Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Thanks to all of you for being one of those
Happy Friday. Right down our toll free telephone number if
you want to be a part of the program, it's
eight hundred and ninety four one Sean if you want
to join us. Interesting developments California, of course, Minnesota Congresswoman
Omar that we're going to get to a House Democrat
(00:21):
now referring to America as the Great Satan. The radicals
don't rule this party at all, do they. We are
going to hit the economy very, very hard. I'm tired of,
you know, the very people that screwed up our economy
and brought inplation up to decades high. The people that
(00:43):
drove gas prices and everything associated with every product you
buy in every store that you go to, lying about
the Trump economy and lecturing us on the issue of
affordability when it's their policies that made everything not affordable.
Uh So we'll hit that hard today and much more
(01:03):
that's on my mind. Not in the best mood today,
Linda not there.
Speaker 2 (01:08):
I'm not gonna hear it.
Speaker 3 (01:09):
I can hear.
Speaker 1 (01:10):
What do you mean you can hear? Linda has this
theory that she thinks I do a better show, and
I'm pissed off, and I'm pissed off at little things,
not big things. There's nothing really that's bothering me.
Speaker 3 (01:19):
You're always all the things.
Speaker 1 (01:21):
You've been irritating me on purpose all day because you
like to do it on purpose. Tell the audience what
you love to do. You like to get me all
riled up before a show. You think I do a
better show if I'm pissed off. I don't want to
live my life angry.
Speaker 4 (01:34):
I guarantee if we gave people the phone number right
now and they called in, they would say, Sean, you
sound fired up.
Speaker 3 (01:39):
You sound like you're ready to go, and you.
Speaker 2 (01:41):
Know to go.
Speaker 1 (01:43):
But I don't need the emotion, the negative emotion of
anger driving my show.
Speaker 2 (01:49):
I don't. It's the show.
Speaker 3 (01:52):
It's driving you, it's giving you motivation.
Speaker 2 (01:54):
You're taking all This is not a left wing show.
I mean, you know, if it was the last we show,
it would be.
Speaker 3 (02:02):
You know, it's just nonsense. You're actually saying words so good.
Speaker 1 (02:04):
On the putred, the lives, the misinformation, the conspiracy, theoris.
Speaker 2 (02:10):
I'm sick of all of it.
Speaker 1 (02:13):
Let's start in the great state of California. Now, remember
we've heard two comments from Gavin Newsom recently. One he
claimed at during the Pacific Palisades fire that while he
was there that his hair went on fire. Now he's
(02:34):
claiming too, that there's a video of it. I've yet
to see the video. I've asked my social media team
to dig deep and see if there's any images of
Gavin's hair.
Speaker 2 (02:47):
I don't know. I mean, is hair jel a retardant
in any way?
Speaker 4 (02:53):
It is a flammable item, Yes, I mean a hair.
It's flammable.
Speaker 2 (02:58):
Okay.
Speaker 4 (02:58):
That would have meant that he'd have to actually be
close to something that's happening in his state, and I'm
sure he was.
Speaker 1 (03:02):
I'm not saying is lying. I'm not saying that it
didn't happen. I'm saying that I doubt it.
Speaker 2 (03:07):
Oh, I'm just saying. It's like I'm saying, show me
the money the video.
Speaker 5 (03:12):
We all turned around when my hair literally first on
there's a video of it, and they threw me in
the car, gets my hair and throws me in the cars.
Speaker 2 (03:21):
Got here there's a video of it. I want to
see the video of it.
Speaker 1 (03:26):
I want Gavin to post the video now if he
wasn't so nasty to me in this last text to me,
I might write him and ask him where's the video?
Speaker 2 (03:33):
But I don't think Gavin likes us anymore.
Speaker 3 (03:36):
Let me tell you something.
Speaker 2 (03:37):
It was a video. He would put it everywhere, Okay,
it was.
Speaker 1 (03:43):
I did share with you what he said to me
in that last text he sent me because he was
pissed off at what you and our social media team
put up about him when he made the claim that
he grew up very poor. Now when he was with
his mother, apparent they did struggle, but his father apparently
(04:03):
was managing. I got what the Getty estate, you know,
the Getty you know of Getty Oil fame, you know,
billionaire and apparently the Getty family kind of half adopted him,
according to reports that I even shared with Gavin after
he sent me this very mean text, very mean, and
but I don't want to share it publicly because I'm.
