Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
All right, thank you Scott Channon, Thanks so to all
of you for being with us. We're right down our
Tofrey telephone number. If you want to be a part
of the program at say eight hundred and ninety four
one Sean if you want to join us. Ah Kamala
Harris is back. I mean, can you think of two
bigger losers one hundred and seven days, two billion dollars
later of failure and a cringe worthy a post of
(00:26):
of her in a bookstore somewhere, and then once the
first interview she does, of course she does. Stephen Colbert.
He went on Stephen Colbert during the Summer of Love,
when the when the five hundred and seventy four riots
took place, and we had two dozen dead Americans, thousands
of injured cops, billions in property damage. And yeah, let's
(00:47):
let's go on Stephen Colbert's show, and let's talk about
the fact that I'm writing a book that I guarantee
you nobody is going to want to write. She went
on this strange rand, poking at her husband an effort
to sell her new book. It is. It is bizarre,
And you know I'm listening to this. I didn't see
(01:08):
it I just heard it because my team pulled it.
I can't watch Colbert, He's not funny. I can't watch Kimmel,
he's not funny. Great Gutfelt's funny. I'll even give props
to Stuart he can be funny. I'll give props to
Bill Mahrk. He can be funny even when they make
fun of me. I really, as long as you're funny,
(01:28):
I don't really care. Just be funny. And nothing funny
about Kamala Harris. It's actually chilling the idea that this
woman could have been president anyway. She said she decided
not to run for California governor because the system is broken. Well,
isn't that the whole point of running for office in
the first place. If you think it's broken, and you
(01:49):
think you've got the answer, maybe you want to run
for office. She's she's spent her entire career, you know,
for this great moment in her life. But the system's
too broken. Was it yesterday?
Speaker 2 (02:04):
I mean an announcement that you're not running for the
governor of California. Correct, even though in early polling you
beat every other Candida by double digits. You said you're
gonna set this one out, why are you sitting this?
Are you saving yourself for a different office?
Speaker 3 (02:18):
That might be.
Speaker 1 (02:20):
Obviously, but obviously people will project onto.
Speaker 3 (02:25):
And honestly that it's it's more pat's basic than that. Recently,
I made the decision that I just for now, I
don't want to go back in the system. I think
it's broken. I believe and I always believed that as
as our democracy is, our systems would be strong enough.
Speaker 1 (02:47):
I can't take it every time. It's like it's not
even nails on a chalkboard. You know, the most fascinating
thing that we've learned in the last two weeks is that,
you know, they ran on a couple of things. Their
closing argument is Donald Trump is a Nazi, Donald Trump
is a fascist. Donald Trump is a racist, He's Hitler,
(03:09):
Stalin Mussolini. And then they ran democracy is hanging in
the balance, and little did we know we'd have the
declassification of Tulca Gabbert, the declassification of CIA Director Ratcliffe. Anyway,
then Kamala Harris has asked a very basic, fundamental, simple question.
All right, if you think the system is broken and
(03:31):
you don't want to go back into the system, all right,
So name the leader of the Democratic Party. Here's our answer,
who's leading the Democratic Party?
Speaker 2 (03:40):
I'm just curious.
Speaker 3 (03:40):
There are lots of leaders and.
Speaker 2 (03:43):
Leader of the Democratic Party, you know, like, oh, that's
the leader Donator party. Who comes to mind.
Speaker 3 (03:48):
I think there are a lot of I'm not going
to go through names because then I'm going to leave
somebody out and then I'm going to hear about it.
But let me just let me say this. I think
it is a mistake for us who want to figure
out how to get out and through this and get
out of it, to put it on the shoulders of
(04:10):
any one person. It's really on all of our shoulders.
Speaker 1 (04:15):
That is such a cop out, wimpy political answer. We
know who the leaders of the Democratic Party are, and
we know who are scared to death of them. I mean,
you got Marxist mum, donnie, who's going to destroy what
is left of New York City. It's already an Adam schiffole.
And if he gets elected, god forbid. Thank god. I
(04:38):
don't own property in New York City, because if our
own property in New York City, you know, you could
just take fifty percent of its value and throw it
down the drain and it's probably not going to recover.
