October 9, 2025 • 31 mins
The Sean Hannity Show unpacks breaking headlines: President Trump's historic peace deal sparks unprecedented celebrations among Israelis and Gazans, with families of freed hostages expressing gratitude to Trump. Sean frames this as a game-changing moment in Middle East diplomacy, highlighting insights from Fox News' Trey Yanks and Senator James Lankford, who discusses the larger regional impact, including normalization with Saudi Arabia and the failed attempts before Trump's intervention. The episode also features Senator Lankford's analysis of the "Schumer shutdown," partisan gridlock, and Jack Smith's controversial surveillance of GOP lawmakers. The show concludes with Fox News' Greg Jarrett unpacking the fresh DOJ indictment of New York Attorney General Letitia James for alleged mortgage fraud, underscoring serious questions about political lawfare. This episode matters for anyone following the accelerating legal and political battles shaping America's future.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:10):
Well, well come out.
Speaker 2 (00:12):
We'll sente one of they, I cains all saying your
conscience zone, well be desire. All that a tell and
if you want a little banging again, I come along.
Speaker 3 (00:28):
In reality, they are going after anyone who objects to
families being ripped apart and community members being disappeared.
Speaker 2 (00:35):
Ice lies and people die.
Speaker 4 (00:38):
And one of the best ways that you can dismantle
a movement of insecure men is by making.
Speaker 5 (00:44):
Fun of them.
Speaker 3 (00:45):
These are the figures that add up in the lives
of New Yorkers.
Speaker 6 (00:48):
These are the figures that together would save the people
of the city more than eight billion dollars.
Speaker 7 (00:54):
Traidom is back in style. Welcome to the revolution, be.
Speaker 8 (01:00):
Away of coming.
Speaker 3 (01:02):
To your site, going the way out against all and
saying you a conscious son.
Speaker 7 (01:09):
Sean the New Sean Hennity Show, more me I'm the scenes,
information on freaking news and more bold inspired solutions for America.
Speaker 2 (01:21):
All right, thanks Scott Shannon.
Speaker 1 (01:22):
An hour two Sean Hannity Show, eight hundred and nine
four one, Sean, if you want to be a part
of the program. Later in the program, my interview with
President Trump's coming up as something that I don't think
most people thought we'd see in our lifetime a real
chance for a lasting peace in the Middle East. You know,
two years and three days, the remaining hostages will be released,
(01:45):
hopefully by Monday. We expect pretty amazing to hear Israeli's
chanting Nobel Prize for Trump and Gossin's chanting Trump's name
after the peace deal is announced. Listen, no bed Bright
through drum, no Man Bryce to tromp Hey, no Ben Price,
do tromp Hey, no Ben Price, do Trump?
Speaker 4 (02:07):
No bad price?
Speaker 9 (02:08):
Do Trump?
Speaker 6 (02:09):
Yeah?
Speaker 10 (02:10):
Trump?
Speaker 2 (02:10):
Yeah Wow.
Speaker 1 (02:23):
I mean Trey Yanks, who has been reporting from Israel
for Fox News for years, that he'd never seen that
or heard that in his entire career of reporting from
the region. The families of the hostages then also spoke
to President Trump after this peace deal was announced.
Speaker 2 (02:39):
Here's what they said. They want to say something.
Speaker 11 (02:41):
All right, President Trump, you have the best crowd in
the world. What do you guys have to say to
President Trump?
Speaker 9 (02:53):
You did it, You did.
Speaker 3 (02:58):
Thank you.
Speaker 2 (03:00):
This is amazing, mister President.
Speaker 6 (03:02):
We believe in you.
Speaker 3 (03:04):
We know you've done so much for us over the
past since you became a president and even before that,
and we trust you fulfilled the mission until every hostage,
every forty eight of the hostages are home. Thank you
so much.
Speaker 2 (03:17):
Less it be the peacemaker.
Speaker 11 (03:19):
God bless you, mister President.
Speaker 8 (03:20):
God bless America very much.
Speaker 6 (03:21):
You just say care of yourselves.
Speaker 2 (03:23):
The hostages will come back. They're coming home, coming back
on Monday. I mean beyond historic.
Speaker 1 (03:32):
Joining us now Senator James Langford of Oklahoma to discuss this,
the Schumer shut down and Jacksmith spying on his fellow
senators and other congressmen. Senator, great to have you back
your reaction to this. I think there's a I lay
out a lot of reasons I believe that this happened.
Speaker 2 (03:51):
What are yours?
Speaker 9 (03:52):
Yeah, I have to tell you, Sean, I had one
word after President Trump posted last night. My response was
just one word, hallelujah. I mean, that is such an
incredible event. People have no idea what this opens up.
The possibilities for obviously those families that have their family
members have been held by barbarians for the last two years,
(04:14):
the people of Gaza who have also been held hostage
by hamas, and the children that have an opportunity to
be able to grow up and have a future because
they're not human shields for Hamas. But this opens up
the opportunities for Saudi Arabia to be able to normalize
with Israel, for Indonesia to be able to normalize within Israel.
There so many other countries around the world to be
(04:34):
able to say that barrier is gone because we were
so close in the Abraham Accords to be having major breakthrough,
which is why Hamas was doing everything they can to
stop it.
Speaker 1 (04:43):
Maybe the most powerful factor is he means what he says,
and that region of the world certainly understands strength. And
Donald Trump taking out Aurand's nuclear facilities and then telling
Hamas take the deal or we will obliterate you. I'm
sure had an m fact on this.
Speaker 9 (05:00):
Yep, no question on that. For President Trump to be
able to step in with the relationships he had, he
was the only president that was able to engage with
that level and pick up the phone, to be able
to talk straight with bb Netsunyahu, his friend, to be
able to talk straight with the leadership of Qatar, with
the UAE, with Saudi Arabia, with Oman, with others, and
to be able to say here's where we are. So
(05:21):
many of those countries in the region were not willing
to take the risk because it's failed so many times,
so they don't want to stick their neck out and
say I'm going to be a part of a deal
that failed because Egypt tried to do this, Jordan tried
to engage France. I mean, you go on and on
and on. No one was successful, and so everyone just
backed away and stopped trying until President Trump reached in
to be able to negotiate this and to be able
(05:42):
to get it done. And once he stuck his neck
out and he started actually getting it done, others started
falling in behind.
Speaker 1 (05:48):
Let's talk a little bit about where we stand with
the Schumer shutdown. You know, there were a couple of moments.
I want to play Hikeem Jefferies. He got embarrassed on
CNBC this morning and then had a a knockdown, drag
out confrontation with Mike Lawler. I'll pay play just a
small part of that, but first let me play him
on CNBC.
Speaker 5 (06:08):
There was an election and the Republicans were put in
a position where they were able to pass the Big
Beautiful Bill, or you call it the Big Ugly Bill,
to then say we don't like any of that, so
we're going to shut down the government until you take
back all the things that you duly passed through legislation.
