February 24, 2025 • 23 mins
Newsom asks Congress for nearly $40BIL in L.A wildfire relief. California officials push to cut energy credits to households with rooftop solar panels. Is AI making us less intelligent? Why don’t we trust doctors like we used to?
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
You're listening to Bill Handle on demand from KFI A
six forty.
Speaker 2 (00:05):
KF I am six forty Bill Handled here a little
bit under the weather.
Speaker 1 (00:09):
All right, some of the stories we're looking at.
Speaker 2 (00:13):
Volodimir Veolinsky said he's ready to give up his leadership
leadership if that will lead to a piece between Ukraine
and Russia. And you know, interestingly enough that when the
Elon Musk memo went out to the entire government of
the United States and the employee saying, tell us what
(00:36):
you have done in the past week, give me gives
five good things or five.
Speaker 1 (00:40):
Things you have done.
Speaker 2 (00:41):
Otherwise if you don't reply, that will be we will
interpret that as your resignation, which I don't quite get
how that's your resignation. But you've got some agency's are
saying don't bother, including the FBI under cash PTEL. It's
kind of interesting now the story the ongoing fight, if
you wanted to a fight, because this may be where
(01:01):
Trump and Gavin Newsom actually come together. Trump has said
he will help California. When they met and Trump landed
at lax and there was Gavenusom down at the bottom.
Speaker 1 (01:15):
Of the tarmac, the bottom of the Astairs Trump.
Speaker 2 (01:19):
They were both for the microphones, and Trump said, I'm
going to do whatever I can.
Speaker 1 (01:22):
You are going to get the support of the US government.
Speaker 2 (01:25):
Well, with that in mind, Gavin Newsom is asking Congress
to approve an additional forty billion dollars in aid to
help LA recover.
Speaker 1 (01:34):
And this is no.
Speaker 2 (01:36):
Doubt going to become the costliest natural disaster.
Speaker 1 (01:38):
In US history.
Speaker 2 (01:40):
And he sends a letter to the House Speaker, the
House Minority Leader Hakim Jeffries.
Speaker 1 (01:45):
And others who were on the House.
Speaker 2 (01:49):
Appropriations Committee, which is going to be responsible for allowing
payment or determining how much. And estimates of the economic
gloss have swelled more than two hundred and fifty billion dollars,
real estate loan thirty billion dollars. Sixteen thousand structures were destroyed,
(02:09):
thirty seven thousand acres of Pacific Palisades, Malibu, Pasadenia, of
course Altadena, and Newsom talks about what the money would
be used for rebuilding homes, infrastructure, business schools, churches, healthcare facilities,
and Newsom rights in his letter, make no mistake, Los
Angeles will use this money wisely.
Speaker 1 (02:32):
This is an additional by the way.
Speaker 2 (02:35):
An additional sixteen eighteen billion dollars from the FEDS FEMA,
which is intended to rebuild property and infrastructure debris cleanup
which FEMA is doing that is estimated at five billion dollars.
And the letter doesn't even go into the dispute over
the Trump administration threatening to oppose conditions on federal aid,
(02:59):
one of them being and it's already happened the water
coming down from northern California, because had the water come
down from the Delta, then the fires would have been
able to be put out, even though the water has
nothing to do with the water pressure on the amount
of water that Palisades and the other communities had at
hand or would have at hand. So what it does
(03:23):
doesn't mention a word about that. It just thanks the
President for fast tracking there were a debris removal, debris removal.
Speaker 1 (03:31):
And offering a hands all hands on deck approach to recovery.
Speaker 2 (03:36):
I knew some rights were entirely grateful, internally grateful, and
LA will continue to serve as a beacon to the
world and putting the city on solid ground in the
coming years is going to be hugely important as it
hosts the FIFA World Cup, the Olympics, and we will
(03:56):
be thriving for the century to come.
Speaker 1 (04:00):
Well, will this get approved? Well?
Speaker 2 (04:02):
It hinges on the willingness of Republican lawmakers to give funding,
for example, the House Appropriations Committee, which funds virtually everything,
and you have the Republicans that are in charge, and
they have they hate California. As Trump feels and talks,
(04:23):
Republicans in Congress follow and so some Republicans have suggested
linking the AID to imposing the water policy, new voter
ID requirements, helping the FEDS deal with finding and helping
deport immigration.
Speaker 1 (04:43):
Straight out.
Speaker 2 (04:44):
He's threatened to withhold federal funding the states that did
not support his agenda, and frequent critic of California new
some The bottom line is he hates California. California is
as anti Trump as any state in the Union. And
when you're anti Trump, it comes back fivefold tenfold. And
(05:07):
one of the possible conditions being discussed simply defunding the
California Coastal Commission, which regulates coastal development and protects public
be that beach excess. Now I want to say something about,
you know, stopping the educate, disbanding the Department of education.