Speaker 3 (04:23):
I don't think you could. I think it's an FCC.
Speaker 1 (04:26):
Violation now, it would be an FCC violation for sure.
And then Gavin, you know, remember I think Gavin has
If you go back, there's been this evolution of Gavin Newsom.
Gavin Newsom he was going to try to get along
with conservatives. And he started his podcast and and he
(04:46):
put on people like Steve Bannon and Charlie Kirk and
that was one Gavin, but that was not getting him
any attention or any traction because we know that his
ultimate ambition is to be the twenty twenty eight Democratic
Party nominee.
Speaker 2 (05:01):
He's a lot of things. I would argue, stupid.
Speaker 1 (05:04):
Is not one of them, although you can argue that
being as hardcore left wing radical as he is, that
is not intelligent, but that's a separate issue for a separate,
separate day. He is slick to a fault in my view.
And so he's he's gotten more radicalized, more intense, and
(05:26):
as I say, he's become like a full time podcaster,
full time tweety bird, full time I don't know what
I mean. He's traveling the globe. He's going to you know,
climate change conferences in Brazil, and he's you know, trying
to make statements, even though he ended up losing in Texas,
the Texas case on jerrymandering. And he is getting more
(05:50):
hard radical left, and as evidence this week by these
comments about trans listen contradictions.
Speaker 5 (05:57):
But that I think I can explain perhaps loose, and
so we didn't get into transports. That's an issue no
one wants to hear about because eighty percent of people
listening disagree with my position on this.
Speaker 2 (06:07):
But it comes from my heart, not just my head.
Speaker 5 (06:10):
It wasn't a political evolution.
Speaker 2 (06:12):
It wassition being that I don't think it's fair. I
want to see trans kids. I have a trans God's son.
Speaker 5 (06:18):
There's no governance sign more pro trans legislation than I have,
and no one has been a stronger advocate for the
LGBT in too minute. But you have to accommodate the
reality of those whose rights are being taken away as
we advance the rights of the trans community in terms
of the fairness of athletic competition.
Speaker 1 (06:37):
I don't even know if he knows what he's saying.
I just don't, But I do think that what he's
going through have to do to get this nomination is
go hard deep in the paint radical AOC Bernie, Jasmine Krockett,
Mamdannie Left. And I think he's in the process.
Speaker 2 (06:58):
Of doing that.
Speaker 1 (06:58):
This is the one thing that seems to be missing
from his thinking or his thought process, and this is
where you know his brain is bifurcated and blinded by ambition.
Speaker 2 (07:10):
He has a record. He is mayor of.
Speaker 1 (07:13):
San Francisco, He's lieutenant governor for eight years. By the
time it's all said and on a we governor for
eight years. And what is the net result after eight
years of being governor in California? The largest deficits, the
highest poverty rate in the country, highest homeless rate in
the country, highest income taxes in the country, state income taxes,
(07:34):
the highest sales taxes in the country, the highest gas
taxes in the country. Uh, not exactly a track record
of success, highest illegal immigrant population in the country. And
he has a track record of saying the most extreme,
(07:55):
radical things. Now, okay, maybe these radical positions will help
him get the nomination in twenty twenty eight.
Speaker 2 (08:03):
Maybe they will, maybe they won't.
Speaker 1 (08:05):
I would say that he's probably polls are probably right,
he's the odds on favorite. I really don't want to
spend a lot of time on twenty twenty eight, but
you know, he's got a track record of saying all
of these extreme things, and they will be used against
him in a campaign. And if he thinks I'm not
(08:26):
going to be prepared to make sure that every single
American knows every radical position and failed policy he's ever
advocated for and supported and put in place. Then he's
blinded by his own ambition. I'll give you another example.
If you look at the FBI Active Shooter Report, it shows, uh,
(08:50):
California led the nation in active shooter incidents for the
five year period of twenty twenty to twenty twenty four.