If Republicans had tried to do that to the Inflation
(06:29):
Reduction Act or the any of the acts that Biden
and that administration had passed. It if they said we're
going to shut down the government because we don't like
any of those things you did. We're going to not
pay our military, We're going to you know, not allow
the government to reopen until you do what we want.
After an election where the American people put them in
(06:50):
put Democrats in power, you'd be going crazy. You'd be
going crazy about using a shut down of the government
with a continuing on a continuing resolution to get what
you want just because you don't like what the Republicans did.
It's not how it's bad. It's bad precedent, and it's
just clear. And you're talking about the House, you've already
(07:12):
passed this. The Senate is who we're talking about, and
they have a bill which will reopen the government right
now with five more Democrats.
Speaker 8 (07:19):
What is bad precedent is the Republican refusal to engage
in biprotestant negotiations. What is bad President, President is the
Republicans embarking on a my way or the highway approach
from the very beginning of this Congress.
Speaker 2 (07:34):
The my way or the highway approach is them.
Speaker 1 (07:37):
They're demanding one point five trillion to keep the government
open for seven weeks, including funding using taxpayer funding for
healthcare for illegals.
Speaker 2 (07:48):
They're never going to get that. How long does this
go on?
Speaker 6 (07:52):
Yeah?
Speaker 9 (07:52):
I don't know how long this goes on. This is
one of those issues where once a war starts, it's
hard to stop. Once a shutdown starts, it's hard to
stop on and their irrational demands on it to be
able to unwind the one big beautiful bill to be
able to give healthcare to folks are not American citizens.
They even have shown a section in there that a
lot of people aren't talking about. They have a section
where they're demanding electric vehicles get the ability to be
(08:14):
able to drive in HOV lanes, and new climate initiatives
for foreign entities. I mean, it is like a progressive
wish list is their demand to be able to get it,
and it's just not rational. I go back to four
times in September that the last four septembers we had
a moment similar to this where we hadn't gotten everything
finished on appropriation, so we did a continuing resolutions. We
(08:38):
disagreed as Republicans strongly where Biden was, but we're not
going to cut off military funding as they are to
try to demand something. And so we've been through this
four times. We do know the difference. But the difference
for this one now is Schumer literally came out yesterday
and said things are getting better for Democrats every day.
It's like, literally, as pay is being cut off to
(08:58):
the members of the military, to the nowtional guard that
are being deployed, to civilian employees, he can't get to
answer at the IRS because they have so many furloughed folks,
to all the different things that are happening. Schumer has
to stand the micron and smile and tate's getting better
for Democrats every day. Well, it's not better for the
American people.
Speaker 1 (09:15):
Let me play for you, Chuck Schumer. Over the years,
because his entire career, he has spoken out against government
shutdowns on how bad they are.
Speaker 2 (09:23):
Here's what he said, what if I.
Speaker 11 (09:25):
Persuaded, my call is to say I'm going to shut
the government down. I am going to not pay our
bills unless I get my way. It's a politics of idiocy,
of confrontation, of paralysis. It's sort of like this, someone
goes into your house, takes your wife and children hostage,
and then says, let's negotiate over the price of your house.
You know, we could do the same thing on immigration.
(09:46):
We could, we believe strongly in immigration reform. We could
say we're shutting down the government. We're not going to
raise the debt ceiling until you pass immigration reform. It
would be governmental chaos. Speaker McCarthy needs to stop letting
the MAGA radicals drive his decisions and do the obvious
and sensible thing, follow the Senate's lead and pass a
(10:06):
bipartisan cr to prevent this reckless shutdown. We do not
want to let a Trump temper tantrum governor policies will
cause the shutdown of a government which everyone on both
sides of the aisles knows is the wrong idea.
Speaker 1 (10:22):
Oh, it looks like the temper tantrum is coming from
Chucky himself. The idiocy, the paralysis, the hostage taking, the chaos,
the recklessness is his. I think that Chuck Schumer basically
is trying to cling on to power, knowing that he
really is the leader in name only of the Democratic Party,
and he's scared to death that he's going to lose
(10:44):
his seat to AOC.
Speaker 2 (10:45):
That's my theory, what's yours.
Speaker 9 (10:47):
My theory as well. And he's watching what's happening in
New York City and in New York with Mondamie and
with the extreme far left and the socialists rise there
and realize if he's going to stay in power, that's
the group that he's got to please. He's doing everything
he can to be able to show he's the resistance.
There are some Democrat senators that are now saying, hey,
we're actually hurting families. We've got to figure out how
(11:08):
to be able to get out of this, and Schumer
continues to be able to push back and to say no,
we've got to show where the resistance. So this is
a Schumer shutdown over something that's just not rational. All
Republicans are looking for is just keep the government open
at the same level we are right now while we're
still negotiating. That is not partisan, That is just common sense.
Speaker 1 (11:30):
And I want to put emphasis on that. Republicans they
have a clean cr meaning you fund government at its
current levels as you negotiate, negotiate out the budgets, and
that's the place in the forum to do it, and
not to hold the people hostage again. One point five
trillion that they're demanding for seven weeks to keep the
government open.
Speaker 2 (11:49):
That's never going to happen.
Speaker 1 (11:51):
It'll be interesting now behind the scenes, are you talking
to Democrats that understand they box themselves in here.
Speaker 9 (11:58):
I have actually and not continue to be able to
do that. And I'm not the type that goes and
shouts and belittles people. No one ever convinces me when
they do that to me. So I go quietly to
be able to visit with folks one on one, catch
them and have some conversation, try to see we can
actually move some people to say, come on, now, you
know what this is doing to families. You know what
this is doing to so many members of our military.
We've got folks being deployed this weekend through the National
(12:21):
Guard that are heading overseas and they're having to say
that they're families. I don't know if you're going to
get paid and I'm on deployment. That's not right. We
got to be able to solve this, and so there
are several Democrats that are now saying, yeah, we got
to figure out how to be able to get out
of this. Susan Collins has been terrific on this, by
the way, and trying to be able to negotiate on
the appropriations level as the head of Appropriations to try
(12:41):
to move some Democrat colleagues on this. So we're going
to keep moving and pushing on this and to see
how we can actually solve this for the American people.
Speaker 1 (12:50):
Quick break right back, we'll continue more with Oklahoma Senator
James Langford on the other side. Then we'll get your
calls in as well, and my interview with President Trump
coming up. Eight hundred and nine four one Sean. If
you want to be a part of the program, The Sean.
Speaker 7 (13:09):
Hannity Show, A thermonuclear mmbay assault on fake News. Hannity
is on right now.
Speaker 1 (13:44):
Where we continue our final movements with Senator James Langford
of Oklahoma. Last question, Senator, A number of your colleagues
we now have discovered have been spied on more spied
on by Jack Smith. And I'm going to play for you.
