October 29, 2025 • 28 mins
Sean Hannity opens with breaking coverage of the House Oversight Committees bombshell report, "The Biden Autopen Presidency: Decline, Delusion, and Deception in the White House," chaired by Congressman James Comer. Comer details findings of staffers shielding President Bidens cognitive decline and using an autopen for over 4,000 pardons and executive actions without direct presidential involvement. Hannity frames this as an unprecedented constitutional crisis, citing stonewalling witnesses and mounting evidence of a cover-up. Comer, featured guest, explains why the committee is urging the DOJ to void these actions and presses for transparency, arguing the scandals scope undermines executive trust and demands public reckoning.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
All right, News round up in Information Overload Hour. Here's
(00:02):
our toll free telephone number if you want to be
a part of the program. It's eight hundred and ninety
four one Sean if you want to join us. So
yesterday we spent a lot of time on this program,
going over the release by the House Committee on Oversight,
the Oversight Committee chaired by Congressman James Comer, friend of
this program. It's called the Biden Auto Pen Presidency Decline,
(00:25):
Delusion and Deception in the White House, and it was
prepared by the committee. I'll go right to the conclusion. Now,
you don't need to read all ninety one pages as
I did, but it's fascinating reading and you can't believe
all this happened. The committee recommends the Department of Justice
investigates all former President Biden's executive actions, particularly clemency actions,
(00:49):
to assess whether legal action must be taken to void
any action that former president the former President did not
in fact take himself. They lay out a compelling case.
Here is James Comer on with our friend John Solomon,
investigative reporter Justinnews dot com, saying they should all be
Nolan void.
Speaker 2 (01:09):
Listen, I think all the pardons should be declared, Nolan
Boyd that were signed.
Speaker 3 (01:13):
With the Auto pin.
Speaker 4 (01:15):
These were all done during the lame duck period when
Joe Biden.
Speaker 3 (01:19):
Was checked out. I think the executive orders that we're
done during the lame duck period should be declared. Nolan Boyd.
Speaker 1 (01:27):
And the committee also released this montage of the people
that testified before the committee, including those pleading the fifth We.
Speaker 5 (01:37):
Were watching the testimony of this woman here, Annie Thomas Senior.
She's the former senior advisor to President Joe Biden. She
was the third person set to appear before James Covers Committee.
She has now taken the fifth There is now a
pattern of key Biden confidant seeking the shield themselves from
criminal liability for this potential conspiracy.
Speaker 2 (01:58):
Were you ever told to lie about the president all
the advice and council, Mister respectully declined to answer, based
upon the physician patient privilege and in reliance, am I
right under the fifth Man of the Constitution. Let the
record reflect that doctor O'Connor has invoked the Fifth Amendment
right against self incrimination. Doctor O'Connor, did you ever believe
the President was unfit to execute his duties as president, and.
Speaker 5 (02:21):
We can tell you that he will have the same
answer with respect to any questions that are asked.
Speaker 2 (02:26):
Did any unelected official or family member of President Joe
Biden execute the duties of the presidents? Did Joe Biden,
a member of his family, or anyone at the White
House ever instruct you to lie regarding his health on the.
Speaker 6 (02:39):
Advice and Council? I respect him declined to answer the
question for the Constitution.
Speaker 1 (02:45):
All right, joining us now? He is the chairman of
the all important House Oversight Committee's the chairman, James Comer
is with us. Well, Uh, you've been busy. This is
about as damning a report as I've ever read coming
out of Congress. It is extraordinarily meticulously well researched, well written,
(03:05):
well laid out with I believe the right conclusion. But
I want to hear it directly from you because you've
been spending a year of your life on this.
Speaker 4 (03:15):
Well, thanks Sean. And it is a very substantive report.
We did hours and hours and hours of depositions with
all of the players in the Body administration that had
any role whatsoever in the use of the autoped What
we concluded were two things first of all, the obvious
and you said it forever, we all saw it with
(03:37):
our own eyes. But there was a cognitive decline in
the president, and his inner circle covered that up. They
shielded him from even his most inner circle of staffers.
There were staffers like Ian Sam's that would go out
and speak on behalf of Joe Biden every day to
(03:58):
the national media. And when we got him under oath,
he admitted he only saw and spoke to Joe Biden
in person two times in two years. The same with
his executive secretary of near attendant. She would go weeks
and weeks and weeks without seeing him. That's your most
closest staffer as a president United States. So there was
(04:20):
a cover up. The staffers admitted under oath that they
talked about giving Joe Biden a cognitive test. I mean,
who does that, Sean? I mean, no one's sitting around
Fox to you saying Sean Annity or or Laura Ingram
should be taking a cognitive test. I mean you only
say that if the if it's obvious they.
Speaker 1 (04:41):
I think liberals would like me to take one. But
all said, I'm not worried about it.
Speaker 4 (04:45):
Well, but you know, at the end of the day,
they all said they decided against it. Now, if you
thought he should take a cognitive test, and if the
American people, even some in the in the left wing media,
were saying the president should take a kind of test
and then you all ltimately rule against it, I mean
that shows that you had no confidence he was in
a pass it. But we found there was a cover up.
(05:08):
And secondly, we found that there was no evidence that
Joe Biden was involved in any of the decision making
process with respect to the pardons.
Speaker 1 (05:19):
And you know, and by the way, just to remind people,
we're talking about over four thousand of them, and executive
actions on top of it.
Speaker 4 (05:27):
And Joe Biden gave one interview post presidency, and he
gave it to the New York Times, and he admitted
to the New York Times and what should have been
a puffy article for him, that he didn't review all
the pardons, and he delegated that, well, that's not how
it works, Sean.
Speaker 1 (05:42):
You have to well, well, it actually was more than that,
because he said he set up standards and practices and
guidelines for his staff to make the decisions. But as
you rightly point out in your report, and you quote
our Constitution that the power of the pardon is absolute.
There's no no disputing that. However, the decision has to
(06:03):
be made specifically by a president.
Speaker 4 (06:06):
Yes. And and again there was no there were no
notes in the national archives, there was no chain of
custody that there was no uh, emails back and forth,
you have. We just met with the president and he
said this. When the pardons were authorized on the auto pen,
it was you know, a different process for for different partons.
(06:27):
It would be a phone call from a stafford to
a friend to another staffer. Yeah, and they would say, yeah,
the President gave that okay, and that you know, there
was no there was no in the archives. There's no meetings. Uh,
there are no planning sessions. Uh, there are no notes. Nothing.