But if you invested in, if you're investing in Florida,
my free state, you do so much better in terms
of your investment. Because all these people, all these banks,
(04:59):
all the these financial institutions, they're all moving down to
Wall Street South, as they refer to it, private equity companies,
big bank companies, et cetera, et cetera. Maybe like maybe
they realize that the system is broken to we know
who the leaders are, Marxist Mom Donnie, Tommy, Mam Donnie. Uh,
then we've got AOC. Then we've got the squad, and
(05:22):
then we got Grandpa Bernie and Pocahontas and the rest
of the lunatics. Now we got this guy in Minneapolis
of Mom Donnie, you know, Junior, with the same radical
Marxist status, socialist communist views that he has. Anyway, then
she's asked the hardest of all questions. And this is
(05:43):
relevant because yesterday Mike Donlin tomp aid to Biden, who
cashed in as a highly paid advisor. He made four
million dollars running the Biden campaign that died, and was
scheduled to get another four million dollars if in fact
he won and Kamala Harris. No Democrat can ask answer
(06:04):
this question, when did you notice Joe Biden's cognitive decline?
Stephen Colbert, at least he did one halfway decent thing
as he's about to let the door hit him in
the ass on the way out, and that is he
asked the question. Here's the answer.
Speaker 2 (06:22):
Biden walk on stage of that debate and it did
not go well. Spoiler, it did not go well in
that debates. There there therefore you became the candidate. At
what point in this a month that followed that did
people start saying you might need to be prepared for this.
Speaker 3 (06:39):
Let me say something about Joe Biden, say something about
Joe bid for him, and I think that the way
that we should be thinking about where we are in account.
Remember that we had a president of the United States
who believed in the rule of law.
Speaker 1 (07:02):
No, we had a president that didn't know what day
of the week it was. Ah, I hate being lied to,
like I can live with the fact that you know,
if you have kids, all of you that have had children,
you know what it's like your kids. Will you know
whatever trouble mischief they may get in? Okay, you probably
(07:24):
did it yourself. If you're like me, you probably did
it on testosterone and human growth hormone. I was a
kid that kind of mostly raised myself. I'd hate to
have to confess to everything that I did. I've confessed
a lot to a lot of what I did, but
not everything. But it's when your kids look at you
(07:44):
and flat out lie to you, and it's like, did
you eat the cookie? I told you, Daddy can have
a cookie. No, you can't have the cookie. Daddy, Please,
I want a cookie? Please, pretty please. There's what kids do.
They go, please, please, please, please, please please please did please?
That is like the most annoying thing on earth, right,
(08:06):
And then you say no, you hold your ground, you
can't have the cookie. And then you see them like
five minutes later and they got cookie all over their
face and you asked, did you eat the cookie? And
they say no. It infuriates me. And this is what
politicians do. They infuriate me. We have updates and I
(08:28):
think this is very very relevant after with all that
we've learned from Tulsa Gabbard and the declassification and CIA
director Ratcliffe. Justinnews dot Com is a piece out today
after the Clinton Russia ruse was intercepted by US intelligence.
(08:49):
Guess who took the first shot and smearing Donald Trump.
It was Joe Biden. According to justinnews dot com, He's
the one that publicly linked Donald Trump the Vladimir Putin
right around the same time that Hillary Clinton had signed
off on the Clinton planned intelligence now remember, just to
take you back, Hillary Clinton, personally, according to these declassifications,
(09:14):
approved the plan to smear Trump with the bogus Russia
Gate allegations. Hillary Clinton signed off on the plan hatched
by the top advisor to smear then candidate Trump with
false claims of Russia collusion and distract from her own
mounting server email scandal during the twenty sixteen campaign. The
(09:35):
plot the brain child of Clinton. The Clinton campaigns then
farm policy advisor Julianne Smith included quote raising the theme
of Putin support for Trump, and quote subsequently steering public
opinion toward the notion that it needs to equate the
Russian leader's political influence campaign with actual hacking of election
(09:59):
in structure and Smith would go on to serve as
former President Joe Biden's ambassador to NATO. I don't have
any comments, he said to the new York Post when
they reached out. We've been reaching out to all these
people that we've been talking about anyway, then you remember
the smoking gun. Then we find out now the Soros
(10:21):
Open Society group, they are denying everything they did. At
least they got back to us denying any of this
is true. Anyway. Their senior vice president is Leonardo Benardo,
and they apparently was looped into the scheme, although they're
denying it and laid out it's intended effect. Quote Julie
(10:43):
says it will be a long term affair to demonize
Putin and Trump. Bernardo was quoted as writing on July
twenty fifth. For now, it's good for a post convention
bounce later and this should scare everybody because this is
the weaponization of re letter agencies. The FBI will put
more oil into the fire. Two days later, writing Hillary
(11:08):
Rodham Clinton HRC approved Julia's idea about Trump and Russian
hackers hampering US elections. That should distract people from a
row missing email, especially if the affair goes to the
Olympic level, an apparent reference to revelations of a massive
state sponsored doping campaign by Russia following the twenty fourteen
(11:32):
Winter Games in soci Anyway, the Special Council John Durham
uncovered the files during this multi year probe into intelligence.