A department was founded in nineteen seventy seven. Okay, how
(05:29):
are our kids reading scores now? How are our kids
mass scores now less than they were when the Department
of Education was founded? Is there an argument to be
had that that government has to look at itself?
Speaker 1 (05:49):
Is there fraud? Is there a waste? You bet there is?
Speaker 2 (05:54):
Did the Biden administration ignore that completely? Yes it did.
Did the Biden administration put more emphasis on LBGTQ rights
and immigration than it did on inflation, on the issues
that Americas actually care about the economy? Yes, it did.
One of the reasons that the election went to Trump.
(06:18):
So is there a method to the madness? The problem
is the amount and the speed of which is going on.
You know, there are eighteen and nineteen year old kids
that work for Musks that are going through the various
departments and cleaning them out. One nineteen year olds reported
is an advisor, a senior advisor to Musk and doge.
Speaker 1 (06:43):
I mean that's wild stuff, all right? Moving on, and
this has to do with solar power.
Speaker 2 (06:48):
Now, when I built a Persian palace, I didn't put
in solar power, but as soon as it became sort
of available and became popular.
Speaker 1 (06:55):
I immediately put in solar panels.
Speaker 2 (06:58):
And because solar panels that they generate more power than
most houses use, the power goes back to the grid automatically,
and the power companies had to pay for that at retail.
Speaker 1 (07:16):
Well, that started going down down, and then it.
Speaker 2 (07:20):
Turned out that it would pay at wholesale, and then
laws were passed that it they don't pay for any
that goes back. And then but first tier one like
my house had the Persian Palace, still were under the
old system. And then now laws are being considered that
(07:42):
you can forget all of it.
Speaker 1 (07:44):
And so what is the bitch and the moaning that's
going on, Well.
Speaker 2 (07:48):
Those people that don't have solar are arguing that they
are subsidizing people that do have solar.
Speaker 1 (07:58):
I don't care about selling back to the.
Speaker 2 (08:00):
Grid at all, because I have a new solar system
and I get no credit for anything goes back to
the grid. I just like the idea that I'm not
paying for power. Now, I happen to be in the
most expensive utility in the United States, and I do
not pay for power used in the daytime, so I
(08:22):
charge my car for example, during the day, I only
turn my lights on during the day, which is very strange,
but I try to use the least amount of power
at night. But I bought a battery system too, and
right now it has some issues. So today you can't
buy a solar system without batteries. And the bottom line
(08:45):
is you don't use power from the grid. You don't
because of the battery I did initially, but in goes
the battery system, And so a bunch of ideas are
out there floating around where you have the utilities themselves arguing.
Speaker 1 (09:02):
The subsidy doesn't make any sense.
Speaker 2 (09:05):
Can you imagine utilities are arguing in favor of rate payers.
I mean, that's where you talk about the fox guarding
the chicken house, the chicken coop, And it's true, it's true,
that's the case. And they're going in front of the PUC,
the Public Utilities Commission, which controls the amount of money
(09:27):
that power companies can charge. They can't get a rate
hike without the PUC saying absolutely. And the PUC just said, okay,
a rate hike simply to deal with the infrastructure, because
how much.
Speaker 1 (09:41):
Of that you think went down?
Speaker 2 (09:43):
So life is a changing And there is a report
from the Commission and the advocates who are in favor
of charging taxing solar roof recipients or solar rooftop installers
(10:04):
homes that have solar rooftop rooftops, and they're saying a
major reason for our fast rising electrical rates are in
fact solar power. Now, you would think that because everybody
is on solar power, rates would actually drop because.
Speaker 1 (10:22):
There isn't as much demand.
Speaker 2 (10:25):
And when there's no demand, what happens if you look
at economics, Sorry about that, I'm coughing through this. If
you look at the rules of economics, if you've ever
taken economics one oh one, when demand drops, guess what
else happens? Prices go down. It's the other way. And
(10:48):
the argument is those that don't are paying for those
that do. Those that do generally have more money. Solar
systems are pretty expensive. I mean a low of ten
twelve thousand dollars up to a high of well, I'm
(11:11):
not even gonna mention how much my solar panels cost
at the Persian Palace.
Speaker 1 (11:17):
I mean it was insanity.
Speaker 2 (11:20):
And the way you figure out the cost of a
solar system is the payback.
Speaker 1 (11:25):
When does it break even?
Speaker 2 (11:27):
And if it breaks even, at five or six years,
you've paid back the money you've invested. That's damn good.