And again with the way the staff shielded the president
(06:50):
says uh, and the way they just disregarded him and
pushed him aside after that debate, after he dropped out,
that's when the auto pen you went off the charts.
Is when Joe Biden, when the American people saw with
our own eyes that he's not mentally capable of performing
(07:11):
the duties of the presidency. That's when the staff seemed
to take over, and even we found Sean there were
emails from the Department of Justice, from the Americ Garland
Department Justice questioning whether or not Joe Biden was involved
in the decision making process with the pardons and warning
the staff of the excessive use of the autopin on
(07:32):
legal documents.
Speaker 1 (07:34):
Well, you go through a lot of specificity in detail,
and you really, I think went very hard, rightly so
at doctor O'Connor, who propped up Biden with you know
what you describe as grossly misleading assessments in all of this,
and how Biden, you go into specificity, was losing command
(07:54):
of himself. You know, Congressman, I first started pointing this
out to the American people in twenty nineteen. It was
apparent to me all there's used to be and all
men and women are created by the thing, oh you
know the thing.
Speaker 6 (08:09):
I mean.
Speaker 1 (08:09):
It was like moment after moment, and then as his
presidency went on, it was worse and worse. It was mumbling,
it was bumbling, it was fumbling, it was slurring. It
was which way do I go? You know, you know,
having somebody direct him off the stage. You go into
all of this and how scripted everything was, and how
(08:32):
his inner circle controlled is every step it was. There
was you know, extreme gatekeeping with his inner circle, and
you know how delusional either they were delusional or lying.
I happened to lean towards believing that a lot of
people lied. That's my own personal opinion.
Speaker 4 (08:50):
Well, look, John, nobody's disputing it, and it always seen
from the Biden camp is a is a statement from
some unnamed stafford. I thought, how how consistent is that
with the way with the report, the way the White
House was operating. You don't know who wrote that statement.
But at the end of the day, no one in
the Biden administration wants to come out and dispute this
(09:10):
because they don't want to be brought in before the
Justice Cabinet or before the Oversight Committee. Because we saw
with our own eyes. You you have always reported this
accurately about the mental decline and Joe Biden. Everyone saw it.
Everyone saw it. And if you really want to see
a sad example of Joe Biden's mental decline, then you
(09:32):
need to watch the Robert her interview where Joe Biden
had to sit there. The staffers couldn't stand.
Speaker 6 (09:38):
When are we going to get access to view it.
Speaker 4 (09:41):
Well, we we're gonna do everything we can to make
that public. That right, So you've watched it, yes, yes,
and it's pain.
Speaker 6 (09:51):
Can you describe it?
Speaker 4 (09:52):
He doesn't know, He gets confused, he thinks he's vice president,
he gets confused on what year it is. I mean,
this is unbelievable situation. And what I think you could
see is Joe Biden was good for five, ten, fifteen minutes.
I wouldn't say good. He was, you know, coherent, But
(10:13):
as time went on, he deteriorated. He lost focus, he
forgot you know, dates, and he would forget the question
that the Robert Her would ask him a question and
he would start mumbling, and then then he would get
sidetracked and he would be talking about something completely irrelevant
to the question, something that happened in Delaware thirty years ago.
(10:33):
I mean, he all the characteristics of people that you
see with early stages of dementia or Alzheimer's or things
like that. We all have people in our family, we've
all seen the symptoms of that, and that's why Robert
and Her put that in the report. You kind of
have a different appreciation for the Her report when you
(10:53):
watch the video of the of the interview. So I
think that you know, we're relieved seeing all the audio
of the depositions, and we're going to do everything we
can so the American people can see for themselves the
situation the president was in. And then you realize there
was a cover up by a few staffords because a
(11:16):
lot of his cabinet secretaries, like Vudhajig, they didn't seem
for months and months at the end of his administration.
Speaker 1 (11:22):
Quick break right back more with the Chairman of the
House Overside Committee, James Comer on the other side than
your calls coming up eight hundred and nine to four
one Sean, if you want to be a part of
the program, continue now with the Chairman of the House
Overside Committee, and they're huge blockbuster report on the Biden
autopen presidency declined the lusion deception in the White House.
Speaker 6 (11:42):
Let me ask you this now.
Speaker 1 (11:44):
You have said that they should be null and void,
meaning the pardons and the commutations. Okay, I appreciate all
of that, and I agree with your conclusion. I think
it was transparent, It was obvious for anybody with eyes
to see that wasn't politically biased. I mean, well, you know,
why did they have that debate so early in June?
(12:04):
Because I believe he was pushed into it for the
purpose of him being exposed.
Speaker 6 (12:08):
Am I wrong? I'm believing that.
Speaker 4 (12:10):
I think you're right. And we asked every one of
the twelve Biden staffers that exact question, and they just
they would all have different, you know, reasons. Well, you know,
we just wanted to get it started and get the
momentum building, you know. And and you know, I think
the same thing you think. I think that there were
people in the Democrat Party, uh maybe Obama people like
(12:34):
that that that.
Speaker 6 (12:35):
That's never happened before.
Speaker 4 (12:37):
They never knew there was a problem, and they're like,
all right, we've got to We've got to put him
out here, let him, let him hang himself, and then
we'll we'll try to, you know, put.
Speaker 1 (12:47):
We'll go in for the kill and and and he
won't be able to run. I mean, the moment when
Trump was asked, well, what do you think about Biden's answer,
he said, well, I don't think he knows what he says.
I don't know what he said, and I don't think
he knows what he said. Was that was the That
was it for him. All right, last question, how do
you know and void these pardons and commutations? Would that
include the pardons for his family?
Speaker 4 (13:08):
Absolutely? And you know the only pardon that he signed
for his family was for Hunter, and Hunter's pardon was
months before.
Speaker 1 (13:16):
What about what about as Oh, you mean the one
he signed personally? What about his brother and others?
Speaker 4 (13:21):
They were all signed with the autopen. The brother, both brothers,
and the and their spouses. They were all signed with
the autopen. So uh, but the process, Shawn, would be
the Department of Justice would then uh declare them Nolan void.
It will end up in court. We believe that this investigation,
(13:44):
the ninety three pages, the links to all and then
plus all the transcripts of the deposition, plus all the
emails and all the evidence is enough evidence to hold
up in court if the Department of Justice comes to
the same conclusion that we came to committee.
Speaker 1 (14:02):
I'm not going to ask this audience three ninety one
pages because everybody's busy, but I'm going to put up
the five page executive summary. And you did a phenomenal
work here. It's a shame that we don't have more honesty.