Now here's maybe the most interesting side of this, and
the most predictable side of this. New York Times Washington
Post got pullitzerprises. You may recall they are trying to
(11:54):
make the case today. I do not agree with their
interpretation that the Clinton Plan emails were likely made by
Russian spies. Now they should be returning the Pulletzer prizes
as far as I'm concerned. Anyway, they're talking about the
annex to Special Council John durhams Durham's report, and you know,
(12:15):
we scoured the Russian investigation wrongdoing et cetera, et cetera,
et cetera, and the information. A twenty nine page annex
to the Special Council's report reveals the foundational document for
the theory was most likely stitched together by Russian spies.
Now that's not exactly what it was saying. If you
(12:35):
read it, it was pretty clear that they had this
information before the plan was even hatched, that the plan
was being discussed, and apparently according to at least the
classified intelligence is that there was a hacking, obviously by
the Russians, and they think it came from one of
(12:57):
the Open Doors group that again denies any knowledge of
any of this. But then where did all of this
come from? They have a lot of questions to answer. Anyway.
They're talking about the July twenty seven to twenty sixteen
email that said Missus Clinton had approved the campaign and
the proposal to tie Trump to the Russia to Russia
to distract from the scandal over her own private email server.
(13:20):
The release of the annex adds new details about all
of this. The declassification is the latest disclosure in recent
weeks concerning the Russia investigation. The wave has come as
the administration is seeking to change the subject. That is
not what this is about. Now. This is why I
said back in two thousand and seven the journalism's dead.
(13:44):
This is why I said after this election that legacy
media is dead because these people lied and peddled a
phony Russia conspiracy theory that apparently was hatched. If you
believe the classified intel from Ratcliffe, and if you believe
that the classified info from Pelsey Gabbard, you had career
(14:10):
intelligence officials to a post mortem and an assessment, and
they discovered there was no Trump Russia collusion. Only the
top ranking deep state operatives didn't like that conclusion, and
against very angry and very outspoken rank and files senior
intelligence officials, they decided to do another assessment, one that
(14:31):
fit their narrative. How does this happen in the United
States of America. This situation in Cincinnati is really really
bothering me. We have what is the name of this
city council woman Linda who, Yeah, her name is Parks.
What's her first name, Victoria Parks. Yeah, Victoria Parks. So
(14:55):
she puts on Facebook ball they kind of asked for
they deserved it. She was asked about whether or not
she still agrees with her own comment. Here's what she said.
Speaker 3 (15:04):
I had the freedom of speech and and.
Speaker 1 (15:09):
You know, I am a drone woman. That night when
when I wrote on the Internet, I meant it.
Speaker 3 (15:15):
That's the way I felt, and I'm not going to
back down from it.
Speaker 1 (15:19):
Right now. A mob that beats the living hell nearly
kills this young woman, Holly. As a matter of fact,
this woman who was beaten unconscious, Now she didn't even
see the punch coming that comes running up to her.
Blindsides her. Uh, if you haven't seen the pictures of
(15:39):
her swollen, black and blue face, who would break anybody's heart.
He only went over to help this man that was
getting the crap beaten out of him. I can't believe
he got kicked and punched in the head as much
as he did. And he's and and the guy stood
not in the hospital for the rest of his life.
It's pretty unbelievable anyway. And Holly, and she had given
(16:02):
Senator Moreno on the pictures and permission to put it
on the internet. On on X you know, she decided
to go home to Russia. I mean, if you want
to go home to Russia, that ought to tell you
how bad things are getting in American big cities. And
you know, Billy Cunningham was right the other day. It's
it is institutionalized failure. It's in New York, it's New Joysey.
(16:25):
Every big city's at Chicago, it's Los Angeles at San Francisco.
