July 31, 2025 • 30 mins
Investigative reporter John Solomon joins Hannity to break down the Durham Report annex—revealing that George Soros’s ally Leonard Bernardo was in on Hillary Clinton’s plan to link Trump to Russia. New documents show the Clinton campaign not only devised the smear but may have coordinated with the FBI and Obama administration. Solomon previews upcoming bombshells, including Joe Biden’s early role in pushing the Russia hoax narrative. The hour is filled with receipts, timelines, and hard-hitting commentary on how a political operation hijacked America’s intelligence agencies.
Follow Sean and Our Guests on Social Media:
-
Facebook: facebook.com/SeanHannity
-
X (Twitter): x.com/seanhannity
-
Truth Social: truthsocial.com/@SeanHannity
-
John Solomon:
-
Website: justthenews.com
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
All right, thanks Scott sho On on Hour two Sean Hannity Show,
Toll free. Our number is eight hundred and nine to
four one, Sean if you want to be a part
of the program. Well, smoking gun evidence. I've been getting
wind of this now from my friend John Solomon for
days than he was on TV the other night.
Speaker 2 (00:20):
He said, I expect in.
Speaker 1 (00:22):
Coming days that we're going to hear a lot about
and he goes and he laid out the perfect tiase
for what was declassified this annex, which was released by
Chuck Grassley earlier today, declassified intelligence tying Soros to Clinton's
Russia gate plan for the FBI to put more oil
into the fire. That's the headline on justinnews dot com.
(00:46):
This has been a story that John Solomon has been
working on for years and years of his life. He
has more contacts deep within the intelligence community the f
than any other person that I know on the face
of this earth. And we have worked together in tandem
(01:07):
along with a very small cast of other people, including
Greg Jarrett, Sarah Carter, and then some members of Congress
that were very very helpful during the process. Devin Nunas
would be one, Mark Meadows Rather than me rehashing a
lot of what I said in the last hour, why
don't we bring John on and get his take on it,
but also tie this into the declassification by Toolsey Gabbertt
(01:32):
at the DNI. And when you put it all together,
what I believe we are looking at is probably what
Chuck Grassley classified is as the biggest political scandal in
American history. I've been saying that this is going to
make Watergate look like a Jaywalking ticket in the end,
and I believe this smoking gun out today proves that
(01:55):
comment to be correct. John Solomon, founder editor in chief
investigative reporters The News dot Com, sir, well, how many
years of your life have you worked on this story?
Speaker 3 (02:06):
Well, I remember a certain March twenty seventeen sitting in
your studio and I told you what I thought was
going on. He said, let's peel this onion back. And
so it's been eight years, the eight years this year.
It's just remarkable, and I think it really is time
you've given it because it's an important It was your
broll horn and your own instincts that helped drive this,
and so we're very lucky now to really understand how
(02:26):
it went down.
Speaker 1 (02:27):
So we have this newly declassified so called Clinton Plan intelligence,
including intercepted communications from a George Soros ally by the Russians, ironically,
which suggested that Hillary's campaign against Donald Trump was plotting
a long term affair to demonize Trump. Now this is
the information we had got a little piece of this
(02:49):
information that even foreign actors knew that Hillary had planned
this operation ahead of time. And the revelations include this,
these communications or purported communications from Leonard Bernardo's It's not
somebody I'd heard of before, a top official at George
Soros's Open Society Foundations, and communications by Clinton Forum policy
advisor Julianne Smith. Tell us what this says and what
(03:13):
stands out the most to you, Well.
Speaker 3 (03:15):
It makes sense that if you're Hillary Clinton, you're going
into your Democratic national nominating convention, you just survived by
a whisker an email scandal that maybe others would have
been indicted for, that you would tell your big benefactors,
your donors, the base of your party. Hey, I've got
a plan to get myself out of this hole. Yeah,
I got the classified email problem. It's been hanging around
my neck for two years. But I got to plan
(03:36):
to change the topic, and you would tell your donors,
you tell your benefactors. That's how a political candidate works.
And that's what this email, what's the Russians purported to
have intercepted? Says Leonard Bernardo, top official with George Soros's
Open Society Foundation, is recounting his conversations with a top
advisor at the Clinton campaign, saying, all right, they're going
(03:57):
to put a plan in place, and the plan is
they're going to make it look like Donald Trump has
a Russia collusion problem, maybe he was involved in the
hacking of Hillary's emails. That we're going to change the
subject from her email scandal to this. And by the way,
we don't really know if the Russians actually couldn't emails
because we don't have direct evidence of it from our vendor,
the vendor that the FBI then relied on to make
(04:20):
the claim. But hey, we're going to let it roll.
Let's see where it goes. That email has extraordinary detail.
And it's four days before the FBI opens up Crossfire Hurricane,
and it's the day that Hilary Clinton's plan starts to
go in motion. Joe Biden is going to go out
and give a speech or make a comment and start
(04:42):
the rumble. And then Jake's Sullivan and other people are
out there, and Christopher Steele's coming to Washington's about to
meet with Bruce or on July thirties. In this four
day window, the Russians knew what was going to happen
before it happened. And then you look at this intercept,
is it real? Well, what the guy writes actually occurs
all the way through, so he is either a fortune
(05:05):
teller or he got read in. And Hillary Clinton really
put this plan in motion.
Speaker 1 (05:09):
Now there's a let me give the date because I
want people to understand exactly what you're saying here. July
twenty seven, twenty sixteen, email from this guy Leonard Bernardo,
four days before they launch Operation Crossfire Hurricane. That's right,
quote HRC Hillary rodam Clinton approved Julia's idea about Trump
and Russia hackers hampering US elections. That should distract people
(05:33):
from her own missing email, especially if the affair goes
to the Olympic level, then it goes on the point
is making the Russian play a US domestic issue.
Speaker 3 (05:46):
They wanted to make it. They wanted what the Russians did.
They wanted to hang it on Donald Trump, and of
course that's what happens. Right. A couple of days later,
a guy named Alexander Downer, who's a friend of the
Clinton walks into the fay. I want to tell you
about a conversation in May where I thought a Trump
guy was hinting that he might have been involved in
the acting of Hillary couldn't an emails Chris. We know
that is true, but that got reported. Then Christopher Steele
(06:08):
is already set in motion is DOSSI eight and he's
coming to Washington, DC to meet with Bruce or on
July thirtieth. So from the moment Hillary couldn't approves the
plan on July twenty sixth to July thirty First, what
George Soros's guy purportedly writes in his email that the
Russians intercept actually plays out, so he's either a fortune
teller or he knew he was on the no. And
(06:28):
the sad part about this is that Bill Barr and
John Durham had a chance to subpoena this email, so
maybe see if the NSA added any of their email
or phone intercepts. We can't tell from the report that
they did that. It doesn't look like they did that.
