March 27, 2025 • 29 mins
Brad Schimel is running for Supreme Court race in Wisconsin, the implications of this race reach far and wide for the 2026 midterms and control of the House for President Trump.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Stay right here for our final news roundup and information overload.
Speaker 2 (00:04):
All right, News Roundup and information overload. Our toll free
our number is eight hundred and nine point one Sean
if you want to be a part of the program.
Next Tuesday in the great state of Wisconsin, this will
determine the balance of power on the state Supreme Court
in Wisconsin. And the implications of this race are far
(00:26):
and wide for the twenty twenty six midterms and control
of the House for President Trump because in large part
a lot of this has to do with the Supreme
Court of Wisconsin. We'll be dealing with the issue of redistricting,
among other important issues. And a second we're going to
speak to Brad Schimmel is running for the Supreme Court
(00:48):
race in Wisconsin. He would be the fourth conservative justice
on that court, otherwise you get a radical leftist. And
we learned in a pretty you know, stunning development that
the House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries expose the Democratic Party
in their plan to use this liberal activist Justice Susan Crawford,
(01:09):
the jerry Mander Wisconsin's congressional map for the purpose of
flipping two seats to Democrats. And anyway here's Akeem Jeffries
actually leaking Susan Crawford's plan to jerrymander Wisconsin.
Speaker 3 (01:21):
In Wisconsin, that's a fifty to fifty race because we
know Wisconsin's a fifty to fifty state and we have
a strong Democratic candidate, whoever wins is going to determine
who has the majority in the Wisconsin Supreme Court. Why
is that important because there are jerrymandered congressional lions right
(01:42):
now in Wisconsin. Wisconsin's a fifty to fifty state, as
I mentioned, but there are six Republicans and only two
Democrats out of an eight person delegation. Because the lines
are broken, and as soon as possible, we need to
be able to revisit that and have fair line's. The
only way for that to be even a significant possibility
(02:05):
is if you have an enlightened Supreme Court. And so
you know, I think that's an incredibly important race, a.
Speaker 2 (02:12):
Very very important race. Anyway, Brad Schimol is running for
the Supreme Court in Wisconsin. This election is this coming Tuesday.
It's very very important. It's critically important as a matter
of fact, especially in light of Hakeem Jeffrey's attempt and
frankly blatant open attempt to use this new activist justice
(02:34):
for the purpose of redistricting Wisconsin in a way that
would only benefit Democrats anyway, Brad, thanks for being on
the program.
Speaker 1 (02:41):
Oh, thank you, Sean. It's a great honor to be
on with you. And yeah, you're not going to find
me agreeing with Akeem Jeffries very often. But he's right,
this is a critically important race. You know. The interesting
thing he complains about these maps being jerrymandered. These are
the maps that were put in place by our Democrat
elected governor. These are his maps. They just don't like
(03:03):
the outcome because they went to the poll and they
didn't get the congressional seats they wanted. So now they
want to do it through the court. And now my
opponent promised it over a month ago, and now we
got to Keen Jeffries talking about it again that they're
going to use the court to take away the power
of the people reflected through the legislature and do it
with four justices on the court if they win this race.
Speaker 2 (03:26):
I mean, that is to me, corruption at a level
we just don't need to see in this country. We
really don't. But for Keem jeffries to mention that just
shows you the depths of depravity and desperation that the
left in this country has. Let's talk about some of
the other issues. Wisconsin is a fifty to fifty state,
(03:47):
it's a key swing state, and as I mentioned, you
know this, this is going to impact a lot of
other issues in the in the state of Wisconsin. Tell
us what other issues are likely to appear for the
Supreme Court if you become that tie breaking justice.
Speaker 1 (04:06):
We actually have huge issues coming. There are major battles
queued up over what the respective powers between the executive
branch and legislative brandch We have divided government at Democrat
governor Republican legislature in Wisconsin. There are huge battles queued
up to come to the Supreme Court on that question.
Where of course, we've got a question coming up before
(04:28):
the Court as to whether our state constitution provides a
constitutional right to abortion. We've got questions about a reform
path over a decade ago. You're familiar well over a
decade ago, you're familiar with ACTAN in Wisconsin that's being
queued up to come before the Court, even though it's
already been approved fourteen years ago by the Wisconsin Supreme
(04:50):
Court and by the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeal. That's
coming back around, and if the liberals have controlled its court,
they'll strike it down.
Speaker 2 (04:57):
Explain Oct. Ten for those that don't know.
Speaker 1 (05:00):
Yeah, so Governor Scott Walker was a governor at the
time and back in twenty eleven created a law that
puts some restrictions on collective bargaining for public employee unions.
Has nothing to do with public private sector unions. Just
public employee unions limited some of their outsized power they had,
(05:20):
and that got resolved many years ago, and now it's
coming back because all the liberals want to take another
crack at it now that they've changed the makeup of
the court.
Speaker 2 (05:31):
Well they if they get the change that they're looking for,
and obviously you would play a very pivotal role, probably
be the key swing vote in any decision that's made
in the state. Let me take you back to twenty twenty.
I'll never forget and I read the entire decision and
dissent that was put out by the Wisconsin Supreme Court,
(05:52):
and this was about the twenty twenty election, and the
Chief Justice, writing for the descent in this particular case
the Supreme Court, the Chief Justice could not have been
any more brutal in his takedown of the other justices,
the majority four justices. It was a three to four decision,
(06:12):
and in pointing out that the laws of Wisconsin were
not followed, the constitution of the state of Wisconsin was
not followed. Correct me if I'm wrong. I thought that
was maybe the most stinging rebuke in a dissent I'd
ever read.
Speaker 1 (06:27):
There were a whole string of election integrity laws that
were not followed because of COVID. That was their excuse.
And then when those challenges came to the Supreme Court,
our Supreme Court, with three Liberals and one of the
Conservatives who jumped ship, decided it was too close to
the election to hear those cases, so they didn't take
(06:47):
them up until after the election, which meant that no
one corrected those voter integrity problems. Nobody fixed serious issues.
For instance, the Green Party was kept off the ballot
by our state Elections Commission over a technicality. There was
Supreme Court decided in twenty twenty not to take that
case up because it was they feared it was too
(07:09):
close to the election, and we could influence the outcome
of the election. Well, President Trump lost Wisconsin by twenty
one thousand votes. The Green Party pulls over thirty thousand
votes from Democrats based on that. The Supreme Court deciding
not to take that up did affect the outcome of
the election. And this is one of a whole string
(07:31):
of cases they declined to resolve. They should be doing
their job take up cases. Resolve these important legal issues
so that everyone can have confidence in the outcome of
an election.