And the quality of life issues, defund dismantled, no bail laws,
insanity and and it's just open season for criminals on
innocent people. And the mayor I think if he finally
shows up today he's been gone the whole time. Great job,
(16:47):
he was on vacation. Why would he ever want to
come back from vacation. One follow up on the interview
which was horrific last night between the two losers, Kamala
Harris and Stephen Colbert. I do like Mark Alpern. I
think is a really strong reporter. I don't always agree
with his political views, but I like him, and he
(17:07):
was one of the few people that was willing to say,
all of you people watching MSDNC are losing your mind,
because he was one of the few people like me
that was actually looking at real numbers, early voting numbers,
and it was very apparent that Donald Trump was going
to win this election. In the days and weeks and
months ly once early voting started, I was getting a
(17:30):
reported day. Now, some of you may think I should
have been more honest about what I was reading every day,
because as every day passed, it got more apparent that
the odds were higher and higher and higher that Donald
Trump was going to win. I don't like to create
false optimism. I like to under promise and overdeliver. You deliver,
(17:53):
you don't over promise and underdeliver. That's why as much
as this. You know, these revelations and this d class
of vcation are so glaring and so egregious. I can't
sit here on this programming and give you any degree
of confidence that the people that are responsible for what
we have now uncovered through declassification are going to be
(18:13):
held accountable. I wish I could. Anyway. Halprin reported today
that former President Joe Biden's team apparently have a ton
of unflattering information that they're ready to release if former
Vice President Kamala Harris turns on him. Isn't it nice Democrats?
They treat each other so well. They didn't treat the
(18:34):
country particularly well when they were in power. Alprin says,
I'm going to break a little news. He says, we
talk all the time about what did Kamala Harris know?
When did she know it about Joe's cognitive decline? She
ducked and dodged that question last night, and anyway goes on.
If the Biden people decide that Kamala Harris is coming
after Joe Biden, wait till you hear the stories about
(18:57):
how much they tried to help her be prepared to
be vice president and be in the position to run
and how much they decided not happening. She is not
up to this job. And if the Biden people feel threatened,
you will hear stories about Kamala Harris as vice president
that will not make her. Look at what did she
(19:17):
do as vice president? She could barely string two sentences together.
The only difference between her and Joe is at least
Joe had an excuse. He was in a steep cognitive decline.
Pretty incredible times we live in. Let me go back
to if I can with this classified annex from the
(19:37):
Durham Report, which is classified no more. In the newly
revealed evidence might be more explosive than we ever knew.
And as a reminder, Durham, you know, just to bring it,
you know, full circle here. This is on top of
Tulsa Gabbard's release. And remember we found the intelligence showed
(19:59):
by seeing your intel officials, rank and file career people
that there was no Trump Rusher collusion. And then once
presented with that information, well it didn't fit the narrative.
That we now know based on this new release, that
it was not the narrative that was desired by these
high ranking deep state political operatives. Within these three letter
(20:23):
agencies that had it out for Donald Trump and seemed to,
from my perspective, be wanting to put cinder blocks on
the scales of not one, not two, but three presidential elections.
I mean, I was texting with Rudy Giuliani's former attorney,
Bob Costello. Bob Costello, for example, in twenty twenty, had
(20:45):
a copy of the Laptop from Hell. They knew he
had a copy of the Laptop from Hell. They knew
Rudy had a copy of the Laptop from Hell. And
he told me how they had it because when they
rated Rudy's house, they got into his iCloud and they
knew there was a on there, so they knew it
was going to break. They knew it would be leaked,
They knew the public would know ahead of time. And
(21:07):
Bob Costello wrote me and even said that he went
as far as to tell Rudy to tell Trump that
the election's over, that there's no way that Biden can
win this election. Based on this information, I'll think back,
what we know is on the laptop. You know the drugs,
the guns, the women and everything in between of Hunter Biden,
(21:28):
but more importantly, the big guy and all the money
going to the big guy, and I have to give
half my income to the big guy, and I have
to pay for the big guy's home repairs. And this
goes back to Barisma and CEFC. And you know a
guy that at the time is an admitted crack addict
with no experience and energy, oil, gas, coal, fracking, none
(21:51):
of it, and is getting paid millions of dollars to
sit on a board and he's basically there explaining all
of this would have killed any presidential candidates. So they
verify the authenticity of this laptop. In March of twenty twenty,
and the FBI decides to go meet weekly with big
(22:12):
tech companies, and the lead up to the twenty twenty election,
they're pre bunking what they know is going to be
leaked in terms of the laptop, warning these big tech
companies that they'll likely be a victim of Russian disinformation,
and all of this designed to impact the result of
that election. I would argue to me, that's putting cinder
(22:34):
blocks on the scales of an election, and no government agency,
no government employee, should abuse their power that way. And
you know this, now, add to that, this whole Russian
narrative which I was, you know, reading to you earlier.
I mean, some of the key lines are just devastating
(22:55):
in terms of Hillary Clinton, you know, and you know
what that would the things that they were saying and doing,
you know, this long term affair to demonize Putin and
Trump all part of their strategy, and that they knew
from the very beginning that it was simply not true.