Dubious achievements according to these figures from the FBI's Active
Shooter Report. But apparently, you know, they're the most pro
gun control state in the country. An assault weapons ban,
(09:12):
high capacity magazine ban, universal background checks, red flag laws,
bump stock bans, ghost gun regulations, ten day waiting period
for a gun purchase, gun registration requirements, a concealed carry
permit requirement, a limit on the number of guns a
law abiding citizen can buy every month. A ban on
(09:33):
college campus carry for self defense, a ban on K
through twelve teachers being armed in a classroom, gun storage laws,
ammunition controls. I don't even want to go into the state,
you know, for fear. It's like I used to drive
from Rhode Island to Massachusetts. You know they had this
big sign. Yeah, one year mandatory minimum if you were
(09:54):
caught with a gun at the time in Massachusetts.
Speaker 2 (09:57):
Now, I've lived in these states.
Speaker 1 (09:58):
When I did live in CALIFORNI Linda shockingly like when
I lived in New York, I had a New York
City pistol carry from it and not easy to get.
You have to prove a need for it. My need
was a lot of death threats. That's what that that was. Well,
put it over the top, and it.
Speaker 3 (10:13):
Can't you want to tell the audience how many?
Speaker 2 (10:17):
I can't even count them? Do you want to?
Speaker 3 (10:19):
So you had to have no.
Speaker 4 (10:21):
The requirement in New York it's you have to have
over two thousand death threats.
Speaker 1 (10:27):
Real death wise, hand it over like a folder full
of them. I mean, these are the ones in writing,
not even the ones you know that were called in.
I mean, I remember one.
Speaker 3 (10:40):
Isn't enough, you need two thousand. It's crazy.
Speaker 1 (10:44):
Well, I remember one officer looked at me and said,
why don't you have full time security?
Speaker 2 (10:48):
That's what they said at the time. But anyway, we
have an update. You know.
Speaker 1 (10:55):
Jonathan Turtley's very smart. I like Jonathan Turley a lot.
He's a legal sky, he's a Democrat. Interestingly, he's now
asking the question, if the allegations, and again New York
Post has written about it. The Minneapolis Star Tribune raised
these questions back in twenty nineteen.
Speaker 2 (11:14):
We've hit on it this week.
Speaker 1 (11:17):
If the allegations that Congresswoman Omar committed marital immigration fraud
are not true, Here's how he asked the question, then
why isn't she suing for defamation?
Speaker 5 (11:30):
Now?
Speaker 2 (11:30):
That is a very good question.
Speaker 1 (11:33):
Now, I've been very clear, I don't know what really
happened in these marriages. I know it's bizarre, and I'm
not going to regurgitate everything that we brought to your
attention this week. He says, in defamation, truth is a defense.
The truth of the matter, however, has never been easy
(11:54):
to establish. I mean, he's using his legal mind and
his analysis here. He says, in fairness to Congresswoman Omar,
it's not her obligation to prove that she is not
a fraud or that she did not marry her brother.
Her critics have never produced compelling evidence to support the claim.
I have no idea if she did or not, but
(12:15):
I know it's being investigated. Tom Homan said it this week. However,
despite years of such statements by various people. Omar has
never sued for defamation, and he said, you know, it
is a curious omission, since such a successful lawsuit would
dramatically reduce such claims, and even as a public official,
(12:37):
she could likely show actual malice in many of her critics.
Speaker 2 (12:41):
I don't disagree at all with his legal analysis.
Speaker 1 (12:43):
Conversely, such litigation would also expose Omar to a lengthy
discovery process regarding a family's immigration history and related family issues.
He says, I've taught defamation for over three decades, and
it is rare for such an allegation and linger without
some legal action by the subject. On its face, this
(13:05):
would be a strong defamation case. If the allegation is false.
The publication of DNA results would disprove these allegations. If
such evidence exists, it would not just be conclusive, but
compelling for a jury. The question is why Omar has
not elected to bring such a case given the vast
(13:27):
array of choices of potential defendants within the statute of limitations,
he points out rightly, So it's a target rich environment
for a defamation lawyer, and I think he's accurate here. Anyway,
we'll get to all of this. Also, you know there's one.
The other thing about Gavin I didn't bring up. I
want to hear his explanation why the fire hydrants didn't
(13:50):
have water and why the reservoir was empty, and why
he has the highest property tax I'm sorry, the highest
income taxes, sells taxes, gas taxes. I want to hear
why he has the highest homeless population, highest poverty rate.