If it takes eight or nine years, that's not bad.
If it takes fifteen years, you're already dead by the
time that this thing is paid off, and it doesn't
make much sense. And then the issue do you lease
do you buy? If you lease, it's generally a twenty
(11:50):
five year lease which the new home buyer gets with
the house. My lease is three high LEAs. My lease
is three hundred and five dollars. That's what I pay
for energy, three hundred and five dollars a month. Now,
keep in mind I am in the most expensive utility
(12:10):
district in the country, So for me, three hundred and
five dollars is a bargain. I have a pool, I
use a lot of energy rechargeable batteries.
Speaker 1 (12:26):
And I don't want to go into why. You can
talk to my fiance about that.
Speaker 2 (12:31):
Rechargeable batteries cost a fortune to run on electricity. Okay,
here's something else that's not fun, and that has to
do with AI. Couple of years ago, chat GPT came out,
and who do you think is using it the most?
No surprise students, and they rely on chat GPT to
(12:56):
write essays because students hate essays and one of the
things about essays, the teachers want you to think instead
of just regurgitate.
Speaker 1 (13:05):
I mean, that's.
Speaker 2 (13:07):
Theoretically what essays are about. So guess what kids are cheating?
Speaker 1 (13:13):
Oh? What a shocker.
Speaker 2 (13:15):
And teachers have responded because they're using chat gpt to
identify cheaters, and some have resorted to unreliable online checkers.
Speaker 1 (13:27):
As opposed to chat GPT.
Speaker 2 (13:29):
One university professor failed an entire class after the screening
tool he uses said that all of the students were
using chat GPT in his classroom. Others have hidden like
little text within the assignments instructing chatbooks to use the
word banana and frge sign in the when someone uses
(13:52):
chat gpt.
Speaker 1 (13:54):
Guess what teachers are losing.
Speaker 2 (13:57):
There was a Pew Research Center study that was just done,
and I love real science, and when real research comes out,
I tend to quote it. A quarter of thirteen to
seventeen year olds recently admitted they use chat ept to
write their homework.
Speaker 1 (14:14):
That's double what it was a year earlier. I think
this thing isn't exploding now.
Speaker 2 (14:22):
Cheating, I mean, who Number one doesn't cheat or try
to cheat at some point.
Speaker 1 (14:29):
Conor you ever cheated in homework? Of course you have, no,
Please suck it up. You're such a liar. And have
you ever cheated? Yes, no, cheating.
Speaker 2 (14:42):
Everybody knows what cheating is. Come on using other people's works. Plagiarizing,
of course you have.
Speaker 1 (14:51):
In a mean way.
Speaker 2 (14:52):
Well, I'm I'm sorry. You cheating really benign? Well, cheating
theoretically is bad, and I'm gonna explain. And artificial intelligence,
these blots have become ubiquitous and ubiquitous and capable. And
now the researcher saying, is this technology affecting how we
(15:12):
learn and think?
Speaker 1 (15:14):
That's the issue.
Speaker 2 (15:16):
It makes us think less, it makes us not think.
So last week, a little interesting here, Bill, is that
the teacher, in order to filter to see if they're
using AI, has to use an AI filter. No, that's
different because that's not a question of cognitive thinking. That's
simply a question of trying to find teachers. Well, but
(15:39):
now they have to be But I don't understand. So
last week researchers at Microsoft and Cardnegie Mellon provided evidence.
Here's the evidence offloading our brains to AI system. Well,
it lowers the ability to use our brain. There were
three hundred nineteen quote knowledge workers people working in computer science, education,
(16:03):
business administration, and found that the use of AI was
associated with lower levels of critical thinking. I remember well
the bar, for example. When I took the bar, wanted
a lot of critical thinking. I mean, there was no
way around it. They want to know that. People want
(16:24):
to think. Same thing with a lot of essays that
you write in school. What happens is workers who use that,
students who use that are less likely to engage their brains.
GENAI tools appeared to reduce the perceived effort required for
critical thinking. The researchers noted it used improperly cheating. For example,
(16:50):
tech can and results in the deterioration of cognitive facilities,
and reliance on it leaves our cognitive muscles.
Speaker 1 (17:01):
Atrophied, unprepared.
Speaker 2 (17:03):
If we don't think, we don't use those brain muscles.
And I know that's neurologically kind of insane, but that's
a reality. And so has it happened before? It goes
back to Socrates? Huh. Socrates feared that reliance on writing
(17:23):
writing itself interfere with our memories and led to a
real surface level understanding of important arguments pocket calculator. Remember
the nineteen seventies panic, Oh my god, students aren't going
to learn math.
Speaker 1 (17:42):
Well, guess what.
