Andrew Dickens: Is casual clothing in the house acceptable?

Winston Peters turned into a grumpy old conservative man in the house yesterday. 

A role he assumes to hoover up votes from his constituents rather than the stately Foreign Minister image he shows to the rest of the world. 

He complained that Ricardo Menéndez March, the Green MP, wore a leather jacket in the house. It was a glossy little number, but was it disrespectful? 

It raises the question about clothes in the workforce. 

If you wear a $1,500 designer leather jacket, is that less respectful than a $300 suit from Laidlaw + Leeds from Farmers?

Things have obviously loosened. Our big boss wears a jacket, but I’ve never seen him in a tie. 

Casual Friday has become casual weekday.  

So, I’m not worried about Ricardo’s leather jacket - even though it gave off Boy George vibes and he looked like he was off to the disco. 

He obviously took care of his look and turned up well-groomed, even if he looked like a clown. 

And it’s not called the House of Representatives for nothing. It should be representative of all of us, including the leather jacket wearers.  

I’ve sometimes wondered at the ensembles that appear on our screens worn by public servants and MPs. Many are obviously expensive purchased on wages provided by the taxpayers.  

Flaunting your public purse wealth at us.  

But the biggest problem with Ricardo Menéndez March's leather jacket is that it’s leather.  

I thought you were a Green MP opposed to products derived from animal cruelty.  

The thing about symbolism is that it’s symbolic, and Ricardo’s leather jacket screamed hypocrisy. 

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
The House was hilarious yesterday when sim Peter's turned into
a grumpy old Conservative, a role he assumes to hoover
up votes from his constituents, rather than the stately foreign
minister image he shows to the rest of the world.
So what was the thing? He complained that Ricardo Menender's
march the Green MP wore a leather jacket in the house.
It was a glossy little number. Question is is it

(00:22):
disrespectful raising the question about clothes in the workforce? You know,
if you wear a fifteen hundred dollar designer leather jacket,
is that less respectful than someone wearing a three hundred
dollar sales suit from laid Law and leeds from Farmers.
I mean, things have obviously loosened. Our big boss here
wears a jacket, but I've never ever seen him in
a tie. Casual Friday has become casual weekday. And I

(00:45):
wasn't worried about Ricardo's leather jacket, even though it gave
off boy George vibes and he looked like he was
off to a disco. He obviously took care in his
look and he turned up well groomed, even if he
did look like a clown. And it's not called the
House of Representatives for nothing. It should be representative of
all of us, including leather wearers. And I've sometimes wondered
at the ensembles that appear on our screens worn by
public servants at MPs. You know, some of them are

(01:07):
very fancy. Many are obviously expensive, purchased on wages provided
by the taxpayers, flaunting your public purse wealth at us
public servants. But the biggest problem with Ricardo Menenz's leather
jacket is that it's leather. I thought Riccardo was a
green MP, opposed to products derived from animal cruelty. The

(01:28):
thing about symbolism is that it is symbolic, and Ricardo's
leather jacket screamed hypocrisy. For more from Early edition with
Ryan Bridge. Listen live to News Talks it be from
five am weekdays, or follow the podcast on iHeartRadio.