Speaker 2 (07:42):
That's all I want as an American citizen. I want
integrity in the process. I want confidence in the results.
I have a hard time understanding a mindset that says
they don't want voter ID signature verification, chain of custody controls,
if there's going to be mail on balloting, updated voter roles.
To me, this is basic and fundamental. Again, so people
(08:03):
have believed that there's integrity in the process and they'll
have confidence in the results, and then there won't be
questions at the end of the process.
Speaker 4 (08:12):
Right.
Speaker 1 (08:12):
Well, my opponent was the lead attorney attacking our voter
ID law years ago, and that was when that was
on the potentially on the chopping block. She was the
attorney going after it. You know, when she ran for
Dane County Circuit Court judge, she bragged about that. She said,
I was that lawyer, and she called it draconian, showing
a voter showing a photo ID to vote, she said
(08:32):
it was draconian. She compared it to a poll tax,
all those things when she wanted to be a judge
in our most liberal county in Wisconsin. But now she's
running statewide, she's trying to back away from those positions
she took. She was also the lead attorney who challenged
Act ten that I talked about a few moments ago.
But now she tried to back away from all that.
But we already know the real her. When she's talking
(08:55):
to her liberal allies, she's all about fighting, fighting against
any reforms. But suddenly she pretends to be harmless. But
as you know, that's how liberals always run. They always
run like they're a centrist. They're harmless, we're not updating,
we're going to just follow the law. They all claim that,
but then when they get in power, they don't follow that.
Speaker 2 (09:15):
So let's talk about this special election, and I find
the timing of it, and this goes for the state
of Florida, even although Florida law mandates that after somebody
resigns that you have an election two months after. So
it's very specifically identified. But why April first, because it's
not a date that most people expect to be going
(09:38):
to the polls. And but what worries me about your election?
And I hope the people of Wisconsin and we have
many many people that listen to us there and watch
us on Hannity. My hope is is that the people
of Wisconsin know that the stakes are very, very high
in your election. And do you feel like people are
engaged because normally you would refer to this as a
(10:01):
base election. In other words, whatever party is able to
get their base to the polls is the party that's
going to end up winning. And it has little to
do with swing voters. They usually are not the ones
that are going to be targeted to show up at
the polls on this particular election. How do you feel
that it's going in that regard, Well.
Speaker 1 (10:19):
You're right about this. This is a turnout election. This
is actually for our non partisan elections. We have them
on the first Tuesday in April according to our constitution.
So this is the normal Spring election. But you're right,
they get very low turnouts because they're the non partisan races.
People don't really get as juiced up about him as
the November elections. So it is a turnout race. Our
(10:42):
side gets it, though. I've never seen our side this
excited and motivated and working as hard for a Spring
Court election as this. I've been involved with elections for
a long time. They've never been this fired up because
we've been getting our teeth kicked in. The Liberals took
over the Supreme Court in twenty twenty three, and for
the last year and a half, they have been going
(11:04):
through a political agenda on that court, and we see it.
We know we've got to make the change. All we've
got to do is make sure our voters turn out.
If sixty percent of the voters who voted for President
Trump on November fifth show up and vote for me
on April first, we win this.
Speaker 2 (11:21):
April first is on Tuesday, and I'm merging everybody in Wisconsin.
If you're in Wisconsin and you're a registered voter, this
race is critical if you if you don't want the
radical left controlling the courts. Now we've seen what's been
how the left in this country has been using the courts,
(11:42):
and frankly, they go judge shopping most of the time,
and they get these low level court judges, and they've
been issuing injunction after an injunction after injunction, with no
accountability to stymy or at least temporarily stop the president's agenda.
I call judicial activism. And what Democrats can't get done
legislatively or electorally, they seem to run to the courts for.
(12:05):
And in this case, if they run to the Wisconsin
Supreme Court, if you're not elected, then the odds are
very high that they're going to be successful in advancing
their radicalism.
Speaker 1 (12:16):
That way, right, And if we don't take the conservative
majority back this April first, our next chance is until
twenty twenty eight. So the leftist son this court will
have had five years of unchecked power because they're the
final word when it comes to Wisconsin statutes and the
Wisconsin Constitution. We don't have five years to go through
(12:36):
their political agenda. It will be ugly. We won't even
recognize the state when they're done.
Speaker 2 (12:41):
Let me ask you about the polls. When I had
Scott Walker on last week talking about this very specific issue,
and he was a very strong advocate for you. He said,
the latest polls had it at a dead heat forty
seven forty seven. What are the polls showing you down?
Speaker 1 (12:56):
Yeah, that's the last poll we got was that one
forty seven forty seven. It's and that's pretty predictable in Wisconsin.
We're seeing all the momentum though. I mean that my
opponent is just doing nothing. She's taken pictures in front
of ice cream stands, by herself eating an ice cream cone.
We're out. We're out hitting huge gatherings of people. We
(13:17):
just finished one in Green Bay at great rally of
people showed up to have for a meet and greet.
We're we're going around the state with the meeting the
voters where they are. I've gotten to all seventy two
counties in this state campaigning over the last sixteen months.
We've got the momentum. We're going to take this thing.
And you know, as you know, conservatives in states like Wisconsin,
(13:38):
they always underpolled. So if if it shows us tied
it andans we're about to win.
Speaker 2 (13:43):
Yeah. When Wisconsin, you know, first passed on March nineth,
twenty eleven, those consent are ten, that we're restricted collective
bargaining rights for most public sector employees, but allowed public
safety employees to continue to collectively bargain with their municipal employers. Anyway,
there's so much on the ballad here. I want everybody
(14:04):
in Wisconsin please pay attention to this race. Brad Schimmel
is running for the Supreme Court in the state of Wisconsin.
Speaker 1 (14:11):
Yeah, Shimmelfustice dot com, schim e l for fr Justice
dot com and they can find out more about this
race and find out how they can help us get
this across the finish line. You know that Act ten
you talked about this passage back in twenty eleven. Your
listeners may recall those giant riots with one hundred thousand
(14:32):
people protesting outside the Wisconsin capital that was over Act ten.
That was how big of an event that was to
pass that reform in Wisconsin government.