Speaker 2 (17:42):
Students don't learn math and we do just fine because
who can do square roots anymore?
Speaker 1 (17:52):
Search engines man.
Speaker 2 (17:54):
That led to a lot of issues digital and we
forget things as soon as we're told them because all
we do is look them up. All we do is
put in search words, like I just did with the
pope pope joan, a woman pope and the do they
now check that.
Speaker 1 (18:13):
A woman that it's a man who is pope by
checking balls his balls.
Speaker 2 (18:18):
Yes, but all you have to do is look it up,
which I did, Balls, Pope, Pope Joan, election of Pope.
Speaker 1 (18:28):
Yeah, it's all there. But here's the.
Speaker 2 (18:31):
Difference, as they point out, all of those is very
different because it allows us to store information. AI promises
to think on our behalf. There is the difference, and
what are they going to do about it? Well, here's
the problem is that people who hate AI hate limiting AI.
Speaker 1 (18:57):
No one wants AI, that doesn't that's the whole purpose.
Speaker 2 (19:03):
One of the authors of the study says, humans appreciate
comfort and if you have a tool that takes difficult
things away from you and makes your life easier. Guess
what happens we use it? Look at Pope Joan. Okay,
let me start with I do not hang with a
lot of people, very very few people I socialize with.
Speaker 1 (19:28):
Neil. Do I socialize with you? Probably more than anybody else? Yeah?
I do. Another person, Well, let me go through it. Cono.
Do we socialize? No? Correct? And do we socialize now? Also? Correct?
Michael Monks do we socialize? I've asked you, that's correct,
(19:49):
and I say no.
Speaker 2 (19:51):
Someone I do socialize with is Jim Kinney. Jim and
I hang and one of the things we talk about
a lot is the health system, because well we talk
about the health system and how broken it is.
Speaker 1 (20:05):
And he comes from a doctor's viewpoint.
Speaker 2 (20:07):
People just don't trust doctors anymore, not the way I
used to, or not the way they used.
Speaker 1 (20:14):
To I still do. They're wary of the healthcare system
supposed to make.
Speaker 2 (20:19):
Us feel better and cure us, but when it doesn't
because we have more diseases, not that we have more diseases,
we have recognized and discovered more diseases and more drugs,
and it's just so complicated that we want answers and
we want them now, and if the doctor doesn't give
it to us, we go to the web WebMD for example,
(20:42):
then see I need surgery, No you don't. Or you
do need surgery, no I don't. Here's what you should try.
Here's a supplement. It's not the same. So we've always
relied on doctors for or pain and life saving decisions.
(21:04):
People are less confident now we think doctors just don't care.
And there's a reason for that. Do doctors care less well?
People going to medical school, actually, I think are more
involved in trying to help people because the money isn't
nearly as great as it used to be. The problem
(21:25):
is is that doctors are so stressed.
Speaker 1 (21:29):
They see so many people.
Speaker 2 (21:30):
Case in point Jim, when someone goes when he goes
to the er, he does a shift.
Speaker 1 (21:36):
He doesn't sit down.
Speaker 2 (21:38):
He is on his feet running from er room r
bay to er bay for twelve hours without stopping. Lunch
is grabbing a sandwich and still walking and going. So
the other reason is that we don't have enough doctors.
(21:59):
We certainly don't have enough. In turn us we're getting older,
we have more chronic condition.
Speaker 1 (22:07):
We need more treatment. We need more prescription drugs.
Speaker 2 (22:10):
You know, the average an older adult takes four daily medications.
Speaker 1 (22:14):
I must take eight or nine.
Speaker 2 (22:18):
Thirty percent of people on medicare see five or more
doctors every year.
Speaker 1 (22:23):
And here's the other pain in the ass.
Speaker 2 (22:26):
If you have a pain there, every time you see
a new doctor, you have to retell.
Speaker 1 (22:30):
Your story over and over again. And I mean that
happens to me.
Speaker 2 (22:36):
Where I go for any treatment, any numdic medication, he
goes through the whole list. The nurse or the tech
will spend fifteen minutes with you or with me going
through the list. And so we're all, every one of
us think the healthcare is broken.
Speaker 1 (22:52):
Is there an answer?
Speaker 2 (22:53):
You know?
Speaker 1 (22:54):
Are we going to think less of doctors? I don't know.
I don't know.
Speaker 2 (22:58):
I think medicine is getting better, but only for those
of us to have really good insurance, you know, for
folks to say we have the best medical system in
the world. Yeah, go to Appalachia, go to Squirrel Hollow,
where the nearest clinic is one hundred miles away, and
tell them how great our medical system is. Just want
(23:22):
to make it feel better. Okay, this is KFI A
M six forty
Speaker 1 (23:28):
You're listening to Bill Handle on demand from KFI AM
six forty
You're listening to Bill Handle on demand from KFI A
six forty.