They left it an unfinished answer. But if this email
gets corroborated, if this is truly an actual email as
the Russians intercepted, and it was really sense, then this
(06:51):
is the roadmap before proving that Hillary Clinton created a
ruse and that others will get involved. And let me
give you one other piece of the intelligence. The other
thing that's in this chatter that the Russians had is
the Russians seemed to know in advance that the FBI
was going to participate in the scheme, that they were
going to open up an investigation and give credence to
it and put it on steroids. And so the Russians
(07:14):
have that component as well, which means they're sitting on
perhaps multiple locations and they know now what happens. Again,
this is before July thirty. First, either the Russians and
the people they're intercepting our fortune tellers, or they really
were on top of what was going on. And this
is what really happened. The FBI conspired with Hillary Clinton
to make a false story look real, look legitimate, and
(07:36):
make it an Olympic size scandal on Donald Trump so
that Hillary Clinton could be taken off the hook on
her email scandal. That's what this says. And that's why
someone like Chuck Grassei, who chooses his words carefully. He's
ninety years old, he's been in Washington fifty years. He
doesn't exaggerate. He believes that this may be the greatest
political scandal of his lifetime. There's a lot of work
(07:57):
that still needs to be done. We need to authenticate
these about. John Durham didn't get us all the way there. Now,
what John Durham did do is find some Clinton emails
that are legit. We know for sure they're not Russian.
Really emails that show the plan was being activated the
way the Russians said it was going to be activated,
the way the Sorow's intercepted communication. So there's contemporaneous evidence
(08:19):
that that plan was put in motion. Out tomorrow, I'm
going to give you one of the components of the plan.
You're going to see text messages where the Clinton campaign
is trying to get Joe Biden to take the first
shot at Clinton. Let's have the vice president take a
first shot and accused Donald Trump of being a Russian
stooge and we're going to show you Joe Biden actually
delivers the goods. He fires the first shot. A lot
of people forgot this. I didn't the first shot of
(08:41):
the Russia collusion.
Speaker 1 (08:42):
Can you give us a little bit of this preview
of coming attractions?
Speaker 2 (08:47):
What did Biden say?
Speaker 3 (08:48):
First? There are the text messages of the Clinton campaign
scrambling to get Joe Biden to give some credence to this,
and then he has an interview and in the interview
he says, I think Donald Trump to bastardize NATO so
that the Russians could take over Europe or something to
that effect. Leans right into Donald Trump is a Russian stooge.
(09:08):
And then a couple days later you start to see
other elements of this story come out, and you've got
all of a sudden, you've got the DNT lawyers going
to the FBI dropping off a packets saying here's Alpha Bank.
We know that was bank a bunk, but they deliver that.
You've got the Christopher Steele thing coming over. Either these
are the most incredible coincidences in all of history, or
the Russians really did stumble onto the plot, and you
(09:31):
can see the actual contemporaneous evidence match is what the
Russians thought was going to happen because they were sitting
on Hillary Clinton's communications. I think that's what we're going
to find out. I think there's one important line I
want to point out to everybody. I want to remind
everybody a story that you allowed me come on your
show and break back. In twenty twenty one, the official
(09:51):
assessment of the United States government is that the Russians
did hack into the Democratic National Committee. Now they have
good evidence, excellent evidence that they ha into John Pedesta's emails.
There's not as good an evidence on the Russian hack
into the DNC because the FBI never went and got
the servers. Instead, they trusted the DNC vendor, the security vendor,
(10:14):
to look at it, and we in twenty one I
came on your show and I had this testimony from
that vendor, a former FBI agent, and he admitted that
they had no evidence that emails were exfltrated. Meeting. All right,
the Russians got on the servers, but we don't see
any evidence that they pulled anything off of it. That
has always been a red flag. Congress jumped all over that.
Jim George jumped on and Mark Meadows. I've always kept
(10:36):
that in the back of my mind, which says, hey,
if they didn't see the emails leave the server, how
do you know that the hack actually occurred. Well, in
this email today, in the George Shows email, there's a
line in there that says, hey, that vendor, that security
vendor doesn't have direct proof of the hack. That's exactly
what the security vendor was trying to tell Congress at
the testimony. I think even that evaluation, we have to
(10:58):
go back and look and see, well, why do the
FBI say it so conclusively when because they were relying
on Hillary Coulton's security vendor, and the security vendor said
I didn't have direct evidence of it. Perhaps another part
of the ruse.
Speaker 1 (11:09):
All right, clickbreak more with John Solomon, Founder, editor in chief,
chief investigative reporter Justinnews dot com than your calls on
the other side, eight hundred and ninety four one, Shawn
Hry We continue now. The Durham Report declassified annex out today.
John Solomon, Founder, editor in chief, chief investigator reporter Justinnews
dot com. Let's go to the declassification that Tulsey Gabbert
(11:32):
released last week and what have we learned.
Speaker 2 (11:35):
We learned in.
Speaker 1 (11:36):
December there was a post mortem on the twenty sixteen election.
We learned that senior career intelligence officials determined and ascertained
that there was no such thing as Trump Russia collusion
in the election and played no impact on that election
at all whatsoever. That's the intelligent assessment conclusion that they
(11:58):
came up with. And then there was a meeting in
December of twenty sixteen after this report came out by
senior career intelligence people saying it didn't happen and they
didn't like the results of that conclusion, and then they
decided to do another assessment, and career intelligence senior career
(12:21):
intelligence people warned, you know, very very clearly that including
the Steele dossier, for example, and doing the second assessment
was absolutely wrong to do. The second assessment directly contradicted
the first assessment. We have about a minute, minute and
a half. How do you interpret all of that based
(12:43):
on the knowledge we got today.
Speaker 3 (12:45):
It's very important that the three people in that August
third meeting, Barack Obama, James Comy, and John Brennan during
the August meeting, they know the truth that Hillary Clinton
may have just done this as a dirty trick. Are
the same guys that decide in December where they're going
to do a do over right? Obama orders it, John
Brennan leads it, James Comy insists to put the debunk
(13:06):
Steele d'Assi into it. The same three guys that knew
back in August that this was a dirty trick are
the guys in December hijacking the intelligence and flipping it
on its head. And I want to remind you of
one thing why James Coby is going to be so
important going forward. He is a guy that submits the
vice of warrants, he signs them right, and that vice
of warrant is based on the Steele Dassis. And by December,
(13:28):
the Steele Dasi is discredited. Steel has been fired, the
CIA's warned he's been penetrated by Russian intelligence. They've done
an assessment and they can't find any proof that anything
in the think is true, and they've debunk something. They
are hanging out there with the fis of Court. One
way the FBI could save face with the vice of
Court is if the Intelligence Committee suddenly decided to treat
the Steel Dahsi legitimately in a bogus intelligence assessment. A
(13:50):
lot of people are going to ask that question. But
that James Comey's motive for sticking that bad document in
the intelligence community session, we don't know, but it needs
to be investigated.
Speaker 1 (13:58):
But we do know one and remember under oath, wasn't
Brennan asked if, in fact he included it and lied
and said no.
Speaker 3 (14:06):
They said it was just in the appendix. But we
now know that conclusions in the main part of it
rested on the on the stealed ose. So now see
why Cash Brittel opened up the Grand conspiracy case. You
start to see these things and it can't be bumbling.
It looks like intentionality, and that's where the strike force
has to begin. It's worth validate, prove well, arrogate, see
(14:28):
if there's crimes.
Speaker 1 (14:29):
John Solomon, we'll have more coverage of this tonight on
Hannity nine Easterns that you DVR. I would say, am
I right in my assessment? The biggest political scandal perhaps
in the history of the country certainly.
