December 1, 2025 • 29 mins
In this gripping hour of The Sean Hannity Show, Sean dives deep into the staggering lack of vetting for the 76,000 Afghan refugees allowed into the U.S., highlighting alarming numbers connected to national security risks. Joining the discussion is Kash Patel, who reveals new details surrounding the recently dismissed case against James Comey, hinting at a possible grand conspiracy and the potential for renewed legal action. Legal analysts John Solomon and Greg Jarrett unpack the implications of the findings from the FBI's "burn bag" room and the ongoing investigations into Comey's actions during the controversial Russia collusion probe. Tune in for essential insights into these critical topics shaping our national conversation.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Now a two Seawan Hennedy Show, eight hundred and ninety
four one Shawn on number. If you want to be
a part of the program, there is a follow up.
We have a lot of legal issues we're going to
get to, not the least of which the legality and
the lack of vetting that went on with all of
these Afghan quote refugees that were allowed into the country.
(00:20):
When you look at the numbers, they're actually staggering in
terms of the lack of vetting that took place. This
is what I have been warning about repeatedly. It's prayed
that I was wrong, but I'm not wrong. Seventy six
thousand Afghan refugees resettled.
Speaker 2 (00:36):
But here's the problem.
Speaker 1 (00:38):
Six hundred and sixty eight Biden Harris mayorcis you know,
led into the country that were flagged for derogatory information
five thousand plus flag for national security purposes and a
whole variety of national security risks associated with them, and
they still let them in. And so we'll get to
(00:59):
that in a second. One thing we wanted to update
you on is the issue of James Comy. It's big news.
James Comy's case was temporarily thrown out. There is a
six month window for them to bring these charges back
into play. Cash Patel has spoken out about this, said
the FBI has numerous options to pursue the dismissed case
(01:23):
against Comy.
Speaker 2 (01:23):
Here's what he said.
Speaker 3 (01:25):
Director Comy was recently dismissed. What is your reaction to that.
Speaker 4 (01:29):
Well, because it's pending in terms of appellet status and
what we are going to do for the next steps.
The judicial process can make whatever determination it wants, but we,
the FBI and our partners at the DOJ, have numerous
options to proceed and we're executing on all those options.
Speaker 5 (01:46):
So we're not done.
Speaker 4 (01:48):
I'm any detail, I would say stay tuned for right
after Thanksgiving and you'll see multiple responses in my opinion.
Speaker 2 (01:57):
All right.
Speaker 1 (01:57):
So he also went on to say that they're going
to continue to expose everything that they found in the
burn bag rooms, but also recall that it was Cash
Pattel that said that they're investigating a possible grand conspiracy.
I won't go through the entire laundry list and all
the specificity, but from the moment Trump came down that
escalator in twenty fifteen, all the way through the election
(02:19):
in twenty twenty four, there's been a concerted deep state
effort that we have chronicled in great specificity on this
program of putting cinder blocks on the scale of presidential elections.
And here's what he kind of said about that and
what they might find in these burn bag rooms.
Speaker 3 (02:36):
Just one thing about the burn bags, really quickly, this
room nine to five, eight to two. How is it
that people didn't know it existed or how is it found?
Can you give us any sense of this at all?
Speaker 4 (02:49):
I'll just say this generally, when the United States government
and agency heads want things to disappear and want things
to be buried and hidden, they know how to do it.
But what they didn't count on was and Trump winning
him electing leadership across the United States government to say,
go find out how they corrupted and weaponized law enforcement.
And that's what we did, that's what we're doing. That's
(03:11):
how we found it, and we're going to continue to
expose it. And you're going to see everything we found
in that room in one way or another, be it
through investigation, public trial, or disclosure of the Congress.
Speaker 1 (03:20):
Now John Solomon, Editor in chief, founder and chief investigator
reporter of justinews dot Com joins us. Greg Jarrett, Fox
News legal analysts, New York Times number one best selling author,
are with us. Welcome both of you. I find all
of this pretty amazing. First of all, I'm stun that
they left all of this information in a burn bag
(03:42):
in I guess on the seventh floor of the FBI building.
That's pretty spectacular in and of itself. You would think
on the way out they probably want to cover their tracks,
knowing they were up to no good.
Speaker 6 (03:53):
Yeah, you're right, John, And it may be the theory
that a lot of the people who worked on this
inside the FBI have is that some patriots inside the
FBI were told to destroy it. They told people they
had done it, but they accidentally had put accidentally in
their quotes, left the burn bags unburned so that they
would be found by a future director during the transition.
You just look at the timing of this. This is
(04:15):
going on in January of twenty twenty five, just a
few days before the Trump administration's coming in. It clearly
is a cover up. Some people inside the FBI say, hey,
this is the modern day version of the nineteen minute
gap on the Nixon tapes from Watergate people were trying
to get rid of evidence before it goes Now, let's
see what the evidence that Let's find out what agents
and employees were in that room, who were they talking
(04:36):
to before they went into that room, who gave them instructions?
Why was James Comey's handwritten notes in that room but
not logged into the FBI system? Those notes are very
important for one part of the issue. All FBI records
are supposed to be logged into a database, So why
weren't those notes logged into database? And were they close
to being destroyed? Those are all very important things that
(04:59):
we're now learning about up from the court records, and
I think Cash Pttel has hint that maybe a big
avalanche of new information coming in the coming days.
Speaker 1 (05:07):
That's what it certainly sounds like to me, Greg Jarrett,
And a grand conspiracy case eliminates all of the Statute
of Limitation issues that basically, if handcuffed the Trump administration,
the only reason lying to Congress came up is because
he did that. I believe it was in twenty twenty,
and they filed that just before the Statute of Limitations
even ran out on that.
Speaker 2 (05:27):
But if it's a grand conspiracy.
Speaker 1 (05:29):
My understanding legally is that they have every right to
bring up, you know, what involvement he had with the
dirty dossier, when he knew what, when and where? Why
did he sign three of the four FISA applications used
in the dossier that was even debunked by December of
twenty sixteen, and he still continued to use it and
present it to a court. Despy on President Trump and Carter.
Speaker 7 (05:51):
Page, I think you're right about the statue of limitations
when Patel says that they're pursuing multiple options. There are
three of them. First of all, the ruling by the
Clinton appointed judge that Halligan was invalidly appointed. That's now
an appeal maybe overturned, and the original Komi indictment in
(06:13):
Virginia reinstated. Second option, any alternative comy can simply be
re indicted with the exact same charges, even additional charges.
Because Judge Currey's dismissal was rendered quote unquote without prejudice.
That means the criminal case against Kemi can be brought
(06:34):
all over again by a new vote of the Virginia
grand jury, a different US attorney. Because, as you point out, Sean,
under the law, the statue of limitations is automatically extended
for six more months. But third, and finally, this overarching conspiracy.