And I think at some point somebody is going to
open up and say, yeah, we all knew. I'm just
waiting for that moment to happen. Phenomenal work. I know
(14:25):
it's been a heavy lift. I know you've been under
heavy fire because of it. But this is a you know,
this is a scandal unlike any we've ever seen in
this country. Who was in charge? We don't know who
gave the ok for all these decisions. We don't know.
Congressman James camer great work. We really appreciate you more.
Speaker 6 (14:44):
Than you know.
Speaker 4 (14:45):
Thank you, Sean.
Speaker 1 (14:47):
All right, let's go to Israel. Jerusalem Isaac on the
Sean Hannity Show. Are you listening in Jerusalem?
Speaker 7 (14:55):
Yes, I'm in Jerusalem right now. Sean.
Speaker 6 (14:57):
What's going on? Thanks for listening. Glad you called.
Speaker 4 (15:00):
Yes.
Speaker 7 (15:01):
Yes. First of all, I'm from Brooklyn. I'm only here
for a few months. But there was amazing seeing President
Trump come here and how the country was celebrating two
weeks ago, and how the President just made a whole
country just on such a high high happiness, and there
was amazing to see it as an American experiencing it.
And also, Sewan, the way they love you over here. Also,
(15:22):
they like your support. They love, your support. The way
you stand betune because not too many people in the
world staying with Israel, and when they see Americans, you know.
Speaker 1 (15:30):
Can I just stand and can I make a statement
about this? You're still there? That I lose you, I
think I might have lost them. You know, I will
say this, there's times in life when you need moral clarity,
you need a moral compass. And when I hear and
see the rise of virulent anti Semitism, it disturbs me
(15:55):
a lot because there's a lot of ignorance behind the
positions that people have. And I don't care if you're
hearing it in the halls of Congress, on college campuses,
if you see the rise of anti Semitism worldwide, you
know in the punditry class it's everywhere. And you know,
everyone's entitled to their opinion, but an opinion that's based
(16:16):
in ignorance, to me is it's it's just intellectually lazy,
and it's missing a sense of right and wrong and
moral clarity. And you know, I don't know what part
of Israel having to withstand hundreds of thousands of rockets
over the decades being fired into their countries by groups
(16:40):
that have in their charter, like AMAS a call for
the destruction of Israel, and they follow through, culminating in
what happened on October the seventh. You have a very
small population in Israel, under ten million people, you know'll
compare that to America's population, what three fifty sixty million people?
(17:01):
That would be like losing forty thousand Americans in a day.
And I'm having a hard time understanding those that don't
understand that Israel does have their right to exist and
their own country. And what would you want your country
to do if some country was firing all of these
missiles into American towns, American cities, you know, killing forty
(17:24):
thousand Americans in a day, kidnapping thousands of Americans in
a day, you know, never mind the rape, the kidnapping,
the torture, and the beheadings that I also know took
place because I've seen the videos. Anyway, did we get
Isaac back from Jerusalem? All right, We'll give you a
last comment. I was explaining that to me, this is
a simple right wrong, moral clarity issue.
Speaker 7 (17:46):
Yeah, Yeahjean, And you're totally right and everything you're saying,
and it really, really, it's really comforting to hear you
and Mark Mark Levin also and all the all the
people on the right, because it's a shame how there's
people on the right also now that I love President Trump,
and but like the Tuckers and everyone listen.
Speaker 1 (18:06):
I mean, everyone's entitled to their opinion. And for me,
it's you know, radical Islamists. We need to understand them.
You know, for example, when the President wiped out the
Ice Says Caliphate and he took out around his nuclear sites,
you know, the world is a safer place because he
did both things. When he took out Solamani and Bagdaddy.
(18:27):
You know, the world's a safer place. Is a proper
use of military that fits into the Trump doctrine, which
is also no forever wars. I appreciate you calling in
from Jerusalem. Thank you, my friend. Eight hundred and nine
four one, Shawn is a number if you want to
be a part of the program. Frank North Carolina next
Sean Hannity Show. It's up, Frank, how are.
Speaker 3 (18:45):
You hey, Sean? Thanks for the call, two time caller,
longtime listener.
Speaker 1 (18:51):
Well, thanks for being here. I love, by the way,
North Carolina's beautiful. I've been in the mountains of North
Carolina above the clouds, you know, visiting a friend.
Speaker 3 (18:59):
The lives there anyway, retired Navy twenty four years Saberne Force.
But I wanted to ask what you thought about Fetterman
using his position in the Senate to Coherst Dems as
a run for as a ruse or a springboard for
twenty twenty eight presidential run.
Speaker 6 (19:20):
You know, I.
Speaker 1 (19:21):
Actually have come to like Fetterman a lot. I think
Fetterman is an anomaly in the Democratic Party. And when
I interviewed him, what a week or so ago on Hannity,
you know, we just had a fair open discussion. He goes,
if you're looking, you know, I'm not the Democrat that's
going to be screaming Nazi, fascist, racist. I do believe
(19:41):
the President made the right call on Iran's nuclear sites.
I do support Israel's right to exist, and I'm not
going to be shy about who I am. And he goes,
I'm not running for re election right now. I don't
care what the consequences are.
Speaker 6 (19:56):
Now.
Speaker 1 (19:57):
That's not something you often hear from an elected official,
and I kind of admire that a lot. And you know,
I think he understands his parties radicalized. He just refuses
to go along with it.
Speaker 3 (20:09):
Yeah, he's definitely making a better name for himself than
leveraging and getting more attention from what I believe Republicans
see him as something that we can get behind. Now.
I'm not saying I'm going to be behind him, but
you know, I kind of like him. Definitely overnews him,
definitely overnews him.
Speaker 1 (20:28):
Well, you got Newsom, you got Pete Buddha Judge, you
got Kamala Harris, you got AOC. I mean, I don't
see a more moderate Democrat breaking through and winning a
primary because I think the basis is with the radicals.
I think the whole party has been transformed. You know,
(20:50):
I mentioned this study earlier in the program. You know,
seventy percent, this is one hundreds of thousands of people
surveyed see that the Democratic Party is too extreme and
too radicalized, and that they're wrong on the borders, they're
wrong on law and order, they're wrong on the economy,
and they're too fixated on all the wrong issues. Those
(21:12):
are devastating numbers. I doubt that the Democrats will.
Speaker 6 (21:16):
Pay attention to it.