Speaker 3 (14:41):
Feels moving in that direction. I think I went all
the proofs and it probably rises to that level.
Speaker 1 (14:45):
Founder Editor in Chief, Chief Investigative Reporter, justinnews dot com.
Well done, my friend, Thank you. We appreciate your time
as always. All right, twenty five now till the top
of the hour. We'll get to your calls here in
a minute. Eight hundred and nine to four one sean.
If you want to be a part of the program.
This is it the biggest political scandal, I believe now
(15:06):
in history, with the smoking gun. We can talk more
about that. We'll take some of your calls on it
as well. Again the number eight hundred nine four one sean. Look,
there is a ceasefire in Israel, he asks the people
of Israel, if they feel peace, You're going to hear
a very different story. I know because I have so
many friends there. You have bombed out, entire neighborhoods and
(15:27):
homes and families torn apart. Kids can play outside, they're
playing in underground bunkers. Believe it or not, playground bunkers.
The violence may have slowed, the fear hasn't disappeared, and
you have tens and tens of thousands of Israelis that
are displaced, that are in desperate need of humanitarian assistance.
(15:48):
That's why our partnership in the work of the International
Fellowship of Christians and Jews. The IFCJ is more vital
than ever. Maybe others have moved on the IFCJ, they
remain steadfast. They are bringing that life saving aid, long
term support to the people of Israel as they have
been fighting for the very survival. I mean, they are
(16:08):
feeding the displaced, the sick, the elderly, Holocaust survivors, children,
you name it, food, water, medicines, clothing, shelter. They're providing
all of it, and they just need as much help
as possible. Whatever you can do, whatever you can donate.
All of this money goes directly to the people in need,
(16:30):
and the need is great. Please go to their website
IFCJ dot org. That's IFCJ dot org. Two day. All
right to our busy, busy telephones. Let us say hi
to James's in my free state of Florida. James, how
are you glad you called?
Speaker 3 (16:48):
Hi? Sean?
Speaker 4 (16:48):
Thanks taking my call, first time caller.
Speaker 5 (16:51):
I've been listening to you forever.
Speaker 2 (16:54):
I thank you. What took you so long to call?
Speaker 6 (16:58):
Work?
Speaker 1 (17:00):
I'm so that's a fair answer. You're allowed to work
and make money.
Speaker 5 (17:04):
I'm a social worker, so we're always busy, and I
wanted to give my perspective of this community police and
idea that people seem to have that solial workers are
somehow going to magically make policing grade Again, it's just
an insane idea to think that a social worker has
(17:25):
the ability to deal with a domestic violence situation.
Speaker 1 (17:31):
Well, let me, let me let's go back to yesterday,
and you have a comrade or Marxist mum, Donnie, and
what he said yesterday, he tried to walk back his
twenty twenty comments when he said very very clearly that
he wants to defund the police.
Speaker 2 (17:47):
And here's what he said.
Speaker 6 (17:49):
My statements in twenty twenty were ones made amidst a
frustration that many New Yorkers help at the murder of
George Floyd and the inability to deliver on what Eric
Adams of all people described as the right for all
of us to be able to enjoy safety and justice.
I am not defunding the police. I'm not running to
(18:10):
defund the police. Andrew Cuomo is far more comfortable living
his life in the past and then attacking tweets of
twenty twenty than in running against the campaign that we
have been leading for the last eight months.
Speaker 2 (18:23):
Uh huh.
Speaker 1 (18:24):
And then here's mom Donnie opposing the NYPD Strategic Response
Group because they violate civil rights. This is the very
group that showed up on Monday when the shooting took place.
They're the people that are most trained, most capable. And
here's what he said about that.
Speaker 6 (18:43):
And as it pertains, the Strategic Response Group, when it
was first formed, there was an intention for its use
to be more akin to the manner in which it
was deployed earlier this week. What we have found, however,
is the city has come to rely upon the Strategic
Response Group as its primary means of response to acts
of protests across the city when New Yorkers exercise their
(19:04):
First Amendment rights. And that decision, in asking the members
of that unit to respond to protests as opposed to
what was the stated reason, is a decision that has
led to the violation of a number of New Yorkers
civil rights. And it's a decision that has been the
basis of my critique of the use of the group
towards that end.
Speaker 1 (19:26):
Well, there's your guy, mom, Donnie. Now, by the way,
yours how long you've been a social worker.
Speaker 5 (19:29):
I've been a social worth for about nineteen now doing
a child the Beast investigations and working with the elderly.
Speaker 3 (19:35):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (19:35):
Well, look, there is a great need for social workers.
But the idea that we're going to send social workers
into violence situations where you know, people of the lives
of being threatened.
Speaker 2 (19:46):
I mean, what are you supposed to do.
Speaker 1 (19:48):
Is there anything that maybe happened in your childhood is
that has triggered these these feelings of violence and your
desire to kill people. No, you need people with guns
that can save the lives of innocent people. We had
Billy Cunningham on earlier in the program.
Speaker 3 (20:02):
Today.
Speaker 1 (20:02):
You saw that violent riot where this woman, you know,
got got blindsided and knocked out, and the pictures of
the brutal beating she took and this guy took this
beating and they're kicking and pounding on this man's head.
You know, how this guy doesn't have a brain bleed
or brain damage at this point is pretty remarkable. There's
(20:23):
a place for it, institutional settings, helping people that are homeless,
helping people with mental illness, giving them a place, you know,
to stay. And by the way, President Trump has come
out and said he wants to get these people off
the streets and into facilities those that are mentally ill,
because they do cause a risk risk to the rest
(20:45):
of society. Now there's a fine line. I mean, you
could take healthy people and want to commit them, and
certainly there has to be some process by which you
and some criteria which you follow. But I mean, what's
what they're doing now by allowing people with mental health
issues and drug addiction issues on the streets. That's not
(21:06):
working and it's putting everybody else, every law abiding citizen
at risk. Anyway, my friend, I appreciate your call.
Speaker 2 (21:12):
Thank you.
Speaker 1 (21:12):
Eight hundred and ninety four one, Shawn is a number
if you want to be a part of the program.
Missouri Sherry next on the Sean Hennity Show.
Speaker 7 (21:19):
Hi, Hi, thanks for taking my call.
Speaker 4 (21:22):
Love your show.
Speaker 7 (21:24):
I'm just calling in about Sydney Sweeney and her ad
which I watched it. Tried really hard to find something
wrong with it. I found nothing. It's just a pretty
girl advertising gene. But my thing is that the people
that have a problem with this, that are saying while
(21:44):
blonde hair, blue eye, did not have a problem with
the blonde hair, blue eyed trans woman that Vogue hired
as a model or the blonde hair, blue eye cover girl,
trans woman, and there's others. But they didn't have a
problem with that. And they're saying it's Nazism. But yet
(22:06):
the same people go out and say from the river
to the sea. So it makes no sense to me.
Speaker 2 (22:12):
Listen, I can only say this. I like her more.
Speaker 1 (22:15):
You know why, because at least up to now, she's
not given into the woke media mob. He's not given in.
The gene company's not given in. Just the opposite has occurred.