Even if Comy were to prevail in Virginia getting the
(06:56):
case tossed out, He's not pretty and clear as he
seems to think. Alleged lies is corrupt acts are also
being investigated in a different jurisdiction in Florida by a
separate grand jury convened by a different US attorney. So
you Comey's irrogant claim that the case is over now
is grossly premature, even worse in his insistence that he
(07:21):
is a victim of quote malevolence. His hypocritical and laughable
I mean, Commy is a guy who hijacked and weaponized
the law to victimize Trump, bringing a phony Russia collusion
case that he knew at the outset was pure and
utter fiction invented by Hillary Clinton.
Speaker 2 (07:41):
Let me get your.
Speaker 1 (07:42):
Take legally on the President announcing he's canceled all Biden
autopen orders in a truth social post that he made
as he said it is hereby terminated.
Speaker 2 (07:53):
Reaction to that is that binding?
Speaker 7 (07:55):
Sure, it could be absolutely and it would only be
tested as somebody challenge is it in a court of law.
Most of the executive orders, it doesn't really matter because
they were overturned by subsequent succeeding executive orders by Trump
when he took office. But as for you know, the
(08:17):
autopen and all of the commutations and pardons and so forth,
the Trump administration could take the position that these people
are no longer entitled to that that would trigger litigation
by those individuals who were pardoned, and a court of
law would have to look into it. But their substantial
(08:40):
ground that Biden was either not competent to make a
decision or he delegated it to somebody else, and that
under law is not allowed. It renders the commutations null
and void.
Speaker 1 (08:57):
Yeah, click break more with Johnson and Greg Jarrett on
the other side, and your phone calls coming up. Eight
hundred and ninety four one, Sean, if you want to
be a part of the program, I moll with John
Solomon and Greg jareda with us and I want to
get both your takes and John, I'll start with you
on this one. We're learning a lot. I mean, we have,
(09:18):
you know, one National Guards person dead, another clinging to life.
And the more we learn about the Afghans that were resettled.
Now we have to go back to what happened, and
that was the disaster at Cobbolo International Airport, and we
really need to go back even further than that. When
President Trump was in office, he had a conversation with
(09:39):
the head of the Taliban and he said, and I've
interviewed him many times, and I brought this up to
him many times, and he said that he was on
the phone with the head of the Taliban. He said,
before any withdrawal, let me make it very clear to you,
if you move one inch, we will know about it
and will destroy you. And I think he had in
(10:00):
his case, he had dropped the mother of all bombs
on Afghanistan. He took out the Isis Califate Solamani Bagdaddy
and associates. Subsequently, in this term, he's taken out a
RAN's nuclear sites. And it would have been, you know,
a peaceful transition. We would have also kept Barber Air Base,
I believe is which we built that we lost in
(10:21):
the process. But we saw the mess that was the
hasty withdrawal that abandoned Americans behind enemy lines. And yes,
we had made promises to afghanies that had been of
assistance to us that we would help them helped. It
does not necessarily that I know of defined as coming
to America. We're now learning that the number of people
Biden let in was over seventy six thousand, eight hundred
(10:43):
and sixty eight flag for derogatory information, five thousand plus
flag for national security, nearly a thousand flag for fraud,
nearly a thousand flag for public safety, and we still
have eight hundred and eighty five national security risks at
large in the country that Biden and Harris let into
the country. Not a matter of if it's going to happen,
(11:05):
is when is going to happen. And this seems to
be a win situation for me, but not the big
win that I'm predicting.
Speaker 2 (11:11):
And I hope I'm wrong about that. I pray to
God I'm wrong about Well.
Speaker 6 (11:13):
Listen, there is a moment. Let's remind everybody the game
that the Biden administration played. They let all these people
in exactly the way you described, and they would go
on TV every day and say, nope, we vett it
ninety nine percent of all Afghan evacuations in the United States,
and Congress say that's not possible. Eighty seventy eighty thousand
in a month. How'd you vet them? And they just
kept repeating it. In fact, the former Homeland Security Secretary
(11:38):
of ma Orcus said it into Congress multiple times. Then
in twenty twenty two, that lie was pierced. Why because
the Homeland the Security Departments Inspector General's chief watchdog said, no,
they didn't do that. This is a direct quote from
this September twenty twenty two report from by the way,
the Biden Administration's All Land Security Department. We determined information
(12:01):
youth evaculies through US government databases, such as name data,
birth identification number, travel document data was inaccurate, incomplete, or missing.
We also determined that Customs Border Protection admitted or parole
the evacuees were not fully vetted into the United States,
so they used bad data to vet some and they
didn't vet others at all. Now that gave us a
warning in September twenty twenty two. What did the Biden
(12:23):
administration do after that? The answer is nothing. Now. Tragically,
just a few days before the shooting outside the White
House of those two brave National guardsmen, the Justice Department
to me the Biden Trump administration began a re vetting
process now, not because they knew the tack was coming,
just because it was on their radar of things they
(12:44):
needed to get done. So they began this comprehensive review
look at everybody brought into the country from Afghanistan from
January twenty to February twenty, Janney twenty twenty one to
February twenty, twenty twenty five, so basically all the way
through the Biden years. In the first month of Trump's
new administration, because the old people were still in charge
in many of these agencies, the goal was to reinterview
all refugees, particularly those that came from Afghanistan. So the
(13:07):
Trump administration was trying to fix this problem. But the
real opportunity that they allowed to pass was in September
twenty twenty two, when the Homeland Security Department's chief watchdog
on Joe Biden's watch, warned that there were thousands of
unvetted people from a dangerous country, Afghanistan, walking around in
the United States. Nothing happened after that, and that is
where this strategy can clearly be tracked back to.
Speaker 2 (13:30):
Well, get your thoughts, Greig jar We have less than
a minute as a matter.
Speaker 7 (13:33):
Of common sense and logic, it was impossible to vet
these people. And everybody knew it. Why because vetting involves
the host government and the government from whence the refugees came,
which is Afghanistan. The government in Afghanistan was driven out
(13:54):
of power by the Taliban, and when the Taliban took over,
they ended relations with the Uited States. They were hostiles
to the US.
Speaker 8 (14:02):
And so you couldn't contact the Taliban run government and say, well,
tell us about these Afghan refugees. And so Biden knew
full well and those in the administration that you're talking
about people who are a national security risk inherently, you know, overall,
(14:23):
bi didn't care if he was letting in from all
kinds of countries, murderers, rapist, child abusers, and terrorists. He
just didn't care.
Speaker 7 (14:33):
And the end result is people have been victimized, and
more recently, two lives, precious.
Speaker 1 (14:39):
Lives lost, so tragic, it's so sad, and one is
clinging to life as we speak. And I spoke to
the family last night. The mother of this one National
guardsman is scheduled to join us on television tonight, and
I'll tell you it is the vetting failure is spectacular
(15:02):
and it's been a ticking time bomb from day one.
Appreciate both of you. Thank you, Greg Jarrett, Thank you
John Solomon. Great work as always. Eight hundred and nine
to four one, Sean, if you want to be a
part of the program.