Speaker 1 (21:17):
You know, the reason Bill Maher was right in his
observation that every Democrat is on the ballot in New
York City is because he's right. I mean, the whole
country's gonna watch that election. And assuming Mam Donnie wins
this election, that's gonna that he will be the poster
child of the new radicalized Democratic Left. It will empower
(21:41):
the likes of AOC and the Squad and Newsome and
and all the people that are pretty radical left. And
you know, if either Harris or Newsom okay, when you
get to a general election, assuming they win the primary,
you know, do you want New York? Do you want
America to be California? And I think most of America
(22:05):
will reject that. You know, it doesn't mean things can
change over time. Thank you, Frank, appreciate it, buddy, God
bless you. Eight hundred and nine four one. Shawn is
a number Todd in Arizona. What's up, Todd?
Speaker 8 (22:17):
Thank Sean, Thanks for having me.
Speaker 4 (22:18):
You're a great American.
Speaker 3 (22:19):
The thank you shutdown.
Speaker 8 (22:22):
I think the Democrats are showing their cards. The forty
two million people on SNAP is a problem in itself,
But with that said, I would venture to say the
bulk of those constituents belong in Democratic run cities, and
so they're just cutting their people loose over health care
for illegal immigrants and a very small percentage I wanted
(22:45):
to point out, and it doesn't affect very many people.
My wife and I were both junior andlisted with two
children and full time employed obviously in the military, but
when we were young, we still qualified for which programs.
So there's a portion of the military out there with
larger families that are being deployed and whatnot that are
dependent on government subsidies on top of their minuscule government
(23:07):
paycheck for what they're doing.
Speaker 1 (23:09):
No, it's terrible, and it's terrible. I mean, we've got
to have a livable wage for people that serve. You know,
the last caller serve twenty four years. Thank him for
his service. It's just but you're right in your observation
forty two million Americans. Now it's not the time to
really have the conversation about why so many people are
(23:31):
in need of basic food assistance like this in this country.
You know, this is why I keep reminding everybody that
you have all of these high paying career jobs now
in the pipeline, and we're talking about seventeen trillion and
committed money from manufacturing. You'll have the massive impact when
it kicks in of the economy and the Trump tax
(23:53):
cuts really take hold. I would say by this time
next year, you're going to see a dramatically different economy.
That's my prediction. And it took Reagan about a year
and a half to get out of the malaise of
Jimmy Carter once his once his plan was passed, So
I think it's going to take about that long. But
I but you know, the President very cleverly, you know,
(24:15):
is incentivizing building these auto plants, pharmaceutical plants, uh, semiconductor
chip plans and rare earth you know, minerals and then
also opening up you know, energy dominance jobs that are
going to be you know, high paying career or oriented.
All of this is you know now it's it's kind
(24:37):
of been jacked up on steroids and human growth hormone
because of the President and this you know one hundred
percent uh deduction uh part of the big beautiful bill.
You get one hundred percent depreciation if you build a
manufacturing facility.
Speaker 6 (24:53):
That's awesome.
Speaker 1 (24:54):
That's that means they're going to get it up and
running now while they get the tax benefit of doing
it simultaneously creating all those jobs, including in construction. Once
you get interest rates down, it went down another half
point today, and we get a new fed chair in May,
then you're going to see sale of pre existing homes skyrocket.
Now you're going to see new home construction begins to skyrocket,
(25:17):
and you know things are going to be humming along
at a pretty good clip. That's my prediction. That's what
I believe. I'm a supply side economics guide. This is
it on steroids. Anyway, appreciate the call real quick. Caroly
in California. Carol, how are you.
Speaker 8 (25:33):
I'm fine, Sean, Thank you for taking my call.
Speaker 6 (25:37):
I got about a minute, but it's all yours go.
Speaker 4 (25:40):
We need help.
Speaker 7 (25:42):
Musom is trying to push this prop fifty, telling people
that it's giving the power back to the people.
Speaker 8 (25:48):
It's the exact opposite. We used to have a committee
that drew the lines.
Speaker 7 (25:53):
Now they're trying to take it away from us.
Speaker 1 (25:55):
We need They're trying to circumvent this is a jerry
mandering ploy the Democrats. Yes, but you know remember all
the jerry mandering in the world has been done in
liberal states like yours.
Speaker 3 (26:07):
Yes, and I don't know how they can do any worse,
but they're trying to take the few people that we
have away from us.
Speaker 4 (26:14):
We need your help. Tell the people know on fifty they.
Speaker 6 (26:18):
Know on fifty I just told them, and I'm serious.
This is not good.
Speaker 8 (26:23):
No, it's terrible, terrible. We need your help.
Speaker 6 (26:28):
Why do you stay out in California?
Speaker 8 (26:31):
Well, my house is paid for. I couldn't afford to
live here otherwise, and I'm involved in a release.
Speaker 1 (26:37):
Well, prop third Team was good because you get capped
out on your property tax.
Speaker 6 (26:40):
That's helpful.
Speaker 1 (26:41):
And if are you retired, yes, all right, so your
income is not being taxed at the highest rate in
the country, but you still pay the highest sales and
gas taxes in the country.
Speaker 4 (26:53):
Right, exactly.
Speaker 8 (26:55):
I don't know how young people can do it. I
really don't.
Speaker 6 (26:58):
Well, it's not a surprise you have the highest poverty
rate in the country.
Speaker 1 (27:01):
No, I've tried to have productive conversations with Gavin, but frankly,
they're you know, it's sadly become a waste of time
as his presidential aspirations grow by the day.
Speaker 6 (27:14):
Carol, I got a run, though. I appreciate your call.
God bless you.
Speaker 1 (27:17):
And uh, you know, it is a beautiful state in
terms of geography, but I don't see California switching. Steve
Hilton would be a great governor, you know. I hope
he can make a competitive anyway, We're going to be
in New Jersey tomorrow night for Hannity with Jack Chidarelli.
Speaker 3 (27:34):
Uh.
Speaker 1 (27:35):
They now have another pullout one point race that's gonna
wrap things up today. But I have good news. We
have a great Hannity tonight nine Eastern on the Fox
News Channel. Please set your DVR. Senator Josh Hawley tonight.
We also have Senator Tom Cotton, Trey Goudy tonight, Jonathan
Turley tonight, also Jason Chafitz. We have Klay Travis, we
(27:58):
have Peter Doucey who's been with the President, Kaylee McGhee white,
and much more news you'll never get from the state
run Legacy Medium Mob nine easton tonight on Hannity on
Box News.
Speaker 6 (28:08):
We'll see you then.
Speaker 1 (28:09):
We will be in New Jersey tomorrow for tomorrow night's
town hall with Jack Chitdarelli. New Jersey's in play, as
is Virginia, New York City.