They're selling out of these genes like crazy. The campaign
is the exact opposite of Dilla mulvaney and the disaster
with bud Light. And she's not backing down, the gene
(22:39):
Company's not backing down, and people are responding by buying
the jeens. I happen to like jeans. I'd never heard
of this particular brand. Did they make them for guys, Lynda?
I don't even know. I assume they do, right, they
always make it for guys that they do, all right.
So she's a pretty young woman clearly, and okay, a
play on words. She's he's selling genes j e A
(23:02):
n s uh. So she's an attractive young woman. Oh,
jeens g E n e s. How do you get
from there to eugenics the Nazi Germany? You know, only
a crazy, insane liberal could do could could pull that off.
But that's how insane they are. And if this is
where their minds are at, I mean, let them stay there,
(23:23):
let them stay in mom donning Land.
Speaker 2 (23:25):
I don't care about that either. Anyway. It's crazy.
Speaker 1 (23:29):
This this party has lost their collective minds.
Speaker 7 (23:33):
Crazy. Yeah, and so it doesn't make any sense.
Speaker 1 (23:39):
So well, I it makes no sense. It makes none anyway. Sherry, good,
good call, appreciate it. I believe it's Nathania. Is that
how you say it? New York, New York? How you doing, Nathania?
What's going on?
Speaker 4 (23:53):
Sean? Thank you for taking my call, long time listener,
first time caller, because I can never get through.
Speaker 1 (24:00):
I'm glad you got through. And you do not have
a thick New York accent at all?
Speaker 2 (24:06):
I try, No, you actually do. I'm in case you
didn't know.
Speaker 1 (24:12):
When I first started in broadcasting, I did not know
that I had a thick New York accent, and I
worked hard at trying to minimize it. I don't know
if I'm successful or not. Because I don't listen to
my own show.
Speaker 4 (24:25):
No, I can't listen to myself either, And I'm so
glad I'm not hearing the feedback, so thank you for that.
My question is about Mom Donnie, and I'm panicked like
everybody else. I don't live in the city. I live
in Long Island. But where I live, and where most
people live in Long Island, most people commute into the city.
(24:45):
My fear is that if he wins, and at this
point I think it's a foregone conclusion, maybe we'll get lucky.
I don't know. But my fear is that all of
these companies and all of these real estate farms that
are going to start pulling out of me New York City,
and the financial firms, all these people that live out
here and work in the city are no longer going
(25:06):
to have jobs. So how is that going to ripple
out to the suburbs of the Tri State area of
New York City.
Speaker 1 (25:14):
That's my bigin going to ripple out big time. And
you know, for my friends in New York, I don't
want this to happen to them. You know, I'm thoughtful
enough now for my free state of Florida. It's gonna
be gonna it's gonna be a mass exodus. It's going
to be a jail break, and it's going to increase
property values, the direct opposite of what's going to happen
(25:36):
in New York.
Speaker 2 (25:37):
What a lot of people don't know.
Speaker 1 (25:40):
And I do know because I used to live in
your state, and I left your state for a lot
of reasons, not the least of which is they didn't
want me there. I could, I could read a room,
and there were too many people that might that I
would trigger by my very presence. Believe it or not,
I know that sounds absurd, but it's true. And so
(26:01):
I left. And I can tell you in my free
state of Florida, every one of those investment firms, every
one of those insurance companies, every one of those big banks,
they all Morgan Stanley, you name any big company, they
all have offices. And they're building out more offices in
(26:22):
South Florida and they call it Wall Street South. My
prediction is they're gonna pull up stakes and they're gonna
probably headquarter completely down in Florida, and they're probably gonna
cut ties. What does that mean for people in New York?
That means they're either gonna move to Florida themselves, means
(26:42):
property values will precipitously decline in the short term. Look,
New York is a pretty resilient place. It might come back.
I don't think it will ever be the city at
once was. That's my own personal belief. I don't think
there's gonna be a course correct because I think most
people have seen like I have seen, the handwriting is
(27:04):
on the wall. I can't stop it, so I might
as well move on to friendlier territory.
Speaker 2 (27:09):
And that's that. That was a big part of my decision.
Speaker 1 (27:12):
Now, for the people that live in Long Island, like yourself,
I think that you'll see yet a lot of homes
for sale. I think home prices will decline. I think,
you know, people that maybe thought their home was worth
actually going to find that it's worth why and and
less than what they thought it was, And they're going
to be getting out. It's probably a scenario where the quicker,
(27:32):
the earlier you get out, the better you're going to be.
As of today, this guy wins, can something change? Maybe
are people going to buy this election? In your conversion
conversion of Mom, Donnie, I don't know. It's sad though, it.
Speaker 4 (27:45):
Is anyway, but thank you for confirming what I've been
thinking and it's helping me.
Speaker 1 (27:51):
Nathaniel. I wish you and your friends all the best.
I really do, a lot of innocent people are going
to get hurt by all of this in madness. All right,
quick break right back to our bit. Here's our toll
free number. It's eight hundred and nine, Sean, if you
want to be a part of the program. All right,
let's get back to our busy phones. We love to
hear from you. Eight hundred ninety four one, sewn George
again in my free state of Florida.
Speaker 2 (28:12):
Hey George, how are you? What's going on?
Speaker 3 (28:13):
Hey, Sean?
Speaker 1 (28:14):
How you doing? Hey?
Speaker 8 (28:16):
Beginning, I wanted to thank you for inviting me over
the Clearwater. My wife and I loved you, and last
month we had a great time, a great evening with
like minded people and stuff. So it was just a
great even show. I want to thank you.
Speaker 3 (28:32):
Very much for that.
Speaker 1 (28:32):
Oh, I'm so glad that, Kim, we had a great time.
We're we're going to have an announcement soon. We're going
to be adding at least one show, maybe two shows,
and we also have upcoming the Fox Nation Patriot Awards
and some other stuff. So we're getting out on the
road a little bit more than we we have them
in the past. So looking forward to seeing everybody.
Speaker 8 (28:54):
Yeah, my wife said, if you do it anymore, you
have to have some T shirts made and some stuff
that we can buy stuff out at the front. So
and for this, you know, you you start doing it regularly.
Speaker 3 (29:05):
I like to see if.
Speaker 8 (29:05):
Sean Hannity did and Jimmy shirt or something.
Speaker 3 (29:09):
So it was.
Speaker 8 (29:10):
There was a great time.
Speaker 3 (29:11):
But the reason why I called is with the Hillary.
Speaker 8 (29:16):
Emails and stuff that's coming out. When I'm with the
Russian Hopes, the Democrats do things very well. They would
basically they repeat. They usually repeat themselves on any cop
of playbooks and stuff. Everybody's looking in twenty sixteen. But Shawn,
you need to go back to twenty fifteen where uh
(29:36):
Plan Planned Parenthood was caught on under cover of videos
and they hired with George Soros a a research a
research film because a correction, a research firm called uh
GBS Jusion GPS.
Speaker 1 (29:56):
No remember it was hired by Hillary law firm Fusion
GPS Christopher Steele. Dirty dossier, all debunked, all used and
then they manufactured. As we see, this was completely manufactured
out of thin air. Everybody knew about it before it happened.
(30:17):
They all then contributed to a post election to make
to sabotage the Trump presidency. They tried to do more
in twenty sixteen fifty one former Intel officials. They knew
it was a very real laptop. They used law fair
and weaponization in twenty twenty four. That is the Grand Conspiracy,
the biggest political scandal by far in the history of
(30:40):
our country, and we're going to continue to talk about it.
