Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:01):
All right, Leonard skinnerd simple man. That can only mean
one thing as we kick off twenty twenty six on
this radio program, and that is all things self proclaimed
simple man. That means all things Bill O'Reilly, all things
O'Reilly of Bill O'Reilly dot Com. Mister O'Reilly, sir, Happy
new year to you. I hope you had a good vacation,
(00:21):
little time off with the urchins. How was it?
Speaker 2 (00:24):
Everything was smoothly. There were no arrests, which is.
Speaker 1 (00:27):
Always you know, one I'm most worried about is you
getting arrested.
Speaker 2 (00:33):
Yeah, well obviously that's the big one. Everybody behaved, even me.
Thank you for asking. I wish you were a happy
new year, and I'm happy to be on the hand
of the radio broadcast in twenty twenty six.
Speaker 1 (00:45):
Well, well, glad to have you before I get to
all that is going on around the globe, and there's
a lot. Start this new year off without ribbing you
about your new mayor in New York City, and that's
zoron Marxistmum Dannie. You know he appointed a new director
for the city Office to protect tenants. This woman has
(01:08):
called for the seizure of all private property, private property,
including any kind, especially home ownership. It's she says, it's
a weapon of white supremacy. The police are just the
state sanctions to murder with impunity. She goes on to say, quote,
seize private property. It's important for white people to feel defeated.
(01:29):
She wants to impoverish the white middle class, that we
will transition from treating property as an individual good to
a collective good. Whites especially will be impacted. I had
Bill Deblasio, the former mayor, Comrade Deblasio, as we affectionately
call him, on the program last night. He didn't want
to address this, but there's a word that comes to
(01:51):
mind when you designate or delineate certain policies based on race.
What word would that be, mister O'Reilly? That will be
the word of the day.
Speaker 2 (02:01):
Yeah, it's communists. But that's not anything new.
Speaker 1 (02:04):
Everything now it's racist. I mean, if you said, if
you said we're going to impoverish the Asian American middle class,
the Hispanic American middle class, the African American middle class,
wouldn't that be racist?
Speaker 2 (02:16):
Yeah? Okay, But the goal of Mandanni is not just
to take white people's assets, is take anybody who's well
off I mean, if people of color who are wealthy
in New York City don't think they're going to get hammered,
they will. But I started an interview with the Blasio.
Was instructive about that interview is that he would not
(02:37):
answer any direct questions and that is his style. So
you could ask him a question, do you think that
man Donnie's a communist? He will not answer. He'll launch
into some kind of rehearse thing that he has. Now
you remember when I was on Fox that this has
been going on for decades, and I al would come
(02:57):
in and get pretty nasty with these guests. You're much
a nicer guy than I am, But I would say, Holy,
he is not answering. Is there a reason you're not answering?
And I do that too well.
Speaker 1 (03:07):
Bill. I went back three separate times to get an
answer on it. He ducked and dodged and weaved. I mean,
you've got to give me an eight plus for attempting
to get an answer, no doubt about it.
Speaker 2 (03:17):
And there are two ways to reveal people. You can
be polite as you were and he wouldn't answer, or
he can be boorish like me and it might be
and say, look I'm asking you a question, you won't
answer it. That's disrespectful to my audience, and why are
you doing it? All right?
Speaker 1 (03:37):
Let me give you another example of this though. You
know billionaire Larry Ellison, he has now officially severed his
ties to San Francisco and what's known as Billionaire's Row.
He has purchased property down here in Florida. I believe
he'll be moving his headquarters down here because they're about
to institute a five percent billionaire's tax out there. Larry Page,
(04:01):
the co founder of Google, the world's second richest man.
He's left California because of this tax. What happens to
states like New York and California as they now move
in this radical direction.
Speaker 2 (04:13):
Well, it grow more debt. So that's what's happened in
New York. The dead is staggering. And Newsom, who's running
for president, I don't know how he's going to explain
that kind of debt to the American people when he
inherited a surplus from Jerry Brown. So they don't care
whether billionaires leave the state. Newsom and the Hoco in
(04:37):
New York, they don't care because it doesn't matter to
them how much money the state owes. They'll just keep
racking it up, racking it up, racking it up, and
hope that they'll be out of office when everything collapses.
