August 9, 2025 • 34 mins
Sean welcomes Mike Rowe, host of Dirty Jobs and founder of the mikeroweWORKS Foundation, for a deep conversation on the value of skilled trades in an era of AI and automation. They discuss the satisfaction of hands-on work, the looming skills gap, and the urgent need to inspire a new generation of workers. From manufacturing’s resurgence to the lessons of Deadliest Catch, Rowe delivers hard truths about America’s work ethic and the road ahead. Plus, Sean breaks down Tulsi Gabbard’s revelations on Obama-era intelligence manipulation during the Russia collusion hoax, with legal analysis from Greg Jarrett and Brett Tolman.
Follow Sean and Our Guests on Social Media:
-
Sean Hannity – Facebook | X (Twitter) | Truth Social
-
Mike Rowe – Facebook | X (Twitter)
-
Tulsi Gabbard – Facebook | X (Twitter) | Truth Social
-
Greg Jarrett – Facebook | X (Twitter)
-
Brett Tolman – X (Twitter)
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Now back to the best of Sean Hannity.
Speaker 2 (00:10):
Well, we have come out your city.
Speaker 1 (00:15):
On May I get.
Speaker 3 (00:17):
Saying you a conscious zone.
Speaker 1 (00:19):
Will be entire hotel And if you want a little banging,
a Yuni.
Speaker 4 (00:27):
Ain't come along.
Speaker 2 (00:28):
They understand that we have a Timu Hitler in the
White House right now.
Speaker 5 (00:32):
That thinks that he is going to.
Speaker 6 (00:33):
Become the dictator of the United States.
Speaker 5 (00:35):
The time is up for playing in our faces.
Speaker 1 (00:38):
He has to be brought down. And I don't mean physically,
I'm talking about politically. We will bring him down. He
will be impeached again.
Speaker 6 (00:47):
We have a consolidating dictatorship in our country. And it
sounds melodramatic to say it.
Speaker 1 (00:53):
I know freedom is back in style. Welcome to the revolution.
Be away of coming to your SENTI.
Speaker 2 (01:05):
Going the way out against allazon saying you a conscious soil.
Speaker 7 (01:09):
Se Sean Hennity Show, more me I'm the scenes, information
on freaking news and more bold inspired solutions for America.
Speaker 5 (01:21):
All right, thanks Scott cha ha.
Speaker 2 (01:22):
An Hour two Sean Hannity Show told free it's eight
hundred and nine four one Sean. If you want to
be a part of the program. Uh, everybody says well,
Ai the future is going to change dramatically.
Speaker 5 (01:35):
Well, the future is now.
Speaker 2 (01:36):
It is changing dramatically, and as a result of artificial intelligence.
I can tell you that there are going to be
careers and jobs that are simply going to evaporate in
our economy. And that's why it's critical that you think
through if you're a young person, what profession you might
be thinking about going into, because you don't want to
(01:57):
be replaced by artificial intelligence. I spent a lot of
time using GROC. I've learned a lot from it, and
you can learn a lot from it. I urge all
of my listeners if you've not experimented with chat, GPT,
with rock Gemini, any of these artificial intelligence things, I
would spend time with it now.
Speaker 5 (02:18):
I say this because I read.
Speaker 2 (02:21):
An article and I spent a lot of time on it,
maybe about a month and a half ago, that the
next generation of millionaires in America are going to be
blue collar, working class people. That's the one thing that
we know AI is not going to replace. Although robotics
(02:41):
are certainly showing up in a major way. I saw,
for example, a video this week of a robot doing
a roof on a house and doing it perfectly. I
mean that would be something you have to pay attention to.
There's a new article out today gen z is ditching
college and taking up secure trade jobs, but new data
(03:04):
shows office administration jobs are still safer, more stable, and
less deadly. With that said, the one person that has
been maybe the biggest advocate of the trades is our
good friend Mike Rowe love micro He's a great broadcaster,
good friend. He's with micro works and anyway we appreciate
(03:27):
that's his foundation. I still never donated twenty five grand,
but I never got my autographed I never got my
autograph poster from all the captains of Deadliest Catch. And
if I'm waiting for it, I'm sure it'll come any
day in the mail.
Speaker 5 (03:42):
Now, how are you?
Speaker 8 (03:43):
I'm just saving it up for a special, a super special.
Speaker 5 (03:48):
You got the check and you cashed it, so that's
all I know.
Speaker 8 (03:51):
Well, let me tell you what I did with the
money and a bunch of other money that came in
from people who, like you, lived the balance life and
like you, believe that prosperity can still be achieved by
learning a skill that's in demand and work in your
butt off. I put it in a pile, and I
(04:12):
awarded five hundred and twenty six work ethic scholarships this year.
That comes out to five million, fifty thousand dollars. That
money goes out later this week to help train the
next generation of skilled workers. Because the articles you mentioned
are rooted in fact, undeniable, incontrovertible fact. And it's too
(04:38):
early for a victory lap. But for seventeen years at Microworks,
we've been saying that the chickens will come home to
roost and they're going to look a lot like carpenters
and plumbers and steamfitters and pipe fitters and HVAC professionals
and collision repair and welders and so forth, and so
it is. It's somewhat gratifying and a little scary. You know,
(05:01):
I thought your summation there was pretty balanced. I don't
have a crystal ball either, and long term, who knows,
But short term I think you're right on the money.
The next generation to hit it out of the park
is going to be a generation possessive skill.
Speaker 2 (05:18):
So in my ten years that I worked in construction,
I did everything from framing and roofing, and then I
learned how to paint and I started my own painting company.
Then I learned how to hang wallpaper, and then I
learned how to lay tile. I didn't like falling three
stories off a roof. I didn't particularly love heights. It
(05:38):
was not my favorite thing, especially after falling. I'm frankly
lucky I was alive because I went down head first.
It was a slippery day. It was in Rhode Island,
and it was the last nail of the day. It
was a hell storm. We were trying to put tar
paper on the roof before we left, and my feet
gave out. I swung at a two at the second
two and a half story dormer with my hammer. I
(06:00):
missed it. Now I'm going down head first. I dislocated
my elbow, broke my radio head, busted up my teeth.
After all my years playing hockey, I didn't lose a tooth.
Now I lost them all. And I kind of feel
lucky that I'm alive. In many ways, however, when I
learned to do finish work, when I would paint a
room or hang paper or lay tile, and I was
(06:21):
I really had a good eye for finished work because
I just.
Speaker 5 (06:25):
I really wanted to do a good job.
Speaker 2 (06:28):
I had a sense of personal satisfaction at the end
of every day that I can't even really describe to people.
Speaker 8 (06:34):
No, you can't part of what Dirty Jobs did, and
you know I was. I'm particularly proud of it because
it's very difficult. You know, you're in TV. TV is careful,
it's produced. You hire actors, you create scripts, you rehearse
dirty Jobs. We never did a second take. We only
used real people and we would show up with our
(06:56):
cameras and we would go on a roof like the
one you described, and we witnessed some accidents like the
ones you described. And I'm not here to sugarcoat it.