Speaker 2 (15:21):
Bold Inspired Solutions for America. This is the Sean Hannity Show.
Speaker 1 (15:27):
Oh, by the way, did you hear Linda the Exchange?
Katie Miller, Steven Miller's wife. Here's a new podcast out
that she had with Abby Phillips over at Fake News CNN.
Speaker 2 (15:40):
Listen to this.
Speaker 9 (15:41):
Funt is actually a Hitler is a different thing. Wait,
you have died for Welsh on your show and you've
never pushed back. She hold on my health, my lesband
a white nationalist. Hold on, that is no different than
Nick tests going on Tucker Cross. So it's not and
you should admitted. Well hold on, wait, hold on, how
is it anything similar? It's not remotely similar at all.
Nick Flint sits around and says that he likes Hitler.
(16:04):
How is that similar?
Speaker 2 (16:05):
To do with it?
Speaker 7 (16:05):
What she has to do?
Speaker 10 (16:07):
She has nothing but mold literally, Scott, Katie is the
person who just said to me that it is comparable
to say that Nick flint is who is literally a
neo Nazi, is the same as somebody a liberal.
Speaker 9 (16:21):
Who who has an opinion, who is not a neo nazy.
They are not hateful the same How do.
Speaker 2 (16:27):
You want to excuse me?
Speaker 6 (16:28):
They are?
Speaker 9 (16:29):
But Nick.
Speaker 2 (16:31):
On the same show, It is not.
Speaker 9 (16:33):
They didn't push back the same way. You didn't mate
when someone hold on a second, not told that a second?
If do you believe? But do you think that that's
Do you think those things are different or not?
Speaker 2 (16:43):
I believe.
Speaker 9 (16:47):
I just think that you are making are making You
are making a comparison of two things that are not
in any way the same.
Speaker 1 (16:54):
The thing is is they have called Stephen Miller a
fascist and a Nazi. And you know, let me tell
you what the media would love to do if they can.
There's not one person listening to this program right now,
not one of you that would ever care about the
(17:14):
thoughts of some insane person that praises Adolf Hitler. Not one,
And but the media would love to make that the
poster child of the MAGA movement and of conservatism in general.
Speaker 2 (17:29):
It is not. And other extremist voices they are not.
Speaker 1 (17:34):
And the idea that this is what they would paint
with that broad of brush is insane, but that's what
they're trying to do now. Stephen Miller is a serious conservative.
He's a maga conservative. He's not a fascist, he's not
a nazi. They don't like his position on the borders.
(17:54):
They don't like his position on immigration, they don't like
how outspoken he is, and they don't like that he
and his wife are both capable of absolutely embarrassing the
hell out of them whenever they show up on these
idiotic programs that not many people are watching.
Speaker 2 (18:11):
And that's what it comes down to.
Speaker 1 (18:12):
They would love to make to pick out a few
of the most you know, fringe people. They're all over
the internet, these these keyboard warriors. I don't care if
they claim to be conservative or liberal. You know, they
sit there and their mom and dad's basement anonymously in
most cases, and yeah, they you know, they just say
(18:37):
whatever they want to try to get the most reaction.
And people think that that world is real. That world
is not real. It is it's it's imagination. It's noise,
and to be very honest, it's it's in many ways
become toxic and like cancer for so many people. I mean,
young people are devastated because of what a comment that
(18:58):
some idiot might make about them online.
Speaker 2 (19:01):
Don't pay its attention to it.
Speaker 1 (19:03):
If, Linda, if I wanted to feel bad today, how
long would it take me, if I had access to
my accounts, which I don't, how long would it take
me on one of these social media platforms to find
out how horrible I am, how dumb I am, how
ugly I am, et cetera.
Speaker 11 (19:18):
I don't know if that's a fair question, because you
did have a hate handity line, so I think your
tolerance may be a little higher than most.
Speaker 5 (19:24):
But no, pretty fast, I.
Speaker 1 (19:27):
Have immunity at the highest level. I don't care about
any of these people. I just don't.
Speaker 5 (19:33):
But I mean, it's pretty easy. People are sick and
they say gross stuff.
Speaker 1 (19:37):
Is there any conservative that you know of, any thoughtful,
prominent conservative that that would praise Adolf Hitler.
Speaker 2 (19:45):
No.
Speaker 5 (19:46):
No, it's just a talking point, and it's worked, and
so they stick to it.
Speaker 1 (19:52):
But the level wants to make that the poster child
of the MAGA movement of conservatism.
Speaker 2 (19:57):
It is not.
Speaker 1 (19:59):
It is fake news. It is a phony narrative. The
left knows it, but they don't care. And anybody in
this day and age can have their own show. You
just get a microphone, you get on YouTube, you get
on Rumble, you get on X and you're a talk
show host. I predicted this many years ago. By the
(20:20):
time it's all said and done, everybody's going to have
their own talk show, except they're not going to be responsible.
By the way, how'd your Thanksgiving work out? How many
people picked up the doggie bag? I didn't ask.
Speaker 11 (20:30):
You, you know what? I ran out of bags. There
were so many. They were lined up. They were like,
you know what, she's a conservative, but we like the turkey,
so they came anyway.
Speaker 5 (20:39):
It was fine.
Speaker 1 (20:40):
Come on, how many people You did not set one
wag out on your doorstep and give it away to
a relative that you refuse to let in your house.
Speaker 2 (20:48):
You did not say that you just a couple. No, no,
it was a mutual understanding. I'm calling out fake news.
Speaker 1 (20:55):
You did not leave a doggie bags.
Speaker 11 (21:00):
It's like the song you know you don't have to
go home, but you can't stay here.
Speaker 5 (21:03):
You know you can't eat here, but you could pick
up your food. It's fine, and I had.
Speaker 11 (21:07):
The perfect Thanksgiving meme which I got from our friend
Mark Simone, which said Happy Thanksgiving. And then I had
a punkin pie with pecans on it and it said
Trump won.
Speaker 12 (21:18):
It was great.
Speaker 5 (21:18):
I sent it to everybody. It was so much fun.
Speaker 2 (21:20):
Did you leave a single doggie bag on your steps?
Speaker 5 (21:24):
Only three?
Speaker 2 (21:25):
You're lying?
Speaker 1 (21:26):
You are so only three? So full of Adam Scheiff.
You're not telling the truth.
Speaker 2 (21:30):
You're lying.
Speaker 5 (21:31):
I'm telling the truth. Only three.
Speaker 1 (21:32):
Linda did not leave three doggie bags for liberal relatives
because she wouldn't let them in the house.
Speaker 2 (21:38):
You did not.
Speaker 11 (21:39):
And I wrapped the turkey and foil as well, just
to keep it hot. It was very cold on Thanksgiving here.
Speaker 2 (21:44):
Okay, yeah, I'm calling complete. Was you tama hawk?
Speaker 5 (21:48):
Was your tamahawk?