I want to hear his answer to why people in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan, Arizona, Nevada,
(14:12):
you know, should go along with his extremely left wing
positions on social issues. I want to hear why has
massive deit deficits with the highest taxes. Why as the
largest migration out of his state than any other state
in the country. I'd like answers to those questions. I
don't know, inquiring minds want to know, so you'll find
(14:33):
this interesting, Linda, We did reach out to Congresswoman Omar's team,
as we always do.
Speaker 2 (14:41):
You look for all sides.
Speaker 1 (14:43):
Accusations that the congresswoman married her brother are absurd and offensive.
This is right wing fodder with no basis in reality.
It is disgusting that the right wing continues to spread
falsehoods for clicks, now that's not what we were just saying.
In the last segment, Jonathan Turley's column was very clear
(15:04):
that if it's not true, I think a guy I
agree with his legal analysis, and that is that you
know that she's not obligated to prove that she's a
fraud or not a fraud.
Speaker 2 (15:17):
She's not at all.
Speaker 1 (15:18):
However, despite years of statements by various people, Omar has
never sued anyone for defamation.
Speaker 2 (15:24):
And I think he's right.
Speaker 1 (15:26):
He's taught defamation for over three decades and it's rare
that this kind of allegation, if it's false, if it
were made, would Linger be allowed to linger without some
legal action on the subject. He points out on his face,
this would be a strong defamation case if the allegation
is false. I have no idea, man, I'm just telling
(15:46):
you what all sides are saying. I'm telling you. Tom
Homan says there's a full on investigation. Actually is quoted
today is saying the fraud investigator that is looking into this,
who he says he knows personally, is one of the
best fraud investigators in homeland security investigations.
Speaker 3 (16:03):
Problems over there, huh, some tough time in Minnesota.
Speaker 2 (16:07):
Again, I'd like to get to the bottom of all
of it. You know, it's confusing.
Speaker 4 (16:12):
Which husband do you list on his axe return? It's
it is confusing, you know, can happen?
Speaker 2 (16:18):
I think you're being very judgmental.
Speaker 4 (16:21):
As I said previously, I am incredibly judgmental, and I
own that.
Speaker 2 (16:25):
So yes, I have some good news. Uh.
Speaker 1 (16:29):
The West Virginia Governor Patrick Morrissey has given us an
update on on Melody wolf Is, the the mother I've
talked to her of Andrew Wolfe. She's a lovely lady,
by the way, very very devout, and she is reporting
to the governor that her son is now smiling, moving
(16:52):
more of his right side, and able to sit in
a chair for a few hours. You might recall that
he was the National guardsman that was severely wounded when
shot his fellow guardsmen. A guardswoman actually lost her life.
We've talked about that at length here, but you know,
(17:13):
just praying for his full and complete recovery for the family.
I'm sure these are very difficult times for all of them,
the radical left, you know, they we got a preview
of coming attractions from the radical left this week, and
it really shouldn't surprise anybody, because you know, if you
(17:34):
look at the impeachment vote that took place in the House,
you know, all right, the one in June a little lopsided.
One hundred and twenty eight Democrats voted with Republicans to
block the impeachment. They had another impeachment vote yesterday. Only
twenty three Democrats voted with Republicans this time around. What
does this mean? This is a preview of coming attractions.
(18:00):
What Democrats cannot do at the ballotpox legislatively, they race
to the courts and they want to as soon as
humanly possible if they ever get back power, they want
to impeach Donald Trump another ten times. They want to
set the record for impeachments. If they are in power
(18:21):
and they're in control, that is what they will do. Now,
I'm not telling you that it's time for you to
be worried or concerned or engaged at all and what
is happening, you know, with the twenty six midterm elections.
But I will tell you, I mean, we're all getting ready.
We're gonna have the holidays. We are working most of
(18:42):
the next week. By the way, when you I want
you to go home, I want you to spend time
with your family. I want you to enjoy Hanukkah. I
want you to enjoy Christmas. This is not a public school.
We're allowed to say these words on national radio. Still,
it's amazing. We don't live in Britain. They have all
these free speech restrictions, actually arresting people for posts that
(19:06):
they put up. And I'm not talking about threatening posts.
There's controversial posts. I'm a pretty much a free speech absolutist,
but I will tell you that there is in this country.
Speaker 2 (19:19):
There's a reason, Linda.