Speaker 6 (28:19):
Good luck.
Speaker 1 (28:20):
We'll see you tomorrow from New Jersey. Thanks for being
with us, See you tonight.
All right, News round up in Information Overload Hour. Here's
(00:02):
our toll free telephone number if you want to be
a part of the program. It's eight hundred and ninety
four one Sean if you want to join us. So
yesterday we spent a lot of time on this program,
going over the release by the House Committee on Oversight,
the Oversight Committee chaired by Congressman James Comer, friend of
this program. It's called the Biden Auto Pen Presidency Decline,
(00:25):
Delusion and Deception in the White House, and it was
prepared by the committee. I'll go right to the conclusion. Now,
you don't need to read all ninety one pages as
I did, but it's fascinating reading and you can't believe
all this happened. The committee recommends the Department of Justice
investigates all former President Biden's executive actions, particularly clemency actions,
(00:49):
to assess whether legal action must be taken to void
any action that former president the former President did not
in fact take himself. They lay out a compelling case.
Here is James Comer on with our friend John Solomon,
investigative reporter Justinnews dot com, saying they should all be
Nolan void.
Speaker 2 (01:09):
Listen, I think all the pardons should be declared, Nolan
Boyd that were signed.
Speaker 3 (01:13):
With the Auto pin.
Speaker 4 (01:15):
These were all done during the lame duck period when
Joe Biden.
Speaker 3 (01:19):
Was checked out. I think the executive orders that we're
done during the lame duck period should be declared. Nolan Boyd.
Speaker 1 (01:27):
And the committee also released this montage of the people
that testified before the committee, including those pleading the fifth We.
Speaker 5 (01:37):
Were watching the testimony of this woman here, Annie Thomas Senior.
She's the former senior advisor to President Joe Biden. She
was the third person set to appear before James Covers Committee.
She has now taken the fifth There is now a
pattern of key Biden confidant seeking the shield themselves from
criminal liability for this potential conspiracy.
Speaker 2 (01:58):
Were you ever told to lie about the president all
the advice and council, Mister respectully declined to answer, based
upon the physician patient privilege and in reliance, am I
right under the fifth Man of the Constitution. Let the
record reflect that doctor O'Connor has invoked the Fifth Amendment
right against self incrimination. Doctor O'Connor, did you ever believe
the President was unfit to execute his duties as president, and.
Speaker 5 (02:21):
We can tell you that he will have the same
answer with respect to any questions that are asked.
Speaker 2 (02:26):
Did any unelected official or family member of President Joe
Biden execute the duties of the presidents? Did Joe Biden,
a member of his family, or anyone at the White
House ever instruct you to lie regarding his health on the.
Speaker 6 (02:39):
Advice and Council? I respect him declined to answer the
question for the Constitution.
Speaker 1 (02:45):
All right, joining us now? He is the chairman of
the all important House Oversight Committee's the chairman, James Comer
is with us. Well, Uh, you've been busy. This is
about as damning a report as I've ever read coming
out of Congress. It is extraordinarily meticulously well researched, well written,
(03:05):
well laid out with I believe the right conclusion. But
I want to hear it directly from you because you've
been spending a year of your life on this.
Speaker 4 (03:15):
Well, thanks Sean. And it is a very substantive report.
We did hours and hours and hours of depositions with
all of the players in the Body administration that had
any role whatsoever in the use of the autoped What
we concluded were two things first of all, the obvious
and you said it forever, we all saw it with
(03:37):
our own eyes. But there was a cognitive decline in
the president, and his inner circle covered that up. They
shielded him from even his most inner circle of staffers.
There were staffers like Ian Sam's that would go out
and speak on behalf of Joe Biden every day to
(03:58):
the national media. And when we got him under oath,
he admitted he only saw and spoke to Joe Biden
in person two times in two years. The same with
his executive secretary of near attendant. She would go weeks
and weeks and weeks without seeing him. That's your most
closest staffer as a president United States. So there was
(04:20):
a cover up. The staffers admitted under oath that they
talked about giving Joe Biden a cognitive test. I mean,
who does that, Sean? I mean, no one's sitting around
Fox to you saying Sean Annity or or Laura Ingram
should be taking a cognitive test. I mean you only
say that if the if it's obvious they.
Speaker 1 (04:41):
I think liberals would like me to take one. But
all said, I'm not worried about it.
Speaker 4 (04:45):
Well, but you know, at the end of the day,
they all said they decided against it. Now, if you
thought he should take a cognitive test, and if the
American people, even some in the in the left wing media,
were saying the president should take a kind of test
and then you all ltimately rule against it, I mean
that shows that you had no confidence he was in
a pass it. But we found there was a cover up.
(05:08):
And secondly, we found that there was no evidence that
Joe Biden was involved in any of the decision making
process with respect to the pardons.
Speaker 1 (05:19):
And you know, and by the way, just to remind people,
we're talking about over four thousand of them, and executive
actions on top of it.
Speaker 4 (05:27):
And Joe Biden gave one interview post presidency, and he
gave it to the New York Times, and he admitted
to the New York Times and what should have been
a puffy article for him, that he didn't review all
the pardons, and he delegated that, well, that's not how
it works, Sean.
Speaker 1 (05:42):
You have to well, well, it actually was more than that,
because he said he set up standards and practices and
guidelines for his staff to make the decisions. But as
you rightly point out in your report, and you quote
our Constitution that the power of the pardon is absolute.
There's no no disputing that. However, the decision has to
(06:03):
be made specifically by a president.
Speaker 4 (06:06):
Yes. And and again there was no there were no
notes in the national archives, there was no chain of
custody that there was no uh, emails back and forth,
you have. We just met with the president and he
said this. When the pardons were authorized on the auto pen,
it was you know, a different process for for different partons.
(06:27):
It would be a phone call from a stafford to
a friend to another staffer. Yeah, and they would say, yeah,
the President gave that okay, and that you know, there
was no there was no in the archives. There's no meetings. Uh,
there are no planning sessions. Uh, there are no notes. Nothing.
And again with the way the staff shielded the president
(06:50):
says uh, and the way they just disregarded him and
pushed him aside after that debate, after he dropped out,
that's when the auto pen you went off the charts.
Is when Joe Biden, when the American people saw with
our own eyes that he's not mentally capable of performing
(07:11):
the duties of the presidency. That's when the staff seemed
to take over, and even we found Sean there were
emails from the Department of Justice, from the Americ Garland
Department Justice questioning whether or not Joe Biden was involved
in the decision making process with the pardons and warning
the staff of the excessive use of the autopin on
(07:32):
legal documents.
