really well. He's got a big problem and that
is his past positions, and in a campaign, all of
that will come too late.
Speaker 4 (24:59):
I hope you're right. I agree. I've just seen this
guy and he's he's a slippery snake. So I just
still have my concerns. I hope you're right. Thank you again,
Sean for everything.
Speaker 1 (25:08):
Appreciate it, Appreciate your call. Thank you. Rick is in
New York. We're going from one socialist utopia to the next.
What's up, Rick? How are you doing?
Speaker 2 (25:18):
Sion? I'm so glad you're our voice. I'll tell you what,
Rustling boy.
Speaker 1 (25:22):
Thank you forgiving it to me. I appreciate it. What's
on your mind?
Speaker 2 (25:26):
Well, I was, h yeah, I see how that it
seems like the liberals seem like they weaponize against themselves.
I'm watching how they're going after Elon Musk's electric cars,
and you know, for years, as a conservative, I'm like,
you know what, they're kind of forcing us to do
these electric cars. I don't really want to own one.
I'm a muscle car guy myself. But and then all
(25:49):
of a sudden, now they're running their own people off
the road, and they're graffiti, you know, vandalizing their own
people that are driving these cars. Most most of your
electric our drivers are kind of a liberal.
Speaker 1 (26:02):
Well here's the cool thing. I can tell you this
now from my own personal experience. I'm a muscle car guy.
I'm like a Corvette Z six. You know, guy, Uh,
do you realize that Tesla s plaid has over a
thousand horse power. It goes from zero to sixty and
two point zero seconds. It feels like a rocket ship
when you drive it. It's self driving and the technology
(26:23):
is incredible. Oh so, I mean it's beyond innovation. Now,
with all that said, I'm pro choice in the sense
that buy whatever car you want. But I am buying
a Tesla in a show of solidarity to speak out
against what they're doing to somebody who has not done
anything to deserve this. It's evil what they're doing.
Speaker 2 (26:44):
Yeah, you've won me over, though I signed up for
to win the Tesla. I'll drive one next to my Kuda.
Speaker 1 (26:50):
Oh really, you got a Kuda?
Speaker 2 (26:53):
Oh yeah, I got a couple of hours. I'm building
one now in the garage. So I just parted up
like three or four days ago with the engine.
Speaker 1 (26:59):
Oh good for you. You're a real motorhead. You really
get in there and get your hands starting. I used
to do all that. I don't have time anymore. I
wish I did. And by the way, i look into
the hood of a new car and I'm like, okay,
I just shut it because there's nothing I can do
to help that car anyway. My friend appreciate it. Uh,
And don't forget Hannity dot Com. And the word of
the day is, uh, what's at Liberty today? If you
want to sign up? You can sign up once a
(27:20):
day every day. Real quick. Let's say hi to Tom
and Texas, all right, God bless Texas. Finally, a red state.
What's going on? Tom?
Speaker 5 (27:29):
Hi, Sean, how are It's a pleasure to talk to you.
I just wanted to talk a little bit about the
spenditures that everybody seems the thinker out of line. And
I think they're out of line too. But when I
take a look at it, when I look at all
the lists of expenditures that are that are misspent that
you put on TV every night, what occurs to me
is how come no one takes a look at the
(27:51):
organization chart of the US government. You know, We've got
a Congress that says, oh, we carry the power of
the purse, and all they seem to do is is
do a top line, top line funding level down to
all these different agencies that have the responsibility of spending
the money that they appropriate. And when I look at
the organization chart of the United States government, it starts
(28:14):
with the Constitution and it has the three branches, Article one, two,
and three of the Constitution. But when I get down
to the agency levels that the Congress seems to spend
saying that you have the authority to spend the money
and determine how it's spent. They all report to the
President of the United states, they don't report back to
the legislative branch, and they don't report over to the
(28:34):
judicial branch with respect with respect to their organizations. So
I guess I'm of the opinion that President Trump can
select anyone who wants to, thank God for Elon Musk
to take a look at him. It hasn't been looked
at seriously for one hundred and fifty years.
Speaker 2 (28:50):
I don't think.
Speaker 1 (28:51):
Well what we have all said, and even Democrats have
said they wanted, which is the elimination of waste brought
in abuse, that is now a moral imperative that we
not put forty trillion dollars in debt on our children
and grandchildren. And it's not fair to the hard working
men and women in this country to have their money
wasted like this. It just isn't. And that's why Democrats
(29:13):
they want to die on this hill. Let them die
on it. If they want to die on you know,
men and women's sports and standing up of the rights
of the illegals over with the safety of Americans, let them.
Speaker 8 (29:27):
The final hour of the Sean Hannity Show was up next.
Speaker 1 (29:31):
Hang on for Shawn's conservative solutions. All right, everybody knows
that I'm more into health, wellness, fitness, nutrition than I've
ever been. I'm not perfect yet, but I'm trying to
get better and better, and I really, you know, I'm
keeping as much sugar out of my diet as possible.
(29:54):
And that meant that I had to give up cereal,
which I love, I love, love love cereal, but they're
high insuran and corn syrup and chemical additives, and especially
these cereal made in America, it's unbelievable. So it's just
garbage compared to other countries. It's amazing that they can
make one brand of cereal here in America with all
this junk in it, and then they make a whole
(30:15):
different brand, same name, and they'll sell the healthier brand
in Canada and in Europe. It's insane. Well that's until
recently my life changed and I added cereal back into
my life thanks to meeting Peter Harris. He and his
father created grainberry cereals and the purpose was to bring
the healthiest, most natural choice to the cereal aisle. And
(30:36):
you're going to love it. And unlike these other cereals
that are high in sugar, have corn syrup and these
chemical additives, grainberry instead is focused on controlling sugar levels
and being heart healthy and Grainberry uses natural plant based fiber.
It has a ton of antioxidants. Grainberry cereal is healthy
and it tastes great, which matters to me anyway. It's
(30:57):
an all round healthy food choice and I've added it
back to my diet thanks to Graenenberry. Now there are
seven different Grainberry cereals you could choose from, like multi
brand Flakes, honey nut, original, toasted oats, oats, apple, cinnamon,
Linda's favorite which is Grainberry Raisin brand. Just go to
Grainberry now remember the name. It's hard. You have to
go through the cereal aisle which is massive, and you
(31:20):
have to really look for it, or you might find
it in your health food aisle. But you're going to
find it if you look for it. Look for the name,
or talk to your grocer or talk to the manager Grainberry.
Remember the name Grainberry. Today when we come back, Miranda
Devine will join us next our toll free numbers eight
hundred and ninety four one Sean if you want to
be a part of the program and the cabinet meeting
from earlier today as well,
The Sean Hannity Show News
Host
Sean Hannity
Popular Podcasts
Fudd Around And Find Out
UConn basketball star Azzi Fudd brings her championship swag to iHeart Women’s Sports with Fudd Around and Find Out, a weekly podcast that takes fans along for the ride as Azzi spends her final year of college trying to reclaim the National Championship and prepare to be a first round WNBA draft pick. Ever wonder what it’s like to be a world-class athlete in the public spotlight while still managing schoolwork, friendships and family time? It’s time to Fudd Around and Find Out!
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.