You know, the world is filled with risk, and the
skilled trades are not for everyone. Some people just aren't
cut out for it. That's why our scholarship program is
called a work ethic program. The world's a dangerous place
(07:18):
and the skilled trades are near the tip of that sphere.
But having said all that, your last point is the
most important point. There's so much meaning, there's so much purpose,
there's so much satisfaction. I mean, we did three hundred
and fifty dirty jobs and you know, people still ask
(07:39):
me to this day, what did that cohort know what
did that group of people know that most of us
have forgotten. And a big part of that answer is
the simple satisfaction that comes from always knowing how you're
doing along the course of your work. And these are
the intangible things. It's kind of like a soft skill, right.
(08:02):
You can't really teach people appreciation, you can't really teach
them work ethic. These are things you choose to have
or not. And I spend a lot of my time,
as you know, with the Foundation. It's not just a
scholarship fund or a pr campaign for hard work. It's
(08:22):
an honest attempt to get people who aren't in the trades,
not necessarily into them, although that's clearly something we need
to do. It's only a matter of national security, but
just to foster a sense of appreciation, a little bit
of wonder for the fact that when you flick the switch,
the lights come on, and that's the hell of a thing.
And when you flush the toilet, the mess goes away,
(08:44):
and that's a modern miracle. And if we don't have
an honest appreciation, I'm talking about the three hundred million
or so people who share my addiction to smooth roads
and indoor plumbing and affordable electricity. If we're not blown
away by the miracle of it and by the people
who provide it, then the skills gap is going to
(09:05):
get wider. And I worry, man, because I'm rooting for
the president. I want to see manufacturing reshort and I
want to see indust realization reinvigorated. But we have seven
point six million open jobs right now Sean four hundred
and eighty thousand of them are in manufacturing alone.
Speaker 2 (09:24):
So, by the way, that's about to get so much
bigger because Donald Trump has secured anywhere from twelve to
fifteen trillion dollars in manufacturing money for automobiles, for pharmaceuticals,
semiconductor chips, rare earths, magnets. I mean, all that manufacturing
(09:46):
is coming online quickly, especially because they added apparently bonus deppreciation,
which means that if you build a manufacturing center, you
get to write it off in year one, and that
is incentivizing companies to spend that money almost immediately.
Speaker 8 (10:02):
Yep, yep, all true. But look, I was in the
room about three weeks ago in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, sitting on
the stage with the President and thirty five CEOs of
some of the biggest companies in the country who collectively
pledged ninety two billion dollars to infrastructure and data centers
(10:25):
in PA alone. Now, it was a story, but it
wasn't big enough. This is a huge thing that happened.
And I realized about halfway through. The reason I was
there was kind of to remind the crowd. Look, we've
got the money, and we have a president who seems
pretty determined to bring these opportunities back to the States.
(10:49):
But I don't know that we have the workforce right now.
And I don't know if you've crossed paths yet with
Nick Everstadt, you'd love him. He wrote a book called
Men Without Work, and in it he takes a deep,
deep dive into the reasons why there's seven million able
bodied men in this country right now who not only
(11:10):
aren't working, they're not looking for work. That's never happened
in peacetime before. So when you think about the opportunities
that currently exist that employers can't fill, and then when
you think about the opportunities you've just described that are
going to be created, you have to wrestle with the
basic truth that creating jobs is different than creating enthusiasm
(11:37):
for jobs, and if we don't have the enthusiasm, if
we don't have the aforementioned appreciation, we're going to have
a really tough time filling those opportunities.
Speaker 2 (11:48):
The jobs that we're describing here are high paying career
jobs with great benefits, you know, that will help people
achieve the American dream. You know always admired you from Afar.
I feel like in my life and career, I've been
blessed beyond anything I ever deserved. If there were two
(12:09):
shows that I could do that were different than what
I'm doing now, they would be the two shows you
worked on, Thirtiest Jobs and Deadliest Catch. I mean, you know,
I'm obsessed with them because I talk to you about
it all the time. I'm obsessed with it. Well, ye,
and because I mean, like my heart was broken when
(12:34):
when Deadliest Catch you went through a period was about
two years in a row, and a lot of the
crew members they were dying left, right, and sideways. I'm like,
oh my, I couldn't even believe it. Yeah, it was
so tragic and so sad. And you knew these guys intimately.
Speaker 8 (12:51):
Yeah, Phil Harris was a friend lost him in two
thousand and eight. I suppose it was Cornelia Marie went
down who was a guy every year? You know, and look,
this is this is not something that ought to be glamorized,
but nor is it something that should be ignored. You
fell off for roof in the midst of a construction
career that you nevertheless continued to enjoy these men on
(13:16):
Deadliest Catch, which, by the way, season twenty one just started.
Twenty one seasons, so you know, there are a lot
of things you can look at Dirty Jobs and Deadliest Catch,
and you can you can wonder, you know, why would
those shows last two decades? And you know, I've got
a couple theories, but at the top of the list
(13:37):
is the simple fact that they show you something that
is undeniably true, undeniably real, and undeniably work. And it's
a reminder, you know, as we I think, I mean,
since we started this conversation with artificial intelligence, I'll make
the point around that term. In the future, even though
(14:00):
I can't see it clearly, I am pretty sure that
there's going to be a bright line drawn between all
that is artificial and all that is authentic, and that
line's going to become really important for people to understand
and we're going to value things on both sides of
(14:21):
the line, but we're going to hunger for the authentic thing,
whether it's a piece of art music or a roofer
or a craftsman. And I think the extent to which
this new technology affects everything will be different. It's going
to be really hard to handicap what comes next exactly.
Speaker 2 (14:44):
But well, let me tell you, you can never replace those
guys on Deadly's catch. Artificial intelligence. Maybe technology might help
the you know how heartbreaking it is when they pull up,
you know, when they pull up the cage and there's
no no crab in it. Ah, I'm like so disappointed.
I feel like I'm living it with them.
Speaker 8 (15:05):
It's life. It's like I mean the metaph it's real.
It's absolutely real. And look, I'll tell you something else
you don't see in that show, which is awesome.
Speaker 5 (15:14):
We got about thirty seconds, So go ahead, flat.
Speaker 8 (15:16):
Seas, nothing happening, pleasant temperatures, bord he I.
Speaker 5 (15:22):
Have never seen that. And no, and he's got in
the bearing sea.
Speaker 8 (15:27):
No, but it's a part of life too. Look, your
day is full and busy, but you don't spend twenty
four hours on the radio or in front of the camera.
That's what people know you for. But there's a whole
lot of other stuff that makes Sean Hannity Sean Hannity.
And the same is true of Mike Row and Phil
Harris and any any one of a thousand roofers we've
never met but would be better for We love.
Speaker 2 (15:49):
Talking to our friend Mike Row. Mike, we appreciate it.