Speaker 2 (00:05):
KF I am six forty Bill Handled here a little
bit under the weather.
Speaker 1 (00:09):
All right, some of the stories we're looking at.
Speaker 2 (00:13):
Volodimir Veolinsky said he's ready to give up his leadership
leadership if that will lead to a piece between Ukraine
and Russia. And you know, interestingly enough that when the
Elon Musk memo went out to the entire government of
the United States and the employee saying, tell us what
(00:36):
you have done in the past week, give me gives
five good things or five.
Speaker 1 (00:40):
Things you have done.
Speaker 2 (00:41):
Otherwise if you don't reply, that will be we will
interpret that as your resignation, which I don't quite get
how that's your resignation. But you've got some agency's are
saying don't bother, including the FBI under cash PTEL. It's
kind of interesting now the story the ongoing fight, if
you wanted to a fight, because this may be where
(01:01):
Trump and Gavin Newsom actually come together. Trump has said
he will help California. When they met and Trump landed
at lax and there was Gavenusom down at the bottom.
Speaker 1 (01:15):
Of the tarmac, the bottom of the Astairs Trump.
Speaker 2 (01:19):
They were both for the microphones, and Trump said, I'm
going to do whatever I can.
Speaker 1 (01:22):
You are going to get the support of the US government.
Speaker 2 (01:25):
Well, with that in mind, Gavin Newsom is asking Congress
to approve an additional forty billion dollars in aid to
help LA recover.
Speaker 1 (01:34):
And this is no.
Speaker 2 (01:36):
Doubt going to become the costliest natural disaster.
Speaker 1 (01:38):
In US history.
Speaker 2 (01:40):
And he sends a letter to the House Speaker, the
House Minority Leader Hakim Jeffries.
Speaker 1 (01:45):
And others who were on the House.
Speaker 2 (01:49):
Appropriations Committee, which is going to be responsible for allowing
payment or determining how much. And estimates of the economic
gloss have swelled more than two hundred and fifty billion dollars,
real estate loan thirty billion dollars. Sixteen thousand structures were destroyed,
(02:09):
thirty seven thousand acres of Pacific Palisades, Malibu, Pasadenia, of
course Altadena, and Newsom talks about what the money would
be used for rebuilding homes, infrastructure, business schools, churches, healthcare facilities,
and Newsom rights in his letter, make no mistake, Los
Angeles will use this money wisely.
Speaker 1 (02:32):
This is an additional by the way.
Speaker 2 (02:35):
An additional sixteen eighteen billion dollars from the FEDS FEMA,
which is intended to rebuild property and infrastructure debris cleanup
which FEMA is doing that is estimated at five billion dollars.
And the letter doesn't even go into the dispute over
the Trump administration threatening to oppose conditions on federal aid,
(02:59):
one of them being and it's already happened the water
coming down from northern California, because had the water come
down from the Delta, then the fires would have been
able to be put out, even though the water has
nothing to do with the water pressure on the amount
of water that Palisades and the other communities had at
hand or would have at hand. So what it does
(03:23):
doesn't mention a word about that. It just thanks the
President for fast tracking there were a debris removal, debris removal.
Speaker 1 (03:31):
And offering a hands all hands on deck approach to recovery.
Speaker 2 (03:36):
I knew some rights were entirely grateful, internally grateful, and
LA will continue to serve as a beacon to the
world and putting the city on solid ground in the
coming years is going to be hugely important as it
hosts the FIFA World Cup, the Olympics, and we will
(03:56):
be thriving for the century to come.
Speaker 1 (04:00):
Well, will this get approved? Well?
Speaker 2 (04:02):
It hinges on the willingness of Republican lawmakers to give funding,
for example, the House Appropriations Committee, which funds virtually everything,
and you have the Republicans that are in charge, and
they have they hate California. As Trump feels and talks,
(04:23):
Republicans in Congress follow and so some Republicans have suggested
linking the AID to imposing the water policy, new voter
ID requirements, helping the FEDS deal with finding and helping
deport immigration.
Speaker 1 (04:43):
Straight out.
Speaker 2 (04:44):
He's threatened to withhold federal funding the states that did
not support his agenda, and frequent critic of California new
some The bottom line is he hates California. California is
as anti Trump as any state in the Union. And
when you're anti Trump, it comes back fivefold tenfold. And
(05:07):
one of the possible conditions being discussed simply defunding the
California Coastal Commission, which regulates coastal development and protects public
be that beach excess. Now I want to say something about,
you know, stopping the educate, disbanding the Department of education.