We have a lot on this tonight on Hannity nine
Eastern on the Fox News Channel.
All right, thanks Scott sho On on Hour two Sean Hannity Show,
Toll free. Our number is eight hundred and nine to
four one, Sean if you want to be a part
of the program. Well, smoking gun evidence. I've been getting
wind of this now from my friend John Solomon for
days than he was on TV the other night.
Speaker 2 (00:20):
He said, I expect in.
Speaker 1 (00:22):
Coming days that we're going to hear a lot about
and he goes and he laid out the perfect tiase
for what was declassified this annex, which was released by
Chuck Grassley earlier today, declassified intelligence tying Soros to Clinton's
Russia gate plan for the FBI to put more oil
into the fire. That's the headline on justinnews dot com.
(00:46):
This has been a story that John Solomon has been
working on for years and years of his life. He
has more contacts deep within the intelligence community the f
than any other person that I know on the face
of this earth. And we have worked together in tandem
(01:07):
along with a very small cast of other people, including
Greg Jarrett, Sarah Carter, and then some members of Congress
that were very very helpful during the process. Devin Nunas
would be one, Mark Meadows Rather than me rehashing a
lot of what I said in the last hour, why
don't we bring John on and get his take on it,
but also tie this into the declassification by Toolsey Gabbertt
(01:32):
at the DNI. And when you put it all together,
what I believe we are looking at is probably what
Chuck Grassley classified is as the biggest political scandal in
American history. I've been saying that this is going to
make Watergate look like a Jaywalking ticket in the end,
and I believe this smoking gun out today proves that
(01:55):
comment to be correct. John Solomon, founder editor in chief
investigative reporters The News dot Com, sir, well, how many
years of your life have you worked on this story?
Speaker 3 (02:06):
Well, I remember a certain March twenty seventeen sitting in
your studio and I told you what I thought was
going on. He said, let's peel this onion back. And
so it's been eight years, the eight years this year.
It's just remarkable, and I think it really is time
you've given it because it's an important It was your
broll horn and your own instincts that helped drive this,
and so we're very lucky now to really understand how
(02:26):
it went down.
Speaker 1 (02:27):
So we have this newly declassified so called Clinton Plan intelligence,
including intercepted communications from a George Soros ally by the Russians, ironically,
which suggested that Hillary's campaign against Donald Trump was plotting
a long term affair to demonize Trump. Now this is
the information we had got a little piece of this
(02:49):
information that even foreign actors knew that Hillary had planned
this operation ahead of time. And the revelations include this,
these communications or purported communications from Leonard Bernardo's It's not
somebody I'd heard of before, a top official at George
Soros's Open Society Foundations, and communications by Clinton Forum policy
advisor Julianne Smith. Tell us what this says and what
(03:13):
stands out the most to you, Well.
Speaker 3 (03:15):
It makes sense that if you're Hillary Clinton, you're going
into your Democratic national nominating convention, you just survived by
a whisker an email scandal that maybe others would have
been indicted for, that you would tell your big benefactors,
your donors, the base of your party. Hey, I've got
a plan to get myself out of this hole. Yeah,
I got the classified email problem. It's been hanging around
my neck for two years. But I got to plan
(03:36):
to change the topic, and you would tell your donors,
you tell your benefactors. That's how a political candidate works.
And that's what this email, what's the Russians purported to
have intercepted? Says Leonard Bernardo, top official with George Soros's
Open Society Foundation, is recounting his conversations with a top
advisor at the Clinton campaign, saying, all right, they're going
(03:57):
to put a plan in place, and the plan is
they're going to make it look like Donald Trump has
a Russia collusion problem, maybe he was involved in the
hacking of Hillary's emails. That we're going to change the
subject from her email scandal to this. And by the way,
we don't really know if the Russians actually couldn't emails
because we don't have direct evidence of it from our vendor,
the vendor that the FBI then relied on to make
(04:20):
the claim. But hey, we're going to let it roll.
Let's see where it goes. That email has extraordinary detail.
And it's four days before the FBI opens up Crossfire Hurricane,
and it's the day that Hilary Clinton's plan starts to
go in motion. Joe Biden is going to go out
and give a speech or make a comment and start
(04:42):
the rumble. And then Jake's Sullivan and other people are
out there, and Christopher Steele's coming to Washington's about to
meet with Bruce or on July thirties. In this four
day window, the Russians knew what was going to happen
before it happened. And then you look at this intercept,
is it real? Well, what the guy writes actually occurs
all the way through, so he is either a fortune
(05:05):
teller or he got read in. And Hillary Clinton really
put this plan in motion.
Speaker 1 (05:09):
Now there's a let me give the date because I
want people to understand exactly what you're saying here. July
twenty seven, twenty sixteen, email from this guy Leonard Bernardo,
four days before they launch Operation Crossfire Hurricane. That's right,
quote HRC Hillary rodam Clinton approved Julia's idea about Trump
and Russia hackers hampering US elections. That should distract people
(05:33):
from her own missing email, especially if the affair goes
to the Olympic level, then it goes on the point
is making the Russian play a US domestic issue.
Speaker 3 (05:46):
They wanted to make it. They wanted what the Russians did.
They wanted to hang it on Donald Trump, and of
course that's what happens. Right. A couple of days later,
a guy named Alexander Downer, who's a friend of the
Clinton walks into the fay. I want to tell you
about a conversation in May where I thought a Trump
guy was hinting that he might have been involved in
the acting of Hillary couldn't an emails Chris. We know
that is true, but that got reported. Then Christopher Steele
(06:08):
is already set in motion is DOSSI eight and he's
coming to Washington, DC to meet with Bruce or on
July thirtieth. So from the moment Hillary couldn't approves the
plan on July twenty sixth to July thirty First, what
George Soros's guy purportedly writes in his email that the
Russians intercept actually plays out, so he's either a fortune
teller or he knew he was on the no. And
(06:28):
the sad part about this is that Bill Barr and
John Durham had a chance to subpoena this email, so
maybe see if the NSA added any of their email
or phone intercepts. We can't tell from the report that
they did that. It doesn't look like they did that.
They left it an unfinished answer. But if this email
gets corroborated, if this is truly an actual email as
the Russians intercepted, and it was really sense, then this
(06:51):
is the roadmap before proving that Hillary Clinton created a
ruse and that others will get involved. And let me
give you one other piece of the intelligence. The other
thing that's in this chatter that the Russians had is
the Russians seemed to know in advance that the FBI
was going to participate in the scheme, that they were
going to open up an investigation and give credence to
it and put it on steroids. And so the Russians
(07:14):
have that component as well, which means they're sitting on
perhaps multiple locations and they know now what happens. Again,
this is before July thirty. First, either the Russians and
the people they're intercepting our fortune tellers, or they really
were on top of what was going on. And this
is what really happened. The FBI conspired with Hillary Clinton
to make a false story look real, look legitimate, and
(07:36):
make it an Olympic size scandal on Donald Trump so
that Hillary Clinton could be taken off the hook on
her email scandal. That's what this says. And that's why
someone like Chuck Grassei, who chooses his words carefully. He's
ninety years old, he's been in Washington fifty years. He
doesn't exaggerate. He believes that this may be the greatest
political scandal of his lifetime. There's a lot of work
(07:57):
that still needs to be done. We need to authenticate
these about. John Durham didn't get us all the way there. Now,
what John Durham did do is find some Clinton emails
that are legit. We know for sure they're not Russian.