So that's what they're doing, and it's obvious. I wanted
to say one thing though about your show Left Now
(04:57):
would do good on television. You had Rezie Bob Lobby,
the son of the Shah of Iran, because Iran's tottering
now and that's all connected to Venezuela and the Trump
arm policy. I haven't seen Bob Lobby in a while,
but you know, I wrote Confronting Evil, and I have
(05:18):
tolse On. I covered a book, and what the Chavran
did to get overthrown is exactly one hundred what the
mothers are doing now. It's the same thing fifty years later.
So I do expect that there might I shouldn't say
I expect there will be a regime change in Iran,
(05:41):
and that's going to be an enormous story for the
entire world.
Speaker 1 (05:46):
Let me let me now go to international affairs, because
there is a lot happening. Obviously, Nicholas Maduro has been
taken to the US. Obviously, there is a period of
transition going on as we speak. The President announced last
night as I was coming on the air, that Venezuela
has agreed to turn over between thirty and fifty million
(06:09):
barrels of high quality, sanctioned oyle to the US. That
oil will be sold at market prices. It will benefit
the people of Venezuela, will benefit the people of America,
and the President will be in charge of that aspect
of it. They're calling it now the Donro doctrine, and
that is he's no longer going to allow the influence
of Iran and Russia and China in our hemisphere. I
(06:34):
believe Cuba by every measure, obviously, the people, they are
scared and nervous. The lifeblood of their economy, like every economy,
is energy, and they got all of their energy from Venezuela.
Those supplies will now be cut off. You mentioned Iran,
and clearly Iran is on the brink right now. Two
cities in western Iran now have been effectively taken over,
(06:57):
and people are accelerating and celebrating on the streets, and
even police are laying down arms and they're all now
chanting death to come a knee uh. And I think
it's only a matter of time before that happens, and
then of course US Forces overnight dramatically sees the Russian
flag oil tanker, which was basically a Venezuelan oil tanker
(07:19):
that was being protected by Putin in Russia, and it
was a joint operation with Great Britain. So there's a
lot happening around the globe, and I think that by
the end of this year we may see a very
different map of the world.
Speaker 3 (07:34):
Yeah.
Speaker 2 (07:34):
I hope it goes down peacefully. We don't want a
lot of tag and thies around is where I know.
So I have recommended to Presidentiump myself in person and
also on the air, that he form a rabid response.
Speaker 1 (07:48):
By the way, just a listener note, Bill O'Reilly does
name drop lock?
Speaker 2 (07:53):
Keep going, sir, all right, but you know that I
have so just no doubt about it.
Speaker 1 (08:00):
I so have vibe, but I don't talk about it
like you do. But go ahead, But.
Speaker 2 (08:03):
I'm talking about it in the context of a news story.
Had This isn't just idle chatter you think.
Speaker 1 (08:11):
If you think you're getting a cupcake interview at the
start of the year, you're out of your mind.
Speaker 2 (08:14):
All right. I'm just going to tell you what I'm saying.
What I'm saying. So, the uh Chavez Maduro regimes, and
this is never reported on most of the media, sees
seized billions of dollars worth of American infrastructure because we
(08:34):
built their oil industry down there. It sees it with
no payback. So Trump's absolutely right in taking as much
roll as he wants to pay that debt. And if
he had a rapid response team just go out and
say that what I just said in less than thirty seconds,
it would crystallize and make it much more difficult for
(08:57):
the charlatans and the liars to attack President Trump.
Speaker 1 (09:01):
Do I have a point, You have a great point, actually,
And I think at the heart of all of this
now and I think there's going to be a domino
effect here. I think that Venezuela. Look, I interviewed Maria
Carino Machado, who won ninety two percent of the vote
in twenty three as the leader of the opposition in Venezuela.