A department was founded in nineteen seventy seven. Okay, how
(05:29):
are our kids reading scores now? How are our kids
mass scores now less than they were when the Department
of Education was founded? Is there an argument to be
had that that government has to look at itself?
Speaker 1 (05:49):
Is there fraud? Is there a waste? You bet there is?
Speaker 2 (05:54):
Did the Biden administration ignore that completely? Yes it did.
Did the Biden administration put more emphasis on LBGTQ rights
and immigration than it did on inflation, on the issues
that Americas actually care about the economy? Yes, it did.
One of the reasons that the election went to Trump.
(06:18):
So is there a method to the madness? The problem
is the amount and the speed of which is going on.
You know, there are eighteen and nineteen year old kids
that work for Musks that are going through the various
departments and cleaning them out. One nineteen year olds reported
is an advisor, a senior advisor to Musk and doge.
Speaker 1 (06:43):
I mean that's wild stuff, all right? Moving on, and
this has to do with solar power.
Speaker 2 (06:48):
Now, when I built a Persian palace, I didn't put
in solar power, but as soon as it became sort
of available and became popular.
Speaker 1 (06:55):
I immediately put in solar panels.
Speaker 2 (06:58):
And because solar panels that they generate more power than
most houses use, the power goes back to the grid automatically,
and the power companies had to pay for that at retail.
Speaker 1 (07:16):
Well, that started going down down, and then it.
Speaker 2 (07:20):
Turned out that it would pay at wholesale, and then
laws were passed that it they don't pay for any
that goes back. And then but first tier one like
my house had the Persian Palace, still were under the
old system. And then now laws are being considered that
(07:42):
you can forget all of it.
Speaker 1 (07:44):
And so what is the bitch and the moaning that's
going on, Well.
Speaker 2 (07:48):
Those people that don't have solar are arguing that they
are subsidizing people that do have solar.
Speaker 1 (07:58):
I don't care about selling back to the.
Speaker 2 (08:00):
Grid at all, because I have a new solar system
and I get no credit for anything goes back to
the grid. I just like the idea that I'm not
paying for power. Now, I happen to be in the
most expensive utility in the United States, and I do
not pay for power used in the daytime, so I
(08:22):
charge my car for example, during the day, I only
turn my lights on during the day, which is very strange,
but I try to use the least amount of power
at night. But I bought a battery system too, and
right now it has some issues. So today you can't
buy a solar system without batteries. And the bottom line
(08:45):
is you don't use power from the grid. You don't
because of the battery I did initially, but in goes
the battery system, And so a bunch of ideas are
out there floating around where you have the utilities themselves arguing.
Speaker 1 (09:02):
The subsidy doesn't make any sense.
Speaker 2 (09:05):
Can you imagine utilities are arguing in favor of rate payers.
I mean, that's where you talk about the fox guarding
the chicken house, the chicken coop, And it's true, it's true,
that's the case. And they're going in front of the PUC,
the Public Utilities Commission, which controls the amount of money
(09:27):
that power companies can charge. They can't get a rate
hike without the PUC saying absolutely. And the PUC just said, okay,
a rate hike simply to deal with the infrastructure, because
how much.
Speaker 1 (09:41):
Of that you think went down?
Speaker 2 (09:43):
So life is a changing And there is a report
from the Commission and the advocates who are in favor
of charging taxing solar roof recipients or solar rooftop installers
(10:04):
homes that have solar rooftop rooftops, and they're saying a
major reason for our fast rising electrical rates are in
fact solar power. Now, you would think that because everybody
is on solar power, rates would actually drop because.
Speaker 1 (10:22):
There isn't as much demand.
Speaker 2 (10:25):
And when there's no demand, what happens if you look
at economics, Sorry about that, I'm coughing through this. If
you look at the rules of economics, if you've ever
taken economics one oh one, when demand drops, guess what
else happens? Prices go down. It's the other way. And
(10:48):
the argument is those that don't are paying for those
that do. Those that do generally have more money. Solar
systems are pretty expensive. I mean a low of ten
twelve thousand dollars up to a high of well, I'm
(11:11):
not even gonna mention how much my solar panels cost
at the Persian Palace.
Speaker 1 (11:17):
I mean it was insanity.
Speaker 2 (11:20):
And the way you figure out the cost of a
solar system is the payback.
Speaker 1 (11:25):
When does it break even?
Speaker 2 (11:27):
And if it breaks even, at five or six years,
you've paid back the money you've invested. That's damn good.
If it takes eight or nine years, that's not bad.