Lindsey Graham, who was on my show the other night,
and well he was. I played him when he was
at the hearing, and he was pretty pissed off. When
(14:08):
talking to the Attorney General, he wasn't mad at her
at all. I think she was as outraged as he was.
And but discovering that he was spied on by Jack
Smith is what he said.
Speaker 12 (14:19):
He announced He's going to run for president in twenty
twenty two for the twenty four election. Within eight months,
ninety one indictments were levied against him, coming from New York, Atlanta, Washington,
d c. And Florida. Ninety one felony charges against Donald Trump.
Here's what I believe. If he had never announced he
(14:40):
was going to run for president, none of this would
have happened. They were trying to destroy his comeback. This
was all orchestrated by Jack Smith, Alvin Bragg, Fannie Willis,
Letitia James to destroy this man so he could not
win in twenty twenty four.
Speaker 1 (14:56):
Weaponization, I would argue, was putting cinderblocks on the scale
of Donald Trump's chances to win an election. And in
this last cycle, I believe the pre bunking of Hunter's
laptop was a way to try to stop Trump. In
twenty twenty they were successful at suppressing that story. And
then everything that happened with the dirty dossier, fize applications,
(15:20):
double standard of justice, and what happened with you know,
Barack Obama wanting a new Intel assessment because they didn't
like the old one that said, oh, there was no
Trump Russia collusion. Have we had deep state operatives trying
to impact presidential elections in the last three.
Speaker 9 (15:37):
Cycles, Absolutely we have. We've had folks that are within
the military. I mean you've talked about it before, Peter Strausk,
others that were within the system that were trying to
find ways that they had levers that they could actually
use to be able to affect the outcome of the
election and to see what they could do to be
able to control where the American people are. The good
news is the American people saw through those ninety to
(16:01):
one indictments, saw right through what was actually happening politically.
And as the information continues to come out, as it
says in scripture, those things that are whispered in the
secret place will be shouted from the housetops. As the
information comes out and the truth is exposed on it,
more and more people are seeing seriously the FBI was
tracking Republican members of Congress and tracking their phone to
(16:24):
be able to see what they could actually figure out
how to be able to fish to go through this.
It had reached that level that this bad administration from
the Biden administration would determine they're going to use whatever
power they have. And instantly enough they kept talking over
and over again, we've got a save democracy. Literally, they
were selling out democracy and creating autocracy while they're chanting
(16:44):
save democracy.
Speaker 1 (16:45):
Well, said Senator Lineford Voklahoma. Appreciate your time, Senator, to
keep up the good work.
Speaker 2 (16:51):
All right, So this is what we know. It's not
a whole lot Now.
Speaker 1 (16:55):
We did learn earlier in the day that Lindsey how
Again in the Eastern District of Virginia went in to
a grand jury on the issue of Letitia James. We
believe it probably has to do with the mortgage issue
that we've covered fairly extensively here on this program and
whether or not, oh it is okay, and we're gonna
(17:17):
get more details in a second. But anyway, we now
have the DOJ has indicted the New York at Attorney General. Anyway,
I think there's a whole lot of lawfare that should
have been looked into too. And you know, how does
somebody run on a platform of get Trump at the
way she did? Anyway, Fox News legal analysts, our friend
(17:39):
Greg Jared is with us.
Speaker 2 (17:40):
Now this is big news.
Speaker 1 (17:42):
And you know she and Adam Schiff seem to have
similar problems, don't they.
Speaker 10 (17:49):
Yeah, they absolutely do. And it's mortgage fraud allegedly. And
the indictment follows this criminal referral from the Federal Housing
Finance Agency director who cited alleged mortgage application fraud involving
properties in Virginia and New York. The Virginia property, James
(18:14):
is accused of falsely claiming that home as her primary
residence to secure better mortgage rates, despite the fact that
her official residence is New York. It must be New
York in order to hold the position that she has
as the state attorney general. And in fact, apparently there's
(18:38):
a power of attorney document that was signed by James
granting her niece authority to execute the purchase and listing
the property as James's principal residence. So you know, I think,
having not read the indictment because the news of it
just broke I suspect.
Speaker 2 (19:00):
I have a little bit more news. Let me pass
it on to you.
Speaker 1 (19:03):
The Justice Department won an indictment against New York Attorney
General Letitia James, accusing her of committing mortgage fraud when
she purchased a property in Virginia in twenty twenty three.
The indictment on bank fraud makes James the second of
President Donald Trump's political foes to be charged in the
(19:24):
Eastern District of Virginia. Since President Trump pushed out the
top prosecutor, Lindsay Halligan, is now in charge there. And anyway,
Halligan apparently presented this case before the grand jury. And
this is very interesting to me. Now I want to
go into the law as it relates to people that
(19:47):
would make mortgage applications and talk about places being their
permanent home, permanent residence. And this is an issue that
has come up as it relates to Adam Schiff because
he was claiming who properties and benefiting on this tax forms.
As it relates to you know which properties and getting
more favorable mortgage rates because he claimed them as their
(20:09):
primary residence. This is a big deal. And this, by
the way, happens all the time. These charges are brought.
Speaker 2 (20:15):
All the time.
Speaker 10 (20:16):
Yeah, that's true. Just look at Marilyn Moseby, who was
the prosecutor in Baltimore who ended up getting convicted of
doing the exact same thing. So you know, I mean, look,
the law is very clear. You cannot have two separate homes,
both of which is your principal place of residence. You
(20:41):
can only have one. But Adam Schiff designated allegedly California
as well as you know, Washington area. I believe it
was Maryland home as his principal place of residence. You
can't do that against the law. It's called mortgage fraud.
Speaker 11 (21:00):
Uh.
Speaker 10 (21:00):
And you know you're cheating on all kinds of uh,
you know, government tax advantages and so forth, and so
you know, it's about time that prosecutions are brought. Now
understand that Letitia James is going to make the same
claim that James Cumy is making in his particular case. Oh,
(21:22):
dismiss the case, your honor. This is a vindictive prosecution
by Donald Trump.
Speaker 11 (21:29):
Uh.
Speaker 10 (21:30):
And you know, grand jury abuse and outrageous government conduct
and so forth. You know, they'll they'll say it should
be tossed because Trump pressure government lawyers to bring a
politically motivated prosecution. Well, I got news for them. That
(21:52):
doesn't mean under law that a person cannot be criminally
prosecuted for I'll give you an example. Biden constantly criticized
Trump as a threat to democracy, and his dirty fingerprints
were all over the double prosecutions brought by Special Counsel
Jack Smith. And you know, as The New York Times
(22:12):
reported back in twenty twenty two, Biden let it be
known he wanted Trump prosecutor to applied pressure on Attorney
General Merrick Garland to get it done, and it got done.