Don't forget micro works. I believe it's microworks dot com.
Speaker 8 (15:56):
Right, microworks dot org. And look, I will I promise you.
I promise you. I'll get you back.
Speaker 2 (16:02):
I don't worry. I just love jazz and you. It's fine.
I love those guys. Please tell him I'm a big fan.
Speaker 8 (16:09):
I'll tell him. And I'm serious about the money. It
went a long way and we're gonna ring. No.
Speaker 2 (16:14):
That was my pleasure, but I just give I'd just
like to give you a hard time because I can.
You gave me an opening, and I'm taking full advantage
of it.
Speaker 8 (16:21):
I'm at your mercy. Thanks for having me on.
Speaker 2 (16:24):
All right, Mikero, All right, quick break right back. We'll
continue straight ahead. Eight hundred nine. Shawn is on number.
Speaker 9 (16:36):
When fake news gives you lies, any supplies the truth.
Sean Hannity is on right now.
Speaker 5 (17:04):
You know what you do.
Speaker 2 (17:05):
Everybody listening in my voice, you do need a personal
safety security plan. Not every situation requires the lethal option.
That's where the new technology that is Burner b Whyrna
comes in. Now, the Berner launcher has powerful deterrence that
can incapacitate any attacker for thirty to forty minutes. Here
gas pepper, spray kinetic rounds. You can hit targets fifty
(17:28):
sixty feet away. Protect yourself and your family. This technology works.
Judge for yourself. Watch the videos.
Speaker 10 (17:36):
You are listening to the best of the Sean Hannity
Show and stay tuned. More memorable moments, interesting guests, and
a lot of fun coming up next. More of the
(17:59):
best of the Sean Hannity Show coming up.
Speaker 7 (18:02):
Sean Hannity talks to the people involved in the top
stories of the day every day.
Speaker 1 (18:09):
Sean Hannity is on.
Speaker 2 (18:13):
In a minute, we'll get to Greg Jarrett and Brett Tolman.
Greg Jarrett has a peace out today. Who could be
indicted by a grand jury in the Russia collusion hoax?
And he names names, But first let me play TULSEI
Gabbard on Elbama's involvement in all of this.
Speaker 6 (18:32):
Go to ODNI, dot gov, goov. It's all right there
for anyone to see. And those who go in and
read this will see how President Obama directed that a
National Security Council meeting be called to talk about Russia.
That the report that came out of that meeting was
filled with tasks that were delivered by James Clapper's assistant
(18:56):
to John Brennan, and two other elements of the Intelligence Committee,
John Brennan, the head of the CIA at the time,
all saying per the president's direction, per the president's order,
and very specifically, they were tasked to create an intelligence
assessment that detailed how Moscow tried to influence the election,
(19:16):
not if, but how. And this was the beginning of
this manufactured intelligence assessment where they knowingly wrote things in
this assessment that were false, and they knew they were false.
They knew that they were basing it on discredited intelligence
or documents like the Steele dossier that was politically motivated
(19:37):
and that they knew was false. And this was how
they came up with the rush hooks that was then
weaponized and used to try to delegitimize the president, President Trump,
and to try to ultimately enact this year's long coup
throughout his entire four years of his first administration.
Speaker 2 (19:54):
Let me give a little context to what Tulsea is
saying as part of the declassified information that she released.
The first part of this is there was an original
intelligence assessment. She's talking here about the intelligence assessment that
was ordered after they read the original one that was
(20:16):
put together by senior career intelligence officials, released in early
December twenty sixteen, a post mortem, if you will, on
the twenty sixteen election, asking the question if there was
any Trump Russia collusion. Their conclusion it was finished. There
(20:38):
was no Trump Russia conclusion. That is what our top
career intelligence officials determined. And then, as she brightly points out,
it was Obama ordering people, you know, not if Russia interfered,
how Russia interfered. And then they went about creating a
new intelligence assessment report. And it's the new intelligence assessment
(21:03):
report that purposely used what that had already been completely
debunked by that time, and that was the dirty Russian
disinformation Hillary Clinton bought and paid for dossier and other
information that they knew to be false to come up
with an assessment, oh that yeah, Russia favored Donald Trump
(21:24):
and that there was collusion when there never was.
Speaker 5 (21:27):
They knew there never was. They knew it was false intelligence.
Speaker 2 (21:30):
So initially this plan was hatched in July of twenty
sixteen for the purposes of smearing and slandering Donald Trump
to deflect away from Hillary's own email server problem. They
knew it was manufactured. But also the declassified information gave
us very pertinent information that yeah, this will give us
(21:50):
a bump out of the convention, but then they'll be
accelerant when the FBI runs with this lie as well.
And remember in August twenty sixteen, Bruce Or warned against
using the steal dossier because it was political in nature.
But yet it became the basis for not one but
four FISA applications, which Rune Carter Page is live and
(22:14):
then was a backdoor wait to aspire on the Trump campaign,
then later his transition team, and then later his presidency.
But the fact that all these top officials and were
going all the way up to Obama saying not if,
but how Russia interfered after the initial assessment said otherwise
is breathtaking to me. Greig Jared is with US Fox
(22:36):
News leagal analyst, New York Times bestselling author. He wrote
two best selling books on this very topic. And Brett
TOLMANI is with his former federal prosecutor, Sir for US
Attorney of Utah. Greg I loved your article today. Who
could be indicted by a grand jury in the Russia
collusion hoax? This is something you wrote about what seven
years ago?
Speaker 4 (22:56):
Yeah, seven years ago, and then the sequel six years
ago which Hunt and I laid out how Brennan, Coming
and Clapper were untruthful in their congressional testimony, and you've
identified it. You know, they insisted that the dossier was
never a part of the intelligence assessment, and they were
(23:21):
incredibly devious about it. Sean. They actually erased or expunged
the section of the intelligence assessment in which they relied
on the dossier. They provided to Congress and the public
a sanitized version of it. They literally took it out
(23:42):
and then testified, oh, you know, we didn't rely on it,
it's not in there. Well, it turns out the newly
declassified documents show a clean original version in which it's
in the body of the ICA. Now that strikes me
as a lawyer as a deliberate falsehood.
Speaker 8 (24:02):
It's a lie.
Speaker 4 (24:03):
And so if you're testifying under oath, that's perjury, and
if it's not under oath, it's nevertheless a false fraudulent statement.
Both carry the same punishment, up to five years in prison.
And if you conspire together to do that, it's a conspiracy,
(24:23):
which only doubles down on the penalties.
Speaker 5 (24:26):
Bright Tolman, let's get your your view on this matter.
Speaker 3 (24:30):
Well, nobody's really talking about Barack Obama being being charged,
right we are assuming presidential you know, executive immunity applies.
But I say, so what, let's put him in the
grand jury. If the conspiracy you know, started while he
was president, it certainly continued when he was no longer president.