(09:23):
Over ninety two percent. Pill that's a big number, and
she stayed there. She stayed in Venezuela until she went
to pick up the Nobel Peace Prize, which he dedicated
to Donald Trump. And said to me on the air
on Monday and yesterday on this radio program that she
wants to give to Donald Trump. I believe they will
have over time. Stability has to be reached, of course,
(09:46):
first free and fair elections, and I do believe she'll
be one of the closest allies to the United States.
And I think and a net result of all of
this is I think Cuba is on the bring go falling.
I think that's good well our safety and security in
our hemisphere. And I think that the Iranians now in
(10:09):
large part, I think you can thank Donald Trump for
taking out their nuclear capabilities. They don't have access to
any money either because of Trump's sanctions. I think all
three of these countries, like Dominos, are going to fall,
probably sooner than later. Am I wrong?
Speaker 2 (10:27):
Well, it's hard to predictulo if that'll absolutely happen, but
my message will go out.
Speaker 1 (10:32):
On a limb. The odds are pretty high they will, right, Yeah, if.
Speaker 2 (10:35):
You're gambling it would be well, here's my message. Jambilloerilly
dot com addresses your question and I run down all
three countries. Okay, so venezuel it's likely to happen. There's
military kind of runner for a year, then they'll have
free elections. And I like this, and if the Venezuelan
people want to elect her, I'm fine with that. Cuba
(10:58):
very very precarious right now. But remember we don't have
the CIA presence inside Cuba that they had inside Venezuela.
CIA orchestrated all of this stuff in Venezuela. All of
Maduro's problems stem from the CIA, which made a deal
with the Venezuelan military.
Speaker 1 (11:15):
Well, why are you not confident that we do have
assets on the ground in Cuba. I would bet any
amount of money.
Speaker 2 (11:20):
We do a few, but not like Venezuela, because Cuba
is a much tighter police state, much easier to govern,
much more fanatical about their communist doctrination. Venezuelan is didn't
like Maduro. They just want them to get out of this.
They can make some money. Do I have any emotion
tied to him? Singurt. Police in Cuba do have emotion
(11:42):
tied into the postcast or a regime. However, don't have
any money. And once the people have a food shortage,
which will come soon, they already have an energy stortage.
But it's winter now, so it's not quite as hot.
But when it gets spring and summer down there and
you have no air conditioning anywhere, that's going to be
pretty intense. All in Iran. Both you and I know,
(12:06):
because we have good connections in the administration that the eye,
not only one eye told, but the whole Muller crew
has already made a deal with Putin to go to
join us sod in Russia and have fun. You're gonna
love it up there. It's two degrees today, okay, So
they're already planning to get out of there now. Whether
(12:26):
they have to or not, again, it's speculation, but it's
going to be very difficult for them to maintain control.
And you are correct, kinding, and that pains me to say,
because the bombing that Trump ordered last summer destabilized the
confidence in that government. It embarrassed them and humiliated them
(12:49):
the military, which is again in charge. Okay, I told
us lose the military. They're done. They drew back and said,
you know, we can't stop this, and yeah, it was
it was a new facility, but that could be a
military base tomorrow.
Speaker 1 (13:06):
We have been following the events out of Minneapolis. Had
Tom Homan on TV last night talking about they are
flooding the zone in Minneapolis, especially in light of the
Somali fraud which is just skyrocketing through the roof. I mean,
it's it's unbelievable. And in Minnesota you had this Hampton
in Lakeville. Uh, they have now lost their Hilton branding all.
(13:30):
You know, tip of a hat of the hat to
Hilton management for saying no, you don't get to say
no to ICE agents and American heroes and ban them
from the hotel and use our name. So they have
stripped that property that is independently owned from using the
Hilton name. Uh, you know, good good for them for
(13:50):
doing that. An anti ICE terrorist was shot and killed
in Minneapolis after trying to run over agents with her car. Uh.
The Somali fraud scandal in Minneapolis is now expanding. There's
a scathing audit, by the way, that reveals more fraud
concerns inside of Minnesota's agency, with fabricated documents, tons of misconduct.