If it takes fifteen years, you're already dead by the
time that this thing is paid off, and it doesn't
make much sense. And then the issue do you lease
do you buy? If you lease, it's generally a twenty
(11:50):
five year lease which the new home buyer gets with
the house. My lease is three high LEAs. My lease
is three hundred and five dollars. That's what I pay
for energy, three hundred and five dollars a month. Now,
keep in mind I am in the most expensive utility
(12:10):
district in the country, So for me, three hundred and
five dollars is a bargain. I have a pool, I
use a lot of energy rechargeable batteries.
Speaker 1 (12:26):
And I don't want to go into why. You can
talk to my fiance about that.
Speaker 2 (12:31):
Rechargeable batteries cost a fortune to run on electricity. Okay,
here's something else that's not fun, and that has to
do with AI. Couple of years ago, chat GPT came out,
and who do you think is using it the most?
No surprise students, and they rely on chat GPT to
(12:56):
write essays because students hate essays and one of the
things about essays, the teachers want you to think instead
of just regurgitate.
Speaker 1 (13:05):
I mean, that's.
Speaker 2 (13:07):
Theoretically what essays are about. So guess what kids are cheating?
Speaker 1 (13:13):
Oh? What a shocker.
Speaker 2 (13:15):
And teachers have responded because they're using chat gpt to
identify cheaters, and some have resorted to unreliable online checkers.
Speaker 1 (13:27):
As opposed to chat GPT.
Speaker 2 (13:29):
One university professor failed an entire class after the screening
tool he uses said that all of the students were
using chat GPT in his classroom. Others have hidden like
little text within the assignments instructing chatbooks to use the
word banana and frge sign in the when someone uses
(13:52):
chat gpt.
Speaker 1 (13:54):
Guess what teachers are losing.
Speaker 2 (13:57):
There was a Pew Research Center study that was just done,
and I love real science, and when real research comes out,
I tend to quote it. A quarter of thirteen to
seventeen year olds recently admitted they use chat ept to
write their homework.
Speaker 1 (14:14):
That's double what it was a year earlier. I think
this thing isn't exploding now.
Speaker 2 (14:22):
Cheating, I mean, who Number one doesn't cheat or try
to cheat at some point.
Speaker 1 (14:29):
Conor you ever cheated in homework? Of course you have, no,
Please suck it up. You're such a liar. And have
you ever cheated? Yes, no, cheating.
Speaker 2 (14:42):
Everybody knows what cheating is. Come on using other people's works. Plagiarizing,
of course you have.
Speaker 1 (14:51):
In a mean way.
Speaker 2 (14:52):
Well, I'm I'm sorry. You cheating really benign? Well, cheating
theoretically is bad, and I'm gonna explain. And artificial intelligence,
these blots have become ubiquitous and ubiquitous and capable. And
now the researcher saying, is this technology affecting how we
(15:12):
learn and think?
Speaker 1 (15:14):
That's the issue.
Speaker 2 (15:16):
It makes us think less, it makes us not think.
So last week, a little interesting here, Bill, is that
the teacher, in order to filter to see if they're
using AI, has to use an AI filter. No, that's
different because that's not a question of cognitive thinking. That's
simply a question of trying to find teachers. Well, but
(15:39):
now they have to be But I don't understand. So
last week researchers at Microsoft and Cardnegie Mellon provided evidence.
Here's the evidence offloading our brains to AI system. Well,
it lowers the ability to use our brain. There were
three hundred nineteen quote knowledge workers people working in computer science, education,
(16:03):
business administration, and found that the use of AI was
associated with lower levels of critical thinking. I remember well
the bar, for example. When I took the bar, wanted
a lot of critical thinking. I mean, there was no
way around it. They want to know that. People want
(16:24):
to think. Same thing with a lot of essays that
you write in school. What happens is workers who use that,
students who use that are less likely to engage their brains.
GENAI tools appeared to reduce the perceived effort required for
critical thinking. The researchers noted it used improperly cheating. For example,
(16:50):
tech can and results in the deterioration of cognitive facilities,
and reliance on it leaves our cognitive muscles.
Speaker 1 (17:01):
Atrophied, unprepared.
Speaker 2 (17:03):
If we don't think, we don't use those brain muscles.
And I know that's neurologically kind of insane, but that's
a reality. And so has it happened before? It goes
back to Socrates? Huh. Socrates feared that reliance on writing
(17:23):
writing itself interfere with our memories and led to a
real surface level understanding of important arguments pocket calculator. Remember
the nineteen seventies panic, Oh my god, students aren't going
to learn math.
Speaker 1 (17:42):
Well, guess what.
Speaker 2 (17:42):
Students don't learn math and we do just fine because
who can do square roots anymore?
Speaker 1 (17:52):
Search engines man.