Speaker 2 (14:43):
I remember that's when they were taken over like the
capitol in Wisconsin, right, yep, it was unbelievable. Brad Schimmel,
We appreciate you, and we're watching very closely on Tuesday.
I urge people to pay very close attention to Wisconsin.
If you support the President's agenda. Please make this an
important priority for you. Similarly, if you're in my free
(15:05):
state of Florida, make the race in the Daytona Beach
and that would be the Mike Wallasey. That election is
April first as well, both taking place this coming Tuesday,
Both very very important races. Brad Schimo, we appreciate you
being with us. Thank you, sir, Thank you so much. Well.
I've been arguing that the Democratic Party has swung to
(15:27):
the radical, hardcore left, as evidenced by these comments of
our old friend Corey Bush. Listen, there were.
Speaker 5 (15:36):
Going to be two separate bills, and we had already
had those conversations. But when it was clear, remember the
investment kept going down, down, down, and we were like, no,
because we need this investment. We need, like you said,
the money that was that was more money for lead
pipes than what we had.
Speaker 6 (15:52):
What we see trillion.
Speaker 4 (15:54):
Did it start at three point nine and go down or.
Speaker 5 (15:56):
Did it we were at I thought we were at ten,
and then it went down to six and then down three,
then went down to one point seven.
Speaker 2 (16:03):
I believe ten trillion dollars Democrats were planning to spend
on a climate bill. Ten trillion dollars. We are forty
trillion dollars close to forty trillion dollars in our national debt.
And I keep referring back the party that puts the
(16:23):
rights of illegals, including gang members from trend day Arragua.
We have known terrorists, murderers, rapists, gang members, cartel members
in the country over your safety and security, your family
safety and security. This is the same Democratic party that
is championing the right of men to play women's sports,
(16:44):
as evidenced by the vote in the US Senate. This
is the same Democratic party that thinks it's a constitutional
crisis if you don't want to spend all that money
and all their radicalism abroad. This is how far left
they've become, and where has it gotten them. It has
gotten them to the point whether the percentage of Americans
(17:04):
that say we are on the right track is through
the roof. When you break it down issue by issue,
then Donald Trump is anywhere in the low sixties to
the high eighties in terms of where he stands on
issues that people care about. This is how out of
touch they are now when you hear this percentage, understand
(17:25):
these are historic highs.
Speaker 7 (17:27):
Listen, let's take a look at the percentage of the
country who say that we're on the right track. It's
actually a very high percentage when you compare it to
some historical numbers.
Speaker 2 (17:34):
What are you talking about?
Speaker 7 (17:35):
According to Maris, forty five percent say that we're on
the right track. That's the second highest that Maris has
measured since two thousand and nine.
Speaker 2 (17:41):
How about NBC.
Speaker 7 (17:42):
News forty four percent, that's the highest since two thousand
and four. The bottom line is, the percentage of Americans
who say we're on the right track is through the roof.
And if you were to compare it to when presidents
have historically been re elected. Of course, Trump is not
constitutionally eligible to run for election, but I think it
sort of puts it in perspective. Forty two percent of the
country says the country is on the right truck when
the incumbent party is re elected. And also keep in mind,
(18:04):
back when Kamala Harris lost and the Democrats were turned out
of power, only about twenty seven or twenty eight percent
of the country said the country is on the right track.
The bottom line is, right now, a much higher percentage
of the country says we're on the right truck.
Speaker 2 (18:16):
Oh, okay, the country is saying. Now. Add to that,
Democrats last three polls their approval rating the lowest ever
in the twenties. This is now a thirty year low
for them. All right, let's get to our busy phones.
Eight hundred and nine to four one seawan our number
if you want to be a part of the program.
Jeff in South Carolina, Jeff, how are you glad you called?
Speaker 8 (18:35):
Thanks for checking in, Yes, sir, a big fan. I'm
amazed by the hypocrisy of the left. People are crying
on TikTok, fear for their lives, Roso big Vett and
Ellen degenerous leaving in fear. But that's to be in
torch left and right procket making threats, and some in
Congress are calling for civil war. But we're supposedly the
bad guys. I don't understand, well a.
Speaker 2 (18:57):
Bad guy exactly. Let me tell you the violence on
the left. And this is ironic considering this is the
party that has spent five years and they continue to
bring up January sixth, January sixth, January sixth. But yet
this was the party that said mostly peaceful the five
hundred and seventy four riots in the summer of twenty twenty,
dozens of dead Americans, thousands of injured cops, billions of
(19:20):
property damage, mostly peaceful according to them. This is the
same party which has, you know, radical supporters of Hamas.
You've got the Hamas wing of the Democratic Party that
doesn't get condemned by other quote mainstream Democrats. Their silence
is deafening. This is the same party that praises the
likes of Luigi Mangioni. I mean certain Democrats and certain
(19:44):
radical leftists have been praising this guy as if he's
a hero after assassinating the United Healthcare CEO. This is
the same exact Democratic Party that is, you know, celebrating
even on ABC Disney. If Bob Iger, the CEO of Disney,
approves this message of Jimmy Kimmel that we've been playing
(20:05):
and his joking about the violence and domestic terrorism at
at Tesla dealerships in Tesla charging stations and bullets being
fired into these places, you know, this is now the
radical left today. This is who they are. And you
know that's why it's a joke when they talk about
national security, because they don't mean it. That's the big secret.
(20:26):
As I've been saying, but it's scary. It is now
the party of crazy versus the Party of common sense.
And I think the party of common sense that is
working to make the lives of working men and women
better in this country is going to win that win
the argument every day of the week. Anyway, my friend,
appreciate the call. Eight hundred and nine to four one,
Shawn is our number. You want to be part of
(20:48):
the program, Don and Iowa, Don. How are you glad
you called?
Speaker 4 (20:51):
Sir?
Speaker 6 (20:52):
Hi Sean, thank you for taking my call. I'm actually
in San Antonio, Texas right now, Katie's neck of the woods.
Speaker 2 (20:59):
Okay, what are you doing to know? You're a trucker?
Speaker 6 (21:01):
I am a truck driver, Yes, sir.
Speaker 2 (21:04):
Well, godspeed on the road. I think I just turd
your horn. And we appreciate our truckers and the fact
that you fill every store with everything we could ever want,
need or desire. I go, I go shopping at Costco,
or I go shopping at my grocery store. I go
shopping at Home Depot or Low's, and I'm like overwhelmed,
(21:24):
there's so much stuff there.