(24:51):
I want to see him answer about communications that he
had after What did he communicate with Komy, What were
the what were the emails or the text messages? Because
this is Obama who was the only president in our
lifetime who stayed in Washington, DC when he was done
serving as president. Why did he do that? Because he
knew he had an opportunity to try to control the government.
(25:14):
A shadow government was what.
Speaker 8 (25:16):
He was pushing for. So I would love to see
the use.
Speaker 3 (25:18):
Of the grand jury to robustly investigate all of the conspiracy,
including President Obama and who he communicated with after he
was president.
Speaker 2 (25:28):
Greg you let's go back to your column who could
be indicted by this grand jury in the Russia collusion hoax?
Speaker 5 (25:34):
Who?
Speaker 4 (25:35):
Well, in addition to Brennan, Comey, and Clapper, which we
just discussed, there are other people who were involved at
the CIA, the FBI, the Office of National Intelligence, and
you know, some of these people were coerced into doing it.
(25:56):
They would probably as witnesses, asked for immunity and they're tested,
money would be valuable, they might get conditional immunity. But
there are others, and for example, we've already seen some
of their emails, who warned Brennan in particular, you're using
bogus information the dossier, don't do it. There's no other
(26:17):
credible evidence to justify this revised intelligence assessment. Those people,
and I think there are probably at least a handful,
if not a dozen, will happily step forward before a
grand jury and implicate not just Comy but Brendan rather,
but Comy and Clapper as well, but you know, the
(26:38):
list is a long one. I identify in my column today,
you know, the Hillary Clinton campaign, not just Hillary yourself,
but those who were in on it. I think a
critical witness is Julianne Smith. It was Smith, according to
the Durham Annex, that proposed the entire fictitious illusion scheme
(27:01):
that Hillary approved on July twenty six, twenty and sixteen.
And you know, Smith was questioned by Durham's investigators and said, well,
I don't specifically remember, but it's possible I did that. Well,
being placed in legal jeopardy in front of a grand jury,
(27:22):
she may have a sudden memory recollection, and you know
that would be a critical witness. But I've also identified
Jake Sullivan, the attorney, Mark Elias, Robbie Mook, John Podesta.
These are all critical people who to me appear to
have been involved in conjuring up the hoax and spreading
(27:46):
the lie, and their testamenty I think would be important
because they're also in legal jeopardy. I wouldn't be surprised
if they too would take the fifth.
Speaker 2 (27:57):
I quick break right back more with Greg jarreb Brett
Tolman on the other side, and your call's coming up
final half hour, eight hundred and ninety four one Sean,
if you want to be a part of the program
as we continue.
Speaker 1 (28:12):
Hennity for president? Is that true?
Speaker 8 (28:16):
What?
Speaker 9 (28:17):
Just imagine the guy with the most radio stations now
getting the biggest microphone in America.
Speaker 1 (28:25):
President Hennedy Willie? Really do it? Stay tuned, we'll find out.
Speaker 8 (28:51):
All right.
Speaker 2 (28:51):
We continue now who might be indicted by a grand
jury over the Russia Russia Russia hoax? We continue with
Greg Jarrett and Brett Tolman. Let's talk a little bit
now about this issue of immunity bread that you brought up,
because conventional wisdom is that presidential immunity in the decision,
the Supreme Court decision as it related to President Trump,
(29:14):
would apply to President Obama. And there's one one, maybe
slight bit of difference. I know everyone thinks that that
would apply. But is it really part of the duties
of the president of the United States to subvert or
sabotage intelligence or manufacture false intelligence for the purpose of
(29:38):
hurting a successor?
Speaker 3 (29:40):
Well, John, I think you hit on the point that
this country needs to be talking about. And yes, you know,
the Supreme Court did clarify that the government could not
use in a prosecution the evidence of his communications while
he was president, but he's outside the bounds of of
what his executive power is. You never have executive power
(30:04):
to commit a conspiracy to interfere in an election. So
because of that, I think the focus needs to be
on was he part of the conspiracy still when he
left as president. That's the cleanest case. You don't have
to worry about litigating what he said and what he
did when he was president. But when he's no longer president,
(30:25):
are there overt acts by him or communications in furtherance
of the conspiracy. It is highly unlikely that he just
left as president of the United States and didn't continue
to try to orchestrate what we know was an attack
on President Trump while he was president to try to
pull him down and delegitimize his presidency. So if that's
(30:46):
the case, conspiracy continues on where past when it first committed,
and it involves individuals that may not necessarily know, like
Greg points out, properly, they may not know they're really
part of this conspiracy, but there are those that did,
and what were those overt acts? And President Obama was
at the helm of this, So he needs to be
(31:06):
put in front of the grand jury. Let him take
the fifth while he's in the grand jury, and let
the American people see that he has a lot to
hide after he was president of the United States.
Speaker 2 (31:17):
What's your take on that, Greg jerup his post presidency actions.
Speaker 4 (31:21):
Well, if he's claiming that he has a broad immunity
for official acts, not unofficial, but official acts, he's no
longer in jeopardy before grand jury, right, because he's got community,
he claims the community. You know, he has to tell
the truth because he's no longer in jeopardy.
Speaker 8 (31:44):
He was knee deep in all of this.
Speaker 4 (31:47):
The new records show that he pressured Comy to clear
Hillary Clinton of her obvious email crimes. I think that's
well excited.
Speaker 2 (31:58):
He didn't want this to, you know, put a stand
on his presidency, that's right.
Speaker 4 (32:03):
And then he actively joined the plot to push the
phony collusion narrative that Hillary had instigated. And he was
a principal player engineering that counterfeit case against Trump by
altering or massaging the intelligence. So, you know, I agree
(32:25):
with the Brett's analysis. I think he should be called.
Hillary Clinton absolutely must be called. And you know, if
she's not telling the truth in front of the grand jury,
and the documents and testimony of others undermine her and
demonstrate that she's lying. There could be a new charge
(32:47):
against her. Lyne to a grand jury. So you know,
all of these people, it strikes me, are in a
world of hurt, and.
Speaker 2 (32:55):
By the way, you know, I would bet they're all
going to play the fifth But I have to run
real quick.
Speaker 4 (33:00):
I know they think that this is going to happen
in Washington, DC. I disagree. I think it's gonna happen
in Clarida based on an overarching criminal conspiracy that extends
to the Morrologo rate. So I think the grand jury
will be We're already is in the state of Florida.
Speaker 2 (33:18):
Be fascinating. Wouldn't it be great if I got called?
I'd be very fair and balanced. I believe in our constitution.
I believe in the rule of law. That's the problem.
They don't want people like me on a grand jury
or on a jury altogether. Anyway, Brett, thank you, Greg Jarrett,
always as always, thank you. I know we see a
ceasefire in Israel, but if you ask the people of
(33:41):
Israel if they're feeling peace You're going to get a
very different story. You know, bombed out homes, complete neighborhoods,
families torn apart, kids they can't play outside. The violence
may have slowed, the fear has not. You have tens
and tens of thousands of Israelis that have been displayed.