(14:16):
There were hearings going on all day. There are people
on the ground now exposing all of this. What is
the name of that that citizen journalist that exposed all
of this, All these daycare centers that were what's his
name Nick Shirley. And now this poor guy's receiving death threats.
I hope he's staying safe. I know he was on
(14:37):
Riley Gains podcast. But anyway, a judge cleared the way
from Minnesota's welfare fraud ringleader to have to forfeit their
Porsche and millions held in accounts. And that has resulted
now in a lot of boots on the ground. And
guess what you know, Ice Tom Homan, they're all doing
their job. Nick Shirley, you know, God bless him. He
(14:58):
did fire back at Tim Walls, accusing him of deflecting.
This is the reason now Tim Walls has announced that
he's not running for reelection. There were hearings on Capitol
Hill today. Let me play one exchange, Branding Gill, Congressman
from Texas, questioning Democratic witnesses over this Minnesota somalis and
(15:19):
the use of these welfare programs. I mean, when you
look at the numbers, they are staggering, the number of people,
the percentage of people on welfare, the percentage of people
that are children that are labeled autistic, etc. I mean,
you're talking about billions and billions and billions of dollars
and it's going to be far more widespread than just Minnesota.
(15:42):
It's going to be Ohio, it's going to be New York,
it's going to be California, it's going to be Illinois.
And there's going to be full investigations into all of
these states. This is the tip of the iceberg and
all this. But here's Brandon Gill questioning this Democratic witness
over the Somali case of the abuse of welfare programmes.
Speaker 4 (16:00):
Listen, mister Valleu, again, thank you for being here. Ask
you does large scale Somali immigration make Minnesota stronger or weaker?
Certainly stronger, certainly stronger. Do you know what percentage of
Somali headed households in Minnesota are on food stamps?
Speaker 3 (16:16):
No?
Speaker 4 (16:17):
Fifty four percent? Do you know what that number is
for Native Minnesota headed households.
Speaker 5 (16:22):
Well, to be clear, a majority.
Speaker 4 (16:24):
Of the seven it's seven percent. There's a big difference
between fifty four percent seven percent?
Speaker 5 (16:28):
Is there?
Speaker 2 (16:28):
Not?
Speaker 6 (16:29):
Use me?
Speaker 1 (16:29):
So I could I answer the question.
Speaker 4 (16:30):
Let me let me move on. We've got a lot
of questions here. What what percentage of Somali headed households
in Minnesota are on medicaid?
Speaker 1 (16:36):
I don't know it's.
Speaker 4 (16:38):
Seventy three percent. Do you know what that number is
for Minnesota native households?
Speaker 5 (16:42):
Again, you're using the phrase Minnesota native households the number.
Speaker 4 (16:46):
If the number is eighteen percent, that's a quite an
astounding difference. I think we would.
Speaker 5 (16:50):
Can I answer the question?
Speaker 3 (16:51):
Please?
Speaker 4 (16:52):
Let me ask you one more and then we can
go onto that. What what percentage of Somali headed households
are on welfare in general?
Speaker 1 (16:57):
I don't know.
Speaker 4 (16:58):
It's eighty one percent. What about let me just ask you,
after ten years of being in the United States, what
percentage of Somali immigrant households are on continue to be
on welfare?
Speaker 1 (17:08):
I don't know.
Speaker 4 (17:10):
The number is seventy eight percent. So even after ten years,
seventy eight percent of Somali immigrant households continue to be
on welfare. Do you know what that number is for
native Minnesota headed households again, non Somali immigrant immigrant headed households.
Speaker 5 (17:27):
If I can just answer the question when you're using
the phrase native Minnesotans, the majority of Somali Minnesotans are
as Minnesota as any of us. They were born in
the United States. It's only eight thousand of the one
hundred and eight thousand in.
Speaker 4 (17:41):
Nevertheless, the welfare usage is astoundingly different. Let me ask
you again, does that make Minnesota stronger or weaker?