Speaker 6 (21:26):
Yeah, sir, No, definitely, and I appreciate that. I also
I've been a Sean Hannity follower since Hannity and Coombs
back in the eighties, which I can't even remember.
Speaker 2 (21:38):
I have to take it was actually the nineties. But
you're closed, don't. You don't want to age me that much,
you know, I'd like to believe I have a few
more years left to me. But I do appreciate it.
Thank you for being such a loyal, faithful friend. You know,
it's amazing over the years. How how some people, in
spite of very steady conservatism, I say one little it's
(22:01):
he bitsy thing that they don't approve of. Man, they'll
just rip my head off on social media, but you
know what, it goes with the territory. I can handle it.
But anyway, thank you. What's on your mind today?
Speaker 6 (22:11):
Everybody's always looking to criticize. What I called for was
about this whole signal APP thing. I want to explain
it in layman's terms for the simple tens that are
following this reporter and believe that there was some kind
of national emergency. Signal APP is not much more than
(22:35):
take Latin a simple encryption. Not meant for national security.
It's meant for, you know, for privacy of you know online,
that's all it's meant for. It's not as if they
had thirty thousand emails sent to a known felon's laptop
(22:55):
where he was, you know, messaging with fifteen year old girls,
where he could have been compromised greatly to the detriment
of national security. It's not like it was piles of
boxes parked in a garage next to a core vette
(23:15):
where a correct user had prostitutes and drug dealers in
that house, in and out daily. That's a security risk
signal is used just for privacy, not for national security.
Speaker 2 (23:32):
Agreed, And I believe it was a one off. It
was an honest mistake. It was not done by design.
There's nobody in the administration that likes or respects the
work of Jeffrey Goldberg. How it ultimately happened, I don't know.
Is this going to be something that we're going to
see often.
Speaker 4 (23:51):
No.
Speaker 2 (23:52):
And that's the difference between this systemic and institutionalized security
breaches of the Biden years that nobody you've said a
word about. The Only people that were pointing it out
were people like me. And there's a big difference between
systemic and institutionalized lying and corruption and national security threat
(24:13):
threats plural versus one inadvertent mistake on an app. And
you've got to remember too. And I think this is important,
and that is while it was definitely sensitive information, and
I think this is very important. Sensitive information versus classified
information are two very distinct things in terms of the law.
(24:37):
And as they pointed out, no classified information was passed on.
The mission was a success lesson hopefully learned moving forward,
So we really have to fight back against cybercrime and
these foreign countries that are bombarding this country with all
this criminal activity. And at some point it now behooves
(25:00):
us as a country. We can no longer take it
and say we don't know. The Biden years, all of
these things happen. You know, the Trump campaign was hacked repeatedly.
Biden didn't do a thing about it, and now this happened,
and hopefully this will lead to the impetus to make
dramatic systemic change that will protect our privacy. I think
(25:21):
it's critical. Don we appreciate all your truckers. God bless you,
God bless Iowa. Get home safe, my friend, back to
our phones. As we say hi to Ken in Texas,
God bless Texas. Ken how are you glad you called?
Speaker 4 (25:37):
Great? Thanks Sean. Great to talk to you today.
Speaker 2 (25:40):
Great to talk to you. What's going on?
Speaker 4 (25:42):
Understand, I have a great deal of resuspect, first of all,
for Elon Musk and his team for what they're doing
in a private sector, and for dose you put my
question and understand, take this in the spiritus intended. I
hope what hasn't our elected officials that I mean, Congress,
why haven't they been doing the job of doge over
(26:04):
the last I don't know, decades, Because I mean, surely
all this waste and corruption and fraud didn't just show
up over the past six weeks since January twentieth, and
surely I would expect Congress has got the same or
even more access to all the files and the information
that Elon Muskin's team had. So, you know, I applaud
(26:26):
Elon Muskin his team, but didn't he taken all the
heat for the job that the people we send to
Washington should be doing well.
Speaker 2 (26:34):
I mean, you're making a great point. I mean, these
other politicians, all these people that have done this. You know,
one of the things that I think we've got to
dig a little deeper into as well to kind of
go off. Your point is they were not honest with
the American people about how they were spending this money.
They would put it under you know, these broad headings
(26:55):
without the specifics of you know, forty three million taxpayer
dollars for or sesame street productions in Iraq, or DEI
programs in Burma, or the money that was spent in
every other country on DEI, transgenderism, wokism, and the radical
Green New Deal. So they hit it all on top
of it, and somehow Elon Musk has become public Enemy
(27:18):
number one for what reason? What has he done? He's
just helped the American people, you know, or is helping
America to get its fiscal house and order so that
we don't steal from our kids and grandkids. I'll give
you the last words.
Speaker 4 (27:31):
And he is doing that. My concern is he's going
to wake up one day, look in the mirror and say,
you know what, I don't need this, I don't need this.
And especially that's going to happen if he identifies all
this corruption and waste and in Congress to do anything
about it.
Speaker 2 (27:46):
He's going to mean I could see, honestly, I could
see that happening there. Look he did. He signed up
to help. He didn't sign up for the abuse. He
didn't sign up for his companies to get rude. He
signed up to help the country. I'm very confident though,
with the technology in Tesla that can alert and take
(28:06):
photos of people that are involved in acts of terrorism,
and in the FBI under Cash Betel and the DOJ
under Pambondi, I'm very confident that we're going to get
to the bottom of this and these people that are
responsible will be caught. They will be tried, they will
be convicted, they will be put in jail, and the
people that are funding it will also similarly be held accountable.
(28:27):
I am confident in that, and I hope that happens
sooner than later. Anyway, my friend, I have to roll.
I do appreciate you. Call God bless Texas eight hundred
and ninety four one Sean if you want to be
a part of the program. I guys some wrapplings. So
for today, don't forget go to Hannity dot com and
that's we're going to use the same word for the
next four days. Make it easier for people and just
click on the Tesla contest icon. It'll be brought to
(28:49):
the contest page and today's word of the Day and
that'll be for today, Tomorrow, Saturday, Sunday is America. And
that will give you four chances to win your own tesla.
You get to pick the winner, We'll get to pick
the tesla of their choice. Just go to hannity dot
com Word of the Day America Today, Tomorrow, Saturday, and Sunday.