You know, it's a myth that a president cannot tell
DOJ lawyers or US attorneys what to do. I got
(22:33):
news for him. Read article to the Constitution. The president
holds ultimate authority over all executive branch departments, including the
DOJ and their US attorneys. He can direct decisions as
a part of his inherent powers, including prosecutorial decisions. So
(22:54):
if you're going to follow the law that you know,
selective prosecution, vindictive prosecution should not work.
Speaker 11 (23:03):
But you know, in.
Speaker 10 (23:04):
Comey's case, you know, he's making a pitch in front
of a friendly Empire district judge who was appointed to
the bench by President Joe Biden, who's you know, dj
Ran interference for Comy. So you know this is going
to be a tough case, particularly in that district in Virginia,
(23:27):
which is dominated by a liberal jury pool that will
ultimately make the decision.
Speaker 1 (23:37):
It's amazing to me because you know, it's honestly like
if Donald Trump spit on the sidewalk, they wanted to
go after him. And I really have no sympathy for
the likes And by the way, we're going to take
some of your calls if you want to weigh in
on this. I see my phone's blowing up here. Finally,
I mean, you have somebody that runs on a platform.
(23:58):
She's going to be the attorney general of a Laticia
James and Latisia James, you know, runs on a platform,
Get Trump, Alvin Bragg, get Trump.
Speaker 2 (24:09):
You know what was the case? Letitia James?
Speaker 1 (24:11):
What explic because it's the almost the exact same issue
she was charging the Trump organization with in a civil
case and then getting this ridiculous, unprecedented fine which they're
not gonna have to pay, thank god. And remember if
it wasn't it that case where they had in Goron
(24:32):
and evaluation of mar Lago at eighteen million, when it's
a property worth between one and one point five billion dollars.
Speaker 6 (24:40):
Uh.
Speaker 1 (24:41):
And it would take just a minute's perusal of a
website like realtor dot com or Zillo dot com and
find out, oh h, they undervalued that property and didn't
want to know the truth. Nobody cared that they statuted
limitations had run out on Alvin Bragg. And in terms
of misdemeanor charge of what would have been a misdemeanor
(25:02):
charge for a legal non disclosure agreement that was labeled
a non disclosure agreement that was paid as a legal expense,
I mean the degree of weaponization there. Now in this
case you have Letitia James. This is about something that
is real and something that is serious, and that's called
(25:23):
mortgage fraud. And for a Virginia property she's claiming as
a principal residence. You can't be a New York New
York's top prosecutor and have a Norfolk, Norfolk, Virginia house
as your principal residence. What do you claim that whoopsie Daisy,
I made a mistake on my loan application.
Speaker 2 (25:43):
Is that what they claim?
Speaker 10 (25:45):
Yeah? I mean that is that's going to be her
her defense. Well her, she has a two part defense. One,
it's a vindictive prosecution. Dismiss the case, you're honor. Number Two,
if it goes to a jury, it's whoopsie days as
you call it. There was a pretty good explanation. Ogee,
it was a typo or a miscommunication. Well under the
(26:10):
Letitia James standard in the case you brought against Trump,
she argued and said publicly, it doesn't matter if there's
a miscommunication or somebody else did the work for you.
Ultimately Trump is responsible. Well, then you know she's ultimately
responsible in this particular mortgage fraud case. But you know,
(26:34):
spare me the fake moral outrage over weaponization of the law.
You're right, Sean. She ran on the campaign promise to
get Trump, and now people are upset because Trump wants
to get Letitia James. You know you can't have it
(26:55):
both ways.
Speaker 2 (26:56):
Well, I mean this seems pretty cut and dry.
Speaker 1 (26:58):
I mean, either she claimed it as her principal residence
while she's the top, you know, while she's the age
in New York, as she claimed the Virginia property was
the prince over residence, or she didn't. And if she did,
and I don't really think there's a lot of excuses.
But Greg, we appreciate you man, You're the best. Thank you,
my pleasure, Greg Jarrett, Fox News Legal Analyst, eight hundred
(27:22):
and nine to four one Seawn our number if you
want to be a part of the program. By the way,
we're going to have Peter Navarro and John Solomon on
at the top. What they did to Peter Navarro is unbelievable.
Speaker 6 (27:31):
Uh.
Speaker 2 (27:32):
Anyway, Jim is in North Carolina. Jim, how are you
glad you called?
Speaker 3 (27:35):
Sir?
Speaker 6 (27:37):
Hey, Sean good? How are you doing good?
Speaker 2 (27:40):
Buddy? Glad you called.
Speaker 6 (27:41):
I've been I've been a real estate broker or a
broker since nineteen eighty seven. That's almost forty years. I've
been a I'm a certifying residential appraiser, been one since
nineteen ninety one. I'm faha approved. What Latisia James did
sickens me. That woman knows exactly what she did and
(28:01):
she needs to go to jail. I've taken continuing education
for the entire time that I've been a broker and
an appraiser. I've also served on an appraisal board in
another state and maybe the Appraisal Board and also the
Real Estate Board of New York needs to get involved
as well. But that woman needs to go to jail. Period.
Speaker 2 (28:27):
Well, I will tell you my thought. Look, it was
very funny.
Speaker 1 (28:33):
There was a time because me and some friends invest
in real estate, et cetera, et cetera.
Speaker 4 (28:39):
We do it.
Speaker 2 (28:39):
I mean, we have lawyers out the yazoo, we really do.
Speaker 1 (28:43):
And it was funny because we had refinanced some loan
and you know that there are government back loans. I
don't even know the process, to be very honest, because
that's not my part of the business.
Speaker 2 (28:54):
That's not what I do.
Speaker 1 (28:55):
And they said, oh, he refinanced, and Donald Trump must
to giving him favorable treatment. Turned out we did it
during the Obama years.
Speaker 2 (29:04):
How funny is that.
Speaker 6 (29:07):
Exactly? I mean, there's any time, Sean, as you know,
when you have banking and landing involved, it's all now
interstate and those are considered federally related transactions, generally related transactions.
And that's why it's fawn and it's criminal. She knows
exactly what she did. There's no sense typo. As you know,
(29:29):
underwriters are involved in every single loan that they underwrite.
It's all taken very seriously and she needs to go
to jail.
Speaker 1 (29:39):
Well, they knew what her job was, they knew it
couldn't possibly be of principal residence anyway, Jim, really informative call.
Thank you Afrat Texas. We have about a minute. It's
all yours, go for it.
Speaker 4 (29:54):
Hi, mister Hannity, I would just like to sincerely thank
you from the bottom of our hearts for here's the
of the Jewish people, the Israeli people. As an American
Jewish Israeli, we can't tell you how much we appreciate
your loyalty and honesty and truth. You've been speaking truth
from the beginning, and you've never strayed where some have
(30:15):
decided otherwise, but you have always spoken the truth. And
I know sometimes you must feel that you are not
being appreciated by us, but please know that everyone that
I know supports and loves you for always supporting us.
So thank you very much for all that you've done.