Speaker 1 (19:20):
Remember I used to spend hours and hours late into
the night battling on Twitter at the time the likes
of Jimmy Kimmel and Alec Baldwin. And then finally I
just said enough is enough because it became a full
time job and I enjoy I will admit there was
a part of me that enjoyed those fights. I enjoyed
Twitter fights, but I don't do it anyway.
Speaker 4 (19:41):
Those were very fun nights at two in the morning,
when you're like, look at this that I just posted,
I'm like, oh God, what did you write?
Speaker 2 (19:47):
What happened?
Speaker 3 (19:48):
Now?
Speaker 1 (19:48):
And then there would always be those people that were
like stoking the fire fight fight Fight, you know, absolutely,
and you know, for pure entertainment purposes, people liked it.
Social media, unfortunately, has devolved and it has a base
of people that live on it, and unfortunately, some people
(20:13):
can't discern what's true and what's not true. And unfortunately,
there are people that make their living putting out very strange, bizarre,
and at times very hateful comments, commentary, conspiracy theories that
are not proven, and that's how they make their money.
(20:37):
And what I'm telling this audience, which is way more
intelligence sophisticated than the average audience out there, is that
you've got to be discerning and what you watch, what
you listen to, and how you spend your time. Understand
that a lot of the rancor that is an animosity
and hatred is either built up by people that make
(20:59):
their lives doing it or people that don't work, live
in their parents' basement, you know, have the blessing of anonymity.
People don't know who they are, where they are, you know,
and they're sitting there all day naked in their parents'
basement or in their underwear and anonymously. You know, these
(21:21):
keyboard warriors are throwing out every toxic thing they could
possibly think of about every single person. Now, the problem is,
and this gets to the issue of Australia banning social
media I for kids under sixteen. I don't really think
it's a bad idea. It may be like one of
those bad idea, bad ideas whose time has come. I've
(21:42):
or often said that about term limits. It's like you
don't want your kids involved in this toxicity constantly. I mean,
I can't tell you. And this was kind of the
beauty of you know, Charlie Kirk's new book, which I
highly recommen men reaching for it, Stopping the Name of God.
(22:04):
Why honoring the Sabbath will transform your life? I mean
because part of it is shutting off all the noise,
turning off your devices for twenty four hours in a week. Uh,
and that's it, and being present and remembering and getting
back to your center and yourself and God and principles
(22:25):
that matter in your life.
Speaker 2 (22:27):
And I think that people.
Speaker 1 (22:29):
Should should pause, you know, should reflect, should be introspective,
should shut down, should be present with their children.
Speaker 2 (22:38):
And we probably all get caught up in it. I
know I do.
Speaker 1 (22:42):
I mean Linda knows that I do because she can
get a text, you know about show ideas and things
that I'm reading, you know, any hour of the day,
twenty four hours a day, and maybe that's not as
healthy as as it should be. I don't know whatever.
Speaker 4 (22:57):
I don't know if it's the healthiest thing, but I
don't know that it's the worst thing ever.
Speaker 1 (23:00):
If it's your job, it's also my job. I mean,
that's the point. It is my job. I mean, this
is what I do. And I don't think you can
be halfway good at this job if you don't immerse
yourself in it.
Speaker 2 (23:13):
I don't.
Speaker 1 (23:14):
It doesn't mean that on my weekends when I'm with
my kids or with friends and family and the people
I love, that I don't shut down because I do.
Doesn't mean that when I sit at a table, even
if it's you know, in a restaurant that doesn't let phones,
don't let do you have phones? That phone is right
between my legs, underneath one of my legs. Isn't that
(23:36):
terrible all the time?
Speaker 2 (23:38):
Well?
Speaker 1 (23:39):
The problem is if it starts is because I have
it on silence, I will excuse myself and go to
the bathroom because that tells me something maybe happening that
I need to know about. If it's an occasional biz,
i'd ignore it, or maybe I'll sneak a look when
(23:59):
nobody's looking.
Speaker 3 (24:01):
You're dead making a look. I think you should be
honest about that. I've never not seen you check your phone.
Speaker 1 (24:06):
There's never been a dinner where I've not been sneaking
a look. There never has been one.
Speaker 2 (24:13):
But I actually, what do you mean? What is the
just like, Oh God, don't put me in a good mood.
I'm in a foul mood. I don't want to hear
this crap today. I really don't.