(29:09):
And to all of you, good luck. That's all the
time we have left. Thank you for joining us, thank
you for making this show possible.
Stay right here for our final news roundup and information overload.
Speaker 2 (00:04):
All right, News Roundup and information overload. Our toll free
our number is eight hundred and nine point one Sean
if you want to be a part of the program.
Next Tuesday in the great state of Wisconsin, this will
determine the balance of power on the state Supreme Court
in Wisconsin. And the implications of this race are far
(00:26):
and wide for the twenty twenty six midterms and control
of the House for President Trump because in large part
a lot of this has to do with the Supreme
Court of Wisconsin. We'll be dealing with the issue of redistricting,
among other important issues. And a second we're going to
speak to Brad Schimmel is running for the Supreme Court
(00:48):
race in Wisconsin. He would be the fourth conservative justice
on that court, otherwise you get a radical leftist. And
we learned in a pretty you know, stunning development that
the House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries expose the Democratic Party
in their plan to use this liberal activist Justice Susan Crawford,
(01:09):
the jerry Mander Wisconsin's congressional map for the purpose of
flipping two seats to Democrats. And anyway here's Akeem Jeffries
actually leaking Susan Crawford's plan to jerrymander Wisconsin.
Speaker 3 (01:21):
In Wisconsin, that's a fifty to fifty race because we
know Wisconsin's a fifty to fifty state and we have
a strong Democratic candidate, whoever wins is going to determine
who has the majority in the Wisconsin Supreme Court. Why
is that important because there are jerrymandered congressional lions right
(01:42):
now in Wisconsin. Wisconsin's a fifty to fifty state, as
I mentioned, but there are six Republicans and only two
Democrats out of an eight person delegation. Because the lines
are broken, and as soon as possible, we need to
be able to revisit that and have fair line's. The
only way for that to be even a significant possibility
(02:05):
is if you have an enlightened Supreme Court. And so
you know, I think that's an incredibly important race, a.
Speaker 2 (02:12):
Very very important race. Anyway, Brad Schimol is running for
the Supreme Court in Wisconsin. This election is this coming Tuesday.
It's very very important. It's critically important as a matter
of fact, especially in light of Hakeem Jeffrey's attempt and
frankly blatant open attempt to use this new activist justice
(02:34):
for the purpose of redistricting Wisconsin in a way that
would only benefit Democrats anyway, Brad, thanks for being on
the program.
Speaker 1 (02:41):
Oh, thank you, Sean. It's a great honor to be
on with you. And yeah, you're not going to find
me agreeing with Akeem Jeffries very often. But he's right,
this is a critically important race. You know. The interesting
thing he complains about these maps being jerrymandered. These are
the maps that were put in place by our Democrat
elected governor. These are his maps. They just don't like
(03:03):
the outcome because they went to the poll and they
didn't get the congressional seats they wanted. So now they
want to do it through the court. And now my
opponent promised it over a month ago, and now we
got to Keen Jeffries talking about it again that they're
going to use the court to take away the power
of the people reflected through the legislature and do it
with four justices on the court if they win this race.
Speaker 2 (03:26):
I mean, that is to me, corruption at a level
we just don't need to see in this country. We
really don't. But for Keem jeffries to mention that just
shows you the depths of depravity and desperation that the
left in this country has. Let's talk about some of
the other issues. Wisconsin is a fifty to fifty state,
(03:47):
it's a key swing state, and as I mentioned, you
know this, this is going to impact a lot of
other issues in the in the state of Wisconsin. Tell
us what other issues are likely to appear for the
Supreme Court if you become that tie breaking justice.
Speaker 1 (04:06):
We actually have huge issues coming. There are major battles
queued up over what the respective powers between the executive
branch and legislative brandch We have divided government at Democrat
governor Republican legislature in Wisconsin. There are huge battles queued
up to come to the Supreme Court on that question.
Where of course, we've got a question coming up before
(04:28):
the Court as to whether our state constitution provides a
constitutional right to abortion. We've got questions about a reform
path over a decade ago. You're familiar well over a
decade ago, you're familiar with ACTAN in Wisconsin that's being
queued up to come before the Court, even though it's
already been approved fourteen years ago by the Wisconsin Supreme
(04:50):
Court and by the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeal. That's
coming back around, and if the liberals have controlled its court,
they'll strike it down.
Speaker 2 (04:57):
Explain Oct. Ten for those that don't know.
Speaker 1 (05:00):
Yeah, so Governor Scott Walker was a governor at the
time and back in twenty eleven created a law that
puts some restrictions on collective bargaining for public employee unions.
Has nothing to do with public private sector unions. Just
public employee unions limited some of their outsized power they had,
(05:20):
and that got resolved many years ago, and now it's
coming back because all the liberals want to take another
crack at it now that they've changed the makeup of
the court.
Speaker 2 (05:31):
Well they if they get the change that they're looking for,
and obviously you would play a very pivotal role, probably
be the key swing vote in any decision that's made
in the state. Let me take you back to twenty twenty.
I'll never forget and I read the entire decision and
dissent that was put out by the Wisconsin Supreme Court,
(05:52):
and this was about the twenty twenty election, and the
Chief Justice, writing for the descent in this particular case
the Supreme Court, the Chief Justice could not have been
any more brutal in his takedown of the other justices,
the majority four justices. It was a three to four decision,
(06:12):
and in pointing out that the laws of Wisconsin were
not followed, the constitution of the state of Wisconsin was
not followed. Correct me if I'm wrong. I thought that
was maybe the most stinging rebuke in a dissent I'd
ever read.
Speaker 1 (06:27):
There were a whole string of election integrity laws that
were not followed because of COVID. That was their excuse.
And then when those challenges came to the Supreme Court,
our Supreme Court, with three Liberals and one of the
Conservatives who jumped ship, decided it was too close to
the election to hear those cases, so they didn't take
(06:47):
them up until after the election, which meant that no
one corrected those voter integrity problems. Nobody fixed serious issues.
For instance, the Green Party was kept off the ballot
by our state Elections Commission over a technicality. There was
Supreme Court decided in twenty twenty not to take that
case up because it was they feared it was too
(07:09):
close to the election, and we could influence the outcome
of the election. Well, President Trump lost Wisconsin by twenty
one thousand votes. The Green Party pulls over thirty thousand
votes from Democrats based on that. The Supreme Court deciding
not to take that up did affect the outcome of
the election. And this is one of a whole string
(07:31):
of cases they declined to resolve. They should be doing
their job take up cases. Resolve these important legal issues
so that everyone can have confidence in the outcome of
an election.