They have no homes to go back to is go
(34:02):
to IFCJ dot org. That's if CJ dot org today.
This is the best of the Sean Hannity Show. Don't
forget stay tuned for more right after the latest news,
right here on this radio station.
Now back to the best of Sean Hannity.
Speaker 2 (00:10):
Well, we have come out your city.
Speaker 1 (00:15):
On May I get.
Speaker 3 (00:17):
Saying you a conscious zone.
Speaker 1 (00:19):
Will be entire hotel And if you want a little banging,
a Yuni.
Speaker 4 (00:27):
Ain't come along.
Speaker 2 (00:28):
They understand that we have a Timu Hitler in the
White House right now.
Speaker 5 (00:32):
That thinks that he is going to.
Speaker 6 (00:33):
Become the dictator of the United States.
Speaker 5 (00:35):
The time is up for playing in our faces.
Speaker 1 (00:38):
He has to be brought down. And I don't mean physically,
I'm talking about politically. We will bring him down. He
will be impeached again.
Speaker 6 (00:47):
We have a consolidating dictatorship in our country. And it
sounds melodramatic to say it.
Speaker 1 (00:53):
I know freedom is back in style. Welcome to the revolution.
Be away of coming to your SENTI.
Speaker 2 (01:05):
Going the way out against allazon saying you a conscious soil.
Speaker 7 (01:09):
Se Sean Hennity Show, more me I'm the scenes, information
on freaking news and more bold inspired solutions for America.
Speaker 5 (01:21):
All right, thanks Scott cha ha.
Speaker 2 (01:22):
An Hour two Sean Hannity Show told free it's eight
hundred and nine four one Sean. If you want to
be a part of the program. Uh, everybody says well,
Ai the future is going to change dramatically.
Speaker 5 (01:35):
Well, the future is now.
Speaker 2 (01:36):
It is changing dramatically, and as a result of artificial intelligence.
I can tell you that there are going to be
careers and jobs that are simply going to evaporate in
our economy. And that's why it's critical that you think
through if you're a young person, what profession you might
be thinking about going into, because you don't want to
(01:57):
be replaced by artificial intelligence. I spent a lot of
time using GROC. I've learned a lot from it, and
you can learn a lot from it. I urge all
of my listeners if you've not experimented with chat, GPT,
with rock Gemini, any of these artificial intelligence things, I
would spend time with it now.
Speaker 5 (02:18):
I say this because I read.
Speaker 2 (02:21):
An article and I spent a lot of time on it,
maybe about a month and a half ago, that the
next generation of millionaires in America are going to be
blue collar, working class people. That's the one thing that
we know AI is not going to replace. Although robotics
(02:41):
are certainly showing up in a major way. I saw,
for example, a video this week of a robot doing
a roof on a house and doing it perfectly. I
mean that would be something you have to pay attention to.
There's a new article out today gen z is ditching
college and taking up secure trade jobs, but new data
(03:04):
shows office administration jobs are still safer, more stable, and
less deadly. With that said, the one person that has
been maybe the biggest advocate of the trades is our
good friend Mike Rowe love micro He's a great broadcaster,
good friend. He's with micro works and anyway we appreciate
(03:27):
that's his foundation. I still never donated twenty five grand,
but I never got my autographed I never got my
autograph poster from all the captains of Deadliest Catch. And
if I'm waiting for it, I'm sure it'll come any
day in the mail.
Speaker 5 (03:42):
Now, how are you?
Speaker 8 (03:43):
I'm just saving it up for a special, a super special.
Speaker 5 (03:48):
You got the check and you cashed it, so that's
all I know.
Speaker 8 (03:51):
Well, let me tell you what I did with the
money and a bunch of other money that came in
from people who, like you, lived the balance life and
like you, believe that prosperity can still be achieved by
learning a skill that's in demand and work in your
butt off. I put it in a pile, and I
(04:12):
awarded five hundred and twenty six work ethic scholarships this year.
That comes out to five million, fifty thousand dollars. That
money goes out later this week to help train the
next generation of skilled workers. Because the articles you mentioned
are rooted in fact, undeniable, incontrovertible fact. And it's too
(04:38):
early for a victory lap. But for seventeen years at Microworks,
we've been saying that the chickens will come home to
roost and they're going to look a lot like carpenters
and plumbers and steamfitters and pipe fitters and HVAC professionals
and collision repair and welders and so forth, and so
it is. It's somewhat gratifying and a little scary. You know,
(05:01):
I thought your summation there was pretty balanced. I don't
have a crystal ball either, and long term, who knows,
But short term I think you're right on the money.
The next generation to hit it out of the park
is going to be a generation possessive skill.
Speaker 2 (05:18):
So in my ten years that I worked in construction,
I did everything from framing and roofing, and then I
learned how to paint and I started my own painting company.
Then I learned how to hang wallpaper, and then I
learned how to lay tile. I didn't like falling three
stories off a roof. I didn't particularly love heights. It
(05:38):
was not my favorite thing, especially after falling. I'm frankly
lucky I was alive because I went down head first.
It was a slippery day. It was in Rhode Island,
and it was the last nail of the day. It
was a hell storm. We were trying to put tar
paper on the roof before we left, and my feet
gave out. I swung at a two at the second
two and a half story dormer with my hammer. I
(06:00):
missed it. Now I'm going down head first. I dislocated
my elbow, broke my radio head, busted up my teeth.
After all my years playing hockey, I didn't lose a tooth.
Now I lost them all. And I kind of feel
lucky that I'm alive. In many ways, however, when I
learned to do finish work, when I would paint a
room or hang paper or lay tile, and I was
(06:21):
I really had a good eye for finished work because
I just.
Speaker 5 (06:25):
I really wanted to do a good job.
Speaker 2 (06:28):
I had a sense of personal satisfaction at the end
of every day that I can't even really describe to people.
Speaker 8 (06:34):
No, you can't part of what Dirty Jobs did, and
you know I was. I'm particularly proud of it because
it's very difficult. You know, you're in TV. TV is careful,
it's produced. You hire actors, you create scripts, you rehearse
dirty Jobs. We never did a second take. We only
used real people and we would show up with our
(06:56):
cameras and we would go on a roof like the
one you described, and we witnessed some accidents like the
ones you described. And I'm not here to sugarcoat it.
You know, the world is filled with risk, and the
skilled trades are not for everyone. Some people just aren't
cut out for it. That's why our scholarship program is
called a work ethic program. The world's a dangerous place
(07:18):
and the skilled trades are near the tip of that sphere.
But having said all that, your last point is the
most important point. There's so much meaning, there's so much purpose,
there's so much satisfaction. I mean, we did three hundred
and fifty dirty jobs and you know, people still ask
(07:39):
me to this day, what did that cohort know what
did that group of people know that most of us
have forgotten. And a big part of that answer is
the simple satisfaction that comes from always knowing how you're
doing along the course of your work. And these are
the intangible things. It's kind of like a soft skill, right.