Speaker 12 (21:48):
Good?
Speaker 2 (21:49):
It was awesome, loved it. I thought of you. George
and Florida. What's up? George? How are you? Hey?
Speaker 12 (21:57):
How you doing? Happy belated Thanksgiving? And I just uh
just calling to say this. Thanks you for uh you
know your program. You know you're one how important it is,
especially this year of just uh keeping the uh our
politicians accountable. And I think y'all and and Linda and
(22:19):
Katie are doing a great job. And I appreciate all
you all you've done, and and just you know, just
keep up that great work. I think you We just
got to keep working on that, uh An, alternative media,
keep growing that alternative media, Sean. I think I was
just listening to you and Linda talking about the media
(22:40):
of how how one sided they are and we just
need to keep all alternative. It reminded me of a
time when uh, the March for Life had a million
people marching, and the media picked out this coming and
boys and they talked about this, uh, this this group
of boys. They try it because they were the way
(23:02):
they were perceived and they try to destroy that. And
that's how the media works. They pick out that one
little thing, Sean, and they just dwell on something and
it's not true and it is they move on to
something else. And so thank you for just bringing just
standing in that gap. Sean.
Speaker 1 (23:18):
The saddest thing that happened over the holiday is the
the you know, this one woman who lost their life.
I talked to the mother of this National Guard uh
Anthony is his name, and he's fighting for dear life.
Hopefully she'll be able to join us tonight on TV.
And you know how do you think their Thanksgiving was.
(23:40):
I just couldn't get it out of my head the
whole time. To be very blunt with you, I found
it very very disturbing. I don't this. This is the
one thing that I've been warning would happen that I
wanted to be wrong about. This is the one thing
I hoped i'd be wrong about, and I played it earlier.
I won't go back and play it now. All these
people kept telling us no, no, no, these people are vetted.
(24:02):
They weren't vetted. They didn't have time to vet them.
It was so chaotic the way they got out, and
they even abandoned Americans behind enemy lines. We started counting
him down and never mind there were people legitimately that
needed our help. Didn't necessarily mean that we were going
to give him access and citizenship and a place to
(24:22):
live in the US without vetting them. It's said, anyway,
I appreciate the call, my friend. All right, quick break
right back to our phones, our toll free numbers eight
hundred and ninety four one Sean if you want to
be a part of the program, Annony tonight, nine Eastern
on the.
Speaker 2 (24:37):
Fox News Channel.
Speaker 1 (24:38):
We got a lot of ground to catch up on
and cover also the mother of one of the guardsmen
that was shot. He's now clinging to life. We'll get
an update on his condition and her thoughts on all
these unvetted Afghans that were let into the country that
we were shored. We're vetted, they weren't. We'll continue.
Speaker 13 (25:02):
The final hour roundup is next.
Speaker 7 (25:04):
You do not want to miss it, and stay tuned
for the final hour Free for All on the Sean
Hannity Show.
Speaker 1 (25:23):
Allright, let's get back to our busy phones. Eight hundred
and ninety four one. Sean is our number if you
want to be a part of the program. Nevada Phil,
Sean Hannity Show, Hey Don Radio. What's up, Phil?
Speaker 2 (25:33):
How are you?
Speaker 13 (25:34):
I'm doing good. Thanks sake McCall. Something's been bugging me
for a while. He just and this kind of did
the trick for me, where these two guardsmen were killed
and everybody's blaming it on them that they were killed
because they were there, And then you got the Hamas
hiding people under hospitals. I had a friend who was
(25:55):
in Vietnam. He volunteered to go. He was there for
a couple of years.
Speaker 1 (25:58):
He was put up by the way, Just so you know,
one of the guardsmen are still fighting for their life.
I talked to the mother last night, love by the way,
and she wants all of our love and our thoughts
and our prayers, and it's my pleasure, you know, to
pass that on to people. Please pray for Anthony that
he makes a recovery. She said, he's made remarkable strides
(26:19):
considering the severity of the injury.
Speaker 13 (26:21):
That's good to hear. It's really good to hear. So, yeah,
my friend went to Vietnam. He volunteered. He was there
for a couple of years. He was put on guard
duty for an off base activity and he watched about
one hundred feet away or so, these two men hand
a six or seven year old kid a grenade and
then pointed towards the soldiers, and this kid was running
(26:42):
at him. He spoke a little bit of Vietnamese, was
running at him, saying that he had a present for
the soldiers. That put my friend in a really bad situation,
and he had to make a choice, and he made
the choice. The child was dead anyway, so he had
to make the choice to shoot this little kid.
Speaker 2 (26:58):
He got home.
Speaker 1 (26:59):
I mean, were there these we tasked these people and
put them in the most unbelievable positions. Do you remember
the case where a commander I believe was arrested and
we championed this case, Linda, you might remember his name,
And there was a motorcycle. He had just become the
head of a unit and the previous head had been
(27:21):
killed in an attack and somebody, you know, passed a
roadblock and was on a motorcycle and he had to
decide in a split second whether or not that guy
was a suicide bomber or not. He made the decision
to protect his troops, and then he why don't I
think was this the Lranz case?
Speaker 2 (27:41):
Which case was that? Linda?
Speaker 5 (27:42):
Do you remember it was Clint Larance? He's actually now
an attorney.
Speaker 1 (27:47):
Well, good for him, but and he went through hell?
And how do we second guests guys he is tasked
with protecting his troops. We're not there when on the ground,
and we're second guessing these guys, and he's got lives
hanging in the balance here. And I just find it
(28:08):
so inappropriate to be second guessing guys on the battlefield
whose lives are in jeopardy.
Speaker 13 (28:14):
And second guessing us are our site. I guess for
going in and taking people out of the country that
are here illegally. For Israel having to bomb a hospital
because they're the Hamas base underneath. Who's responsible for those deaths.
It's not Israel, they're saving their own lives. It's not
these guardsmen that are responsible for this guy shooting them.
(28:39):
We got to put the blame where it belonged.
Speaker 1 (28:41):
We were told just that the borders closed, the border
is secure. No, all these Afghans have been vetted. They
lied to us, they lied, and now we have one
dead guardsman and one clinging to life. Thank you very much, Joe,
thank you, Kamala, thank you Majorcis. That's on them and
all the people that Liedgnsaki circle back and the rest
(29:01):
of them. Listen. I know some of you are still struggling.
You have the Biden Harris economic hangover. Look, we have
the building blocks for a great economy. Things are changing,
Things are slowly getting better. But a lot of people,
you know, a lot of what President Trump has been
able to negotiate, get online and pass. Just does it,
(29:22):
don't don't snap your fingers, and it gets into the
economic bloodstream, and people now feel the improvement dramatically. I
think that'll happen as we head into the second and
third quarter next year, for sure. But if you're in
that situation, we expect one more rate drop before the
end of this year. We're hoping in another zero point
twenty five basis points
Now a two Seawan Hennedy Show, eight hundred and ninety
four one Shawn on number. If you want to be
a part of the program, there is a follow up.