Speaker 2 (07:42):
That's all I want as an American citizen. I want
integrity in the process. I want confidence in the results.
I have a hard time understanding a mindset that says
they don't want voter ID signature verification, chain of custody controls,
if there's going to be mail on balloting, updated voter roles.
To me, this is basic and fundamental. Again, so people
(08:03):
have believed that there's integrity in the process and they'll
have confidence in the results, and then there won't be
questions at the end of the process.
Speaker 4 (08:12):
Right.
Speaker 1 (08:12):
Well, my opponent was the lead attorney attacking our voter
ID law years ago, and that was when that was
on the potentially on the chopping block. She was the
attorney going after it. You know, when she ran for
Dane County Circuit Court judge, she bragged about that. She said,
I was that lawyer, and she called it draconian, showing
a voter showing a photo ID to vote, she said
(08:32):
it was draconian. She compared it to a poll tax,
all those things when she wanted to be a judge
in our most liberal county in Wisconsin. But now she's
running statewide, she's trying to back away from those positions
she took. She was also the lead attorney who challenged
Act ten that I talked about a few moments ago.
But now she tried to back away from all that.
But we already know the real her. When she's talking
(08:55):
to her liberal allies, she's all about fighting, fighting against
any reforms. But suddenly she pretends to be harmless. But
as you know, that's how liberals always run. They always
run like they're a centrist. They're harmless, we're not updating,
we're going to just follow the law. They all claim that,
but then when they get in power, they don't follow that.
Speaker 2 (09:15):
So let's talk about this special election, and I find
the timing of it, and this goes for the state
of Florida, even although Florida law mandates that after somebody
resigns that you have an election two months after. So
it's very specifically identified. But why April first, because it's
not a date that most people expect to be going
(09:38):
to the polls. And but what worries me about your election?
And I hope the people of Wisconsin and we have
many many people that listen to us there and watch
us on Hannity. My hope is is that the people
of Wisconsin know that the stakes are very, very high
in your election. And do you feel like people are
engaged because normally you would refer to this as a
(10:01):
base election. In other words, whatever party is able to
get their base to the polls is the party that's
going to end up winning. And it has little to
do with swing voters. They usually are not the ones
that are going to be targeted to show up at
the polls on this particular election. How do you feel
that it's going in that regard, Well.
Speaker 1 (10:19):
You're right about this. This is a turnout election. This
is actually for our non partisan elections. We have them
on the first Tuesday in April according to our constitution.
So this is the normal Spring election. But you're right,
they get very low turnouts because they're the non partisan races.
People don't really get as juiced up about him as
the November elections. So it is a turnout race. Our
(10:42):
side gets it, though. I've never seen our side this
excited and motivated and working as hard for a Spring
Court election as this. I've been involved with elections for
a long time. They've never been this fired up because
we've been getting our teeth kicked in. The Liberals took
over the Supreme Court in twenty twenty three, and for
the last year and a half, they have been going
(11:04):
through a political agenda on that court, and we see it.
We know we've got to make the change. All we've
got to do is make sure our voters turn out.
If sixty percent of the voters who voted for President
Trump on November fifth show up and vote for me
on April first, we win this.
Speaker 2 (11:21):
April first is on Tuesday, and I'm merging everybody in Wisconsin.
If you're in Wisconsin and you're a registered voter, this
race is critical if you if you don't want the
radical left controlling the courts. Now we've seen what's been
how the left in this country has been using the courts,
(11:42):
and frankly, they go judge shopping most of the time,
and they get these low level court judges, and they've
been issuing injunction after an injunction after injunction, with no
accountability to stymy or at least temporarily stop the president's agenda.
I call judicial activism. And what Democrats can't get done
legislatively or electorally, they seem to run to the courts for.
(12:05):
And in this case, if they run to the Wisconsin
Supreme Court, if you're not elected, then the odds are
very high that they're going to be successful in advancing
their radicalism.
Speaker 1 (12:16):
That way, right, And if we don't take the conservative
majority back this April first, our next chance is until
twenty twenty eight. So the leftist son this court will
have had five years of unchecked power because they're the
final word when it comes to Wisconsin statutes and the
Wisconsin Constitution. We don't have five years to go through
(12:36):
their political agenda. It will be ugly. We won't even
recognize the state when they're done.
Speaker 2 (12:41):
Let me ask you about the polls. When I had
Scott Walker on last week talking about this very specific issue,
and he was a very strong advocate for you. He said,
the latest polls had it at a dead heat forty
seven forty seven. What are the polls showing you down?
Speaker 1 (12:56):
Yeah, that's the last poll we got was that one
forty seven forty seven. It's and that's pretty predictable in Wisconsin.
We're seeing all the momentum though. I mean that my
opponent is just doing nothing. She's taken pictures in front
of ice cream stands, by herself eating an ice cream cone.
We're out. We're out hitting huge gatherings of people. We
(13:17):
just finished one in Green Bay at great rally of
people showed up to have for a meet and greet.
We're we're going around the state with the meeting the
voters where they are. I've gotten to all seventy two
counties in this state campaigning over the last sixteen months.
We've got the momentum. We're going to take this thing.
And you know, as you know, conservatives in states like Wisconsin,
(13:38):
they always underpolled. So if if it shows us tied
it andans we're about to win.
Speaker 2 (13:43):
Yeah. When Wisconsin, you know, first passed on March nineth,
twenty eleven, those consent are ten, that we're restricted collective
bargaining rights for most public sector employees, but allowed public
safety employees to continue to collectively bargain with their municipal employers. Anyway,
there's so much on the ballad here. I want everybody
(14:04):
in Wisconsin please pay attention to this race. Brad Schimmel
is running for the Supreme Court in the state of Wisconsin.
Speaker 1 (14:11):
Yeah, Shimmelfustice dot com, schim e l for fr Justice
dot com and they can find out more about this
race and find out how they can help us get
this across the finish line. You know that Act ten
you talked about this passage back in twenty eleven. Your
listeners may recall those giant riots with one hundred thousand
(14:32):
people protesting outside the Wisconsin capital that was over Act ten.
That was how big of an event that was to
pass that reform in Wisconsin government.
Speaker 2 (14:43):
I remember that's when they were taken over like the
capitol in Wisconsin, right, yep, it was unbelievable. Brad Schimmel,
We appreciate you, and we're watching very closely on Tuesday.