Speaker 1 (30:33):
My sincerest prayers go out to the people of Israel,
and if I find there's a lot of ignorance out
there and what they've had to withstand tens and hundreds
of thousands of rockets surrounded by enemies, and then October
seventh is unbelievable evil in our time, I have no
(30:54):
problem standing for what's right. Thank you, Efrot, appreciate it.
Eight hundred nine four one Channel is a number.
Well, well come out.
Speaker 2 (00:12):
We'll sente one of they, I cains all saying your
conscience zone, well be desire. All that a tell and
if you want a little banging again, I come along.
Speaker 3 (00:28):
In reality, they are going after anyone who objects to
families being ripped apart and community members being disappeared.
Speaker 2 (00:35):
Ice lies and people die.
Speaker 4 (00:38):
And one of the best ways that you can dismantle
a movement of insecure men is by making.
Speaker 5 (00:44):
Fun of them.
Speaker 3 (00:45):
These are the figures that add up in the lives
of New Yorkers.
Speaker 6 (00:48):
These are the figures that together would save the people
of the city more than eight billion dollars.
Speaker 7 (00:54):
Traidom is back in style. Welcome to the revolution, be.
Speaker 8 (01:00):
Away of coming.
Speaker 3 (01:02):
To your site, going the way out against all and
saying you a conscious son.
Speaker 7 (01:09):
Sean the New Sean Hennity Show, more me I'm the scenes,
information on freaking news and more bold inspired solutions for America.
Speaker 2 (01:21):
All right, thanks Scott Shannon.
Speaker 1 (01:22):
An hour two Sean Hannity Show, eight hundred and nine
four one, Sean, if you want to be a part
of the program. Later in the program, my interview with
President Trump's coming up as something that I don't think
most people thought we'd see in our lifetime a real
chance for a lasting peace in the Middle East. You know,
two years and three days, the remaining hostages will be released,
(01:45):
hopefully by Monday. We expect pretty amazing to hear Israeli's
chanting Nobel Prize for Trump and Gossin's chanting Trump's name
after the peace deal is announced. Listen, no bed Bright
through drum, no Man Bryce to tromp Hey, no Ben Price,
do tromp Hey, no Ben Price, do Trump?
Speaker 4 (02:07):
No bad price?
Speaker 9 (02:08):
Do Trump?
Speaker 6 (02:09):
Yeah?
Speaker 10 (02:10):
Trump?
Speaker 2 (02:10):
Yeah Wow.
Speaker 1 (02:23):
I mean Trey Yanks, who has been reporting from Israel
for Fox News for years, that he'd never seen that
or heard that in his entire career of reporting from
the region. The families of the hostages then also spoke
to President Trump after this peace deal was announced.
Speaker 2 (02:39):
Here's what they said. They want to say something.
Speaker 11 (02:41):
All right, President Trump, you have the best crowd in
the world. What do you guys have to say to
President Trump?
Speaker 9 (02:53):
You did it, You did.
Speaker 3 (02:58):
Thank you.
Speaker 2 (03:00):
This is amazing, mister President.
Speaker 6 (03:02):
We believe in you.
Speaker 3 (03:04):
We know you've done so much for us over the
past since you became a president and even before that,
and we trust you fulfilled the mission until every hostage,
every forty eight of the hostages are home. Thank you
so much.
Speaker 2 (03:17):
Less it be the peacemaker.
Speaker 11 (03:19):
God bless you, mister President.
Speaker 8 (03:20):
God bless America very much.
Speaker 6 (03:21):
You just say care of yourselves.
Speaker 2 (03:23):
The hostages will come back. They're coming home, coming back
on Monday. I mean beyond historic.
Speaker 1 (03:32):
Joining us now Senator James Langford of Oklahoma to discuss this,
the Schumer shut down and Jacksmith spying on his fellow
senators and other congressmen. Senator, great to have you back
your reaction to this. I think there's a I lay
out a lot of reasons I believe that this happened.
Speaker 2 (03:51):
What are yours?
Speaker 9 (03:52):
Yeah, I have to tell you, Sean, I had one
word after President Trump posted last night. My response was
just one word, hallelujah. I mean, that is such an
incredible event. People have no idea what this opens up.
The possibilities for obviously those families that have their family
members have been held by barbarians for the last two years,
(04:14):
the people of Gaza who have also been held hostage
by hamas, and the children that have an opportunity to
be able to grow up and have a future because
they're not human shields for Hamas. But this opens up
the opportunities for Saudi Arabia to be able to normalize
with Israel, for Indonesia to be able to normalize within Israel.
There so many other countries around the world to be
(04:34):
able to say that barrier is gone because we were
so close in the Abraham Accords to be having major breakthrough,
which is why Hamas was doing everything they can to
stop it.
Speaker 1 (04:43):
Maybe the most powerful factor is he means what he says,
and that region of the world certainly understands strength. And
Donald Trump taking out Aurand's nuclear facilities and then telling
Hamas take the deal or we will obliterate you. I'm
sure had an m fact on this.
Speaker 9 (05:00):
Yep, no question on that. For President Trump to be
able to step in with the relationships he had, he
was the only president that was able to engage with
that level and pick up the phone, to be able
to talk straight with bb Netsunyahu, his friend, to be
able to talk straight with the leadership of Qatar, with
the UAE, with Saudi Arabia, with Oman, with others, and
to be able to say here's where we are. So
(05:21):
many of those countries in the region were not willing
to take the risk because it's failed so many times,
so they don't want to stick their neck out and
say I'm going to be a part of a deal
that failed because Egypt tried to do this, Jordan tried
to engage France. I mean, you go on and on
and on. No one was successful, and so everyone just
backed away and stopped trying until President Trump reached in
to be able to negotiate this and to be able
(05:42):
to get it done. And once he stuck his neck
out and he started actually getting it done, others started
falling in behind.
Speaker 1 (05:48):
Let's talk a little bit about where we stand with
the Schumer shutdown. You know, there were a couple of moments.
I want to play Hikeem Jefferies. He got embarrassed on
CNBC this morning and then had a a knockdown, drag
out confrontation with Mike Lawler. I'll pay play just a
small part of that, but first let me play him
on CNBC.
Speaker 5 (06:08):
There was an election and the Republicans were put in
a position where they were able to pass the Big
Beautiful Bill, or you call it the Big Ugly Bill,
to then say we don't like any of that, so
we're going to shut down the government until you take
back all the things that you duly passed through legislation.
If Republicans had tried to do that to the Inflation
(06:29):
Reduction Act or the any of the acts that Biden
and that administration had passed. It if they said we're
going to shut down the government because we don't like
any of those things you did. We're going to not
pay our military, We're going to you know, not allow
the government to reopen until you do what we want.
After an election where the American people put them in
(06:50):
put Democrats in power, you'd be going crazy. You'd be
going crazy about using a shut down of the government
with a continuing on a continuing resolution to get what
you want just because you don't like what the Republicans did.