We have a lot of legal issues we're going to
get to, not the least of which the legality and
the lack of vetting that went on with all of
these Afghan quote refugees that were allowed into the country.
(00:20):
When you look at the numbers, they're actually staggering in
terms of the lack of vetting that took place. This
is what I have been warning about repeatedly. It's prayed
that I was wrong, but I'm not wrong. Seventy six
thousand Afghan refugees resettled.
Speaker 2 (00:36):
But here's the problem.
Speaker 1 (00:38):
Six hundred and sixty eight Biden Harris mayorcis you know,
led into the country that were flagged for derogatory information
five thousand plus flag for national security purposes and a
whole variety of national security risks associated with them, and
they still let them in. And so we'll get to
(00:59):
that in a second. One thing we wanted to update
you on is the issue of James Comy. It's big news.
James Comy's case was temporarily thrown out. There is a
six month window for them to bring these charges back
into play. Cash Patel has spoken out about this, said
the FBI has numerous options to pursue the dismissed case
(01:23):
against Comy.
Speaker 2 (01:23):
Here's what he said.
Speaker 3 (01:25):
Director Comy was recently dismissed. What is your reaction to that.
Speaker 4 (01:29):
Well, because it's pending in terms of appellet status and
what we are going to do for the next steps.
The judicial process can make whatever determination it wants, but we,
the FBI and our partners at the DOJ, have numerous
options to proceed and we're executing on all those options.
Speaker 5 (01:46):
So we're not done.
Speaker 4 (01:48):
I'm any detail, I would say stay tuned for right
after Thanksgiving and you'll see multiple responses in my opinion.
Speaker 2 (01:57):
All right.
Speaker 1 (01:57):
So he also went on to say that they're going
to continue to expose everything that they found in the
burn bag rooms, but also recall that it was Cash
Pattel that said that they're investigating a possible grand conspiracy.
I won't go through the entire laundry list and all
the specificity, but from the moment Trump came down that
escalator in twenty fifteen, all the way through the election
(02:19):
in twenty twenty four, there's been a concerted deep state
effort that we have chronicled in great specificity on this
program of putting cinder blocks on the scale of presidential elections.
And here's what he kind of said about that and
what they might find in these burn bag rooms.
Speaker 3 (02:36):
Just one thing about the burn bags, really quickly, this
room nine to five, eight to two. How is it
that people didn't know it existed or how is it found?
Can you give us any sense of this at all?
Speaker 4 (02:49):
I'll just say this generally, when the United States government
and agency heads want things to disappear and want things
to be buried and hidden, they know how to do it.
But what they didn't count on was and Trump winning
him electing leadership across the United States government to say,
go find out how they corrupted and weaponized law enforcement.
And that's what we did, that's what we're doing. That's
(03:11):
how we found it, and we're going to continue to
expose it. And you're going to see everything we found
in that room in one way or another, be it
through investigation, public trial, or disclosure of the Congress.
Speaker 1 (03:20):
Now John Solomon, Editor in chief, founder and chief investigator
reporter of justinews dot Com joins us. Greg Jarrett, Fox
News legal analysts, New York Times number one best selling author,
are with us. Welcome both of you. I find all
of this pretty amazing. First of all, I'm stun that
they left all of this information in a burn bag
(03:42):
in I guess on the seventh floor of the FBI building.
That's pretty spectacular in and of itself. You would think
on the way out they probably want to cover their tracks,
knowing they were up to no good.
Speaker 6 (03:53):
Yeah, you're right, John, And it may be the theory
that a lot of the people who worked on this
inside the FBI have is that some patriots inside the
FBI were told to destroy it. They told people they
had done it, but they accidentally had put accidentally in
their quotes, left the burn bags unburned so that they
would be found by a future director during the transition.
You just look at the timing of this. This is
(04:15):
going on in January of twenty twenty five, just a
few days before the Trump administration's coming in. It clearly
is a cover up. Some people inside the FBI say, hey,
this is the modern day version of the nineteen minute
gap on the Nixon tapes from Watergate people were trying
to get rid of evidence before it goes Now, let's
see what the evidence that Let's find out what agents
and employees were in that room, who were they talking
(04:36):
to before they went into that room, who gave them instructions?
Why was James Comey's handwritten notes in that room but
not logged into the FBI system? Those notes are very
important for one part of the issue. All FBI records
are supposed to be logged into a database, So why
weren't those notes logged into database? And were they close
to being destroyed? Those are all very important things that
(04:59):
we're now learning about up from the court records, and
I think Cash Pttel has hint that maybe a big
avalanche of new information coming in the coming days.
Speaker 1 (05:07):
That's what it certainly sounds like to me, Greg Jarrett,
And a grand conspiracy case eliminates all of the Statute
of Limitation issues that basically, if handcuffed the Trump administration,
the only reason lying to Congress came up is because
he did that. I believe it was in twenty twenty,
and they filed that just before the Statute of Limitations
even ran out on that.
Speaker 2 (05:27):
But if it's a grand conspiracy.
Speaker 1 (05:29):
My understanding legally is that they have every right to
bring up, you know, what involvement he had with the
dirty dossier, when he knew what, when and where? Why
did he sign three of the four FISA applications used
in the dossier that was even debunked by December of
twenty sixteen, and he still continued to use it and
present it to a court. Despy on President Trump and Carter.
Speaker 7 (05:51):
Page, I think you're right about the statue of limitations
when Patel says that they're pursuing multiple options. There are
three of them. First of all, the ruling by the
Clinton appointed judge that Halligan was invalidly appointed. That's now
an appeal maybe overturned, and the original Komi indictment in
(06:13):
Virginia reinstated. Second option, any alternative comy can simply be
re indicted with the exact same charges, even additional charges.
Because Judge Currey's dismissal was rendered quote unquote without prejudice.
That means the criminal case against Kemi can be brought
(06:34):
all over again by a new vote of the Virginia
grand jury, a different US attorney. Because, as you point out, Sean,
under the law, the statue of limitations is automatically extended
for six more months. But third, and finally, this overarching conspiracy.
Even if Comy were to prevail in Virginia getting the
(06:56):
case tossed out, He's not pretty and clear as he
seems to think. Alleged lies is corrupt acts are also
being investigated in a different jurisdiction in Florida by a
separate grand jury convened by a different US attorney. So
you Comey's irrogant claim that the case is over now
is grossly premature, even worse in his insistence that he
(07:21):
is a victim of quote malevolence. His hypocritical and laughable
I mean, Commy is a guy who hijacked and weaponized
the law to victimize Trump, bringing a phony Russia collusion
case that he knew at the outset was pure and
utter fiction invented by Hillary Clinton.
Speaker 2 (07:41):
Let me get your.
Speaker 1 (07:42):
Take legally on the President announcing he's canceled all Biden
autopen orders in a truth social post that he made
as he said it is hereby terminated.