Speaker 1 (17:49):
Now we're not talking about millions here, We're talking about
tens and tens of billions of dollars widespread fraud. The
worst part of the story is their war are brave
whistleblowers that we're pointing all of this out to Minnesota
officials in this case, including the governor Tim Wallas. They
(18:10):
knew all about it. The reason I argue and speculate
that they refuse to act is they did not want
to alienate what is a large voting base within Minnesota.
It's that simple, pure politics. Anyway, let's get to our
busy phones. Let's say hi to Todd. He's in Mississippi. Todd,
how are you glad you called?
Speaker 6 (18:31):
I'm doing fantastic, Sean. I think the whole reason that
we have the it's really a Democrat issue. It's not
a Somali issue. What they do is they take all
this money and then they send it out to all
these little organizations in agencies and so forth, and then
they get their kickbacks back. I mean, where does Kamala
(18:53):
get a billion and a half dollars to run for president.
I mean it's like it's all just a Democrat, you know,
regenerating the money from the from the taxpayers. And then
you asked Nancy Pelosi about it, what it's all about
the children. It's all about the children. I mean, it's
like their ideas are not are defunct and they know it.
(19:14):
The only thing they can do is that raise enough
money and why about everything that they're doing, That's the
only way they can get reelected. So I mean it's like, yeah,
the somalis, yeah, I mean, but they're they're doing their
level best to uh to keep feeding cats.
Speaker 1 (19:30):
Well. I mean, from what I can see from the
outside looking in, it's pretty clear what's happening is they
discovered a way to defraud the government during COVID and
and using the medicaid system to defraud that, and it
became institutionalized and people were taught how to do this,
and people were you know, made aware of how they
(19:53):
can make you know, millions and millions of dollars doing so,
and in the process it just I mean, when you
have an autism rate of eighty percent, when you have
daycare centers that don't exist, that are claiming that they're
taking care of X number of kids every day and
they don't even have doors that are open for kids to,
(20:13):
you know, to go there. It doesn't get I mean,
it's just outright fraud and stealing. And who are they
stealing from. They're stealing from everyone listening to this program
that pays taxes. That's that's who they are stealing from.
And when it becomes that institutionalize that money adds up
very quickly and getting to the bottom of this is critical.
(20:36):
Holding people accountable is critical. I know a lot of
you are skeptical as I am that people never seem
to be held accountable. Unfortunately, in this case, I do
believe accountability is coming. I really do, and I do
believe it will go straight to the top. But we'll
see if I'm right. I got a run. I appreciate
the call, my friend. All right, let's get back to
(20:59):
our business. Eight hundred ninety four one our number if
you want to join us. Jerry is in New Orleans. Jerry, Hi,
how are you glad you called? Sir? Are you I'm good, sir,
glad you called?
Speaker 3 (21:10):
Can you hear me? Okay?
Speaker 1 (21:11):
I hear you? Fine? The worst words in the English language.
You know when people are on the phone, you know,
are you there? Can you hear me? Can you hear me?
Speaker 3 (21:21):
Hear me? Now?
Speaker 6 (21:22):
Hear me?
Speaker 1 (21:23):
Now? Can you hear me? I hate it?
Speaker 3 (21:26):
What I wanted to talk to you about was the
Venezuelan brain dream that's occurred over the last twenty or
so years. Don't you think we should have a plan
to repatriate these folks who know the country, know the facilities.
Is probably engineers that worked in the oil fields, you know,
the best in the brightness to the first to leave.
(21:46):
And they have a plan to once we get a
stable government in place, to bring these folks home to
help us extract the minerals, the store of oil fields
and infrastructure.
Speaker 2 (21:58):
What's your thoughts?
Speaker 1 (21:59):
All right? So Chris Wright is his name. He's the
Energy secretary and he met with all of our oil
companies yesterday. And remember American oil companies, they built all
the oil industry inside of Venezuela, going back to the
nineteen twenties. I went through a full history of this
(22:20):
on Monday. And do I think that these people ought
to be compensated for their losses? But when they nationalized
the energy industry and kicked out American companies. The only
one that stayed in some capacity but they still had
everything confiscated was Chevron. But the answer to your question is,
of course they should be compensated. But the only way,
(22:43):
the way out of the complicated problem of an eighty
six percent poverty rate that they currently have in Venezuela,
the only way out for them is going to be oil.