I urge people to pay very close attention to Wisconsin.
If you support the President's agenda. Please make this an
important priority for you. Similarly, if you're in my free
(15:05):
state of Florida, make the race in the Daytona Beach
and that would be the Mike Wallasey. That election is
April first as well, both taking place this coming Tuesday,
Both very very important races. Brad Schimo, we appreciate you
being with us. Thank you, sir, Thank you so much. Well.
I've been arguing that the Democratic Party has swung to
(15:27):
the radical, hardcore left, as evidenced by these comments of
our old friend Corey Bush. Listen, there were.
Speaker 5 (15:36):
Going to be two separate bills, and we had already
had those conversations. But when it was clear, remember the
investment kept going down, down, down, and we were like, no,
because we need this investment. We need, like you said,
the money that was that was more money for lead
pipes than what we had.
Speaker 6 (15:52):
What we see trillion.
Speaker 4 (15:54):
Did it start at three point nine and go down or.
Speaker 5 (15:56):
Did it we were at I thought we were at ten,
and then it went down to six and then down three,
then went down to one point seven.
Speaker 2 (16:03):
I believe ten trillion dollars Democrats were planning to spend
on a climate bill. Ten trillion dollars. We are forty
trillion dollars close to forty trillion dollars in our national debt.
And I keep referring back the party that puts the
(16:23):
rights of illegals, including gang members from trend day Arragua.
We have known terrorists, murderers, rapists, gang members, cartel members
in the country over your safety and security, your family
safety and security. This is the same Democratic party that
is championing the right of men to play women's sports,
(16:44):
as evidenced by the vote in the US Senate. This
is the same Democratic party that thinks it's a constitutional
crisis if you don't want to spend all that money
and all their radicalism abroad. This is how far left
they've become, and where has it gotten them. It has
gotten them to the point whether the percentage of Americans
(17:04):
that say we are on the right track is through
the roof. When you break it down issue by issue,
then Donald Trump is anywhere in the low sixties to
the high eighties in terms of where he stands on
issues that people care about. This is how out of
touch they are now when you hear this percentage, understand
(17:25):
these are historic highs.
Speaker 7 (17:27):
Listen, let's take a look at the percentage of the
country who say that we're on the right track. It's
actually a very high percentage when you compare it to
some historical numbers.
Speaker 2 (17:34):
What are you talking about?
Speaker 7 (17:35):
According to Maris, forty five percent say that we're on
the right track. That's the second highest that Maris has
measured since two thousand and nine.
Speaker 2 (17:41):
How about NBC.
Speaker 7 (17:42):
News forty four percent, that's the highest since two thousand
and four. The bottom line is, the percentage of Americans
who say we're on the right track is through the roof.
And if you were to compare it to when presidents
have historically been re elected. Of course, Trump is not
constitutionally eligible to run for election, but I think it
sort of puts it in perspective. Forty two percent of the
country says the country is on the right truck when
the incumbent party is re elected. And also keep in mind,
(18:04):
back when Kamala Harris lost and the Democrats were turned out
of power, only about twenty seven or twenty eight percent
of the country said the country is on the right track.
The bottom line is, right now, a much higher percentage
of the country says we're on the right truck.
Speaker 2 (18:16):
Oh, okay, the country is saying. Now. Add to that,
Democrats last three polls their approval rating the lowest ever
in the twenties. This is now a thirty year low
for them. All right, let's get to our busy phones.
Eight hundred and nine to four one seawan our number
if you want to be a part of the program.
Jeff in South Carolina, Jeff, how are you glad you called?
Speaker 8 (18:35):
Thanks for checking in, Yes, sir, a big fan. I'm
amazed by the hypocrisy of the left. People are crying
on TikTok, fear for their lives, Roso big Vett and
Ellen degenerous leaving in fear. But that's to be in
torch left and right procket making threats, and some in
Congress are calling for civil war. But we're supposedly the
bad guys. I don't understand, well a.
Speaker 2 (18:57):
Bad guy exactly. Let me tell you the violence on
the left. And this is ironic considering this is the
party that has spent five years and they continue to
bring up January sixth, January sixth, January sixth. But yet
this was the party that said mostly peaceful the five
hundred and seventy four riots in the summer of twenty twenty,
dozens of dead Americans, thousands of injured cops, billions of
(19:20):
property damage, mostly peaceful according to them. This is the
same party which has, you know, radical supporters of Hamas.
You've got the Hamas wing of the Democratic Party that
doesn't get condemned by other quote mainstream Democrats. Their silence
is deafening. This is the same party that praises the
likes of Luigi Mangioni. I mean certain Democrats and certain
(19:44):
radical leftists have been praising this guy as if he's
a hero after assassinating the United Healthcare CEO. This is
the same exact Democratic Party that is, you know, celebrating
even on ABC Disney. If Bob Iger, the CEO of Disney,
approves this message of Jimmy Kimmel that we've been playing
(20:05):
and his joking about the violence and domestic terrorism at
at Tesla dealerships in Tesla charging stations and bullets being
fired into these places, you know, this is now the
radical left today. This is who they are. And you
know that's why it's a joke when they talk about
national security, because they don't mean it. That's the big secret.
(20:26):
As I've been saying, but it's scary. It is now
the party of crazy versus the Party of common sense.
And I think the party of common sense that is
working to make the lives of working men and women
better in this country is going to win that win
the argument every day of the week. Anyway, my friend,
appreciate the call. Eight hundred and nine to four one,
Shawn is our number. You want to be part of
(20:48):
the program, Don and Iowa, Don. How are you glad
you called?
Speaker 4 (20:51):
Sir?
Speaker 6 (20:52):
Hi Sean, thank you for taking my call. I'm actually
in San Antonio, Texas right now, Katie's neck of the woods.
Speaker 2 (20:59):
Okay, what are you doing to know? You're a trucker?
Speaker 6 (21:01):
I am a truck driver, Yes, sir.
Speaker 2 (21:04):
Well, godspeed on the road. I think I just turd
your horn. And we appreciate our truckers and the fact
that you fill every store with everything we could ever want,
need or desire. I go, I go shopping at Costco,
or I go shopping at my grocery store. I go
shopping at Home Depot or Low's, and I'm like overwhelmed,
(21:24):
there's so much stuff there.