Really emails that show the plan was being activated the
way the Russians said it was going to be activated,
the way the Sorow's intercepted communication. So there's contemporaneous evidence
(08:19):
that that plan was put in motion. Out tomorrow, I'm
going to give you one of the components of the plan.
You're going to see text messages where the Clinton campaign
is trying to get Joe Biden to take the first
shot at Clinton. Let's have the vice president take a
first shot and accused Donald Trump of being a Russian
stooge and we're going to show you Joe Biden actually
delivers the goods. He fires the first shot. A lot
of people forgot this. I didn't the first shot of
(08:41):
the Russia collusion.
Speaker 1 (08:42):
Can you give us a little bit of this preview
of coming attractions?
Speaker 2 (08:47):
What did Biden say?
Speaker 3 (08:48):
First? There are the text messages of the Clinton campaign
scrambling to get Joe Biden to give some credence to this,
and then he has an interview and in the interview
he says, I think Donald Trump to bastardize NATO so
that the Russians could take over Europe or something to
that effect. Leans right into Donald Trump is a Russian stooge.
(09:08):
And then a couple days later you start to see
other elements of this story come out, and you've got
all of a sudden, you've got the DNT lawyers going
to the FBI dropping off a packets saying here's Alpha Bank.
We know that was bank a bunk, but they deliver that.
You've got the Christopher Steele thing coming over. Either these
are the most incredible coincidences in all of history, or
the Russians really did stumble onto the plot, and you
(09:31):
can see the actual contemporaneous evidence match is what the
Russians thought was going to happen because they were sitting
on Hillary Clinton's communications. I think that's what we're going
to find out. I think there's one important line I
want to point out to everybody. I want to remind
everybody a story that you allowed me come on your
show and break back. In twenty twenty one, the official
(09:51):
assessment of the United States government is that the Russians
did hack into the Democratic National Committee. Now they have
good evidence, excellent evidence that they ha into John Pedesta's emails.
There's not as good an evidence on the Russian hack
into the DNC because the FBI never went and got
the servers. Instead, they trusted the DNC vendor, the security vendor,
(10:14):
to look at it, and we in twenty one I
came on your show and I had this testimony from
that vendor, a former FBI agent, and he admitted that
they had no evidence that emails were exfltrated. Meeting. All right,
the Russians got on the servers, but we don't see
any evidence that they pulled anything off of it. That
has always been a red flag. Congress jumped all over that.
Jim George jumped on and Mark Meadows. I've always kept
(10:36):
that in the back of my mind, which says, hey,
if they didn't see the emails leave the server, how
do you know that the hack actually occurred. Well, in
this email today, in the George Shows email, there's a
line in there that says, hey, that vendor, that security
vendor doesn't have direct proof of the hack. That's exactly
what the security vendor was trying to tell Congress at
the testimony. I think even that evaluation, we have to
(10:58):
go back and look and see, well, why do the
FBI say it so conclusively when because they were relying
on Hillary Coulton's security vendor, and the security vendor said
I didn't have direct evidence of it. Perhaps another part
of the ruse.
Speaker 1 (11:09):
All right, clickbreak more with John Solomon, Founder, editor in chief,
chief investigative reporter Justinnews dot com than your calls on
the other side, eight hundred and ninety four one, Shawn
Hry We continue now. The Durham Report declassified annex out today.
John Solomon, Founder, editor in chief, chief investigator reporter Justinnews
dot com. Let's go to the declassification that Tulsey Gabbert
(11:32):
released last week and what have we learned.
Speaker 2 (11:35):
We learned in.
Speaker 1 (11:36):
December there was a post mortem on the twenty sixteen election.
We learned that senior career intelligence officials determined and ascertained
that there was no such thing as Trump Russia collusion
in the election and played no impact on that election
at all whatsoever. That's the intelligent assessment conclusion that they
(11:58):
came up with. And then there was a meeting in
December of twenty sixteen after this report came out by
senior career intelligence people saying it didn't happen and they
didn't like the results of that conclusion, and then they
decided to do another assessment, and career intelligence senior career
(12:21):
intelligence people warned, you know, very very clearly that including
the Steele dossier, for example, and doing the second assessment
was absolutely wrong to do. The second assessment directly contradicted
the first assessment. We have about a minute, minute and
a half. How do you interpret all of that based
(12:43):
on the knowledge we got today.
Speaker 3 (12:45):
It's very important that the three people in that August
third meeting, Barack Obama, James Comy, and John Brennan during
the August meeting, they know the truth that Hillary Clinton
may have just done this as a dirty trick. Are
the same guys that decide in December where they're going
to do a do over right? Obama orders it, John
Brennan leads it, James Comy insists to put the debunk
(13:06):
Steele d'Assi into it. The same three guys that knew
back in August that this was a dirty trick are
the guys in December hijacking the intelligence and flipping it
on its head. And I want to remind you of
one thing why James Coby is going to be so
important going forward. He is a guy that submits the
vice of warrants, he signs them right, and that vice
of warrant is based on the Steele Dassis. And by December,
(13:28):
the Steele Dasi is discredited. Steel has been fired, the
CIA's warned he's been penetrated by Russian intelligence. They've done
an assessment and they can't find any proof that anything
in the think is true, and they've debunk something. They
are hanging out there with the fis of Court. One
way the FBI could save face with the vice of
Court is if the Intelligence Committee suddenly decided to treat
the Steel Dahsi legitimately in a bogus intelligence assessment. A
(13:50):
lot of people are going to ask that question. But
that James Comey's motive for sticking that bad document in
the intelligence community session, we don't know, but it needs
to be investigated.
Speaker 1 (13:58):
But we do know one and remember under oath, wasn't
Brennan asked if, in fact he included it and lied
and said no.
Speaker 3 (14:06):
They said it was just in the appendix. But we
now know that conclusions in the main part of it
rested on the on the stealed ose. So now see
why Cash Brittel opened up the Grand conspiracy case. You
start to see these things and it can't be bumbling.
It looks like intentionality, and that's where the strike force
has to begin. It's worth validate, prove well, arrogate, see
(14:28):
if there's crimes.
Speaker 1 (14:29):
John Solomon, we'll have more coverage of this tonight on
Hannity nine Easterns that you DVR. I would say, am
I right in my assessment? The biggest political scandal perhaps
in the history of the country certainly.
Speaker 3 (14:41):
Feels moving in that direction. I think I went all
the proofs and it probably rises to that level.
Speaker 1 (14:45):
Founder Editor in Chief, Chief Investigative Reporter, justinnews dot com.
Well done, my friend, Thank you. We appreciate your time
as always. All right, twenty five now till the top
of the hour. We'll get to your calls here in
a minute. Eight hundred and nine to four one sean.
If you want to be a part of the program.