Speaker 2 (07:53):
Reaction to that is that binding?
Speaker 7 (07:55):
Sure, it could be absolutely and it would only be
tested as somebody challenge is it in a court of law.
Most of the executive orders, it doesn't really matter because
they were overturned by subsequent succeeding executive orders by Trump
when he took office. But as for you know, the
(08:17):
autopen and all of the commutations and pardons and so forth,
the Trump administration could take the position that these people
are no longer entitled to that that would trigger litigation
by those individuals who were pardoned, and a court of
law would have to look into it. But their substantial
(08:40):
ground that Biden was either not competent to make a
decision or he delegated it to somebody else, and that
under law is not allowed. It renders the commutations null
and void.
Speaker 1 (08:57):
Yeah, click break more with Johnson and Greg Jarrett on
the other side, and your phone calls coming up. Eight
hundred and ninety four one, Sean, if you want to
be a part of the program, I moll with John
Solomon and Greg jareda with us and I want to
get both your takes and John, I'll start with you
on this one. We're learning a lot. I mean, we have,
(09:18):
you know, one National Guards person dead, another clinging to life.
And the more we learn about the Afghans that were resettled.
Now we have to go back to what happened, and
that was the disaster at Cobbolo International Airport, and we
really need to go back even further than that. When
President Trump was in office, he had a conversation with
(09:39):
the head of the Taliban and he said, and I've
interviewed him many times, and I brought this up to
him many times, and he said that he was on
the phone with the head of the Taliban. He said,
before any withdrawal, let me make it very clear to you,
if you move one inch, we will know about it
and will destroy you. And I think he had in
(10:00):
his case, he had dropped the mother of all bombs
on Afghanistan. He took out the Isis Califate Solamani Bagdaddy
and associates. Subsequently, in this term, he's taken out a
RAN's nuclear sites. And it would have been, you know,
a peaceful transition. We would have also kept Barber Air Base,
I believe is which we built that we lost in
(10:21):
the process. But we saw the mess that was the
hasty withdrawal that abandoned Americans behind enemy lines. And yes,
we had made promises to afghanies that had been of
assistance to us that we would help them helped. It
does not necessarily that I know of defined as coming
to America. We're now learning that the number of people
Biden let in was over seventy six thousand, eight hundred
(10:43):
and sixty eight flag for derogatory information, five thousand plus
flag for national security, nearly a thousand flag for fraud,
nearly a thousand flag for public safety, and we still
have eight hundred and eighty five national security risks at
large in the country that Biden and Harris let into
the country. Not a matter of if it's going to happen,
(11:05):
is when is going to happen. And this seems to
be a win situation for me, but not the big
win that I'm predicting.
Speaker 2 (11:11):
And I hope I'm wrong about that. I pray to
God I'm wrong about Well.
Speaker 6 (11:13):
Listen, there is a moment. Let's remind everybody the game
that the Biden administration played. They let all these people
in exactly the way you described, and they would go
on TV every day and say, nope, we vett it
ninety nine percent of all Afghan evacuations in the United States,
and Congress say that's not possible. Eighty seventy eighty thousand
in a month. How'd you vet them? And they just
kept repeating it. In fact, the former Homeland Security Secretary
(11:38):
of ma Orcus said it into Congress multiple times. Then
in twenty twenty two, that lie was pierced. Why because
the Homeland the Security Departments Inspector General's chief watchdog said, no,
they didn't do that. This is a direct quote from
this September twenty twenty two report from by the way,
the Biden Administration's All Land Security Department. We determined information
(12:01):
youth evaculies through US government databases, such as name data,
birth identification number, travel document data was inaccurate, incomplete, or missing.
We also determined that Customs Border Protection admitted or parole
the evacuees were not fully vetted into the United States,
so they used bad data to vet some and they
didn't vet others at all. Now that gave us a
warning in September twenty twenty two. What did the Biden
(12:23):
administration do after that? The answer is nothing. Now. Tragically,
just a few days before the shooting outside the White
House of those two brave National guardsmen, the Justice Department
to me the Biden Trump administration began a re vetting
process now, not because they knew the tack was coming,
just because it was on their radar of things they
(12:44):
needed to get done. So they began this comprehensive review
look at everybody brought into the country from Afghanistan from
January twenty to February twenty, Janney twenty twenty one to
February twenty, twenty twenty five, so basically all the way
through the Biden years. In the first month of Trump's
new administration, because the old people were still in charge
in many of these agencies, the goal was to reinterview
all refugees, particularly those that came from Afghanistan. So the
(13:07):
Trump administration was trying to fix this problem. But the
real opportunity that they allowed to pass was in September
twenty twenty two, when the Homeland Security Department's chief watchdog
on Joe Biden's watch, warned that there were thousands of
unvetted people from a dangerous country, Afghanistan, walking around in
the United States. Nothing happened after that, and that is
where this strategy can clearly be tracked back to.
Speaker 2 (13:30):
Well, get your thoughts, Greig jar We have less than
a minute as a matter.
Speaker 7 (13:33):
Of common sense and logic, it was impossible to vet
these people. And everybody knew it. Why because vetting involves
the host government and the government from whence the refugees came,
which is Afghanistan. The government in Afghanistan was driven out
(13:54):
of power by the Taliban, and when the Taliban took over,
they ended relations with the Uited States. They were hostiles
to the US.
Speaker 8 (14:02):
And so you couldn't contact the Taliban run government and say, well,
tell us about these Afghan refugees. And so Biden knew
full well and those in the administration that you're talking
about people who are a national security risk inherently, you know, overall,
(14:23):
bi didn't care if he was letting in from all
kinds of countries, murderers, rapist, child abusers, and terrorists. He
just didn't care.
Speaker 7 (14:33):
And the end result is people have been victimized, and
more recently, two lives, precious.
Speaker 1 (14:39):
Lives lost, so tragic, it's so sad, and one is
clinging to life as we speak. And I spoke to
the family last night. The mother of this one National
guardsman is scheduled to join us on television tonight, and
I'll tell you it is the vetting failure is spectacular
(15:02):
and it's been a ticking time bomb from day one.
Appreciate both of you. Thank you, Greg Jarrett, Thank you
John Solomon. Great work as always. Eight hundred and nine
to four one, Sean, if you want to be a
part of the program.
Speaker 2 (15:21):
Bold Inspired Solutions for America. This is the Sean Hannity Show.
Speaker 1 (15:27):
Oh, by the way, did you hear Linda the Exchange?
Katie Miller, Steven Miller's wife. Here's a new podcast out
that she had with Abby Phillips over at Fake News CNN.
Speaker 2 (15:40):
Listen to this.
Speaker 9 (15:41):
Funt is actually a Hitler is a different thing. Wait,
you have died for Welsh on your show and you've
never pushed back. She hold on my health, my lesband
a white nationalist. Hold on, that is no different than
Nick tests going on Tucker Cross. So it's not and
you should admitted. Well hold on, wait, hold on, how
is it anything similar? It's not remotely similar at all.