Speaker 1 (07:34):
Well, you go through a lot of specificity in detail,
and you really, I think went very hard, rightly so
at doctor O'Connor, who propped up Biden with you know
what you describe as grossly misleading assessments in all of this,
and how Biden, you go into specificity, was losing command
(07:54):
of himself. You know, Congressman, I first started pointing this
out to the American people in twenty nineteen. It was
apparent to me all there's used to be and all
men and women are created by the thing, oh you
know the thing.
Speaker 6 (08:09):
I mean.
Speaker 1 (08:09):
It was like moment after moment, and then as his
presidency went on, it was worse and worse. It was mumbling,
it was bumbling, it was fumbling, it was slurring. It
was which way do I go? You know, you know,
having somebody direct him off the stage. You go into
all of this and how scripted everything was, and how
(08:32):
his inner circle controlled is every step it was. There
was you know, extreme gatekeeping with his inner circle, and
you know how delusional either they were delusional or lying.
I happened to lean towards believing that a lot of
people lied. That's my own personal opinion.
Speaker 4 (08:50):
Well, look, John, nobody's disputing it, and it always seen
from the Biden camp is a is a statement from
some unnamed stafford. I thought, how how consistent is that
with the way with the report, the way the White
House was operating. You don't know who wrote that statement.
But at the end of the day, no one in
the Biden administration wants to come out and dispute this
(09:10):
because they don't want to be brought in before the
Justice Cabinet or before the Oversight Committee. Because we saw
with our own eyes. You you have always reported this
accurately about the mental decline and Joe Biden. Everyone saw it.
Everyone saw it. And if you really want to see
a sad example of Joe Biden's mental decline, then you
(09:32):
need to watch the Robert her interview where Joe Biden
had to sit there. The staffers couldn't stand.
Speaker 6 (09:38):
When are we going to get access to view it.
Speaker 4 (09:41):
Well, we we're gonna do everything we can to make
that public. That right, So you've watched it, yes, yes,
and it's pain.
Speaker 6 (09:51):
Can you describe it?
Speaker 4 (09:52):
He doesn't know, He gets confused, he thinks he's vice president,
he gets confused on what year it is. I mean,
this is unbelievable situation. And what I think you could
see is Joe Biden was good for five, ten, fifteen minutes.
I wouldn't say good. He was, you know, coherent, But
(10:13):
as time went on, he deteriorated. He lost focus, he
forgot you know, dates, and he would forget the question
that the Robert Her would ask him a question and
he would start mumbling, and then then he would get
sidetracked and he would be talking about something completely irrelevant
to the question, something that happened in Delaware thirty years ago.
(10:33):
I mean, he all the characteristics of people that you
see with early stages of dementia or Alzheimer's or things
like that. We all have people in our family, we've
all seen the symptoms of that, and that's why Robert
and Her put that in the report. You kind of
have a different appreciation for the Her report when you
(10:53):
watch the video of the of the interview. So I
think that you know, we're relieved seeing all the audio
of the depositions, and we're going to do everything we
can so the American people can see for themselves the
situation the president was in. And then you realize there
was a cover up by a few staffords because a
(11:16):
lot of his cabinet secretaries, like Vudhajig, they didn't seem
for months and months at the end of his administration.
Speaker 1 (11:22):
Quick break right back more with the Chairman of the
House Overside Committee, James Comer on the other side than
your calls coming up eight hundred and nine to four
one Sean, if you want to be a part of
the program, continue now with the Chairman of the House
Overside Committee, and they're huge blockbuster report on the Biden
autopen presidency declined the lusion deception in the White House.
Speaker 6 (11:42):
Let me ask you this now.
Speaker 1 (11:44):
You have said that they should be null and void,
meaning the pardons and the commutations. Okay, I appreciate all
of that, and I agree with your conclusion. I think
it was transparent, It was obvious for anybody with eyes
to see that wasn't politically biased. I mean, well, you know,
why did they have that debate so early in June?
(12:04):
Because I believe he was pushed into it for the
purpose of him being exposed.
Speaker 6 (12:08):
Am I wrong? I'm believing that.
Speaker 4 (12:10):
I think you're right. And we asked every one of
the twelve Biden staffers that exact question, and they just
they would all have different, you know, reasons. Well, you know,
we just wanted to get it started and get the
momentum building, you know. And and you know, I think
the same thing you think. I think that there were
people in the Democrat Party, uh maybe Obama people like
(12:34):
that that that.
Speaker 6 (12:35):
That's never happened before.
Speaker 4 (12:37):
They never knew there was a problem, and they're like,
all right, we've got to We've got to put him
out here, let him, let him hang himself, and then
we'll we'll try to, you know, put.
Speaker 1 (12:47):
We'll go in for the kill and and and he
won't be able to run. I mean, the moment when
Trump was asked, well, what do you think about Biden's answer,
he said, well, I don't think he knows what he says.
I don't know what he said, and I don't think
he knows what he said. Was that was the That
was it for him. All right, last question, how do
you know and void these pardons and commutations? Would that
include the pardons for his family?
Speaker 4 (13:08):
Absolutely? And you know the only pardon that he signed
for his family was for Hunter, and Hunter's pardon was
months before.
Speaker 1 (13:16):
What about what about as Oh, you mean the one
he signed personally? What about his brother and others?
Speaker 4 (13:21):
They were all signed with the autopen. The brother, both brothers,
and the and their spouses. They were all signed with
the autopen. So uh, but the process, Shawn, would be
the Department of Justice would then uh declare them Nolan void.
It will end up in court. We believe that this investigation,
(13:44):
the ninety three pages, the links to all and then
plus all the transcripts of the deposition, plus all the
emails and all the evidence is enough evidence to hold
up in court if the Department of Justice comes to
the same conclusion that we came to committee.
Speaker 1 (14:02):
I'm not going to ask this audience three ninety one
pages because everybody's busy, but I'm going to put up
the five page executive summary. And you did a phenomenal
work here. It's a shame that we don't have more honesty.
And I think at some point somebody is going to
open up and say, yeah, we all knew. I'm just
waiting for that moment to happen. Phenomenal work. I know
(14:25):
it's been a heavy lift. I know you've been under
heavy fire because of it. But this is a you know,
this is a scandal unlike any we've ever seen in
this country. Who was in charge? We don't know who
gave the ok for all these decisions. We don't know.
Congressman James camer great work. We really appreciate you more.