This is it the biggest political scandal, I believe now
(15:06):
in history, with the smoking gun. We can talk more
about that. We'll take some of your calls on it
as well. Again the number eight hundred nine four one sean. Look,
there is a ceasefire in Israel, he asks the people
of Israel, if they feel peace, You're going to hear
a very different story. I know because I have so
many friends there. You have bombed out, entire neighborhoods and
(15:27):
homes and families torn apart. Kids can play outside, they're
playing in underground bunkers. Believe it or not, playground bunkers.
The violence may have slowed, the fear hasn't disappeared, and
you have tens and tens of thousands of Israelis that
are displaced, that are in desperate need of humanitarian assistance.
(15:48):
That's why our partnership in the work of the International
Fellowship of Christians and Jews. The IFCJ is more vital
than ever. Maybe others have moved on the IFCJ, they
remain steadfast. They are bringing that life saving aid, long
term support to the people of Israel as they have
been fighting for the very survival. I mean, they are
(16:08):
feeding the displaced, the sick, the elderly, Holocaust survivors, children,
you name it, food, water, medicines, clothing, shelter. They're providing
all of it, and they just need as much help
as possible. Whatever you can do, whatever you can donate.
All of this money goes directly to the people in need,
(16:30):
and the need is great. Please go to their website
IFCJ dot org. That's IFCJ dot org. Two day. All
right to our busy, busy telephones. Let us say hi
to James's in my free state of Florida. James, how
are you glad you called?
Speaker 3 (16:48):
Hi? Sean?
Speaker 4 (16:48):
Thanks taking my call, first time caller.
Speaker 5 (16:51):
I've been listening to you forever.
Speaker 2 (16:54):
I thank you. What took you so long to call?
Speaker 6 (16:58):
Work?
Speaker 1 (17:00):
I'm so that's a fair answer. You're allowed to work
and make money.
Speaker 5 (17:04):
I'm a social worker, so we're always busy, and I
wanted to give my perspective of this community police and
idea that people seem to have that solial workers are
somehow going to magically make policing grade Again, it's just
an insane idea to think that a social worker has
(17:25):
the ability to deal with a domestic violence situation.
Speaker 1 (17:31):
Well, let me, let me let's go back to yesterday,
and you have a comrade or Marxist mum, Donnie, and
what he said yesterday, he tried to walk back his
twenty twenty comments when he said very very clearly that
he wants to defund the police.
Speaker 2 (17:47):
And here's what he said.
Speaker 6 (17:49):
My statements in twenty twenty were ones made amidst a
frustration that many New Yorkers help at the murder of
George Floyd and the inability to deliver on what Eric
Adams of all people described as the right for all
of us to be able to enjoy safety and justice.
I am not defunding the police. I'm not running to
(18:10):
defund the police. Andrew Cuomo is far more comfortable living
his life in the past and then attacking tweets of
twenty twenty than in running against the campaign that we
have been leading for the last eight months.
Speaker 2 (18:23):
Uh huh.
Speaker 1 (18:24):
And then here's mom Donnie opposing the NYPD Strategic Response
Group because they violate civil rights. This is the very
group that showed up on Monday when the shooting took place.
They're the people that are most trained, most capable. And
here's what he said about that.
Speaker 6 (18:43):
And as it pertains, the Strategic Response Group, when it
was first formed, there was an intention for its use
to be more akin to the manner in which it
was deployed earlier this week. What we have found, however,
is the city has come to rely upon the Strategic
Response Group as its primary means of response to acts
of protests across the city when New Yorkers exercise their
(19:04):
First Amendment rights. And that decision, in asking the members
of that unit to respond to protests as opposed to
what was the stated reason, is a decision that has
led to the violation of a number of New Yorkers
civil rights. And it's a decision that has been the
basis of my critique of the use of the group
towards that end.
Speaker 1 (19:26):
Well, there's your guy, mom, Donnie. Now, by the way,
yours how long you've been a social worker.
Speaker 5 (19:29):
I've been a social worth for about nineteen now doing
a child the Beast investigations and working with the elderly.
Speaker 3 (19:35):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (19:35):
Well, look, there is a great need for social workers.
But the idea that we're going to send social workers
into violence situations where you know, people of the lives
of being threatened.
Speaker 2 (19:46):
I mean, what are you supposed to do.
Speaker 1 (19:48):
Is there anything that maybe happened in your childhood is
that has triggered these these feelings of violence and your
desire to kill people. No, you need people with guns
that can save the lives of innocent people. We had
Billy Cunningham on earlier in the program.
Speaker 3 (20:02):
Today.
Speaker 1 (20:02):
You saw that violent riot where this woman, you know,
got got blindsided and knocked out, and the pictures of
the brutal beating she took and this guy took this
beating and they're kicking and pounding on this man's head.
You know, how this guy doesn't have a brain bleed
or brain damage at this point is pretty remarkable. There's
(20:23):
a place for it, institutional settings, helping people that are homeless,
helping people with mental illness, giving them a place, you know,
to stay. And by the way, President Trump has come
out and said he wants to get these people off
the streets and into facilities those that are mentally ill,
because they do cause a risk risk to the rest
(20:45):
of society. Now there's a fine line. I mean, you
could take healthy people and want to commit them, and
certainly there has to be some process by which you
and some criteria which you follow. But I mean, what's
what they're doing now by allowing people with mental health
issues and drug addiction issues on the streets. That's not
(21:06):
working and it's putting everybody else, every law abiding citizen
at risk. Anyway, my friend, I appreciate your call.
Speaker 2 (21:12):
Thank you.
Speaker 1 (21:12):
Eight hundred and ninety four one, Shawn is a number
if you want to be a part of the program.
Missouri Sherry next on the Sean Hennity Show.
Speaker 7 (21:19):
Hi, Hi, thanks for taking my call.
Speaker 4 (21:22):
Love your show.
Speaker 7 (21:24):
I'm just calling in about Sydney Sweeney and her ad
which I watched it. Tried really hard to find something
wrong with it. I found nothing. It's just a pretty
girl advertising gene. But my thing is that the people
that have a problem with this, that are saying while
(21:44):
blonde hair, blue eye, did not have a problem with
the blonde hair, blue eyed trans woman that Vogue hired
as a model or the blonde hair, blue eye cover girl,
trans woman, and there's others. But they didn't have a
problem with that. And they're saying it's Nazism. But yet
(22:06):
the same people go out and say from the river
to the sea. So it makes no sense to me.
Speaker 2 (22:12):
Listen, I can only say this. I like her more.
Speaker 1 (22:15):
You know why, because at least up to now, she's
not given into the woke media mob. He's not given in.
The gene company's not given in. Just the opposite has occurred.
They're selling out of these genes like crazy. The campaign
is the exact opposite of Dilla mulvaney and the disaster
with bud Light. And she's not backing down, the gene
(22:39):
Company's not backing down, and people are responding by buying
the jeens. I happen to like jeans. I'd never heard
of this particular brand. Did they make them for guys, Lynda?
I don't even know. I assume they do, right, they
always make it for guys that they do, all right.
So she's a pretty young woman clearly, and okay, a
play on words. She's he's selling genes j e A
(23:02):
n s uh. So she's an attractive young woman. Oh,
jeens g E n e s. How do you get
from there to eugenics the Nazi Germany? You know, only
a crazy, insane liberal could do could could pull that off.