It's not how it's bad. It's bad precedent, and it's
just clear. And you're talking about the House, you've already
(07:12):
passed this. The Senate is who we're talking about, and
they have a bill which will reopen the government right
now with five more Democrats.
Speaker 8 (07:19):
What is bad precedent is the Republican refusal to engage
in biprotestant negotiations. What is bad President, President is the
Republicans embarking on a my way or the highway approach
from the very beginning of this Congress.
Speaker 2 (07:34):
The my way or the highway approach is them.
Speaker 1 (07:37):
They're demanding one point five trillion to keep the government
open for seven weeks, including funding using taxpayer funding for
healthcare for illegals.
Speaker 2 (07:48):
They're never going to get that. How long does this
go on?
Speaker 6 (07:52):
Yeah?
Speaker 9 (07:52):
I don't know how long this goes on. This is
one of those issues where once a war starts, it's
hard to stop. Once a shutdown starts, it's hard to
stop on and their irrational demands on it to be
able to unwind the one big beautiful bill to be
able to give healthcare to folks are not American citizens.
They even have shown a section in there that a
lot of people aren't talking about. They have a section
where they're demanding electric vehicles get the ability to be
(08:14):
able to drive in HOV lanes, and new climate initiatives
for foreign entities. I mean, it is like a progressive
wish list is their demand to be able to get it,
and it's just not rational. I go back to four
times in September that the last four septembers we had
a moment similar to this where we hadn't gotten everything
finished on appropriation, so we did a continuing resolutions. We
(08:38):
disagreed as Republicans strongly where Biden was, but we're not
going to cut off military funding as they are to
try to demand something. And so we've been through this
four times. We do know the difference. But the difference
for this one now is Schumer literally came out yesterday
and said things are getting better for Democrats every day.
It's like, literally, as pay is being cut off to
(08:58):
the members of the military, to the nowtional guard that
are being deployed, to civilian employees, he can't get to
answer at the IRS because they have so many furloughed folks,
to all the different things that are happening. Schumer has
to stand the micron and smile and tate's getting better
for Democrats every day. Well, it's not better for the
American people.
Speaker 1 (09:15):
Let me play for you, Chuck Schumer. Over the years,
because his entire career, he has spoken out against government
shutdowns on how bad they are.
Speaker 2 (09:23):
Here's what he said, what if I.
Speaker 11 (09:25):
Persuaded, my call is to say I'm going to shut
the government down. I am going to not pay our
bills unless I get my way. It's a politics of idiocy,
of confrontation, of paralysis. It's sort of like this, someone
goes into your house, takes your wife and children hostage,
and then says, let's negotiate over the price of your house.
You know, we could do the same thing on immigration.
(09:46):
We could, we believe strongly in immigration reform. We could
say we're shutting down the government. We're not going to
raise the debt ceiling until you pass immigration reform. It
would be governmental chaos. Speaker McCarthy needs to stop letting
the MAGA radicals drive his decisions and do the obvious
and sensible thing, follow the Senate's lead and pass a
(10:06):
bipartisan cr to prevent this reckless shutdown. We do not
want to let a Trump temper tantrum governor policies will
cause the shutdown of a government which everyone on both
sides of the aisles knows is the wrong idea.
Speaker 1 (10:22):
Oh, it looks like the temper tantrum is coming from
Chucky himself. The idiocy, the paralysis, the hostage taking, the chaos,
the recklessness is his. I think that Chuck Schumer basically
is trying to cling on to power, knowing that he
really is the leader in name only of the Democratic Party,
and he's scared to death that he's going to lose
(10:44):
his seat to AOC.
Speaker 2 (10:45):
That's my theory, what's yours.
Speaker 9 (10:47):
My theory as well. And he's watching what's happening in
New York City and in New York with Mondamie and
with the extreme far left and the socialists rise there
and realize if he's going to stay in power, that's
the group that he's got to please. He's doing everything
he can to be able to show he's the resistance.
There are some Democrat senators that are now saying, hey,
we're actually hurting families. We've got to figure out how
(11:08):
to be able to get out of this, and Schumer
continues to be able to push back and to say no,
we've got to show where the resistance. So this is
a Schumer shutdown over something that's just not rational. All
Republicans are looking for is just keep the government open
at the same level we are right now while we're
still negotiating. That is not partisan, That is just common sense.
Speaker 1 (11:30):
And I want to put emphasis on that. Republicans they
have a clean cr meaning you fund government at its
current levels as you negotiate, negotiate out the budgets, and
that's the place in the forum to do it, and
not to hold the people hostage again. One point five
trillion that they're demanding for seven weeks to keep the
government open.
Speaker 2 (11:49):
That's never going to happen.
Speaker 1 (11:51):
It'll be interesting now behind the scenes, are you talking
to Democrats that understand they box themselves in here.
Speaker 9 (11:58):
I have actually and not continue to be able to
do that. And I'm not the type that goes and
shouts and belittles people. No one ever convinces me when
they do that to me. So I go quietly to
be able to visit with folks one on one, catch
them and have some conversation, try to see we can
actually move some people to say, come on, now, you
know what this is doing to families. You know what
this is doing to so many members of our military.
We've got folks being deployed this weekend through the National
(12:21):
Guard that are heading overseas and they're having to say
that they're families. I don't know if you're going to
get paid and I'm on deployment. That's not right. We
got to be able to solve this, and so there
are several Democrats that are now saying, yeah, we got
to figure out how to be able to get out
of this. Susan Collins has been terrific on this, by
the way, and trying to be able to negotiate on
the appropriations level as the head of Appropriations to try
(12:41):
to move some Democrat colleagues on this. So we're going
to keep moving and pushing on this and to see
how we can actually solve this for the American people.
Speaker 1 (12:50):
Quick break right back, we'll continue more with Oklahoma Senator
James Langford on the other side. Then we'll get your
calls in as well, and my interview with President Trump
coming up. Eight hundred and nine four one Sean. If
you want to be a part of the program, The Sean.
Speaker 7 (13:09):
Hannity Show, A thermonuclear mmbay assault on fake News. Hannity
is on right now.
Speaker 1 (13:44):
Where we continue our final movements with Senator James Langford
of Oklahoma. Last question, Senator, A number of your colleagues
we now have discovered have been spied on more spied
on by Jack Smith. And I'm going to play for you.
Lindsey Graham, who was on my show the other night,
and well he was. I played him when he was
at the hearing, and he was pretty pissed off. When
(14:08):
talking to the Attorney General, he wasn't mad at her
at all. I think she was as outraged as he was.
And but discovering that he was spied on by Jack
Smith is what he said.
Speaker 12 (14:19):
He announced He's going to run for president in twenty
twenty two for the twenty four election. Within eight months,
ninety one indictments were levied against him, coming from New York, Atlanta, Washington,
d c. And Florida. Ninety one felony charges against Donald Trump.
