Mike's Minute: Central Govt's differing approach to local govt

The battle of duelling responsibilities is unfolding before our eyes and I can't work out whether it will all end in tears. 

On one hand you've got the Local Government Minister off to Cabinet with his rates cap plan for councils. The average rate rise is almost 10%. Inflation isn't. 

It's not good enough. They are out of control and Wellington is going to do something about it. 

But then on the other hand we have Local Water Done Well, the new Government's replacement for Three Waters. 

You can buddy up with a group of councils and areas, or you can go it alone. 

For example, Gisborne District Council has decided to go it alone. Is that a good idea? Not according to Internal Affairs, who have written to them, having seen their plans. 

They have also written to five other councils with similar ideas and said to them that you don’t seem to have the capacity and wherewithal to pull this off. 

So, what if they're right? 

What if they don’t and the whole thing goes tits up? 

How is it a Central Government on one hand is setting the rules of engagement on rates for fear of things getting out of control, yet letting councils, who their own people are suggesting aren't up to it, loose on water infrastructure that may well end up putting them in the poor house? 

It's that complex, angsty line between freedom and control, local and central. Where is that line drawn? 

If you don't trust them on rates, is water so simple and cheap and easy that they should be fine? 

Then you get to the bit about voters and local democracy. Gisborne claim they’ve consulted and the community is behind them. 

That almost certainly isn't true, given the consultation would have involved the usual handful of those actually interested, as opposed to the majority who wont be remotely aware, or care, until of course it all goes wrong. At which point there is all hell to pay. 

So who is right?  

Central Government getting control of the out of control, or letting the out of control dabble elsewhere and going into it with a red flag? 

There seems a stark inconsistency in approach from Wellington because both approaches can't be right. 

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
The battle of the dueling responsibilities is unfolding before our eyes,

(00:03):
and I can't work out whether it all going to
end in TSS. On one hand, the local government Minister
is off to Cabinet with his rates cap plan for councils.
Average rate rises almost ten percent, inflation isn't it's not
good enough? They're out of control and Wellington's going to
do something about it. Good good, good good. But then
we have local water done well, the new government's replacement
for three waters. You can buddy up with a group

(00:25):
of councils and areas, or you can go it alone.
Gisbon District, for example, has decided to go it alone.
Is that a good idea? Well not, according to Internal
Affairs who've written to them having seen their plans. They've
also written to five other councils with similar ideas and gone,
you don't seem to have the capacity and wherewithal to
pull this off. So what if they're right? What if
they don't and the whole thing goes tits up? How

(00:47):
is it? A central government on one hand, a setting
the rules of engagement on rates for fear of things
getting out of control, yet letting councils who their own
people are suggesting ut up to it loose on water
infrastructure that may well end up putting them in the
poor house. It's that complex angsty line. I guess between
freedom and control, local and central Where is that line drawn?
So if you don't trust them on rates, is water

(01:10):
so simple and cheap and easy they should be fine?
Then you get to the bit about voters and local democracy.
Gisban claimed they've consulted and the community is behind them.
That almost certainly isn't true, given the consultation will have
involved the usual handful of those actually interested, as opposed
to the vast majority who wouldn't be remotely aware or
care until, of course, it all goes wrong, at which
point that we held to pay. So who's right central

(01:30):
government getting control of the out of control or letting
the out of control debbel elsewhere and going into it
with a red flag. There seems a stark inconsistency in
approach from the capital, because both approaches can't be right.
For more from the Mic Asking Breakfast, listen live to
news talks it'd be from six am weekdays, or follow
the podcast on iHeartRadio.