But that's how insane they are. And if this is
where their minds are at, I mean, let them stay there,
(23:23):
let them stay in mom donning Land.
Speaker 2 (23:25):
I don't care about that either. Anyway. It's crazy.
Speaker 1 (23:29):
This this party has lost their collective minds.
Speaker 7 (23:33):
Crazy. Yeah, and so it doesn't make any sense.
Speaker 1 (23:39):
So well, I it makes no sense. It makes none anyway. Sherry, good,
good call, appreciate it. I believe it's Nathania. Is that
how you say it? New York, New York? How you doing, Nathania?
What's going on?
Speaker 4 (23:53):
Sean? Thank you for taking my call, long time listener,
first time caller, because I can never get through.
Speaker 1 (24:00):
I'm glad you got through. And you do not have
a thick New York accent at all?
Speaker 2 (24:06):
I try, No, you actually do. I'm in case you
didn't know.
Speaker 1 (24:12):
When I first started in broadcasting, I did not know
that I had a thick New York accent, and I
worked hard at trying to minimize it. I don't know
if I'm successful or not. Because I don't listen to
my own show.
Speaker 4 (24:25):
No, I can't listen to myself either, And I'm so
glad I'm not hearing the feedback, so thank you for that.
My question is about Mom Donnie, and I'm panicked like
everybody else. I don't live in the city. I live
in Long Island. But where I live, and where most
people live in Long Island, most people commute into the city.
(24:45):
My fear is that if he wins, and at this
point I think it's a foregone conclusion, maybe we'll get lucky.
I don't know. But my fear is that all of
these companies and all of these real estate farms that
are going to start pulling out of me New York City,
and the financial firms, all these people that live out
here and work in the city are no longer going
(25:06):
to have jobs. So how is that going to ripple
out to the suburbs of the Tri State area of
New York City.
Speaker 1 (25:14):
That's my bigin going to ripple out big time. And
you know, for my friends in New York, I don't
want this to happen to them. You know, I'm thoughtful
enough now for my free state of Florida. It's gonna
be gonna it's gonna be a mass exodus. It's going
to be a jail break, and it's going to increase
property values, the direct opposite of what's going to happen
(25:36):
in New York.
Speaker 2 (25:37):
What a lot of people don't know.
Speaker 1 (25:40):
And I do know because I used to live in
your state, and I left your state for a lot
of reasons, not the least of which is they didn't
want me there. I could, I could read a room,
and there were too many people that might that I
would trigger by my very presence. Believe it or not,
I know that sounds absurd, but it's true. And so
(26:01):
I left. And I can tell you in my free
state of Florida, every one of those investment firms, every
one of those insurance companies, every one of those big banks,
they all Morgan Stanley, you name any big company, they
all have offices. And they're building out more offices in
(26:22):
South Florida and they call it Wall Street South. My
prediction is they're gonna pull up stakes and they're gonna
probably headquarter completely down in Florida, and they're probably gonna
cut ties. What does that mean for people in New York?
That means they're either gonna move to Florida themselves, means
(26:42):
property values will precipitously decline in the short term. Look,
New York is a pretty resilient place. It might come back.
I don't think it will ever be the city at
once was. That's my own personal belief. I don't think
there's gonna be a course correct because I think most
people have seen like I have seen, the handwriting is
(27:04):
on the wall. I can't stop it, so I might
as well move on to friendlier territory.
Speaker 2 (27:09):
And that's that. That was a big part of my decision.
Speaker 1 (27:12):
Now, for the people that live in Long Island, like yourself,
I think that you'll see yet a lot of homes
for sale. I think home prices will decline. I think,
you know, people that maybe thought their home was worth
actually going to find that it's worth why and and
less than what they thought it was, And they're going
to be getting out. It's probably a scenario where the quicker,
(27:32):
the earlier you get out, the better you're going to be.
As of today, this guy wins, can something change? Maybe
are people going to buy this election? In your conversion
conversion of Mom, Donnie, I don't know. It's sad though, it.
Speaker 4 (27:45):
Is anyway, but thank you for confirming what I've been
thinking and it's helping me.
Speaker 1 (27:51):
Nathaniel. I wish you and your friends all the best.
I really do, a lot of innocent people are going
to get hurt by all of this in madness. All right,
quick break right back to our bit. Here's our toll
free number. It's eight hundred and nine, Sean, if you
want to be a part of the program. All right,
let's get back to our busy phones. We love to
hear from you. Eight hundred ninety four one, sewn George
again in my free state of Florida.
Speaker 2 (28:12):
Hey George, how are you? What's going on?
Speaker 3 (28:13):
Hey, Sean?
Speaker 1 (28:14):
How you doing? Hey?
Speaker 8 (28:16):
Beginning, I wanted to thank you for inviting me over
the Clearwater. My wife and I loved you, and last
month we had a great time, a great evening with
like minded people and stuff. So it was just a
great even show. I want to thank you.
Speaker 3 (28:32):
Very much for that.
Speaker 1 (28:32):
Oh, I'm so glad that, Kim, we had a great time.
We're we're going to have an announcement soon. We're going
to be adding at least one show, maybe two shows,
and we also have upcoming the Fox Nation Patriot Awards
and some other stuff. So we're getting out on the
road a little bit more than we we have them
in the past. So looking forward to seeing everybody.
Speaker 8 (28:54):
Yeah, my wife said, if you do it anymore, you
have to have some T shirts made and some stuff
that we can buy stuff out at the front. So
and for this, you know, you you start doing it regularly.
Speaker 3 (29:05):
I like to see if.
Speaker 8 (29:05):
Sean Hannity did and Jimmy shirt or something.
Speaker 3 (29:09):
So it was.
Speaker 8 (29:10):
There was a great time.
Speaker 3 (29:11):
But the reason why I called is with the Hillary.
Speaker 8 (29:16):
Emails and stuff that's coming out. When I'm with the
Russian Hopes, the Democrats do things very well. They would
basically they repeat. They usually repeat themselves on any cop
of playbooks and stuff. Everybody's looking in twenty sixteen. But Shawn,
you need to go back to twenty fifteen where uh
(29:36):
Plan Planned Parenthood was caught on under cover of videos
and they hired with George Soros a a research a
research film because a correction, a research firm called uh
GBS Jusion GPS.
Speaker 1 (29:56):
No remember it was hired by Hillary law firm Fusion
GPS Christopher Steele. Dirty dossier, all debunked, all used and
then they manufactured. As we see, this was completely manufactured
out of thin air. Everybody knew about it before it happened.
(30:17):
They all then contributed to a post election to make
to sabotage the Trump presidency. They tried to do more
in twenty sixteen fifty one former Intel officials. They knew
it was a very real laptop. They used law fair
and weaponization in twenty twenty four. That is the Grand Conspiracy,
the biggest political scandal by far in the history of
(30:40):
our country, and we're going to continue to talk about it.
We have a lot on this tonight on Hannity nine
Eastern on the Fox News Channel.
The Sean Hannity Show News
Host
Sean Hannity
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
The Joe Rogan Experience
The official podcast of comedian Joe Rogan.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Special Summer Offer: Exclusively on Apple Podcasts, try our Dateline Premium subscription completely free for one month! With Dateline Premium, you get every episode ad-free plus exclusive bonus content.