Speaker 1 (24:23):
You're starting on me. But the reality is, I'll give
you a perfect case in point. You know, when the
incident happened to Trump International, I had gone to breakfast
with Steve Whitkoff, now the Mid East Envoy, and I
like Steve a lot. And he's one of the nicest
people you'll ever meet in your life, very very personable
(24:44):
and very generous. You know what he loves. Steve loves
Joe's stone crabs. He's like the biggest Joe's stone Crab
person I've ever met in my life. Now, they are amazing,
but I mean, he loves them. It's like his favorite thing.
Speaker 2 (24:58):
In the world. We go to break that's a city
for it, that's for sure. Okay.
Speaker 1 (25:03):
Then he's trying to convince me to go play golf
with him, and well, then the election hadn't occurred at
the time. I don't think if my memory serves me well.
With President Trump and he's like, come on, come play
with us, I want to play with you. Meanwhile, you know,
he's like a professional golfer. He's like a scratch golfer.
Trump is like a scratch golfer. I had n't picked
(25:25):
up a stick in like five six years. I've since
done so maybe about ten times, and I played like
nine holes. I actually am not too bad for somebody
who hasn't played in seven years. But I don't want
to play with people and care if I'm not playing well.
I want to be able to drop another ball and
hit another one. I don't care all you purist out there.
You go play golf your way, and I'm going to
(25:46):
play with Hannity rules and have fun. If I'm not
having fun on a golf course and distracting myself from
every day stress and pressure, then you know, what's the point. Anyway,
But that day, it was like an hour and a half.
Two hours later, I got a call from Steve telling me,
you're not gonna believe this, but you know, I think
(26:07):
somebody tried to kill the president again and shots had
been fired. We didn't know exactly at the time what
had happened. Anyway, why am I looking at this at
You're telling me to look at my phone.
Speaker 4 (26:24):
I was just saying that that happened on September fifteenth,
ahead of the election.
Speaker 2 (26:27):
It was before the election.
Speaker 1 (26:28):
I thought, so, uh, okay, hang on, tell Tiff, I'll
call her in.
Speaker 2 (26:35):
About two minutes.
Speaker 3 (26:35):
Okay, I will tell her.
Speaker 1 (26:37):
But that day, if I was practicing the Sabbath, that
I would not have gotten that call. And then I
immediately got on the phone. I got I got then
candidate Trump on the phone. It was all okay, And
then we didn't find out until there after. I think
before I went on the air, I immediately went, you know,
called the people a fox and said, okay, this just happened.
(27:00):
It's not broken anywhere yet. I'm headed to the studio.
And while I'm headed to the studio, I'm getting as
many details as I can. I mean, that's part of
what the job that I do. Anyway, that was a
scary day, just like Butler, just like Charlie.
Speaker 3 (27:16):
And we've heard so much, so many details about that.
Speaker 1 (27:20):
Hank Johnson describing the US under Donald Trump as the
Great Satan during a recent podcast. We are the world's
number one bully. We're using our immense, unrivaled power to
rule over those of less power and who are doing
it with punity. I'll quote the great Barry Farber, one
of the great pioneers at talk radio. There has never
(27:41):
been in the history of this world a country that
has accumulated more power and abused it less than the
United States of America. And I add my line to it,
not that you know I should, but I do. There's
never been a country in the history of man that
(28:01):
has accumulated more power, abused it less, and used it
for the advancement of the human condition than the United
States of America. And that's all because of freedom, All
because of liberty, all because it fosters an environment where
the individual can be their best self, the person that
(28:23):
God made them to be and the talent that God
put with in every individual. By the way, breaking Tulsea
Gabbard says, at least two thousand of the Afghan refugees
brought to the US by Biden have ties to terrorism.
Good grief nearly one hundred thousd two thousand.
Speaker 2 (28:41):
Wow.
Speaker 1 (28:42):
Sean Duffy's going to yank seventy three million in transportation
funds from New York State because they keep issuing truck drivers'
licenses to illegals. Same thing needs to happen to California
and Washington State Ice operations in La rounded of ten
thousand illegals since June, including murderers, rapists, kidnappers, and child predators.
(29:04):
How's Gavin going to answer that? Oh, and Kilmar Obrego Garcia,
the Left's favorite poster child. You know he's now free
thanks to a liberal judge. I stand before you as
a free man. You think the world's safer? Confirmed trende
or raguo, According to government officials,