(08:02):
You can't really teach people appreciation, you can't really teach
them work ethic. These are things you choose to have
or not. And I spend a lot of my time,
as you know, with the Foundation. It's not just a
scholarship fund or a pr campaign for hard work. It's
(08:22):
an honest attempt to get people who aren't in the trades,
not necessarily into them, although that's clearly something we need
to do. It's only a matter of national security, but
just to foster a sense of appreciation, a little bit
of wonder for the fact that when you flick the switch,
the lights come on, and that's the hell of a thing.
And when you flush the toilet, the mess goes away,
(08:44):
and that's a modern miracle. And if we don't have
an honest appreciation, I'm talking about the three hundred million
or so people who share my addiction to smooth roads
and indoor plumbing and affordable electricity. If we're not blown
away by the miracle of it and by the people
who provide it, then the skills gap is going to
(09:05):
get wider. And I worry, man, because I'm rooting for
the president. I want to see manufacturing reshort and I
want to see indust realization reinvigorated. But we have seven
point six million open jobs right now Sean four hundred
and eighty thousand of them are in manufacturing alone.
Speaker 2 (09:24):
So, by the way, that's about to get so much
bigger because Donald Trump has secured anywhere from twelve to
fifteen trillion dollars in manufacturing money for automobiles, for pharmaceuticals,
semiconductor chips, rare earths, magnets. I mean, all that manufacturing
(09:46):
is coming online quickly, especially because they added apparently bonus deppreciation,
which means that if you build a manufacturing center, you
get to write it off in year one, and that
is incentivizing companies to spend that money almost immediately.
Speaker 8 (10:02):
Yep, yep, all true. But look, I was in the
room about three weeks ago in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, sitting on
the stage with the President and thirty five CEOs of
some of the biggest companies in the country who collectively
pledged ninety two billion dollars to infrastructure and data centers
(10:25):
in PA alone. Now, it was a story, but it
wasn't big enough. This is a huge thing that happened.
And I realized about halfway through. The reason I was
there was kind of to remind the crowd. Look, we've
got the money, and we have a president who seems
pretty determined to bring these opportunities back to the States.
(10:49):
But I don't know that we have the workforce right now.
And I don't know if you've crossed paths yet with
Nick Everstadt, you'd love him. He wrote a book called
Men Without Work, and in it he takes a deep,
deep dive into the reasons why there's seven million able
bodied men in this country right now who not only
(11:10):
aren't working, they're not looking for work. That's never happened
in peacetime before. So when you think about the opportunities
that currently exist that employers can't fill, and then when
you think about the opportunities you've just described that are
going to be created, you have to wrestle with the
basic truth that creating jobs is different than creating enthusiasm
(11:37):
for jobs, and if we don't have the enthusiasm, if
we don't have the aforementioned appreciation, we're going to have
a really tough time filling those opportunities.
Speaker 2 (11:48):
The jobs that we're describing here are high paying career
jobs with great benefits, you know, that will help people
achieve the American dream. You know always admired you from Afar.
I feel like in my life and career, I've been
blessed beyond anything I ever deserved. If there were two
(12:09):
shows that I could do that were different than what
I'm doing now, they would be the two shows you
worked on, Thirtiest Jobs and Deadliest Catch. I mean, you know,
I'm obsessed with them because I talk to you about
it all the time. I'm obsessed with it. Well, ye,
and because I mean, like my heart was broken when
(12:34):
when Deadliest Catch you went through a period was about
two years in a row, and a lot of the
crew members they were dying left, right, and sideways. I'm like,
oh my, I couldn't even believe it. Yeah, it was
so tragic and so sad. And you knew these guys intimately.
Speaker 8 (12:51):
Yeah, Phil Harris was a friend lost him in two
thousand and eight. I suppose it was Cornelia Marie went
down who was a guy every year? You know, and look,
this is this is not something that ought to be glamorized,
but nor is it something that should be ignored. You
fell off for roof in the midst of a construction
career that you nevertheless continued to enjoy these men on
(13:16):
Deadliest Catch, which, by the way, season twenty one just started.
Twenty one seasons, so you know, there are a lot
of things you can look at Dirty Jobs and Deadliest Catch,
and you can you can wonder, you know, why would
those shows last two decades? And you know, I've got
a couple theories, but at the top of the list
(13:37):
is the simple fact that they show you something that
is undeniably true, undeniably real, and undeniably work. And it's
a reminder, you know, as we I think, I mean,
since we started this conversation with artificial intelligence, I'll make
the point around that term. In the future, even though
(14:00):
I can't see it clearly, I am pretty sure that
there's going to be a bright line drawn between all
that is artificial and all that is authentic, and that
line's going to become really important for people to understand
and we're going to value things on both sides of
(14:21):
the line, but we're going to hunger for the authentic thing,
whether it's a piece of art music or a roofer
or a craftsman. And I think the extent to which
this new technology affects everything will be different. It's going
to be really hard to handicap what comes next exactly.
Speaker 2 (14:44):
But well, let me tell you, you can never replace those
guys on Deadly's catch. Artificial intelligence. Maybe technology might help
the you know how heartbreaking it is when they pull up,
you know, when they pull up the cage and there's
no no crab in it. Ah, I'm like so disappointed.
I feel like I'm living it with them.
Speaker 8 (15:05):
It's life. It's like I mean the metaph it's real.
It's absolutely real. And look, I'll tell you something else
you don't see in that show, which is awesome.
Speaker 5 (15:14):
We got about thirty seconds, So go ahead, flat.
Speaker 8 (15:16):
Seas, nothing happening, pleasant temperatures, bord he I.
Speaker 5 (15:22):
Have never seen that. And no, and he's got in
the bearing sea.
Speaker 8 (15:27):
No, but it's a part of life too. Look, your
day is full and busy, but you don't spend twenty
four hours on the radio or in front of the camera.
That's what people know you for. But there's a whole
lot of other stuff that makes Sean Hannity Sean Hannity.
And the same is true of Mike Row and Phil
Harris and any any one of a thousand roofers we've
never met but would be better for We love.
Speaker 2 (15:49):
Talking to our friend Mike Row. Mike, we appreciate it.
Don't forget micro works. I believe it's microworks dot com.
Speaker 8 (15:56):
Right, microworks dot org. And look, I will I promise you.
I promise you. I'll get you back.
Speaker 2 (16:02):
I don't worry. I just love jazz and you. It's fine.
I love those guys. Please tell him I'm a big fan.
Speaker 8 (16:09):
I'll tell him. And I'm serious about the money. It
went a long way and we're gonna ring. No.
Speaker 2 (16:14):
That was my pleasure, but I just give I'd just
like to give you a hard time because I can.
You gave me an opening, and I'm taking full advantage
of it.
Speaker 8 (16:21):
I'm at your mercy. Thanks for having me on.
Speaker 2 (16:24):
All right, Mikero, All right, quick break right back. We'll
continue straight ahead. Eight hundred nine. Shawn is on number.