The only people that are equipped to get this job
done and get a job, get the job done in
(23:03):
the right way, and get it done expeditiously. That's going
to be American ingenuity, American oil companies. They're going to
have to move fast. The people of Venezuela will have
to benefit. These companies should and will be compensated for
the losses of all their stolen equipment by these dictators
(23:24):
in Venezuela, and the American people also should profit. I mean,
that's kind of Trump one on one. They should pay
for the liberation and they will, and I'm confident that
will all happen.
Speaker 3 (23:36):
Well, I'm still thinking that we need the Venezuelans that
are here and abroad as a backbone to support the
American oil companies employing Venezuelans to do the work.
Speaker 6 (23:53):
It's going to take.
Speaker 3 (23:54):
American ingenuity and know how. But I think if we
repatriate the best and the brightest from the Venezuelan community
from around the globe. They're they're in Spain, they're in Europe,
that throughout the United States, that would help enrich the
country faster because they'd have experienced people who have now
(24:16):
worked in America for a period of time, and we'll
be able to easily transition into a position in Venezuela
working for an American company.
Speaker 1 (24:28):
Listen, there's a lot that's going to have to happen.
Speaker 3 (24:31):
It.
Speaker 1 (24:32):
The sooner they get their oil industry and infrastructure up
and running, the better it will be for Venezuela, for
the Venezuelan people. The better it will be for American
oil companies that have been rob blind. Uh oh, big oil, Hannity,
Why are you defending them because they had everything stolen
(24:53):
from them? And I do believe in President Trump's doctrine
that you know, if we are going to liberate you
and we are going to put our military at risk,
that yeah, there should be compensation for that. And and
even when we spoke to Maria Karina Maschado. She said
she wants to be America's best friend, and she even
(25:14):
offered reparations for families like Lake and Riley's family killed
by trendy Aragua members. So I think a lot of
good things are going to come as a result of
all of this. It doesn't mean any of it is easy.
It doesn't mean that that this is not without risk.
Everything is fraught with the risk in life. But if
you don't do anything, nothing's going to change anyway. Ray
(25:37):
in Canada, what's up our friend, our liberal friend, Ray,
what's up?
Speaker 2 (25:40):
Ray?
Speaker 1 (25:41):
How are you? I see that little Justin is dating
Katie Perry. That's that's must be exciting for the people
of Canada.
Speaker 7 (25:49):
All embarrassing, honestly.
Speaker 1 (25:52):
What's embarrassing about it?
Speaker 7 (25:53):
It's just I mean, it just shows like Justin Trudeaul.
I'm far from a liberal, I'm a conservative, but shows
what Justin Trudeau was made of. And thank God, good
writtence for him and we.
Speaker 1 (26:04):
Have well he's not the Prime minister who cares what
he does? I don't care. I wish them, I wish
them health and happiness. How's that?
Speaker 7 (26:12):
Absolutely? I wish them all the best. Just a quick question,
because I haven't heard any answers. In nineteen fifty one,
I think the US and Denmark signed an agreement about
green Man and it gave the US the ability to
go in and set up military basis where and wherever
they want it, basically, and to start utilizing the natural resources.
(26:37):
He did set up thirty bases in the last fifty years,
but now we're down to one. Why do you have
to buy it or take it? When you have this
treaty and you can do what you want to do well.
Speaker 1 (26:47):
I can tell you that Denmark they have not been
nice to the people of Greenland. I can tell you
that part. As a matter of fact, when people travel
from Greenland to Denmark, they're not treated well. I think
if Greenland and the people of Greenland, you know, hear
Trump out and I would expect that President Trump would
(27:10):
probably make them a financial offer they can't refuse. I
think it would be in their best interest to be
in business with US. But let's see how that plays out.