Speaker 6 (14:44):
Than you know.
Speaker 4 (14:45):
Thank you, Sean.
Speaker 1 (14:47):
All right, let's go to Israel. Jerusalem Isaac on the
Sean Hannity Show. Are you listening in Jerusalem?
Speaker 7 (14:55):
Yes, I'm in Jerusalem right now. Sean.
Speaker 6 (14:57):
What's going on? Thanks for listening. Glad you called.
Speaker 4 (15:00):
Yes.
Speaker 7 (15:01):
Yes. First of all, I'm from Brooklyn. I'm only here
for a few months. But there was amazing seeing President
Trump come here and how the country was celebrating two
weeks ago, and how the President just made a whole
country just on such a high high happiness, and there
was amazing to see it as an American experiencing it.
And also, Sewan, the way they love you over here. Also,
(15:22):
they like your support. They love, your support. The way
you stand betune because not too many people in the
world staying with Israel, and when they see Americans, you know.
Speaker 1 (15:30):
Can I just stand and can I make a statement
about this? You're still there? That I lose you, I
think I might have lost them. You know, I will
say this, there's times in life when you need moral clarity,
you need a moral compass. And when I hear and
see the rise of virulent anti Semitism, it disturbs me
(15:55):
a lot because there's a lot of ignorance behind the
positions that people have. And I don't care if you're
hearing it in the halls of Congress, on college campuses,
if you see the rise of anti Semitism worldwide, you
know in the punditry class it's everywhere. And you know,
everyone's entitled to their opinion, but an opinion that's based
(16:16):
in ignorance, to me is it's it's just intellectually lazy,
and it's missing a sense of right and wrong and
moral clarity. And you know, I don't know what part
of Israel having to withstand hundreds of thousands of rockets
over the decades being fired into their countries by groups
(16:40):
that have in their charter, like AMAS a call for
the destruction of Israel, and they follow through, culminating in
what happened on October the seventh. You have a very
small population in Israel, under ten million people, you know'll
compare that to America's population, what three fifty sixty million people?
(17:01):
That would be like losing forty thousand Americans in a day.
And I'm having a hard time understanding those that don't
understand that Israel does have their right to exist and
their own country. And what would you want your country
to do if some country was firing all of these
missiles into American towns, American cities, you know, killing forty
(17:24):
thousand Americans in a day, kidnapping thousands of Americans in
a day, you know, never mind the rape, the kidnapping,
the torture, and the beheadings that I also know took
place because I've seen the videos. Anyway, did we get
Isaac back from Jerusalem? All right, We'll give you a
last comment. I was explaining that to me, this is
a simple right wrong, moral clarity issue.
Speaker 7 (17:46):
Yeah, Yeahjean, And you're totally right and everything you're saying,
and it really, really, it's really comforting to hear you
and Mark Mark Levin also and all the all the
people on the right, because it's a shame how there's
people on the right also now that I love President Trump,
and but like the Tuckers and everyone listen.
Speaker 1 (18:06):
I mean, everyone's entitled to their opinion. And for me,
it's you know, radical Islamists. We need to understand them.
You know, for example, when the President wiped out the
Ice Says Caliphate and he took out around his nuclear sites,
you know, the world is a safer place because he
did both things. When he took out Solamani and Bagdaddy.
(18:27):
You know, the world's a safer place. Is a proper
use of military that fits into the Trump doctrine, which
is also no forever wars. I appreciate you calling in
from Jerusalem. Thank you, my friend. Eight hundred and nine
four one, Shawn is a number if you want to
be a part of the program. Frank North Carolina next
Sean Hannity Show. It's up, Frank, how are.
Speaker 3 (18:45):
You hey, Sean? Thanks for the call, two time caller,
longtime listener.
Speaker 1 (18:51):
Well, thanks for being here. I love, by the way,
North Carolina's beautiful. I've been in the mountains of North
Carolina above the clouds, you know, visiting a friend.
Speaker 3 (18:59):
The lives there anyway, retired Navy twenty four years Saberne Force.
But I wanted to ask what you thought about Fetterman
using his position in the Senate to Coherst Dems as
a run for as a ruse or a springboard for
twenty twenty eight presidential run.
Speaker 6 (19:20):
You know, I.
Speaker 1 (19:21):
Actually have come to like Fetterman a lot. I think
Fetterman is an anomaly in the Democratic Party. And when
I interviewed him, what a week or so ago on Hannity,
you know, we just had a fair open discussion. He goes,
if you're looking, you know, I'm not the Democrat that's
going to be screaming Nazi, fascist, racist. I do believe
(19:41):
the President made the right call on Iran's nuclear sites.
I do support Israel's right to exist, and I'm not
going to be shy about who I am. And he goes,
I'm not running for re election right now. I don't
care what the consequences are.
Speaker 6 (19:56):
Now.
Speaker 1 (19:57):
That's not something you often hear from an elected official,
and I kind of admire that a lot. And you know,
I think he understands his parties radicalized. He just refuses
to go along with it.
Speaker 3 (20:09):
Yeah, he's definitely making a better name for himself than
leveraging and getting more attention from what I believe Republicans
see him as something that we can get behind. Now.
I'm not saying I'm going to be behind him, but
you know, I kind of like him. Definitely overnews him,
definitely overnews him.
Speaker 1 (20:28):
Well, you got Newsom, you got Pete Buddha Judge, you
got Kamala Harris, you got AOC. I mean, I don't
see a more moderate Democrat breaking through and winning a
primary because I think the basis is with the radicals.
I think the whole party has been transformed. You know,
(20:50):
I mentioned this study earlier in the program. You know,
seventy percent, this is one hundreds of thousands of people
surveyed see that the Democratic Party is too extreme and
too radicalized, and that they're wrong on the borders, they're
wrong on law and order, they're wrong on the economy,
and they're too fixated on all the wrong issues. Those
(21:12):
are devastating numbers. I doubt that the Democrats will.
Speaker 6 (21:16):
Pay attention to it.
Speaker 1 (21:17):
You know, the reason Bill Maher was right in his
observation that every Democrat is on the ballot in New
York City is because he's right. I mean, the whole
country's gonna watch that election. And assuming Mam Donnie wins
this election, that's gonna that he will be the poster
child of the new radicalized Democratic Left. It will empower
(21:41):
the likes of AOC and the Squad and Newsome and
and all the people that are pretty radical left. And
you know, if either Harris or Newsom okay, when you
get to a general election, assuming they win the primary,
you know, do you want New York? Do you want
America to be California? And I think most of America
(22:05):
will reject that. You know, it doesn't mean things can
change over time. Thank you, Frank, appreciate it, buddy, God
bless you. Eight hundred and nine four one. Shawn is
a number Todd in Arizona. What's up, Todd?