Speaker 9 (16:36):
When fake news gives you lies, any supplies the truth.
Sean Hannity is on right now.
Speaker 5 (17:04):
You know what you do.
Speaker 2 (17:05):
Everybody listening in my voice, you do need a personal
safety security plan. Not every situation requires the lethal option.
That's where the new technology that is Burner b Whyrna
comes in. Now, the Berner launcher has powerful deterrence that
can incapacitate any attacker for thirty to forty minutes. Here
gas pepper, spray kinetic rounds. You can hit targets fifty
(17:28):
sixty feet away. Protect yourself and your family. This technology works.
Judge for yourself. Watch the videos.
Speaker 10 (17:36):
You are listening to the best of the Sean Hannity
Show and stay tuned. More memorable moments, interesting guests, and
a lot of fun coming up next. More of the
(17:59):
best of the Sean Hannity Show coming up.
Speaker 7 (18:02):
Sean Hannity talks to the people involved in the top
stories of the day every day.
Speaker 1 (18:09):
Sean Hannity is on.
Speaker 2 (18:13):
In a minute, we'll get to Greg Jarrett and Brett Tolman.
Greg Jarrett has a peace out today. Who could be
indicted by a grand jury in the Russia collusion hoax?
And he names names, But first let me play TULSEI
Gabbard on Elbama's involvement in all of this.
Speaker 6 (18:32):
Go to ODNI, dot gov, goov. It's all right there
for anyone to see. And those who go in and
read this will see how President Obama directed that a
National Security Council meeting be called to talk about Russia.
That the report that came out of that meeting was
filled with tasks that were delivered by James Clapper's assistant
(18:56):
to John Brennan, and two other elements of the Intelligence Committee,
John Brennan, the head of the CIA at the time,
all saying per the president's direction, per the president's order,
and very specifically, they were tasked to create an intelligence
assessment that detailed how Moscow tried to influence the election,
(19:16):
not if, but how. And this was the beginning of
this manufactured intelligence assessment where they knowingly wrote things in
this assessment that were false, and they knew they were false.
They knew that they were basing it on discredited intelligence
or documents like the Steele dossier that was politically motivated
(19:37):
and that they knew was false. And this was how
they came up with the rush hooks that was then
weaponized and used to try to delegitimize the president, President Trump,
and to try to ultimately enact this year's long coup
throughout his entire four years of his first administration.
Speaker 2 (19:54):
Let me give a little context to what Tulsea is
saying as part of the declassified information that she released.
The first part of this is there was an original
intelligence assessment. She's talking here about the intelligence assessment that
was ordered after they read the original one that was
(20:16):
put together by senior career intelligence officials, released in early
December twenty sixteen, a post mortem, if you will, on
the twenty sixteen election, asking the question if there was
any Trump Russia collusion. Their conclusion it was finished. There
(20:38):
was no Trump Russia conclusion. That is what our top
career intelligence officials determined. And then, as she brightly points out,
it was Obama ordering people, you know, not if Russia interfered,
how Russia interfered. And then they went about creating a
new intelligence assessment report. And it's the new intelligence assessment
(21:03):
report that purposely used what that had already been completely
debunked by that time, and that was the dirty Russian
disinformation Hillary Clinton bought and paid for dossier and other
information that they knew to be false to come up
with an assessment, oh that yeah, Russia favored Donald Trump
(21:24):
and that there was collusion when there never was.
Speaker 5 (21:27):
They knew there never was. They knew it was false intelligence.
Speaker 2 (21:30):
So initially this plan was hatched in July of twenty
sixteen for the purposes of smearing and slandering Donald Trump
to deflect away from Hillary's own email server problem. They
knew it was manufactured. But also the declassified information gave
us very pertinent information that yeah, this will give us
(21:50):
a bump out of the convention, but then they'll be
accelerant when the FBI runs with this lie as well.
And remember in August twenty sixteen, Bruce Or warned against
using the steal dossier because it was political in nature.
But yet it became the basis for not one but
four FISA applications, which Rune Carter Page is live and
(22:14):
then was a backdoor wait to aspire on the Trump campaign,
then later his transition team, and then later his presidency.
But the fact that all these top officials and were
going all the way up to Obama saying not if,
but how Russia interfered after the initial assessment said otherwise
is breathtaking to me. Greig Jared is with US Fox
(22:36):
News leagal analyst, New York Times bestselling author. He wrote
two best selling books on this very topic. And Brett
TOLMANI is with his former federal prosecutor, Sir for US
Attorney of Utah. Greg I loved your article today. Who
could be indicted by a grand jury in the Russia
collusion hoax? This is something you wrote about what seven
years ago?
Speaker 4 (22:56):
Yeah, seven years ago, and then the sequel six years
ago which Hunt and I laid out how Brennan, Coming
and Clapper were untruthful in their congressional testimony, and you've
identified it. You know, they insisted that the dossier was
never a part of the intelligence assessment, and they were
(23:21):
incredibly devious about it. Sean. They actually erased or expunged
the section of the intelligence assessment in which they relied
on the dossier. They provided to Congress and the public
a sanitized version of it. They literally took it out
(23:42):
and then testified, oh, you know, we didn't rely on it,
it's not in there. Well, it turns out the newly
declassified documents show a clean original version in which it's
in the body of the ICA. Now that strikes me
as a lawyer as a deliberate falsehood.
Speaker 8 (24:02):
It's a lie.
Speaker 4 (24:03):
And so if you're testifying under oath, that's perjury, and
if it's not under oath, it's nevertheless a false fraudulent statement.
Both carry the same punishment, up to five years in prison.
And if you conspire together to do that, it's a conspiracy,
(24:23):
which only doubles down on the penalties.
Speaker 5 (24:26):
Bright Tolman, let's get your your view on this matter.
Speaker 3 (24:30):
Well, nobody's really talking about Barack Obama being being charged,
right we are assuming presidential you know, executive immunity applies.
But I say, so what, let's put him in the
grand jury. If the conspiracy you know, started while he
was president, it certainly continued when he was no longer president.
(24:51):
I want to see him answer about communications that he
had after What did he communicate with Komy, What were
the what were the emails or the text messages? Because
this is Obama who was the only president in our
lifetime who stayed in Washington, DC when he was done
serving as president. Why did he do that? Because he
knew he had an opportunity to try to control the government.
(25:14):
A shadow government was what.
Speaker 8 (25:16):
He was pushing for. So I would love to see
the use.
Speaker 3 (25:18):
Of the grand jury to robustly investigate all of the conspiracy,
including President Obama and who he communicated with after he
was president.
Speaker 2 (25:28):
Greg you let's go back to your column who could
be indicted by this grand jury in the Russia collusion hoax?
Speaker 5 (25:34):
Who?
Speaker 4 (25:35):
Well, in addition to Brennan, Comey, and Clapper, which we
just discussed, there are other people who were involved at
the CIA, the FBI, the Office of National Intelligence, and
you know, some of these people were coerced into doing it.