Nick Flint sits around and says that he likes Hitler.
(16:04):
How is that similar?
Speaker 2 (16:05):
To do with it?
Speaker 7 (16:05):
What she has to do?
Speaker 10 (16:07):
She has nothing but mold literally, Scott, Katie is the
person who just said to me that it is comparable
to say that Nick flint is who is literally a
neo Nazi, is the same as somebody a liberal.
Speaker 9 (16:21):
Who who has an opinion, who is not a neo nazy.
They are not hateful the same How do.
Speaker 2 (16:27):
You want to excuse me?
Speaker 6 (16:28):
They are?
Speaker 9 (16:29):
But Nick.
Speaker 2 (16:31):
On the same show, It is not.
Speaker 9 (16:33):
They didn't push back the same way. You didn't mate
when someone hold on a second, not told that a second?
If do you believe? But do you think that that's
Do you think those things are different or not?
Speaker 2 (16:43):
I believe.
Speaker 9 (16:47):
I just think that you are making are making You
are making a comparison of two things that are not
in any way the same.
Speaker 1 (16:54):
The thing is is they have called Stephen Miller a
fascist and a Nazi. And you know, let me tell
you what the media would love to do if they can.
There's not one person listening to this program right now,
not one of you that would ever care about the
(17:14):
thoughts of some insane person that praises Adolf Hitler. Not one,
And but the media would love to make that the
poster child of the MAGA movement and of conservatism in general.
Speaker 2 (17:29):
It is not. And other extremist voices they are not.
Speaker 1 (17:34):
And the idea that this is what they would paint
with that broad of brush is insane, but that's what
they're trying to do now. Stephen Miller is a serious conservative.
He's a maga conservative. He's not a fascist, he's not
a nazi. They don't like his position on the borders.
(17:54):
They don't like his position on immigration, they don't like
how outspoken he is, and they don't like that he
and his wife are both capable of absolutely embarrassing the
hell out of them whenever they show up on these
idiotic programs that not many people are watching.
Speaker 2 (18:11):
And that's what it comes down to.
Speaker 1 (18:12):
They would love to make to pick out a few
of the most you know, fringe people. They're all over
the internet, these these keyboard warriors. I don't care if
they claim to be conservative or liberal. You know, they
sit there and their mom and dad's basement anonymously in
most cases, and yeah, they you know, they just say
(18:37):
whatever they want to try to get the most reaction.
And people think that that world is real. That world
is not real. It is it's it's imagination. It's noise,
and to be very honest, it's it's in many ways
become toxic and like cancer for so many people. I mean,
young people are devastated because of what a comment that
(18:58):
some idiot might make about them online.
Speaker 2 (19:01):
Don't pay its attention to it.
Speaker 1 (19:03):
If, Linda, if I wanted to feel bad today, how
long would it take me, if I had access to
my accounts, which I don't, how long would it take
me on one of these social media platforms to find
out how horrible I am, how dumb I am, how
ugly I am, et cetera.
Speaker 11 (19:18):
I don't know if that's a fair question, because you
did have a hate handity line, so I think your
tolerance may be a little higher than most.
Speaker 5 (19:24):
But no, pretty fast, I.
Speaker 1 (19:27):
Have immunity at the highest level. I don't care about
any of these people. I just don't.
Speaker 5 (19:33):
But I mean, it's pretty easy. People are sick and
they say gross stuff.
Speaker 1 (19:37):
Is there any conservative that you know of, any thoughtful,
prominent conservative that that would praise Adolf Hitler.
Speaker 2 (19:45):
No.
Speaker 5 (19:46):
No, it's just a talking point, and it's worked, and
so they stick to it.
Speaker 1 (19:52):
But the level wants to make that the poster child
of the MAGA movement of conservatism.
Speaker 2 (19:57):
It is not.
Speaker 1 (19:59):
It is fake news. It is a phony narrative. The
left knows it, but they don't care. And anybody in
this day and age can have their own show. You
just get a microphone, you get on YouTube, you get
on Rumble, you get on X and you're a talk
show host. I predicted this many years ago. By the
(20:20):
time it's all said and done, everybody's going to have
their own talk show, except they're not going to be responsible.
By the way, how'd your Thanksgiving work out? How many
people picked up the doggie bag? I didn't ask.
Speaker 11 (20:30):
You, you know what? I ran out of bags. There
were so many. They were lined up. They were like,
you know what, she's a conservative, but we like the turkey,
so they came anyway.
Speaker 5 (20:39):
It was fine.
Speaker 1 (20:40):
Come on, how many people You did not set one
wag out on your doorstep and give it away to
a relative that you refuse to let in your house.
Speaker 2 (20:48):
You did not say that you just a couple. No, no,
it was a mutual understanding. I'm calling out fake news.
Speaker 1 (20:55):
You did not leave a doggie bags.
Speaker 11 (21:00):
It's like the song you know you don't have to
go home, but you can't stay here.
Speaker 5 (21:03):
You know you can't eat here, but you could pick
up your food. It's fine, and I had.
Speaker 11 (21:07):
The perfect Thanksgiving meme which I got from our friend
Mark Simone, which said Happy Thanksgiving. And then I had
a punkin pie with pecans on it and it said
Trump won.
Speaker 12 (21:18):
It was great.
Speaker 5 (21:18):
I sent it to everybody. It was so much fun.
Speaker 2 (21:20):
Did you leave a single doggie bag on your steps?
Speaker 5 (21:24):
Only three?
Speaker 2 (21:25):
You're lying?
Speaker 1 (21:26):
You are so only three? So full of Adam Scheiff.
You're not telling the truth.
Speaker 2 (21:30):
You're lying.
Speaker 5 (21:31):
I'm telling the truth. Only three.
Speaker 1 (21:32):
Linda did not leave three doggie bags for liberal relatives
because she wouldn't let them in the house.
Speaker 2 (21:38):
You did not.
Speaker 11 (21:39):
And I wrapped the turkey and foil as well, just
to keep it hot. It was very cold on Thanksgiving here.
Speaker 2 (21:44):
Okay, yeah, I'm calling complete. Was you tama hawk?
Speaker 5 (21:48):
Was your tamahawk?
Speaker 12 (21:48):
Good?
Speaker 2 (21:49):
It was awesome, loved it. I thought of you. George
and Florida. What's up? George? How are you? Hey?
Speaker 12 (21:57):
How you doing? Happy belated Thanksgiving? And I just uh
just calling to say this. Thanks you for uh you
know your program. You know you're one how important it is,
especially this year of just uh keeping the uh our
politicians accountable. And I think y'all and and Linda and
(22:19):
Katie are doing a great job. And I appreciate all
you all you've done, and and just you know, just
keep up that great work. I think you We just
got to keep working on that, uh An, alternative media,
keep growing that alternative media, Sean. I think I was
just listening to you and Linda talking about the media
(22:40):
of how how one sided they are and we just
need to keep all alternative. It reminded me of a
time when uh, the March for Life had a million
people marching, and the media picked out this coming and
boys and they talked about this, uh, this this group
of boys. They try it because they were the way
(23:02):
they were perceived and they try to destroy that. And
that's how the media works. They pick out that one
little thing, Sean, and they just dwell on something and
it's not true and it is they move on to
something else. And so thank you for just bringing just
standing in that gap. Sean.