Speaker 2 (17:54):
That led to a lot of issues digital and we
forget things as soon as we're told them because all
we do is look them up. All we do is
put in search words, like I just did with the
pope pope joan, a woman pope and the do they
now check that.
Speaker 1 (18:13):
A woman that it's a man who is pope by
checking balls his balls.
Speaker 2 (18:18):
Yes, but all you have to do is look it up,
which I did, Balls, Pope, Pope Joan, election of Pope.
Speaker 1 (18:28):
Yeah, it's all there. But here's the.
Speaker 2 (18:31):
Difference, as they point out, all of those is very
different because it allows us to store information. AI promises
to think on our behalf. There is the difference, and
what are they going to do about it? Well, here's
the problem is that people who hate AI hate limiting AI.
Speaker 1 (18:57):
No one wants AI, that doesn't that's the whole purpose.
Speaker 2 (19:03):
One of the authors of the study says, humans appreciate
comfort and if you have a tool that takes difficult
things away from you and makes your life easier. Guess
what happens we use it? Look at Pope Joan. Okay,
let me start with I do not hang with a
lot of people, very very few people I socialize with.
Speaker 1 (19:28):
Neil. Do I socialize with you? Probably more than anybody else? Yeah?
I do. Another person, Well, let me go through it. Cono.
Do we socialize? No? Correct? And do we socialize now? Also? Correct?
Michael Monks do we socialize? I've asked you, that's correct,
(19:49):
and I say no.
Speaker 2 (19:51):
Someone I do socialize with is Jim Kinney. Jim and
I hang and one of the things we talk about
a lot is the health system, because well we talk
about the health system and how broken it is.
Speaker 1 (20:05):
And he comes from a doctor's viewpoint.
Speaker 2 (20:07):
People just don't trust doctors anymore, not the way I
used to, or not the way they used.
Speaker 1 (20:14):
To I still do. They're wary of the healthcare system
supposed to make.
Speaker 2 (20:19):
Us feel better and cure us, but when it doesn't
because we have more diseases, not that we have more diseases,
we have recognized and discovered more diseases and more drugs,
and it's just so complicated that we want answers and
we want them now, and if the doctor doesn't give
it to us, we go to the web WebMD for example,
(20:42):
then see I need surgery, No you don't. Or you
do need surgery, no I don't. Here's what you should try.
Here's a supplement. It's not the same. So we've always
relied on doctors for or pain and life saving decisions.
(21:04):
People are less confident now we think doctors just don't care.
And there's a reason for that. Do doctors care less well?
People going to medical school, actually, I think are more
involved in trying to help people because the money isn't
nearly as great as it used to be. The problem
(21:25):
is is that doctors are so stressed.
Speaker 1 (21:29):
They see so many people.
Speaker 2 (21:30):
Case in point Jim, when someone goes when he goes
to the er, he does a shift.
Speaker 1 (21:36):
He doesn't sit down.
Speaker 2 (21:38):
He is on his feet running from er room r
bay to er bay for twelve hours without stopping. Lunch
is grabbing a sandwich and still walking and going. So
the other reason is that we don't have enough doctors.
(21:59):
We certainly don't have enough. In turn us we're getting older,
we have more chronic condition.
Speaker 1 (22:07):
We need more treatment. We need more prescription drugs.
Speaker 2 (22:10):
You know, the average an older adult takes four daily medications.
Speaker 1 (22:14):
I must take eight or nine.
Speaker 2 (22:18):
Thirty percent of people on medicare see five or more
doctors every year.
Speaker 1 (22:23):
And here's the other pain in the ass.
Speaker 2 (22:26):
If you have a pain there, every time you see
a new doctor, you have to retell.
Speaker 1 (22:30):
Your story over and over again. And I mean that
happens to me.
Speaker 2 (22:36):
Where I go for any treatment, any numdic medication, he
goes through the whole list. The nurse or the tech
will spend fifteen minutes with you or with me going
through the list. And so we're all, every one of
us think the healthcare is broken.
Speaker 1 (22:52):
Is there an answer?
Speaker 2 (22:53):
You know?
Speaker 1 (22:54):
Are we going to think less of doctors? I don't know.
I don't know.
Speaker 2 (22:58):
I think medicine is getting better, but only for those
of us to have really good insurance, you know, for
folks to say we have the best medical system in
the world. Yeah, go to Appalachia, go to Squirrel Hollow,
where the nearest clinic is one hundred miles away, and
tell them how great our medical system is. Just want
(23:22):
to make it feel better. Okay, this is KFI A
M six forty
Speaker 1 (23:28):
You're listening to Bill Handle on demand from KFI AM
six forty
The Bill Handel Show News
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.