Speaker 6 (21:26):
Yeah, sir, No, definitely, and I appreciate that. I also
I've been a Sean Hannity follower since Hannity and Coombs
back in the eighties, which I can't even remember.
Speaker 2 (21:38):
I have to take it was actually the nineties. But
you're closed, don't. You don't want to age me that much,
you know, I'd like to believe I have a few
more years left to me. But I do appreciate it.
Thank you for being such a loyal, faithful friend. You know,
it's amazing over the years. How how some people, in
spite of very steady conservatism, I say one little it's
(22:01):
he bitsy thing that they don't approve of. Man, they'll
just rip my head off on social media, but you
know what, it goes with the territory. I can handle it.
But anyway, thank you. What's on your mind today?
Speaker 6 (22:11):
Everybody's always looking to criticize. What I called for was
about this whole signal APP thing. I want to explain
it in layman's terms for the simple tens that are
following this reporter and believe that there was some kind
of national emergency. Signal APP is not much more than
(22:35):
take Latin a simple encryption. Not meant for national security.
It's meant for, you know, for privacy of you know online,
that's all it's meant for. It's not as if they
had thirty thousand emails sent to a known felon's laptop
(22:55):
where he was, you know, messaging with fifteen year old girls,
where he could have been compromised greatly to the detriment
of national security. It's not like it was piles of
boxes parked in a garage next to a core vette
(23:15):
where a correct user had prostitutes and drug dealers in
that house, in and out daily. That's a security risk
signal is used just for privacy, not for national security.
Speaker 2 (23:32):
Agreed, And I believe it was a one off. It
was an honest mistake. It was not done by design.
There's nobody in the administration that likes or respects the
work of Jeffrey Goldberg. How it ultimately happened, I don't know.
Is this going to be something that we're going to
see often.
Speaker 4 (23:51):
No.
Speaker 2 (23:52):
And that's the difference between this systemic and institutionalized security
breaches of the Biden years that nobody you've said a
word about. The Only people that were pointing it out
were people like me. And there's a big difference between
systemic and institutionalized lying and corruption and national security threat
(24:13):
threats plural versus one inadvertent mistake on an app. And
you've got to remember too. And I think this is important,
and that is while it was definitely sensitive information, and
I think this is very important. Sensitive information versus classified
information are two very distinct things in terms of the law.
(24:37):
And as they pointed out, no classified information was passed on.
The mission was a success lesson hopefully learned moving forward,
So we really have to fight back against cybercrime and
these foreign countries that are bombarding this country with all
this criminal activity. And at some point it now behooves
(25:00):
us as a country. We can no longer take it
and say we don't know. The Biden years, all of
these things happen. You know, the Trump campaign was hacked repeatedly.
Biden didn't do a thing about it, and now this happened,
and hopefully this will lead to the impetus to make
dramatic systemic change that will protect our privacy. I think
(25:21):
it's critical. Don we appreciate all your truckers. God bless you,
God bless Iowa. Get home safe, my friend, back to
our phones. As we say hi to Ken in Texas,
God bless Texas. Ken how are you glad you called?
Speaker 4 (25:37):
Great? Thanks Sean. Great to talk to you today.
Speaker 2 (25:40):
Great to talk to you. What's going on?
Speaker 4 (25:42):
Understand, I have a great deal of resuspect, first of all,
for Elon Musk and his team for what they're doing
in a private sector, and for dose you put my
question and understand, take this in the spiritus intended. I
hope what hasn't our elected officials that I mean, Congress,
why haven't they been doing the job of doge over
(26:04):
the last I don't know, decades, Because I mean, surely
all this waste and corruption and fraud didn't just show
up over the past six weeks since January twentieth, and
surely I would expect Congress has got the same or
even more access to all the files and the information
that Elon Muskin's team had. So, you know, I applaud
(26:26):
Elon Muskin his team, but didn't he taken all the
heat for the job that the people we send to
Washington should be doing well.
Speaker 2 (26:34):
I mean, you're making a great point. I mean, these
other politicians, all these people that have done this. You know,
one of the things that I think we've got to
dig a little deeper into as well to kind of
go off. Your point is they were not honest with
the American people about how they were spending this money.
They would put it under you know, these broad headings
(26:55):
without the specifics of you know, forty three million taxpayer
dollars for or sesame street productions in Iraq, or DEI
programs in Burma, or the money that was spent in
every other country on DEI, transgenderism, wokism, and the radical
Green New Deal. So they hit it all on top
of it, and somehow Elon Musk has become public Enemy
(27:18):
number one for what reason? What has he done? He's
just helped the American people, you know, or is helping
America to get its fiscal house and order so that
we don't steal from our kids and grandkids. I'll give
you the last words.
Speaker 4 (27:31):
And he is doing that. My concern is he's going
to wake up one day, look in the mirror and say,
you know what, I don't need this, I don't need this.
And especially that's going to happen if he identifies all
this corruption and waste and in Congress to do anything
about it.
Speaker 2 (27:46):
He's going to mean I could see, honestly, I could
see that happening there. Look he did. He signed up
to help. He didn't sign up for the abuse. He
didn't sign up for his companies to get rude. He
signed up to help the country. I'm very confident though,
with the technology in Tesla that can alert and take
(28:06):
photos of people that are involved in acts of terrorism,
and in the FBI under Cash Betel and the DOJ
under Pambondi, I'm very confident that we're going to get
to the bottom of this and these people that are
responsible will be caught. They will be tried, they will
be convicted, they will be put in jail, and the
people that are funding it will also similarly be held accountable.
(28:27):
I am confident in that, and I hope that happens
sooner than later. Anyway, my friend, I have to roll.
I do appreciate you. Call God bless Texas eight hundred
and ninety four one Sean if you want to be
a part of the program. I guys some wrapplings. So
for today, don't forget go to Hannity dot com and
that's we're going to use the same word for the
next four days. Make it easier for people and just
click on the Tesla contest icon. It'll be brought to
(28:49):
the contest page and today's word of the Day and
that'll be for today, Tomorrow, Saturday, Sunday is America. And
that will give you four chances to win your own tesla.
You get to pick the winner, We'll get to pick
the tesla of their choice. Just go to hannity dot
com Word of the Day America Today, Tomorrow, Saturday, and Sunday.
(29:09):
And to all of you, good luck. That's all the
time we have left. Thank you for joining us, thank
you for making this show possible.
The Sean Hannity Show News
Host
Sean Hannity
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!