Here's what I believe. If he had never announced he
(14:40):
was going to run for president, none of this would
have happened. They were trying to destroy his comeback. This
was all orchestrated by Jack Smith, Alvin Bragg, Fannie Willis,
Letitia James to destroy this man so he could not
win in twenty twenty four.
Speaker 1 (14:56):
Weaponization, I would argue, was putting cinderblocks on the scale
of Donald Trump's chances to win an election. And in
this last cycle, I believe the pre bunking of Hunter's
laptop was a way to try to stop Trump. In
twenty twenty they were successful at suppressing that story. And
then everything that happened with the dirty dossier, fize applications,
(15:20):
double standard of justice, and what happened with you know,
Barack Obama wanting a new Intel assessment because they didn't
like the old one that said, oh, there was no
Trump Russia collusion. Have we had deep state operatives trying
to impact presidential elections in the last three.
Speaker 9 (15:37):
Cycles, Absolutely we have. We've had folks that are within
the military. I mean you've talked about it before, Peter Strausk,
others that were within the system that were trying to
find ways that they had levers that they could actually
use to be able to affect the outcome of the
election and to see what they could do to be
able to control where the American people are. The good
news is the American people saw through those ninety to
(16:01):
one indictments, saw right through what was actually happening politically.
And as the information continues to come out, as it
says in scripture, those things that are whispered in the
secret place will be shouted from the housetops. As the
information comes out and the truth is exposed on it,
more and more people are seeing seriously the FBI was
tracking Republican members of Congress and tracking their phone to
(16:24):
be able to see what they could actually figure out
how to be able to fish to go through this.
It had reached that level that this bad administration from
the Biden administration would determine they're going to use whatever
power they have. And instantly enough they kept talking over
and over again, we've got a save democracy. Literally, they
were selling out democracy and creating autocracy while they're chanting
(16:44):
save democracy.
Speaker 1 (16:45):
Well, said Senator Lineford Voklahoma. Appreciate your time, Senator, to
keep up the good work.
Speaker 2 (16:51):
All right, So this is what we know. It's not
a whole lot Now.
Speaker 1 (16:55):
We did learn earlier in the day that Lindsey how
Again in the Eastern District of Virginia went in to
a grand jury on the issue of Letitia James. We
believe it probably has to do with the mortgage issue
that we've covered fairly extensively here on this program and
whether or not, oh it is okay, and we're gonna
(17:17):
get more details in a second. But anyway, we now
have the DOJ has indicted the New York at Attorney General. Anyway,
I think there's a whole lot of lawfare that should
have been looked into too. And you know, how does
somebody run on a platform of get Trump at the
way she did? Anyway, Fox News legal analysts, our friend
(17:39):
Greg Jared is with us.
Speaker 2 (17:40):
Now this is big news.
Speaker 1 (17:42):
And you know she and Adam Schiff seem to have
similar problems, don't they.
Speaker 10 (17:49):
Yeah, they absolutely do. And it's mortgage fraud allegedly. And
the indictment follows this criminal referral from the Federal Housing
Finance Agency director who cited alleged mortgage application fraud involving
properties in Virginia and New York. The Virginia property, James
(18:14):
is accused of falsely claiming that home as her primary
residence to secure better mortgage rates, despite the fact that
her official residence is New York. It must be New
York in order to hold the position that she has
as the state attorney general. And in fact, apparently there's
(18:38):
a power of attorney document that was signed by James
granting her niece authority to execute the purchase and listing
the property as James's principal residence. So you know, I think,
having not read the indictment because the news of it
just broke I suspect.
Speaker 2 (19:00):
I have a little bit more news. Let me pass
it on to you.
Speaker 1 (19:03):
The Justice Department won an indictment against New York Attorney
General Letitia James, accusing her of committing mortgage fraud when
she purchased a property in Virginia in twenty twenty three.
The indictment on bank fraud makes James the second of
President Donald Trump's political foes to be charged in the
(19:24):
Eastern District of Virginia. Since President Trump pushed out the
top prosecutor, Lindsay Halligan, is now in charge there. And anyway,
Halligan apparently presented this case before the grand jury. And
this is very interesting to me. Now I want to
go into the law as it relates to people that
(19:47):
would make mortgage applications and talk about places being their
permanent home, permanent residence. And this is an issue that
has come up as it relates to Adam Schiff because
he was claiming who properties and benefiting on this tax forms.
As it relates to you know which properties and getting
more favorable mortgage rates because he claimed them as their
(20:09):
primary residence. This is a big deal. And this, by
the way, happens all the time. These charges are brought.
Speaker 2 (20:15):
All the time.
Speaker 10 (20:16):
Yeah, that's true. Just look at Marilyn Moseby, who was
the prosecutor in Baltimore who ended up getting convicted of
doing the exact same thing. So you know, I mean, look,
the law is very clear. You cannot have two separate homes,
both of which is your principal place of residence. You
(20:41):
can only have one. But Adam Schiff designated allegedly California
as well as you know, Washington area. I believe it
was Maryland home as his principal place of residence. You
can't do that against the law. It's called mortgage fraud.
Speaker 11 (21:00):
Uh.
Speaker 10 (21:00):
And you know you're cheating on all kinds of uh,
you know, government tax advantages and so forth, and so
you know, it's about time that prosecutions are brought. Now
understand that Letitia James is going to make the same
claim that James Cumy is making in his particular case. Oh,
(21:22):
dismiss the case, your honor. This is a vindictive prosecution
by Donald Trump.
Speaker 11 (21:29):
Uh.
Speaker 10 (21:30):
And you know, grand jury abuse and outrageous government conduct
and so forth. You know, they'll they'll say it should
be tossed because Trump pressure government lawyers to bring a
politically motivated prosecution. Well, I got news for them. That
(21:52):
doesn't mean under law that a person cannot be criminally
prosecuted for I'll give you an example. Biden constantly criticized
Trump as a threat to democracy, and his dirty fingerprints
were all over the double prosecutions brought by Special Counsel
Jack Smith. And you know, as The New York Times
(22:12):
reported back in twenty twenty two, Biden let it be
known he wanted Trump prosecutor to applied pressure on Attorney
General Merrick Garland to get it done, and it got done.
You know, it's a myth that a president cannot tell
DOJ lawyers or US attorneys what to do. I got
(22:33):
news for him. Read article to the Constitution. The president
holds ultimate authority over all executive branch departments, including the
DOJ and their US attorneys. He can direct decisions as
a part of his inherent powers, including prosecutorial decisions. So
(22:54):
if you're going to follow the law that you know,
selective prosecution, vindictive prosecution should not work.
Speaker 11 (23:03):
But you know, in.
Speaker 10 (23:04):
Comey's case, you know, he's making a pitch in front
of a friendly Empire district judge who was appointed to
the bench by President Joe Biden, who's you know, dj
Ran interference for Comy. So you know this is going
to be a tough case, particularly in that district in Virginia,
(23:27):
which is dominated by a liberal jury pool that will
ultimately make the decision.