Speaker 1 (23:18):
The saddest thing that happened over the holiday is the
the you know, this one woman who lost their life.
I talked to the mother of this National Guard uh
Anthony is his name, and he's fighting for dear life.
Hopefully she'll be able to join us tonight on TV.
And you know how do you think their Thanksgiving was.
(23:40):
I just couldn't get it out of my head the
whole time. To be very blunt with you, I found
it very very disturbing. I don't this. This is the
one thing that I've been warning would happen that I
wanted to be wrong about. This is the one thing
I hoped i'd be wrong about, and I played it earlier.
I won't go back and play it now. All these
people kept telling us no, no, no, these people are vetted.
(24:02):
They weren't vetted. They didn't have time to vet them.
It was so chaotic the way they got out, and
they even abandoned Americans behind enemy lines. We started counting
him down and never mind there were people legitimately that
needed our help. Didn't necessarily mean that we were going
to give him access and citizenship and a place to
(24:22):
live in the US without vetting them. It's said, anyway,
I appreciate the call, my friend. All right, quick break
right back to our phones, our toll free numbers eight
hundred and ninety four one Sean if you want to
be a part of the program, Annony tonight, nine Eastern
on the.
Speaker 2 (24:37):
Fox News Channel.
Speaker 1 (24:38):
We got a lot of ground to catch up on
and cover also the mother of one of the guardsmen
that was shot. He's now clinging to life. We'll get
an update on his condition and her thoughts on all
these unvetted Afghans that were let into the country that
we were shored. We're vetted, they weren't. We'll continue.
Speaker 13 (25:02):
The final hour roundup is next.
Speaker 7 (25:04):
You do not want to miss it, and stay tuned
for the final hour Free for All on the Sean
Hannity Show.
Speaker 1 (25:23):
Allright, let's get back to our busy phones. Eight hundred
and ninety four one. Sean is our number if you
want to be a part of the program. Nevada Phil,
Sean Hannity Show, Hey Don Radio. What's up, Phil?
Speaker 2 (25:33):
How are you?
Speaker 13 (25:34):
I'm doing good. Thanks sake McCall. Something's been bugging me
for a while. He just and this kind of did
the trick for me, where these two guardsmen were killed
and everybody's blaming it on them that they were killed
because they were there, And then you got the Hamas
hiding people under hospitals. I had a friend who was
(25:55):
in Vietnam. He volunteered to go. He was there for
a couple of years.
Speaker 1 (25:58):
He was put up by the way, Just so you know,
one of the guardsmen are still fighting for their life.
I talked to the mother last night, love by the way,
and she wants all of our love and our thoughts
and our prayers, and it's my pleasure, you know, to
pass that on to people. Please pray for Anthony that
he makes a recovery. She said, he's made remarkable strides
(26:19):
considering the severity of the injury.
Speaker 13 (26:21):
That's good to hear. It's really good to hear. So, yeah,
my friend went to Vietnam. He volunteered. He was there
for a couple of years. He was put on guard
duty for an off base activity and he watched about
one hundred feet away or so, these two men hand
a six or seven year old kid a grenade and
then pointed towards the soldiers, and this kid was running
(26:42):
at him. He spoke a little bit of Vietnamese, was
running at him, saying that he had a present for
the soldiers. That put my friend in a really bad situation,
and he had to make a choice, and he made
the choice. The child was dead anyway, so he had
to make the choice to shoot this little kid.
Speaker 2 (26:58):
He got home.
Speaker 1 (26:59):
I mean, were there these we tasked these people and
put them in the most unbelievable positions. Do you remember
the case where a commander I believe was arrested and
we championed this case, Linda, you might remember his name,
And there was a motorcycle. He had just become the
head of a unit and the previous head had been
(27:21):
killed in an attack and somebody, you know, passed a
roadblock and was on a motorcycle and he had to
decide in a split second whether or not that guy
was a suicide bomber or not. He made the decision
to protect his troops, and then he why don't I
think was this the Lranz case?
Speaker 2 (27:41):
Which case was that? Linda?
Speaker 5 (27:42):
Do you remember it was Clint Larance? He's actually now
an attorney.
Speaker 1 (27:47):
Well, good for him, but and he went through hell?
And how do we second guests guys he is tasked
with protecting his troops. We're not there when on the ground,
and we're second guessing these guys, and he's got lives
hanging in the balance here. And I just find it
(28:08):
so inappropriate to be second guessing guys on the battlefield
whose lives are in jeopardy.
Speaker 13 (28:14):
And second guessing us are our site. I guess for
going in and taking people out of the country that
are here illegally. For Israel having to bomb a hospital
because they're the Hamas base underneath. Who's responsible for those deaths.
It's not Israel, they're saving their own lives. It's not
these guardsmen that are responsible for this guy shooting them.
(28:39):
We got to put the blame where it belonged.
Speaker 1 (28:41):
We were told just that the borders closed, the border
is secure. No, all these Afghans have been vetted. They
lied to us, they lied, and now we have one
dead guardsman and one clinging to life. Thank you very much, Joe,
thank you, Kamala, thank you Majorcis. That's on them and
all the people that Liedgnsaki circle back and the rest
(29:01):
of them. Listen. I know some of you are still struggling.
You have the Biden Harris economic hangover. Look, we have
the building blocks for a great economy. Things are changing,
Things are slowly getting better. But a lot of people,
you know, a lot of what President Trump has been
able to negotiate, get online and pass. Just does it,
(29:22):
don't don't snap your fingers, and it gets into the
economic bloodstream, and people now feel the improvement dramatically. I
think that'll happen as we head into the second and
third quarter next year, for sure. But if you're in
that situation, we expect one more rate drop before the
end of this year. We're hoping in another zero point
twenty five basis points
The Sean Hannity Show News
Host
Sean Hannity
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
Are You A Charlotte?
In 1997, actress Kristin Davis’ life was forever changed when she took on the role of Charlotte York in Sex and the City. As we watched Carrie, Samantha, Miranda and Charlotte navigate relationships in NYC, the show helped push once unacceptable conversation topics out of the shadows and altered the narrative around women and sex. We all saw ourselves in them as they searched for fulfillment in life, sex and friendships. Now, Kristin Davis wants to connect with you, the fans, and share untold stories and all the behind the scenes. Together, with Kristin and special guests, what will begin with Sex and the City will evolve into talks about themes that are still so relevant today. "Are you a Charlotte?" is much more than just rewatching this beloved show, it brings the past and the present together as we talk with heart, humor and of course some optimism.