(23:17):
Hillary Rodham Clinton approved Julia's ideas about Trump and Russian
hackers hampering with US elections. That should distract people from
their own missing email scandal. That means Hillary scandal, especially
if the affair goes to the Olympic level. An apparent
reference to the revelations of a massive state sponsored doping
campaign by Russia following the twenty fourteen Winter Games in Soshi.
(23:41):
I took it to mean something else, but I took
it to meaning it goes it really gets to be
a big, big story. But John Durham was tasked under
Donald Trump's first term to investigate the sketchy origins of
the Russia hoax. This annak has been there available, just
(24:02):
like this treasure trove of you know, this burned bag
things that the FBI normally would take and literally burn.
You have armed agents that take it to incinerators and
they watch it being burned. And this is how they
get rid of sensitive information that they never want to
get in the hands of the wrong people. That part
(24:24):
doesn't bother me. That's part of the job. But the
email from July at twenty sixteen, these documents declassified by
Chuck Grassley, and in this case, a top Soros back
Clinton ally named Leonard Bernardo wrote, quote, HRC Hillary Rodham
Clinton approved Julia's idea about Trump and Russian hackers hampering
(24:46):
with US elections. That should distract people from her own
missing email. Well tell me what part of that does
not mean that this is all being hatched. And I'll
get into this maybe later in the program. People say, well, hannedy,
sometimes you're a little too repetitive. If I did not
go out on a daily basis, we spent three years
(25:08):
on this and explain to people how Hillary Clinton's campaign
used a law firm to hire an op research firm
that went and hired a former mi I six agent
that put together a series of individual documents that collectively
later became known as the dossier. And if I didn't
(25:30):
point out so regularly it's a Hillary Clinton bought and
paid for Russian disinformation dossier. Then I don't think people
would understand this story as much. I don't think they'll
understand it at all. And that's a big problem. So
Hillary Clinton approved the idea about Trump and Russia hackers
(25:56):
in the absence of direct evidence, CrowdStrike and threat connect
by the way their DNC linked tech firms will supply
the media. And this is the other part of the story,
is that the media took every single thing that was
being fed to them, manufactured by and then fed to
them as gospel truth, and they spent three years pedaling
(26:19):
the lies and the conspiracy theory. Then you have to
ask yourself this question, how does this possibly happen in
the United States of America. Now, one interesting side note here,
as they're spreading this propaganda, if you go back to
July twenty seven, twenty sixteen, only four days before the
(26:39):
FBI decided to open their investigation into Trump and Russia,
you know, maybe it's an insane coincidence. As I said
on TV last night, because it gets interesting. A prior
email on July twenty fifth, from the same Clinton Allies
dated quote that Julie says it will be a long
term affair to demonize Putin and t Now is a
(27:00):
good time for post convention bounds. Later, the FBI will
put more oil into the fire. Well, what does that mean?
That means that the FBI is gonna put cinder blocks
and blow up a story that they know to be false.
We know that James Comi was warned not to use
the Hillary Clinton bought and paid for Russian disinformation dossier,
(27:22):
and Lindsay Graham was very clear last night he signed
three of the four PISA warrants. The bulk of that
information came from the from the dirty dossier, and he's
never been held accountable. It was years later that Lindsey
Graham actually got James Comy and everybody else that signed
off on that dossier to admit under oath that knowing
(27:43):
what they know now, they never would have they never
would have signed off on those PISA applications. Now you
start connecting the dots here, you know, and and I
can go on and on and on, but they were
so desperate to get you know, this new report. After
the senior intelligence career people came out and said there
(28:06):
was no Trump Rusher collusion and By the way, we
did reach out to everybody involved in all of this
through my TV show, Brennan and Clapper and call me
all of them reached out to the Sorrows backed Clinton ally,
and those released emails reached out to Obama, Clinton, Brennan, Clapper,
(28:27):
the Obama advisor mentioned in the annex. We have yet
to hear back from these people, you know, the Sorrows
back Clinton ally in the organization for the Relief. No, no,
not a word. The only people that got back to
us is the Sorrows people and they said, no, we
had nothing to do with any of this. Well, that's
why we present the information and you get to decide.
(28:49):
But to me, the biggest scandal in history. All right,
when we come back, It's been a transformational week as
it relates to healthcare. Everybody worries about their health. I'm
not a big health warrior, but I guess for good reason.
And you know what health care is about, the change
for the better. Democrats are demagogueing. You're trying to scare
older people. They're going to kill you and take away
(29:11):
your your health insurance. No they're not. They're cutting medicate,
No they're not. They're increasing it. By seven percent. Doctor
Oz Next