Speaker 1 (23:37):
It's amazing to me because you know, it's honestly like
if Donald Trump spit on the sidewalk, they wanted to
go after him. And I really have no sympathy for
the likes And by the way, we're going to take
some of your calls if you want to weigh in
on this. I see my phone's blowing up here. Finally,
I mean, you have somebody that runs on a platform.
(23:58):
She's going to be the attorney general of a Laticia
James and Latisia James, you know, runs on a platform,
Get Trump, Alvin Bragg, get Trump.
Speaker 2 (24:09):
You know what was the case? Letitia James?
Speaker 1 (24:11):
What explic because it's the almost the exact same issue
she was charging the Trump organization with in a civil
case and then getting this ridiculous, unprecedented fine which they're
not gonna have to pay, thank god. And remember if
it wasn't it that case where they had in Goron
(24:32):
and evaluation of mar Lago at eighteen million, when it's
a property worth between one and one point five billion dollars.
Speaker 6 (24:40):
Uh.
Speaker 1 (24:41):
And it would take just a minute's perusal of a
website like realtor dot com or Zillo dot com and
find out, oh h, they undervalued that property and didn't
want to know the truth. Nobody cared that they statuted
limitations had run out on Alvin Bragg. And in terms
of misdemeanor charge of what would have been a misdemeanor
(25:02):
charge for a legal non disclosure agreement that was labeled
a non disclosure agreement that was paid as a legal expense,
I mean the degree of weaponization there. Now in this
case you have Letitia James. This is about something that
is real and something that is serious, and that's called
(25:23):
mortgage fraud. And for a Virginia property she's claiming as
a principal residence. You can't be a New York New
York's top prosecutor and have a Norfolk, Norfolk, Virginia house
as your principal residence. What do you claim that whoopsie Daisy,
I made a mistake on my loan application.
Speaker 2 (25:43):
Is that what they claim?
Speaker 10 (25:45):
Yeah? I mean that is that's going to be her
her defense. Well her, she has a two part defense. One,
it's a vindictive prosecution. Dismiss the case, you're honor. Number Two,
if it goes to a jury, it's whoopsie days as
you call it. There was a pretty good explanation. Ogee,
it was a typo or a miscommunication. Well under the
(26:10):
Letitia James standard in the case you brought against Trump,
she argued and said publicly, it doesn't matter if there's
a miscommunication or somebody else did the work for you.
Ultimately Trump is responsible. Well, then you know she's ultimately
responsible in this particular mortgage fraud case. But you know,
(26:34):
spare me the fake moral outrage over weaponization of the law.
You're right, Sean. She ran on the campaign promise to
get Trump, and now people are upset because Trump wants
to get Letitia James. You know you can't have it
(26:55):
both ways.
Speaker 2 (26:56):
Well, I mean this seems pretty cut and dry.
Speaker 1 (26:58):
I mean, either she claimed it as her principal residence
while she's the top, you know, while she's the age
in New York, as she claimed the Virginia property was
the prince over residence, or she didn't. And if she did,
and I don't really think there's a lot of excuses.
But Greg, we appreciate you man, You're the best. Thank you,
my pleasure, Greg Jarrett, Fox News Legal Analyst, eight hundred
(27:22):
and nine to four one Seawn our number if you
want to be a part of the program. By the way,
we're going to have Peter Navarro and John Solomon on
at the top. What they did to Peter Navarro is unbelievable.
Speaker 6 (27:31):
Uh.
Speaker 2 (27:32):
Anyway, Jim is in North Carolina. Jim, how are you
glad you called?
Speaker 3 (27:35):
Sir?
Speaker 6 (27:37):
Hey, Sean good? How are you doing good?
Speaker 2 (27:40):
Buddy? Glad you called.
Speaker 6 (27:41):
I've been I've been a real estate broker or a
broker since nineteen eighty seven. That's almost forty years. I've
been a I'm a certifying residential appraiser, been one since
nineteen ninety one. I'm faha approved. What Latisia James did
sickens me. That woman knows exactly what she did and
(28:01):
she needs to go to jail. I've taken continuing education
for the entire time that I've been a broker and
an appraiser. I've also served on an appraisal board in
another state and maybe the Appraisal Board and also the
Real Estate Board of New York needs to get involved
as well. But that woman needs to go to jail. Period.
Speaker 2 (28:27):
Well, I will tell you my thought. Look, it was
very funny.
Speaker 1 (28:33):
There was a time because me and some friends invest
in real estate, et cetera, et cetera.
Speaker 4 (28:39):
We do it.
Speaker 2 (28:39):
I mean, we have lawyers out the yazoo, we really do.
Speaker 1 (28:43):
And it was funny because we had refinanced some loan
and you know that there are government back loans. I
don't even know the process, to be very honest, because
that's not my part of the business.
Speaker 2 (28:54):
That's not what I do.
Speaker 1 (28:55):
And they said, oh, he refinanced, and Donald Trump must
to giving him favorable treatment. Turned out we did it
during the Obama years.
Speaker 2 (29:04):
How funny is that.
Speaker 6 (29:07):
Exactly? I mean, there's any time, Sean, as you know,
when you have banking and landing involved, it's all now
interstate and those are considered federally related transactions, generally related transactions.
And that's why it's fawn and it's criminal. She knows
exactly what she did. There's no sense typo. As you know,
(29:29):
underwriters are involved in every single loan that they underwrite.
It's all taken very seriously and she needs to go
to jail.
Speaker 1 (29:39):
Well, they knew what her job was, they knew it
couldn't possibly be of principal residence anyway, Jim, really informative call.
Thank you Afrat Texas. We have about a minute. It's
all yours, go for it.
Speaker 4 (29:54):
Hi, mister Hannity, I would just like to sincerely thank
you from the bottom of our hearts for here's the
of the Jewish people, the Israeli people. As an American
Jewish Israeli, we can't tell you how much we appreciate
your loyalty and honesty and truth. You've been speaking truth
from the beginning, and you've never strayed where some have
(30:15):
decided otherwise, but you have always spoken the truth. And
I know sometimes you must feel that you are not
being appreciated by us, but please know that everyone that
I know supports and loves you for always supporting us.
So thank you very much for all that you've done.
Speaker 1 (30:33):
My sincerest prayers go out to the people of Israel,
and if I find there's a lot of ignorance out
there and what they've had to withstand tens and hundreds
of thousands of rockets surrounded by enemies, and then October
seventh is unbelievable evil in our time, I have no
(30:54):
problem standing for what's right. Thank you, Efrot, appreciate it.
Eight hundred nine four one Channel is a number.
The Sean Hannity Show News
Host
Sean Hannity
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
The Breakfast Club
The World's Most Dangerous Morning Show, The Breakfast Club, With DJ Envy, Jess Hilarious, And Charlamagne Tha God!