(25:56):
They would probably as witnesses, asked for immunity and they're tested,
money would be valuable, they might get conditional immunity. But
there are others, and for example, we've already seen some
of their emails, who warned Brennan in particular, you're using
bogus information the dossier, don't do it. There's no other
(26:17):
credible evidence to justify this revised intelligence assessment. Those people,
and I think there are probably at least a handful,
if not a dozen, will happily step forward before a
grand jury and implicate not just Comy but Brendan rather,
but Comy and Clapper as well, but you know, the
(26:38):
list is a long one. I identify in my column today,
you know, the Hillary Clinton campaign, not just Hillary yourself,
but those who were in on it. I think a
critical witness is Julianne Smith. It was Smith, according to
the Durham Annex, that proposed the entire fictitious illusion scheme
(27:01):
that Hillary approved on July twenty six, twenty and sixteen.
And you know, Smith was questioned by Durham's investigators and said, well,
I don't specifically remember, but it's possible I did that. Well,
being placed in legal jeopardy in front of a grand jury,
(27:22):
she may have a sudden memory recollection, and you know
that would be a critical witness. But I've also identified
Jake Sullivan, the attorney, Mark Elias, Robbie Mook, John Podesta.
These are all critical people who to me appear to
have been involved in conjuring up the hoax and spreading
(27:46):
the lie, and their testamenty I think would be important
because they're also in legal jeopardy. I wouldn't be surprised
if they too would take the fifth.
Speaker 2 (27:57):
I quick break right back more with Greg jarreb Brett
Tolman on the other side, and your call's coming up
final half hour, eight hundred and ninety four one Sean,
if you want to be a part of the program
as we continue.
Speaker 1 (28:12):
Hennity for president? Is that true?
Speaker 8 (28:16):
What?
Speaker 9 (28:17):
Just imagine the guy with the most radio stations now
getting the biggest microphone in America.
Speaker 1 (28:25):
President Hennedy Willie? Really do it? Stay tuned, we'll find out.
Speaker 8 (28:51):
All right.
Speaker 2 (28:51):
We continue now who might be indicted by a grand
jury over the Russia Russia Russia hoax? We continue with
Greg Jarrett and Brett Tolman. Let's talk a little bit
now about this issue of immunity bread that you brought up,
because conventional wisdom is that presidential immunity in the decision,
the Supreme Court decision as it related to President Trump,
(29:14):
would apply to President Obama. And there's one one, maybe
slight bit of difference. I know everyone thinks that that
would apply. But is it really part of the duties
of the president of the United States to subvert or
sabotage intelligence or manufacture false intelligence for the purpose of
(29:38):
hurting a successor?
Speaker 3 (29:40):
Well, John, I think you hit on the point that
this country needs to be talking about. And yes, you know,
the Supreme Court did clarify that the government could not
use in a prosecution the evidence of his communications while
he was president, but he's outside the bounds of of
what his executive power is. You never have executive power
(30:04):
to commit a conspiracy to interfere in an election. So
because of that, I think the focus needs to be
on was he part of the conspiracy still when he
left as president. That's the cleanest case. You don't have
to worry about litigating what he said and what he
did when he was president. But when he's no longer president,
(30:25):
are there overt acts by him or communications in furtherance
of the conspiracy. It is highly unlikely that he just
left as president of the United States and didn't continue
to try to orchestrate what we know was an attack
on President Trump while he was president to try to
pull him down and delegitimize his presidency. So if that's
(30:46):
the case, conspiracy continues on where past when it first committed,
and it involves individuals that may not necessarily know, like
Greg points out, properly, they may not know they're really
part of this conspiracy, but there are those that did,
and what were those overt acts? And President Obama was
at the helm of this, So he needs to be
(31:06):
put in front of the grand jury. Let him take
the fifth while he's in the grand jury, and let
the American people see that he has a lot to
hide after he was president of the United States.
Speaker 2 (31:17):
What's your take on that, Greg jerup his post presidency actions.
Speaker 4 (31:21):
Well, if he's claiming that he has a broad immunity
for official acts, not unofficial, but official acts, he's no
longer in jeopardy before grand jury, right, because he's got community,
he claims the community. You know, he has to tell
the truth because he's no longer in jeopardy.
Speaker 8 (31:44):
He was knee deep in all of this.
Speaker 4 (31:47):
The new records show that he pressured Comy to clear
Hillary Clinton of her obvious email crimes. I think that's
well excited.
Speaker 2 (31:58):
He didn't want this to, you know, put a stand
on his presidency, that's right.
Speaker 4 (32:03):
And then he actively joined the plot to push the
phony collusion narrative that Hillary had instigated. And he was
a principal player engineering that counterfeit case against Trump by
altering or massaging the intelligence. So, you know, I agree
(32:25):
with the Brett's analysis. I think he should be called.
Hillary Clinton absolutely must be called. And you know, if
she's not telling the truth in front of the grand jury,
and the documents and testimony of others undermine her and
demonstrate that she's lying. There could be a new charge
(32:47):
against her. Lyne to a grand jury. So you know,
all of these people, it strikes me, are in a
world of hurt, and.
Speaker 2 (32:55):
By the way, you know, I would bet they're all
going to play the fifth But I have to run
real quick.
Speaker 4 (33:00):
I know they think that this is going to happen
in Washington, DC. I disagree. I think it's gonna happen
in Clarida based on an overarching criminal conspiracy that extends
to the Morrologo rate. So I think the grand jury
will be We're already is in the state of Florida.
Speaker 2 (33:18):
Be fascinating. Wouldn't it be great if I got called?
I'd be very fair and balanced. I believe in our constitution.
I believe in the rule of law. That's the problem.
They don't want people like me on a grand jury
or on a jury altogether. Anyway, Brett, thank you, Greg Jarrett,
always as always, thank you. I know we see a
ceasefire in Israel, but if you ask the people of
(33:41):
Israel if they're feeling peace You're going to get a
very different story. You know, bombed out homes, complete neighborhoods,
families torn apart, kids they can't play outside. The violence
may have slowed, the fear has not. You have tens
and tens of thousands of Israelis that have been displayed.
They have no homes to go back to is go
(34:02):
to IFCJ dot org. That's if CJ dot org today.
This is the best of the Sean Hannity Show. Don't
forget stay tuned for more right after the latest news,
right here on this radio station.
The Sean Hannity Show News
Host
Sean Hannity
Popular Podcasts
Fudd Around And Find Out
UConn basketball star Azzi Fudd brings her championship swag to iHeart Women’s Sports with Fudd Around and Find Out, a weekly podcast that takes fans along for the ride as Azzi spends her final year of college trying to reclaim the National Championship and prepare to be a first round WNBA draft pick. Ever wonder what it’s like to be a world-class athlete in the public spotlight while still managing schoolwork, friendships and family time? It’s time to Fudd Around and Find Out!
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.