Speaker 8 (22:17):
Thank Sean, Thanks for having me.
Speaker 4 (22:18):
You're a great American.
Speaker 3 (22:19):
The thank you shutdown.
Speaker 8 (22:22):
I think the Democrats are showing their cards. The forty
two million people on SNAP is a problem in itself,
But with that said, I would venture to say the
bulk of those constituents belong in Democratic run cities, and
so they're just cutting their people loose over health care
for illegal immigrants and a very small percentage I wanted
(22:45):
to point out, and it doesn't affect very many people.
My wife and I were both junior andlisted with two
children and full time employed obviously in the military, but
when we were young, we still qualified for which programs.
So there's a portion of the military out there with
larger families that are being deployed and whatnot that are
dependent on government subsidies on top of their minuscule government
(23:07):
paycheck for what they're doing.
Speaker 1 (23:09):
No, it's terrible, and it's terrible. I mean, we've got
to have a livable wage for people that serve. You know,
the last caller serve twenty four years. Thank him for
his service. It's just but you're right in your observation
forty two million Americans. Now it's not the time to
really have the conversation about why so many people are
(23:31):
in need of basic food assistance like this in this country.
You know, this is why I keep reminding everybody that
you have all of these high paying career jobs now
in the pipeline, and we're talking about seventeen trillion and
committed money from manufacturing. You'll have the massive impact when
it kicks in of the economy and the Trump tax
(23:53):
cuts really take hold. I would say by this time
next year, you're going to see a dramatically different economy.
That's my prediction. And it took Reagan about a year
and a half to get out of the malaise of
Jimmy Carter once his once his plan was passed, So
I think it's going to take about that long. But
I but you know, the President very cleverly, you know,
(24:15):
is incentivizing building these auto plants, pharmaceutical plants, uh, semiconductor
chip plans and rare earth you know, minerals and then
also opening up you know, energy dominance jobs that are
going to be you know, high paying career or oriented.
All of this is you know now it's it's kind
(24:37):
of been jacked up on steroids and human growth hormone
because of the President and this you know one hundred
percent uh deduction uh part of the big beautiful bill.
You get one hundred percent depreciation if you build a
manufacturing facility.
Speaker 6 (24:53):
That's awesome.
Speaker 1 (24:54):
That's that means they're going to get it up and
running now while they get the tax benefit of doing
it simultaneously creating all those jobs, including in construction. Once
you get interest rates down, it went down another half
point today, and we get a new fed chair in May,
then you're going to see sale of pre existing homes skyrocket.
Now you're going to see new home construction begins to skyrocket,
(25:17):
and you know things are going to be humming along
at a pretty good clip. That's my prediction. That's what
I believe. I'm a supply side economics guide. This is
it on steroids. Anyway, appreciate the call real quick. Caroly
in California. Carol, how are you.
Speaker 8 (25:33):
I'm fine, Sean, Thank you for taking my call.
Speaker 6 (25:37):
I got about a minute, but it's all yours go.
Speaker 4 (25:40):
We need help.
Speaker 7 (25:42):
Musom is trying to push this prop fifty, telling people
that it's giving the power back to the people.
Speaker 8 (25:48):
It's the exact opposite. We used to have a committee
that drew the lines.
Speaker 7 (25:53):
Now they're trying to take it away from us.
Speaker 1 (25:55):
We need They're trying to circumvent this is a jerry
mandering ploy the Democrats. Yes, but you know remember all
the jerry mandering in the world has been done in
liberal states like yours.
Speaker 3 (26:07):
Yes, and I don't know how they can do any worse,
but they're trying to take the few people that we
have away from us.
Speaker 4 (26:14):
We need your help. Tell the people know on fifty they.
Speaker 6 (26:18):
Know on fifty I just told them, and I'm serious.
This is not good.
Speaker 8 (26:23):
No, it's terrible, terrible. We need your help.
Speaker 6 (26:28):
Why do you stay out in California?
Speaker 8 (26:31):
Well, my house is paid for. I couldn't afford to
live here otherwise, and I'm involved in a release.
Speaker 1 (26:37):
Well, prop third Team was good because you get capped
out on your property tax.
Speaker 6 (26:40):
That's helpful.
Speaker 1 (26:41):
And if are you retired, yes, all right, so your
income is not being taxed at the highest rate in
the country, but you still pay the highest sales and
gas taxes in the country.
Speaker 4 (26:53):
Right, exactly.
Speaker 8 (26:55):
I don't know how young people can do it. I
really don't.
Speaker 6 (26:58):
Well, it's not a surprise you have the highest poverty
rate in the country.
Speaker 1 (27:01):
No, I've tried to have productive conversations with Gavin, but frankly,
they're you know, it's sadly become a waste of time
as his presidential aspirations grow by the day.
Speaker 6 (27:14):
Carol, I got a run, though. I appreciate your call.
God bless you.
Speaker 1 (27:17):
And uh, you know, it is a beautiful state in
terms of geography, but I don't see California switching. Steve
Hilton would be a great governor, you know. I hope
he can make a competitive anyway, We're going to be
in New Jersey tomorrow night for Hannity with Jack Chidarelli.
Speaker 3 (27:34):
Uh.
Speaker 1 (27:35):
They now have another pullout one point race that's gonna
wrap things up today. But I have good news. We
have a great Hannity tonight nine Eastern on the Fox
News Channel. Please set your DVR. Senator Josh Hawley tonight.
We also have Senator Tom Cotton, Trey Goudy tonight, Jonathan
Turley tonight, also Jason Chafitz. We have Klay Travis, we
(27:58):
have Peter Doucey who's been with the President, Kaylee McGhee white,
and much more news you'll never get from the state
run Legacy Medium Mob nine easton tonight on Hannity on
Box News.
Speaker 6 (28:08):
We'll see you then.
Speaker 1 (28:09):
We will be in New Jersey tomorrow for tomorrow night's
town hall with Jack Chitdarelli. New Jersey's in play, as
is Virginia, New York City.
Speaker 6 (28:19):
Good luck.
Speaker 1 (28:20):
We'll see you tomorrow from New Jersey. Thanks for being
with us, See you tonight.
The Sean Hannity Show News
Host
Sean Hannity
Popular Podcasts
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!
The Joe Rogan Experience
The official podcast of comedian Joe Rogan.
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.